Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

1
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

SCOPE 
SCOPE .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1

DEAD LOADING ................................................................................................................................................................................... 2

LIVE LOADING ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2

SNOW LOADING .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3

WIND LOADING ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4

ROOF TRUSS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN .......................................................................................................................................... 11

FLOOR BEAM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN .......................................................................................................................................... 29

2 FLOOR LOAD BEARING WALL PANEL DESIGN ......................................................................................................................... 31

1 FLOOR LOAD BEARING WALL PANEL DESIGN ......................................................................................................................... 39

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN .......................................................................................................................................... 46

 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

2
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

DEAD LOADING

DEAD LOAD CONSTRUCTION

1 Floor

Material Thickness  Weight

3
(mm) (kN/m ) (kN/m2)
Timber crate 150 0.500
Polystyrene 150 2 0.300
Totals 300 0.800

2 Floor

Material Thickness  Weight

(mm) (kN/m3) (kN/m2)
Oriented strand board 10 7 0.070
Woodwool 150 6 0.900
Oriented strand board 20 7 0.140
Plywood 20 7 0.140
Totals 200 1.250

Roof

Material Thickness  Weight

3
(mm) (kN/m ) (kN/m2)
Oriented strand board 22 7 0.154
Roof tiles clay 10 19 0.190
Totals 32 0.344

Ceiling

Material Thickness  Weight

(mm) (kN/m3) (kN/m2)
Oriented strand board 10 7 0.070
Woodwool 150 6 0.900
Totals 160 0.970

LIVE LOADING
LEVEL Weight
(kN/m2
1 FLOOR 2.0

2FLOOR 2.0

ROOF 0.5
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

3
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

SNOW LOADING (EN1991)

SNOW LOADING
In accordance with EN1991-1-3:2003+A1:2015 incorporating corrigenda dated December 2004 and March 2009 and the
recommended values
Tedds calculation version 1.0.10

Characteristic ground snow load

Climatic region Central East
Location Stare Budy
Site altitude above sea level A = 50 m
Zone number Z = 1.0
Density of snow  = 2.00 kN/m3
Characteristic ground snow load sk = ((0.264  Z - 0.002)  (1 + (A / 256m)2))  1kN/m2 = 0.27 kN/m2
Exposure coefficient (Normal) Ce = 1.0
Thermal coefficient Ct = 1.0
Snow fence Present
Building details
Roof type Duopitch
Width of roof (left on elevation) b1 = 3.72 m
Width of roof (right on elevation) b2 = 3.72 m
Slope of roof (left on elevation) 1 = 30.00 deg
Slope of roof (right on elevation) 2 = 30.00 deg

Shape coefficients
Shape coefficient roof (Table 5.2) 2_1 = 0.80
Shape coefficient roof (Table 5.2) 2_2 = 0.80

Loadcase 1 Table 5.2

Loading to roof 1 (LHS) s1_1 = 2_1  Ce  Ct  sk = 0.22 kN/m2
Loading to roof 2 (RHS) s2_1 = 2_2  Ce  Ct  sk = 0.22 kN/m2
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

4
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Loadcase 2 Table 5.2

Loading to roof 1 (LHS) s1_2 = 0.5  2_1  Ce  Ct  sk = 0.11 kN/m2
Loading to roof 2 (RHS) s2_2 = 2_2  Ce  Ct  sk = 0.22 kN/m2

Loadcase 3 Table 5.2

Loading to roof 1 (LHS) s1_3 = 2_1  Ce  Ct  sk = 0.22 kN/m2
Loading to roof 2 (RHS) s2_3 = 0.5  2_2  Ce  Ct  sk = 0.11 kN/m2

WIND LOADING (EN1991)

WIND LOADING
In accordance with EN1991-1-3:2005+A1:2010 and the recommended values
Tedds calculation version 3.0.22

Building data
Type of roof Duopitch
Length of building L = 9650 mm
Width of building W = 7200 mm
Height to eaves H = 8100 mm
Pitch of roof 0 = 30.0 deg
Total height h = 10178 mm
Basic values
Fundamental basic wind velocity vb,0 = 22.0 m/s
Season factor cseason = 1.00
Direction factor cdir = 1.00
Shape parameter K K = 0.2
Exponent n n = 0.5
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

5
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Air density  = 1.250 kg/m3

Probability factor cprob = [(1 - K  ln(-ln(1-p)))/(1 - K  ln(-ln(0.98)))]n = 1.00
Basic wind velocity (Exp. 4.1) vb = cdir  cseason  vb,0  cprob = 22.0 m/s
Reference mean velocity pressure qb = 0.5    vb2 = 0.303 kN/m2

Orography
Orography factor not significant co = 1.0
Terrain category III
Displacement height (sheltering effect excluded) hdis = 0mm
The velocity pressure for the windward face of the building with a 0 degree wind is to be considered as 1 part as the
height h is less than b (cl.7.2.2)
The velocity pressure for the windward face of the building with a 90 degree wind is to be considered as 2 parts as the
height h is greater than b but less than 2b (cl.7.2.2)
Peak velocity pressure - windward wall - Wind 0 deg and roof
Reference height (at which q is sought) z = 8100mm
Displacement height (sheltering effects excluded) hdis = 0 mm
Roughness length (Table 4.1) z0 = 300 mm
Roughness length (Category II) z0,II = 50 mm
Minimum height (Table 4.1) zmin = 5000 mm
Maximum height zmax = 200000 mm
Terrain factor kr = 0.19  (z0 / z0,II)0.07 = 0.215
Roughness factor cr = kr  ln(z / z0) = 0.71
Mean wind vm = cr  co  vb = 15.6 m/s
Turbulence factor kI = 1.0
Turbulence intensity Iv = kI / (co  ln(z / z0)) = 0.303
Peak velocity pressure qp = (1 + 7  Iv)  0.5    vm2 = 0.48 kN/m2

Structural factor
Building type Other
Structural factor (Annex D) csCd = 1.000
Peak velocity pressure - windward wall (lower part) - Wind 90 deg
Reference height (at which q is sought) z = 7200mm
Displacement height (sheltering effects excluded) hdis = 0 mm
Terrain factor kr = 0.19  (z0 / z0,II)0.07 = 0.215
Roughness factor cr = kr  ln(z / z0) = 0.68
Mean wind vm = cr  co  vb = 15.1 m/s
Turbulence factor kI = 1.0
Turbulence intensity Iv = kI / (co  ln(z / z0)) = 0.315
Peak velocity pressure qp = (1 + 7  Iv)  0.5    vm2 = 0.45 kN/m2
Peak velocity pressure - windward wall (upper part) - Wind 90 deg and roof
Reference height (at which q is sought) z = 10178mm
Displacement height (sheltering effects excluded) hdis = 0 mm
Terrain factor kr = 0.19  (z0 / z0,II)0.07 = 0.215
Roughness factor cr = kr  ln(z / z0) = 0.76
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

6
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Mean wind vm = cr  co  vb = 16.7 m/s

Turbulence factor kI = 1.0
Turbulence intensity Iv = kI / (co  ln(z / z0)) = 0.284
Peak velocity pressure qp = (1 + 7  Iv)  0.5    vm2 = 0.52 kN/m2

Peak velocity pressure for internal pressure

Peak velocity pressure – internal (as roof press.) qp,i = 0.52 kN/m2
Pressures and forces
Net pressure p = csCd  qp  cpe - qp,i  cpi
Net force Fw = pw  Aref

Roof load case 1 - Wind 0, cpi 0.20, -cpe

Ext pressure Peak velocity
Net pressure Area Net force
Zone coefficient pressure
p (kN/m2) Aref (m2) Fw (kN)
cpe qp, (kN/m2)
F (-ve) -0.50 0.52 -0.36 5.38 -1.96
G (-ve) -0.50 0.52 -0.36 5.38 -1.96
H (-ve) -0.20 0.52 -0.21 29.36 -6.11
I (-ve) -0.40 0.52 -0.31 29.36 -9.17
J (-ve) -0.50 0.52 -0.36 10.75 -3.92
Total vertical net force Fw,v = -20.02 kN
Total horizontal net force Fw,h = 1.53 kN
Walls load case 1 - Wind 0, cpi 0.20, -cpe
Ext pressure Peak velocity
Net pressure Area Net force
Zone coefficient pressure
p (kN/m2) Aref (m2) Fw (kN)
cpe qp, (kN/m2)
A -1.20 0.52 -0.73 16.71 -12.18
B -0.80 0.52 -0.52 49.09 -25.55
D 0.80 0.48 0.28 78.17 21.64
E -0.52 0.48 -0.35 78.17 -27.52
Overall loading
Equiv leeward net force for overall section Fl = Fw,wE = -27.5 kN
Net windward force for overall section Fw = Fw,wD = 21.6 kN
Lack of correlation (cl.7.2.2(3) – Note) fcorr = 0.87 as h/W is 1.414
Overall loading overall section Fw,D = fcorr  (Fw - Fl) + Fw,h = 44.1 kN

Roof load case 2 - Wind 0, cpi -0.3, +cpe

 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

7
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Ext pressure Peak velocity

Net pressure Area Net force
Zone coefficient pressure
p (kN/m2) Aref (m2) Fw (kN)
cpe qp, (kN/m2)
F (+ve) 0.70 0.52 0.52 5.38 2.80
G (+ve) 0.70 0.52 0.52 5.38 2.80
H (+ve) 0.40 0.52 0.36 29.36 10.70
I (+ve) -0.40 0.52 -0.05 29.36 -1.53
J (+ve) -0.50 0.52 -0.10 10.75 -1.12
Total vertical net force Fw,v = 11.82 kN
Total horizontal net force Fw,h = 9.47 kN
Walls load case 2 - Wind 0, cpi -0.3, +cpe
Ext pressure Peak velocity
Net pressure Area Net force
Zone coefficient pressure
p (kN/m2) Aref (m2) Fw (kN)
cpe qp, (kN/m2)
A -1.20 0.52 -0.47 16.71 -7.83
B -0.80 0.52 -0.26 49.09 -12.78
D 0.80 0.48 0.54 78.17 41.98
E -0.52 0.48 -0.09 78.17 -7.18
Overall loading
Equiv leeward net force for overall section Fl = Fw,wE = -7.2 kN
Net windward force for overall section Fw = Fw,wD = 42.0 kN
Lack of correlation (cl.7.2.2(3) – Note) fcorr = 0.87 as h/W is 1.414
Overall loading overall section Fw,D = fcorr  (Fw - Fl) + Fw,h = 52.0 kN

Roof load case 3 - Wind 90, cpi 0.20, -cpe

Ext pressure Peak velocity
Net pressure Area Net force
Zone coefficient pressure
p (kN/m2) Aref (m2) Fw (kN)
cpe qp, (kN/m2)
F (-ve) -1.10 0.52 -0.68 2.99 -2.03
G (-ve) -1.40 0.52 -0.83 2.99 -2.49
H (-ve) -0.80 0.52 -0.52 23.94 -12.46
I (-ve) -0.50 0.52 -0.36 50.30 -18.33
Total vertical net force Fw,v = -30.58 kN
Total horizontal net force Fw,h = 0.00 kN
Walls load case 3 - Wind 90, cpi 0.20, -cpe
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

8
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Ext pressure Peak velocity

Net pressure Area Net force
Zone coefficient pressure
p (kN/m2) Aref (m2) Fw (kN)
cpe qp, (kN/m2)
A -1.20 0.48 -0.68 11.66 -7.88
B -0.80 0.48 -0.49 46.66 -22.63
C -0.50 0.48 -0.34 19.85 -6.79
Db 0.80 0.45 0.26 51.84 13.43
Du 0.80 0.52 0.31 13.96 4.36
E -0.50 0.52 -0.37 65.80 -24.07
Overall loading
Equiv leeward net force for upper section Fl = Fw,wE / Aref,wE  Aref,wu = -5.1 kN
Net windward force for upper section Fw = Fw,wu = 4.4 kN
Lack of correlation (cl.7.2.2(3) – Note) fcorr = 0.85 as h/L is 1.055
Overall loading upper section Fw,u = fcorr  (Fw - Fl) + Fw,h = 8.1 kN
Equiv leeward net force for bottom section Fl = Fw,wE / Aref,wE  Aref,wb = -19.0 kN
Net windward force for bottom section Fw = Fw,wb = 13.4 kN
Lack of correlation (cl.7.2.2(3) – Note) fcorr = 0.85 as h/L is 1.055
Overall loading bottom section Fw,b = fcorr  (Fw - Fl) = 27.6 kN

Roof load case 4 - Wind 90, cpi -0.3, -cpe

Ext pressure Peak velocity
Net pressure Area Net force
Zone coefficient pressure
p (kN/m2) Aref (m2) Fw (kN)
cpe qp, (kN/m2)
F (-ve) -1.10 0.52 -0.42 2.99 -1.25
G (-ve) -1.40 0.52 -0.57 2.99 -1.71
H (-ve) -0.80 0.52 -0.26 23.94 -6.23
I (-ve) -0.50 0.52 -0.10 50.30 -5.24
Total vertical net force Fw,v = -12.49 kN
Total horizontal net force Fw,h = 0.00 kN
Walls load case 4 - Wind 90, cpi -0.3, -cpe
Ext pressure Peak velocity
Net pressure Area Net force
Zone coefficient pressure
p (kN/m2) Aref (m2) Fw (kN)
cpe qp, (kN/m2)
A -1.20 0.48 -0.42 11.66 -4.84
B -0.80 0.48 -0.22 46.66 -10.49
C -0.50 0.48 -0.08 19.85 -1.63
Db 0.80 0.45 0.52 51.84 26.92
Du 0.80 0.52 0.57 13.96 7.99
E -0.50 0.52 -0.11 65.80 -6.94
Overall loading
Equiv leeward net force for upper section Fl = Fw,wE / Aref,wE  Aref,wu = -1.5 kN
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

9
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Net windward force for upper section Fw = Fw,wu = 8.0 kN

Lack of correlation (cl.7.2.2(3) – Note)
Overall loading upper section
Equiv leeward net force for bottom section
Net windward force for bottom section
Lack of correlation (cl.7.2.2(3) – Note)
Overall loading bottom section
fcorr = 0.85 as h/L is 1.055
Fw,u = fcorr  (Fw - Fl) + Fw,h = 8.1 kN
Fl = Fw,wE / Aref,wE  Aref,wb = -5.5 kN
Fw = Fw,wb = 26.9 kN
fcorr = 0.85 as h/L is 1.055
Fw,b = fcorr  (Fw - Fl) = 27.6 kN
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

10
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

ROOF TRUSS ANALYSIS & DESIGN (EN1995)

TIMBER MEMBER ANALYSIS & DESIGN (EN1995-1-1:2004)

In accordance with EN1995-1-1:2004 + A2:2014 incorporating corrigendum June 2006 and the recommended values
Tedds calculation version 2.1.03

ANALYSIS
Tedds calculation version 1.0.27
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

11
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Results
Total deflection
1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.5RQ (Strength) - Total deflection

1.0G + 1.0Q + 1.0RQ (Service) - Total deflection

1.0G + 1.02Q (Quasi) - Total deflection

Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

12
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.50S (Strength) - Total deflection

1.0G + 1.0Q + 0.5S (Service) - Total deflection

1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.5S (Strength) - Total deflection

 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

13
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.50RQ (Strength) - Total deflection

1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.50S (Strength) - Total deflection

1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.5RQ (Strength) - Total deflection

 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

14
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.50S (Strength) - Total deflection

1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.5S (Strength) - Total deflection

Node deflections
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.5RQ (Strength)
Node Deflection Rotation Co-ordinate
system
X Z
(mm) (mm) ()
1 0 0 0.68056
2 0.3 0 -0.69025
3 0.2 0.6 0.00779
Load combination: 1.0G + 1.0Q + 1.0RQ (Service)
Node Deflection Rotation Co-ordinate
system
X Z
(mm) (mm) ()
1 0 0 0.50448
2 0.2 0 -0.50448
3 0.1 0.5 0
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

15
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Load combination: 1.0G + 1.02Q (Quasi)

Node Deflection Rotation Co-ordinate
system
X Z
(mm) (mm) ()
1 0 0 0.50677
2 0.2 0 -0.46156
3 0.1 0.4 -0.03634
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.50S (Strength)
Node Deflection Rotation Co-ordinate
system
X Z
(mm) (mm) ()
1 0 0 0.69972
2 0.4 0 -0.70941
3 0.2 0.7 0.00779
Load combination: 1.0G + 1.0Q + 0.5S (Service)
Node Deflection Rotation Co-ordinate
system
X Z
(mm) (mm) ()
1 0 0 0.51725
2 0.3 0 -0.51725
3 0.1 0.5 0
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.5S (Strength)
Node Deflection Rotation Co-ordinate
system
X Z
(mm) (mm) ()
1 0 0 0.72035
2 0.4 0 -0.70097
3 0.2 0.7 -0.01558
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.50RQ (Strength)
Node Deflection Rotation Co-ordinate
system
X Z
(mm) (mm) ()
1 0 0 0.68203
2 0.3 0 -0.66266
3 0.2 0.6 -0.01558
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

16
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Load combination: 1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.50S (Strength)

Node Deflection Rotation Co-ordinate
system
X Z
(mm) (mm) ()
1 0 0 0.70119
2 0.3 0 -0.68181
3 0.2 0.7 -0.01558
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.5RQ (Strength)
Node Deflection Rotation Co-ordinate
system
X Z
(mm) (mm) ()
1 0 0 0.57774
2 0.3 0 -0.60051
3 0.1 0.6 0.0183
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.50S (Strength)
Node Deflection Rotation Co-ordinate
system
X Z
(mm) (mm) ()
1 0 0 0.5969
2 0.3 0 -0.61967
3 0.2 0.6 0.0183
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.5S (Strength)
Node Deflection Rotation Co-ordinate
system
X Z
(mm) (mm) ()
1 0 0 0.61753
2 0.3 0 -0.61123
3 0.2 0.6 -0.00506
Total base reactions
Load case/combination Force
FX FZ
(kN) (kN)
1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.5RQ (Strength) 0 12.9
1.0G + 1.0Q + 1.0RQ (Service) 0 9.4
1.0G + 1.02Q (Quasi) 0 8.5
1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.50S (Strength) 0 13.8
1.0G + 1.0Q + 0.5S (Service) 0 10
1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.5S (Strength) 0 14.1
1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.50RQ 0 12.4
(Strength)
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

17
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Load case/combination Force

FX FZ
(kN) (kN)
1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.50S 0 13.2
(Strength)
1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.5RQ (Strength) 0 11.3
1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.50S 0 12.2
(Strength)
1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.5S 0 12.5
(Strength)
Element end forces
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.5RQ (Strength)
Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment
(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
1 7.44 1 5 -3.2 2.8
2 -5 -3.2 -2.8
2 4.4 1 -5.9 -0.1 -2.8
3 4.2 -2.6 -2.8
3 4.4 3 -4.2 -2.7 2.8
2 6 -0.2 2.8
Load combination: 1.0G + 1.0Q + 1.0RQ (Service)
Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment
(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
1 7.44 1 3.6 -2.4 2.1
2 -3.6 -2.4 -2.1
2 4.4 1 -4.3 -0.1 -2.1
3 3.1 -1.9 -2.1
3 4.4 3 -3.1 -1.9 2.1
2 4.3 -0.1 2.1
Load combination: 1.0G + 1.02Q (Quasi)
Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment
(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
1 7.44 1 3.2 -2.3 2
2 -3.2 -2.4 -2.2
2 4.4 1 -3.8 -0.1 -2
3 2.6 -1.9 -1.9
3 4.4 3 -2.8 -1.5 1.9
2 3.6 0.3 2.2
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.50S (Strength)
Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment
(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
1 7.44 1 5.4 -3.2 2.8
2 -5.4 -3.2 -2.7
2 4.4 1 -6.5 -0.2 -2.8
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

18
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment

(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
3 4.6 -2.8 -3
3 4.4 3 -4.5 -2.9 3
2 6.6 -0.3 2.7
Load combination: 1.0G + 1.0Q + 0.5S (Service)
Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment
(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
1 7.44 1 3.9 -2.4 2
2 -3.9 -2.4 -2
2 4.4 1 -4.7 -0.2 -2
3 3.3 -2.1 -2.2
3 4.4 3 -3.3 -2.1 2.2
2 4.7 -0.2 2
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.5S (Strength)
Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment
(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
1 7.44 1 5.5 -3.2 2.7
2 -5.5 -3.2 -2.8
2 4.4 1 -6.8 -0.4 -2.7
3 4.6 -3 -3.1
3 4.4 3 -4.7 -2.9 3.1
2 6.7 -0.2 2.8
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.50RQ (Strength)
Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment
(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
1 7.44 1 4.7 -3.2 2.8
2 -4.7 -3.2 -2.9
2 4.4 1 -5.6 -0.1 -2.8
3 3.9 -2.6 -2.7
3 4.4 3 -4 -2.4 2.7
2 5.5 0.1 2.9
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.50S (Strength)
Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment
(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
1 7.44 1 5.1 -3.2 2.7
2 -5.1 -3.2 -2.8
2 4.4 1 -6.2 -0.3 -2.7
3 4.3 -2.8 -2.9
3 4.4 3 -4.4 -2.7 2.9
2 6.1 -0.1 2.8
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

19
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Load combination: 1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.5RQ (Strength)

Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment
(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
1 7.44 1 4.4 -2.7 2.4
2 -4.4 -2.7 -2.3
2 4.4 1 -5.2 0 -2.4
3 3.8 -2.3 -2.5
3 4.4 3 -3.6 -2.4 2.5
2 5.3 -0.3 2.3
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.5Q + 1.50S (Strength)
Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment
(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
1 7.44 1 4.8 -2.7 2.4
2 -4.8 -2.7 -2.3
2 4.4 1 -5.8 -0.2 -2.4
3 4.1 -2.5 -2.6
3 4.4 3 -4 -2.6 2.6
2 5.9 -0.4 2.3
Load combination: 1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.5S (Strength)
Element Length Nodes Axial force Shear force Moment
(m) Start/End (kN) (kN) (kNm)
1 7.44 1 4.9 -2.7 2.3
2 -4.9 -2.7 -2.3
2 4.4 1 -6 -0.4 -2.3
3 4.1 -2.6 -2.7
3 4.4 3 -4.2 -2.6 2.7
2 6 -0.3 2.3
Forces
Strength combinations - Moment envelope (kNm)
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

20
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Strength combinations - Shear envelope (kN)

Member results
Envelope - Strength combinations
Member Shear force Moment
Pos Max abs Pos Max Pos Min
(m) (kN) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm)
Bottom Chord 7.44 -3.2 (max abs) 3.705 3.2 (max) 7.44 -2.9
Left Rafter 4.4 -3 0.109 2.8 4.4 -3.1 (min)
Right Rafter 0 2.9 4.4 2.9 0 -3.1 (min)

Bottom Chord - Span 1

Partial factor for material properties and resistances
Partial factor for material properties - Table 2.3 M = 1.250

Member details
Load duration - cl.2.3.1.2 Permanent
Service class - cl.2.3.1.3 1
Glulam section details
Number of timber sections in member N=1
Breadth of sections b = 50 mm
Depth of sections h = 200 mm
Glulam strength class - EN 14080:2013 - Table 6 GL24c
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

21
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Span details
Left hand bearing length Lb_e1 = 150 mm
Right hand bearing length Lb_e2 = 100 mm

Consider Combination 6 - 1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.5S (Strength)

Modification factors
Duration of load and moisture content - Table 3.1 kmod = 0.6
Deformation factor - Table 3.2 kdef = 0.6
Depth factor for bending - Major axis - exp.3.2 kh,m,y = min((600 mm / h)0.1, 1.1) = 1.1
Depth factor for tension - exp.3.2 kh,t = min((600 mm / max(b, h))0.1, 1.1) = 1.1
Bending stress re-distribution factor - cl.6.1.6(2) km = 0.7
Crack factor for shear resistance - cl.6.1.7(2) kcr = 0.67
Load configuration factor - cl.6.1.5(4) kc,90 = 1.75
Check tension parallel to the grain - Section 6.1.2
Axial tension Pd = 5.519 kN
Design tensile stress t,0,d = Pd / (b  min(hef_e1, hef_e2)) = 0.566 N/mm2
Design tensile strength ft,0,d = kh,t  kmod  ft.0.g.k / M = 8.976 N/mm2
t,0,d / ft,0,d = 0.063
PASS - Design tensile strength exceeds design tensile stress

Check design 3705 mm along span

Check bending moment - Section 6.1.6
Design bending moment My,d = 3.202 kNm
Design bending stress m,y,d = My,d / Wy = 9.607 N/mm2
Design bending strength fm,y,d = kh,m,y  kmod  fm.g.k / M = 12.672 N/mm2
m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.758
PASS - Design bending strength exceeds design bending stress
Check combined bending and axial compression - Section 6.2.4
Combined loading checks - exp.6.17 & 6.18 t,0,d / ft,0,d + m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.821
t,0,d / ft,0,d + km  m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.594
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

22
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

PASS - Combined bending and axial tension utilisation is acceptable

Check design at end of span

Check compression perpendicular to the grain - cl.6.1.5
Design perpendicular compression - major axis Fc,y,90,d = 6.95 kN
Effective contact length Lb,ef = Lb_e2 = 100 mm
Design perpendicular compressive stress - exp.6.4 c,y,90,d = Fc,y,90,d / (b  Lb,ef) = 1.390 N/mm2
Design perpendicular compressive strength fc,y,90,d = kmod  fc.90.g.k / M = 1.200 N/mm2
c,y,90,d / (kc,90  fc,y,90,d) = 0.662
PASS - Design perpendicular compression strength exceeds design perpendicular compression stress
Check shear force - Section 6.1.7
Design shear force Fy,d = 3.206 kN
Design shear stress - exp.6.60 y,d = 1.5  Fy,d / (kcr  b  h) = 0.718 N/mm2
Design shear strength fv,y,d = kmod  fv.g.k / M = 1.680 N/mm2
y,d / fv,y,d = 0.427
PASS - Design shear strength exceeds design shear stress
Check bending moment - Section 6.1.6
Design bending moment My,d = 2.786 kNm
Design bending stress m,y,d = My,d / Wy = 8.358 N/mm2
Design bending strength fm,y,d = kh,m,y  kmod  fm.g.k / M = 12.672 N/mm2
m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.66
PASS - Design bending strength exceeds design bending stress
Check combined bending and axial compression - Section 6.2.4
Combined loading checks - exp.6.17 & 6.18 t,0,d / ft,0,d + m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.723
t,0,d / ft,0,d + km  m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.525
PASS - Combined bending and axial tension utilisation is acceptable

Consider Combination 2 - 1.0G + 1.0Q + 1.0RQ (Service)

Check design 3720 mm along span

Check y-y axis deflection - Section 7.2
Instantaneous deflection y = 31 mm
Final deflection y,Final = y  (1 + kdef) = 49.6 mm
Allowable deflection y,Allowable = Min(Lm1_s1 / 145, 75 mm) = 51.3 mm
y,Final / y,Allowable = 0.967
PASS - Allowable deflection exceeds final deflection

Left Rafter - Span 1

Partial factor for material properties and resistances
Partial factor for material properties - Table 2.3 M = 1.250

Member details
Load duration - cl.2.3.1.2 Permanent
Service class - cl.2.3.1.3 1
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

23
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Glulam section details

Number of timber sections in member N=1
Breadth of sections b = 50 mm
Depth of sections h = 200 mm
Glulam strength class - EN 14080:2013 - Table 6 GL24c

Span details
Left hand bearing length Lb_e1 = 150 mm
Right hand bearing length Lb_e2 = 100 mm

Consider Combination 6 - 1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.5S (Strength)

Modification factors
Duration of load and moisture content - Table 3.1 kmod = 0.6
Deformation factor - Table 3.2 kdef = 0.6
Depth factor for bending - Major axis - exp.3.2 kh,m,y = min((600 mm / h)0.1, 1.1) = 1.1
Depth factor for tension - exp.3.2 kh,t = min((600 mm / max(b, h))0.1, 1.1) = 1.1
Bending stress re-distribution factor - cl.6.1.6(2) km = 0.7
Crack factor for shear resistance - cl.6.1.7(2) kcr = 0.67
Check compression parallel to the grain - cl.6.1.4
Design axial compression Pd = 6.785 kN
Design compressive stress c,0,d = Pd / A = 0.678 N/mm2
Design compressive strength fc,0,d = kmod  fc.0.g.k / M = 10.320 N/mm2
c,0,d / fc,0,d = 0.066
PASS - Design parallel compression strength exceeds design parallel compression stress

Check design at end of span

Check shear force - Section 6.1.7
Design shear force Fy,d = 3.02 kN
Design shear stress - exp.6.60 y,d = 1.5  Fy,d / (kcr  b  h) = 0.676 N/mm2
Design shear strength fv,y,d = kmod  fv.g.k / M = 1.680 N/mm2
y,d / fv,y,d = 0.402
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

24
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

PASS - Design shear strength exceeds design shear stress

Check bending moment - Section 6.1.6
Design bending moment My,d = 3.06 kNm
Design bending stress m,y,d = My,d / Wy = 9.181 N/mm2
Design bending strength fm,y,d = kh,m,y  kmod  fm.g.k / M = 12.672 N/mm2
m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.724
PASS - Design bending strength exceeds design bending stress
Check combined bending and axial compression - Section 6.2.4
Combined loading checks - exp.6.19 & 6.20 (c,0,d / fc,0,d)2 + m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.729
(c,0,d / fc,0,d)2 + km  m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.511
PASS - Combined bending and axial compression utilisation is acceptable
Check columns subjected to either compression or combined compression and bending - cl.6.3.2
Effective length for y-axis bending Le,y = 0.9  4400 mm = 3960 mm
Slenderness ratio y = Le,y / iy = 68.589
Relative slenderness ratio - exp. 6.21 rel,y = y /   (fc.0.g.k / E0.g.05) = 1.061
Effective length for z-axis bending Le,z = 0 mm
Slenderness ratio z = Le,z / iz = 0
Relative slenderness ratio - exp. 6.22 rel,z = z /   (fc.0.g.k / E0.g.05) = 0
rel,y > 0.3 column stability check is required
Straightness factor c = 0.1
Instability factors - exp.6.25, 6.26, 6.27 & 6.28 ky = 0.5  (1 + c  (rel,y - 0.3) + rel,y2) = 1.101
kz = 0.5  (1 + c  (rel,z - 0.3) + rel,z2) = 0.485
kc,y = 1 / (ky + (ky2 - rel,y2)) = 0.717
kc,z = 1 / (kz + (kz2 - rel,z2)) = 1.031
Column stability checks - exp.6.23 & 6.24 c,0,d / (kc,y  fc,0,d) + m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.816
c,0,d / (kc,z  fc,0,d) + km  m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.571
PASS - Column stability is acceptable
Check beams subjected to either bending or combined bending and compression - cl.6.3.3
Fifth percentile shear modulus parallel to the grain G0.g.05 = E0.g.05 / 16 = 568.75 N/mm2
Torsion factor  = 0.277
Torsional moment of inertia Itor =   b3  h = 6933750 mm4
Lateral buckling factor - exp.6.34 kcrit = 1.000
Beam stability check - exp.6.35 (m,y,d / (kcrit  fm,y,d))2 + c,0,d / (kc,z  fc,0,d) = 0.589
PASS - Beam stability is acceptable

Consider Combination 2 - 1.0G + 1.0Q + 1.0RQ (Service)

Check design 1671 mm along span

Check y-y axis deflection - Section 7.2
Instantaneous deflection y = 7 mm
Final deflection y,Final = y  (1 + kdef) = 11.2 mm
Allowable deflection y,Allowable = Min(Lm2_s1 / 145, 75 mm) = 30.3 mm
y,Final / y,Allowable = 0.371
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

25
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

PASS - Allowable deflection exceeds final deflection

Right Rafter - Span 1

Partial factor for material properties and resistances
Partial factor for material properties - Table 2.3 M = 1.250

Member details
Load duration - cl.2.3.1.2 Permanent
Service class - cl.2.3.1.3 1
Glulam section details
Number of timber sections in member N=1
Breadth of sections b = 50 mm
Depth of sections h = 200 mm
Glulam strength class - EN 14080:2013 - Table 6 GL24c

Span details
Left hand bearing length Lb_e1 = 150 mm
Right hand bearing length Lb_e2 = 100 mm

Consider Combination 6 - 1.35G + 1.50Q + 1.5S (Strength)

Modification factors
Duration of load and moisture content - Table 3.1 kmod = 0.6
Deformation factor - Table 3.2 kdef = 0.6
Depth factor for bending - Major axis - exp.3.2 kh,m,y = min((600 mm / h)0.1, 1.1) = 1.1
Depth factor for tension - exp.3.2 kh,t = min((600 mm / max(b, h))0.1, 1.1) = 1.1
Bending stress re-distribution factor - cl.6.1.6(2) km = 0.7
Crack factor for shear resistance - cl.6.1.7(2) kcr = 0.67
Check compression parallel to the grain - cl.6.1.4
Design axial compression Pd = 4.711 kN
Design compressive stress c,0,d = Pd / A = 0.471 N/mm2
Design compressive strength fc,0,d = kmod  fc.0.g.k / M = 10.320 N/mm2
c,0,d / fc,0,d = 0.046
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

26
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

PASS - Design parallel compression strength exceeds design parallel compression stress

Check design at start of span

Check shear force - Section 6.1.7
Design shear force Fy,d = 2.875 kN
Design shear stress - exp.6.60 y,d = 1.5  Fy,d / (kcr  b  h) = 0.644 N/mm2
Design shear strength fv,y,d = kmod  fv.g.k / M = 1.680 N/mm2
y,d / fv,y,d = 0.383
PASS - Design shear strength exceeds design shear stress
Check bending moment - Section 6.1.6
Design bending moment My,d = 3.06 kNm
Design bending stress m,y,d = My,d / Wy = 9.181 N/mm2
Design bending strength fm,y,d = kh,m,y  kmod  fm.g.k / M = 12.672 N/mm2
m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.724
PASS - Design bending strength exceeds design bending stress
Check combined bending and axial compression - Section 6.2.4
Combined loading checks - exp.6.19 & 6.20 (c,0,d / fc,0,d)2 + m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.727
(c,0,d / fc,0,d)2 + km  m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.509
PASS - Combined bending and axial compression utilisation is acceptable
Check columns subjected to either compression or combined compression and bending - cl.6.3.2
Effective length for y-axis bending Le,y = 0.9  4400 mm = 3960 mm
Slenderness ratio y = Le,y / iy = 68.589
Relative slenderness ratio - exp. 6.21 rel,y = y /   (fc.0.g.k / E0.g.05) = 1.061
Effective length for z-axis bending Le,z = 0 mm
Slenderness ratio z = Le,z / iz = 0
Relative slenderness ratio - exp. 6.22 rel,z = z /   (fc.0.g.k / E0.g.05) = 0
rel,y > 0.3 column stability check is required
Straightness factor c = 0.1
Instability factors - exp.6.25, 6.26, 6.27 & 6.28 ky = 0.5  (1 + c  (rel,y - 0.3) + rel,y2) = 1.101
kz = 0.5  (1 + c  (rel,z - 0.3) + rel,z2) = 0.485
kc,y = 1 / (ky + (ky2 - rel,y2)) = 0.717
kc,z = 1 / (kz + (kz2 - rel,z2)) = 1.031
Column stability checks - exp.6.23 & 6.24 c,0,d / (kc,y  fc,0,d) + m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.788
c,0,d / (kc,z  fc,0,d) + km  m,y,d / fm,y,d = 0.551
PASS - Column stability is acceptable
Check beams subjected to either bending or combined bending and compression - cl.6.3.3
Fifth percentile shear modulus parallel to the grain G0.g.05 = E0.g.05 / 16 = 568.75 N/mm2
Torsion factor  = 0.277
Torsional moment of inertia Itor =   b3  h = 6933750 mm4
Lateral buckling factor - exp.6.34 kcrit = 1.000
Beam stability check - exp.6.35 (m,y,d / (kcrit  fm,y,d))2 + c,0,d / (kc,z  fc,0,d) = 0.569
PASS - Beam stability is acceptable
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

27
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Consider Combination 2 - 1.0G + 1.0Q + 1.0RQ (Service)

Check design 2729 mm along span

Check y-y axis deflection - Section 7.2
Instantaneous deflection y = 6.9 mm
Final deflection y,Final = y  (1 + kdef) = 11 mm
Allowable deflection y,Allowable = Min(Lm3_s1 / 145, 75 mm) = 30.3 mm
y,Final / y,Allowable = 0.364
PASS - Allowable deflection exceeds final deflection

FLOOR BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN (EN1995)

GLULAM BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN TO EN1995-1-1:2004

In accordance with EN1995-1-1:2004 + A2:2014 and Corrigendum No.1 and the recommended values
Tedds calculation version 1.7.03
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

28
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Applied loading
Beam loads
Permanent self weight of beam  1
Permanent full UDL 0.750 kN/m
Variable full UDL 1.200 kN/m
Load combinations
Load combination 1 Support A Permanent  1.35
Variable  1.50
Span 1 Permanent  1.35
Variable  1.50
Support B Permanent  1.35
Variable  1.50

Analysis results
Maximum moment Mmax = 17.949 kNm Mmin = 0.000 kNm
Design moment M = max(abs(Mmax),abs(Mmin)) = 17.949 kNm
Maximum shear Fmax = 10.345 kN Fmin = -10.345 kN
Design shear F = max(abs(Fmax),abs(Fmin)) = 10.345 kN
Total load on beam Wtot = 20.690 kN
Reactions at support A RA_max = 10.345 kN RA_min = 10.345 kN
Unfactored permanent load reaction at support A RA_Permanent = 3.036 kN
Unfactored variable load reaction at support A RA_Variable = 4.164 kN
Reactions at support B RB_max = 10.345 kN RB_min = 10.345 kN
Unfactored permanent load reaction at support B RB_Permanent = 3.036 kN
Unfactored variable load reaction at support B RB_Variable = 4.164 kN

Glulam section details

Breadth of glulam section b = 100 mm
Depth of glulam section h = 300 mm
Number of glulam sections in member N=1
Overall breadth of glulam member bb = N  b = 100 mm
Glulam strength class - EN 14080:2013 - Table 5 GL28h
Member details
Load duration - cl.2.3.1.2 Permanent
Service class of timber - cl.2.3.1.3 1
Length of span Ls1 = 6940 mm
Length of bearing Lb = 150 mm
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

29
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Section properties
Cross sectional area of member A = N  b  h = 30000 mm2
Section modulus Wy = N  b  h2 / 6 = 1500000 mm3
Wz = h  (N  b)2 / 6 = 500000 mm3
Second moment of area Iy = N  b  h3 / 12 = 225000000 mm4
Iz = h  (N  b)3 / 12 = 25000000 mm4
Radius of gyration ry = (Iy / A) = 86.6 mm
rz = (Iz / A) = 28.9 mm

Partial factor for material properties and resistances

Partial factor for material properties - Table 2.3 M = 1.250

Modification factors
Modification factor for load duration and moisture content - Table 3.1
kmod = 0.600
Deformation factor for service classes - Table 3.2 kdef = 0.600
Depth factor for bending - exp.3.2 kh.m = min((600 mm / h)0.1, 1.1) = 1.072
Depth factor for tension - exp.3.2 kh.t = min((600 mm / max(b, h))0.1, 1.1) = 1.072
Bending stress re-distribution factor - cl.6.1.6(2) km = 0.700
Crack factor for shear resistance - cl.6.1.7(2) kcr = 0.670
Load configuration factor - exp.6.4 kc.90 = 1.000
System strength factor - cl.6.6 ksys = 1.000
Lateral buckling factor - cl.6.3.3(5) kcrit = 1.000
Compression perpendicular to the grain - cl.6.1.5
Design compressive stress c.90.d = RA_max / (N  b  Lb) = 0.690 N/mm2
Design compressive strength fc.90.d = kmod  ksys  kc.90  fc.90.g.k / M = 1.200 N/mm2
c.90.d / fc.90.d = 0.575
PASS - Design compressive strength exceeds design compressive stress at bearing
Bending - cl 6.1.6
Design bending stress m.d = M / Wy = 11.966 N/mm2
Design bending strength fm.d = kh.m  kmod  ksys  kcrit  fm.g.k / M = 14.405 N/mm2
m.d / fm.d = 0.831
PASS - Design bending strength exceeds design bending stress

Shear - cl.6.1.7
Applied shear stress d = 3  F / (2  kcr  A) = 0.772 N/mm2
Permissible shear stress fv.d = kmod  ksys  fv.g.k / M = 1.680 N/mm2
d / fv.d = 0.460
PASS - Design shear strength exceeds design shear stress
Deflection - cl.7.2
Deflection limit lim = min(40 mm, 0.0045  Ls1) = 31.230 mm
Instantaneous deflection due to permanent load instG = 9.647 mm
Final deflection due to permanent load finG = instG  (1 + kdef) = 15.435 mm
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

30
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Instantaneous deflection due to variable load instQ = 13.230 mm

Factor for quasi-permanent variable action
Final deflection due to variable load
Total final deflection
2 = 0
finQ = instQ  (1 + 2  kdef) = 13.230 mm
fin = finG + finQ = 28.665 mm
fin / lim = 0.918
PASS - Total final deflection is less than the deflection limit

2 FLOOR LOAD BEARING WALL PANEL DESIGN (EN1995)

TIMBER FRAME RACKING PANEL DESIGN

In accordance with EN1995-1-1:2004 + A1:2008 incorporating corrigendum June 2006 and the UK National Annex
incorporating Corrrigendum No.2 and the Published Document PD6693-1:2012 Non-Contradictory Complementary
Information to Eurocode 5.
Tedds calculation version 1.0.05
Compression force of the leeward end of the racking wall shall be checked independently in combination with the stud buckling
design and the top rail bearing design in accordance with Eurocode 5. For a wall diaphragm with more than two studs within the
0.1 L of its leeward end in a dwelling of less than three storeys, the compressive force at the leeward end may be disregarded
(clause 21.5.2.10 of PD6693-1).
Single storey racking wall with openings
Wall panel geometry
Wall height H = 2750 mm
Wall length L = 9390 mm
Width of stud bs = 45 mm
Depth of stud hs = 145 mm
Stud spacing ss = 600 mm
Sheathing layers 2
Description of openings
Number of openings within the wall panel Nopening = 2
Opening 1
Width of the opening lo1 = 1400 mm
Height of the opening ho1 = 950 mm
Distance opening to panel leading stud lso1 = 1330 mm
Distance from bottom rail to edge of opening bro1 = 840 mm
Opening area, cl 21.2.6 Ao1 = ho1  lo1 = 1.33 m2
Opening 2
Width of the opening lo2 = 1400 mm
Height of the opening ho2 = 950 mm
Distance opening to panel leading stud lso2 = 4200 mm
Distance from bottom rail to edge of opening bro2 = 840 mm
Opening area, cl 21.2.6 Ao2 = ho2  lo2 = 1.33 m2
Total area of openings At = 2.66 m2
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

31
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Timber frame material

Timber material Solid timber
Strength class C24
Characteristic density of timbers k = 350 kg/m3

Sheathing
Sheathing material OSB/3
Thickness of sheathing ts1 = 9 mm
Characteristic density k1 = 575 kg/m3
Fastener wire type Nail BRT
Fastener diameter dn1 = 3.1 mm
Fastener length ln1 = 50 mm
Perimeter spacing s1 = 150 mm
Connection to substrate
Sole plate detail Open panel sole plate detail
Holding down restrain No holding down
Characteristic restrain capacity Fhd.k = 0.00 kN
Actions on the wall
Self weight qsw.k = 0.20 kN/m2
Permanent load qG.k = 7.00 kN/m
Uplift wind load quplift.k = 2.10 kN/m
Horizontal racking load FW.k = 5.00 kN
2750

950

950
840

840

Sole plate fixing detail

Number of shear planes Nsp = 2
Sub-connection 1 - Bottom rail to sole plate, C1
Detail of fastener BRT ring shanked nail 3.1 x 75 mm
Characteristic withdrawal capacity Fsp.w.k1 = 0.19 kN
Characteristic shear capacity Fsp.v.k1 = 0.83 kN
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

32
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Number of fasteners perpendicular to grain nsp1 = 1

Spacing of the fasteners parallel to grain ssp1 = 150 mm
Sub-connection 2 - Sole plate to foundations, C2
Detail of fastener Shot-fired smooth round nail 3.5 x 70 mm
Characteristic withdrawal capacity Fsp.w.k2 = 0.05 kN
Characteristic shear capacity Fsp.v.k2 = 1.50 kN
Number of fasteners perpendicular to grain nsp2 = 1
Spacing of the fasteners parallel to grain ssp2 = 300 mm
Service class conditions – cl 2.3.1.3
Racking wall panel SC = 1
Sole plate fixing SCsp = 1
Safety factors – Table NA.A1.2(A/B)
Limit state (EQU and STR)
Permanent favourable actions G.fav = 1.00
Limit state (STR/GEO)
Variable unfavourable actions Q.unfav.str = 1.50

Material factors – Table 2.3

Sheathing panels M.sht1 = M.sht2 =1.20
Timber in frame M.frame = 1.30
Connections M.conn = 1.30

Modification factors – Table 3.1

Timber in the frame kmod.frame = 1.10
Primary sheathing material kmod.sht1 = 1.10
Sheathed frame primary side kmod.wall1 = (kmod.frame  kmod.sht1) = 1.10
Secondary sheathing material kmod.sht2 = 1.10
Sheathed frame secondary side kmod.wall2 = (kmod.frame  kmod.sht2) = 1.10
Sole plate shear plane 1 kmod.sp1 = 1.10
Sole plate shear plane 2 kmod.sp2 = 1.05
Determination of design fastener capacities
Sole plate fixing fasteners
Shear plane 1
Design withdrawal capacity fsp.w.d1 = Fsp.w.k1 Ч kmod.sp1 Ч nsp1 / (ssp1 Ч M.conn) = 1.08 kN/m
Design lateral load capacity fsp.v.d1 = Fsp.v.k1 Ч kmod.sp1 Ч nsp1 / (ssp1 Ч M.conn) = 4.70 kN/m
Shear plane 2
Design withdrawal capacity fsp.w.d2 = Fsp.w.k2 Ч kmod.sp2 Ч nsp2 / (ssp2 Ч M.conn) = 0.13 kN/m
Design lateral load capacity fsp.v.d2 = Fsp.v.k2 Ч kmod.sp2 Ч nsp2 / (ssp2 Ч M.conn) = 4.04 kN/m
Minimum design withdrawal capacity fsp.w.d = 0.13 kN/m
Minimum design lateral load capacity fsp.v.d = 4.04 kN/m
Design shear capacity of sheathing connection – cl 8.3.1
Primary sheathing to frame nail
Nail diameter dn1 = 3.100 mm
Nail head diameter hn1 = 7.0 mm
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

33
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Nail length ln1 = 50 mm

Nail profile
Headside penetration
Pointside penetration
Pointside penetration factor, cl 8.3.2(7)
Embedment strength in panel, cl. 8.3.1.3(3)
Embedment strength in timber, cl. 8.3.1.1(5)
Ratio between embedment strength of members
Characteristic withdrawal in panel, cl. 8.3.2(4)
Characteristic withdrawal in timber
Characteristic pull-through in panel
Characteristic withdrawal capacity
Characteristic nail yield moment
Smooth round nail
ts1 = 9 mm
tpen1 = ln1 - ts1 = 41 mm
Dps1 = 1
fh.k.hs1 = 65 N/mm2  (ts1 / 1mm)0.1  (dn1 / 1mm)-0.7 = 36.68 N/mm2
fh.k.ps1 = 0.082 N/mm2 Ч k/1kg/m3 Ч (dn1/1mm)-0.3=20.44 N/mm2
1 = fh.k.ps1 / fh.k.hs1 = 0.56
fax.k.hs1 = 20 N/mm2 Ч (k1 / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 6.61 N/mm2
fax.k.ps1 = Dps1 Ч 20 N/mm2 Ч (k / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 2.45 N/mm2
fhead.k1 = 70 N/mm2 Ч (k1 / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 23.14 N/mm2
Fax.Rk1 = min(fax.k.ps1  dn1  tpen1, (fax.k.hs1  dn1  ts1) + (fhead.k1  hn12)) = 311
N
My.Rk1 = 0.30 Nmm  fu1 / 1N/mm2  (dn1 / 1mm)2.6 = 3979 Nmm

Secondary sheathing to frame nail

Nail diameter
Nail head diameter
Nail length
Nail profile
Headside penetration
Pointside penetration
Pointside penetration factor, cl 8.3.2(7)
Embedment strength in panel, cl. 8.3.1.3(3)
Embedment strength in timber, cl. 8.3.1.1(5)
Ratio between embedment strength of members
Characteristic withdrawal in panel, cl. 8.3.2(4)
Characteristic withdrawal in timber
Characteristic pull-through in panel
Characteristic withdrawal capacity
Characteristic nail yield moment
dn2 = 3.100 mm
hn2 = 6.98 mm
ln2 = 50 mm
Smooth round nail
ts2 = 9 mm
tpen2 = ln2 - ts2 = 41 mm
Dps2 = 1
fh.k.hs2 = 65 N/mm2  (ts2 / 1mm)0.1  (dn2 / 1mm)-0.7 = 36.68 N/mm2
fh.k.ps2 = 0.082 N/mm2 Ч k/1kg/m3 Ч (dn2/1mm)-0.3=20.44 N/mm2
2 = fh.k.ps2 / fh.k.hs2 = 0.56
fax.k.hs2 = 20 N/mm2 Ч (k2 / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 6.61 N/mm2
fax.k.ps2 = Dps2 Ч 20 N/mm2 Ч (k / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 2.45 N/mm2
fhead.k2 = 70 N/mm2 Ч (k2 / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 23.14 N/mm2
Fax.Rk2 = min(fax.k.ps2  dn2  tpen2, (fax.k.hs2  dn2  ts2) + (fhead.k2  hn22)) = 311
N
My.Rk2 = 0.30 Nmm  fu2 / 1N/mm2  (dn2 / 1mm)2.6 = 3979 Nmm

Load-carrying capacity of connection primary board:

Failure modes for panel to timber connections:

Maximum rope effect contribution - cl. 8.2.2(2) NailProfile1 – 1 = 15 %

Failure mode (a) failure.mode.a1 = fh.k.hs1 Ч ts1 Ч dn1 = 1.02 kN
Failure mode (b) failure.mode.b1 = fh.k.ps1 Ч tpen1 Ч dn1 = 2.60 kN
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

34
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Failure mode (c) failure.mode.c1 = min((failure.mode.a1 / (1 + 1) Ч [[1 + (2 Ч 12 Ч [1 + (

tpen1 / ts1) + (tpen1 / ts1)2]) + (13 Ч ( tpen1 / ts1)2)] - 1 Ч (1 + (tpen1 / ts1))] +
(Fax.Rk1 / 4)), (failure.mode.a1 / (1 + 1) Ч [[1 + (2 Ч 12 Ч [1 + ( tpen1 / ts1) +
(tpen1 / ts1)2]) + (13 Ч (tpen1/ ts1)2)] - 1 Ч (1 + (tpen1 / ts1))] Ч (NailProfile1))) =
1.02 kN
Failure mode (d) failure.mode.d1 = min((1.05 Ч failure.mode.a1 / (2 + 1) Ч[[(2 Ч 1 Ч (1 +
1)) + (4 Ч 1 Ч (2 + 1) Ч My.Rk1 /(failure.mode.a1 Ч ts1))] - 1]) + (Fax.Rk1 /
4), (1.05 Ч failure.mode.a1 / (2 + 1) Ч[[(2 Ч 1 Ч (1 + 1)) + (4 Ч 1 Ч (2 +
1) Ч My.Rk1 /(failure.mode.a1 Ч ts1))] - 1])Ч (NailProfile1)) = 0.70 kN
Failure mode (e) failure.mode.e1 = min((1.05 Ч fh.k.hs1 Ч tpen1 Ч dn1 /(1 + (2 Ч 1)) Ч [[(2 Ч
12 Ч (1 + 1)) + (4 Ч 1 Ч (1 + (2 Ч 1)) Ч My.Rk1 / (fh.k.hs1 Ч tpen12 Ч dn1))] -
1] + (Fax.Rk1 / 4)), (1.05 Ч fh.k.hs1 Ч tpen1 Ч dn1 /(1 + (2 Ч 1)) Ч [[(2 Ч 12 Ч
(1 + 1)) + (4 Ч 1 Ч (1 + (2 Ч 1)) Ч My.Rk1 / (fh.k.hs1 Ч tpen12 Ч dn1))] - 1] Ч
(NailProfile1))) = 1.18 kN
Failure mode (f) failure.mode.f1 = min((((1.15) Ч ((2 Ч 1 / (1 + 1))) Ч((2 Ч My.Rk1 Ч fh.k.hs1
Ч dn1))) + (Fax.Rk1 / 4)), (1.15) Ч ((2 Ч 1 / (1 + 1))) Ч((2 Ч My.Rk1 Ч fh.k.hs1
Ч dn1)) Ч NailProfile1) = 1.00 kN
Characteristic lateral nail shear resistance Failure mode (d)
Fv.Rk1 = 0.70 kN
Fastener spacing s1 = 150 mm
Design lateral carrying capacity Fv.Rd1 = Fv.Rk1 Ч kmod.wall1 / M.conn = 0.60 kN
Design shear for unit length primary board fp.d1 = Fv.Rd1 Ч (1.15 m + s1) / (s1 Ч 1 m) = 5.17 kN/m
Load-carrying capacity of connection secondary board:
Maximum rope effect contribution - cl. 8.2.2(2) NailProfile2 – 1 = 15 %
Failure mode (a) failure.mode.a2 = fh.k.hs2 Ч ts2 Ч dn2 = 1.02 kN
Failure mode (b) failure.mode.b2 = fh.k.ps2 Ч tpen2 Ч dn2 = 2.60 kN
Failure mode (c) failure.mode.c2 = min((failure.mode.a2 /(1 + 2) Ч [[2 + (2 Ч 22 Ч [1 +
(tpen2 / ts2) + (tpen2/ ts2)2]) + (23 Ч (tpen2/ ts2)2)] - 2 Ч (1 + (tpen2 / ts2))] + (Fax.Rk2
/ 4)), (failure.mode.a2 /(1 + 2) Ч [[2 + (2 Ч 22 Ч [1 + (tpen2 / ts2) + (tpen2 /
ts2)2]) + (23 Ч (tpen2 / ts2)2)] - 2 Ч (1 + (tpen2 / ts2))] Ч (NailProfile2))) = 1.02
kN
Failure mode (d) failure.mode.d2 = min((1.05 Ч failure.mode.a2 / (2 + 2) Ч[[(2 Ч 2 Ч (1 +
2)) + (4 Ч 2 Ч (2 + 2) Ч My.Rk2 / (failure.mode.a2 Ч ts2))] - 2]) + (Fax.Rk2 /
4), (1.05 Ч failure.mode.a2 / (2 + 2) Ч[[(2 Ч 2 Ч (1 + 2)) + (4 Ч 2 Ч (2 +
2) Ч My.Rk2 / (failure.mode.a2 Ч ts2))] - 2])Ч (NailProfile2)) = 0.70 kN
Failure mode (e) failure.mode.e2 = min((1.05 Ч fh.k.hs2 Ч tpen2 Ч dn2 / (1 + (2 Ч 2)) Ч [[(2 Ч
22 Ч (1 + 2)) + (4 Ч 2 Ч (1 + (2 Ч 2)) Ч My.Rk2 / (fh.k.hs2 Ч tpen22 Ч dn2))] -
2] + (Fax.Rk2 / 4)), (1.05 Ч fh.k.hs2 Ч tpen2 Ч dn2 /(1 + (2 Ч 2)) Ч [[(2 Ч 22 Ч
(1 + 2)) + (4 Ч 2 Ч (1 + (2 Ч 2)) Ч My.Rk2 / (fh.k.hs2 Ч tpen22 Ч dn2))] - 2] Ч
(NailProfile2))) = 1.18 kN
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

35
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Failure mode (f)
Characteristic lateral nail shear resistance
Fastener spacing
Design lateral carrying capacity
Design shear for unit length secondary board
Sheathing combination factor, cl 21.5.2.2
Total design shear capacity of perimeter fasteners
failure.mode.f2 = min((((1.15) Ч ((2 Ч 2 / (1 + 2))) Ч((2 Ч My.Rk2 Ч fh.k.hs2
Ч dn2))) + (Fax.Rk2 / 4)), (1.15) Ч ((2 Ч 2 / (1 + 2))) Ч((2 Ч My.Rk2 Ч fh.k.hs2
Ч dn2)) Ч NailProfile2) = 1.00 kN
Failure mode (d)
Fv.Rk2 = 0.70 kN
s2 = 150 mm
Fv.Rd2 = Fv.Rk2 Ч kmod.wall2 / M.conn = 0.60 kN
fp.d2 = Fv.Rd2 Ч (1.15 m + s2) / (s2 Ч 1 m) = 5.17 kN/m
Kcomb = 0.75
fp.d.t = fp.d1 + (Kcomb  fp.d2) = 9.04 kN/m

Design loads acting on shear wall

Design permanent load
Self-weight of the wall panel
Design wind uplift load
Design horizontal wind load
Design tension from holding down restrain
qG.d = qG.k Ч G.fav = 7.00 kN/m
qsw.d = qsw.k Ч H Ч G.fav = 0.55 kN/m
quplift.d = quplift.k Ч Q.unfav.str = 3.15 kN/m
FW.d = FW.k Ч Q.unfav.str = 7.50 kN
Fhd.d = Fhd.k Ч kmod.wall1 / M.conn = 0.00 kN

Design destabilising moments

Distance to top sheathing hdst.top = bs = 45 mm
Distance to base sheathing hdst.base = H = 2750 mm
Destabilising moment at base Md.dst.base = FW.d Ч hdst.base = 20.63 kNm
Design stabilising moments
Design stabilising vertical load fstb.d = qG.d + qsw.d - quplift.d = 4.40 kN/m
Total vertical load Fstb.d = fstb.d Ч L = 41.32 kN
Stabilising moment Md.stb = 0.5 Ч fstb.d Ч L2 = 193.98 kNm
Net stabilising moment at the base Mn.base = Md.stb - Md.dst.base = 173.35 kNm
Factor of Utilisation Md.dst.base / Md.stb = 0.106
PASS - Design stabilising moment exceeds design destabilising moment at base of the shear wall
Design for sliding stability
Coefficient of friction fr = 0.4
Frictional resistance Ffriction = fr Ч Fstb.d = 16.53 kN
Sole plate shear resistance Fsp.v.d = fsp.v.d Ч L = 37.95 kN
Design horizontal wind load FW.d = 7.50 kN
Sliding resistance Fsliding = Ffriction + Fsp.v.d = 54.48 kN
FW.d / Fsliding = 0.138
PASS - Design sliding resistance exceeds horizontal design wind load
Opening factor – cl 21.2.6
Percentage of opening area over full wall p = At / (H Ч L) = 0.10
Opening factor Kopening = 1 – (1.9 Ч p) = 0.80
Panel shape factor – cl 21.5.2.5
Ratio of shear capacities  = min [1, (fsp.w.d / fp.d.t)] = 0.01
Shape factor Kw = min (1.0,
[1 + (H / ( Ч L))2 + (2 Ч Mn.top / ( Ч fp.d.t Ч L2))]0.5 – (H / ( Ч L))) = 0.84
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

36
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Design racking strength – cl 21.5.2

Shear strength of sole plate
Shear strength of panel
Design racking strength
Serviceability validation check – cl 21.5.2.3
Sheathing combination factor - Table 8
Design load limit for serviceability validation
Modified load for serviceability validation
Fsp.v.d = 37.95 kN
Fwall.v.d = Kopening Ч Kw Ч fp.d.t Ч L = 57.13 kN
Fv.d = Fwall.v.d = 57.13 kN
FW.d / Fv.d = 0.131
PASS - Design racking strength exceeds racking load due to wind
Kcomb = 0.75
FSLS.lim = 8 kN/m Ч (1 + Kcomb) Ч L / H = 47.80 kN/m
FSLS.mod = Kw Ч fp.d.t = 7.57 kN/m
FSLS.mod / FSLS.lim = 0.158
PASS - The condition 21.5.2.3 of PD 6693-1 is met

1 FLOOR LOAD BEARING WALL PANEL DESIGN (EN1995)

TIMBER FRAME RACKING PANEL DESIGN

In accordance with EN1995-1-1:2004 + A1:2008 incorporating corrigendum June 2006 and the UK National Annex
incorporating Corrrigendum No.2 and the Published Document PD6693-1:2012 Non-Contradictory Complementary
Information to Eurocode 5.
Tedds calculation version 1.0.05
Compression force of the leeward end of the racking wall shall be checked independently in combination with the stud buckling
design and the top rail bearing design in accordance with Eurocode 5. For a wall diaphragm with more than two studs within the
0.1 L of its leeward end in a dwelling of less than three storeys, the compressive force at the leeward end may be disregarded
(clause 21.5.2.10 of PD6693-1).
Single storey racking wall with openings
Wall panel geometry
Wall height H = 2800 mm
Wall length L = 9390 mm
Width of stud bs = 45 mm
Depth of stud hs = 145 mm
Stud spacing ss = 600 mm
Sheathing layers 2
Description of openings
Number of openings within the wall panel Nopening = 2
Opening 1
Width of the opening lo1 = 1400 mm
Height of the opening ho1 = 1400 mm
Distance opening to panel leading stud lso1 = 1330 mm
Distance from bottom rail to edge of opening bro1 = 974 mm
Opening area, cl 21.2.6 Ao1 = ho1  lo1 = 1.96 m2
Opening 2
Width of the opening lo2 = 1400 mm
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

37
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Height of the opening ho2 = 1400 mm

Distance opening to panel leading stud lso2 = 4200 mm
Distance from bottom rail to edge of opening bro2 = 974 mm
Opening area, cl 21.2.6 Ao2 = ho2  lo2 = 1.96 m2
Total area of openings At = 3.92 m2
Timber frame material
Timber material Solid timber
Strength class C24
Characteristic density of timbers k = 350 kg/m3

Sheathing
Sheathing material OSB/3
Thickness of sheathing ts1 = 9 mm
Characteristic density k1 = 575 kg/m3
Fastener wire type Nail BRT
Fastener diameter dn1 = 3.1 mm
Fastener length ln1 = 50 mm
Perimeter spacing s1 = 150 mm
Connection to substrate
Sole plate detail Open panel sole plate detail
Holding down restrain No holding down
Characteristic restrain capacity Fhd.k = 0.00 kN
Actions on the wall
Self weight qsw.k = 9.00 kN/m2
Permanent load qG.k = 33.00 kN/m
Uplift wind load quplift.k = 2.00 kN/m
Horizontal racking load FW.k = 5.00 kN
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

38
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Sole plate fixing detail

Number of shear planes Nsp = 2
Sub-connection 1 - Bottom rail to sole plate, C1
Detail of fastener BRT ring shanked nail 3.1 x 75 mm
Characteristic withdrawal capacity Fsp.w.k1 = 0.19 kN
Characteristic shear capacity Fsp.v.k1 = 0.83 kN
Number of fasteners perpendicular to grain nsp1 = 1
Spacing of the fasteners parallel to grain ssp1 = 150 mm
Sub-connection 2 - Sole plate to foundations, C2
Detail of fastener Shot-fired smooth round nail 3.5 x 70 mm
Characteristic withdrawal capacity Fsp.w.k2 = 0.05 kN
Characteristic shear capacity Fsp.v.k2 = 1.50 kN
Number of fasteners perpendicular to grain nsp2 = 1
Spacing of the fasteners parallel to grain ssp2 = 300 mm
Service class conditions – cl 2.3.1.3
Racking wall panel SC = 2
Sole plate fixing SCsp = 2
Safety factors – Table NA.A1.2(A/B)
Limit state (EQU and STR)
Permanent favourable actions G.fav = 1.00
Limit state (STR/GEO)
Variable unfavourable actions Q.unfav.str = 1.50

Material factors – Table 2.3

Sheathing panels M.sht1 = M.sht2 =1.20
Timber in frame M.frame = 1.30
Connections M.conn = 1.30

Modification factors – Table 3.1

Timber in the frame
Primary sheathing material
Sheathed frame primary side
Secondary sheathing material
Sheathed frame secondary side
Sole plate shear plane 1
Sole plate shear plane 2
Determination of design fastener capacities
Sole plate fixing fasteners
Shear plane 1
Design withdrawal capacity
Design lateral load capacity
Shear plane 2
Design withdrawal capacity
Design lateral load capacity
kmod.frame = 1.10
kmod.sht1 = 0.90
kmod.wall1 = (kmod.frame  kmod.sht1) = 0.99
kmod.sht2 = 0.90
kmod.wall2 = (kmod.frame  kmod.sht2) = 0.99
kmod.sp1 = 1.10
kmod.sp2 = 1.05
fsp.w.d1 = Fsp.w.k1 Ч kmod.sp1 Ч nsp1 / (ssp1 Ч M.conn) = 1.08 kN/m
fsp.v.d1 = Fsp.v.k1 Ч kmod.sp1 Ч nsp1 / (ssp1 Ч M.conn) = 4.70 kN/m
fsp.w.d2 = Fsp.w.k2 Ч kmod.sp2 Ч nsp2 / (ssp2 Ч M.conn) = 0.13 kN/m
fsp.v.d2 = Fsp.v.k2 Ч kmod.sp2 Ч nsp2 / (ssp2 Ч M.conn) = 4.05 kN/m
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

39
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Minimum design withdrawal capacity fsp.w.d = 0.13 kN/m

Minimum design lateral load capacity fsp.v.d = 4.05 kN/m
Design shear capacity of sheathing connection – cl 8.3.1
Primary sheathing to frame nail
Nail diameter dn1 = 3.100 mm
Nail head diameter hn1 = 7.0 mm
Nail length ln1 = 50 mm
Nail profile Smooth round nail
Headside penetration ts1 = 9 mm
Pointside penetration tpen1 = ln1 - ts1 = 41 mm
Pointside penetration factor, cl 8.3.2(7) Dps1 = 1
Embedment strength in panel, cl. 8.3.1.3(3) fh.k.hs1 = 65 N/mm2  (ts1 / 1mm)0.1  (dn1 / 1mm)-0.7 = 36.68 N/mm2
Embedment strength in timber, cl. 8.3.1.1(5) fh.k.ps1 = 0.082 N/mm2 Ч k/1kg/m3 Ч (dn1/1mm)-0.3=20.44 N/mm2
Ratio between embedment strength of members 1 = fh.k.ps1 / fh.k.hs1 = 0.56
Characteristic withdrawal in panel, cl. 8.3.2(4) fax.k.hs1 = 20 N/mm2 Ч (k1 / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 6.61 N/mm2
Characteristic withdrawal in timber fax.k.ps1 = Dps1 Ч 20 N/mm2 Ч (k / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 2.45 N/mm2
Characteristic pull-through in panel fhead.k1 = 70 N/mm2 Ч (k1 / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 23.14 N/mm2
Characteristic withdrawal capacity Fax.Rk1 = min(fax.k.ps1  dn1  tpen1, (fax.k.hs1  dn1  ts1) + (fhead.k1  hn12)) = 311
N
Characteristic nail yield moment My.Rk1 = 0.30 Nmm  fu1 / 1N/mm2  (dn1 / 1mm)2.6 = 3979 Nmm

Secondary sheathing to frame nail

Nail diameter
Nail head diameter
Nail length
Nail profile
Headside penetration
Pointside penetration
Pointside penetration factor, cl 8.3.2(7)
Embedment strength in panel, cl. 8.3.1.3(3)
Embedment strength in timber, cl. 8.3.1.1(5)
Ratio between embedment strength of members
Characteristic withdrawal in panel, cl. 8.3.2(4)
Characteristic withdrawal in timber
Characteristic pull-through in panel
Characteristic withdrawal capacity
Characteristic nail yield moment
dn2 = 3.100 mm
hn2 = 6.98 mm
ln2 = 50 mm
Smooth round nail
ts2 = 9 mm
tpen2 = ln2 - ts2 = 41 mm
Dps2 = 1
fh.k.hs2 = 65 N/mm2  (ts2 / 1mm)0.1  (dn2 / 1mm)-0.7 = 36.68 N/mm2
fh.k.ps2 = 0.082 N/mm2 Ч k/1kg/m3 Ч (dn2/1mm)-0.3=20.44 N/mm2
2 = fh.k.ps2 / fh.k.hs2 = 0.56
fax.k.hs2 = 20 N/mm2 Ч (k2 / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 6.61 N/mm2
fax.k.ps2 = Dps2 Ч 20 N/mm2 Ч (k / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 2.45 N/mm2
fhead.k2 = 70 N/mm2 Ч (k2 / 1kg/m3)2 Ч 10-6 = 23.14 N/mm2
Fax.Rk2 = min(fax.k.ps2  dn2  tpen2, (fax.k.hs2  dn2  ts2) + (fhead.k2  hn22)) = 311
N
My.Rk2 = 0.30 Nmm  fu2 / 1N/mm2  (dn2 / 1mm)2.6 = 3979 Nmm

Load-carrying capacity of connection primary board:

Failure modes for panel to timber connections:
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

40
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Maximum rope effect contribution - cl. 8.2.2(2) NailProfile1 – 1 = 15 %

Failure mode (a) failure.mode.a1 = fh.k.hs1 Ч ts1 Ч dn1 = 1.02 kN
Failure mode (b) failure.mode.b1 = fh.k.ps1 Ч tpen1 Ч dn1 = 2.60 kN
Failure mode (c) failure.mode.c1 = min((failure.mode.a1 / (1 + 1) Ч [[1 + (2 Ч 12 Ч [1 + (
tpen1 / ts1) + (tpen1 / ts1)2]) + (13 Ч ( tpen1 / ts1)2)] - 1 Ч (1 + (tpen1 / ts1))] +
(Fax.Rk1 / 4)), (failure.mode.a1 / (1 + 1) Ч [[1 + (2 Ч 12 Ч [1 + ( tpen1 / ts1) +
(tpen1 / ts1)2]) + (13 Ч (tpen1/ ts1)2)] - 1 Ч (1 + (tpen1 / ts1))] Ч (NailProfile1))) =
1.02 kN
Failure mode (d) failure.mode.d1 = min((1.05 Ч failure.mode.a1 / (2 + 1) Ч[[(2 Ч 1 Ч (1 +
1)) + (4 Ч 1 Ч (2 + 1) Ч My.Rk1 /(failure.mode.a1 Ч ts1))] - 1]) + (Fax.Rk1 /
4), (1.05 Ч failure.mode.a1 / (2 + 1) Ч[[(2 Ч 1 Ч (1 + 1)) + (4 Ч 1 Ч (2 +
1) Ч My.Rk1 /(failure.mode.a1 Ч ts1))] - 1])Ч (NailProfile1)) = 0.70 kN
Failure mode (e) failure.mode.e1 = min((1.05 Ч fh.k.hs1 Ч tpen1 Ч dn1 /(1 + (2 Ч 1)) Ч [[(2 Ч
12 Ч (1 + 1)) + (4 Ч 1 Ч (1 + (2 Ч 1)) Ч My.Rk1 / (fh.k.hs1 Ч tpen12 Ч dn1))] -
1] + (Fax.Rk1 / 4)), (1.05 Ч fh.k.hs1 Ч tpen1 Ч dn1 /(1 + (2 Ч 1)) Ч [[(2 Ч 12 Ч
(1 + 1)) + (4 Ч 1 Ч (1 + (2 Ч 1)) Ч My.Rk1 / (fh.k.hs1 Ч tpen12 Ч dn1))] - 1] Ч
(NailProfile1))) = 1.18 kN
Failure mode (f) failure.mode.f1 = min((((1.15) Ч ((2 Ч 1 / (1 + 1))) Ч((2 Ч My.Rk1 Ч fh.k.hs1
Ч dn1))) + (Fax.Rk1 / 4)), (1.15) Ч ((2 Ч 1 / (1 + 1))) Ч((2 Ч My.Rk1 Ч fh.k.hs1
Ч dn1)) Ч NailProfile1) = 1.00 kN
Characteristic lateral nail shear resistance Failure mode (d)
Fv.Rk1 = 0.70 kN
Fastener spacing s1 = 150 mm
Design lateral carrying capacity Fv.Rd1 = Fv.Rk1 Ч kmod.wall1 / M.conn = 0.54 kN
Design shear for unit length primary board fp.d1 = Fv.Rd1 Ч (1.15 m + s1) / (s1 Ч 1 m) = 4.67 kN/m
Load-carrying capacity of connection secondary board:
Maximum rope effect contribution - cl. 8.2.2(2) NailProfile2 – 1 = 15 %
Failure mode (a) failure.mode.a2 = fh.k.hs2 Ч ts2 Ч dn2 = 1.02 kN
Failure mode (b) failure.mode.b2 = fh.k.ps2 Ч tpen2 Ч dn2 = 2.60 kN
Failure mode (c) failure.mode.c2 = min((failure.mode.a2 /(1 + 2) Ч [[2 + (2 Ч 22 Ч [1 +
(tpen2 / ts2) + (tpen2/ ts2)2]) + (23 Ч (tpen2/ ts2)2)] - 2 Ч (1 + (tpen2 / ts2))] + (Fax.Rk2
/ 4)), (failure.mode.a2 /(1 + 2) Ч [[2 + (2 Ч 22 Ч [1 + (tpen2 / ts2) + (tpen2 /
ts2)2]) + (23 Ч (tpen2 / ts2)2)] - 2 Ч (1 + (tpen2 / ts2))] Ч (NailProfile2))) = 1.02
kN
Failure mode (d) failure.mode.d2 = min((1.05 Ч failure.mode.a2 / (2 + 2) Ч[[(2 Ч 2 Ч (1 +
2)) + (4 Ч 2 Ч (2 + 2) Ч My.Rk2 / (failure.mode.a2 Ч ts2))] - 2]) + (Fax.Rk2 /
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

41
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

4), (1.05 Ч failure.mode.a2 / (2 + 2) Ч[[(2 Ч 2 Ч (1 + 2)) + (4 Ч 2 Ч (2 +

Failure mode (e)
Failure mode (f)
Characteristic lateral nail shear resistance
Fastener spacing
Design lateral carrying capacity
Design shear for unit length secondary board
Sheathing combination factor, cl 21.5.2.2
Total design shear capacity of perimeter fasteners
2) Ч My.Rk2 / (failure.mode.a2 Ч ts2))] - 2])Ч (NailProfile2)) = 0.70 kN
failure.mode.e2 = min((1.05 Ч fh.k.hs2 Ч tpen2 Ч dn2 / (1 + (2 Ч 2)) Ч [[(2 Ч
22 Ч (1 + 2)) + (4 Ч 2 Ч (1 + (2 Ч 2)) Ч My.Rk2 / (fh.k.hs2 Ч tpen22 Ч dn2))] -
2] + (Fax.Rk2 / 4)), (1.05 Ч fh.k.hs2 Ч tpen2 Ч dn2 /(1 + (2 Ч 2)) Ч [[(2 Ч 22 Ч
(1 + 2)) + (4 Ч 2 Ч (1 + (2 Ч 2)) Ч My.Rk2 / (fh.k.hs2 Ч tpen22 Ч dn2))] - 2] Ч
(NailProfile2))) = 1.18 kN
failure.mode.f2 = min((((1.15) Ч ((2 Ч 2 / (1 + 2))) Ч((2 Ч My.Rk2 Ч fh.k.hs2
Ч dn2))) + (Fax.Rk2 / 4)), (1.15) Ч ((2 Ч 2 / (1 + 2))) Ч((2 Ч My.Rk2 Ч fh.k.hs2
Ч dn2)) Ч NailProfile2) = 1.00 kN
Failure mode (d)
Fv.Rk2 = 0.70 kN
s2 = 150 mm
Fv.Rd2 = Fv.Rk2 Ч kmod.wall2 / M.conn = 0.54 kN
fp.d2 = Fv.Rd2 Ч (1.15 m + s2) / (s2 Ч 1 m) = 4.67 kN/m
Kcomb = 0.75
fp.d.t = fp.d1 + (Kcomb  fp.d2) = 8.18 kN/m

Design loads acting on shear wall

Design permanent load
Self-weight of the wall panel
Design wind uplift load
Design horizontal wind load
Design tension from holding down restrain
qG.d = qG.k Ч G.fav = 33.00 kN/m
qsw.d = qsw.k Ч H Ч G.fav = 25.20 kN/m
quplift.d = quplift.k Ч Q.unfav.str = 3.00 kN/m
FW.d = FW.k Ч Q.unfav.str = 7.50 kN
Fhd.d = Fhd.k Ч kmod.wall1 / M.conn = 0.00 kN

Design destabilising moments

Distance to top sheathing hdst.top = bs = 45 mm
Distance to base sheathing hdst.base = H = 2800 mm
Destabilising moment at base Md.dst.base = FW.d Ч hdst.base = 21.00 kNm
Design stabilising moments
Design stabilising vertical load fstb.d = qG.d + qsw.d - quplift.d = 55.20 kN/m
Total vertical load Fstb.d = fstb.d Ч L = 518.33 kN
Stabilising moment Md.stb = 0.5 Ч fstb.d Ч L2 = 2433.55 kNm
Net stabilising moment at the base Mn.base = Md.stb - Md.dst.base = 2412.55 kNm
Factor of Utilisation Md.dst.base / Md.stb = 0.009
PASS - Design stabilising moment exceeds design destabilising moment at base of the shear wall
Design for sliding stability
Coefficient of friction fr = 0.4
Frictional resistance Ffriction = fr Ч Fstb.d = 207.33 kN
Sole plate shear resistance Fsp.v.d = fsp.v.d Ч L = 38.00 kN
Design horizontal wind load FW.d = 7.50 kN
Sliding resistance Fsliding = Ffriction + Fsp.v.d = 245.33 kN
FW.d / Fsliding = 0.031
PASS - Design sliding resistance exceeds horizontal design wind load
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

42
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Opening factor – cl 21.2.6

Percentage of opening area over full wall
Opening factor
Panel shape factor – cl 21.5.2.5
Ratio of shear capacities
Shape factor
p = At / (H Ч L) = 0.15
Kopening = 1 – (1.9 Ч p) = 0.72
 = min [1, (fsp.w.d / fp.d.t)] = 0.02
Kw = min (1.0,
[1 + (H / ( Ч L))2 + (2 Ч Mn.top / ( Ч fp.d.t Ч L2))]0.5 – (H / ( Ч L))) = 1.00

Design racking strength – cl 21.5.2

Shear strength of sole plate
Shear strength of panel
Design racking strength
Serviceability validation check – cl 21.5.2.3
Sheathing combination factor - Table 8
Design load limit for serviceability validation
Modified load for serviceability validation
Fsp.v.d = 38.00 kN
Fwall.v.d = Kopening Ч Kw Ч fp.d.t Ч L = 55.05 kN
Fv.d = Fwall.v.d = 55.05 kN
FW.d / Fv.d = 0.136
PASS - Design racking strength exceeds racking load due to wind
Kcomb = 0.75
FSLS.lim = 8 kN/m Ч (1 + Kcomb) Ч L / H = 46.95 kN/m
FSLS.mod = Kw Ч fp.d.t = 8.18 kN/m
FSLS.mod / FSLS.lim = 0.174
PASS - The condition 21.5.2.3 of PD 6693-1 is met

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS & DESIGN (EN1992/EN1997)

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS (EN1997-1:2004)

In accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the recommended values
TEDDS calculation version 3.2.20

Strip foundation details - considering a one metre strip

Length of foundation Lx = 1000 mm
Width of foundation Ly = 600 mm
Foundation area A = Lx  Ly = 0.600 m2
Depth of foundation h = 400 mm
Depth of soil over foundation hsoil = 900 mm
Level of water hwater = 0 mm
Density of water water = 9.8 kN/m3
Density of concrete conc = 25.0 kN/m3
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

43
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

y
578 kN/m2

Wall no.1 details

Width of wall ly1 = 250 mm
position in y-axis y1 = 300 mm
Soil properties
Density of soil soil = 18.0 kN/m3
Characteristic cohesion c'k = 0 kN/m2
Characteristic effective shear resistance angle 'k = 30 deg
Characteristic friction angle k = 30 deg

Foundation loads
Permanent surcharge load FGsur = 18.0 kN/m2
Variable surcharge load FQsur = 1.5 kN/m2
Self weight Fswt = h  conc = 10.0 kN/m2
Soil weight Fsoil = hsoil  soil = 16.2 kN/m2

Wall no.1 loads per linear metre

Permanent load in y FGy1 = 2.0 kN
Permanent load in z FGz1 = 36.0 kN
Variable load in y FQy1 = 3.0 kN
Variable load in z FQz1 = 20.0 kN
Variable moment in y MQy1 = 15.0 kNm
Bearing resistance (Section 6.5.2)
Forces on foundation per linear metre
Force in y-axis Fdy = FGy1 + FQy1 = 5.0 kN
Force in z-axis Fdz = A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur + FQsur) + FGz1 + FQz1 = 83.4 kN
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

44
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Moments on foundation per linear metre

Moment in y-axis Mdy = A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur + FQsur)  Ly / 2 + FGz1  y1 + FGy1  h + FQz1 
y1 + MQy1 + FQy1  h = 42.0 kNm

Eccentricity of base reaction

Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis ey = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 204 mm
Pad base pressures
q1 = 0 kN/m2
q2 = 4  Fdz / [3  1000 mm  (Ly - 2  ey)] = 578 kN/m2
Minimum base pressure qmin = min(q1, q2) = 0 kN/m2
Maximum base pressure qmax = max(q1, q2) = 578 kN/m2
Presumed bearing capacity
Presumed bearing capacity Pbearing = 600.0 kN/m2
PASS - Presumed bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure
Design approach 1
Partial factors on actions - Combination1
Partial factor set A1
Permanent unfavourable action - Table A.3 G = 1.35
Permanent favourable action - Table A.3 Gf = 1.00
Variable unfavourable action - Table A.3 Q = 1.50
Variable favourable action - Table A.3 Qf = 0.00

Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination1

Resistance factor set R1
Bearing - Table A.5 R.v = 1.00
Sliding - Table A.5 R.h = 1.00

Forces on foundation per linear metre

Force in y-axis Fdy = G  FGy1 + Q  FQy1 = 7.2 kN
Force in z-axis Fdz = G  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur) + FGz1) + Q  (A  FQsur + FQz1) = 115.8
kN
Moments on foundation per linear metre
Moment in y-axis Mdy = G  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur)  Ly / 2 + FGz1  y1) + Q  (A  FQsur  Ly
/ 2 + FQz1  y1) + Q  MQy1 + (G  FGy1 + Q  FQy1)  h = 60.1 kNm

Eccentricity of base reaction

Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis ey = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 219 mm
Effective area of base per linear metre
Effective width L'y = Ly - 2  ey = 161 mm
Effective length L'x = 1000 mm
Effective area A' = L'x  L'y = 0.161 m2

Pad base pressure

Design base pressure fdz = Fdz / A' = 716.8 kN/m2
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

45
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Sliding resistance (Section 6.5.3)

Forces on foundation per linear metre
Force in y-axis
Force in z-axis
Sliding resistance verification per linear metre (Section 6.5.3)
Horizontal force on foundation
Sliding resistance (exp.6.3a)
Fdy = G  FGy1 + Q  FQy1 = 7.2 kN
Fdz = Gf  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur) + FGz1) + Qf  (A  FQsur + FQz1) = 62.5
kN
H = abs(Fdy) = 7.2 kN
RH.d = Fdz  tan(k) / ' = 36.1 kN
H / RH.d = 0.199
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by sliding
Library item: Check sliding output

Design approach 1
Partial factors on actions - Combination2
Partial factor set A2
Permanent unfavourable action - Table A.3 G = 1.00
Permanent favourable action - Table A.3 Gf = 1.00
Variable unfavourable action - Table A.3 Q = 1.30
Variable favourable action - Table A.3 Qf = 0.00

Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination2

Resistance factor set R1
Bearing - Table A.5 R.v = 1.00
Sliding - Table A.5 R.h = 1.00

Forces on foundation per linear metre

Force in y-axis Fdy = G  FGy1 + Q  FQy1 = 5.9 kN
Force in z-axis Fdz = G  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur) + FGz1) + Q  (A  FQsur + FQz1) = 89.7 kN

Moments on foundation per linear metre

Moment in y-axis Mdy = G  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur)  Ly / 2 + FGz1  y1) + Q  (A  FQsur  Ly
/ 2 + FQz1  y1) + Q  MQy1 + (G  FGy1 + Q  FQy1)  h = 48.8 kNm

Eccentricity of base reaction

Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis ey = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 244 mm
Effective area of base per linear metre
Effective width L'y = Ly - 2  ey = 113 mm
Effective length L'x = 1000 mm
Effective area A' = L'x  L'y = 0.113 m2

Pad base pressure

Design base pressure fdz = Fdz / A' = 796.9 kN/m2
Sliding resistance (Section 6.5.3)
Forces on foundation per linear metre
Force in y-axis Fdy = G  FGy1 + Q  FQy1 = 5.9 kN
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

46
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Force in z-axis Fdz = Gf  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur) + FGz1) + Qf  (A  FQsur + FQz1) = 62.5
kN
Sliding resistance verification per linear metre (Section 6.5.3)
Horizontal force on foundation H = abs(Fdy) = 5.9 kN
Sliding resistance (exp.6.3a) RH.d = Fdz  tan(k) / ' = 28.9 kN
H / RH.d = 0.204
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by sliding
Library item: Check sliding output

FOUNDATION DESIGN (EN1992-1-1:2004)

In accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated January 2008 and the recommended values
TEDDS calculation version 3.2.20

Concrete details (Table 3.1 - Strength and deformation characteristics for concrete)
Concrete strength class C20/25
Characteristic compressive cylinder strength fck = 20 N/mm2
Characteristic compressive cube strength fck,cube = 25 N/mm2
Mean value of compressive cylinder strength fcm = fck + 8 N/mm2 = 28 N/mm2
Mean value of axial tensile strength fctm = 0.3 N/mm2  (fck/ 1 N/mm2)2/3 = 2.2 N/mm2
5% fractile of axial tensile strength fctk,0.05 = 0.7  fctm = 1.5 N/mm2
Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete Ecm = 22 kN/mm2  [fcm/10 N/mm2]0.3 = 29962 N/mm2
Partial factor for concrete (Table 2.1N) C = 1.50
Compressive strength coefficient (cl.3.1.6(1)) cc = 1.00
Design compressive concrete strength (exp.3.15) fcd = cc  fck / C = 13.3 N/mm2
Tens.strength coeff.for plain concrete (cl.12.3.1(1)) ct,pl = 0.80
Des.tens.strength for plain concrete (exp.12.1) fctd,pl = ct,pl  fctk,0.05 / C = 0.8 N/mm2
Maximum aggregate size hagg = 20 mm
Ultimate strain - Table 3.1 cu2 = 0.0035
Shortening strain - Table 3.1 cu3 = 0.0035
Effective compression zone height factor  = 0.80
Effective strength factor  = 1.00
Bending coefficient k1 K1 = 0.44
Bending coefficient k2 K2 = 1.25  (0.6 + 0.0014/cu2) =1.25
Bending coefficient k3 K3 =0.54
Bending coefficient k4 K4 =1.25  (0.6 + 0.0014/cu2) = 1.25

Reinforcement details
Characteristic yield strength of reinforcement fyk = 500 N/mm2
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcement Es = 210000 N/mm2
Partial factor for reinforcing steel (Table 2.1N) S = 1.15
Design yield strength of reinforcement fyd = fyk / S = 435 N/mm2
Nominal cover to reinforcement cnom = 30 mm
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

47
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Shear diagram (kN)

Moment diagram (kNm)

-2.8
0.3

13.1
25.7

Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)

Design bending moment
Depth to tension reinforcement
Lever arm
Depth of neutral axis
Area of tension reinforcement required
Tension reinforcement provided
Area of tension reinforcement provided
Minimum area of reinforcement (exp.9.1N)
Maximum area of reinforcement (cl.9.2.1.1(3))
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control (Section 7.3)
Limiting crack width
Variable load factor (EN1990 – Table A1.1)
Serviceability bending moment
Tensile stress in reinforcement
Load duration factor
Effective depth of concrete in tension
Effective area of concrete in tension
Mean value of concrete tensile strength
Reinforcement ratio
Modular ratio
Bond property coefficient
Strain distribution coefficient
Maximum crack spacing (exp.7.11)
MEd.y.max = 13.1 kNm
d = h - cnom - y.bot / 2 = 364 mm
K = MEd.y.max / (Lx  d2  fck) = 0.005
K' = (2    cc/C)(1 -   ( - K1)/(2  K2))(  ( - K1)/(2  K2))
K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
z = min(0.5 + 0.5  (1 - 2  K / (  cc / C))0.5, 0.95)  d = 346 mm
x = 2.5  (d - z) = 45 mm
Asy.bot.req = MEd.y.max / (fyd  z) = 87 mm2
12 dia.bars at 200 c/c bottom
Asy.bot.prov = 565 mm2
As.min = max(0.26  fctm / fyk, 0.0013)  Lx  d = 473 mm2
As.max = 0.04  Lx  d = 14560 mm2
wmax = 0.3 mm
2 = 0.3
Msls.y.max = 2.2 kNm
s = Msls.y.max / (Asy.bot.prov  z) = 11.4 N/mm2
kt = 0.4
hc.ef = min(2.5  (h - d), (h - x) / 3, h / 2) = 90 mm
Ac.eff = hc.ef  Lx = 90000 mm2
fct.eff = fctm = 2.2 N/mm2
p.eff = Asy.bot.prov / Ac.eff = 0.006
e = Es / Ecm = 7.009
k1 = 0.8
k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4 =3.4
k4 = 0.425
sr.max = k3  cnom + k1  k2  k4  y.bot / p.eff = 427 mm
 Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

48
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

02.09.2022

Maximum crack width (exp.7.8) wk = sr.max  max([s – kt  (fct.eff / p.eff) (1 + e  p.eff)] / Es,
0.6  s / Es) = 0.014 mm
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Library item: Crack width output