CASE BRIEF

CASE NAME AND CASE LAW:

Seema Pandey And Anr v. Ministry of Railways And Ors.; (Writ
Petition No. 10256 of 2019); [Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, 1949]
FACTS:
The Petitioners seek a direction to forbid the respondents from
granting the tenders of Catering stalls reserved for women.
They had submitted their bid to get the license but did not
submit GSTIN and the food license in the individual name to
complete the contract as it was specified. The main purpose of
those were to prove that all the partners in the firm were
women but the petitioners did not prove that. So, they filed a
Writ Petition in the High Court of Delhi.
ISSUE:
Whether the decision of respondent is reasonable?
JUDGEMENT:
The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi on September 26th,2019 by the
2- judges bench of Justice G S Sistani and Justice Anup Jairam
Bhambhani held that the respondents were not irresponsible in
not providing the tender and in fact no merit was found to
exercise this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.