Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Skyline Pipes para Wise
Skyline Pipes para Wise
The petitioner has made an error while filing GSTR 3B(Q) for the
14,10,400/-. The error was noticed by the petitioner while filing GSTR
petitioner seeks to rectify the GSTR-3B return for any of the month
CGST Act, 2017, the petitioner was entitled to take input tax credit in
both after the 30th November, following the end of financial year to
annual return, whichever is earlier. That is, ITC for the FY 2021-22
upto 30th November, 2022. The error was noticed by the petitioner in
08.12.2022 to rectify the error. GST portal vide their email dated
response from GSTIN was received vide email dated 21.12.2022 to the
Page 1 of 4
"Dear Taxpayer,
You have reported issue related to auto population
Of the data from GSTR-1/ R2B to 3B. There is no
process to amend GSTR-3B form once it is
Offset/Filed. As per our system records you have
already filed 3B form for the reported month.
Please adjust the same ITC in your next month
manually. For any other queries/concerns, please
raise a ticket with helpdesk.
Thanks, Team GSTN."
specified date to claim the ITC, i.e., 30 th November, 2022 in this case.
A. The error has been made by the petitioner in the quarter ending
GSTR 3B returns filed till 30.11.2022. Also, Section 16(4) of the CGST
B. The petitioner has relying upon the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in
the matter of Eicher Motors Limited, and Anr. v. Union ofIndia and Ors.
reported in 1999 (106) ELT3 (S.C.) and Collector of Central Excise, Pune
and Ors. w. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd. and Ors., 1999 (112) BLT 353 (S.C).,
state that accrued right cannot be taken away due to a mere clerical
error. The aforesaid case law is in relation to the rule of MODVAT not in
consonance with the Section of the Act. However, in the present case, the
time limit for availment of ITC in the return has been prescribed under
Page 2 of 4
C. No comments to offer.
2022. Thus, there is no delay on the party of the GSTIN system as the
for the technical difficulties for the taxpayer. The GST helpdesk cannot
2017.
E. The petitioner has cited various case laws in their support, however all
the case laws cited are in relation to amendment in form GSTR 1 and are
not relevant in the present case. Contrary to that Hon’ble Supreme Court
in the case of Union Of India Through Its ... vs Bharti Airtel Ltd.
“In any case, the direction issued by the High Court being in the nature of
issuing writ of mandamus to allow the writ petitioner to rectify Form GSTR -
3B for the period July to September 2017, in the teeth of express statutory
F. No comments to offer.
G. The petitioner contends that they have right to claim ITC under the
Section 16 clearly states that the last date for availing ITC for a
2017;
H. No comments to offer;
J. No comments to offier;
Page 3 of 4
K. There is no deficiency in the GSTIN system, as contemplated by the
petition. It was petitioner’s fault that they didn’t avail the input tax
M. No comments to offier;
N. No comments to offer;
O. No comments to offer;
P. No comments to offer;
Q. No comments to offer;
R. No comments to offer;
S. No comments to offer;
T.
Para 56: It is prayed before the court that the application of the petitioner be
reckonits eligibility to ITC etc. primarily on the basis of his office record and
time to time. The same has been not done by the petitioner during the
Page 4 of 4