2021 - 2022 OPCRF HAMAC (AutoRecovered)

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region X
DIVISION OF TANGUB CITY
Anecito Siete St., Tangub City
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: STEWART E. HAMAC Name of Rater: MA. SHERWIN C. ALDUHEZA
Designation: Head Teacher III Designation DIC/OIC Principal
Rating Period: S.Y. 2021-2022 Date of Review: February 2022
Office/Division: Tangyub City National High School
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Performance
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
MOVs Standard SCORE
(Target) 5 4 3 2 1
(Outstanding) (Very Satisfactory) (Satisfactory) (Unsatisfactory) (Poor) Q E T RATING
Conducted classes Conducted classes Conducted classes Conducted classes Conducted classes
with the identified with the identified with the identified with the identified with the identified
LDM following the LDM following the LDM following the LDM following the LDM following the
three phases as three phases as first two phases as first two phases as first two phases as
Quality indicated in the BE- indicated in the BE- indicated in the BE- indicated in the BE- indicated in the BE-
LCP with complete LCP with incomplete LCP with complete LCP with incomplete LCP without
Basic Education Services
supporting supporting supporting supporting supporting

documents as MOVs documents as MOVs documents as MOVs documents as MOVs documents as MOVs
Approved BE-LCP
a. Led in the implemention of Plan, Leads in the
the School-Based Basic Oct. 2020 Accomplishment conduct of classes
1. School
Education - Learning Continuity - July 5% Report, with the identified 5 5 5 5.000 0.250
Leadership (20%) Plan (BE-LCP) 2021 Documentation, LDM for SY. 2020- 90-100% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the 60-69% of the 50-59% of the
Pictures, Attendance 2021
Sheet activities in the 3 activities in the 3 activities in the 3 activities in the 3 activities in the 3
phases of BE-LCP phases of BE-LCP phases of BE-LCP phases of BE-LCP phases of BE-LCP
Efficiency were implemented were implemented were implemented were implemented were implemented
with the least with the lesser with the less with more with the most
percentage of percentage of percentage of percentage of percentage of
expenses expenses expenses expenses expenses
Implemented the BE- Implemented the Implemented the Implemented the

Implemented the BE-
LCP activities 1 day BE-LCP acitivities 2 BE-LCP acitivities 3 BE-LCP acitivities 1
Timeliness LCP activities as after the scheduled days after the days after the week after the
scheduled
date scheduled date scheduled date scheduled date
b. Conducts School Monitoring, Oct. 2020 Conducts quarterly

Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA) - July School Monitoring,
2021 Evaluation and
Adjustment (SMEA)
Identified
performance Identified
indicators, existing performance Identified
Approved BE-LCP challenges, indicators, existing performance Identified Identified only the
Accomplishment Quality interventions
implemented, craft
challenges,
interventions
indicators, existing
challenges and
performance
indicators and performance
Report indicators
Documentation Adjustment Plans and implemented and interventions existing challenges
Attendance Sheet address gaps through craft Adjustment implemented
cation Services
the conduct of SMEA Plans

*Updated School
Report Card
* Current
Adjustment Plan
based on the
4% previous year's 4 4 4 4.000 0.160
Page 1 of performance
Region X
b. Conducts School Monitoring, Oct. 2020 OFFICE PERFORMANCE

Conducts quarterly COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Evaluation and Adjustment (SMEA) - July School Monitoring,
2021 Evaluation and
Name of Employee: STEWART E. HAMAC Adjustment (SMEA) Name of Rater: MA. SHERWIN C. ALDUHEZA
Office/Division: Tangyub City National High School Approved BE-LCP
Accomplishment
Report
Documentation TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Attendance Sheet
Performance
Weight *Updated School
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOVs
per KRA Report Card
Standard SCORE
(Target) 5 4 3 2 1
* Current
Adjustment Plan
based on the
4% previous year's 4 4 4 4.000 0.160
performance 80-89% of the
1. School 90-100% of the 70-79% of the 60-69% of the 50-59% of the
indicators activities in the
Leadership (20%) * Performance activities in the activities in the activities in the activities in the
adjusted plans were
indicators based adjusted plans were adjusted plans were adjusted plans were adjusted plans were
Efficiency
implemented with implemented with implemented with implemented with implemented with
from LIS/EBEIS the lesser
* Audited the least percentage the less percentage more percentage of most percentage of
of expense percentage of of expense expense expense
Financial Report expense
Documentation,
Pictures,
Attendance
Sheets
Implemented the Implemented the Implemented the Implemented the
Implemented the
Timelines activities in the activities in the activities in the activities in the activities in the
adjustment plan 1 adjustment plan 2 adjustment plan 3 adjustment plan 1
s adjustment plan as week after the weeks after the weeks after the month after the
scheduled
scheduled date scheduled date scheduled date scheduled date
Increased enrolment Increased enrolment Sustained the Decreased Decreased

Quality rate by at least 2% rate by at least 1% number of enrolment rate by at enrolment rate by
over the previous over the previous enrolment from least 1% over the at least 2% over the
year year previous year previous year previous year
80-84% of the
100% of the school- 95-99% of the 90-94% of the 85-89% of the school- aged
school- aged children school- aged school- aged
Leads in the aged children and and Out of School children and Out of children and Out of children and Out of
c. Leads in the conduct of Out of School Youth School Youth (OSY)
Oct. 2020 (OSY) listed in the Youth (OSY) listed in School Youth (OSY) School Youth (OSY) listed in the
institutionalization of Community the community listed in the listed in the
Community Mapping to - July 3% Mapping to Efficiency community mapping community 5 5 5 5.000 0.150
2021 forms were enrolled mapping forms were community mapping community mapping mapping forms
1. School increase enrolment rate increase enrolled with the forms were enrolled forms were enrolled were enrolled with
Leadership (20%) enrolment rate with the assistance of
BHW, PSU, BPAT & assistance of BHW, with the assistance with the assistance the assistance of
Brgy. Council PSU, BPAT & Brgy. of BHW, PSU, BPAT of BHW, PSU, BPAT BHW, PSU, BPAT &
Council & Brgy. Council & Brgy. Council Brgy. Council
Page 2 of
Region X


Designation: Head Teacher III Leads in the Designation DIC/OIC Principal
Rating Period: S.Y.
c. 2021-2022
Leads in the Oct. 2020 conduct of Date of Review: February 2022
institutionalization of Community
Office/Division: Tangyub
CommunityCity National
Mapping to High School
- July 3%
Mapping to
5 5 5 5.000 0.150
2021
1. School increase enrolment rate increase
Leadership (20%) enrolment
TO BE FILLEDrateIN DURING PLANNING
Performance
Weight
per KRA
MOVs Standard SCORE
(Target) 5 4 3 2 1
School-aged School-aged School-aged

School-aged children School-aged children
and Out of School and Out of School children and Out of children and Out of children and Out of
Timeliness Youth (OSY) were Youth (OSY) were School Youth (OSY) School Youth (OSY) School Youth (OSY)
were enrolled 2 were enrolled 3 were enrolled 1
enrolled earlier or on enrolled 1 week after weeks after the weeks after the month after the
the deadline the deadline
deadline deadline deadline
Maintained 0%
.01-1% LARDOs in 1.1-1.5% LARDOs in 1.6 -2% LARDOs in above 2% LARDOs in
Quality LARDOs in all
quarters all quarters all quarters all quarters all quarters
Monitors the
d. Monitors the daily Sept 2021 daily attendance
attendance of learners to - June 4% LIS School Forms of learners Maintained 0% 5 5 5 5.000 0.200
.01-1% LARDOs in all 1.1-1.5% LARDOs in 1.6-2% LARDOs in 2% LARDOs in all
achieve 0% Drop - out Rate 2022 through constant LARDOs in all quarters by utilizing all quarters by all quarters by quarters by utilizing
supervision quarters by utilizing
all means of utilizing all means of utilizing all means of all means of
Efficiency & all means of

Timeliness technology available technology available technology available technology available technology available
and partnership with and partnership with and partnership and partnership and partnership
stakeholders at a stakeholders at a with stakeholders at with stakeholders at with stakeholders at
minimal cost minimal cost a minimal cost a minimal cost a minimal cost
1. School 100% of the learners 95-99% of the 90-94% of the 85-89% of the 80-84% of the
Leadership (20%) were promoted in all learners were learners were learners were learners were
quarters promoted in all promoted in all promoted in all promoted in all
quarters quarters quarters quarters
Quality
Individual Monitors the
Learning
Monitoring Plan , performance of
e. Monitors the performance learners once in
Sept. Weekly
of learners to achieve 100% every two weeks
Promotion Rate 2021 - 4% Accomplishment and make Learners' academic Learners' academic Learners' academic Learners' academic Learners' academic 5 5 5 5.000 0.200
June 2022 Report, LIS Forms, performance was performance was performance was performance was performance was
CMS and result interventions
needed
as
monitored & monitored & monitored & monitored & monitored &
of weekly followed-up once followed-up once a followed-up once in followed-up once in followed-up once in
assessment Efficiency & every two weeks month every two months two quarters a year
Timeliness
Page 3 of
Region X

Performance
Weight
per KRA
MOVs Standard SCORE
(Target) 5 4 3 2 1
Technical assistance Technical assistance Technical assistance Technical assistance Technical assistance
Quality was given to at least was given to at least was given to at least was given to at least was given to at
5 teachers in a week 4 teachers in a week 3 teachers in a week 2 teachers in a week least 1 teacher in a
week
Approved
Monthly
a. Provides Technical Monitoring Plan, Provides Submitted Weekly Submitted Weekly
Technical Submitted Weekly Submitted Weekly Accomplishment Accomplishment Submitted Weekly
Assistance (TA) to teachers Monthly Accomplishment Accomplishment Accomplishment
Oct. 2021 Assistance (TA) to Report/Performance Report/Performance
2. Instructional based on the Weekly Accomplishment Report/Performance Report/Performance Report/Performanc 5
- July 10% teachers based Monitoring and Monitoring and 5 5 5.000 0.500
Leadership (30%) Accomplishment Report and 2022 Report of on emerging Monitoring and Monitoring and e Monitoring and
Monitoring and Coaching Form Teachers' Efficiency Coaching Form Coaching Form
issues and Coaching Form Coaching Form Coaching Form
Monitored and (PMCF) of at least 3 (PMCF) of at least 2
concerns (PMCF) of at least 5 (PMCF) of at least 4 (PMCF) of at least 1
Given Assistance teachers through teachers through
teachers through teachers through the the link in Google the link in Google teacher through the
(TMGA), etc. Google Drive link in Google Drive link in Google Drive
Drive Drive
Submitted three
Timeliness
Submitted every Submitted one day Submitted two days days after the Submitted four days
Monday of the Week after the deadline after the deadline after the deadline
deadline
100% of 95-99% of SLM were 90-94% of SLM were 85-89% of SLM were 80-84% of SLM were
SLMs/Modules were completely completely completely
completely delivered
completely delivered delivered and delivered and delivered and
Quality and retrieved at the
and retrieved at the retrieved at the retrieved at the retrieved at the
designated dropping
designated dropping points designated dropping designated dropping designated
points points. points. dropping points.
95-99% of 90-94% of 85-89% of 80-84% of

100% of SLMs/Modules were SLMs/Modules were SLMs/Modules were SLMs/Modules were
Record Manages the SLMs/Modules were completely completely completely
completely delivered
book/logbook, production, completely delivered delivered and delivered and delivered and
b. Manages the production, and retrieved
Oct. 2021 attendance delivery, and Efficiency and retrieved with the assistance retrieved retrieved retrieved
2. Instructional delivery, and retrieval of Self- - July 8% sheets, List of retrieval of Self- with the assistance of with the assistance with the assistance with the assistance 5 5 5 5.000 0.400
Leadership (30%) Learning Materials (SLM) and Parents/BHW/ PSU/ of Parents/BHW/ of Parents/BHW/ of Parents/BHW/ of Parents/BHW/
2022 Competencies Learning PSU/ BPAT/ Brgy.
Modules Covered, pictures Materials (SLM) BPAT/ Brgy. Council PSU/ BPAT/ Brgy. PSU/ BPAT/ Brgy. PSU/ BPAT/ Brgy.
Council Council Council Council
etc… and Modules
Page 4 of
Region X

Head Teacher III
Designation: Designation DIC/OIC Principal

Record Manages the
book/logbook, production,
b. Manages the production, attendance TO
2. Instructional delivery, and retrieval of Self-
Oct. 2021 BE FILLED
delivery, and IN DURING PLANNING
Leadership (30%) Learning Materials (SLM) and - July 8% sheets, List of retrieval of Self- 5 5 5 5.000 0.400
Modules 2022 Competencies Learning PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
Performance
Weight Covered, pictures Materials (SLM)
per KRA
MOVs
etc… Standard
and Modules SCORE
(Target) 5 4 3 2 1
100% of
100% of 100% of 100% of SLMs/Modules were
100% of SLMs/Modules were SLMs/Modules were
SLMs/Modules were completely
SLMs/Modules were completely completely
completely delivered completely delivered delivered & delivered & delivered &
Timeliness
& retrieved at the & retrieved at the retrieved at the retrieved at the retrieved at the
designated dropping designated dropping designated dropping designated dropping designated
points as scheduled points 1 day after points 2 days after points 3 days after dropping points 4
the scheduled date days after the
the scheduled date the scheduled date scheduled date
Produced Produced Produced Produced Produced

contextualized contextualized contextualized contextualized contextualized
Activity Sheets Activity Sheets Activity Sheets Activity Sheets Activity Sheets
alligned to the alligned to the alligned to the alligned to the alligned to the
Quality learning learning learning learning learning
competencies in a competencies in a competencies in a competencies in a competencies in a
month with no month with 1 month with 2 month with 3 month with 4
revision revision revisions revision revisions
Leads in the
contextualization 90-100% of the 80-89% of the
70-79% of the 60-69% of the 50-59% of the
2. Instructional c. Leads in the Oct. 2021 Copy of and quality contextualized contextualized
contextualized contextualized contextualized
contextualization of - July 4% Contextualized activity sheets were activity sheets were 4 3 4 3.667 0.147
Leadership (30%) supplemental Activity Sheets 2022 Activity Sheets assurance of the activity sheets were activity sheets were activity sheets were
supplemental Efficiency quality assured by the quality assured by quality assured by quality assured by quality assured by
Activity Sheets school QA team & the school QA team
produce at a & produce at a the school QA team the school QA team the school QA team
minimum cost minimum cost at a minimum cost at a minimum cost at a minimum cost
Contextualized
Contextualized Contextualized Contextualized Contextualized
activity sheets were activity sheets were activity sheets were activity sheets were activity sheets were
QA 4-5 days before QA 3 days and
Timeliness
QA 10 days before QA 8-9 days before QA 6-7 days before
the distribution day the distribution day the distribution day the distribution day below before the
distribution day
Page 5 of
Region X

Performance
Weight
per KRA
MOVs Standard SCORE
(Target) 5 4 3 2 1
Came up with a
Conducted Action
Research/ Innovation research/innovation Drafted Identified needs and
Quality approved by the proposal based on research/innovation issues but a research Identified needs and
the needs and issues proposal was not issues
Division Research identified but not yet proposal conceptualized
Screening Committee
conducted
80-89% of the 70-79% of the 60-69% of the

Conducts 1 100% of the issues, 90-99% of the issues,
issues, needs and issues, needs and issues, needs and
Action Research/ needs and gaps needs and gaps
d. Conducts Action Research/ identified were identified were gaps identified gaps identified gaps identified
Approved Innovation were addressed were addressed were addressed
Innovation related to Sept 2021 Reasearch / related to
Efficiency
addressed based on addressed based on
curriculum implementation - June 3% based on the based on the based on the 0 0 0 0.000 0.000
Innovation Instructional the findings with a the findings with a
2022 findings with a findings with a findings with a
proposal Leadership minimal cost minimal cost
minimal cost minimal cost minimal cost
Action Research/ Action Research/ Action Research/ Action Research/ Action Research/
Timeliness
Innovation was Innovation was Innovation was Innovation was Innovation was
completed within 6 completed within 5 completed within 4 completed within 3 completed within 2
months months months months months
All teachers have All teachers have TV 80-90% of the 50-79 % of the Below 50% of the
been provided with teachers have TV teachers have TV teachers have TV
TV sets, Laptops, sets, Laptops, sets, Laptops, sets, Laptops, sets, Laptops,
speakers and AVPM
Quality speakers and AVPM packages from their speakers and AVPM speakers and AVPM speakers and AVPM
packages from personal expense & packages from their packages from their packages from their
MOOE/Stakeholders MOOE fund personal expense & personal expense & personal expense &
Procured the fund MOOE fund MOOE fund MOOE fund
needed
equipments/mate Facilitates in the
rials (TV/ implementation
Speakers/Laptop of MAI by
e. Facilitates in the & Projectors) monitoring,
2. Instructional implementation of the Media Jan 2022 -
5% from MOOE and procuring or 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
Leadership (30%) Assisted Instruction (MAI) June 2022 other Linkages encouraging
teachers to
provide the
Monitored and needed materials
Page 6 of observed MAI
Region X

Performance
Weight Procured
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOVsthe Standard SCORE
per KRA needed 5 4 3 2 1
(Target) Q E T RATING
equipments/mate Facilitates in the (Outstanding) (Very Satisfactory) (Satisfactory) (Unsatisfactory) (Poor)
rials (TV/ implementation
Speakers/Laptop of MAI by
e. Facilitates in the & Projectors) monitoring,
2. Instructional implementation of the Media Jan 2022 - 80-99% of the 60-79% of the 50-59% of the Below 50% of the
5% from MOOE and procuring or All teachers are 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
Leadership (30%) Assisted Instruction (MAI) June 2022 observed & teachers are teachers are teachers are teachers are
other Linkages encouraging observed & observed & observed & observed &
teachers to Efficiency monitored daily as monitored daily as monitored daily as monitored daily as monitored daily as
provide the reflected in the reflected in the reflected in the reflected in the reflected in the
Monitored and needed materials monitoring plan
monitoring plan monitoring plan monitoring plan monitoring plan
observed MAI
implementation
Monitored MAI
implementation as Monitored MAI Monitored MAI Monitored MAI Monitored MAI
scheduled or as
Timeliness
reflected in the implementation implementation implementation implementation
twice a week once a week twice a month once a month
lesson Logs of
Teachers
Narrative Report,
All services were All services were All services were All services were All services were
Pictures, School Quality available and available but only 3 available but only 2 available but only 1 available and non is
Memo, functional are functional are functional is functional functional
Ensures the
a. Ensures Safe Learning Logbook, availability of
Accomplished
Environment through the Water in School
3. Child-Centered availability of the following Health (WinS), Hand
Sept 2021 Declaration Zero % Covid Case .05 % Covid Cases 1 % Covid Cases and 1.5% Covid Cases 2% Covid Cases and
Learning functional services: washing
Environment - Water in School (WinS)/Hand - June 3% Forms, Audited facilities / Efficiency and other infectious and other infectious other infectious and other infectious other infectious 5 5 5 5.000 0.150
(5%) washing facilities / WatSan 2022 Financial Report WatSan, Safety disease diseases diseases diseases diseases
if any, Health
- Safety Health Protocols Health Protocols,
Monitoring
- Functional School Clinic tool ,Inventory of and Functional
School Clinic Submitted required
school clinic
Timeliness reports before due
Submitted required Submitted required Submitted required Submitted required
supplies &
date reports on due date reports
due date
2 days after reports 3 days after reports 4 days after
due date due date
facilities
Page 7 of
Region X

Performance
Weight
per KRA
MOVs Standard SCORE
(Target) 5 4 3 2 1
Conducted the
following DRRMS
activities:
- Earthquake Drill
- Psychosocial and
Mental Health
Awareness Drive 5 out of 7 DRRMS 4 out of 7 DRRMS 3 out of 7 DRRMS 2 out of 7 DRRMS
Quality - Covid 19 Protocols activities were activities were activities were activities were
- Fire Drill conducted conducted conducted conducted

- Flood drill (as
applicable)
- Posting of safety
Approved School signages
b. Implements School Implements
3. Child-Centered contingency Plan, - School-based
Contingency Plan thru School- Oct. 2020 activities in the
Learning Pictures, DRRMS trainings
Environment Based Disaster Risk Reduction
Management System (DRRMS) 2021
- July 2% Narrative School
Contingency Plan
4 4 4 4.000 0.080
(5%) Reports,Training
Matrix etc.
100% of DRRMS 95-99% of DRRMS 90-94% of DRRMS 85-89% of DRRMS 80-84% of DRRMS
Efficiency
activities were activities were activities were activities were activities were
conducted with conducted with conducted with conducted with conducted with
minimal cost minimal cost minimal cost minimal cost minimal cost
Activities were Activities were Activities were Activities were Activities were
Timeliness conducted as conducted 1 day conducted 2 days conducted 3 days conducted 4 days or
after the scheduled after the scheduled after the scheduled more after the
scheduled
date date date scheduled date
All teachers in school All teachers in school All teachers in All teachers in All teachers in
Quality submitted complete
portfolio with no
submitted complete
portfolio with 1
school submitted
complete portfolio
school submitted
complete portfolio
school submitted
complete portfolio
revision revision with 2 revisions with 3 revisions with 4 revisions
Portfolio,
Summary of Gives TA to
Ratings, Pictures, teachers in the
a. Gives Technical Assistance Approved SLAC effective
(TA) in the implementation of Sept 2021 Training implementation
Learning Delivery Modality - June 4% Implementation of Learning 5 5 5 5.000 0.200
vices
Course 2 (LDM 2) for teachers 2022 Plan and Delivery Modality

Page 8 of Accomplishment Course 2 (LDM 2)
Region X

Performance
Weight
per KRA
MOVs Standard SCORE
(Target) 5 4 3 2 1
Portfolio,
Summary of Gives TA to
Ratings, Pictures, teachers in the
a. Gives Technical Assistance
(TA) in the implementation of Approved SLAC effective
Sept 2021 Training implementation 6 out of 11 teachers 5 out of 11 teachers 4 out of 11 teachers 3 out of 11 teachers
Learning Delivery Modality were given TA in the were given TA in the were given TA in the was given TA in the No teacher was
- June 4% Implementation of Learning 5 5 5 5.000 0.200
Efficiency
Course 2 (LDM 2) for teachers 2022 Plan and Delivery Modality implementation of implementation of implementation of implementation of given TA
Accomplishment Course 2 (LDM 2) the LDM modules the LDM modules the LDM modules the LDM modules
Report ,
Attendance sheet
4. HR & School memo
Management 100% of teachers in
and Professional school submitted 100% of teachers in 100% of teachers in 100% of teachers in 100% of teachers in
Development school submitted school submitted school submitted school submitted
Timeliness LDM 2 portfolio
(10%) anytime before due LDM 2 portfolio on LDM 2 portfolio 2 LDM 2 portfolio 4 LDM 2 portfolio 5
the due date days after due date days after due date days after due date
date
Teachers attended at Teachers attended at Teachers attended at Teachers attended at Teachers attended at
b. Ensures teachers' Quality least 10 least 8 least 6 least 4 least 2
webinars/trainings/short webinars/trainings/shor webinars/trainings/sho webinars/trainings/sho webinars/trainings/sho
Professional Development Ensures teachers' cources t cources rt cources rt cources rt cources
through attendance to attendance to
Certificate of
webinars and trainings Sept 2021 webinars and
facilitated by Central Office, - June 2% Participation, other virtual 4 4 4 4.000 0.080
Pictures, 100% of teachers 95-99% of teachers 90-94% of teachers 85-89% of teachers 84% and below of
Regional Office, Division Office, 2022 Reflection etc… trainings attended attended attended attended teachers attended
District and School Efficiency webinars/trainings and webinars/trainings and webinars/trainings and webinars/trainings and webinars/ trainings
short courses with short courses with short courses with short courses with and short courses with
minimal cost minimal cost minimal cost minimal cost minimal cost
Timeliness
4 out of 4 Phases in 3 out of 4 Phases in 2 out of 4 Phases in 1 out of 4 Phases in

RPMS-IPCRF cycle RPMS-IPCRF cycle RPMS-IPCRF cycle RPMS-IPCRF cycle
were implemented were implemented were implemented were implemented
with complete with complete with complete with complete
Quality
supporting supporting supporting supporting
documents as documents as documents as documents as
evidence in the evidence in the evidence in the evidence in the
submitted MOVs submitted MOVs submitted MOVs submitted MOVs
c Education Services
Signed IPCRF
Development
Plan, Agreement Sustains the
4. HR based on PMCF & implementation
Management c. Sustains the implementation Oct. 2020 Updated IPCRF of the (RPMS)
and Professional of the Results-based - July 4% Dev.Plan & Cycle through 4 4 4 4.000 0.160
Development Performance Management 2021 Portfolio, Signed monitoring the
(10%) System (RPMS) Cycle Portfolio & IPCRF compliance of
with computed teachers to the
final rating, set standards
Page 9 of
Region X

Performance
Weight
per KRA
MOVs Standard SCORE
5 4 3 2 1
(Outstanding) (Very Satisfactory) (Satisfactory) (Unsatisfactory) (Poor)
Signed IPCRF
Development Sustains the
Plan, Agreement implementation
4. HR based on PMCF &
Management c. Sustains the implementation Oct. 2020 Updated IPCRF of the (RPMS)
and Professional of the Results-based - July 4% Dev.Plan & Cycle through 90-100% of the total 80-89% of the total 70-79% of the total 60-69% of the total 50-59% of the total 4 4 4 4.000 0.160
Performance Management monitoring the
Development System (RPMS) Cycle 2021 Portfolio, Signed compliance of number of teachers number of teachers number of teachers number of teachers number of teachers
(10%) Portfolio & IPCRF were given technical were given technical were given technical were given technical were given technical
teachers to the
with computed assistance on actual assistance on actual assistance on actual assistance on actual assistance on actual
set standards Efficiency
final rating, performance of performance of performance of performance of performance of
Certificate of duties as stated in the duties as stated in duties as stated in duties as stated in duties as stated in
Recognition performance the performance the performance the performance the performance
commitment form commitment form commitment form commitment form commitment form
Followed RPMS Cycle Followed RPMS Followed RPMS Followed RPMS

Timeliness
Followed RPMS Cycle 1 week after the Cycle 8 days after Cycle 9 days after Cycle 10 days after
as scheduled
scheduled date the scheduled date the scheduled date the scheduled date
Partnered/linked with Partnered/linked

Partnered/linked Partnered/linked Partnered/linked
at least 3 sectoral with at least 3 with at least 2 with at least 1 with at least 1
a. Mobilizes the School Quality stakeholders with sectoral stakeholders sectoral sectoral stakeholder sectoral stakeholder
MOA/MOU, MOA/MOU & stakeholders with
Support System in the complete support with incomplete incomplete support with incomplete without support
Communication/L support documents support documents documents
implementation of the Mobilizes the documents documents
5. Parent following programs: etter with School Support
Involvement and - Brigada Eskwela Oct. 2020 Acknowledgemen System in the
Community - Adopt a School Program - July 5% t Receipt, implementation 4 4 4.000 0.200
Partnership - School-initiated Feeding 2021 Designations, of school Efficiency
Rules & Functions Engaged stakeholders Engaged Engaged Engaged Engaged
(10%) Program of PTA Officers & Programs and
- SB-DRRMS Projects (PAPs) and raise at least stakeholders and stakeholders and stakeholders and stakeholders and
- Fund raising and other SBM Tasks Force 20,000 pesos and raise at least 16,000- raise at least 12,000- raise at least 8,000- raise at least 4,000-
etc... above to support the 19,999 to support 15,999 to support 11,999 pesos to 7,999 pesos to
outsourcing activities
Timeliness school programs the school programs the school programs support the school support the school
within the rating within the rating within the rating programs within the programs within the
period period period rating period rating period
Page 10 of
Region X

Performance
Weight
per KRA
MOVs Standard SCORE
(Target) 5 4 3 2 1
95-100% of the 90-94% of the 85-89% of the 80-84% of the 75-79% of the
organized organized organized organized organized
committees were committees were committees were committees were committees were
Quality maximized in the maximized in the maximized in the maximized in the maximized in the
distribution and distribution and distribution and distribution and distribution and
retrieval of SLMs and retrieval of SLMs and retrieval of SLMs retrieval of SLMs retrieval of SLMs
modules modules and modules and modules and modules

b. Maximizes the support of
the organized Purok Servicing List of working Maximizes the
support of the
5. Parent Unit (PSU), Brgy.Police committees , organized Purok
Involvement and Auxillary Team (BPAT), Brgy. Oct. 2020 pictures, Servicing Unit 100% of the SLMs 95-99% of the SLMs 90-94% of the SLMs 85-89% of the SLMs 80-84% of the SLMs
Community Health Workers (BHW), Brgy. - July 5% attendance (PSU) through and modules were and modules were and modules were and modules were and modules were 5 5 5 5.000 0.250
Partnership Officials and other 2021 sheets, Certificate the sustained- distributed and distributed and distributed and distributed and distributed and
stakeholders for the of Recognition, Efficiency
retrieved by the retrieved by the retrieved by the retrieved by the retrieved by the
(10%) partnership and
distribution and retrieval of logbook and giving of organized organized organized organized organized
School's Self-Learning others committees committees committees committees committees
recognitions
Materials and Modules
90-100% of SLMs
90-100% of SLMs and 90-100% of SLMs and Modules were 90-100% of SLMs 90-100% of SLMs
Modules were and Modules were and Modules were and Modules were
Timeliness distributed and distributed and distributed and distributed and distributed and
retrieved as retrieved 1 day after retrieved 2 days retrieved 3 days retrieved 5 days
after the scheduled
scheduled the scheduled date after scheduled date after scheduled date
date
Submitted the
Submitted the correct Submitted the school
operational plans
Submitted the
school operational
Submitted the
school operational school operational
Quality and complete school plans with more
operational plans with one plans with two plans with three than three
revision/lacking revisions/lacking revisions/lacking
revisions/lacking
Submits the
a. Submits correct and correct and
complete school operational SIP, AIP, SOB, complete school
6. School
plans (SIP, AIP, SOB, WFP, APP, Oct. 2020 WFP, APP, PPMP, operational plans 100% of the school 95-99% of the school 90-94% of the 85-89% of the 80-84% of the
Management PPMP, APP-CSE, APP NON-CSE, - July 4% APP-CSE, APP based on the 5 5 5 5.000 0.200
and Operations Efficiency
operational plans operational plans school operational school operational school operational
MDP etc.) 2021 NON-CSE, MDP needs of the were fully were fully plans were fully plans were fully plans were fully
(15%) etc. school implemented implemented implemented implemented implemented
Page 11 of
Region X

S.Y. 2021-2022 February 2022
Rating Period: Date of Review:

Submits the
a. Submits correct and correct and
complete school operational TO BE FILLED
SIP, AIP, SOB, complete IN DURING PLANNING
school
6. School
Management plans (SIP, AIP, SOB, WFP, APP, Oct. 2020 WFP, APP, PPMP, operational plans
PPMP, APP-CSE, APP NON-CSE, - July 4% APP-CSE, APP based on the
Performance
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 5ACTUAL
5 5RESULTS
5.000 0.200
and Operations Weight NON-CSE, MDP needs of the
MFOs (15%) KRAs MDP etc.)OBJECTIVES 2021
TIMELINE MOVs Standard SCORE
per KRA etc. school 5 4 3 2 1
(Outstanding) (Very Satisfactory) (Satisfactory) (Unsatisfactory) (Poor)
Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the

Submitted the correct Submitted the
and complete school correct and correct and correct and correct and
Timeliness operational plans on complete school complete school complete school complete school
operational planson operational plans 1- operational plans
the second week of operational plans on the last week of 5 days after the more than 5 days
October 3rd week of October
October deadline after the deadline
Submitted monthly Submitted the

Submitted the correct Submitted the Submitted the liquidation monthly liquidation
Quality and complete monthly liquidation monthly liquidation documents with documents with
monthly liquidation documents with one documents with two three revisions / more than three
documents revision/lacking revisions/ lackings revisions /
lackings
lackings
100% of the quarterly 95-99% of the

Ensures quarterly
utilization of downloaded MOOE downloaded MOOE 90-94% of the 85-89% of the 80-84% of the
3rd copy of funds were fully quarterly quarterly quarterly
MOOE Funds funds were fully
6. School b. Ensures utilization of Oct. 2020 correct and based on existing Efficiency utilized as planned downloaded MOOE downloaded MOOE downloaded MOOE
Management complete utilized as planned
MOOE Funds - July 8% needs and passes and the liquidation and the liquidation funds were fully funds were fully funds were fully 4 4 4 4.000 0.320
and Operations liquidation report is submitted utilized as planned utilized as planned utilized as planned
(15%) 2022 documents & liquidation report is submitted
reports ahead of to SDO to SDO
certification
time
Submitted the correct Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the
correct and correct and correct and
and complete complete monthly complete monthly correct and complete monthly
monthly liquidation complete monthly
Timeliness
documents on or liquidation liquidation liquidation liquidation
before the 25th day documents on the documents on the documents 1-5 days documents more
of the month 26th to 29th day of 30th day of the after the deadline than 5 days after
the month month the deadline
Page 12 of
Region X

Performance
Weight
per KRA
MOVs Standard SCORE
(Target) 5 4 3 2 1
90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the 65-69% of the

Quality 100% of the systems' systems' data were systems' data were systems' data were systems' data were
data were updated
updated updated updated updated
c. Monitors the
accomplishment of the Monitors the
Enhanced Basic Education accomplishments
6. School Information System (EBEIS), Cerification from Updated the 4 Updated the 3 Updated the 2 Updated the 1 Updated the 1
Oct. 2020 of all online data
Management Learners Information System Div. Planning mentioned systems mentioned systems mentioned systems mentioned systems mentioned systems
- July 3% monitoring 4 4 4 4.000 0.120
and Operations (LIS), Learners Performance Officer, DICs and Efficiency
with complete and with complete and with complete and with complete and with incomplete
(15%) Progress/Online Encoding of 2021 Div. ITO system of the
school (EBEIS, LIS, accurate data accurate data accurate data accurate data data
Weekly Assessment Result &
CMSS, etc..)
Curriculum Management
Support System (CMSS)

Updated systems' Updated systems' Updated systems' Updated systems'
Timeliness
Updated systems' data 2 days after the data 2 days after the data 3 days after the data 4 days after the
data as scheduled deadline except deadline except deadline except deadline except
EBEIS EBEIS EBEIS EBEIS
Attended at least 5 of Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2 Attended at least 1
Quality the mentioned of the mentioned of the mentioned of the mentioned of the mentioned
activites activites activites activites activites
a. Promotes professional
development Promotes
- Division MANCOM professional
Meetings/Conferences Pictures, development by
7. Personal and - DepEd Webinars Oct. 2020 providing goals,
Professional - DedEd Short term - July 5% Attendance , trainings and 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
Certificates, TOR, 100% attendance of 95-99% attendance 90-94% attendance 85-89% attendance 80-84% attendance
Attributes (10%) courses/grants 2021 etc… funds for short
- Non-Deped Short term courses allowed the required of the required of the required of the required of the required
courses/grants by Deped Efficiency
meetings/ meetings/ meetings/ meetings/ meetings/
- Enroll Post Graduate Studies conferences/webinar conferences/webinar conferences/webina conferences/webina conferences/webina
- Others s/ s/ rs/ rs/ rs/
courses/grants courses/grants courses/grants courses/grants courses/grants
Timeliness
No complaints filed in Complaints filed and Complaints filed and Complaints filed and Complaints filed and
Quality any DepEd settled in settled in District settled in Division settled in Regional
cation Services
Testimonies from Maintains a Offices/Civil Courts School/Brgy. Level Level Level Level
Stakeholders professional
b. Maintains a professional
7. Personal and image of being trustworthy, Oct. 2020 (Teachers' Org., image of being
Professional regularity of attendance and - July 5% PTA Pres., trustworthy, 5 5 5 5.000 0.250
Page 13 ofAttributes (10%) punctuality, good grooming 2021
SPG/SSG Pres., punctual, well
Region X

Performance
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOVs Standard SCORE
per KRA Testimonies from Maintains a 5 4 3 2 1

Stakeholders professional (Outstanding) (Very Satisfactory) (Satisfactory) (Unsatisfactory) (Poor)
b. Maintains a professional (Teachers' Org., image of being
7. Personal and image of being trustworthy, Oct. 2020 PTA Pres., trustworthy,
Professional regularity of attendance and - July 5% SPG/SSG Pres., punctual, well 5 5 5 5.000 0.250
Attributes (10%) punctuality, good grooming 2021 5 out of 5 identified 4 out of 5 identified 3 out of 5 identified 2 out of 5 identified 1 out of 5 identified
SGC Pres., & groomed and Efficiency stakeholders gave stakeholders gave stakeholders gave stakeholders gave stakeholders gave
and communication Brgy. Captain. ) good positive testimonies positive testimonies positive testimonies positive testimonies positive testimonies
DTR, Log Books communicator
Timeliness
1. Participation city & brgy.

activities
2. Outstanding employee
Plus Factor (.02 award
per plus factor) 3. Coordinatorship
* To
get
the
score, Total 100%
the
rating Very Satisfactory 4.417
is
multip
lied
by the
weigh MA. SHERWIN C. ALDUHEZA STEWART E. HAMAC NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD, CESO VI
t
assign Rater Ratee Approving Authority
ed.
Signature above printed name Signature above printed name Signature above printed name
DEPED RPMS form 1
Page 14 of
Page 15 of
Page 16 of
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below - 1.499 Poor

2021opcrf
Page 17 of
Name of Emloyee: STEWART E. HAMAC Rating Period: SY 2021-2022
Division: TANGUB CITY DIVISION
COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
Self Management Teamwork
1. Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development. 5 1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility. 5
2. Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear 2. Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and
4
and purposive and takes into account personal goals and 5 goal accomplishment across the organization.
values congruent to that of the organization. 3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. 4
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is 4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions. 4
4
is challenged by higher goals 5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across
5
4. Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through gant charts, organizations to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
4
checklists, etc.) to achieve goals Teamwork Avegare 4.400
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others. 5
5 4 3 2 1
Self Management average 4.600 Service Orientation
1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues
5 4 3 2 1 4
Professionalism and Ethics and problems.
1. Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the 2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting
5
Norms of Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials 5 customer service issues and concerns.
and employees (RA 6713). 3. Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women
5
2. Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct empowerment.
4
taking into account the impact of his/her actions and decisions. 4. Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates
5
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of and strategies based on DepEd strategies and directions.
5
attendance and punctuality, good grooming and communication. 5. Develops and adopts service improvement programs through
4
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs. 5 simplified procedures that will further enhance service delivery.
5. Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the Service Orientation Average 4.600
organization’s needs, improve systems and help others 4
5 4 3 2 1
improve their effectiveness. Innovation
Professional and Ethics Average 4.600 1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective
solutions. Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests better 4
5 4 3 2 1
Results Focus ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources 2. Demonstrates an ability to think ―beyond the box‖.
5
most of the time. Continuously focuses on improving personal productivity to 4
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work create higher value and results.
4
methods by placing organizational needs before personal needs. 3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co – workers to
4
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to develop original ideas or solutions.
standard operating procedures correctly and consistently. 4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions
4
Able to produce very satisfactory quality of work n terms of 4 that improve the work unit and organization.
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no pervision 5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities.
required. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability to succeed 4
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration with minimal resources.
at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise 4 Innovation Average 4.000
ways of meeting goals set.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING SCALE DEFINITION
to improve performance. Examples may include doing something 4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding 5 Role Model
better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently; or improving 4 3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory 4 Consistency demonstartes
quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any 2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory 3 Most of the time demonstrates
specific goal. 1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory 2 Sometimes demonstrates
Results Focus Average 4.200 below - 1.499 Poor 1 Rarely demonstrates
DEPED RPMS form - 2
Page 4
MA. SHERWIN C. ALDUHEZA STEWART E. HAMAC NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD, CESO VI
Rater Ratee Approving Authority
Signature Over Printed Name Signature Over Printed Name Signature Over Printed Name
4.4
Note: Total for core behavioral competencies total (need not to print)
Name of Emloyee: STEWART E. HAMAC Rating Period: SY 2021-2022
Division: TANGUB CITY DIVISION
COMPETENCIES
LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES
5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
Leading people People Development
1. Uses basic persuasion techniques in a discussion or presentation 1. Improves the skills and effectiveness of individuals through ###
4
e.g. staff mobilization, appeals to reason and/or emotions, uses 4 employing a range of development strategies.
data and examples, visual aids 2. Facilitates workforce effectiveness through coaching and motivating/ ###
2. Persuades, convinces or influences others, in order to have a developing people within a work environment that promotes 5
5
specific impact or effect. mutual trust and respect
3. "Sets good example", is a credible and respected leader; and 3. Conceptualizes and implements learning interventions to meet ###
5 4
demonstrates desired behavior. identified training needs.
4. Forwards personal, professional and work unit needs and interests 4. Does long-term coaching and training by arranging appropriate ###
5
in an issue. and helpful assignments, formal training, or other experiences
4
5. Assumes a pivotal role in promoting the development of an for the purpose of supporting a person's learning and
inspiring, relevant vision for the organization and influences 5 development.
others to share ownereship of DepED goals, in order to create an 5. Cultivates a learning environment by structuring interactive ###
effective work environment. experiences such as looking for future opportunities that are in 4
Leading People Average 4.800 support of achieving individual career goals.
People Development 4.200
5 4 3 2 1
People Performance Management
1. Makes specific changes in the Performance Management System
or in own work methods to improve performance (e.g. does
4
something better, faster, at lower cost, more efficiently; improves OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS
quality, customer satisfaction, morale, revenues) A. CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 4.400
2. Sets performance standards and measures progress of employees B. LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES 4.533
5
based on office and department targets. OVERALL RATING 4.467
3. Provides feedback and technical assistance such as coaching for
5
performance improvement and action planning.
4. States performance expectations clearly and checks
5
understanding and commitment.
Overall
5. Performs all the stages of Result-based Performance 4.467
Rating
Management System supported by evidence and required 4
documents/forms.
People Performance Management Average 4.600
Very Satisfactory
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING SCALE DEFINITION

4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding 5 Role Model
3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory 4 Consistency demonstrates
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory 3 Most of the time demonstrates
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory 2 Sometimes demonstrates
below - 1.499 Poor 1 Rarely demonstrates
NOTE: These ratings can be used for the developmental plans of the employee.

Signature above printed name Signature above printed name Signature above printed name
Page 5
PART III : SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION
Fiinal Performance Results Rating

VS
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives 4.417
Score /
Weight per Numerical Ratings
KRA Weight per KRA Objectives Rating
Objectives
Q E T Average
Objective a 5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.250
Objective b 4% 4 4 4 4.000 0.160
1 1. School Leadership (20%) 20%
Objective c 3% 5 5 5 5.000 0.150
Objective d 4% 5 5 5.000 0.200
Objective e 4% 5 5 5 5.000 0.200
Objective a 10% 5 5 5 5.000 0.500
Objective b 8% 5 5 5 5.000 0.400
2 2. Instructional Leadership (30%) 30% Objective c 4% 4 3 4 3.667 0.147
Objective d 3% 0 0 0 0.000 0.000
Objective e 5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
Objective a 3% 5 5 5 5.000 0.150

3 3. Child-Centered learning environment (5%) 5%
Objective b 2% 4 4 4 4.000 0.080
Objective a 4% 5 5 5 5.000 0.200

4 4. HR Management and Professional Development 10% 10% Objective b 2% 4 4 4.000 0.080
Objective c 4% 4 4 4 4.000 0.160
Objective a 5% 4 4 4.000 0.200

5 5. Parent Involvement and Community Partnership (10%) 10%
Objective b 5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.250
6 Objective a 4% 5 5 5 5.000 0.200

6. School Management and Operations (15%) 15% Objective b 8% 4 4 4 4.000 0.320
Objective c 3% 4 4 4 4.000 0.120
7 Objective a 5% 4 4 4.000 0.200

7. Personal and Professional Attributes (10%) 10%
Objective b 5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.250
8 Plus Factor (.02 per plus factor) 100% Total 100%

Overall Rating for
Very Satisfactory 4.417
Accomplishments
Overall Rating for
Accomplishments
Employee - Superior Agreement

4.500 - 5.000 (O) Outstanding 5 Role Model
3.500 - 4.499 (VS) Very Satisfactory 4 Consistency demonstartes
2.500 - 3.499 (S) Satisfactory 3 Most of the time demonstrates
1.500 - 2.499 (US) Unsatisfactory 2 Sometimes demonstrates
below - 1.499 (P) Poor 1 Rarely demonstrates
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.
Name of Employee Name of Superior

STEWART E. HAMAC MA. SHERWIN C. ALDUHEZA
Signature Signature
Date Date
PART IV: INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)
Maintains a professional image

being trustworthy,regularity of
attendance and punctuality,good
grooming and communication.
LORENA P. SERRANO, CESE STEWART E. HAMAC NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD, CESO VI
DEPED RPMS form - 3

Page 6
4.417
PART III : SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION
Fiinal Performance Results Rating

VS
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives 4.457
Score /
Weight Weight per Numerical Ratings
KRA Objectives Rating
per KRA Objectives
Q E T Average
Objective a 5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.250 BE-LCP, Pictures, Attendance sheet
Objective b 5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.200 SRC, Adjustment plan, LIS/EBIES
1 1. School Leadership (20%) 20%
Objective c 5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.250 Sforms, Mapping tools
Objective d 5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.250 LIS SFs
Objective e 5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.250 ILMP, LIS Forms, CMS
Objective a 10% 5 5 5 5.000 0.500 Approved monhtly monitoring plan
Objective b 8% 5 5 5 5.000 0.400 Record book, logbook, distribution list
2 2. Instructional Leadership (30%) 30% Objective c 5% 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 Contextualized Media Assisted Instructions
Objective d 4% 4 3 4 3.667 0.147 Contextualized activity sheets
Objective e 3% 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 Research and innovation
Narrative report, Safety heatlh protocols
Objective a 3% 5 5 5 5.000 0.150 Functional Healht clinic
3 3. Child-Centered learning environment 5%
Objective b 2% 4 4 4 4.000 0.080 Approved contingency plan, narative reports, training matrix
Objective a 4% 5 5 5 5.000 0.200 Summary of ratings, Pictures, approved LAC, Attendacne sheet, memo
4 4. HR Management and Professional Deve 10% Objective b 2% 4 4 4.000 0.080 Cetificates of recognition of teachers, pictures, reflections
Objective c 4% 4 4 4 4.000 0.160 Signed IPCRF development plan
5. Parent Involvement and Community Objective a 5% 4 4 4.000 0.200 SBM and PTA functions with acknowledgement, SBM task force, designations
5 10%
Partnership (10%) Objective b 5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.250 List of working committees in distribution and retrieval, certificate of recognit
6 Objective a 4% 5 5 5 5.000 0.200 SIP, AIP, SOB, all plans

6. School Management and Operations 15% Objective b 8% 4 4 4 4.000 0.320 3rd copy of liquidation documents and certification
Objective c 3% 4 4 4 4.000 0.120 Cetification from div planning officer and ITO
7 Objective a 5% 4 4 4.000 0.200 Attendance in MANCOM,, certificates and tor

7. Personal and Professional Attributes 10%
Objective b 5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.250 Testimony from brgy captain, DTR and logbook
8 Plus Factor (.02 per plus factor) 100% Total City carozza competition
Overall Rating for
Accomplishments
Overall Rating for
Accomplishments
Employee - Superior Agreement

4.500 - 5.000 (O) Outstanding 5 Role Model
3.500 - 4.499 (VS) Very Satisfactory 4 Consistency demonstartes
2.500 - 3.499 (S) Satisfactory 3 Most of the time demonstrates
1.500 - 2.499 (US) Unsatisfactory 2 Sometimes demonstrates
below - 1.499 (P) Poor 1 Rarely demonstrates
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.
Name of Employee Name of Superior

STEWART E. HAMAC MA. SHERWIN C. ALDUHEZA
Signature Signature
Date Date
PART IV: INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs(Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)
Conduct Action Learning and
Conducts the School monitoring, Research/Innovation Attends seminars and propose/conduct Development Team,
Year - round
evaluation and adjustments (SMEA) related to Curriculum 1 action research, LAC Session Education Program
Implementation Supervisor, School Head
and School Fund

DEPED RPMS form - 3

Page 6
SBM and PTA functions with acknowledgement, SBM task force, designations
List of working committees in distribution and retrieval, certificate of recognition to stakeholders

2021 - 2022 OPCRF HAMAC (AutoRecovered)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2021 - 2022 OPCRF HAMAC (AutoRecovered)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

supporting supporting supporting supporting supporting

Implemented the BE- Implemented the Implemented the Implemented the

b. Conducts School Monitoring, Oct. 2020 Conducts quarterly

the conduct of SMEA Plans

b. Conducts School Monitoring, Oct. 2020 OFFICE PERFORMANCE

Increased enrolment Increased enrolment Sustained the Decreased Decreased

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: STEWART E. HAMAC Name of Rater: MA. SHERWIN C. ALDUHEZA

School-aged School-aged School-aged

Efficiency & all means of

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

95-99% of 90-94% of 85-89% of 80-84% of

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Designation: Designation DIC/OIC Principal

Produced Produced Produced Produced Produced

revision revision revisions revision revisions

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

80-89% of the 70-79% of the 60-69% of the

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

- Fire Drill conducted conducted conducted conducted

Course 2 (LDM 2) for teachers 2022 Plan and Delivery Modality

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

4 out of 4 Phases in 3 out of 4 Phases in 2 out of 4 Phases in 1 out of 4 Phases in

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Followed RPMS Cycle Followed RPMS Followed RPMS Followed RPMS

Partnered/linked with Partnered/linked

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

modules modules and modules and modules and modules

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Rating Period: Date of Review:

Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the

Submitted monthly Submitted the

100% of the quarterly 95-99% of the

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the 65-69% of the

Support System (CMSS)

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

per KRA Testimonies from Maintains a 5 4 3 2 1

1. Participation city & brgy.

below - 1.499 Poor

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING SCALE DEFINITION

MA. SHERWIN C. ALDUHEZA STEWART E. HAMAC NIMFA R. LAGO, PhD, CESO VI

Fiinal Performance Results Rating

Objective a 3% 5 5 5 5.000 0.150

Objective a 4% 5 5 5 5.000 0.200

Objective a 5% 4 4 4.000 0.200

6 Objective a 4% 5 5 5 5.000 0.200

7 Objective a 5% 4 4 4.000 0.200

8 Plus Factor (.02 per plus factor) 100% Total 100%