Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scat
Scat
Published by:
The Secretariat of Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan
Administrative Tribunals and Special Courts
Annual Report 2020
Published by:
The Secretariat of Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan
Supreme Court Building, Islamabad
www.ljcp.gov.pk
Contents at a Glance
A Foreword 1
B Summary of the Performance 3
1 Accountability Courts 7
2 Anti-Dumping Appellate Tribunal 35
3 Appellate Tribunals Inland Revenue 43
4 Customs Appellate Tribunals 55
5 Drug Courts 69
6 Environmental Protection Tribunals 83
7 Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Boards 93
8 Special Courts (Central) 99
9 Special Courts (Control of Narcotic Substances) 117
10 Special Courts (Customs, Taxation & Anti-Smuggling) 129
11 Special Courts (Offences in Banks) 137
12 Insurance Appellate Tribunal 147
13 Banking Courts 153
14 Commercial Courts 191
15 Federal Service Tribunal 197
16 Competition Appellate Tribunal 203
17 Provincial Service Tribunals 209
18 Anti-Corruption Courts (Provincial) 221
19 Anti-Terrorism Courts 243
20 Consumer Courts 321
21 Labour Courts 361
22 Labour Appellate Tribunals 397
23 Child Protection Court 407
24 Lahore Development Authority Tribunal, Lahore 413
25 Special Courts of Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) 419
26 Anti – Encroachment Tribunal 427
27 Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Revenue Board 437
28 Appellate Tribunal, Punjab Revenue Authority 443
29 Appellate Tribunal, Local Council (Judicial Forum) 449
30 Livestock Tribunal 455
31 Intellectual Property Tribunal 461
32 Prevention of Electronic Crime 469
33 National Industrial Relations Commission 475
34 Summary 481
Contents
Summary of the Performance ................................................................................................................................ 3
1. Accountability Courts ................................................................................................................................. 7
1.1 Establishment of Accountability Courts ...................................................................................................... 7
1.2 Procedure of the Courts ............................................................................................................................. 7
1.3 Consolidated Statement of Accountability Courts ....................................................................................... 8
1.4 Accountability Court – I, Islamabad ............................................................................................................ 9
1.5 Accountability Court – II, Islamabad ..........................................................................................................10
14.4 Commercial Court (Punjab & Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) at Lahore ................................................................ 193
14.5 Commercial Court, Karachi ..................................................................................................................... 194
15. Federal Service Tribunal ......................................................................................................................... 197
15.1 Branch Registries of the Tribunal ............................................................................................................ 197
15.2 Procedure to file Appeal before the Tribunal .......................................................................................... 197
15.3 Appeal to the Supreme Court of Pakistan ............................................................................................... 197
15.4 Consolidated Statement of Federal Service Tribunal ............................................................................... 198
15.5 Federal Service Tribunal (All Benches) .................................................................................................... 199
21.1 Establishment of Labour Courts & Labour Appellate Tribunals ................................................................. 361
21.2 Consolidated Statement of Labour Courts ............................................................................................... 364
21.3 Labour Court – I, Lahore .......................................................................................................................... 365
21.4 Labour Court – II, Lahore ......................................................................................................................... 366
21.5 Labour Court – III, Lahore ........................................................................................................................ 367
21.6 Labour Court – IV, Faisalabad .................................................................................................................. 368
21.7 Labour Court –V, Gujranwala .................................................................................................................. 369
21.8 Labour Court – VI, Rawalpindi ................................................................................................................. 370
25.5 Special Court of Public Property (Removal of Encroachment), Sukkur ...................................................... 423
26. Anti- Encroachment Tribunal ................................................................................................................... 427
27.4 Consolidated Statement of Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Revenue Board ...................................................... 438
27.5 Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Revenue Board, Karachi ................................................................................... 439
28. Appellate Tribunal, Punjab Revenue Authority ........................................................................................ 443
28.1 Establishment of the Tribunal.................................................................................................................. 443
28.2 Consolidated Statement of Appellate Tribunal, Punjab Revenue Authority .............................................. 444
Foreword
The Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan’s annual report on the Administrative Tribunals
and Special Courts for the year 2020 provides performance statistics for the administrative
tribunals and special courts established by the Federal and provincial governments under
different statutes. Beside statistical data on cases, the report also provides detailed information
about the sanctioned / working strength and vacant posts of judicial officers as well as
administrative staff and annual budgetary allocations for the courts.
We hope, this report will enable the stakeholders to evaluate the performance of the courts
and formulate strategies for improving the quality of justice service delivery.
As part of our continuing effort to improve our services and transparency, and pursuant to the
Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan’s 39th Meeting held on 17 August 2015, the Secretariat
has initiated the process to strengthen information and datasets to enable more informed
analysis of the quality and reach of the administration of justice in country. To this end, as well
as gathering supply-side information, efforts are also being made to capture more demand-side
data as a baseline for justice needs and evaluating performance. By strengthening the LJCP’s
analytic capacities, it is hoped that data in future will be more accessible and informative for a
wider range of stakeholders, and more amenable to translating it into policy prescriptions.
This report is also placed on our website to enable greater access to information.
We would also welcome any suggestions to improve the quality of statistics and information
provided.
Secretary
Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan
Performance Review
This report contains detailed information about the institution and disposal of cases by the administrative
tribunals and special courts under the administrative control of Federal and provincial governments. Table
below shows an overview of the performance of such courts during the year 2020.
Number Pendency Institution Disposal Balance
Title of Tribunals/ Special *Difference
Sr. # of on during the Total during on
Courts in Balance
Courts 1-1-2020 year the year 31-12-2020
Environmental Protection
6 Tribunals
4 551 314 865 47 819 1
14 Commercial Courts 2 32 0 32 7 25 0
Anti-Corruption Courts
18 (Provincial)
17 6416 3007 9423 3266 6228 150
The difference is reported due to transfer, re-opening/restoration, remand and in case where leave to appeal is granted.
1. Accountability Courts
1.1 Establishment of Accountability Courts
Accountability Courts are established after promulgation of the National Accountability
Ordinance, 1999. The purpose of establishment of the Accountability Courts is to
eradicate corruption, corrupt practices, misuse or abuse of power or authority,
misappropriation of property, taking of kickbacks, commissions and hold accountable all
those persons accused of such charges. The Accountability Courts have exclusive
jurisdiction to try all the offences mentioned in the Schedule to the said Ordinance.
Accountability Court shall consist of a Judge who shall be appointed by the President of
Pakistan, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court of the Province
concerned. A serving District and Sessions Judge qualified to be appointed as Judge of
the High Court or retired District and Sessions Judge, can be appointed as Judge of
Accountability Court.
300
250
200
100
50
0
Institution during 2020 Disposal during 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 14 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 1 1 0
7 LDC 9 1 1 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Qasid 2 1 0 1
10 Naib Qasid 1 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 0 1
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 14 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 1 1 0
7 LDC 9 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 2 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 1 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 0 1
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 0 1
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 14 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 1 1 0
7 LDC 9 1 1 0
8 Driver 6 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 14 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 1 0 1
7 LDC 9 1 1 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 14 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 1 0 1
7 LDC 9 1 1 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 14 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 1 1 0
7 LDC 9 1 1 0
8 Driver 7 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
Institution, Disposal and Pendency of cases during the year 2020
Pendency at Institution Total Disposal Balance at Difference
the start of during the during the the end of in balance
month month month month
53 11 64 15 49 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 53 2 55 7 48 0
February 48 3 51 1 50 0
March 50 0 50 2 48 0
April 48 0 48 0 48 0
May 48 1 49 0 49 0
June 49 1 50 0 50 0
July 50 0 50 0 50 0
August 50 1 51 0 51 0
September 51 0 51 0 51 0
October 51 2 53 3 50 0
November 50 1 51 2 49 0
December 49 0 49 0 49 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 1 0
5 Reader 14 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 1 1 0
7 LDC 9 1 1 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Stenotypist 14 1 0 1
5 Reader 14 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 1 1 0
7 LDC 9 1 1 0
8 Driver 4 1 1 0
9 Qasid 3 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Presiding Officer 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 1 0
3 Assistant Private Secretart 16 1 1 0
4 Reader 14 1 1 0
5 Steno Typist 14 1 0 1
6 UDC 11 1 1 0
7 LDC 9 1 1 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Qasid 2 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Presiding Officer 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 Assistant Private Secretart 16 1 1 0
4 Reader 14 1 1 0
5 Steno Typist 14 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 1 0 1
7 LDC 9 1 1 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Qasid 2 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Presiding Officer 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 18 1 0 1
3 Assistant Private Secretary 16 1 0 1
4 Reader 14 1 1 0
5 Steno Typist 14 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 1 1 0
7 LDC 9 1 1 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Qasid 2 1 1 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
Institution, Disposal and Pendency of cases during the year 2020
Pendency at Institution Total Disposal Balance at Difference
the start of during the during the the end of in balance
month month month month
53 18 74 14 56 -1
Month-wise Breakup
January 53 0 53 0 52 -1
February 52 4 56 3 50 0
March 50 1 53 0 53 0
April 53 0 53 0 53 0
May 53 0 53 0 53 0
June 53 0 53 0 53 0
July 53 1 55 2 53 0
August 53 3 56 1 55 0
September 55 5 60 2 58 0
October 58 0 58 0 58 0
November 58 3 61 2 59 0
December 59 1 60 4 56 0
decision. However, no such application shall be accepted by the Appellate Tribunal later
than thirty days of its decision. The Appellate Tribunal may call for and examine the
official records of an investigation conducted by the Commission and any other
information or documents relied upon by the Commission in reaching a determination
appealed against for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of an
impugned determination of the Commission.
1 93 50 69 74 0
75
69
60
50
45
30
15
0
Institution during 2020 Disposal during 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
2 Member MP-I 2 2 0
3 Registrar 17 1 1 0
4 Private Secretary 17 3 3 0
7 Reader 14 1 1 0
8 Computer Operator 14 1 0 1
9 Stenotypist 14 1 0 1
10 UDC 11 2 0 2
11 LDC 9 3 2 1
12 Bailiff 5 2 1 1
13 Driver 4 4 4 0
14 Dispatch Rider 4 1 1 0
15 Qasid 5 1 0 1
16 Naib Qasid 1 5 5 0
17 Mali 1 1 1 0
18 Farash 1 1 1 0
19 Chowkidar 1 3 3 0
20 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
Disposal
Pendency at Institution Balance at
during Difference
the start of during the Total the end of
the in balance
month month month
month
93 50 143 69 74 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 93 1 94 3 91 0
February 91 0 91 4 87 0
March 87 2 89 0 89 0
April 89 8 97 0 97 0
May 97 5 102 14 88 0
June 88 1 89 13 76 0
July 76 15 91 3 88 0
August 88 5 93 14 79 0
September 79 10 89 0 89 0
October 89 2 91 15 76 0
November 76 0 76 0 76 0
December 76 1 77 3 74 0
case may be. The Appellate Tribunal may, upon application in writing, admit an appeal
after expiration of the prescribed period if it is satisfied that the person appealing was
prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within that period. Notwithstanding
that an appeal has been filed, tax shall, unless recovery thereof has been stayed by the
Appellate Tribunal, be payable in accordance with the assessment made in the case
provided that where recovery of tax has been stayed by the Appellate Tribunal by an
order, such order shall cease to have effect on the expiration of a period of three
months following the date on which it is made, unless the appeal is decided, or such
order withdrawn by the Appellate Tribunal earlier. The Appellate Tribunal may, before
disposing of an appeal, call for such particulars as it may require in respect of the
matters arising on the appeal or cause further enquiry to be made by the Commissioner.
The Appellate Tribunal shall afford an opportunity of being heard to the parties to the
appeal and, in case of default by any of the party on the date of hearing, the Tribunal
may, if it deems fit, dismiss the appeal in default, or may proceed ex parte to decide the
appeal on the basis of the available record. The Appellate Tribunal shall decide the
appeal within six months of its filing.
25000
20000
15000
10000 20267
14568
5000
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart Illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
2 Judicial Member 21 2 2 0
3 Member Accounting 21 3 1 2
4 Registrar 19 1 0 1
5 Private Secretary 17/18/19 6 6 0
6 Deputy Registrar 17 1 1 0
7 Assistant Registrar 16 2 2 0
8 Assistant Private Secretary 16 6 6 0
9 Stenotypist 14 1 0 1
10 Assistant 14 1 1 0
11 Superintendent 13 1 1 0
12 Supervisor 10 3 3 0
13 UDC 9 7 7 0
14 LDC 7 15 15 0
15 Driver 5 6 6 0
16 Daftary 3 4 4 0
17 Qasid 3 6 6 0
18 Naib Qasid 2 18 18 0
19 Chowkidar 2 3 3 0
20 Farash 2 2 2 0
21 Sweeper 2 2 2 0
Month-wise Breakup
Month-wise Breakup
confirming, modifying or annulling the decision or order appealed against. The appeal
shall be decided within sixty days of filing the appeal or within such extended period as
the Tribunal may, for reasons to be recorded in writing thinks fit. The Appellate Tribunal
may, at any time within one year from the date of order, with a view to rectifying any
mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed by it and shall make such
amendments if the mistake is brought to its notice by the Collector of Customs or the
other party to the appeal, provided that an amendment which has the effect of
enhancing the assessment or reducing a refund or otherwise increasing the liability of
the other party shall not be made, unless the Appellate Tribunal has given notice to the
party of its intention to do so and has allowed a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
heard it. Where the members of a Special Bench are equally divided, the points on
which they differ shall be decided by the Chairman. Subject to the provisions of the
Customs Act 1969, the Appellate Tribunal shall have power to regulate its own
procedure and the procedure of the Benches thereof in all matters arising out of the
exercise of its powers or of the discharge of its functions, including the places at which
the Benches shall hold their sittings. The Appellate Tribunal shall, for the purposes of
discharging its functions, have the same powers as are vested in a court under the Code
of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), in respect of matters of discovery and inspection,
enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath, compelling the
production of books of account and other documents and issuing Commissions.
Custom Appellate Tribunals has eight Benches, three at Karachi, two each at Lahore and
Islamabad and one at Peshawar. Each Bench consists of two Members (B-21).
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending a the beginning and end of the year
3500
3000
2500
2000
3241
1500
1000
500 1123
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
5. Drug Courts
5.1 Establishment of Drug Courts
The Drugs Act, 1976 was enforced to regulate the import, export, manufacture, storage,
distribution and sale of drugs. Under section 31 of the Act, the Federal Government and,
if so directed by the Federal Government, the Provincial Governments may establish as
many Drug Courts to exercise jurisdiction under this Act as it considers necessary. A
Drug Court shall consist of a person who is, or has been or is qualified for appointment
as a Judge of a High Court, who shall be the Chairman, and two members being persons
who, in the opinion of the Federal Government, are experts in the medical or
pharmaceutical fields.
A Drug Court shall have all the powers conferred by the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1898 (Act V of 1898) on a Court of Sessions exercising original jurisdiction. A person
sentenced by a Drug Court may prefer an appeal to a Bench of the High Court consisting
of not less than two Judges within thirty days of the judgment.
5.2 Procedure of Drug Courts
No Court other than a Drug Court shall try an offence punishable under Chapter 4 of the
said Act i.e. relating to offences, penalties and procedure. The Drug Court shall, in all
matters with respect to which no procedure has been prescribed by this Act, follow the
procedure prescribed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 for the trial of summons
cases by magistrates.
At present ten (10) Drug Courts are functioning under the Drugs Act, 1976 presided over
by a Chairman. However, the work of part-time Drug Court at Quetta has been assigned
to one of Judges in the Federal courts in addition to his own duties.
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending a the beginning and end of the year
3000
2500
2000
1500
2673
1000
500 1030
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
The Act also provides for the establishment of the Pakistan Environmental Protection
Agency at Federal and provincial level to exercise the powers and perform the functions
assigned to it under this Act and the rules and regulations made there under and to take
all necessary measures for the implementation of the National Environmental Policies
approved by the Council.
6.1 Establishment of the Tribunals
Under section 20 of the said Act the Federal Government may by notification in the
official gazette establish as many Environmental Tribunals as it considers necessary and
where it establishes more than one Environmental Tribunals, it shall specify territorial
limits within which or the class of cases in respect of which each one of them shall
exercise jurisdiction under this Act. An Environmental Tribunal shall consist of a
Chairperson who is or has been or is qualified for appointment as a judge of the High
Court to be appointed after consultation with the Chief Justice of the concerned High
Court and two members to be appointed by the Federal Government of which at least
one shall be a technical member with suitable professional qualification and experience
in the environmental field as may be prescribed.
6.2 Right of Appeal
Any person aggrieved by any order or direction of the Federal or Provincial Agency
passed under any provision of this Act or rules or regulations made there under may
prefer an appeal with the Environmental Tribunal within thirty days of the date of
communication of the order or direction to such person. An appeal to the
Environmental Tribunal shall be in such form, contain such particulars and be
accompanied by such fees as may be prescribed. Any person aggrieved by any final
order or by any sentence of the Environmental Tribunal passed under this Act may
within thirty days of communication of such order or sentence, prefer an appeal to the
High Court. At present there are four Environmental Protection Tribunals constituted
under the Environmental Protection Act, 1997, functioning in Islamabad, Lahore, Karachi
and Quetta.
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending a the beginning and end of the year
300
200
314
100
47
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending a the beginning and end of the year
30
20
28
24
10
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
2 LDC 9 1 1 0
3 Daftary 4 1 1 0
4 Naib Qasid 1 1 1 0
5 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
2 UDC 11 1 1 0
3 Bailiff 3 1 1 0
4 Daftary 2 1 1 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 3 0 3 0 3 0
February 3 1 4 1 3 0
March 3 1 4 0 4 0
April 4 0 4 0 4 0
May 4 0 4 0 4 0
June 4 0 4 0 4 0
July 4 0 4 0 4 0
August 4 0 4 0 4 0
September 4 0 4 0 4 0
October 4 0 4 1 3 0
November 3 0 3 0 3 0
December 3 0 3 0 3 0
6000
4000
6044
5566
2000
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 UDC 11 1 1 0
5 LDC 9 1 1 0
6 Driver 5 1 1 0
7 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
1500
1000
1308
500
879
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
600
500
400
300
504
200
352
100
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of
the year
225
175
125 216
186
75
25
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
members and, if there is a difference of opinion among its members, the opinion of the
majority shall prevail provided that where the members are equally divided on any
point, it shall be decided in accordance with the views of the Chairperson. The
Ordinance also provides that the decision of a Tribunal shall be given in writing and shall
be signed by the Chairperson and a copy thereof, shall be given by the Tribunal to each
party to the dispute and a copy shall also be forwarded to the Commission.
12.3 Appeal
Under section 124 of the said Ordinance, the decision of the Tribunal on any application
shall be final and shall not be questioned in any Court or before any other Authority.
However, any party aggrieved by a decision of the Tribunal may, if the amount of the
claim in dispute or the penalty prescribed, as the case may be, is not less than one
hundred thousand rupees, prefer an appeal to the High Court within a period of thirty
days from the date of such decision to be heard by a Bench of not less than two judges
of the High Court having territorial jurisdiction over the relevant Tribunal.
10
6
10
4
1
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
21000
18000
15000
12000
9000 18717
15104
6000
3000
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
1 Judge 21 1 0 1
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 0 1
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 3 0
6 LDC 9 2 1 1
7 Driver 7 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 3 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 3 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 3 0
6 LDC 9 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 0 1
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 3 3 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
Institution, Disposal and Pendency of cases during the year 2020
Pendency at Institution Total Disposal Balance at Difference
the start of during the during the the end of in balance
month month month month
671 343 1014 169 859 14
Month-wise Breakup
January 671 48 719 31 688 14
February 702 41 743 69 674 0
March 674 39 713 48 665 0
April 665 28 693 1 692 0
May 692 6 698 2 696 -1
June 695 15 710 0 710 0
July 710 8 718 0 718 0
August 718 22 740 0 740 1
September 741 25 766 0 766 0
October 766 30 796 2 794 0
November 794 48 842 0 842 0
December 842 33 875 16 859 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 0 1
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 3 0
6 LDC 9 2 2 0
7 Driver 7 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
10 Farash 1 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 16 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 3 0
6 LDC 9 2 2 0
7 Driver 7 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 3 2 2 0
10 Farash 3 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 3 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 3 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 0 1
2 APS 16 1 0 1
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 3 0
6 LDC 9 2 2 0
7 Driver 7 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 3 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 3 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Reader 14 1 1 0
5 Nazir 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 3 2 1
7 LDC 9 2 2 0
8 Driver 7 1 1 0
9 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
10 Naib Qasid 2-3 2 2 0
11 Farash 2 1 1 0
12 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
Institution, Disposal and Pendency of cases during the year 2020
Pendency at Institution Total Disposal Balance at Difference
the start of during the during the the end of in balance
month month month month
1013 203 1216 171 1056 11
Month-wise Breakup
January 1013 35 1048 16 1034 2
February 1034 12 1046 23 1022 -1
March 1022 17 1039 13 1026 0
April 1026 8 1034 3 1031 0
May 1031 4 1035 2 1033 0
June 1033 1 1034 1 1033 0
July 1033 40 1073 12 1062 1
August 1062 1 1063 11 1052 0
September 1052 30 1082 28 1054 0
October 1054 27 1081 16 1071 6
November 1071 19 1090 20 1073 3
December 1073 9 1082 26 1056 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Private Secretary 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 0 1
5 UDC 11 3 3 0
6 LDC 9 2 2 0
7 Driver 7 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 3 2 2 0
10 Farash 3 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 3 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 3 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 3 0
6 LDC 9 2 2 0
7 Driver 7 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 3 2 1 1
10 Farash 3 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 3 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 3 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 0 1
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 3 0
6 LDC 9 2 2 0
7 Driver 7 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 2 1
6 LDC 9 2 1 1
7 Driver 7 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 1 1 1 0
10 Farash 3 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Registrar 17 1 0 1
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 Reader 14 1 1 0
5 Nazir 11 1 1 0
6 UDC 11 3 3 0
7 LDC 9 2 2 0
8 Driver 5 1 1 0
9 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
10 Naib Qasid 3 2 2 0
11 Farash 1 1 1 0
12 Chowkidar 1 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
Institution, Disposal and Pendency of cases during the year 2020
Pendency at Institution Total Disposal Balance at Difference
the start of during the during the the end of in balance
month month month month
736 369 1105 197 909 1
Month-wise Breakup
January 736 25 761 25 737 1
February 737 51 788 32 756 0
March 756 57 813 15 798 0
April 798 9 807 0 807 0
May 807 8 815 3 812 0
June 812 5 817 0 817 0
July 817 33 850 12 838 0
August 838 16 854 13 841 0
September 841 47 888 23 865 0
October 865 47 912 20 892 0
November 892 16 908 27 881 0
December 881 55 936 27 909 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 0 1
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 2 1
6 LDC 9 3 3 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 3 2 2 0
10 Farash 1 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 3 1 1 0
13 Sweeper 3 1 0 1
1 Judge 21 1 0 1
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 0 1
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 9 3 3 0
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 6 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 1 1
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 2 1
6 LDC 7 2 2 0
7 Driver 4 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Naib Qasid 2 1 1 0
11 Farash 2 1 1 0
12 Chowkidar 2 1 0 1
13 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 3 0
6 LDC 9 2 1 1
7 Driver 7 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 3 0
6 LDC 9 2 2 0
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 2 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 2 2 2 0
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 Reader 14 1 1 0
3 APS 16 1 1 0
4 UDC 11 3 3 0
5 Nazir 11 1 1 0
6 LDC 9 2 1 1
7 Driver 5 1 1 0
8 Baliff 3 2 2 0
9 Naib Qasid 3 2 1 1
10 Farash 2 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 2 1 1 0
12 Sweeper 2 1 1 0
1 Judge 21 1 1 0
2 APS 16 1 1 0
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 Nazir 11 1 1 0
5 UDC 11 3 3 0
6 LDC 9 2 2 0
7 Driver 4 1 1 0
8 Bailiff 3 2 1 1
9 Naib Qasid 1 2 2 0
10 Farash 1 1 1 0
11 Chowkidar 1 1 0 1
12 Sweeper 1 1 1 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
8
4
7
3
1
0
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
1 Chairman 21 1 0 1
2 APS 16 2 1 1
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 LDC 9 1 1 0
5 Qasid 4 1 0 1
6 Naib Qasid 3 1 0 1
7 Chowkidar 3 1 0 1
Institution, Disposal and Pendency of cases during the year 2020
Pendency at Institution Total Disposal Balance at Difference
the start of during the during the the end of in balance
month month month month
26 0 26 7 19 0
Month-wise Breakup
January 26 0 26 3 23 0
February 23 0 23 0 23 0
March 23 0 23 3 20 0
April 20 0 20 0 20 0
May 20 0 20 0 20 0
June 20 0 20 0 20 0
July 20 0 20 0 20 0
August 20 0 20 0 20 0
September 20 0 20 0 20 0
October 20 0 20 1 19 0
November 19 0 19 0 19 0
December 19 0 19 0 19 0
3 Reader 14 1 1 0
4 UDC 11 1 1 0
5 Naib Qasid 1 1 1 0
February 6 0 6 0 6 0
March 6 0 6 0 6 0
April 6 0 6 0 6 0
May 6 0 6 0 6 0
June 6 0 6 0 6 0
July 6 0 6 0 6 0
August 6 0 6 0 6 0
September 6 0 6 0 6 0
October 6 0 6 0 6 0
November 6 0 6 0 6 0
December 6 0 6 0 6 0
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
5000
4000
3000
4292
2000
3301
1000
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of
the year
15
10
11
5
0
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
25000
20000
15000
24535
10000 19966
5000
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
Month-wise Breakup
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
4000
3000
2000
3266
3007
1000
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
4000
3000
2000
3330
2953
1000
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
District of the Province to be presided by the District and Sessions Judge. A consumer to
redress the grievance may file a complaint before the Consumer Court. Any person
aggrieved by any final order of the Consumer Court, may file an appeal in the Peshawar
High Court within thirty days of such order.
The Balochistan Consumers Protection Act, was enforced in 2003 to protect and
promote rights and interests of the consumers. Under section 12 of the Act, the
Government of Balochistan shall establish as many Consumer Courts as necessary to
exercise jurisdiction under this Act and appoint a Judge for each of such Consumer
Courts or confer upon a Court of Judicial Magistrate to exercise the power of the
Consumer Court under this Act, in consultation with the High Court of Balochistan. A
consumer who has grievance, may file a complaint before the Consumer Court. Any
person aggrieved by any final order of the Consumer Court may prefer an appeal to the
Sessions Court or the Balochistan High Court within period of thirty days of such order.
The Consumer Court may require the claimant to deposit to the credit of the Consumer Court
such fees as may be specified, for payment to the laboratory for carrying out the necessary
analysis or test and the fee so deposited by the claimant shall be payable by the defendant if,
the test or analysis support the version of the claimant.
The Consumer Court shall, if the claim relates to any services, forward a copy of such
claim to the defendant directing him to file his written statement within a period of
fifteen days or such extended period not exceeding fifteen days as may be granted by
the Consumer Court and on receipt of the written statement of the defendant, if any,
proceed to settle the dispute on the basis of evidence produced by both the parties. For
the purposes, the Consumer Court shall have the same powers as are vested in Civil
Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act XX of 1908). The Consumer Court
shall decide the claim within six months after the service of summons on the
respondent. Consumer Courts have, so far been established in Punjab and Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa. Eleven Consumer Courts have been established in the Punjab in Districts
Lahore, Sahiwal, Multan, Dera Ghazi Khan, Rawalpindi, Gujrat, Sialkot, Gujranwala,
Bahawalpur, Sargodha and Faisalabad. Similarly, fifteen consumer courts have been
established in Swat, Bannu, Dera Ismail Khan, Mansehra, Karak, Lakki Marwat,
Abbottabad, Chitral, Charsadda, Malakand, Swabi, Tank, Mardan, Kohat and Nowshera.
8800
6600
4400
8009
7507
2200
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
For the Islamabad Capital Territory, the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 was enacted to
consolidate and rationalize the law relating to formation of trade unions and
improvement of relations between employers and workmen in the Islamabad Capital
Territory and transe-provincial establishments and industries. Under section 53 of the
Act the Federal Government is empowered to constitute the National Industrial
Relations Commission (NIRC) consisting of not less than ten full time members including
the Chairman to adjudicate and determine industrial disputes in the Islamabad Capital
Territory and trans-provincial disputes to which a trade union or federation of such
trade union is party or the dispute is of national importance or referred to the NIRC by
the Federal Government.
In the Punjab, the Punjab Industrial Relations Act, 2010 was enacted to regulate
formation of trade unions and union activities, relations between employers and
workmen and the avoidance and settlement of any differences or disputes arising
between them and other ancillary matters. The Government of the Punjab may
establish as many Labour Courts as it considers necessary to exercise jurisdiction under
this Act. A Labour Court shall consist of one Presiding Officer appointed by the
Government, who shall not be qualified for appointment as Presiding Officer unless he
has been or is a District Judge or an Additional District Judge. Under section 47 of the
Act, the Government of Punjab may constitute as many Labour Appellate Tribunals
consisting of one member as it may consider necessary to exercise jurisdiction under
this Act. The member of the said Tribunal shall be a person who is or has been a Judge
or an Additional Judge of the Lahore High Court. Under section 46 of the Act, any
aggrieved party may, within thirty days of the communication of the final award,
decision or sentence passed by the Labour Court, prefer an appeal to the Labour
Appellate Tribunal.
In the province of Sindh, the Industrial Relations Act, 2008 (Act No. IV of 2008) was
revived with object to regulate formation of trade unions and union activities, relations
between employers and workmen and the avoidance and settlement of any differences
or disputes arising between them and other ancillary matters. The Government of Sindh
may establish as many Labour Courts as it considers necessary to exercise jurisdiction
under this Act. A Labour Court shall consist of one Presiding Officer appointed by the
Government of Sindh, who shall not be qualified for appointment as Presiding Officer
unless he has been or is a District Judge or an Additional District Judge. Under section 55
of the Act, the Government of Sindh may constitute as many Labour Appellate Tribunals
consisting of one member as it may consider necessary to exercise jurisdiction under
this Act. The member of the said Tribunal shall be a person who is or has been a Judge
or an Additional Judge of the Sindh High Court. Under section 54 of the Act, any
aggrieved party may, within thirty days of the communication of the final award,
decision or sentence passed by the Labour Court, prefer an appeal to the Labour
Appellate Tribunal.
consider necessary to exercise jurisdiction under this Act. The member of the said
Tribunal shall be a person who is or has been a Judge or an Additional Judge of the
Peshawar High Court. Under section 50 of the Act, any aggrieved party may, within
thirty days of the communication of the final award, decision or sentence passed by the
Labour Court, prefer an appeal to the Labour Appellate Tribunal.
In Balochistan, the Balochistan Industrial Relations Act, 2010 was enforced with the aim
to regulate formation of trade unions, regulation of relations between employers and
workmen and the avoidance and settlement of any differences or disputes arising
between them or matters connected therewith and ancillary thereto. Under section 52
of the Act, the Government of Balochistan may establish as many Labour Courts as it
considers necessary to exercise jurisdiction under this Act. A Labour Court shall consist
of one Presiding Officer appointed by the Government of Balochistan. A person shall
not be qualified for appointment as Presiding Officer unless he has been or is a District
Judge or an Additional District Judge provided that the Government of Balochistan may
in consultation with the High Court of Balochistan, appoint any person not so qualified
to be the Presiding Officer of a Labour Court. Under section 55 of the Act, the
Government of Balochistan may constitute as many Labour Appellate Tribunals
consisting of one member as it may consider necessary to exercise jurisdiction under
this Act. The member of the said Tribunal shall be a person who is qualified to be
appointed a Judge of High Court and shall be appointed in consultation with the High
Court of Balochistan. Any aggrieved party may, within thirty days of the communication
of the final award, decision or sentence passed by the Labour Court, prefer an appeal to
the Labour Appellate Tribunal.
12000
8000
14701
13764
4000
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
1500
1250
1000
750
1431
1294
500
250
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
980
960
940
920
900
971
880
860
840
858
820
800
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
information from any office and issue summons for witnesses or documents. The
Tribunal finally decides a case within a period of six months from the date of initiation of
proceedings and if it fails to decide the case within six months then it shall conduct day
to day proceedings in the case till the final decision. The Tribunal executes its decisions
as if it is a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
50
45
40
35
30
25
43
20
15 29
10
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
0 10 20 30 40
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
12
9.5
10
4.5
5
2
400
300
200
314
287
100
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
60
50
40
30
51
48
20
10
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
110
100
90
80
70
60
50 106
40 76
30
20
10
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
0 0.5 1 1.5
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
1.5
0.5 1 1
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
30 Livestock Tribunal
30.1 Establishment of the Livestock Tribunal
The Tribunal is established under the Punjab Livestock Breading Act,2014. The
purpose of this Act is to provide for regulation of livestock breeding services, to
improve genetic potential of breeds and protect indigenous breeds of livestock in the
Punjab.
The Tribunal is constituted under section 38 of the Act, the Government may
constitute, one or more Tribunals consisting of not less than one technical and one
judicial member with requisite qualification and experience. The judicial member shall
be appointed with consultation of the Lahore High Court. The Judicial member shall be
the presiding officer of the Tribunal.
1 86 72 139 19 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
140
120
100
80
139
60
40
72
20
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
1000
800
600
972
400
696
200
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
Under section 29 of the Electronic Crimes Act, 2016 the Federal Government may
establish or designate a law enforcement agency as the investigation agency for the
purposes of investigation of offences under the Act, 2016. The investigation agency and
the authorized officer shall in all matters follow the procedure laid down in the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1898 to the extent that it is not inconsistent with any provision of the
Act, 2016. The investigation agency shall establish its own capacity for forensic analysis of
the data or in information systems and the forensic analysis reports generated by the
investigation agency shall not be inadmissible in evidence before any court for the sole
reason that such reports were generated by the investigation agency.
1 73 81 81 73 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Chart illustrating a comparison between number of cases pending at the beginning and end of the year
120
100
80
60
40 81 81
20
0
Institution during, 2020 Disposal during, 2020
Chart illustrating a comparison between institution and disposal of cases during the year
9000
7000
5000
8800
3000
5073
1000
Khyber
3 13 4264 3959 8068 2109 5746 13.5
Pakhtunkhwa
Punjab
Pendency as Balance as Disposal Per
No. of Courts on Institution Total Disposal on Month Per
01-01-2020 31-12-2020 Court
10 Special Courts (Offences in Banks) 3 437 171 608 169 440 4.7
11 Banking Courts 18 23619 13721 37340 11296 26516 52.3
Total 48 48 57005 31965 88973 26987 62315
Sindh
1 Intellectual Property Tribunal 1 97 16 113 4 109 0.3
2 Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 1 8017 2854 10871 1976 8981 164.7
3 Custom Appellate Tribunals 3 2684 2760 5444 850 4661 23.6
Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate
4
Board
1 3 2 5 2 3 0.2
5 Commerical Court 1 6 0 6 0 6 0.0
6 Special Court (Central) 3 449 381 830 450 385 12.5
Special Court (Custom, Taxation & Anti -
7
Smuggling)
1 604 309 913 206 707 17.2
8 Accountability Courts 6 261 59 320 30 298 0.4
Special Court (Control of Narcotics
9
Substances)
2 7379 188 7567 438 7130 18.3
10 Special Court (Offences in Banks) 1 191 33 224 12 212 1.0
11 Banking Courts 11 8670 4080 12750 2942 9855 22.3
12 Drug Court 1 78 0 78 0 78 0.0
13 Insurance Appellate Tribunal 1 115 10 125 1 124 0.1
Total 33 28554 10692 39246 6911 32549 17.5
KPK
Disposal
Pendency as Balance as Per
No. of
on Institution Total Disposal on Month
Courts
01-01-2020 31-12-2020 Per
Court
1 Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 1 1685 760 2445 492 1535 41.0
2 Special Court (Central) 1 224 440 664 368 296 30.7
Special Court (Custom, Taxation & Anti -
3
Smuggling)
1 109 49 0 48 110 4.0
4 Accountability Courts 4 192 76 271 66 197 1.4
5 Special Court (Control of Narcotics Substances) 1 338 268 606 166 440 13.8
6 Special Court (Offences in Banks) 1 15 6 21 2 19 0.2
7 Banking Courts 3 1225 468 1693 484 1264 13.4
8 Drug Court 1 476 1892 2368 483 1885 40.3
Total 13 4264 3959 8068 2109 5746 13.5
Balochistan
1 Special Court (Central) 1 70 10 80 8 72 0.7
2 Accountability Courts 2 83 21 104 18 85 0.8
3 Special Court (Control of Narcotics Substances) 1 57 111 168 109 59 9.1
4 Banking Courts 1 376 144 520 123 393 10.3
5 Drug Court 1 75 36 111 14 96 1.2
Total 6 661 322 983 272 705 3.8
Islamabad
1 Intellectual Property Tribunal 1 71 24 95 21 74 1.8
2 Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 1 12322 4906 17228 3350 13878 279.2
3 Custom Appellate Tribunals 2 300 251 551 129 422 5.4
4 Special Courts (Central) 1 358 57 415 55 360 4.6
5 Accountability Courts 3 108 50 158 50 108 1.4
6 Special Courts (Control of Narcotics Substances) 1 159 82 241 50 191 4.2
7 Special Courts (Offences in Banks) 1 34 6 40 3 37 0.3
8 Banking Courts 1 1347 304 1651 259 1392 21.6
9 Anti Terrorism Court 2 42 43 85 57 28 2.4
10 Drug Court 1 3 0 3 2 1 0.2
11 Prevention of Electronic Crimes 1 73 81 0 81 73 6.8
12 Environmental Protectional Tribunal 1 17 11 28 5 23 0.4
13 Anti-Dumping Appellate Tribunal 1 93 50 143 69 74 5.8
14 Federal Service Tribunal 1 7860 4292 12152 3301 8951 275.1
15 Competition Appellate Tribunal 1 113 11 124 0 124 0.0
16 National Industrial Commission 1 12929 5073 18002 8800 9202 733.3
Total 20 35829 15241 50916 16232 34938 67.6
KPK
Balance
Pendency as Disposal
No. of as on
on Institution Total Disposal Per Month
Courts 01-01-2020
31-12-
Per Court
2020
1 Consumer Courts 17 1907 5256 7163 5990 1407 29.4
2 Anti Terrorism Courts 13 232 729 961 742 183 4.8
3 Labour Courts 5 4834 8279 13113 7938 5175 132.3
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service
4 Tribunal
1 5337 16257 21594 12023 9589 1001.9
5 Anti Corruption Courts 2 325 117 442 84 360 3.5
6 Labour Appellate Tribunals 6 213 34 247 41 206 0.6
Total 44 12848 30672 43520 26818 16920 50.8
Balochistan
1 Balochistan Service Tribunal 1 467 362 829 133 696 11.1
2 Labour Appellate Tribunals 1 10 16 26 19 7 1.6
3 Environmental Protection Tribunal 1 8 187 195 7 188 0.6
4 Anti Terrorism Courts 9 189 293 482 296 153 2.7
5 Anti Corruption Courts 1 18 10 28 3 25 0.3
6 Labour Courts 5 54 636 690 654 36 10.9
Total 18 746 1504 2250 1112 1105 5.1
Summary Categorywise
Summary Categorywise
Total 93 50 143 69 74
26 Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Islamabad 12322 4906 17228 3350 13878
27 Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Lahore 24928 11747 36675 8750 27924
28 Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Karachi 8017 2854 10871 1976 8981
29 Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Peshawar 1685 760 2445 492 1535
30 Customs Appellate Tribunal Bench I, Islamabad 186 250 436 113 323
33 Customs Appellate Tribunal Bench II, Lahore 414 111 525 105 396
35 Customs Appellate Tribunal Bench II, Karachi 543 742 1285 467 1139
36 Customs Appellate Tribunal Bench III, Karachi 746 1311 2057 336 2081
Summary Categorywise
Total 50 28 78 24 54
Summary Categorywise
Summary Categorywise
Summary Categorywise
Total 32 0 32 7 25
120 Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad Bench 7860 4292 12152 3301 8951
122 Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore 4618 7287 11905 7361 5264
123 Sindh Service Tribunal, Karachi 581 629 1210 449 788
124 K.P Service Tribunal, Peshawar 5337 16257 21594 12023 9589
125 Balochistan Service Tribunal, Quetta 467 362 829 133 696
127 Anti-Corruption Court - II, Lahore 458 187 645 231 406
131 Anti-Corruption Court, Dera Ghazi Khan 482 332 814 297 520
Summary Categorywise
Summary Categorywise
Summary Categorywise
Summary Categorywise
237 Consumer Court, Dera Ismail Khan 781 1780 2561 2045 516
Summary Categorywise
251 Labour Court -II, Lahore 974 573 1547 573 991
252 Labour Court - III, Ferozewala at Lahore 419 297 716 217 515
253 Labour Court - IV, Faisalabad 692 616 1308 498 810
255 Labour Court - VI, Rawalpindi 202 119 321 211 112
256 Labour Court - VII, Sargodha 394 397 791 162 726
257 Labour Court - VIII, Bahawalpur 569 277 846 197 649
258 Labour Court - IX, Multan 768 254 1022 129 893
260 Labour Court - XI, Dera Ghazi Khan 520 214 734 24 710
262 Labour Court - II, Karachi 250 261 511 125 250
Summary Categorywise
264 Labour Court - IV, Karachi 221 419 640 409 301
270 Labour Court - II, Mardan 1055 1286 2341 717 1624
271 Labour Court - III, Haripur 226 1425 1651 1360 291
272 Labour Court - iV, Dera Ismail Khan 1934 1546 3480 2191 1289
279 Labour Appellate Tribunal, Lahore 200 745 945 751 167
280 Labour Appellate Tribunal, Multan 608 272 880 452 467
Summary Categorywise
289 Child Protection Court, Punjab, Lahore 361 971 1332 858 474
Total 27 10 37 5 33
Total 48 48 96 51 45
Total 1 1 2 1 1
304 Intellectual Property Tribunal, Lahore 1285 932 2217 671 1546
Summary Categorywise
Total 73 81 154 81 73