Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2011 Koch Et Al. Design and Application of CITESwoodID Computer-Aided Identification PDF
2011 Koch Et Al. Design and Application of CITESwoodID Computer-Aided Identification PDF
Summary
Introduction
Table 1. List of cites protected trade timbers in the database cites woodID.
Botanical name Trade name cites Trading* Quantity
Appendix [m 3 /a]*
Bulinesia sarmientoi Palo santo II NI NI
Caesalpinia echinata Brazil wood II NI NI
Cedrela odorata Cedro III Bolivia, Peru R USA 45,000
Dalbergia nigra Brazilian I no trade permitted NI
rosewood
Dalbergia retusa Cocobolo III NI NI
Dalbergia Honduras III NI NI
stevensonii rosewood
Fitzroya cupressoides Patagonian I no trade permitted NI
cypress
Gonystylus spp. Ramin II Malaysia R Italy, China 70,000
Guaiacum spp. Lignum vitae II Mexico R Germany 100 tons
Pericopsis elata Afrormosia II Congo, Cameroon R Italy,
Belgium 15,000
Platymiscium Granadillo II NI NI
pleiostachyum
Swietenia spp. American II Bolivia, Peru R USA NI
mahogany
Intsia spp. Merbau under cites Indonesia, Papua New Guinea
observation R Germany, Netherlands 660,000
* Data available from the German CITES Scientific Authority, 2006. NI = no information.
ring characteristics. Even a small transverse area may still reveal more information
about the wood structure (composition) than large longitudinal (radial and/or tangen-
tial) surfaces. However, there are limits as to how small a transverse area may be in
order to still reveal useful structural details. In the case of thin (generally around 0.5
mm thick) veneers, for instance, typical structural patterns cannot be fully recognized
in the transverse plane and need to be reconstructed from the corresponding patterns
on longitudinal surfaces.
When initiating the identification process using CITESwoodID, the user has several
options to follow. The program starts in the normal working mode, i.e., the available
features are listed in a sequence of “best characters” wherein the character on top of
the list is best suited for separating the (remaining) taxa in the database (Fig. 2). For
inexperienced users the software encourages looking for these targeted characters first.
If a more experienced user is sure of the detection of a certain character it can im-
mediately be chosen. The search function in the toolbar facilitates locating the desired
character. A further option is using the natural order of the characters as represented in
the original character list.
Each character is accompanied by notes with information on definitions, explanations
as to how observations can be correctly interpreted, procedures concerning specimen
preparation for certain purposes, examples of timbers with a very typical expression
of the character in question, cautionary notes on how to guard against misinterpreta-
tion, and information on specific wood characters not covered by the character list, etc.
(Fig. 3). In addition, characters and the timbers in the database are accompanied by
high-quality colour images illustrating important macroscopic features on both trans-
verse and longitudinal surfaces (Fig. 4 and 5). The photomacrographs of transverse
sections were taken at a magnification commensurate with that of a handlens (c. 10-
fold). Illustrations of wood surfaces are reproduced at magnifications that parallel what
is seen with a hand lens. These illustrations provide an excellent means of visualizing
certain character expressions and directly compare the results of an identification run
and the unknown object to be identified (Richter et al. 2008). Furthermore, nearly all
characters used for description and identification are accompanied by explanatory notes
with definitions, examples, procedures, etc.
CITESwoodID also offers complete program-generated wood descriptions. These
encompass all relevant information contained in coded form in the database, converted
into a natural language text and saved in a single file. The individual wood description
can be used interactively for consultation and/or printing at any point of an identification
run (Richter & Trockenbrodt 1995). Independent of the program, the system provides
access to several files in the directory EN\RTF such as: descr.rtf (document contain-
ing the descriptions of all taxa); chars-lg.rtf (character list with explanatory notes);
chars-sh.rtf (character list without explanatory notes); names.rtf (list of the botanical
and trade names of the timbers in the database).
Figure 4. American mahogany = Swietenia spp. (CITES Annex II, left) is very similar to khaya =
Khaya spp. (right) in external appearance. The two timber groups differ significantly by the lack
of macroscopically visible axial parenchyma in Khaya spp.
Figure 5. Ramin = Gonystylus spp. (CITES Annex II, left) and limba = Terminalia superba (right)
are similar in appearance and structure. However, limba has much larger and fewer vessels often
filled with tyloses. Furthermore, the wood of limba is darker with a greenish hue.
References
Baas, P. 2009. CITESwoodID – Innovative medium for education, information, and identifica-
tion of protected trade timbers. Review in IAWA J. 30 (1): 95–96.
CITES Identification Guide – Tropical Woods. 2002. Government of Canada, Environment
Canada. CW 66-204 /2002. 188 pp.
Garrett, L., N. McGough, M. Groves & G. Clarke. 2010. CITES & Timber: Ramin (+ Timber
Identification CD-ROM). Kew Publishing. 32 pp.
Gasson, P. 2011. How precise can wood anatomy be? Wood anatomy’s role in support of the
legal timber trade, especially CITES. IAWA J. 32 [this issue]: 137–154.
Gasson, P., P. Baas & E.A. Wheeler. 2011. Wood anatomy of Cites-listed timber. IAWA J. 32
[this issue]: 00–00.
Gasson, P., R.B. Miller, D. J. Stekel, F. Whinder & K. Zieminska. 2010. Wood identification of
Dalbergia nigra (CITES Appendix I) using quantitative wood anatomy, principal compo-
nents analysis and naïve Bayes classification. Ann. Bot. 105: 45–56.
Koch, G., H.G. Richter & U. Schmitt. 2008a. Cites and wood data bases: computer-aided iden-
tification and description of cites-protected trade timbers. Landbauforschung vTI Agricul-
ture and Forestry Research. Sonderheft, Band 321: 61–66.
Koch, G., H. G. Richter & U. Schmitt. 2008b. Computer-aided identification and description of
CITES protected trade timbers. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques N° 297 (3): 69–73.
Miller, R.B. & M.C. Wiemann. 2006. Separation of Dalbergia nigra from Dalbergia spruceana.
Research Paper FPL-RP-632. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Forest Products Laboratory. 5 pp.
Richter H.G., K. Gembruch & G. Koch. 2008-onwards: CITESwoodID: Descriptions, illustrations,
identification, and information retrieval. In English, German, French and Spanish. Version:
October 2008.
Richter, H.G. & M. Trockenbrodt. 1995. Computergestützte Holzartenbestimmung unter Einsatz
des DELTA /INTKEY-Programmpaketes. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
53: 215–219.
Schmitz-Kretschmer, H. J., G. Koch & G. Krämer. 2006. Lupe, Notebook und die Software
CITESwoodID. Holz-Zentr.bl. 132: 484 – 485.
Wheeler, E.A. & P. Baas. 1998. Wood identification – a review. IAWA J. 19: 241–264.
Wheeler, E.A., P. Baas & P.E. Gasson (eds.). 1989. IAWA List of microscopic features for hard-
wood identification. IAWA Bull. n.s. 10: 219–332.
Wiedenhoeft, A.C. & R.B. Miller. 2005. Structure and function of wood. Handbook of wood
chemistry and wood composites. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press: pp. 9–33.