Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Seminar 2 - Classifcation and The Three Certainties
Seminar 2 - Classifcation and The Three Certainties
Seminar 2 - Classifcation and The Three Certainties
Objectives
By the end of this Seminar you should be able to:
1. Identify and differentiate fixed trusts, discretionary trusts and powers and the
relevant tests which apply to determining the validity of each;
2. Apply skills in legal method to interpret dispositions and reach reasoned conclusions
on the validity of testamentary bequests; and
3. Assess the role of intention in creating an express trust.
Required Reading
Virgo: Ch.4
Hunter v Moss [1994] 1 WLR 452
McPhail v Doulton [1971] AC 424 (HL)
Re Baden’s Deed Trusts (No 2) [1973] Ch 9 (CA)
Further Reading
Emery, ‘The most hallowed principle – certainty of beneficiaries of trusts and powers
of appointment’ (1982) 98 LQR 551
Hayton, ‘Uncertainty of subject-matter of trusts’ (1994) LQR 335-340
Parkinson, ‘Reconceptualising the Express Trust [2002] CLJ 657
1
Questions
Q1. Jenny died in 2022. During a successful career as a high-ranking police officer in
Birmingham, Jenny had devoted her life to advancing citizenship within the community. She
had also amassed a substantial collection of art by the 19 th Century artists - “The
Sisterhood”. By her will made in 2020, Jenny appointed Kevin and Michael as her trustees.
Jenny made a number of directions:
(a) One painting from my collection to be given, as my trustees think fit, to any
person who is appreciative of The Sisterhood.
Q2. Do you think Hunter v Moss was a good decision? Why or why not?
Q3.When analysing the 3 certainties to what extent does the law ensure the intentions of
the settlor are fulfilled?