Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UUSIL Chapter 1 1.2
UUSIL Chapter 1 1.2
UUSIL Chapter 1 1.2
p. 13
States. lt also held that the Proclamation did
not violate the Establishment Clause. This is an
important case because it touches on many
issues regarding presidential powers.
On April 18, 2017, the President signed an
Executive Order entitled "Buy American and
Hire American" 41 that seeks to maximize
"through terms and conditions of Federal
financia! assistance awards and Federal
procurements, the use of goods, products, and
materials produced in the United States."
Additionally, the Order seeks to "rigorously
enforce and administer the laws governing
entry into the United States of workers from
abroad," in order to protect the economic
interests of U.S. workers. The effects of these
orders are discussed 1n Chapter 3,
Nonimmigrant Visas for lntracompany
Transferees, Trade and lnvestment, and
Professional Employment, and Chapter 7,
Employment-Based and Self-Sponsored
lmmigration.
A signiflcant increase in the number of
foreign nationals seeking asylum in the United
States at the U.S.- Mexican border, particularly
families from Central America, has prompted
the iritroduction of a variety of policies meant
to discourage migration. In May 2018, then-
Attorney General Jeffrey Sessions announced
a "zero tolerance" immigration policy, where
individuals, including parents who crossed the
border seeking asylum, were prosecuted
criminally. This culminated in the deliberate
separation of children from their parents,
sending the children to shelters and detention
facilities in what became known as the family
separation policy. Widespread public
opposition caused the policy to be withdrawn.
At the time of writing this edition of the book,
new efforts to stem the flow of asylum seekers
continue to be introduced, including the
Migration Protection Protocols,42 which
requires asylum seekers entering from Mexico
to be returned there while their asylum
application is processed in the United States.
The case is currently under challenge. 43
p. 14
federal courts also play a role in rev1ew1ng a
statute, regulation, or decision and determining
whether it should be modifled, explained, or
discarded. The role of these government
entities is depicted in Figure 1.1.
Figure 1.1
p. 15
Figure 1.2
Execul1ve Branch
Conc.ular Offic~
tmm1gratton and Customs
Enforcement
(ICT)
L Board of lmm1grat1on
Appeals
(BIA)
.:1nd fmmagrat1on Courts
L Employment and Tra1nmg
Admin
Office of Foreign Labor
Cert1fic.at1on (ETA)
Customs ,m d Borde,
Protect1on
iCBPi
p. 16
security or other concerns about his reason
for being here. Once Domenic enters the
country, he is expected to attend classes,
since this is the purpose for which he was
issued a visa. lf he fails to attend, the school
can report him to ICE, which may place him in
removal or deportation proceedings where a
U.S. immigration judge will decide in
immigration court if he will have to leave the
country. The court is part of the DOJ's EOIR. lf
Domenic can show he had a good reason for
not attending class - perhaps he was very ill
- he can apply to the USCIS to ask that it
reinstate his student status. Once reinstated,
Domenic can explain this to the immigration
judge and ask him or her to terminate his
proceedings so that he will no longer be
subject to deportation.
p. 17
law" as proscribed 1n the Fourteenth
Amendment. 47 Far immigration purposes,
therefore, no one within the United States can
be deported without sorne form of adjudication
to determine whether the removal decision is
appropriate.
Under the Supremacy Clause,48 the federal
government's laws supersede state laws when
there is a conflict. This is particularly important
when it comes to immigration laws. The scope
of federal regulation of immigration law has
often been the subject of litigation related to
the concept known as preemption, which
means when there is a conflict between federal
law and state or local law, the federal law
governs. When a state or local statute presents
an obstacle to the accomplishment of a federal
purpose, or when a person or entity cannot
comply with both the state and federal law,
preemption requires that the latter govern.
Federal case law continues to be invoked to
determine the division of power between
federal and state authorities with respect to
immigration enforcement.
Case for Discussion
D.2.a. Statutes
p. 18
D.2.b. Regulations
p. 19
D.3.a. Websites
p.20
D.3.c. lnternational Law
E. l . A Nonimmigrant Visa
This nonimmigrant visa, as shown in Figure 1.3,
contains the name and date of birth of the
holder and the country and particular consular
offlce where the visa was issued. In addition,
we can learn the date and the purpose for
which the visa was issued and the length of the
visa's validity. lt is stamped 81/8-2 visa,
denoting a tourist visa, issued for the purpose
of traveling temporarily to the United States. lt
was issued on April 8, 2003 in Seoul, South
Korea and is a multi-entry visa, valid for ten
years. This means the holder can travel back
and forth between her home country and the
United States using this visa to gain entry as a
tourist theoretically for as many times as she
likes in that ten-year period. lf, instead of an M
for "multiple entries," the numeral 1 appeared
under Entries, then the visa would only be valid
for a single visit to the United States. However,
the actual time the foreign national can remain
in the country in this category will be
determined by the C8P offlcer at the border,
who will entera stamp in the person's passport
to indicate this period. A selection of
nonimmigrant visa categories is shown in
Table 1.1.
p. 21
Figure 1.3
ELEL<-<HAPP.
----
8~0R50010l3 07183SE0001L
---__··-
·--·
_
_.,
.._ For . . _ ., an
-SEIIIS--
~ __ _ ......
_. _...,...,.,.
111111...,,ou
U.S. lllalnolqlocll>
--lona,oumey,uy
In . . u.s.
viur
s.. - - .io.
Crewmember D
p.22
1 Employee of a designated Gl-G5, NATO
internatianal arganizatian ar NATO
Exchange visitar J
visitar
lntra-campany transferee L
1
Media, jaurnalist
Physician J, H-1 B
Religiaus warker R
p.23
Figure 1.4
G•U-tf._..,
Rttrteval
u
LYOIA
81r910IIIGlll200IIII~ 01.-trtNO
Pnapo.1n •- Ptnu»u
°'
0111 Enlr1. , moonm °"11'2012
0nl of Adnallon: 81
p. 24
The card was evidence of lawful admission into
the United States, the expiration date of the
individual's authorized stay (in sorne cases
"D/S," or "duration of stay," 52 was noted in lieu
of a date), and the nonimmigrant classiflcation
under which entry was granted. lt was not
issued to immigrants returning to the United
States. In arder to streamline the admission
process and reduce costs, however, CBP
phased out the 1-94 card. Now, all
nonimmigrants arriving by air or sea no longer
receive a card. Rather, the information is
collected electronically and can be accessed
online at a later time by the foreign national. 53
Those arnv1ng by land and certain
humanitarian immigrants such as refugees,
still receive a paper 1-94 Arrival/Departure
Record card. Those that do not receive one will
be given an admission stamp in his or her
passport or travel document instead,
annotated with the date of admission, the
admission classiflcation, and the date the
period of stay expires. A sample of the
electronic card is in Figure 7.4.