Stephen Krashen is a linguist who developed several hypotheses about second language acquisition. His most fundamental hypothesis distinguishes between acquisition, which occurs subconsciously through meaningful interaction and communication, and learning, which is a conscious process involving formal instruction of grammar rules. Krashen believes acquisition is more important for developing language proficiency. His other hypotheses include: the natural order hypothesis, which states grammatical structures are acquired in a predictable order; the input hypothesis, which holds that comprehensible input slightly above a learner's current level drives acquisition; and the affective filter hypothesis, which posits affective variables like motivation and anxiety can impact a learner's ability to acquire a new language.
Stephen Krashen is a linguist who developed several hypotheses about second language acquisition. His most fundamental hypothesis distinguishes between acquisition, which occurs subconsciously through meaningful interaction and communication, and learning, which is a conscious process involving formal instruction of grammar rules. Krashen believes acquisition is more important for developing language proficiency. His other hypotheses include: the natural order hypothesis, which states grammatical structures are acquired in a predictable order; the input hypothesis, which holds that comprehensible input slightly above a learner's current level drives acquisition; and the affective filter hypothesis, which posits affective variables like motivation and anxiety can impact a learner's ability to acquire a new language.
Stephen Krashen is a linguist who developed several hypotheses about second language acquisition. His most fundamental hypothesis distinguishes between acquisition, which occurs subconsciously through meaningful interaction and communication, and learning, which is a conscious process involving formal instruction of grammar rules. Krashen believes acquisition is more important for developing language proficiency. His other hypotheses include: the natural order hypothesis, which states grammatical structures are acquired in a predictable order; the input hypothesis, which holds that comprehensible input slightly above a learner's current level drives acquisition; and the affective filter hypothesis, which posits affective variables like motivation and anxiety can impact a learner's ability to acquire a new language.
Second Language Acquisition The Acquisition learning Hypothesis
-the distinction between acquisition and
Stephen Krashen learning hypothesis -Prof emeritus of University of Southern -most fundamental California -widely known among linguists -linguist, activist, educational researcher -published 350 plus papers and books 2 independent systems credited various concepts and terms in second language acquisition Acquisition/ Acquired system -product of subconscious process -in his home state in california an -requires meaningful interaction, natural educational policy became increasingly communication hostile to bilingualism, he responded -speakers focus not on a form of with research critical to the new policies utterance, not on their grammar but the public speaking engagement and communicative act itself. newspaper editors -similar when the child first learns their first language -by 2006, he submitted 1,000 letters to editors Learning/ Learned System “was bilingual education eight students -conscious process results to conscious with english and now it's your december knowledge of language 4th thumbs down blinds quote education -Product of formal instruction and poorly educated parents and quote -Knowledge of grammar rules for the reported to find and literacy among hispanics in the united states -Krashen is not against learning another whatever the cause is not bilingual language education study after study has -is that learning is less important than demonstrated that english learners and acquisition, we must provide real and bilingual education programs typically authentic, meaningful opportunities for acquire english faster and those all students to really use second language english programs in fact and last year three major studies have appeared in Natural Order Hypothesis scientific journals confirming mass -describes 2 natural phenomena that bilingual education uses the child's first are interrelated language in a way that accelerate english language development any sign Based on research findings in 1970s this letters stephen krashen america's Suggested that acquisition of university of southern california los grammatical structures follows a natural angeles” order -he feels that teachers are the -for a given language some grammatical structures are acquired early or late, this order seems to be independent from the learners age. The Input Hypothesis -that second language acquisition that -attempt to explain how the learner are required in 4 stages acquires the second language a. Pre production stage aka silent -focuses on acquisition not learning period- they don't know a single -try putting a comprehensible input word of english -The learner improves along the natural b. Early production stage- able to order when they receive second answer with one word language input that is one step beyond c. Speech emergence stage- their current stage of linguistic entering to the intermediate level competence. Able to answer in short sentences The Affective Filter Hypothesis d. Intermediate fluency stage -that a number of affective variables play Much more fluent, speaking in a role in 2nd language acquisition, such compound and complex as motivation, self-confidence and sentences and fewer anxiety. pronunciation and grammar errors Learners of high motivation are better equipped to succeed with 2nd language acquisition. With a low affective filter.
The Monitor Hypothesis Learners of low self-esteem can
-explains the relationship between combine to raise the affective filter and acquisition and learning and influence of form a mental block that prevents learning to acquisition comprehensible input. High affective filter and language acquisition will be L+1 is your first language, your native impeded. language, or your mother tongue. You are a native speaker of that language.
-the role of the monitor should be minor.
Being used to correct deviations from speech and give speech to be polished
Is easier when ur doing it in writing than
speaking Lecture Notes
-we don't only teach them the now, we
need to have a bottom approach in language teaching.
-Individually matters in teaching.
When will we acquire it?
We acquire the language when we communicate and accept
Where? Learn it unconsciously. Acquired in natural setting