The document compares how two different sources - a text and a video - describe how Odin lost his eye. According to the text, Odin plucked out one of his eyes in exchange for divine wisdom, while the video said he did so on a quest for knowledge to save mankind from frost giants. While the text was easy to access and engage with, the student found the video sluggish and less engaging due to an monotone narrator. Overall, the student preferred the concise and detailed delivery of information in the written text format.
The document compares how two different sources - a text and a video - describe how Odin lost his eye. According to the text, Odin plucked out one of his eyes in exchange for divine wisdom, while the video said he did so on a quest for knowledge to save mankind from frost giants. While the text was easy to access and engage with, the student found the video sluggish and less engaging due to an monotone narrator. Overall, the student preferred the concise and detailed delivery of information in the written text format.
The document compares how two different sources - a text and a video - describe how Odin lost his eye. According to the text, Odin plucked out one of his eyes in exchange for divine wisdom, while the video said he did so on a quest for knowledge to save mankind from frost giants. While the text was easy to access and engage with, the student found the video sluggish and less engaging due to an monotone narrator. Overall, the student preferred the concise and detailed delivery of information in the written text format.
Criteria How Odin Lost His Eyes How Odin Lost His Eyes (Text format) (Video format) 1. Content The story is about how The video talked about Odin only has one eye Odin's quest to gain because he plucked his knowledge in order save other eye out in exchange the mankind from the frost for divine wisdom. giants. It actually happened similarly to what happened in the story in text format. 2. Source It seems to me that the This text also has source of this text are secondary sources. secondary sources. 3. Accessibility I had no trouble reading I was able to watch the the story's text format. In story's video text however, fact, it was so simple to the video appears to be access that I was able to sluggish due to our read it early. unstable internet. 4. Effectivity Engagement I was so indulged in I was not really engaged reading the story that I felt with the video text because the emotions of the main I would rather read it character like I was myself than listening to actually there when the someone narrating the story happened, such as whole story for me so worry, physical pain and plainly. even the satisfaction after he was able to gain the knowledge that he wanted. Delivery The text delivered the The video was quiet whole story in a concise, underwhelming with how detailed manner and it was the speaker talks with his overall so comprehensive monotone voice, it was and you could truly enjoy certainly something I the way it was written so I wouldn’t want to sit like it better than watching through again. the video. Influence The story influenced me to I realized that sometimes be brave and to learn how you feel that the stakes to sacrifice for a greater you have to pay are too good. high, but what matters most is that you were able to protect what you needed and obtain what you wanted.