Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Embarazo y Ae PDF
Embarazo y Ae PDF
D u r i n g P re g n a n c y
Considerations in Management
KEYWORDS
Hereditary angioedema Pregnancy Women Management Treatment
Estrogen C1INH deficiency
KEY POINTS
Pregnancy has a highly variable and unpredictable effect on hereditary angioedema (HAE)
symptoms and can result in worsening, improvement, or no change in the HAE clinical
course.
Prepregnancy education and counseling is an important component of HAE management
to familiarize patients and families with the genetics of HAE and potential changes in
symptoms and treatment plans during pregnancy.
Evidence-based guidelines recommend plasma-derived C1INH for acute and preventa-
tive treatment during pregnancy based on available safety data for HAE medications dur-
ing pregnancy and lactation.
Collaborative care by obstetrics and the HAE specialist is important around the time of de-
livery to ensure acute and short-term prophylactic HAE treatment plans are in place as
appropriate thereby minimizing the risk of HAE symptoms during and following childbirth.
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
PREPREGNANCY
Box 1
Hereditary angioedema management considerations surrounding pregnancy
Prepregnancy
Genetic counseling for patient/family on HAE inheritance pattern (autosomal-dominant with
variable expression)
Review with patient/family variable course of HAE symptoms during pregnancy: possible
increase, decrease, or no change in symptoms
Review HAE medication safety data for pregnancy and evidence-based guideline
recommendations for pd-C1INH use
Adjust prescribed medications before pregnancy when planned and possible
For assisted reproductive procedures (ie, ovulation induction), discuss risk of worsening HAE
symptoms with exogenous estrogen administration; adjust management plan to include pd-
C1INH long-term prophylaxis if needed
Pregnancy
Review medication safety data and management plan
Ensure reliable access to HAE medication and clear administration plan including back-up
medical facility if home or self-administration is unsuccessful
Ensure regular communication between patient and HAE clinical care team to review
symptom changes during pregnancy
Adjust HAE treatment plan as needed; consider pd-C1INH long-term prophylactic treatment
for women who will benefit based on individualized care plan and shared-decision making
Recommend short-term prophylactic treatment (pd-C1INH IV) for diagnostic procedures,
such as amniocentesis or chorionic villous sampling
Monitor weight periodically and adjust dosing of weight-based HAE medication
Delivery and Postdelivery
Communicate with obstetrics team regarding management plan surrounding childbirth
Ensure access to acute HAE medication (pd-C1INH IV, at least 2 doses) for use as needed
during delivery period
Uncomplicated labor and normal spontaneous vaginal delivery rarely triggers HAE
symptoms; if forceps, vacuum assistance required, administration of pd-C1INH IV
recommended
For surgical delivery: short-term prophylaxis with pd-C1INH IV recommended and use of
regional anesthesia recommended when possible
Monitor for HAE symptoms postpartum because of potential increased risk of attacks; ensure
access to effective acute HAE medication
During breastfeeding, pd-C1INH recommended for HAE treatment based on current safety
data
Discuss importance of testing child for HAE
unknown safety in pregnancy during the first trimester. In addition, the long half-life of
monoclonal antibodies, such as lanadelumab, means that discontinuation of the medi-
cation at the time pregnancy is confirmed may still result in fetal drug exposure given
evidence that IgG1 monoclonal antibodies cross the placenta, albeit at low levels early
in pregnancy.44 Because the safety of lanadelumab in pregnancy is currently un-
known, it is reasonable and advisable to ideally discontinue this medication greater
than or equal to 3 months (>5 half-lives) before conception.
Assisted reproductive technology to address infertility issues also raises important
questions for women with HAE. Specifically, the ovulation induction procedures may
involve increased risk of angioedema attacks because the estrogens administered
frequently exacerbate HAE symptoms.45 Although the diagnosis of HAE does not pre-
clude these fertility efforts, women and families should understand the risks of wors-
ening HAE symptoms with any exogenous estrogen therapy (eg, ovulation induction,
contraception, hormone replacement). Frequently, HAE management plans must be
adjusted because of increased frequency and severity of HAE symptoms during ovula-
tion induction; specifically LTP with pd-C1INH should be considered (discussed later) .
PREGNANCY
Once pregnancy is confirmed, the HAE management plan should again be reviewed in
detail with the patient. This is to ensure that: (1) HAE-specific medications used during
pregnancy maximize safety based on available data, (2) the patient and family know
how to effectively manage HAE symptoms, and (3) the patient is aware that HAE
symptoms may change during pregnancy necessitating reevaluation and adjustment
of the HAE management plan.
Based on currently available safety data, recent evidence-based guidelines for the
management of HAE recommend pd-C1INH concentrates as preferred medication for
acute treatment and prophylaxis (long-term or short-term) during pregnancy.41–43 Cur-
rent pregnancy safety data for HAE medications are summarized next.
Acute Treatments
Plasma-derived C1INH (Berinert)
Because pd-C1INH concentrates have been used to treat HAE for more than 40 years,
considerable historical data on use during pregnancy exist. A recent systematic liter-
ature review reported published data on 1562 doses of pd-C1INH in 136 pregnancies,
showing a favorable safety profile and supporting the current evidence-based guide-
line recommendations as the preferred medication for HAE treatment during preg-
nancy.46 International registry data on pd-C1INH use in pregnancy has yielded
similarly reassuring results.47
Recombinant human C1INH (Ruconest)
rh-C1INH is produced from the isolated gene for human C1INH, resulting in an amino
acid sequence identical to that of endogenous human C1INH.48 Protein glycosylation
differences result in a shorter plasma half-life compared with plasma-derived prod-
ucts. Published cases series on rh-C1INH use in pregnancy include 242 doses in 17
women with no pregnancy-related adverse events and full-term healthy babies deliv-
ered for all women.49,50 Based on these data, rh-C1INH is a reasonable consideration
for treatment during pregnancy, particularly if pd-C1INH is not readily available.
Icatibant (Firazyr, generic products)
Data on the use of icatibant in pregnancy are limited to case series with a small num-
ber of attacks treated: experience with 20 doses in nine women has been published,
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en National Autonomous University of Mexico de
ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en marzo 17, 2023. Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se
permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos
reservados.
150 Riedl
although one report does not specify the number of doses administered in a single pa-
tient while pregnant.50–53 Of 11 pregnancy outcomes reported, one preterm delivery
occurred but no other adverse pregnancy-related events. However, the dataset re-
mains too small to reach conclusions on safety. Animal studies have shown evidence
of adverse events including premature birth, abortion, fetal death, and preimplantation
loss, although no evidence of teratogenicity.54 Further work and data are needed to
evaluate the safety of icatibant in pregnancy.
Ecallantide (Kalbitor)
No human data are available on the safety of ecallantide use in pregnancy. Animal
studies have shown some evidence of developmental toxicity.55
Prophylactic Treatments
Plasma-derived C1INH (Cinryze, Haegarda)
Based on the data outlined previously, evidence-based guidelines recommend pd-
C1INH concentrates given IV or SC every 3 to 4 days for LTP treatment of HAE during
pregnancy.41–43
Lanadelumab (Takhzyro)
No human data on the safety of lanadelumab in pregnancy are available. IgG1 mono-
clonal antibodies, such as lanadelumab, are transported across the placenta particu-
larly during the third trimester of pregnancy.44 Animal studies have not shown any
evidence of harm to the developing fetus.56
Berotralstat (Orladeyo)
No human data on the safety of berotralstat in pregnancy are available. Animal studies
have been reassuring.57
Androgens (Danazol, others)
Attenuated androgens are contraindicated during pregnancy because they cross the
placenta and may affect fetal development, particularly with regard to virilization of the
fetus.58,59
Antifibrinolytics (tranexamic acid)
Antifibrinolytics cross the placenta but no specific pregnancy-related adverse events
have been reported.60 Animal studies of tranexamic acid have shown no evidence of
teratogenicity.61 Given the inferior preventative efficacy of tranexamic acid in HAE-
C1INH, use should only be considered when C1INH concentrates are unavailable.
Based on the previously mentioned data and evidence-based guidelines, HAE man-
agement plans during pregnancy are generally centered on the use of pd-C1INH con-
centrates for on-demand treatment of attacks, with consideration of LTP with pd-
C1INH for patients who benefit from this added to the acute treatment plan.41–43
This approach maximizes the safety profile of the HAE medication used during preg-
nancy, although logistically, requires that the patient is reliably able to administer
C1INH therapy IV for acute treatment of symptoms. Many patients are able to self-
administer IV C1INH or receive treatment with the assistance of family or friends,
although adequate training of the patient and/or caregiver is required.62,63 Patients
should have a backup plan for health care professional assistance with medication
dosing through home-health, outpatient clinic, urgent care, or hospital services if
needed.
In addition to the acute treatment plan, LTP with pd-C1INH is an important consid-
eration for patients who experience frequent, severe, or disruptive symptoms. SC pd-
C1INH for LTP is usually preferred over IV because of the easier route of administration
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en National Autonomous University of Mexico de
ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en marzo 17, 2023. Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se
permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos
reservados.
Hereditary Angioedema During Pregnancy 151
SUMMARY
The clinical course of HAE is highly variable and unpredictable during pregnancy.
Optimal management requires patient and family education, careful attention to med-
ications administered, consistent monitoring, and collaboration between the obstet-
rics team and HAE specialists. Current treatment guidelines recommend pd-C1INH
therapy for acute and prophylactic treatment during pregnancy, with adjustment of
the treatment plan often necessary because of the variable effect of pregnancy on
HAE. Delivery, postpartum care, and breastfeeding require additional planning and
monitoring. Fortunately, HAE-related complications seem rare; safely and effectively
treating or preventing symptoms, anticipating HAE triggers, and avoiding iatrogenic
complications during pregnancy is paramount.
Prepregnancy discussions with women and families affected by HAE are beneficial in
providing education/information on genetics of HAE, possible changes in HAE symptoms
during pregnancy, and adjusting medication use for optimal safety.
The clinical course of HAE during pregnancy is highly variable and unpredictable, although
at least one-third of women experience worsening HAE symptoms with pregnancy.
Based on available safety data, evidence-based guidelines recommend pd-C1INH for HAE
acute treatment, and when indicated, for prophylactic treatment during pregnancy and
lactation.
Immediate access to IV pd-C1INH for acute treatment may be sufficient for uncomplicated
labor and spontaneous vaginal delivery, which rarely trigger HAE symptoms; if
instrumentation (ie, forceps) or surgical delivery is required, dosing of IV pd-C1INH for short-
term prophylaxis is recommended.
DISCLOSURE
M.A. Riedl has received research grants from BioCryst, CSL Behring, Ionis, Kalvista,
Pharvaris, and Takeda; consultancy fees from Astria, BioCryst, Biomarin, CSL Behr-
ing, Cycle Pharma, Fresenius-Kabi, Ipsen, Kalvista, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Pharming,
Pharvaris, RegenexBio, and Takeda; and fees for speaker presentations from CSL
Behring, Grifols, Pharming, and Takeda. All grants provided to the institution and all
fee payments regulated and processed through the institutional compensation plan.
REFERENCES
27. Zuraw BL, Busse PJ, White M, et al. Nanofiltered C1 inhibitor concentrate for
treatment of hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med 2010;363(6):513–22.
28. Longhurst H, Cicardi M, Craig T, et al. Prevention of hereditary angioedema at-
tacks with a subcutaneous C1 inhibitor. N Engl J Med 2017;376(12):1131–40.
29. Banerji A, Riedl MA, Bernstein JA, et al. Effect of lanadelumab compared with
placebo on prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks: a randomized clinical
trial. JAMA 2018;320(20):2108–21.
30. Zuraw B, Lumry WR, Johnston DT, et al. Oral once-daily berotralstat for the pre-
vention of hereditary angioedema attacks: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled phase 3 trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021;148(1):164–72.
31. Gelfand JA, Sherins RJ, Alling DW, et al. Treatment of hereditary angioedema with
danazol. Reversal of clinical and biochemical abnormalities. N Engl J Med 1976;
295(26):1444–8.
32. Riedl MA. Critical appraisal of androgen use in hereditary angioedema: a system-
atic review. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2015;114(4):281–8.
33. Wintenberger C, Boccon-Gibod I, Launay D, et al. Tranexamic acid as mainte-
nance treatment for non-histaminergic angioedema: analysis of efficacy and
safety in 37 patients. Clin Exp Immunol 2014;178(1):112–7.
34. Vitrat-Hincky V, Gompel A, Dumestre-Perard C, et al. Type III hereditary angio-
oedema: clinical and biological features in a French cohort. Allergy 2010;
65(10):1331–6.
35. Craig T. Triggers and short-term prophylaxis in patients with hereditary angioe-
dema. Allergy Asthma Proc 2020;41(Suppl 1):S30–4.
36. Zanichelli A, Ghezzi M, Santicchia I, et al. Short-term prophylaxis in patients with
angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency undergoing dental procedures: an
observational study. PLoS One 2020;15(3):e0230128.
37. Farkas H, Zotter Z, Csuka D, et al. Short-term prophylaxis in hereditary angioe-
dema due to deficiency of the C1-inhibitor: a long-term survey. Allergy 2012;
67(12):1586–93.
38. Germenis AE, Margaglione M, Pesquero JB, et al. International consensus on the
use of genetics in the management of hereditary angioedema. J Allergy Clin Im-
munol Pract 2020;8(3):901–11.
39. Bork K, Wulff K, Witzke G, et al. Hereditary angioedema with normal C1-INH with
versus without specific F12 gene mutations. Allergy 2015;70(8):1004–12.
40. Agostoni A, Ayg.ren-Pursun E, Binkley KE, et al. Hereditary and acquired angioe-
dema: problems and progress: proceedings of the third C1 esterase inhibitor
deficiency workshop and beyond. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;114(3):S51–131.
41. Busse PJ, Christiansen SC, Riedl MA, et al. US HAEA Medical Advisory Board
2020 guidelines for the management of hereditary angioedema. J Allergy Clin Im-
munol Pract 2021;9(1):132–50.
42. Maurer M, Magerl M, Betschel S, et al. The International WAO/EAACI guideline for
the management of hereditary angioedema: the 2021 revision and update. Al-
lergy 2022.
43. Betschel S, Badiou J, Binkley K, et al. The International/Canadian Hereditary An-
gioedema Guideline. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2019;15:72.
44. Pentsuk N, van der Laan JW. An interspecies comparison of placental antibody
transfer: new insights into developmental toxicity testing of monoclonal anti-
bodies. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 2009;86(4):328–44.
45. Gompel A, Fain O, Boccon-Gibod I, et al. Exogenous hormones and hereditary
angioedema. Int Immunopharmacol 2020;78:106080.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en National Autonomous University of Mexico de
ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en marzo 17, 2023. Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se
permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos
reservados.
156 Riedl
46. Brooks JP, Radojicic C, Riedl MA, et al. Experience with intravenous plasma-
derived C1-inhibitor in pregnant women with hereditary angioedema: a system-
atic literature review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8(6):1875–80.
47. Fox J, Vegh AB, Martinez-Saguer I, et al. Safety of a C1-inhibitor concentrate in
pregnant women with hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc 2017;38(3):
216–21.
48. van Veen HA, Koiter J, Vogelezang CJ, et al. Characterization of recombinant hu-
man C1 inhibitor secreted in milk of transgenic rabbits. J Biotechnol 2012;
162(2–3):319–26.
49. Moldovan D, Bernstein JA, Hakl R, et al. Safety of recombinant human C1
esterase inhibitor for hereditary angioedema attacks during pregnancy.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019;7(8):2938–40.
50. Hakl R, Kuklı́nek P, Krc mová I, et al. Treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks
with icatibant and recombinant C1 inhibitor during pregnancy. J Clin Immunol
2018;38(7):810–5.
51. Farkas H, Ko }halmi KV, Veszeli N, et al. First report of icatibant treatment in a preg-
nant patient with hereditary angioedema. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016;42(8):
1026–8.
52. Kaminsky LW, Kelbel T, Ansary F, et al. Multiple doses of icatibant used during
pregnancy. Allergy Rhinol (Providence) 2017;8(3):178–81.
53. Zanichelli A, Mansi M, Periti G. Icatibant exposure during pregnancy in a patient
with hereditary angioedema. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2015;25(6):447–9.
54. Icatibant [package insert]. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/022150s000lbl.pdf. Accessed January 22, 2022.
55. Ecallantide [package insert]. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/125277s071lbl.pdf. Accessed January 22, 2022.
56. Lanadelumab [package insert]. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/761090s000lbl.pdf. Accessed January 22, 2022.
57. Berotralstat [package insert]. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/214094s000lbl.pdf. Accessed January 22, 2022.
58. Schwartz R. Ambiguous genitalia in a term female infant due to exposure to da-
nazol in utero. Am J Dis Child 1982;136(5):474.
59. Reschini E, Giustina G, D’Alberton A, et al. Female pseudohermaphroditism due
to maternal androgen administration: 25-year follow-up. Lancet 1985;1:1226.
60. Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Tranexamic acid: a review of its use in surgery and other indi-
cations. Drugs 1999;57:1005–32.
61. Tranexamic acid [package insert]. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/022430s004lbl.pdf. Accessed January 22, 2022.
62. Zanichelli A, Azin GM, Cristina F, et al. Safety, effectiveness, and impact on qual-
ity of life of self-administration with plasma-derived nanofiltered C1 inhibitor (Be-
rinert) in patients with hereditary angioedema: the SABHA study. Orphanet J
Rare Dis 2018;13(1):51.
63. Riedl MA, Bygum A, Lumry W, et al. Safety and usage of C1-inhibitor in hereditary
angioedema: Berinert Registry Data. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2016;4(5):
963–71.
64. Martinez-Saguer I, Rusicke E, Aygören-Pürsün E, et al. Characterization of acute
hereditary angioedema attacks during pregnancy and breast-feeding and their
treatment with C1 inhibitor concentrate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203(2):131.
65. Bouillet L, Longhurst H, Boccon-Gibod I, et al. Disease expression in women with
hereditary angioedema. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(5):484.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en National Autonomous University of Mexico de
ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en marzo 17, 2023. Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se
permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos
reservados.
Hereditary Angioedema During Pregnancy 157
66. Czaller I, Visy B, Csuka D, et al. The natural history of hereditary angioedema and
the impact of treatment with human C1-inhibitor concentrate during pregnancy: a
long-term survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;152(1):44–9.
67. Caballero T, Farkas H, Bouillet L, et al. International consensus and practical
guidelines on the gynecologic and obstetric management of female patients
with hereditary angioedema caused by C1 inhibitor deficiency. J Allergy Clin Im-
munol 2012;129:308–20.
68. Nielsen EW, Gran JT, Straume B, et al. Hereditary angioedema: new clinical ob-
servations and autoimmune screening, complement and kallikrein-kinin analyses.
J Intern Med 1996;239:119–30.
69. Caballero T, Canabal J, Rivero-Paparoni D, et al. Management of hereditary an-
gioedema in pregnant women: a review. Int J Womens Health 2014;6:839–48.
70. Danazol [package insert]. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/017557s033s039s040s041s042lbl.pdf. Accessed
January 22, 2022.
71. Drugs and lactation Database (LactMed) [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Li-
brary of Medicine (US); 2021. 2006–. Tranexamic Acid.
72. Farkas H, Martinez-Saguer I, Bork K, et al. International consensus on the diag-
nosis and management of pediatric patients with hereditary angioedema with C1
inhibitor deficiency. Allergy 2017;72:300–13.
73. Pedrosa M, Phillips-Angles E, López-Lera A, et al. Complement study versus
CINH gene testing for the diagnosis of type I hereditary angioedema in children.
J Clin Immunol 2016;36(1):16–8.