Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Knowledge and Curriculam Assignment
Knowledge and Curriculam Assignment
Knowledge and Curriculam Assignment
FIRST YEAR- B. ED
Roll No. :- 16
1|Page
INDEX
Sr.
Particulars Page No.
No.
1 Introduction 3
2 Objectives Of Syllabus 6
Justification Of Examples
5 8
Selected
6 Conclusion 16
2|Page
INTRODUCTION
Professors emphasize that asking the right
question is a crucial aspect of research. A "right
question" is one that is significant, captivating,
and can be answered through a specific
methodology. It serves as the foundation of
inquiry, directing the investigation and shaping
the researcher's thought process. In essence, the
phrasing of a research question determines the
available approaches to answering it. The resulting
answers are frequently utilized to bolster
arguments for educational policy changes.
Therefore, it is imperative to carefully craft
research questions to ensure that they are
relevant, thought-provoking, and can be effectively
addressed through research methods.
5|Page
recognize the unique needs of each student and
carefully consider the potential outcomes of their
decisions to ensure that all students receive a fair
and equitable education.
OBJECTIVES OF SYLLABUS
It is imperative to provide equal treatment to all
human beings, regardless of their gender, caste,
colour, or any other aspect. Additionally, it is
crucial to create provisions for those who are
disabled, ensuring they have equal opportunities
to improve their quality of life.
6|Page
EXAMPLES OF EQUITY AND
EQUALITY
7|Page
“Equality is giving everyone the same pair of shoes. Equity is
giving everyone a pair of shoes that fits.”
JUSTIFICATION OF EXAMPLES
This concise cartoon effectively illustrates the
difference between the concepts of equality
and equity in education. The former assumes
that all students require the same resources
to succeed, while the latter recognizes that
each individual has unique needs that
require tailored support. For instance, some
students may need extra assistance to
achieve proficiency on standardized tests or
to enjoy a baseball game, as depicted in the
cartoon.
9|Page
While an equity orientation is sensitive to the
needs of different students, it can lead to
problems when it comes to defining what
constitutes success and progress. Simple
answers, such as test scores and graduation
rates, may seem uncontroversial at first
glance. However, when examined more
closely, policies that aim to ensure all
students meet testing benchmarks can stifle
the wide range of values and goals that exist
within American society. For instance,
policies like the No Child Left Behind Act
(NCLB) have resulted in a narrowed
curriculum that prioritizes proficiency on
state standardized tests over other important
aspects of education.
10 | P a g e
can limit the potential of students. Although
the goal of equity is based on fundamental
rights and positive ideals, the implementation
of NCLB can unintentionally harm students.
11 | P a g e
ends for every student. Instead, it is oriented
around the value of liberty and the pursuit of
one’s own goals by ensuring that students are
prepared to make informed, knowledgeable
decisions and have the skills and
understandings necessary to
achieve their goals. It is about seeing
students as agents in their own education
who have rights and inherent abilities.
Finally, implicit in the idea of justice is that
education is about ensuring that
historical injustices are addressed, such as a
historical lack of access to quality education
faced by poor and marginalized students.
There are also problematic assumptions
inherent in the idea of a just education. The
first issue is that it is difficult to know what
justice is and looks like for each student.
Expanding definitions of success is
complicated because success defined broadly
does not allow for the same methods to
measure student academic achievement—
standardized tests. Standardized tests are
controversial for exactly the reason asking
questions about educational equity are not
sufficient; testing limits the definitions of
success and homogenizes the diversity of
skills and experiences that students enter
school with, as well as the variety of skills,
12 | P a g e
knowledge, and abilities they can develop
with the caring help of teachers and their
communities.
Despite these issues, asking questions about
justice has been sorely missing in large
“school improvement” projects such as the
recent overhaul of Newark public schools.
Instead of ensuring that communities had a
significant voice in decision making, an
aspect of liberty, the policy makers focused
on top-down policies that, although focused
on equity by trying to improve the failing
schools, in fact created chaos and upheaval.
The improvement effort ultimately failed to
have the desired impact. Perhaps one of the
reasons was that the improvement effort was
overly focused on equity at the expense of
justice.
Policy makers are beginning to realize the
importance of justice and liberty in education
policy. The ESSA has scaled back much of its
direct oversight of accountability measures,
leaving that to state governments—a move
that has been praised by many education
experts. However, the legal stance of the
ESSA policy is still oriented around the idea
of equity and has not yet taken the next step
towards a just education: an education
focused on liberty while ensuring quality. The
13 | P a g e
focus on equitable education is an important
part of any educational policy, but another
step remains to be taken. It may not be
politically feasible at the national level, but
local authorities, teacher leaders, and policy
makers may be in a position to think of
creating policies that offer quality education
while still ensuring that students have the
liberty to reach their own unique potential,
the core strength of a democratic society. In
other words, a just education ensures that
each citizen has agency in their own
education.
14 | P a g e
Education policies that solely focus on equity
can neglect the needs for justice and liberty.
Just like the federal government, checks and
balances for education policy are necessary.
Asking "does the policy improve equality,
equity, and justice?" provides a more
comprehensive framework for creating fair
and effective policies that meet the needs of
all students and communities. As we strive
for every student to succeed, we must not
achieve equality or equity at the expense of
justice.
In summary, it's important to consider the
broader context and implications of education
policies. By asking the right questions and
striving for a balance between equality,
equity, and justice, we can create policies
that benefit all students and communities.
15 | P a g e
CONCLUSION
16 | P a g e