Assumption Made working days 26

Working Hour 8

A) Payment Amount And Resource Requirement Calculation

Pay Item No Description Unit price Quantity Unit

0000' General 196,314.76 1.00 Total
34.01(b) Grouted pitching 290.00 5,829.83 m2
42.03(a) Common (normal) excavation 93.00 21.64 m3
51.01(a)(ii) Gravel sub-base layer 140.00 1,294.75 m3
81.02(a) Soft material irrespective of depth 200.00 20.08 m3
81.03(a) Reinforcement grade 40 36,000.00 0.19 ton
84.01(a) Cast in-situ concrete, Grade 30/20 3,500.00 11.16 m3
89.01(b) Stone masonry walls (Class B) 1,200.00 61.30 m3
Crushing Base course crushing 6,685.60 m3
Contractor Camp & service Vehicles
Head office supply & service Vehicles

B) Incurred Cost

Manpower 2,861,780.65
Spare Part 320,063.40
Tyre 319,130.36
Material 2,822,251.43
Cement 297,597.25
Fuel 2,524,654.18
Lubricant
Equipment Cost
6,323,225.84

C) Equipment Utilization Evaluation

Required Actual Difference in Hour

Machine
Working Hr. Number For
From Engine 26 working
Machine type as per IPC Report hour Engine Hour From report
hour days
Quantity

Dozer 147.1 184.5 154.0 37.4 6.9 1

Excavator 259.3 771.4 610.8 512.1 351.5 1.2
Loader 114.5 183.3 117.4 68.8 2.9 0.6
Grader 7.2 47.5 8.6 40.3 1.4 0.03
Dump truck 1158.2 1271.8 113.6 -1158.2 6
Water pump 23.7 -23.7 -23.7
Water truck 135.0 169.3 34.3 -135.0 0.6
Roller 2.2 10.3 3.97 8.1 1.7 0.0
320 Mixer 14.1 -14.1 -14.1 0.1
Vibrator 1.6 -1.6 -1.6 0.0
W-Drill-Comp 64.8 -64.8 -64.8 0.3
Cr-Gen-1 107.8 61.5 -46.3 -107.8 0.5
Cr-Gen-2 107.8 61.5 -46.3 -107.8 0.5
M-Ca-Gen 408.0 -408.0 -408.0 2.0
Was-Ca-Gen 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SHA-Ca-Gen 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sup-S-Vehicle 325.3 600.0 274.7 -325.3 1.6
Cont. S-Vehicle 457.2 758.0 300.8 -457.2 2.2
Welding Machine 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
F-Truck 84.1 -84.1 -84.1 0.4
HQ. S-Vehicle 34.3 -34.3 -34.3 0.2
HQ F-Truck 55.0 -55.0 0.3
Explosive work 0.0 0.0 0.0
Grand total

D) Man Power Utilization Evaluation

Required
Working Hr. Reported Difference
Manpower type as per IPC 26 working 16.3 working 14 working for salary
days days days
Quantity
Dz - Op 147.1 1 3 2
Ex-OP 483.9 2 7 5
LD - Op 114.5 0.6 4 3
Gr - OP 7.2 0.03 3 3
R - Op 2.2 0.01 4 3.99
D/T -Driver 1158.2 6 27 21
W/T -Driver 135.0 0.65 2 1.35
FT-Driver 84.1 0.4 1 0.60
LV-driver 782.5 7 14 6.89
WD-Op 64.8 0.3 1 0.69
Gen-Op 408.0 2.0 0 (1.96)
Cr- Foreman 107.8 0.5 2 1.48
Cr-Op 107.8 0.5 0 (0.52)
E- Foreman 290.1 1.4 2 0.61
HQ. LV-driver 34.3 0.2 1 0.83
HQ.FT-Driver 55.0 0.3 1 0.74
St- Foreman 172.3 1 1 1 (0.32)
Foreman 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1.00
Br- Foreman 3.0 0 0 1 0.98
Mason 7944.3 38 62 59 (3.07)
Bar-bender 3.0 0 0 1 0.98
Carpenter 892.2 4 8 6 (1.97)
T.K 498.1 2 3 6 3.61
Labor 2329.1 11 21 163 142.20

E) Construction Material Utilization Evaluation

Material Type Calculated Unit GIV Data Difference Remark

Cement 637.94 Quintal 679 41.06 Wastage
Water 15,398 liter
Sub base 1,295 m3
Re-bar 0.19 Ton 0.20 0.01 Wastage
M.Stone 1,852 m 3

Sand 433 m3

E) Conclusion
- The project is ineffective in its of Equipment utilization, follow up of outputs, confirming correctness of report data &
frequent fuel consumption checking
- There is no significant excess manpower except 1 dozer , 1 excavator , 1 loader and 3 drivers
- Except fuel , there is no significant material utilization gap particularly on cement and reinforcing steel.
 Amount
196,314.76
1,690,651.28
2,012.92
181,264.44
4,016.00
6,840.00
39,060.00
73,561.65

2,193,721

fuel
Required Actual GIV
consumption Difference
Fuel Report
Hr.

40 5,883.93 6,270.00 386.07

25 6,482.13 15,854.00 9,371.87
15 1,717.36 1,797.00 79.64
20 143.86 155.00 11.14
 10.8 12,549.65 13,781.00 1,231.35
0.6 14.20 15 0.80
10 1,350.00 1,734.00 384.00
5 11.21 - (11.21)
2.5 35.34 34 (1.34)
1.5 0 -
7.5 485.98 460 (25.98)
30 3,234.97 3189.5 (45.47)
30 3,234.97 3189.5 (45.47)
9 3,672.00 3580 (92.00)
- 0 -
- 0 -
3 976.00 976 -
3 1,371.60 1592 220.40
11 43.00 43 -
8 673.00 673 -
3 103.00 103 -
8 440.00 440 -
48.00 48
42,470.19 53,934.00 11,463.81

Remark

1 was assigned at A/A crusher plant , one operator was unnecessarily waiting for his DZ maintenance
2 ware on Rainy season leave after certain days whereas, one(1) work on unpaid earth work operation , and one (1) ware unn
3 ware on Rainy season leave whereas, one (1) ware unnecessarily withheld by the Project
2 ware on leave,
3 ware on Rainy season leave . The other one also sent on leave after 11 days
11 ware on Rainy season leave . The other 7 also sent to Addis Ababa and mojo site . But 3 drivers were unnecessarily kept at
1 was on leave,
1 was one leave, the water truck driver was also assigned to operates this vehicle
4 were on leave and 3 were also sent to home after 15 days

there is no one under this title

Only one operator works on the site
No one assigned under this title
1 was on leave .
From A/A
From A/A
1 was on leave . And works ware T.Kn up by ne (1) structure labor foreman
 1 was on leave.
Deficiency of Mason exists
1 was on leave
Deficiency of Carpenter exists

Deficiency of labor exists

orrectness of report data &

 Remark

8.5 hr. mobilization not accounted

209.83 hr. of work accounted on August statement, Excavator at Quarry consume excess fuel
Reported Sub -base loading hr. is Exaggerated & fuel consumption is under Question
 out of 15 trucks on the site only 6 were on proper duty while others wondering unnecessarily

Remark

ator was unnecessarily waiting for his DZ maintenance

ys whereas, one(1) work on unpaid earth work operation , and one (1) ware unnecessarily withheld by the Project
) ware unnecessarily withheld by the Project

also sent on leave after 11 days

lso sent to Addis Ababa and mojo site . But 3 drivers were unnecessarily kept at project.

so assigned to operates this vehicle

after 15 days

e (1) structure labor foreman