Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aguilar - 09 Activity 1 - ARG@Sustainable
Aguilar - 09 Activity 1 - ARG@Sustainable
Aguilar - 09 Activity 1 - ARG@Sustainable
If visitor impacts are not closely observed, environmental quality may gradually
deteriorate without MPA employees becoming aware of it until the harm is severe.
Similar gradual negative changes may start to take place in regional communities.
Careful monitoring of impacts, both positive and negative, must be a core activity of the
site's overall management to identify and address issues before they get out of hand.
The idea of carrying capacity, which was initially used in the field of range
management for Lumba-Lumba island, was the foundation for the first approaches
created to address the effects of tourism. In the literature, different definitions of
carrying capacity have been produced based on how and where the idea was used.
Impacts will depend on a variety of factors, including visitor motivations and behaviors,
modes of transportation and lodging, the efficiency of tour guides, and the seasons
during which use is highest. The amount and type of use that can be sustained in each
area over time while maintaining desired biophysical resource conditions and
opportunities for high-quality visitor experiences at specific levels of management input
are referred to as carrying capacity in a recreational context.
With that in mind, the following is my analysis of how I can implement visitor
impact management to provide sustainable tourism measures on Lumba-Lumba Island:
• Seasonal or temporal limits on use, for example, limiting visiting times,
accommodation facilities, or public transport; ensuring visits occur at appropriate
times of the day.
• Regulating group size, particularly for specialist activities, requiring pre-
registration (visits only by prior arrangement), and providing guided tours that
allow for more control and maximize enjoyment.
• Restricting visitor behavior, for example, ensuring that visitors stay on specified
routes and do not trample vegetation or disturb animals and that noise and the use
of light at night (for example during visits to turtle nesting beaches) is minimized.
• Using zoning, for example, closing areas to visitors, or reducing visits to ecologically
important areas.
• Increasing entrance fees at peak periods or to popular areas.
• Constructing facilities and trails that reduce the impact but allow more visitors and
helpthem to see the wildlife - boardwalks, overlooks, hides, pontoons, etc.
• Provide garbage bins to encourage visitors to not leave litter.
• Educating visitors via visitor guidelines, codes of conduct, and information boards.
• Increased guide training to increase visitor education and monitor visitor behavior.
Visitor Impact Management (VIM)
There may be an implicit "zero tolerance" for effects on nonrenewable resources
on Lumba-Lumba island when it comes to cultural resources. While this might be true in
some circumstances, it is frequently not the case. The implicit "zero tolerance" for
impact, however, can make it difficult to choose the right metrics and benchmarks for
excellence.
Several properties of the VERP process make it effective for assessing the carrying
capacity of cultural resources on the Lumba-Lumba island. The VERP framework's
preliminary components call for parks to ascertain the function and importance of the
resource. To achieve this, the inhabitants of the island of Lumba-Lumba must
comprehend what makes the resources they oversee unique and significant. The
advantages of this exercise include an understanding of the qualities that cultural
resources must possess to be listed, a deeper comprehension of the historical
occurrences, personality, or culture that the resource tries to interpret, and the potential
to enhance public interpretation of the site.