Explaining deeply the difference between form follows function and function follows form

"Form follows function" and "function follows form" are two architectural design
principles that address the relationship between the appearance of a building
(form) and its intended purpose or use (function).

Form follows function is a principle that suggests the shape and appearance
of a building should be primarily based upon its intended function or purpose.
This idea was popularized by the American architect Louis Sullivan in the late
19th century. According to this principle, the design of a building should be
driven by its intended use, and the form should naturally evolve to
accommodate that function. A well-designed building, following this principle,
would have a form that clearly communicates its purpose and efficiently serves
its intended function.

Function follows form is a less common principle, but it can be interpreted

as the idea that the function of a building can adapt or be shaped by its form.
This approach places more emphasis on the aesthetic and artistic aspects of
the design, prioritizing the visual impact and unique qualities of the building's
form. In this scenario, the architect might start with an intriguing or innovative
shape, and then find ways to incorporate the required functions within that
form. This can result in unconventional or experimental designs that challenge
traditional notions of how a building should look and be used.

These two principles represent different approaches to architectural design, and

they are not mutually exclusive. Many architects find a balance between the
two, considering both the functional requirements and aesthetic qualities of a building
when creating their designs. Ultimately, the relationship between form and
function in architecture can be fluid and flexible, depending on the specific
project and the architect's design philosophy.

Form Follow Function

"Form follows function" is a design principle that states that the shape of an
object should be based primarily on its intended function or purpose. In other
words, design elements like form and shape should be determined by the
object's purpose and how it works, rather than just its appearance.
Some examples of this principle in design:
• A spoon is shaped the way it is to function well for scooping and holding
liquid or food. The rounded bowl shape follows the function of containing the
material you want to move.
• A knife has a sharp blade at the front and a handle at the back, following the
function of being able to cut into things and allow control for the user.
• A car has a streamlined, rounded shape to allow for efficient movement. The
form of the car follows the function of transportation.
• In architecture, skyscrapers often have a grid of rectangular windows and
limited ornamentation. The form of the boxy shape and simplicity follows the
function of being an office building.
• In product design, a measuring jug has clear, measured markings and a
spout for easy pouring. The form corresponds directly to the function of
measuring and dispensing liquids.
• Websites often have large buttons, simple navigation, and significant white
space. The form of the uncluttered, straightforward layout follows the function
of allowing users to easily browse and find information.
• Even in nature, you see this principle. A dolphin has a streamlined, torpedo-
shaped body for fast, agile swimming. The form of the body follows the
function of locomotion through water.
In summary, whenever there is a close and logical connection between the
form of an object and its intended purpose or function, the principle of "form
follows function" is at work. The purpose and usage determine the shape.