RITA - Tanque Cilindrico - Alcalinos Diluidos - SPI - David - Long

SPI - Tanque Cilindrico 22/02/2023 Página 1 de 27
SPI
Static calculation
for a thermoplastic cylindrical tank with Flat bottom
made from Polystone G black B 100 (PE100) incorporating relevant
DVS calculations
Project: SPI - Tanque Cilindrico
Description: Solicitud Alcalinos Diluidos
Drawing number:
For company: SPI

Soluciones en Termoplásticos, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Carbono 41,Minerales, San Jose El Verde
JAL, México CP 45694

Installation: inside
Medium: Alcalinos Divididos
Temperature: 28 °C
Type of roof: Flat roof
Quantity of rigidities:: 9
Ventilation Pipe venting
Overpressure: pressure less
Lifetime: 10 Years
Computation base: Guideline DVS 2205
Calculated by: LDM S.A. De C.V.
CESLA AMERICAS SA de CV
Bvld. Xolotl 13
Los Girasoles
Hermosillo, Sonora
Date: 22/02/2023
Sign / Company stamp
Calculated with RITA4.0 of the Röchling Engineering Plastics SE & Co. KG

material used is distributed under the tradename Polystone G black B 100 (PE100)
SPI
1 Scope
The following calculation is based on the current German guideline DVS 2205-2 for vertical, cylindrical
workshop-fabricated tanks of thermoplastic materials. The measurements used in this calculation are
based on customer data.
For the application of this calculation, it is necessary to comply with the following prerequisites:
- The welding of the shells with each other and with the bottom corresponds to one of the
variants indicated on Fig. 1 of DVS 2205-2 supplement 6.
- The reinforcing shell is shrunk on to the lowest course without any gaps or any
impermissible pretension.
- The characteristic material values are identical for both shells.
- No openings in the reinforced region.
Tanks, installed in a region outside of Germany should be designed in accordance with the rules and
regulations valid for that area. In agreement with the operator a calculation with the RITA-software based
on DIN 4149 can be performed, in case information about the ground acceleration, geological soil class
and soil class are available.
For the validation of this static calculation, it is necessary to comply with the following prerequisites:
- The tank can be installed inside or outside a building. The tanks basement should be in direct contact
with the ground. In case the tank is installed in higher floors of a building, on a platform etc. additional
proof considering the movement of the whole system is required.
- The tank should always be anchored directly or in case of a tank inside a collecting tank indiretly to the
foundation. The construction of the lower and upper support structure should be in accordance with
pictures 1 and 2 in DVS 2205-2 supplement 4. in case of deviating designs corresponding proofs are
required.
The welding seams should be in accordance with the corresponding DVS guideline.
Remark:
For the calculation the values and the formula symbols of the guideline DVS 2205-2 are used. These are
shown in the annex of the calculation. Other used parameters for example AD are shown direct in the
text.
2 Construction values
2.1 Dimensions
Internal diameter: d 2 550 mm

Cylindrical height: hz 5 200 mm
Quantity of rigidities n 9
Height of Section 1: (upper) 2 200 mm

Height of Section 2: (lower) Two layers 3 000 mm
Total height without bottom: h 5 210 mm

Setup height: hM 6 225 mm
Construction volume: V 26.56 m³

Max. volume: 25.23 m³
Max. filling level: hF 4 939 mm
Material: Polystone G black B 100 (PE100)
Ventilation Pipe venting

SPI
2.2 Operating data
Medium: Alcalinos Divididos

Density of medium: F 1.02 g/cm³
Temperature: TM 28 °C
Maximum medium temperature: TMK 28 °C
Operating pressures
Shortterm internal pressure: p üK 0,005 bar
Shortterm internal vacuum: p uK 0,003 bar
Mean ambient air temperature: TA 23 °C
Maximum ambient air temperature: TAK 30 °C
2.3 Welding process
Sections(Longitudinal Heated tool butt welding fs 0,8 fz 0,9

seams):
Roof (radial seams): Heated tool butt welding fs 0,8 fz 0,9
2.4 Characteristic values of material
Material: Polystone G black B 100 (PE100)
Material density: 1.00 g/cm³
Reduction factor A 2: 1.00
Reduction factor A 2I: 1.00
Safety concept: Partial Safety Concept
Partial safety factor: M 1.30
Global safety factor:  g   F 2  M 1.95
Permissible edge expansion e: 1.00 %
Material specific design factor C: 1.20
2.4.1 Temperature-dependent parameters:
T C K K* K M* K L* K K* ,d K M* ,d K L* ,d EK A1
[°C] [N/mm²] [N/mm²] [N/mm²] [N/mm²] [N/mm²] [N/mm²] [N/mm²] [-]
20.00 14.80 11.46 10.42 11.39 8.81 8.02 800,0 1.00
25.50 13.52 10.46 9.52 10.40 8.05 7.32 662,5 1.00
28.00 12.98 10.05 9.14 9.99 7.73 7.03 600,0 1.00
29.00 12.78 9.89 9.00 9.83 7.61 6.92 575,0 1.00
37.75 11.17 8.64 7.86 8.59 6.65 6.05 426,0 1.00
50.00 9.36 7.24 6.51 7.20 5.57 5.01 270,0 1.00

SPI
3 Loadings
3.1 Permanent loadings
3.1.1 Weight of whole tank: G  G  G  G  G  7 959 N

E D Z B A
2
6 πd 3
Weight of roof: G  A s    g  10  g   10  1 124 N
D D D A 4
 6
Weight of cylinder: G  A s    g  10  6 004 N
Z Z Z
 6
Weight of bottom: G  A  s    g  10  831 N
B B B
Area loadings on the roof (e. g. nozzles) gA = 0.00 kN/m²
Weight of installations on the roof straining only the cylinder : GA = 0 N

Ladders and similar are to be placed and fixed independently of the tank.
3.1.2 Weight of medium: G F = V   F  g  10 3 GF = 257 326 N
3.1.3 Internal and external pressure: No specification
In the case of the installation of safety fittings such as overcharge safety devices or aerators and
deaerators causing higher pressures, only these pressures shall be considered.
3.2 Medium term active loadings
Not applicable Inside
3.3 Short-term active loadings
The time of influence for short-term active loadings is determined with 10-1 hours.
Water hammers which may occur when filling shall be avoided by appropriate measures.
3.3.1 Internal and external pressure püK, puK
According to the customers specification no higher pressures in the tank are existing. Therefore the
minimum pressures according to DVS 2205-2 Section 1 are quoted. From the definition of püK it is
determined
püK  pü. It is the same for puK.
The following value is assumed
Over pressure: 0,0005 N/mm² (0,005 bar)
Depression: 0,0003 N/mm² (0,003 bar)
3.3.2 Live loads on the roof
The roofs must not be walked on if load distributing measures have not been carried out.
Corresponding precautions are to be taken at installations and inspection works.
3.3.3 Wind loading
Not applicable
3.3.4 Pulsation equivalent stress due to wind loading

SPI
Not applicable
3.3.5 Depression due to wind suction
Not applicable inside

3.3.6 Installation loadings
The tank shall be designed for the loading conditions arising at transport and installation. Thereby it
shall be calculated with the 1,5fold installation loading. The safety factor is according
Partial Safety Concept: F1 = 1,35
The short-time welding factor according to DVS 2205-1 is to be considered.

3.3.7 Seismic load
The periodic time is calculated on a clamped bending shear beam with the wall thickness at a point two
thirds of the way along, taking into account the intrinsic weight of the tank and the additional roof loads GA
and gA, the 1.5-fold value of the static E-modulus being used as the dynamic E-modulus. The periodic
time from filling is calculated by using the formula (A.24) from DIN EN 1998-4.
For the given geological soil class and the soil class the geological soil parameter S and the values for TB,
TC and TD are obtained.
The calculation value of the horizontal acceleration ah and the calculation value of the vertical
acceleration av are in accordance with DIN 4149 Sect. 5.4.3 calculated from the ground acceleration ag,
the geological soil parameter S, the amplification factor β0, the value of significance γlE, the behaviour
factor q and the reading value on a spectrum normalised to one.
Area: Other countries
Geological soil class: T Soil class: C
Ground acceleration: ag 0.40 m/s² Geological soil parameter: S 1.25

Normalised spectral value: 0.99 Value of significance:  IE 1,6
Amplification factor:  0 2,5 Factor of behaviour: q 1,5
Calculation value: a v 0.93 m/s² Calculation value: ah 1.33 m/s²
Periodic time: T 0.40 s
The global moment (product of the masses (filling, roof, cylinder, additional roof masses from GA and
gA), the calculation value of the horizontal acceleration and the lever arm) is required at the lower limit
of the courses and at the level of the nozzles.
For the calculation of the earthquake moment in the height x the following formula is obtained from.
  d2 h  x 2   d2   a
  h ges  x  M Gz ( x)   h
M Erd ,d   f Schwapp  g F   GD  G A  g A 
 4 2  4   g
For the calculation of the stress resulting from the earthquake moment the following formula is used.
4   F 4  M Erd ,d
 Erd ,d 
  d 2  s Z ,i
Since the filling level is not smaller than the diameter, the effect of sloshing can be disregarded.
fSchwapp  1.00

SPI
Course-No. Height x M Erd ,i  Erd ,i

1 3 000 mm 13,9 kNm 0,226 N/mm²
2 0 mm 88,5 kNm 0,754 N/mm²
3.4 Temperature
Wetted parts are designed for the mean medium temperature TM in case of long time loading effects and
for the maximum medium temperature TMK in case of short time loading effects. The mean temperature is
defined as the temperature, which causes the same decrease in material strength like alternating
temperatures do according to Miner's rule. The average of the two neighbouring air temperatures is taken
as wall temperature for not wetted parts. The air temperature in the tank is assumed to be the medium
temperature.
4 Design calculation
The safety factor is defined in Direction DVS 2205-1 for proofs of strength and stability.
In general, the following is applicable:
Sd  1
Rd
with Sd dimensioning value of the stresses
Rd dimensioning value of the stress ability
In this respect, the characteristic effects or the stresses are multiplied by the partial safety coefficients γF
according to Table 1.
Table 1. Partial safety coefficients of the effects.

Effect Partial safety coefficient
Dead weight, filling and assembly γF1 = 1,35
Pressures, wind and snow γF2 = 1,5
Stress-reducing dead weight γF3 = 0,9
Earthquake γF4 = 1,0
4.1 Proof of strength
4.1.1 Effects
Loadings due to connected nozzles and pipelines are not covered by this calculation and are to be
considered separately by means of constructive measures (e.g. compensators).

SPI
4.1.2 Overlapping of effects

Three loading categories are distinguished according to the time of influence:
- short-term active loadings (K), e.g. püK, puK, pus, peu, wind
- medium-term active loadings (M), e.g. Snow pS or summer temperatures – not important for
inside installation
- long-term active loadings (L), e.g. own weight, filling, pü, pu
According to DVS 2205 for all proofs of strength a double proof were made.
1) It is proved that the load due to long-term active loadings in overlapping with the effects of a mean-
term time of influence but without short-term loadings does not exceed the creep strength.
K Lvorh K Mvorh  Lvorh

, M , d  A1  A2
,d
 ,d
1 mit , M ,d 
K Lvorh N / mm²
K L* ,d K M* ,d fs
KL,d* = Creep strength for the calculated usable life at the mean active temperature.
KM,d* = Creep strength for the mean-term influence (e.g. at snow for 3 months at 0 ° C for the roof).
2) It is proved that the load due to short-term loading in overlapping with the remaining effects does not
exceed the residual solidity of the material at the end of the calculated usable life. In this case the
creep strength is determined with 10-1 hours as residual solidity.
K Kvorh
,d
1
K K* ,d
with KK,d* = creep strength for 10-1 hours at the temperature belonging to this loading combination.
For the proof of solidity of the roof it is verified wether the consideration of snow loading leads to
unfavourable results since the sum of loadings will be increased, but the creep strength will also increase
due to the active wall temperature of 0 ° C.
The more unfavourable of the two proofs for the measuring of the components were decisive.
4.1.3 Shell
The height of the lower section hZF have to be at least hZF  14
,  d  sSF . For tanks with varying wall
thickness a wall thickness relation of the neighbouring sections of max. 2 is admissible without further
proof.
4.1.3.1 Proof in circumferential direction
The proof is furnished for each section that the lower edge can withstand the ring tensile stress resulting
from the contents and overpressure. The double proof is furnished according to 4.1.2 with
( F 1  p stat ,i   F 2  p ü )  d  A1  A2
K Lvorh
,d  [N/mm²]
2  f s  s Z ,i
( F 1  p stat ,i   F 2  püK )  d  A1  A2
K Kvorh
,d  [N/mm²]
2  f Z  s Z ,i
pstat ,i   F  g  hF ,i 106 [N/mm²]
at which hF,i = signifies the height of the filling capacity over the lower edge of section i. The upper section
is numbered with I = 1.Loadings resulting from medium-term active influences do not occur at this proof.
K vorh
M ,d  0

SPI
In the case of cylinders made from sheets the welding factor of the shell weld fS is considered.
The residual stresses from the bending of the sheets at ambient temperature may be neglected if the
s
values given in table 2 for the permissible edge expansion e   100 [%] according to DVS 2205-2 are
d
not exceeded. With bending the sheets at elevated temperatures the residual stresses can be reduced
obviously. Therefore RITA permits an edge expansion of 2 % for sheets which are bended at elevated
temperatures. For the proper heating- and forming- process the tank manufacturer is responsible for. In
the case of PVC, the sheets are hot-formed.
In the calculation the following values are calculated:
Minimum wall thickness of the inner layer in the double wall section: s Z ,n  15.00 mm
Thickness of supporting shell: s Z ,0  8.00 mm
Minimum height of the supporting layer: hZ , 0  340.00 mm
Effective wall thickness in the double layer section considered for the proof of strength in the
circumferential direction:
s Z  s Z ,n  s Z ,0  23.00 mm
Course-No. Height Thickness gA =  Erd ,i K Lvorh K M Erd ,i

1 2200 mm 12 mm 0,020 N/mm² 3,2 N/mm² 3,5 N/mm² 0.32 0.50
2 3000 mm 23 mm 0,050 N/mm² 4,2 N/mm² 4,7 N/mm² 0.42 0.67
In the case of earthquakes:

   av 
k, i, d   F 4   p Stat , i
p Erd

  1  v
a 
  p ü  N / mm 2 Erd
p Stat, 
i,  p Stat ,i   1 

  g    g 
 d  A  A2
N / mm 
Erd
p d2 2
K k,U,i,Erd   k, i, d    F  a h  1
 2  s z ,i 4  s z ,i
d
 fz
2. Term from additional pressure on cylinder wall
Course-No. hz sz Erd
p Stat K KU,,dErd K K* ,d  KErd
1 2 200 mm 12 mm 0,0217 N/mm² 2.76 N/mm² 9.99N/mm² 0.28
2 3 000 mm 23 mm 0,0552 N/mm² 3.50 N/mm² 9.99N/mm² 0.35

SPI
4.1.3.2 Proof in longitudinal direction
The highest tensile stresses shall be controlled. The relieving, continuously active compressive stress
may hereby be considered to 90 %.
Only the lower section at the transition to the bottom has to be examined for the proof of the loading in
longitudinal direction.
The double proof shall be furnished according to point 4.1.2 with:
  d2 
   (GD  GZ  g A  10 3 ) 
K Lvorh
d d
 C  ( F 1  pstat   F 2  pü )    F 2  pü  
F 3
4

A1  A2 N/mm² 
,d
 2 4  d  s ZF
 
p stat  ρ F  g  h F  10 6
vorh
K M,d  0
   d 2 3 
   (G  G  g  10 ) 
d 4   F 2  MW 10 A A N/mm² 
3
d F 3 D Z A
4
KKvorh ,1
 C  ( F1  pstat   F 2  pü )    F 2  pü     1 2
 d  d
,d ,W 2
 2 4  sZF
 
   d 2 3 
 d d
 F 3  (GD  GZ  g A  10 ) 
A A
K Kvorh ,2
 C  ( F1  pstat   F 2  püK )    F 2  püK   4  1 2

,d ,W
 2 4  d  sZF
 
 a 
Erd
p stat  pstat   1  v 
 g
  d2 
 (G D  GZ  g A   10 3 )    A1  A2
 d d 4  M Erd  10 3  4 a
K K ,d ,Erd   F 4   C  ( p stat
vorh Erd
 pü )   pü        F 3   F 4  v   
  2 4  d2   d  g   s ZF
 
, d  Max( K K , d ,W , K K , d ,W , K K , d , Erd )
K Kvorh vorh ,1 vorh , 2 vorh
N/mm² 
Factor C for the welded transition of the bottom-shell connection is the product of the load increase factor
C1 = 1,2 and a material specific design factor C2 as specified in table 3 of the DVS 2205-2. 2.
In the calculation the following values are calculated:
Minimum wall thickness of the inner layer in the double wall section: s Z ,n  15.00 mm
Thickness of supporting shell: s Z ,0  8.00 mm

Minimum height of the supporting layer: hZ , 0  340.00 mm
Effective wall thickness in the double layer section considered for the proof of strength in the axial
direction:
s  s  0,5  s 
Z Z ,n Z ,0
19.00 mm
Course-No. Height Thickness

gA =  Erd ,i K Lvorh K M Erd ,i
2 3000 mm 23 mm 0,050 N/mm² 5,5 N/mm² 5,4 N/mm² 0.55 0.77

SPI
For the combination of ring tensile load and axial compressive load, the strength analyses of the cylinder
sections should then be carried out with reference stresses according to von Mises. The maximum
comparative stress shall be calculated from these load combinations: long-term overpressure and
long-term underpressure.
Load overpressure - LF1:
  pü  d 4  M Erd ,i  1 0 3 G D  G A  k f  G Z ,i   a  A  A
K A,k, i,Erd   F 4       1  v   1 2 N / mm  2
 d  d
d
 4 2
 g   s z ,i
 p Erd
k, i, d  d d2  A1  A 2   a  
k, i, d   F 4   p Stat , i
K k,U,i,Erd      F  ah  p Erd   1  v   p ü 
d  2s 4  s z ,i  f  g 
 z ,i  z  
 KM,i,,Erd K A , Erd
  K
2 U , Erd
2
 K KA ,,iErd
, d  K K ,i , d
U , Erd

K ,i , d K ,i , d
Erd
K ,i
 d

K K* K K*
In load case underpressure – LF2, the long-term overpressure in the formulas mentioned above will be
replaced by the long-term underpressure with the negative value.
Course-No. Load sz Erd

p Stat M Erd K KA,,dErd K KU,,dErd  KM,d,Erd K K* ,d  KErd
case
[-] [mm] [N/mm²] [kNm] [N/mm²] [N/mm²] [N/mm²] [N/mm²] [-]
1 LF2 12 0,0217 13,88 -0,26 2,96 3.10 9.99 0,3
2 LF2 23 0,0552 88,55 -0,80 3,61 4.07 9.99 0,4
Minimum height of lower 440 mm

section:
The requirements are fulfilled.

SPI
4.1.4 Flat bottom
4.1.4.1 Proof for the type of burden filling
The bottom and the cylinder are connected with fillet welds. The required bottom thickness was
calculated as follows:
 B  s *ZF  sB  s ZF with sZF carried-out wall thickness and B according to figure 7 of DVS 2205-2
s*ZF  max(s*ZF,L ,s*ZF,K )

 d d  F3  (G D  G Z)  A1  A 2
*
s ZF,L  C  (  p stat    p )     p  
F1 F2 Ü F2 Ü  * mm
 2 4 π  d  K L,d
 d d  F3  (G D  G Z)  A1  A 2
*
s ZF,K  C  (  pstat    p üK )     p üK  
F1 F2 F2  * mm 
 2 4 π  d  K K,d
s *ZF  15.00 mm δB  0.80 s *ZF  δ B  12.00 mm
s ZF  23.00 mm sB  15.00 mm
4.1.4.2 Proof for a non-anchored tank with overpressure
A residual filling height resulting from overpressure is not required! (hRFu < 30 mm)
4.1.4.3 Proof for an internal partial vacuum
A residual filling height resulting from internal vacuum is not required! (hRFu < 30 mm)
4.1.5 Welding joint between bottom and shell
An explicit proof of the weld load can be omitted if the following conditions are complied with:
Thickness of welding seam a ³ 0,7×sB = 10.50 mm
Long term welding factor ³ 0,6 = 0.60 (DVS 2203-4)

If one of these conditions is not complied with, a detailed proof of the stresses in the weld has to be
furnished.

SPI
4.1.6 Type of roof
The flat roof is manufactured according DVS 2205-2 supplement 3 with the number of regidities and
stiffeners stated below.
The ratio of the height to the thickness of the regidities is limited to 8
Quantity of rigidities:: 9 Width of rigidity: 120

Quantity of webs: 9 Thickness of stiffener: 15
4.1.6.1 Loadings
Weight of the roof webs and rigidities GD1, G Rigidities 1.124,0 N
Minimum pressures according DVS 2205-2 chapter 1PuK / PüK 0,0003 N/mm² / 0,0005 N/mm²
Depression due to wind suction PuS 0,0003 N/mm²

SPI
pE = 1 kN/m² = 0,001 N/mm² for considering unplanned point loads (without transmission into the
cylinder).
4.1.6.2 Proof of steadiness
4.1.6.2.1 Proofs of stability of the roofing plate across the stiffeners

The bending moment in the roofing plate between the stiffeners is produced, in simplified form, from:
p × d2
m=
8 × (n  1) 2
2
(3  μ) × p × d
m= n =9
64
K Lvorh K Kvorh
It applies:
,d
 1 and ,d
1
K L* ,d K K* ,d
pDL , d × d 2 × 6 × A1 × A2
K vorh
L,d =
(n  1) 2 × 8 × sD2 × f s
pDL,d = max( F1 × gD   F 2 × pu , F 2 × pü   F3 × (gD  gA ))
pDK ,d × d 2 × 6 × A1 × A2
 K Kvorh,d = (n  1)2 × 8 × sD2 × f z
p DK ,d = max F1 × g D   F 2 × (max(puK , puS )  p E ),  F 2 × püK   F 3 × ( g D  g A )
K L,vorh
d K vorh
K, d
p DL,d K L,vorh
d
p DK,d K vorh
K, d K *L,d K *K,d
0,0001 N/mm² 0.08 N/mm² 0,0021 N/mm² 1.13 N/mm² 0.01 0.11
K*,d 7.38 N/mm² 9.83 N/mm²
In earthquake follows with:

 av 
DK, d =  F 4 × g D ×  1 
p Erd     F 4 × pu
 g  K Erd
p Erd
Dk, d
K Erd
K, d
K *K,d K, d
K *K, d
Earthquake 0,109 kN/m² 0.06 N/mm² 9.99 N/mm² 0.01

SPI
4.1.6.2.2 Proofs along the stiffeners
A T-beam with the carrying width

0,85 × d
bm = is calculated for the proofs along the stiffeners.
n1
n=9 bm = 216.75 mm
The position of the centre of gravity zS (measured on the mid-space of the roofing plate) and the
moment of inertia IS result from:
hS  s D
hS × sS × 2
2 h 3S × s S b m × s D3  h  sD 
zS = IS =   b m × s D × z S2  hS × s S ×  S  zS 
h S × s S  bm × sD 12 12  2 
zs = 29.49 mm ls = 6,332,778.95 mm
4
4.1.6.2.2.1 Inward stresses
Proof of the strength at the bottom edge of the stiffener

 s 
( F1 × ( gD  gSteife)   F 2 × pu ) × d 3 ×  hS  D  zS  × A1 × A2
 2  pDK ,d =  F 1 × ( g D  g Steife )   F 2 × max( puK , puS )  pE
,d =
KLvorh
(n 1) × 8 × I S
 s 
p DK ,d × d 3 ×  hS  D  z S  × A1 × A2 hS × sS ×  × g
 2 
 K K ,d =
vorh
(n  1) × 8 × I S
gSteife = (2 × n  1) ×
d × 10 6
p DK,d = 0,0021 N/mm² g Rigidity = 0,0001 N/mm² gD = 0,0001 N/mm²

vorh
K
K L,vorh
d
K, d
K L,vorh
d K vorh
K, d
K *L,d K
*
K, d
0.93 N/mm² 7.02 N/mm² 0.13 0.70
K*,d 7.03 N/mm² 9.99 N/mm²



DK, d =  F 4 ×  g D  g Steife
p Erd ×  1  a v   p u 
  g  
K Erd
p Erd
Dk, d K Erd
K, d K *K,d K, d
K *K, d
Earthquake 0,241 kN/m² 0.75 N/mm² 9.99 N/mm² 0.08
Proof of stability of the roofing plate
The compressive strains in the roofing plate dvorh parallel to the stiffeners are protected against the
buckling stress K,d.
p
vorh
A2l ×   d
vorh × d 3 × zS
=
 K ,d
1  d vorh
= DK , d
(n  1) × 8 × I S
p DK , d
vorh
=  F 1 × ( g D  g Steife )   F 2 × (max( puK , puS )  p E )
EKT C
k ×  2 × (n  1) 2 × × s D2
M
with  K ,d = [N/mm²]
12 × d × (1   2 )
2
with the buckling value k = 5,5 and the poisson’s ratio µ = 0,38 used for all thermoplastics.
SPI
Existing stress
Sp = 0,0022 N/mm² sK = 3,5963 N/mm²
Existing stress
s = 2,1687 N/mm² h = 0.60



p Erd ×  1  a v   p u  =0,241 kN/m² Erd =
σ d,vorh 0.23 N/mm²
  g  
E TK C
k ×  × n  1 × 1,5 ×
2
2
× s D2
M
σ K, d, Erd = σ K, d, Erd =
12 × d × 1 -  
2 2 5.63 N/mm²
A 2l ×  σ d,vorh η Erd =
η Erd = 1
Erd
-0,10
σ K,d,Erd

SPI
4.1.6.2.2.2 Outward stresses
Proof of solidity of the roofing plate
 F2 
× pü   F 3 × g D  g Steife  g A × d 3 ×  zS  D  × A1 × A2
 s 
2 hS × sS ×  × g
 gSteife = 2 × n  1×
,d =
K Lvorh
n  1× 8 × I S × f s d × 10 6
 F2


× püK   F 3 × g D  g Steife  g A × d 3 ×  z S  D  × A1 × A2
s 
 2
K vorh
K ,d =
n  1× 8 × I S × f z
K L,vorh
d K vorh
K, d
vorh
K L,d K vorh
K, d K *L,d K *K,d
-0.28 N/mm² 0.69 N/mm² -0,0379 0,0704
K*,d 7.38 N/mm² 9.83 N/mm²



p Erd × a v  p u    F 3 × g D  g Steife  g A 
 g 
K Erd
p Erd
Dk, d
K Erd
K, d
K *K,d K, d
K *K, d
Earthquake -0,177 kN/m² -0.22 N/mm² 9.99 N/mm² 0.02
Proof of stability of the stiffener

The compressive strain in the stiffener Ssdvorh were protected against buckling stress. sK,d.
 s 
p
vorh
A2 l ×  s d
vorh
DK , d × d 3 ×  hS  D  z S 
 2 
h= 1 s
vorh
=
s K ,d d
(n  1) × 8 × I S
p DK , d
vorh
=  F 2 × p üK   F 3 × ( g D  g Steife  g A )
EKT C
k × 2 × × sS2
M
s K ,d = with the buckling value k = 1,1 and the poisson’s ratio µ = 0,38 used for
12 × h × (1   2 )
2
S
all thermoplastics.
Sp = 0,0006 N/mm² sK = 7,6255 N/mm²
Existing stress
s = 1,7255 N/mm² h = 0.23



p Erd × a v  p u    F 3 × g D  g Steife  g A  = -0,177 kN/m²
 g 
Erd =
E TK C σ d,vorh -0.55 N/mm²
k ×  2 × 1,5 × × s S2
M
σ K, d,Erd =
12 × h S × 1 -  2 
2 σ K, d, Erd = 11.44 N/mm²
A 2l ×  σ d,vorh
= 1
Erd
η Erd η Erd = 0.02
σ K,d,Erd

SPI
The requirements are fulfilled. Roof thickness = 10.00 mm
4.1.7 Nozzles
4.1.7.1 Nozzles in the roof
Not applicable
4.1.7.2 Nozzles in the cylinder
Nozzles in the cylinder are not intended

SPI
4.1.8 Anchorages
Quantity of anchorages: 40
Max. claw strength: 3311 N
Width of claw: 70 mm
Width of the space plate 70 mm
Case 1: short-term overpressure at content's temperature
 ×p × × d 2 
 F 2 üK 1
 × (G  G  G )  ×
 4 F3 D A Z  z
H1 =
  1 H1 =-0.02
K*
K, d
(b  s ) × s ×
Pr B Z,0 A × 2
1
K *K,d = 9.99 N/mm² 28 °C
Case 2: long-term overpressure at content's temperature
 × p × × d 2 
 F2 ü 1
 × (G  G  G )  ×
 4 F 3 D A Z  z
H2 =
  1 H2 = -0.07
K*
L, d
(b  s ) × s ×
Pr B Z,0 A × 2
1
K *L,d = 7.03 N/mm² 28 °C
Case 4: Earth quake at the short term media temperature
4 × ×M  × p × × d 2 a 
 1
F4 Erd × 10 3  F 2 ü  × (1  V ) × ( G  G  G )  ×
 d 4 F 3 g D A Z  z
H4 =
  1 H4 = 0.98
K*
K, d
(b  s ) × s ×
Pr B Z,0 A × 2
1
K *K,d = 9.99 N/mm² 28 °C
The proof of anchor bolts taking into account the lever arm resulting during the assembly as well as
the proof for the induction of these forces into the foundation are carried out separately.
The maximum claw strength which is to be transmitted to the dowel already includes the
corresponding partial safety factor.
The claws to be used must be dimensioned to suit the required bending strength.

SPI
The horizontal force from wind load can be transmitted to the anchor fittings via steel space plates
positioned below the anchor lugs. The anchor fittings should be dimensioned for this horizontal force.
H W, k = c f 1 × q × d × hG   c f 2, j × q × A j  H W, k = 0 N
 F 2 × 4 × H W ,k H Düb, d = 0 N
H Düb, d =
z
The utilization of the proof of compression between bottom plate and distance plate is:
H Düb, d
ηH = 1 ηH = 0.00
1,5 × K K*
b Dp × s B ×
M
If the tank is to be installed in a seismic zone, undercut anchors with proven suitability must be used.
The global seismic horizontal force HErd, d, must be conducted into the foundation by appropriate
design measures.
H Erd = 35.83 kN
The total horizontal force from seismicity can be transmitted to the anchor fittings via steel space
plates positioned below the anchor lugs. The anchor fittings should be dimensioned for this horizontal
force.
 F 4 × 4 × H Erd
H Erd
Düb, d
= H Erd =
z Düb, d 3583 N
The utilization of the proof of compression between bottom plate and distance plate is:
H Erd
η Erd = Düb, d
1 η Erd = 0.29
H
1,5 × K K* H
b Dp × s B ×
M

SPI
4.1.9 Lifting lugs
One of the possible lug forms is shown in the sketch. A precondition for the use of these lifting lugs is that
only two lifting lugs per tank and a parallel lifter is used.
In order to be able to dispense with a proof of the introduction of loading in the upper section it has to be
ensured that the lifting lug is no thicker than three times the wall thickness of the upper section. The
diameter of hole (dL) shall be matched for the
diameter of the shackle (dsch).
The thickness of weld seam has to be 0,7 sZ,1.
It applies: sZ,1  s Öerf  3 × sZ,1
dSch  dL  1,1 × dSch
Herewith it is proved that 1,5 times of the

loading can be borne momentarily at 20 ° C.
The required wall thickness (sÖ) of the lifting lug

results from the proof of the face of hole.
GE  G A  G AHeb
1,5 ×  F 1 × × A1
sÖ = 2 [mm]
2 × K K*
d Sch × ( )
M
The maximum of the two following proofs is decisive for the width of the lifting lug (bÖ).
bÖ = max(bÖ,1,bÖ,2)
Proof of the shearing stress of the cross weld when lifting the lying tank
1,5 ×  F 1 × × A1
bÖ ,1 = 4 [mm]
K K*
0,7 × sZ ,1 × × fz
2 × M
Eye bar
1,5 ×  F 1 × × A1
2 7
bÖ , 2 = *
 × d L [mm]
K 3
sÖ × K
M
K *K = 14.80 N/mm²
d Sch = 20 mm
dL = 21 mm
In case the size of bö1 and bö2 is lower than four times the thickness of the lifting lugs, the width of the
lifting lugs will be increased to the thickness times four.
Minimum width of lifting lug: 106 mm
Minimum thickness of lifting lug: 20 mm
Maximum thickness of lifting lug: 36 mm
a-value of welding seam: 8 mm
Minimum length of welding seam: 212 mm

SPI
4.2 Proof of stability
4.2.1 Superposition of influences
The critical buckling stress sK is calculated with the temperature-dependent moduli ETK°C, which are
indicated in table 8 of DVS 2205-2 for the essential thermoplastics. Herewith the most unfavourable
combination of the loadings under consideration of the temperature behaviour of the thermoplastics is
examined.
4.2.2 Shell
For the shell of the tank, a proof of the sufficient safety against stability due to the axial thrust, shell
pressure and against the interaction of both is furnished.
providing that the ovality of the cylinder remains limited in the following form:
2 × (d max  d min )
u= × 100  0,5%
d max  d min
4.2.2.1 Axial stability
For each section i, the axial compressive strain out of own weight, depressions pu, puK and puS existing
at the lower edge is determined in the most unfavourable combination and secured with the buckling
stress sk,I,d.
For inside installation it applies according

 s i,d =  F 1 × s G   F 2 × max s puK ,s pus ,s V 
vorh
[N/mm²]
The equivalent compressive force taken as a constant across the area in the cylinder, determined from
the equivalent weight GA
GA
s GA = ×kf
2 ×  × r × sZ
must be increased by the concentration factor
1,82 r 
k f = max  × ,1
 n la sZ 
The equivalent compressive force from traffic load taken as a constant in the cylinder is determined
from
maxABü × pV , nla × PV 
sV = ×kf [N/mm²]
2 ×  × r × sZ
s G also includes the compressive stress from GA, increased by the concentration factor kf.
The buckling stress is simplified calculated according to the following equation:
E KT C sZ ,i
s k ,i ,d = s i × 0,62 × f ,i × ×  K K* ,d [N/mm²]
M r
K *K, d = 11.39 N/mm²

SPI
0,7
= with r = Radius des Zylinders
EK20  C r
× (1  )
EL20  C 100 × s Z,i
The effect of the supporting shell is not considered for proofs of stability .
Effective wall thickness: 15.00 mm
Axial stability calculation of the cylinder - inside - Season [ - ]
E TKC = 575.00 N/mm² TZ = 29.00 °C
gA = s Erd ,i hK M Erd ,i
K Lvorh
1 12 mm 0.07 N/mm² 0.28 0.72 N/mm² 0.10
2 23 mm 0.10 N/mm² 0.29 0.95 N/mm² 0.10
4.2.2.2 Pressure stability of the shell
The decisive depression arising out of the most unfavourable combination of the depressions p u, puK,
pus+peu is secured with the critical pressure of the shell p kM
The following condition must be complied with.
A 2l ×  p vorh, d
ηM =
p kM, d
1 p vorh
d = 0,00045 [N/mm²]
ηM = 0.51

The critical pressure of the shell of the graduated tank is calculated on an equivalent cylinder with three
sections according to DIN EN 1993-1-6:
2,5
E T C r  s 
* 0
p kM,d = 0,67 × β × C × K × ×
  [N/mm²] hK 0,30
 l0  r 
M
E TKC = 575 N/mm² (29 °C)
K Lvorh 0,00089 N/mm²
with C* = 1. The -values come out of the tables 20a to c of the DIN EN 1993-1-6.
4.2.2.3 Interaction
The proof for the interaction between axial and pressure stability of the shell has to be furnished for each
section.
h125
, 125
,
A, i  hM  1
S.No. s Erd ,i K Lvorh hK

1 0.06 0.51 0.46
2 0.08 0.51 0.47

SPI
At the calculation of hA,i for the Interaction, the longitudinal stresses due to depression are not considered
since their effect is already included in hM.
4.2.2.4 Axial stability for seismic load
For every course i the axial compressive stress which exists at the lower edge and consists of the
dead weight (incl. weight of the roof), the internal vacuum pu as well as the earthquake moment is
determined and is validated with the buckling stress σk,i,d.
To consider the influence of the vertical earthquake acceleration, the normal force resulting from the
dead load is multiplied by the following factor:
 av 
1  
 g 
Wind- and snow loads and traffic loads do not have to be combined with the loads resulting from
earthquake. The partial safety factor for earthquake is γF4=1,0.
The compressive stress is calculated using the following formula.
  a  M Erd 
s vorh
i ,d =  F 4 × s G × 1  v
 g
  s pu   [N/mm²]
1,2 ×  × r × sZ ,i 
2
 
The stress resulting from the earthquake moment may be divided by 1.2 because the buckling stress
may be increased by 20 % in the event of global buckling.
The buckling stress is determined according to the following formula.
E KT C s Z ,i
s k ,i , d =  i × 0,62 × f  ,i ×
M
×
r
 K K* , d [N/mm²]
During the calculation the mean media temperature TM is considered.
K *K, d = 11.39 N/mm²
0,7
=
E K20C  r 
× 1  

E L20C  100 × sZ ,i 
It is necessary to comply with the following condition for every course i.
A2 I ×  s ivorh
h A,i = ,d
1
s k ,i ,d
A proof of the shell pressure stability or interaction is not necessary as the circumferential load is
essential in case of a filled tank.
gA = M Erd ,i s Erd ,i hK G F = V ×  F × g × 10 3
K Lvorh
1 12 mm 13,9 kNm 0.23 N/mm² 0.28 1.12 N/mm² 0.20
2 23 mm 88,5 kNm 1.03 N/mm² 0.29 1.48 N/mm² 0.69

SPI

SPI
Annex 1: In the calculation used symbols

a mm Depth of the weld seam
aBl mm Weld thickness blocks
AErd kN Global horizontal force at the blocks
ag m/s² Ground acceleration
ah m/s² Calculation value of the horizontal acceleration of the tank
AoR mm² Area of the open ring
aS mm Distance between stiffeners at the bottom
av m/s² Calculation value of the vertical acceleration of the tank
A1 --- Reduction factor for the influence of the specific viscosity (see DIN EN 1778)
A2 --- Reduction factor for the minimum at proof of solidity
A2I --- Reduction factor for the medium at proof of stability
AB mm² Surface of the base
AD mm² Surface of the roof
AJ m² Working surface of the wind (partial surface)
AZ mm² Shell surface of cylinder
bBlo mm Width of the blocks
BErd kN Global horizontal force at the bulkheads
BErd,A kN Horizontal force of the upper support from model A
BErd,B kN Horizontal force of the upper support from model B
BErd,max kN Significant horizontal force of the upper support
bla Mm Width of the load bearing points
bÖ mm Width of lifting lug
bPr mm Width of claw
bR mm Width of the reinforcement rings
bSch mm Width of the bulkheads
cf --- Aerodynamic force factor
C --- C1×C2
C* --- Correction coefficient for the external pressure charged circular cylinder
C1 --- Load increase factor
C2 --- Material specific design factor
d mm Nominal inside diameter
dA mm Nozzle outside diameter
dAZ mm Opening in the skirt
dL mm Diameter of hole in lifting lug
dmax mm Maximum diameter of the cylinder
dmin mm Minimal diamtere of the cylinder
dSch mm Diameter of the shackle
E kT C N/mm² Elastic modulus at short-term loading for T °C
EK20 C N/mm² Elastic modulus at short-term loading for 20 °C
EL20 C N/mm² Elastic modulus at long-term loading for 20 °C
fs --- Long-term welding factor
fSchwapp --- Correction factor for the liquid sloshing
fsD --- Long term welding factor for the roof
fz --- Short-term welding factor
fzD --- Short-term welding factor for the roof
g m/s² Acceleration due to gravity (9,81 m/s²)
gA N/mm² Equivalent surface loading for nozzles etc. on the roof
GA N Inherent loading of the extensions
GAHeb N Weight of the installations on the roof considered during the calculation of the lifting lugs
GB N Inherent loading of the bottom
gD N/mm² Surface related weight of the roof
GD N Inherent loading of the roof
GE N Total inherent loading
GF N Loading of the filling agent
GR N Weight of the rings
GS N Snow loading
GSch N Weight of the bulkheads
GSt N Weight of the stiffeners
GUb N Weight of the closing bottom
GZ N Inherent cylindrical loading
GZar N Weight of the skirt
h mm Height of the tank
hB mm Bottom height
hD mm Roof height
HErd kN Global horizontal force from earthquake
HF kN Horizontal inertia from liquid load
hF mm Height of the filling level
hFr mm Height of free space
hF,i mm Height of the filling level of section i
hM mm Setup height
hR mm Height of the lower edge of the ring above the bottom of the collecting tank
hRF mm Residual height of the filling level
hRK mm Collar height of the ring plate

SPI
hSch mm Height measured from the middle of the bulkheads to the bottom of the collecting tank
hZ mm Cylindrical height
hZar mm Height of the skirt
hZ,i mm Height of section i
hZF mm Height of the lower section
K Kvorh N/mm² Short-term active stresses
K Lvorh N/mm² Long-term active stresses
vorh
KM N/mm² Medium –term active stresses
K K* N/mm² Creep strength for 10-1 hours
K K* ,d N/mm² Dimensioning value of the creep strength for 10-1 hours
K L* N/mm² Creep strength for the calculated lifetime at the mean active temperature
K L* ,d N/mm² Dimensioning value of the creep strength for the computational working life at the mean effective
temperature
*
KM N/mm² Creep strength for the mean-term influences (e.g. for 3 months of snow at 0 °C)
*
KM ,d N/mm² Dimensioning value of the creep strength for the medium effective duration
lBl mm Length of the blocks
lSch mm Length of the bulkheads
MErd Nmm Earthquake moment
MErd,A Nmm Earthquake moment at the height x for the tank in the collecting vessel according to model A
MErd,B Nmm Earthquake moment at the height x for the tank in the collecting vessel according to model B
MErd,max,i Nmm Earthquake moment at the lower edge of the course i of the tank in the collecting vessel
MErd,W Nmm Earthquake moment at the height x for the collecting vessel
MW Nmm Wind moment
nBl Quantity of blocks
nla --- Quantity of the load bearing points for installations on the roof
nS --- Quantity of bottom stiffeners
nSch --- Quantity of bulkheads
NZar,k kN Characteristic value of the global compressive force
pDL,M,K N/mm² Influences on the roof
pmax N/mm² Auxiliary value
pS N/mm² Snow loading on the roof
pstat N/mm² Overpressure at the tank base due to the contents
pstat,i N/mm² Overpressure at lower edge of the section due to the contents
pu N/mm² Continuously active external pressure ( or internal depression)
puK N/mm² Short-term active external pressure ( or internal depression)
pü N/mm² Continuously active internal pressure
püK N/mm² Short-term active internal pressure
puS N/mm² Depression due to the wind suction
PV N Traffic load
pw N/mm² Auxiliary value
p1 N/mm² Auxiliary value
ps N/mm² Auxiliary value
qj kN/m² Impact pressure at partial surface A j
qmax kN/m² Maximum effective impact pressure at the tank
r mm Cylindrical radius
rR mm Radius of the rings for the support of conical bottoms
rZar mm Intermediate radius of the skirt
s mm Minimum wall thickness
sa mm Final wall thickness of the basic component
sB mm Wall thickness of the base
sD mm Wall thickness of the roof
sÖ mm Wall thickness of the lifting lug
sR mm Thickness of the supporting rings
sR mm Thickness of the supporting rings for conical bottoms
sRK mm Thickness of the ring plate
sS mm Thickness of the stiffeners at the bottom
sSch mm Thickness of the bulkheads
sU mm Thickness of the closing bottom
sZ mm Cylindrical wall thickness
sZF mm Wall thickness of the lowest section
s*ZF mm Statically required wall thickness
sZm mm Mean cylindrical wall thickness
sZ,1 mm Wall thickness of the upper section
sZ,i mm Wall thickness of section i
so mm Wall thickness of the upper section of the equivalent cylinder
S --- Geological soil parameter
TA °C Temperature of outside air
TAK °C Maximum external air temperature
TD °C Mean roof temperature
TDK °C Highest roof temperature in the case of indoor installation

SPI
TD* v Average roof temperature for summer load case

Design
TKD °C Maximum calculation temperature for conical roofs
TMK °C Maximum medium temperature
TM °C Temperature of medium
TW °C Temperature of the collecting tank wall
TZ °C Temperature of tank wall
u % Allowable ovality
V m³ Filling volume
vA --- Weakening coefficient
W mm³ Section modulus
wgr mm Allowable hoisting course
Wj kN Wind loading
WoR mm³ Resistance moment of the open ring cross-section
z --- Number of anchors
zS mm Offset of the centroidal axis
 --- Auxiliary value
D degree Angle of inclination of the roof
 --- Coefficient
0 --- Reinforcing coefficient of the spectrum acceleration
F --- Coefficient for roof calculation
S --- Coefficient for roof calculation
 --- Coefficient
B --- Coefficient for bottom calculation
F --- Coefficient for roof calculation
S --- Coefficient for roof calculation
W --- Coefficient
s --- Coefficient
e % Permissible edge expansion
F --- Partial Safety factor of exposure
IE --- Significance coefficient according to DIN 4149, Table 3 (called γIE there)
M --- Partial Safety factor of exposure
hA,i --- Utilization of the axial stability in section i
hM --- Utilization of the pressure stability of the shell
 degree Angle of the roof to the perpendicular
 g/cm³ Density of material
F g/cm³ Density of the filling medium
s Kvorh
,L,M N/mm² Existing stress
sK N/mm² Critical buckling stress
sK,i N/mm² Critical buckling stress at section i
sV N/mm² Equivalent compressive stress in cylinder from traffic load
sW N/mm² Stress due to the wind loading
Calculation base
The tank calculation is based on the guideline DVS 2205 and in its mentioned guides such as DIN, EN, AD-Merkblätter in that
version which is valid at time of programming this version of RITA.
In detail, the following technical regulations are required for sizing the components:
The nominal material values are determined in accordance with DVS 2205-1 (01.15), with the supplementary pages 1 (11.11),
2 (09.13), 3 (09.13), 4 (09.13).
The reducing coefficients for the media flow were taken from the media list 40 Issue 03.2016 of the (Deutsches Institut für Bautech-
nik, German Institute for Building Technology) Berlin.
The standing, round, non-pressurised tanks are calculated in accordance with the guideline DVS 2205-2 (12.15) with the supple-
mentary pages 2 (12.15) for Collecting tanks, 3 (12.15) for flat roofs, 4 (12.15) for seismic calculation and 6 (12.15) for double
layered sections and the technical regulations contained in them.
The calculation of sloped bottoms is based on the guideline DVS 2205-2 supplement 9 (12.15).
The calculation of conical bottoms is based on the guideline DVS 2205-2 supplement 7 (12.15).
Liability and warranty
The Customer is aware that it is not possible in the state of the art to create a program that is entirely free of errors. In light of the
large number of selection options in this program, the Licensor does not offer any warranty and/or liability for calculations that are
performed. The Licensee or user must verify the calculation and figures itself or have them verified by technical experts to determine
whether the respective calculation corresponds to the actual conditions and/or is suitable and permitted for applications. The Licen-
sor will further not be liable for the correctness of the underlying rules and the extrapolation of the values of the rules above and
beyond their scope of application. The Licensee or user of this program must verify the extent to which the content of the corre-
sponding Guideline is applicable to its particular case and whether the program version available to it is still valid. The suitability and
resistance of the selected material must in all cases be verified by the Licensee or user itself or by technical experts. Furthe rmore,
all static calculations produced with this program can only be regarded as suggestions the correctness of which must be veri fied by
the Licensee or user or by technical experts.
Irrespective of the kind of infringement (pre-contractual, contractual or non-contractual), the Licensor will always only be liable to
pay compensation and reimburse expenses in the case of gross negligence or intent by it or by its vicarious agents. Liability will be
limited to the typical loss for such a contract. This shall be without prejudice to liability under the German Product Liabi lity Act and
for intentional breaches of contract as well as in cases of loss of life or limb by any person.
Otherwise the General Terms and Conditions and Licence Terms for the Permanent Transfer of the RITA 4.0 Software shall apply.
These are available on the website www.roechling.com/RITA and can be printed from there.


RITA - Tanque Cilindrico - Alcalinos Diluidos - SPI - David - Long

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

RITA - Tanque Cilindrico - Alcalinos Diluidos - SPI - David - Long

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SPI - Tanque Cilindrico 22/02/2023 Página 1 de 27

Description: Solicitud Alcalinos Diluidos

For company: SPI

Carbono 41,Minerales, San Jose El Verde

JAL, México CP 45694

Medium: Alcalinos Divididos

Ventilation Pipe venting

Overpressure: pressure less

Computation base: Guideline DVS 2205

Calculated by: LDM S.A. De C.V.

Sign / Company stamp

Calculated with RITA4.0 of the Röchling Engineering Plastics SE & Co. KG

Internal diameter: d 2 550 mm

Height of Section 1: (upper) 2 200 mm

Total height without bottom: h 5 210 mm

Construction volume: V 26.56 m³

Material: Polystone G black B 100 (PE100)

Ventilation Pipe venting

Calculated with RITA4.0 of the Röchling Engineering Plastics SE & Co. KG

2.2 Operating data

Medium: Alcalinos Divididos

2.3 Welding process

Sections(Longitudinal Heated tool butt welding fs 0,8 fz 0,9

2.4 Characteristic values of material

Material: Polystone G black B 100 (PE100)

Material density: 1.00 g/cm³

Reduction factor A 2: 1.00

Reduction factor A 2I: 1.00

Safety concept: Partial Safety Concept

Partial safety factor: M 1.30

Global safety factor:  g   F 2  M 1.95

Permissible edge expansion e: 1.00 %

Material specific design factor C: 1.20

2.4.1 Temperature-dependent parameters:

20.00 14.80 11.46 10.42 11.39 8.81 8.02 800,0 1.00

25.50 13.52 10.46 9.52 10.40 8.05 7.32 662,5 1.00

28.00 12.98 10.05 9.14 9.99 7.73 7.03 600,0 1.00

29.00 12.78 9.89 9.00 9.83 7.61 6.92 575,0 1.00

37.75 11.17 8.64 7.86 8.59 6.65 6.05 426,0 1.00

50.00 9.36 7.24 6.51 7.20 5.57 5.01 270,0 1.00

Calculated with RITA4.0 of the Röchling Engineering Plastics SE & Co. KG

3.1 Permanent loadings

3.1.1 Weight of whole tank: G  G  G  G  G  7 959 N

Area loadings on the roof (e. g. nozzles) gA = 0.00 kN/m²

Weight of installations on the roof straining only the cylinder : GA = 0 N

3.1.2 Weight of medium: G F = V   F  g  10 3 GF = 257 326 N

3.1.3 Internal and external pressure: No specification

3.2 Medium term active loadings

Not applicable Inside

3.3 Short-term active loadings

3.3.1 Internal and external pressure püK, puK

Over pressure: 0,0005 N/mm² (0,005 bar)

Depression: 0,0003 N/mm² (0,003 bar)

3.3.2 Live loads on the roof

3.3.3 Wind loading

3.3.4 Pulsation equivalent stress due to wind loading

Calculated with RITA4.0 of the Röchling Engineering Plastics SE & Co. KG

3.3.5 Depression due to wind suction

Not applicable inside

Partial Safety Concept: F1 = 1,35

The short-time welding factor according to DVS 2205-1 is to be considered.

Geological soil class: T Soil class: C

Ground acceleration: ag 0.40 m/s² Geological soil parameter: S 1.25

sZF  max(sZF,L ,s*ZF,K )