Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

Course: Integral Pedagogical Practice
Code: 518018

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Phase 3 - Application of lesson plans

1. Activity Description

Type of activity: Individual

Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3
Highest score of the activity: 100 points
The activity starts on: Monday, March The activity ends on: Tuesday, May 2,
13, 2023 2023
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:

At the end of the activity, the student will be able to apply lesson plans for English
language learning by considering the analysis of categories that influence the
phenomena identified in the practice environment.

The activity consists of:

1. Read the contents of units 2 and 3.

2. Make research about the following English teaching methods:

- The Silent Way

- Task-based language learning
- The Natural Approach
- Grammar-translation
- Audio-lingual
- Suggestopedia
- Total Physical Response (TPR)

Upload in the forum a word document of two pages minimum with the description of
each method. Use APA style to cite every paragraph.

3. Pick one of the methodologies and create an English activity for your

1
 practiceplace, apply the activity and register all the processes in the
format:

- Anexo1- Diario de campo - Practica de inmersión e investigación.

4. With the remaining six methods create two lesson plans considering the
population needs. Use the format:

- Anexo 2. Lesson Plan Template –Integral Pedagogical Practice Course- 518018

Note: Anexo 1 and 2 are attached in the knowledge environment in the file: Activities
guide and evaluation rubric - Unit 3- Phase 3 - Application of lesson plans

- For each lesson plan, you must create five activities based on
threemethodologies researched in the previous step.

- Create a minimum of six resources made by yourself. Use only the

followingwebsites: Quizlet, genially, SmartDraw and h5p. Complete six
resources of your creation (three for every lesson).

E.g
Lesson 1.

Note: The activities must correspond to the principles of the selected method. You

2
must complete six resources in total, three for every lesson.

5. Make a final reflection from about 400 words minimum, with the experience
of creation and application of the two lessons and make a contrast between
the research you made about the methodologies and the practice. Here are
some questions that can lead your writing:

- What elements of the selected methodologies you consider are more

appropriate for the context of your practice?
- What is the coherence between the selected methodologies the context and the
needs of the students?
- In the practice, what aspects of the methodologies worked well, and which did
not?
- Include all the aspects you consider important and the questions that emerge
after your practice with the created activities.
- Cite the authors in APA style.

For the development of the activity consider that:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must: check the course agenda and
interact in the web conferences.

In the Learning Environment, you must: Application of lesson plans

In the Evaluation Environment, you must: Upload your final work in the space Phase
3: Application of lesson plans

Evidences of individual work:

The individual evidence to be submitted is:

A PDF document with the following products:

1. The description of the methodologies

2. The three lesson plan forms filled (annexes 1 y 2).
3. Reflection of the practice and the selected methodologies.
4. References.
Evidences of collaborative work:

3
The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:

1. Share the link of your workshop website and the rubric in the forum and give
feedback to your partners’ works.

2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For Individual evidences, consider the following:

● Make sure that your activities include important elements of the

selectedmethodology.
● Think about the specific needs of the students and the characteristics of
thecontext.
● Be creative when including technological resources for the English
languagelearning process.
● Share with your partners ideas and reflections, learn together.
● Carefully read the contents of the course.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.

4
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3. Evaluation Rubric Template

Type of activity: Individual

Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 3
The highest score in this activity is 100 points
First evaluation
criterion:

The pertinence of High level: The student creates activities considering the
the activities. selected method and the practice context. The level, issues, and
Include the learning skills of the students.
principles of the If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
selected method, and 20 points
the level, issues,
and skills of the Average level: The activities and resources are partially
students, in appropriate, or they are not coherent with the context and the
coherence with the selected method.
context needs in the If your work is at this level, you can get between 8 points
creation of and 14 points
appropriate
activities. Low level: The student does not include the suggested
elements in the activities and/or did not do the lessons.
This criterion If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
represents 20 points and 7 points
points of the total
of 100 points of
the activity.
Second evaluation High level: The student deeply describes the essential
criterion: elements of the selected methodologies with APA style 7th
version.
Depth and If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
coherence in the and 20 points

5
description of the
methodologies. Average level: The student describes the essential elements
of the selected methodologies in a shallow way or incomplete;
This criterion the information is not cited according to APA style 7th version.
represents 20 If your work is at this level, you can get between 8 points
points of the total and 14 points
of 100 points of
the activity. Low level: The student does not describe the selected
methodologies.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
points and 7 points
Third evaluation High level: The student creates six appropriate resources
criterion: including the use of the ICT for the activities included in the
lesson plans.
The pertinence of If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
the resources with and 20 points
the use of the ICT.
Average level: The student creates resources that are not so
This criterion appropriate for the student’s needs, and /or the amount of the
represents 20 resources is not the requested in the activity guide.
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 8 points
of 100 points of and 14 points
the activity.
Low level: The student does not include appropriate resources
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
points and 7 points
Fourth evaluation High level: The student reflects on the creation of the activities
criterion: and the practice with accuracy and depth. The reflection includes
the proposed questions and the research of the theories.
Reflect on the If your work is at this level, you can get between 8 points
practice with depth and 10 points
and accuracy.
Average level: The student includes a reflection based on the
This criterion creation of the activities and the practice, a little shallow and/or
represents 10 incomplete.
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 4 points
of 100 points of and 7 points
the activity.

6
 Low level: The student includes the reflection without a
theoretical background, neither the suggested questions and/or
the student does not do the reflection.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1points
and 6 points
Fifth evaluation High level: The student has a good performance in the
criterion: educative institution selected for the practice. It is evident the
commitment, responsibility, and accomplishment of the
Precedential requested activities. The form F-7-6-12 is signed as the evidence
criteria: of the practice.
performance in the If your work is at this level, you can get between 30 points
practice place and 25 points
evidenced in the F-
7-6-12. Average level: The student has a medium performance in the
educational institution selected for the practice. It is required
This criterion more commitment and responsibility for the accomplishment of
represents 30 the requested activities.
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 24 points
of 100 points of and 7 points
the activity.
Low level: The student does not have any performance in the
educative institution the form F-7-6-12 is not signed as evidence
of the practice.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1
points and 6 points

7
8