Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GEOGRAPHY GLOSSARY English - Isizulu 20210316 PDF
GEOGRAPHY GLOSSARY English - Isizulu 20210316 PDF
Introduction
This glossary contains a selection of geographical and environmental terms used in
your study material. It is organised alphabetically. Each term is briefly defined,
described and/or explained. Numerous well-known examples are given to enhance
the definitions, descriptions and explanations. With the aid of these examples the
terms could be converted from abstract concepts to the realities of the world you live
in. A deliberate attempt was made to cite many examples because this increases the
chance that an example with which you are familiar might be mentioned. Preference
was given to examples from South Africa and Southern Africa, because most of
Unisa’a students live in these regions. Where applicable, references to other terms in
the glossary have been provided. No references to other literature are cited in the
text although a multitude of seminal and authoritative works have been consulted to
define or describe each term; however, no definition or description has in its entirety
been lifted from one or more sources. References to the literature have deliberately
been omitted in order to avoid cluttering and to make the text more readable. The
isiZulu terminology is given in a different type face directly underneath the English
description or definition.
Isingeniso
Le glosari iqukethe amatemu akhethiweyo ejografi kanye nezemvelo,
asetshenziswe kwizinsizakufunda zakho. Amatemu ahleleke
ngokulandelana kwawo ngokwe-alfabhethi. Itemu ngalinye lihambisana
nencazelo yalo emfushane. Kuhlinzekwe futhi nezibonelo eziningana
ezaziwayo, ngenhloso yokwenza kube lula ukuqonda incazelo
enikeziwe. Ngokulekelelwa yilezi zibonelo ezihlinzekiwe, itemu ngalinye
liyaguquka libe yinto yangempela futhi eyiqiniso, eyingxenye yomhlaba
ophila kuwona, esikhundleni sokugcina nje ngokuba yinto ebonakala
ngamehlo engqondo kuphela. Kulo mbhalo kuhlinzekwe ngabomu
izibonelo eziningi ngoba phela lokho kukhulisa amathuba okuthi
uhlangabezane nesibonelo osaziyo kulezo ezihlinzekiwe. Kuqokwe
ikakhulukazi izibonelo ezithathwe eNingizimu Afrika noma esifundeni se-
Southern Africa, ngoba phela iningi labafundi base-Unisa lihlala kulezi
zifunda. Lapho kufanelekile, kuhlinzekwe nezinkomba (references)
eziphathelene namanye amatemu akhona kule glosari. Azikho
izinkomba zezinye izincwadi ezihlinzekiwe emibhalweni yale glosari
nakuba kunezinye izincwadi eziningi ezibalulekile futhi ezinohlonze
ezisetshenzisiwe ngenkathi kuhlanganiswa incazelo yetemu ngalinye;
kodwa-ke nakuba kunjalo, ayikho incazelo ekule glosari ethathwe
njengoba injalo komunye umbhalo noma imibhalo engumthombo
wolwazi. Izinkomba zezincwadi ezisetshenzisiwe zishiywe ngaphandle
ngabomu ngenhloso yokuvimbela imfuhlumfuhlu yemininingwane
eminingi ngokweqile futhi lokho kwenzelwe nokuthi lo mbhalo ufundeke
kalula. Amatemu isiZulu ahlinzekwe ngaphansi kwezincazelo zesiNgisi
futhi wona abhalwe ngendlela ehlukile kunalawo esiNgisi.
________________________________________________
3
A
Absolute location: See “location”.
Accessibility: The ease with which anything or place can be reached, found or
entered. A number of factors could make a certain place more accessible or less
accessible. These include distance, altitude (height above sea-level), political
reasons, security arrangements, cultural taboos, and many more. New York City is
more accessible than the moon because a trip by boat, motorcar, train, bus or
aeroplane to New York is more readily avaibale and costs far less than a space flight
to the moon. The top of Table Mountain in Cape Town is more accessible than the
peak of Mount Everest because the atmosphere on Everest contains too little oxygen
to sustain human life. Any relatively young and reasonably fit person can walk to the
top of Table Mountain – albeit a stiff walk! – but to climb to the summit of Everest,
one needs “bottled” oxygen from oxygen canisters that have to be carried up the
mountain (see “adventure tourism” and “responsible tourism”). People using
wheelchairs might find it impossible to enter certain buildings, which makes those
buildings inaccessible for them. For political reasons, there is no easy movement of
people between South and North Korea, although they are situated right next to one
another. Consequently, North Korea is highly inaccessible for South Koreans. For
security reasons it is very difficult or even impossible to enter the Union Buildings in
Pretoria (the seat of government), but Unisa’s buildings on the Pretoria campus may
be entered by any member of the general public. Accessibility of information is
another good example. It is easy to find information about the soccer matches
played in South Africa in any particular week, but information about the nuclear
capability of the USA is highly inaccessible (difficult or impossible to come by).
accreditation is the Blue Flag accreditation granted to beaches with the necessary
qualities, facilities, safety services and well-appointed recreation areas. Many South
African beaches have already been awarded this status, for instance Marina Beach
in KwaZulu-Natal. An international accreditation from any prestigious body is
extremely important for any site of natural or cultural importance. Once acquired, all
managerial efforts should be directed at retaining international accreditation.
suppressed. During the Nazi rule of 1933 to 1945 certain books, plays and music
were banned in Germany. Exactly the same was the case in the USSR and South
Africa in the 1970s and 1980s. Many other examples of acculturation and
enculturation could be named, and you would probably recognise many from your
own life. Consider the internet and the social networks as factors of acculturation in
your life. (See “demonstration effect”.)
polluted atmosphere is more acidic than what rainfall normally is. Rain that contains
more than normal the concentrations of these acids – especially carbonic and
sulphuric acids – becomes “acid rain”. Acid rain has pH values of 5,2 to as low as 5,0
and is a far more corrosive solution than normal rainwater. Vegetation dies when it
receives acid rain for a lengthy period. Millions of hectares of cypress, spur, spruce,
pine and birch forests in Northern Europe and Canada have already been lost as a
result of acid rain caused by industrial airpollution in Southern European countries
and the USA. From a geographical point of view, it is very important that air pollution
caused in one region, might result in acid rain in another region since winds convey
the pollutants. In the Eastern and South-Eastern Highveld of South Africa (mainly
Mpumalanga and Limpopo) a wide variety of problems might possibly be ascribed to
the acid rain caused by air pollution from coal-burning power stations in the Eastern
Highveld and the petrochemical industry in Sasolburg and Secunda. These problems
range from respiratory diseases in children, to sluggish growth and die-off of pine
forests, to decreasing soil productivity (through soil acidification), but no irrefutable
cause and result relationships have yet been established.
leg to do so – and in many cases a lost arm or leg becomes the harsh reality! In the
2013 climbing season 580 paying clients summited the mountain, but eight –
including two Sherpas – died as a result of people-congestion along the climbing
trail. Some climbers had to wait no less than six hours to ascend the technically
difficult Hillary Step, and “traffic jams” formed on the fixed lines. The Nepalese
tourism authorities have now decided to step in and install safety measures to lessen
the death rate. A fixed ladder is to be secured on the Hillary Step and two separate
fixed lines will be secured, one for the ascending and one for the descending “traffic”.
One could simply change the details in the history written above and apply it to white
water rafting, kayaking, canoeing, scuba diving, extreme skiing, solo navigation
around the world, or hiking through wildlife areas such as the Kruger National Park.
The increasing popularity of adventure tourism has already produced a sizeable
industry. There is no predicting where this trend will end, but currently a multitude of
people all around the world make a living out of tourists who want to take relatively
risky trips and do relatively risky activities. (See “environmental business”, “carrying
capacity”, “alternative tourism” and “accountability”.)
transport their workers to and from work. According to Weber’s model of industrial
location agglomeration is regarded as the most important single factor in the
location of firms and industries, but this is not undisputed. Car assembly plants,
panelbeating firms and firms that manufacture individual car parts are often located
in the same area where they can use economies of scale.
map drawn from the aggregated data. Exactly the same technique is used for all
types of spatial data, for instance the distribution of vegetation types, the occurrence
of sinkholes, the distribution of wetlands, the distribution of foreigners in a country,
and so forth. (See “disaggregation”.)
0,04 percent trace components, but when humans release huge amounts of carbon
dioxide and/or monoxide, sulphur dioxide and/or oxide, nitrogen oxides,
hydrocarbons (like methane), particulates (solid particles like dust), and
chlorofluorocarbon compounds (CFCs), the percentage of trace components is
raised. Air containing high concentrations of these pollutants may be harmful or even
highly toxic to human beings, and in the long run it might perhaps change climatic
conditions on Earth. (See “acid rain” and “climate change”.)
that is, value for its own sake, not for the sake of humans. The environmental
management that you will study in this Geography or Environmental Management
courses is underpinned by an anthropocentric philosophy. Envirocentric strategies
have never found enough traction to become mainstream ethical viewpoints on
which theory and practice could be based; they remain the ethics and ways of
thinking and doing of the radical fringe (that is, the fringe paradigms). (See
“accountability” and “genetically manipulated organism”.)
(such as shrimps and prawns), molluscs (such as mussels and oysters) and plants
such as edible waterlilies (known in South Africa as “waterblommetjies”), seaweed
and other plants believed to have either medicinal or agricultural applications (such
as fertilisers). It can be practised in artificial water bodies or in fenced-off portions of
existing salt or fresh water bodies. Fresh water species are mostly farmed in artificial
ponds such as on trout farms in the cooler regions of South Africa, for instance in
Mpumalanga, and in Lesotho. Oysters, mussels, shrimps and prawns are mostly
cultivated in portioned-off areas of shallow salt water bodies, like the oyster beds
(rows of baskets) in the Knysna lagoon. Aquaculture is a very old industry. It dates
from long before the Roman Empire and has been practised for hundreds or even
thousands of years in China, India, Japan, South-East Asia, South America and
Europe. The volume and value of aquaculture production has been steadily
increasing since the 1950s, but it is doubtful that the industry will ever overtake
commercial fishing as a food source. Breeding purely decorative koi fish and
cultivating oysters to produce cultured pearls, are sometimes classified as
aquaculture and sometimes not. Crayfish is not bred in aquaculture enterprises,
simply because it has not yet been accomplished successfully and crayfish grows so
slowly that its agricultural profitability is doubtful.
north-south line, or the geographic (or true) north-south line. If the direction of the
object is measured with a compass, the magnetic north-south line is used and a
correction must be made to find the actual location of the observed object. In order to
do that, one must know what magnetic declination is (see “magnetic declination”).
Twenty years ago one went into the wilderness with a compass and had to know
basic navigation skills to establish exactly where you were; today one grabs a GPS
and off you go – until the GPS’s battery runs down!
examples of areas with low biodiversity. Such areas are not devoid of any living
organisms, but the number of species as well the numbers of individuals of each
species will be low. The warm, humid tropical forests sustain a rich variety of
vegetation and many different animals and insects, and represent areas of high
biodiversity; these areas are the so-called biodiversity paradises. The island of
Madagascar was once one of the areas of extremely high biodiversity – a true
biodiversity paradise. Unfortunately, human beings have nearly destroyed the
island’s biodiversity through deforestation and hunting. Certain animals, such as the
dodo bird, have been hunted to extinction and deforestation and erosion have
destroyed the habitats of many other animals and plants. (See “extinction”, “natural
selection” and “habitat destruction”.)
C
Cadastral maps: Maps that show property boundaries and other administrative
boundaries, land registration and tenure information. Private and state properties all
over the surveyed world are registered and deeds offices keep all the records and all
registration details of the property. Any map that shows these boundaries is a
cadastral map. International, district, county, municipal and provincial boundaries are
also indicated on these maps. One needs a relatively large scale map (like 1:50 000)
to indicate farm boundaries, but no small urban properties can be mapped on that
scale. For urban properties, such as those in a certain suburb of a city, a larger scale
(like 1:10 000 or preferably 1:1 000) would be needed. Cadastral maps are
indispensable for urban planning, service provision, property tax collection, property
transactions, solving of boundary and ownership disputes, spatial analyses,
geotechnical investigations, environmental impact assessments, and many other
purposes. In South Africa we are fortunate to have excellent cadastral map series on
different scales. The same cannot be said about most developing countries. Land
tenure systems also vary from region to region on Earth. In tribal regions, land
registration and cadastral mapping do not apply. In the former USSR, all land
belonged to the State, and no cadastral system was even developed until the USSR
dissolved in 1991 and private ownership of land became part of their new reality. In
the Sahara Desert nomadic Bedouins move from oasis to oasis (see “salinisation”)
and they do not even know in which country they are at any specific time! But the
nomads know which oasis “belongs” to whom, which ones may be used and which
should be avoided. So they have no need of cadastral maps to settle these matters.
The same applies to many regions such as the Amazonian forests, the Mongolian
deserts, the tribal savannahs and grazing lands of East Africa, the barren
Patagonian tundra, the high Himalayan ranges, and so forth. In fact, the larger part
of the land on Earth is not cadastrally mapped, since there has never been a need
for it.
on the Earth’s surface is the grid formed by the lines of latitude and lines longitude.
Absolute geographical location is described by its latitudinal and longitudinal
coordinates. (See “absolute location” under “location” and “geographical coordinate
system”.)
spatial climatic variability fairly satisfactorily, but we know very little about its
temporal variability. To describe all the details of the Earth’s long history will be
scientists’ task for many years to come. Currently climate variability in the form of
global warming is studied by scientists, discussed by everybody, written about in
scientific and popular lay publications, the topic of numerous international
conferences, and the driving force of a multi-million dollar industry. The theory of
global warming postulates that human activities are causing, or at the very least
accelerating, global climatic change. Time will tell whether it is true or not. (See
“global warming”, “space-in-time perspective”, “spatial data”, “spatial distribution” and
“temporal change”.)
vicinity. As more facilities originate the visitor numbers of all the facilities – including
that of the original draw-card attraction – increase. The Cradle of Humankind world
heritage site serves as an apt example. The popularity and general acquaintance of
the Sterkfontein caves and the exhibition of the Mrs Ples fossil collection, have for
many decades been an attraction for individuals interested in archaeology and
palaeontology. But there are other equally important caves and palaeontological
sites in its near vicinity and the entire area of some square kilometres was regarded
as important enough to grant it world heritage site status. Soon other tourist
attractions were developed in the area, namely the Maropeng museum of evolution,
the Savannah Game Reserve, the Rhino and Lion Nature Reserve, the old
Kromdraai Goldmine, the Cradle Game Reserve, the Cultural Village, hiking routes,
lodges, spas, country escapes, art and craft markets, and the tourist-friendly
developments at the other important caves namely Zwartkrans and Kromdraai, and
many other sites. All of these entities benefit from the nearness of other tourist
attractions, and all of them contribute to the huge tourist numbers now being
attracted to this world heritage site. The Cradle of Humankind world heritage site
represents a successful tourist destination with a whole selection of complementary
developments.
regions are demarcated by rainfall isohyets; rich regions are demarcated by per
capita income or gross domestic product (GDP); biomes are demarcated on grounds
of the types of plants and animals that occur in them; crime-prone areas in a city are
demarcated by the number of criminal incidents reported over a specific period. Note
that all the spatial distributions mentioned above, can be described by means of
maps. Thus geographers demarcate areas which describe spatial distributions.
Nowadays, such data is often stored in geographic information systems (GISs). (See
“regions”.)
never ending deluge of masses of visitors. Unlike these, certain tourism destinations
such as limestone caves, catacombs, salt mines, coral reefs, nature reserves, game
parks, sacred sites and places of meditation and rememberance are fragile and/or
not suited to cope with masses of tourists all the time (see “carrying capacity”). Of
course, the public can never be told not to visit a tourist site, because visitors are the
life blood of any tourist site. However, if the destination is damaged by too many
visitors, management measures have to be taken or the site will be destroyed, and
management could be accused of “killing the goose that lays the golden eggs”.
There is justifiable concern that the carrying capacity of the Kruger National Park is
being exceeded by too many day visitors and the development of a number of new
small camps. Nature reserves like Yellow Stone and Yosemite in the USA have had
to limit visitor numbers years ago – if for no other reason than to relieve the traffic
jams in the reserves! There are various ways of limiting the visitors, namely
increasing the entrance fees, prohibiting children, requiring advance booking,
disallowing visitors to move around without a guide, allowing a limited number of
visitors per day, prohibiting food and beverages on the site, prohibiting photography,
barring visitors access to the most fragile areas or precious artefacts, and so forth.
Tourism management is not as easy as it often seems, and with tourism being the
one of the fastest growing industries in the world, these problems are going to
increase rather than decrease.
years constitute the economically active group of the population who contribute to
the economic productivity. Those younger than 15 years and those older than 65
years usually constitute the non-economically active group. A dependency ratio is
calculated to express the number of people (individuals) who are dependent on
every 100 economically active people. Theoretically, a low dependency ratio is
desirable since it means that a large proportion of the population is contributing to
the economy. A high dependency ratio is economically undesirable, since it means
that a small group of working people must provide for a large group of dependents.
Dependency ratios for the richer, more developed countries are much lower than
those for poor, developing states. In the developed countries the dependency ratios
typically vary from 50 to 70 per cent, but in the developing countries it often exceeds
100 per cent which indicates that there are more dependents than producers in the
population. The dependency ratio has one important shortcoming in that it uses age
as the only variable to identify the productive and unproductive groups of the
population. It does not take into account those people who can work, but cannot find
employment (that is, the unemployed). The general conception of dependency
cannot – and does not – rely solely on the dependency ratio to express the state of
production and dependency in a country or region.
completely barren and unable to support the people living there. International aid
organisations had to supply food to the people, yet many thousands died of
starvation. This tragic event grabbed the attention of people all over the world and
the idea of the Sahara Desert slowly “creeping” or spreading southwards was born.
The misconception that most of the deserts in the world are slowly spreading into the
adjacent regions as a result of natural conditions and climate change became
commonly accepted. After an extensive international research effort, it was
established that desertification is an environmental degradation process created as
the result of excessive human activities which cause the decline of the productivity of
semi-arid regions and converted them into desert-like landscapes (see
“environmental degradation”). In fact, deforestation (see “deforestation”) ultimately
results in desertification. It should be mentioned that large tracts of the Sahel have
regained their productivity after a number of normal rainfall years and more
appropriate grazing and cultivation practices.
square kilometres. By their very nature, military operations and warfare have an
enormous ecological footprint. Recreation for the rich such as golf courses, ski
resorts, racing tracts, human-made 4x4 routes, and many others – ironically – have
enormous ecological footprints which are seldom considered. (See “ecology” and
“environmental degradation”).
definable area. The area occupied by the ecosystem can be demarcated and
mapped (see “demarcation”). From a purely natural scientific perspective
“environment” refers to the natural components and the relationships between them
within a system, and human beings do not form a natural, integral part of that
environment. From a purely social science perspective, “environment” refers to the
social environment and interactions of humans within families, groups or societies
and nature does not form an integral part of those systems. Other components of the
extensive, broadly viewed environment, have been identified as constituting specific
“subsystems” and relational conditions of focussed scientific investigation. These
include the economic, the cultural-historic, the built, the political, the labour or work,
the industrial, the retail, the entertainment and recreational environments, and many
more. The Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site could be regarded and studied
as a natural environment important from both a geological and a paleontological
viewpoint. It is also an archaeological important environment, a cultural-historic site
or environment, an area of importance to environmental management and
geographical investigation, a recreational and tourist environment, an economical
environment, and even a socio-political important environment. Thus, the term
“environment” has a multitude of meanings, and it means different things to different
people. Therefore, the context in which the term is used is extremely important.
the sites are not satisfactorily managed the world heritage site status could be
withdrawn.
natural production potential and carrying capacity of an area could be the cause
of environmental degradation (see “carrying capacity”). Any one or more of the
abovementioned causes, could degrade a certain portion (area) of the environment
to such an extent that no living organisms (including microbial life) could survive
there. All forms of life existing today are to a greater or lesser degree adapted to the
environment they live in. Should that environment change faster than the organisms
(including humans) can evolve, mass extinction of life on Earth will ensue. Humans
have been changing the environment for a few million years, but as a result of the
vast increase in the human population and its staggering technological advancement
during the past 150 years, enormous change is currently being wrought upon the
environment. In the final analysis environmental management is aimed at preventing
irreversible environmental degradation. Should our recent attempts at environmental
management fail, we would probably degrade our environment to a point where it
cannot sustain life anymore and life as we know it would cease to exist. It is
important to note that this environmental degradation is a human-induced process,
not a natural one. Natural processes of environmental change do not degrade the
environment, it slowly changes the environment and the evolution of most forms of
life can change or evolve to adapt to the altered environment. This has been
happening for at least 3 500 million years, but human activities are responsible for an
accelerated rate of environmental change, and we are not at all sure what such fast
alteration is going to cause. (See “extinction” and “natural selections”.)
vast tracts of the Amazonian forests for staggering profits. The destruction of forests
out of greed is morally not justifiable, but to expect Brazil to preserve the forests in
order to filter the atmosphere of the CO2 that the developed countries such as the
United States of America release into the atmosphere, is neither fair nor just. These
matters were not even on the agenda at the start of the Earth Summit in Rio de
Janeiro in 1992, but the developing countries made sure that it became the main
point of discussion at the summit. The paradox between greed and morality has
been part of all environmental thinking ever since. The legal entrenchment of the
principle that the polluter must pay, is probably the only true advance made in this
regard.
person or entity. They are there to be used by all. Since no-one “owns” them, no-one
takes responsibility for the sustainability of their usage. Most of these resources have
for hundreds of years been exploited (see “exploitation”) by all who used them to a
point of unsustainability, irreversible degradation or even total collapse – it has truly
become the “tragedy of the commons”. The Environmental Movement that sprang
to life in the early 1960s (see “ecocentrism, “ecological citizenship”, “ecological
niche” and “environmentalist”) is largely the child born of this tragedy.
Environmentalism and environmental management, in their essence, strive towards
the saving of the “commons” and to ensure that they are used sustainable.
all stem from one human foible, namely greed. The only exceptions are where
poverty forces people to exploit their land, vegetation and water resources. However,
all exploitation has a common end, namely environmental degradation, unproductive
land, increased poverty, hunger and misery.
extinct over the last few hundred years. All species of rhinoceros in Africa and Asia
seem doomed to extinction. The most active and dangerous human-induced
(anthropogenic) cause of extinction is habitat loss, habitat degradation (see
“environmental degradation”) and habitat fragmentation that humans bring about.
Owing to habitat loss the blue swallow of Kaapsche Hoop in South Africa is very
nearly extinct. With less than 30 breeding pairs the genetic pool is so small that it
would probably not be able to escape extinction. Habitat loss is also responsible for
the fact that two species of South Africa’s cranes are teetering on the brink of
extinction. South Africa’s national bird, the blue crane, was very nearly extinct when
a number of nongovernmental, environmental organisations stepped in with a
successful protection and breeding project. The species is still threatened, but there
is hope that it might still be rescued.
we cannot expect to have newly formed resources after a number of years. The
chemical composition of all fossil fuels determines that the burning of these fuels will
release carbon and hydrogen compounds into the atmosphere.
largely. All of this is covered by the basic geographical principle of spatial variation
and variability (see “spatial variation”).
works perfectly to describe location since each point’s position on the grid is
described by two unique coordinates. Hence geographers developed a grid that
would work on a sphere. The geographical coordination system consists of an
imaginary network, or grid, of two sets of straight lines. One set runs in a north-
south-north direction around the globe, and the other in an east-west-east direction.
The north-south lines are called lines of longitude (or meridians), and the east-
west lines are the lines of latitude (or the parallels). The prime meridian, or
Greenwich Meridian (because it runs through Greenwich in England) line is the 0°
meridian dividing the Earth into an eastern and a western hemisphere. The main
parallel or 0° line of latitude is the equator which divides the Earth into a northern
and a southern hemisphere. The north pole and the south pole are respectively the
90°N and the 90°S latitudes and they are not lines, but points. When the absolute
location (see “location”) of a place (point) is described, the latitudinal location
coordinate is given first and secondly the longitudinal location coordinate, for
instance 25°S32°E, or 18°N72°W (see “absolute location” under “location”.) This is
commonly – but unofficially – referred to as the Lat-Lo rule. One exception to this
rule is the the large scale maps of the British Ordinance Survey where longitude is
given first and latitude is given secondly. On these maps lines of longitude are called
“eastings” and lines of latitude are called “northings”.
one international conference after the other in order to curb the release of
greenhouse gasses, but little success has yet been achieved.
products (GDPs), and high human development indices (HDIs) (see “development”
and “developing countries”). From the late 1960s through the 1970s the gap between
the developed countries and the developing countries became very pronounced and
extremely politicised. A number of international organisations such as the United
Nations (UN) and the World Trade Union (WTO) intensified investigation into the
rich-versus-poor discourse and all its economic and political ramifications. In 1980
the UN published the so-called Brandt Report, named after Dr Willy Brandt, the
former Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany) and
respected supporter of the European Economic Community, and then Chairman of
the UN’s Brandt Commission. In order to simplify the description of the global spatial
distribution patterns of wealth and development, poverty and underdevelopment, the
terms “rich North” and “poor South” were created. These two entities are supposed
to be separated by the so-called Brandt line (see “development” and “developing
countries”). These terms became entrenched in scientific as well as lay literature.
When the terms “rich” and “poor” became stigmatised, the use of “global” became
habitual. The Brandt line has a very distinguished shape, as it includes Japan and
South Korea into the rich North and then dips down south to include Australia and
New Zealand into the developed North. Although this line is still being used, it is
rapidly becoming obsolete since several developing states are now countries in
transition (CITs) and these so-called BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China le
South Africa; also see “countries in transition”) are not given special recognition by
the Brandt line.
management of the site has been delegated to the national authority(ies) in South
Afrcia, namely the national and local (or provincial) departments of the environment,
science, technology, tourism and culture, which again passes the execution of
decisions to local authorities and even to local community leaders and the
communities themselves. Hence, the central government is seldom directly involved
in the environmental, paleontological and archaeological conservation issues and the
day to day management of the declared sites. However, ultimately someone or some
authoritive body must accept accountablility. In the explanation above, environmental
governance is used as an example, but more or less the same applies to any other
aspect of life, for instance health, education, sport, housing, defence, social services,
and so forth.
use cellphones not only in the cities, but even in rural areas and certain wilderness
areas far from the beaten track. The diffusion of the popularity of the internet’s social
networks like Facebook and Twitter did not happen hierarchically, but the diffusion of
the physical satellite data reception installations did.
or move away. In human communities, the “invaders” could be people fleeing for
their lives, have no identity papers or money and tenuous or no connections to the
community they have fled to (see “refugee”). The host community might be hostile to
the newcomers and drive them out or even kill them, but that does not happen very
often because people would not flee to an area where they know they would be
unwelcome. There are also international organisations such as the International Red
Cross, Médecins Sans Frontièrs, Oxfam and the United Nations High Commission
for Refugees (UNHCR) who could assist both the refugees and the host community
to cope with the situation. But there is no denying that the people of the host
community are presented with a problem when they have to assimilate “foreigners”.
Even if the foreigners are not refugees in the true sense of the word, problems may
occur as the foreigners consume services, need health care and education, occupy
jobs, and do never quite become part of the host community. South Africans are
currently a host community for many thousands (or even millions) of people from
Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Angola, Nigeria, Ghana, Malawi, the Democratic Republic
of the Congo, Somalia and many other African states. A number of xenophobic
clashes have already taken place and many South Africans are not overly happy
with the presence of these foreigners, but thus far South Africans have proven a
remarkably tolerant host community.
developed countries, the waste heat of combustion is used for domestic heating.
Owing to a lack of the required expertise and the costs involved in the process,
incineration is far less often used in developing countries. Waste disposal is a
specialisation field in environmental management, and it is rarely completely
covered by the environmental management acts of any country. Even in South Africa
with its exemplary environmental management legislation, hazardous waste disposal
is covered by separate, very specific legislation.
changed the world and the entire global ecosystem. It spelled the end of the age of a
rural, localised, independent, subsistence and low-production commercial lifestyles
and hand-made tools in the (now) developed countries, and the emergence of the
reliance on non-renewable fossil fuels and machine-made goods in the largest
economies of the developed world. The environment was seriously degraded by this
dependence on coal, oil and gas to drive the machines in the centralised factories in
the industrialised towns especially those that quickly grew into large cities. In the
(now) developed countries, people moved from the rural areas to the cities to find
employment in the factories. This changed the provision of services since all these
newly urbanised people required religious, educational and medical services. And –
unfortunately – the concerning environmental issues of air pollution, water pollution,
waste management, infrastructure construction, and many more, were created. In
order to secure the necessary raw materials for the manufacturing industry, the rural
regions were also affected by increased mining, infrastructure, telecommunication
networks, water provision to the cities, industrial pollution in water sources and in the
atmosphere, acid rain, and many more. The developing countries were also affected
since many of the raw materials and the labour for the industries were obtained from
the (then) underdeveloped countries.
eight) most powerful economies in the world, the BRICS countries (see ”developing
countries”), the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the
United Nations Environmental Protection Agency (UNEP or UNEPA), the World
Trade Organisation (WTO), the World Health Organisation (WHO), UNESCO, the
World Wildlife Fund (WWF), the International Convention on Trade in Endangered
Species (CITES), the Wildlife and Environmental Society of South Africa (WESSA),
and many, many more. Some of the most famous international environmental
conventions are the Stockholm Declaration of 1972 where it was decided that states
should co-operate to develop international law regarding liability and compensation
for environmental pollution; the Maastricht Treaty and the Lomé Conventions number
I to IV of the late 1980s which were attempts at advancing international co-operation
on environmental regulations; the Ramsar Convention of 1971 on the international
co-operation to protect (see “wetlands”); the Montreal Protocol of 1987, where the
industrial scale use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) was banned; and the Basel
Convention of 1989 which was an attempt to regulate the cross-border transport of
hazardous (especially radio-active) waste. The single most well-publicised (and
probably the largest) international environmental convention ever held was the UN
Conference on Environment and Development (colloquially known as the “Earth
Summit”) held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 (see “environmental justice”). The most
important resolution decided on at that conference was the Convention on the
Protection of Biodiversity, which was later refined and incorporated into a very
important document, called Agenda 21. At the Earth Summit serious discussions
commenced about limiting the volumes of carbon dioxides and other greenhouse
gasses the different economies (states and certain groups of states) may annually
release into the atmosphere. However, little progress was made since the poor,
developing countries and the rich, developed countries could not come to any
agreement. However, once aired, the issue could not be avoided or suppressed any
longer. It led to a conference in Kyoto, Japan, in 1997. There it was decided that
every state would be allowed a certain amount of air pollution in that each respective
state is allocated a specific volume of greenhouse gasses that may be released into
the atmosphere annually. The so-called “carbon quotas” allocated to a number of the
highly developed, industrial states were not acceptable to all of them, notably the
USA, Australia, China and India. Consequently, they did not ratify the protocol. The
10th anniversary of the Earth Summit took place in Johannesburg in 2002, but very
little was achieved at this occasion except for an acknowledgement that the carbon
quotas set in 1992 were probably unrealistic. From the examples listed above, it is
clear that the word “convention” is often replaced by “declaration”, “summit”,
“agreement”, “treaty” or “protocol”, so it could be somewhat confusing. It is advised
that the word “convention” be reserved to describe the actual meeting, debating and
decision-making, while the other terms are reserved to describe the records of
decisions made at the conventions. (See “international protocols”.)
important cities would definitely be visited by more people than one which far away
from the main transport networks. In essence an intervening site is just another site
for doing business in the near vicinity of existing main business sites or tourist
destinations. However, entrepreneurs who wish to establish tourist destinations
would be well advised to seek out localities that would benefit from the vicinity of
other major attractions. The Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site is fortunate in
that it is located in Gauteng near both Pretoria and Johannesburg, while tourist
destinations such as Dullstroom, Sabie and Graskop could all be seen as intervening
opportunities between Johannesburg (and Pretoria) and the Kruger National Park.
L
Land use (land-use): Any purpose for which land is used for human activity.
Two distinct types of land use are recognised, namely rural and urban. Rural land
use includes agriculture in the form of animal husbandry and/or crop cultivation, and
recreation in many different forms such as hiking, skiing, cycling, safaris, game
viewing, bird watching, ecotourism, and a totally unspecific thing called “getting away
from it all”. Urban land use includes residential, educational, industrial, commercial,
and professional activities and services.
and the places where they lived were bulldozed. District Six in Cape Town, Sophia
Town and Triomf in Johannesburg, and Lady Selbourne in Pretoria are examples
from the past. Currently examples of typical local communities are found in Diepsloot
north of Johannesburg, Cross Roads and Gugulethu near Cape Town, Mandela City
near Pretoria, and many more. Local communities need not be urbanised and there
are innumerable rural communities that display the same sense of belonging to place
and people. The communities of Kwadlangezwa, Nkandla, Mier, Elim and Pniel
serve as examples. The phenomenon of close, stable, local community bonds to
place and people, occurs everywhere in the world. In the USA “the hoods” and “the
Projects” are typical examples of sub-economical local communities, while Staten
Island and Long Island represent affluent local communities. The people in the slums
and shanty towns of Kolkota (formerly Culcutta) and Mumbai (formerly Bombay) form
very strong, exclusive local communities and those in the favelas (shanty towns) of
Rio de Janeiro often do not even tolerate the presence of strangers.
dramatic, sudden occurrences which often cause lives to be lost and property to be
irreversibly altered. In our modern, engineered and economical form of life, the
relentlessness of the natural processes of mass movement is often disregarded, and
always to the detriment of the ordinary people. Probably the most well-known
example of mass movement that caused a terrible loss of life is the Aberfan incident
in Wales, Great Britain, when a mine dump collapsed in 1966 and a mass of
oversaturated mine waste simply covered a nearby school burying all the pupils and
teachers in one fell swoop. South Africa too has its examples of dramatic, costly and
often tragic anthropogenic (human-induced) mass movement. One of the most well-
known scenic roads in the world is Chapman’s Peak Drive around the peninsula just
south of Cape Town. The road was built by undercutting the steep slopes of the
peninsula, thus disturbing the natural stability of the slopes and consequently rock
falls are common occurrences all along the route. Enormous amounts have recently
been spent to prevent rocks from tumbling onto the road, and after heavy rains the
road is often closed for a few days in order to avoid calamities and remove debris
from the road surface. An ever-present form of mass wasting is soil creep which is
the slow, continual creeping of soil downwards over a shallow slope of as low as
three degrees (3˚). This is a completely natural process, but human activities such as
animal husbandry and crop production might accelerate the process and render vast
tracts of fertile land unproductive.
reliable, explain why it is less reliable and justify why it has nonetheless been used.
All results obtained from the analysis of less reliable data have to be evaluated very
carefully. In certain types of research one might collect a lot of very reliable data as
well as some less reliable data. In such a case the credibility of the results is
diminished to the level of the least reliable data, although most of the data might be
of the highest possible reliability. If all the data used in an analysis is of a low quality
(a low level of reliability) the results are, of course, questionable and findings or
conclusions must be made with the greatest care possible. There are myriads of
reasons why data could be of a poor quality, and it might occur in any type of
empirical research. In all empirical research, the meta data is indispensable since it
determines the credibility of the conclusions. (See “primary data”.)
community”), or appointed by a higher authority. The local authority controls the area
by means of enforcing a set of by-laws and regulations which apply to that specific,
well demarcated area (see “demarcation”), but have no authority beyond the
geographical limits of that area. When an urban-rural boundary is sharp and definite,
it is obvious where the jurisdiction of the local authority begins and ends, but often
urban and rural areas are not clearly separated and tend to merge over a broad
semi-rural, semi-urban mixed type of land-use (see “land-use”) and the settlement
pattern is rather blurred. In all cases the area of jurisdiction of a metropolitan
authority has to be clearly defined or numerous disputes and local disturbances
might arise. In South Africa, where local authorities are elected bodies, numerous
different metropolitan areas were amalgamated into larger metropolitan areas after
the 1994 regime change. Initially this caused quite a bit of uncertainty for both the
inhabitants and the authorities, but many of those teething problems have now been
overcome.
order to assess the potential short and long term effects of the process. Normally
migration means that people shift their abode (the place where they live) from one
place to another in order to live there for a long period. But it is also common for
people to go and live in another place for a relatively short period such as a few
years. Some people move to other places for an undetermined time and they would
move back to their original home regions at the end of a stint in another place. Even
very short-term movement, such as a tourist’s visit, is sometimes regarded as
“migration”, although tourism is mostly not regarded as migration. One type of
movement which is seldom regarded as migration, is the cross-border movement of
one member of a family to work for 11 months per year in another country, and
returning to their home countries for a month or two, before going back to the host
country (see “refugee”) to earn money. The reason why this type of movement is
seldom regarded as migration is the fact that those worker’s family stays behind and
the worker him/herself does not intend to live in the host country permanently. An
example of this type of human movement is the large numbers of migrant workers
from Zimbabwe, Malawi, Mozambique, Angola, Kenya, the Democratic Republic of
the Congo, Somalia and a number of other African states who annually move to
South Africa because there are no employment opportunities in their home countries.
Migration might be internal, that is, people move from one area in their own country
to another region in the same country. Urbanisation belongs to this category of
migration. In other cases, people move to another country with the full intention of
never returning to their country of origin; this is called external migration (or
emigration). There are numerous reasons why people migrate, and two distinct
types of reasons are distinguished, namely push factors and pull factors. The
former include war, famine and starvation, tribalism, religious intolerance, racism,
political factionalism, poverty and the inability to make a living. When migrants move
as family groups in order to save life or limb, they are in fact fleeing, often do not
carry any documentation, have no possessions and are regarded as refugees.
Migration because of pull factors is usually financially motivated. If their home
country does not offer its citizens the opportunity to make a proper living or find paid
employment, the people migrate to another country. “Push” and “pull” factors are not
always easy to distinguish. Currently, innumerable people from a variety of African
states flock to South Africa and enter the country – legally or illegally – for either
economical and/or political reasons (see “refugee”). Here they find employment or at
least a way to make a living, which was impossible to do in their home countries.
Thus their migration is caused by both “push” factors and “pull” factors and it is really
impossible to identify which of the two is actually responsible. Immigration (“in-
migration”) could have an enormous effect on the demographic structure (see
“demographic data” and “population pyramids”) of a population. Although the crude
birth rate in the United States of America is nearly as low as in the affluent, Western
European nations, the annual population growth rate for the USA is the highest in the
world. The reason is that people from all over the world attempt to, and often
succeed in, moving into the USA for the economical and financial opportunities it
presents.
wheat which has traditionally been grown in the region. He/she gets a very good
price for the canola and next year a few other farmers will also start to grow canola
and then the multiplier effect really kicks in and soon all the farmers are planting
canola (as in the Overberg region in South Africa). However, wheat production has
been shrinking at an increased rate and soon wheat production is so low that wheat
has to be imported. The feedback loops (see “feedback loop”) in an economic
system will assure that growth continues to grow exponentially. What has often been
called “the eight wonder of the world”, namely compound interest, demonstrates
this multiplier effect perfectly. Invested money grows and earns interest and the
larger amount of money grows even faster and earns even more interest. Now the
investor is receiving interest on interest and his/her money is making money which
makes more money, and so it goes on and on. A billionaire can easily make another
million Rand and that is why the richest people in the world are simply getting richer
and richer while the poor are getting poorer and poorer. This is how a classic
capitalist, totally free-market economic system works. In such a system economic
and industrial growth take place at an exponential rate, not a geometric one. Of
course, it cannot continue ad infinitum, but no one knows when the system will break
down. In this respect, natural and human-made systems behave exactly the same.
Exponential growth in a natural system also results in break-down of the system, but
we are not able to predict when the break-down point would be reached.
very expensive problem. The necessary safety measures cost a fortune, and the
problem of financially affordable storage of large amounts of generated energy is still
largely beyond our capability. Owing to the financial investment, the development of
nuclear power plants is restricted to the affluent developed states, such as the USA,
Canada, the Scandinavian countries, France, Russia and some other Western
European countries, as well as Japan invested in the construction and operation of
nuclear plants. The first serious warning that these plants might pose a serious
threat to the local people as well as the environment was the incident at the Three
Mile Nuclear Plant in Pennsylvania, USA, in 1979 when a malfunction caused the
release of radio-active substances into the immediate environment of the plant. The
second highly disconcerting incident happened in 1986 when a major malfunction
and partial meltdown in the old, rather obsolete Chernobyl nuclear plant in the
Ukraine (then still part of the USSR) released an enormous amount of radiation into
the environment. The investigation into this nuclear accident revealed that the
amount of radiation released was ten times (10 times) more than that of the nuclear
bomb which destroyed the city of Hiroshima, Japan, at the end of the Second World
War. In 2011 a seismic incident once again brought the dangers associated with
nuclear plants to the fore. A powerful earthquake in Japan caused a “leakage” of
radio-activity from the Fukushima nuclear electricity plant. Although it was a very
serious situation it was soon brought under control because Japan had the
necessary modern technology and know-how to deal with the matter. It did, however,
stress the dangers associated with nuclear energy. If accidents can be completely
prevented, safe disposal of radio-active waste can be guaranteed and the enormous
amounts of cash to build the plants are available, nuclear energy might prove to be
the preferred alternative to fossil fuels for generating electricity and the entire world
might be able to use nuclear power, but we are still far short of that target.
been added (see “contour maps”, “isometric lines” and “interpolation”). In South
Africa the official series is on a scale of 1:10 000, but only the major urban
complexes have been covered. Orthophoto maps have one major advantage over
topographical maps, namely that they are actual photographs with all the information
about that part of the surface captured exactly as it would be seen by the eye. One
characteristic of these maps is that – owing to the large scale – it would require 15 or
20 or even more sheets to cover an urban complex like Durban, whereas the entire
area could be covered by one 1:50 000 topocadastral map sheet. Under certain
circumstances it is more advantageous to use a topocadastral map, but under
different circumstances the orthophoto maps cannot be surpassed for the specific
detail it provides. It might come as a surprise that orthophoto maps are cheaper to
produce than conventional topocadastral maps and therefore easier to update. (See
“topographical map”, “cadastral map” and “topocadastral map”.)
molecular oxygen and the “loose” atoms then combine with proper oxygen molecules
to form triatomic oxygen. Below the level where ozone is formed, it gradually
disperses toward ground level and on the way down the triatomic ozone quickly
changes to normal oxygen molecules. Ozone is important to us because it readily
absorbs ultra-violet radiation and thus prevents a large amount of the ultra-violet rays
from the sun to reach the Eearth’s surface. Ozone actually protects us from recieving
too much ultra-violet radiation (which could cause skin cancers and eye cataracts).
During the late 1960s and early 1970s, we detected a dramatic reduction of the
ozone in the upper atmosphere. Since we were releasing large volumes of
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) into the atmosphere and knew that CFCs dissociate
ozone, we deduced that air pollution was causing this reduction in atmospheric
ozone. Realising the consequences of too little ozone in the atmosphere, an
international convention (see “international convention”) was held in Montreal,
Canada. The Montreal Protocol was ratified in 1987 which immediately placed a total
ban on the release of CFCs. Even before all the stipulations of the Montreal Protocol
(Accord) could be implemented, the depleted ozone layer started returning to its
former condition. Since then we have discovered that the ozone concentration in the
atmosphere increases and decreases as a result of currently unexplained natural
causes. We do not know what effect the Montreal Accord had on the ozone layer,
but we have at least succeeded in reducing the amount of CFCs released into the
atmosphere and learnt that humans could act together to achieve some
environmental goal, provided the alternative is too serious to risk.
Polarisation: Parties who have the same viewpoint about any important
matter will band together to form polarised pressure groups who could oppose one
another more effectively. In any international gathering of interested parties,
polarisation inevitably happens. Whether it is a political, economical or environmental
issues that is at stake, it is a given that the role players will not all share the same
opinion. Each party will in the first place want to protect its own interests. It would
join the group that holds opinions most compatible with its own. The gathering will
inevitably become polarised, and two or more powergroups will then face it off. In the
political and economical environments, formal agreements might be reached by like-
minded parties. Some of these agreements might stand for many years and might
even survive wars, terrorism and enemy aggression. A typical example is the Allied
Forces of the Second World War who opposed the Axis States, but in that instance
many of the allegiances changed after the war and new animosities surfaced in what
became a 40-year Cold War. The African Union which originated from the
Organisation for African Unity has survived despite a number of wars between the
member nations themselves, but both of these organisations have been remarkably
ineffective in establishing peace and development in Africa. Since politics and
economics are often intertwined, political and economical polarisations are also
intertwined. Some authors regard the world as being polarised between an
economically developed grouping and an economically developing (or
underdeveloped) grouping of states (see “economic development”, “developed
North” and “developing states”). However, nowadays the most prominent economical
groupings are the Group of Eight, the developing states and the BRICS countries
(see “economic development”, “developed states” and “developing nations”). In the
180
environmental sphere, polarisations are very common, but they tend to be loose,
self-serving and changeable. Some countries might band together during one Cites
meeting (see “international conventions”) and oppose all others in order to sell-off
their stock-piles of ivory or rhino horn, and be completely opposed about the very
same issue at the next Cites meeting. At the so-called “Earth Summit” (see
“environmental justice”) the developing (poor) nations and the developed (rich)
nations opposed each other vigorously in unpremeditated polarisation about
environmental responsibility and air pollution. But on the whole, environmental
polarisations tend to be fluid, opportunistic and issue-bound.
Protected areas: Any rural or urban area deemed worthy of protection and/or
conservation for the benefit of the future generations. It includes wildlife areas and
nature reserves, spectacular waterfalls, dramatic coast lines, vast stretches of
pristine desert, historic parts of cities, old city centres, single human artefacts with
their immediate environments, and so forth. Museums provide a safe haven for
relatively small objects, but large natural features and human artefacts such as the
Taj Mahal in Aggra (India), the pyramids in Egypt, the Kruger National Park, the
Cradle of Humankind world heritage site and the Iguassú waterfalls could not be
locked away in museums! Yet, the protection worthiness of these places and
objects have been obvious for many years or even centuries, and attempts to protect
them date from many years ago. Long before modern-day environmental
management was even devised, these very special, valuable and irreplaceable
places and objects were already being protected by various ad hoc international
agreements, national laws, regional and/or municipal regulations and a myriad of
other legal instruments specifically designed to ensure their protection. Although
current environmental management practices and legislation provide for the
protection of these special features, they are still afforded special consideration and
many of the old, specified pre-environmental management rulings still apply. In many
cases, the special case-specific protection arrangements for places or objects take
precedence over the normal environmental legislation. Antarctica is a case in point.
Normal environmental legislation does not apply to Antarctica, it is being protected
by the International Antarctic Treaty, an international body under the aegis and for all
practical purposes the highest decision-making body as far as Antartica is
concerned. From the few examples mentioned above, it is obvious that the variety of
the places and objects that must be protected vary widely in size and nature. Even
within one and the same protected area such as the Cradle of Humankind World
Heritage Site, certain parts are very lightly protected, while certain parts are so
strictly protected that visitors are not even allowed into them. This type of protection
is nowadays commonly used so that certain parts of a protected area are not even
open to the public, while less tight control is excised over the so-called buffer zone
where the public may enjoy the natural or human-made treasures and wonders of
our diverse world. (Note: It is important to realise that environmental management
deals with natural as well as human-made areas and objects.)
finances and the other partner organises the labour and physical activities. There are
endless different ways how such participation schemes can be initialised, organised,
continued and their success could be evaluated. (Please note: Do not confuse the
abovementioned abbreviation “PPP” with the abbreviation “PPP” which is used in
strategic environmental management for policies, plan and projects.)
Q
Quaternary economic activities: Gainful involvement with high-level
technology, high-level information services, knowledge and know-how. Industry
ranges from primary activities (farming, fishing, forestry and mining), to secondary
activities (manufacturing and construction), to tertiary activities (professional
services, hospitality, retailing and transport), to quaternary activities which require a
high level of knowledge and technical expertise. (See “development”, “dual
economy”, “developing countries” and “countries in transition”, “secondary economic
197
batteries which could power ordinary light bulbs, or cook food in a special solar stove
(even a cheap, homemade model). Solar energy is nowadays very commonly used
all over the world for a variety of installations and equipment; these range from
pocket calculators, to cell phone towers, warm water geysers, cookers (stoves),
domestic lighting, to power entire buildings, and many more. The only limitations for
using solar energy are geographic location (certain regions, such as the polar
regions do not receive much sunlight for a few months of the year), cloudy and rainy
regions, the high capital outlay to buy and install the solar equipment (these costs
are high because the equipment and solar panels are expensive), and so forth.
However, even in European countries that receive much less solar energy than we
do in South Africa, solar energy is commonly used, and all homes and buildings
have to install solar panels. In fact, the entire African continent receives so much
sunlight that solar generated electricity could be available to every human being in
Africa, but the expense of solar panels, installations and batteries is beyond the
financial capability of most Africans. Other forms of renewable energy are falling
water which generates hydro-electric power, tidal energy (in the oceans), and wind
energy. Hydro-electricity is generated at a number of places in Africa, namely the
Cahora Bassa Dam in Mozambique, the Gariep Dam in South Africa, the Katse Dam
in Lesotho, the Kariba Dam in Zimbabwe, the Ruacana waterfall on the border
between Namibia and Angola, the Owen Falls in Uganda, the Aswan High Dam in
Egypt, and some others. In parts of the world – like Canada, Scandinavia, parts of
the USA, parts of South America, and New Zealand – where water is more abundant
than in Africa, hydro-electricity is the main source of electricity. Wind energy is what
is used by an ordinary windpump, of which there are many thousands in Africa. Wind
turbines are remarkably effective electricity generators, and they range in size from a
small, domestic turbine smaller than a satellite dish and a car battery, to large “wind
farms” which generate a lot of electricity which is fed into the general energy network
of a country or region. We have one such wind farm in South Africa, namely at
Darling in the Western Cape and one is currently under construction at Mossel Bay.
The main drawbacks of wind turbines are the limited capacity of the batteries to store
the electricity, and the extreme noise caused by the turbines themselves. A wind
turbine would be of little help in Pretoria where the wind frequency is exceptionally
low, but in regions like the Southern and Eastern Cape and the Free State, wind
turbines would be highly successful. Nuclear energy is normally classified as a
renewable source of energy (see “nuclear energy”). Strictly speaking, that is
incorrect since the plutonium and/or uranium used cannot regenerate, but such small
quantities of these materials are used to generate so much electricity that the
available supplies on the Earth could never run out. On top of that, the “waste
material” remains radio-active for so many thousands of years that we might find out
how to use it and thereby lengthen the use of the resource. In practice, nuclear
energy can be regarded as a perpetual source of energy. There are, however, many
negative factors associated with nuclear energy: the first is the high cost, and the
second is the danger of an “accident” causing radio-activity to “leak” into the
environment, like at Three Mile Island in the USA, and Chernobyl in Russia, and the
Fukushima plant in Japan (see “hazardous waste” and “nuclear energy”). Owing to
the dangers inherent to nuclear energy plants and radio-active waste, nuclear energy
would probably always be much disputed and controversial. (Note that there are
quite a number of environmentally friendly, or relatively so, alternatives to fossil fuel
energy, particularly biofuels – [see “fossil fuels”], but thus far certain limitations and
high costs have always tipped the scale to the use of dirty, but relatively cheap, fossil
fuels. Biofuels are really not even to be considered in low-rainfall and semi-arid
208
environments like South Africa, simply because they do not have the climate to make
it viable.)
and the only one which would really arrest all the problems, is the cultivation of a
culture of sustainable use. However, that is a long-term solution, while the problems
demand immediate action which could be provided by international conventions and
national laws, regulations and permitting (see “international conventions” and
“environmental management”).
sanitation workers are continually removing waste from Kilimanjaro. The fact that the
waste is at least removed makes the littering and deposition of waste more
acceptable, but the first principle of eco-tourism and nature tourism of “leave
nothing but your footprints” (see “ecological citizenship”, “ecological footprint” and
“environmentalist”) is conveniently, but lamentably, ignored. One cannot but wonder
how many people would try to climb Everest or Kilimanjaro if they themselves had to
carry all their waste – and that includes their own excreta – down the mountain! The
fashionable past-time of the well-to-do so-called “nature lovers” is to drive their
environmentally unfriendly, 4x4 gas-guzzler off-road, over sensitive grasslands, right
through wetlands, over steep slopes, across dune ridges and on beaches. To
describe all the environmental damage, they do would fill a thick book, and their
“love of nature” is at best superficial and at worse a very flimsy “green screen” for
hubris. From an envirocentric point of view, 4x4-tourism is – by its very nature –
environmentally irresponsible. Well-heeled tourists, who troop through squatter
camps or shanty towns and dish out sweets to the children, are equally irresponsible
– their behaviour is at best insulting and at worse socially and/or culturally and
eventually politically inflammatory. Even the oceans do not escape irresponsible
tourism! Scuba and snorkel divers have committed indescribable, irreversible
damage to the Great Barrier Reef of Australia, the coral reefs of the Maldives, and
just about every coral reef on Earth. The damage done to coral reefs by the
enormous tsunami of 26 December 2004, pales to insignificance compared to what
has been wreaked by so-called nature-loving divers. There are so many examples of
irresponsible tourism and especially irresponsible up-market eco-tourism (which is
per definition irresponsible!) that one could easily fill an entire book on it. It is
encouraging that there are some positive examples of responsible tourism, such as
day-trips to the Galapagos Islands, and trips to Antarctica, sections of the Pantanal,
and specific regions of Canada, Alaska and the Amazonian forests.
also in the developed ones although the merchandise might now be more
sophisticated. The infrastructure required for retail activities has been modernised
and today many retailers do their business from formal shops in buildings specifically
erected for this purpose; shops (sellers) now have proper business addresses.
Retailers buy goods in bulk from wholesalers and sell it at higher prices to
purchasers at their shops with fixed addresses. The price the buyer is now going to
pay would probably be much higher because the retailer has to pay a steep rental for
the shop and his overheads are thus higher than in the informal market space. The
purchaser pays a little (or a lot) more for having the convenience to buy goods in a
conveniently located shop. In most modern cities the CBD is not the main retailing
space anymore, and most retailing happens at decentralised facilities (like malls and
shopping centres). People would rather travel to a nearby shopping centre than to
the CBD to make their ordinary, every-day purchases. Owing to this geographical
shift of retail areas, many CBDs became abandoned, derelict features (see “central
business district” and “gentrification”) where illegal trade, illegal activities, and vice
flourish. It would, for instance, be easier to buy crack-cocaine and procure the
services of a prostitute in the old CBD, than in the glitzy mall in the newer parts of
the city. The official attempts at “sanitising”, revitalising and rejuvenating the old
CBDs (see “gentrification”) might in the future shift the main retailing facilities back to
the CBDs, but we should not hold our breath! Besides, rentals in rejuvenated CBDs
are notoriously high, so the shopper will have to pay even more than previously. And
in the developing world no-one would want to lose the ubiquitous spaza shops!
other undesirable environmental results which might follow on any human activity.
Risk assessment is a predictive technique and it is a very difficult thing to do in the
environmental field, because it basically is a set of economic techniques that are
adapted for use in the environmental field. Ecological risk assessment has become
an extensively used method all over the world, including South Africa, and a
comprehensive set of guidelines have been developed by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) of the Unites States of America. No standardised
methodology exists, but a risk assessment process could be described as a process
consisting of four distinct phases: hazard identification, hazard assessment, risk
estimation, and risk evaluation. The most problematic aspect of any risk assessment
process is probably that values must be ascribed to things which cannot be
measured. There are various ways of doing that and each risk assessment process
must choose the most appropriate technique. The entire process of risk assessment
is to a very large extent guesswork, but an informed guess and calculated risk
could be scientifically justifiable if used with caution and based on prior empirical
proof or experience.
applied in all developed states is: “When in doubt, do an EIA”. In the developing
states, screening is more slack, but that is not desirable as the aforementioned
nuclear waste disposal site might be right in the middle a nomadic clan’s habitual
terrain or even a secret sacred site. A proposal to build an explosives factory in the
heart of a city, does not need any lists to send it directly to the “no-go” class.
identity. The dominance of certain cultures might destroy other cultures either
forcibly or peacefully. When people are so attracted to another way of life, they might
choose to adopt it and abandon their own culture. The American society is an
interesting example. When the African-Americans were initially brought to North
America as slaves, they were ripped from their own socio-cultural practices and were
forced to adopt the practices of the slave-owners. The African slaves were a
completely disrupted people. However, over a period of two hundred years and
many traumatic events, the different peoples in the USA have blended into one
nation which – by and large – shares the same socio-cultural traditions. All the
different peoples of the world have experienced socio-cultural impacts at some stage
or another, they have influenced one another to greater or lesser degree. But the
Europeans, Chinese, Indians, Brazilians, and so forth, are still socio-culturally quite
different from one another. The socio-cultural impact of the internet has already been
significant and its future effect would be interesting to observe.
of zero productivity. Millions of hectares in Africa have gone this route. Soil erosion is
the most serious environmental problem humankind is facing, but it gets far less
media coverage and publicity than air pollution, water pollution and global warming.
It is good that people are aware of all the environmental issues, but our priorities are
not always correct. Numerous international conferences and conventions have been
held on air pollution, global warming and water pollution (see “climate change”,
“environmental degradation”, “food security” and “environmental conventions”), but
the most serious environmental problem, namely accelerated soil erosion has never
formed the central focus of such a conference. Legally soils enjoy less protection
than the atmosphere and the water networks, yet the most serious natural resource
issue we are facing is the loss of our fertile topsoil!
The people themselves might not necessarily travel long distances to do business,
but business transactions (economic activities) usually contain a spatial – or distance
– component and communication networks are intricately involved in these economic
activities. Since economic activities take place over space, they describe spatial
patterns (see “spatial distribution”, “spatial interaction” and “spacio-temporal [or
space-in-time] perspective”) and these are studied by economic geographers.
Economic activities in one specific area are, however, part of an economic network
that might involve a myriad of places on Earth. Especially in the current time, when
economic activities have become completely globalised and multi-national
corporations (MNCs) dominate all economic activity on Earth, spatiality is one of the
most important aspects of all economic activities. A simple example could perhaps
explain it better than a page of text. A farmer who plants cabbage in rural Limpopo
Province, needs a few plastic pipes to irrigate his cabbage plants. He uses his cell-
phone (designed in the USA, but made in Korea) and makes a call (via a cell-phone
service provider based in Johannesburg) to a local store in the nearest town and
orders the pipes he needs. The store owner uses his landline telephone and
contacts the international production company’s call centre and speaks to someone
in Australia to obtain information about the availability and delivery of the pipes,
although the pipes are actually manufactured in Benoni, South Africa. Alternatively,
the store owner might use e-mail to obtain the information. The farmer uses his
vehicle (made in Japan, but assembled in a plant in the Eastern Cape) to drive to
town to collect his pipes. When the cabbages need to be harvested, Zimbabweans
from a nearby refugee settlement walk to his land to cut the cabbages. A contractor
(using a large lorry made in India) transports the cabbages to the market in Pretoria
where retailers (see “retail facilities”) buy it and sell it to consumers in numerous
shops all over Pretoria. Can you imagine how intricate the map of the spatial
distribution and interaction of this relatively simple economic activity is? Although the
regional economy of Limpopo Province is an agricultural one, it is connected to an
increasingly complex network that spans the whole world.
shrinking is others. These are the things that economic geographers study. Often a
simple map of the spatial interactions between areas and some economical
information could explain the entire development or lack of it. Of course, other
variables such as political stability and international agreements play important roles
in the development of economic interaction, but there might be a far more involved
cause-effect (or cause-response) relationship, and this often has a political nature.
Political and economic geography cannot really be separated and have to be
considered as one complex phenomenon.
Africa still does not have a tradition of SEA, some of these mining activities have
been permitted under the NEMA legislation (see “environmental management”) and
environmentalist as well as NGOs are experiencing a tough battle on behalf of the
human and natural heritage conserved in the region. It is an ironic situation, because
South Africa was the very first country in the world to enshrine environmental
concerns in its Act of Constitution, no 108 0f 1996, which implies that SEA would
form the basis of economic development of every kind. Perhaps environmental
management has now finally matured to a stage where SEA might come to its right.
The controversial coal mining north of the Soutpansberg Mountain in the Limpopo
valley has now become a very serious threat to agriculture, the Vhembe biosphere,
certain traditional communities, a number of nature reserves and resorts, and the
water supplies in the region. A number of governmental departments, local
environmental conservation bodies, community-based organisations, stakeholder
groups, organised agriculture, traditional communities and one coal-mining company
are embroiled in an emotional dispute over mining rights and activities in the region.
It seems that only a comprehensive strategic environmental assessment would be
able to break to stalemate and a formal request for such an assessment for the
entire region has been submitted. This SEA would be the first for South Africa. It is
ironic that an SEA is being used to solve a thorny issue, instead of having been done
before the awarding of the mining rigths and thereby all the ensuing events could
have been prevented.
entire economy and commuting workers might lose days of work and pay. When
truck-drivers strike, many economies come to a halt.
other hazardous substances (see “hazardous waste”) and may not be used for any
purposes at all and have to be treated before being released to the environment.
This is currently a very high-profile issue in South Africa since many mines are
releasing hazardous waste water into the environment. These mines have never
been under the legal requirements of our current, stringent environmental legislation
and the mines’ waste treatment practices are therefore outdated and not in the
interest of the environment or the people downstream of the point where they
release their waste water. It is a consolation that only water of the very highest
quality is used in the food industry and very specifically for the manufacture of baby
foods and formula milk. The ordinary drinking water supplied to people in South
African cities and towns, is of an excellent quality, but not good enough to use for
the manufacture of baby formula and needs further purification before it might be
used for that purpose.
X
Y
Z