Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ships Traffic Analysis in North of
Ships Traffic Analysis in North of
Key words: ships traffic, traffic flow, traffic distributions, safety of navigation
Abstract
The paper presents methods and models used for analysis of ships traffic in north of Bornholm Traffic
Separation Scheme. Ships’ traffic has been analyzed by means of statistical methods with use of data
possessed from AIS data obtained from HELCOM. The paper presents probabilistic models of ships’ traffic
spatial distribution and its parameters. The results could be used for safety and risk analysis models in given
area and for creation of general models of ships’ traffic flows.
Słowa kluczowe: ruch statków, strumienie ruchu, rozkład ruchu, bezpieczeństwo nawigacji
Abstrakt
W artykule przedstawiono metody i modele stosowane do analizy strumieni ruchu statków w strefie separa-
cyjnej na północ od Bornholmu. Ruch statków został przeanalizowany metodami statystycznymi z użyciem
danych pozyskanych za pomocą systemu AIS otrzymanych z sieci HELCOM. W artykule przedstawiono
probabilistyczne modele rozkładu horyzontalnego strumienia ruchu statków i jego parametry. Wyniki tego
opracowania mogą zostać wykorzystane do budowy ogólnych modeli rozkładów ruchu statków.
Introduction holmsgat itself and the areas off the southern parts
of the islands Oland and Gotland. The stream of
Ships’ traffic is the most important factor of ships is compressed in these areas. There are other
ships safety. The precise knowledge of ships’ traf- areas which cause concern as well like the area
fic phenomenon and its processes is curtail for na- south of the island of Bornholm and north of the
vigational safety analysis. AIS (Automatic Identifi- coast of Poland and Germany. In the Bornholmsgat,
cation System) gives great opportunity for traffic ships coming from the Polish coast, the Great Belt
monitoring but also for discovering basic processes and the Kiel Canal, the southern coast of Sweden
which rules the traffic of ships in confined areas. and a north-easterly direction converge. The main
Results of statistical analysis present in this paper flows of the traffic are crossed by ferries trading
conducted to find ships’ positions spatial distribu- between, mainly, Sweden and ports in Germany,
tion and its parameters of ships’ traffic in analyzed Denmark and Poland. Furthermore fishing activities
area. are pursued in the area. More than 55 000 passages
The Baltic Sea have relatively dense traffic. are made by ships operating in this part of the
There are two main areas which should be noted: Baltic Sea on a yearly basis. The daily average of
the areas adjacent to the Bornholmsgat and Born- ships’ passages through the Bornholmsgat is around
150 [1]. The number of ships passing through the two associated inshore traffic zones,
area is expected to grow significantly over the years one precautionary area between the three parts.
to come due to the general increase of trade, the The direction (T) of navigation is:
growing economy of the eastern Baltic countries
and the increase of oil exports from Russia. TSS, main part between Sweden and Bornholm:
038° northeast bound course and 218° southwest
Navigational conditions in analyzed area bound course;
TSS, south west part: 071° and 038° northeast
The paper presents data analysis of the vessel bound courses and 218° and 251° southwest
traffic in the area between Sweden and Bornholm bound courses;
Island (TSS Bornholmsgat). Figure 1 shows the TSS, west part: 093° eastbound course and 273°
navigational map of analyzed area. westbound course.
where: z e
6) triangular distribution:
2 y a
b a c a for a x c
dl y
2 b y
b a b c for c x b
where: y – distance to the axis, m – average of ships
distance to the waterway axis, – standard devia-
tion of ships distance to the waterway axis, Γ(p) –
gamma function, β(p, q) – beta function, a, p, q, β, Fig. 2. TSS Bornholmsgat (names of analyzed routes)
α – other parameters of distributions. Rys. 2. Strefa separacyjna Bornholmsgat (przyjęta nomenkla-
tura tras)
The width of traffic flow is fundamental impor-
tance in its assessment. In order to describe these
traffic streams is necessary to determine the charac-
teristics of the distributions of the width of the traf-
fic lane. The paper presents the results of traffic
flows analysis on the TSS Bornholm area. Re-
searches have been conducted on the basis of data
received from the AIS receiver to the area of the
southern Baltic.
the traffic streams for characteristic gates in TSS Table 1 presents descriptive statistics of the ves-
Bornholmsgat are shown in table 1. sel position relative to the axis of the main lane, for
defined gates (sections). Considered the relation-
ship between standard deviation and type of vessel
section (i + 1)
(oil tankers, all other) and the period of navigation
l (summer, winter). It may be noted that in most cas-
section i es, the standard deviation of the tanker is less than
center
other ships. The average difference between the
of the track values of deviations of oil tankers and other vessels
for the same gates and months is 4.97%. Figure 5
shows the percentage difference between the stan-
Fig. 4. Method of statistical data analysis in given sections
dard deviation of distributions.
Rys. 4. Metoda statystycznej analizy ruchu statków i podział Comparing the values of deviations for the
na sekcje drogi wodnej summer months and winter, in most cases there are
Gate Months / type Mean Standard dev. Skewness Kurtosis min y max y
20 1 – 2all N –42.103 873.69 0.0502 2.8441 –2904.4 2483.4
20 6 – 7 all N –108.17 806.13 –0.0791 2.9002 –2407.7 1995.1
20 1 – 2 all S 211.69 912.37 –0.1644 2.6827 –2421.3 2280
20 6 – 7 all S 165.7 908.68 –0.0808 2.4659 –2097.8 2187.8
40 1 – 2all N 182.09 878.68 0.0475 3.5932 –2700.2 2754.3
40 6 – 7 all N 44.732 809.91 0.2978 3.1413 –2249 2660.3
40 1 – 2 all S 258.79 1013 0.3159 3.1544 –2765.2 3540.6
40 6 – 7 all S 379.78 945.85 –0.1856 2.8642 –2674.5 3006.8
55 1 – 2 all NE –128.41 870.63 0.0252 2.6834 –2232.2 2268.4
55 6 – 7 all NE –33.865 803.46 –0.272 2.907 –2162.8 2062.5
55 1 – 2 all ENE –999.56 808.85 0.6496 3.5749 –2502.2 1852.3
55 6 – 7 all ENE –836.42 896.68 0.7233 3.6264 –2541.9 2223.9
55 1 – 2 all SW 1017.5 1041.9 0.1069 2.5685 –1709.9 3709.2
55 6 – 7 all SW 532 897.96 –0.2203 2.595 –2334.9 3037.7
55 1 – 2 all SWW 1195.5 704.96 –0.685 3.1463 –812.4 2489.5
55 6 – 7 all SWW 1271.8 718.82 –0.8951 3.56 –1023.8 2738.5
30.000%
30.000%
20.000%
20.000%
10.000%
10.000%
0.000%
0.000%
20 N 20 S 40 N 40 S 55 NE 55 ENE 55 SW 55 SWS
–10.000%
-10.000%
–20.000%
-20.000%
–30.000%
-30.000%
–40.000%
-40.000%
Gate
Winter
Wimter Summer
Summer
Fig. 5. Percentage difference between the standard deviations for tankers and all other vessels
Rys. 5. Procentowe różnice pomiędzy odchyleniami standardowymi dla tankowców i innych statków
higher values of deviations for the winter months. distribution for the value closest to the average,
This is due to bad weather conditions during this logistic distribution adapts insufficiently to the
period, and thus navigators are not so well able to extreme values. In the case of the triangular
keep the ship on course as in good weather. The distribution to describe extreme values is not
average difference between the deviations is 4.9%. entirely consistent with reality.
Logistic distribution best matches the data
around the mean value. Normal distribution is more Distribution of the traffic stream of tankers
flattened compared to the logistic distribution. Distributions of the location of the vessel rela-
There is also a difference in the description of the tive to the axis of the track for tankers and other
extreme values. Despite the good fit to the logistic ships are shown below. Tankers were divided into
Table 2. Parameters of mathematical models of traffic distributions in the TSS Bornholmsgat (in relation to different routes and
gates)
Tabela 2. Parametry matematycznych modeli rozkładu ruchu statków w Bornholmsgat (w odniesieniu do różnych tras i sekcji toru)
Gate Month / type / route Normal Logistic Triangular
m σ m σ min min likely max
20 1 – 2all N –42.103 873.69 –47.238 500.43 –2348.16 –112.95 2499.88
20 6 – 7 all N –108.17 806.13 –103.49 457.96 –2435.06 –0.77 2018.21
20 1 – 2 all S 211.7 912.38 218.35 527.01 –2451.8 399.2 2352.19
20 6 – 7 all S 165.7 908.66 171.83 529.26 –2171.48 224 2312.7
40 1 – 2all N 258.79 1013 224.44 574.52 –2797.2 75.79 3568.9
40 6 – 7 all N 379.78 945.85 396.03 546.09 –2701.15 675.8 3031.5
40 1 – 2 all S 182.08 878.67 173.56 483.75 –2729.78 196.8 2826.49
40 6 – 7 all S 44.73 809.91 18.62 456.39 –2263.4 –79.1 2682
55 1 – 2 all NE –128.41 870.63 –119.31 501.5 –2304.4 –113.6 2308.8
55 6 – 7 all NE –33.865 806.46 –19.48 458.51 –2210.6 47 2155
60 1 – 2 all ENE –999.56 808.85 –1039.33 457.21 –2561.5 –1779.1 1904.1
60 6 – 7 all ENE –836.42 896.68 –890.24 503.99 –2617.9 –1563.2 2255.3
65 1 – 2 all SW 1017.5 1041.9 999.78 608.39 –1754.2 727.3 3833.5
65 6 – 7 all SW 532 897.96 551.89 524.58 –2357.9 711.41 3059.3
70 1 – 2 all SWW 1195.5 704.96 1246.79 395.36 –916.56 1646.1 2567.8
70 6 – 7 all SWW 1271.77 718.82 1343.63 397.06 –1076 1735.4 2777.5
Logistic(171.83;
Logistic (171.83;529.26)
529.26)
XX<=–1387
-1387
XX<=1730
1730
5.0%
5.0% 95.0%
95.0%
66
55
44
10^-4
–4
Valuesx10
(y)
dl (y)
33
Values
dl
22
11
00
–2500
-2500 –2000
-2000 –1500
-1500 –1000
-1000 –500
-500 0 500
500 1000
1000 1500
1500 2000
2000 2500
2500
Distance
distance from axis of
from the axis ofthe
thelane
lane[m]
[m]
Fig. 6. Distribution of ships positions for SW lane (June–July), all vessel, fitted to logistic distribution
Rys. 6. Rozkład pozycji statków na południowo-zachodniej trasie (czerwiec–lipiec), dla wszystkich statków dopasowany do rozkła-
du logistycznego
two groups: up to 150 m and above 150 m. As we bution in analyzed water area. Due to small samples
can see the main distribution describing the streams more studies should be done in this field.
is logistic distribution. Figure 7 and 8 present dis-
tributions for different groups of ships. Conclusions
Presented examples of distributions are the basis
Logistic (–214.56; 464.99)
X –1584
X <= -1584
Logistic(-214.56; 464.99)
X 1155
X <= 1155
for the development of a mathematical model of
66
5.0%
5.0% 95.0%
95.0%
traffic (tankers and other vessels). Creation of pre-
55
cise model that presents results should be verified
by studying on traffic flows and its distributions on
dl (y) 10–4
44
different water areas.
Values x 10^-4
33
the AIS registered ship traffic. Thus, the leisure
22
boats and fishing boats will be modeled separately
11 to form a complete ship traffic distribution. Leisure
00 boat traffic is only to a limited extent present in
–2450
-2450 –1900
-1900 –1350
-1350 –800
-800 –250
-250 300
300 850
850 1400
1400 1950
1950 2500
2500
winter, spring and fall. Thus, seasonal variations
Distance from
distance fromthe
the axis
axis ofof
thethe lane [m]
lane[m]
will be included in the model to account for leisure
Fig. 7. Fitted distribution for NE lane (June–July), tankers boat traffic in the total ship traffic volume and in
L < 150 m the ship traffic distributions.
Rys. 7. Rozkład pozycji statków na północno-wschodniej trasie Further work should be focused on improving
(czerwiec–lipiec) dla tankowców o L < 150 m, dopasowany do
the model that will involve the examination of traf-
rozkładu logistycznego
fic flows on the open and limited water, depending
Logistic (–550.00; 350.00)
on the hydrometeorological conditions, ship traffic,
Logistic(-550.00; 350.00)
X –1450
X <= -1450
X 350
X <= 350
and depending on the existing dangers (e.g. shoal).
7.1%
7.1% 92.9%
92.9%
88
77 References
dl (y) 10–4
66
1. IMO NAV 51/3/X March 2005 SUB-COMMITTEE ON
SAFETY OF NAVIGATION 51st session. Overview of the
Values x 10^-4
55
dl (y) Values