THE GREAT DECEPTION

Around the time of the war between the United States and the southern states of the American
union, the United States was busy putting together a plan that would increase the jurisdiction of the
United States. This plan was necessary because the United States had no subjects and only the land
ceded to it from the states, ie. the District which was only ten miles square and such land as was
necessary for forts, magazines, arsenals, etc.

Between the 1860’s and the early 1900’s, banking and taxing mechanisms were changing through
legislation. Cunning people closely associated with the powers in England had great influence on the
legislation being passed in the United States. Of course such legislation did not apply to the states or
to the people in the states, but making the distinction was not deemed to be a necessary duty of the
legislators. It was the responsibility of the people to OVERSTAND their relationship to the United
States and to the laws that were being passed by the legislature. This distinction between the United
States and the states was taught in the homes and the schools and churches. The early admiralty
courts did not interpret legislation as broadly at that time because the people knew when the courts
were overstepping their jurisdiction. The people were in control because they knew who they were
and where they were standing in relation to the United States.

In 1913 the United States added numerous private laws to its books that facilitated the increase of
subjects and property for the United States. The 14th Amendment provided for a new class of citizens
– United States citizens, that had not formerly been recognized. Until the 14th Amendment in 1868,
there were no persons born or naturalized in the United States. They had all been born or naturalized
in one of the several states. United States citizenship was a result of state citizenship. After the Civil
War, a new class was recognized and was the beginning of the democracy sited in the District of
Columbia. The American people in the republic sited in the several states could choose to benefit as
one of these new United States citizens BY CHOICE. The new class of citizens was given the right to
vote in the democracy in 1870 by the 15th Amendment. All it required was an application. Benefits
came with this new citizenship, but with the benefits, came duties and responsibilities that were
totally regulated by the legislature for the District of Columbia. Edward Mandell House is attributed to
giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people. (1) The
13th Amendment in 1865 opened the way for the people to volunteer into slavery to accept the
benefits offered by the United States. Whether House actually spoke the words or not , is really
irrelevant because the scenario detailed in the statement attributed to him has clearly been
implemented. Central banking for the United States was legislated with the Federal Reserve Act in
1913. The ability to decrease the currency in circulation through taxation was legislated with the 16th
Amendment in 1913. Support for the presumption that the American people had volunteered to
participate in the United States democracy was legislated with the 17th Amendment in 1913. The path
was provided for the control of the courts, with the creation of the American Bar Association in 1913.

In 1917 the United States legislature passed the Trading with the Enemy Act and the Emergency War
Powers Act, opening the doors for the United States to suspend limitations otherwise mandated in
the Constitution. Even in times of peace, every contrived and created social, political, or financial
emergency was sufficient authority for the officers of the United States to overstep its peacetime
powers and implement volumes of “law” that would increase the coffers of the United States. There is
always a declared emergency in the United States and its States, but it only applies to their subjects.

In the 1920’s the States accelerated the push for mothers to register their babies. Life was good and
people were not paying attention to what was happening in government. The stock market crashed,

Page 1 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
and those who were not on the inside were not warned to take their money out before they lost
everything.

In the 1930’s federal legislation provided for registration of babies through applications for birth
certificates, so government workers could get maternity leave with pay. The States pushed for
registration of cars through applications for certificates of title, and for registration of land through
registration of deeds of trust. Constructive trusts secretly were created as each of the people blindly
walked into the United States democracy, thereby agreeing to be sureties for the debts of the United
States. The great depression supplied the diversion to keep the people’s attention off what
government was doing. The Social Security program was implemented, along with numerous other
United States programs that invited the American people to volunteer to be the sureties behind the
United States’ new registered property and adhesion contracts through the new United States
subjects.

The plan was well on its path by 1933. Massive registration of property through United States
agencies, including the State of _______ subdivisions, was assuring the United States and its officers
would get rich beyond their wildest expectations, as predicted by Mendall House. All of this was done
without disclosure of the material facts that accompanied each application for registration – fraud.
The fraud was a sufficient reason to charge all the United States officers with treason UNLESS a
remedy could be supplied for the people to recoup their property and collect for the damages they
suffered as a result of the fraud.

If a remedy were available, and the people chose not to or failed to use their remedy, no charge of
fraud could be sustained even in a common law court. The United States only needed to provide the
remedy. It was not required to explain it or even tell the people where the remedy could be found.
The attorneys did not even have to be taught about the remedy. That gave them plausible deniability
when the people struggled to OVERSTAND the new laws. The legislators did not have to have the
intricate details of the law explained to them regarding the bills they were passing. That gave them
plausible deniability. If the people failed to use their remedy, the United States came out the winner
every time. If the people did discover their remedy, the United States had to honor it and release the
registered property back to the people, but only if the people knew they had a remedy, and only if
they requested it in the proper manner. It was a great plan.

With plausible deniability, even when the people knew they had a remedy and pursued it, the
attorneys, judges, and legislators could act like they did not understand the people’s claims. Requiring
the public schools to teach civics, government, and history classes out of approved politically correct
textbooks also assured the people would not find the remedy for a long time. Passing new State and
Federal laws that appeared to subject the people to rules and regulations, added another level of
protection against the people finding their remedy. The public media was molded to report politically
correct, though substantially incorrect, news day after day, until few people would even think there
could be a remedy available to them. The people could be separated from their money and their time
to pursue the remedy long enough for the solutions to be lost in the pages of millions of books in huge
law libraries across the country. So many people know there is something wrong with all the conflicts
in the laws with the “facts” taught in the schools. How can the American people be free and subject to
a sovereign government's whims at the same time? Who would ever have thought the people would
be resourceful enough to actually find the remedy? BUT they did!

Page 2 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy into place with House Joint Resolution 192 (2) and
recorded it in the Congressional Record. It was not required to be promulgated in the Federal
Register. An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933, paving the way for the withdrawal of gold in the
United States. Representative Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges on May 23, 1933, against the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the
Secretary of the United States Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933, page 4055-4058). HJR
192 passed on June 3, 1933. Mr. MaFadden claimed on June 10, 1933: “Mr. Chairman, we have in this
country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve
Board and the Federal Reserve Banks…” HJR 192 is the insurance policy that protects the legislators
from a conviction for fraud and treason against the American people. It also protects the American
people from damages caused by the actions of the United States.

HJR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the bills. It removed the requirement that the
United States subjects and employees had to pay their debts with gold. It actually prohibited the
inclusion of a clause in all subsequent contracts that would require payment in gold. It also canceled
the clause in every contract written prior to June 5, 1933, that required an obligation to be paid in
gold – retroactively. It provided that the United States subjects and employees could use any type of
coin and currency to discharge a public debt as long as it was in use in the normal course of business
in the United States. For a time, United States Notes were the currency used to discharge debts, but
later the Federal Reserve and the United States provided a new medium of exchange through paper
notes and debt instruments that could be passed on to a debtor’s creditors to discharge the debtor’s
debts. That same currency is available to us to use to discharge public debts.

In the 1950’s the Uniform Commercial Code was presented to the States as a means of unifying the
generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial fictions
as though they were real. Security instruments replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security
instruments could be supported by presumptive contracts. Debt instruments with collateral, and
accommodating parties could be used instead of money. Money and the need for money was
disappearing, and a uniform system of laws had to be put in place to allow the courts to uphold the
security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling payment or
performance. All this was accomplished by the mid 1960’s.

The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and required procedures all people engaged
in commercial activities must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled thousands of
years ago, but were refined as commerce become more sophisticated over the years. In the 1900’s the
age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became a big part of the
law. Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new direction in enforcing commercial
claims could not be supported in courts. If the claimants were required to produce their claims every
time they tried to collect money or time from the people, they would seldom be successful. The
principles expressed in the code combine the means of dealing with substantive commercial activities
with the means of dealing with presumptive commercial activities. These principles work as well for
the people as they do for the deceivers. The rules do not respect persons.

Those who enticed the people to register their things with the United States and its sub-divisions
gained control of the substance through the registrations. The United States became the Holder of the
titles to many things. The definition of “property” is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the
principal. The property is the interest in the thing. Profits (interest) made from the property of
another, belong to the owner of the thing. Profits were made by the deceivers by pledging the

Page 3 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
registered property in commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers. The profits
belong to the owners of the things. That is always the people. The corporation only shows ownership
of paper – titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. [[Watch the movie Last Action
Hero and watch the confusion created when they try to mix substance and fiction.]] Sometimes the
fiction is made to look very much like substance, but fiction can never become substance. It is an
impossibility.

The profits from all the registered things had to be put into trust (constructive) for the benefit of the
owners. If the profits were put into the general fund of the United States and not into separate trusts
for the owners, the scheme would represent fraud. The profits for each owner could not be
commingled. If the owner failed to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a constructive
trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit from the profits, it would not be the fault of the
deceivers. If the owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his remedy, it would not
be the fault of the deceivers. The owner is responsible for learning the law, so he OVERSTANDS that
the profits from his things are available for him to discharge debts or charges brought against his
public person by the United States.

If the United States has the “gold”, the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund, or
financial ledger). The definition of “fund” is money set aside to pay a debt. The fund is there to
discharge the public debts attributed to the United States subjects, but ultimately back to the
accommodating parties – the American people. The national debt that is owed is to the owners of the
registered things – the American people, as well as to other creditors.

If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the thing, and the owner is presumed (by
accommodation) to owe a public debt to the United States, the logical thing is to ask the United States
to discharge that public debt from the trust fund. The way for the United States to get around having
to pay the public debts for the people is to claim the owner cannot be an owner if he agreed to be the
accommodating party for a debtor person. If the people are truly the principle, then they know how
to handle their financial and political affairs, UNLESS they have never been taught. If the owner
admits by his actions out of ignorance, that he is an accommodating party, he has taken on the
debtor’s liabilities without getting consideration in exchange. Here lies the fiction again. The owner of
the thing does not have to knowingly agree to be the accommodating party for the debtor person; he
just has to act like he agreed. That is easy if he has a choice of going to jail or signing for the debtor
person. The presumption that he is the accommodating party is strong enough for the courts to hold
the owner of the thing liable for a tax on the thing he actually owns.

Debtors may have the use of certain things, but the things belong to the creditors. The creditor is the
master. The debtor is the servant. The Uniform Commercial Code is very specific about the duties and
responsibilities a debtor has. If the owner of the thing is presumed to be a debtor because of his
previous admissions and adhesion contracts, he is going to have a difficult time convincing the United
States that it has a duty to discharge public debts for him. In addition, the courts are staffed with loyal
judges who will look for every mistake the people make when trying to use their remedy.

There is a very powerful tool the people can use to help them get to the real issues when they find
themselves up against the power of presumption. The law provides for either party of an admiralty
court action to OBJECT to a line of questioning. When you object in that court setting, you must tell
the judge why you object, or he will overrule your objection. The reason is:

Page 4 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
“This line of questioning assumes facts not in evidence.”

You can request that evidence of the Plaintiff’s claim be entered as evidence. If the judge overrules
this fundamental, basic, underlying, necessary principle of establishing jurisdiction and right to make a
charge, there is a major procedural error in the proceeding. Granting impersonam jurisdiction to get
to the bottom of the issue is vastly better than arguing, “I’m not that person.”

The owner of the thing, after learning the law and discovering who he is in relation to the United
States, can file a UCC Financing Statement and Security Agreement registering his interest in the
artificial entity (PERSON) the United States created after Mom applied for a birth certificate. That was
the act of registering her biological property, her baby (substance), with the State of _______. The
United States holds the paper title (form), not the substance (baby). Until your Financing Statement is
filed, the United States is the holder of the title to the artificial entity. Its name is spelled in all capital
letter – JOHN HENRY DOE. When John Henry Doe files the Financing Statement supported by a
Security Agreement signed by the artificial entity (JOHN) and the owner (John), he becomes the holder
in due course of the title to JOHN. The UCC and the State commercial law are very specific about the
effect of a registered security interest. It has priority over most other interest claimed (only claimed)
in the same thing. The evidence that is missing in the court, is the registered claim over the person
(JOHN).

The owner also must notify the Secretary of the Treasury that he is going to handle his own affairs in
the future. He can file a Bill of Exchange with the Secretary through which he exchanges his person’s
accepted-for-value birth certificate and social security numbers, for a chargeback of all the presumed
charges brought against his person since the birth certificate was issued.

The owner can also reserve a noncash Federal Reserve routing number and any number of noncash
instrument numbers by filing an amendment to his Financing Statement or just including his
reservation on his original Financing Statement. Each bank account opened in the name of the
owner’s person has a routing number. If an account is open, it is available to process cash items. If you
write a check to the plumber, it can be converted to cash at your bank. You cannot write a check on an
account that has been closed. Those accounts and their routing numbers are reserved for noncash
items for the person (JOHN) that opened the account originally. Accounts that have been closed by
the bank instead of the person, should not be used for noncash items. Once this is done, you are in a
position to begin receiving reimbursements against the obligation the United States owes to you for
money and time it has received that belong to you.

The owner of registered things, who has learned the law and what his rights are, and has filed his
Financing Statement, Security Agreement, and Bill of Exchange, and reserved his noncash account
routing numbers, can issue an instrument indicating his UCC registration number, his registered
Federal Reserve routing number, the name of the public party making a charge against his person, and
the amount of the debt to be discharged.

Think of the whole transaction in relation to a dead battery. The batter represents your public person
(JOHN), which is a dead entity that can function within the public maize of fiction, transmitting
benefits from the public to you in the private IF it is charged up. You cannot go into the public because
you are not a fiction. JOHN has no power until it is charged with some energy. That energy comes
from an IRS default notice, court judgment, credit card bill, utility bill, traffic ticket, or some other
instrument that has a $ amount and JOHN’s name on it as the presumed debtor. The bill is the energy.

Page 5 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
It charges the dead JOHN. You can now discharge JOHN and put JOHN’s accrual account with the
charging party back to a zero balance. You as the secured party over the assets put up as security by
JOHN to you as collateral for the debt JOHN owes you, can discharge JOHN with a negotiable
instrument for the same $ amount as the charging instrument. The charging party that receives your
noncash item can 1) process it through a United States department, 2) give it to a third party, 3) keep
it to increase its liquidity.

When you, as the owner of a thing, registered it with the United States or one of its subdivisions, you
let the United States hold the legal title to your thing based on misrepresentation and failure to
disclose material facts to you at the time of registration. You probably retained possession of the
thing. The United States invested the title and made a profit. If you did not specifically authorize the
United States and its agents to invest the legal title, the profits made from that title belong to you,
because as the owner, you remain the equitable title holder. Legally all the profits from the
investment of the titles to all your registered things must go into a fund for your benefit. If they did
not put the profits in a trust fund of some sort, it would be fraud.

Just acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory registration, is fraud. If the scenario
attributed to Mandell House is now in full application in the United States, which it is, the officers of
the United States could be charged and convicted with treason IF they had not provided a remedy,
which they did. -- House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933. This is their insurance policy to assure
they are not convicted of treason. That does not mean they cannot be charged with treason, but the
courts will dismiss based on failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because you
have a remedy outside the court, you cannot sustain a charge of treason.

The problem in the past with trying to discharge public debts with instruments that could not be
processed through your bank on the corner was that those discharge instruments did not route
through the Federal Reserve. It is the bean counter for the national debt. That debt is first and
primarily owed to the people who are the equitable titleholders of all the substance in this country. If
you try to discharge a public debt with your discharge instrument, and you do not route it through the
Federal Reserve, it appears you are receiving a benefit from the United States without exchanging it
for something of value. This is not technically correct because you have a right to be reimbursed,
whether or not you apply it toward the debt the United States owes you. You are the substance; it is
the fiction.

If you do route your discharge instrument through the Federal Reserve, where the national debt owed
to you can be reduced by the amount of the instrument, you have made an exchange that fits nicely
into their accrual bookkeeping system. Your PERSON’s charge from the charging party within the
United States commercial scheme is discharged, and the debt the United States owes to you is
discharged by the same amount. That is a quid pro quo, and everyone is happy, EXCEPT those who are
not interested in the money but just want to be in control from behind the scenes.

To accomplish this quid pro quo exchange:

1. your claim to being one of the people must appear on a public register (the Secretary of State),

2. you must have an account with the banker for the United States (the Secretary of the Treasury),

3. you must have given notice of your reservation of routing numbers through the national debt

Page 6 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
accountant (the US Treasury),

4. you must refer to the insurance policy that covers your remedy (House Joint Resolution 192),

5. you must make your instrument negotiable so it can be used by the United States for a profit,

6. you must transmit your instrument back into the public through an agent (your registered debtor),

7. you must only use a noncash item for this exchange,

8. you must do a banker’s acceptance of a charging instrument to attach to your noncash item, and

9. you must OVERSTAND that you are not getting something for nothing

The United States and its co-business partners are debtors to you. You are the creditor, not only over
your debtor PERSON but also over the United States, the legal titleholder over the registered things to
which you are the equitable titleholder. You are the primary creditor, so if the United States has other
creditors, like the international bankers, they cannot jump to the front of the line. Their claims are
subordinated to your claims if your claims are registered and if you OVERSTAND the UCC surrounding
what you are doing.

Unalienable Rights are in-born.

 
In Natural Law, you were created equal to any other man or woman, and you were endowed with
certain inherent Unalienable Rights that you possess as your lifelong private property.
 
Your Unalienable Rights were not given to you by any man-made authority, nor can they be taken
away by any man-made authority. The State, as a creation of the People, can only acknowledge,
uphold, and protect your Unalienable Rights. However, your sovereign nation has been usurped by
YOURNATION (INC.), which is bankrupt and using a debt-money system. The real property, wealth,
assets and productivity of the People have been pledged as Surety for the corporate national debt.
This was done, and is perpetuated, by offering contracts to the private sovereign People. 
 
By contract, your private Rights and Properties can be exchanged for public Privileges and Benefits
offered to/by YOUR ALL CAPS NAME (INC.). By contracting into a foreign jurisdiction (Admiralty
Maritime, the Law of the Sea), the sovereign People remove themselves from the protections afforded
by their sovereign nation in the Common Law jurisdiction, the Law of the Land.
 
For example, in the United States corporation, the “Bill of Rights” and the “Constitution for the united
States of America”, do not apply to a “US Citizen” of the corporation. The corporate takeover of your
sovereign nation, and the subsequent denial of your Unalienable Rights by non-disclosure, is treason.

LIVING IN THE PRIVATE

EVERY natural man and woman is born “in the private”. Whereas the State is public, and therefore its
Public Servants, and its legal fiction creations are “in the public”, including its artificial legal “persons”.

A man or woman can either “live” “in the private”, or “act” “in the public”. However ...

Page 7 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION

We are trained from an early age to accept a higher authority as normal. Most people exist in a
culture of submission and conformity, allowing numerous aspects of their lives to be controlled by the
Government. The populace is manipulated to become dependent (debt-money), and conditioned to
become fearful (racism, terrorism, and wars). The manner and appearance of “authority” is usually
intimidating by design, while the language of legal fiction commerce (Legalese) is deceptive.

You are indoctrinated to “act” in the “role” of an artificial legal “person”, which is a creation of the
State and a debtor serving as “surety” for the corporate debt of YOURNATION (INC.).

Every nation with a Central Bank under the Bank for International Settlements has been indebted by
the “incorporation” of its government into the debt-money system, thereby surrendering its power of
sovereign money issuance.
 
A global system of debt-bondage has been established by “incorporating” governments,
and by programming the people to “act” in the fictional “roles” of “artificial persons”,
which as legal fictions having no innate productive capacity, are debtors by default,
serving as “transmitting utilities” for human energy.

An artificial legal “person” is a dead entity. It is a legal fiction “persona” in the “theatre of commerce”,
and it is under the foreign Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction, the international “Law of the Sea”. On the
contrary, you are born into your own sovereign Estate of body, mind, and soul. As a sentient man or
woman you live within the sovereign Common Law Jurisdiction, the national “Law of the Land”.

The “Common Law” follows “Natural Law”, a living system of “right or justice” held to be common to
all humans and derived from Nature rather than from the rules of society. In “Natural Law”, all people
are born equal and endowed with unalienable rights.

Your sovereign jurisdiction, including your inborn Unalienable Rights, cannot be taken from you
without your fully informed and willing consent.

Legal “person” “actors” for incorporated governments, banks, and all corporate entities, need to
contract with other legal “person” “actors” to extract their “commercial energy”.

These legal “actors” make the PRESUMPTION that you are also “acting” in the “role” of a legal
“person” in “legal fiction” commerce, which is why they are seeking a contract “performance”. They
ALWAYS want the NAME and often the creation date of the legal “person” to establish “joinder”,
forming an “adhesion contract”. They NEED A “PERSON”, because there is absolutely no way they can
contract directly with a living man or woman. They need a man or woman to CONSENT TO TAKE
RESPONSIBILITY IN THE MATTER OF THE “PERSON”, unknowingly or knowingly, which is JOINDER.

In this way, a man or woman becomes party to the action involving the “person”, which is “joinder” of
the parties into a single case in legal fiction commerce.

When a living name is “mirrored” by the registration of an artificial legal “person” on the Birth
Certificate, an Estate Trust is formed, such as MR JOHN DOE TRUST. Any living man or woman
unknowingly in JOINDER to such a legal fiction NAME blindly takes responsibility for the alleged debts
of the Trust as its Trustee. Whereas an aware living man or woman can separate themselves from the

Page 8 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
legal fiction NAME and become the rightful controlling Agent, Beneficiary, Executor/Executrix for MR
JOHN DOE TRUST.

Legal “actors” will attempt to engage the “person” by posting letters, by phone, or on the highway, to
make and enforce a contract. Misrepresenting a living man or woman as a fictional “person” causing
unwitting “joinder” is the crime of “personage”, and it is perpetuated by “barratry”, the crime of
bringing false claims in court. The term “barratry”, appropriately, comes from the “Bar Association”.

Under the Common Law Jurisdiction (Law of the Land), both parties must enter into every contract
“knowingly”, “voluntarily”, and “intentionally”, or the contract is unenforceable and void.

However, under the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction (Law of the Sea), consent to contract is often
presumed by silent acquiescence, unless the party contracted thereby rebuts the presumption of
consent.

If you do not wish to consent to their contract offer (presentment), you must Rebut The
Presumption that you are “acting” in the “role” of a fictional legal “person”.
 
Maxim of Law:
Quid fas non veritas est. Legality is not Reality.

The first step is to separate yourself from the legal fiction. If you answer to the artificial legal “person”
NAME, you contract by “joinder” to become a liable debtor. However, if you “stand” truthfully as
a “man” or “woman”, not “acting” as an artificial legal “person”, the two are separated.

Because of years of conditioning, it takes time to separate the legal fiction from reality, in your mind
and in the real world. A powerful and lawful approach is simply to verify everything.

You are never obliged to answer questions or to provide government issued ID. Truly, to uphold your
government of the People, it is not your duty to answer questions, it is your duty to ask questions.
You have the Right to know who is making a claim against you, the Right to know who the injured
party is, the Right to conditionally accept any claim against you upon verification, the Right to reserve
your rights without prejudice, and thereafter the Right to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination.

By failing to exercise their Rights, the People have been betrayed, and have allowed their governance
to be turned against them, so that the People have been “monetized”. The original offices of de jure
unincorporated government institutions have been usurped, and are mostly unoccupied by de jure
public servants working for the People in a de jure public capacity. The “public” State has been
captured by financial piracy, and has become a commercial enterprise, operating by contract under
the Admiralty Maritime jurisdiction (Law Merchant), in the international Law of the Sea.

The following definitions apply to the de facto incorporated State, in which the agencies of
government, and all artificial legal “persons”, are merely corporate franchises. 
 

Page 9 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION

 
 
Private: To be “in the private” is to “live” in a “private capacity” as a Man or Woman, with flesh and
blood, arms and legs, a conscious mind, a spirit, and Life. All Men and Women are created as equal
Sovereigns, endowed with Unalienable Rights and Properties, including Credit equating to their
valuable human energy. As natural Men and Women, they are Creditors, because they are born
naturally with innate productive capacities. Their right to contract is Unlimited, and they have
unlimited liability, being responsible adults. They are outside and above the State. From
Latin privatus “set apart, belonging to oneself (not to the state)”.

Public: To be “in the public” is to “act” in a “public capacity” as an “accommodation party” in

“joinder” to an “artificial person” created and governed by the State. All Men and Women who “act”
in legal fiction “roles” for the State are granted revocable Privileges and Benefits prescribed in
legislative “Acts”. As Artificial Persons, they are Debtors, because they are created legally without
innate productive capacities. Their right to contract is Limited, and they have limited liability, being
legally incompetent “creatures of the State”, its legal children. They are inside and under the State.
From Latin publicus “of the people; of the state; done for the state”

Page 10 of 22
THE GREAT DECEPTION

Page 11 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
WHERE YOU STAND

The individual [a natural man or woman] may “stand” upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is
entitled to carry on his “private” business in his own way. His “power to contract is unlimited”. He
owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an
investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the State, since he
receives nothing therefrom beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as
existed by the “law of the land” long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be
taken from him by “due process of law”, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights
are a refusal to incriminate himself and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or
seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not
trespass upon their rights.

Upon the other hand, the corporation is a “creature of the State”. It is presumed to be incorporated
for the benefit of the public. It receives certain special “privileges” and franchises, and holds them
subject to the laws of the State and the limitations of its charter. Its “powers are limited” by law. It
can make no contract not authorized by its charter. Its rights to act as a corporation are only
preserved to it so long as it obeys the laws of its creation. There is a reserved right in the legislature to
investigate its contracts and find out whether it has exceeded its powers. It would be a strange
anomaly to hold that a State, having chartered a corporation to make use of certain franchises, could
not, in the exercise of its sovereignty, inquire how these franchises had been employed, and whether
they had been abused, and demand the production of the corporate books and papers for that
purpose.

Citation (emphasis added), Hale vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906).

CROSSING THE LINE

A sovereign man/woman lives in their “private capacity” possessing unalienable rights and
properties. They may volunteer to act in a “public capacity” granted revocable privileges and
benefits which are the mere civil rights of an artificial legal person.

Governments incorporate (form) artificial legal persons of many kinds by registration, presuming a
franchise benefit to the State's legal society. Legal persons include: citizen, resident, inhabitant,
driver, individual, taxpayer, employee, voter, and owner. They are servants, transmitting utilities,
debtors, decedents, or incompetent wards of the State.

INCORPORATION transfers ANYTHING from the sovereign national “Law of the Land” (Common Law
Jurisdiction) into the foreign international “Law of the Sea” (Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction).

Whenever people “act” in a “public capacity” as “public servants” they are accountable to the State if

they fail to perform their role as contracted.

Whenever people “live” in their “private capacity” as “private sovereigns” they are accountable in

Common Law if they cause harm to any living soul.

Page 12 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION

If you “act” in the “role” of a “legal person”, you are crossing the line into the lower world of the
legally dead, surrendering your unalienable rights as a living soul.

YOUR PUBLIC TRUST

People create governments to serve, not rule. A People's constitutional government is, by definition, a
Public Trust instituted to serve Private Sovereign People in the Common Law Jurisdiction.
 
A Trust is formed automatically in law whenever a property interest is divided.
Sovereign people form a Public Trust when they institute a constitutional government.

Such a sovereign government is an unincorporated Common Law Assembly, or a “body politic”, NOT

an incorporated “body corporate”. The Sovereign People place their Trust in the governance skills of

Page 13 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
their elected re-presentatives, who are elected into “office”, not into “power”. Your re-presentative
“goes in your place”. The Sovereign People are the employers of their re-presentatives and all
government employees. Without exception, the employees of this Public Trust are “public servants”,
working for the Private Sovereign People, who are the free men and women of the Nation.

Everyone in government service, from your Head of State to the lowest employee, derives their
limited authority from the Private Sovereign People, and each such “public servant” has a Fiduciary
Duty to serve as a Trustee for the Private Sovereign People who are the Beneficiaries of their Public
Trust.
 
Sovereignty resides in the People, whose power is the source of Law.

Your government is “public”, employing numerous Public Officers, each of whom swears an oath of
allegiance “according to law”, for example, as prescribed in the New Zealand Oaths and Declarations
Act 1957. Your Head of State is your principal Trustee in the Law of the Land, the de jure Common
Law. In New Zealand, the Common Law is acknowledged in the Imperial Laws Applications Act
1988: 'After the commencement of this Act, the common law of England (including the principles and
rules of equity), so far as it was part of the laws of New Zealand immediately before the
commencement of this Act, shall continue to be part of the laws of New Zealand.' It is the sworn duty
of all Public Officers to uphold the Common Law embodied in the Private Sovereign People.

If the People's sovereign authority, partly delegated to their government, is turned against the
Sovereign People, the Public Trust is betrayed. Sadly, centuries of systemic monetary, legal and
political corruption have deeply subverted our government, which has been incorporated to serve the
debt-money system of bondage, extracting wealth for a global power elite who rule at the expense of
the majority.

Nevertheless, the foundation of our government is the Public Trust, over which the People are the
Sovereign power of the Nation.

Every governmental entity, unincorporated or incorporated, is subordinate to the authority of every

sovereign man or woman, and to the sovereign People of every community, for all governments
however formed, are subject to their creators, or simply to the will of the People whose consent they
require to exist.

The beginning of freedom is the realization that your Public Trust is there to serve your Life, not take
it. The Power of your Life is found in your self-awareness, for we intuitively know that no other man
or woman was born as our master.

Sovereignty is your right in Natural Law, but it is not given; it is exercised, and it is held by attention to
your Unalienable Rights.

The paramount responsibility of those People who benefit from their constitutional governance is its
maintenance by any reasonable means that upholds its founding principles.

“It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error, it is the function
of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error.” American Communications Association
vs. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442, (1950)

Page 14 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION

PUBLIC SERVANTS
Public Servants serve the Private Sovereigns who, having founded a constitutional unincorporated
government for the benefit of the People, are governed by their consent.

Your government is a “public institution” with “public servant” employees who serve in a “public
capacity”. Whereas, the people who form governments are “private people” living in their “private
capacity”.

Public Servants serve the Private People who, having instituted a freely-elected representative
government for the benefit of the People, are governed by their consent.

All elected officials and/or employees of the public State are Public Servants, including Peace Officers.

The founding of a representative government by the People automatically forms a Trust in Common
Law, with the People as Beneficiaries, and their Public Servants as Trustees. The Public Servants have
a Fiduciary Duty to serve the Beneficiaries of the Trust.

It is the responsibility of the Private People to oversee their Trust, and their Public Servant employees,
for the common good of their communities and nation.

The government of a sovereign nation is an unincorporated body politic, which enabled by the
delegated power of the People, can create subordinate legal fiction governmental corporations, and
non-governmental corporations, for the purpose of commerce.

Sovereign living people are in the Common Law jurisdiction – the national Law-of-the-Land (lawful),
while legally generated corporate “artificial persons” created by the State are in the
Admiralty/Maritime/Commercial jurisdiction – the international Law-of-the-Sea (legal).

The “Common Law” mirrors “Natural Law” inasmuch as the protection of life is paramount, because
life is a sacred creation. “Natural Law” is a system of “right or justice” held to be common to all
humans and derived from Nature rather than from the rules of society.

Whereas the legal fiction system of commerce is simply an imaginary construct, using “artificial
persons” as “transmitting utilities” to extract and exchange productive energy from the real world.
Hence the Maxim of Law: Legality is not Reality.

Jurisdiction is critical because when a man or woman “acts” in the “role” of an “artificial person” they
are subservient to the State which created it by “registration”. The State prescribes “revocable”
“privileges” and “benefits” to its “persons”, whereas private men and women possess “unalienable”
“rights” and “properties”.

Moreover, “artificial persons” and all corporations are created as debtors by default, having no
creative human energy or innate productive capacity, and therefore they can be bankrupted. This is
why your government has been incorporated and why you are using debt-money, instead of sovereign
money issued debt-free by a sovereign unincorporated government.
Public Servants serve the Private Sovereigns who, having founded a constitutional unincorporated
government for the benefit of the People, are governed by their consent.

Page 15 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION

Your government is a “public institution” with “public servant” employees who serve in a “public
capacity”. Whereas, the people who form governments are “private people” living in their “private
capacity”.

Public Servants serve the Private People who, having instituted a freely-elected representative
government for the benefit of the People, are governed by their consent.

All elected officials and/or employees of the public State are Public Servants, including Peace Officers.

The founding of a representative government by the People automatically forms a Trust in Common
Law, with the People as Beneficiaries, and their Public Servants as Trustees. The Public Servants have
a Fiduciary Duty to serve the Beneficiaries of the Trust.

It is the responsibility of the Private People to oversee their Trust, and their Public Servant employees,
for the common good of their communities and nation.

The government of a sovereign nation is an unincorporated body politic, which enabled by the
delegated power of the People, can create subordinate legal fiction governmental corporations, and
non-governmental corporations, for the purpose of commerce.

Sovereign living people are in the Common Law jurisdiction – the national Law-of-the-Land (lawful),
while legally generated corporate “artificial persons” created by the State are in the
Admiralty/Maritime/Commercial jurisdiction – the international Law-of-the-Sea (legal).

The “Common Law” mirrors “Natural Law” inasmuch as the protection of life is paramount, because
life is a sacred creation. “Natural Law” is a system of “right or justice” held to be common to all
humans and derived from Nature rather than from the rules of society.

Whereas the legal fiction system of commerce is simply an imaginary construct, using “artificial
persons” as “transmitting utilities” to extract and exchange productive energy from the real world.
Hence the Maxim of Law: Legality is not Reality.

Jurisdiction is critical because when a man or woman “acts” in the “role” of an “artificial person” they
are subservient to the State which created it by “registration”. The State prescribes “revocable”
“privileges” and “benefits” to its “persons”, whereas private men and women possess “unalienable”
“rights” and “properties”.

Moreover, “artificial persons” and all corporations are created as debtors by default, having no
creative human energy or innate productive capacity, and therefore they can be bankrupted. This is
why your government has been incorporated and why you are using debt-money, instead of sovereign
money issued debt-free by a sovereign unincorporated government.

When a nation, or community, surrenders its sovereign power to create money without debt or
interest, a deadly economy is inevitable due to the cumulative toxic consequences of interest-bearing
debt. Finally, the system is mathematically guaranteed to collapse, because the interest, which is not
created, compounds exponentially, requiring ever more new debt to service existing debt.

Page 16 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
There are no limits to the growth of debt, and yet all debt is sooner or later a future claim on Nature
as the ultimate limited source of all wealth. Servicing debt requires extracting production at any cost
beyond the limits to growth on our finite planet. The “growth imperative” to service endless debt
causes, overall, a destructive economy.

Given the parasitic nature of debtism, it should be obvious why the Private People are not taught to
uphold their living Common Law jurisdiction, which acknowledges their sovereign “rights already
existing” antecedent to the State.

The sovereign People of any nation have a duty to oversee their governmental Public Servants, failing
which the sovereign People, despite their inherent authority, will sooner or later suffer the
consequences of their negligence, because history teaches us that power corrupts, and absolute
power corrupts absolutely.

When Private People wish to exercise their sovereign authority over their Public Servants,
unincorporated and incorporated, they must have Common Law standing.

Every man or woman, and every community of Private People, can uphold the Common Law, declining
consent if they deem it necessary to avoid harm or loss to any living soul, or to safe-guard their
community, or to protect their living Earth upon which all people depend for life.

A private man or woman can rebut a presentment from a Public Servant, and hold them to account,
by using a process of Conditional Acceptance.

Or, a community of Private People can rebut a decision, a plan, or a policy, of their Public Servants by
holding a People's Assembly in order to exercise their “home rule powers”.

Public Servants serve the Private Sovereigns who, having founded a constitutional unincorporated
government for the benefit of the People, are governed by their consent.

Your government is a “public institution” with “public servant” employees who serve in a “public
capacity”. Whereas, the people who form governments are “private people” living in their “private
capacity”.

Public Servants serve the Private People who, having instituted a freely-elected representative
government for the benefit of the People, are governed by their consent.

All elected officials and/or employees of the public State are Public Servants, including Peace Officers.

The founding of a representative government by the People automatically forms a Trust in Common
Law, with the People as Beneficiaries, and their Public Servants as Trustees. The Public Servants have
a Fiduciary Duty to serve the Beneficiaries of the Trust.

It is the responsibility of the Private People to oversee their Trust, and their Public Servant employees,
for the common good of their communities and nation.

The government of a sovereign nation is an unincorporated body politic, which enabled by the
delegated power of the People, can create subordinate legal fiction governmental corporations, and

Page 17 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
non-governmental corporations, for the purpose of commerce.

Sovereign living people are in the Common Law jurisdiction – the national Law-of-the-Land (lawful),
while legally generated corporate “artificial persons” created by the State are in the
Admiralty/Maritime/Commercial jurisdiction – the international Law-of-the-Sea (legal).

The “Common Law” mirrors “Natural Law” inasmuch as the protection of life is paramount, because
life is a sacred creation. “Natural Law” is a system of “right or justice” held to be common to all
humans and derived from Nature rather than from the rules of society.

Whereas the legal fiction system of commerce is simply an imaginary construct, using “artificial
persons” as “transmitting utilities” to extract and exchange productive energy from the real world.
Hence the Maxim of Law: Legality is not Reality.

Jurisdiction is critical because when a man or woman “acts” in the “role” of an “artificial person” they
are subservient to the State which created it by “registration”. The State prescribes “revocable”
“privileges” and “benefits” to its “persons”, whereas private men and women possess “unalienable”
“rights” and “properties”.

Moreover, “artificial persons” and all corporations are created as debtors by default, having no
creative human energy or innate productive capacity, and therefore they can be bankrupted. This is
why your government has been incorporated and why you are using debt-money, instead of sovereign
money issued debt-free by a sovereign unincorporated government.

When a nation, or community, surrenders its sovereign power to create money without debt or
interest, a deadly economy is inevitable due to the cumulative toxic consequences of interest-bearing
debt. Finally, the system is mathematically guaranteed to collapse, because the interest, which is not
created, compounds exponentially, requiring ever more new debt to service existing debt.

There are no limits to the growth of debt, and yet all debt is sooner or later a future claim on Nature
as the ultimate limited source of all wealth. Servicing debt requires extracting production at any cost
beyond the limits to growth on our finite planet. The “growth imperative” to service endless debt
causes, overall, a destructive economy.

Given the parasitic nature of debtism, it should be obvious why the Private People are not taught to
uphold their living Common Law jurisdiction, which acknowledges their sovereign “rights already
existing” antecedent to the State.

The sovereign People of any nation have a duty to oversee their governmental Public Servants, failing
which the sovereign People, despite their inherent authority, will sooner or later suffer the
consequences of their negligence, because history teaches us that power corrupts, and absolute
power corrupts absolutely.

When Private People wish to exercise their sovereign authority over their Public Servants,
unincorporated and incorporated, they must have Common Law standing.

Every man or woman, and every community of Private People, can uphold the Common Law, declining
consent if they deem it necessary to avoid harm or loss to any living soul, or to safe-guard their

Page 18 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
community, or to protect their living Earth upon which all people depend for life.

A private man or woman can rebut a presentment from a Public Servant, and hold them to account,
by using a process of Conditional Acceptance.

Or, a community of Private People can rebut a decision, a plan, or a policy, of their Public Servants by
holding a People's Assembly in order to exercise their “home rule powers”.

See Home Rule Powers

When a nation, or community, surrenders its sovereign power to create money without debt or
interest, a deadly economy is inevitable due to the cumulative toxic consequences of interest-bearing
debt. Finally, the system is mathematically guaranteed to collapse, because the interest, which is not
created, compounds exponentially, requiring ever more new debt to service existing debt.

There are no limits to the growth of debt, and yet all debt is sooner or later a future claim on Nature
as the ultimate limited source of all wealth. Servicing debt requires extracting production at any cost
beyond the limits to growth on our finite planet. The “growth imperative” to service endless debt
causes, overall, a destructive economy.

Given the parasitic nature of debtism, it should be obvious why the Private People are not taught to
uphold their living Common Law jurisdiction, which acknowledges their sovereign “rights already
existing” antecedent to the State.

The sovereign People of any nation have a duty to oversee their governmental Public Servants, failing
which the sovereign People, despite their inherent authority, will sooner or later suffer the
consequences of their negligence, because history teaches us that power corrupts, and absolute
power corrupts absolutely.

When Private People wish to exercise their sovereign authority over their Public Servants,
unincorporated and incorporated, they must have Common Law standing.

Every man or woman, and every community of Private People, can uphold the Common Law, declining
consent if they deem it necessary to avoid harm or loss to any living soul, or to safe-guard their
community, or to protect their living Earth upon which all people depend for life.

A private man or woman can rebut a presentment from a Public Servant, and hold them to account,
by using a process of Conditional Acceptance.

Or, a community of Private People can rebut a decision, a plan, or a policy, of their Public Servants by
holding a People's Assembly in order to exercise their “home rule powers”.

See Home Rule Powers

Page 19 of 22
 THE GREAT DECEPTION
PEACE OFFICERS
Your Public Servants include all oath-bound Officers of the Law. Most frontline “Police Officers”,
however, perform two roles:

As Peace Officers they uphold the law, discharging their impartial duties under Oath “according to
law”, which is the de jure Common Law Jurisdiction, also known as the “Law of the Land”. They swear
to "keep the peace", by doing their best to keep people and their property safe from harm. They are
protected by a Public Bond, having Limited liability. They have Common Law powers (Constitutional)
delegated by the People.

As Policy Officers they enforce statutes, which prescribe the legal terms and conditions of contracts
with penalties etc., in the de facto Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction, also known as the “Law of the
Sea”. They do NOT swear an Oath to “enforce statutes” in commerce, and are NOT protected by a
Public Bond, having Unlimited full commercial liability. They have Corporate powers (Contractual)
which are subject to Consent.
 
Peace Officer = “Constabulary Powers” = Constitutional
Policy Officer = “Corporate Powers” = Contractual

Revenue gathering for YOURNATION (INC.) in the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction is not part of the
sworn duty of a “Peace Officer/Constable”. An Officer conducting legal fiction commerce in support of
the private debt-money system of bondage can be described as a private mercenary abdicating their
Oath.

“Police Officers” enforcing statutes in legal fiction commerce have NO JURISDICTION over any living
man or woman unless that man or woman consents to that jurisdiction.

All legal jurisdiction over a man or woman requires their consent, and so all presentments from of a
“Police Officer” are a “service” offered by “consent”.
 
“It's important for us to know what people think of our service - in New Zealand we police
by consent and cannot afford to lose the support of the people we serve.” (emphasis added)
http://www.police.govt.nz/featured/service-excellence-police

Page 20 of 22
THE GREAT DECEPTION

Page 21 of 22
THE GREAT DECEPTION

Page 22 of 22