Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effect of Fiber Laser Welding On The Fatigue Properties of Dissimilar Welded Joints Between DP980 and HSLA Steels
Effect of Fiber Laser Welding On The Fatigue Properties of Dissimilar Welded Joints Between DP980 and HSLA Steels
net/publication/286818787
CITATIONS READS
2 281
9 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Frank E Goodwin on 18 February 2016.
(a)
200 mm
DP980 HSLA
Rolling direction The fusion zones (FZs) of the two different heat inputs show
some interesting differences in the welding behaviour (Fig. 3).
L In the FZ of the high heat input welded joint, the structure is
(b) B found to be highly martensitic with very little bainite found in
A the structure (~8%) (Fig. 3(a)). However, the low heat input
welds were found to contain approximately 15% bainite in the
C
W
FZ (Fig. 3(b)). The heat affect zone (HAZ) of the two sides of
G the weld appeared similar in both heat input conditions with an
R
upper-critical HAZ, an inter-critical HAZ, and on the DP980
side of the welded joints a sub-critical HAZ [12]. In the upper-
Position G W R L A B C
critical HAZ, the temperature was well above the Ac3 line and
Dimension (mm) 50 12.5 12.5 200 57 50 20
thusly mostly transformed into mostly martensite with a small
amount of ferrite (Fig. (c) and (d)) [12]. In the inter-critical HAZ,
Figure 1. (a) Geometry of the welded sheet, (b) Transverse tensile joint the temperature was between the Ac1 and Ac3 lines and,
machine from the dotted line in (a). therefore, had a hardness similar to that of the DP980 BM;
however, due to the difference in initial microstructure, the
inter-critical HAZ of the DP980 (Fig. 4 (b)) looks very similar to
the DP980 BM (Fig. 2(a)) because there was martensite
Tensile and fatigue test samples were machined to form already present in the structure; however, the HSLA did not
transverse welds in accordance with ASTM: E8/E8M, the have martensite initially and therefore transformed partly into
example of which is indicated by the dashed line in Fig. 1(a) martensite and bainite (Fig. 4(e)). In the aforementioned sub-
with the geometry and dimensions of the test coupons shown critical HAZ on the DP980 sides of the weld, the temperature
in Fig. 1(b). The specimens were machined in such a way that was below the Ac3 line [4,5,7,8,10,11]. This caused the
the weld line was positioned at the center of the gauge length martensite that is normally present in the BM to temper (Fig.
(Fig. 1(b)). Tensile tests were conducted on a fully 4(a)). This tempering process causes the presences of a “soft
computerized United tensile testing machine at room zone” in which the DP980 is weakest at these points [10,11]. It
temperature and with a strain rate of 1×10-3 s−1. An should also be noted that in the low heat input weld, the FZ
extensometer with a gauge length of 50 mm and a strain limit and HAZ width are 400 µm and 500 µm respectively, and in
of 20% was used to measure the strain during the tensile tests. the high heat input welded joints, they are both 500 µm which
Load control fatigue tests were performed following ASTM: would also be related to the amount of extra material that
E466 on a fully computerized Instron 8801 servo-hydraulic would have been melted in the FZ of the high heat input weld.
testing system. Tension-tension cyclic loading was used to
prevent potential buckling of the samples, so a stress ratio of R
= 0.1 was used. The test conditions were conducted at room
temperature with a frequency of 50 Hz and the load was
applied using a sinusoidal waveform. A minimum of two
specimens were tested in the tensile tests and fatigue tests at
each of the cyclic stress amplitudes. The fatigue fracture
surfaces were examined after failure via scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) to view the fatigue fracture mechanisms.
Microstructure
Figure 3. The FZ microstructure of (a) high heat input joint, and (b) low
heat input joint. (M: martensite, B: bainite)
The base metals (BMs) of both DP980 and HSLA steels can
be seen in Fig. 2. The DP980 BM has a microstructure
consisting of a ferrite matrix with islands of martensite. The
DP980 BM was made by inter-critical annealing of and
quenching which alloyed for the dual phase structure to form
Page 2 of 6
Figure 5. Microhardness curves of HSLA-DP980 welded joints made
with different welding conditions. [5]
Tensile
Page 3 of 6
data points in Fig. 9 according to a log-log line of Eq. (1) and
Fatigue and Fractography are tabulated in Table 3. The fatigue life of the welded joints
could be estimated based on the values of f ' and b. From
In the dissimilar HSLA-DP980 welded joints of both welding Table 3, it can be seen that the high heat input welds have a
conditions, the peak stress was above the yield stress of HSLA better b value and a higher fatigue limit which means that they
BM at high stress amplitudes of 250 MPa causing the yielding would have a better fatigue life in comparison to the low heat
and failure in the BM. as shown in Fig. 7(b). At the lower stress input samples.
amplitudes, there was more scatter in the experimental data
due to the fact that the samples were failing in the weld area
(Fig. 7(a)) [5].This was due to the stress concentration 275
developed by the concavity and slight sheet misalignment High heat input
during welding as well as the heterogeneous microstructure Low heat input
caused during the welding procedure because they are far
more sensitive under fatigue than under tensile load (Fig. 8) 225
[14,15].
125
75
1E+1 1E+2 1E+3 1E+4 1E+5 1E+6 1E+7 1E+8
Number of reversals to failure, 2Nf
Figure 7. Typical fatigue fracture locations at (a) low stress amplitude, Table 3. Summary of fatigue and tensile properties [5].
and (b) high stress amplitude.
Steel
f' b
Fatigue
Limit
YS UTS
(MPa) (MPa)
(MPa) (MPa)
HSLA BM 302 -0.023 200 455 546
DP980 BM 1019 -0.098 250 720 1095
Low Heat Input 455 -0.085 100 478 543
High Heat Input 355 -0.049 <150 467 548
The fatigue limit of the high and low heat input samples where
determined from the unlimited life approximation when the
samples reached 107 cycles without failure. As previously
mentioned, the primary difference between the fatigue limits
was due to the difference in concavity between the two
Figure 8. Weld profile of (a) low heat input weld and (b) high heat input samples and because of this caused a lot of experimental
weld. scatter, especially in the high heat input samples.
Page 6 of 6