Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 19 views

    Item Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Jayson Ungang
    This document analyzes the results of an item analysis that was conducted on 35 test items. It provides information on the number of students who selected each answer option, the item difficulty, discrimination index, and remarks for each item. Based on this analysis, decisions were made to retain, modify, or reject each item. Some items that were difficult or had low discrimination were retained if they were deemed to be good. Others that were too easy, had negative discrimination, or very low discrimination were rejected. The goal was to end up with a test that contained a mix of easy, average, and difficult items that effectively discriminated between high and low performing students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Item Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Jayson Ungang
    19 views7 pages
    This document analyzes the results of an item analysis that was conducted on 35 test items. It provides information on the number of students who selected each answer option, the item difficulty, discrimination index, and remarks for each item. Based on this analysis, decisions were made to retain, modify, or reject each item. Some items that were difficult or had low discrimination were retained if they were deemed to be good. Others that were too easy, had negative discrimination, or very low discrimination were rejected. The goal was to end up with a test that contained a mix of easy, average, and difficult items that effectively discriminated between high and low performing students.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document analyzes the results of an item analysis that was conducted on 35 test items. It provides information on the number of students who selected each answer option, the item difficulty, discrimination index, and remarks for each item. Based on this analysis, decisions were made to retain, modify, or reject each item. Some items that were difficult or had low discrimination were retained if they were deemed to be good. Others that were too easy, had negative discrimination, or very low discrimination were rejected. The goal was to end up with a test that contained a mix of easy, average, and difficult items that effectively discriminated between high and low performing students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    19 views7 pages

    Item Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Jayson Ungang
    This document analyzes the results of an item analysis that was conducted on 35 test items. It provides information on the number of students who selected each answer option, the item difficulty, discrimination index, and remarks for each item. Based on this analysis, decisions were made to retain, modify, or reject each item. Some items that were difficult or had low discrimination were retained if they were deemed to be good. Others that were too easy, had negative discrimination, or very low discrimination were rejected. The goal was to end up with a test that contained a mix of easy, average, and difficult items that effectively discriminated between high and low performing students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 7

    Item Analysis

    No. of
    Item
    Item No. A B C D Correct Difficulty Remarks Discrimination
    Index Remarks Decision
    Answer
    UG 11 2 11 Very good
    1 53.85% Average 0.62 Retained
    LG 3 7 3 3 Item
    UG 3 7 3 7
    2 34.62% Difficult 0.38 Good item Retained
    LG 5 2 2 4 2
    UG 11 1 1 11 Very good
    3 53.85% Average 0.62 Retained
    LG 3 7 3 3 Item
    UG 1 1 11 11 Very good
    4 57.69% Average 0.54 Retained
    LG 8 1 4 4 Item
    UG 11 2 11 Very good
    5 61.54% Easy 0.46 Modified
    LG 4 5 4 5 Item
    UG 12 1 12 Very good
    6 69.23% Easy 0.46 Modified
    LG 2 6 2 3 6 Item
    UG 13 13 Very good
    7 69.23% Easy 0.62 Modified
    LG 5 2 6 5 Item
    UG 11 1 1 11 Very good
    8 61.54% Easy 0.46 Modified
    LG 5 3 5 5 Item
    UG 13 13 Very good
    9 80.77% Easy 0.38 Modified
    LG 8 5 8 Item
    UG 1 12 12 To be
    10 88.46% Very easy 0.08 Rejected
    LG 1 1 11 11 Removed
    UG 4 2 2 5 4 To be
    11 34.62% Difficult -0.08 Rejected
    LG 5 1 4 3 5 Removed
    UG 8 2 2 1 8 To be
    12 76.92% Easy -0.31 Rejected
    LG 12 1 12 Removed
    UG 8 5 8 Very good
    13 46.15% Average 0.31 Retained
    LG 4 7 2 4 Item
    UG 6 7 7 Very good
    14 38.46% Difficult 0.31 Retained
    LG 8 3 1 1 3 Item
    UG 2 8 3 8 Very good
    15 42.31% Average 0.38 Retained
    LG 5 3 1 4 3 Item
    UG 1 12 12 Very good
    16 69.23% Easy 0.46 Modified
    LG 4 1 2 6 6 Item
    UG 11 2 11 To be
    17 80.77% Easy 0.08 Rejected
    LG 10 3 10 Removed
    UG 4 1 8 8 To be
    18 65.38% Easy -0.08 Rejected
    LG 3 9 1 9 Removed
    UG 5 7 1 5
    19 26.92% Difficult 0.23 Good item Retained
    LG 2 5 1 5 2
    UG 8 2 1 2 1 Very To be
    20 15.38% -0.15 Rejected
    LG 8 1 3 1 3 difficult Removed
    UG 1 4 7 1 4 Very
    21 19.23% 0.23 Good item Rejected
    LG 5 1 6 1 1 difficult
    UG 7 2 3 1 3 Very
    22 11.54% 0.23 Good item Rejected
    LG 9 4 0 difficult
    UG 6 6 1 6
    23 34.62% Difficult 0.23 Good item Modified
    LG 6 3 1 3 3
    UG 4 9 9 To be
    24 61.54% Easy 0.15 Rejected
    LG 3 7 2 1 7 Removed
    UG 10 3 10
    25 65.38% Easy 0.23 Good item Modified
    LG 4 7 2 7
    UG 2 2 5 4 5
    26 26.92% Difficult 0.23 Good item Modified
    LG 3 4 2 4 2
    UG 5 5 3 5 To be
    27 38.46% Difficult 0 Rejected
    Removed
    27 38.46% Difficult 0 To be Rejected
    LG 5 2 3 3 5 Removed
    UG 10 2 1 10 Very good
    28 57.69% Average 0.38 Retained
    LG 1 5 6 1 5 Item
    UG 3 3 5 2 5 To be
    29 42.31% Average -0.08 Modified
    LG 4 1 6 2 6 Removed
    UG 4 4 4 1 4 To be
    30 34.62% Difficult -0.08 Rejected
    LG 3 5 5 5 Removed
    UG 5 6 2 2 Very To be
    31 11.54% 0.08 Rejected
    LG 2 6 4 1 1 Difficult Removed
    UG 1 8 1 3 8 Very good
    32 42.31% Average 0.38 Retained
    LG 7 3 1 2 3 Item
    UG 9 4 4 To be
    33 38.46% Difficult -0.15 Rejected
    LG 6 1 6 6 Removed
    UG 2 2 6 3 6 Very good
    34 30.77% Difficult 0.31 Modified
    LG 7 2 2 2 2 Item
    UG 2 5 2 4 2 Very To be
    35 15.38% 0 Rejected
    LG 2 3 2 6 2 difficult Removed
    UG 10 3 10 Very good
    36 57.69% Average 0.38 Retained
    LG 5 7 1 5 Item
    UG 2 2 2 7 7 Very good
    37 38.46% Difficult 0.31 Modified
    LG 5 3 2 3 3 Item
    UG 1 2 10 10 Very good
    38 46.15% Average 0.62 Retained
    LG 4 4 3 2 2 Item
    UG 5 1 5 2 5 Very good
    39 23% Difficult 0.31 Modified
    LG 1 4 1 7 1 Item
    UG 8 2 3 8 Very good
    40 46.15% Average 0.31 Retained
    LG 4 6 3 4 Item
    UG 1 8 4 8
    41 50% Average 0.23 Good item Retained
    LG 2 5 6 5
    UG 11 2 11 Very good
    42 61.54% Easy 0.46 Rejected
    LG 1 5 5 2 5 Item
    UG 10 3 3 To be
    43 30.77% Difficult -0.15 Rejected
    LG 8 5 5 Removed
    UG 2 2 8 1 8
    44 50% Average 0.23 Good item Retained
    LG 2 5 5 1 5
    UG 11 2 11 Very good
    45 61.54% Easy 0.46 Rejected
    LG 5 2 2 4 5 Item

    Submitted by:

    JAYSON UNGANG
    Student

    Submitted to:

    Michelle Deniega, Ph.D.


    Professor
    Item Difficulty Discrimination Index Interpretation

    Difficulty
    14 0.5384615 53.85 8 0.6153846 0.62
    20 and below very difficult
    21-40 difficult
    9 0.3461538 34.62 5 0.3846154 0.38
    41-60 average
    61-80 easy
    14 0.5384615 53.85 8 0.6153846 0.62
    81 and above very easy
    15 0.5769231 57.69 7 0.5384615 0.54

    16 0.6153846 61.54 6 0.4615385 0.46

    18 0.6923077 69.23 6 0.4615385 0.46

    18 0.6923077 69.23 8 0.6153846 0.62

    16 0.6153846 61.54 6 0.4615385 0.46

    21 0.8076923 80.77 5 0.3846154 0.38

    23 0.8846154 88.46 1 0.0769231 0.08

    9 0.3461538 34.62 -1 -0.076923 -0.08

    20 0.7692308 76.92 -4 -0.307692 -0.31

    12 0.4615385 46.15 4 0.3076923 0.31

    10 0.3846154 38.46 4 0.3076923 0.31

    11 0.4230769 42.31 5 0.3846154 0.38

    18 0.6923077 69.23 6 0.4615385 0.46

    21 0.8076923 80.77 1 0.0769231 0.08

    17 0.6538462 65.38 -1 -0.076923 -0.08

    7 0.2692308 26.92 3 0.2307692 0.23

    4 0.1538462 15.38 -2 -0.153846 -0.15

    5 0.1923077 19.23 3 0.2307692 0.23

    3 0.1153846 11.54 3 0.2307692 0.23

    9 0.3461538 34.62 3 0.2307692 0.23

    16 0.6153846 61.54 2 0.1538462 0.15

    17 0.6538462 65.38 3 0.2307692 0.23

    7 0.2692308 26.92 3 0.2307692 0.23

    10 0.3846154 38.46 0 0 0.00


    10 0.3846154 38.46 0 0 0.00

    15 0.5769231 57.69 5 0.3846154 0.38


    11 0.4230769 42.31 -1 -0.076923 -0.08

    9 0.3461538 34.62 -1 -0.076923 -0.08

    3 0.1153846 11.54 1 0.0769231 0.08

    11 0.4230769 42.31 5 0.3846154 0.38

    10 0.3846154 38.46 -2 -0.153846 -0.15

    8 0.3076923 30.77 4 0.3076923 0.31

    4 0.1538462 15.38 0 0 0.00

    15 0.5769231 57.69 5 0.3846154 0.38

    10 0.3846154 38.46 4 0.3076923 0.31

    12 0.4615385 46.15 8 0.6153846 0.62

    6 0.2307692 23.08 4 0.3076923 0.31

    12 0.4615385 46.15 4 0.3076923 0.31

    13 0.5 50.00 3 0.2307692 0.23

    16 0.6153846 61.54 6 0.4615385 0.46

    8 0.3076923 30.77 -2 -0.153846 -0.15

    13 0.5 50.00 3 0.2307692 0.23

    16 0.6153846 61.54 6 0.4615385 0.46


    Interpretation

    Discrimination
    0.4 and above very good item
    0.3-0.39 good item
    0.20-0.29 to be improved
    0.19 and below to be removed

    You might also like