Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Federalization of Crime
Federalization of Crime
Federalization of Crime
Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
Federalization of Crime
Congress has increasingly federalized crimes that were part of state penal codes. Some of the
results of the federalization of crime are illustrated below. Firstly, it has led to duplicative
prosecutions at the state and federal levels. In addition, federal prosecutions depersonalize the
criminal justice system, thus withdrawing it from the people's daily experience. The
federalization of crime has also led to an increase in the caseload on the federal judiciary
(Demleitner 123). The increase in federal judgeships may lead to altering the character of federal
courts, thus contributing to changes in the way civil litigation is conducted. Federalization of
crime has also led to the unwise allocation of needed resources to meet genuine crime issues.
The federal justice system usually gives out stricter sentencing of criminal offenses than
the state system for the same criminal offenses. An increased number of detainees means that the
federal government has to allocate resources to cater for them n the detention centers.
Certain crimes can be prosecuted at both the state and federal levels if the unlawful
conduct committed by an individual violates both the state and federal laws (Williams 1499).
There was an attempt to overturn this rule in June 2019, but the Supreme Court affirmed it to
action in a 7-2 ruling (Williams 1499). Criminal acts that can be prosecuted by the state and
federal judicial system include bank robbery, kidnapping, drug trafficking, fraud charges, and
child pornography. The sentencing by the two judicial systems also differs. An example of such
a scenario is the case of Terance Gamble, who Alabama was prosecuted for the illegal possession
Surname 2
of a firearm in 2015, and he served one year in prison (Mullen 207). Subsequently, the federal
government charged him in relation to the 2015 incident and sentenced him to 46 months in jail.
Another example is Roberto Miramontes, who was acquitted of first-degree murder of a peace
officer by the state of Utah jury in 2012 (Manson np). He was later sentenced to life
imprisonment by a federal court in 2017. Do you think Congress should continue federalizing
crimes?
Surname 3
Works Cited
(1998): 123.
Manson, Pamela. "After 7 Years and an Acquittal, Man Is Convicted of Killing Utah Deputy."
Mullen, Kayla. "Gamble v. United States: A Commentary." Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Poly
1499.
Question
What has been the result of the “federalization” of crime? How can certain crimes be prosecuted
at both the state and federal level? Can you provide current examples to the class.