Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Opportunity Cost
Opportunity Cost
Opportunity costs represent the potential benefits that an individual, investor, or business
misses out on when choosing one alternative over another. Because opportunity costs are
unseen by definition, they can be easily overlooked. Understanding the potential missed
opportunities when a business or individual chooses one investment over another allows
for better decision making.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
• Opportunity cost is the forgone benefit that would have been derived from an option
not chosen.
• To properly evaluate opportunity costs, the costs and benefits of every option
available must be considered and weighed against the others.
• Considering the value of opportunity costs can guide individuals and organizations
to more profitable decision-making.
• Opportunity cost is a strictly internal cost used for strategic contemplation; it is not
included in accounting profit and is excluded from external financial reporting.
• Examples of opportunity cost include investing in a new manufacturing plant in Los
Angeles as opposed to Mexico City, deciding not to upgrade company equipment, or
opting for the most expensive product packaging option over cheaper options.
Option A: Invest excess capital in the stock market to potentially earn capital gains.
Option B: Invest excess capital back into the business for new equipment to increase
production efficiency.
Assume the expected return on investment (ROI) in the stock market is 12% over the next
year, and your company expects the equipment update to generate a 10% return over the
same period. The opportunity cost of choosing the equipment over the stock market is 2%
(12% - 10%). In other words, by investing in the business, the company would forgo the
opportunity to earn a higher return.
While financial reports do not show opportunity costs, business owners often use the
concept to make educated decisions when they have multiple options before
them. Bottlenecks, for instance, often result in opportunity costs.
Funds used to make payments on loans, for example, cannot be invested in stocks or
bonds, which offer the potential for investment income. The company must decide if the
expansion made by the leveraging power of debt will generate greater profits than it could
make through investments.
A firm tries to weigh the costs and benefits of issuing debt and stock, including both
monetary and nonmonetary considerations, to arrive at an optimal balance that minimizes
opportunity costs. Because opportunity cost is a forward-looking consideration, the
actual rate of return (RoR) for both options is unknown today, making this evaluation tricky
in practice.
Assume that the company in the above example forgoes new equipment and instead
invests in the stock market. If the selected securities decrease in value, the company could
end up losing money rather than enjoying the expected 12% return.
For the sake of simplicity, assume that the investment yields a return of 0%, meaning the
company gets out exactly what is put in. The opportunity cost of choosing this option is
10% to 0%, or 10%. It is equally possible that, had the company chosen new equipment,
there would be no effect on production efficiency, and profits would remain stable. The
opportunity cost of choosing this option is then 12% rather than the expected 2%.
Comparing Investments
When assessing the potential profitability of various investments, businesses look for the
option that is likely to yield the greatest return. Often, they can determine this by looking at
the expected RoR for an investment vehicle. However, businesses must also consider the
opportunity cost of each alternative option.1
Assume that, given $20,000 of available funds, a business must choose between investing
funds in securities or using it to purchase new machinery. No matter which option the
business chooses, the potential profit that it gives up by not investing in the other option is
the opportunity cost.
If the business goes with the first option, at the end of the first year, its investment will be
worth $22,000. The formula to calculate RoR is [(Current Value - Initial Value) ÷ Current
Value] × 100. In this example, [($22,000 - $20,000) ÷ $20,000] × 100 = 10%, so the RoR
on the investment is 10%. For the purposes of this example, let’s assume it would net 10%
every year after as well. At a 10% RoR, with compounding interest, the investment will
increase by $2,000 in year 1, $2,200 in year two, and $2,420 in year three.
Alternatively, if the business purchases a new machine, it will be able to increase its
production of widgets. The machine setup and employee training will be intensive, and the
new machine will not be up to maximum efficiency for the first couple of years. Let’s assume
it would net the company an additional $500 in profits in the first year, after accounting for
the additional expenses for training. The business will net $2,000 in year two and $5,000
in all future years.
Since the company has limited funds to invest in either option, it must make a choice.
According to this, the opportunity cost for choosing the securities makes sense in the first
and second years. However, by the third year, an analysis of the opportunity cost indicates
that the new machine is the better option ($500 + $2,000 + $5,000 - $2,000 - $2,200 -
$2,420) = $880.
Buying 1,000 shares of company A at $10 a share, for instance, represents a sunk cost of
$10,000. This is the amount of money paid out to invest, and getting that money back
requires liquidating stock. The opportunity cost instead asks where that $10,000 could have
been put to better use.
From an accounting perspective, a sunk cost also could refer to the initial outlay to
purchase an expensive piece of heavy equipment, which might be amortized over time, but
which is sunk in the sense that you won’t be getting it back.4
An opportunity cost would be to consider the forgone returns possibly earned elsewhere
when you buy a piece of heavy equipment with an expected ROI of 5% vs. one with an ROI
of 4%. Again, an opportunity cost describes the returns that one could have earned if the
money were instead invested in another instrument. Thus, while 1,000 shares in company
A eventually might sell for $12 a share, netting a profit of $2,000, company B increased in
value from $10 a share to $15 during the same period.
In this scenario, investing $10,000 in company A returned $2,000, while the same amount
invested in company B would have returned a larger $5,000. The $3,000 difference is the
opportunity cost of choosing company A over company B.
As an investor who has already put money into investments, you might find another
investment that promises greater returns. The opportunity cost of holding the
underperforming asset may rise to the point where the rational investment option is to sell
and invest in the more promising investment.
The key difference is that risk compares the actual performance of an investment against
the projected performance of the same investment, while opportunity cost compares the
actual performance of an investment against the actual performance of another investment.
Still, one could consider opportunity costs when deciding between two risk profiles. If
investment A is risky but has an ROI of 25%, while investment B is far less risky but only
has an ROI of 5%, even though investment A may succeed, it may not. If it fails, then the
opportunity cost of going with option B will be salient. Therefore, decision-makers rely on
much more information than just looking at just opportunity cost dollar amounts when
comparing options.
In 1962, a little known band called The Beatles auditioned for Decca Records. The label
decided against signing the band. This decision would have been made because the
opportunity cost to sign them did not outweigh the opportunity cost to pass on them.5
Economic profit (and any other calculation above that considers opportunity cost) is strictly
an internal value used for strategic decision-making. There are no regulatory bodies that
govern public reporting of economic profit or opportunity cost. Whereas accounting profit
is heavily dictated by reporting rules and frameworks, economic profit factors in vague
assumptions and estimates from management that do not have IRS, SEC, or FASB
oversight.
When feeling cautious about a purchase, for instance, many people will check the balance
of their savings account before spending money. But they often won’t think about the things
that they must give up when they make that spending decision.
The problem comes up when you never look at what else you could do with your money or
buy things without considering the lost opportunities. Having takeout for lunch occasionally
can be a wise decision, especially if it gets you out of the office for a much-needed break.
However, buying one cheeseburger every day for the next 25 years could lead to several
missed opportunities. Aside from the missed opportunity for better health, spending that
$4.50 on a burger could add up to just over $52,000 in that time frame, assuming a very
achievable 5% RoR.
This is a simple example, but the core message holds for a variety of situations. It may
sound like overkill to think about opportunity costs every time you want to buy a candy bar
or go on vacation. But opportunity costs are everywhere and occur with every decision
made, big or small.
This complex situation pinpoints the reason why opportunity cost exists. It may not be
immediately clear to a company the best course of action; however, after retrospectively
assessing the variables above, they may further understand how one option would have
been better than the other and they have incurred a "loss" due to opportunity cost.