Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dangers of A.I
Dangers of A.I
Dangers of A.I
A.I rising up and fighting against humans is a topic that has been going around ever
since the iconic chess match between chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov and an IBM
supercomputer called Deep Blue, with the victory belonging to the latter. We will now
take a deep look into this problem in four different levels, starting with.
I. Level 1: Unemployment
- First traits of claims that robots will cause alterations to the economy:
- With the rapid technological advancement of recent years, computers are increasingly
encroaching on domains that were previously considered exclusively human
Ex:
+ In 1959, professor Arthur Samuel, boldly claimed that a machine would never beat a
human at the game of checker. Two years later, the skeptical scholar was himself checked
by an MIT-developed computer.
+ During the Great Recession, robot intensity plummeted. But since 2009, robot intensity
has sharply increased nationwide. (Especially the Midwest)
-> Robots will have the potential to do things people can do
- why
● Their convenience
Ex:
+ The invention of printing (attributed to Gutenberg in the mid-15th century to modern
printing) presses that have contributed to be more effective and speed up printing while
decreasing costs
+ Can work in hazardous environment, even on Mars or the volcano
+ Drones can help the law enforcement in nature catastrophes
+ They can check you in and deliver orange juice to your hotel room, answer your
questions about a missing package, and pack up thousands of subscription boxes.
+ They are completely immune to diseases, while people have had a hard time in the
coronavirus pandemic.
- Reality
-> Back then they estimated that a staggering 80% of jobs run the risk of being automated in the
coming decades.
BUT
- In recent years
Ex:
+ According to the latest paper, employment was reduced by 7.5 percent following
exposure to industrial robots. Labor force participation decreased by one percent.
+ Foxconn company replaced more than 400,000 jobs with robots between 2012 and 2016
- In the future:
+ Robots could take over 20 million manufacturing jobs around the world by 2030,
economists claimed Wednesday.
+ It was predicted that by 2030, more than 1.5 million jobs would have been lost to robots
in the United States. In China, that number was expected to exceed 11 million
- Impact
- Being unemployed takes away these wages and leaves the individual with less available
income
- Being unemployed is a highly stressful situation, so it may cause stress-related health
issues such as headaches, high blood pressure,insomnia, heart disease
- It also causes family issues (Unemployed or poor men are less likely to marry and more
likely to divorce than men who are employed or who are more economically secure
(McLoyd, 1990))
https://tcf.org/content/report/robots-beginning-affect-workers-wages/
https://www.un.org/en/desa/will-robots-and-ai-cause-mass-unemployment-not-necessarily-they-
do-bring-other
https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2020/nov/27/robots-replacing-jobs-automation-
unemployment-us
https://www.spssi.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.viewpage&pageid=1457
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/26/robots-could-take-over-20-million-jobs-by-2030-study-
claims.html
II. Level 2: Social manipulation through AI algorithms authorithem
-
It is no exaggeration to say that popular platforms with devoted users, like Google and
Facebook, know those users better than their families and friends do.
- Many firms collect an enormous amount of data as an input for their artificial intelligence
algorithms.
- According to one study, Facebook Likes can be used to predict a variety of Facebook
user characteristics with a high degree of accuracy, including "sexual orientation,
ethnicity, religious and political views, personality traits, intelligence, happiness, use of
addictive substances, parental separation, age, and gender." Imagine what data is
gathered from search phrases, internet clicks, articles, and reviews if private AI systems
can identify them from the use of something as basic as the "like" button. stu
⇔ Social media like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube and TikTok rely heavily on AI
algorithms to rank and recommend content.
⇔ On the surface this seems reasonable.
- An algorithm that ranks items based on a combination of quality and popularity.
⇔ Popularity bias is more likely to hinder overall content quality.
- The reason: when only a few people have been exposed to an item, engagement is not a
reliable measure of quality. In these circumstances, engagement provides a noisy signal,
which the algorithm is likely to magnify. When a low-quality item becomes popular
enough, its popularity grows exponentially.
- Fakey ⇔ a game that simulates a news feed similar to those found on Facebook and
Twitter ⇔ Current articles from false news, bad science, as well as mainstream
sources, are displayed to players. ⇔ Users get points for sharing or like reputable
news and flagging low-credibility stories for fact-checking.
- Discovered that when players realize that many other users have engaged with an article,
they are more inclined to like or share it and less likely to report it. Hence, exposure to
engagement metrics creates a vulnerability.
-
-Fact: ProPublica found that if you’re African-American, COMPAS was 77% more likely
to qualify you as a potentially violent offender than if you’re a Caucasian.
? Why would the judges trust it if it seems to exhibit bias?
- They use COMPAS is because it is a model for efficiency. COMPAS lets them go through
caseloads much faster in a backlogged criminal justice system. Why would they question their
own software? It’s been requisitioned by the State, approved by their IT Department.
1. https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/how-ai-bias-happens-and-how-eliminate-it
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRzBk_KuIaM&t=175s
3. https://www.lexalytics.com/blog/bias-in-ai-machine-learning/
4. https://algorithmwatch.org/en/automated-discrimination-facebook-google/