February 2015. These nine salesmen had total stocks in shez | mount 10 Phip900,000.00; Phip2000,000.00 wore pt esses in the Highline Trading by pate complainant, end Php64.060.00 withdeawn by the private complainant and her husband from the account on 18 Febreaty 2015, and which covers more than the investment of private complainant in the partnership. Under the circumstances, private complainant, having pilazed the ship coffers, cannot expect the checks to be funded. BP 22, though 2 special law and therefore a malin probibitum, cannot be applied if its violation is attributable to complainant herself, for as such there would be no inteat to perpetrate The Appellee (private complainant), on the other hand, laments the acquittd of accused in two checks, to wit BDO Checks No. 9900399088 and (0000399089, advancing that since accused appealed the decision, she threw the ‘whole case open for review. As such, Appellee entreats this Court to overumn the Decision and decree accused's conviction and lisbility to all three checks. “The appeal must fail. The Decision of the lower courts affimmed.