Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introducing Knowledge Management (KM) : Lesso N
Introducing Knowledge Management (KM) : Lesso N
LESSO
N
1 INTRODUCING KNOWLEDGE
MANAGEMENT (KM)
15
HOURS
This lesson focuses on the introduction and relevance of Knowledge Management (KM) in today’s
dynamic environments, and its application to the field of Public Administration.
“The 20th anniversary of the landing of an American on the surface of the Moon
occasioned many bittersweet reflections. Sweet was the celebration of the
historic event itself. . . . Bitter, for those same enthusiasts, was the knowledge
that during the twenty intervening years much of the national consensus that
launched this country on its first lunar adventure had evaporated . . . a generation of men and women who had
defined their lives to a large extent in terms of this nation’s epochal departure from Earth’s surface was taking
its leave of the program they had built (Fries 1992).”
In this lesson, you will learn about the important field of KM—what it is and how to implement it
successfully with the tools provided by the technological advances of our times. It presents a balanced
discussion between theory and application of KM to organizations.
Peter Drucker (1994), whom many consider the father of KM, best defines the need for it: Knowledge
has become the key resource, for a nation’s military strength as well as for its economic strength . . . is
fundamentally different from the traditional key resources of the economist—land, labor, and even
capital . . . we need systematic work on the quality of knowledge and the productivity of knowledge . . .
the performance capacity, if not the survival, of any organization in the knowledge society will come
increasingly to depend on those two factors (pp. 66–69).
KM focuses on organizing and making available important knowledge, wherever and whenever it is
needed.
The history of knowledge management is brief because it is a relatively new discipline, starting around
the 1970s.
Knowledge management came about in the 1970s because of papers published by management
theorists and practitioners like Peter Drucker and Paul Strassman. These papers focus around how
information and knowledge could be used as valuable organizational resources.
In the second half of the 20 th century, with increased use of computers, specific adaptations of
technologies such as knowledge bases, expert systems, information repositories, group decision
support systems, intranets, and computer-supported cooperative work were introduces to further
enhance these efforts.
In the early 90’s of the last century Knowledge Management emerged as a pure approach to ICT.
Knowledge has been perceived as having a content written or digitized. Answers to Knowledge
Management have been sought in ICT tools like databases, online libraries, etc.
KM’s focus shifted to the personal side of knowledge. This was partly because of the realization that
knowledge would not be included in ICT systems, but rather personal and subjective: “Knowledge is
on people”.
The approach to human resource or development of human talent is focused on personal capacity
development, as individuals are seen as the main carrier of the knowledge. It includes methods such
as technical, managerial, and personal training, assessment talks, personal goal formulation.
1. People
2. Process
3. Content/IT
4. Strategy
“people, process and technology” This paradigm – often referred to as the “golden triangle” –
has been used by organizational leaders since at least the early 1990s to guide initiatives and
lead organizational change.
1. Senior leaders – providing sponsorship and insight into the broader organizational strategy. They are
often people who lead business areas with significant, urgent need of knowledge.
2. Cross – Functional Stakeholders – is a group of people with different functional expertise working toward
a common goal.
“Knowledge flows like a city water supply, just turn the tap on when someone needs it”. The
KM Team knows how everything flows within the organization, like a Public Administrator.
For example, new product development no longer requires only brainstorming sessions by the
freethinking product designers of the organization, but instead it requires the partnership of
interorganizational teams representing various functional subunits—from finance to marketing to
engineering. Thus, we see an increased emphasis from professional recruiters around the world
seeking new job applicants who not only possess excellent educational and professional
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN KM
Rapid changes in the field of KM have to a great extent resulted from the dramatic progress we have
witnessed in the field of information technology (IT). Information technology facilitates sharing as well as
accelerated growth of knowledge. IT allows the movement of information at increasing speeds and
efficiencies.
For example, computers capture data from measurements of natural phenomena, and then quickly manipulate
the data to better understand the phenomena it represents. Increased computer power at lower prices enables
the measurement of increasingly complex processes, which we possibly could only imagine before. According
to Bradley (1997):
Thus, IT has provided the major impetus for enabling the implementation of KM applications.
Many KM systems implementations have fallen short of their promise. Many KM systems implemented
at organizations have failed to enable knowledge workers to share their knowledge for the benefit of
the organization. Effective KM uses all the options available to motivated employees in order to put
knowledge to work. Effective KM depends on recognizing that all of these options basically need each
other.
One of the primary differences between traditional information systems and KM systems is the active
role that users of KM systems play on building the content of such systems.
Users of traditional information systems are typically not required to actively contribute to building the
content of such systems, an effort typically delegated to the Management Information System (MIS)
department or to information systems consultants. Therefore, traditional IS research has concentrated
much of its efforts in understanding what are the factors leading users to accepting, and thereby using,
IT.
The successful implementation of KM systems requires that its users not only effectively “use” such
systems as in traditional information systems but that in fact that they also “contribute” to the
knowledge base of such systems.
Whereas technology has provided the impetus for managing knowledge, we now know that effective
KM initiatives are not only limited to a technological solution. An old adage states that “effective KM is
80 percent related to organizational culture and human factors and 20 percent related to technology.”
This means that there is an important human component in KM. This finding addresses the fact that
knowledge is first created in the people’s minds. KM practices must:
first identify ways to encourage and stimulate the ability of employees to develop new
knowledge
KM methodologies and technologies must enable effective ways to elicit, represent, organize,
reuse, and renew this knowledge
KM should not distance itself from the knowledge owners but instead celebrate and recognize
their position as experts in the organization
The following shows the example of an organization’s KM Initiative/activities in four functional areas. The first
one focuses on the goal: Maximize Region’s Knowledge-Related Benefits.
Thanks