sonar
us
Ee
ssn
Google Glass Isn’t the Future
of Wearables
by H.James wilson
toner 29,2088
Everybody is hopping on the wearables bandwagon. Since the
publication of my HBR article on wearables, 've been asked a
‘number of follow-up questions from executives, tech analysts,
‘and most especially from entrepreneurs.
‘Though the questions vary, they generally fall into three buckets.
“Aren't Head-up Displays (HUDs) like Google Glass where the
market is going?”
No. Not necessarily. Pricey (and for now, socially awkward-
looking) HUDs will likely be a sliver of the neatly hall
‘that will ship by 2018. By comparison, most other types of
‘wearables will be relatively cheap, and as socially unobtrusive as a
ring or wristband,
lion units
No doubt, there will be well-defined segments of HUD wearers.
For instance, emergency first responders and many disabled
people will immediately benefit from additional contextual
information the tools display that enhance safety and the ability
‘to navigate tricky situations. The more you consider real data and
use-cases, the more you see wearables’ potential to support
humanistic aspirations.
However, as I suggest in my HBR piece, we should vigorously
‘question the ethics and effectiveness of any “asymmetrical” uses
of HUDs. The presumption that a Google Glass wearer has a right
to ascertain information from others who haven't opted in isn’t
necessarily socially acceptable. (HBR editor Scott Berinato calls
Glass wearers who point their devices at others who haven't opted
in “glassholes”), It may not even be legal. In the work place, any
‘use absolutely must be accompanied by clearly stated benefits to
the employee (not just the employer) and ensure her data privacy.
Otherwise, it’s Orwellia
Aren't wearables basically just a hands-free PC or
smartphone?‘Some wearables are indeed the next stage in the evolution from,
PCs to smartphones to tablets. Samsung's watch, for example,
tethers to its phone and lets you take and receive calls and texts.
But many others tools and applications, such as the one I describe
below, are discontinuous. They support radically new ways to
improve work and society. The opportunity in the discontinuous
space is probably bigger, and certainly some of the killer apps for
‘wearables haven't even been conjured yet. Something will take us
by surprise.
Aren't wearables just the latest cool new toys?
‘When people ask this sort of question, they're usually wondering
if these things are just technology for technology's sake. They
‘want to know about purpose, whether and how they can use (or
“hire”) a wearable to fix a problem. In my research, I already see
evidence and use cases of a number of ways wearables are helping
organizations solve specific and sometimes intractable problems.
Here's an example of a wearable that speaks to each of the three
points above: it's not socially awkward to wear and offers a
radically new solution to a big problem.
‘The problem: Each year in the United states, about 5 percent of,
hospital patients catch an infection while being treated, leading
‘to nearly 100,000 deaths. Hospital-borne infections like MRSA
cost hospitals about 10 percent of their operating budgets, and the
‘overall US health care system about $35 billion.
‘The challenge: Research shows that 70 percent of these infections
could be prevented or made less severe by following basic hand-
‘washing guidelines set by the World Health Organization (WHO),
though only about 4 in 10 hospitals effectively comply.
‘The solution: Some hospitals in Florida are piloting a wearable
solution called Intelligent. Doctors, nurses, and all other
caregivers wear RFID wristbands with motion sensors, that
interacts with tagged locations around their hospital.
For instance, at a hand-washing station, the smartband tracks the
user's sequence of hand movements and offers prompt feedback:
Good hand washing that follows the WHO guidelines leads toa
single quick vibration in the wrist, while missing the mark
prompts three vibrations as a nudge to try again,
‘The devices connect to other critical locations, equipment, and
“events” in the facility, proactively reducing oversights by busy
staff, Staff receive alerts as soon as they walk into a patient’s room,
ifthey haven't first washed their hands, Same if they're about to
perform a procedure requiring hand washing, such as inserting an
IV needle,‘Wearers also upload their data at the end of each shift and then
receive a monthly hand hygiene report card. This shows each
provider's compliance results and, for comparison, those ofher
unit and facility. A surgeon can see that her unit was 80 percent
compliant, but that she only hit $2 percent—a number that
should provoke a change in her hand-washing routine,
‘The aim here is to replace visual observation, the costly and labor-
intensive approach used at most hospitals to track hygiene. With,
vvisual observation the data-sets tend to be small and statistically
unreliable, while the numbers from the wearables initiative are
abundantly detailed. These context-based and segmented,
analytics are meant to help administrators spot individual and,
group trends. Instead of simply knowing that her hospital was 72
percent compliant, an administrator could see that ER nurses are
£89 percent compliant before dressing wounds but only 57 percent
compliant after touching patients—a red flag worth addressing at
ateam meeting.
As New Yorker writer and physician Atul Gawande has noted, the
barrier to attacking big problems like hospital germs is that they
are “invisible...and making [solutions] work can be tedious..." In
the everyday tedium of washing hands, a buzzing wristband can
serve the critical function of reminding a busy doctor when
there's a better way to go through the motions,
‘When Tlook past the knee-jerk use cases (“let's look at the Eiffel
‘Tower and get a Wikipedia entry about it”) and sci-fi scenarios,
("Tets rate people tike books and get a star rating when we look at
them") Tsee the real rise of wearables in cases lke the hospital
‘wristband specific, positive developments where wearables are
going to—indeed are already—makinga difference.
H, James Wilson she global managing
rector of thought leadership & technology
research at Accenture, He coauthored multiple
‘books inching Radically Human: How New
‘Technology Is Transforming Business and
Shaping Our Furure (Harvard Business Review
ress, 2022) and Human ¢ Machine:
‘Reimagining Workin the Age of Al (Harvard
Business Review Press, 2018).
¥ Ghjameswiison
Recommended For You
Google's Strategy vs. Glass's Potential
‘Customer Intelligence, Privacy, and the "Creepy Factor”‘What HoloLens Has That Google Glass Didn't
\
3