Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC) Software in Olymp... https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/white-papers/theory-and-use...

Industrial Solutions English Careers Sitemap Global

Back to Resources

Contemporary digital ultrasonic flaw detectors calculate commonly used parameters for reflector position in angle beam testing,
typically including sound path length, flaw depth, surface distance, and beam leg. These calculations are based on a measured
pulse transit time, calibrated material sound velocity and probe zero offset, and entered values for test piece thickness, beam
angle, and beam index point. By default, calculations assume a flat test piece. In the case of circumferential inspection of tubular
parts, the calculations must be adjusted for the effects of test piece curvature. This is done by means of a mathematical correction
based on entered outside and inside diameters of the test piece. The following topics will be reviewed.

1. Mathematical Theory
2. Previous Approaches
3. Implementation of Curved Surface Correction in EPOCH series flaw detectors
4. Measurement examples
5. Use of contoured wedges

In the case of common flat plate tests and axially-oriented tests of pipes and similar products, leg length and reflector depth and
surface distance can be calculated through simple trigonometry through the formulas below. But when testing a curved part in the
circumferential direction, these formulas become inaccurate due to the curvature that effectively causes reflectors to drop away
from the probe, which lengthens the sound path and changes the reflection angle at the inside surface of the part. For example,
compare similar conditions for a 45° beam in flat and curved plates both 20 mm thick. The signal obtained at a 35mm sound path
length in a flat plate corresponds to a reflector located at a depth of 15.2mm, 24.8mm from the exit point. But the same 35 mm
sound path in a 100mm diameter pipe corresponds to a reflector 19.2 mm deep from the OD surface and 31.7mm along the test
surface from the exit point to the point over the reflector.

To correct for curvature, a number of mathematical relationships can be applied, based on the angles, measured sound path and

1 of 11 2/23/2018, 2:45 PM
Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC) Software in Olymp... https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/white-papers/theory-and-use...

dimensions defined below. Utilizing these formulas with leg management enables proper calculation of surface projection and
vertical depth of flaws.

Legend for equations:


S = Surface Distance
Β = Angle of Refraction
Α = Sound path distance
t = Thickness
R1 = Inside Radius
R2 = Outside Radius
Βmax = Maximum angle of refraction
Ε = Angle of reflection at ID
Φ = Projection angle
D = Depth of reflector
1. Projection angle at ID (first leg)
Φ = sin-1(R2/R1 sinΒ)

2. Sound path distance Α, half skip


Α = R1∗sin(Φ_Β)/sin(Β)

3. Depth of reflector D
D = R2 – √Α2 + R22 - 2R2ΑcosΒ

4. Surface distance S
S = ΠR2/180[sin-1(R2/R1 sinΒ)-Β] Note: for first leg test, R1 = t-D

5. Maximum angle of refraction for a given wall thickness (angle of impingement)


Βmax = sin-1(R1/R2)

Traditional analog flaw detectors measured sound path length only and could not automatically calculate reflector depth or surface
distance, or count skip legs. Live automatic displays of these additional dimensional parameters, based on trigonometric
calculations, were introduced with the development of digital instruments. However early model digital flaw detectors calculated
depth for flat test pieces only. Both with these instruments and analog flaw detectors, operators performing circumferential testing
on pipes and similar curved test pieces used graphs and nomograms such as the ones below to calculate dimensions.

2 of 11 2/23/2018, 2:45 PM
Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC) Software in Olymp... https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/white-papers/theory-and-use...

The graph at left is used to determine a correction factor k that is based on refracted angle and the ratio of wall thickness and
outside diameter. The nomogram at right is used to determine the actual reflected angle at the inside of the curved surface, which
because of the curvature is less than the refracted beam angle at the sound entry point.

Once k and the refracted angle Β have been determined, it is possible to calculate the actual leg length AB from the formula:

AB = tk cosΒ

Once the leg length is known, a reflector can be accurately placed within the first or second leg of the sound path based on the
measured sound path length. Further calculations of flaw depth and surface position must be done manually. As an alternative to
calculations, look-up tables have been published that relate these geometrical corrections to test piece diameter, wall thickness,
and inspection angles.

In the absence of software for curved surface correction, another alternative to manual calculations or look-up tables was to
empirically set up flaw detectors with the aid of a reference standard representing the tube wall in question and incorporating a
series of side drilled holes. Reflections from the multiple reference holes can be identified with respect to horizontal position and a
screen overlay can be used to mark their vertical depth and surface projected positions on the display. The resulting screen
display is horizontally non-linear, but reflector positions can be extrapolated from it by referencing the overlay.

3 of 11 2/23/2018, 2:45 PM
Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC) Software in Olymp... https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/white-papers/theory-and-use...

The Curved Surface Correction (CSC) software in the EPOCH series flaw detectors performs calculations automatically based on
setup information input by the user.

These calculations assume that initial probe calibration for sound velocity and zero offset have been performed as usual on an
IIW-type block or similar flat reference block. Following that calibration, the operator enters the probe angle, the thickness of the
test piece, the “X value” (the distance between the beam index point and front edge of the wedge), and the part diameter. The
EPOCH software then uses that information plus the measured sound path length to calculate and display the following, based on
the equations in Section 1.

sound path length

4 of 11 2/23/2018, 2:45 PM
Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC) Software in Olymp... https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/white-papers/theory-and-use...

Projected surface distance from front of probe (or beam index point if no X-value is
input) along outside of the test piece
depth of reflector

Assuming proper calibration and setup, these measurements will be as accurate as those on a flat test piece in a given setup. The
example screens below show a typical measurement of a first leg reflector in a thick wall reference sample, shown with and
without CSC correction. When the correction is applied, the flaw depth measurement is shallower (1.13” versus 1.31”) and the
surface distance or projection is farther from the probe (1.39” versus 1.07”).

CSC correction off CSC correction on


Additional notes:

In all tests that involve circumferential probe alignment it is very important to hold the probe normal to the surface rather
than tilting it. Tilting will skew the sound beam and effectively change the refracted angle in the test piece.
In cases where the ratio of wall thickness to diameter is large, the sound beam at a given angle may not reflect off the ID,
instead continuing straight across to the OD without a skip. (See section 1, equation 6.) In these cases CSC calculations
are not valid and the EPOCH will not report dimensional information.

First leg measurements of pipe section with 0.1” side drilled holes as shown in photograph, using EPOCH 600 flaw detector and
A543S-RM transducer with ABWM-4T-45 wedge. Diameter is 5.0”, wall thickness 0.470”. Reflectors are 0.1” diameter side drilled
holes with centerline depths of 0.160” and 0.310” from OD (1/3 and 2/3 thickness).

The SDH diameter factor causes a small offset in the reading. When establishing the physical location of the reflector within the
part it is important to measure depth and surface projection to the normal of the outer radius tangent. The measured sound path
displayed is not affected by CSC correction status. Proper calibration of zero offset and material velocity are required. In the
examples below:

Physical measurement of sound path to hole OD


Surface projection is measured from the beam index point (X Value=0)

5 of 11 2/23/2018, 2:45 PM
Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC) Software in Olymp... https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/white-papers/theory-and-use...

FIRST LEG CSC Off CSC ON Physical Measurement

Sound Path 0.47 0.47 0.46

Depth 0.33 0.31 0.31

Surface distance 0.33 0.38 0.40

CSC off CSC on

6 of 11 2/23/2018, 2:45 PM
Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC) Software in Olymp... https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/white-papers/theory-and-use...

SECOND LEG CSC Off CSC ON Physical Measurement

Sound Path 1.14 1.14 NA

Depth 0.14 0.27 0.22

Surface distance 0.8 1.04 1.03

CSC off CSC on

7 of 11 2/23/2018, 2:45 PM
Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC) Software in Olymp... https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/white-papers/theory-and-use...

THIRD LEG CSC Off CSC ON Physical Measurement

Sound Path 1.78 1.78 NA

Depth 0.32 0.16 0.160

Surface distance 1.26 1.54 1.50

CSC off CSC on

As the diameter of a cylindrical test piece become smaller, circumferentially oriented coupling of conventional wedges becomes
progressively more challenging, due to reduced contact area and the increased possibility of rocking. For that reason, special
cylindrically contoured wedges are sometimes used on smaller diameter test pieces. As a guideline, the International Institute of
Welding recommends contouring whenever test piece radius R is less than the length of the wedge W squared divided by four:

The SDH diameter factor causes a small offset in the reading. When establishing the physical location of the reflector within the
part it is important to measure depth and surface projection to the normal of the outer radius tangent. The measured sound path
displayed is not affected by CSC correction status. Proper calibration of zero offset and material velocity are required. In the

8 of 11 2/23/2018, 2:45 PM
Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC) Software in Olymp... https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/white-papers/theory-and-use...

examples below:

R W2 / 4

ASTM standard E-164, Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Contact Examination of Weldments, calls for use of radiused wedges
whenever the part diameter is less than 20 inches or 500 mm. Olympus NDT experience suggests that this is a conservative
recommendation, especially when using small angle beam assemblies, but it is up to the user to determine applicability to specific
test.

The minimum outside diameter for which a wedge of a given size can be cylindrically contoured depends on mechanical
considerations related to wedge size and angle. The following chart lists the approximate minimum contouring diameter for three
common Panametrics-NDT wedge types.

Minimum OD for cyl. contour 45 degree 60 degree 70 degree

ABWM-4T 0.8” or 20 mm 1.1” or 28 mm/td> 1.5” or 38 mm

ABWM-5T 1.5” or 38 mm 2.2” or 56 mm 2.8” or 70 mm

ABWM-6T 1.2” or 30 mm 1.7” or 43 mm 2.4” or 60 mm

Panametrics-NDT contoured wedges maintain a beam index point at the BIP location marked on the wedge, and the nominal
wedge angle is calculated based on beam refraction at that point. However it is important to note that cylindrical wedge contouring
affects the incident angle and thus the refracted angle from front to back across the diameter of the beam, resulting in a range of
refracted angles and effectively a defocusing and broadening of the beam in that axis.

When using contoured wedges, appropriately contoured reference blocks must also be used to calibrate zero offset and verify
beam index point and refracted angle. Conventional IIW and AWS-type reference blocks cannot be used because of the gap
between the block and the concave surface of the wedge.

9 of 11 2/23/2018, 2:45 PM
Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC) Software in Olymp... https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/white-papers/theory-and-use...

NDT Instruments Industrial Microscopes XRF and XRD Analyzers Support

Flaw Detectors/Phased Array Laser Confocal Microscopes Handheld XRF Analyzers Product Information
Flaw Detectors Digital Microscopes Compact and Portable XRF Service Centers
Thickness Gages Measuring Microscopes Analyzers Software Downloads
Transducers and Probes Cleanliness Inspector Process XRF Analyzers Training Academy
Bar Inspection Solutions Light Microscopes XRD Analyzers Discontinued and Obsolete
Tube Inspection Solutions Semiconductor & Flat Panel OEM Solutions Products
NDT Systems Instrumentation Display Inspection Applications Solutions Key ISO Certifications
Industrial Scanners Microscopes MSDS Datasheets
Stereo Microscopes Ethics And Corporate
Videoscopes and Digital Cameras Compliance
Borescopes Image Analysis Software Request RMA
Objective Lenses
OEM Microscope Multimedia
Videoscopes
Components for Integration
Fiberscopes
Rigid Borescopes Applications Notes
Light Sources Videos
Inspection Assist Software Webinars
Turning Tools Tutorials
White Papers
FAQs

Compliance Report

10 of 11 2/23/2018, 2:45 PM
Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC) Software in Olymp... https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/white-papers/theory-and-use...

11 of 11 2/23/2018, 2:45 PM

You might also like