Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ethical Thoeries
Ethical Thoeries
Ethical Thoeries
Ethical Foundations
Ethical Philosophies Ethical Values are heavily influenced by one’s cultural
(Moral Theories) background…
❑ aka cultural relativism.
What is “right” and “wrong” depends upon society’s
moral guidelines
These guidelines vary from place to place and from time
to time
A particular action may be right in one society at one
time and wrong in another society or at another time …
1
2/8/2023
2
2/8/2023
Definitions
139
Categories of Ethical Philosophies/Moral ◻ Moral agent: a being who is capable
Theories of acting with reference to right and
Teleological, Deontological wrong. Voluntarily.
and Virtue Approaches ◻ Moral agency: an individual's ability
3
2/8/2023
◻Teleology ◻ Consequentialism
◻In a teleological view, everything has a ◻ A teleological approach.
4
2/8/2023
5
2/8/2023
6
2/8/2023
7
2/8/2023
◻ Context
◻ Competing Virtues
◻ Related to Competing Virtues.
◻Good character traits/virtues may
◻ Virtuous traits can be displayed in the course
compete/be in conflict with each other. of an immoral action.
◻ Honesty requires us to be truthful.
◻ Take a courageous robber. Is there such a
◻ Kindness requires us to be compassionate. thing?
◻ What if telling someone the truth hurts them? ◻S/he is living according to the moral
8
2/8/2023
Ethical Philosophies
Ethical Philosophies Egoism
all our actions are ultimately ❑If you don’t look after yourself no
9
2/8/2023
Ethical Philosophies
Ethical Philosophies/Moral Theories Egoism
No paternalism
❑
10
2/8/2023
11
2/8/2023
❑ God wants us to want good things which are ❑ The primary goal of life is to achieve as fully as
good for us. possible our potential as human beings.
❑ These are 7 basic goods: ❑ The Natural Law states that we should act in a way
12
2/8/2023
❑ You can’t compare the good of one single ❑Humans have free will and they decide to
life with the good of several lives. act or not.
❑ The Fat Man version of the Trolley ❑ When making a moral judgement for a
Problem is not a dilemma any more - person committing an act, we must include
you will not push anyone. an evaluation their intentions.
❑ We cannot lie: ❑e.g. donating to charity to establish a
❑We have a duty not to act against good reputation in the community:
another person’s natural law right to ❑good consequences but not morally
know the truth. admirable.
Ethical Philosophies
Natural law - Problems Ethical Philosophies/Moral Theories
182
13
2/8/2023
14
2/8/2023
❑ Actions are to be judged in terms of the extent to ❑ Nothing but utility is good in itself.
which they promote the greatest total amount of
welfare for humanity. ❑ Particular actions and general rules must
❑A moral action is that which produces the
greatest total utility. be evaluated by their consequences.
❑ Your well-being is of no greater value than ❑Murder, rape, theft, fraud etc are not
someone else’s.
❑ Unlike egoism.
wrong in themselves;
❑ Utilitarians go for what produces the greatest ❑they are only wrong because they do
total utility as opposed to the greatest distribution
of utility. not produce as much utility as
alternative behaviours.
15
2/8/2023
Ethical Philosophies
Objection to Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
Ethical Philosophies
Objection to Utilitarianism Utilitarianism
❑ “...if I am ever responsible for anything, then I must ❑ Jeremy Bentham developed the original concept of
be just as much responsible for things that I allow or utility as: All actions are directed toward gaining
fail to prevent, as I am for things that I myself, in the pleasure or avoiding pain.
more everyday restricted sense, bring about” ❑“It is for them [pain and pleasure] alone to point out
❑ A utilitarian would have to kill the one Native proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as
American to save the other nineteen. they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,”
❑ However, is killing the morally right thing to do, even if ❑happiness being “pleasure and the absence of pain.
lives are saved?
16
2/8/2023
17
2/8/2023
Ethical Philosophies
Utilitarianism Ethical Philosophies/Moral Theories
200
Classical Utilitarianism:
◻ in any given situation, choose the action that
harvesting.
18
2/8/2023
19
2/8/2023
20
2/8/2023
21
2/8/2023
◻ Before acting, a rule utilitarian thinks ◻We avoid doing acts that
about the consequences of people maximise utility in the short term.
following that rule.
◻Instead we follow rules that
◻ If the outcome is considered positive,
s/he might decide that it's good to maximise utility in the long run.
follow that rule in general.
s/he will apply it in future.
argument that no one can, or wants to, particular circumstances, these very
rules may require actions that DO
spend their time weighing each and NOT maximise utility …
every possible outcome each and
◻ Can we then justify rule utilitarianism?
every time they need to act.
22
2/8/2023
23
2/8/2023
24
2/8/2023
❑ Those actions are right that treat human beings as ❑ We should act in a way that equally respects
an end and not a means to an end. the dignity of every human being.
and ❑Actions are judged by whether they treat
human beings as free moral agents who can
actions are right if everyone adopts the moral rule
presupposed by the action: order their lives by their own purposes and
values.
❑ An action is right if you can consent to
❑ Do unto others as you would have them do unto
everyone’s adopting the moral rule
presupposed by the action. you.
25
2/8/2023
❑ All persons possess a divine spark that gives ❑ People are not mere things.
them fundamental human dignity and equality. ❑ They should not be manipulated in a way that
26
2/8/2023
27
2/8/2023
◻ It is best known in its first formulation. ◻ Categorical Imperative: Act only according
Basically “act in such a way that your maxim to that maxim by which you can at the same
could be a general law.” time will that it should become a universal
■Maxim: general principle or rule law.
◻ E.g. you can’t lie; ◻ Problem:
◻ if everyone lied all the time, then no one ◻ Imagine a Nazi man who is genuinely and
would believe anyone, therefore lying conscientiously willing to universalise his
would be impossible. principle/maxim: Kill the weak …
28
2/8/2023
◻ Kant: “But if you were weak you wouldn't want others to ◻ The Second Formulation of the Categorical Imperative:
kill you". ◻ 2. The Formula of Humanity
◻ Nazi man: ◻ Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own
"Better to die than live as a sniveling weakling," person or in that of another, always as an end and
"I would want someone to kill me." never as a means only.
"Do the right thing and put me out of my shame." ◻ Mere means = you are using something only for your
◻ The Categorical Imperative in this case actually own benefit without bothering about that thing’s
approves his maxim… interests/benefit.
◻ Immoral? ◻ Which is fine if it isn’t human.
◻ Kant’s Second Categorical Imperative: The Formula of ◻ How do you know when you're using someone
Humanity merely as a means?
◻ Humans are ends in themselves. ◻ You: “Is the second hand car salesman who sells me a
We are not objects existing to be used by others as mere piece of junk using me only as a means to line his
means. pockets?”
We are rational and autonomous ◻ Salesman: "Let the buyer beware".
We have the ability to set our own goals and work towards ◻ He didn't make you not take it to a mechanic to get
them. it checked out.
■When you lie to me so that you can get something from me ◻ Instead he respected your freedom to be a sucker
that you want, you have robbed me of the autonomy to who didn’t do your own due diligence.
make that decision to help you because my decision is
based on false information.
29
2/8/2023
in their work and other areas of their guided by self chosen ethical principles
lives. ❑ not by fear, guilt, social pressure etc.
30
2/8/2023
No free lunch – assume that all tangible and Social contract Rule – would you like to live in a society
intangible objects are owned by someone else where the principle you are supporting would become the
principle of the entire society?
unless there is a specific declaration and if
useful, then you should assume the creator Social Contract Theory: People live together in society in
accordance with an agreement that establishes moral and political
requires compensation for it rules of behaviour.
31
2/8/2023
References
❑ Bentham, J. (1999, April 30). An Introduction to the Principles of
Morals and Legislation (J. H. Burns, Ed.). Clarendon Press.
https://doi.org/10.1604/9780198205166
❑ D. (n.d.). Utilitarianism : Past, Present and Future. Retrieved
November 1, 2022, from https://www.utilitarianism.com/
❑ Loui, M. C. and Miller, K. W., (2008), Ethics and Professional
Responsibility in Computing, University of Illinois, Springfield, Wiley
Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering, John Wiley
and Sons Inc, 2008
❑ Mill, J. S. (1863) Utilitarianism 1 ed. London: Parker, Son & Bourn,
West Strand.
❑ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). Retrieved November 1,
2022, from https://plato.stanford.edu/
32