Smea Monitoring Form Belcop 2021-2022

You might also like

Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 135

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REGION 3


SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TARLAC PROVINCE
San Roque, Tarlac City

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF) SY 2020 - 2021


Name of Employee: POCHOLO N. CASTANEDA Name of Rater: MARIA CELINA L VEGA, CESE
Position: SCHOOL PRINCIPAL 1 Position: ASSISTANT SCHOOLOS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
Review Period: OCTOBER 2020 - JULY 2021 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DOCLONG 1ST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND DON CESAR ABAD GUALBERTO MULTIGRADE SCHOOL DOCLONG 1ST ELEMENTARY SC

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

1. INSTRUCTIONAL 1. Improved teachers' instructional September 10% 5- 90-100% level of 5- Reports


LEADERSHIP competence by conducting varied 2020 July accomplishment submitted
Instructional Supervision activities: 2021 before the end 5 4 4.5 0.450
each Quarter
a] conducted alternative classroom
observations (as per approved LDM) 4- 80-89% level of 4- Reports
accomplishment submitted
during the
b] monitored Asst. Principals, Head second week of
Teachers, Master Teachers and TICs’ the month
conduct of IS;
3- 70-79% level of 3- Reports
c] checked of WHLP, activity plans, accomplishment submitted
assessment plans, etc. during the third
week of the
d] provided Technical Assistance month
(remote, face to face, mentoring, 2- 60-69% level of 2- Reports
coaching, etc.) accomplishment submitted
during the
e] Others fourth week of
the month
1- 59% and below 1- Reports
level of submitted
accomplishment during the last
day of the
month
2. Ensured the full implementation of September 5% 5 - 16 IMs and 5 - Completed the 5- Attained the
the articulated basic education 2020 July Summary of ILMP target within the objective one
curriculum including its 2021 approved working week before the 5 5 5 5 0.250
contextualization, indigenization, and budget target date
innovation by producing 16 learning
materials in the different learning
areas/curricular/special programs in 4 - 14-15 IMs and 4 - Completed the 4- Attained the
the K to 12 Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective 3 days
additional 5% before the target
supplementary fund date
2. Ensured the full implementation of September 5%
the articulated basic education 2020 July
curriculum including its 2021
contextualization, indigenization, and
innovation by producing 16 learning
materials in the different learning
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
areas/curricular/special programs in
Timeliness) RESULTS
the K to 12 Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

3 - 12-13 IMs and 3 - Completed the 3- Attained the


Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective on the
additional 10% target date
supplementary fund

2 - 10-11 IMs and 2 - Completed the 2- Attained the


Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective 3 days
additional 15% after the target
supplementary fund date

1 - 0-9 IMs and 1 - Completed the 1- Attained the


Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective one
additional 20% week after the
supplementary fund target date

3. Attained the .5% increase in the September 5% 5 – Achieved .40% 5- Submitted


general school average through the 2020 July to .50% increase test results on
following interventions/ strategies/ 2021 and above in the the deadline
activities: general school 4 4 4 0.200
average with
a. remedial instruction approved AIP
b. differentiated instruction
c. self-learning kit 4 – Achieved .30% 4- Submitted
d. contextualized IMs to .39% increase in test results 2
the general school days after the
average with deadline
approved AIP

3 – Achieved .20% 3- Submitted


to .29% increase in test results 3
the general school days after the
average with deadline
approved AIP

2 – Achieved .10% 2- Submitted


to .19% increase in test results 4
the general school days after the
average with deadline
approved AIP

1 – Achieved below 1- Submitted


0.10% increase in test results 5 or
the general school more days after
average with the deadline
approved AIP
Level of
accomplishment
= # of learning
areas targeted/

total
# of learning
areas
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

2. LEARNING 1. Provided healthy, safe, child- September 10% 5 - 5 programs 5 - Completed the 5 - Attained the
ENVIRONMENT friendly, gender-sensitive and 2020 July implemented target within the objective on the
motivating environment for learners 2021 approved working target date 5 5 5 5 0.500
by implementing 100% of the budget
programs, projects, and activities
enumerated in the following plans:
a. School Child Protection Plan (SCPP) 4 - 4 programs 4 - Completed the 4 - Attained the
b. Gender and Development (GAD) implemented target utilizing an objective 3 days
Plan additional 5% after the target
c. School Disaster Risk Reduction supplementary fund date
Management (SDRRM) and/or Climate
Change Adaptation (CCA) Plan
3 - 3 programs 3 - Completed the 3 - Attained the
d. Oplan Kalusugan (OK) sa DepEd (at
implemented target utilizing an objective one
least 2 programs; e.g. Feeding
additional 10% week after the
Program, WINS, NDEP, Adolescent
supplementary fund target date
Reproductive Health Program,
Medical, Dental and Nursing Services)
2 - 2 programs 2 - Completed the 2 - Attained the
implemented target utilizing an objective two
additional 15% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date

1 - 1 program 1 - Completed the 1 - Attained the


implemented target utilizing an objective three
additional 20% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date

2. Ensured a child-friendly environment by September 2020 5% 5 - 35 or higher 5 - Completed the 5 - Attained the
scoring 35 points or higher in the Child- July 2021 (Very Outstanding) target within the objective on the
Friendly School System
approved working target date 4 4 4 4 0.200
- Child-Friendly School Report budget
a. CFSS Tool
b. Accomplishment Report per
goal 4 - 30-35 4 - Completed the 4 - Attained the
- Validated Report by the Cluster CFSS Team (Outstanding) target utilizing an objective 3 days
- Report additional 5% after the target
- Certification on score obtained supplementary fund date

3 - 25-29 (Child- 3 - Completed the 3 - Attained the


friendly) target utilizing an objective one
additional 10% week after the
supplementary fund target date

2 - 20-24 (Striving) 2 - Completed the 2 - Attained the


target utilizing an objective two
additional 15% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date

1 - below 20 (Not 1 - Completed the 1 - Attained the


Child-friendly) target utilizing an objective three
additional 20% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

3. Ensured a safe school learning September 5% 5 - Evaluated by 5 - Completed the 5 - Attained


environment by evaluating and 2020 July the specialists target within the target within
inspecting the school plant, physical 2021 (municipal approved working first semester of
facilities fitness, safety, and engineer, Head of budget SY
sufficiency with the assistance of a the MDRRMC or
specialist annually other licensed 4 5 5 4.6666667 0.233
professional who
perform such
function)

4 - Evaluated by 4 - Completed the 4 - Attained


DepEd Engineer target utilizing an target within
additional 5% 3rd quarter of
supplementary fund SY

3 - Evaluated by 3 - Completed the 3 - Attained


supervisors target utilizing an target on
additional 10% January 2019
supplementary fund

2 - Evaluated by 2 - Completed the 2 - Attained


teachers target utilizing an target on
additional 15% February 2019
supplementary fund

1 - Evaluated by 1 - Completed the 1 - Attained


others target utilizing an target on March
additional 20% 2019
supplementary fund

3. PARENTS' 1. Improved parents' attendance, September 10% 5 - Achieved 75% 5 - Completed the 5 - Conducted 5
INVOLVEMENT participation, and involvement in 2020 July and above parents’ target within the meetings and
AND COMMUNITY school activities 2021 attendance approved working activities with 4 5 5 4.6666667 0.467
PARTNERSHIP budget parents

4 - Achieved 60- 4 - Completed the 4 - Conducted 4


74% parents’ target utilizing an meetings and
attendance additional 5% activities with
supplementary fund parents

3 - Achieved 50- 3 - Completed the 3 - Conducted 3


69% parents’ target utilizing an meetings and
attendance additional 10% activities with
supplementary fund parents

2 - Achieved 30- 2 - Completed the 2 - Conducted 2


49% parents’ target utilizing an meetings and
attendance additional 15% activities with
supplementary fund parents
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

1 - 29% and below 1 - Completed the 1 - Conducted 1


target utilizing an meeting and
additional 20% activity with
supplementary fund parents

2. Enhanced stakeholders' September 5% 5 - 5 projects 5 - Completed the 5-


involvement in school improvement by 2020 July implemented target within the Accomplished
designing and implementing five 2021 approved working the target as
4 5 5 4.6666667 0.233
projects to address school needs budget specified in the
plan

4 - 4 projects 4 - Completed the 4-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 5% the target but
supplementary fund one month late

3 - 3 projects 3 - Completed the 3-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 10% the target but
supplementary fund two months late

2 - 2 projects 2 - Completed the 2-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 15% the target but
supplementary fund three months
late

1 - 1 project 1 - Completed the 1-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 20% the target but
supplementary fund four or more
months late

3. Strengthened stakeholders' September 5% 5 - 85-100% of 5 - Completed the 5-


involvement and community 2020 July stakeholders are target within the Accomplished
partnership by recognizing their 2021 recognized approved working the objectives as
accomplishments and contributions budget specified in the
4 5 5 4.6666667 0.233
annually plan

4 - 71-84% of 4 - Completed the 4-


stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 5% the objectives
supplementary fund one month after
the target date
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

3 - 65-74% of 3 - Completed the 3-


stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 10% the objectives
supplementary fund two months
after the target
date

2 - 51-64% of 2 - Completed the 2-


stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 15% the objectives
supplementary fund three months
after the target
date

1 - 50% and below 1 - Completed the 1-


of stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 20% the objectives
supplementary fund four months
after the target
date

4.HUMAN 1. Enhanced the level of competence September 10% 5 – Encouraged 5 - Completed the 5-
RESOURCE of all school personnel through the 2020 July and supported the target within the Accomplished
MANAGEMENT implementation of the 100% of 2021 teaching and non- approved working the objectives as
AND programs, projects, and activities teaching personnel budget specified in the
DEVELOPMENT enumerated in the School Plan/ through the plan
Learning Continuity Plan / Annual implementation of
5 5 5 5 0.500
Improvement Plan (AIP) 100% of the PPAs
enumerated in the
School Plan/ LCP /
AIP

4– Encouraged and 4 - Completed the 4-


supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 5% the objectives 1
teaching personnel suplementary fund day after the
through the target date
implementation of
90-99% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

3– Encouraged and 3 - Completed the 3-


supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 10% the objectives 1
teaching personnel supplementary fund week after the
through the target date
implementation of
80-89% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP

2 – Encouraged 2 - Completed the 2-


and supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 15% the objectives 1
teaching personnel supplementary fund month after the
through the target date
implementation of
70-79% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP

1 – Encouraged 1 - Completed the 1-


and supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 20% the objectives
teaching personnel supplementary fund within the year
through the
implementation of
60-69% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP

2. Energized and boosted the morale September 5% 5 - Attained 100% 5 - Accomplished 5


of teachers by implementing PPAs on 2020 July level of and above tasks
their welfare and institutionalizing 2021 accomplishment with MOV either
rewards systems as follows: same or 5 4 4.5 0.225
combination thereof.
a. Recommending for upgrading of
positions (ERF)
4 - Attained 80- 4 - Accomplished 4
99% level of tasks with MOV
b. Recommending for reclassification
accomplishment either same or
of positions
combinationthereof.
c. Assisting for promotions

d. Awards and incentives for


3 - Attained 70- 3 - Accomplished 3
personnel
79% level of tasks with MOV
e. Updating of PSIPOP
accomplishment either same or
f. Teachers’ Welfare Program
combinationthereof.
b. Recommending for reclassification
of positions
c. Assisting for promotions

d. Awards and incentives for


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
personnel
Timeliness) RESULTS
e. Updating of PSIPOP Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) f. Teachers’ Welfare
OBJECTIVES
Program TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

2 - Attained 60-69 2 - Accomplished 2


level of tasks with MOV
accomplishment either same or
combinationthereof.

1 - Attained 50- 1 - Accomplished 1


59% level of tasks with MOV
accomplishment either same or
combinationthereof.

3. Developed and applied Support Succession September 2020 5% 5 - Attained 100% 5 - Attained the 4 5 4.5 0.225
Strategy + Team Leadership + (3S + T July 2021 level of objective on the
Leadership) by:
a. Participating in programs and trainings on accomplishment target date
Values-Based Leadership/Strategic and
Innovation and others
b. Transformational Leadership Program
c. Reflections on books on leadership read
d. Published articles on Leadership 4 - Attained 80- 4 - Attained the
99% level of objective 1-2
accomplishment days after the
target date

3 - Attained 70- 3 - Attained the


79% level of objective 3-4
accomplishment days after the
target date

2 - Attained 60- 2 - Attained the


69% level of objective 5-6
accomplishment days after the
target date

1 - Attained 50- 1 - Attained the


59% level of objective 7-8
accomplishment days after the
target date

5. SCHOOL For implementing units: 10% 5 - 100% accurate 5 - On time 5 5 5 0.500


LEADERSHIP, 1. Liquidated 98% to 100% of MOOE submission
MANAGEMENT budget accurately and on time and
AND complied the following processes:
OPERATIONS
a. Improved submission of liquidation
reports through systematic recording
and reporting of the agency financial
and physical operations
b. Attained 100% releases of salaries,
allowances and other benefits of the
personnel through accurate
preparation, processing and
submission of Report of Disbursement
with supporting documents within the
prescribed period
c. Achieved 100% remittances of
salary deductions, government shares,
government financing institutions and
5. SCHOOL For implementing units: 10%
LEADERSHIP, 1. Liquidated 98% to 100% of MOOE
MANAGEMENT budget accurately and on time and
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
AND complied the following processes: Timeliness) RESULTS
OPERATIONS Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
a. Improved submission of liquidation per KRA Rating
reports through systematic recording Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
and reporting of the agency financial
and physical operations 4 - 90% accurate 4 - 3 days late
b. Attained 100% releases of salaries, late
allowances and other benefits of the
personnel through accurate
preparation, processing and
submission of Report of Disbursement
with supporting documents within the
prescribed period
c. Achieved 100% remittances of
salary deductions, government shares, 3 - 80% accurate 3 - 5 days late
government financing institutions and
private lending institutions through
monitoring of accurate preparation
and processing of statement of
remittance for government share and
salary deductions on the 10th day of
the succeeding month

For non-implementing units:


1. Liquidated 100% of MOOE
accurately and on time and complied
with:

a. Improved submission of liquidation


reports through systematic recording
and reporting of the agency financial
and physical operations
with supporting documents within the
prescribed period
c. Achieved 100% remittances of
salary deductions, government shares,
government financing institutions and
private lending institutions through PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
monitoring of accurate preparation Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) and processing of statement of
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
remittance for government share and per KRA Rating
salary deductions on the 10th day of Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
the succeeding month
2 - 70 % accurate 2 - 1 week late
For non-implementing units:
1. Liquidated 100% of MOOE
accurately and on time and complied
with:

a. Improved submission of liquidation


reports through systematic recording
and reporting of the agency financial
and physical operations 1 - 60% and below 1 - more than 1
week

2. Improved the level of clientele's September 5% 5 - Adhered to 9-10 5-


satisfaction by adhering to RA 9485 - 2020 July policies Accomplished
Anti Red Tape Act (ARTA) and Quality 2021 the objectives as
Management System (QMS) specified in the 5 5 5 5 0.250
a. No Collection Policy plan
b. Updated Transparency Board
c. Reporting of School's Accomplished
PPAs 4-
d. No Noon Break Policy Accomplished
e. Following the Citizen's Charter 4 - Adhered to 7-8 the objectives
f. Help Desks or Public Assistance policies one month after
Desks the target date
g. Suggestion Box and Surveys
h. Wearing of IDs or nameplates
i. Monitoring of Attendance of
Personnel (Google Sheet and Printed 3-
DTR Form) Accomplished
j. QMS (implementation of 5S, 3 - Adhered to 5-6 the objectives
documentation of processes) policies two months
after the target
date

2-
Accomplished
2 - Adhered to 3-4 the objectives
policies three months
after the target
date

1-
Accomplished
the objectives
1 - Adhered to 1-2
four months
policies
after the target
date

3. Attained 100% completion of the encoding of September 2020 5% 5 - 100% encoded 5 - Complied within 5 5 5 0.250
learners' profile in the LIS and school data in the July 2021 the deadline
EBEIS during the beginning of school year (BOSY)
and end of school year (EOSY)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
3. Attained 100% completion of the encoding of September 2020 5% Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
learners' profile in the LIS and school data in the July 2021
EBEIS during the beginning of school year (BOSY)
and end of school year (EOSY) 4 - 80-99% encoded 4 - Complied 3 days
after the deadline
3 - 60-79% encoded 3 - Complied 5 days
after the deadline
2 - 40-59% encoded 2 - Complied 1 week
after the deadline

1 - 20-39% encoded 1 - Complied more


than 1 week after the
deadline

TOTAL 100% 4.717


Overall Rating for Accomplishment 4.717

Ratee: Recommending Approval: Approval:

POCHOLO N. CASTANEDA MARIA CELINA L. VEGA, CESE DR. RONALDO A. POZON, CESO V
School Principal Asst. Schools Division Superintendent Schools Division Superintendent
PPRD01/pprd05
DOCLONG 1ST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND DON CESAR ABAD GUALBERTO MULTIGRADE SCHOOL

Any 5 fom the following:


* Monthly Instructional Supervisory and TA
plans and reports
* Performance Monitoring and Coaching Forms
* Approved class and teachers' programs
* Quarterly Reports on Observations
conducted using COT
* Quarterly and/or Monthly Accomplishment
Report – to be submitted to OASDS

* Certification of the use of the IM c/o


principal
* List of IMs per learning area
* Consolidated list of Individual Learning
Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
* Certification of the use of the IM c/o
principal
* List of IMs per learning area
* Consolidated list of Individual Learning
Monitoring Plan (ILMP)

* Consolidated reports on achievement rate


submitted to the SGOD's School Management
Monitoring and Evaluation Section (JHS and
SHS)

* Approved AIP (with reflected intervention/


strategies/ activities)
* Approved Plans
a. SCPP
b. GAD
c. SDRRM
d. OK sa DepEd (any 2)
* Accomplishment Reports

* Child-Friendly School Report


a. CFSS Tool
b. Accomplishment Report per
goal
* Validated Report by the Cluster CFSS Team
- Report
- Certification on score obtained
* Certification of the specialist on the
evaluation and assessment of school plant and
facilities
* NSBI report
* Site Development Plan

Narrative report on parents’ involvement in the


SLMs’ Distribution and Retrieval and other
related activities
* Adopt-a-School Report
* Accomplishment Report
* MOA/MOU of Projects Implemented
* Financial Report

Sample Projects
Feeding Program
Brigada Eskwela Plus
Medical and dental
Clean and Green
Repairs
Homeroom projects
Others

* List of generated supports from


Stakeholders
* Attendance sheet
* List of stakeholders to be recognized
* Certificate of Recognition
Any 5 from the following
* Work plan
* Accomplishment Reports

* Minutes of Meetings
* Teachers’ Developmental Plans
* Approved School Development Plan (SDP)
* Approved Annual/Monthly Learning Action
Cell (LAC) Plan
* Approved LCP
* Approved INSET
* Training Proposal/Matrix/ AR/ SOB/
Evaluation/Certificate of Participation
Any 2 from the following
* School memo on Ranking
* Transmittal to DO of Ranking
* Teachers’ Awards
* Number of processed documents for
upgrading/ reclassification/promotion (if
applicable)
Any 2 of the following
* School Memorandum
* Certificate of Participation
* Accomplishment Reports
* Copies of reflections on books read
* Articles on Leadership

For implementing units:


Documents prepared by ADASs

For non-implementing units:


Documents prepared by ADASs or
documents prepared and submitted by school
heads
For implementing units:
Documents prepared by ADASs

For non-implementing units:


Documents prepared by ADASs or
documents prepared and submitted by school
heads
* Accomplishment Reports
* Documentation on adherence to ARTA and
QMS

* Screenshot of LIS & EBEIS updating


* LIS report
* EBEIS report
* Screenshot of LIS & EBEIS updating
* LIS report
* EBEIS report
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REGION 3
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TARLAC PROVINCE
San Roque, Tarlac City

Proposed Calibrated Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF) SY 2020 - 2021 ONLY
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

1. INSTRUCTIONAL 1. Improved teachers' instructional 10% 5- 90-100% level of 5- Reports


LEADERSHIP competence by conducting varied accomplishment submitted
Instructional Supervision activities: before the end
each Quarter
a] conducted alternative classroom
observations (as per approved LDM) 4- 80-89% level of 4- Reports
accomplishment submitted
during the
b] monitored Asst. Principals, Head second week of
Teachers, Master Teachers and TICs’ the month
conduct of IS;
3- 70-79% level of 3- Reports
c] checked of WHLP, activity plans, accomplishment submitted
assessment plans, etc. during the third
week of the
d] provided Technical Assistance month
(remote, face to face, mentoring, 2- 60-69% level of 2- Reports
coaching, etc.) accomplishment submitted
during the
e] Others fourth week of
the month
a] conducted alternative classroom
observations (as per approved LDM)

b] monitored Asst. Principals, Head


Teachers, Master Teachers and TICs’
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: conduct of IS;

c] checked of WHLP, activity plans,


TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
assessment plans, etc.

d] provided Technical Assistance PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


(remote, face to face, mentoring, Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) coaching, etc.)
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
e] Others Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

1- 59% and below 1- Reports


level of submitted
accomplishment during the last
day of the
month
2. Ensured the full implementation of 5% 5 - 16 IMs and 5 - Completed the 5- Attained the
the articulated basic education Summary of ILMP target within the objective one
curriculum including its approved working week before the
contextualization, indigenization, and budget target date
innovation by producing 16 learning
materials in the different learning
areas/curricular/special programs in 4 - 14-15 IMs and 4 - Completed the 4- Attained the
the K to 12 Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective 3 days
additional 5% before the target
supplementary fund date

3 - 12-13 IMs and 3 - Completed the 3- Attained the


Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective on the
additional 10% target date
supplementary fund

2 - 10-11 IMs and 2 - Completed the 2- Attained the


Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective 3 days
additional 15% after the target
supplementary fund date

1 - 0-9 IMs and 1 - Completed the 1- Attained the


Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective one
additional 20% week after the
supplementary fund target date
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

3. Attained the .5% increase in the 5% 5 – Achieved .40% 5- Submitted


general school average through the to .50% increase test results on
following interventions/ strategies/ and above in the the deadline
activities: general school
average with
a. remedial instruction approved AIP
b. differentiated instruction
c. self-learning kit 4 – Achieved .30% 4- Submitted
d. contextualized IMs to .39% increase in test results 2
the general school days after the
average with deadline
approved AIP

3 – Achieved .20% 3- Submitted


to .29% increase in test results 3
the general school days after the
average with deadline
approved AIP

2 – Achieved .10% 2- Submitted


to .19% increase in test results 4
the general school days after the
average with deadline
approved AIP

1 – Achieved below 1- Submitted


0.10% increase in test results 5 or
the general school more days after
average with the deadline
approved AIP
Level of
accomplishment
= # of learning
areas targeted/

total
# of learning
areas
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

2. LEARNING 1. Provided healthy, safe, child- 10% 5 - 5 programs 5 - Completed the 5 - Attained the
ENVIRONMENT friendly, gender-sensitive and implemented target within the objective on the
motivating environment for learners approved working target date
by implementing 100% of the budget
programs, projects, and activities
enumerated in the following plans:
a. School Child Protection Plan (SCPP) 4 - 4 programs 4 - Completed the 4 - Attained the
b. Gender and Development (GAD) implemented target utilizing an objective 3 days
Plan additional 5% after the target
c. School Disaster Risk Reduction supplementary fund date
Management (SDRRM) and/or Climate
Change Adaptation (CCA) Plan
3 - 3 programs 3 - Completed the 3 - Attained the
d. Oplan Kalusugan (OK) sa DepEd (at
implemented target utilizing an objective one
least 2 programs; e.g. Feeding
additional 10% week after the
Program, WINS, NDEP, Adolescent
supplementary fund target date
Reproductive Health Program,
Medical, Dental and Nursing Services)
2 - 2 programs 2 - Completed the 2 - Attained the
implemented target utilizing an objective two
additional 15% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date

1 - 1 program 1 - Completed the 1 - Attained the


implemented target utilizing an objective three
additional 20% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date

2. Ensured a child-friendly environment by 5% 5 - 35 or higher 5 - Completed the 5 - Attained the


scoring 35 points or higher in the Child- (Very Outstanding) target within the objective on the
Friendly School System
approved working target date
- Child-Friendly School Report budget
a. CFSS Tool
b. Accomplishment Report per
goal
- Validated Report by the Cluster CFSS Team
- Report
- Certification on score obtained
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


2. Ensured a child-friendly environment by 5%
scoring 35 points or higher in the Child- Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) Friendly SchoolOBJECTIVES
System TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
- Child-Friendly School Report Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
a. CFSS Tool
b. Accomplishment Report per
goal 4 - 30-35 4 - Completed the 4 - Attained the
- Validated Report by the Cluster CFSS Team (Outstanding) target utilizing an objective 3 days
- Report additional 5% after the target
- Certification on score obtained supplementary fund date

3 - 25-29 (Child- 3 - Completed the 3 - Attained the


friendly) target utilizing an objective one
additional 10% week after the
supplementary fund target date

2 - 20-24 (Striving) 2 - Completed the 2 - Attained the


target utilizing an objective two
additional 15% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date

1 - below 20 (Not 1 - Completed the 1 - Attained the


Child-friendly) target utilizing an objective three
additional 20% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date

3. Ensured a safe school learning 5% 5 - Evaluated by 5 - Completed the 5 - Attained


environment by evaluating and the specialists target within the target within
inspecting the school plant, physical (municipal approved working first semester of
facilities fitness, safety, and engineer, Head of budget SY
sufficiency with the assistance of a the MDRRMC or
specialist annually other licensed
professional who
perform such
function)

4 - Evaluated by 4 - Completed the 4 - Attained


DepEd Engineer target utilizing an target within
additional 5% 3rd quarter of
supplementary fund SY
3. Ensured a safe school learning 5%
environment by evaluating and
inspecting the school plant, physical
facilities fitness, safety, and
sufficiency with the assistance of a
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: specialist annually

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

3 - Evaluated by 3 - Completed the 3 - Attained


supervisors target utilizing an target on
additional 10% January 2019
supplementary fund

2 - Evaluated by 2 - Completed the 2 - Attained


teachers target utilizing an target on
additional 15% February 2019
supplementary fund

1 - Evaluated by 1 - Completed the 1 - Attained


others target utilizing an target on March
additional 20% 2019
supplementary fund

3. PARENTS' 1. Improved parents' attendance, 10% 5 - Achieved 75% 5 - Completed the 5 - Conducted 5
INVOLVEMENT participation, and involvement in and above parents’ target within the meetings and
AND COMMUNITY school activities attendance approved working activities with
PARTNERSHIP budget parents

4 - Achieved 60- 4 - Completed the 4 - Conducted 4


74% parents’ target utilizing an meetings and
attendance additional 5% activities with
supplementary fund parents

3 - Achieved 50- 3 - Completed the 3 - Conducted 3


69% parents’ target utilizing an meetings and
attendance additional 10% activities with
supplementary fund parents
3. PARENTS' 1. Improved parents' attendance, 10%
INVOLVEMENT participation, and involvement in
AND COMMUNITY school activities
PARTNERSHIP

Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

2 - Achieved 30- 2 - Completed the 2 - Conducted 2


49% parents’ target utilizing an meetings and
attendance additional 15% activities with
supplementary fund parents

1 - 29% and below 1 - Completed the 1 - Conducted 1


target utilizing an meeting and
additional 20% activity with
supplementary fund parents

2. Enhanced stakeholders' 5% 5 - 5 projects 5 - Completed the 5-


involvement in school improvement by implemented target within the Accomplished
designing and implementing five approved working the target as
projects to address school needs budget specified in the
plan

4 - 4 projects 4 - Completed the 4-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 5% the target but
supplementary fund one month late

3 - 3 projects 3 - Completed the 3-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 10% the target but
supplementary fund two months late

2 - 2 projects 2 - Completed the 2-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 15% the target but
supplementary fund three months
late
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

1 - 1 project 1 - Completed the 1-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 20% the target but
supplementary fund four or more
months late

3. Strengthened stakeholders' 5% 5 - 85-100% of 5 - Completed the 5-


involvement and community stakeholders are target within the Accomplished
partnership by recognizing their recognized approved working the objectives as
accomplishments and contributions budget specified in the
annually plan

4 - 71-84% of 4 - Completed the 4-


stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 5% the objectives
supplementary fund one month after
the target date

3 - 65-74% of 3 - Completed the 3-


stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 10% the objectives
supplementary fund two months
after the target
date
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

2 - 51-64% of 2 - Completed the 2-


stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 15% the objectives
supplementary fund three months
after the target
date

1 - 50% and below 1 - Completed the 1-


of stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 20% the objectives
supplementary fund four months
after the target
date

4.HUMAN 1. Enhanced the level of competence 10% 5 – Encouraged 5 - Completed the 5-


RESOURCE of all school personnel through the and supported the target within the Accomplished
MANAGEMENT implementation of the 100% of teaching and non- approved working the objectives as
AND programs, projects, and activities teaching personnel budget specified in the
DEVELOPMENT enumerated in the School Plan/ through the plan
Learning Continuity Plan / Annual implementation of
Improvement Plan (AIP) 100% of the PPAs
enumerated in the
School Plan/ LCP /
AIP
4.HUMAN 1. Enhanced the level of competence 10%
RESOURCE of all school personnel through the
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
MANAGEMENT implementation of the 100% of
AND programs, projects, and activities
DEVELOPMENT enumeratedTOin BEthe
FILLED
SchoolIN DURING PLANNING
Plan/ TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Learning Continuity Plan / Annual
Improvement Plan (AIP) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

4– Encouraged and 4 - Completed the 4-


supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 5% the objectives 1
teaching personnel suplementary fund day after the
through the target date
implementation of
90-99% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP

3– Encouraged and 3 - Completed the 3-


supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 10% the objectives 1
teaching personnel supplementary fund week after the
through the target date
implementation of
80-89% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP

2 – Encouraged 2 - Completed the 2-


and supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 15% the objectives 1
teaching personnel supplementary fund month after the
through the target date
implementation of
70-79% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

1 – Encouraged 1 - Completed the 1-


and supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 20% the objectives
teaching personnel supplementary fund within the year
through the
implementation of
60-69% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP

2. Energized and boosted the morale 5% 5 - Attained 100% 5 - Accomplished 5


of teachers by implementing PPAs on level of and above tasks
their welfare and institutionalizing accomplishment with MOV either
rewards systems as follows: same or
combination thereof.
a. Recommending for upgrading of
positions (ERF)
4 - Attained 80- 4 - Accomplished 4
99% level of tasks with MOV
b. Recommending for reclassification
accomplishment either same or
of positions
combinationthereof.
c. Assisting for promotions

d. Awards and incentives for


3 - Attained 70- 3 - Accomplished 3
personnel
79% level of tasks with MOV
e. Updating of PSIPOP
accomplishment either same or
f. Teachers’ Welfare Program
combinationthereof.

2 - Attained 60-69 2 - Accomplished 2


level of tasks with MOV
accomplishment either same or
combinationthereof.
positions (ERF)

b. Recommending for reclassification


of positions
c. Assisting for promotions

d. Awards and incentives for


personnel
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: e. Updating of PSIPOP
f. Teachers’ Welfare Program
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

1 - Attained 50- 1 - Accomplished 1


59% level of tasks with MOV
accomplishment either same or
combinationthereof.

3. Developed and applied Support Succession 5% 5 - Attained 100% 5 - Attained the


Strategy + Team Leadership + (3S + T level of objective on the
Leadership) by:
a. Participating in programs and trainings on accomplishment target date
Values-Based Leadership/Strategic and
Innovation and others
b. Transformational Leadership Program
c. Reflections on books on leadership read
d. Published articles on Leadership 4 - Attained 80- 4 - Attained the
99% level of objective 1-2
accomplishment days after the
target date

3 - Attained 70- 3 - Attained the


79% level of objective 3-4
accomplishment days after the
target date

2 - Attained 60- 2 - Attained the


69% level of objective 5-6
accomplishment days after the
target date

1 - Attained 50- 1 - Attained the


59% level of objective 7-8
accomplishment days after the
target date
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

5. SCHOOL For implementing units: 5% 5 - 100% accurate 5 - On time


LEADERSHIP, 1. Liquidated 98% to 100% of MOOE submission
MANAGEMENT budget accurately and on time and
AND complied the following processes:
OPERATIONS
a. Improved submission of liquidation
reports through systematic recording
and reporting of the agency financial
and physical operations 4 - 90% accurate 4 - 3 days late
b. Attained 100% releases of salaries, late
allowances and other benefits of the
personnel through accurate
preparation, processing and
submission of Report of Disbursement
with supporting documents within the
prescribed period
c. Achieved 100% remittances of
salary deductions, government shares, 3 - 80% accurate 3 - 5 days late
government financing institutions and
private lending institutions through
monitoring of accurate preparation
and processing of statement of
remittance for government share and
salary deductions on the 10th day of
the succeeding month
2 - 70 % accurate 2 - 1 week late
For non-implementing units:
1. Liquidated 100% of MOOE
accurately and on time and complied
with:

a. Improved submission of liquidation


reports through systematic recording
and reporting of the agency financial
and physical operations
prescribed period
c. Achieved 100% remittances of
salary deductions, government shares,
government financing institutions and
private lending institutions through
monitoring of accurate preparation
and processing of statement of
remittance for government share and
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: salary deductions on the 10th day of
the succeeding month
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
For non-implementing units:
1. Liquidated 100% of MOOE
accurately and on time and complied PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
with: Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
a. Improved submission of liquidation
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
reports through systematic recording
and reporting of the agency financial
and physical operations 1 - 60% and below 1 - more than 1
week

2. Improved the level of clientele's 5% 5 - Adhered to 9-10 5-


satisfaction by adhering to RA 9485 - policies Accomplished
Anti Red Tape Act (ARTA) and Quality the objectives as
Management System (QMS) specified in the
a. No Collection Policy plan
b. Updated Transparency Board
c. Reporting of School's Accomplished
PPAs 4-
d. No Noon Break Policy Accomplished
e. Following the Citizen's Charter the objectives
4 - Adhered to 7-8
f. Help Desks or Public Assistance policies one month after
Desks the target date
g. Suggestion Box and Surveys
h. Wearing of IDs or nameplates
i. Monitoring of Attendance of
Personnel (Google Sheet and Printed 3-
DTR Form) Accomplished
j. QMS (implementation of 5S, 3 - Adhered to 5-6 the objectives
documentation of processes) policies two months
after the target
date

2-
Accomplished
2 - Adhered to 3-4 the objectives
policies three months
after the target
date
Desks
g. Suggestion Box and Surveys
h. Wearing of IDs or nameplates
i. Monitoring of Attendance of
Personnel (Google Sheet and Printed
DTR Form)
j. QMS (implementation of 5S,
documentation of processes)
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

1-
Accomplished
the objectives
1 - Adhered to 1-2
four months
policies
after the target
date

3. Attained 100% completion of the encoding of 5% 5 - 100% encoded 5 - Complied within


learners' profile in the LIS and school data in the the deadline
EBEIS during the beginning of school year (BOSY)
and end of school year (EOSY) 4 - 80-99% encoded 4 - Complied 3 days
after the deadline
3 - 60-79% encoded 3 - Complied 5 days
after the deadline
2 - 40-59% encoded 2 - Complied 1 week
after the deadline

1 - 20-39% encoded 1 - Complied more


than 1 week after the
deadline

PLUS FACTOR 1. Acted as resource speaker, trainer, facilitator, 2% 5 - Submitted all 5 MOV's
judge in seminars, trainings, conferences, and or
other related activities at least within the district/
division level (Principal) 4 - Submitted 4 out of 5
MOV's
3 - Submitted 3 out of 5
MOV's
2 - Submitted 2 out of 5
MOV's
1 - Submitted 1 out of 5
MOV's
2. Organized/ co-organized and managed at least 1 2% 5 - Submitted all 5 MOV's
training/seminar at the district / cluster level to
improve teachers’ competence (Principal)
PLUS FACTOR

Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
2. Organized/ co-organized and managed at least 1 2% Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
training/seminar at the district / cluster level to 4 - Submitted 4 out of 5
improve teachers’ competence (Principal) MOV's
3 - Submitted 3 out of 5
MOV's
2 - Submitted 2 out of 5
MOV's

1 - Submitted 1 out of 5
MOV's
3. Generated resources for school improvement and 1% 5- 100% and above of the
operations amounting to _______ target amount generated
 Mega School 500K and up
 Large School 300K to 499K 4- 90-99% of the target
 Medium School 200K to 299K amount generated
 Small School 100K to 199K 3- 80-89 of the target
amount generated
2- 70-79% of the target
amount generated
1- 69% of the target
amount generated
TOTAL 100%
Overall Rating for Accomplishment

Ratee: Recommending Approval: Approval:

School Principal Asst. Schools Division Superintendent Schools Division Superintendent

PPRD01/pprd05
Any 5 fom the following: KRA1 OBJ1
* Monthly Instructional Supervisory and TA
plans and reports
* Performance Monitoring and Coaching Forms
* Approved class and teachers' programs
* Quarterly Reports on Observations
conducted using COT
* Quarterly and/or Monthly Accomplishment
Report – to be submitted to OASDS
* Performance Monitoring and Coaching Forms
* Approved class and teachers' programs
* Quarterly Reports on Observations
conducted using COT
* Quarterly and/or Monthly Accomplishment
Report – to be submitted to OASDS

* Certification of the use of the IM c/o KRA1 OBJ2


principal
* List of IMs per learning area
* Consolidated list of Individual Learning
Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
* Consolidated reports on achievement rate KRA1 OBJ3
submitted to the SGOD's School Management
Monitoring and Evaluation Section (JHS and
SHS)

* Approved AIP (with reflected intervention/


strategies/ activities)
* Approved Plans KRA2 OBJ1
a. SCPP
b. GAD
c. SDRRM
d. OK sa DepEd (any 2)
* Accomplishment Reports

* Child-Friendly School Report KRA2 OBJ2


a. CFSS Tool
b. Accomplishment Report per
goal
* Validated Report by the Cluster CFSS Team
- Report
- Certification on score obtained
* Child-Friendly School Report
a. CFSS Tool
b. Accomplishment Report per
goal
* Validated Report by the Cluster CFSS Team
- Report
- Certification on score obtained

* Certification of the specialist on the KRA2 OBJ3


evaluation and assessment of school plant and
facilities
* NSBI report
* Site Development Plan
* Certification of the specialist on the
evaluation and assessment of school plant and
facilities
* NSBI report
* Site Development Plan

Narrative report on parents’ involvement in the KRA3 OBJ1


SLMs’ Distribution and Retrieval and other
related activities
Narrative report on parents’ involvement in the
SLMs’ Distribution and Retrieval and other
related activities

* Adopt-a-School Report KRA3 OBJ2


* Accomplishment Report
* MOA/MOU of Projects Implemented
* Financial Report

Sample Projects
Feeding Program
Brigada Eskwela Plus
Medical and dental
Clean and Green
Repairs
Homeroom projects
Others
Sample Projects
Feeding Program
Brigada Eskwela Plus
Medical and dental
Clean and Green
Repairs
Homeroom projects
Others

* List of generated supports from KRA3 OBJ3


Stakeholders
* Attendance sheet
* List of stakeholders to be recognized
* Certificate of Recognition
Any 5 from the following KRA4 OBJ1
* Work plan
* Accomplishment Reports

* Minutes of Meetings
* Teachers’ Developmental Plans
* Approved School Development Plan (SDP)
* Approved Annual/Monthly Learning Action
Cell (LAC) Plan
* Approved LCP
* Approved INSET
* Training Proposal/Matrix/ AR/ SOB/
Evaluation/Certificate of Participation
Any 5 from the following
* Work plan
* Accomplishment Reports

* Minutes of Meetings
* Teachers’ Developmental Plans
* Approved School Development Plan (SDP)
* Approved Annual/Monthly Learning Action
Cell (LAC) Plan
* Approved LCP
* Approved INSET
* Training Proposal/Matrix/ AR/ SOB/
Evaluation/Certificate of Participation
Any 2 from the following KRA4 OBJ2
* School memo on Ranking
* Transmittal to DO of Ranking
* Teachers’ Awards
* Number of processed documents for
upgrading/ reclassification/promotion (if
applicable)
applicable)

Any 2 of the following KRA4 OBJ3


* School Memorandum
* Certificate of Participation
* Accomplishment Reports
* Copies of reflections on books read
* Articles on Leadership
For implementing units: KRA5 OBJ1
Documents prepared by ADASs

For non-implementing units:


Documents prepared by ADASs or
documents prepared and submitted by school
heads
* Accomplishment Reports
* Documentation on adherence to ARTA and
QMS
* Screenshot of LIS & EBEIS updating
* LIS report
* EBEIS report

 Certificate of Recognition
 Copy of Memorandum/ Proof of invitation

 Training Matrix/Program
 Picture
 Hard copy of presentation

 Approval Sheet from SGOD HRDS


 Training Design
 Training Matrix/Program
 Report on the training (attendance sheet, narrative, pictures)
 Certificate of recognition as organizer or co-organizer of a
cluster training
 Approval Sheet from SGOD HRDS
 Training Design
 Training Matrix/Program
 Report on the training (attendance sheet, narrative, pictures)
 Certificate of recognition as organizer or co-organizer of a
cluster training

Any 2 of the following;


 ASP Reports
 DOD and DOA
 Financial Reports
 Summary of generated resources
Republic of the Philippines DepEDROIII-CSC-PPRD-OPCRF-001
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REGION 3 (Created/Revised 07/25/19)
Matalino St. D.M. Government Center, Maimpis, City of San Fernando (P) Version 1.0 Revision 01

FY 2021 Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)


Name of Employee: RONALDO A. POZON, PhD., CESO V Name of Rater: May Batenga-Eclar, PhD., CESO III
Position: Schools Division Superintendent Position: Regional Director
Review Period: January-December 2021 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality Efficiency Timeliness

STRATEGIC (Please
MANAGEMENT AND Shall have . . . indicate the 30%
OPERATIONS target date.)

Annual 1.led in the development of Division January - 5% 5- 100% of the 5 - Utilized 100% of Accomplishmen
Implementation Education Development Plan (DEDP) February 2021 AIP and the approved t of Targets
Plan, Work and and operational plans for the schools operational plans working budget
Financial Plan division office and schools were developed and
implemented.

4- 92%-99% of the 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


AIP and of the approved objective within
operational plans working budget one (1) working
were developed day after the
implemented. target date
Annual 1.led in the development of Division
Implementation Education Development Plan (DEDP)
Plan, Work and and operational plans for the schools
Financial Plan division office and schools

Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality
3- 84-91% Efficiency
of the 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Timeliness
Attained the
AIP and 91% of the approved objective within
operational plans working budget two (2) working
were developed and days after the
implemented target date

2- 76%-83% of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


AIP and 83% of the approved objective within
operational plans working budget three (3)
were developed and working days
implemented. after the target
date

1- 75% and below 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


of of the AIP and and below of the objective within
operational plans approved working four (4)
were developed and budget working days
implemented . after the target
date

Agency Performance 2. led in the implementation of January - 5% 5- 100% of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
Report (Annual policies, research agenda, programs, December policies, research the approved objective within
Report based on projects and activities anchored on 2021 agenda and PPAs working budget the target date
PREXC) evidence-based planning under PREXC were
implemented and
accomplished
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE
2. led in the implementation of
policies, research agenda, programs,
TO activities
projects and BE FILLED IN DURING
anchored on PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
evidence-based planning
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Qualityof the 4 - Utilized
4- 92%-99% Efficiency
92-99% 4- Timeliness
Attained the
policies, research of the approved objective within
agenda and PPAs working budget one (1) working
in the developed day after the
DEDP were target date
implemented and
accomplihed

3-84-91%of the 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Attained the


policies, research 91% of the approved objective within
agenda and PPAs working budget two (2) working
in the developed days after the
DEDP were target date
implemented and
accomplished

2- 76%-83%of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


policies, research 83% of the approved objective within
agenda and PPAs working budget three (3)
in the developed working days
DEDP were after the target
implemented and date
accomplished

1-75% and below 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


of the policies, and below of the objective within
research agenda approved working four (4)
and PPAs in the budget working days
developed DEDP after the target
were implemented date
and accomplished
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality 3. led in the sustainability of quality April to 5% Quality
5- 100% of the Efficiency
5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Timeliness
Attained the
Management management processes in the SDO December quality the approved objective within
Systems, Internal 2021 management working budget the target date
Surveillance Report processes were
sustained

4- 92%-99% of the 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


quality of the approved objective within
management working budget one (1) working
processes were day after the
sustained target date

3- 84-91% of the 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Attained the


quality 91% of the approved objective within
management working budget two (2) working
processes were days after the
sustained target date

2- 76%-83% of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


quality 83% of the approved objective within
management working budget three (3)
processes were working days
sustained after the target
date

1- 75% and below 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


of the quality and below of the objective within
management approved working four (4)
processes were budget working days
sustained after the target
date
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Updated PMIS, 4. overseen the operationalization of January to 5% Quality
5- 100% of the Efficiency
5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Timeliness
Attained the
EBEIS, PSIPOP and the Management Information Systems December Management the approved objective within
other information (MIS) 2021 Information working budget the target date
systems Systems (MIS) were
updated

4- 92%-99% of the 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


Management of the approved objective within
Information working budget one (1) working
Systems (MIS) were day after the
updated target date

3- 84-91% of the 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Attained the


Management 91% of the approved objective within
Information working budget two (2) working
Systems (MIS) were days after the
updated target date

2- 76%-83% of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


Management 83% of the approved objective within
Information working budget three (3)
Systems (MIS) were working days
updated after the target
date
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
1- 75%Quality
and below Efficiency
1 - Utilized 75% 1- Timeliness
Attained the
of the Management and below of the objective within
Information approved working four (4)
Systems (MIS) were budget working days
updated after the target
date

Division TA Plan 5. ensured coordination with Division January to 5% 5- 100% of the TA 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
Field Technical Assistance Team December plan was the approved objective within
(DFTAT) for the provision of 2021 implemented working budget the target date
technical assistance for the division
and schools

4- 92%-99% of the 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


TA plan was of the approved objective within
implemented working budget one (1) working
day after the
target date

3- 84-91% of the 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Attained the


TA plan was 91% of the approved objective within
implemented working budget two (2) working
days after the
target date

2-76%-83% of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


TA plan was 83% of the approved objective within
implemented working budget three (3)
working days
after the target
date
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
1-75%Quality
and below Efficiency
1 - Utilized 75% 1- Timeliness
Attained the
of the TA Plan was and below of the objective within
implemented approved working four (4)
budget working days
after the target
date

Improved SBM 6. led the schools in ensuring October to 5% 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
Level of Practice compliance to standards December 5 - 25% increase in the approved objective within
2021 the no. of Schools working budget the target date
with improved
SBM level of
practice compared
to last year

4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


4 - 20% increase in of the approved objective within
the no. of Schools working budget one (1) working
with improved day after the
SBM level of target date
practice compared
to last year

3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Attained the


3 - 15% increase in 91% of the approved objective within
the no. of Schools working budget two (2) working
with improved days after the
SBM level of target date
practice compared
to last year
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality Efficiency
2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Timeliness
Attained the
2 - 10% increase
83% of the approved objective within
in the no. of
working budget three (3)
Schools with
working days
improved SBM
after the target
level of practice
date
compared to last
year

1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


1 - 5% increase in and below of the objective within
the no. of Schools approved working four (4)
with improved budget working days
SBM level of after the target
practice compared date
to last year

Curriculum and
Instruction 25%
Management
Division Basic 1. led in the general supervision over January to 10% 5- 100% of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
Education Learning basic education in managing December PAPs in the BELCP the approved objective within
Continuity Plan programs for curriculum 2021 were implemented working budget the target date
(Updated) implementation, localization of
curricula, and learning delivery

4- 92%-99%of the 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


PAPs in the BELCP of the approved objective within
were implemented working budget one (1) working
day after the
target date
Division Basic
Education Learning
Continuity Plan
(Updated)

Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality
3- 84-91% of the Efficiency
3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Timeliness
Attained the
PAPs in the BELCP 91% of the approved objective within
were implemented working budget two (2) working
days after the
target date

2- 76%-83%of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


PAPs in the BELCP 83% of the approved objective within
were implemented working budget three (3)
working days
after the target
date

1- 75% and below 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


of the PAPs in the and below of the objective within
BELCP were approved working four (4)
implemented budget working days
after the target
date

Developed and 2. led and managed the development January to 10% 5- 100% out of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
quality assured of local curriculum materials December 1,596 target local the approved objective within
contextualized 2021 curriclum working budget the target date
Learning materials materials were
developed

4- 92-99% of the 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


1,596 target local of the approved objective within
curriclum working budget one (1) working
materials were day after the
developed target date
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality
3-84-91% of the Efficiency
3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Timeliness
Attained the
1,596 target local 91% of the approved objective within
curriclum working budget two (2) working
materials were days after the
developed target date

2-76-83% of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


1,596 target local 83% of the approved objective within
curriclum working budget three (3)
materials were working days
developed after the target
date

1- 75% and below 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


of the 1,596 target and below of the objective within
local curriclum approved working four (4)
materials were budget working days
developed after the target
date

Contextualized 3. led in the development of March 2021, 5% 5- 374 out of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
learning contextualized assessment tools to May 2021 , 374 target the approved objective within
assessment tools measure learners' achievement July 2021 contextualized working budget the target date
First Quarter learning
Test for assessment tools
SY2021-2022 were developed
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE
Contextualized 3. led in the development of
learning contextualized assessment tools to
assessment tools TO BE FILLED
measure learners' IN DURING PLANNING
achievement TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
4- 344Quality Efficiency
- 370 out of 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Timeliness
Attained the
the 374 target of the approved objective within
contextualized working budget one (1) working
learning day after the
assessment tools target date
were developed

3- 314 - 340 out 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Attained the


of the 374 target 91% of the approved objective within
contextualized working budget two (2) working
learning days after the
assessment tools target date
were developed

2. 284 - 310 out of 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


the 374 target 83% of the approved objective within
contextualized working budget three (3)
learning working days
assessment tools after the target
were developed date

1- 280 and below 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


out of the 374 and below of the objective within
target approved working four (4)
contextualized budget working days
learning after the target
assessment tools date
were developed
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Human Resource Development and Quality Efficiency Timeliness
20%
Management
Report on Number 1. a. overseen adherence to the 2% 5 - 100% of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
of written existing policies and guidelines on complaints/cases the approved objective within
Complaints acted recruitment selection, placement and received were acted working budget the target date
upon promotion/reclassification on upon
teaching, teaching-related and non-
teaching personnel including
personnel actions and acted upon on
complaints brought to the office
4 - 92% to 99% of 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the
relative to the aforementioned.
the of the approved objective within
complaints/cases working budget one (1) working
received were acted day after the
upon target date

3 -84%-91% of the 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Attained the


complaints/cases 91% of the approved objective within
received were acted working budget two (2) working
upon days after the
target date

2 - 76 to 93% of 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


the 83% of the approved objective within
complaints/cases working budget three (3)
received were acted working days
upon after the target
date
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
1 - 75%Quality
and below Efficiency
1 - Utilized 75% 1- Timeliness
Attained the
of the and below of the objective within
complaints/cases approved working four (4)
received were acted budget working days
upon after the target
date

Human Resource 2. spearheaded in the implementation January to 5% 5-100% of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
Management of the approved Professional December PPAs in the the approved objective within
Development Plan Development Plan for teachers, school 2021 Professional working budget the target date
leaders and non-teaching personnel in Development Plan
accordance with the procedures and were implemented
standards of the Learning and
Development System.
4- 92%-99%of the 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the
PPAs in the of the approved objective within
Professional working budget one (1) working
Development Plan day after the
were implemented target date

3- 84-91%of the 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Attained the


PPAs in the 91% of the approved objective within
Professional working budget two (2) working
Development Plan days after the
were implemented target date

2 -76%-83%of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


PPAs in the 83% of the approved objective within
Professional working budget three (3)
Development Plan working days
were implemented after the target
date
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
1- 75%Quality
and below Efficiency
1 - Utilized 75% 1- Timeliness
Attained the
of the PPAs in the and below of the objective within
Professional approved working four (4)
Development Plan budget working days
were implemented after the target
date

CSC PRIME HRM 3. managed the development and January to 5% 5- 100% of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
Recognition implementation of the performance December PPAs under the approved objective within
management, rewards and 2021 performance working budget the target date
recognition, employees welfare, and management,
succession and exit programs. rewards and
recognition,
employees welfare,
and succession
and exit were
implemeted (4
pillars)

4- 92%-99%of the 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


PPAs under of the approved objective within
performance working budget one (1) working
management, day after the
rewards and target date
recognition,
employees welfare,
and succession
and exit were
implemeted
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Qualitythe
3- 84-91%of Efficiency
3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Timeliness
Attained the
PPAs under 91% of the approved objective within
performance working budget two (2) working
management, days after the
rewards and target date
recognition,
employees welfare,
and succession
and exit were
implemeted

2- 76%-83% of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


PPAs under 83% of the approved objective within
performance working budget three (3)
management, working days
rewards and after the target
recognition, date
employees welfare,
and succession
and exit were
implemeted
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
1- 75%Quality
and below Efficiency
1 - Utilized 75% 1- Timeliness
Attained the
of the PPAs under and below of the objective within
performance approved working four (4)
management, budget working days
rewards and after the target
recognition, date
employees welfare,
and succession
and exit were
implemeted

Competent 4. led in the Professional 5- 100% of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
Employees Development of the employees within employees were the approved objective within
area of jurisdiction provided with L&D working budget the target date
3% opportunity

4 - 92%-99% of 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


the employees were of the approved objective within
provided with L& working budget one (1) working
D opportunity day after the
target date

3 - 84-91% of the 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Attained the


employees were 91% of the approved objective within
provided with L& working budget two (2) working
D opportunity days after the
target date
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality
2 - 76-83% of the Efficiency
2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Timeliness
Attained the
employees were 83% of the approved objective within
provided with L& working budget three (3)
D opportunity working days
after the target
date
1 - 75% and below 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the
of the employees and below of the objective within
were provided with approved working four (4)
L& D opportunities budget working days
after the target
date

Filled Up Positions 5.a. ensured that recruitment, April 2021 to a. 5 -100% of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
selection and placement is December allocated and the approved objective within
implemented effectively and efficiently 2021 vacant items were working budget the target date
2% filled-up.

4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


4 -92%-99% of the of the approved objective within
allocated and working budget one (1) working
vacant items were day after the
filled-up. target date

3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Attained the


3-84-91% of the 91% of the approved objective within
allocated and working budget two (2) working
vacant items were days after the
filled-up. target date
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality Efficiency
2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Timeliness
Attained the
2-76%-83% of the 83% of the approved objective within
allocated and working budget three (3)
vacant items were working days
filled-up. after the target
date

1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


1 -75% and below and below of the objective within
of the allocated approved working four (4)
and vacant items budget working days
were filled-up. after the target
date

Resource
15%
Management
Report on Equitable 1. led in budget preparation and January to 5% 5 - 100% of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
Budget Allocation equitable allocation of funds and December functional the approved objective within
resources at Division Office, Schools 2021 divisions and working budget the target date
and Learning Centers schools were given
equitable allocation
of funds and
resources

4 -92%-99%of the 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


functional of the approved objective within
divisions and working budget one (1) working
schools were given day after the
equitable allocation target date
of funds and
resources
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality
3 -84-91% of the Efficiency
3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Timeliness
Attained the
functional 91% of the approved objective within
divisions and working budget two (2) working
schools were given days after the
equitable allocation target date
of funds and
resources

2 - 76%-83%of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


functional 83% of the approved objective within
divisions and working budget three (3)
schools were given working days
equitable allocation after the target
of funds and date
resources

1 - 75% and below 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


of the functional and below of the objective within
divisions and approved working four (4)
schools were given budget working days
equitable allocation after the target
of funds and date
resources

BFARS, Financial 2. supervised the division office January to 5% 5- 99%-100% of 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
Statements management with economical, December the financial the approved objective within
(monthly, quarterly) efficient, and effective accounting and 2021 resources were working budget the target date
budgeting services to ensure the cost- utilized
effective utilization of financial
resources
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION


2. supervised the division office
management with economical,
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) efficient, andOBJECTIVES
effective accounting and TIMELINE Average
budgeting services to ensure the cost- per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
effective utilization of financial
Q E T
resources
Qualityof the 4 - Utilized
4- 97%-98% Efficiency
92-99% 4- Timeliness
Attained the
financial resources of the approved objective within
were utilized working budget one (1) working
day after the
target date

3- 95%-96% of the 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Attained the


financial resources 91% of the approved objective within
were utilized working budget two (2) working
days after the
target date

2- 93%-94% of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


financial resources 83% of the approved objective within
were utilized working budget three (3)
working days
after the target
date

1-92% and below 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


of the financial and below of the objective within
resources were approved working four (4)
utilized budget working days
after the target
date
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
SEF Annual 3. led in the preparation and January to 5% Quality
5- 100% of the Efficiency
5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Timeliness
Attained the
Budget, quarterly recommended approval of budgets of December PPAs in the the approved objective within
SEF Utilization schools and all learning centers within 2021 Division Annual working budget the target date
report the Division to the provincial/city Implementation
board after conferring with them on Plan included in
matters affecting school the SEF budget
appropriations and disbursements were implemented.

4- 92%-99% of 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


the PPAs in the of the approved objective within
Division Annual working budget one (1) working
Implementation day after the
Plan included in target date
the SEF budget
were implemented.
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality
3- 84-91% Efficiency
of the 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Timeliness
Attained the
PPAs in the 91% of the approved objective within
Division Annual working budget two (2) working
Implementation days after the
Plan included in target date
the SEF budget
were implemented.

2-76%-83% of 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


the PPAs in the 83% of the approved objective within
Division Annual working budget three (3)
Implementation working days
Plan included in after the target
the SEF budget date
were implemented.
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
1- 75%Quality
and below Efficiency
1 - Utilized 75% 1- Timeliness
Attained the
of the PPAs in the and below of the objective within
Division Annual approved working four (4)
Implementation budget working days
Plan included in after the target
the SEF budget date
were implemented.

Partnership and 10%


Linkages
Inventory of 1. Led in the generation of additional January to 5% 5- 100% of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
Donations resources based on the needs of December identified school the approved objective within
schools through partnership and 2021 needs were working budget the target date
linkages addresed through
partnerships

4- 92%-99% of the 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


identified school of the approved objective within
needs were working budget one (1) working
addresed through day after the
partnerships target date
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality
3-84-91% of the Efficiency
3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Timeliness
Attained the
identified school 91% of the approved objective within
needs were working budget two (2) working
addresed through days after the
partnerships target date

2-76%-83% of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


identified school 83% of the approved objective within
needs were working budget three (3)
addresed through working days
partnerships after the target
date

1- 75% and below 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


of the identified and below of the objective within
school needs were approved working four (4)
addresed through budget working days
partnerships after the target
date

List of Partnerships 2. spearheaded partnerships and January to 5- At least 5 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
linkages with local government units, December partnerships were the approved objective within
non-government organizations, and 2021 3% established working budget the target date
other agencies/stakeholders
on matters affecting schools/LCs and
certain community development 4- At least 4 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the
projects; partnerships were of the approved objective within
established working budget one (1) working
day after the
target date
2. spearheaded partnerships and
linkages with local government units,
non-government organizations, and
other agencies/stakeholders
on matters affecting schools/LCs and
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE
certain community development
projects;
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality
3- At least 3 Efficiency
3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Timeliness
Attained the
partnerships were 91% of the approved objective within
established working budget two (2) working
days after the
target date

2- At least 2 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


partnerships were 83% of the approved objective within
established working budget three (3)
working days
after the target
date

1- At least 1 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


partnerships was and below of the objective within
established approved working four (4)
budget working days
after the target
date

List of Sustained 3. ensured sustainabillity of existing January to 5- At least 5 of the 5 - Utilized 100% of 5- Attained the
partnerships partnership December exisitng the approved objective within
2021 2% partnerships were working budget the target date
sustained

4- At least 4 of the 4 - Utilized 92-99% 4- Attained the


exisitng of the approved objective within
partnerships were working budget one (1) working
sustained day after the
target date
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSDO TARLAC PROVINCE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Average
per KRA Timeliness) RESULTS
Rating
Q E T
Quality
3- At least Efficiency
3 of the 3 - Utilized 84%- 3- Timeliness
Attained the
exisitng 91% of the approved objective within
partnerships were working budget two (2) working
sustained days after the
target date

2- At least 2 of the 2 - Utilized 76%- 2- Attained the


exisitng 83% of the approved objective within
partnerships were working budget three (3)
sustained working days
after the target
date

1- At least 1 of 1 - Utilized 75% 1- Attained the


the exisitng and below of the objective within
partnerships were approved working four (4)
sustained budget working days
after the target
date

TOTAL 100%
Overall Rating for Accomplishment

Ratee: Recommending Approval: Approval:

RONALDO A. POZON, Ph.D., CESO V RHODA T. RAZON PhD, CESO V MAY B. ECLAR , PhD., CESO III
Schools Division Superintendent Assistant Regional Director Regional Director

PPRD01/pprd05
01

sion 01

Err:522

SCORE

Copies of : DEDP, AIP, Quarterly DMEA


Reportswith findings/ Analysis
SCORE

Copies of: Agency Performance Reports (APR)


submitted to DBM, Compendium of
Researches
Copies of: Agency Performance Reports (APR)
submitted to DBM, Compendium of
Researches

SCORE
SCORE

Updated Operation Manuals, Results of


Internal Quality Surveillance Team vis-a vis
Continuous Improvement Initiatives
SCORE

Updated PMIS ( quarterly online generation of


AR, ATC, Physical and Financial
Accomplishment Report), EBEIS, PSI-POP
SCORE
SCORE

List of Schools with SBM Level for 2020, and


List of Improved Schools validated by the
Division SBM Team, List of Schools Validted/
cetified by RO
SCORE

CID Supervisory Plan, M& E and


Accomplishment Reports, Division Basic
Education Learning Continuity Plan,
Innovations,
SCORE

Inventory or list of locally developed materials


and report on utilization
SCORE

List of Competencies, Validation Result of the


Tools, Pilot Testing
SCORE
SCORE

Inventory and Status of cases received and


action taken
SCORE

Copy of the SDS approved PD plan developed


by the HRMO, List of Learning Development
Activities conducted vis-à-vis training needs
analysis
SCORE

Mid and End of Year Performance Evaluation


( IPCR and OPCR Ratings) intervention plan
bridging performance gaps

copy of
rewards and recognition
SCORE
SCORE

Summary of performance ratings. TNA vis-a-


vis training conducted. List of trainings ( per
category: for SHs managerial/ leadership; for
non- teaching: technical skills ; for teaching:
pedagogical, technical..) and no.of employees
trained.Inventory of Employees and Trainings
Attended
SCORE

PSIPOP, Report of Filled and Unfilled


Positions
SCORE

Budget Proposal for the Fiscal year 2021


SCORE

Division Budget utilization Rate


SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE

Inventory of Needs and Resource Generated


SCORE

MOA/MOU
SCORE

MOA/MOU, list of projects


SCORE
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REGION 3
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TARLAC PROVINCE
San Roque, Tarlac City

Proposed Calibrated Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF) SY 2020 - 2021 ONLY
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
TO BE FILLED DURING
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES
per KRA
Quality Efficiency Timeliness

1. INSTRUCTIONAL 1. Improved teachers' instructional 10% 5- 90-100% level of accomplishment 5- Reports submitted before the Any 5 fom the following:
LEADERSHIP competence by conducting varied end each Quarter * Monthly Instructional
Instructional Supervision activities: Supervisory and TA plans and
4- 80-89% level of accomplishment 4- Reports submitted during the reports
a] conducted alternative classroom second week of the month * Performance Monitoring and
observations (as per approved LDM) Coaching Forms
* Approved class and teachers'
3- 70-79% level of accomplishment 3- Reports submitted during the programs
b] monitored Asst. Principals, Head third week of the month * Quarterly Reports on
Teachers, Master Teachers and Observations conducted using
TICs’ conduct of IS; COT
2- 60-69% level of accomplishment 2- Reports submitted during the * Quarterly and/or Monthly
c] checked of WHLP, activity plans, fourth week of the month Accomplishment Report – to be
assessment plans, etc. submitted to OASDS
1- 59% and below level of 1- Reports submitted during the
d] provided Technical Assistance accomplishment last day of the month
(remote, face to face, mentoring,
coaching, etc.)

e] Others

2. Ensured the full implementation 5% 5 - 16 IMs and Summary of ILMP 5 - Completed the target within the 5- Attained the objective one week * Certification of the use of the IM
of the articulated basic education approved working budget before the target date c/o principal
curriculum including its * List of IMs per learning area
contextualization, indigenization, * Consolidated list of Individual
and innovation by producing 16 4 - 14-15 IMs and Summary of ILMP 4 - Completed the target utilizing an 4- Attained the objective 3 days Learning Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
learning materials in the different additional 5% supplementary fund before the target date
learning areas/curricular/special
programs in the K to 12
3 - 12-13 IMs and Summary of ILMP 3 - Completed the target utilizing an 3- Attained the objective on the
additional 10% supplementary fund target date
of the articulated basic education c/o principal
curriculum including its * List of IMs per learning area
contextualization, indigenization, * Consolidated list of Individual
and innovation by producing 16 Learning Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
learning materials in the different
learning areas/curricular/special PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
programs in the K to 12 Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES
per KRA
Quality Efficiency Timeliness

2 - 10-11 IMs and Summary of ILMP 2 - Completed the target utilizing an 2- Attained the objective 3 days
additional 15% supplementary fund after the target date

1 - 0-9 IMs and Summary of ILMP 1 - Completed the target utilizing an 1- Attained the objective one week
additional 20% supplementary fund after the target date

3. Attained the .5% increase in the 5% 5 – Achieved .40% to .50% increase 5- Submitted test results on the * Consolidated reports on
general school average through the and above in the general school deadline achievement rate submitted to the
following interventions/ strategies/ average with approved AIP SGOD's School Management
activities: Monitoring and Evaluation Section
4 – Achieved .30% to .39% increase 4- Submitted test results 2 days (JHS and SHS)
a. remedial instruction in the general school average with after the deadline
b. differentiated instruction approved AIP * Approved AIP (with reflected
c. self-learning kit intervention/ strategies/ activities)
d. contextualized IMs
3 – Achieved .20% to .29% increase 3- Submitted test results 3 days
in the general school average with after the deadline
approved AIP

2 – Achieved .10% to .19% increase 2- Submitted test results 4 days


in the general school average with after the deadline
approved AIP

1 – Achieved below 0.10% increase in 1- Submitted test results 5 or


the general school average with more days after the deadline
approved AIP
Level of accomplishment = # of
learning areas targeted/
total # of
learning areas

2. LEARNING 1. Provided healthy, safe, child- 10% 5 - 5 programs implemented 5 - Completed the target within the 5 - Attained the objective on the * Approved Plans
ENVIRONMENT friendly, gender-sensitive and approved working budget target date a. SCPP
motivating environment for learners b. GAD
by implementing 100% of the 4 - 4 programs implemented 4 - Completed the target utilizing an 4 - Attained the objective 3 days c. SDRRM
programs, projects, and activities additional 5% supplementary fund after the target date d. OK sa DepEd (any 2)
enumerated in the following plans: * Accomplishment Reports
a. School Child Protection Plan 3 - 3 programs implemented 3 - Completed the target utilizing an 3 - Attained the objective one
(SCPP) additional 10% supplementary fund week after the target date
b. Gender and Development (GAD)
Plan
c. School Disaster Risk Reduction 2 - 2 programs implemented 2 - Completed the target utilizing an 2 - Attained the objective two
Management (SDRRM) and/or additional 15% supplementary fund weeks after the target date
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA)
Plan
d. Oplan Kalusugan (OK) sa DepEd
(at least 2 programs; e.g. Feeding
Program, WINS, NDEP, Adolescent
Reproductive Health Program,
Medical, Dental and Nursing
Services)
motivating environment for learners b. GAD
by implementing 100% of the c. SDRRM
programs, projects, and activities d. OK sa DepEd (any 2)
enumerated in the following plans: * Accomplishment Reports
a. School Child Protection Plan
(SCPP)
b. Gender and Development (GAD) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Plan Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES
c. School Disaster Risk Reduction per KRA
Management (SDRRM) and/or Quality Efficiency Timeliness
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA)
Plan 1 - 1 program implemented 1 - Completed the target utilizing an 1 - Attained the objective three
d. Oplan Kalusugan (OK) sa DepEd additional 20% supplementary fund weeks after the target date
(at least 2 programs; e.g. Feeding
Program, WINS, NDEP, Adolescent
Reproductive Health Program,
Medical, Dental and Nursing
Services)

2. Ensured a child-friendly environment by 5% 5 - 35 or higher (Very Outstanding) 5 - Completed the target within the 5 - Attained the objective on the * Child-Friendly School Report
scoring 35 points or higher in the Child- approved working budget target date a. CFSS Tool
Friendly School System b. Accomplishment Report per
goal
- Child-Friendly School Report 4 - 30-35 (Outstanding) 4 - Completed the target utilizing an 4 - Attained the objective 3 days * Validated Report by the Cluster CFSS
a. CFSS Tool additional 5% supplementary fund after the target date Team
b. Accomplishment Report per - Report
goal - Certification on score obtained
- Validated Report by the Cluster CFSS 3 - 25-29 (Child-friendly) 3 - Completed the target utilizing an 3 - Attained the objective one
Team additional 10% supplementary fund week after the target date
- Report
- Certification on score obtained
2 - 20-24 (Striving) 2 - Completed the target utilizing an 2 - Attained the objective two
additional 15% supplementary fund weeks after the target date

1 - below 20 (Not Child-friendly) 1 - Completed the target utilizing an 1 - Attained the objective three
additional 20% supplementary fund weeks after the target date

3. Ensured a safe school learning 5% 5 - Evaluated by the specialists 5 - Completed the target within the 5 - Attained target within first * Certification of the specialist on
environment by evaluating and (municipal engineer, Head of the approved working budget semester of SY the evaluation and assessment of
inspecting the school plant, MDRRMC or other licensed school plant and facilities
physical facilities fitness, safety, professional who perform such * NSBI report
and sufficiency with the assistance function) * Site Development Plan
of a specialist annually

4 - Evaluated by DepEd Engineer 4 - Completed the target utilizing an 4 - Attained target within 3rd
additional 5% supplementary fund quarter of SY

3 - Evaluated by supervisors 3 - Completed the target utilizing an 3 - Attained target on January


additional 10% supplementary fund 2019

2 - Evaluated by teachers 2 - Completed the target utilizing an 2 - Attained target on February


additional 15% supplementary fund 2019
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES
per KRA
Quality Efficiency Timeliness

1 - Evaluated by others 1 - Completed the target utilizing an 1 - Attained target on March 2019
additional 20% supplementary fund

3. PARENTS' 1. Improved parents' attendance, 10% 5 - Achieved 75% and above parents’ 5 - Completed the target within the 5 - Conducted 5 meetings and Narrative report on parents’
INVOLVEMENT participation, and involvement in attendance approved working budget activities with parents involvement in the SLMs’
AND COMMUNITY school activities Distribution and Retrieval and
PARTNERSHIP 4 - Achieved 60-74% parents’ 4 - Completed the target utilizing an 4 - Conducted 4 meetings and other related activities
attendance additional 5% supplementary fund activities with parents

3 - Achieved 50-69% parents’ 3 - Completed the target utilizing an 3 - Conducted 3 meetings and
attendance additional 10% supplementary fund activities with parents

2 - Achieved 30-49% parents’ 2 - Completed the target utilizing an 2 - Conducted 2 meetings and
attendance additional 15% supplementary fund activities with parents

1 - 29% and below 1 - Completed the target utilizing an 1 - Conducted 1 meeting and
additional 20% supplementary fund activity with parents

2. Enhanced stakeholders' 5% 5 - 5 projects implemented 5 - Completed the target within the 5 - Accomplished the target as * Adopt-a-School Report
involvement in school improvement approved working budget specified in the plan * Accomplishment Report
by designing and implementing five * MOA/MOU of Projects
projects to address school needs 4 - 4 projects implemented 4 - Completed the target utilizing an 4 - Accomplished the target but Implemented
additional 5% supplementary fund one month late * Financial Report

Sample Projects
3 - 3 projects implemented 3 - Completed the target utilizing an 3 - Accomplished the target but Feeding Program
additional 10% supplementary fund two months late Brigada Eskwela Plus
Medical and dental
2 - 2 projects implemented 2 - Completed the target utilizing an 2 - Accomplished the target but Clean and Green
additional 15% supplementary fund three months late Repairs
Homeroom projects
Others
1 - 1 project implemented 1 - Completed the target utilizing an 1 - Accomplished the target but
additional 20% supplementary fund four or more months late

3. Strengthened stakeholders' 5% 5 - 85-100% of stakeholders are 5 - Completed the target within the 5 - Accomplished the objectives as * List of generated supports from
involvement and community recognized approved working budget specified in the plan Stakeholders
partnership by recognizing their * Attendance sheet
accomplishments and contributions * List of stakeholders to be
annually 4 - 71-84% of stakeholders are 4 - Completed the target utilizing an 4 - Accomplished the objectives recognized
recognized additional 5% supplementary fund one month after the target date * Certificate of Recognition

3 - 65-74% of stakeholders are 3 - Completed the target utilizing an 3 - Accomplished the objectives
recognized additional 10% supplementary fund two months after the target date

2 - 51-64% of stakeholders are 2 - Completed the target utilizing an 2 - Accomplished the objectives
recognized additional 15% supplementary fund three months after the target date
partnership by recognizing their * Attendance sheet
accomplishments and contributions * List of stakeholders to be
annually recognized
* Certificate of Recognition

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)


Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES
per KRA
Quality Efficiency Timeliness

1 - 50% and below of stakeholders 1 - Completed the target utilizing an 1 - Accomplished the objectives
are recognized additional 20% supplementary fund four months after the target date

4.HUMAN 1. Enhanced the level of 10% 5 – Encouraged and supported the 5 - Completed the target within the 5 - Accomplished the objectives as Any 5 from the following
RESOURCE competence of all school personnel teaching and non-teaching personnel approved working budget specified in the plan * Work plan
MANAGEMENT through the implementation of the through the implementation of 100% * Accomplishment Reports
AND 100% of programs, projects, and of the PPAs enumerated in the
DEVELOPMENT activities enumerated in the School School Plan/ LCP / AIP
Plan/ Learning Continuity Plan / * Minutes of Meetings
Annual Improvement Plan (AIP)
4– Encouraged and supported the 4 - Completed the target utilizing an 4 - Accomplished the objectives 1 * Teachers’ Developmental Plans
teaching and non-teaching personnel additional 5% day after the target date * Approved School Development
through the implementation of 90- suplementary fund Plan (SDP)
99% of the PPAs enumerated in the * Approved Annual/Monthly
School Plan/ LCP / AIP Learning Action Cell (LAC) Plan

3– Encouraged and supported the 3 - Completed the target utilizing an 3 - Accomplished the objectives 1 * Approved LCP
teaching and non-teaching personnel additional 10% supplementary fund week after the target date * Approved INSET
through the implementation of 80- * Training Proposal/Matrix/ AR/
89% of the PPAs enumerated in the SOB/ Evaluation/Certificate of
School Plan/ LCP / AIP Participation

2 – Encouraged and supported the 2 - Completed the target utilizing an 2 - Accomplished the objectives 1
teaching and non-teaching personnel additional 15% supplementary fund month after the target date
through the implementation of 70-
79% of the PPAs enumerated in the
School Plan/ LCP / AIP

1 – Encouraged and supported the 1 - Completed the target utilizing an 1 - Accomplished the objectives
teaching and non-teaching personnel additional 20% supplementary fund within the year
through the implementation of 60-
69% of the PPAs enumerated in the
School Plan/ LCP / AIP

2. Energized and boosted the 5% 5 - Attained 100% level of 5 - Accomplished 5 and above tasks Any 2 from the following
morale of teachers by implementing accomplishment with MOV either same or combination * School memo on Ranking
PPAs on their welfare and thereof. * Transmittal to DO of Ranking
institutionalizing rewards systems 4 - Attained 80-99% level of 4 - Accomplished 4 tasks with MOV
as follows: accomplishment either same or combinationthereof. * Teachers’ Awards
a. Recommending for upgrading of * Number of processed documents
positions (ERF) 3 - Attained 70-79% level of 3 - Accomplished 3 tasks with MOV for upgrading/
accomplishment either same or combinationthereof. reclassification/promotion (if
b. Recommending for applicable)
reclassification of positions
2 - Attained 60-69 level of 2 - Accomplished 2 tasks with MOV
c. Assisting for promotions accomplishment either same or combinationthereof.

d. Awards and incentives for


personnel
e. Updating of PSIPOP
f. Teachers’ Welfare Program
PPAs on their welfare and * Transmittal to DO of Ranking
institutionalizing rewards systems
as follows: * Teachers’ Awards
a. Recommending for upgrading of * Number of processed documents
positions (ERF) for upgrading/
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) reclassification/promotion (if
b. Recommending for Weight applicable)
KRAs OBJECTIVES
reclassification of positions per KRA
Quality Efficiency Timeliness
c. Assisting for promotions

d. Awards and incentives for 1 - Attained 50-59% level of 1 - Accomplished 1 tasks with MOV
personnel accomplishment either same or combinationthereof.
e. Updating of PSIPOP
f. Teachers’ Welfare Program
3. Developed and applied Support 5% 5 - Attained 100% level of 5 - Attained the objective on the Any 2 of the following
Succession Strategy + Team Leadership + accomplishment target date * School Memorandum
(3S + T Leadership) by: * Certificate of Participation
a. Participating in programs and trainings * Accomplishment Reports
on Values-Based Leadership/Strategic and 4 - Attained 80-99% level of 4 - Attained the objective 1-2 days * Copies of reflections on books read
Innovation and others accomplishment after the target date * Articles on Leadership
b. Transformational Leadership Program
c. Reflections on books on leadership read
d. Published articles on Leadership 3 - Attained 70-79% level of 3 - Attained the objective 3-4 days
accomplishment after the target date

2 - Attained 60-69% level of 2 - Attained the objective 5-6 days


accomplishment after the target date

1 - Attained 50-59% level of 1 - Attained the objective 7-8 days


accomplishment after the target date

5. SCHOOL For non-implementing units: 10% 5 - 100% accurate 5 - On time submission For implementing units:
LEADERSHIP, 1. Liquidated 100% of MOOE Documents prepared by ADASs
4 - 90% accurate 4 - 3 days late
MANAGEMENT accurately and on time and
late
AND complied with: For non-implementing units:
OPERATIONS 3 - 80% accurate 3 - 5 days late Documents prepared by ADASs or
a. Improved submission of documents prepared and
liquidation reports through 2 - 70 % accurate 2 - 1 week late submitted by school heads
systematic recording and reporting
of the agency financial and physical
operations
1 - 60% and below 1 - more than 1 week

2. Improved the level of clientele's 5% 5 - Adhered to 9-10 policies 5 - Accomplished the objectives as * Accomplishment Reports
satisfaction by adhering to RA 9485 specified in the plan * Documentation on adherence to
- Anti Red Tape Act (ARTA) and ARTA and QMS
Quality Management System (QMS)
a. No Collection Policy
b. Updated Transparency Board
c. Reporting of School's
Accomplished PPAs
d. No Noon Break Policy
e. Following the Citizen's Charter
f. Help Desks or Public Assistance
Desks
g. Suggestion Box and Surveys
h. Wearing of IDs or nameplates
i. Monitoring of Attendance of
Personnel (Google Sheet and
Printed DTR Form)
j. QMS (implementation of 5S,
documentation of processes)
2. Improved the level of clientele's 5% * Accomplishment Reports
satisfaction by adhering to RA 9485 * Documentation on adherence to
- Anti Red Tape Act (ARTA) and ARTA and QMS
Quality Management System (QMS)
a. No Collection Policy PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
b. Updated OBJECTIVES
Transparency Board Weight
KRAs
c. Reporting of School's per KRA
Accomplished PPAs Quality Efficiency Timeliness
d. No Noon Break Policy
e. Following the Citizen's Charter 4 - Accomplished the objectives
f. Help Desks or Public Assistance 4 - Adhered to 7-8 policies one month after the target date
Desks
g. Suggestion Box and Surveys
h. Wearing of IDs or nameplates
i. Monitoring of Attendance of 3 - Accomplished the objectives
3 - Adhered to 5-6 policies two months after the target date
Personnel (Google Sheet and
Printed DTR Form)
j. QMS (implementation of 5S, 2 - Accomplished the objectives
documentation of processes) 2 - Adhered to 3-4 policies
three months after the target date

1 - Accomplished the objectives


1 - Adhered to 1-2 policies four months after the target date

3. Attained 100% completion of the encoding of 5% 5 - 100% encoded 5 - Complied within the deadline * Screenshot of LIS & EBEIS updating
learners' profile in the LIS and school data in the 4 - 80-99% encoded 4 - Complied 3 days after the deadline * LIS report
EBEIS during the beginning of school year * EBEIS report
(BOSY) and end of school year (EOSY)
3 - 60-79% encoded 3 - Complied 5 days after the deadline
2 - 40-59% encoded 2 - Complied 1 week after the deadline
1 - 20-39% encoded 1 - Complied more than 1 week after the
deadline

TOTAL 100%
Overall Rating for Accomplishment

Ratee: Recommending Approval: Approval:

Schools Division
School Principal Asst. Schools Division Superintendent Superintendent

PPRD01/pprd05
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REGION 3
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TARLAC PROVINCE
San Roque, Tarlac City

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF) SY 2020 - 2021


Name of Employee: POCHOLO N. CASTANEDA Name of Rater: MARIA CELINA L VEGA, CESE
Position: SCHOOL PRINCIPAL 1 Position: ASSISTANT SCHOOLOS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
Review Period: OCTOBER 2020 - JULY 2021 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DOCLONG 1ST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND DON CESAR ABAD GUALBERTO MULTIGRADE SCHOOL DOCLONG 1ST ELEMENTARY SC

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL


Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

1. INSTRUCTIONAL 1. Improved teachers' instructional September 10% 5- 90-100% level of 5- Reports


LEADERSHIP competence by conducting varied 2020 July accomplishment submitted
Instructional Supervision activities: 2021 before the end 5 4 4.5 0.450
each Quarter
a] conducted alternative classroom
observations (as per approved LDM) 4- 80-89% level of 4- Reports
accomplishment submitted
during the
b] monitored Asst. Principals, Head second week of
Teachers, Master Teachers and TICs’ the month
conduct of IS;
3- 70-79% level of 3- Reports
c] checked of WHLP, activity plans, accomplishment submitted
assessment plans, etc. during the third
week of the
d] provided Technical Assistance month
(remote, face to face, mentoring, 2- 60-69% level of 2- Reports
coaching, etc.) accomplishment submitted
during the
e] Others fourth week of
the month
1- 59% and below 1- Reports
level of submitted
accomplishment during the last
day of the
month
2. Ensured the full implementation of September 5% 5 - 16 IMs and 5 - Completed the 5- Attained the
the articulated basic education 2020 July Summary of ILMP target within the objective one
curriculum including its 2021 approved working week before the 5 5 5 5 0.250
contextualization, indigenization, and budget target date
innovation by producing 16 learning
materials in the different learning
areas/curricular/special programs in 4 - 14-15 IMs and 4 - Completed the 4- Attained the
the K to 12 Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective 3 days
additional 5% before the target
supplementary fund date
2. Ensured the full implementation of September 5%
the articulated basic education 2020 July
curriculum including its 2021
contextualization, indigenization, and
innovation by producing 16 learning
materials in the different learning
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
areas/curricular/special programs in
Timeliness) RESULTS
the K to 12 Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

3 - 12-13 IMs and 3 - Completed the 3- Attained the


Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective on the
additional 10% target date
supplementary fund

2 - 10-11 IMs and 2 - Completed the 2- Attained the


Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective 3 days
additional 15% after the target
supplementary fund date

1 - 0-9 IMs and 1 - Completed the 1- Attained the


Summary of ILMP target utilizing an objective one
additional 20% week after the
supplementary fund target date

3. Attained the .5% increase in the September 5% 5 – Achieved .40% 5- Submitted


general school average through the 2020 July to .50% increase test results on
following interventions/ strategies/ 2021 and above in the the deadline
activities: general school 4 4 4 0.200
average with
a. remedial instruction approved AIP
b. differentiated instruction
c. self-learning kit 4 – Achieved .30% 4- Submitted
d. contextualized IMs to .39% increase in test results 2
the general school days after the
average with deadline
approved AIP

3 – Achieved .20% 3- Submitted


to .29% increase in test results 3
the general school days after the
average with deadline
approved AIP

2 – Achieved .10% 2- Submitted


to .19% increase in test results 4
the general school days after the
average with deadline
approved AIP

1 – Achieved below 1- Submitted


0.10% increase in test results 5 or
the general school more days after
average with the deadline
approved AIP
Level of
accomplishment
= # of learning
areas targeted/

total
# of learning
areas
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

2. LEARNING 1. Provided healthy, safe, child- September 10% 5 - 5 programs 5 - Completed the 5 - Attained the
ENVIRONMENT friendly, gender-sensitive and 2020 July implemented target within the objective on the
motivating environment for learners 2021 approved working target date 5 5 5 5 0.500
by implementing 100% of the budget
programs, projects, and activities
enumerated in the following plans:
a. School Child Protection Plan (SCPP) 4 - 4 programs 4 - Completed the 4 - Attained the
b. Gender and Development (GAD) implemented target utilizing an objective 3 days
Plan additional 5% after the target
c. School Disaster Risk Reduction supplementary fund date
Management (SDRRM) and/or Climate
Change Adaptation (CCA) Plan
3 - 3 programs 3 - Completed the 3 - Attained the
d. Oplan Kalusugan (OK) sa DepEd (at
implemented target utilizing an objective one
least 2 programs; e.g. Feeding
additional 10% week after the
Program, WINS, NDEP, Adolescent
supplementary fund target date
Reproductive Health Program,
Medical, Dental and Nursing Services)
2 - 2 programs 2 - Completed the 2 - Attained the
implemented target utilizing an objective two
additional 15% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date

1 - 1 program 1 - Completed the 1 - Attained the


implemented target utilizing an objective three
additional 20% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date

2. Ensured a child-friendly environment by September 2020 5% 5 - 35 or higher 5 - Completed the 5 - Attained the
scoring 35 points or higher in the Child- July 2021 (Very Outstanding) target within the objective on the
Friendly School System
approved working target date 4 4 4 4 0.200
- Child-Friendly School Report budget
a. CFSS Tool
b. Accomplishment Report per
goal 4 - 30-35 4 - Completed the 4 - Attained the
- Validated Report by the Cluster CFSS Team (Outstanding) target utilizing an objective 3 days
- Report additional 5% after the target
- Certification on score obtained supplementary fund date

3 - 25-29 (Child- 3 - Completed the 3 - Attained the


friendly) target utilizing an objective one
additional 10% week after the
supplementary fund target date

2 - 20-24 (Striving) 2 - Completed the 2 - Attained the


target utilizing an objective two
additional 15% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date

1 - below 20 (Not 1 - Completed the 1 - Attained the


Child-friendly) target utilizing an objective three
additional 20% weeks after the
supplementary fund target date
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

3. Ensured a safe school learning September 5% 5 - Evaluated by 5 - Completed the 5 - Attained


environment by evaluating and 2020 July the specialists target within the target within
inspecting the school plant, physical 2021 (municipal approved working first semester of
facilities fitness, safety, and engineer, Head of budget SY
sufficiency with the assistance of a the MDRRMC or
specialist annually other licensed 4 5 5 4.6666667 0.233
professional who
perform such
function)

4 - Evaluated by 4 - Completed the 4 - Attained


DepEd Engineer target utilizing an target within
additional 5% 3rd quarter of
supplementary fund SY

3 - Evaluated by 3 - Completed the 3 - Attained


supervisors target utilizing an target on
additional 10% January 2019
supplementary fund

2 - Evaluated by 2 - Completed the 2 - Attained


teachers target utilizing an target on
additional 15% February 2019
supplementary fund

1 - Evaluated by 1 - Completed the 1 - Attained


others target utilizing an target on March
additional 20% 2019
supplementary fund

3. PARENTS' 1. Improved parents' attendance, September 10% 5 - Achieved 75% 5 - Completed the 5 - Conducted 5
INVOLVEMENT participation, and involvement in 2020 July and above parents’ target within the meetings and
AND COMMUNITY school activities 2021 attendance approved working activities with 4 5 5 4.6666667 0.467
PARTNERSHIP budget parents

4 - Achieved 60- 4 - Completed the 4 - Conducted 4


74% parents’ target utilizing an meetings and
attendance additional 5% activities with
supplementary fund parents

3 - Achieved 50- 3 - Completed the 3 - Conducted 3


69% parents’ target utilizing an meetings and
attendance additional 10% activities with
supplementary fund parents

2 - Achieved 30- 2 - Completed the 2 - Conducted 2


49% parents’ target utilizing an meetings and
attendance additional 15% activities with
supplementary fund parents
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

1 - 29% and below 1 - Completed the 1 - Conducted 1


target utilizing an meeting and
additional 20% activity with
supplementary fund parents

2. Enhanced stakeholders' September 5% 5 - 5 projects 5 - Completed the 5-


involvement in school improvement by 2020 July implemented target within the Accomplished
designing and implementing five 2021 approved working the target as
4 5 5 4.6666667 0.233
projects to address school needs budget specified in the
plan

4 - 4 projects 4 - Completed the 4-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 5% the target but
supplementary fund one month late

3 - 3 projects 3 - Completed the 3-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 10% the target but
supplementary fund two months late

2 - 2 projects 2 - Completed the 2-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 15% the target but
supplementary fund three months
late

1 - 1 project 1 - Completed the 1-


implemented target utilizing an Accomplished
additional 20% the target but
supplementary fund four or more
months late

3. Strengthened stakeholders' September 5% 5 - 85-100% of 5 - Completed the 5-


involvement and community 2020 July stakeholders are target within the Accomplished
partnership by recognizing their 2021 recognized approved working the objectives as
accomplishments and contributions budget specified in the
4 5 5 4.6666667 0.233
annually plan

4 - 71-84% of 4 - Completed the 4-


stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 5% the objectives
supplementary fund one month after
the target date
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

3 - 65-74% of 3 - Completed the 3-


stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 10% the objectives
supplementary fund two months
after the target
date

2 - 51-64% of 2 - Completed the 2-


stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 15% the objectives
supplementary fund three months
after the target
date

1 - 50% and below 1 - Completed the 1-


of stakeholders are target utilizing an Accomplished
recognized additional 20% the objectives
supplementary fund four months
after the target
date

4.HUMAN 1. Enhanced the level of competence September 10% 5 – Encouraged 5 - Completed the 5-
RESOURCE of all school personnel through the 2020 July and supported the target within the Accomplished
MANAGEMENT implementation of the 100% of 2021 teaching and non- approved working the objectives as
AND programs, projects, and activities teaching personnel budget specified in the
DEVELOPMENT enumerated in the School Plan/ through the plan
Learning Continuity Plan / Annual implementation of
5 5 5 5 0.500
Improvement Plan (AIP) 100% of the PPAs
enumerated in the
School Plan/ LCP /
AIP

4– Encouraged and 4 - Completed the 4-


supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 5% the objectives 1
teaching personnel suplementary fund day after the
through the target date
implementation of
90-99% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

3– Encouraged and 3 - Completed the 3-


supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 10% the objectives 1
teaching personnel supplementary fund week after the
through the target date
implementation of
80-89% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP

2 – Encouraged 2 - Completed the 2-


and supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 15% the objectives 1
teaching personnel supplementary fund month after the
through the target date
implementation of
70-79% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP

1 – Encouraged 1 - Completed the 1-


and supported the target utilizing an Accomplished
teaching and non- additional 20% the objectives
teaching personnel supplementary fund within the year
through the
implementation of
60-69% of the
PPAs enumerated
in the School Plan/
LCP / AIP

2. Energized and boosted the morale September 5% 5 - Attained 100% 5 - Accomplished 5


of teachers by implementing PPAs on 2020 July level of and above tasks
their welfare and institutionalizing 2021 accomplishment with MOV either
rewards systems as follows: same or 5 4 4.5 0.225
combination thereof.
a. Recommending for upgrading of
positions (ERF)
4 - Attained 80- 4 - Accomplished 4
99% level of tasks with MOV
b. Recommending for reclassification
accomplishment either same or
of positions
combinationthereof.
c. Assisting for promotions

d. Awards and incentives for


3 - Attained 70- 3 - Accomplished 3
personnel
79% level of tasks with MOV
e. Updating of PSIPOP
accomplishment either same or
f. Teachers’ Welfare Program
combinationthereof.
b. Recommending for reclassification
of positions
c. Assisting for promotions

d. Awards and incentives for


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
personnel
Timeliness) RESULTS
e. Updating of PSIPOP Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) f. Teachers’ Welfare
OBJECTIVES
Program TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T

2 - Attained 60-69 2 - Accomplished 2


level of tasks with MOV
accomplishment either same or
combinationthereof.

1 - Attained 50- 1 - Accomplished 1


59% level of tasks with MOV
accomplishment either same or
combinationthereof.

3. Developed and applied Support Succession September 2020 5% 5 - Attained 100% 5 - Attained the 4 5 4.5 0.225
Strategy + Team Leadership + (3S + T July 2021 level of objective on the
Leadership) by:
a. Participating in programs and trainings on accomplishment target date
Values-Based Leadership/Strategic and
Innovation and others
b. Transformational Leadership Program
c. Reflections on books on leadership read
d. Published articles on Leadership 4 - Attained 80- 4 - Attained the
99% level of objective 1-2
accomplishment days after the
target date

3 - Attained 70- 3 - Attained the


79% level of objective 3-4
accomplishment days after the
target date

2 - Attained 60- 2 - Attained the


69% level of objective 5-6
accomplishment days after the
target date

1 - Attained 50- 1 - Attained the


59% level of objective 7-8
accomplishment days after the
target date

5. SCHOOL For implementing units: 10% 5 - 100% accurate 5 - On time 5 5 5 0.500


LEADERSHIP, 1. Liquidated 98% to 100% of MOOE submission
MANAGEMENT budget accurately and on time and
AND complied the following processes:
OPERATIONS
a. Improved submission of liquidation
reports through systematic recording
and reporting of the agency financial
and physical operations
b. Attained 100% releases of salaries,
allowances and other benefits of the
personnel through accurate
preparation, processing and
submission of Report of Disbursement
with supporting documents within the
prescribed period
c. Achieved 100% remittances of
salary deductions, government shares,
government financing institutions and
5. SCHOOL For implementing units: 10%
LEADERSHIP, 1. Liquidated 98% to 100% of MOOE
MANAGEMENT budget accurately and on time and
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
AND complied the following processes: Timeliness) RESULTS
OPERATIONS Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
a. Improved submission of liquidation per KRA Rating
reports through systematic recording Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
and reporting of the agency financial
and physical operations 4 - 90% accurate 4 - 3 days late
b. Attained 100% releases of salaries, late
allowances and other benefits of the
personnel through accurate
preparation, processing and
submission of Report of Disbursement
with supporting documents within the
prescribed period
c. Achieved 100% remittances of
salary deductions, government shares, 3 - 80% accurate 3 - 5 days late
government financing institutions and
private lending institutions through
monitoring of accurate preparation
and processing of statement of
remittance for government share and
salary deductions on the 10th day of
the succeeding month

For non-implementing units:


1. Liquidated 100% of MOOE
accurately and on time and complied
with:

a. Improved submission of liquidation


reports through systematic recording
and reporting of the agency financial
and physical operations
with supporting documents within the
prescribed period
c. Achieved 100% remittances of
salary deductions, government shares,
government financing institutions and
private lending institutions through PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
monitoring of accurate preparation Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) and processing of statement of
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
remittance for government share and per KRA Rating
salary deductions on the 10th day of Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
the succeeding month
2 - 70 % accurate 2 - 1 week late
For non-implementing units:
1. Liquidated 100% of MOOE
accurately and on time and complied
with:

a. Improved submission of liquidation


reports through systematic recording
and reporting of the agency financial
and physical operations 1 - 60% and below 1 - more than 1
week

2. Improved the level of clientele's September 5% 5 - Adhered to 9-10 5-


satisfaction by adhering to RA 9485 - 2020 July policies Accomplished
Anti Red Tape Act (ARTA) and Quality 2021 the objectives as
Management System (QMS) specified in the 5 5 5 5 0.250
a. No Collection Policy plan
b. Updated Transparency Board
c. Reporting of School's Accomplished
PPAs 4-
d. No Noon Break Policy Accomplished
e. Following the Citizen's Charter 4 - Adhered to 7-8 the objectives
f. Help Desks or Public Assistance policies one month after
Desks the target date
g. Suggestion Box and Surveys
h. Wearing of IDs or nameplates
i. Monitoring of Attendance of
Personnel (Google Sheet and Printed 3-
DTR Form) Accomplished
j. QMS (implementation of 5S, 3 - Adhered to 5-6 the objectives
documentation of processes) policies two months
after the target
date

2-
Accomplished
2 - Adhered to 3-4 the objectives
policies three months
after the target
date

1-
Accomplished
the objectives
1 - Adhered to 1-2
four months
policies
after the target
date

3. Attained 100% completion of the encoding of September 2020 5% 5 - 100% encoded 5 - Complied within 5 5 5 0.250
learners' profile in the LIS and school data in the July 2021 the deadline
EBEIS during the beginning of school year (BOSY)
and end of school year (EOSY)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, ACTUAL
Timeliness) RESULTS
Weight Average
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE
per KRA Rating
3. Attained 100% completion of the encoding of September 2020 5% Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T
learners' profile in the LIS and school data in the July 2021
EBEIS during the beginning of school year (BOSY)
and end of school year (EOSY) 4 - 80-99% encoded 4 - Complied 3 days
after the deadline
3 - 60-79% encoded 3 - Complied 5 days
after the deadline
2 - 40-59% encoded 2 - Complied 1 week
after the deadline

1 - 20-39% encoded 1 - Complied more


than 1 week after the
deadline

TOTAL 100% 4.717


Overall Rating for Accomplishment 4.717

Ratee: Recommending Approval: Approval:

POCHOLO N. CASTANEDA MARIA CELINA L. VEGA, CESE DR. RONALDO A. POZON, CESO V
School Principal Asst. Schools Division Superintendent Schools Division Superintendent
PPRD01/pprd05
DOCLONG 1ST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND DON CESAR ABAD GUALBERTO MULTIGRADE SCHOOL

Any 5 fom the following:


* Monthly Instructional Supervisory and TA
plans and reports
* Performance Monitoring and Coaching Forms
* Approved class and teachers' programs
* Quarterly Reports on Observations
conducted using COT
* Quarterly and/or Monthly Accomplishment
Report – to be submitted to OASDS

* Certification of the use of the IM c/o


principal
* List of IMs per learning area
* Consolidated list of Individual Learning
Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
* Certification of the use of the IM c/o
principal
* List of IMs per learning area
* Consolidated list of Individual Learning
Monitoring Plan (ILMP)

* Consolidated reports on achievement rate


submitted to the SGOD's School Management
Monitoring and Evaluation Section (JHS and
SHS)

* Approved AIP (with reflected intervention/


strategies/ activities)
* Approved Plans
a. SCPP
b. GAD
c. SDRRM
d. OK sa DepEd (any 2)
* Accomplishment Reports

* Child-Friendly School Report


a. CFSS Tool
b. Accomplishment Report per
goal
* Validated Report by the Cluster CFSS Team
- Report
- Certification on score obtained
* Certification of the specialist on the
evaluation and assessment of school plant and
facilities
* NSBI report
* Site Development Plan

Narrative report on parents’ involvement in the


SLMs’ Distribution and Retrieval and other
related activities
* Adopt-a-School Report
* Accomplishment Report
* MOA/MOU of Projects Implemented
* Financial Report

Sample Projects
Feeding Program
Brigada Eskwela Plus
Medical and dental
Clean and Green
Repairs
Homeroom projects
Others

* List of generated supports from


Stakeholders
* Attendance sheet
* List of stakeholders to be recognized
* Certificate of Recognition
Any 5 from the following
* Work plan
* Accomplishment Reports

* Minutes of Meetings
* Teachers’ Developmental Plans
* Approved School Development Plan (SDP)
* Approved Annual/Monthly Learning Action
Cell (LAC) Plan
* Approved LCP
* Approved INSET
* Training Proposal/Matrix/ AR/ SOB/
Evaluation/Certificate of Participation
Any 2 from the following
* School memo on Ranking
* Transmittal to DO of Ranking
* Teachers’ Awards
* Number of processed documents for
upgrading/ reclassification/promotion (if
applicable)
Any 2 of the following
* School Memorandum
* Certificate of Participation
* Accomplishment Reports
* Copies of reflections on books read
* Articles on Leadership

For implementing units:


Documents prepared by ADASs

For non-implementing units:


Documents prepared by ADASs or
documents prepared and submitted by school
heads
For implementing units:
Documents prepared by ADASs

For non-implementing units:


Documents prepared by ADASs or
documents prepared and submitted by school
heads
* Accomplishment Reports
* Documentation on adherence to ARTA and
QMS

* Screenshot of LIS & EBEIS updating


* LIS report
* EBEIS report
* Screenshot of LIS & EBEIS updating
* LIS report
* EBEIS report

You might also like