The High Court of Karnataka heard an appeal challenging the constitutional validity of rule 31A(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017. Rule 31A deals with determining the value of supplies for lottery, betting, gambling and horse racing. The single judge had declared rule 31A(3) ultra vires. The High Court admitted the appeal for final hearing. Considering that the appellants made a prima facie case, the court stayed the operation of the impugned order allowing the challenge to rule 31A(3) till the next date of hearing.
The High Court of Karnataka heard an appeal challenging the constitutional validity of rule 31A(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017. Rule 31A deals with determining the value of supplies for lottery, betting, gambling and horse racing. The single judge had declared rule 31A(3) ultra vires. The High Court admitted the appeal for final hearing. Considering that the appellants made a prima facie case, the court stayed the operation of the impugned order allowing the challenge to rule 31A(3) till the next date of hearing.
The High Court of Karnataka heard an appeal challenging the constitutional validity of rule 31A(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017. Rule 31A deals with determining the value of supplies for lottery, betting, gambling and horse racing. The single judge had declared rule 31A(3) ultra vires. The High Court admitted the appeal for final hearing. Considering that the appellants made a prima facie case, the court stayed the operation of the impugned order allowing the challenge to rule 31A(3) till the next date of hearing.
WA No. 727 of 2021 Decided On: 12.08.2021 Appellants: Union of India Vs. Respondent: Bangalore Turf Club Ltd. Hon'ble Judges/Coram: S.C. Sharma and Sachin Shankar Magadum, JJ. Counsels: For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Vikram Aditya Huilgol, Adv. Nature of Issue Involved: Validity of Provision ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the question of admission. 2. The appeal is admitted for final hearing. 3 . Learned counsel for the parties are also heard on the question of grant of interim relief. 4. The respondents before this Court have filed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of rule 31A(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017 and the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition declaring rule 31A(3) as ultra vires. 5. Rule 31(A) is reproduced as under: '31A. Value of supply in case of tottery, betting, gambling and horse racing.-- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of this Chapter, the value in respect of supplies specified below shall be determined in the manner provided hereunder: (2)(a) The value of supply of lottery run by State Government shall be deemed to be 100/112 of the face value of ticket or of the price as notified in the official gazette, by the organizing State, whichever is higher. (b) The value of supply of lottery authorized by State Government shall be deemed to be 100/128 of the face value of the ticket or of the price as notified in the official gazette by the organizing State, whichever is higher. Explanation:--For the purposes of this sub-rule, the expressions-- (a) lottery run by State Governments means a lottery not allowed to be sold in any State other than the organizing State; (b) lottery authorized by State Government means a lottery which is authorized to be sold in State(s) other than the organizing State also;
14-03-2023 (Page 1 of 2) www.manupatra.com NATIONAL LAW INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY, BHOPAL