Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Monster Energy Company Lawsuit Against The Monster Shawarma
Monster Energy Company Lawsuit Against The Monster Shawarma
Monster Energy Company Lawsuit Against The Monster Shawarma
PageID #: 1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
4
5 )
MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY, ) Case No.: 3:23-cv-480
6 )
a Delaware corporation, ) COMPLAINT FOR
7 ) TRADEMARK
Plaintiff, ) INFRINGEMENT, TRADE
8 ) DRESS INFRINGEMENT,
) FALSE DESIGNATION OF
9 v. ) ORIGIN, UNFAIR
) COMPETITION, AND
10 ) DECEPTIVE TRADE
LAVIE WESTGATE LLC, an Ohio ) PRACTICES
11 limited liability company, )
) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
12 )
Defendant. )
13 )
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 2 of 27. PageID #: 2
-1-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 3 of 27. PageID #: 3
-2-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 4 of 27. PageID #: 4
-3-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 5 of 27. PageID #: 5
1 DATE REG.
MARK REG. NO. GOODS/SERVICES
FILED DATE
2 MONSTER 3,057,061 “Fruit juice drinks having a juice April 18, February 7,
3 ENERGY® content of 50% or less by volume 2002 2006
that are shelf stable, carbonated
4 soft drinks, carbonated drinks
enhanced with vitamins, minerals,
5 nutrients, amino acids and/or
herbs, but excluding perishable
6 beverage products that contain
7 fruit juice or soy, whether such
products are pasteurized or not”
8 in International Class 32 (first use
in commerce: April 18, 2002)
9 M 3,044,314 “Nutritional supplements in liquid May 23, January 17,
MONSTER form, but excluding perishable 2003 2006
10
ENERGY® beverage products that contain
11 fruit juice or soy, whether such
products are pasteurized or not”
12 in International Class 5 (first use
in commerce: April 18, 2002)
13 M 3,134,842 “Beverages, namely, carbonated May 7, August 29,
MONSTER soft drinks, carbonated drinks 2003 2006
14
ENERGY® enhanced with vitamins, minerals,
15 nutrients, amino acids and/or
herbs, carbonated energy or
16 sports drinks, fruit juice drinks
having a juice content of 50% or
17 less by volume that are shelf
18 stable, but excluding perishable
beverage products that contain
19 fruit juice or soy, whether such
products are pasteurized or not”
20 in International Class 32 (first use
in commerce: April 18, 2002)
21
1 DATE REG.
MARK REG. NO. GOODS/SERVICES
FILED DATE
2 use in commerce: April 18, 2002)
3 MONSTER 5,820,689 Inter alia, “Beverageware; January 15, July 30,
ENERGY® insulated beverage containers for 2019 2019
4 domestic use; bottles, sold empty;
drinking bottles for sports; water
5 bottles sold empty; bottle openers”
in International Class 21 (first use
6 in commerce date: January 2005)
7 JAVA 5,689,189 “Bar services; café services; coffee May 8, March 5,
MONSTER® bars; mobile restaurant services; 2018 2019
8 restaurant services; mobile café
services for providing food and
9 drink” in International Class 43
(first use in commerce date: March
10
2013
11 4,865,702 “Nutritional supplements in liquid February 2, December
form” in International Class 5 (first 2015 8, 2015
12 use in commerce April 18, 2002)
13
®
14
12. Attached hereto as Exhibits 1–14 are true and correct copies of
15
Monster’s trademark registrations identified in Paragraph 11 above, which are
16
hereby incorporated by reference. Collectively, those registrations and
17
trademarks, including all common rights therein, are referred to as the
18
“MONSTER Marks.”
19
13. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1065, U.S. Trademark Registration
20
Nos. 3,044,315; 4,036,680; 4,036,681; 3,057,061; 3,044,314; 3,134,842;
21
3,134,841; and 4,865,702 are incontestable.
22
14. In addition, since 2002, Monster has consistently used a distinctive
23
trade dress for its packaging and promotional materials, including the mark
24
MONSTER displayed in a well-recognized, unique and stylized font as shown
25
below (the “MONSTER Trade Dress”):
26
27
28
-5-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 7 of 27. PageID #: 7
10
11
12
13
14
15
17 of its MONSTER Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress to identify the goods and
18 services listed in the table in Paragraph 11 above and Monster as their source,
19 Monster owns valid and subsisting federal statutory and common law rights to
22 commercial success. Since 2002, Monster has sold more than 42 billion cans of
23 its MONSTER line of drinks worldwide and sales of the MONSTER line of
24 drinks have generated over $92 billion in estimated total retail revenues
25 internationally. In 2020 alone, Monster sold nearly 5 billion cans worldwide. The
26 MONSTER brand has established itself as the best-selling energy drink brand in
28
-6-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 8 of 27. PageID #: 8
1 18. Further, since 2002, Monster has widely used the colors green, black,
2 and white in connection with marketing its MONSTER® brand. Some examples
3 are shown below:
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-7-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 9 of 27. PageID #: 9
28
-8-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 10 of 27. PageID #: 10
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
-9-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 11 of 27. PageID #: 11
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-10-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 12 of 27. PageID #: 12
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-11-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 13 of 27. PageID #: 13
28
-13-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 15 of 27. PageID #: 15
1 32. The MONSTER Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress have acquired
2 great value as specific identifiers of Monster’s products that serve to identify and
3 distinguish Monster’s products from those of others. Monster has obtained strong
4 common law rights in the MONSTER Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress, which
5 are not only inherently distinctive but have also acquired secondary meaning.
6 Customers in this judicial district and elsewhere readily recognize MONSTER
7 Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress as distinctive designations of the origin of
8 Monster’s drinks, restaurant services, beverageware, hats, clothing, bags, sporting
9 equipment, accessories, promotional items, and numerous other products and
10 services. The MONSTER Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress are intellectual
11 property assets of enormous value as symbols of Monster and its quality,
12 reputation, and goodwill.
13 33. Monster has consistently and successfully enforced and protected its
14 MONSTER Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress against past infringements.
15 B. Defendant’s Unlawful Activities
16 34. Upon information and belief, Defendant operates a restaurant called
17 The Monster Shawarma. Defendant also owns and operates the website
18 https://monstershawarmatoledo.com/, where it advertises its restaurant to
19 consumers, including customers in this Judicial District. Defendant also
20 maintains the Facebook account https://www.facebook.com/people/The-
21 Monster-Shawarma/100063466355486/.
22 35. Without permission or consent from Monster, Defendant has sold
23 and is offering for sale goods and services using trademarks and trade dress that
24 are confusingly similar to one or more of the MONSTER Marks and the
25 MONSTER Trade Dress. Beginning long after Monster acquired protectable
26 exclusive rights in the MONSTER Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress,
27 Defendant adopted and began using the mark THE MONSTER SHAWARMA
28
-14-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 16 of 27. PageID #: 16
1
and stylized version of the same, including,
2 (the “Infringing Marks”) in connection with the promotion of its restaurant and
3 sale of its food and beverages in U.S. commerce. Examples of Defendant’s use
4 of the Infringing Marks and associated infringing trade dress (the “Infringing
5 Trade Dress”) are shown below:
6
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
36. As shown above, Defendant is using the identical mark MONSTER
26
and is also displaying the mark in a font that is nearly identical to the distinctive
27
font used by and associated with Monster. A comparison is shown below:
28
-15-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 17 of 27. PageID #: 17
1 Monster Defendant
2
4
37. In addition, Defendant predominantly uses the word MONSTER in
5
the Infringing Marks in a white stylized font, which is the same color that Monster
6
has used for its MONSTER mark on its flagship original MONSTER ENERGY
7
drink and widely used in its marketing and promotional materials since 2002.
8
Defendant is also using the Infringing Marks in connection with the colors green
9
and black, which are colors Monster has also widely and prominently used since
10
2002. Defendant’s Infringing Marks create a strikingly similar commercial
11
impression to that of the MONSTER Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress. Upon
12
information and belief, Defendant offers and sells its restaurant services, food,
13
and beverages to the general public. Monster similarly markets its goods and
14
services to the general public.
15
38. Upon information and belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of
16
Monster, the MONSTER Marks, and MONSTER Trade Dress when Defendant
17
commenced its infringing activities, due to Monster’s decades-long, widespread,
18
and continuous use of the MONSTER Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress in
19
commerce and the presence of Monster’s U.S. Trademark Registrations on the
20
Principal Register.
21
39. Defendant has been aware of Monster, the MONSTER Marks, and
22
MONSTER Trade Dress since at least as early as December 8, 2022, when
23
Monster sent a cease and desist letter to Defendant regarding its infringement.
24
Monster sent a follow-up letter to Defendant on January 12, 2023. Defendant did
25
not respond to either letter, and has continued its infringement thereafter
26
unabated.
27
28
-16-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 18 of 27. PageID #: 18
1 40. Defendant’s infringing acts as alleged herein have caused and are
2 likely to cause confusion, mistake, and deception among the relevant consuming
3 public as to the source or origin of the Defendant’s goods and services and are
4 likely to deceive the relevant consuming public into believing, mistakenly, that
5 Defendant’s restaurant services, food, and beverages originate from, or are
6 associated or affiliated with, or otherwise authorized by Monster.
7 41. Upon information and belief, Defendant’s acts are willful and
8 conducted with the deliberate intent to trade on the goodwill of Monster’s
9 MONSTER Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress and cause confusion and
10 deception in the marketplace.
11 42. Defendant’s acts are causing, and unless restrained, will continue to
12 cause damage and immediate irreparable harm to Monster and to its valuable
13 reputation and goodwill with the consuming public for which Monster has no
14 adequate remedy at law.
15 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
16 (Trademark Infringement, Trade Dress Infringement, and False
17 Designation of Origin Under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a))
18 43. Monster repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 42 hereof, as if
19 fully set forth herein.
20 44. As a result of the widespread use and promotion of Monster’s
21 MONSTER Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress, the marks and trade dress have
22 acquired strong fame and secondary meaning to consumers and potential
23 consumers, in that consumers and potential consumers have come to associate the
24 MONSTER Marks and MONSTER Trade Dress with Monster.
25 45. Defendant’s unauthorized use in commerce of the Infringing Marks
26 and Infringing Trade Dress as alleged herein is likely to deceive consumers as to
27 the origin, source, sponsorship, or affiliation of Defendant’s goods and services,
28 and is likely to cause consumers to believe, contrary to fact, that Defendant’s
-17-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 19 of 27. PageID #: 19
1 Dress by using a false designation of origin, through the marketing, sale, and
2 promotion of Defendant’s products and/or services;
3 C. That the Court render a final judgment that Defendant has violated
4 the provisions of Oh. Rev. Code § 4165.02(A);
5 D. That the Court render a final judgment that Defendant has violated
6 Ohio common law by unfairly competing with Monster;
7 E. That Defendant, its agents, servants, employees, attorneys,
8 successors, affiliates, and assigns, and all of those in active concert and
9 participation with any of the foregoing persons and entities who receive actual
10 notice of the Court’s order by personal service or otherwise, be forthwith
11 preliminarily and permanently enjoined from:
12 a. using the Infringing Marks and Infringing Trade Dress in connection
13 with the advertising, promotion, or sale of Defendant’s products
14 and/or services, using any of the MONSTER Marks or MONSTER
15 Trade Dress in connection with Defendant’s products and/or
16 services, using any of the MONSTER Marks or MONSTER Trade
17 Dress in adveristing or promoting Defendant’s products and/or
18 services, and/or using confusingly similar variations of any of the
19 MONSTER Marks or MONSTER Trade Dress in any manner that is
20 likely to create the impression that Defendant’s products and/or
21 services originate from Monster, are endorsed by Monster, or are
22 connected in any way with Monster;
23 b. manufacturing, distributing, providing, selling, marketing,
24 advertising, promoting, or authorizing any third party to
25 manufacture, distribute, provide, sell, market, advertise, or promote
26 any unauthorized products bearing any of the MONSTER Marks or
27 MONSTER Trade Dress, and/or any confusingly similar marks or
28 trade dress;
-22-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 24 of 27. PageID #: 24
23
24
25
26
27
28
-25-
Case: 3:23-cv-00480-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/09/23 27 of 27. PageID #: 27
1 Respectfully submitted,
2
Dated: March 9, 2023 By: /s/
3 James A. Tate (Ohio Bar. No. 0085319)
HELMER, MARTINS, TATE &
4 GARRETT CO. LPA
1745 Madison Rd.
5 Cincinnati, Ohio 45206
Telephone: (513) 421-2400
6 Facsimile: (513) 421-7902
Email: jtate@fcalawfirm.com
7
8
Steven J. Nataupsky (CA Bar No. 155913)
Pro hac vice to be filed
9 steven.nataupsky@knobbe.com
Lynda Zadra-Symes (CA Bar No. 156511)
10 Pro hac vice to be filed
11 lynda.zadrasymes@knobbe.com
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
12 2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
13 Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 760-0404
14 Facsimile: (949) 760-9502
15
Hans L. Mayer (CA Bar No. 291998)
16 Pro hac vice to be filed
hans.mayer@knobbe.com
17
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
18 1925 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
19
Telephone: (310) 551-3450
20 Facsimile: (949) 760-9502
21
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
22 MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY
23
24
25
26
27
28
-26-