USABILITY TESTING

Task: Discuss the main similarities and differences on the methods of usability
testing as suggested by (Rubin and Chisnell, 2008) and (Lazar, 2006). Which do
you think is the better approach? Justify your responses.

There are a lot of similarities between the study of Rubin and

Chisnell, and Lazar. Some of these are: both have explained very
thoroughly what usability testing is. For Rubin and Chisnell. Usability
tests, in which representative users interact with the medical device
in a simulated environment of use, are one of the most efficient
ways to assess device interfaces. The results of usability testing
frequently include the success/failure rate, the frequency and kind of
errors, the amount of time spent on the job, and user reactions on
perceived usability and satisfaction.
As for Lazar, how formal or casual a usability test is can depend
on whether it is formative, summative, or validation. A formal
approach to usability testing that is like experimental design is at one
extreme of the range. The main distinction would be that usability
testing looks for ways to spot usability issues and enhance particular
interfaces, whereas experimental design looks for statistically
significant variations between groups to learn some research truth.