Questionnaires and interviews are two common self-report techniques used to assess participants' thoughts and experiences. Questionnaires use written questions to collect data, which can be open-ended or closed-format, while interviews involve a live interaction where an interviewer asks questions. Both techniques aim to gather qualitative and quantitative data but have some limitations, such as acquiescence bias, social desirability bias, and variability between interviewers. Unstructured interviews provide flexibility but analysis is difficult, while structured interviews and questionnaires standardize the format but may frustrate participants.
Questionnaires and interviews are two common self-report techniques used to assess participants' thoughts and experiences. Questionnaires use written questions to collect data, which can be open-ended or closed-format, while interviews involve a live interaction where an interviewer asks questions. Both techniques aim to gather qualitative and quantitative data but have some limitations, such as acquiescence bias, social desirability bias, and variability between interviewers. Unstructured interviews provide flexibility but analysis is difficult, while structured interviews and questionnaires standardize the format but may frustrate participants.
Questionnaires and interviews are two common self-report techniques used to assess participants' thoughts and experiences. Questionnaires use written questions to collect data, which can be open-ended or closed-format, while interviews involve a live interaction where an interviewer asks questions. Both techniques aim to gather qualitative and quantitative data but have some limitations, such as acquiescence bias, social desirability bias, and variability between interviewers. Unstructured interviews provide flexibility but analysis is difficult, while structured interviews and questionnaires standardize the format but may frustrate participants.
Questionnaires – a set of written questions (sometimes referred to as items) to
which the participant responds to, used to assess a person’s thoughts and/or experiences. A questionnaire may be used in an experiment to assess the dependant variable. For example, whether views on legalisation of specific recreational drugs are different in older and younger people. Questions in a questionnaire can be broadly divided into open questions and closed questions. Open questions: does not have a fixed range of answers and respondents are free to answer in which ever way they wish. For example, asking ppts in an energy experiment how they felt during investigation or why they thought they became more talkative (assuming they have). Open questions tend to produce more qualitative data that is rich in depth and may be difficult to analyse. Closed questions: offers a fixed number of responses, questions tend to be restricted to two options of ‘yes or no’. Alternatively, participants can be given a scale from 1-10 for example ow sociable they felt once consuming the energy drink. Closed questions produce numerical data due to limiting the answers respondents can give They tend to produce more quantitative data, this is usually easier to analyse but it may lack the depth and detail which is associated to open questions. Problems with Questions on : Acquiescence bias: suggests that respondents were not focusing on the content of the questions but were simply answering at their preferred end of the scale (which was probably the 'agreement' end). If respondents were answering truthfully on both occasions, then we would expect a negative correlation between the two sets of results as the scale for each item had been reversed. Social desirability: Interviews Interview – a ‘live ‘encounter where one person a set of questions to assess an interviewees thoughts/experiences. These may be conduced over the phone, face to face etc. The questions which are asked during an interview may be pre-set (structured) or may develop as the interview goes along (unstructured). Structured: made up of a pre-determined set of questions that are asked in a fixed order, its practically like a questionnaire but conducted between interviewee or interviewer. AO3: They are straight forward to replicate due to standardised format, format also reduces the differences between interviewers. Strength == reduces interviewer bias However, it may be extremely frustrating for interviewees as they would be heavily restricted and would no be bale to elaborate or resist the sequence of the interview. Unstructured: works more like a conversation, no set questions. There’s usually a general aim that a certain topic will be discussed and interaction tends to be free-flowing. Interviewee is encouraged to expand and elaborate their answers as prompted by interviewer. AO3: Much more flexible than structured as it allows the interviewer to gain a better insight of the interviewee. However the analysis isn’t straight forward and drawing conclusions may be difficult as irrelevant info can conceal important details. As with questionnaires there’s a risk interviewee may lie to gain social desirability however a skilled experienced interviewer should be able to establish sufficient rapport with ppt so that responses are truthful and sincere.