Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peponis, J., Hadjinikolaou, E., Livieratos, C., & Fatouros, D. A. (1989) - The Spatial Core of Urban Culture. Ekistics, 43-55.
Peponis, J., Hadjinikolaou, E., Livieratos, C., & Fatouros, D. A. (1989) - The Spatial Core of Urban Culture. Ekistics, 43-55.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
John Peponis, Associate Professor of Architecture teaching at The article supports two general theoretical claims:
the Doctoral Program of the College of Architecture, Georgia • First, that one essential key to urban spatial typology
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA, received his Ph. D at Univer- is the description of the way in which each space is
sity College London where he worked as a researcher and lec- accessible from all the other spaces in the system, not
turer. He has consulted on the application of space syntax in in terms of metric distance but rather in terms of the
the design of communities and other urban areas in London
and in Athens, where he also runs a small architectural practice.
number of changes of direction necessary to move from
His current research interests include the extension of descrip- one place to another. In particular, what matters from
tive theories and methods referring to the intelligibility of built a theoretical as well as an empirical point of view are
form and its aesthetic properties. His published articles deal the properties of the "urban core": this comprises the
with cases such as museums, factories, health centers and spaces which are more easily accessible, or best in-
other building types, focusing on the way in which architecturetegrated into the urban layout as a whole.
becomes entailed in the implementation of cultural, administrative • Second, that the structure of accessibility and integra-
or social policy.
tion of an area is strongly associated with, and seems
Eleni Hadjinikolaou obtained her degree in Architecture from to determine, the distribution of pedestrian movement.
the National Technical University of Athens and completed her One of the major dimensions of urban typology con-
postgraduate training at the Bartlett School of Architecture,
cerns the relation of local layout patterns and overall
University College London. She was recently involved in the
development of the town plan of the Eleusina-Aspropyrgos area
global patterns. From this point of view the article
distinguishes three types of layouts: continuous,
near Athens, and she is currently working at the European Cultural
Centre at Delphi, and also in collaboration with G. Candilis regionalized and polarized.
on planning in support of the Greek application for hosting • Continuous layouts have a diffused pattern of centrali-
the Olympic Games in 1996. ty reaching towards all the parts of the system depen-
Costas Livieratos has a degree in Planning from the Polytechnic ding of course on the degree of integration.
of Central London and postgraduate degrees in Regional Develop- • Regionalized layouts are of two kinds:
ment and Geography for which he studied in Athens and at - those whose parts converge towards a common
the University of Paris IV. He worked as a planner from 1976
center; and,
to 1980 and as a member of the Centre for Adult Training and
Self-Education in Athens from 1982 to 1987. He recently co- - those whose parts diverge towards distinct sub-
centers.
founded the Alexandria publishing house in Athens.
Dimitris A. Fatouros has been Professor of Architecture at the • Polarized layouts superimpose a large scale urban grid
University of Thessaloniki, Greece, since 1959 and was Provoston a deformed small scale urban fabric in such a way
of the University from 1984 to 1988; his publications includethat the two principles of organization cannot be
geographically separated in a non-trivial way.
the books Systematic Theory of Architecture (2 vols), Architec-
tural Organization and Expression, The Organization of Space
The article also presents some findings which are
and Geometrical Organization, and many articles on issues rang-
characteristic of Greek urban culture. The major finding
ing from the appropriation of space to aesthetics.
concerns the formation of sub-areas, a theme which is
often taken up in the urban literature. According to the
Introduction research findings in all six cases, the formation of sub-
areas within the urban system as a whole, as diagnosed
The present paper on the basis of the pattern of movement, is not about
This article adopts the basic concepts and methods of containment and enclosure, but about the differential
the descriptive theory of space developed at the Unit orientation of the sub-areas towards the larger urban
for Architectural Studies, University College London, and scale. Thus, identity is combined with openness.
presents some of the findings of a research program1 The merit of syntactic analysis is to allow the develop-
which has extended and applied these concepts and ment of urban typology in cases where the global con-
methods to study the morphology of Greek towns and tinuity and openness of the urban fabric is the overriding
their patterns of pedestrian movement. The study is,fact. In this sense, our consideration of sub-area forma-
however, also informed by a wider but methodologically tion differs radically from the more common definition
less developed concern with the properties of spatial of sub-areas in terms of discontinuity and enclosure alone.
continuity and discontinuity as the formative properties Finally the article demonstrates that a descriptive theory
of architecture, over and above geometrical order (HILLIER of urban space is more powerful if it can provide not
and HANSON, 1984; FATOUROS, 1979). only an accurate and sensitive model of the differences
Fig. 5: Thessaloniki.
Fig. 4: Nauplion.
Trends within the sample as a whole: The decomposition Lines RRA Spread Strength Overlap Definition Intelligib... RelSpread
Spread -.017
case. Thus the sample of 6 towns gave a further sample Strength -.41 3 -.75 -445 J
Definition
. 1
-.034
3
9 in Thessaloniki, 3 in Larisa and 2 in Kypseli (Athens). Intelligibi... -.614 -.738 .416 .783 .091 .084 1
In Kerkyra, Thessaloniki and Nauplion, the number of RelSpread .232 .1 1 .706 -.095
sub-areas includes second order sub-areas resulting from Rellntel. -.56 -1.92E-7 -.042 .34 -.344 -.092 .674 -.056
Blocks/Li... -.221 -.864 .693 .669 .363 .121 .702 .12
further decomposition of the results of the first decom- Connecti -.045 -.859 .685 .565 |.473 |.05 |.623 1.122
position of the town into parts. The complete set of 31
complexes, whose numerical profile is given in table 1,
was analyzed to detect any general trends and to help
identify the typological characteristics of each town. Correlation Matrix for Varlablea: Xļ ... X-j 2
In the process of examining whether there are any RelStren.. . Rellntel. Blocks/... Connecti. ..
Rellntel. -514 1
measures (table 2), we found a strong negative correla- Blocks/Lines .032 .096
Table 1
The syntactic characteristics of 6 towns and 25 sub-areas
I Area I Lines RRA Spread Strength Overlap Definition Intelligibility RelSpread RelStrength Rellntel. Blocks/Lines Conn
T KERKYRA 381.000 .850 2.641 L400 7500 7951 7450 7041 125* 133 7507 2.131
3 NorthKerkyra 209.000 .860 2.863 OĪ0 7530 385" .580 .298 -.1 10 -.091 355" 2.120
3 ČentralKerkyra 109.000 .890 2.629 170 7500 355" 370 7750 133 -.144 383 77890
4 SouthKerkyra ""587000 .700 3.153 1.470 .570" 1.214 ~ .580 ~ -.158 -.037 ~ -.182 .691 2.059
5 Antivouniotisa 108.000 . 890 2.530 1.240 0 .§66 .710 .061 -.163 .056 .463 2.028
5" AgioiPateres 68.000 .860 1.874 77390 7740 Ī7033" ?740" T593 130 359" 300 Ī13T
7 NAUPLION 252.000 .860 2.388 77470 7TSÜ" 7875" 7590 ITS" 7050 7070 .833 37330
S" ÔldNauplio U8.00Ô .790 2.554 1 .430 7250 1.089 .790 -.473 T03S" .079 7788" 37373
9 ironia 75.ÔÔÔ .720 2.516 77540 7730 7T79T 350 T573" .144 399" 7783 5337
10 LowOldNauplio 38.000 .550 1.963 77370 3ÜÖ" 77435" .910 -2.718 -.119 35T 77784 5337
11 HighOldNaupfiõ 63.000 .870 2.241 77450 7770 7908" 330" -.291 335" -.036 .508 77778"
~~ Ī3" MYTILINI 348.000 1.030 2.868 1.400 330" 77058" .540 .746 373" T035" .287 Ī390"
~~ 73 WestMytìlini 133.000 1.070 1.905 1.380 330" .963 .540 -.143 .075 -.012 .338 7355"
14 EastMytìlini 127.000 1.110 3.491 T300" 330" .928 .630 1.510 .017 .101 .260 77380
15 THESSALONIKI 289.000 .480 7.357 77493 7930" 1.031 .760 1.556 -.135 -.127 1.118 37975"
13 NorthThess 131.000 .490 5.200 1.561 7930" 380" .700 -.411 T05T -.182 1.053 37580
17 SouthThess 150.000 .500 5.250 1.561 7930" 350" .850 183 -.056 -.026 1.233 37033"
18" NWThess 44.000 .550 2.375 Ī7530" .750 .891 .860 -2.306 7030" .013 7854 37383
13 NCThess 32.000 .480 5.737 Ī773S" 370" 1.021 7950" T05T .130 373" Ī738Ī 37533
10 NEThess 69.000 .600 4.387 1.530 .570 .817 .820 378" -.032 .001 .797 37390
21 SWThess 59.000 .600 3.648 1.556 7830" .833 .860 157 T003 .041 .712 37390
22 SCThess 46.000 .530 7.595 1.623 7500 343 .900 37539" .022 .041 1.457 37833
13 SEThess 60.000 .500 5.738 T75Ī7 7570 1.000 7900 7303 0 .024 1.167 37783
24 Ladadika 24.000 .580 2.335 Ī77Ī3 .500 7703T .930 -1.985 .142 .100 .625 37T33
25 LARISA 218.000 .580 4.029 1.584 7700 0 33 .770 193 .011 -.060 313" 37393
13 WestLarisa 84.000 .850 4.164 1.579 7530 7583 380 T7353 .154 7303 7953 37503
17
IS"
19 KYPSELI, ATHENS 244.000 .520 5.486 173 380 7988" /790 7380 13T T074" 053 3173
10 AgiosGeorgios 43.000 "330 3.055 1.745 .500 353 350 T750 7750 7Ī03 1.140 37339
IT AgiasZonis 57.000 190 9.179 1.679 .670 77057 340 37358" 3555" 158" Í737T 375IT
33 1 Average! 1Ž1.Ž39I .5951 3.8l8 1 1-539 1 .562 1 .995 1 .765 1 -.016 1 -.Ò
Table 3
Correlation coefficients between syntactic variables and moving
people densities.
Time of Obs. Period of Obs. Syntactic VariaElē Nauplioñ" Old NaupHõõ Old N.Emb Pruni a" Pron.Emb" Kerkyra North Kerk" North Kerk. Emb Myrilini West Myt. West Myl. Emb. South Thessaloniki S Th.Emb. SETH. 5E Th.Emb.inTh.ļSE Th.Emb.inS Tit!
7 Shops Opēn" yjn>er Connectivity" ' .70 ~ .62" ~ .62" .47 ~ 77 .43 .36 j .47 7
3 Shops Opēn" Winter Choice Vtluc ' .54 ~ .23 ~ .12 TT ~BT .41 3T 30 ~ •"
5 Shops Open Summer (1/RRA) .66 .43" .84 .61 .78 .71 .40" TT T5 IT ~ T3 ~ ~ 7 r
S Shops Opēn" Summer" Length TT ~7T ~TĪ .58 58 .55 TT .53" TĪT TT TT
"TT ~" Shops Closed Winter Choice Value T9" TT TS" TT TI T9r TTļ TT ~ 7 7
~" IT Shops Closed Winter Length ' Tö" TT TT TS" TS" T9" TT TT ~ 7
"TT Shops ClošēT Summer (1/RRA) ' .51 ~ .64 ~ .71 TT ~33 TT TTļ T8 TT TT TT r
15 Shops Closed Summer Choice Value Tö" .34' .50 TT TB" 33 3T 39" Tö" 3T 5B"|
~~T7 All Observation ff»"» _ (1/RRA) TT ~~T3 TT .39" .66 33 TB| .49 »
~T9 All Observations" Wintěř Choice Ý3ěe .5l~ .24 .41 TT .82 T9"
TT All Observation Summēt (1/RJEāT .65 .59 .83 .55 .74 .71 T9" TT T3 TT TT 7
24 1 AU Observation I Summer | Length .37 .74 .74 .47 TT .59 62 TT Tl' .16 " lT •
TV Superflr. rn.Supe^r.Emb.lnUļl'h.SupcrtSr.Emb.lnS TŅ tt.Ladadlka rrh.Laj.F.mb.inTn.pii.Lad.Ěmb.lnS Th.ļ Larisa |WUrlsa |W U.kmb.ļ Mb Lansap lar.Emb. |SE I^ns«|SE Lar.Emb.j Kypscli Ag.Gcorgios jAg.Gcor.Emb.j Ag.Zon.s |Ag.Zon,»Emb.
S ^
■ ■ ■ a A . # • • • •
3T .47- .3T
33 TT TT
=« 33