Professional Documents
Culture Documents
sb1c00007 Si 001
sb1c00007 Si 001
sb1c00007 Si 001
Supporting Data
Yu J. Cao1*, Xuechun Wang1, Zhidong Wang1, Lijun Zhao1, Shuhong Li1, Zhuxia
Zhang1, Xiaoyi Wei1, Hwayoung Yun2, Sei-hyun Choi3, Zhong Liu4, Lili Zhao5,
Stephanie A. Kazane6
1 State Key Laboratory of Chemical Oncogenomics, Key Laboratory of Chemical Genomics,
Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China
3 Department of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
4 Shandong New Time Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, No.1 North Outer Ring Road, Feixian County,
Shandong, 273400, China
5 State Engineering Laboratory of High Expression of Mammalian Cells, No.1 North Outer Ring
Road, Feixian County, Shandong, 273400, China
6 California Institute for Biomedical Research, 11119 N Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, CA, 92037,
USA
S1
Materials and Methods
Cell lines and cell culture. The breast cancer cells SKBR3, HCC1954, MDA MB453,
MDA MB361, BT-20, MDA MB231, MDA MB468 were obtained from American Type
Culture Collection. The cell line MDA MB435 and its Her2-transfected cell line, MDA
MB435/Her2 were supplied from Dr. Brunhide H. Felding (The Scripps Research
Institute, La Jolla, CA). All cell lines were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented
with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, plus 1% antibiotics and 2mM L-glutamine.
Synthesis of FITC-linker
5-(3-(1-((1R,8S,9s)-bicyclo[6.1.0]non-4-yn-9-yl)-3-oxo-2,7,10,13-tetraoxa-4-
azapentadecan-15-yl)thio-ureido)-2-(6-hydroxy-3-oxo-3H-xanthen-9-yl)benzoic acid
(FITC linker, 16)
S O
H
O O
HN N O N O
O 1) H H
O O H
H H2N NH2 , DIPEA, DMF
N 3
O O CO2H
O 2) FITC, DIPEA, DMF
H
15 16
O O OH
S2
1.29 – 1.23 (m, 1H), 0.87 – 0.83 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz) δ 181.40,
169.37, 157.29, 152.78, 129.89, 124.96, 116.50, 116.12, 113.50, 110.63, 103.10,
100.00, 99.84, 70.63, 70.61, 70.53, 70.40, 70.00, 69.30, 62.23, 44.56, 41.31, 40.95,
29.45, 21.71, 20.41, 18.52; HR-MS (ESI+) calcd. for C40H44N3O10S+ [M + H+]+ 758.2742;
found 758.2743.
S3
CD3 molecules. Lentivirual vectors were produced after transfection of HEK293FT
human embryonic kidney cells in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 6mM
glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 0.1mM MEM Non-essential amino acid, 1mM
MEM sodium pyruvate. Transduction of human T cells was conducted as previously
described2, 4. HEK 293FT Cells were seeded at 5 106 per 10cm tissue culture plate 24h
before transfection. Cells were transfected with 7.5g pRRL-SIN-EF1-WPRE, 6g
pMDL, 6g pREV and 2.5g pVSVG plasmids using FugeneHD (Promega). Medium
was changed 6h after transfection and the viral supernatant was harvested at 48 post
transfection. Virus particles were concentrated 10-fold by ultracentrifugation for 2h at
27,000rpm with a Beckman Ti70 rotor (Beckman Coulter). Human T cells were purified
from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using EasySep human T cell
enrichment kit (StemCell Technologies Inc), and further activated for 24h with
CD3/CD28-coated magnetic beads (Life Technologies) before infection. Concentrated
lentivirus were incubated with the activated human T cells in the presence of 5g/mL
protamine sulfate and 50 IU/mL IL-2, and centrifuged at 1000rpm for 1h at 32C. The
surface expression of CAR on transduced T cells was determined by flow cytometry
after staining with APC labelled anti-human IgG antibody and APC labelled anti-mouse
IgG antibody.
Binding of antigen specific switches to target cells. Flow cytometry was performed
to evaluate Her2 or IGF1R binding of different FITC or Myc-based switches on breast
cancer cells (SKBR3, MDA MB453, MDA MB231 and MDA MB468). A fixed
concentration of 20nM switches were incubated with cells at 4C for 2h. After washes,
the cells labelled with FITC conjugates were analyzed directly on BD LSR II flow
cytometer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry System), and the cells labelled with Myc
fusions were further incubated with FITC labelled anti-Myc antibody, followed by flow
cytometry analysis.
In vitro cytotoxicity assay. Co-culture containing 1×104 target cells and PBMCs or
1×105 CAR-T cells with different concentrations of ADC, bsAb or antibody switches were
incubated at 37°C for 24h. To test the effects of E: T ratio, 1×104 target cells were
incubated with 100pM antibody switches with different numbers of the corresponding
CAR-T cells (0.01 - 10 ×105) at 37°C for 24h. Cytotoxic activity was determined by
measuring lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in the cultured supernatant using the
S4
Cytotox-96 nonradioactive cytotoxicity assay kit (Promega). Percent cytotoxicity was
calculated by: % cytotoxicity = [(absorbance experimental – absorbance spontaneous
average)/(absorbance maximum killing average – absorbance spontaneous average)] ×
100.
CAR-T cell activation analysis. CAR-T cells were incubated with switch bound target
cells for 24h at 37°C. T cell activation was analyzed by flow cytometry with APC
conjugated anti-human CD69 and PerCP/Cy5.5 conjugated anti-human CD25. In
addition, the levels of cytokines (IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α) produced in the culture medium
were measured by human IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α test kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All
the tests were conducted in triplicate and results are shown as mean ± SD.
In vivo efficacy study. The efficacy studies targeting Her2 expressing breast cancers
were conducted in 8-week old female NSG mice. The tumor models including Her2 3+
(HCC1954), 2+ (MDA MB453) and 1+ (MDA MB435) were investigated for the in vivo
efficacy of switchable and conventional CAR-T cells, bsAbs and ADC. On day 0, 5 106
(HCC1954 or MDA MB453) or 2 106 MDA MB435 cells in 50% Matrigel were s.c.
implanted into the right flank. For sCAR-T cells groups, on day 8, anti-FITC CAR-T cells
(15 106 cells) were injected into the peritoneal cavity. Two days later, mice were
received i.v. injection of anti-Her2-FITC as treatment and anti-Her2 Fab as control at
0.5mg/kg every other day. For conventional CAR-T, on day 10, anti-Her2 CAR-T cells
(15 106 cells) were administrated by once i.v. injection. For bsAbs group, ex vivo-
expanded T cells (15 × 106 cells) were i.p. injected three times for Her2 1+ tumor model
on day 8, 14 and 20. On day 10, mice were received i.v. injection of PBS or bsAbs
(1mg/kg) every other day. For ADC group, once 5mg/kg dose of ADC was i.v. injected
on day 10. Animals were monitored and tumors were measured twice weekly using
caliper for an additonal 40 days.
S5
image representing light intensity (blue, least intense; red, most intense) was generated
using Living Image.
REFERENCES
1. Cao, Y., Axup, J. Y., Ma, J. S., Wang, R. E., Choi, S., Tardif, V., Lim, R. K., Pugh, H.
M., Lawson, B. R., Welzel, G., Kazane, S. A., Sun, Y., Tian, F., Srinagesh, S.,
Javahishvili, T., Schultz, P. G., and Kim, C. H. (2015) Multiformat T-cell-engaging
bispecific antibodies targeting human breast cancers, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 54,
7022-7027.
2. Cao, Y., Rodgers, D. T., Du, J., Ahmad, I., Hampton, E. N., Ma, J. S., Mazagova, M.,
Choi, S. H., Yun, H. Y., Xiao, H., Yang, P., Luo, X., Lim, R. K., Pugh, H. M., Wang, F.,
Kazane, S. A., Wright, T. M., Kim, C. H., Schultz, P. G., and Young, T. S. (2016) Design
of Switchable Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Targeting Breast Cancer, Angew
Chem Int Ed Engl 55, 7520-7524.
3. Axup, J. Y., Bajjuri, K. M., Ritland, M., Hutchins, B. M., Kim, C. H., Kazane, S. A.,
Halder, R., Forsyth, J. S., Santidrian, A. F., Stafin, K., Lu, Y., Tran, H., Seller, A. J.,
Biroc, S. L., Szydlik, A., Pinkstaff, J. K., Tian, F., Sinha, S. C., Felding-Habermann, B.,
Smider, V. V., and Schultz, P. G. (2012) Synthesis of site-specific antibody-drug
conjugates using unnatural amino acids, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 16101-16106.
4. Ma, J. S., Kim, J. Y., Kazane, S. A., Choi, S. H., Yun, H. Y., Kim, M. S., Rodgers, D.
T., Pugh, H. M., Singer, O., Sun, S. B., Fonslow, B. R., Kochenderfer, J. N., Wright, T.
M., Schultz, P. G., Young, T. S., Kim, C. H., and Cao, Y. (2016) Versatile strategy for
controlling the specificity and activity of engineered T cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
113, E450-458.
S6
Supplementary Figures
O O
H H
N N N O O
N N N O NH2
H
O O O O O
Auristatin F-linker
O N
O N
Acetate buffer pH 4.5
O
O
37C
1-4 days
S7
anti-Her2/anti-CD3 bsAb
37°C
N3-PEG3-ONH2 16-24 hr
O
H
O O O
N O O O N O O N
O O N3 H
H
PBS pH 7.4
37°C
1-3 days
O
H
O O O
O N O O N
H
N O O H
O O N
N N
anti-Her2/anti-CD3 bsAb
Figure S2. General scheme for the generation of bispecific antibodies: the
antibodies with pAcF were first selectively coupled with bifunctional ethylene
glycol linkers, and subsequently conjugated to each other by “Click” reaction.
S8
anti-Her2/FITC Switch
O
anti-Her2 Fab
(LS202X)
O O N3
H 2N O O
O O N3
N O O
O O OH
CO2H
“Click” chemistry
H
H H
HN N O N O
O O
H
S O
FITC-linker
HO O O
N N HO2C
O N
N O
3 H H
O N N NH
O
O 3 S
anti-Her2/FITC
S9
anti-Her2/FITC
anti-Her2–azide
MW: 48066
anti-Her2/FITC
MW: 48823
S10
MW kDa
245
180
135
100
75
63
48
35
25
20
17
11
S11
SKBR3 MDA MB453 MDA MB231 MDA MB468
(Her2 3+) (Her2 2+) (Her2 1+) (Her2 0)
anti-Her2/FITC
anti-Her2 Fab
S12
SKBR3 (Her2 3+) EC50 (nM)
Mean Fluorescence Intensity Control N.D.
500 ADC 0.95±0.11
bsAb 0.79±0.14
400
anti-Her2/FITC 1.16±0.24
300
200
100
0
10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3
Concentration (nM)
Control N.D.
500 ADC N.D.
bsAb N.D.
400 N.D.
anti-Her2/FITC
300
200
100
0
10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3
Concentration (nM)
Figure S7. Binding of ADC, bsAb and anti-Her2/FITC to SKBR3 (Her2 3+) and
MDA MB468 (Her2 0) cancer cells. Cells were incubated with indicated switches
and detected with Alexa Fluor647 conjugated anti-human kappa chain antibody.
The EC50 value was calculated with Graphpad Prism software.
S13
SKBR3 (Her2 3+) HCC1954 (Her2 3+) MAD MB435/Her2 (Her2 3+)
100 100 100
Cytotoxicity (%)
Cytotoxicity (%)
Cytotoxicity (%)
75 75 75
50 50 50
25 25 25
0 0 0
0.1 1 10 0.1 1 10 0.1 1 10
E: T ratio E: T ratio E: T ratio
Cytotoxicity (%)
Cytotoxicity (%)
75 75
50 50
25 25
0 0
0.1 1 10 0.1 1 10
E: T ratio E: T ratio
BT20 (Her2 1+) MDA MB231 (Her2 1+) MAD MB435 (Her2 1+)
100 100 100
Cytotoxicity (%)
Cytotoxicity (%)
Cytotoxicity (%)
75 75 75
50 50 50
25 25 25
0 0 0
0.1 1 10 0.1 1 10 0.1 1 10
E: T ratio E: T ratio E: T ratio
MDA MB468 (Her2 0)
100
CAR-T
4D5-BBZ
Cytotoxicity (%)
75 100
Control CAR-T
FITC-E2-BBZ
Cytotoxicity (%)
50 75 sCAR-T + aHer2-FITC
FITC-E2-BBZ
25
50
0
0.1 25 1 10
E: T ratio
0
Figure S8.
0.1 In vitro1 comparison
10 of sCAR-T cells with conventional anti-Her2 CAR-
E: T ratio
T cells on different Her2 expressing cancer cells. The cytotoxicity of anti-FITC
CAR-T cells in the presence of 100pM anti-Her2/FITC was assessed at the
indicated E: T ratios. In the presence of switch, anti-FITC CAR-T showed the
comparable activity as anti-Her2 CAR-T against different Her2 expressing cancer
cells.
S14
MDA MB435 (Her2 1+) IC50 (pM)
100
0h 59.4±2.5
Cytotoxicity (%)
75 24 h 65.2±2.7
48 h 69.4±1.7
50 72 h 122.4±3.8
25
0
10 -2 10 0 10 2 10 4 10 6
Concentration (pM)
S15
HCC1954 (Her2 3+)
Tumor volume (mm3)
1500
1500
Tumor volume (mm3 )
CAR-T
Legend
CAR-T Control
Legend sCAR-T
CAR-T
1000 sCAR-T
Legend
1000
500
500
0
0 0 10 20 30 40 50
0 10 20 30 40 50 Days
Days
S16
MDA MB453 (Her2 2+)
CAR-T
Legend
400 CAR-T
Control
Legend sCAR-T
CAR-T sCAR-T
Legend
1000 300
200
500 100
0
0 0 10 20 30 40 50
0 10 20 30 40 50 Days
Days
S17
Days
50 40 30 20 10 0
MDA MB435 (Her2 1+)
Saline
Saline + T cells
8 ADC
ADC
T cells
(total counts 109)
bsAb
Legend
Luminescence
CAR-T
Legend
6 CAR-T cells
CAR-T
Control sCAR-T
Legend
sCAR-T
Legend T cells
4
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Days
S18
HCC1954 (Her2 3+)
CAR-T
Tumor volume (mm3)
30
25
1500
Tumor volume (mm3 )
CAR-T
Legend
20 Control
Legend sCAR-T
CAR-T sCAR-T
Legend
1000
15
500 0 10 20 30 40 50
Days
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Figure S13. Body weight changes of mice during treatment of CAR-T and sCAR-
Days
T against HCC1954 (Her2 3+) xenograft models. No significant changes in body
weight or other treatmentrelated toxicities were observed during the studies.
S19
MDA MB453 (Her2 2+)
CAR-T
Tumor volume (mm3)
30
25
1500
Tumor volume (mm3 )
CAR-T
Legend
Control
Legend sCAR-T
CAR-T 20
1000 sCAR-T
Legend
15
500 0 10 20 30 40 50
Days
0
0 10 20 5030 40
Days
Figure S14. Body weight changes of mice during treatment of CAR-T and sCAR-
T against MDA MB453 (Her2 2+) xenograft models. No significant changes in
body weight or other treatmentrelated toxicities were observed during the
studies.
S20
MDA MB435 (Her2 1+)
T cells
25
Days
20
50 40 30 20 10 0
15 0
ADC
ADC
1000
bsAb
Legend
sCAR-T
Legend
CAR-T 1500
Control sCAR-T
Legend
sCAR-T
Legend T cells 2000
S21
anti-Her2/Myc
Thrombin site
anti-IGF1R/Myc
Thrombin site
anti-Her2/Myc/anti-IGF1R
Thrombin site
S22
ani-Her2/Myc
kDa kDa
180 180
135 135
100 100
75 75
65 65
45 45
35 35
25 25
18 18
Figure S17. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis of anti-Her2/Myc before and
after thrombin cleavage under nonreducing conditions. Western blot was probed
anti-Myc mouse monoclonal antibody, followed by chemiluminescence using
HRP labelled goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody.
S23
anti-IGF1R/Myc
kDa
kDa
150
100
116
70
66
50
45
35 35
25 25
20
18
14 15
Figure S18. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis of anti-IGF1R/Myc before and
after thrombin cleavage under nonreducing conditions. Western blot was probed
anti-Myc mouse monoclonal antibody, followed by chemiluminescence using
HRP labelled goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody.
S24
ani-Her2/Myc/anti-IGF1R
kDa kDa
150
116 100
70
66
50
45
35 35
25 25
20
18
14 15
S25
SKBR3 MDA MB453 MDA MB231 MDA MB468
Her2 3+ Her2 2+ Her2 1+ Her2 0
Her2
PE
IGF1R
APC
Figure S20. FACS analysis of Her2 and IGF1R expression on different breast
cancer cells. Her2 and IGF1R expression was determined with PE-conjugated
anti-Her2 antibody and APC conjugated anti-IGF1R antibody.
S26
SKBR3 MDA MB453 MDA MB231 MDA MB468
(Her2 3+) (Her2 2+) (Her2 1+) (Her2 0+)
Normalized
Control
anti-Her2/Myc
anti-IGF1R/Myc
anti-Her2/Myc/anti-IGF1R
100 101 102 103 104 100 101 102 103 104 100 101 102 103 104 100 101 102 103 104
FITC
S27
sCAR-T-Her2 +
Control sCAR-T-Her2 sCAR-T-IGF1R sCAR-T-IGF1R Bi-sCAR-T
SKBR3
Her2 3+
MDA MB453
Her2 2+
MDA MB231
CD25
Her2 1+
MDA MB468
Her2 0
CD69
S28
SKBR3 (Her2 3+) MDA MB453 (Her2 2+)
*** 200 ****
400 ns ****
*** ****
** 150 ****
IFN- (pg/mL)
IFN- (pg/mL)
300
100
200
100 50
0 0
tin
tin
tin
tin
tin
tin
e
yc
yc
l
l
ic
ic
M
M
ec
ec
ec
ec
ec
ec
h
h
5/
5/
Ve
Ve
dn
dn
dn
dn
dn
dn
4D
4D
/A
/A
/A
/A
/A
/A
yc
yc
yc
yc
yc
yc
M
M
M
M
M
M
5/
5/
+
+
4D
4D
yc
yc
M
M
5/
5/
4D
4D
MDA MB231 (Her2 1+) MDA MB468 (Her2 0)
125 *** 125 ns
*** ns
100 *** 100
*** ns
IFN- (pg/mL)
IFN- (pg/mL)
ns
75 75
50 50
25 25
0 0
tin
tin
tin
tin
tin
tin
e
yc
yc
l
l
ic
ic
M
M
ec
ec
ec
ec
ec
ec
h
h
5/
5/
Ve
Ve
dn
dn
dn
dn
dn
dn
4D
4D
/A
/A
/A
/A
/A
/A
yc
yc
yc
yc
yc
yc
M
M
M
M
M
M
5/
5/
+
+
4D
4D
yc
yc
M
M
5/
5/
4D
4D
S29
SKBR3 (Her2 3+) MDA MB453 (Her2 2+)
**** 800 ****
1500 **** ****
TNF- (pg/mL)
TNF- (pg/mL)
**** 600 ****
**** ****
1000
400
500 200
0 0
tin
tin
tin
tin
e
yc
tin
tin
e
yc
l
l
ic
ic
M
M
ec
ec
ec
ec
ec
ec
h
h
5/
5/
Ve
Ve
dn
dn
dn
dn
dn
dn
4D
4D
/A
/A
/A
/A
/A
/A
yc
yc
yc
yc
yc
yc
M
M
M
M
M
5/
5/
+
+
4D
4D
yc
yc
M
M
5/
5/
4D
4D
MDA MB231 (Her2 1+) MDA MB468 (Her2 0)
**** ns
300 **** TNF- (pg/mL) 300 ns
TNF- (pg/mL)
****
ns
****
200 200 ns
100 100
0 0
tin
tin
tin
e
yc
tin
tin
tin
e
yc
l
l
ic
ic
ec
ec
ec
M
ec
ec
ec
h
h
5/
5/
Ve
dn
dn
dn
Ve
dn
dn
dn
4D
4D
/A
/A
/A
/A
/A
/A
yc
yc
yc
yc
yc
yc
M
M
M
M
M
5/
5/
+
+
4D
4D
yc
yc
M
M
5/
5/
4D
4D
S30
Supplementary Tables
Table S1. Comparative IC50 values and maximal killing efficacy of Her2 targeted therapeutics including ADC, bsAbs and
sCAR-T against various human breast cancer cell lines
IC50 (pM)/Maximal Killing (%)
Cell line Her2 level
ADC bsAb sCAR-T
SKBR3 3+ 16.11.8/61.563.7 2.00.4/60.45.2 0.90.1/69.93.8
HCC1954 3+ 105.24.6/27.24.2 15.22.3/45.54.7 8.41.1/67.75.2
MDA MB435/Her2 3+ 51.53.7/47.42.8 2.90.7/65.13.7 0.40.1/85.83.3
MDA MB361 2+ 244.913.4/26.63.5 31.33.0/49.63.1 8.61.1/77.03.6
MDA MB435 2+ 12.01.8/50.62.2 3.50.5/60.24.1 1.10.2/75.75.8
BT20 1+ 452.715.9/12.41.8 88.53.1/37.12.3 26.42.9/56.63.8
MDA MB231 1+ N.D. 59.42.0/49.61.8 32.71.2/57.73.9
MDA MB435 1+ N.D. 101.99.4/43.75.2 42.72.5/47.53.5
MDA MB468 0 N.D. N.D. N.D.
Abbreviations: IC50, half-maximal inhibitory concentration; N.D., not determined.
Data shown are a mean of duplicate samples ± SD.
S31
Table S2. Comparative IC50 values and maximal killing efficacy of monospecific and bispecific sCAR-T against various
human breast cancer cell lines
IC50 (pM)/Maximal Killing (%)
Cell line Her2 level
sCAR-T-Her2+
sCAR-T-Her2 sCAR-T-IGF1R Bi-sCAR-T
sCAR-T-IGF1R
SKBR3 3+ 58.55.8/85.07.7 N.D./21.63.6 55.20.1/78.25.8 21.21.9/82.52.9
MDA MB435 2+ 181.47.2/87.35.2 N.D./48.76.3 196.63.2/84.15.3 21.63.3/81.67.1
MDA MB231 1+ 880.26.6/45.27.1 N.D./43.82.8 117.94.2/35.04.9 112.73.8/65.00.9
MDA MB468 0 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
Abbreviations: IC50, half-maximal inhibitory concentration; N.D., not determined.
Data shown are a mean of duplicate samples ± SD.
S32