The document discusses public financial management in Sudan. It notes that providing public services that meet social and economic needs is the principal goal of public financial management. Key institutions for effective public financial management include establishing a long-term development plan, medium-term planning frameworks, and annual budgets that reflect citizen priorities. It also discusses the need for strong budget management institutions that plan, execute, monitor, and oversee budgets in a transparent, accountable, and results-oriented manner. Linking policies to budgets through multi-year planning is advocated, but Sudan has not adopted this approach yet. Overall the document emphasizes the importance of institutional capacity and participation for effective public service delivery through public financial management.
The document discusses public financial management in Sudan. It notes that providing public services that meet social and economic needs is the principal goal of public financial management. Key institutions for effective public financial management include establishing a long-term development plan, medium-term planning frameworks, and annual budgets that reflect citizen priorities. It also discusses the need for strong budget management institutions that plan, execute, monitor, and oversee budgets in a transparent, accountable, and results-oriented manner. Linking policies to budgets through multi-year planning is advocated, but Sudan has not adopted this approach yet. Overall the document emphasizes the importance of institutional capacity and participation for effective public service delivery through public financial management.
The document discusses public financial management in Sudan. It notes that providing public services that meet social and economic needs is the principal goal of public financial management. Key institutions for effective public financial management include establishing a long-term development plan, medium-term planning frameworks, and annual budgets that reflect citizen priorities. It also discusses the need for strong budget management institutions that plan, execute, monitor, and oversee budgets in a transparent, accountable, and results-oriented manner. Linking policies to budgets through multi-year planning is advocated, but Sudan has not adopted this approach yet. Overall the document emphasizes the importance of institutional capacity and participation for effective public service delivery through public financial management.
accountability are regulated by many other laws and regulations like the Procurement Act of 2010. In 2011 a new Act on combating money laundering and financing terrorism was adopted to supplement the 2004 Act. A general committee comprises all related state departments has been established to oversee the general implementation of the act. A technical financial unit was also established to closely monitor the adherence of banks and other financial institutions to the preventive and precautionary measures as illustrated by international cooperation directives.
4.5 Effective service delivery Public Financial
Management 78. The provision of public services that meet the social and economic development needs of the population is the principal goal of public financial management and an important dimension of good governance and the legitimacy of government. The services that the government provides in many areas infrastructure, human development, social protection, are crucial for the economic growth and poverty reduction that Sudan is seeking, The Government has a fiduciary responsibility to use public funds efficiently and effectively to provide public services, hence the importance of the strong and institutional and technical capacity for public financial management. The key institutions include:
• A policy framework that guides public resource allocation: This
would include a long-term vision such as that embedded in the Sudan's 25 year development plan, a medium-term planning framework, such as the 5 year plan, and short-term policy documents like an annual budget framework paper. A necessary ingredient of these policy documents is that they reflect the aspirations and priorities e of the population, evidenced the wide participation of the civil society including the private sector in the preparation of the documents. Sudan is not strong on participation of the civil society in government decisions. The PRSP process presents an opportunity for participation in the elaboration of public policy and plans documents.
• Institutions for budget management: The Government needs strong
institutions and technical capacity for planning and budgeting, budget execution (financial controls, procurement, monitoring and reporting, cash and treasury management, accounting and auditing); monitoring and evaluation and oversight. Results orientation, participation, transparency and accountability are key principles that should be embedded in these budget institutions at all levels of government. Capacities are generally weak, particularly at sub-national levels of government, hence the necessity for sustained capacity reinforcement efforts.
• Linking policy and budgets: Planning and budgeting instruments that
can link policies with budgets foster the achievement of policy objectives through the budget process. The traditional annual budget process has been found unsuitable for such linkages; rather a multi-year medium-term planning and budgeting processes have been advocated for linking policy and budgets". Many developed and developing countries have adopted the multi-year budgeting approach. It has been proposed to Sudan but it has not yet been adopted. In any case, in the absence of a detailed medium-term development policy framework, a medium-term planning and budgeting framework will be premature. Now, with the interim PRSP 1
1 4 Most common approach is the well-known Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF)