Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Seedat2004 PDF
Seedat2004 PDF
Seedat2004 PDF
Drawing on a content analysis of selected articles from the South African Journal of
Psychology (SAJP) and Psychology in Society (PINS), the authors reflect on the extent
to which South African community psychology's early vision resonates in publications in
post-1994 South African psychology. Concerned about the Euro-American, patriarchal,
classist, and individualised orientation in clinical, counselling, and social psychology, com
munity psychology's vision arose as a response to this crisis of 'relevance' in the 1980s
in South Africa. It placed the accent on accessible psychosocial services, re-defining the
roles of psychologists, democratising psychological practice, prevention, competencies,
empowerment of under-represented groups, collaboration, and inclusive modes of knowl
edge production. Our content analysis suggests that South African community psychology
tends to operate within a porous disciplinary boundary, sharing academic concerns with
a larger group of critical psychologists. Authorship characteristics show that for the 1994
to 2003 period male and females were more or less equally represented as authors, the
majority of whom were affiliated to academic institutions. In contrast, co-authorship as an
expression of collaboration did not feature strongly and the community voice was unrepre
sented at authorship level. Most of the articles tended to assume an empirical or theoreti
cal slant and examined themes consistent with community psychology's early vision and
focus. Similarly, research in community psychology seemed to have attended to selected
priority psychosocial issues and drawn on historically neglected groups, including black
adolescents and adults, to serve as participants. By way of conclusion, we surmise that
community psychology, albeit an under-represented branch of psychology, may be one of
many areas of engagement for those aligned to the quest for emancipatory psychological
practice and theory in South Africa.
Community psychology, which originated in the United States of America (US) dur
ing the 1960s era of civil unrest, gained currency in South Africa during a period of
violent socio-political conflicts when the socio-medical sciences, including psychol
ogy, experienced an existential crisis. For psychology, the crisis centred on theoretical
relevance and practice-related appropriateness. Raising questions about the 'alien' and
non-African nature of South African psychology, writers interrogated the discipline's
uncritical relationship with Euro-American philosophical traditions, its support of the
colonial and apartheid missions to occupy the black psyche, its sexist and patriarchal
assumptions, and its socio-cultural incongruence in South Africa (Dawes, 1986; de la
Rey & Parekh, 1996; Hayes, 1984). At the level of practice the disciplines of clinical
and counselling psychology were critiqued for their inaccessibility, elitist orientation,
focus on pathology, and one-on-one therapeutic modalities (Seedat, Cloete & Shochet,
1988; Swartz, Dowdall & Swartz, 1986). Many argued that the 'talking cure' was
insufficient to address the material and oppressive conditions faced by the majority
of South Africans (Anonymous, 1986; Berger & Lazarus, 1987; Perkel, 1988). These
disciplines were also viewed as a-historical and contextually disconnected from the
'spirit ofAfrica'. Many went as far as criticising clinical psychology for being integral
to the arsenal of oppressive social control measures (Bodibe, 1994; Holdstock, 1981;
Nicholas & Cooper, 1990).
In response to these and other such critiques, small groups of formally and infor
mally organised psychologists, referred to as 'progressive psychologists', including
those who adopted the social messages encoded into North American community
psychology, aligned themselves to an emerging agenda to reconsider and reconstruct
clinical, counselling and social psychology. Community psychology in South Africa,
like its North American counterpart and as part of its reconstruction agenda, em
phasised the need for: (a) transforming the nature and content of mental health and
psychological service delivery; (b) re-conceptualising the genesis and determinants
of psychosocial and mental health problems; (c) cultural and contextual congruence
in service delivery; and (d) reformulating the roles of psychologists to include, among
other functions, community and resource mobilisation, advocacy, lobbying, training,
and networking (Berger & Lazarus, 1987; Lazarus & Seedat, 1996; Seedat, Duncan,
& Lazarus, 2001). In addition, advocates of community psychology in South Africa
stressed the need to address apartheid-generated distortions in knowledge production.
They encouraged political representation of marginalised groups in professional as
sociations, the inclusion of blacks and women at authorship level, and theoretical and
methodological plurality that recognised and critically examined the psychological
life worlds of both the dominant and dominated in society (Fullagar & Paizas, 1986;
Nicholas & Cooper, 1990; Seedat, 1993; Thornton & Ramphele, 1988; Van Vlaenderen
& Gilbert, 1992).
This Special Issue offers a timely opportunity to reflect on community psychology's
growth during South Africa's first decade of democracy. However, a fully-fledged
596
597
598
move away from 'blaming the victim' towards ecological explanations for psychosocial
problems (Dawes, 1985; Freeman, 1991; Gibson, 1987). Social inequality, the uneven
distribution of material and discursive resources, and exclusionary social and profes
sional practices were therefore viewed as systemic hindrances to achieving positive
mental health. In the process, individual psychosocial and cognitive factors that may
contribute to psychosocial problems tended to be de-emphasised. In the re-conceptu
alisation process, community psychologists were alerted to the ordinary, other-than-
Western discourses of illness, trauma and disease (Buch & De Beer, 1990; Butchart,
1990), the sociolinguistic context (Levett, 1989; Swartz, 1989) and the dangers of
conflating individual and collective transformation (Seedat, 1993).
599
METHODOLOGY
Data corpus: scope and limits
Within the present study, out of a total number of 379 articles published in the SAJP
and PINS for the specified period (1994 to 2003), a total of 47 articles were selected
for content analysis. An initial search using the PsycINFO database with the keywords
community and community psychology only yielded 18 articles. Given the diverse
nature of community psychology, the authors decided then to visually scan the titles
and abstracts of all articles published in both journals (1994 to 2003) in orderte deter
mine their suitability and appropriateness for the current study. In an attempt to be as
inclusive as possible, articles containing a direct and/or indirect focus on community
psychology or that referred to subjects such as community empowerment, groups,
equity, social relevance, prevention, critical psychology, social marginalisation and
participatory processes were all included for content analysis. A significant number of
articles influenced by postmodernist thought, critical psychology and social psychol
ogy were also included for review, as they seemed to contribute towards the ongo
ing development of community psychology. In short, all of the 47 selected articles
referred to subjects that are found within various definitions and foci of community
psychology (Seedat, Duncan, & Lazarus, 2001).
Content analysis
Content analysis, first used in eighteenth century Sweden to settle a religious dispute
(Krippendorff, 1980), has mushroomed to be applied in diverse areas, including
communication studies, psychology, sociology and political intelligence. Content
analysis has been used to characterise the nature of theoretical and methodological
developments in general psychology, community psychology and community mental
health (e.g. Alpert & Yammer, 1983; Bruner & Allport, 1940; Loo, Fong & Iwamasa,
1988; Lounsbury, Leader & Mears, 1980). In South Africa, critical analyses of texts
and content analyses on publications have been conducted by among others Duncan
(1993,2001), Seedat (1998,2001a, 2001b) and Stevens (2003), highlighting publica
tion trends and the distinct relationship between formal knowledge production and
socio-political processes.
Journals
The SAJP, (1970-), the official journal of the Psychological Society of South Africa
(PsySSA), incorporates its predecessors, namely, the Journal of Behavioural Sciences,
(1969-1979), Psychological Africana (1962-1983), and the South African Psycholo-
gist (1962 - 1979), and may be regarded as the most popular and privileged journal
in South African psychology, boasting significant circulation and annual submissions.
The SAJP encourages the publication of empirical research, theoretical and methodo
logical articles, reviews and short communications.
600
PINS (1983-) represents an organised effort to create a forum through which psy
chologists could critically examine the dominant ideas about the nature of psychology
in apartheid South Africa. It encourages critiques of mainstream psychology, and
substantive theoretical and methodological reviews. Post-1994 PINS aims to promote
socio-historical and critical theory perspectives through an emphasis on the theory
and practice of psychology in a transitional democratic society.
These two journals together offer a fairly comprehensive picture of the nature and
character of selected developments in South African psychology, and so the reflections
we offer herein is the 'view' represented by these two journals. Our journal-based
content analysis offers some indication of the philosophical and service-oriented
continuities, shifts and developments that characterised community psychology dur
ing the 1994 to 2003 period.
Content categories refer to the central themes and subject matter covered in the
articles. We selected and adapted 5 subject categories relevant to community psychol
ogy from a list of 137 content categories developed by Seedat (1993) over two stages.
In Stage 1, Seedat (1993) content analysed all the articles that were published in the
SAJP and PINS between 1983 and 1988. After reviewing articles for central themes
he categorised them according to their areas of focus. This stage yielded a total of 26
content categories, which were reviewed with three doctoral level psychologists who
were also qualitative methodologists. They emphasised the need to be inclusive of the
diversity of subjects within the broad field of psychology, and called for precision in
the definition of content categories and the overall content categorisation scheme. In
Stage 2, Seedat (1993) advanced the development of thematic categories by expand
ing his content analysis to include articles from other journals such as Psychologia
Africana and Humanitas. Through this extended analysis Seedat (1993) generated
a total of 137 content categories, incorporating 17 content labels and titles used in
the Index of Psychological Abstracts to delineate fields of speciality in psychology,
and the labels employed by Lounsbury et al., (1985) to define topics evident in com
munity psychology. The 137 content categories were diverse in nature and so were
further clustered under 26 broad fields of psychology, such as community psychology,
industrial psychology, personality psychology and experimental psychology. For the
purposes of our study reported herein we adapted, modified and relabelled the five
content categories that were delineated by Seedat (1993) under thefieldof community
psychology. The 5 modified thematic categories used to classify the journal articles
are labelled as: (a) Relevance, appropriateness and scope of psychology to include
articles focusing on postmodernist thought, critical psychology and social psychol
ogy, as well as formulations about the Africanisation of psychology, universalism,
knowledge production, 'race' issues in psychology, and the roles of psychologists; (b)
Mental health policy and services to incorporate articles focusing on service delivery,
innovative intervention approaches and models, and the evaluation thereof; (c) Specific
mental health andpsychosocial issues to cover articles addressing concerns such as
HIV/AIDS, teenage pregnancies, violence, sexually transmitted diseases, political
violence, suicide and psychopathology, (d) Gender specific issues to consider articles
focusing on issues specific to either women or men; and (e) 'Race 'specific issues to
include articles dealing with the perpetuation of racism in the discipline of psychol
ogy and society in general.
All the selected articles and abstracts were first scanned for central themes and
thereafter allocated to an appropriate content category on the adapted list. If the article
covered multiple themes/subjects, it was assigned to a maximum of two thematic
categories. Where the analyst was uncertain about the allocation, the themes were
described in detail under the 'other' category and final allocation was arrived at after
discussion among the authors. The coded data were analysed using the SPSS data
analysis package, yielding descriptive statistics for the nominal data set. In addition
602
Note: The Universities of Natal and Durban-Westville have now merged to form the University of KwaZulu-
Natal.
603
604
Thematic focus
The analysis revealed overall emergent themes and provided a synopsis, albeit not
exhaustive, of the key areas of focus relevant to community psychology.
Note: As some articles were assigned to more than one category the total percentage is greater than
100%.
605
606
CONCLUSIONS
Our corpus of data and related analysis suggest that community psychology in South
Africa, as represented in the SAJP and PINS, may be a minor yet significant aspect
of the larger endeavour of liberatory psychology. Even though it is not circumscribed
by clearly discernable borders, the labels, language, terminology, concepts, philoso
phy and mission of community psychology are evident in the 47 articles we content
analysed.
Authors' affiliations indicate that community psychology's vision may be restricted
primarily but not exclusively to certain institutions, such as the Universities of Natal,
Cape Town, South Africa, Western Cape and the former Durban-Westville, which
historically and currently continue to house small enclaves of 'progressive psycholo
gists' committed to liberatory scholarship and addressing South Africa's racialised and
gendered systems of knowledge production. The representation of authors affiliated
to the Universities of the Western Cape and the former Durban-Westville, historically
reserved for those other-than-white, may in fact be reflective of the gradual inclusion
of groups that were marginal to the processes of knowledge production.
Authorship characteristics also point to a limited incorporation of the principles
of collaboration and community-academic partnerships. The under-representation of
community voices at the authorship level indicates that the act of academic writing
remains a specialised function, conducted by academics located mainly in Eng
lish-medium universities, historically reserved for those classified white within the
apartheid-generated nomenclature. This raises questions about the forms and nature
of community self-representation that may stand as tools of dissemination and com
munication alongside academic publications. The relatively equal gender distribution
of the authors, however, points to a growing tendency towards the inclusion of women,
coupled with an increasing interest in women's issues. Articles focusing on the structure
and form of psychology, mental health service innovation, and psychosocial issues of
relevance to marginalised groups represent a continuation of earlier focus areas, and
so raises the possibility of the further development of community psychology.
607
We surmise from our journal-based content analysis that there is a fair degree of
continuity in the core developments of community psychology even though such de
velopments may be subsumed by the larger initiative of liber atory psychology, which
in turn seems to hold a small and marginal place in the professional and academic
activities of South African psychologists. Many of the core elements and principles
of community psychology seem to have been appropriated by feminists, critical psy
chologists, post-colonial writers, health decision-makers and practitioners. It may
also be instructive to note that community psychology enjoyed greater voice in PINS
compared to the SAJP, perhaps indicative of the explicit transformation agenda and
critical orientation of PINS. Of the 47 articles selected for analysis, 32 (68.1%) were
from the SAJP, representing 10.2% of the total number of articles (315) published in
the SAJP for the 1994 to 2003 period. The remaining 15 (31.9%) articles were drawn
from PINS, representing 23.4% of the total number of articles (64) published in PINS
during 1994 to 2003. Whereas SAJP publications tended to focus on the provision of
mental health services and priority psychosocial issues, articles from PINS placed a
strong emphasis on critical approaches to community psychology. Irrespective of the
differing emphasis, our content analysis raises optimistic pos; ibilities for the continued
influence of the philosophies underlying community psychology in the ongoing and
changing quest for an emancipatory praxis in psychology, which includes the endea
vour to redress the distorted systems of knowledge production in the discipline.
Our analysis may well also raise questions about the precise definition, structure,
content, location, influence, role and future of community psychology in a fledging
democratic society such as South Africa. Similarly, there may be concerns about the
possibility of community psychology being discursively misappropriated and distilled
of its critical content in the service of restrictive social agendas, especially whenever
a high premium is placed on economic liberalisation, political stability and interna
tional recognition. The answers to such questions and concerns perhaps lie in further
studies, including an examination of community psychology's contemporary and
prospective roles within a dynamic global and national democratic order, and reviews
of community psychology's achievements and challenges at the levels of curriculum
reform, post- and under-graduate training, representation in professional organisations,
and focused analyses of psychology departments' commitments and approaches to
community psychology. This kind of research would require an expanded selection
of publications, including books, conference proceedings and monographs.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Brett Bowman and Victor Peteke for their assistance in developing this
article.
608
REFERENCES
Alpert, J. L. and Yammer, D. M. (1983). Research in school consultation: A content analysis
of selected journals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 14(5), 604-612.
Anonymous (1986). Some thoughts on a more relevant or indigenous counselling psychology
in South Africa: Discovering the socio-political context of the oppressed. Psychology in
Society, 5, 81-89.
Berger, S. and Lazarus, S. (1987). The views of community organisers on the relevance of
psychological practice in South Africa. Psychology in Society, 7, 2-6.
Bodibe, R. C. (1994, January). The needfor a third voice in South African psychology. Paper
presented at the Psychology and Societal Transformation Conference, University of the
Western Cape, Bellville.
Bruner, J. S. and Allport, G. W. (1940). Fifty years of change in American psychology.
Psychological Bulletin, 57(10), 1 SI-lib.
Buch, E. and De Beer, C. (1990). Health and health care in Mhala: An overview. Paper
presented to the Second Carnegie Inquiry into Poverty and Development in Southern
Africa, Cape Town.
Butchart, A. (1990, March). Self-importance and social insignificance: A critical analysis of
progressive psychology's current roles in South Africa. Paper presented at the American
Psychological Association's Annual Convention, Boston, Massachusetts.
Campbell, C. and Williams, B. (1998). Evaluating HIV-prevention programmes: Conceptual
challenges. Psychology in Society, 24, 57-68.
Cloete, N., Pillay, S. and Swartz, A. (1986). The proactive counsellor: Is neutrality possible?
Paper presented at the Student Counselling Conference in Southern Africa, Durban.
Dawes, A. (1985). Politics and mental health. The position of clinical psychology in South
Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 55-61.
Dawes, A. R. L. (1986). The notion of relevant psychology with particular reference to
Africanist pragmatic initiatives. Psychology in Society, 5, 28-48.
Dawes, A. (1987). Security laws and children in prison: The issue of psychological impact.
Psychology in Society, 8, 21-41.
Dawes, A. and Tredoux, C. ( 1989). Emotional status of children exposed to political violence
in the Crossroads squatter area during 1986/1987. Psychology in Society, 12, 33^47.
de la Rey, C. and Parekh, A. (1996). Community-based peer groups: An intervention programme
for teenage mothers. Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, 6(5), 373-381.
Duncan, N. (1993). Discourses on racism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of
the Western Cape, Bellville.
—. (2001). Dislodging the sub-texts: An analysis of a corpus of articles on racism produced
by South African psychologists. In N. Duncan, A. van Niekerk, C. de la Rey and M. Seedat
(Eds), Race, racism, knowledge production andpsychology in South Africa (pp. 127-154).
New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Durrheim, K. and Mokeki, S. (1997). Race and relevance: A content analysis of the South
African Journal of Psychology. South African Journal of Psychology, 27(A), 206-213.
Finchilescu, G. (1995). Setting the frame: Gender and psychology. South African Journal of
Psychology, 25(3), 133-139.
Freeman, M. (1991). Mental health for all - moving beyond rhetoric. South African Journal
of Psychology, 21(3), 141-147.
609
Fullagar, C. (1984). Psychology and labour: A relationship of neglect. South African Journal
of Psychology, 14(3), 95-100.
Fullagar, C. and Paizas, H. (1986). Organised labour and psychology's role: Some African
perspectives. Psychology in Society, 6, 63-84.
Gibson, K. (1987). Civil conflict, stress and children. Psychology in Society, 8, 4-26.
Gibson, K., Sandenbergh, R. and Swartz, L. (2001). Becoming a community clinical
psychologist: Integration of community and clinical practices in psychologists' training.
South African Journal of Psychology, 31(1), 29-35.
Hayes, G. (1984). The repression of the social. Psychology in Society, 2,41-53.
Holdstock, T. L. (1981). Psychology in South Africa belongs to the colonial era. Arrogance
or ignorance? South African Journal of Psychology, 11,123-129.
Isemonger, I. (1994). Professionalism: Trick or treat? Psychology in Society, 18, 21-33.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to methodology. California: Sage
Publications.
Lazarus, S. (1985). Action research in an educational setting. South African Journal of
Psychology, 15(4), 112-118.
Lazarus, S. and Seedat, M. (1996, June). Community psychology in South Africa. Paper
presented at the fifth annual conference of the Society for Community Research and
Action, Chicago.
Levett, A. (1989). Psychological trauma and childhood. Psychology in Society, 12,19-32.
Lindegger, G. and Wood, G. (1995). The AIDS crisis: A review of psychological issues and
implications, with special reference to the South African situation. South African Journal
of Psychology, 25(1), 1-11.
Loo, F., Fong, T. K. and Iwamasa, G. (1988). Ethnicity and cultural diversity: An analysis of
work published in community psychology journals, 1965-1985. Journal of Community
Psychology, 16(3), 332-348.
Lounsbury, J. W., Cook, M. P., Leader, D. S. and Meares, E. P. (1985). A content analysis
of community psychology research. In D. Klein and S. E. Susskind (Eds), Research in
community psychology: The state of the art (pp. 39-105). New York: Praeger.
Lounsbury, J. W., Leader, D. S. and Mears, E. P. (1980). An analytic review of research in
community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 8(4), 415-440.
Lund, C. and Swartz, L. (1998). Xhosa-speaking schizophrenic patients' experience of their
condition: Psychosis and amafufunyana. South African Journal of Psychology, 28(2),
62-70.
Macleod, C , Masilela, T. C. and Malomane, E. (1998). Feedback of research results: Reflections
from a community-based mental health programme. South African Journal of Psychology,
28(4), 215-221.
Malefo, V. (2000). Psycho-social factors and academic performance among African women
Students at a predominantly white university in South Africa. South African Journal of
Psychology, 30(4), 40-45.
Mojapelo-Batka, E. M. and Schoeman, J. B. (2003). Voluntary termination of pregnancy:
Moral concerns and emotional experiences among black South African adolescents. South
African Journal of Psychology, 33(3), 144-153.
Müller, J. and Cloete, N. (1987). The white hands: Academic social scientists, engagement
and struggle in South Africa. Social Epistemology, 1(2), 141-154.
610
Nell, V. (1994). Critical psychology and the problem of mental health. Psychology in Society,
79,31-44.
Nicholas, L. J. and Cooper, S. (Eds) (1990). Psychology and apartheid. Cape Town: Vision.
Parekh, A. and de la Rey, C. (1997). Intragroup accounts of teenage motherhood: A community
based psychological perspective. South African Journal of Psychology, 27(4), 223-229.
Parker, I. (1996). Psychology, science fiction and postmodern space. South African Journal
of Psychology, 26(3), 143-150.
Perkel, K. A. (1988). Towards a model for a South African clinical psychology. Psychology
in Society, 23(5), 569-579.
Petersen, I. (1998). Comprehensive integrated primary mental health care in South Africa.
The need for a shift in the discourse of care. South African Journal of Psychology, 28(4),
196-204.
Pillay, Y. and Freeman, M. (1996). Mental health policy and planning: Continuing the debates.
Psychology in Society, 21, 60-71.
Pillay, Y. G. and Petersen, I. (1996). Current practice patterns of clinical and counselling
psychologists and their attitudes to transforming mental health policies in South Africa.
South African Journal of Psychology, 26(2), 76-80.
Rock, B. (1994). A wolf in sheep's clothing? Theoretical diversity and the drive towards
sameness. Psychology in Society, 18, 56-59.
Seedat, M. (1993). Topics, trends and silences in South African psychology 1948-1988:
Ethnocentrism, crisis and liberator)! echoes. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of
the Western Cape, Bellville.
—. (1998). A characterization of South African psychology (1948-1988): The impact of
exclusionary ideology. South African Journal of Psychology, 28(2), 74-84.
—. (2001a). Invisibility in South African psychology (1948-1988): A trend analysis. In
N. Duncan, A. van Niekerk, C. de la Rey and M. Seedat (Eds), Race, racism, knowledge
production and psychology in South Africa (pp.83-102). New York: Nova Science
Publishers.
—. (2001b). A comparative characterization of South African psychology (1948-1988):
Discerning ideological and academic strands. In N. Duncan, A. van Niekerk, C. de la Rey
and M. Seedat (Eds), Race, racism, knowledge production andpsychology in South Africa
(pp. 103-126). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Seedat, M., Cloete, N. and Shochet, I. (1988). Community psychology: Panic or panacea.
Psychology in Society, II, 141-149.
Seedat, M., Duncan, N. and Lazarus, S. (Eds) (2001). Community psychology. Cape Town:
Oxford University Press.
Shabalala, N., Strebel, A., Shefer, T., Simbayi, L., Wilson, T., Ratele, K., Andipatin, M. and
Potgieter, C. (2002). Evaluation of the quality of care for sexually transmitted infections
in primary health care centres in South Africa. South African Journal ofPsychology, 32(4),
33-40.
Shefer, T. (2001). Ordering gender: Revisiting the role of psychology. Psychology in Society,
27, 3Φ45.
Stanfield, J. H. (1985). The ethnocentric bias of social science knowledge production Review
of Research in Education, 12(2), 320-331.
Statman, J. M. (2000). Performing the truth: The social-psychological context of TRC
611
612