This document discusses centralized vs decentralized decision making and provides examples of each. A centralized organization has power concentrated at the top with one person making decisions, while a decentralized organization distributes authority throughout the group so decisions are made collectively. The document gives examples of the military having a centralized structure where orders flow down, while activists and communists tend towards decentralization. It also discusses the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as an example of centralized decision making by Truman, and the deaths of 44 Philippine commandos as potentially resulting from conflicts in decentralized decision making around providing reinforcements.
This document discusses centralized vs decentralized decision making and provides examples of each. A centralized organization has power concentrated at the top with one person making decisions, while a decentralized organization distributes authority throughout the group so decisions are made collectively. The document gives examples of the military having a centralized structure where orders flow down, while activists and communists tend towards decentralization. It also discusses the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as an example of centralized decision making by Truman, and the deaths of 44 Philippine commandos as potentially resulting from conflicts in decentralized decision making around providing reinforcements.
This document discusses centralized vs decentralized decision making and provides examples of each. A centralized organization has power concentrated at the top with one person making decisions, while a decentralized organization distributes authority throughout the group so decisions are made collectively. The document gives examples of the military having a centralized structure where orders flow down, while activists and communists tend towards decentralization. It also discusses the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as an example of centralized decision making by Truman, and the deaths of 44 Philippine commandos as potentially resulting from conflicts in decentralized decision making around providing reinforcements.
Structural dilemmas affect system of institutions and working
theoretical paradigm like universal care, juvenile law, and immigration this type of dilemma can affect a community and even a society at large () As in the case of centralized vs. decentralized decision making , centralized organization has the primary power from the person at the top he/ she is the hierarchy of the organization and had the supremacy to decide while decentralized organization the whole delegate has the authority through the organization, all their decision is being manifested by its adherent . For example, the military has centralized organization structure. This is because the higher ups order those below them and everybody must follow and embodied their decisions, Activist and communist has a decentralized organization wherein decision making is distributed or delegated away from a central authoritative group.
Reason behind bombing of the cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima?
Two cities in Japan Nagasaki and Hiroshima was being bombed in 1945. American soldiers and civilians were weary from four years’ war yet Japanese was refusing to give up their fight against American. On august 6, 1945 an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima The reason behind the bombing of Hiroshima was because of its military importance, Nagasaki was bombed a few days later another atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki where 80,000 Japanese people perished. This is example of structural dilemma centralized vs decentralized decision making. American military is centralized the bombing is caused by Truman decision making which caused them to win the war against the Japanese on the other hand Truman decision making was a barbaric act that bought negative long term consequences to the united states and a new commandos of the Philippines nuclear terror lead to a dangerous arms race.
The mamasapano saf 44
44 special action forced commandos of the Philippines national police
were perished in one sided battle with Moro Islamic front and Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom fighter in Mamasapano Maguindanao. The saf fighter were on gate away from a successful operation which resulted in killing top Malaysian terrorist Marwan. According to news the reason why saf 44 killing is that no reinforcement has come to rescue them from the trap of the MIL AND BIFF. This example of structural dilemma because there are conflict in having a decision making which caused 44 special action force fighter to be killed.