Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Surgical Repair of Upper Central Face Injury and The Orbi
Surgical Repair of Upper Central Face Injury and The Orbi
SURGICAL REPAIR
OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE
INJURY AND THE ORBITAL
FLOOR
JOHN BOWERMAN, M.B., F.R.C.S., F.D.S.R.C.S
SURGICAL REPAIR OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE INJURY AND THE ORBITAL FLOOR 39
Posterior Displacement of the Nose the face with the toe or heel of a boot, this type of
injury is frequently misdiagnosed as a simple nasal
The essential physical signs of displacement of the
fracture and manipulated externally. It is character-
nose into the interorbital space are usually classic
ized by semicircular depression of the side of the
when bilateral (Fig. 4-1). The tip of the nose is.
nose, and the nasojugal fold is usually accentuated.
upturned, and this produces a more obtuse nasola-bial
Due to instability of the frontal process of the max-
angle. The base of the nose is displaced under the
glabella, and this may result in rupture of the glabella illary bone and an associated medial orbital wall
skin or the production of marked depression of the skin "blow-out," relapse inevitably occurs, resulting in
at the base of the nose. Severe posterior displacement nasal deformity and enophthalmos. The injury results
of the base of the nose with attached canthal ligaments in displacement of the frontal process of the maxillary
into the interorbital space produces an enhanced bone into the interorbital space, with associated
nasojugal fold. comminution of the underlying ethmoid bone. Open
When unilateral (Fig. 4-2), resulting from a kick in reduction and repair are mandatory.
SURGICAL REPAIR OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE INJURY AND THE ORBITAL FLOOR 41
————————————————————————————_^__M———•••^•^MMB^MM^^MM^H D
Figure 4-2. Unilateral nasoethmoid injury resulting from a kick in the face. Note the semicircular depression of the right side of the nose. (From
Bowerman, J.E.: Fractures of the middle third of the facial skeleton. In Rowe, N.L., Williams, J.LI: Maxillofacial Injuries, vol 1. Edinburgh,
Churchill Livingstone, 1985.)
42 SURGICAL REPAIR OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE INJURY AND THE ORBITAL FLOOR
Canthal Spread indicative of canthal spread. The intercanthal distance
should be measured with dividers, taking special care
It is essential to have a high index of suspicion that to note the midpoint of the nose so that unilateral
canthal spread has occurred in all upper face injuries, displacement is not missed. An increased
particularly with fractures at the Le Fort II and III measurement of 2 to 3 mm unilaterally may represent
levels. The normal intercanthal distance was given very significant canthal displacement. The palpebral
with a mean distance of 32 to 33 mm in women and 33 fissure should be scrutinized because it becomes
to 34 mm for Caucasian men by Wardenburg in 1951. almond shaped, with blunting of the medial angle,
In 1980, Freihofer suggested that an intercanthal and the caruncle is less easily visualized (Fig. 4-3).
distance between 25 and 35 mm should be considered The epicanthal fold may become more prominent and
a reasonable range for normality, with a mean figure the naso-orbital valley more shallow. The canthal
of 31.2 mm. It is my experience that in Caucasians a ligament may be difficult to feel on palpation because
distance of 35 mm or more is usually of its increased laxity.
Figure 4-3. Displacement of the right canthal ligament showing
the typical features of canthal spread. (From Bowerman, J.E.:
Fractures of the middle third of the facial skeleton. In Rowe, N.L.,
Williams, J.LI: Maxillofacial Injuries, vol 1. Edinburgh, Churchill
Livingstone, 1985.) , . , . . . , ..„
SURGICAL REPAIR OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE INJURY AND THE ORBITAL FLOOR 43
Absolute Indications
1. Nasal displacement into the interorbital space
(unilateral or bilateral)
2. Can thai spread (unilateral or bilateral)
3. Depressed fracture of the frontal bone, partic-
ularly the anterior wall of the frontal sinus with or
without nasal injury
SURGICAL APPROACH
In the past 20 years, authors have described dif- Figure 4-4. (From Bowerman, J.E.: Fractures of the middle third of
ferent approaches to the nasoethmoidal complex the facial skeleton. In Rowe, N.L., Williams, J.M.: Maxillofacial
Injuries, vol 1. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1985.)
44 SURGICAL REPAIR OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE INJURY AND THE ORBITAL FLOOR
The Coronal Approach way the frontal bone is exposed almost in its entirety,
together with the upper part of the nose and canthal
The scalp and face are prepared and draped. The ligaments, and 'access is also provided to the roof
incision extends from the vertex across the scalp, and medial and lateral walls of the orbits, including
joining two preauricular incisions (Fig. 4-5A). Prior the zygoma tic arches (Fig. 4-5B and C).
to making the cuts it is helpful to inject normal saline When the definitive repair of the bony injury has
into the subaponeurotic areolar tissue, which lies just been completed, the soft tissue flap is returned.
superficial to the pericranium, thus facilitating sepa- Particular care should be taken to resuture the peri-
ration of these two layers. The soft tissues are thus osteal incision above the supraorbital ridge to ensure
divided down to the plane superficial to the pericra- accurate realignment of the eyebrows. Vacuum drains
nium and the flap is raised by dissecting forward may be inserted under the scalp flap in the absence
along this plane, thus turning the flap downward and of dural perforation prior to careful and meticulous
forward. Care should be taken to protect the temporal soft tissue closure. A simple plaster of Paris splint
branch of the facial nerve as it crosses the midpoint of should be applied accurately to the soft tissue anterior
the zygoma tic arch. Bleeding is controlled in the to the medial angles of each palpebral fissure.
posterior edge of the incision with artery forceps, and Carefully performed, this technique produces an
it is helpful to use clips (e.g., Raney clips) on the excellent cosmetic result because the scar lines are
mobilized edge of the flap. The periosteum is then usually within the hairline and the preauricular ex-
divided some 2 cm above the bridge of the nose and tensions lie within the skin folds between the pinna
supraorbital ridges, and the dissection is then and the facial skin. The surgical exposure achieved
continued subperiosteally. The frontal nerves, if by this approach facilitates accurate reduction and
contained within a foramen, are released by fracturing thus ultimately a better cosmetic and functional re-
the anterior margin with an osteotome as the flap is sult.
turned downward. In this
Figure 4-5. (A) The line of the skin incision
is marked for the bicoronal flap. The
preauricular extensions lie in the skin
fold in front of the pinna, and the scalp
incision extends up toward the vertex.
(This is particularly important in male
patients with a receding hairline.)
B
SURGICAL REPAIR OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE INJURY AND THE ORBITAL FLOOR 45
Figure 4-5 Continued (B and C) The coronal flap turned down provides wide exposure of the frontal bones, nose, supraorbital ridges, and
zygomas. Note the incision of the periosteum 2 to 3 cm above the supraorbital ridges. The depression of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus
and the fracture of the nasal bones are clearly visualized. (D) Pre-disimpaction position. Note the anterior wall of the frontal sinus is removed
and stored. (Asch's forceps are used for reducing the nasal complex, and a bone hook can be applied for additional traction, as illustrated.) (E)
Postreduction position prior to transosseous wiring. (F) Multiple transosseous wires in situ prior to tightening. Note (white arrow) lateral
displacement of frontal process of the maxillary bone after disimpaction. This will be reduced by a transnasal wire (double arrows, white and
black) secured over "toggles." (G) Final reduction. Note the wire used to provide anterior traction on the nose during tightening. This is
removed subsequently. (From Bowerman, J.E.: Fractures of the middle third of the facial skeleton. In Rowe, N.L, Williams, J.L1.: Maxillofacial
Injuries, vol 1. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1985.)
46 SURGICAL REPAIR OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE INJURY AND THE ORBITAL FLOOR
Fractures of the orbital floor occur most commonly 7. Alteration in ocular level. Initial swelling may
as direct extensions of the infraorbital rim in fractures result in slight elevation of the ocular level, but if
of the zygoma tic complex and at the Le Fort II level. there has been considerable herniation of the orbital
Isolated fractures of the orbital floor without involve- contents into the maxillary sinus below, then the
ment of the orbital rim are of two types: (1) the blowout ocular level may be depressed.
fracture and (2) the blow-in fracture. The indirect
blow-out fracture of the floor of the orbit was de-
scribed by Pfeiffer in 1942. The injury occurs from a Radiographic Assessment
direct blow to the front of the eyeball from such
things as a ball or a fist, and transmitted pressure The standard occipitomental projections at 0° and
results in the thin weak bone of the orbital floor 30°, if taken after the initial swelling and bleeding
giving way. The much rarer blow-in fracture was resulting from soft tissue injury have resolved, will, if
described by Dingman and Natvig in 1964. A bone of good quality, show on the 0° projection the typical
fragment or fragments will be seen projecting upward "hanging drop" appearance. This herniation of the
into the orbit on radiographic examination. The orbital fat into the maxillary sinus, depending on its
mechanism of this type of bony displacement is, at the volume, may or may not give rise to abnormal
present time, speculative. physical signs, such as restricted eye movement in
This section deals essentially with the isolated the vertical gaze, diplopia, and enophthalmos. An-
fractures of the orbital floor, and the reader is referred other useful projection is the occipitofrontal 25° pro-
to Chapters 1 and 2 for the clinical assessment and jection, providing the petrous bone is thrown clear of
management of fractures of the orbital rim that extend the orbital floor.
into the orbital floor. Orbital tomography 25° (to the baseline) using a
posteroanterior (PA) projection should be used to
assess the degree of herniation of orbital contents
into the adjacent paranasal sinuses, but it is essential
PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT for air to be present to provide contrast with orbital
soft tissues. Thus, it is a waste of time to attempt
Clinical Assessment tomography until the standard occipitomental or
occipitofrontal views show the presence of air in the
Indirect or isolated fractures of the orbital floor are maxillary sinus. The examination is frequently de-
frequently missed at the time of injury owing to layed until 8 to 10 days after injury to allow the
difficulties in diagnosis and the absence of physical resolution of hematoma.
signs. A history of a direct blow to the front of the eye Computed tomography (CT) scanning with coronal
should alert the clinician that an indirect fracture of the sections of the face provides a valuable diagnostic
orbital floor may have occurred. view in the examination of the orbits and paranasal
Both eyes should be carefully inspected and com- sinuses and should be obtained, if technically possible.
pared. Visual acuity should be checked and ophthal- CT is not the investigation of first choice in all cases
moscopic examination performed. The shape and of orbital trauma, particularly when simpler
angulation of the palpebral fissures should be re- conventional methods give a satisfactory diagnosis.
corded and the intercanthal distance measured. The CT has, however, become accepted as the best form
position of the globe in both vertical and horizontal of orbital radiography, and good axial and coronal
axes should be checked together with the range of eye positioning will give slice images clearly showing
movements. A Hess chart should then be obtained. major orbital structures in relationship to the walls of
Clinical features that should arouse suspicion are as the orbit.
follows:
1. Traumatic mydriasis Indications for Surgical
2. Limited elevation and/or depression of vertical
eye movement Treatment
3. Diplopia, particularly in relation to restricted
vertical gaze The morbidity of careful exploration of the orbital
4. Enophthalmos * floor is minimal when compared with the difficulties
5. Slight narrowing of the palpebral fissue encountered in treating established enophthalmos and
6. Deepening of the superior palpebral fold diplopia resulting from a missed diagnosis or
SURGICAL REPAIR OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE INJURY AND THE ORBITAL FLOOR 51
conservative management. There is no substitute for clinical and radiographic assessment. The indication
clinical experience, but careful clinical and radio- for surgical treatment will then become more appar-
graphic assessment will reveal most of the absolute ent. When there are absolute indications, exploration
indications for surgical exploration. The main prob- can be carried out within 10 to 14 days post injury.
lem arises when there are no abnormal clinical signs, However, in the absence of physical signs, explora-
such as restricted eye movement and diplopia with tion can be delayed for 2 to 4 weeks post injury to
radiographic evidence of orbital floor fracture. I facilitate further assessment, such as additional Hess
would advise exploration for bony spicules protruding charting and radiographic examination. In my opinion,
upward into the orbit, bone fragments hinged down there is nothing to be gained by conservative
into the antrum, and the presence of herniated soft management beyond this period and at this stage a
tissues into the maxillary sinus depicted radio- definite decision regarding whether or not to explore
logically. I have never had cause to regret an explo- should be made.
ration of the orbital floor under these circumstances
in the absence of physical signs, because prevention is
better than cure. SURGICAL APPROACH
Excluding the use of an appropriate laceration, four
Absolute Indications main approaches have been described: (1) the
1. Restricted vertical gaze, upward or downward conjunctival approach, (2) the subciliary approach, (3)
2. Concomitant diplopia the lower eyelid incision, and (4) the low infraor-bital
3. Clinical evidence of enophthalmos, even if only incision, also variously described as the subtar-sal or
of minor degree orbital rim incision. It is of interest that the consensus
4. Radiologic evidence of a blow-in or blow-out of opinion among experienced surgeons (Converse,
fracture of the orbital floor ,. --. - -. , 1981) is that the subtarsal or orbital rim incision is the
approach of choice. This is also my view; it provides
rapid access and adequate exposure with minimal or
Absolute Contraindication no intra- or postoperative complications (Holtmann et
In all patients sustaining orbital injuries, visual al., 1981).
acuity of both eyes should be carefully assessed pre- The low infraorbital incision is described here in
operatively. Severe impairment or absence of sight in detail, because it is the most versatile approach to the
the unaffected eye is an absolute contraindication to orbital floor and because it can be used at any time
surgical intervention. after injury, even in the presence of swelling and
bruising. It is also particularly applicable for the
approach to the orbital rim for direct transosseous
Timing of Surgical Intervention wiring or bone plating after reduction of fractures of
the zygoma tic complex and at the Le Fort II level.
There is virtually no indication for early exploration
Any direct extension of the fractures into the orbital
of the orbital floor. Swelling and bruising should be floor can then be readily explored and repaired as
allowed to resolve, which will improve the quality of necessary.
52 SURGICAL REPAIR OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE INJURY AND THE ORBITAL FLOOR
Figure 4-12. (A) Low infraorbital incision. Note the stepped ap-
proach. (B) Orbital floor and defect exposed. Note the soft malleable
copper retractor elevating tissues of the lower eyelid.
SURGICAL REPAIR OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE INJURY AND THE ORBITAL FLOOR 53
or nylon subcuticular suture; it is advisable to sup-
plement this with Steri-Strips. The conjunctiva should
be flushed with saline and chloramphenicol ointment
applied.
This incision is simple and expedient and provides
adequate access to the orbital floor, the lateral orbital
floor, and part of the medial floor of the orbit.
Additional exposure can be achieved by extending
this curved incision downward and laterally, and the
lower placement of the incision reduces the amount
of postoperative lymphedema. The residual scars are
usually barely noticeable.
Figure 4-14. />y Subciliary incision. Note the line of approach. (B)
Arrow indicates the path of exposure. Note the graft wired in situ.
SURGICAL REPAIR OF UPPER CENTRAL FACE INJURY AND THE ORBITAL FLOOR 55