Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ead 505 t2 Caseanalysiscaitlinhallam
Ead 505 t2 Caseanalysiscaitlinhallam
Caitlin Hallam
4. One or two existing laws or court rulings that relate to the issues:
In the Abington School District v. Schempp court case, the Supreme Court ruled that
“requiring public-school students to participate in classroom exercises involving daily
Bible verse reading violating the religious freedom of students under the First and
Fourteenth Amendments” (Bill of Rights, n.d.). This court case essentially told school
© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Page 1 of 5
districts that religious studies cannot include Bible verse reading. The judges determined
that the practice of the Abington School District “violated the Establishment Clause and
the Free Exercise Clause” (Bill of Rights, n.d.). The U.S. Department of Education also
states, “Public schools may not provide religious instruction, but they may teach about
religion” (US Department, 2020).
8. Action steps (2-5) for implementing your solution, including a timeline for each step:
Step 1: Day 1: Propose the idea of a World History class to other teachers
Step 2: Day 2: After teacher approval and interest, this should be proposed to the school
board and community members at an open meeting to gather thoughts and ideas
Step 3: Day 3: This may be a few days or weeks later, but the idea should be proposed to
the superintendent to vote on
Part 2: Rationale
Religion in schools always has been and probably always will be a controversial topic. It
has to be explained in a way that does not offend anyone or favor any particular religion over
another. In this case study, it is no different. Ms. Beckel is in support of teaching religious
studies and incorporating it into the curriculum for the following year. She has the support of the
principal and another teacher. While I would personally agree with Ms. Beckel that a religious
study class should be allowed, it would cause a lot of uproar in the community. I am not
surprised that Ms. Wright did not like the idea nor was she in support of a long-time friend
bringing this curricular decision to light. There are more community members than just Ms.
Wright who probably feel the same way as her and do not want religious studies to be
incorporated into the curriculum and implemented into the schools the following year.
In order to appeal to both sides of this religious debate, I would make it a point to state
that the school is going to be teaching about religion, not teaching religion. This means that the
teachers would not be telling students how to feel about certain religions or what religious words
to believe, nor the holidays they should observe. The middle school has been known to be
“innovative, supportive” and place where “new ideas are encouraged” (Hanson, 2009). While the
school’s vision and mission are to be “innovative” and “supportive”, they also have to follow the
same laws and policies as other schools in the country, their school district, and Dayton. While
appealing to both sides of this argument, I would propose that a World History curriculum be
created.
The World History class would also ensure that students’ needs are being met and that
they are still going to be “identified by the state as one of the top 10 performing schools”
(Hanson, 2009). The students would be learning about economics, geography, climate, religion,
cultures, languages, and more about different regions of the world. This would be a direct
promotion of social justice for students. It might encourage more students to join the class and
participate in discussions in other classes if they are given more background knowledge of
different world history aspects. While religious aspects of the World History class would be
important, it is a history class, so more than religion needs to be taught. Students must learn
about how the regions of the world became what they look like today in terms of everything
previously stated. This would be a relatable class for the middle school’s
“multicultural student body” (Hanson, 2009).
When the World History class would be proposed to the committees, superintendent,
community members, other stakeholders, and student body, it would be important to go over the
expectations that the school has in implementing this into the curriculum. Parents could be
invited to present information or artifacts that they have from different world regions or even
various time periods. This would allow for collaboration to happen between parents and students
which would help encourage even more learning and exploration of world history. It is also part
of the middle school’s mission to “invite parents to play an active role” (Hanson, 2009). The
World History class could even hold a presentation where students discuss different countries or
regions located throughout the world and include the place’s beliefs, traditions, cultures,
economics, and religion. This would create a moment for community members to learn about the
teachings of the class and it would help them develop more of a trust of the school’s teachings
and expectations that students are learning world history, not just religious beliefs.
Bill of Rights Institute. (n.d.). Religious liberty: landmark supreme court cases - bill of rights
institute. https://billofrightsinstitute.org/e-lessons/religious-liberty.
Hanson, K. L. (2009). Case 13 The Bible and Ms. Wright. In A casebook for school leaders:
Linking the ISLLC standards to effective practice (3rd ed.). essay,
Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.