02H09 - Vol 2 - Annexes PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 710

DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT

(DRAFT)
VOLUME 2: ANNEXES
Of
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT (11.05 MW)
Bajhang District, Sudurpashchim Province, Nepal

Submitted to:

Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd.


Chandol, Kathmandu
Phone No: 01-4436184

Prepared by:

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


(Energy & Infrastructure Maven Pvt. Ltd. - EIMPL)
Buddhanagar, Bhawana Marg, Kathmandu
Post Box: 24016, Phone no.: 9851157962
email : info@eimaven.com.np
website: www.eimaven.com.np

November, 2020
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT
(DRAFT)
VOLUME 2: ANNEXES
OF
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROECT (11.05 MW)

Signature Date

Prepared by:
Ishwar Dahal / Sanish Maharjan / Dipesh Kharel

Checked by: Swayambu Shakya

Approved by:
Sunil Ghaju

(Quality Control Page)


Prepared by:
E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
(Energy and Infrastructure Maven Pvt. Ltd. - EIMPL)
Buddhanagar, Bhawana Marg, Kathmandu
Post Box: 24016, Phone no.: 9851157962
email : info@eimaven.com.np
website: www.eimaven.com.np

November, 2020
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT (11.05 MW)
DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT
REPORTING STRUCTURE

VOLUME 1A-CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS

VOLUME 1B-REINFORCEMENT DRAWINGS

VOLUME 2-ANNEXES

Annex A- Hydrological Calculations

Annex B- Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Annex C1- Structural Design Report

Annex C2- Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Annex D- Geophysical Investigation Report

Annex E- Construction Material Test Report

Annex F- Sediment Laboratory Test Report

Annex G- Cost Estimate

Annex H- Financial Analysis

Annex I- Construction Time Schedule


DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT (11.05 MW)

VOLUME 2: ANNEX A
HYDROLOGICAL CALCULATIONS
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Daily Flow Data at Chamelya River

Stn No. 120 Catchment Area at Chameliya 1184 sq.km


Stn name: Nayal Badi Headworks 165.00 sq.km

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

1965 20.8 20.8 20.8 29.9 28.3 55.3 74.7 77.6 40.6 31.4 20.8
20.8 20.8 20.8 29.9 26.7 62.2 74.7 74.7 40.6 31.4 20.8
20.8 20.8 20.8 25.1 29.9 53 77.4 74.7 40.6 31.1 20.8
20.8 20.8 20.8 22.2 29.9 48.7 67.1 67.1 40.6 30.9 20.8
20.8 20.8 20.8 25.1 28.3 48.7 77.4 67.1 40.6 31.9 20.8
20.8 20.8 20.8 25.1 26.7 72.4 72.2 67.1 40.6 30.9 20.8
20.8 20.8 22.2 25.1 26.7 67.1 74.7 67.1 36.9 30.4 20.8
20.8 20.8 25.1 25.1 28.3 65.6 74.9 64.7 35 30.4 20.8
20.8 20.8 25.1 22.2 29.9 65.6 67.1 67.1 35 30.4 20.8
20.8 20.8 25.1 20.8 32.6 64.9 67.1 67.1 35 29.9 20.8
20.4 20.8 26.7 25.1 29.9 64.9 67.1 69.6 35 29.4 20.8
20.4 20.8 29.9 25.1 29.9 61.6 67.1 67.1 35 28.9 20.8
20.8 20.8 28.3 25.1 29.9 62.2 59.8 59.8 35 28.9 20.8
20.8 20.8 25.1 25.1 29.9 57.5 59.8 59.8 35 28.6 20.8
20.8 20.8 20.8 28.3 35 80.1 74.9 53 35 28.5 20.8
20.8 20.8 25.1 26.7 29.9 77.4 74.7 55.3 35 25.1 20.8
20.8 20.8 29.9 29.9 36.9 59.8 77.4 57.5 35 25.1 20.8
20.8 20.8 29.9 29.9 35 94.9 74.7 55.3 34.5 25.1 20.8
23.7 20.8 29.9 25.1 35 74.7 74.7 53 35 25.1 20.8
20.8 25.1 29.9 25.1 35 72.2 80.1 53 34.2 25.1 20.8
20.8 20.8 25.1 25.1 40.6 77.4 77.6 53 34 25.1 20.8
20.8 20.8 25.1 25.1 42.6 67.1 82.8 48.7 33.7 25.1 20.8
20.8 20.8 25.1 25.1 35 74.7 109 46.6 33.5 25.1 20.8
21.2 20.8 20.8 25.1 25.1 60 74.7 94.2 50.9 33.3 25.1 20.8
21.2 20.8 20.8 25.1 25.1 50.9 74.7 82.8 46.6 33 25.1 20.8
20.8 20.8 20.8 25.1 29.9 53 82.9 82.8 46.6 32.4 25.1 20.8
20.8 20.8 20.8 25.1 29.9 55.3 94.7 88.5 46.6 32.4 25.1 20.8
20.8 20.8 20.8 28.3 26.7 60 77.4 67.1 46.6 32.4 25.1 20.8
20.8 20.8 29.9 25.1 59.8 69.6 82.8 44.6 31.9 20.8 20.8
20.8 20.8 29.9 25.1 69.9 67.1 82.8 40.6 31.7 20.8 20.8
20.8 20.8 25.1 67.1 82.8 31.9 20.8

1966 20.8 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 82.8 179 100 46.6 29.9 20.8
20.8 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 78.8 167 91.3 46.6 29.9 20.8
20.8 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 82.8 105 88.5 46.6 29.9 20.8
20.8 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 74.7 91.3 82.8 46.6 29.9 20.8
20.8 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 74.7 82.8 91.3 46.6 25.1 20.8
18.8 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 67.1 144 91.3 46.6 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 67.1 130 82.8 46.6 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 59.8 119 82.8 46.6 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 27.5 59.8 119 82.8 43.6 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 20.8 25.1 59.8 119 82.8 40.6 25.1 20.8

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 1 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 20.8 25.1 53 123 82.8 40.6 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 20.8 25.1 53 130 82.8 40.6 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 20.8 29.9 53 110 82.8 40.6 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 20.8 31.2 53 116 82.8 40.6 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 20.8 31.9 53 110 82.8 40.6 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 20.8 33.2 53 110 82.8 37.8 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 20.8 32.2 53 109 74.7 35 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 20.8 33.6 59.8 105 69.6 35 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 20.8 34.5 64.3 100 67.1 35 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 30.4 105 100 62.2 35 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 30.4 100 100 59.8 35 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 74.9 95.6 100 59.8 35 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 55.3 91.3 100 59.8 35 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 85.6 82.8 133 53 35 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 69.6 191 175 53 35 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 80.1 110 130 51.7 35 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 74.7 110 110 51.7 32.4 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 74.7 110 100 50.4 29.9 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 82.8 151 109 50.4 29.9 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 16.9 25.1 74.7 217 110 49.2 29.9 25.1 20.8
16.9 16.9 25.1 192 100 29.9 20.8

1967 20.8 17.3 13.4 13.4 18.5 25.1 73.3 114 109 58.2 35.6 30.2
20.8 17.3 13.4 13.4 16.9 28.2 53.9 106 110 57.5 35.6 30.2
20.8 17.3 13.4 13.4 16.9 27.5 50.4 97 101 56.8 35.1 30.2
20.8 17.3 13.4 13.4 16.9 26.3 79 129 94.6 55.7 35.1 30.2
20.8 17.3 13.4 13.4 16.9 22.5 156 141 91.1 55.1 35.1 29.8
20.8 17.3 13.4 13.4 16.9 20.6 72.4 139 87.6 54.7 35.1 29.7
20.8 17.3 13.4 13.4 21 20 58.9 113 86.2 53.6 34.6 29.7
20.8 17.3 13.4 13.4 20.9 22.7 69.6 122 85.2 52.4 34.6 29.7
20 17.3 13.4 16.9 26.3 29.9 140 110 88.9 50.5 34.6 29.7
19.2 16.9 13.4 16.9 24.9 27 140 108 88.1 48.6 34.6 29.7
19.2 16.9 13.4 16.9 22.7 24.7 96.5 104 84.4 47.6 34.1 29.2
18.8 16.9 13.4 16.9 21.7 26.8 86.1 103 82.5 47 34.1 29.2
18.8 13.4 13.4 16.9 20.8 27.5 69.3 111 92.6 45.9 33.5 29.2
18.8 13.4 13.4 16.9 20 28 78.5 120 86.8 45.2 33.5 29.2
18.7 13.4 13.4 16.9 20 27.5 69.1 107 83.8 44.6 33 29.2
18.5 13.4 13.4 16.9 25.1 28.5 124 104 86.8 44 33 29.2
18.5 13.4 13.4 16.9 16.9 30.4 127 116 82.3 43.2 32.5 29.2
18.3 13.4 13.4 16.9 16.6 29.4 124 120 77 42.8 32 29.2
18.1 13.4 13.4 18.5 16.2 27.5 104 118 73.5 42.6 32 29.2
18.1 13.4 13.4 18.5 16.2 26.8 105 122 70.8 42.1 31.6 28.7
18.1 13.4 13.4 18.5 16.9 27.5 96.8 120 68.6 41.4 31.6 28.7
18.1 13.4 13.4 18.8 18.8 29.9 95.7 116 67.9 40.7 31.1 28.7
18.1 13.4 13.4 20 25.6 49.8 101 127 66.7 40.1 31.1 28.3
17.7 13.4 13.4 16.9 24.9 37.1 115 128 68.8 39.7 31.1 28.3
17.7 13.4 13.4 20 22.5 32.3 123 137 67.2 39.4 30.6 28.3
17.7 13.4 13.4 16.9 20.8 41.4 108 136 66.3 38.8 30.6 27.8
17.7 13.4 13.4 22.3 20.8 39.2 105 137 62.6 38.1 30.6 27.4

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 2 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
17.7 13.4 13.4 20.8 19.4 48.1 104 143 60.8 37.7 30.6 26.7
17.3 13.4 18.8 22.5 47.7 102 133 60.6 37.2 30.3 26
17.3 13.4 18.5 23.6 51.5 104 124 59 36.8 30.2 25.6
17.3 13.4 26.3 113 115 35.6 25.4

1968 25.2 23.4 21.4 23.4 34.8 32.2 48.8 106 85.7 67.6 38.1 30.6
25.2 22.6 21.8 23.5 35.6 36 47.3 102 83.5 64.2 37.7 30.6
24.7 22.6 21.8 22.7 36.7 31.2 51.3 101 82.8 60.6 37.4 30.6
24.7 22.6 21.8 23 33.9 30.5 50 101 81.8 58.2 37.2 30.6
24.7 22.6 22.2 24 33.9 34.9 52.6 102 81.3 56.4 36.8 30.6
24.7 22.6 23.1 27.2 32.3 32.3 59.3 97.8 78.7 54.7 36.5 30.6
24.7 22.2 23.7 27.7 34.2 38.4 55.1 94.6 74.5 51.9 36.1 30.2
25 22.2 23.5 27.2 31.9 37.9 61.5 103 71.5 51.1 36 30.2
24.3 22.2 23.3 26.3 29.2 40.6 64.4 106 68.6 50.5 35.6 30.2
23.8 22.2 23.8 24.4 27.4 42.3 72.3 116 67.2 49.6 35.6 29.7
23.8 22.2 22.6 26.5 26.3 42.5 64.4 111 64.9 49.2 35.1 29.7
23.8 21.8 23.8 28 29.5 41.4 69.1 104 62.6 49 34.9 29.7
23.4 21.8 24 26.2 29.5 47.5 75.7 96.8 61.5 48.2 34.6 29.7
23.4 21.8 23.5 25.5 28.1 52.4 98.1 122 60.8 47.6 34.1 29.2
23.4 21.8 23.8 30.3 28 70.4 94.7 132 60.6 47.3 34.1 29.2
23.4 21.5 23.4 28.6 27.5 68.4 104 121 61.7 45.9 33.5 29.2
23 21.4 23.5 25.7 29.1 53.4 112 112 62.6 45.1 33.5 29.2
23 21.4 23.5 25.2 30.5 55.6 132 109 66.3 44.4 33.5 28.7
23 21.4 23.4 24.7 29.7 57.5 104 120 131 43.4 33 28.7
23 21.8 24.4 25.6 30.3 55.8 116 124 90.8 42.5 33 28.7
23 21.4 23.8 26.8 29.7 47.3 142 133 79.7 41.7 33 28.3
23 21.4 23.4 27.7 29.2 54.7 119 126 82.3 41.6 32.5 28.3
22.6 21.4 23.4 25.9 28.6 71.8 116 137 86 41.2 32 28.3
22.6 21.4 24.3 25.2 27.7 63.3 102 126 84.6 41 32 28.3
22.6 21.4 24 25.5 27.4 58.2 98.1 122 82.5 40.4 31.9 27.8
22.6 21.4 25.5 24.9 27.7 61.5 99.2 117 79.6 39.9 31.6 27.8
22.6 21.4 25.3 27.8 29.5 65.4 94.3 105 78.7 39.5 31.6 27.8
23 21.5 25.7 28.4 30.8 63.3 99.8 96.2 76.7 39.4 31.6 27.8
23.4 21.4 25.3 30.9 31.7 59.7 98.9 90.6 74.5 38.8 31.1 27.4
24 24.7 34.6 35.4 54.2 97 89.2 72.5 38.8 31.1 27.4
23.4 23.7 35.1 104 87.6 38.2 27.4

1969 26.9 23.4 22.2 23.8 25.2 115 81.5 76 43.2 30.2
26.9 23.4 22.2 23.4 25.2 41 113 83.6 72.5 43.2 30.2
26.9 23 22.2 23.4 25.2 40.3 106 81.3 70 42.6 30.2
26.9 23 22.2 23.4 25.2 41.7 102 86 68.1 42.1 29.7
26.9 23 22.2 23.4 26 43 123 89.2 65.1 41.6 29.7
26.6 23 22.2 23 26.9 44.6 113 84.1 62.4 41.2 29.7
26.5 23 22.2 23 26.9 46.3 106 121 60.4 40.6 29.7
26.5 23 22.2 22.6 27.8 54.9 103 109 59.5 39.9 29.2
26 23 22.2 22.6 29.2 67 102 114 59 39.4 29.2
26 23 22.2 22.6 31.9 96.8 95.1 114 58.4 38.6 28.7
26 23 22.2 23 34.6 76 100 103 57.5 37.9 28.7
26 22.6 22.2 23.8 33.4 67.6 90.6 97.3 57.3 37.4 28.3

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 3 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
25.6 22.6 22.2 23.8 33 67.7 88.1 92.2 56 36.5 28.1
25.6 23.4 22.2 23.4 33 115 90.6 97 55.3 36 27.8
25.6 22.6 22.2 25.6 32.7 159 86 102 54.7 35.4 27.6
25.3 22.6 22.2 26.5 32.5 118 97 105 53 34.8 27.4
25.2 22.6 22.2 24.7 31.7 83.9 101 96.8 51.1 34.1 27.1
25.2 22.6 22.6 24.3 31.6 74.2 134 87.6 50.5 33.7 26.9
25.2 22.6 22.6 23.8 30.9 74 147 93.5 50.7 33 26.5
24.7 22.6 23 23.8 30.2 79.7 138 86.5 47.3 32.5 26
24.7 22.6 22.6 24.7 29.8 74 160 93.5 46.7 32.2 25.8
24.7 22.6 22.9 25 29.7 69.3 143 116 46.1 32 25.6
24.7 22.6 23.4 24.6 36.5 104 132 164 45.7 31.7 25.6
24.3 22.2 23.4 24.3 37.4 104 125 131 45.5 31.6 25.2
24.3 22.2 23.8 24.3 40.3 99.8 112 105 45.5 31.2 25.2
24.3 22.2 24.6 24.8 40.3 125 115 104 44.9 31.1 24.9
24.3 22.2 25 25.2 41.2 104 108 97.8 44.7 31.1 24.7
23.8 22.2 23.8 25.2 39.2 108 99.5 89.5 44.4 30.6 24.7
23.8 23.4 25.2 37.5 108 97.3 83.1 44.4 30.5 24.7
23.8 23.4 25.7 36.5 93.8 95.4 79 43.8 30.2 24.3
23.4 23.4 36.1 95.9 91.6 43.4 23.8

1970 23.8 23 21.1 25.2 25.9 22.6 46.5 48.7 40.4 36.7
23.8 22.6 20.9 26 24.6 25 60.8 48.4 40.4 36.7
23.8 22.6 20.9 26 24.3 28 60.1 48.4 40.4 36.1
23.8 22.6 20.5 25 23.4 33.7 69.6 47.8 39.9 36.1
23.8 22.2 20.5 24.6 23.4 35.6 66 47.8 39.9 36.1
23.8 22.2 20.9 23.8 23.4 32.7 61.5 47.3 39.9 35.9
23.8 22.2 20.9 23.7 23 29.5 57.7 47.3 39.9 35.6
23.4 22.2 21.4 24.9 23 26.9 59.5 46.7 39.4 35.6
23.4 21.8 21.4 26.5 22.4 24.6 72.1 46.4 39.4 35.4
23.4 21.8 21.6 25.6 22.6 27.1 97.8 46.1 39.4 35.1
23.4 21.8 21.5 25.3 22.6 34.9 90.3 45.8 39.4 35.1
23.4 21.8 22.3 25.2 22.6 44.2 93.8 45.5 38.8 34.6
23.4 21.4 22 24.7 24.9 51.7 99.6 45.2 38.8 34.6
23.4 21.4 22.7 24.5 27.6 47.5 107 44.9 38.8 34.3
23 21.4 22.4 24.1 29.8 72.5 94.1 44.4 38.8 34.1
23 21.4 22.2 23.8 29.8 75.5 89.1 44.1 38.8 34.1
23 21.1 22.2 25.9 28.3 89.1 83.8 43.8 38.2 33.5
23 20.9 23.3 28 26.3 77 90.6 43.5 38.2 33.5
23 20.9 22.7 28 26.9 61.1 100 43.2 38.2 33.3
23 20.9 23.4 28.9 27.8 43.4 267 42.9 38.2 33
23 20.9 23.7 28.6 26 47.1 42.6 38.2 32.8
23 20.9 22.4 27.4 24.4 48.5 42.6 37.7 32.5
23 20.5 22.2 30.5 27.8 48 57 42.1 37.7 32.3
23 20.5 22.3 32.1 29.5 42.1 54.7 42.1 37.7 32
23 20.5 21.9 34.6 25.7 41.9 54 41.6 37.7 31.8
23.6 20.5 21.8 30 27.5 41.6 52.2 41.6 37.2 31.6
25.2 20.5 24.7 29.4 24.9 47.8 51.2 41.3 37.2 31.3
23.5 21.4 24.3 27.5 24.9 46.3 50.3 41 37.2 31.1
23.4 24.1 26.8 23.7 47.5 49.9 41 36.7 30.6

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 4 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
23 23.4 25.6 22.9 44 49.6 41 36.7 30.6
23 25 22.2 40.4 30.6

1971 23.3 18.2 22.7 24.6 28.3 56.6 197 143 156 86.6 58 45.4
23 18.2 23 23 28.4 50.3 262 141 189 84.8 57.4 45.4
22.7 18.2 22.6 23.1 27.5 51.2 203 135 169 83.6 56.6 44.8
22.6 17.9 24 24.9 28.3 47.2 178 166 162 82.4 55.4 44.8
22.3 17.9 24 24 27.5 92.7 173 202 164 81 55 44.2
22.2 17.9 23.4 23.7 27.5 72.5 175 199 159 79.6 54.4 43.9
22.2 17.9 22.9 24.7 27.8 73.7 194 176 155 78 53.8 43.6
21.9 17.5 22.6 27.3 26.3 98.8 193 220 189 76.8 53.2 43
21.8 17.5 22.3 26.2 26.6 82 182 240 201 75.8 52.6 42.7
21.8 17.5 22.6 27.1 26.2 116 161 206 221 75 52 42.4
21.5 17.5 23.1 27.4 25.7 312 162 197 180 73.8 51.4 42.1
21.4 17.5 23.1 29.7 25.9 142 157 204 163 73 50.4 41.8
21.4 17.5 22.7 28.4 26.2 163 144 199 150 71.7 49.6 41.2
21.4 17.5 22.6 28.6 27.5 444 146 197 141 70.1 48.8 41.2
20.9 23.2 22.6 25.7 29.2 258 135 180 134 68 48.4 40.9
20.9 23 22.2 25.3 29.2 233 143 173 129 67.7 48.4 40.6
20.9 23.6 23 26.8 28.3 187 143 188 124 74.1 47.8 40.3
20.9 23.4 23.3 27.4 26.9 169 145 181 118 106 47.8 40
20.9 23.2 22.9 27.1 27.1 158 138 183 117 84.6 47.8 39.7
20.5 23 23.4 29.1 29.6 151 164 212 114 72.8 47.2 39.4
20.5 23.1 23.1 28 33.7 150 139 194 112 72 47.2 38.8
20.5 23 23.5 34.8 31.4 162 172 183 108 70.4 47.2 38.5
20.5 22.6 22.9 35.8 31.1 162 172 172 104 67.5 47 38.2
20.1 22.6 22.9 28.9 31.2 172 144 171 102 64.5 46.6 37.6
19.9 22.6 23.7 27.7 30 199 138 180 101 63.6 46.6 37
19.7 22.6 24.7 28.7 30.6 197 169 171 98.8 63.2 46.6 36.7
19.3 23 25 30.5 32.7 236 185 171 96 62.2 46.2 36.1
19.1 23.2 23.5 33.2 34.9 186 145 170 91.8 61 46 35.5
18.9 23.4 30.9 33.2 184 155 169 89.6 60.4 46 35.2
18.6 23.4 28.9 35.3 205 169 163 88 59.8 45.4 34.6
18.6 23.5 37.4 147 164 59.2 34

1972 34 32.2 27.4 29.8 35.2 48 62 122 134 66.3 36.1 28.7
34 32.2 27.4 29.4 36 46.4 63.5 119 138 65.1 35.8 28.3
34 32.2 27.4 29.2 35.6 45.8 75.2 112 179 62.1 35.4 28.3
34 32.2 27.4 28.8 35 40.2 108 166 160 61.5 35.1 28
33.4 32.2 28 29.2 33.6 39.8 103 136 148 60.6 34.6 27.7
33.4 32.2 28 29.2 34.6 36.6 168 132 139 58.8 34.1 27.4
33.4 31.6 28 29.2 37.8 34.8 235 135 157 57.9 33.7 27.1
33.4 31.6 27.8 29.2 42.6 34 129 148 141 56.8 33.5 26.9
33.4 31.6 27.4 28.6 44.6 33.4 111 146 135 53.8 33 26.6
33.4 31 28 29.2 44.2 34.4 104 139 129 51.9 33 26.5
33.4 31 28.6 29.2 45.6 34 110 146 126 50.7 32.5 26.2
33.4 31 28.6 29.2 45 34.4 112 157 143 49.4 32.5 26
33.2 31 28.6 28.6 44.8 34.8 102 155 214 48.6 32.2 25.9
32.8 31 28.6 28.6 41.6 34 105 156 266 47.6 32 25.6

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 5 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
32.8 30.4 28.6 28.6 41.4 35.4 96.4 159 186 46.3 31.9 25.5
32.8 30.4 28.2 36.8 44.6 45.6 91.8 135 164 45.3 31.6 25.2
32.8 30.4 28 32 44.6 42.8 145 142 158 44.6 31.2 25.2
32.8 30.4 28 33.2 46.6 45.8 186 137 133 44 31.1 24.7
32.8 29.8 28.6 35.6 45.6 67.3 187 130 124 43 30.6 24.7
32.8 29.8 28.6 33.2 41.6 59.2 167 125 114 42.3 30.6 24.3
32.8 29.8 28.6 32.6 45.8 46.2 160 118 109 41.4 30.6 24.3
32.2 29.2 28 32.8 47.4 43 133 119 100 40.4 30.2 24
32.2 29.2 28 32.8 53.3 46.4 128 123 96.5 39.7 30.2 23.8
32.2 29.2 28.6 32.2 46.6 48.8 145 141 91.1 38.6 30.2 23.8
32.2 28.6 28.6 34 46.4 50.2 135 145 86.2 37.7 29.7 23.8
32.2 28.6 28.6 38.2 50.8 50.4 138 137 82.8 37.4 29.7 23.7
32.2 28.6 29.2 35.4 47.8 61.6 135 158 79 36.7 29.7 23.4
32.2 28 29.2 37.6 46.4 59.4 173 176 75.2 37.2 29.2 23.4
32.2 28 29.8 39.2 47 58.6 146 172 72.7 40.6 29.2 23.4
32.2 29.8 38 47.8 56.6 141 143 68.8 37.9 28.7 23.4
32.2 29.8 46 129 136 36.7 23.4

1973 23 21.4 20.5 23 23.4 26.9 80.5 114 135 93.2 43.2 28.3
23 20.9 20.9 23 23.1 26.5 82.6 126 141 88.9 42.6 27.8
22.7 20.9 20.9 23 22.9 26.5 80.5 124 144 82 42.5 27.7
22.6 20.9 20.9 22.6 23 26 88.1 124 134 87.3 41.9 27.4
22.6 20.9 20.9 22.6 22.6 25.9 101 147 128 88.7 41.6 27.1
22.6 20.9 20.9 22.6 22.6 25.6 105 149 127 204 40.8 26.8
22.6 20.9 20.9 22.6 22.2 25.6 100 214 132 138 40.3 26.5
22.6 20.9 21.4 22.4 22.2 35.1 153 186 127 107 39.7 26
22.6 20.9 21.4 22.2 22.6 36.1 101 222 123 97.8 39.2 26
22.2 20.5 21.2 22.2 23.4 35.3 91.9 169 115 94.3 38.6 25.6
22.2 20.5 20.9 21.8 24 75 84.3 166 120 90.8 36.7 25.3
22.2 20.5 20.9 21.8 24.4 65.4 87.6 222 239 87 36.1 25.2
22.2 20.5 21.4 21.8 24.3 65.3 90.3 216 177 84.9 35.6 24.7
21.8 20.5 21.4 21.8 24.3 63.1 93 179 159 80.8 35.1 24.4
21.8 20.5 21.8 21.8 25.3 119 114 150 133 80.5 34.9 24.3
21.8 20.5 21.8 21.8 25.7 80.5 108 143 126 79.5 34.6 24
21.8 20.1 21.8 21.8 25.6 163 103 134 126 78.7 34.1 23.8
21.8 20.1 21.8 21.6 25.5 93.3 97.8 161 105 78.2 33.9 23.8
21.8 20.1 21.8 21.4 26.2 87 101 154 114 76.7 33.5 23.5
21.8 20.1 21.8 21.4 25.7 104 124 140 107 74.2 33 23.4
21.8 20.1 22 21.4 29.1 146 115 134 102 70.5 32.5 23.4
21.4 20.1 21.8 21.4 26 102 121 191 96.8 64.9 32 23.3
21.4 20.1 22.2 21.4 27.2 89.5 111 134 106 60.8 31.4 23
21.4 20.1 22.2 21.4 27.2 88.4 171 132 97.8 55.5 30.5 22.9
21.4 20.1 22.2 21.8 27.4 90.6 126 130 108 51.9 30 22.6
21.4 20.1 22.2 21.8 28.4 99.6 144 156 108 49 29.7 22.6
21.4 20.5 22.6 21.8 27.7 123 144 151 112 47.6 29.2 22.4
21.4 20.5 22.4 21.8 31.4 95.4 126 132 105 46.5 28.7 22.2
21.4 22.2 22.4 29.1 83.6 114 127 97.3 44.9 28.6 22.2
21.4 22.2 22.2 27.5 84.5 117 138 94.5 44.2 28.3 22.2
21.4 22.7 26.9 116 133 43.2 22.2

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 6 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

1974 21.9 20.1 19.4 19.7 19.3 27.8 34.2 114 116 99.7 53.4 16.4
21.8 20.1 19.3 19.7 19.3 29.2 29.4 110 114 98.1 51.3 16.4
21.8 20.1 19.3 20.1 20.1 31.1 33.4 116 115 96.2 48.6 16.4
21.8 20.1 19.7 19.7 19.7 28.7 104 121 111 95.1 46.7 16.1
21.8 20.1 19.7 19.7 19.3 26.6 56.4 191 110 94.1 45.5 16.1
21.8 19.8 19.3 19.8 20.9 31.9 42.8 182 122 92.7 43.2 16.1
21.8 19.7 19.3 19.7 20.9 27.2 43.6 176 118 90.6 40.1 16.1
21.4 19.7 19.3 20.1 21.8 22.3 43.2 184 117 89.2 37.9 16.1
21.4 19.7 19.3 20.1 22.6 26 41.9 187 126 88.7 36 16.1
21.4 19.7 19.3 20.3 22.2 24.9 41 176 131 86.5 33.9 15.7
21.4 19.7 19.3 20.1 21.8 23.1 37.7 179 130 85.2 31.7 15.7
21.4 19.3 19.3 20.1 21.8 21.8 41.4 170 127 83.8 30.5 15.7
21.4 19.3 19.7 20.1 21.4 22.2 57.9 159 124 81.8 28.7 15.7
21.4 19.3 19.7 19.7 22.2 20.9 41.2 152 121 79.7 27.5 15.7
21.4 19.3 20.1 19.7 21.4 29.4 39.9 145 123 77.7 26.3 15.7
21.4 19.3 20.1 19.7 20.9 31.7 41 142 119 75.7 25 15.7
21.4 19.3 19.7 19.7 20.9 40.1 52.9 135 115 74.2 24.4 15.7
21.4 19.3 19.7 20.1 20.9 31.7 67.4 131 114 72.7 23.1 15.7
21.4 19.3 19.7 20.1 20.9 44.3 73.3 130 113 71.3 21.9 15.7
20.9 19.3 19.8 20.1 21.4 40.4 66.9 125 110 70 20.7 15.7
20.9 19.3 19.7 20.5 21.4 46.7 53.2 123 109 68.3 19.8 15.7
20.9 19.3 19.7 20.1 21.4 47.5 53 124 112 66.5 19.4 15.7
20.9 19.7 19.7 20.1 20.9 33.4 49.2 121 108 64.4 18.8 15.4
20.9 19.7 19.7 19.7 20.5 27.5 79 122 107 62.8 18.6 15.4
20.9 19.7 19.3 19.7 20.1 25.7 76 121 106 61.7 18.1 15.4
20.5 19.7 19.3 19.7 20.1 24.3 77.2 116 105 60.4 17.6 15.4
20.5 19.7 19.3 19.7 20.9 23.1 84.9 123 104 59 17.4 15.4
20.5 19.7 19.3 19.7 21.4 21.8 98.5 119 103 57.7 17 15.4
20.5 19.3 19.6 21.4 21.4 106 117 102 56.4 16.8 15.4
20.5 19.3 19.3 22.2 27.5 106 119 102 56 16.8 15.4
20.1 19.3 28.6 96.5 117 56 15.4

1975 15.4 13 11.2 15.7 18.2 21.4 161 126 109 75.6 37 23
15.4 12.7 11.5 16.5 18.9 22 145 176 108 73.1 36.6 22.7
15.4 12.7 11.5 16.4 19.1 22.3 182 202 126 70.2 36 22.3
15.4 12.7 11.9 17.1 18.7 22.2 169 178 260 68.4 35.3 22.2
15 12.7 12.6 17.6 18.6 22.7 156 146 221 66.4 34.4 22
15 12.4 12.7 17.5 19.4 23.4 140 134 210 64.9 33.7 21.6
15 12.4 13.2 18 19.3 26.5 110 130 211 64.9 33.2 21.4
15 12.4 13.2 17.9 19.6 23.8 83 125 212 63.8 32.7 21.3
15 12.1 13.6 17.6 20.1 22.6 77 121 208 63.2 32.4 20.9
15 12.1 13.3 18.7 20.1 24.4 124 112 178 61.8 31.8 20.7
15 12.1 13.8 18.6 21.1 25.5 99.5 111 159 59.3 31.2 20.5
15 12.1 14 18.6 20.1 28 86.9 108 165 57.4 30.3 20.2
15 12.1 14.3 18.6 20.8 27.8 83.7 111 157 55.6 29.8 20.2
15 12.1 14.6 17.9 19.6 28.6 104 109 149 54.1 29.2 19.8
14.7 11.8 14.9 17.7 19.3 32.4 122 111 136 53.3 28.7 19.8
14.7 11.8 14.7 17.5 19.3 34.4 116 108 129 51.2 28.2 19.5

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 7 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
14.4 11.8 15.2 17.1 19.3 33.5 111 104 125 49.9 28 19.5
14.4 11.8 15.5 17.6 18.9 34.8 116 99.4 119 48.2 27.4 19.1
14.4 11.8 15.4 17.5 18.8 65.8 173 101 115 46.7 26.8 19.1
14 11.7 16.1 17.5 18.6 77.5 156 106 113 45.8 26.6 18.8
14 11.5 16.3 17.1 18.5 59.7 143 112 111 44.6 26.3 18.8
13.7 11.5 15.8 17.1 18.2 231 141 127 107 44 25.9 18.8
13.4 11.5 16.2 17.1 18.2 119 151 122 103 42.8 25.5 18.6
13.4 11.5 16.1 16.9 18 79.9 139 123 96.6 42 25.1 18.4
13.4 11.5 16.7 16.8 17.9 68.4 165 120 89.9 40.7 24.7 18.1
13.3 11.5 17 16.8 17.9 66.7 197 118 83.7 39.6 24.4 18.1
13.1 11.5 16.8 16.4 20 78.4 167 115 82 39.3 24 17.8
13.1 11.2 16.4 16.4 20.1 74.7 141 125 79.9 38.4 23.8 17.8
13.1 15.9 17.5 19.8 87.5 152 118 77.7 38 23.5 17.8
13.1 15.7 18.5 20.9 128 135 115 74.9 37.6 23.1 17.8
13.1 15.7 20.9 128 111 37.5 17.4

1976 17.4 17.1 17.1 17.8 25.5 39.9 98.9 122 57.9 35.4 25.2
17.1 17.1 17.1 17.8 26 41.4 101 197 56.9 34.9 24.7
17.1 17.1 17.1 17.8 25.9 43 104 160 56.2 34.9 24.2
17.1 17.1 17.4 17.8 25.9 44.7 110 136 55.6 34.3 23.7
16.8 17.1 17.4 18.4 26.8 46.2 112 143 55.2 34.3 23.1
16.8 17.1 17.4 18.4 28 44.7 114 142 53.7 34 22.6
16.8 17.1 17.4 18.6 29.1 44 113 154 53.1 33.8 22.1
16.8 17.1 17.4 19.9 28.8 43.9 116 147 51.9 33.8 21.8
16.5 17.1 17.4 19.5 30.1 43.3 122 146 51.2 33.3 21.5
16.5 17.1 17.4 20.4 31.1 43.5 125 137 49.8 33.3 21
16.5 17.1 17.4 20.2 30.9 43.5 129 129 48.8 32.8 20.7
16.5 17.1 17.1 20.5 31.8 43 134 126 46.9 32.8 20.2
16.5 17.1 17.1 21.3 31.4 42.7 137 123 46.1 32.4 19.9
16.1 17.1 17.1 20.9 32.1 42.5 135 129 45.5 32.2 19.4
16.1 17.1 17.1 22 32.1 42 130 122 44.6 31.9 19
16.1 17.1 17.4 22.1 31.1 43.2 126 111 43.2 31.7 18.6
16.1 17.1 17.4 22 30.9 42.7 122 104 42.5 31.2 18.4
16.1 17.1 17.4 22.8 32.1 41.4 117 98.1 41.7 30.8 18.4
16.1 17.1 17.4 22.6 33.4 41.4 113 92.5 41.1 30.6 18
16.1 17.1 17.1 23 34.1 40.6 125 89.3 40.7 30.1 18
16.5 17.1 17.6 22.7 35.2 40.4 120 82.8 39.8 29.9 17.5
16.5 17.1 17.4 23.2 36.5 39.7 121 78.5 38.2 29.6 17.5
16.5 17.1 17.4 23.8 38 39.4 151 82.8 37.9 29.1 17.5
16.5 17.1 17.4 23.2 37.5 38.4 137 74.6 37.1 28.7 17.5
16.5 17.1 17.4 24.4 37 48 153 72.7 36.9 28.2 17.5
16.5 17.1 17.4 24.3 36 46.9 145 72.5 36.5 27.7 17.5
16.8 17.1 17.4 25.1 35.5 48.8 123 70.2 36.2 27.2 17.5
16.8 17.1 18 25.9 36.3 51 122 64.9 36 26.5 17.5
16.7 17.1 17.8 25.9 38 52.4 117 62.7 36 26.2 17
17.1 17.8 25.5 38.4 52.6 112 61.2 35.4 25.7 17
17.1 17.8 38.9 111 35.4 17

1977 17 16.2 14.9 14.1 12.8 21.2 119 182 135 82.1 42.3 27.9

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 8 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
17 16.2 14.9 13.6 12.8 23.2 128 161 133 78.5 41.9 27.6
17 16.2 14.5 13.6 12.8 24.4 130 164 213 75.3 44.1 27
17 16.2 14.5 13.2 12.8 24 128 182 132 73.6 43.6 26.9
17 15.7 14.5 13.2 12.8 26.5 114 186 143 72.5 42.8 26.5
17 15.7 14.5 13.2 12.4 26.7 112 157 138 71.8 41.1 26.4
17 15.7 14.5 13.2 12.4 28.6 107 157 133 69.8 40.7 26
17 15.7 14.5 13.2 12.6 32.4 103 160 129 68.9 40 25.8
17 15.3 14.5 13.2 12.6 35.6 96.5 145 128 68.2 39.4 25.5
17 15.3 14.5 13.2 12.4 35.2 106 162 122 67.3 38.8 25.2
17 15.3 14.5 13.2 13.4 41.9 130 148 213 66.7 38.4 25
16.6 15.3 14.1 13.2 13.2 43.8 127 193 181 66 38.2 24.5
16.6 15.3 14.1 13.2 13.2 47.8 128 301 165 65.1 37.7 24.5
16.6 15.3 14.1 13.2 14.1 47.5 155 260 159 62.5 37.1 24
16.6 15.3 14.1 12.8 13.8 56 172 327 148 61.8 37.3 24
16.6 14.9 14.1 12.8 14.9 51.2 139 196 142 59.2 35.4 24
16.6 14.9 14.1 12.8 14.7 62.3 150 168 137 57.5 34.9 23.6
16.6 14.9 13.6 12.8 14.5 61.4 165 147 135 55 34.3 23.6
16.6 14.9 14.1 12.8 14.5 61.6 154 140 132 53.9 33.8 23.2
16.6 14.9 14.5 12.8 14.5 64.5 151 139 129 53.1 33.1 23.1
16.6 14.9 15.2 12.8 16.2 69.6 146 126 129 52.3 32.8 23.1
16.6 14.9 16 12.8 18 78.1 142 191 128 51.2 32.2 23.1
16.6 14.9 16.2 12.8 17.8 86.2 139 184 126 50.8 31.7 23.1
16.6 14.9 15.7 12.8 19.3 77.8 144 172 125 50.2 31.2 23.1
16.2 14.9 16.2 12.8 19.3 94.3 156 165 122 49.8 30.6 22.6
16.2 14.9 16.6 12.8 18 105 133 170 122 49 30.3 22.6
16.2 14.9 17.2 12.8 18 90.3 164 178 120 48.6 29.8 22.6
16.2 14.9 16.4 12.8 20.7 89.1 167 164 114 47.7 29.1 22.6
16.2 15.7 12.8 20 115 161 150 104 46.5 28.6 22.6
16.2 15.3 12.8 19.8 111 149 149 89.9 45 28.1 22.6
16.2 14.9 19.8 158 152 43.4 22.4

1978 22.6 18 16.2 14.9 16.6 22.1 136 303 152 122 37.5 24
22.6 18 16.2 14.9 16.6 22.6 156 280 150 120 37.2 23.6
22.6 18 16.2 14.9 16.6 30.1 152 266 144 118 36.2 23.6
22.6 18 16.2 14.5 16.6 27.6 146 264 140 114 35.8 23.6
22.6 17.5 16.2 14.5 17 25 139 251 146 110 35.6 23.2
22.6 17.5 16.2 14.5 17 29.6 147 246 141 107 35.3 23.2
22.1 17.5 15.7 14.5 17 35.4 152 252 139 107 34.4 23.2
21.2 17.5 15.7 14.5 17.5 32.8 136 235 136 101 33.9 23.2
21.6 17.5 15.7 14.5 17.5 41.7 181 232 137 94.1 33 22.8
21.5 17.5 15.7 14.5 17.5 41.7 198 210 134 87.9 32.5 22.8
21.5 17 15.7 14.5 17.5 42.5 335 227 144 83.8 32 22.8
20.7 17 15.7 14.5 18 46.3 284 300 137 80.3 31.8 22.8
20.2 17 15.7 14.5 18 48.1 264 232 134 79.3 31.2 22.8
20 17 15.7 14.5 18.4 50 256 213 132 76.2 30.5 22.8
19.8 17 15.7 14.5 18.4 51.2 276 201 131 72.6 30 22.5
19.8 17 15.3 14.5 18.8 45.2 259 192 130 66.3 29.5 22.5
19.6 16.6 15.3 14.5 19.3 53.1 249 187 132 62.8 29.1 22.5
19.3 16.6 15.3 15 19.3 94.2 248 183 129 59.3 28 22.5

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 9 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
19.3 16.6 15.3 14.9 19.8 140 236 180 127 54.9 27.4 22.5
19.3 16.6 15.3 14.9 19.8 126 231 176 127 52.1 26.6 22.5
19.4 16.6 15.3 14.9 20.2 94.2 220 173 129 49.3 26.3 22.1
19.8 16.2 15.3 14.9 20.2 136 224 170 130 47.8 25.5 22.1
19.8 16.2 15.3 15.3 20.7 156 213 176 127 47.7 25.5 22.1
18.4 16.2 15.3 15.3 21.2 122 211 187 126 46.2 25 22.1
18.2 16.2 15.3 15.3 21.2 135 205 171 125 45.5 24.7 22.1
18 16.2 14.9 15.7 21.2 136 206 163 127 43.6 24.7 22.1
18 16.2 14.9 16.2 21.6 137 266 159 124 41.9 24.2 22.1
18 16.2 14.9 16.2 21.6 137 306 159 126 39.9 23.6 21.7
18 14.9 16.6 21.6 144 296 159 125 38.6 23.6 21.7
18 14.9 16.2 22.1 133 261 156 125 38.6 23.6 21.7
18 14.9 22.1 308 153 38.4 21.7

1979 21.7 21 19.3 16.1 131 28 97.6 227 94.3 60.3 31.8 27.6
21.7 21 19.2 16.1 65.9 28.8 91.1 232 95.4 57.4 31.3 27.6
21.7 21 19 15.7 29.1 30.9 87.6 231 99.2 55.9 31.3 27.6
21.7 21 19 15.7 17.4 32.2 100 221 93.6 53.4 31.3 27.6
21.7 20.7 19 15.7 16.9 41.5 90.1 217 93.6 53.4 31.3 27.1
21.7 20.7 18.6 15.6 16.9 37 91.2 216 93.6 53.2 30.9 26.7
21.7 20.6 18.3 15.4 16.1 35.6 113 214 90.6 51.7 30.9 26.7
21.7 20.3 18.3 15.4 17.3 35 105 211 88.1 51.5 30.9 26.7
21.7 20.3 18.1 15.4 17.3 33 104 210 86.9 51.1 30.9 26.7
21.7 20.3 18 15.4 16.8 36.9 109 208 86.9 58.4 30.5 26.6
21.7 20.3 17.7 15.4 17.1 38.3 98.4 206 86.9 50.4 30.5 26.3
21.7 20.3 17.7 15.4 17.6 40 92.8 206 86.9 48.5 30.5 26.3
21.7 20 17.4 15.3 17.9 41.6 97.4 200 86.9 43.6 30.9 26.3
21.7 20 17.3 15.1 18 41.6 103 198 86.9 41.1 30.9 26.3
21.7 20 17.3 15.1 18.3 45.7 120 197 86.9 41.1 30.9 26.3
21.7 20 17 15.1 20.1 47.8 121 196 86.9 40.4 30.9 23.6
21.7 20 17 14.8 19.5 108 122 194 85.5 40.1 30.9 23.2
21.7 19.8 17 14.8 20.2 183 161 194 85 39.3 30.9 22.8
21.7 19.7 16.8 14.8 20.6 120 207 191 84.8 37.7 30.5 22.1
21.7 19.7 16.7 14.8 21.6 76.9 254 207 84.8 37.7 30.2 21.7
21.7 19.7 16.7 14.8 21.7 60 252 174 84.8 36.2 29.6 21.7
21.7 19.7 16.7 14.8 21.6 59.3 248 167 84.1 36.2 29.6 21.7
21.7 19.4 16.7 14.7 21.7 77.1 251 161 79.8 35 29.6 21.4
21.7 19.3 16.4 14.5 22.5 82.2 253 149 79.8 34.8 29.6 21
21.7 19.3 16.4 14.5 22.8 88.6 235 144 76.4 34.4 29.6 20.7
21.7 19.3 16.4 14.5 23.1 86.7 237 137 75 33.9 29.6 20.7
21.7 19.3 16.4 14.5 23 85.5 242 129 73 33.6 28.8 20.7
21.7 19.3 16.1 14.5 23.1 78.4 245 126 65.7 32.3 28.8 20.7
21.7 16.1 14.5 23.5 76.9 240 122 62.8 31.8 28 20.7
21.7 16.1 14.5 23.9 86 238 109 61.5 31.8 27.6 20.7
22.5 16.1 23.9 229 97.4 31.8 20.7

1980 21.4 18.3 16.7 18.6 26.3 32.8 96.9 121 91.9 61.3 38.1 29.2
21.4 18 16.7 18.6 26.3 32.6 86.9 120 155 59.3 37.3 29.2
21.4 18 16.7 19 26.3 32.2 82.2 184 121 57.4 37.5 28.8

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 10 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
20.3 18 16.7 19.3 26.7 31.8 77.5 248 113 55.5 37 28.4
20.3 18 16.7 19.3 26.7 32.2 73.5 243 114 54.5 36.6 28
20.3 18 16.7 19.7 26.9 31.6 79.8 230 152 52.6 36.1 28
20.3 18 16.7 19.7 27.1 33 82.2 200 152 52.6 35.8 27.6
20.3 18 16.7 19.7 27.6 34.2 91.8 202 148 51.7 35.2 27.6
20.3 17.7 16.7 20 27.6 35.3 88.1 215 121 50.8 34.7 27.1
20 17.7 16.7 20 28.4 38.6 115 172 101 48.9 34.1 27.1
20 17.7 16.7 20 28.8 38.9 113 172 99.4 48.9 33.9 26.7
20 17.7 17.3 20 29.6 42.8 101 148 95.6 48.5 33.9 26.3
20 17.3 17.3 20 29.6 35.5 98.1 147 93.1 48 33 26.3
20 17.3 17.7 20 29.6 33.9 96.9 121 101 46.8 32.6 26.3
19.7 17.3 17.7 21.7 31 34.7 94.3 99.5 95.6 46.6 31.9 25.5
19.7 17 17.7 21.7 30.3 38.6 124 94.3 86.9 45.7 31.8 25.5
19.3 17 18 21.7 30.6 38 120 95.6 81 44.3 31.8 25.5
19.3 17 18 23.6 30.5 43.6 113 94.3 79.8 43.8 31.8 25.5
19.3 17 18.3 23.6 31 47.1 130 110 77.5 43.6 31.6 25.5
19 17 18.3 23.6 31.9 54.5 107 108 78.7 43.3 31.3 25.5
18.6 17 18.3 24.7 31.5 53.6 101 103 73 42.4 31.2 25.1
18.3 16.7 18.3 25.5 32.3 58.5 120 106 71.9 41.9 30.9 24.7
18.3 16.7 18.3 25.5 32.2 62.4 106 113 71.9 41.3 30.5 24.7
18.3 16.7 18.3 25.5 31.8 60.3 95.6 111 69.8 41.1 30.5 24.4
18.3 16.7 18.3 25.5 31.5 105 88.1 101 67.6 40.3 30 24
18.3 16.7 18.3 25.5 31 130 105 86.9 66.5 40.1 30 24
18.3 16.7 18.3 25.5 32 87.2 89.4 91.9 67.6 40.1 29.6 24
18.3 16.7 18.3 25.5 32.9 80.1 86.9 100 66.5 39.8 29.6 24
18.3 16.7 18.3 25.5 32.3 109 82.2 98.1 64.4 39.4 29.6 24
18.3 18.3 25.5 31.8 110 211 89.4 62.4 38.9 29.6 24
18.3 18.4 31.9 130 97.3 38.3 23.6

1981 23.6 21.7 20.3 23.7 27.4 41.8 114 150 122 68.3 31.9 24.2
23.6 21.7 20.3 23.9 27.1 41.6 134 147 118 54.5 31.3 24.1
23.6 21.4 20 24 27.1 42.8 119 139 115 54.5 31.8 23.5
23.6 21.4 20 24 27.6 43.1 110 140 107 53.2 33.6 23.1
23.6 21 20 24.2 27.6 43.4 88.3 118 101 52.6 32.9 23
23.6 21 20 24 29.3 43.6 110 113 91.8 51.1 31.8 23
23.6 21 20.7 26.2 26.7 44 138 122 85.7 50 31.6 22.6
23.6 21 20.7 25.5 26.7 43.6 139 118 78.7 48.2 30.9 22.6
23.6 21 20.7 25.6 26.6 44.1 136 139 68.7 45.9 30.9 22.2
23.2 21 20.8 25.4 26.3 44.8 135 128 63.4 43.6 30.9 22.3
23.2 20.7 20.3 25.5 26.3 45.9 134 124 60.3 40.9 30.5 22
23.2 20.7 20.3 25.4 26.5 46.2 132 125 64.4 38.4 30.2 21.8
23.2 20.7 20.3 25.6 26.3 45.9 131 128 66.9 36.9 30 21.7
23.2 20.7 20.3 26.3 26.7 46.4 240 123 69.1 35.6 29.7 21.7
23.2 20.7 20.2 26.3 27.7 46.2 167 139 64.6 34.7 29.2 21.7
23 20.7 20.1 26.7 28 47.3 144 128 59.3 34.1 28.6 21.6
22.8 20.7 20.1 26.6 28.5 47.3 142 162 57.4 33 28.1 21.6
22.7 20.7 20.1 26.3 28.6 48 138 177 54.5 32.8 28.2 21.6
22.5 20.7 20.2 26.3 28.8 48.4 130 172 53.4 33 28.1 21.7
22.5 20.7 20.1 26.6 29.3 48.7 127 205 54.5 33.5 27.7 21.7

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 11 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
22.2 20.7 23.7 26.7 29.7 49.3 132 196 54.5 33.6 27.6 21.7
22.1 20.7 23 27.3 30.6 49.8 133 214 53.8 33.9 27.4 21.6
21.7 20.7 23.2 26.7 31 52.1 128 194 52.4 34.2 26.9 21.6
21.7 20.7 23.2 26.7 32.9 49.1 118 168 50.8 33.9 26.2 21.7
21.7 20.7 23.1 26.7 33.5 52.4 145 163 51 33.8 26 21.6
21.7 20.6 23.1 27 41.3 49.5 128 155 49.1 33 25.8 21.4
21.7 20.3 23 26.7 38.4 61.3 121 147 50.4 32.6 25.4 21.4
21.7 20.3 22.8 26.7 38.9 113 167 142 63.4 32.5 25.2 21.5
21.7 23.2 26.9 39.3 128 142 136 104 32.2 25 21.4
21.7 23.2 27.1 39.9 125 140 133 90.2 31.8 24.6 21.4
21.7 23.6 41.1 201 132 31.8 21.4

1982 21.4 19 19.1 21.5 22.1 22.3 47.3 106 140 53.2 29.6 23.7
21.4 19 18.9 21.7 22.1 22 51 103 132 51.3 29.2 23.2
21.1 19.2 19.1 21.7 21.7 22.2 53 102 132 49.6 29.2 22.7
21.1 19.2 19.3 21.5 21.7 38.6 53.8 103 126 48.9 28.9 22.3
21 19 19.2 20.9 22.1 36.2 54.1 104 126 47.5 28.8 22.1
21 18.9 19.1 20.1 22.5 38.8 53.9 104 122 45.7 28.6 21.7
20.9 18.6 19.5 20.2 22.1 39.8 51.9 103 117 44 28.4 21.4
20.7 18.5 19.4 20 22.3 46.4 50.8 105 113 42.8 28.4 21.4
20.8 18.5 19.2 20 22.5 41.9 50.8 126 108 41.6 28.4 21.2
20.6 18.3 19.3 20 22.3 41.6 51.9 122 104 40.4 28 20.9
20.5 18.3 19.5 20.3 22.8 42.3 53 120 97.6 39.4 28 20.7
20.3 18.3 19.8 20.3 23.1 43.8 54.1 122 90.8 37.8 27.7 20.3
20.3 18.1 20.2 20.6 23.2 45 53.9 208 86 37.2 27.6 20
20.1 18.4 20.3 20.7 24.1 45.7 54.3 132 82.6 35 27.6 20
20 18.3 20.3 20.7 23.6 47 57 131 78.9 34.1 27.1 19.9
19.9 18.5 20.3 21 23.5 51 61.5 132 76.2 32.8 27.1 19.7
19.8 18.4 20.5 21 23.1 52.3 86 140 73.2 31.5 26.7 19.3
19.5 18.6 20.2 20.7 23.2 52.3 81.2 136 68.9 31.3 26.3 19.3
19.4 18.4 20.1 20.8 23.2 51.5 88.9 140 69.5 30.9 26.3 19.3
19.3 18.6 20.2 20.9 22.8 51 99.7 188 68.7 30.9 26.3 19
19.3 18.8 20.2 21.2 22.6 51.3 126 184 65.7 30.6 26.2 19
19.2 18.8 20.2 21.4 22.5 53.6 127 181 65.3 30.5 25.9 18.9
19 18.8 21.7 21.6 22.5 51.7 132 177 64.8 30 25.9 18.6
19 18.8 21.7 21.5 22.5 49.6 161 169 63.8 30 25.9 18.6
19 18.8 21.7 21.7 22.2 51 99.7 170 62.8 30 25.6 18.6
19 18.9 21.1 22.1 22.5 51.7 175 166 60.9 31.6 25.5 18.6
19 18.9 20.6 22 22.1 49.6 130 162 59.7 30.7 25.1 18.6
19 19.3 20.3 22.1 22.3 47.5 128 157 57.8 30.3 24.7 18.6
19 20.2 22.1 22.1 45.4 127 152 56.2 29.9 24.4 18.6
19 20.9 22.5 22.1 43.8 126 148 54.3 29.6 24 19
19 21.8 22.2 109 143 29.6 19

1983 18.6
18.6
18.6
18.6
18.6

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 12 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
18.6
18.6
18.6
18.6
18.6
18.3
18.3
18.3
18.3

24.4
24
23.6
23.2
22.8
22.5
22.1
22.1
21.7
21.4
21
21
20.7
20.7
20.7
20.7

1984 20.3 18.6 19 18.3 18 35.8 78 113 90.9 68.8 29.8 22.5
20.3 18.6 19 18 18 35.8 79.1 110 89.9 68.4 29.2 22.3
20.3 18.6 19 18 18 36.2 78.9 110 89.4 67.5 28.9 22.3
20.3 18.6 19 18 18 36.9 80 109 88.6 66.7 28.8 22.3
20.3 18.3 19 18 18.3 51.8 82.2 109 87.9 65.6 28.7 22.2
20.3 18.3 19 18 18.3 66.1 83.8 108 87.4 64.7 28.4 22
20.3 18 19 18 18.6 65.1 86.4 106 86.4 64.3 28.1 22
20.3 18 19 17.7 18.6 66.5 90.6 105 85.9 63.2 27.3 22
20.3 18 19 17.7 18.6 66.9 92.6 105 85.2 62 26.7 21.6
20 17.7 19 17.7 18.6 66.1 95.1 105 85.2 61.1 26.3 21.6
20 17.7 18.6 18 18.6 67.2 97.4 104 84.4 59.5 25.8 21.6
20 17.6 18.6 18 19 68.4 98.4 102 83.5 57.6 25.5 21.6
20 17.3 18.6 18 20.3 68.7 100 101 83 56.8 25 21.3
20 17.3 18.3 17.7 19.7 69.3 101 97.9 82.3 55.3 24.7 21.3
19.7 17.3 18.3 17.7 19.3 70.8 98.7 94.5 81.8 53.5 24.3 21.3
19.7 17.3 18.3 18 19 72.1 98.1 93.4 81.5 52.2 24.3 21.3
19.7 17 18 18 19 73 99.4 95.3 80.8 50.6 24.8 20.9
19.7 17 18 18 19 74.6 100 94.5 79.6 47.7 23.9 20.9
19.7 17.7 18 18 19 75.5 101 94.2 78.4 45.1 23.9 20.7
19.7 18 17.7 18 19 76.9 102 93.4 76.7 43 23.9 20.5
19.7 18 17.7 18.3 19.3 78 103 93.4 76 39.6 23.6 20.5
19.7 20 17.3 18.3 19.7 77.3 108 94.7 75.1 35.7 23.5 20.3

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 13 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
19.3 19.7 17.3 18.2 19.7 76.2 115 93.4 74.7 34.3 23.4 20.2
19.3 19.4 17.3 18 20.3 75.5 119 92.4 73.8 33.5 23.1 20.2
19.3 19.3 17.7 18 31.9 74.6 114 91.9 73.3 33.2 23.1 19.8
19.3 19.3 18.2 18 31.5 73.7 113 91.1 72.9 32.9 23.1 19.7
19.3 19.3 18.6 18 32.8 73 111 94.7 72.2 32.3 23.1 19.5
19 19.3 18.3 18.5 42.9 74.1 110 94.5 71.3 31.8 22.7 19.3
19 19 18.3 18.3 39.4 74.6 110 93.7 70.2 31.4 22.7 19.1
19 18.3 18.3 35.6 75.7 109 92.9 69.7 31.1 22.7 18.8
19 18.3 36.2 109 91.9 30.3 18.8

1985 18.8 16.8 15.8 14.9 17.8 20.9 41.4 106 172 77.1 50.6 31.8
18.4 16.8 15.8 14.9 17.8 20.7 44.2 105 175 74.4 49.5 31.6
18.4 16.8 15.8 14.9 17.8 20.5 45.8 106 184 68.9 48.1 31.3
18.4 16.8 15.8 14.9 18.1 20.4 47.7 102 187 66.1 47.3 30.9
18.4 16.8 15.8 14.9 18.1 20.2 113 101 189 64 46.1 30.7
18.4 16.8 15.8 14.9 18.1 20.2 92.7 100 189 63.2 44.8 30.3
18.1 16.8 15.8 14.9 18.4 25.8 86.7 99.2 184 63.2 44 30
18.1 16.5 15.8 14.9 18.4 24.2 81.8 97.1 180 64.6 43.3 29.9
18.1 16.5 15.5 15.2 18.8 23.4 77.9 95.8 177 65.3 42.3 29.6
17.8 16.5 15.5 15.8 18.8 23.1 77.9 94.5 171 67.2 41.4 29.2
17.8 16.5 15.5 15.8 19.1 23.9 80.3 92.7 166 86.8 40.3 28.8
17.8 16.5 15.5 15.8 26 24.3 82.5 91.9 163 84.1 39.6 28.8
17.4 16.5 15.5 16.5 22.2 24.6 87.2 91.4 158 86.9 38.4 28.4
17.4 16.5 15.2 16.5 21.7 25.2 90.9 90.1 155 81.9 37.8 28.4
17.4 16.5 15.2 16.8 24.2 25.9 95.8 89.1 150 78.9 36.9 28
17.4 16.5 15.2 16.8 24.4 26.6 102 88.9 146 77.8 36.7 28
17.4 16.5 15.2 17.1 24 27 102 97.6 143 78.2 36.2 28
17.4 16.1 14.9 17.1 22.7 28.1 101 110 139 77.5 36.1 28
17.4 16.1 14.9 17.1 22.2 28.5 97.6 127 134 77.1 35.6 28
17.4 16.1 14.9 17.1 21.7 29.5 94.7 132 129 75.3 35.3 28
17.4 16.1 14.9 17.4 21.1 29.6 90.6 134 124 71.5 35.2 28
17.4 16.1 14.6 17.4 20.9 30.1 91.4 141 119 67.1 34.8 28
17.4 16.1 14.6 17.8 23.2 30.2 96 145 116 63.8 34.8 27.6
17.4 16.1 14.6 18.1 23.1 30.6 101 148 113 61.3 34.4 27.6
17.4 16.1 14.6 18.1 22.5 31.7 104 149 108 59.3 34.4 27.1
17.1 16.1 14.6 17.8 21.7 33.4 106 151 104 58 34.1 27.1
17.1 16.1 14.6 17.8 21.3 34.7 108 155 100 56.6 33.9 27.1
17.1 16.1 14.6 17.4 21.3 37 111 157 93.8 55.5 33.6 26.7
17.1 14.6 17.4 21.1 37.6 109 160 89.9 54.3 32.9 26.3
17.1 14.6 17.8 20.9 38.8 108 165 85.7 52.8 32 26.3
17.1 14.6 20.9 108 168 51.3 25.9

1986 25.9 20.1 17.7 18.3 28.4 30 50.6 148 98.9 58.4 32.1 22
25.6 20 17.7 18.3 29.6 29.6 51.3 145 96.8 57.2 31.8 21.6
25.5 20 17.3 18.3 29.6 29.5 51.7 143 94.2 56.2 31.2 21.4
25.2 19.7 17.3 18.3 30 29.6 52.8 144 90.1 55.1 30.5 21.1
25 19.7 17.3 18.3 30.6 30.3 53.4 147 86.4 53.7 30.1 20.9
24.7 19.3 17 18.3 31.6 29.6 76.4 144 83.2 52.4 29.6 20.5
24.4 19.3 17 18.3 32.2 29.9 68.7 140 79.4 50.6 29.2 20.5

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 14 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
24 19 16.9 18.3 32.6 30.3 71.9 135 76.5 49.5 28.8 20.5
24 19 16.7 18.3 32.6 30.6 77.5 131 74.2 47.8 28.4 20.4
23.7 19 16.7 19 32.9 31.8 133 128 73.1 44.9 28.1 20.2
23.3 19 16.7 19.7 33.5 34.1 136 123 72.4 42.7 28 20.2
23.1 20.1 16.7 19.7 33.9 36.2 141 119 72.4 42 27.5 19.8
22.8 19.4 17 19.7 34.7 37.7 146 117 71.7 41.3 27.5 19.8
22.8 19.3 17.3 20 35.3 41.9 150 116 71.3 40.6 27.1 19.8
22.8 19 17.3 20 34.2 42.6 156 115 71.1 39.9 27 19.8
22.5 18.6 17.7 20.3 33.9 44 166 115 70.4 39.1 26.7 19.5
22.5 18.6 17.7 20.5 33.8 45.4 161 113 70.4 38 26.3 19.5
22.3 18.4 17.7 20.7 33.5 46.8 157 122 69.7 38 25.9 19.5
22.1 18.3 20 21.1 33.5 48.2 157 119 69 38 25.5 19.5
22.1 18.3 19.4 21.8 33.5 48.4 153 122 68.4 37.5 25.2 19.1
22.1 18.3 19 22.6 33.5 48.5 152 121 67.8 37 25 19.1
21.7 18.3 19 22.8 33 50.4 155 115 67.3 36.5 24.7 19.1
21.7 18.3 19 23.2 33 51.3 157 115 66.4 36.2 24.3 18.8
21.6 18.3 19 23.6 32.6 52.8 155 114 65.8 35.3 24 18.8
21.4 18.3 19 29.6 32.6 54.5 148 111 64.9 35 23.8 18.8
21 18 18.6 29.3 32.2 57.4 139 110 63.8 34.6 23.5 18.8
21 18 18.6 28.9 32.2 60.3 133 108 63 34.1 23.1 18.8
20.9 17.7 18.6 28.4 32.2 59.7 131 107 61.8 33.7 22.8 18.4
20.7 18.3 28.4 31.8 56.6 127 105 60.7 33.2 22.6 18.4
20.3 18.3 28 31.3 51.9 124 104 59.7 32.7 22.3 18.4
20.3 18.3 30.7 147 102 32.4 18.1

1986 25.9 20.1 17.7 18.3 28.4 30 50.6 148 98.9 58.4 32.1 22
25.6 20 17.7 18.3 29.6 29.6 51.3 145 96.8 57.2 31.8 21.6
25.5 20 17.3 18.3 29.6 29.5 51.7 143 94.2 56.2 31.2 21.4
25.2 19.7 17.3 18.3 30 29.6 52.8 144 90.1 55.1 30.5 21.1
25 19.7 17.3 18.3 30.6 30.3 53.4 147 86.4 53.7 30.1 20.9
24.7 19.3 17 18.3 31.6 29.6 76.4 144 83.2 52.4 29.6 20.5
24.4 19.3 17 18.3 32.2 29.9 68.7 140 79.4 50.6 29.2 20.5
24 19 16.9 18.3 32.6 30.3 71.9 135 76.5 49.5 28.8 20.5
24 19 16.7 18.3 32.6 30.6 77.5 131 74.2 47.8 28.4 20.4
23.7 19 16.7 19 32.9 31.8 133 128 73.1 44.9 28.1 20.2
23.3 19 16.7 19.7 33.5 34.1 136 123 72.4 42.7 28 20.2
23.1 20.1 16.7 19.7 33.9 36.2 141 119 72.4 42 27.5 19.8
22.8 19.4 17 19.7 34.7 37.7 146 117 71.7 41.3 27.5 19.8
22.8 19.3 17.3 20 35.3 41.9 150 116 71.3 40.6 27.1 19.8
22.8 19 17.3 20 34.2 42.6 156 115 71.1 39.9 27 19.8
22.5 18.6 17.7 20.3 33.9 44 166 115 70.4 39.1 26.7 19.5
22.5 18.6 17.7 20.5 33.8 45.4 161 113 70.4 38 26.3 19.5
22.3 18.4 17.7 20.7 33.5 46.8 157 122 69.7 38 25.9 19.5
22.1 18.3 20 21.1 33.5 48.2 157 119 69 38 25.5 19.5
22.1 18.3 19.4 21.8 33.5 48.4 153 122 68.4 37.5 25.2 19.1
22.1 18.3 19 22.6 33.5 48.5 152 121 67.8 37 25 19.1
21.7 18.3 19 22.8 33 50.4 155 115 67.3 36.5 24.7 19.1
21.7 18.3 19 23.2 33 51.3 157 115 66.4 36.2 24.3 18.8
21.6 18.3 19 23.6 32.6 52.8 155 114 65.8 35.3 24 18.8

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 15 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
21.4 18.3 19 29.6 32.6 54.5 148 111 64.9 35 23.8 18.8
21 18 18.6 29.3 32.2 57.4 139 110 63.8 34.6 23.5 18.8
21 18 18.6 28.9 32.2 60.3 133 108 63 34.1 23.1 18.8
20.9 17.7 18.6 28.4 32.2 59.7 131 107 61.8 33.7 22.8 18.4
20.7 18.3 28.4 31.8 56.6 127 105 60.7 33.2 22.6 18.4
20.3 18.3 28 31.3 51.9 124 104 59.7 32.7 22.3 18.4
20.3 18.3 30.7 147 102 32.4 18.1

1987 18.1 15.5 14.9 16.8 23.5 25.1 31.4 185 126 47.5 33.2 27.7
17.8 15.5 14.6 16.8 33.2 25.5 31.4 175 116 48.4 33 27.5
17.8 15.5 14.6 17 28.8 25.9 31.8 164 102 46.9 32.7 27.5
17.8 15.5 14.6 17.1 26.7 28.2 32.3 162 88.6 46 32.7 27.3
17.4 15.2 14.3 17.4 25.1 30.3 32.9 154 80.1 45.6 32.7 27.1
17.4 15.2 14.3 17.8 25 33.2 33.2 154 73.1 44.9 32.7 26.8
17.4 15.2 14.3 18.1 25.1 34.1 33.7 155 68.6 44.2 32.7 26.7
17.1 15.2 14 18.4 26.7 35.8 34.3 154 68.6 43.5 32.7 26.7
17.1 15.2 14 22.7 26.7 38 35.5 152 81.3 43 32.7 26.7
17.1 14.9 14 20.9 25.9 37.5 35.7 155 70.8 42.1 32.7 26.7
16.8 14.9 14.3 19.8 25 35.8 36.6 180 68.6 41.6 32.7 26.7
16.8 14.9 14.6 17.2 23.4 33.8 37.3 214 67.5 40.6 32.7 26.7
16.8 14.9 14.6 16.7 22.7 31.8 37.6 196 66.4 40.4 32.3 26.7
16.5 14.9 14.6 16.5 21.9 31.4 38.4 196 65.8 40.4 32.3 26.3
16.5 16.9 14.6 16.5 22.2 30.9 39.3 181 63.2 39.9 32.3 26.3
16.5 16.5 14.6 16.5 22.5 30.9 39.4 144 63.2 39.9 31.8 26.3
16.5 16.5 14.6 16.5 22.7 31.8 39.9 114 61.3 39.4 30.9 26.3
16.1 15.8 14.6 16.8 23.4 32.3 40.4 106 60.1 39.3 30.5 26.3
16.1 15.5 14.3 16.8 24 33.2 40.4 100 76.5 38.9 30.1 25.9
16.1 15.2 15.5 17.1 24.6 33.2 40.4 92.4 76.5 38.4 30.1 25.9
16.1 15.2 15.2 17.4 25.1 33.7 42.2 87.4 73.1 38.1 29.6 25.9
16.1 15.2 14.9 17.1 29.5 34.6 82.5 81.3 69.7 37.8 29.6 25.5
16.1 15.2 14.6 17.1 28.8 35.5 111 75.4 65.4 37.5 29.6 25.5
15.8 15.2 14.3 17.6 28 34.6 192 73.1 64.3 36.8 29.2 25.5
15.8 15.2 14.3 18 27.1 35.5 220 66.4 62.2 36.3 28.8 25.1
15.8 15.1 14 18.4 26.7 33.7 206 66.4 58 36 28.5 25.1
15.8 14.9 14 19.1 26.3 33.7 188 70.8 56 35.5 28.4 24.7
15.5 14.9 14 19.1 25.9 33.2 188 196 52.2 35 28.1 24.7
15.5 14 20.3 25.1 32.7 173 168 49.3 34.7 28 24.3
15.5 14.3 22.7 24.7 32.3 176 148 47.5 34.1 28 24.3
15.5 15.8 24.7 182 140 33.7 24.3

1988 24.3 21.3 22.3 24.3 25.9 29.4 69.8 102 73.1 46.2 35.3 27.1
24.3 21.3 22.3 24.3 28.8 31.5 65.5 88.6 69.7 46.2 35 26.7
23.9 20.9 22 24.3 29.4 30.6 54.3 86.2 69.7 45.8 34.6 26.7
23.9 20.9 22 24.3 28.7 29.5 76 93.7 65.4 45.6 34.1 26.7
23.9 20.9 21.6 24.3 27.8 29.2 100 95 63.2 45.6 33.8 26.3
23.5 20.5 21.6 24.3 26.7 28.5 166 101 61.1 45.3 33.2 26.3
23.5 20.5 21.6 24.3 27.1 29.1 97.7 93.7 60.1 45.1 32.7 26.3
23.1 20.5 21.6 24.7 28.1 28.9 72 103 60.1 44.6 32.3 25.9
23.1 20.2 22.7 24.7 28.7 29.2 56 102 57 44.6 31.7 25.9

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 16 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
23.1 20.2 22.7 24.8 29.2 29.5 69.8 95 57 44 31.2 25.9
23.1 20.2 22.7 25.2 30.2 29.5 59.1 102 55.1 43.7 30.6 25.5
23.1 19.8 22.7 25.8 29.1 30.6 95.5 95 54.1 43.3 30.1 25.5
23.1 19.8 22.7 25.6 28.8 31.4 72 91.1 53.1 43 29.8 25.5
23.1 19.8 22.7 25.5 28.8 31.7 59.1 96.3 51.2 42.5 29.6 25.1
22.7 19.8 23.1 25.5 29.2 31.4 65.4 103 49.5 42 29.2 25.1
22.7 19.8 23.1 25.1 29.2 30.9 69.3 108 48.4 41.4 28.8 25.1
22.7 19.8 23.1 25.1 29.6 32.1 65.4 103 48.4 41.4 28.5 25.1
22.7 19.8 23.1 25.1 29.6 30.9 74.2 98.9 48.4 41.3 28.8 24.7
22.7 19.8 23.5 24.7 29.6 31.8 88.6 93.7 47.8 40.4 28.4 24.7
22.3 19.8 23.5 24.7 30.1 32.1 88.6 110 47.8 40.4 28.5 24.7
22.3 19.5 23.5 24.7 30.6 33.2 95 111 47.8 39.7 28.4 24.3
22.3 20.9 23.5 24.6 32.9 36.3 97.6 97.6 47.8 39.3 28 24.3
22.3 20.9 23.5 24.3 32.1 38.8 91.1 91.1 47.8 38.9 28 23.9
22 20.5 23.5 24.3 30.3 41.3 95 84.9 47.3 38.4 28 23.9
22 20.5 23.9 24.7 29.8 55.1 87.4 83.7 47.3 38 27.5 23.9
22 20.2 23.9 24.7 29.8 49.4 96.3 81.3 47.3 37.5 27.5 23.6
21.6 20.2 23.9 24.8 30.1 68.9 89.9 82.5 46.7 37.1 27.5 23.5
21.6 20.2 23.9 25.1 30.1 60.6 126 76.5 46.7 37 27.5 23.5
21.6 22.7 23.9 25.5 29.8 50.3 92.4 76.5 46.7 36.5 27.1 23.1
21.6 23.9 25.9 29.4 57.4 89.9 76.5 46.2 36.2 27.1 23.1
21.3 24.3 29.2 100 73.1 35.5 22.7

1989 23.1 22.7 19.1 22.7 21.6 26.7 44.6 148 111 60.1 26.7 25.1
23.1 22.7 18.1 22.5 21.6 26.7 48.1 138 107 60.1 26.7 25.1
23.1 22.3 17.4 22.3 21.3 26.7 54.1 133 107 60.1 24.7 25.1
22.7 22.3 17.4 22.3 21.3 26.7 60.1 122 103 57 24.7 24.7
22.7 22.3 17.8 22.3 21.3 27.5 60.1 112 103 57 22.7 24.7
22.7 22.3 17.8 22.3 21.3 27.5 62.4 107 98.9 57 22.7 24.7
26.7 22 17.8 22.6 20.9 27.5 63.6 100 98.9 57 20.9 24.7
31 22 17.8 22.7 20.9 28.8 69.7 98.9 98.9 54.1 20.9 24.7
27.3 22 17.8 22.7 20.9 28.8 73.1 98.9 95 54.1 19.1 24.7
25 22 17.8 22.7 20.9 29.6 74.5 111 95 54.1 19.1 24.7
24.7 22 18.1 22.7 20.9 29.6 76.5 107 95 51.2 19.1 24.3
23.8 21.6 18.1 22.7 20.9 30.9 78.7 106 91.1 51.2 19.1 24.3
23.5 21.6 18.4 22.7 21.3 31.8 81.8 102 91.1 51.2 17.4 24.3
23.5 21.6 21.6 22.3 21.3 33.2 86.2 98.9 91.1 48.4 17.4 23.9
23.5 21.6 21.6 22.3 21.3 34.1 78.9 103 87.4 48.4 17.4 23.9
23.5 21.6 21.6 22.3 21.6 34.1 71.3 107 87.4 48.4 19.1 23.5
23.5 21.3 21.6 22.3 22.7 35.5 69.7 103 87.4 45.6 20.9 23.1
23.5 21.3 21.6 22.3 28.9 36.2 66.4 98.9 83.7 45.6 22 23.1
23.5 21.3 21.9 22 26.7 36.5 63.2 98.9 83.7 43 22.2 23.1
23.5 21.3 22 22 25.4 37.6 78.9 107 80.1 43 22.7 22.7
23.1 21.3 22 22 25.4 38 107 115 76.5 40.4 23.9 22.7
23.1 21.3 22 22 25.4 39.4 132 196 73.1 40.4 23.9 22.7
23.1 20.9 22 22 25.5 39.4 122 169 73.1 38 25.1 22.3
23.1 20.9 22.3 21.6 25.5 39.4 132 152 69.7 35.5 25.9 22.3
23.1 20.9 22.3 21.6 25.5 40.4 138 143 69.7 35.5 25.9 22
23.1 20.9 22.3 21.6 25.4 40.4 160 138 69.7 33.2 25.5 22

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 17 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
23.1 20.5 22.3 21.6 26.3 41.4 136 133 66.4 33.2 25.1 21.6
22.7 21.3 23.1 21.6 26.7 42.1 135 133 66.4 30.9 25.9 21.6
22.7 23.1 21.6 26.7 43 152 124 63.2 30.9 25.5 21.3
22.7 22.8 21.6 26.7 44 149 124 63.2 28.8 25.5 21.3
22.7 22.7 26.7 169 118 28.8 20.9

1990 20.5 17.8 19.1 21.6 35.5 103 65.2 107 107 66.5 38 26.3
20.2 17.8 18.1 22 36.5 107 67.8 98.9 98.9 66.5 37 26.3
19.8 17.8 17.4 22 37 107 66.5 98.9 121 66.5 35.5 25.9
19.5 17.8 17.4 21.6 38 107 63.2 96.6 115 66.5 35.5 25.9
19.5 17.4 17.8 21.6 38 107 60.1 101 115 63.2 34.6 25.5
19.5 17.4 17.8 21.6 38 107 57 107 107 63.2 34.6 25.5
19.5 17.4 17.8 21.6 38 111 60.1 221 107 63.2 33.2 25.1
19.5 17.4 17.8 21.3 38 111 74.5 198 98.9 63.2 33.2 24.7
19.5 17.4 17.8 21.3 38.9 111 93.4 173 98.9 60.1 32.3 23.9
19.1 17.4 17.8 21.3 39.9 107 124 173 98.9 60.1 31.8 23.1
19.1 17.4 18.1 20.9 40.4 107 98.9 162 91.1 60.1 31.8 22.7
19.1 17.4 18.1 21.6 39.4 107 85.9 162 91.1 57 30.9 22.7
19.1 17.4 18.4 22 38 111 76.5 170 83.7 57 30.9 22
19.1 17.4 18.8 22.7 35.5 111 69.7 165 83.7 57 30.9 22
18.8 17.4 18.8 23.5 103 107 74.5 183 83.7 57 30.1 21.6
18.8 17.1 19.1 23.5 104 107 83.7 194 83.7 54.1 30.1 21.3
18.8 17.1 19.1 24.7 106 107 85.9 183 80.1 54.1 29.2 21.3
18.8 17.1 19.1 25.5 107 107 96.6 173 76.5 51.2 29.2 20.9
18.8 17.1 19.1 26.7 107 50.1 98.9 165 76.5 51.2 29.2 20.5
18.4 17.1 19.1 28 107 51.2 101 152 76.5 48.4 28.8 20.5
18.4 17.1 19.8 29.6 107 45.6 107 152 76.5 48.4 28.8 20.2
18.4 17.1 20.9 30.9 107 51.2 121 146 73.1 45.6 28.4 20.2
18.4 17.1 23.5 31.4 108 48.4 124 143 73.1 43 28 21.3
18.4 17.1 22.7 33.2 107 111 131 133 69.7 43 28 20.2
18.4 17.1 22.7 33.2 83.7 111 135 133 69.7 43 27.5 20.2
18.1 16.8 22.3 34.6 82.3 107 141 124 69.7 43 27.5 20.2
18.1 16.8 22.3 34.6 98.9 107 143 124 69.7 40.4 27.1 20.2
18.1 16.8 22 35.5 98.9 107 143 119 66.5 40.4 26.7 20.2
18.1 22 35.5 98.9 45.6 136 115 66.5 40.4 26.7 20.2
18.1 22 35.5 103 64.5 124 115 66.5 38 26.7 20.2
18.1 21.6 103 115 107 38 20.2

1991 19.8 17.1 17.4 21.3 20.9 27.5 39.9 49 76.5 83.7 36.5 25.9
19.8 17.1 17.4 21.6 22.3 27.1 37 67.8 170 82.3 36 25.5
19.8 17.1 16.8 22 22 30.5 37 63.2 132 84.4 36 25.1
19.8 16.8 16.8 20.5 22.7 27.1 34.6 76.5 149 80.8 35.5 24.7
19.8 16.8 21.6 21.6 23.5 27.1 37 84.4 130 77.9 35 24.3
19.8 16.8 19.1 20.9 23.1 30.5 33.7 82.3 120 74.5 34.6 24.3
19.8 16.8 18.4 19.8 21.6 31.4 29.6 93.4 132 67.8 34.1 24.3
19.8 16.8 18.4 19.1 23.1 28.8 31.8 88.9 125 67.1 33.7 23.9
19.5 16.8 18.1 21.3 23.9 27.5 33.2 91.1 128 64.5 33.2 23.5
19.5 16.8 18.1 21.3 21.6 31.4 32.7 98.1 118 62 32.3 23.1
19.5 16.8 17.8 20.2 20.9 29.6 35.5 83 109 60.1 31.8 22.7

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 18 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
19.5 16.8 18.4 20.5 21.3 29.6 35.5 104 113 57.6 31.8 22.7
19.5 16.5 17.8 20.9 21.6 31.4 34.1 80.8 112 55.3 30.9 22.3
19.1 16.5 19.5 22 29.6 37 73.8 110 54.1 30.5 22.7
19.1 16.5 18.4 22.7 30.9 34.1 73.1 108 53.5 30.1 22.3
19.1 16.5 19.1 23.5 31.8 35 80.8 120 52.9 29.6 22.3
18.8 16.5 19.5 24.7 29.2 42.5 93.4 128 51.8 28.4 22
18.8 16.5 20.5 30.1 24.7 49.5 88.1 119 50.1 28.8 21.6
18.4 16.5 19.8 27.1 23.1 65.2 107 118 49 28.4 21.6
18.4 16.5 19.1 26.7 23.9 58.9 102 106 47.3 28.4 21.6
18.1 16.5 20.2 23.9 25.1 56.4 128 104 45.6 28.4 21.6
18.1 16.5 18.4 25.5 30.5 77.9 119 107 45.1 28 21.3
18.1 16.5 20.2 24.7 28.8 80.1 116 110 44 28 20.9
17.8 16.5 18.4 25.9 32.3 64.5 136 114 43.5 27.5 20.5
17.8 16.8 17.8 26.7 32.3 63.2 133 109 43.5 27.1 20.5
17.8 16.8 18.8 28 34.6 57 130 105 42.5 27.1 20.2
17.8 18.1 18.8 23.9 43 49.5 107 99.7 42 26.7 20.5
17.4 17.4 20.2 26.3 51.2 49 106 91.1 40.4 26.3 20.2
17.4 20.5 25.5 42 67.8 88.9 85.2 38.4 26.3 20.2
17.4 22 23.5 40.9 52.9 79.4 83 37.5 25.9 20.2
17.1 22.7 28 49.5 75.8 37 19.8

1992 19.5 18.1 17.4 16.5 19.1 25.1 23.9 64.5 91.1 93.4 41.4 26.3
19.8 17.8 17.1 16.5 19.5 24.7 26.7 52.9 89.6 91.1 38.9 26.3
19.8 17.8 17.1 17.1 19.1 23.9 26.3 55.8 95.8 94.2 38 25.9
19.8 17.4 17.1 16.5 18.1 23.5 28.8 65.2 130 88.1 37 25.5
19.8 17.4 17.1 16.8 19.1 21.3 30.1 63.8 112 87.4 36.5 25.5
19.8 17.4 16.8 17.8 17.8 18.8 30.5 93.4 120 83 35.5 25.1
19.5 17.4 16.1 17.1 18.8 18.4 28 103 117 78.7 34.6 25.1
19.8 18.1 16.1 17.4 20.5 18.4 38.4 91.9 140 72.4 34.1 24.3
19.8 17.4 15.8 17.8 19.8 18.1 48.4 91.1 126 69 33.7 23.9
19.5 17.4 15.8 17.4 19.5 21.6 50.1 87.4 119 67.1 33.2 23.9
20.2 17.4 15.8 18.1 18.4 20.5 39.4 84.4 135 63.8 32.7 23.9
19.8 17.4 15.8 17.1 18.8 19.8 37 87.4 140 60.7 32.3 23.9
19.5 17.1 15.8 17.8 18.4 19.8 32.7 72.4 128 58.2 31.4 23.5
19.1 18.1 15.8 19.5 18.4 20.9 33.2 66.5 131 55.8 31.4 23.1
19.1 17.8 15.8 17.4 19.5 23.9 31.8 69 140 55.3 30.5 22.7
18.4 18.4 16.1 17.4 23.1 24.7 32.3 73.8 119 55.3 30.1 23.1
18.4 20.9 16.5 16.5 21.6 21.3 30.5 75.1 109 55.3 29.6 23.1
18.4 19.1 16.5 16.5 21.3 20.2 28.8 95.8 108 52.9 29.6 23.1
18.4 18.4 16.5 16.8 20.2 19.8 28 105 106 51.8 29.2 22.7
18.4 17.8 16.5 15.8 19.5 20.9 25.5 105 107 50.1 28.8 22.3
18.4 17.4 16.1 16.5 19.5 20.9 26.7 111 101 48.4 28.4 22.3
18.1 17.4 16.1 17.8 18.4 20.5 29.6 109 91.9 46.7 28.4 22
18.4 17.1 15.8 18.4 18.8 19.8 29.2 98.1 103 46.2 28.4 21.6
18.4 18.4 15.5 16.8 19.1 20.5 27.5 107 105 45.1 28 21.6
18.1 17.4 15.5 17.4 20.5 21.3 32.3 109 104 43.5 27.5 21.3
18.1 17.4 15.8 17.1 19.8 22.3 30.9 101 104 43 27.1 21.3
17.8 17.1 15.8 17.1 19.5 22 30.9 113 109 42.5 27.1 21.3
18.1 17.1 15.5 17.1 20.9 22 34.1 92.7 98.9 43.5 26.7 21.3

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 19 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
18.4 17.1 15.5 17.4 21.3 25.1 39.9 84.4 89.6 49 26.7 21.3
18.1 15.5 19.5 22 24.7 49.5 88.9 85.9 43.5 26.7 21.3
18.1 17.8 24.3 58.2 89.6 43 21.3

1993 18.8 17.1 17.1 18.4 35 37 44.6 85.2 84.6 63.3 31.1 24.7
18.8 17.1 17.1 17.8 35.5 31.8 40.9 98.4 97.6 60.6 30.6 24.3
18.8 17.1 16.8 17.8 36 27.5 42 80 93.5 59.3 30.2 24.3
18.8 17.1 16.8 17.4 33.7 26.7 39.4 96 126 57.3 29.7 23.8
18.4 17.1 16.8 18.4 31.8 25.5 39.9 97.6 153 54.7 29.2 23.4
19.1 17.1 16.8 18.8 34.6 26.3 44 119 123 55.3 29.2 23.8
19.8 17.8 17.1 19.1 34.6 28 45.6 130 113 52.8 29.2 23.4
21.6 18.8 17.1 19.5 33.2 33.7 51.8 122 105 52.1 28.7 23.4
19.5 18.8 17.8 19.1 31.8 34.6 49 103 95.1 51.5 28.3 23
19.1 18.8 17.4 18.4 26.3 30.9 55.3 110 93.5 49.6 28.3 23
19.1 19.5 17.1 19.5 27.1 31.8 62.6 108 87 48.4 27.8 22.6
19.1 18.1 16.8 19.1 25.1 36.5 57 99.2 129 47.3 27.8 22.6
18.4 17.8 17.1 19.5 24.3 32.3 52.9 84.6 118 44.9 27.8 22.2
18.1 17.8 17.8 19.8 23.5 32.7 54.1 76.2 97.6 43.8 27.8 22.2
18.1 18.1 17.4 21.6 22.7 38.9 93.4 70.3 89.5 43.2 27.4 22.2
18.1 17.4 17.1 22 23.9 39.4 77.9 68.8 83 42.6 27.4 21.8
18.4 17.4 17.1 23.9 24.3 42.5 77.2 71 77 42.1 27.4 21.8
18.1 17.1 16.8 22.7 24.3 43.5 79.4 66.7 76.2 41.6 26.9 21.8
18.1 16.8 16.8 21.6 23.1 34.1 71.1 69.5 71 40.4 26.9 21.8
18.1 16.5 16.8 21.6 23.5 32.3 66.5 68.1 69.5 39.9 26.5 21.8
18.1 16.5 17.1 21.3 22.7 30.1 60.1 68.8 68.8 38.8 26 21.3
17.8 16.5 16.5 24.3 23.5 30.9 76.5 63.3 94.3 37.7 26 21.3
17.8 16.1 16.5 24.3 25.1 38.9 73.1 59.9 80 36.1 26 20.9
17.4 16.8 18.1 24.7 27.1 47.3 63.2 62.6 83 35.6 25.6 20.9
17.4 17.4 18.8 24.7 27.1 40.9 57.6 79.2 87.8 34.6 25.6 20.9
17.1 17.8 19.1 24.7 30.9 55.8 71.7 68.8 89.5 34.1 25.2 20.5
17.1 17.4 19.1 25.5 31.4 47.3 60.1 62.6 85.4 34.1 25.6 20.5
17.8 17.4 18.8 28.8 31.4 69.7 75.8 61.9 75.5 33.5 25.2 20.5
17.8 18.8 31.4 33.7 55.8 69.7 68.8 70.3 33 25.2 20.5
17.4 18.8 32.7 29.2 51.2 74.5 73.2 68.1 32.5 24.7 20.5
17.4 18.8 33.2 76.5 91.9 31.6 20.1

1994 20.1 18.9 17.9 18.6 18.9 25.6 64.7


20.1 18.6 17.9 18.2 19.3 25.6 61.9
20.1 18.6 17.9 17.9 20.5 23.8 111
20.1 18.6 17.9 18.2 22.2 23.8 85.4
19.7 18.6 17.9 18.9 21.8 21.8 87
19.7 18.2 17.9 18.6 21.3 23 84.6
19.3 18.2 17.9 18.2 20.5 23 79.2
19.3 18.6 17.5 18.2 20.9 26.5 78.5
19.3 19.3 17.5 17.5 26.9 26.5 73.2
19.3 18.6 17.9 17.5 23.8 33 70.3
18.9 18.6 17.9 17.5 21.3 28.3 69.5
19.7 18.6 17.9 17.5 21.3 28.7 72.5
18.9 18.2 17.9 17.1 21.3 24.3 71

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 20 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
18.9 18.2 17.9 17.1 21.8 23 74.7
19.7 18.2 18.2 17.5 20.1 26 71
20.1 18.2 18.2 17.9 19.7 27.4 68.8
19.3 17.9 17.9 17.9 19.7 26.5 73.2
19.3 17.9 18.2 17.5 19.7 31.1 71.8
19.3 17.9 18.9 17.5 20.9 31.1 73.2
19.3 17.9 18.2 17.5 23.8 31.1 99.2
18.9 17.9 18.2 17.1 27.8 34.6 106
18.9 17.9 18.2 17.9 26.5 57.3 90.3
18.6 17.9 17.9 17.9 26.9 30.6 100
18.6 17.9 17.9 17.9 27.4 36.1 101
18.6 17.9 17.9 17.9 26 44.9 91.9
18.6 17.9 17.9 17.9 26 54 87
18.6 17.9 17.9 17.9 26 56 91.1
18.6 17.9 17.9 17.5 26 46.7 85.4
18.6 17.9 18.2 28.3 56.6 93.5
18.9 17.9 18.6 26 54.7 109
18.6 18.2 27.4 129

1995 18.9 17.9 17.5 26 27.8 31.1 38.2 117 115 49.5 30.9 25.5
18.6 17.9 17.5 25.6 25.6 30.6 37.7 136 107 48.4 30.5 25.5
18.9 17.9 17.5 25.2 25.2 31.1 38.8 134 103 47.8 30.1 25.5
18.9 17.5 17.5 24.7 25.2 30.2 41 126 104 46.2 30.1 25.5
18.9 17.5 17.5 24.3 24.3 32 54 113 146 44.6 30.1 25.1
18.6 17.5 17.5 23.8 23.4 33 49 109 148 44 30.1 25.1
18.6 17.1 17.5 23.4 23.4 32.5 77 108 147 43 29.6 24.7
19.3 17.1 17.5 23.4 24.3 32 68.8 106 119 43.5 29.6 24.7
22.2 17.1 17.5 23.8 26.5 32.5 66 110 106 42.5 29.2 24.7
21.3 17.9 17.5 23.8 25.2 32 65.4 113 97.3 42 29.2 24.3
20.5 17.9 17.5 23.8 29.2 33 74 110 88.1 42 30.9 24.3
19.3 17.9 17.1 22.2 31.6 33.5 77.7 120 83.7 40.9 29.6 24.3
19.3 17.5 17.1 20.9 34.1 42.1 86.2 145 83 40.4 29.2 24.3
19.3 17.9 17.1 21.3 34.1 35.6 120 131 82.3 39.9 29.2 23.9
20.1 21.8 17.1 21.3 37.7 36.1 97.6 115 80.8 38.9 28.8 23.9
19.3 20.1 17.1 21.3 37.7 34.1 87 108 79.4 39.4 28 23.9
18.9 18.2 17.1 20.9 41.6 36.7 87.8 104 73.8 38.9 28.4 23.9
18.6 17.9 17.1 21.3 39.9 34.1 98.4 101 71.7 38 28.4 23.5
18.6 17.9 17.5 21.8 37.2 38.8 91.1 108 67.8 37 28 23.5
18.6 17.9 17.5 23.4 33 38.8 103 121 67.1 36.5 27.5 23.5
18.6 17.9 17.9 22.6 31.1 37.2 97.6 122 65.2 35.5 27.5 23.1
18.6 17.5 20.9 24.3 29.2 31.6 179 114 63.2 34.6 27.1 23.1
18.6 17.5 20.9 25.6 26 33.5 135 109 61.3 34.1 27.1 23.1
18.6 17.5 22.6 23.8 24.3 31.1 106 128 58.9 33.2 27.1 22.7
18.2 17.5 23 25.2 23.8 32.5 93.4 133 57.6 33.2 26.7 22.7
18.2 17.5 23 24.7 23.4 31.1 86.7 119 56.4 33.2 26.7 22.7
18.2 17.5 26 26.5 26 35.1 84.4 128 53.5 32.7 26.3 22.7
18.2 17.5 23.4 26 26.5 33.5 83.7 132 54.1 32.7 26.3 22.7
18.2 24.7 27.8 29.2 33 81.5 158 52.9 32.3 25.9 22.3
18.2 26 28.7 29.2 39.9 81.5 148 51.8 31.8 25.9 22.3

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 21 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
18.2 25.6 30.2 85.9 128 31.8 22

1996 20.9 18.9 18.9 20.2 29.9 29 83.4 159 191 77.8 40.1 27.1
20.8 18.5 18.5 20.4 29.9 30.2 63.1 149 185 75.6 39.4 26.9
20.8 18.3 18.3 20.2 29.9 27.1 57.7 182 204 72.3 39.1 26.5
20.8 18.3 18.2 19.7 29.9 25.7 62.2 169 209 76.3 38.6 26.3
20.6 18.2 18.5 21.3 26.1 25.1 59.2 195 197 143 37.9 26.1
20.6 18.3 18.9 21.1 26.5 23.6 58 164 216 85.5 37.1 25.9
20.4 18.3 18.9 20.1 31.1 24.2 59.3 149 203 77.8 36.6 25.5
20.2 18.3 18.5 19.9 32.4 27.2 59.3 226 209 71.6 36.1 25.3
20.1 18 19 20.8 33.1 31.8 91.3 198 212 67 36.1 25.1
19.9 18.9 20.1 20.8 32.9 35.5 129 197 181 66 35.6 24.9
19.9 18.5 21.4 21.3 29 38.1 158 213 164 63.4 34.6 24.6
19.7 18.3 21.4 22.2 25.3 44.7 149 224 149 62.1 34 24.4
19.7 18.3 20.4 20.4 23.6 44.3 182 228 153 60.1 34 24.4
19.7 18.3 22 20.4 23.6 40.9 161 210 141 58.2 33.3 24.2
19.9 18.2 22 24.2 23 42.5 157 229 135 56.1 33.3 24.2
21.7 18 21.3 26.6 23 37.4 134 243 160 54.6 32.8 23.8
20.9 17.8 18.9 25.9 22.4 44.4 128 240 144 52.8 32.6 23.6
20.6 17.5 20.4 23.6 23 41.2 140 266 131 52.5 32.4 23.4
20.6 17.5 19.4 25.9 22.4 53.1 158 237 122 51.6 31.9 23.4
20.2 18.2 19 27.8 22 58.2 159 336 115 50.4 31.7 23.4
19.7 17.7 18.9 26.5 22 55.7 158 222 110 49.6 31.3 23.2
19.5 17.5 20.6 24.9 22.4 57.3 235 241 104 48.5 30.6 23.2
19.4 17.5 20.2 23.6 22.2 55.9 176 192 100 47.1 29.9 23.4
19.2 18.2 19.9 23.8 23.6 63.6 150 180 95.8 46.3 29.9 23.2
19.4 19.2 19.7 25.3 28.5 70.1 210 163 93.4 45.4 29.3 23.2
19.4 20.6 21.3 23.8 33.2 69.2 192 155 89.9 43.8 29 22.8
19.4 20.2 21.3 27 32.4 73 157 149 89.9 43.5 28.6 22.6
19.2 19.7 23 27.4 34.3 84.4 152 180 88.8 43.2 28.6 22.6
19 19 21.8 30.2 31.3 115 149 158 83.3 42.4 27.9 22.6
19.2 22.2 32.2 26.7 154 179 186 80 41.6 27.5 22
18.9 20.6 25.5 157 223 40.9 22

1997 21.8 22 19.4 19.5 24 22.2 78.2 162 99.4 73.4 37.6 33.6
21.6 21.8 19.7 18.7 23.2 20.4 57.3 196 98.6 73.4 36.9 28.6
21.4 21.8 19 19 23 25.3 50.2 411 99 71.6 36.1 27.9
21.4 21.6 18.5 21.3 24.2 27 53.7 190 136 69.4 35.6 27.3
21.4 21.4 18.5 20.2 23.2 26.5 49.4 163 141 67 34.6 27.1
24.4 21.3 18.5 19.2 24.2 27.1 61.9 174 151 63.1 34 26.7
24.9 21.1 18.3 18.7 23.6 26.7 59.3 149 280 62.4 33.5 26.3
24.8 20.9 18.5 20.2 31.9 28.7 113 151 205 60.8 33.3 25.9
24.6 20.8 18.5 21.3 28.6 28.2 80 141 154 58.6 33.1 26.5
24.4 20.8 18.2 20.1 25.9 28.4 84.4 136 168 57.3 33.3 38.5
24.4 20.8 18.2 20.9 25.3 28.4 76.3 170 170 55.8 32.6 30.8
24.2 20.4 18 21.4 25.3 26.8 106 162 185 54.9 32.8 30.6
24.2 20.4 17.5 21.8 23.2 26.6 95 195 166 54 31.7 27.9
23.8 20.2 17.5 22 23 28.5 116 171 152 53.7 31.5 28.8
23.4 20.1 17.5 22.8 22.4 28.6 140 153 141 52.8 31.1 27.5

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 22 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
23.6 19.9 17.5 22.2 23.6 31.3 132 138 130 52.2 30.2 26.9
23.6 19.5 17.3 21.3 21.8 30.2 105 127 153 51.3 29.5 26.3
23.6 19 17.1 20.2 21.8 29 95.1 134 142 50.1 29.5 26.3
23.8 19 17 19.7 24.4 32 91.9 134 125 47.9 30.2 25.9
24.4 18.9 17.3 19.4 23.8 32.6 99 126 119 46.3 29.5 25.7
23.8 18.7 17.3 19.9 22.8 34 96.2 118 112 44.9 29 25.7
23.6 18.7 17.7 20.9 23.2 40.3 131 116 109 43.8 28.8 25.5
23.6 18.7 18.2 20.9 24.4 39.6 119 106 101 42.7 27.9 25.1
23.6 18.9 17.7 21.7 23.6 43.9 126 107 96.6 42.4 27.5 24.9
23.2 19.4 17.3 23.6 22.6 42.5 159 101 94.6 41.4 27.9 24.8
23 19.4 17 23.8 21.3 65.3 153 95.8 92.6 40.6 30.8 24.4
23 19.2 16.8 24.2 22.8 65.4 136 92.2 87 39.9 29.9 24
22.8 18.9 17.1 25.7 27 51.4 138 91.8 84 39.1 29.3 24
22.6 19.2 24.9 26.4 42.8 186 104 80 38.6 29.5 24.2
22.4 20.8 24.2 24.8 69.2 201 101 76.3 38.4 27.9 24.2
22.4 18.7 24.6 169 101 38.4 23.8

1998 23.6 18.5 17.7 23.8 34.9 43.5 108 191 207 105 53.3 36.1
23.4 19.5 17.5 25.3 35.7 41.7 95.4 258 203 101 53 35.9
23 18.9 17.5 27.4 38.6 42 123 269 197 91 52.5 35.6
23 18.7 17.1 26.5 41 38.6 134 273 191 88.2 51.7 35.2
22.6 18.5 17.7 25.7 38.6 35.2 178 229 183 85.9 50.9 34.9
22.4 18.2 20.2 25.3 36.9 34.5 214 195 175 84.4 50.1 34.7
22.4 18.2 18.3 25.5 50.7 35.6 142 213 166 81.5 49.3 34.5
22.4 18.2 18 30.4 43.8 37.4 128 214 157 78.9 48.7 34
22.4 18.2 17.8 30.6 36.6 38.1 115 263 146 77.8 48.5 33.5
22.2 18 18 30.4 32.2 36.4 112 383 138 76 47.9 33.3
21.8 17.8 17.8 29.7 33.1 34.2 104 372 131 74.7 47.4 32.8
21.8 17.7 17.8 29 31.9 34.7 104 355 131 73 46.9 32.6
21.6 17.5 20.8 28.2 32.6 36.1 105 368 130 72 46.1 32.1
21.3 17.5 18.3 26.1 35.2 33.7 115 318 125 70.3 45.8 32.1
21.3 17.5 18.3 25.9 35.4 31.3 132 342 116 68.7 44.5 32.1
21.1 17.5 18.3 27.2 39.9 34.6 169 295 111 67.7 44.5 32.1
20.9 17.5 18.7 25.9 42.2 35.4 178 263 107 84.8 43.9 31.7
20.6 17.5 18.2 29.7 46.3 41 170 266 104 107 43.7 31.7
20.4 17.3 18 30.4 42.2 44.4 166 288 103 94.1 43.7 31.2
20.2 17.3 18.2 31.3 41.7 64 225 255 107 71 43.4 30.7
20.2 17.3 19.4 28.6 42.2 62.1 275 268 121 69 42.1 30.7
19.9 17 19 30.8 45.7 65.6 193 261 115 67 41 30.3
19.7 16.8 19.4 32.4 45.7 56.5 171 255 111 65.1 40.1 30
19.4 17.8 18.9 36.4 46.5 79 208 260 116 63.6 39.4 29.8
19.4 19 18.3 36.4 43 60.9 181 245 118 62.4 38.7 29.6
19.2 18.5 18.3 37.1 48.8 79.1 149 261 107 60 38.7 29.8
18.9 18 19.4 36.1 46.5 201 141 238 101 59.1 38 28.9
18.7 17.8 20.8 35.2 46.5 101 178 304 98.2 58.2 38 28.9
19 24.9 34.5 46.8 104 153 232 103 57.3 37.3 28.9
18.7 23.6 35.7 41.4 88.4 162 223 115 56.2 36.6 28.6
18.5 23.6 41.4 150 219 54.9 28.6

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 23 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1999 28.6 23.8 21.1 22.2 24 31 134 191 138 115 53 35.6
28.2 23.6 21.5 21 21.8 30.7 180 168 140 115 52.2 35.6
27.9 23.6 21.8 20 21.6 30 264 174 141 112 51.4 35.2
27.5 23.4 22.3 20 22.2 29.3 358 154 136 113 51.1 34.5
27.5 23.4 22 20.5 22 30.7 196 178 127 108 50.3 33.8
26.8 23.2 22.3 20.8 24.3 30.7 152 263 131 105 49.8 32.8
26.8 23.2 22.2 20.8 24.5 30.7 131 214 137 126 47.4 32.4
26.8 23.1 21 21.8 24.7 29.6 122 220 123 114 46.1 31.7
26.8 22.9 20.6 21.3 22.3 31.9 121 260 136 103 45.5 31.2
26.8 22.7 20.5 22.7 21.1 30.7 124 230 136 96.6 45 32.1
26.6 22.5 20.1 23.8 21 30.3 122 209 146 91.4 44.2 31.7
26.5 22.5 20.3 25.3 20.5 48.8 116 226 152 88.2 43.4 31.4
26.3 22.3 20.1 24.8 20.5 87.8 115 205 153 86.6 43.4 31
26.1 22.2 20.1 24.7 23.2 58.3 112 188 160 82.6 42.9 30.7
25.7 22 20.3 25.4 21.1 45 107 167 154 79.3 42.1 30
25.6 21.8 20.8 22.2 21 39.4 110 156 156 75.7 42.1 30
25.4 21.6 20.6 24.3 21.1 89.7 114 141 138 73 41.5 29.3
25.2 21.5 20.5 23.1 22.5 60.3 163 142 131 71.7 41.3 29.3
25 21.5 20.5 22.3 22.3 141 142 160 130 69.7 40.3 28.9
24.7 21.5 20.6 24 23.1 127 271 156 127 69.3 39.8 28.6
24.5 21.1 20.6 25 24.3 78.3 190 147 128 68 39.4 27.9
24.5 21 20.1 26 23.8 60 180 199 132 66 38.4 27.7
24.5 20.8 20.1 25 24.8 57.8 172 191 148 63.6 38 27.7
24.3 20.8 19.8 26 26.4 58.2 218 181 131 62.4 37.7 27.2
24.1 20.8 19.8 24.8 30.3 53.3 225 175 124 61.2 37.3 26.8
24 20.8 19.8 24.5 28.6 50.3 235 208 120 60.3 37 26.6
23.6 20.8 19.8 24.7 30.3 49.8 230 196 119 59.1 36.6 26.6
23.8 20.8 19.8 24.8 38.4 64.8 262 185 118 57.9 36.3 26.8
24.7 20.8 24.3 30.5 68.4 232 164 118 57.3 36.3 26.8
24 22.9 24.3 31.2 70.7 204 152 116 56.5 35.9 26.5
23.6 22.2 31.9 204 141 55.4 26.1

2000 25.9 21.6 21.5 29.3 34.7 40.3 99 263 230 74.1 39.6 27.5
25.9 24.1 20.8 29.8 32.4 38.7 98.2 259 203 72.7 39.4 27.3
25.6 22.7 21 29.1 34 38.9 97 197 202 69 39.1 27.3
25.4 22.7 21 28.6 40.9 47.4 86.2 172 181 65.1 39.1 26.9
25.4 23.8 21.3 28.4 43.7 45.8 85.5 148 176 67.7 38.6 26.3
25.2 23.6 20.8 27.8 41.8 52.7 97.8 135 167 66.4 37.4 26.1
25 23.2 20.5 28.4 38 113 156 130 162 65.1 36.9 25.7
25 22.5 21.5 28.6 35.9 398 124 132 171 62.1 36.4 25.5
24.8 22.2 21.6 28.4 36.3 210 166 186 187 60.8 35.6 25.5
24.7 22 21.8 25.9 37.3 91.3 145 195 173 59.5 35.4 25.1
24.5 23.2 21.8 25.6 42.4 64.7 169 186 159 58.2 35.4 24.9
24.5 23.8 21.6 26.5 45.3 53.1 170 213 142 55.5 34.6 24.9
24.3 22.7 22 27.7 45.3 46 172 222 135 54.3 34.2 24.8
24.5 22.3 21.3 30.5 41.6 45.2 158 203 127 53.4 33.7 24.4
24.1 22.2 21.1 29.8 44 65.2 169 252 124 51.6 33.5 24
23.6 21.8 21.1 27.1 44.2 65.1 216 210 128 50.4 32.8 24
23.4 21.8 21.1 27.1 43.9 58.9 243 189 115 49.8 32.2 23.8

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 24 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
23.1 21.6 21.6 28.4 45.5 58.3 202 193 109 49.3 31.5 23.8
22.9 21.5 21.6 30.5 43.9 81.8 232 229 109 49.3 31.1 23.4
22.9 21.5 21.3 33.1 48.2 190 180 195 114 49.6 30.8 23.4
22.7 21.5 21.5 34.7 42.4 119 184 198 115 48.7 30.8 22.8
22.5 21 21.3 37.3 43.2 126 223 201 109 47.9 30.2 22.8
22.3 20.8 21.8 36.1 46.9 118 158 176 102 46.3 29.5 22.8
22 20.8 22.3 32.6 61.5 98.2 163 173 95.8 44.6 29.3 22.6
22 21 21.8 31.9 60.8 86.6 168 194 91 43.5 28.8 22.6
22.2 21 22.7 34 60.1 85.5 166 170 88.1 43 28.6 22.2
22.2 20.8 22.3 41.6 49.3 90.1 172 195 84.4 41.6 28.6 22.2
22.2 20.8 23.2 37.5 45.5 90 216 204 82.2 41.6 29.9 22
22 20.8 24.8 34.9 47.4 92.2 192 246 80 40.9 29.3 22
21.8 25.9 33.5 41.9 119 229 219 76.7 40.6 28.4 22
21.8 29.1 42.6 488 291 40.1 21.8

2001 21.8 18.2 16.8 18.5 22.8 34.5 90.8 225 108 62 38.5 28.2
24 18.2 16.8 18.2 28.4 36.4 93.4 190 112 62 38.2 27.7
22 17.8 16.8 17.8 27.4 43 107 226 138 61.4 37.8 27.2
21.8 17.7 16.3 18.3 25.5 50.6 94.8 191 144 60.8 37.1 27.2
21.6 17.5 16.3 18.2 26.5 61.9 83.5 169 129 59.3 36.8 27
21.6 17.3 16.2 18 30.8 46.5 87.9 152 123 58.1 36.8 26.6
21.4 17.3 15.9 17.5 36 42.2 95.9 152 111 57.5 37.1 26.4
21.1 17.3 15.9 19.7 31.5 37.9 102 158 108 56.6 36.1 26
20.9 17.1 15.9 18.9 39.2 35.9 87.1 174 103 55.4 35.7 25.5
20.8 17 16 18.3 34.5 35.2 83.5 207 98.5 55.1 35 25.5
20.6 16.8 15.9 17.8 32.2 36.6 152 175 104 53.6 34.3 24.8
20.6 16.8 15.6 18.2 36.1 45.2 205 190 99.2 51.7 33.8 24.6
20.4 16.6 16 17.8 35.9 46 160 198 95.6 50.9 33.6 24.4
20.4 16.5 16 18.5 34.7 59.6 177 199 94.5 50.3 33.1 25.1
20.1 17.3 16 18.5 35.9 57.8 179 182 90.1 49 33.1 25.7
20.1 17.5 16 18.7 39.2 53.7 239 227 86.4 48.5 32.4 25.7
19.5 17.5 15.9 20.2 33.3 61.9 214 198 83.8 47.7 32.4 25.5
19.4 17.3 15.6 19.7 29 78.5 189 168 81.3 47.1 31.7 25
19.2 17 15.4 19.7 28.6 64.8 168 195 80.9 46.6 31.9 25
19.2 16.8 15.4 20.2 28.9 55 167 196 78.7 46.3 32.4 24.6
19 16.8 15.4 20.2 33.4 54.6 184 182 76.5 46.6 32.2 24.3
19 16.8 17.7 20.9 31.1 79.3 214 186 73.9 45.8 31.9 24.3
19 16.8 17.7 20.8 28.4 201 255 160 72.1 44.8 30.7 24.3
19 16.8 17 22.4 32.2 134 254 160 70.1 44.1 29.9 24.3
19 18.3 17.8 23.6 34.5 110 257 152 68.9 43.1 29.9 23.9
19 18.7 18.2 23.6 32.2 117 330 138 67.4 42.2 29.2 23.4
19 18 18.7 23.6 29.5 114 333 130 65.6 41.5 29 23.4
18.9 17.3 19 23.8 29.5 98.5 348 128 64.4 41 28.8 23.2
18.7 19 25.7 31.9 93.4 258 119 62.9 39.9 28.8 23.2
18.7 18.7 23.8 39.7 88.2 249 118 62.3 39.4 28.2 23.2
18.5 18.7 32.9 247 119 38.9 22.9

2002 21.8 19.9 20.2 24.2 31.7 33.2 58 92.1 218 73.4 37.4 26.2
21.8 19.6 23.6 23.4 28.6 33 60 118 231 72.4 36.1 26.2

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 25 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
22 19.4 23.6 23.1 30.5 33 79.3 179 190 69.3 36.1 26.6
21.8 19.7 22.1 23.4 34 33 93.6 174 203 67.4 35.3 26
21.8 19.9 21.5 25.5 37.3 33 163 134 222 66.5 34.8 25.8
21.6 20 21.5 27.1 36.6 33.8 96.8 137 320 64.6 34.2 24.9
21.6 20 21.6 28.1 35.5 43.2 79.6 147 290 63.3 34 24.7
21.3 20.2 22.3 26 37.7 38.8 73.7 139 228 63 33.6 24.4
21.1 21.6 21 24.7 40.9 64.8 75.1 128 220 60.8 32.8 24.1
21 20.5 21 23.6 42.3 48.1 79.6 120 195 59.6 32.4 23.9
20.8 20.3 22.3 22.9 40.7 50.7 76.1 124 236 58.5 32.2 23.8
20.8 22.6 22.9 22.6 42.9 52.4 91.7 110 222 58.5 31.7 23.6
20.8 21.3 22 24.8 45.5 46.8 74.4 156 187 56.5 33.4 23.4
21 20.8 21.6 27.7 46.1 42.8 80 143 168 54.8 31.9 23.4
21 20.5 23.3 28.3 59.4 41.9 86.1 126 151 54 31.7 23.4
21.8 20.2 23.8 33 73.1 39.7 83.5 154 140 52.8 31.5 23.8
20.8 20.2 23.9 34 55.7 40.4 81.7 155 130 51.1 31.7 23.4
21.1 20 23.4 31.4 52.1 40.4 75.4 140 123 50.6 31.1 22.9
21.1 19.9 24.2 30.6 45.3 40.9 86.5 137 113 49.3 31.1 22.8
20.7 19.9 25.9 32.2 39.7 38.8 119 165 110 47.6 30.3 22.3
20.2 19.4 26.4 32.8 36.1 37.5 130 254 107 47 30.3 22.1
19.9 19.4 24.4 29 34.4 35.3 184 192 100 46 29.8 21.8
19.9 19.6 23.4 32 37 38.2 131 257 97 44.5 29.4 21.8
19.9 19.7 24.4 31.9 34.8 62.5 117 254 91.6 43.5 29.2 21.8
19.4 20.3 22.9 29.2 38.6 45 114 194 94.7 42.3 28.6 21.8
19.3 19.7 21.6 39.6 33.4 50 108 180 88.3 41.6 28.1 21.8
19.2 19.4 20.8 30.7 30.3 47.8 100 199 83.9 40.7 27.9 21.8
19.7 19.6 20.8 30.2 34.6 53.7 102 193 80.6 40.2 27.7 21.6
19.3 22.1 29.8 34.4 58 92.8 173 78.5 39.5 27.1 21.5
19.9 22.1 28.8 38.2 52.4 87.6 176 75.1 38.3 26.6 20.8
19.7 23.1 33.4 89.1 159 37.9 21.1

2003 22.5 20.9 19.8 24.8 23.9 36.8 57.5 145 223 101 42.7 28.8
22 19.9 23.4 24.6 25 35.9 50.7 147 221 97.4 41.5 28.6
21.8 19.3 22.3 25.5 26.4 30.3 59 176 231 93 40.6 27.9
21.3 18.8 20.7 23.4 29 35.9 62.9 146 244 89.7 39.9 27.2
21.1 18.5 20.4 23 28.2 35.9 238 136 236 86.8 38.7 27.2
21.1 18.2 20.7 22.3 29.4 30.1 111 133 214 84.6 37.5 27.7
20.7 18.4 20.2 22.7 25.7 32.6 102 131 182 84.2 36.8 27.2
21.1 18.2 19.6 22.5 24.6 36.6 109 183 162 81.6 38 27
20.7 18.2 19.9 24.8 23.7 39.4 117 183 158 79.1 36.8 26.8
20.4 18.2 19.8 24.8 23.4 42.3 125 226 170 75.8 36.4 26.6
20.1 18.2 18.8 24.1 26.4 37.5 157 164 160 72.5 36.4 26.6
20.1 17.9 18.4 24.3 24.6 33.1 160 160 162 69.5 36.1 26.8
19.8 17.8 18.1 25.5 29.6 32.3 122 148 152 68.3 35.9 26.4
19.3 17.6 18.4 25.5 28.4 32 114 143 170 66.5 36.4 26.4
19.4 17.3 20.1 24.6 29.2 31.6 122 154 196 65.3 35.2 26
19.1 17.3 18.8 26 27.2 36.4 148 151 177 64.1 35 25.7
19.1 17.9 18.2 24.3 30 47 208 148 170 63.5 34.5 26.2
19.3 20.6 17.9 25.5 29.2 46.5 255 162 194 62.3 34 25.5
19.3 23 18.2 28.1 27.5 43.2 212 274 161 59.6 32.6 25.3

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 26 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
19.3 20.7 18.4 24.6 28.1 54.6 166 252 144 57.2 32.4 24.8
19.1 20.4 20.4 25.2 26 49.3 218 307 135 55.4 32.4 24.6
18.5 20.7 21.3 24.1 33.7 54.4 152 200 138 53.1 31.9 24.3
18.5 20.6 23 26.6 35.9 49.3 150 257 140 51.4 31.7 23.9
18.5 20.1 24.6 30.4 28.6 53.4 206 197 166 50.6 31.2 23.4
18.4 20.7 22 31.8 27.5 72.7 153 193 186 49 30.3 23
18.2 20.4 22 31.4 28.8 62.6 150 194 149 47.9 30.1 22.7
18.2 19.9 21.5 31 28.6 59.3 134 207 133 46.6 29.4 23.4
19 20.4 23.6 30 29.2 61.7 166 194 122 46.1 28.8 23.2
19.4 26.6 26.1 29.2 59.3 150 190 113 45.5 28.6 22.5
18.8 24.3 25 30 62 123 210 105 44.3 28.6 22.3
20.2 23.9 32.1 140 221 43.6 22.3

2004 22.2 19.3 17.3 15.6 25.3 29.2 40.5 194 111 72.7 42.4 30.7
22.2 19.1 17.6 15.6 21.5 31.1 44.9 179 105 71.3 41.7 30.5
21.8 19.1 16.8 15.6 20.1 28.6 53.2 181 101 73 40.7 30.1
21.3 19.3 17.1 15.6 22 25.3 55.7 174 99 71 40.3 29.9
21.1 18.1 16.7 16.1 19.8 26.6 65.9 170 95 72.3 40 29.6
20.9 18.2 16.5 15.9 18.4 24 72.3 172 92.4 69.3 39.6 29
20.9 18.2 16.4 16.1 21.1 28.1 87.9 174 88 66.9 38.9 28.5
21.1 18.7 16.2 17.9 19.3 28.3 92.4 282 86.7 65.6 38.2 27.7
20.9 19.1 16.8 17.1 20.2 26.2 107 308 85.3 63.2 37.5 27.7
20.9 18.5 16.8 17 22.7 28.1 182 298 124 61.1 37.2 27.3
20.9 18.8 17 16.5 21.5 30 98.3 281 89.8 72.7 37 27.2
21.5 18.2 16.7 16.1 23.2 28.3 79 249 84 66.7 36.8 27.2
20.2 18.2 16.4 16.2 23.2 29.2 74.3 274 82 65.1 36.6 27.2
20.2 17.8 16.5 17 21.3 38.8 98.6 217 83.7 61.9 36.2 27
21.3 17.1 17.1 15.5 18.5 36.7 102 190 81.3 61.9 36 27
21.5 17.4 17.1 16.2 21.5 55.4 203 184 82 57.6 35.4 26.8
20.2 17.4 17.4 16.1 23.4 61 118 256 82.7 56.7 34.8 27
20.4 17.9 18.4 18.7 27.7 74.7 112 239 82.3 55.5 34.3 26.6
20.4 17.6 17.4 16.4 24.3 67.2 162 222 81 54.3 34.1 26.6
20.4 17.3 17.8 17.4 28.4 57.5 124 233 79 52.8 33.7 26.6
21.3 17.6 18.2 18.8 44.9 66.1 106 219 81.7 51.3 33.1 26
20.6 17.3 17 18.4 31.7 66.1 95.3 214 233 50.8 32.9 26
22.5 17.3 17 17.3 37 49.6 91.3 185 113 49.6 32.9 26
21.5 17.3 16.5 19.8 31.9 48.2 84 198 97.9 51.3 32.5 25.8
21.1 17.6 16.1 17.4 27.5 43.5 93.1 182 92 49.8 32.3 25.3
21.5 18.2 15.6 16.8 26.8 44 110 175 88.4 48.2 32.3 25.3
21.3 17.8 16.1 19.1 27.5 41.2 256 166 77.3 45.9 31.9 25
21.3 17 15.7 20.6 27.2 39.3 277 140 76.3 44 31.9 25
20.6 16.8 15.6 18.4 26.6 38.4 235 132 76.3 43.3 31.7 25
19.3 16.1 19.3 26.2 41.2 231 130 73.7 42.4 31.3 25
20.1 15.2 25.9 270 121 43.5 24.8

2005 24.8 24.8 25.8 24.8 29.6 32.3 89.2 183 111 108 44.7 31.1
24.8 23.3 25.8 25.7 28.1 31.5 75.7 195 111 103 44.5 30.5
24.5 22.3 27.3 25.3 29 31.9 108 215 129 99.4 43.8 30.3
24.5 22.3 29.8 25.3 28.3 29.4 94.6 183 123 93.1 42.8 30.1

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 27 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
24.5 21.8 28.8 29.4 31.1 29.2 110 279 122 88.4 42.1 29.8
24.3 21.5 28.3 30.5 34.5 29.4 114 313 113 84.7 42.1 29.4
23.8 23.8 27.7 29.8 32.1 30.5 81.3 223 110 80.3 41.4 29.2
23.5 28.6 27.5 27.5 31.9 30.9 76.7 179 106 84 40.7 29
23.1 27 25.8 27.2 39.1 31.7 83.7 158 115 81 40 28.5
23.1 26.6 26.6 26.2 37.5 32.1 135 146 118 76 39.6 28.3
23.1 24.5 25.3 26.1 33.7 30.7 129 132 103 74 39.6 27.9
23.1 24.3 24.8 29.1 32.3 34.5 116 162 128 70 38.6 27.7
23.1 24 25.8 33.1 32.1 35.6 109 144 112 67.2 38.2 27.3
22.8 24 29.2 31.3 31.1 39.2 129 142 107 66.1 37.9 27.3
22.5 23.5 29.8 31.9 35 40.7 149 133 118 64.8 37.5 27.3
22.1 24.5 29.8 32.1 34.8 41.4 128 202 116 62.1 37 27.3
24.3 23.8 35.4 32.1 34.5 46.8 205 244 134 61.3 36.6 27.2
25.3 22.8 34.5 32.1 34.1 38.5 185 264 116 59.1 36.2 27
24.1 22.8 32.7 31.3 32.7 35.8 164 247 106 58.5 35.6 26.8
23.8 22.8 29.8 30.6 33.3 37.3 153 246 99 58.5 35.4 26.6
23 22.8 29.6 31.3 33.3 42.8 145 235 92.4 56.1 35 26.2
23.3 22.5 28.6 31.7 33.3 49 139 212 112 55.2 34.3 26
28.1 22.3 29.2 30.7 33.3 50.6 139 196 2.8 54 33.7 26.4
24.5 22.5 27.3 30.7 32.7 47.7 164 173 107 52.5 33.5 27.2
25.3 22.3 26.2 30.3 33.5 57.2 266 170 312 51.1 33.1 26.2
23.8 23.6 26 30.7 34.8 58.6 283 158 180 49.8 32.9 26
23.3 24.5 27.3 30.3 34.8 58.1 265 142 146 49.1 32.5 25.7
23.5 24.8 27 29.8 30.9 59 206 135 135 49.1 32.3 25.5
23 26.4 29 33.3 59.8 203 132 124 47.7 32.1 25.5
23 25.8 27.2 33.7 63.5 214 121 113 46.1 31.7 25.1
22.8 25.3 31.1 213 116 45.6 25

2006 24.6 20.7 18.7 18.4 29.4 29.4 61.2 135 197 75 40.5 28.5
24.5 20.5 18.7 18.4 27 35.3 51.8 153 173 73 39.6 28.5
24.1 20.5 18.7 18.7 24.5 68.5 111 133 155 69 39.6 28.3
24.1 20.2 18.7 19 23.5 87.6 101 147 138 66.4 39.8 28.1
24 20 18.6 19.3 24.5 77 75 168 153 68.1 39.3 28.5
24 20 18.4 19.3 27.9 52.9 72.7 153 126 66.4 39.3 28.1
23.6 20 18 19.9 31.7 46.8 70.7 152 133 65.3 38.6 27.9
23.5 19.9 17.5 20 30.9 44.2 82.8 162 127 63.5 38.2 27.3
23.3 19.7 17.5 20.8 33.6 42.6 107 152 118 63.2 37.5 27.2
23.1 19.6 17.5 20.8 32.3 45.6 94.2 138 117 61.9 36.8 26.8
22.6 19.2 20.4 21.3 34.5 44.9 94.2 135 221 60.8 36.4 29.6
22.6 20.2 19.3 21.3 30.9 37.1 126 121 187 57.9 35.8 28.1
22.6 20 19 20.7 29.9 33.3 121 125 172 59.9 35.6 27.7
22.6 20 23.1 21.1 29.9 31.9 119 158 152 57.3 34.8 27.2
22.5 19.9 22.3 20.5 30.3 29.6 106 214 137 54 34.3 27.2
22.5 20 22.3 20.2 29.2 29.8 119 198 127 53.1 34.1 27
22.5 19.6 21.6 19.7 33.3 29.8 121 158 123 51.9 33.7 26.6
22.5 19.6 20.3 19.9 31.1 28.8 161 158 120 51.3 33.5 26.2
22.5 19.6 19.9 19.9 29.8 27.9 129 131 138 51.9 32.9 26
22.5 19.6 19.7 19.9 29.9 27 168 133 127 50.1 32.5 26
22.5 19.3 19.6 20 30.9 26 240 152 122 49.1 31.9 25.7

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 28 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
22.3 19.3 19.6 20.8 29.9 27 166 152 109 48.2 31.7 25.5
22 19.3 19.9 20.8 35.2 27.7 142 150 102 47.7 31.7 25.1
21.8 19.2 19.9 20.8 34.1 31.3 140 155 98.3 45.4 31.1 25
21.5 19.7 19.7 21.3 37.6 37.2 142 226 94.6 44.2 30.5 24.6
21.1 19.6 19.3 21.5 38.9 39.8 147 172 89.1 44.2 30.3 24.6
20.8 19.3 18.7 22.8 39.2 44.7 190 307 87.3 42.8 30.1 24.3
20.8 19.3 18.6 24.3 33.9 56 172 331 85.3 43.1 29.6 24.1
21 18.6 24.8 32.1 56.7 174 269 82 41.9 29.4 24
21 18.6 27 33.3 73.3 141 279 89.3 41.7 28.8 23.6
20.7 18.4 30.9 146 235 40.7 23.6

2007 23.3 23.1 23.1 23 22.6 22.5 22.1 22 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.5
19.3 19.2 19.6 19.6 19.4 19.9 19.7 19.6 19.6 19.4 23.3 20.7
24.5 23.8 22.3 20.8 20.7 20.5 21.1 21.3 21.3 21 20.7 21.8
36.4 33.7 32.5 32.7 32.1 30.7 30.9 27.7 27.5 26.4 27.5 28.6
28.3 30.3 30.1 35.8 32.7 31.5 29.8 27.9 30.1 29.6 29.9 30
27.9 27.9 29.2 32.1 31.5 32.1 32.7 35.2 38.9 41.2 43.5 53.3
95.8 151 125 109 94.6 108 97.9 119 106 95 136 142
299 269 252 225 190 182 213 181 183 166 179 212
240 280 303 263 287 293 230 202 181 162 149 134
147 129 116 106 99 94.6 89.5 86 84.7 82.7 80.3 77.3
46.1 45.6 45.4 44.7 44.7 44 42.6 42.1 41.9 41 39.8 39.1
30.5 30.1 29.8 29.4 29.2 28.6 28.5 28.3 27.7 28.5 28.6 27.9
21.5 21.3 28.1 30.1 27.7 43.1 173 224 127 75.3 38.2 27.5
21.1 21.8 33.1 29.6 26.6 65.8 128 279 124 72.3 37.7 27.5
21.1 19.9 29.6 32.3 30.3 55.5 112 292 116 71.7 37.2 27
21 19.6 27.5 35.6 35.2 70.2 93.5 331 109 71.7 36.4 26.6
21 19.2 26.4 33.9 32.3 57.8 101 246 104 71.3 35.8 25.8
21 19.3 27.3 34.1 34.8 45.9 93.5 214 101 68.3 35.4 25.5
20.8 19.3 29.9 32.5 34.3 41.4 84.3 191 103 64 35.2 25.5
20.7 19.2 31.7 32.9 34.5 41 89.2 217 99.4 61.9 34.8 25.1
20.5 19 31.7 32.1 37.6 37.8 95.7 177 106 60.3 34.3 24.8
20.3 19.3 29.6 29.9 33.7 36.2 146 161 102 58.2 33.9 24.5
20 19.3 29.6 28.6 32.1 40.3 244 147 90.6 56.4 33.3 24.3
19.9 19.3 29.8 29.2 29.6 41.2 220 149 88.5 54.9 33.1 24.1
20 18.7 29.4 28.1 28.1 50.2 185 192 86 53.4 32.9 23.8
19.9 18.6 29.4 25.5 27.7 48.3 203 162 255 52.2 32.7 23.8
19.4 18.6 30.1 25.5 31.1 51 241 198 277 51.1 32.3 23.5
19.4 22.6 31.1 27.2 30.5 49.4 216 247 167 49.8 32.1 23.5
19.4 33.3 27.3 28.3 53.8 222 225 252 48.9 31.5 23.1
19.3 35 27 27.7 106 184 210 170 47.7 31.1 23
19.3 35.8 27.5 208 211 46.8 22.8

2008 23 22.6 22.5 22.1 22 21.8 22 21.5 21.6 22.5 21.8 21.5
18.9 18.7 18.6 18.6 18.4 18.4 18.1 18 18 17.8 17.5 17.5
18.3 18.3 18.1 17.3 17.5 17.7 18.3 17.5 17.7 18.1 17.3 16.7
15.9 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 21.4 18.9 19 19.3 18.9 20.5 22
23.1 21.8 20.5 22 24.3 22.1 21.1 20.8 19.9 19.4 19.4 19
25 24.8 26.8 27.3 27 28.3 32.7 44.5 63.7 56.4 54.9 63.1

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 29 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
136 115 167 131 111 129 111 135 127 106 178 162
185 170 166 179 160 174 191 194 177 187 211 198
158 138 127 124 122 112 104 96.8 92.8 89.1 87 89.1
78 75.7 74 72 71 73 71 69 66.4 64 61.6 60.3
40.5 40 39.6 39.3 38.4 37.9 37.9 37.2 37.7 36.6 36.8 36.8
29.8 29.4 29.2 28.8 28.5 28.3 27.7 27.7 27.7 27 26.6 26.2
21.1 17.1 16.8 20.4 19 77.7 164 206 89.8 59.4 36 26.2
21 17.1 16.7 19.3 19.9 72.5 140 220 91.3 59.1 35.2 25.8
20.8 17 16.8 18.7 20 146 142 213 86 57.6 34.5 25.8
20.7 17 16.8 18.6 22.5 84.8 133 241 82.7 55.8 34.5 25.7
20.3 17.3 16.4 19.3 25.2 102 142 228 81.7 54.6 33.9 25.5
20.3 17.1 17 19.9 24.3 90.9 135 222 79.3 52.8 33.3 25.3
20.5 17.3 16.8 20.9 26.3 120 142 194 79.7 51.3 32.9 25
20.5 16.8 16.5 22 26.6 111 147 190 336 49.8 33.1 24.8
20.5 17.3 16.1 23 25.9 90 145 189 244 49.4 32.9 25
20.2 17.7 16.1 23 25.2 89.3 142 216 143 48.2 32.3 24.5
19.9 17.1 16.1 25.4 30.9 84.5 197 225 128 46.8 32.1 24.5
19.9 16.8 15.9 24.9 33.3 83 168 194 111 45.9 31.9 24.1
19.7 16.7 15.9 25.2 39.1 91.2 191 186 101 44.9 31.7 24.1
20.2 16.4 15.9 24.9 43.5 81 260 196 94.2 44.2 31.5 24
19.9 16.4 15.9 23.1 34.1 83 246 226 89.1 43.3 30.9 24.1
19.7 16.7 16.2 23.5 30.9 83 205 269 85 42.4 30.5 24
19.3 18.3 15.9 21.8 29 87.2 198 228 80.3 42.1 30.3 23.8
19.4 15.9 23.3 26 121 179 195 80 41.2 29.9 23.6
19.2 15.9 25 200 178 40.7 23.6

2009 27.1 22.3 20 19.6 25.2 25.4 52.5 138 137 87.1 59.7 37.2
26.7 22.3 20.1 20.5 25 26.7 38 128 128 86 59.1 37.2
26.7 22.3 20.8 20 22.2 26.9 43 128 128 82.7 57.1 36.5
26.5 22.3 21.1 20.6 21.3 30.1 39.1 146 146 83.5 56.5 35.9
27.5 22.2 20 20.8 21.1 33.9 40.4 158 158 194 54.8 35.6
27.1 22.2 20 21.5 20.8 36.7 35.9 205 205 446 53.6 35.2
26.5 22 20.3 20.1 20.1 33.7 36.1 272 272 350 52.5 34.8
26.3 21.8 20 19.1 20 31.3 39.9 296 296 231 51.1 34.3
26.1 21.6 19.4 20.8 20.1 28.6 75.8 246 246 172 50.3 33.9
25.9 21.8 19.3 20.1 19.6 27.1 47.9 223 223 148 49.8 33.5
25.7 23.5 19 21 19.4 24.6 56.8 204 204 126 49.2 33.3
25.6 23.3 19 21.8 22.3 24.6 92.7 183 184 120 48.4 32.8
25.2 23.3 19 20.6 21.8 26.3 78.6 185 185 109 57.3 32.6
25.2 23.2 19.6 21.3 23.7 24.6 170 278 169 102 55.4 32.2
25.2 22.3 19.1 20.6 24.8 24.2 82.4 278 161 96.9 49.2 32
25.2 22 19 21.3 24.6 24.1 79.2 237 148 92.8 47.4 31.5
25 21.6 18.5 20 24.1 22.8 68.9 250 141 91.7 45.8 31.3
24.6 21.5 18.4 20.5 24.6 24.1 122 285 132 85.3 44.8 30.9
24 21.1 18.5 22.2 42.1 25.4 90.6 241 127 80.9 43.2 30.7
24 21 19.4 23.2 25.9 25.4 317 222 120 79.1 42.7 30.2
23.9 20.5 20.8 23.7 27.9 27.1 150 183 122 76.8 41.8 29.8
23.9 20.6 20.5 21 30.1 28.9 126 169 118 74.4 41.5 29.4
24 20.5 20.1 19.4 27.3 30.9 112 157 112 72.1 41.1 29

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 30 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
24 20.6 19.6 21.6 26.5 31.6 123 146 109 69.7 40.6 28.8
23.7 20.5 20 22.2 25 35.7 107 148 117 67.2 40.1 28.5
23.5 20.5 20.8 22 23.9 39.4 123 181 105 66.3 39.4 28.3
23.5 20.3 20 22.3 24.6 37.8 200 178 101 65.9 38.9 27.9
23.2 20.1 22.7 24.1 25.6 46.9 211 187 97.3 63.7 38.4 27.7
23 21.5 26.3 23.2 83.8 173 174 95.3 62.8 37.9 27.7
23 20.3 24.7 24.2 64 177 216 89 62.8 37.9 27.3
22.8 20 25.7 157 192 61.6 27.1

2010 27.1 23.3 23.9 22.2 25.4 27.1 40.1 256 367 112 47.1 28.5
26.9 23 23.3 22.5 25.4 26.7 39.6 199 324 106 45.3 28.3
26.5 22.7 23.3 22.2 25.4 26.1 45.8 229 406 101 44 28.1
26.5 22.7 23 22.7 25.2 29.5 84.2 245 348 96.9 43.5 27.5
28.1 22.5 23.2 22.7 27.3 26.3 84 337 341 94.5 43 27.5
27.5 22.3 23 22.7 27.9 26.1 63.8 236 279 90.8 42.5 27.1
27.3 22.3 23.2 23.9 30.3 25.9 56.9 222 343 87.5 41.3 26.9
26.9 22.7 22.5 25.8 29.5 56.4 63.8 188 343 84.2 40.3 26.9
26.3 32 22.3 26.9 26.5 32.6 145 187 262 80.9 39.9 26.9
26.1 25.4 22.7 25.9 27.3 28.5 137 270 226 77.8 39.6 26.5
25.7 25.6 22.5 25.2 27.7 27.5 116 283 210 76.8 39.4 26.3
25.6 24.6 22.8 26.3 24.8 28.8 101 276 200 73.7 39.4 26.1
25.4 24 22.7 24.6 24.8 30 93 232 208 71.7 38.7 25.9
26.5 23.5 22.3 22.7 24.8 32 84.2 224 198 73.1 37.7 25.4
25.6 23.3 21.5 23.7 23.5 29.5 88.7 224 187 77.8 36.7 25.2
25.6 23.3 22.2 24.4 23.2 33.5 107 289 181 72.1 36.1 24.8
25.6 23 22.3 26.3 24.8 39.5 219 236 216 67.2 35.9 24.8
25.6 22.8 23.7 26.5 25.2 36.8 144 423 205 65.9 35 24.4
25.2 22.8 24.6 27.7 27.5 33.9 160 440 293 63.7 34.8 24
25.2 23.3 27.1 26.1 26.3 37.7 174 401 222 62.5 34.3 23.9
25.2 23.7 28.7 26.5 24.1 37.5 165 440 200 61.2 33.7 23.7
25 24.2 28.3 25.7 26.3 35.4 153 444 190 59.1 33.5 23.7
24.6 25 28.5 26.5 34 38.7 138 333 193 59.4 33 23.3
24.2 24 28.9 25.2 29.5 42 123 323 175 57.7 32.8 22.8
24.2 23.2 28.3 23.3 32 35.6 221 323 164 55.1 32.2 22.5
24 23.5 26.9 23.2 32.6 38.2 168 279 153 53.3 32 22.3
23.9 23.5 24.2 23 30.9 43.3 177 242 140 50.8 31.5 22
23.9 23.7 23.7 25.6 31.3 38.2 176 252 134 49.8 30.7 21.8
23.9 24.8 25.2 29.5 39.1 150 344 125 48.7 30 21.8
23.7 24.6 24.1 26.1 44.6 295 348 118 47.9 29.6 21.6
23.3 23 26.1 355 386 47.4 22.8

2011 23.3 17.3 16.9 19.5 29.1 33.7 169 328 266 84.2 41.5 29
23.2 17 16.9 18.7 27.3 33.7 158 229 218 81.6 40.3 29.4
22.8 16.9 17 18.2 26.7 31.5 129 237 193 79.5 40.3 29.6
22.3 16.9 16.9 18.1 29.5 30.2 116 275 175 76.1 39.4 28.8
21.8 16.9 17 19.3 28.6 31.1 150 254 166 76.4 38.9 28.1
21.3 17.2 16.9 19.1 32.8 31.3 152 223 152 73.7 38.2 27.3
21.1 17 17 19.3 29.9 31.1 205 203 153 70.7 37.2 26.9
21 16.9 17.3 18.7 28.6 32.6 257 276 159 69.4 37 26.3

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 31 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
20.8 16.9 17.2 18.5 27.1 31.1 201 226 230 68.4 37 26.3
20.3 17.3 16.9 18.5 27.7 30.2 174 211 175 65.9 37 25.7
20.3 17.2 16.6 18.7 26.7 30 150 218 180 64.4 36.5 25.2
20.1 17 16.3 19.3 27.3 55.8 138 252 166 62.8 35.9 24.8
20 17.3 16.6 19.8 32.2 40.6 135 259 176 62.2 35.2 24.6
19.6 17 18.1 21 32.6 45.6 159 231 186 61.6 35 24
20 20.5 17.9 20.3 29.4 48 161 249 220 60.3 34.8 24
20.5 22.3 18.4 20.6 29.7 41.3 159 308 188 58.6 34.1 23.7
20.3 20.3 20.3 21.6 30.9 44 151 273 171 55.4 33 23.3
20.1 19 20 28.3 33.7 45.9 139 234 158 53.6 33.7 23.3
19.6 18.5 20.1 24.2 29.9 42.8 134 327 146 51.6 33.7 23
19.6 18.2 19 24.2 34.6 53.4 165 302 137 50.5 33 22.8
19.3 18.2 19.3 22.8 34.8 67.4 249 254 129 51.9 33 22.8
19.1 17.8 19 20.8 33.3 57.5 267 229 125 50 32.8 22.5
19.1 17.8 19.6 20.6 31.7 60.1 220 237 115 48.7 32.4 22
18.7 17.5 19.6 21.6 30.3 64.1 248 215 107 47.7 32.2 21.8
18.4 17.3 18.7 23 35 86.1 290 195 103 47.1 31.7 21.8
18.2 17.8 17.6 24.1 34.3 89.8 219 208 103 45.3 31.1 21.8
17.9 17.2 17.9 25.7 34.3 101 225 236 100 44.5 30.4 21.5
17.8 16.8 18.2 27.5 31.7 137 239 286 96.5 43.2 29.4 21.1
17.8 19.6 28.5 34.1 183 231 229 93.2 43 28.8 21
17.6 19.8 28.8 39.9 168 199 270 88.6 42.3 29.4 21
17.3 19.4 32.6 196 236 41.8 20.6

2012 21.6 17 14.6 16.8 17.8 35.1 37.8 295 151 94.5 42.7 29.4
21.5 16.9 13.8 17.3 17.5 32 79.5 256 143 92.1 41.5 29
21 16.9 13.8 17.9 16.6 34.2 56.1 286 152 86.8 40.8 28.6
20.6 16.9 13.9 18.5 16.2 28.3 90.5 301 192 84.2 40.1 28.6
20.6 16.8 14.7 17.3 16.3 26.1 92.1 260 200 80.9 40.1 28.3
20.6 16.5 15.1 16.5 16.2 23.3 82.1 223 203 76.8 39.6 28.1
20.6 16.5 14.7 17.2 17.9 22.7 84.4 256 200 73.7 38.7 27.5
20.3 16.5 14.7 17.3 22 22.2 80.3 190 185 72.4 38.2 26.7
20.5 16.3 14.6 17.3 25.4 23.7 65.6 218 164 70.7 37.9 26.5
20.1 16 14.3 18.2 24.5 30.1 95.6 225 168 70.4 37.7 26.1
20.3 16.5 14.3 20.3 27.5 24.1 70.1 188 169 68.1 37.2 25.9
20 16.3 13.9 20 22.4 22.5 83.5 201 196 66.9 36.5 25.9
20 15.9 15.3 19.2 24.8 26.2 92.7 226 202 65 35.9 25.7
19.8 16.2 14.8 17.2 23.9 25.4 82.4 239 211 62.2 35.4 26.1
20 16 15.1 18.4 23.2 27.3 81 201 243 61.2 34.8 25.9
21.1 16 14.4 19.8 21.6 28.1 79.2 187 222 60 34.6 25.7
20.3 15.7 16 19.8 21.1 31.6 73.1 170 294 58.6 33.7 25.2
20.1 15.6 16 17.9 23.2 33.5 70.8 160 302 56.8 33.3 25.2
19.6 15.6 16.8 18.2 23.6 39.5 86.4 191 262 55.1 33.3 24.6
19.3 15.6 17.6 19 24.8 33 162 271 209 53.3 32.6 24.4
19.1 15.6 16.8 21.1 27.7 38.3 131 227 184 52.5 32.4 24
18.8 15.3 16 19.8 24.2 51.2 116 229 163 51.6 31.7 23.9
18.7 15.1 16.6 18.7 25.8 51 163 225 156 50.3 31.5 23.5
18.7 15.1 17 17.8 27.3 54.1 210 201 140 49.8 30.9 23.3
18.4 14.8 17 18.4 32.9 54.4 204 223 129 48.2 30.4 23

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 32 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
18.4 14.7 16.6 17.3 37.1 55.1 191 204 120 47.7 30.2 22.7
18.2 14.7 15.6 17.6 33.9 41.1 233 193 114 46.1 29.8 22.7
18.2 14.4 15.4 18.1 33.7 34.8 232 180 108 45 29.4 22.5
17.5 14.8 16.3 18.7 31.8 33.3 307 172 104 44.5 29 22
17.2 16.6 19.1 31.2 33.9 288 160 101 44.5 31.3 21.8
16.9 15.9 31.2 273 152 43.5 21.8

2013 21.8 20 18.8 20.8 28.5 36.1 111 190 212 84.2 49.5 34.8
21.5 19.4 19.4 22.7 26.5 37.5 117 212 191 81.3 48.7 34.6
21.3 19.4 20.5 21.8 26.1 36.5 124 196 179 80.9 47.7 34.3
21 19.8 21.1 22 26.1 34.6 207 204 171 94.5 47.1 33.9
20.8 22 22 21.8 23.2 42.7 197 199 160 85.7 46.3 33.9
20.8 29.3 20.6 21.8 22.2 40.1 234 229 152 85.3 46.3 33.9
20 23 20.6 22.7 24.3 39.2 190 227 141 80.2 45.5 33.5
20 21.8 22.7 24.1 27.1 37.8 281 217 136 78.8 45 33.3
19.6 21 23 25.9 27.3 41.1 292 220 130 78.1 44.5 33
19.6 20.8 23.2 23.7 28.5 49.3 244 206 127 77.4 43.7 32.8
19.4 20.6 20.5 23.3 29.5 54 193 231 124 76.4 43.2 32.4
19.4 20.6 21 21.6 26.7 41.8 195 220 127 72.1 43 31.7
19.4 19.6 22.2 23.2 25.6 71.2 185 384 119 71.4 42.5 31.3
19.4 19.3 22.3 23.7 24.4 55.2 236 265 115 69.1 42 31.3
19.4 19.4 23 22.5 25.7 55.7 303 274 111 67.5 41.8 31.1
19.1 19.4 22.2 22.7 25.7 137 349 258 109 65.6 41.1 30.9
19.1 22.7 20.8 22.7 24.2 308 300 247 104 64.7 40.6 30.9
28.7 20 20 22.7 25.2 336 306 241 101 64.1 40.6 30.9
23.2 20 20.1 22.7 26.9 112 267 247 99.7 62.8 39.9 30.7
23.3 19.4 22 21.8 32 85.4 269 233 98.1 61.6 39.4 30.2
22.3 19.1 22.3 22.7 34.6 71.4 226 203 94.5 60.6 39.1 29.8
21.3 19.1 20.6 22.5 38 70.1 270 209 92 59.7 38.9 29.6
20.8 19.1 22.3 23 38 117 333 188 89.7 58.6 37.5 29.2
20 19.1 22 23 38.9 108 399 183 87.5 57.1 37.5 29
19.8 18.8 21 23.7 44.9 170 296 184 85.3 55.9 37.5 28.8
19.8 18.8 22.5 25.9 46.4 126 244 191 84.2 54.8 37 28.5
20 19.6 23.5 25.6 43.3 126 279 242 82.4 54.5 36.7 28.5
20 18.7 22.5 26.9 42.5 131 232 217 89.4 53.9 36.5 28.6
20 22.2 28.3 41.3 116 205 217 92.1 52.5 35.6 28.5
20 21.1 29.3 35.7 140 200 224 91.7 51.9 35.2 27.9
20 22.2 31.3 201 220 50.5 28.1
AVERAGE 21.87 20.11 20.35 23.01 29.16 51.30 118.60 155.76 112.77 55.98 33.70 25.64

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA_DAILY_DISCHARGE: 33 of 33 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Monthly Average Flow Data at Chamelya River

Stn No. 120 Catchment Area at Chameliya 1184 sq.km


Stn name: Nayal Badi Headworks 165.00 sq.km
Catchment Area Ratio 0.139358

AVERAGE MONTHLY AND YEARLY DISCHARGE AT REFERENCE RIVER (CHAMELIYA RIVER)


Annual
YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Average
1965 20.90 20.90 25.40 25.90 38.00 68.90 76.50 58.30 53.00 38.10 24.40
1966 17.60 16.90 16.90 16.90 21.30 42.10 89.00 117.00 72.90 38.70 25.70 20.80 41.32
1967 18.90 15.00 13.40 16.80 20.50 31.00 98.30 120.00 80.40 45.60 32.90 28.80 43.47
1968 23.60 21.90 23.60 26.40 30.70 50.00 87.20 110.00 76.50 47.40 34.20 29.10 46.72
1969 25.40 22.70 24.10 32.20 111.00 99.60 54.20 35.90 27.30
1970 23.40 21.50 22.30 26.70 25.20 44.60 44.40 38.60 33.80
1971 21.00 20.40 23.20 27.70 29.40 160.00 166.00 182.00 138.00 73.20 50.00 40.30 77.60
1972 32.90 30.50 28.40 32.00 43.40 44.90 130.00 141.00 132.00 47.80 31.90 25.50 60.03
1973 21.90 20.50 21.60 22.00 25.40 73.60 109.00 155.00 125.00 79.80 35.30 24.50 59.47
1974 21.20 19.60 19.50 19.90 21.20 29.30 60.30 140.00 114.00 76.50 29.20 15.70 47.20
1975 14.40 12.00 14.60 17.40 19.30 53.70 135.00 123.00 137.00 52.90 29.20 19.80 52.36
1976 16.60 17.10 17.40 21.60 32.40 43.80 122.00 111.00 44.80 31.20 19.70
1977 16.70 15.30 14.90 13.10 15.30 57.70 138.00 177.00 138.00 60.10 36.00 24.30 58.87
1978 20.20 17.00 15.50 14.90 19.10 77.90 223.00 208.00 134.00 72.50 29.80 22.60 71.21
1979 21.70 20.10 17.40 15.10 25.40 62.10 162.00 184.00 84.20 43.20 30.30 24.10 57.47
1980 19.50 17.30 17.60 22.10 29.80 53.30 103.00 136.00 94.60 46.70 32.90 26.00 49.90
1981 22.70 20.80 21.30 25.90 30.50 54.40 138.00 148.00 72.50 39.90 28.90 22.10 52.08
1982 20.00 18.70 20.10 21.10 22.60 44.20 85.40 140.00 87.40 36.70 27.00 20.10 45.28
1984 19.80 18.30 18.40 18.00 22.70 66.50 98.80 99.20 80.60 49.70 25.30 20.90 44.85
1985 17.70 16.40 15.20 16.50 20.90 27.20 89.40 119.00 145.00 68.70 39.00 28.60 50.30
1986 22.80 18.90 17.90 21.70 32.40 42.30 122.00 122.00 73.40 42.00 26.80 19.70 46.83
1987 16.60 15.30 14.50 18.00 25.50 32.60 80.10 139.00 71.40 40.20 31.10 26.10 42.53
1988 22.80 20.40 23.00 24.80 29.30 36.60 84.70 93.40 53.70 41.50 30.10 25.00 40.44
1989 23.80 21.60 20.40 22.20 23.50 34.10 93.40 121.00 86.20 45.90 22.60 23.40 44.84
1990 18.90 17.30 19.60 26.30 38.50 43.40 97.70 145.00 86.50 53.20 30.70 22.30 49.95
1991 18.80 16.80 19.10 21.80 27.90 35.10 71.00 116.00 82.70 37.60 25.30 20.00 41.01
1992 18.90 17.80 16.20 17.40 19.90 21.50 33.70 87.40 112.00 60.60 31.50 23.20 38.34
1993 18.40 17.50 17.50 22.00 28.70 37.80 61.40 83.50 93.00 44.30 27.50 22.20 39.48

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA MONLTHY DISCHARGE: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Annual
YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Average
1994 19.30 18.30 18.00 17.90 23.30 33.50 85.50 114.00 77.60 35.40 24.60 20.70 40.68
1995 19.00 17.90 19.40 23.90 29.20 34.00 99.40 208.00 134.00 47.90 30.60 23.50 57.23
1996 20.00 18.40 20.10 23.60 27.10 50.70 134.00 202.00 145.00 60.20 33.30 24.20 63.22
1997 23.30 20.10 18.10 21.30 24.20 35.00 108.00 146.00 132.00 52.50 31.50 27.00 53.25
1998 21.00 17.90 19.00 29.90 40.80 55.70 154.00 270.00 134.00 75.00 44.80 32.00 74.51
1999 25.70 22.10 20.80 23.30 24.70 54.80 178.00 185.00 135.00 82.70 42.90 30.10 68.76
2000 23.70 22.00 22.00 30.80 43.90 94.30 175.00 199.00 135.00 53.60 33.40 21.20 71.16
2001 20.10 17.30 16.70 20.00 32.00 69.10 184.00 173.00 91.70 49.90 33.20 25.10 61.01
2002 20.70 20.10 22.70 28.40 40.00 43.60 95.80 162.00 160.00 53.40 31.60 23.30 58.47
2003 19.80 19.30 20.80 25.70 28.00 44.50 143.00 185.00 170.00 66.30 34.70 25.50 65.22
2004 21.00 18.00 16.70 17.10 25.00 41.10 123.00 204.00 94.20 58.40 35.80 27.10 56.78
2005 23.80 23.70 28.00 29.40 32.90 41.20 151.00 186.00 124.00 67.60 37.50 27.50 64.38
2006 22.60 19.80 19.40 20.80 31.30 42.30 125.00 176.00 130.00 55.10 34.60 26.50 58.62
2007 45.3 49.2 51.8 49.4 48.2 61.4 126 158 109 60.3 46.5 41.3 70.53
2008 36.6 33.8 33.4 36.5 38.1 79.3 127 152 92.3 51.4 44.7 38.7 63.65
2009 24.99 21.69 19.9 21.43 24.28 32.42 105.35 201.1 152.52 116.36 47.52 31.71 66.61
2010 25.52 23.78 24.26 24.64 27.26 34.23 134.45 293.9 231.7 71.82 37.12 24.95 79.47
2011 19.97 17.79 18.13 21.64 31.17 59.26 186.61 248.71 155.84 59.11 34.76 24.32 73.11
2012 19.61 15.87 15.43 18.36 24.62 33.87 128.81 216.45 179.57 62.37 35.04 25.31 64.61
2013 20.67 20.35 21.55 23.5 30.99 94.22 241.45 225.1 119.85 68.12 41.66 31.16 78.22
Mean Monthly
21.89 20.12 20.43 23.20 28.38 50.47 120.68 157.90 113.68 56.01 33.81 25.66 56.61
Flow

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CHAMELIYA MONLTHY DISCHARGE: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Monthly Average Flow Data at Suni Gad Intake by Catchment Area Ratio Method

Reference Stn No. 120 Catchment Area at Chameliya (Reference Station) 1184 sq.km
Reference Stn name: Nayal Badi Catchment Area of Suni Gad Headworks 165.00 sq.km
Catchment Area Ratio 0.13936

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Annual Average
1965 2.91 2.91 3.54 3.61 5.30 9.60 10.66 8.12 7.39 5.31 3.40
1966 2.45 2.36 2.36 2.36 2.97 5.87 12.40 16.30 10.16 5.39 3.58 2.90 5.76
1967 2.63 2.09 1.87 2.34 2.86 4.32 13.70 16.72 11.20 6.35 4.58 4.01 6.06
1968 3.29 3.05 3.29 3.68 4.28 6.97 12.15 15.33 10.66 6.61 4.77 4.06 6.51
1969 3.54 3.16 3.36 4.49 15.47 13.88 7.55 5.00 3.80
1970 3.26 3.00 3.11 3.72 3.51 6.22 6.19 5.38 4.71
1971 2.93 2.84 3.23 3.86 4.10 22.30 23.13 25.36 19.23 10.20 6.97 5.62 10.81
1972 4.58 4.25 3.96 4.46 6.05 6.26 18.12 19.65 18.40 6.66 4.45 3.55 8.36
1973 3.05 2.86 3.01 3.07 3.54 10.26 15.19 21.60 17.42 11.12 4.92 3.41 8.29
1974 2.95 2.73 2.72 2.77 2.95 4.08 8.40 19.51 15.89 10.66 4.07 2.19 6.58
1975 2.01 1.67 2.03 2.42 2.69 7.48 18.81 17.14 19.09 7.37 4.07 2.76 7.30
1976 2.31 2.38 2.42 3.01 4.52 6.10 0.00 17.00 15.47 6.24 4.35 2.75
1977 2.33 2.13 2.08 1.83 2.13 8.04 19.23 24.67 19.23 8.38 5.02 3.39 8.20
1978 2.82 2.37 2.16 2.08 2.66 10.86 31.08 28.99 18.67 10.10 4.15 3.15 9.92
1979 3.02 2.80 2.42 2.10 3.54 8.65 22.58 25.64 11.73 6.02 4.22 3.36 8.01
1980 2.72 2.41 2.45 3.08 4.15 7.43 14.35 18.95 13.18 6.51 4.58 3.62 6.95
1981 3.16 2.90 2.97 3.61 4.25 7.58 19.23 20.63 10.10 5.56 4.03 3.08 7.26
1982 2.79 2.61 2.80 2.94 3.15 6.16 11.90 19.51 12.18 5.11 3.76 2.80 6.31
1984 2.76 2.55 2.56 2.51 3.16 9.27 13.77 13.82 11.23 6.93 3.53 2.91 6.25
1985 2.47 2.29 2.12 2.30 2.91 3.79 12.46 16.58 20.21 9.57 5.43 3.99 7.01
1986 3.18 2.63 2.49 3.02 4.52 5.89 17.00 17.00 10.23 5.85 3.73 2.75 6.53
1987 2.31 2.13 2.02 2.51 3.55 4.54 11.16 19.37 9.95 5.60 4.33 3.64 5.93
1988 3.18 2.84 3.21 3.46 4.08 5.10 11.80 13.02 7.48 5.78 4.19 3.48 5.64
1989 3.32 3.01 2.84 3.09 3.27 4.75 13.02 16.86 12.01 6.40 3.15 3.26 6.25
1990 2.63 2.41 2.73 3.67 5.37 6.05 13.62 20.21 12.05 7.41 4.28 3.11 6.96
1991 2.62 2.34 2.66 3.04 3.89 4.89 9.89 16.17 11.52 5.24 3.53 2.79 5.71
1992 2.63 2.48 2.26 2.42 2.77 3.00 4.70 12.18 15.61 8.45 4.39 3.23 5.34
1993 2.56 2.44 2.44 3.07 4.00 5.27 8.56 11.64 12.96 6.17 3.83 3.09 5.50
1994 2.69 2.55 2.51 2.49 3.25 4.67 11.92 15.89 10.81 4.93 3.43 2.88 5.67
1995 2.65 2.49 2.70 3.33 4.07 4.74 13.85 28.99 18.67 6.68 4.26 3.27 7.98
1996 2.79 2.56 2.80 3.29 3.78 7.07 18.67 28.15 20.21 8.39 4.64 3.37 8.81

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CA_RATIO_METHOD: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Annual Average
1997 3.25 2.80 2.52 2.97 3.37 4.88 15.05 20.35 18.40 7.32 4.39 3.76 7.42
1998 2.93 2.49 2.65 4.17 5.69 7.76 21.46 37.63 18.67 10.45 6.24 4.46 10.38
1999 3.58 3.08 2.90 3.25 3.44 7.64 24.81 25.78 18.81 11.52 5.98 4.19 9.58
2000 3.30 3.07 3.07 4.29 6.12 13.14 24.39 27.73 18.81 7.47 4.65 2.95 9.92
2001 2.80 2.41 2.33 2.79 4.46 9.63 25.64 24.11 12.78 6.95 4.63 3.50 8.50
2002 2.88 2.80 3.16 3.96 5.57 6.08 13.35 22.58 22.30 7.44 4.40 3.25 8.15
2003 2.76 2.69 2.90 3.58 3.90 6.20 19.93 25.78 23.69 9.24 4.84 3.55 9.09
2004 2.93 2.51 2.33 2.38 3.48 5.73 17.14 28.43 13.13 8.14 4.99 3.78 7.91
2005 3.32 3.30 3.90 4.10 4.58 5.74 21.04 25.92 17.28 9.42 5.23 3.83 8.97
2006 3.15 2.76 2.70 2.90 4.36 5.89 17.42 24.53 18.12 7.68 4.82 3.69 8.17
2007 6.31 6.86 7.22 6.88 6.72 8.56 17.56 22.02 15.19 8.40 6.48 5.76 9.83
2008 5.10 4.71 4.65 5.09 5.31 11.05 17.70 21.18 12.86 7.16 6.23 5.39 8.87
2009 3.48 3.02 2.77 2.99 3.38 4.52 14.68 28.02 21.25 16.22 6.62 4.42 9.28
2010 3.56 3.31 3.38 3.43 3.80 4.77 18.74 40.96 32.29 10.01 5.17 3.48 11.07
2011 2.78 2.48 2.53 3.02 4.34 8.26 26.01 34.66 21.72 8.24 4.84 3.39 10.19
2012 2.73 2.21 2.15 2.56 3.43 4.72 17.95 30.16 25.02 8.69 4.88 3.53 9.00
2013 2.88 2.84 3.00 3.27 4.32 13.13 33.65 31.37 16.70 9.49 5.81 4.34 10.90
Mean Monthly
3.06 2.81 2.84 3.20 4.01 6.82 16.73 22.79 16.37 7.93 4.65 3.49 7.95
Flows

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations CA_RATIO_METHOD: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Mean Monthly Flows and Flow Duration Curve (Catchment Area Ratio Method)

Discharge of
Sunigad
Month
Correlation with Hydrograph (CA Ratio Method)
Nayalbadi (m3/s) 25.00

Jan 3.06
20.00
Feb 2.81

Discharge m3/s
Mar 2.84
15.00
Apr 3.20
May 4.01 10.00
Jun 6.82
Jul 16.73 5.00
Aug 22.79
Sep 16.37 0.00
Oct 7.93 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Nov 4.65 Month
Dec 3.49
Annual average 7.89

Percentage of
Discharge (m3/s)
Exceedance, %
1% 36.09
5% 24.76
10% 18.67
15% 15.05 Flow duration curve (CA_Ratio Method)
40.00
20% 12.21
35.00
25% 9.59
30.00
30% 7.39
Discharge m3/s

35% 5.99 25.00

40% 5.09 20.00


45% 4.54 15.00
50% 4.17 10.00
55% 3.83 5.00
60% 3.54 -
65% 3.32 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
70% 3.14 % excedence
75% 2.98
80% 2.83
85% 2.66
90% 2.49
95% 2.34
100% 0.39

For the Detail Design of the Project, 3.95 m3/s of design discharge is adopted considering the
Note: power evation issue.

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 04_OUTPUT_CA_RATIO_METHOD: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: MIP Method

Region 1
Measured discharge 1.798 m3/s
Date of measurement March 6
Preceeding month 1.80
Current month 1.30
Next month 1.00
Corrected coefficient for 1.45
current month
Corrected dicharge 1.61 m3/s
April flow 1.24

Month Coefficient Predicted


Hydrograph*
Hydrograph (MIP)
35.000

m3/s 30.000
January 2.40 2.976 25.000

Discharge m3/s
February 1.80 2.232
March 1.30 1.612 20.000
April 1.00 1.240 15.000
May 2.30 2.852
June 6.00 7.440 10.000
July 14.50 17.980 5.000
August 25.00 31.000
September 16.50 20.460 0.000
October 8.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
9.920
November 4.10 5.084 Month
December 3.10 3.844

Flow duration curve Flow duration curve (MIP)


Probability Coefficients Discharge 35.00
% exceedence 30.00
P m3/s 25.00
Discharge m3/s

0% 100% 31.00 20.00


5% 95% 25.20 15.00
20% 80% 16.37 10.00
40% 60% 6.50
5.00
60% 40% 3.32
0.00
80% 20% 2.36 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
95% 5% 1.44 % excedence
100% 0% 1.24

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 05_MIP_March6: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: MIP Method

Region 1
Measured discharge 8.336 m3/s
Date of measurement May 28
Preceeding month 1.00
Current month 2.30
Next month 6.00
Corrected coefficient for 3.90
current month
Corrected dicharge 4.91 m3/s
April flow 2.14

Month Coefficient Predicted


Hydrograph*
Hydrograph (MIP)
60.000

m3/s 50.000
January 2.40 5.125

Discharge m3/s
February 1.80 3.844 40.000
March 1.30 2.776
April 1.00 30.000
2.136
May 2.30 4.912 20.000
June 6.00 12.814
July 14.50 30.966 10.000
August 25.00 53.390
September 16.50 35.238 0.000
October 8.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
17.085
November 4.10 8.756 Month
December 3.10 6.620

Flow duration curve Flow duration curve (MIP)


Probability Coefficients Discharge 60.00

% exceedence 50.00
P m3/s
Discharge m3/s

40.00
0% 100% 53.39
30.00
5% 95% 43.41
20% 80% 28.19 20.00
40% 60% 11.19 10.00
60% 40% 5.72
0.00
80% 20% 4.06 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
95% 5% 2.49 % excedence
100% 0% 2.14

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 06_MIP_May 28: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: MIP Method

Region 1
Measured discharge 4.345 m3/s
Date of measurement November 6
Preceeding month 8.00
Current month 4.10
Next month 3.10
Corrected coefficient for 5.27
current month
Corrected dicharge 3.38 m3/s
April flow 0.82

Month Coefficient Predicted


Hydrograph*
Hydrograph (MIP)
25.000

m3/s
20.000
January 2.40 1.979

Discharge m3/s
February 1.80 1.484
15.000
March 1.30 1.072
April 1.00 0.824
May 2.30 10.000
1.896
June 6.00 4.947
July 14.50 11.955 5.000
August 25.00 20.612
September 16.50 13.604 0.000
October 8.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
6.596
November 4.10 3.380 Month
December 3.10 2.556

Flow duration curve


Flow duration curve (MIP)
Probability Coefficients Discharge 25.00
% exceedence
20.00
P m3/s
Discharge m3/s

0% 100% 20.61 15.00


5% 95% 16.76
10.00
20% 80% 10.88
40% 60% 4.32 5.00
60% 40% 2.21
80% 20% 1.57 0.00
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
95% 5% 0.96
% excedence
100% 0% 0.82

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 07_MIP_Nov 06: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: MIP Method

Region 1
Measured discharge 2.711 m3/s
Date of measurement January 29
Preceeding month 3.10
Current month 2.40
Next month 1.80
Corrected coefficient for 2.12
current month
Corrected dicharge 3.07 m3/s
April flow 1.28

Month Coefficient Predicted Hydrograph*


Hydrograph (MIP)
35.000
m3/s
January 2.40 30.000
3.069
February 1.80 2.302 25.000

Discharge m3/s
March 1.30 1.662
20.000
April 1.00 1.279
May 2.30 2.941 15.000
June 6.00 7.673 10.000
July 14.50 18.542
August 25.00 5.000
31.969
September 16.50 21.100 0.000
October 8.00 10.230 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
November 4.10 5.243 Month
December 3.10 3.964

Flow duration curve Flow duration curve (MIP)


Probability Coefficients Discharge 35.00
% exceedence 30.00
P m3/s 25.00
Discharge m3/s

0% 100% 31.97 20.00


5% 95% 25.99 15.00
20% 80% 16.88 10.00
40% 60% 6.70
5.00
60% 40% 3.43
0.00
80% 20% 2.43 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
95% 5% 1.49 % excedence
100% 0% 1.28

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 08_MIP_Jan 29: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: MIP Method

Measurement
6-Mar-17 28-May-18 6-Nov-17 29-Jan-18
Date
Measured
1.798 8.336 4.345 2.711
Discharge(m3/s)
April Flow 1.24 2.14 0.82 1.28
Predicted Hydrograph*
Month Average at
Derived Flow at Suni Gad Intake, m3/s
SGHP Intake
January 2.98 5.13 1.98 3.07 3.29
February 2.23 3.84 1.48 2.30 2.47
March 1.61 2.78 1.07 1.66 1.78
April 1.24 2.14 0.82 1.28 1.37
May 2.85 4.91 1.90 2.94 3.15
June 7.44 12.81 4.95 7.67 8.22
July 17.98 30.97 11.95 18.54 19.86
August 31.00 53.39 20.61 31.97 34.24
September 20.46 35.24 13.60 21.10 22.60
October 9.92 17.08 6.60 10.23 10.96
November 5.08 8.76 3.38 5.24 5.62
December 3.84 6.62 2.56 3.96 4.25

Hydrograph (MIP)
40.00
35.00
30.00
Discharge m3/s

25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
-
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Month

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 09_MIP Comparison: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Average
%Exceedence Flow at
SGHP Intake
0% 53.39
5% 31.63
10% 24.06 Flow duration curve (MIP)
15% 20.36 60.00
20% 17.62
50.00
25% 13.01

Discharge m3/s
30% 10.20 40.00
35% 8.27
40% 6.78 30.00
45% 5.23
20.00
50% 5.02
55% 4.11 10.00
60% 3.75
-
65% 3.02 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
70% 2.86 % excedence
75% 2.49
80% 2.17
85% 1.90
90% 1.57
95% 1.25
100% 0.82

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 09_MIP Comparison: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: MHSP Method (Medium Hydropower Study Project)_Intake_SGHP

Estimation of Hydrological Parameters (MHSP Method)


Catchment Area for: Discharge calculations
Region Western
2
Catchment Area at Intake 165.00 m
2
Area below 5000 m 162.00 m
2
Area Below 3000 m 21.00 m
Mean Monsoon Precipitation (MMP) 1430 mm
Monsoon Wetness Index (MWI) 1200.00

Mean Monthly Flows


Month Discharge Hydrograph (MHSP)
(m3/s) 30.00

Jan 2.57
25.00
Feb 2.11
Mar 1.93
Discharge m3/s

20.00
Apr 2.35
May 2.67 15.00

Jun 8.17
10.00
Jul 23.65
Aug 28.41 5.00
Sep 22.19
Oct 10.50 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Nov 5.07
Month
Dec 3.28
Average Annual 9.41

Flood Flow
Return Flow
Period K b (m3/s) Remarks
5 2.041 0.863 167.476
20 3.290 0.851 253.635 Constants
50 4.257 0.844 317.356 depend on
100 5.223 0.835 371.468 Regions
1000 9.229 0.815 591.508 Specified
10000 14.458 0.806 887.290

Flow duration curve (MHSP)


Flow Duration Curve 60.00

Flow exceedence Flow (m3/s) 50.00


0 170.69
Discharge m3/s

40.00
25.00 11.79
45.00 4.17 30.00
65.00 2.51
20.00
85.00 1.64
95.00 1.12 10.00
100 0.29
-
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
% excedence

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 10_MHSP @ Intake: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Hydest Method (WECS/DHM,1990)_Intake_SGHP

Basin Area fo Intake ,A 165.00 Km2 Area >100, ok!


Basin Area below 5000 masl, 162.00 Km2
A5
Basin Area below 3000 masl, 21.00 Km2
A3
Monsoon wetness index, 1200.00 mm
MWI
Month Coefficients Mean
Monthly flow*
Hydrograph (HYDEST)
30.00
C A1 A2 A3 m3/s
January 0.01423 0.0000 0.9777 0.0000 2.07 25.00
February 0.01219 0.0000 0.9766 0.0000 1.76

Discharge m3/s
March 0.00999 0.0000 0.9948 0.0000 1.59 20.00
April 0.00797 0.0000 1.0435 0.0000 1.62
15.00
May 0.00843 0.0000 1.0898 0.0000 2.17
June 0.00694 0.9968 0.0000 0.2610 7.17 10.00
July 0.02123 0.0000 1.0093 0.2523 21.71
August 0.02548 0.0000 0.9963 0.2620 26.12 5.00
September 0.01677 0.0000 0.9894 0.2878 19.93
October 0.00972 0.0000 0.9880 0.2508 8.83 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
November 0.00176 0.9605 0.0000 0.3910 3.80
Month
December 0.00149 0.9536 0.0000 0.3607 2.49
*Mean monthly flow = C*(area of Basin)^A1*(Area below 5000+1)^A2*(Monsoon wetness index)^A3 8.27
**Predicted hydrograph=Non dimensional hydrograph*Average annual flow
Flow duation curve (HYDEST)
60.00
Flow duration curve
Probabiliy Coefficients Discharge 50.00
% exceedence a b c d Q=e^a*A^b*(A5+1)^c*MWI^d

Discharge m3/s
40.00
P m3/s
30.00
0 -3.53 0.00 0.94 0.37 49.57
5 -3.50 0.00 0.98 0.27 29.79 20.00
20 -5.44 0.98 0.00 0.44 14.96
10.00
40 -5.95 1.01 0.00 0.32 4.39
60 -6.48 1.00 0.00 0.30 2.14 0.00
80 -4.85 0.00 1.04 0.00 1.54 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
95 -5.47 0.00 1.08 0.00 1.02 % excedence
100 -0.10 0.00 0.08 0.00 1.37

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 11_WECS-HYDEST @ Intake: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Flood Analysis
Instantaneous Daily
m3/s m3/s
Q2 28.34 15.50
Q100 141.53 56.43
Return period Standard Coefficient Instantaneo Coefficient Daily
normal variate us discharge Instantaneous Flood frequency
discharge 400.00
T(x) for instantaneous s1 c1=ln(Q100/Q2)/ Q=exp(ln c2=ln(Q100/Q2)/ Q=exp(ln Instantaneous discharge
2.326 Q2+c1*s) 2.326 Q2+c2*s) 350.00
Years m3/s Daily
0 discharge 0
300.00

Discharge m3/s
2 0.00 28.34 15.50 0 #N/A
250.00
5 0.84 50.73 24.74
10 1.28 68.77 31.59 200.00 0 #N/A
20 1.65 88.38 38.65 150.00 0 #N/A
50 2.05 117.27 48.51 100.00
100 2.33 0.6914 141.53 0.5556 56.43
50.00
200 2.58 168.23 64.84
500 2.88 207.01 76.59 0.00
1 10 100 1000 10000
1000 3.09 240.02 86.26
Return period, Years
5000 3.54 327.62 110.77
10000 3.72 370.78 122.35

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 11_WECS-HYDEST @ Intake: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Modified Hydest Method (DHM 2004)_Intake_SGHP

Basin Area ,A 165.00 Km2 Area >100, ok!


Basin Area below 162.00 Km2
5000 masl, A5
Basin Area below 21.00 Km2
3000 masl, A3
Monsoon wetness 1200.00 mm
index, MWI

Average basin elevation 3500 m

Mean Monthly Flow


Coef. Of Coef. Of
Coef. of Avg. Coef. Of Area Mean Monthly
Month Constant Annual Area below
Elvevation below 3000 m flow*
precitiation 5000 m
Hydrograph (HYDEST)
1 2 3 4 5 m3/s 14.00
Jan -16.7 1.36 0.47 0.82 - 1.26
12.00
Feb -17.2 1.42 0.456 0.814 - 1.10
2.38 10.00
Mar 0.384 - - - 0.091

Discharge m3/s
Apr 0.181 - - - 0.104 2.26 8.00
May 0.0001 - - - 0.136 3.00 6.00
Jun -19.5 1.61 0.709 0.872 - 3.74
4.00
Jul -16.3 1.26 0.759 0.884 - 7.81
Aug -14.7 1.24 0.622 0.871 - 11.95 2.00
Sep -13.7 1.09 0.594 0.872 - 7.86 0.00
Oct -15.3 1.21 0.6 0.846 - 4.07 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Nov -16.7 1.36 0.543 0.826 - 2.14 Month
Dec -17 1.39 0.504 0.822 - 1.52

Flow duration curve


Flow duration curve (MIP)
12.00
Month Constant Coef. of Avg. Coef. Of Coef. Of Area Coef. Of Discharge
Elevation Annual below 3000 m Area below 10.00
precitiation 5000 m

Discharge m3/s
8.00
m3/s
0 -12.8 0.366 - 0.529 - 127.17 6.00
5 -13.6 1.108 0.607 0.874 - 11.09
20 -17 1.359 0.716 0.883 - 6.39 4.00
40 -19 1.554 0.656 0.859 - 2.58 2.00
60 -18.3 1.535 0.513 0.832 - 1.49
80 -19.4 1.589 0.559 0.834 - 1.07 0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
95 -21.2 1.732 0.598 0.842 - 0.77
100 -2.18 - 0.048 - 0.077 0.21 % excedence

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations Modified_Hydest @ Intake: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Flood Analysis
Instantaneous
m3/s
Q2 31.40
Q100 185.34
Return period Standard Coefficient Instantaneous
normal variate discharge
Instantaneous Flood frequency
600.00
T(x) for instantaneous c1=ln(Q100/Q2)/2.3 Q=exp(ln Q2+c1*s) Instantaneous
s1 26 500.00 discharge
Years m3/s

Discharge m3/s
2 0.00 31.40 400.00
5 0.84 59.71
300.00
10 1.28 83.54
20 1.65 110.21
200.00
50 2.05 150.59
100 2.33 0.7633 185.34 100.00
200 2.58 224.30
500 2.88 282.02 0.00
1000 3.09 332.06 1 10 100 1000 10000
5000 3.54 468.15 Return period, Years
10000 3.72 536.69

Low Flow Estimation


Return Period Day Const. Cd,T Coef. Fd,T Discharge, m3/s
1 0.2144 0.0815 1.57
2 7 0.2362 0.083 1.67
30 0.3026 0.0854 1.93
Monthly 0.3397 0.086 2.06
1 0.0859 0.0729 1.03
7 0.092 0.0748 1.09
10
30 0.1807 0.0766 1.34
Monthly 0.2138 0.0777 1.45
1 0.0698 0.0703 0.93
7 0.0662 0.0726 0.98
20
30 0.1609 0.0742 1.22
Monthly 0.1945 0.0754 1.33

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations Modified_Hydest @ Intake: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title:Hydrological Calculations
Job: Mean Monthly Flow Comparison

Modified Hydest / Catchment Area Ratio Adopted Mean


MIP MHSP WECS/Hydest
Month DHM 2004 with Chameliya River Monthly Flow

m3/s m3/s m3/s m3/s m3/s m3/s


Jan 3.29 2.57 2.07 1.26 3.06 3.06
Feb 2.47 2.11 1.76 1.10 2.81 2.81
Mar 1.78 1.93 1.59 2.38 2.84 2.84
Apr 1.37 2.35 1.62 2.26 3.20 3.20
May 3.15 2.67 2.17 3.00 4.01 4.01
Jun 8.22 8.17 7.17 3.74 6.82 6.82
Jul 19.86 23.65 21.71 7.81 16.73 16.73
Aug 34.24 28.41 26.12 11.95 22.79 22.79
Sep 22.60 22.19 19.93 7.86 16.37 16.37
Oct 10.96 10.50 8.83 4.07 7.93 7.93
Nov 5.62 5.07 3.80 2.14 4.65 4.65
Dec 4.25 3.28 2.49 1.52 3.49 3.49
Annual
9.82 9.41 8.27 4.09 7.93 7.93
Average

Mean Monthly Flows by Different Methods


40.00
MIP

35.00 MHSP

30.00 WECS/Hydest
Discharge, m3/s

25.00 Modified Hydest / DHM 2004

20.00 Catchment Area Ratio with Chameliya River

15.00

10.00

5.00

-
WECS/Hydest
Months

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 13_Mean Monthly Flow All: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Meteorological Calculations


Job: Precipitaion Data

Lattitude (deg/minute) : 2933


Longitude (deg/minute) : 8113
Elevation (m) 1304
Rainfall in (mm) for CHAINPUR WEST

Monsoon
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Precipitation
1965 36.2 202 188.4 32.5 6.4 146.4 316 365.2 134.6 50.3 33 0 1511 962.2
1966 0 77.8 6.3 0 48.3 187.8 307.4 323.8 93.4 22 11.4 6.4 1084.6 912.4
1967 0 27.7 63.5 28.9 7.1 78.9 393 308.2 166.3 10.1 16.7 26.3 1126.7 946.4
1968 120.2 53.1 67.5 23.5 9.4 183.8 338.2 296.6 169.8 0 0 48.1 1310.2 988.4
1969 70.7 39.7 65.6 45.7 28 123.7 385.9 368.4 262.3 11 0 0 1401 1140.3
1970 100.3 29.6 21.8 3.5 65.8 306.8 406 254.4 112.6 43.1 0 0 1343.9 1079.8
1971 34.7 48.4 32.8 118.7 24.8 271 218.8 271.3 271.6 110.4 4.3 0 1406.8 1032.7
1972 4.3 80.2 46.5 58.2 18.9 53 427.7 313.9 163.4 57.6 0.7 0 1224.4 958
1973 71.3 31.4 52.3 1 67.2 302 268.4 417.4 248.1 105 1.1 0 1565.2 1235.9
1974 54.4 41 5.4 5.2 38.2 86.8 249.2 320.3 67.1 45.1 2.1 37.4 952.2 723.4
1975 100.2 54.4 54.9 1.2 36.8 363 297.9 260.7 354.9 56.3 0 1 1581.3 1276.5
1976 10.6 102.4 26.2 32.7 38.7 115.4 177 415.7 178.5 6.2 0 10.4 1113.8 886.6
1977 56.9 20.1 8.4 89.3 113.2 162.5 427.4 237.5 187.3 63.6 2 53.9 1422.1 1014.7
1978 13.1 75.2 131.6 84 81.1 199.5 340.1 290.5 145.4 8 30.1 17 1415.6 975.5
1979 27.1 66.9 49.5 95.4 100.7 81.3 354 252.6 29.7 20 0 52.6 1129.8 717.6
1980 26.2 44.4 99.1 52.9 45.6 315.3 336.4 324 291 37.6 0 23 1595.5 1266.7
1981 106.3 40.2 78.2 39.6 100.8 149.4 416.8 387.6 238.1 0 60.7 27.4 1645.1 1191.9
1982 84.7 69.6 191.8 106.8 100.5 112.8 354.8 477.5 97.1 31.3 9.1 25.5 1661.5 1042.2
1983 67.8 18.8 64.9 175.7 186.8 171.5 240.4 519.8 437 110.1 0 12.2 2005 1368.7
1984 28.6 154.8 40.2 36.8 33.9 345.1 282.1 288.1 261.8 7.5 0 16.8 1495.7 1177.1
1985 34.1 7.6 4.2 43.4 63.4 76.7 507.5 307.9 269.9 265.3 3 92 1675 1162
1986 2 17.5 69.8 80.3 155.3 125.4 492 329.2 185.9 95.5 24 85.2 1662.1 1132.5
1987 23 67.9 27.8 72.3 142.3 64.8 370.5 350.2 189.9 14.5 0 26.1 1349.3 975.4
1988 11.8 111 110.4 22 20.6 95 553.2 443.3 116.3 4.3 3.2 118.4 1609.5 1207.8
1989 168.5 27.8 47.9 7.5 35.6 140.1 331.9 551.2 202.7 11.1 19.3 3.5 1547.1 1225.9
1990 0 126.4 191.9 34 47.5 175 422 462.3 276.9 17.5 6.2 44.2 1803.9 1336.2
1991 40.2 81 115.8 67.5 63.1 220.5 285.4 581.1 163.8 3.6 8.2 27.6 1657.8 1250.8
1992 103.9 33.6 31 37.6 58.7 104.9 334.2 482.7 201.4 50.2 16.5 0.3 1455 1123.2
1993 72.9 62.9 154.1 19.9 154.4 DNA 184.3 253.5 250.3 0 0 0 1152.3 688.1
1994 39 142.3 1.5 50.2 42.2 211.4 335.6 339.2 129.4 3.2 0 4.8 1298.8 1015.6

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 14_Precipitation Data: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Monsoon
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Precipitation
1995 105.4 109.9 63.7 20 31.6 173.1 532.6 372.1 207.3 21.4 37 2.8 1676.9 1285.1
1996 61.6 104.9 49.1 36.8 29.7 120.2 501 441.9 217.3 87.4 0 0 1649.9 1280.4
1997 58.5 21.7 20.4 75.3 53.3 161.8 507.5 417.4 240.2 31.8 48.6 131.6 1768.1 1326.9
1998 0.4 70.8 117.2 66 46.5 184.7 431.3 510.6 158.1 56.8 23.4 0 1665.8 1284.7
1999 20.4 18.6 2 0 38.6 286.7 515.7 275.1 185.3 80.1 0 15.1 1437.6 1262.8
2000 12.2 94.3 37.9 49.9 204.8 435.1 277.3 440.5 257.2 0.6 0 0 1809.8 1410.1
2001 64.6 43 53.4 24.6 103.5 277.8 396.8 281.2 59.6 14.7 2.6 0 1321.8 1015.4
2002 97.8 137.5 55.1 90.2 60.1 157.5 407.1 540.5 287.5 16 3.7 0 1853 1392.6
2003 48.4 118.4 53.9 26.2 40.8 243.4 407.5 473.8 321.4 0 3.4 10.1 1747.3 1446.1
2004 69.6 5.8 0 54 82 118.7 410.8 284.4 194 77.6 16.8 3 1316.7 1007.9
2005 117.9 78.2 16.8 6.9 55.5 110.8 410 348 263.7 9.7 0.5 26.9 1444.9 1132.5
2006 0 4.8 94.5 148.2 70.3 126.4 417.6 325 196.1 48.9 15.8 19.5 1467.1 1065.1
2007 0 93.3 171.5 18.9 30.9 121.4 376.2 405.1 335.3 27.8 15.8 23.4 1619.6 1238
2008 24 9.5 14.7 41.7 87.2 335.5 458 387.9 277.1 10.8 7.5 0 1653.9 1458.5
2009 3.5 31.3 50.6 44.1 84.9 58.4 377.2 452.5 264.2 273.6 31.8 0.8 1672.9 1152.3
2010 9.3 93.4 8 10.6 30.3 93.8 390.5 500.8 239 5.7 0 0.1 1381.5 1224.1
Mean 47.88 65.02 62.13 47.38 64.9 177.22 373.29 375.02 208.69 43.98 9.97 21.6 1493.24 1134.22
Max 168.5 202 191.9 175.7 204.8 435.1 553.2 581.1 437 273.6 60.7 131.6 2005 2006.4
Min 0 4.8 0 0 6.4 53 177 237.5 29.7 0 0 0 952.2 497.2

Monthly Precipitation
400

350
Mean Monthly rainfall in mm

300

250

200

150

100

50

0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 14_Precipitation Data: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Maximum Instantanious flow Recorded at Chameliya Reference Station
Year Discharge (m3/s) Gauge Height (m) Date
1965 119 2.2 18/07/1965
1966 226 3.1 18/07/1966
1967 187 2.8 18/07/1967
1968 222 3.05 18/07/1968
1969 182 2.72 18/07/1969
1970 341
1971 523 4.8 14/06/1971
1972 309 3.65 14/09/1972
1973 270 3.4 7/8/1973
1974 202 2.88 5/8/1974
1975 333 3.8 22/06/1975
1976 212 2.95 2/8/1976
1977 404 4.2 15/08/1977
1978 359 3.95 11/7/1978
1979 254 3.29 20/07/1979
1980 270 3.4 4/8/1980
1981 242 3.2 14/07/1981
1982 209 2.92 13/08/1982
1984 122 2.05 24/07/1984
1985 190 2.76 5/9/1985
1986 168 2.53 16/07/1986
1987 248 3.25 25/07/1987
1988 212 2.95 6/7/1988
1989 206 2.9 22/08/1989
1990 242 3.2 7/8/1990
1991 173 2.6 2/9/1991
1992 157 2.45 4/9/1992
1993 172 2.63 7/8/1993
1994 210 2.95 31/07/1994
1995 194 2.82 22/07/1995
1996 417 3 20/08/1996
1997 501 3.3 3/8/1997
1998 403 2.84 10/8/1998
1999 478 3.12 4/7/1999
2000 643 3.75 8/6/2000
2001 408 2.85 26/07/2001
2002 310 2.43 6/9/2002
2003 347 2.6 21/08/2003
2004 338 2.55 9/8/2004
2005 338 2.55 6/8/2005
2006 360 2.65 28/08/2006
2007 360 2.65 16/08/2007
2008 408 2.85 20/09/2008
2009 464 4.82 6/10/2009
2010 472 4.85 3/9/2010
2011 392 4.55 1/8/2011
2012 331 4.3 29/07/2012
2013 458 4.8 24/07/2013
Max 643 4.8 8/6/2000
Mean 285
Min 119 18/07/1965

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 15_Instant_Max_Flow_Chameliya: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Flood Calculations by Gumbel's Method

Catchment Area of Reference Station (Chameliya River)=1184 sq. km.


Catchment Area of Suni Gad Intake= 165 sq. km.
Catchment Area of Suni Gad Powerhouse= 202 sq. km.

Return
Year Discharge Rank Period
m3/s m (T=n+1/m)(xi-Xm)^2
1965 119 48 1.02 34178.77 Table 7.3 REDUCED MEAN yn IN GUMBEL'S EXTREME VALUE DISTRIBUTION
1966 226 31 1.58 6064.52 N = Sample size
1967 187 41 1.20 13659.77 N 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1968 222 32 1.53 6703.52 10 0.4952 0.4996 0.5035 0.5070 0.5100 0.5128 0.5157 0.5181 0.5202 0.5220
1969 182 42 1.17 14853.52 20 0.5236 0.5252 0.5268 0.5283 0.5296 0.5309 0.5320 0.5332 0.5343 0.5353
1970 341 18 2.72 1378.27 30 0.5362 0.5371 0.5380 0.5388 0.5396 0.5402 0.5410 0.5418 0.5424 0.5430
1971 523 2 24.50 48015.77 40 0.5436 0.5442 0.5448 0.5453 0.5458 0.5463 0.5468 0.5473 0.5477 0.5481
1972 309 24 2.04 26.27 50 0.5485 0.5489 0.5493 0.5497 0.5501 0.5504 0.5508 0.5511 0.5515 0.5518
1973 270 25 1.96 1147.52 60 0.5521 0.5524 0.5527 0.5530 0.5533 0.5535 0.5538 0.5540 0.5543 0.5545
1974 202 38 1.29 10378.52 70 0.5548 0.5550 0.5552 0.5555 0.5557 0.5559 0.5561 0.5563 0.5565 0.5567
1975 333 21 2.33 848.27 80 0.5569 0.5570 0.5572 0.5574 0.5576 0.5578 0.5580 0.5581 0.5583 0.5585
1976 212 33 1.48 8441.02 90 0.5586 0.5587 0.5589 0.5591 0.5592 0.5593 0.5595 0.5596 0.5598 0.5599
1977 404 11 4.45 10025.02 100 0.5600
1978 359 16 3.06 3038.77
1979 254 27 1.81 2487.52
1980 270 25 1.96 1147.52 Table 7.4 REDUCED STANDARD DEVIATION Sn IN GUMBEL'S EXTREME VALUE DISTRIBUTION
1981 242 29 1.69 3828.52 N = Sample size
1982 209 36 1.36 9001.27 N 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1984 122 47 1.04 33078.52 10 0.9496 0.9676 0.9833 0.9971 1.0095 1.0206 1.0316 1.0411 1.0493 1.0565
1985 190 40 1.23 12967.52 20 1.0628 1.0696 1.0754 1.0811 1.0864 1.0915 1.0961 1.1004 1.1047 1.1086
1986 168 45 1.09 18462.02 30 1.1124 1.1159 1.1193 1.1226 1.1255 1.1285 1.1313 1.1339 1.1363 1.1388
1987 248 28 1.75 3122.02 40 1.1413 1.1436 1.1458 1.1480 1.1499 1.1519 1.1538 1.1557 1.1574 1.1590
1988 212 33 1.48 8441.02 50 1.1607 1.1623 1.1638 1.1658 1.1667 1.1681 1.1696 1.1708 1.1721 1.1734
1989 206 37 1.32 9579.52 60 1.1747 1.1759 1.1770 1.1782 1.1793 1.1803 1.1814 1.1824 1.1834 1.1844
1990 242 29 1.69 3828.52 70 1.1854 1.1863 1.1873 1.1881 1.1890 1.1898 1.1906 1.1915 1.1923 1.1930
1991 173 43 1.14 17128.27 80 1.1938 1.1945 1.1953 1.1959 1.1967 1.1973 1.1980 1.1987 1.1994 1.2001
1992 157 46 1.07 21572.27 90 1.2007 1.2013 1.2020 1.2026 1.2032 1.2038 1.2044 1.2049 1.2055 1.2060
1993 172 44 1.11 17391.02 100 1.2065
1994 210 35 1.40 8812.52
1995 194 39 1.26 12072.52 Source: Engineering Hydrology, K Subramanya, Page 257
1996 417 8 6.13 12797.27
1997 501 3 16.33 38858.27

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 16_Gumbel_Method: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

1998 403 12 4.08 9825.77


1999 478 4 12.25 30319.52
2000 643 1 49.00 115005.77
2001 408 9 5.44 10842.02
2002 310 23 2.13 37.52
2003 347 17 2.88 1859.77
2004 338 19 2.58 1164.52
2005 338 19 2.58 1164.52
2006 360 14 3.50 3150.02
2007 360 14 3.50 3150.02
2008 408 9 5.44 10842.02
2009 464 6 8.17 25640.02
2010 472 5 9.80 28266.02
2011 392 13 3.77 7766.02
2012 331 22 2.23 735.77
2013 458 7 7.00 23754.52
Sum 14586.00 219.563 666859.25

n 48
Mean (Xm) 303.88
Standard Deviation (σn-1) 119.12

For n = 48 Years
Yn 0.5477 See Table 7.3
Sn 1.1574 See Table 7.4

Return
Q (m3/s) at referance Q (m3/s) at Suni Q (m3/s) at Suni
Period (T YT K
station, Chameliya River Gad Intake Gad Powerhouse
years)

2 0.367 -0.157 285.228 39.749 48.662


5 1.500 0.823 401.876 56.005 68.563
10 2.250 1.471 479.107 66.768 81.740
20 2.970 2.093 553.190 77.091 94.379
25 3.199 2.290 576.689 80.366 98.388
50 3.902 2.898 649.081 90.455 110.739
100 4.600 3.501 720.939 100.469 122.998
200 5.296 4.102 792.534 110.446 135.213
500 6.214 4.895 886.990 123.609 151.328
1000 6.907 5.495 958.378 133.558 163.507

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 16_Gumbel_Method: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Flood Calculations by Log Pearson and Log Normal Method
Catchment Area of Reference Station (Chameliya River)= 1184 sq. km.
Catchment Area of Suni Gad Intake= 165 sq. km.
Catchment Area of Suni Gad Powerhouse= 202 sq. km.

2 3
Year Discharge Rank z=LogX (zi-Z) (zi-Z) TABLE 7.6: KZ = F(CS,T) FOR USE IN LOG-PEARSON TYPE III DISTRIBUTION
m3/s m
1965 119 48 2.076 0.140 -0.052 Coeff. of Recurrence interval T in years
1966 226 31 2.354 0.009 -0.001 skew, Cs 2 10 25 50 100 200 1000
1967 187 41 2.272 0.032 -0.006 3.0 -0.396 1.180 2.278 3.152 4.051 4.970 7.250
1968 222 32 2.346 0.011 -0.001 2.5 -0.360 1.250 2.262 3.048 3.845 4.652 6.600
1969 182 42 2.260 0.036 -0.007 2.2 -0.330 1.284 2.240 2.970 3.705 4.444 6.200
1970 341 18 2.533 0.007 0.001 2.0 -0.307 1.302 2.219 2.912 3.605 4.298 5.910
1971 523 2 2.719 0.072 0.019 1.8 -0.282 1.318 2.193 2.848 3.499 4.147 5.660
1972 309 24 2.490 0.002 0.000 1.6 -0.254 1.329 2.163 2.780 3.388 3.990 5.390
1973 270 25 2.431 0.000 0.000 1.4 -0.225 1.337 2.128 2.706 3.271 3.828 5.110
1974 202 38 2.305 0.021 -0.003 1.2 -0.195 1.340 2.087 2.626 3.149 3.661 4.820
1975 333 21 2.522 0.005 0.000 1.0 -0.164 1.340 2.043 2.542 3.022 3.489 4.540
1976 212 33 2.326 0.015 -0.002 0.9 -0.148 1.339 2.018 2.498 2.957 3.401 4.395
1977 404 11 2.606 0.025 0.004 0.8 -0.132 1.336 1.998 2.453 2.891 3.312 4.250
1978 359 16 2.555 0.011 0.001 0.7 -0.116 1.333 1.967 2.407 2.824 3.223 4.105
1979 254 27 2.405 0.002 0.000 0.6 -0.099 1.328 1.939 2.359 2.755 3.132 3.960
1980 270 25 2.431 0.000 0.000 0.5 -0.083 1.323 1.910 2.311 2.686 3.041 3.815
1981 242 29 2.384 0.004 0.000 0.4 -0.066 1.317 1.880 2.261 2.615 2.949 3.670
1982 209 36 2.320 0.017 -0.002 0.3 -0.050 1.309 1.849 2.211 2.544 2.856 3.525
1984 122 47 2.086 0.132 -0.048 0.2 -0.033 1.301 1.818 2.159 2.472 2.763 3.380
1985 190 40 2.279 0.029 -0.005 0.1 -0.017 1.292 1.785 2.107 2.400 2.670 3.235
1986 168 45 2.225 0.050 -0.011 0.0 0.000 1.282 1.751 2.054 2.326 2.576 3.090
1987 248 28 2.394 0.003 0.000 -0.1 0.017 1.207 1.716 2.000 2.252 2.482 2.950
1988 212 33 2.326 0.015 -0.002 -0.2 0.033 1.258 1.680 1.945 2.178 2.388 2.810
1989 206 37 2.314 0.018 -0.002 -0.3 0.050 1.245 1.643 1.890 2.104 2.294 2.675
1990 242 29 2.384 0.004 0.000 -0.4 0.066 1.231 1.606 1.834 2.029 2.201 2.540
1991 173 43 2.238 0.045 -0.009 -0.5 0.083 1.216 1.567 1.777 1.955 2.108 2.400
1992 157 46 2.196 0.064 -0.016 -0.6 0.099 1.200 1.528 1.720 1.880 2.016 2.275
1993 172 44 2.236 0.046 -0.010 -0.7 0.116 1.183 1.488 1.663 1.806 1.926 2.150
1994 210 35 2.322 0.016 -0.002 -0.8 0.132 1.166 1.448 1.606 1.733 1.837 2.035
1995 194 39 2.288 0.026 -0.004 -0.9 0.148 1.147 1.407 1.549 1.660 1.749 1.910
1996 417 8 2.620 0.029 0.005 -1.0 0.164 1.128 1.366 1.492 1.588 1.664 1.880
1997 501 3 2.700 0.063 0.016 -1.4 0.225 1.041 1.198 1.270 1.318 1.351 1.465
1998 403 12 2.605 0.024 0.004 -1.8 0.282 0.945 1.035 1.069 1.087 1.097 1.130
1999 478 4 2.679 0.053 0.012 -2.2 0.330 0.844 0.888 0.900 0.905 0.907 0.910
2000 643 1 2.808 0.129 0.046 -3.0 0.396 0.660 0.666 0.666 0.667 0.667 0.668
2001 408 9 2.611 0.026 0.004
2002 310 23 2.491 0.002 0.000 [Note: Cs = 0 corresponds to log-normal distribution]
2003 347 17 2.540 0.008 0.001
2004 338 19 2.529 0.006 0.001
2005 338 19 2.529 0.006 0.001
2006 360 14 2.556 0.011 0.001
2007 360 14 2.556 0.011 0.001
2008 408 9 2.611 0.026 0.004
2009 464 6 2.667 0.047 0.010
2010 472 5 2.674 0.050 0.011
2011 392 13 2.593 0.021 0.003
2012 331 22 2.520 0.005 0.000
2013 458 7 2.661 0.045 0.009
Sum 14586 117.575 1.421 -0.030

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 17_Log Pearson III and Normal: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

n 48
Mean (Z) 2.449
Standard Deviation (σn-1) 0.174
Coeff. Of Skewness (Cs) -0.125

Log Pearson III Distribution Method Log Pearson III Distribution

Q (m3/s) at Q (m3/s) at Q (m3/s) at 140.00


Return 120.00

Discharge (Q m3/s)
K K*σ ZT=Z+K*σ referance station, Suni Gad Suni Gad
Period (T) 100.00
Chameliya River Intake Powerhouse
80.00
2 0.021 0.004 2.453 283.885 39.56 48.43 60.00
10 1.220 0.212 2.662 458.745 63.93 78.27 40.00
25 1.707 0.297 2.746 557.534 77.70 95.12 20.00
50 1.986 0.345 2.795 623.476 86.89 106.37 -
100 2.233 0.388 2.838 688.343 95.93 117.44 1 10 100 1000
200 2.458 0.427 2.877 753.218 104.97 128.51 Return Periods (T years)
1000 2.915 0.507 2.956 904.237 126.01 154.27

Normal Distribution
Log Normal Distribution Method
151.00
Q (m3/s) at Q (m3/s) at Q (m3/s) at

Discharge (Q m3/s)
Return
K K*σ ZT=Z+K*σ referance station, Suni Gad Suni Gad Remarks
Period (T) 101.00
Chameliya River Intake Powerhouse
2 0.000 0.000 2.449 281.507 48.03 48.03 51.00
10 1.282 0.223 2.672 470.311 65.54 80.24 Coeff. Of
25 1.751 0.304 2.754 567.451 79.08 96.81 Skewness = 0
1.00
50 2.054 0.357 2.807 640.634 89.28 109.30 for Normal
1 10 100 1000
100 2.326 0.404 2.854 714.334 99.55 121.87 Distribution
Return Periods (T years)
200 2.576 0.448 2.897 789.529 110.03 134.70
1000 3.090 0.537 2.987 969.918 135.17 165.48

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 17_Log Pearson III and Normal: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: MHSP Method (Medium Hydropower Study Project)_Powerhouse_SGHP

Estimation of Hydrological Parameters (MHSP Method)


Catchment Area for: Flood Calculations
Region Western
2
Catchment Area at Powerhouse 202.00 m
2
Area below 5000 m 197.00 m
2
Area Below 3000 m 56.26 m
Mean Monsoon Precipitation (MMP) 1430 mm
Monsoon Wetness Index (MWI) 1200.00

Mean Monthly Flows


Month Discharge Hydrograph (MIP)
(m3/s) 40.00
Jan 3.07 35.00
Feb 2.52 30.00
Mar 2.32
Discharge m3/s

25.00
Apr 2.85
May 3.25 20.00
Jun 9.89 15.00
Jul 28.50 10.00
Aug 34.14
5.00
Sep 26.61
Oct 12.54 0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Nov 6.06
Month
Dec 3.93
Average Annual 11.30

Flood Flow
Return Flow
Period K b (m3/s) Remarks
5 2.041 0.863 199.435
20 3.290 0.851 301.289 Constants
50 4.257 0.844 376.480 depend on
100 5.223 0.835 439.853 Regions
1000 9.229 0.815 697.517 Specified
10000 14.458 0.806 1044.511

Flow duration curve (MHSP)


Flow Duration Curve 60.00
Flow exceedence Flow (m3/s)
50.00
0 201.16
Discharge m3/s

25.00 14.23 40.00


45.00 5.03
30.00
65.00 3.02
85.00 1.97 20.00
95.00 1.36
10.00
100 0.37
-
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
% excedence

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 18_MHSP @ Powerhouse: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Hydest Method (WECS/DHM,1990)_Powerhouse_SGHP

Basin Area fo Intake ,A 202.00 Km2 Area >100, ok!

Basin Area below 5000 197.00 Km2


masl, A5
Basin Area below 3000 56.26 Km2
masl, A3
Monsoon wetness 1200.00 mm
index, MWI

Month Coefficients Mean


Monthly flow* Hydrograph (HYDEST)
35.00
C A1 A2 A3 m3/s 30.00
January 0.01423 0.0000 0.9777 0.0000 2.50
February 0.01219 0.0000 0.9766 0.0000 2.13 25.00

Discharge m3/s
March 0.00999 0.0000 0.9948 0.0000 1.92 20.00
April 0.00797 0.0000 1.0435 0.0000 1.99
15.00
May 0.00843 0.0000 1.0898 0.0000 2.68
June 0.00694 0.9968 0.0000 0.2610 8.77 10.00
July 0.02123 0.0000 1.0093 0.2523 26.42
5.00
August 0.02548 0.0000 0.9963 0.2620 31.70
September 0.01677 0.0000 0.9894 0.2878 24.16 0.00
October 0.00972 0.0000 0.9880 0.2508 10.70 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
November 0.00176 0.9605 0.0000 0.3910 4.61 Month
December 0.00149 0.9536 0.0000 0.3607 3.03
*Mean monthly flow = C*(area of Basin)^A1*(Area below 5000+1)^A2*(Monsoon wetness index)^A3 10.05
**Predicted hydrograph=Non dimensional hydrograph*Average annual flow
Flow duation curve (HYDEST)
70.00
Flow duration curve
60.00
Probabiliy Coefficients Discharge
% exceedence a b c d Q=e^a*A^b*(A5+1)^c*MWI^d 50.00

Discharge m3/s
P m3/s 40.00
0 -3.53 0.00 0.94 0.37 59.52 30.00
5 -3.50 0.00 0.98 0.27 36.06
20.00
20 -5.44 0.98 0.00 0.44 18.26
40 -5.95 1.01 0.00 0.32 5.38 10.00
60 -6.48 1.00 0.00 0.30 2.62 0.00
80 -4.85 0.00 1.04 0.00 1.89 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
95 -5.47 0.00 1.08 0.00 1.25 % excedence
100 -0.10 0.00 0.08 0.00 1.39

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 19_WECS-HYDEST @ Powerhouse: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Flood Analysis
Instantaneous Daily
m3/s m3/s
Q2 65.66 38.55
Q100 285.67 126.61
Return period Standard Coefficient Instantaneo Coefficient Daily
normal variate us discharge Instantaneous Flood frequency
discharge 800.00
T(x) for instantaneous s1 c1=ln(Q100/Q2)/ Q=exp(ln c2=ln(Q100/Q2)/ Q=exp(ln Instantaneous discharge
2.326 Q2+c1*s) 2.326 Q2+c2*s) 700.00
Years m3/s Daily
0 discharge 0
600.00

Discharge m3/s
2 0.00 65.66 38.55 0 #N/A
500.00
5 0.84 111.81 59.29
10 1.28 147.66 74.25 400.00 0 #N/A
20 1.65 185.74 89.39 300.00 0 #N/A
50 2.05 240.54 110.17 200.00
100 2.33 0.6321 285.67 0.5112 126.61
100.00
200 2.58 334.57 143.86
500 2.88 404.43 167.71 0.00
1 10 100 1000 10000
1000 3.09 463.02 187.09
Return period, Years
5000 3.54 615.36 235.48
10000 3.72 689.08 258.05

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 19_WECS-HYDEST @ Powerhouse: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Modified Hydest Method (DHM 2004)

Basin Area ,A 202.00 Km2 Area >100, ok!


Basin Area below 5000 197.00 Km2
masl, A5
Basin Area below 3000 56.26 Km2
masl, A3
Monsoon wetness index, 1200.00 mm
MWI
Average basin elevation 3200 m

Mean Monthly Flow


Coef. Of Mean
Coef. of Avg. Coef. Of Area Coef. Of Area
Month Constant Annual Monthly Hydrograph (HYDEST)
Elvevation below 3000 m below 5000 m flow* 30.00
precitiation
1 2 3 4 5 m3/s
25.00
Jan -16.7 1.36 0.47 0.82 - 2.49

Discharge m3/s
Feb -17.2 1.42 0.456 0.814 - 2.17 20.00
Mar 0.384 - - - 0.091 2.76
15.00
Apr 0.181 - - - 0.104 2.69
May 0.0001 - - - 0.136 3.64 10.00
Jun -19.5 1.61 0.709 0.872 - 7.65
5.00
Jul -16.3 1.26 0.759 0.884 - 16.66
Aug -14.7 1.24 0.622 0.871 - 25.23 0.00
Sep -13.7 1.09 0.594 0.872 - 16.83 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Oct -15.3 1.21 0.6 0.846 - 8.41 Month
Nov -16.7 1.36 0.543 0.826 - 4.28
Dec -17 1.39 0.504 0.822 - 3.02
Flow duration curve (MIP)
25.00
Flow duration curve
Month Constant Coef. of Avg. Coef. Of Coef. Of Area Coef. Of Area Discharge
20.00
Elevation Annual below 3000 m below 5000 m

Discharge m3/s
precitiation
15.00
m3/s
0 -12.8 0.366 - 0.529 - 140.94 10.00
5 -13.6 1.108 0.607 0.874 - 23.77
20 -17 1.359 0.716 0.883 - 13.51 5.00
40 -19 1.554 0.656 0.859 - 5.23
60 -18.3 1.535 0.513 0.832 - 2.94 0.00
80 -19.4 1.589 0.559 0.834 - 2.11 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
95 -21.2 1.732 0.598 0.842 - 1.51 % excedence
100 -2.18 - 0.048 - 0.077 0.32

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 20_Modified_Hydest @ Powerhouse: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Flood Analysis
Instantaneous
m3/s
Q2 73.28
Q100 376.80
Return period Standard Coefficient Instantaneous
normal variate discharge
Instantaneous Flood frequency
1200.00
T(x) for instantaneous c1=ln(Q100/Q2)/2.3 Q=exp(ln Q2+c1*s) Instantaneous
s1 26 1000.00 discharge
Years m3/s

Discharge m3/s
2 0.00 73.28 800.00
5 0.84 132.56
600.00
10 1.28 180.69
20 1.65 233.30
400.00
50 2.05 311.14
100 2.33 0.7039 376.80 200.00
200 2.58 449.31
500 2.88 554.96 0.00
1000 3.09 645.19 1 10 100 1000 10000
5000 3.54 885.64 Return period, Years
10000 3.72 1004.58

Low Flow Estimation


Return Period Day Const. Cd,T Coef. Fd,T Discharge, m3/s
1 0.2144 0.0815 1.84
2 7 0.2362 0.083 1.96
30 0.3026 0.0854 2.25
Monthly 0.3397 0.086 2.39
1 0.0859 0.0729 1.23
7 0.092 0.0748 1.30
10
30 0.1807 0.0766 1.58
Monthly 0.2138 0.0777 1.70
1 0.0698 0.0703 1.12
7 0.0662 0.0726 1.18
20
30 0.1609 0.0742 1.45
Monthly 0.1945 0.0754 1.57

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 20_Modified_Hydest @ Powerhouse: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Comparison of Flood Calculations by Different Methods

Flood Flow at Intake, m3/s


Return Periods Adopted Design
WECS/ Modified
Gumbel Log Pearson Log Normal MHSP Flood (Modified
Hydest Hydest/ DHM
Hydest Method)
2 39.75 39.56 48.03 167.48 28.34 31.40 31.40
5 56.00 50.73 59.71 59.71
10 66.77 63.93 65.54 68.77 83.54 83.54
20 77.09 253.63 88.38 110.21 110.21
25 80.37 77.70 79.08
50 90.45 86.89 89.28 317.36 117.27 150.59 150.59
100 100.47 95.93 99.55 371.47 141.53 185.34 185.34
200 110.45 104.97 110.03 168.23 224.30 224.30
500 123.61 207.01 282.02 282.02
1,000 133.56 126.01 135.17 591.51 240.02 332.06 332.06
5,000 327.62 468.15 468.15
10,000 887.29 370.78 536.69 536.69

Flood Flow at Powerhouse, m3/s


Return Periods Adopted Design
WECS/ Modified
Gumbel Log Pearson Log Normal MHSP Flood (Modified
Hydest Hydest/ DHM
Hydest Method)
2 48.66 48.43 48.03 199.43 65.66 73.28 73.28
5 68.56 111.81 132.56 132.56
10 81.74 78.27 80.24 147.66 180.69 180.69
20 94.38 301.29 185.74 233.30 233.30
25 98.39 95.12 96.81
50 110.74 106.37 109.30 376.48 240.54 311.14 311.14
100 123.00 117.44 121.87 439.85 285.67 376.80 376.80
200 135.21 128.51 134.70 334.57 449.31 449.31
500 151.33 404.43 554.96 554.96
1,000 163.51 154.27 165.48 697.52 463.02 645.19 645.19
5,000 615.36 885.64 885.64
10,000 1,044.51 689.08 1,004.58 1,004.58

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 21_Comparison_Flood_Data: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Construction Flood Calculations by Gumbel's Method

Catchment Area of Reference Station (Chameliya River)= 1184 sq. km.


Catchment Area of Suni Gad Intake= 165 sq. km.
Catchment Area of Suni Gad Powerhouse= 202 sq. km.

Note: Maximum daily flow in between the months January-May and October to December of each year from 1965-2013 at Chameliya Reference Station is considered.
Return
Year Discharge Rank Period
m3/s m (T=n+1/m)(xi-Xm)^2
1965 40.6 47 1.04 3103.19 Table 7.3 REDUCED MEAN yn IN GUMBEL'S EXTREME VALUE DISTRIBUTION
1966 46.6 45 1.09 2470.71 N = Sample size
1967 58.2 39 1.26 1452.09 N 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1968 67.6 32 1.53 824.05 10 0.4952 0.4996 0.5035 0.5070 0.5100 0.5128 0.5157 0.5181 0.5202 0.5220
1969 76 23 2.13 412.34 20 0.5236 0.5252 0.5268 0.5283 0.5296 0.5309 0.5320 0.5332 0.5343 0.5353
1970 48.7 43 1.14 2266.36 30 0.5362 0.5371 0.5380 0.5388 0.5396 0.5402 0.5410 0.5418 0.5424 0.5430
1971 106 13 3.77 93.97 40 0.5436 0.5442 0.5448 0.5453 0.5458 0.5463 0.5468 0.5473 0.5477 0.5481
1972 66.3 33 1.48 900.38 50 0.5485 0.5489 0.5493 0.5497 0.5501 0.5504 0.5508 0.5511 0.5515 0.5518
1973 204 4 12.25 11597.94 60 0.5521 0.5524 0.5527 0.5530 0.5533 0.5535 0.5538 0.5540 0.5543 0.5545
1974 99.7 15 3.27 11.52 70 0.5548 0.5550 0.5552 0.5555 0.5557 0.5559 0.5561 0.5563 0.5565 0.5567
1975 75.6 24 2.04 428.75 80 0.5569 0.5570 0.5572 0.5574 0.5576 0.5578 0.5580 0.5581 0.5583 0.5585
1976 57.9 40 1.23 1475.04 90 0.5586 0.5587 0.5589 0.5591 0.5592 0.5593 0.5595 0.5596 0.5598 0.5599
1977 82.1 22 2.23 201.82 100 0.5600
1978 122 8 6.13 660.17
1979 131 6 8.17 1203.66
1980 61.3 36 1.36 1225.44 Table 7.4 REDUCED STANDARD DEVIATION Sn IN GUMBEL'S EXTREME VALUE DISTRIBUTION
1981 68.3 31 1.58 784.35 N = Sample size
1982 53.2 41 1.20 1858.15 N 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1984 68.8 30 1.63 756.59 10 0.9496 0.9676 0.9833 0.9971 1.0095 1.0206 1.0316 1.0411 1.0493 1.0565
1985 86.9 19 2.58 88.48 20 1.0628 1.0696 1.0754 1.0811 1.0864 1.0915 1.0961 1.1004 1.1047 1.1086
1986 58.4 38 1.29 1436.88 30 1.1124 1.1159 1.1193 1.1226 1.1255 1.1285 1.1313 1.1339 1.1363 1.1388
1987 48.4 44 1.11 2295.01 40 1.1413 1.1436 1.1458 1.1480 1.1499 1.1519 1.1538 1.1557 1.1574 1.1590
1988 46.2 46 1.07 2510.64 50 1.1607 1.1623 1.1638 1.1658 1.1667 1.1681 1.1696 1.1708 1.1721 1.1734
1989 60.1 37 1.32 1310.89 60 1.1747 1.1759 1.1770 1.1782 1.1793 1.1803 1.1814 1.1824 1.1834 1.1844
1990 108 10 4.90 136.74 70 1.1854 1.1863 1.1873 1.1881 1.1890 1.1898 1.1906 1.1915 1.1923 1.1930
1991 84.4 20 2.45 141.76 80 1.1938 1.1945 1.1953 1.1959 1.1967 1.1973 1.1980 1.1987 1.1994 1.2001
1992 94.2 18 2.72 4.44 90 1.2007 1.2013 1.2020 1.2026 1.2032 1.2038 1.2044 1.2049 1.2055 1.2060
1993 63.3 34 1.44 1089.41 100 1.2065
1994 28.3 48 1.02 4624.85
1995 49.5 42 1.17 2190.83 Source: Engineering Hydrology, K Subramanya, Page 257
1996 143 5 9.80 2180.31

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 22_Gumbel_Method_Constr_Flood: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

1997 73.4 27 1.81 524.70


1998 107 12 4.08 114.36
1999 126 7 7.00 881.72
2000 74.1 26 1.88 493.12
2001 62 35 1.40 1176.92
2002 73.4 27 1.81 524.70
2003 101 14 3.50 22.03
2004 73 29 1.69 543.18
2005 108 10 4.90 136.74
2006 75 25 1.96 453.96
2007 303 2 24.50 42722.31
2008 211 3 16.33 13154.66
2009 446 1 49.00 122285.72
2010 112 9 5.44 246.29
2011 84.2 21 2.33 146.56
2012 94.5 16 3.06 3.26
2013 94.5 16 3.06 3.26
Sum 4622.70 219.171 233170.21

n 48
Mean (Xm) 96.31
Standard Deviation (σn-1) 70.43

For n = 48 Years
Yn 0.5477 See Table 7.3
Sn 1.1574 See Table 7.4

Return
Q (m3/s) at referance Q (m3/s) at Suni Q (m3/s) at Suni
Period (T YT K
station, Chameliya River Gad Intake Gad Powerhouse
years)

2 0.367 -0.157 85.280 11.884 14.549


5 1.500 0.823 154.256 21.497 26.317
10 2.250 1.471 199.924 27.861 34.109
20 2.970 2.093 243.730 33.966 41.582
25 3.199 2.290 257.626 35.902 43.953
50 3.902 2.898 300.432 41.868 51.256
100 4.600 3.501 342.923 47.789 58.505
200 5.296 4.102 385.258 53.689 65.728
500 6.214 4.895 441.111 61.472 75.257
1000 6.907 5.495 483.324 67.355 82.459

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 22_Gumbel_Method_Constr_Flood: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Station No.: Meas. No.: 1


River No.: Soni Guaed Computed:
Location: Intake Date:
Date: 6.Mar.2017 Checked:
Discharge Measurement Notes Date:
2 3
Width in m: 14.00 Area in m : 6.25 Mean velocity in m/s: 0.294 Discharge in m /s: 1.837

Party: G tiwari Counter No.: Meter No.: Price Type 622 Rated on:
Weight: Distance from currentmeter to the bottom of the weight in m:

Location of measuring site: m. upstream/downstream of gauge

Time 11,30 Am Weather:


G. Ht.

Mean Gauge height: Air temperature: Water temperature:

Remarks: 1 Verticals >10 % of Discharge


0 Verticals with missing angle correction

Vert.
angle 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Coeff. f1 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.998 0.997 0.996 0.995 0.994 0.993 0.991 0.990 0.989
Coeff. f2 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.007 0.010 0.012 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.026 0.030 0.035
Coefficients f1, f2 for vertical angle correction
Vert.
angle 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Coeff. f1 0.987 0.985 0.984 0.982 0.980 0.978 0.976 0.973 0.971 0.969 0.966 0.963 0.961 0.958 0.955
Coeff. f2 0.040 0.045 0.051 0.057 0.063 0.070 0.077 0.084 0.092 0.100 0.109 0.118 0.127 0.137 0.148

0.6
0 0 Depth [m]
0.7 -0.23 0.16 0.03
Mean Velocity
1.4 -0.25 0.26 0.04
Discharge
0.4 -0.27
2.1 0.21 0.04
Velocity [m/s] Discharge [m3/s]

2.8 -0.18 0.18 0.02


3.5 -0.21 0.18 0.03
0.2 -0.22
4.2 0.19 0.03
4.9 -0.26 0.12 0.02
5.6 -0.38 0.34 0.09
6.3 0 -0.38 0.26 0.07
7 0-0.44 0.3452 2 0.1063 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
7.7 -0.43 0.3371 0.1015
8.4 -0.54 0.3907 0.1477
-0.2
9.1 -0.56 0.3995 0.1566
9.8 -0.69 0.3995 0.193
10.5 -0.72 0.3452 0.174
11.2
-0.4 -0.78 0.3082 0.1683
11.9 -0.78 0.2618 0.143
12.6 -0.75 0.2618 0.1375
13.3 -0.86 0.234 0.1409
-0.6
14 0.00
Depth [m]

-0.8

-1

Distance to initial point [m]

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 23_Discharge_March06_2017: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Discharge Measurement at Intake Site

Station No.: Meas. No.: 1


River No.: Suni Gad Khola Computed:
Location: Intake Date:
Date: 06/11/017 Checked:
Discharge Measurement Notes Date:
2 3
Width in m: 16.00 Area in m : 8.33 Mean velocity in m/s: 0.522 Discharge in m /s: 4.345

Party: DPG Counter No.: Meter No.: Price Type 622 Rated on:
Weight: Distance from currentmeter to the bottom of the weight in m:

Location of measuring site: m. upstream/downstream of gauge

Time 11.35 12:35 Weather: Cloudy


G. Ht. 1.00 1;00

Mean Gauge height: 1.00 Air temperature: Water temperature:

Remarks: discharge 2 % reduced 0 Verticals >10 % of Discharge


0 Verticals with missing angle correction

Vert.
angle 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Coeff. f1 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.998 0.997 0.996 0.995 0.994 0.993 0.991 0.990 0.989
Coeff. f2 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.007 0.010 0.012 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.026 0.030 0.035
Coefficients f1, f2 for vertical angle correction
Vert.
angle 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Coeff. f1 0.987 0.985 0.984 0.982 0.980 0.978 0.976 0.973 0.971 0.969 0.966 0.963 0.961 0.958 0.955
Coeff. f2 0.040 0.045 0.051 0.057 0.063 0.070 0.077 0.084 0.092 0.100 0.109 0.118 0.127 0.137 0.148

51 1.5 0
50 -0.57 0.22 0.09
Depth [m]
49.6 -0.3 0.5 0.06
Mean Velocity
49.2 -0.3 0.47 0.06
Discharge

Velocity [m/s] Discharge [m3/s]


48.8 -0.4 0.49 0.08
48.4 -0.95
1 0.61 0.23
48 -0.8 0.83 0.27
47.6 -0.82 0.79 0.26
47.2 -0.52 0.85 0.18
46.8 -0.56 0.85 0.19
46.4 0.5-0.50 0.8312 0.1662
46 -0.44 0.4473 0.0787
45.6 -0.62 0.4572 0.1134
45.2 -0.99 0.2678 0.1061
44.8 -0.96 0.4287 0.1646
44.4 0-0.92 0.5242 0.1929
44 -0.80
0 0.6652 0.2129 10 20 30 40 50 60
43.6 -0.95 0.4784 0.1818
43.2 -0.88 0.4676 0.1646
42.8 -0.88 0.4006 0.141
42.4 -0.72 0.3746 0.1079
42 -0.5-0.70 0.4473 0.1252
41.6 -0.65 0.5695 0.1481
41.2 -0.55 0.6341 0.1395
40.8 -0.50 0.2449 0.049
40.4 -0.45 0.1866 0.0336
40 -1-0.45 0.1635 0.0294
Depth [m]

39.6 -0.30 0.396 0.0475


39.2 -0.40 0.8866 0.1419
38.8 -0.40 1.0826 0.1732
38.4 -0.45 0.5562 0.1001
38 -0.44 0.7732 0.1361
37.6 -1.5-0.36 0.3519 0.0507
37.2 -0.27 0.6058 0.0654
36.8 -0.22 0.4572 0.0402 Distance to initial point [m]
36.4 -0.16 0.3086 0.0198

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 24_Discharge_Nov06_2017: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Discharge Measurement at Intake Site
Station No. : Measured by : Khagendra
River Name : Suni Gad Computed by : KP
Location : Intake (Measurement 1 of 1)
Date : 29/1/2018(2074/10/15) Checked by :
Discharge Measurement Notes Date :
Width in m : 11.00 Area in m2 : 4.99 Mean velocity in m/s : 0.543 Discharge in m3/s : 2.711

Party : DK Consult Counter No. : Meter No. : Price Type 622 Rated on :
Weight : Distance from current meter to the bottom of the weight in m :

Location of measurement site : Intake (At downstream of the confluence)

Time 11:00 AM 12:00 PM Weather : Clear


G. Ht. 0.83 m 0.83 cm

Mean Gauge Height :0.83 Air Temperature : Water Temperature :

Remarks : Discharge reduced by 2% 1 Verticals > 10 % of total discharge


0 Verticals with missing angle correction

Vert.
angle 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Coeff. f1 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.998 0.997 0.996 0.995 0.994 0.993 0.991 0.990 0.989
Coeff. f2 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.007 0.010 0.012 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.026 0.030 0.035
Coefficients f1, f2 for vertical angle correction
Vert.
angle 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Coeff. f1 0.987 0.985 0.984 0.982 0.980 0.978 0.976 0.973 0.971 0.969 0.966 0.963 0.961 0.958 0.955
Coeff. f2 0.040 0.045 0.051 0.057 0.063 0.070 0.077 0.084 0.092 0.100 0.109 0.118 0.127 0.137 0.148

Depth [m]
1.00
Mean Velocity

Discharge
Velocity (m/s); Discharge (m3/s)

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.20

0.00
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 4.25
4.50
-0.20 4.75
5.00
5.25
-0.40 5.50
5.75
6.00
-0.60 6.25
Depth (m)

6.50
6.75
-0.80
7.00
7.25
7.50
-1.00
7.75
8.00
Distance from Initial Point (m) 8.25
-1.20

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 25_Discharge_Jan29_2018: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Discharge Measurement at Intake Site
Station No. : Measured by : Khagendra
River Name : Sanigad khola Computed by : KP
Location : Intake (Measurement 1 of 1)
Date : 28/5/2018(2075/2/14) Checked by :
Discharge Measurement Notes Date :
Width in m : 17.50 Area in m2 : 9.54 Mean velocity in m/s : 0.874 Discharge in m3/s : 8.336

Party : DK Consult Counter No. : Meter No. : Price Type 622 Rated on :
Weight : Distance from current meter to the bottom of the weight in m :

Location of measurement site : Intake (At downstream of the confluence)

Time 2:00 PM 3:00 PM Weather : Clear


G. Ht. 1.00 m 1.00 cm

Mean Gauge Height :1.00 Air Temperature : Water Temperature :

Remarks : Discharge reduced by 2% 1 Verticals > 10 % of total discharge


0 Verticals with missing angle correction

Vert.
angle 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Coeff. f1 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.998 0.997 0.996 0.995 0.994 0.993 0.991 0.990 0.989
Coeff. f2 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.007 0.010 0.012 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.026 0.030 0.035
Coefficients f1, f2 for vertical angle correction
Vert.
angle 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Coeff. f1 0.987 0.985 0.984 0.982 0.980 0.978 0.976 0.973 0.971 0.969 0.966 0.963 0.961 0.958 0.955
Coeff. f2 0.040 0.045 0.051 0.057 0.063 0.070 0.077 0.084 0.092 0.100 0.109 0.118 0.127 0.137 0.148

1.50 Depth [m]

Mean Velocity

Discharge
Velocity (m/s); Discharge (m3/s)

1.00

0.50

0.00
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
-0.50
10.00
10.50
11.00
Depth (m)

11.50
-1.00 12.00
12.50
13.00
13.50
14.00
-1.50 Distance from Initial Point (m)
14.50

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 26_Discharge_May28_2018: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Hydrology Gajauni Kholsi at Headrace Pipe Siphon Region

Catchment Area of the Gjauni Kholsi= 15.08 sq.km.


Catchmet Area below 5000 m amsl= 15.08 sq.km.
Catchmet Area below 3000 m amsl= 11.59 sq.km.
Mean Elevation of the Catchment= 2638.09 m amsl
Maximum Catchment Elevation= 3898 m amsl
Minimum Catchment Elevation= 1698 m amsl

Mean Monthly Flow Calculation by CAR Method


Months Flow (m3/s)
Jan 0.28
Feb 0.26
Mar 0.26
Apr 0.29
May 0.37
Jun 0.62
Jul 1.53
Aug 2.08
Sep 1.50
Oct 0.72
Nov 0.42
Dec 0.32
Annual Average 0.72

Flood Analysis of Gajauni Kholsi by CAR Method with the Adopted Flood Discharge at Suni Gad Headworks
Adopted Design Flood (CA Ratio Method with
Return Periods Flood Discharge at SGHP Intake
2 10.05
5 18.17
10 24.77
20 31.98
50 42.65
100 34.44
200 41.06
500 50.72
1000 58.97
5000 80.94
10000 91.81

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations 27_Gajauni_Kholsi_Hydrology: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex A: Hydrological Calculations

Title: Hydrological Calculations


Job: Hydrology Gajauni Kholsi at Headrace Pipe Siphon Region

Catchment Area of the Gjauni Kholsi= 2.1 sq.km.


Catchmet Area below 5000 m amsl= 2.1 sq.km.
Catchmet Area below 3000 m amsl= 2.1 sq.km.
Mean Elevation of the Catchment= 2304.84 m amsl
Maximum Catchment Elevation= 2977 m amsl
Minimum Catchment Elevation= 1600 m amsl

Mean Monthly Flow Calculation by CAR Method

Months Flow (m3/s)


Jan 0.04
Feb 0.04
Mar 0.04
Apr 0.04
May 0.05
Jun 0.09
Jul 0.21
Aug 0.29
Sep 0.21
Oct 0.10
Nov 0.06
Dec 0.04
Annual Average 0.10

Flood Analysis by CAR Method with the Adopted Flood Discharge at Suni Gad Headworks
Adopted Design Flood (CA Ratio Method
Return Periods with Flood Discharge at SGHP Intake Note: Factor of Safety 2.5 considered for flood analysis in small catchments
2 2.33
5 4.22
10 5.75
20 7.42
50 9.90
100 11.99
200 14.30
500 17.66
1000 20.53
5000 28.18
10000 31.96

02H09_Hydrological_Calculations Charadi_Kholsi_Hydrology: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT (11.05 MW)

VOLUME 2: ANNEX B
HYDRAULIC DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Flow Data Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_01 Approved by : SG

3
Release downstream of weir 0.281 m /s
3
Diversion capacity 3.95 m /s
Additional discharge to intake for flushing 20%
Leakages through waterways -

Monthly Flow Data


Available at Extraction at Evaporation + Discharge for Intake Settling Basin
Month Flow at River
D/S Release Intake intake leakage Power yield Discharge Discharge
Jan 3.06 0.281 2.78 2.78 - 2.78 2.78 2.78
Feb 2.81 0.281 2.53 2.53 - 2.53 2.53 2.53
Mar 2.84 0.281 2.56 2.56 - 2.56 2.56 2.56
Apr 3.20 0.281 2.92 2.92 - 2.92 2.92 2.92
May 4.01 0.281 3.73 3.73 - 3.73 3.73 3.73
Jun 6.82 0.281 6.54 3.95 - 3.95 4.74 4.35
Jul 17.00 0.281 16.72 3.95 - 3.95 4.74 4.35
Aug 22.80 0.281 22.52 3.95 - 3.95 4.74 4.35
Sep 16.37 0.281 16.09 3.95 - 3.95 4.74 4.35
Oct 7.90 0.281 7.62 3.95 - 3.95 4.74 4.35
Nov 4.65 0.281 4.37 3.95 - 3.95 3.95 4.35
Dec 3.49 0.281 3.21 3.21 - 3.21 3.21 3.21

Topographical data
Weir Crest Level 1,767.50 m amsl
Turbine centerline (Horizontal Axis Pelton Turbine) 1,410.00 m amsl
Gross head, m 357.50 m

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss FlowData-SGHP: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Adopted Flood Data at Intake (DHM_2004_Modified_Hydest Method)


Flood Discharge,
Return Period
m3/s
2 31.40
5 59.71
10 83.54
20 110.21
50 150.59
100 185.34
200 224.30
500 282.02
1000 332.06
10000 536.69

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss FlowData-SGHP: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Weir and Undersluice Design Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_02 Approved by : SG

Assumptions
1. The weir structures and flood wall has been designed for the passage of the 100 years flood from primary and secondary weir in case the undersluice is closed.

Flood Data
Return Period 100
Adopted
Flood(Hydest) 185 Ref: Hydrological Calculations
Input Parameters:
Input Parameters:
100 Yr. design flood 185 m3/s
Design Discharge 4 m3/s
Length of Weir (Main) 25 m
Weir Crest Level of Weir (Main) 1,767.50 amsl
Side Contraction Factor 1
Undersluice width 3.00 m
Total Length of Waterway 28.00 m
Size of Undersluice opening
Width 3.00 m
Depth 3.00 m
Combined Hydraulics at Weir and Undersluice
Upstream Apron Level 1765.30
Crest Level of Weir 1767.50 amsl
Sill Level of Undersluice 1765.00 amsl
Design Flood 185.34 (m3/s)
Net Length of Weir 25.00 m
No of Undersliuces 1 Nos
Sluice Dimension
Sluice Width b 3.00 m
Sluice Gate opening a 3.00 m
Depth below crest w 2.20 m
Abutment Contraction Coeff Ka 0.01
Pier Contraction Coeff Kp 0.01
Contraction Coefficient sluice Cc 0.6

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss Weir and UnderSluice Design: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Weir Portion Underslice Portion

Remarks (In case Total Remarks (In case


Eff. Discharge Undersluice is Eff. Dis. Discharge undersluice is
Actual Vel. Coeff, Discharge,
SN Eff. Head on weir, m Length of Cd through closed) Length, Ratio Coeff, 3 (Weir + opened)
level Cv 3 m /s
weir, m weir, m /s m Cu Undersluice),
m3/s
1 0.50 1768.00 24.99 0.64 1.88 16.65 2.98 1.00 0.47 32.75 49.40
2 0.60 1768.10 24.99 0.64 1.90 22.01 2.98 1.03 0.48 33.50 55.51
3 0.70 1768.20 24.99 0.65 1.91 27.89 2.97 1.07 0.48 34.23 62.12 > 5 years flood
4 0.80 1768.30 24.98 0.65 1.92 34.27 > 2 years flood 2.97 1.10 0.48 34.95 69.22
5 0.90 1768.40 24.98 0.65 1.93 41.11 2.96 1.13 0.49 35.66 76.78
6 1.00 1768.50 24.98 0.66 1.94 48.42 2.96 1.17 0.49 36.36 84.78 > 10 years flood
7 1.10 1768.60 24.98 0.66 1.95 56.16 2.96 1.20 0.49 37.06 93.22
8 1.20 1768.70 24.98 0.66 1.96 64.34 > 5 years flood 2.95 1.23 0.49 37.74 102.08
9 1.30 1768.80 24.97 0.67 1.97 72.94 2.95 1.27 0.49 38.41 111.35 > 20 years flood
10 1.40 1768.90 24.97 0.67 1.98 81.95 2.94 1.30 0.50 39.07 121.03
11 1.50 1769.00 24.97 0.67 1.99 91.37 > 10 years flood 2.94 1.33 0.50 39.73 131.10
12 1.60 1769.10 24.97 0.68 2.00 101.20 2.94 1.37 0.50 40.37 141.57
13 1.70 1769.20 24.97 0.68 2.01 111.42 > 20 years flood 2.93 1.40 0.50 41.01 152.43 > 50 years flood
14 1.80 1769.30 24.96 0.69 2.02 122.03 2.93 1.43 0.50 41.64 163.67
15 1.90 1769.40 24.96 0.69 2.03 133.03 2.92 1.47 0.51 42.27 175.30
16 2.00 1769.50 24.96 0.69 2.05 144.41 2.92 1.50 0.51 42.88 187.30 > 100 years flood
17 2.10 1769.60 24.96 0.70 2.06 156.18 > 50 years flood 2.92 1.53 0.51 43.49 199.67
18 2.20 1769.70 24.96 0.70 2.07 168.33 2.91 1.57 0.51 44.09 212.43
19 2.30 1769.80 24.95 0.70 2.08 180.86 2.91 1.60 0.51 44.69 225.55 > 200 years flood
20 2.40 1769.90 24.95 0.71 2.09 193.76 > 100 years flood 2.90 1.63 0.51 45.28 239.04
21 2.50 1770.00 24.95 0.71 2.10 207.04 2.90 1.67 0.51 45.86 252.90
22 2.60 1770.10 24.95 0.71 2.11 220.69 2.90 1.70 0.52 46.44 267.13
23 2.70 1770.20 24.95 0.72 2.12 234.71 > 200 years flood 2.89 1.73 0.52 47.01 281.72 > 500 years flood
24 2.80 1770.30 24.94 0.72 2.13 249.11 2.89 1.77 0.52 47.58 296.69
25 2.90 1770.40 24.94 0.73 2.14 263.87 2.88 1.80 0.52 48.14 312.01
26 3.00 1770.50 24.94 0.73 2.15 279.01 2.88 1.83 0.52 48.69 327.70
27 3.10 1770.60 24.94 0.73 2.16 294.51 > 5000 years flood 2.88 1.87 0.52 49.24 343.75 > 1000 years flood
28 3.20 1770.70 24.94 0.74 2.17 310.39 2.87 1.90 0.52 49.78 360.17
29 3.30 1770.80 24.93 0.74 2.19 326.63 2.87 1.93 0.52 50.32 376.95
30 3.40 1770.90 24.93 0.74 2.20 343.24 > 1000 years flood 2.86 1.97 0.53 50.86 394.09

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss Weir and UnderSluice Design: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Output:
Weir Crest of Weir 1767.50 amsl
Weir Crest Length of Weir 25.00
High Flood Level at Weir 1769.90 amsl
Velocity of flow at main weir during High Flood Discharge 3.07 m/s
Freeboard provided for Flood Wall 1.50 m
Crest of Flood Wall Provided 1771.40 amsl
Crest of Guide Wall Provided 1768.00 amsl (Considering 0.5 m above Weir Crest level)
55.00
400.00 Discharge through undersluice
350.00
Discharge through Weir
50.00
300.00
Discharge, m3/s

250.00

Discharge, m3/s
45.00

200.00
40.00
150.00

100.00
35.00
50.00

0.00
30.00
1767.50

1768.00

1768.50

1769.00

1769.50

1770.00

1770.50

1771.00

1771.50

1767.50

1768.00

1768.50

1769.00

1769.50

1770.00

1770.50

1771.00

1771.50
Water level
Water level

450.00

400.00
Discharge through both Weir and Undersluice
350.00

300.00
Discharge, m3/s

250.00

200.00

150.00

100.00

50.00

0.00
1767.50

1768.00

1768.50

1769.00

1769.50

1770.00

1770.50

1771.00

1771.50

Water level

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss Weir and UnderSluice Design: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Stilling Basin Design Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_03 Approved by : SG

Input and Calculations:


Weir Crest Level 1767.50 m amsl
3
Discharge Through primary weir 168.33 m /s
Effective Weir Length, L 25.00 m
2
Discharge Intensity, q 6.73 m /s
Head over Crest, Afflux, Ho 1.80 m
Upstream Water Level 1769.90 m amsl
Downstream River Bed Level 1764.00 m amsl
Downstream Water Depth 2.10 m Ref: Hec Ras Analysis
Downstream Water Level 1766.10 m amsl
Upstream Velocity Head 0.71 m
Width of Stilling Basin 29.00 m
100 Years Flood Discharge 185.34
Downstream Velocity Head 0.47
Upstream TEL 1770.61
Downstream TEL 1766.57
Head Loss 4.04
Ef2 3.50 Ref: Plate No. 10.1, S.K. Garg
Level at which jump will form 1763.07
Ef1 7.54
𝑞2
Y1 corresponding to Ef1 0.58 𝐸𝑐 = 𝑦1 +
(2 𝑋 𝑔 𝑋 𝑦12 )
Velocity, V1 11.69
Froude No., F1 4.92 𝑞
𝐹𝑟1 =
Y2 corresponding to Ef2 3.73 (𝑔 𝑋 𝑦1 )3
Length of Concrete Floor 18.91 𝑦1
𝑦2 = (−1 + 1 + 8𝐹12 )
Provided Length 20.00 2

Output:
Provided Length of the Stilling Basin 20.0 m
Provide Stilling Basin Level 1763.1 m amsl

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 03_Stilling Basin Design: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Seepage Analysis: Check for Piping Failure (Bligh's Creep Theory) Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_04 Approved by : SG

Cutoffs H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9
Height 1.9 0.98 2.22 1.64 2.13 2.27 0.57 1.96 3.3

Floor L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8
Length, L 0.5 8.06 0.8 12.42 1.6 5 6.97 0.8
Total creep length L 53.12 m
U/s water level 1769.90 m
D/s water level 1766.1 m
Water Difference HL 3.80 m
Safe hydraullic
SN Type of soil Value of C
gradient
1 Fine micaceous sand 15 1/15
2 Coarse grained sand 12 1/12
3 Sand mixed with boulder and gravel and for loam soil 7.5 1/5 to 1/9
4 Light sand and mud 8 1/18
Source: SK Garg
Check for safety against piping
Hydraulic Gradient HL/L 0.0715
Type of soil Sand mixed with boulder and gravel and
7.5 for loam soil NOTE: Permiability Test is Required
Check Safe Against piping
Min. length of floor C*HL*1.1 32.00m
Provided creep length of floor 53.12 Total of horizontal and vertical flood length

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 04_Seepage Analysis_PipingCheck: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Seepage Analysis: Check for Uplift (Bligh's Creep Theory) Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_05 Approved by : SG

At sheet pile Total Creep Length


Cutoffs H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 H1 1.9 1.9
Height 1.9 0.98 2.22 1.64 2.13 2.27 0.57 1.96 3.3 0.5 2.4
H2 0.98 3.38
Floor L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 8.06 11.44
Length, L 0.5 8.06 0.8 12.42 1.6 5 6.97 0.8 H3 2.22 13.66
0.8 14.46
Total length 53.12 H4 1.64 16.1
U/s water level 1,769.90 12.42 28.52
D/s water level 1,766.10 H5 2.13 30.65
Uplift factor 1.00 1.6 32.25
Head HL 3.80 H6 2.27 34.52
Hydraulic Gradient HL/L 0.07 5 39.52
Gradient i 13.98 H7 0.57 40.09
Nominal Thickness 1.00 6.97 47.06
H8 1.96 49.02
0.8 49.82
Calculation of floor thickness @H6 Mid section between H7 H9 3.3 53.12
Residual head 1.33 0.93
Thickness of floor required 0.95 0.67
Thickness considered with factor of safety 1.14 0.80
Provided Thickness 1.20 0.80

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss Seepage Analysis_Uplift: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Intake and Side Spillway Design Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_06 Approved by : SG

Coefficient of Discharge for intake orifice Ci 0.60


Coefficient of Discharge for spillway Cs 1.70
Weir crest level 1,767.50 m
Intake invert level 1,766.30 m
Spillway crest level 1,767.55 m
Normal water level 1,767.50 m
High flood level 1,769.90 m
3
Design discharge Qd 3.95 m /s
3
Discharge for Gravel Flush Qg 10% m /s
3
Discharge for Sediment Flush Qs 10% m /s
3
Flood discharge Q100 185.34 m /s
Assumed datum 1,766.30 m (at intake invert level)

During normal operation,


3
Discharge through intake QT 4.74 m /s
No. of intake effective openings n 2.00 set
Intake opening
Effective Height H 1.40 m set
Width W 2.50 m set
2
Area of Opening A 6.00 m
Approach velocity v 0.79 m/s OK Must be 0.6 to 1.4m/s, Layman's Guideline, Pg 121

During flood,
Area of intake opening 7.00 Size of intake orifice near spillway
hrf 3.60 m
hcf 2.20 m Set, trial
hrf-hcf 1.40 m
Qflood @ intake during high flood
22.01 m3/s
(Calculated)
Water level at Intake canal during flood 1,768.50 m

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss Intake_and_Side_Spillway_Design: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Sizing of Spillway and Spillway Canal


Head over spillway hs 0.95 m
Required Length of spillway Ls 13.98 m

Adopt Length of Spillway 14.00 m


Discharge through spillway in 100 years
22.04
flood (Calculated) m3/s
Manning's Coefficient 0.016
Slope Provided 0.010
Width of Spillway Canal 2.90 m
Water Depth at Spillway 1.50 m
Area of flow 4.35 m2
Wetted Perimeter 5.90 m
Hydraulic Radius 0.74 m
Discharge Capacity of Spillway Canal 22.19 m3/s
Design of Spillway Canal OK
Adopted Slope of Spillway Canal 1 in 100
Free board 0.30 m

Output: Adopted Dimensions and Level


Intake invert level 1,766.30 m amsl
Intake opening
Effective Height H 1.40 m
Width W 2.50 m
Adopt Length of Spillway 14.00 m
Width of Spillway Canal 2.90 m
Water Depth at Spillway 1.50 m
Free Board to the Spillway Canal 0.30 m
Adopt Crest Level of Spillway 1,767.55 m amsl
Adopted Wall level for Approach Canal,
Spillway and Settling Basin 1,769.00 m amsl
Adopted Free Board to the Walls 0.5 m

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss Intake_and_Side_Spillway_Design: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Gravel Trap and Flushing Culvert Design Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_07 Approved by : SG

Input Parameter Calculations Units Referances and Formulas


3
Design Discharge 3.95 m /s
Flushing Discharge 0.79 m3/s (10% for Gravel Trap and 10 % for Settling Basin)
Total Discharge 4.74 m3/s
Particle Size Selected 5 mm
Fall Velocity(w) 0.30 m/s DoeD Guidelines, Zhurablov, 1975, Pg: 2H-8
Permissible Flow Velocity 0.80 m/s Moosyni, Page 7/78v=a*d^(1/2), a=0.36
Sediment Concentration 2000 ppm Ref: FSR SGHP, Sediment Studies
Manning's n 0.017
No of Bay 1
Unit Discharge 4.74 m3/s
Design of Gravel Trap (Main Part)
Mean Height 2.00 m
Flow Area(A) 10.00 m2
Wetted Perimeter 9.00 m
Hydraulic radius R 1.11 m
Hydraulics Gradient 0.000056 Mannings Eqn, (S)=(Qn/ARh^0.67)^2
Hz Flow Velocity 0.47 m/s
Shear Velocity 0.0248 m/s (U*)=sqrt(gRS)
Required Length 3.44 m
Provided length of Gravel Trap 6.00 m
Provided Depth 2.00 m
Provided Width 5.00 m
Surface Area(m2) 30.00 m2
Outlet Transition Length

18.0
Deflection angle @ end of basin(θ) Degrees
Gravel Trap width(B) 5.0 m

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 07_Gravel Trap_Flushing Culvert: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Width at Canal (B) 2.4 m


L=(B-b)/ 2tanθ, Ref: Micro Hydro Guidelines, Pg 77,
Length of Transition 4 m Note: θ in radians
Adopt Transition length 4.00 m
Sediment Load Calculations Ref: Micro Hydro Guidelines, Pg 77
Sediment Concentration 2.00 kg/m3
Sediment Density 2600 kg/m3
Flushing Frequency 2 Hrs
Sediment Load 68256.00 kg Sload=Q*T*C
Packing Factor, Pfac 1.0
Volume of Sedment 26.25 m3 Vsed=Sload/(Pfac*Density)
Basin Surface Area 30.00 m2

Required Depth for Sediment Deposit 0.88 m

2.00
Required Depth for Settling of Particle m
Total Depth Required 2.88 m
Provided Depth including Hoover
3.30 m
section

OK
Design Size as per Sediment Flushing

Flushing Culvert During Normal Flow


(Water Level at Weir Crest Level)
Flushing Discharge 0.79 m3/s
Orifice Discharge Coefficient, Cor 0.60
Orifice Width 0.80 m
Orifice Depth 0.80 m
Water Depth for gravel flushing (h) 3.30 m Ref: Drawing Intake and Gravel Trap

Maximum Flushing Discharge to pass 3.09


during Normal Flow, calculated m3/s Q=Aor*Cor*(2*g*h)^0.5, In case of full opening of gates
Flushing Velocity 4.83 m/s

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 07_Gravel Trap_Flushing Culvert: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Maximum Flushing Discharge to pass Note: 4.5 m of head at Gravel Trap during the
3.61
during 100 yrs Flood Flow m3/s Monsoon Season

OK
Design Check Should be greater than required flushing discharge
Gravel Flushing Canal after Gates
(Water Level at Weir Crest Level)
Provided Width 0.80 m
Water Depth 0.21 m say
Longitudinal Slope 0.02
Area 0.17 m2
Wetted Perimeter 1.22 m
Manning's n 0.02
Velocity 2.36 m/s
Flushing Discharge 0.40 m3/s Flushing Discharge
Diamter of Particle that will settle 30.30 mm

Gravel Flushing Canal after Gates


during Monsoon Season
Provided Width 0.8 m
Provided Depth 0.8 m
Provided Longitudinal Slope 0.02
Area 0.64 m2
Wetted Perimeter 2.40 m
Manning's n 0.02
Flushing Discharge during full opening
3.61
during flood m3/s
Velocity 5.64 m/s Flushing Discharge
Hydraulic Slope 0.05
Diamter of Particle that will settle 139.06 mm

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 07_Gravel Trap_Flushing Culvert: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Approach Canal Design Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_08 Approved by : SG

Description Calculations Unit


Design Discharge 4.35 m3/s Including 10 % sediment flushing discharge
Mannings Coefficient 0.02
Width 2.40 m
Depth 1.30 m
Area of flow section 3.12 m2
Wetted Perimeter 5.00 m
Hydraulic Radious 0.62 m
Longitudanal Slope needed 0.000931
1 in 1074

Provided Slope of Approach Canal 1 in 500


Flow Velocity 1.39 m/s
Discharge Capacity 6.37 m3/sec

Adopted Approach Canal Size:


Width of Canal 2.4 m
Freeboard Provided 0.5 m Considering the head over crest at spillway during HFL conditions
Depth with Freeboard 1.8 m
Provided Bed slope 1 in 500

Checking of settling velocity


Diameter of paticle that will settle 14.00 mm
Design Considerations OK >5 mm

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 08_Approach Canal Design: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Settling Basin and Forebay Design Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_09 Approved by : SG

Input Parameter
Design Discharge 3.95 m3/s
Flushing Discharge 0.40 m3/s 10% of Design Discharge
Total Discharge 4.35 m3/s
Particle Size Selected 0.2 mm
Fall Velocity 0.01876 m/s Ref: DoED GuidelinesPg: 2H-7, at 15 deg temp
Permissible Flow Velocity 0.197 m/s v=a*d^0.5, a=0.44 for 0.1<d<1
Sediment Concentration 3000 Mg/Litre
Manning's n 0.017
Selected Type Continuous Type Desanding Basin
No of Bay 2
Unit Discharge 2.17 m3/s
Design of Deasnder
Mean Depth 2.00 m
Width of Settling Basin 7.00 m
Wetted Perimeter 11.00 m
Flow Area 14.00 m2
Hydraulic Radius 1.27 m
Flow Velocity,V 0.155 m/s
Shear velocity 0.006 m/s (U*)=0.042V/(Rh^(1/6)
Check for shear Velocity, Yes U*<w/2.5
Length of Settling Basin Required 24.83 m L=V*H/(w-U*)
Adopted Dimension
Length 40.00 m
Width 7.00 m
Height 2.00 m
Efficiency(η), Vetter's Eqn 91.1% (η)=(1-e^(-wAs/Q), Vetter's Equation
Efficiency(η), Camp's Eqn 100.00% From camp efficiency graph

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 09_Settling_Basin & Forebay: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Transition Length
Deflection angle @ start of basin 13.5 degrees
Desanding Basin width 14.3 m
Width at Gate 2.4 m
Ltransition 24.8 =(B-b)/2tanθ
Adopted Transition length 25.4
Minimum Bottom Slope
Adopt Size Maximum 5 mm
Discharge Per Unit Width 0.31 m3/s/m Bouvard Equation
Min Slope 0.09% Provide Min 2% Slope, (Smin)=0.30d^(9/7)/q^(6/7)
So Adopted Slope(S) 2.50% 1V:40H
Check for Mobility of Bed Load
Flow Area 14.00 m2
HGL(S) 0.000028 (Q*n/ARh^1.67)^2
Hydraulic Radius 1.27 m
Density of water 1000 Kg/m3
Density of Sediments 2600 Kg/m3
Flow through Velocity(v),m/s 0.155 m/s
Shear velocity 0.004 m/s (U*)=0.042V/(Rh^(1/6)
Mean Particle Size(D50) 1.10 mm
Kinematic Viscosity 1.3E-06 m2/s 10deg Temperature
2
to=gwRS 0.035 kg/m mean boundry shear
Parameter for Shield's diagram
Boundry Renold No 3.642 (X) = U*D50/u
Mobility No 0.020 t* (Y)= to/(gs-g)/D50
Go to Shields diagram and find NO SCOUR
Sediment Depth
Sediment Concentration 3000 Mg/Lit
Sediment Density 2600 kg/m3
Flushing Frequency 8 hrs
Sediment Load 187704.00 kg Sload=Q*T*C
Packing Factor 1 Pfac
Volume of Sedment 72.19 m3 Vsed=Sload/(Pfac*Density)
Basin Surface Area 280.00 m2
Required Depth 0.26 m
Provided Depth for sediment Deposition 2.00 m

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 09_Settling_Basin & Forebay: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Design Size as per Sediment Flushing OK


Sediment Flushing Orifice
Orifice width 1 m
Orifice depth 1 m
Water depth from orifice crest 5 m
Area 1 m2
Orifice coefficient 0.7
Bed Slope 0.02
Discharge that can be flushed 6.93 m3/s
Flushing Discharge 0.40 m3/s
Wetted Perimeter 4.00 m
Hydraulic Radius 0.25 m
Particle size to be flushed 55.00 mm
Settling Basin Outlet
Orifice width 1.20 m
Orifice height 1.20 m
Water depth at outlet gate 1.50 m
Area 1.44 m2
Velocity at Desander Outlet Gate 0.69 m/s
Forebay Design
Pipe/Penstock.Headrace d 1.40 m
Adopted width 6.00 m
Provided Length 25.0 m
Design Discharge 3.95 m3/s
Velocity in Headrace Pipe 2.57 m/s
Hydraulic Design for Submergence at Forebay
KNAUSS
Submergence head 4.83 m ht>=D*(1+2.3*v/sqrt(gD)
NAGARKAR
Submergence head 8.01 m ht>=4.4*(V*D^0.5)^0.54
ROHAN
Submergence head 2.99 m ht>=1.474*V^0.48*D^0.76
GORDON
ht>=c*v*D^0.5, c=0.5434 for symmetric approach
Submergence head 1.65 m
conditions
SUNCTION HEAD (REQUIRED) 1.74 m ht>=1.8*d*v/(2*9.81*d)^0.5

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 09_Settling_Basin & Forebay: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

PROSSER, (1997) 2.10 m ht>=1.5*d


ITDG MANUAL 0.50 m ht>=1.5*v^2/2g
REQUIRED SUBMERGENCE 3.12 m
PROVIDED SUBMERGECE 3.50 M
SIZING OF HEADPOND
Design Discharge 3.95 m3/s
No of Units 2.00
Unit Demand 1.98 m3/s
Pipe Diameter 1.40 m
Volume of Water Storage Requied 237.00 m3 Considering supply time of 2 min
3
Provided Volume for Storage 263.28 m

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 09_Settling_Basin & Forebay: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Approach Pipe Design Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_10 Approved by : SG

Note : For flow more than half full


Diameter of Pipe, D 2.00 m
Radius of pipe, r 1.00 m
Water depth in pipe 1.50 m
Flow in pipe, Q 3.95 m3/s
Free Board, h 0.50 m
Angle Suspended, θ 2.09 radians
Water flow area, A 2.53 m2
Wetted Perimeter 4.19 m
Hydraulic Depth 0.60 m
Manning's Constant for pipe 0.012
Slope required 0.00068985
1 in 1450
Velocity in pipe 1.56 m/s
Provided Slope 0.002
1 in 500
Velocity for adopted slope 1.56 m/s
Discharge capacity for adopted slope 6.73 m3/s

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 10_Approach Pipe_FreeFlow: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Bend Loss Calculation: Approach Pipe Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_11 Approved by : SG

Bend No. Horizontal Deflection Angle Bend Loss Coefficient


1 70.00 0.13
2 55.00 0.12
3 69.00 0.13
4 14.15 0.04
5 35.00 0.08
6 2.34 0.01
7 20 0.05
8 26.38 0.07
9 16.61 0.04
Total Bend Loss Coefficient 0.68

Velocity in Approach Pipe 1.563


Head Loss at Approach Pipe 0.08

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 11_BendLoss at Approach Pipe: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Bend Loss Calculation: Waterway (Minimum Value of Friction Factor Considered) Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_12 Approved by : SG

Q 3.95 m3/s
g 9.81 m/s2

Minor headloss Major Headloss


Pipe number Friction Factor Length Area Velocity Hydraulic diameter Major headloss Minor headloss Total headloss
coefficient Coefficient
1 0.01 10.00 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.25 0.07 0.02 0.08 0.11
2 0.01 35.72 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.26 0.09 0.01 0.09
3 0.01 46.76 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.33 0.11 0.02 0.14
4 0.01 32.76 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.23 0.08 0.02 0.10
5 0.01 47.09 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.15 0.34 0.11 0.05 0.16
6 0.01 8.11 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.02
7 0.02 50.00 8.96 0.44 3.14 0.69 0.32 0.00 0.01 0.01
8 0.02 552.72 8.96 0.44 3.14 0.00 3.52 0.03 0.00 0.03
9 0.02 609.72 8.96 0.44 3.14 0.00 3.88 0.04 0.00 0.04
10 0.01 7.00 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.52 0.05 0.02 0.17 0.19
11 0.01 9.13 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.04
12 0.01 55.42 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.02 0.40 0.13 0.01 0.14
13 0.01 50.54 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.36 0.12 0.02 0.14
14 0.01 62.23 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.44 0.15 0.04 0.19
15 0.01 13.00 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.07
16 0.01 46.61 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.33 0.11 0.01 0.12
17 0.01 50.72 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.36 0.12 0.00 0.12
18 0.01 59.81 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.43 0.14 0.03 0.17
19 0.01 24.30 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.17 0.06 0.03 0.08
20 0.01 29.79 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.21 0.07 0.04 0.11
21 0.01 24.91 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.18 0.06 0.03 0.09
22 0.01 19.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.14 0.05 0.04 0.09
23 0.01 12.51 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.05
24 0.01 25.71 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.18 0.06 0.03 0.09
25 0.01 26.98 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.19 0.06 0.02 0.08
26 0.01 18.99 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.14 0.05 0.04 0.09
27 0.01 21.63 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.07
28 0.01 39.15 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.14 0.28 0.09 0.05 0.14
29 0.01 25.40 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.15 0.18 0.06 0.05 0.11

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 12_Headloss_min_Waterway: 1 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

30 0.01 25.30 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.15 0.18 0.06 0.05 0.11
31 0.01 20.76 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.07
32 0.01 67.59 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.48 0.16 0.03 0.19
33 0.01 63.04 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.45 0.15 0.03 0.18
34 0.01 59.03 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.42 0.14 0.03 0.17
35 0.01 58.44 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.13 0.42 0.14 0.04 0.18
36 0.01 31.89 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.23 0.08 0.04 0.12
37 0.01 17.57 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.13 0.04 0.01 0.05
38 0.01 41.45 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.30 0.10 0.04 0.14
39 0.01 9.69 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.04 0.06
40 0.01 39.03 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.28 0.09 0.03 0.12
41 0.01 68.43 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.15 0.49 0.16 0.05 0.22
42 0.01 53.22 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.13 0.38 0.13 0.05 0.17
43 0.01 32.34 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.14 0.23 0.08 0.05 0.12
44 0.01 29.17 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.21 0.07 0.03 0.10
45 0.01 40.43 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.29 0.10 0.04 0.14
46 0.01 47.07 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.34 0.11 0.03 0.14
47 0.01 32.48 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.23 0.08 0.04 0.12
48 0.01 18.03 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.13 0.04 0.03 0.08
49 0.01 11.57 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.03
50 0.01 51.07 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.36 0.12 0.02 0.14
51 0.01 28.11 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.20 0.07 0.04 0.11
52 0.01 32.68 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.23 0.08 0.04 0.12
53 0.01 19.70 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.14 0.05 0.03 0.08
54 0.01 22.27 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.16 0.05 0.02 0.07
55 0.01 31.21 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.22 0.07 0.02 0.10
56 0.01 32.28 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.23 0.08 0.01 0.09
57 0.01 53.01 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.38 0.13 0.01 0.14
58 0.01 24.76 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.18 0.06 0.04 0.09
59 0.01 14.98 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.11 0.04 0.02 0.06
60 0.01 34.28 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.24 0.08 0.02 0.10
61 0.01 13.59 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.10 0.03 0.02 0.05
62 0.01 41.22 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.29 0.10 0.02 0.12
63 0.01 24.16 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.17 0.06 0.03 0.09
64 0.01 23.35 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.17 0.06 0.04 0.09
65 0.01 17.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.13 0.04 0.03 0.07
66 0.01 34.67 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.25 0.08 0.03 0.11
67 0.01 12.08 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.09 0.03 0.04 0.07
68 0.01 19.30 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.14 0.14 0.05 0.05 0.09
69 0.01 18.05 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.04 0.09
70 0.01 34.61 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.25 0.08 0.02 0.11

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 12_Headloss_min_Waterway: 2 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

71 0.01 22.70 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.16 0.05 0.03 0.09
72 0.01 28.93 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.21 0.07 0.03 0.10
73 0.01 33.47 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.24 0.08 0.03 0.11
74 0.01 10.05 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.01 0.03
75 0.01 22.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.16 0.05 0.03 0.09
76 0.01 17.38 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.12 0.04 0.02 0.06
77 0.01 29.34 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.21 0.07 0.02 0.10
78 0.01 39.31 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.28 0.09 0.01 0.11
79 0.01 23.84 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.17 0.06 0.01 0.07
80 0.01 69.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.50 0.17 0.04 0.21
81 0.01 22.10 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.16 0.05 0.01 0.07
82 0.01 19.00 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.14 0.05 0.02 0.07
83 0.01 9.18 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.07 0.02 0.04 0.06
84 0.01 33.34 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.02 0.24 0.08 0.01 0.09
85 0.01 55.16 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.39 0.13 0.01 0.14
86 0.01 52.39 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.37 0.13 0.00 0.13
87 0.01 63.60 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.45 0.15 0.03 0.18
88 0.01 34.70 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.25 0.08 0.03 0.12
89 0.01 55.71 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.01 0.40 0.13 0.00 0.14
90 0.01 63.15 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.01 0.45 0.15 0.00 0.16
91 0.01 43.92 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.31 0.11 0.00 0.11
92 0.01 40.16 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.29 0.10 0.01 0.10
93 0.01 25.83 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.18 0.06 0.03 0.09
94 0.01 31.38 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.22 0.08 0.03 0.11
95 0.01 16.15 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.12 0.04 0.02 0.06
96 0.01 55.78 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.40 0.13 0.01 0.15
97 0.01 42.66 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.30 0.10 0.03 0.13
98 0.01 23.47 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.17 0.06 0.01 0.07
99 0.01 59.86 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.43 0.14 0.01 0.15
100 0.01 32.86 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.23 0.08 0.01 0.09
101 0.01 49.40 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.35 0.12 0.00 0.12
102 0.01 47.90 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.02 0.34 0.11 0.01 0.12
103 0.01 45.11 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.32 0.11 0.02 0.13
104 0.01 63.02 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.45 0.15 0.00 0.15
105 0.01 63.63 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.45 0.15 0.01 0.16
106 0.01 41.38 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.30 0.10 0.00 0.10
107 0.01 44.58 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.13 0.32 0.11 0.04 0.15
108 0.01 29.07 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.21 0.07 0.04 0.11
109 0.01 35.74 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.26 0.09 0.01 0.10
110 0.01 42.56 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.30 0.10 0.02 0.12
111 0.01 34.02 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.24 0.08 0.00 0.08

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 12_Headloss_min_Waterway: 3 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

112 0.01 38.50 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.14 0.27 0.09 0.05 0.14
113 0.01 31.52 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.01 0.23 0.08 0.00 0.08
114 0.01 20.60 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.15 0.05 0.01 0.06
115 0.01 24.03 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.17 0.06 0.01 0.07
116 0.01 19.15 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.02 0.14 0.05 0.01 0.05
117 0.01 14.95 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.08
118 0.01 23.24 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.17 0.06 0.02 0.07
119 0.01 36.36 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.26 0.09 0.03 0.12
120 0.01 25.89 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.18 0.06 0.03 0.09
121 0.01 24.44 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.17 0.06 0.03 0.09
122 0.01 28.25 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.01 0.20 0.07 0.00 0.07
123 0.01 34.97 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.25 0.08 0.03 0.12
124 0.01 15.50 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.08
125 0.01 59.94 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.43 0.14 0.03 0.18
126 0.01 33.27 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.24 0.08 0.02 0.10
127 0.01 46.20 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.33 0.11 0.04 0.15
128 0.01 25.05 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.18 0.06 0.03 0.09
129 0.01 33.02 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.24 0.08 0.03 0.11
130 0.01 29.02 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.21 0.07 0.04 0.11
131 0.01 32.45 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.23 0.08 0.02 0.10
132 0.01 45.95 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.33 0.11 0.02 0.13
133 0.01 44.81 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.32 0.11 0.04 0.14
134 0.01 41.52 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.30 0.10 0.04 0.14
135 0.01 34.05 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.24 0.08 0.04 0.12
136 0.01 43.87 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.31 0.11 0.01 0.12
137 0.01 47.53 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.34 0.11 0.04 0.15
138 0.01 20.87 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.15 0.05 0.04 0.09
139 0.01 36.36 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.26 0.09 0.03 0.11
140 0.01 42.13 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.30 0.10 0.01 0.12
141 0.01 40.40 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.29 0.10 0.02 0.12
142 0.01 37.39 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.01 0.27 0.09 0.00 0.09
143 0.01 66.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.48 0.16 0.03 0.19
144 0.01 15.55 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.11 0.04 0.02 0.05
145 0.01 18.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.13 0.04 0.04 0.08
146 0.01 43.47 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.31 0.10 0.00 0.10
147 0.01 39.21 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.28 0.09 0.03 0.12
148 0.01 38.96 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.28 0.09 0.04 0.13
149 0.01 26.05 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.19 0.06 0.04 0.10
150 0.01 42.35 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.30 0.10 0.03 0.13
151 0.01 69.79 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.50 0.17 0.02 0.19
152 0.01 61.86 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.44 0.15 0.02 0.17

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 12_Headloss_min_Waterway: 4 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

153 0.01 54.67 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.39 0.13 0.00 0.13
154 0.01 63.62 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.02 0.45 0.15 0.01 0.16
155 0.01 62.95 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.45 0.15 0.02 0.17
156 0.01 11.04 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.39 0.08 0.03 0.13 0.16
157 0.01 23.14 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.06 0.21 0.19 0.05 0.24
158 0.01 36.54 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.03 0.33 0.29 0.03 0.32
159 0.01 57.43 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.00 0.52 0.46 0.00 0.46
160 0.01 57.43 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.00 0.52 0.46 0.00 0.46
161 0.01 49.39 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.03 0.45 0.40 0.03 0.43
162 0.01 63.69 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.00 0.58 0.51 0.00 0.51
163 0.01 63.69 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.02 0.58 0.51 0.01 0.52
164 0.01 73.54 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.09 0.67 0.59 0.08 0.67
165 0.01 57.45 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.02 0.52 0.46 0.02 0.48
166 0.01 73.07 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.04 0.66 0.58 0.03 0.62
167 0.01 81.85 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.02 0.74 0.66 0.02 0.68
168 0.01 45.05 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.69 0.41 0.36 0.61 0.97
169 0.01 11.96 0.50 3.93 0.80 0.10 0.15 0.12 0.08 0.19
170 0.01 25.38 0.50 3.93 0.80 - 0.32 0.25 - 0.25

Total headloss 18.79 5.06 23.84


Headrace Tunnel Headloss
Coefficient 7.71 0.70 8.41
Headrace Pipe Headloss Coefficient
38.38 12.17 50.55
Penstock Pipe Headloss Coefficient
6.20 1.01 7.21
Bifurcation Pipe Headloss
Coefficient 0.47 0.10 0.56
Tunnel Total headloss 0.08 0.01 0.08
Headrace Pipe Total Head Loss 12.88 4.08 16.96
Penstock Pipe Total Head Loss Upto
Unit 1 5.46 0.89 6.35
Bifurcation Pipe Headloss 0.37 0.08 0.44
Total headloss upto unit 1 18.79 5.06 23.84
Net head at unit 1 332.66

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 12_Headloss_min_Waterway: 5 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Bend Loss Calculation: Waterway (Maximum Value of Friction Factor Considered) Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_13 Approved by : SG

Q 3.95 m3/s
g 9.81 m/s2

Minor headloss Major Headloss


Pipe number Friction Factor Length Area Velocity Hydraulic diameter Major headloss Minor headloss Total headloss
coefficient Coefficient
1 0.016 10.00 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.25 0.11 0.04 0.08 0.12
2 0.016 35.72 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.41 0.14 0.01 0.15
3 0.016 46.76 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.53 0.18 0.02 0.20
4 0.016 32.76 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.37 0.13 0.02 0.15
5 0.016 47.09 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.15 0.54 0.18 0.05 0.23
6 0.016 8.11 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.09 0.03 0.00 0.03
7 0.035 50.00 8.96 0.44 3.14 0.69 0.56 0.01 0.01 0.01
8 0.035 552.72 8.96 0.44 3.14 0.00 6.15 0.06 0.00 0.06
9 0.035 609.72 8.96 0.44 3.14 0.00 6.79 0.07 0.00 0.07
10 0.016 7.00 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.52 0.08 0.03 0.17 0.20
11 0.016 9.13 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.10 0.04 0.02 0.05
12 0.016 55.42 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.02 0.63 0.21 0.01 0.22
13 0.016 50.54 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.58 0.19 0.02 0.22
14 0.016 62.23 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.71 0.24 0.04 0.28
15 0.016 13.00 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.15 0.05 0.03 0.08
16 0.016 46.61 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.53 0.18 0.01 0.19
17 0.016 50.72 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.58 0.19 0.00 0.20
18 0.016 59.81 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.68 0.23 0.03 0.26
19 0.016 24.30 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.28 0.09 0.03 0.12
20 0.016 29.79 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.34 0.11 0.04 0.15
21 0.016 24.91 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.28 0.10 0.03 0.12
22 0.016 19.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.22 0.08 0.04 0.12
23 0.016 12.51 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.14 0.05 0.02 0.07
24 0.016 25.71 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.29 0.10 0.03 0.13
25 0.016 26.98 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.31 0.10 0.02 0.12
26 0.016 18.99 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.22 0.07 0.04 0.11
27 0.016 21.63 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.25 0.08 0.02 0.10
28 0.016 39.15 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.14 0.45 0.15 0.05 0.20
29 0.016 25.40 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.15 0.29 0.10 0.05 0.15

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 13_Headloss_Max_Waterway: 1 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

30 0.016 25.30 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.15 0.29 0.10 0.05 0.15
31 0.016 20.76 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.24 0.08 0.02 0.10
32 0.016 67.59 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.77 0.26 0.03 0.29
33 0.016 63.04 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.72 0.24 0.03 0.27
34 0.016 59.03 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.67 0.23 0.03 0.26
35 0.016 58.44 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.13 0.67 0.22 0.04 0.27
36 0.016 31.89 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.36 0.12 0.04 0.16
37 0.016 17.57 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.20 0.07 0.01 0.08
38 0.016 41.45 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.47 0.16 0.04 0.20
39 0.016 9.69 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.07
40 0.016 39.03 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.45 0.15 0.03 0.18
41 0.016 68.43 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.15 0.78 0.26 0.05 0.31
42 0.016 53.22 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.13 0.61 0.20 0.05 0.25
43 0.016 32.34 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.14 0.37 0.12 0.05 0.17
44 0.016 29.17 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.33 0.11 0.03 0.14
45 0.016 40.43 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.46 0.16 0.04 0.20
46 0.016 47.07 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.54 0.18 0.03 0.21
47 0.016 32.48 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.37 0.12 0.04 0.16
48 0.016 18.03 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.21 0.07 0.03 0.10
49 0.016 11.57 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.13 0.04 0.00 0.05
50 0.016 51.07 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.58 0.20 0.02 0.21
51 0.016 28.11 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.32 0.11 0.04 0.15
52 0.016 32.68 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.37 0.13 0.04 0.16
53 0.016 19.70 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.23 0.08 0.03 0.11
54 0.016 22.27 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.25 0.09 0.02 0.10
55 0.016 31.21 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.36 0.12 0.02 0.14
56 0.016 32.28 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.37 0.12 0.01 0.14
57 0.016 53.01 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.61 0.20 0.01 0.21
58 0.016 24.76 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.28 0.09 0.04 0.13
59 0.016 14.98 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.17 0.06 0.02 0.08
60 0.016 34.28 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.39 0.13 0.02 0.15
61 0.016 13.59 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.16 0.05 0.02 0.07
62 0.016 41.22 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.47 0.16 0.02 0.18
63 0.016 24.16 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.28 0.09 0.03 0.12
64 0.016 23.35 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.27 0.09 0.04 0.13
65 0.016 17.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.20 0.07 0.03 0.10
66 0.016 34.67 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.40 0.13 0.03 0.16
67 0.016 12.08 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.14 0.05 0.04 0.08
68 0.016 19.30 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.14 0.22 0.07 0.05 0.12
69 0.016 18.05 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.13 0.21 0.07 0.04 0.11
70 0.016 34.61 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.40 0.13 0.02 0.16

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 13_Headloss_Max_Waterway: 2 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

71 0.016 22.70 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.26 0.09 0.03 0.12
72 0.016 28.93 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.33 0.11 0.03 0.14
73 0.016 33.47 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.38 0.13 0.03 0.16
74 0.016 10.05 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.11 0.04 0.01 0.05
75 0.016 22.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.26 0.09 0.03 0.12
76 0.016 17.38 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.20 0.07 0.02 0.09
77 0.016 29.34 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.34 0.11 0.02 0.14
78 0.016 39.31 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.45 0.15 0.01 0.17
79 0.016 23.84 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.27 0.09 0.01 0.10
80 0.016 69.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.80 0.27 0.04 0.31
81 0.016 22.10 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.25 0.08 0.01 0.10
82 0.016 19.00 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.22 0.07 0.02 0.10
83 0.016 9.18 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.07
84 0.016 33.34 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.02 0.38 0.13 0.01 0.14
85 0.016 55.16 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.63 0.21 0.01 0.22
86 0.016 52.39 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.60 0.20 0.00 0.20
87 0.016 63.60 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.73 0.24 0.03 0.27
88 0.016 34.70 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.40 0.13 0.03 0.17
89 0.016 55.71 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.01 0.64 0.21 0.00 0.22
90 0.016 63.15 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.01 0.72 0.24 0.00 0.25
91 0.016 43.92 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.50 0.17 0.00 0.17
92 0.016 40.16 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.46 0.15 0.01 0.16
93 0.016 25.83 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.30 0.10 0.03 0.12
94 0.016 31.38 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.36 0.12 0.03 0.15
95 0.016 16.15 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.18 0.06 0.02 0.08
96 0.016 55.78 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.64 0.21 0.01 0.23
97 0.016 42.66 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.49 0.16 0.03 0.19
98 0.016 23.47 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.27 0.09 0.01 0.10
99 0.016 59.86 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.68 0.23 0.01 0.24
100 0.016 32.86 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.38 0.13 0.01 0.14
101 0.016 49.40 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.56 0.19 0.00 0.19
102 0.016 47.90 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.02 0.55 0.18 0.01 0.19
103 0.016 45.11 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.52 0.17 0.02 0.19
104 0.016 63.02 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.72 0.24 0.00 0.24
105 0.016 63.63 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.73 0.24 0.01 0.26
106 0.016 41.38 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.47 0.16 0.00 0.16
107 0.016 44.58 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.13 0.51 0.17 0.04 0.21
108 0.016 29.07 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.33 0.11 0.04 0.15
109 0.016 35.74 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.03 0.41 0.14 0.01 0.15
110 0.016 42.56 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.49 0.16 0.02 0.18
111 0.016 34.02 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.39 0.13 0.00 0.13

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 13_Headloss_Max_Waterway: 3 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

112 0.016 38.50 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.14 0.44 0.15 0.05 0.19
113 0.016 31.52 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.01 0.36 0.12 0.00 0.12
114 0.016 20.60 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.24 0.08 0.01 0.09
115 0.016 24.03 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.27 0.09 0.01 0.10
116 0.016 19.15 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.02 0.22 0.07 0.01 0.08
117 0.016 14.95 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.17 0.06 0.04 0.10
118 0.016 23.24 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.27 0.09 0.02 0.11
119 0.016 36.36 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.42 0.14 0.03 0.17
120 0.016 25.89 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.30 0.10 0.03 0.12
121 0.016 24.44 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.28 0.09 0.03 0.13
122 0.016 28.25 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.01 0.32 0.11 0.00 0.11
123 0.016 34.97 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.40 0.13 0.03 0.17
124 0.016 15.50 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.18 0.06 0.04 0.10
125 0.016 59.94 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.68 0.23 0.03 0.26
126 0.016 33.27 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.38 0.13 0.02 0.15
127 0.016 46.20 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.53 0.18 0.04 0.22
128 0.016 25.05 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.10 0.29 0.10 0.03 0.13
129 0.016 33.02 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.09 0.38 0.13 0.03 0.16
130 0.016 29.02 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.33 0.11 0.04 0.15
131 0.016 32.45 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.37 0.12 0.02 0.15
132 0.016 45.95 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.53 0.18 0.02 0.20
133 0.016 44.81 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.51 0.17 0.04 0.21
134 0.016 41.52 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.47 0.16 0.04 0.20
135 0.016 34.05 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.39 0.13 0.04 0.17
136 0.016 43.87 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.50 0.17 0.01 0.18
137 0.016 47.53 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.54 0.18 0.04 0.22
138 0.016 20.87 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.12 0.24 0.08 0.04 0.12
139 0.016 36.36 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.42 0.14 0.03 0.17
140 0.016 42.13 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.04 0.48 0.16 0.01 0.18
141 0.016 40.40 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.46 0.15 0.02 0.18
142 0.016 37.39 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.01 0.43 0.14 0.00 0.15
143 0.016 66.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.76 0.26 0.03 0.28
144 0.016 15.55 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.05 0.18 0.06 0.02 0.08
145 0.016 18.65 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.21 0.07 0.04 0.11
146 0.016 43.47 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.50 0.17 0.00 0.17
147 0.016 39.21 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.45 0.15 0.03 0.18
148 0.016 38.96 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.45 0.15 0.04 0.18
149 0.016 26.05 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.11 0.30 0.10 0.04 0.14
150 0.016 42.35 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.08 0.48 0.16 0.03 0.19
151 0.016 69.79 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.80 0.27 0.02 0.29
152 0.016 61.86 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.07 0.71 0.24 0.02 0.26

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 13_Headloss_Max_Waterway: 4 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

153 0.016 54.67 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.00 0.62 0.21 0.00 0.21
154 0.016 63.62 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.02 0.73 0.24 0.01 0.25
155 0.016 62.95 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.06 0.72 0.24 0.02 0.26
156 0.016 11.04 1.54 2.57 1.40 0.39 0.13 0.04 0.13 0.17
157 0.016 23.14 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.06 0.34 0.30 0.05 0.35
158 0.016 36.54 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.03 0.53 0.47 0.03 0.50
159 0.016 57.43 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.00 0.84 0.74 0.00 0.74
160 0.016 57.43 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.00 0.84 0.74 0.00 0.74
161 0.016 49.39 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.03 0.72 0.63 0.03 0.66
162 0.016 63.69 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.00 0.93 0.82 0.00 0.82
163 0.016 63.69 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.02 0.93 0.82 0.01 0.83
164 0.016 73.54 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.09 1.07 0.94 0.08 1.02
165 0.016 57.45 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.02 0.84 0.74 0.02 0.75
166 0.016 73.07 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.04 1.06 0.94 0.03 0.97
167 0.016 81.85 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.02 1.19 1.05 0.02 1.07
168 0.016 45.05 0.95 4.16 1.10 0.69 0.66 0.58 0.61 1.18
169 0.016 11.96 0.50 3.93 0.80 0.10 0.24 0.19 0.08 0.26
170 0.016 25.38 0.50 3.93 0.80 - 0.51 0.40 - 0.40

Total headloss 30.07 5.06 35.12


Headrace Tunnel Headloss
Coefficient 13.50 0.70 14.20
Headrace Pipe Headloss Coefficient
61.41 12.17 73.58
Penstock Pipe Headloss Coefficient
9.92 1.01 10.93
Bifurcation Pipe Headloss
Coefficient 0.75 0.10 0.84
Tunnel Total headloss 0.13 0.01 0.14
Headrace Pipe Total Head Loss 20.61 4.08 24.69
Penstock Pipe Total Head Loss Upto
Unit 1 8.74 0.89 9.63
Bifurcation Pipe Headloss 0.59 0.08 0.66
Total headloss upto unit 1 30.07 5.06 35.12
Net head at unit 1 321.38

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 13_Headloss_Max_Waterway: 5 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Detailed Head Loss Calculations Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_14 Approved by : SG

Assumptions:-
Mannings value,n Number 1/n
Concrete 0.014 71.43
Shortcrete 0.022 46.51

General Project Parameters


Installed Capacity 11.05 MW
Design discharge Qd 3.95 m3/s
Percetange of Over diversion 0%
Diversion Discharge Qdiversion 4.74 m3/s
Number of units 2
Maximum Regulated water Level MRWL 1767.5 masl
Minimum operating water Level MOWL 1767.5 masl
Turbine Axis Level 1410 masl
Gross Head Hgross max 357.5 masl
Total Head Loss HL Total 30.24 m
Normal or Installed Regulated Water Level NRWL 1767.50 masl
Net Head Hnet head 327.26 m
Rated Head Hnet head rated 327.26 m
Normal or Installed Regulated Water Level
Weir Crest Level 1767.50
After Intake 1767.39
After Transistion Canal/ Inlet Transistion of Canal 1767.36
At end of Gravel Trap Settling Zone 1767.35
At start of Approach Canal 1767.29
At end of Approach Canal 1767.28
At the start of Settling Zone 1767.27
At the end of Settling Zone 1767.27
At Head Pond start 1767.22

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 14_Headloss_Conclusion: 6 of 7 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

At Head Pond End 1767.22


At start of Approach Pipe 1767.17
At end of Approach Pipe 1766.88
At the end of forebay 1766.88
1. LOSSES FROM INTAKE TO SETTLING BASIN OUTLET
1.1 Intake Loss due to change in direction of flow
Diversion Discharge 4.74 m3/s
Velocity inflow in main stream V1 0 m/s
Effective Width of Intake Wi 5.00 m
Depth of water at intake h 1.2 m
Opening Reduction factor
v22  v22 v12 
 
Velocity in intake V2 0.79 m/s
he  K 
2  g  2  g 2  g 
Entrance Coefficient k 0.3
Head loss Due to change in directiion of flow HL1 0.041 m
1.2 Head Loss due Trash Rack at Intake
Coefficient K1 1.00
K2 2.42 4
 d  3 v0
2
Thickness of trash rack bar d 10.00 mm hTR  K1  K 2      sin
Space between trash rack bar
Intake velocity
a
Vo
100
0.79
mm
m/s
 a  2 g
Inclination angle a 80 degree
Head loss Due to Trash Rack HL2 0.004 m
1.3 Head Loss at Intake Orifice
Coefficient of discharge Cd 0.700
No. of Openings 2.000
Width B 2.500 m
2
Height H 1.200 m
Area of orifice A 6.000 m2
Velocity V 0.790 m/s
Q2
Velocity Head 0.032 m H L0  2
Cd A2 * 2 g
Headloss through orifice HL3 0.065 m
1.4 Head Loss at Transition of Canal
Ccontraction coefficient kc 0.02
v22  v22 v12 
Height before transition hc1 1.20 m
he  K   
Width before transition Wc1 6.00 m
2  g  2  g 2  g 

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 14_Headloss_Conclusion: 7 of 7 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


v22  v22 Vol2  B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
v12 Annex
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW)
he  K    
Height after transition hc2 1.90 m
2  g  2  g 2  g 
Width after transition W c2 5.00 m
Velocity before transition V1 0.66 m/s
Velocity after transition V2 0.50 m/s
2
Area after transition A 9.5 m
Head loss Due to transition of canal HL4 0.035 m
1.6 Gravel Trap Settling Zone
3 H Lg  keg
V
1
2
V2
2

Design discharge of Settling Basin basin Qd 4.35 m /s 2g
Length of Gravel Trap L 6 m
Width of basin W 5 m
Depth of basin at starting point h1 1.85 m
Depth of basin at end point h2 1.85 m
Average depth h 1.85 m n 2V 2
L
2 H Ld 
Crossectional area of basin A 9.25 m 4
R 3

Wetted Perimeter of Basin P 8.7 m


Hydraulic Radius of Basin R 1.06 m
Velocity along Gravel Trap Basin V 0.47 m/s
Manning's coefficient n 0.014
Head loss along the Gravel Trap basin HL5 0.0002 m
1.7 Gravel Trap Fine Trashrack Headloss
Coefficient K1 1.00
0 K2 2.42
Thickness of trash rack bar d 10.00 mm
Space between trash rack bar a 50.00 mm
Flow Velocity Vo 0.67
Inclination angle a 75.00
Head loss Due to Trash Rack HL6 0.006
1.7 Gravel Trap Outlet Transistion
contraction coefficient Keg 0.018
Height before transition hc1 1.50 m
Width before transition Wc1 5.00 m
Height after transition hc2 1.50 m
Width after transition W c2 2.40 m
Velocity before transition V1 0.58 m/s v22  v22 v12 
he  K   
2  g  2  g 2  g 
Velocity after transition V2 1.21 m/s

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 14_Headloss_Conclusion: 8 of 7 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) v  v22 Vol2
2
 B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations
v12 Annex
he  K 2
   
Area after transition A 3.60 m
2
2 g  2 g 2 g 
Head loss along the Gravel Trap basin HL7 0.058
1.8 Approach Canal
Velocity 1/So 0.0009 From Design Calculations
Length L 14.50
Head loss in Canal HL8 0.0135
1.9 Settling Basin loss
ii. Inlet Transistion of Settling Basin
Design Discharge for one chamber Qd 2.17 m3/s
Width at entrance W1 0.7 m
Depth at entrance H1 1.54 m
Width after transition W2 7 m
Deptht after transition H2 2.2 m
Velocity before the expnasion Ve1 2.02 m/s
H Lg  keg
V 1
2
V2
2

Velocity after the expansion Ve2 0.14 m/s 2g
Gradual expansion Coeffiient Keg 0.018
Head loss Due to Expansion of Settling basin HL9 0.0037 m
iii. Along the Settling Basin Legnth
Design discharge of Settling Basin basin Qd 2.17 m3/s
Length of basin L 40 m
Width of basin W 7 m
Depth of basin at starting point h1 2.2 m
Depth of basin at end point h2 5.02 m
Average depth h 3.61 m
Crossectional area of basin A 25.27 m2
Wetted Perimeter of Settling Basin basin P 14.22 m
Hydraulic Radius of Settling Basin basin R 1.78 m n 2V 2
L
H Ld  4
Velocity along Settling Basin basin V 0.09 m/s R 3

Manning's coefficient n 0.014


Head loss along the Settling Basin HL10 0.00003 m
iv. Orifice Loss
Orifice width Wo 1.20 m
Orifice Height Ho 1.20 m
Number of Opening no 4.00
3 Q2
Discharge 3.95 m /s H L0  2
Cd A2 * 2 g

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 14_Headloss_Conclusion: 9 of 7 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) 2 Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations
Q
H L0  2
Discharge coefficient Cd 0.7 Cd A2 * 2 g
Head loss Due to orifice HL11 0.049 m
iv. Contraction Loss at the end of Settling Basin
3
Design Discharge Qd 3.95 m /s
Width at starting point w1 14.3 m
Depth at starting point h1 1.65 m
width at end point w2 4.7 m
depth at end point h2 1.65 m
2
Sectional Area before Contraction A1 23.595 m
Sectional area after contraction A2 7.755 m3
Velocity before Contraction
Velocity After contraction
V1
V2
0.17
0.51
m/s
m/s HLCD  Cd *
V
2
2
V1
2

Contraction coefficient Cd 0.018 2g
Head loss Due to Contraction at end of Settling Basin HL12 0.0002 m
Total Loss at the end of settling Basin HLHW 0.28 m
2. HEADLOSS AFTER Settling Basin TO FOREBAY END
2.1 Entrance loss
Design Discharge of pipe Qd 3.95 m3/s
Diameter of pipe d 2 m
X-section area A 2.53 m
Entrance loss coefficient Ke 0.15
Velocity After Entrance V 1.56 m/s
Head loss Due to entrance 0.019 m
2.2 The losses due Trash Rack at start of Approach Pipe
Coefficient K1 1.00
K2 2.42
Thickness of trash rack bar d 10.00 mm
Space between trash rack bar a 50 mm
Intake velocity Vo 1.56 m/s
Inclination angle a 72 degree
Head loss Due to Trash Rack 0.034 m
2.3 Headloss at Approach Pipe
Length of Pipe L 300 m
Slope of Hydraulic Gradient Line 0.00069 m
Head loss Due to Approach Pipe 0.207 m

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 14_Headloss_Conclusion: 10 of 7 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

2.4 Headloss at Approach Pipe due to bends 0.084


2.5 Headloss at Inlet Transistion of Forebay
Design Discharge for one chamber Qd 3.95 m3/s
Width at entrance W1 3 m
Depth at entrance H1 1.5 m H L g  keg

V1
2
 V
2g
2
2

Width after transition W2 6 m


Deptht after transition H2 4.5 m
Velocity before the expnasion Ve1 0.88 m/s
Velocity after the expansion Ve2 0.15 m/s
Gradual expansion Coeffiient Keg 0.018
Head loss Due to Expansion of Forebay 0.0007 m
2.6 Headloss at Forebay
Design discharge of forebay Qd 3.95 m3/s
Length of basin L 19 m
Width of basin W 6 m
Depth of basin at starting point h1 4.5 m
Depth of basin at end point h2 7.4 m
Average depth h 5.95 m
Crossectional area of basin A 35.7 m2
Wetted Perimeter of forebay basin P 17.9 m
Hydraulic Radius of forebay basin R 1.99 m n 2V 2 L
Velocity along forebay basin V 0.11 m/s
H Ld  4
R 3

Manning's coefficient n 0.014


Head loss along the Forebay basin 0.0000182 m
Total Loss from Settling Basin End to Forebay End HLHW 0.34 m

3. HEAD LOSS AT WATERWAY ALIGNMENT


3.1. Entrance loss
Design Discharge of pipe Qd 3.95 m3/s
Diameter of pipe d 1.4 m
X-section area A 1.54 m
Entrance loss coefficient Ke 0.15
Velocity After Entrance V 2.57 m/s
Head loss Due to entrance HL 1 0.05 m
3.2 The losses due Trash Rack at Forebay End

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 14_Headloss_Conclusion: 11 of 7 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Coefficient K1 1.00
K2 2.42
Thickness of trash rack bar d 10.00 mm
Space between trash rack bar a 50 mm v22  v22 v2 
Intake velocity Vo 2.57 m/s he  K    1 
Inclination angle a 72 degree
2 g  2 g 2 g 
Head loss Due to Trash Rack HL 2 0.090 m

3.3 Friction Loss, Bend Loss and other Losses at Headrace Pipe and Headrace Tunnel
HL HRP 20.94
3.4 Friction Loss, Bend Loss and other Losses at Penstock Pipe
HL PP 8.542
Head losses Summary
Total Head loss in Headworks upto Approach Pipe HLHW 0.28 m
Total Head loss from Approach Pipe upto start of HRP HLFB 0.48 m
Head Loss in HRP and Headrace Tunnel 20.94 m
Head Loss in Penstock Pipe 8.54 m
Total Head Loss 30.24 m
Net head available @ rated discharge 327.26 m

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 14_Headloss_Conclusion: 12 of 7 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title HeadLoss Calculations_Monthwise Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_15 Approved by : SG

3
Design Discharge 3.95 m /s
Gross Head 357.50 m
Monthly Variations of Net Head
Headloss in
Discharge in Riparian Release, Maximum Plant Headloss at Headloss Headloss at Headloss in Total Head Net head,
S.N. Months 3 3 3 Gross Head, m bifurcation
river, m /s m /s Discharge, m /s Headworks, m at HRT, m HRP, m penstock, m loss, m m
pipe, m
1.00 Jan 3.06 0.28 2.779 357.50 0.76 0.06 10.31 3.95 0.27 15.35 342.15
2.00 Feb 2.81 0.28 2.529 357.50 0.76 0.05 8.54 3.28 0.23 12.85 344.65
3.00 Mar 2.84 0.28 2.559 357.50 0.76 0.05 8.74 3.35 0.23 13.14 344.36
4.00 Apr 3.20 0.28 2.919 357.50 0.76 0.06 11.37 4.36 0.30 16.86 340.64
5.00 May 4.01 0.28 3.729 357.50 0.76 0.10 18.56 7.12 0.49 27.04 330.46
6.00 Jun 6.82 0.28 3.950 357.50 0.76 0.11 20.83 7.99 0.55 30.24 327.26
7.00 Jul 17.00 0.28 3.950 357.50 0.76 0.11 20.83 7.99 0.55 30.24 327.26
8.00 Aug 22.80 0.28 3.950 357.50 0.76 0.11 20.83 7.99 0.55 30.24 327.26
9.00 Sep 16.37 0.28 3.950 357.50 0.76 0.11 20.83 7.99 0.55 30.24 327.26
10.00 Oct 7.90 0.28 3.950 357.50 0.76 0.11 20.83 7.99 0.55 30.24 327.26
11.00 Nov 4.65 0.28 3.950 357.50 0.76 0.11 20.83 7.99 0.55 30.24 327.26
12.00 Dec 3.49 0.28 3.209 357.50 0.76 0.07 13.75 5.27 0.36 20.22 337.28

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 15_Headloss_Months: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Power and Energy Calculation Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_16 Approved by : SG

Gross Head 357.5 m Turbine Efficiency 91%


Net Head 327.26 m Generator Efficiency 97%
Design Discharge 3.95 m3/s Transformer Efficiency 99%
Installed Capacity 11.05 MW Combined Efficiency 87%

Available
River Environmental Installed Outage & Contract Dry Contract Wet Monthly
No. of Plant Head Loss Net Head Gross Energy
Months Discharge Release Capacity Losses (5%) Energy Energy Revenue
Days Discharge
m3/s m3/s m3/s m m kW kWh kWh kWh kWh NRs, '000
January 31 3.06 0.28 2.78 15.35 342.15 8233 6,064,432.24 303,221.61 5,761,210.63 48,394.17
February 28 2.81 0.28 2.53 12.85 344.65 7548 5,021,321.26 251,066.06 4,770,255.19 40,070.14
March 31 2.84 0.28 2.56 13.14 344.36 7631 5,620,559.21 281,027.96 5,339,531.25 44,852.06
April 30 3.20 0.28 2.92 16.86 340.64 8610 6,137,304.58 306,865.23 5,830,439.35 48,975.69
May 31 4.01 0.28 3.73 27.04 330.46 10671 7,859,696.21 392,984.81 7,466,711.40 62,720.38
June 30 6.82 0.28 3.95 30.24 327.26 11050 7,876,440.00 393,822.00 7,482,618.00 35,916.57
July 31 17.00 0.28 3.95 30.24 327.26 11050 8,138,988.00 406,949.40 7,732,038.60 37,113.79
August 31 22.80 0.28 3.95 30.24 327.26 11050 8,138,988.00 406,949.40 7,732,038.60 37,113.79
September 30 16.37 0.28 3.95 30.24 327.26 11050 7,876,440.00 393,822.00 7,482,618.00 35,916.57
October 31 7.90 0.28 3.95 30.24 327.26 11050 8,138,988.00 406,949.40 7,732,038.60 37,113.79
November 30 4.65 0.28 3.95 30.24 327.26 11050 7,876,440.00 393,822.00 7,482,618.00 35,916.57
December 31 3.49 0.28 3.21 20.22 337.28 9372 6,903,211.22 345,160.56 6,558,050.66 55,087.63
Total Energy 85,652,808.71 4,282,640.44 35,726,198.48 45,643,969.80 519,191.12
Total Energy after Loss and Outage 81,370,168.28
% Energy 43.91% 56.09%

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss 16_Power_and_Energy_Calculation: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/3/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Tailrace Culvert Design Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_17 Approved by : SG

Design of Tailrace Cuvert


Non pressure culvert

Manning Roughness Cofficient,


n 0.017
Slope, 1V:H 600
Required Discharge of each
Canal,Qr 1.98 m3/sec
Base Width , b 1.50 m
Depth, d 1.00 m
Area, A 1.500 Sq. m
Wetted Perimneter, P 3.500 m
Mean Hydraulic Depth, R 0.429 m
Velocity 1.365 m/sec
Calculated Discharge, Qcal 2.05 m3/sec OK fb= 0.5 m
Free board,fb 0.5 m

Output:Tailrace Culver size H=1.5 m d= 1.000 m


Width 1.50 m
Height 1.50 m
Slope (1V:H) 600
B= 1.5 m
Fig. Tailrace culvert section

02H09_01_Hydrailic_Design_HW_and_Headloss_Updated 17_Tailrace_Culvert: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Surge Pipe Design (Upsurge height calculation for instantaneous closer (Finite Difference Method) Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_18 Approved by : SG

Water level at reservoir NWL 1,766.50 m amsl


Length of Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) l1 5,345.00 m 82%
Length of Headrace Tunnel (Shotcre + Concrete Lining) l2 1,210.00 m 18%
Total Length of pressure waterway upto Surge Tank L 6,555.00 m
Cross Sectional Area of Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) A1 1.54 m2
Cross Sectional Area of of Headrace Tunnel (Concrete Section) A2 9.97 m2 Consider the Headrace Tunnel of Concrete Section for Upsurge Calculation
Equivalent Daimeter of pressure tunnel D1 1.40 m
Equivalent Daimeter of Headrace Tunnel (Concrete Section) D2 3.56 m
Equivalent Cross section area of waterway f 1.54 m2
Wetted Perimeter of Headrace pipe (Steel Section) P1 4.40 m
Wetted Perimeter of Hedarace Tunnel (Concrete section) P2 11.97 m
Hydraulic Radius of Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) R1 0.35 m
Hydraulic Radius of Headrace Tunnel (Concrete Section) R2 0.83 m
Discharge Q 3.95 m3/s
Diameter of Surge Pipe D 2.50 m
Angle of Inclination of Surge Pipe With Horizontal α 25.00
Equicalent Cross sectional Area of Surge Pipe F 11.62 m2
Acceleration due to gravity g 9.81 m2/s For Upsurge, minimum values of Manning's Constant
Velocity Coefficient for Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) k1 100.00 Manning's Constant- For Steel Section
Velocity Coefficient for Headrace Tunnel (Concrete Section) k2 83.33 Manning's Constant- For Concrete
Resistance factor of Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) β1 2.17
Resistance factor of HeadraceTunnel (Concrete Section) β2 0.22
Velocity in Headrace Pipe(Steel Section) v1 2.57 m/s
Velocity in Headrace Tunnel (Concrete Section) v2 0.40 m/s
Steady state loss in Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) y1 14.27 m
Steady state loss in Headrace tunnel (Concrete Section) y2 0.03 m
Total Steady Head Loss Y 14.30 m
Time period of surge T 230.71 s
Time period of half cycle T/2 115.35 s
Time steps t 5 s
Output
Time (s) Elevation (m amsl) height (m) Time interval
1st upsurge 150 1,781.230 (14.730) 150
2nd upsurge 345 1,758.360 8.140 195
3rd upsurge 545 1,771.969 (5.469) 200
4th upsurge 740 1,762.506 3.994 195
Adopted Upsurge Level 1,781.230

02H09_02_Surge_Pipe_Design_Calculations 18_Surge Pipe_ Upsurge Design: 1 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Computation of 1st upsurge height y1


SN time ∆t vi ∆y yi yi+1 βvi2 yi+1-βvi2 ∆v
1 - - 2.566 - 14.303 14.303 15.731 (1.428) -
2 5.00 5.00 2.566 (1.700) 14.303 12.603 15.731 (3.128) (0.023)
3 10.00 5.00 2.543 (1.685) 12.603 10.918 15.445 (4.528) (0.034)
4 15.00 5.00 2.509 (1.662) 10.918 9.256 15.036 (5.781) (0.043)
5 20.00 5.00 2.465 (1.634) 9.256 7.622 14.522 (6.901) (0.052)
6 25.00 5.00 2.414 (1.600) 7.622 6.022 13.920 (7.899) (0.059)
7 30.00 5.00 2.355 (1.560) 6.022 4.462 13.247 (8.785) (0.066)
8 35.00 5.00 2.289 (1.517) 4.462 2.945 12.518 (9.573) (0.072)
9 40.00 5.00 2.217 (1.469) 2.945 1.476 11.746 (10.271) (0.077)
10 45.00 5.00 2.140 (1.418) 1.476 0.058 10.946 (10.889) (0.081)
11 50.00 5.00 2.059 (1.364) 0.058 (1.306) 10.129 (11.435) (0.086)
12 55.00 5.00 1.973 (1.308) (1.306) (2.614) 9.304 (11.919) (0.089)
13 60.00 5.00 1.884 (1.249) (2.614) (3.863) 8.482 (12.346) (0.092)
14 65.00 5.00 1.792 (1.187) (3.863) (5.050) 7.671 (12.721) (0.095)
15 70.00 5.00 1.697 (1.124) (5.050) (6.174) 6.878 (13.052) (0.098)
16 75.00 5.00 1.599 (1.060) (6.174) (7.234) 6.109 (13.343) (0.100)
17 80.00 5.00 1.499 (0.993) (7.234) (8.227) 5.370 (13.597) (0.102)
18 85.00 5.00 1.397 (0.926) (8.227) (9.153) 4.665 (13.819) (0.103)
19 90.00 5.00 1.294 (0.857) (9.153) (10.010) 4.001 (14.011) (0.105)
20 95.00 5.00 1.189 (0.788) (10.010) (10.798) 3.379 (14.177) (0.106)
21 100.00 5.00 1.083 (0.718) (10.798) (11.516) 2.803 (14.319) (0.107)
22 105.00 5.00 0.976 (0.647) (11.516) (12.163) 2.276 (14.439) (0.108)
23 110.00 5.00 0.868 (0.575) (12.163) (12.738) 1.800 (14.538) (0.109)
24 115.00 5.00 0.759 (0.503) (12.738) (13.241) 1.377 (14.618) (0.109)
25 120.00 5.00 0.650 (0.431) (13.241) (13.672) 1.009 (14.681) (0.110)
26 125.00 5.00 0.540 (0.358) (13.672) (14.030) 0.696 (14.727) (0.110)
27 130.00 5.00 0.430 (0.285) (14.030) (14.315) 0.441 (14.756) (0.110)
28 135.00 5.00 0.319 (0.212) (14.315) (14.527) 0.244 (14.771) (0.111)
29 140.00 5.00 0.209 (0.138) (14.527) (14.665) 0.104 (14.769) (0.111)
30 145.00 5.00 0.098 (0.065) (14.665) (14.730) 0.023 (14.753) (0.110)
31 150.00 5.00 (0.012) 0.008 (14.730) (14.722) 0.000 (14.723) (0.110)
32 155.00 5.00 (0.122) 0.081 (14.722) (14.641) 0.036 (14.677) (0.110)
33 160.00 5.00 (0.232) 0.154 (14.641) (14.487) 0.129 (14.616) (0.109)
34 165.00 5.00 (0.342) 0.226 (14.487) (14.261) 0.279 (14.540) (0.109)
35 170.00 5.00 (0.450) 0.298 (14.261) (13.963) 0.485 (14.448) (0.108)
36 175.00 5.00 (0.558) 0.370 (13.963) (13.593) 0.745 (14.338) (0.107)
37 180.00 5.00 (0.666) 0.441 (13.593) (13.152) 1.059 (14.211) (0.106)
38 185.00 5.00 (0.772) 0.512 (13.152) (12.640) 1.424 (14.065) (0.105)
39 190.00 5.00 (0.877) 0.581 (12.640) (12.059) 1.839 (13.898) (0.104)
40 195.00 5.00 (0.981) 0.650 (12.059) (11.409) 2.301 (13.710) (0.103)

02H09_02_Surge_Pipe_Design_Calculations 18_Surge Pipe_ Upsurge Design: 2 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Computation of 1st downsurge height y2


SN time ∆t vi ∆y yi yi+1 βvi2 yi+1+βvi2 ∆v
1 - - - - (14.730) (14.730) - (14.730) -
2 5.00 5.00 - - (14.730) (14.730) - (14.730) (0.110)
3 10.00 5.00 (0.110) 0.073 (14.730) (14.657) 0.029 (14.628) (0.109)
4 15.00 5.00 (0.220) 0.146 (14.657) (14.511) 0.115 (14.396) (0.108)
5 20.00 5.00 (0.327) 0.217 (14.511) (14.294) 0.256 (14.038) (0.105)
6 25.00 5.00 (0.432) 0.287 (14.294) (14.007) 0.447 (13.560) (0.101)
7 30.00 5.00 (0.534) 0.354 (14.007) (13.653) 0.681 (12.972) (0.097)
8 35.00 5.00 (0.631) 0.418 (13.653) (13.235) 0.951 (12.284) (0.092)
9 40.00 5.00 (0.723) 0.479 (13.235) (12.756) 1.249 (11.508) (0.086)
10 45.00 5.00 (0.809) 0.536 (12.756) (12.220) 1.564 (10.657) (0.080)
11 50.00 5.00 (0.889) 0.589 (12.220) (11.631) 1.887 (9.744) (0.073)
12 55.00 5.00 (0.962) 0.637 (11.631) (10.994) 2.210 (8.785) (0.066)
13 60.00 5.00 (1.027) 0.681 (10.994) (10.313) 2.522 (7.791) (0.058)
14 65.00 5.00 (1.086) 0.719 (10.313) (9.594) 2.816 (6.778) (0.051)
15 70.00 5.00 (1.136) 0.753 (9.594) (8.841) 3.086 (5.756) (0.043)
16 75.00 5.00 (1.179) 0.782 (8.841) (8.059) 3.324 (4.735) (0.035)
17 80.00 5.00 (1.215) 0.805 (8.059) (7.254) 3.527 (3.728) (0.028)
18 85.00 5.00 (1.243) 0.824 (7.254) (6.430) 3.690 (2.740) (0.021)
19 90.00 5.00 (1.263) 0.837 (6.430) (5.593) 3.813 (1.780) (0.013)
20 95.00 5.00 (1.277) 0.846 (5.593) (4.747) 3.894 (0.853) (0.006)
21 100.00 5.00 (1.283) 0.850 (4.747) (3.897) 3.933 0.036 0.000
22 105.00 5.00 (1.283) 0.850 (3.897) (3.047) 3.931 0.884 0.007
23 110.00 5.00 (1.276) 0.846 (3.047) (2.201) 3.891 1.690 0.013
24 115.00 5.00 (1.264) 0.837 (2.201) (1.364) 3.814 2.450 0.018
25 120.00 5.00 (1.245) 0.825 (1.364) (0.539) 3.704 3.165 0.024
26 125.00 5.00 (1.221) 0.809 (0.539) 0.270 3.565 3.835 0.029
27 130.00 5.00 (1.193) 0.790 0.270 1.060 3.399 4.459 0.033
28 135.00 5.00 (1.159) 0.768 1.060 1.828 3.212 5.039 0.038
29 140.00 5.00 (1.122) 0.743 1.828 2.571 3.006 5.577 0.042
30 145.00 5.00 (1.080) 0.716 2.571 3.287 2.787 6.073 0.045
31 150.00 5.00 (1.035) 0.686 3.287 3.973 2.557 6.530 0.049
32 155.00 5.00 (0.986) 0.653 3.973 4.626 2.321 6.947 0.052
33 160.00 5.00 (0.934) 0.619 4.626 5.245 2.083 7.328 0.055
34 165.00 5.00 (0.879) 0.582 5.245 5.827 1.845 7.672 0.057
35 170.00 5.00 (0.821) 0.544 5.827 6.371 1.612 7.983 0.060
36 175.00 5.00 (0.762) 0.505 6.371 6.876 1.386 8.262 0.062
37 180.00 5.00 (0.700) 0.464 6.876 7.340 1.170 8.510 0.064
38 185.00 5.00 (0.636) 0.422 7.340 7.762 0.967 8.729 0.065
39 190.00 5.00 (0.571) 0.378 7.762 8.140 0.779 8.918 0.067
40 195.00 5.00 (0.504) 0.334 8.140 8.474 0.607 9.081 0.068

02H09_02_Surge_Pipe_Design_Calculations 18_Surge Pipe_ Upsurge Design: 3 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Computation of 2nd upsurge height y3


SN time ∆t vi ∆y yi yi+1 βvi2 yi+1-βvi2 ∆v
1 - - - - 8.140 8.140 - 8.140 -
2 5.00 5.00 - - 8.140 8.140 - 8.140 0.061
3 10.00 5.00 0.061 (0.040) 8.140 8.100 0.009 8.091 0.061
4 15.00 5.00 0.121 (0.080) 8.100 8.020 0.035 7.984 0.060
5 20.00 5.00 0.181 (0.120) 8.020 7.900 0.078 7.821 0.059
6 25.00 5.00 0.240 (0.159) 7.900 7.741 0.137 7.603 0.057
7 30.00 5.00 0.297 (0.197) 7.741 7.544 0.210 7.334 0.055
8 35.00 5.00 0.351 (0.233) 7.544 7.311 0.295 7.016 0.052
9 40.00 5.00 0.404 (0.268) 7.311 7.043 0.390 6.653 0.050
10 45.00 5.00 0.454 (0.301) 7.043 6.742 0.492 6.250 0.047
11 50.00 5.00 0.501 (0.332) 6.742 6.410 0.599 5.811 0.043
12 55.00 5.00 0.544 (0.361) 6.410 6.049 0.707 5.342 0.040
13 60.00 5.00 0.584 (0.387) 6.049 5.662 0.815 4.847 0.036
14 65.00 5.00 0.620 (0.411) 5.662 5.251 0.919 4.332 0.032
15 70.00 5.00 0.653 (0.433) 5.251 4.818 1.018 3.800 0.028
16 75.00 5.00 0.681 (0.451) 4.818 4.367 1.108 3.258 0.024
17 80.00 5.00 0.705 (0.468) 4.367 3.899 1.189 2.710 0.020
18 85.00 5.00 0.726 (0.481) 3.899 3.418 1.258 2.159 0.016
19 90.00 5.00 0.742 (0.492) 3.418 2.926 1.315 1.611 0.012
20 95.00 5.00 0.754 (0.500) 2.926 2.426 1.358 1.068 0.008
21 100.00 5.00 0.762 (0.505) 2.426 1.921 1.387 0.534 0.004
22 105.00 5.00 0.766 (0.508) 1.921 1.413 1.402 0.011 0.000
23 110.00 5.00 0.766 (0.508) 1.413 0.905 1.402 (0.497) (0.004)
24 115.00 5.00 0.762 (0.505) 0.905 0.400 1.388 (0.989) (0.007)
25 120.00 5.00 0.755 (0.500) 0.400 (0.100) 1.362 (1.462) (0.011)
26 125.00 5.00 0.744 (0.493) (0.100) (0.593) 1.322 (1.916) (0.014)
27 130.00 5.00 0.730 (0.484) (0.593) (1.077) 1.272 (2.349) (0.018)
28 135.00 5.00 0.712 (0.472) (1.077) (1.549) 1.211 (2.761) (0.021)
29 140.00 5.00 0.691 (0.458) (1.549) (2.007) 1.142 (3.149) (0.024)
30 145.00 5.00 0.668 (0.443) (2.007) (2.450) 1.066 (3.516) (0.026)
31 150.00 5.00 0.642 (0.425) (2.450) (2.875) 0.983 (3.859) (0.029)
32 155.00 5.00 0.613 (0.406) (2.875) (3.281) 0.897 (4.178) (0.031)
33 160.00 5.00 0.581 (0.385) (3.281) (3.666) 0.808 (4.474) (0.033)
34 165.00 5.00 0.548 (0.363) (3.666) (4.029) 0.717 (4.747) (0.036)
35 170.00 5.00 0.512 (0.340) (4.029) (4.369) 0.627 (4.997) (0.037)
36 175.00 5.00 0.475 (0.315) (4.369) (4.684) 0.539 (5.223) (0.039)
37 180.00 5.00 0.436 (0.289) (4.684) (4.973) 0.454 (5.427) (0.041)
38 185.00 5.00 0.395 (0.262) (4.973) (5.235) 0.373 (5.609) (0.042)
39 190.00 5.00 0.353 (0.234) (5.235) (5.469) 0.298 (5.768) (0.043)
40 195.00 5.00 0.310 (0.206) (5.469) (5.675) 0.230 (5.905) (0.044)

02H09_02_Surge_Pipe_Design_Calculations 18_Surge Pipe_ Upsurge Design: 4 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Computation of 2nd downsurge height y4


SN time ∆t vi ∆y yi yi+1 βvi2 yi+1+βvi2 ∆v
1 - - - - (5.469) (5.469) - (5.469) -
2 5.00 5.00 - - (5.469) (5.469) - (5.469) (0.041)
3 10.00 5.00 (0.041) 0.027 (5.469) (5.442) 0.004 (5.438) (0.041)
4 15.00 5.00 (0.082) 0.054 (5.442) (5.388) 0.016 (5.372) (0.040)
5 20.00 5.00 (0.122) 0.081 (5.388) (5.307) 0.035 (5.272) (0.039)
6 25.00 5.00 (0.161) 0.107 (5.307) (5.200) 0.062 (5.138) (0.038)
7 30.00 5.00 (0.200) 0.132 (5.200) (5.068) 0.095 (4.973) (0.037)
8 35.00 5.00 (0.237) 0.157 (5.068) (4.911) 0.134 (4.777) (0.036)
9 40.00 5.00 (0.273) 0.181 (4.911) (4.730) 0.178 (4.553) (0.034)
10 45.00 5.00 (0.307) 0.203 (4.730) (4.527) 0.225 (4.302) (0.032)
11 50.00 5.00 (0.339) 0.225 (4.527) (4.302) 0.274 (4.028) (0.030)
12 55.00 5.00 (0.369) 0.245 (4.302) (4.057) 0.325 (3.732) (0.028)
13 60.00 5.00 (0.397) 0.263 (4.057) (3.794) 0.377 (3.418) (0.026)
14 65.00 5.00 (0.423) 0.280 (3.794) (3.514) 0.427 (3.088) (0.023)
15 70.00 5.00 (0.446) 0.295 (3.514) (3.219) 0.475 (2.745) (0.021)
16 75.00 5.00 (0.466) 0.309 (3.219) (2.910) 0.519 (2.391) (0.018)
17 80.00 5.00 (0.484) 0.321 (2.910) (2.589) 0.560 (2.029) (0.015)
18 85.00 5.00 (0.499) 0.331 (2.589) (2.258) 0.596 (1.663) (0.012)
19 90.00 5.00 (0.512) 0.339 (2.258) (1.919) 0.626 (1.294) (0.010)
20 95.00 5.00 (0.521) 0.346 (1.919) (1.573) 0.650 (0.924) (0.007)
21 100.00 5.00 (0.528) 0.350 (1.573) (1.223) 0.667 (0.556) (0.004)
22 105.00 5.00 (0.532) 0.353 (1.223) (0.870) 0.677 (0.193) (0.001)
23 110.00 5.00 (0.534) 0.354 (0.870) (0.516) 0.681 0.165 0.001
24 115.00 5.00 (0.533) 0.353 (0.516) (0.163) 0.678 0.515 0.004
25 120.00 5.00 (0.529) 0.350 (0.163) 0.187 0.668 0.855 0.006
26 125.00 5.00 (0.522) 0.346 0.187 0.533 0.652 1.185 0.009
27 130.00 5.00 (0.514) 0.340 0.533 0.873 0.630 1.503 0.011
28 135.00 5.00 (0.502) 0.333 0.873 1.206 0.603 1.809 0.014
29 140.00 5.00 (0.489) 0.324 1.206 1.530 0.571 2.101 0.016
30 145.00 5.00 (0.473) 0.313 1.530 1.843 0.535 2.377 0.018
31 150.00 5.00 (0.455) 0.302 1.843 2.145 0.495 2.640 0.020
32 155.00 5.00 (0.436) 0.289 2.145 2.434 0.453 2.887 0.022
33 160.00 5.00 (0.414) 0.274 2.434 2.708 0.409 3.117 0.023
34 165.00 5.00 (0.391) 0.259 2.708 2.967 0.365 3.331 0.025
35 170.00 5.00 (0.366) 0.242 2.967 3.209 0.319 3.528 0.026
36 175.00 5.00 (0.339) 0.225 3.209 3.434 0.275 3.709 0.028
37 180.00 5.00 (0.312) 0.206 3.434 3.640 0.232 3.872 0.029
38 185.00 5.00 (0.283) 0.187 3.640 3.827 0.191 4.017 0.030
39 190.00 5.00 (0.253) 0.167 3.827 3.994 0.152 4.146 0.031
40 195.00 5.00 (0.221) 0.147 3.994 4.141 0.117 4.258 0.032

02H09_02_Surge_Pipe_Design_Calculations 18_Surge Pipe_ Upsurge Design: 5 of 5 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Surge Pipe Design (Down Surge height calculation for instantaneous opening) Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_19 Approved by : SG

Water level at reservoir NWL 1,766.50 m amsl


Length of Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) l1 5,345.00 m 82%
Length of Headrace Tunnel (Shotcre + Concrete Lining) l2 1,210.00 m 18%
Total Length of pressure waterway upto Surge Tank L 6,555.00 m
2
Cross Sectional Area of Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) A1 1.54 m
2
Cross Sectional Area of of Headrace Tunnel (Shotcrete Section) A2 9.10 m Consider the Headrace Tunnel of Concrete Section for Upsurge Calculation
Equivalent Daimeter of pressure tunnel D1 1.40 m
Equivalent Daimeter of Headrace Tunnel (Shotcrete Section) D2 3.40 m
2
Equivalent Cross section area of waterway f 1.54 m
Wetted Perimeter of Headrace pipe (Steel Section) P1 4.40 m
Wetted Perimeter of Hedarace Tunnel (Shotcrete section) P2 11.46 m
Hydraulic Radius of Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) R1 0.35 m
Hydraulic Radius of Headrace Tunnel (Shotcrete Section) R2 0.79 m
3
Discharge Q 3.95 m /s
Diameter of Surge Pipe D 2.50 m
Angle of Inclination of Surge Pipe With Horizontal α 25.00
2
Equicalent Cross sectional Area of Surge Pipe F 11.62 m
2
Acceleration due to gravity g 9.81 m /s For Downsurge, maximum values of Manning's Constant
Velocity Coefficient for Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) k1 83.33 Manning's Constant-0.014 For Steel
Velocity Coefficient for Headrace Tunnel (Shotcrete Section) k2 28.57 Manning's Constant-0.035 For Concrete
Resistance factor of Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) β1 3.12
Resistance factor of HeadraceTunnel (Shotcrete Section) β2 2.01
Velocity in Headrace Pipe(Steel Section) v1 2.57 m/s
Velocity in Headrace Tunnel (Shotcrete Section) v2 0.43 m/s
Steady state loss in Headrace Pipe (Steel Section) y1 26.71 m Consider 30 % for Minor Head Loss
Steady state loss in Headrace tunnel (Shotcrete Section) y2 0.49 m Consider 30 % for Minor Head Loss
Total Steady Head Loss Y 27.20 m
Undamped maximum surge for instantaneous closer ymax 24.15 m

02H09_02_Surge_Pipe_Design_Calculations 19_Surge Pipe_Downsurge Design: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Ph. Forchheimer
Amplitude of down surge y1 33.21 m
Maximum down surge level 1,733.29 m amsl
A. Schafer
Amplitude of down surge y1 37.12 m
Maximum down surge level 1,729.38 m amsl
E. Braun (very reliable)
Amplitude of down surge y1 29.18 m
Maximum down surge level 1,737.32 m amsl
Calame and Gaden
Calame and Goden dimensionless ration P0 1.13
Amplitude of down surge no solution m
Maximum down surge level N/A m amsl

Adopted Downsurge Level: 1,729.38 m amsl

02H09_02_Surge_Pipe_Design_Calculations 19_Surge Pipe_Downsurge Design: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Headrace Pipe Thickness Calculation Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_20 Approved by : SG
Design paramteres Other data
Minimum thickness
Design discharge 3.95 m3/s for corrosion 2 mm
Minimum safety
Overall efficiency 86.9% factor 3
Time of closure of
Total gross head, Hg 359.5 turbine 20 Sec

Pipe paramteres
Diameter of pipe 1.4 m
Roughness value, k 0.5 mm
Modulus of elasticity of pipe 2.10E+05 N/mm2
Ultimate tensile strength of pipe 410 N/mm2 (Material E-250)
Density of pipe 7850 Kg/m3
Cost of pipe/kg 130 Rs.

Description Formula Unit Stretch


Stretch Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Length of streach, Li m 218.51 148.59 162.40 2076.54 75.72 191.00 77.66 2478.04
Cumulative length from forebay, L 218.51 367.10 529.50 2606.04 2681.76 2872.76 2950.42 5428.46
Internal diameter of pipe, d m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Minimum Thickness Check :
PG & E formula t(min) = D/288 inch 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19
Bureau of Relcamation Formula t(min) = (D+20)/400 inch 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19
PG & E formula t(min) = D/289 mm 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86 4.86
Bureau of Relcamation Formula t(min) = (D+20)/401 mm 4.77 4.77 4.77 4.77 4.77 4.77 4.77 4.77
Topographic head, Hg m 12.90 69.16 121.80 70.56 122.13 171.50 121.27 72.03
Thickness, t mm 8.00 8.00 12.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 12.00 8.00
Velocity in pipe, v m/s 2.57 2.57 2.57 2.57 2.57 2.57 2.57 2.57
Roughness value,k mm 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
k/d 0.00036 0.00036 0.00036 0.00036 0.00036 0.00036 0.00036 0.00036
Friction factor ,f 0.01574 0.01574 0.01574 0.01574 0.01574 0.01574 0.01574 0.01574
Head loss, Hl fLv^2/(2gd) m 0.82 0.56 0.61 7.83 0.29 0.72 0.29 9.35
Wave velocity, vw 1440/sqrt(1+(2150*d/E/t)) m/s 861.85 861.85 972.08 861.85 972.08 1045.83 972.08 861.85
Critical closure time 2*L/vw sec 0.5071 0.3448 0.3341 4.8188 0.1558 0.3653 0.1598 5.7505
Time of closure of turbine sec 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Surge head,Hs 10 % of Gross Head m 1.2900 6.9160 12.1800 7.0560 12.2130 17.1500 12.1270 7.2030
Total head, H Hg+Hs 14.1900 76.0760 133.9800 77.6160 134.3430 188.6500 133.3970 79.2330
Density of pipe Kg/m3 7850.00 7850.00 7850.00 7850.00 7850.00 7850.00 7850.00 7850.00
Inner Pressure N/mm2 0.1392 0.7463 1.3143 0.7614 1.3179 1.8507 1.3086 0.7773
Effective thickness of pipe, te 4.06 4.06 7.09 4.06 7.09 10.12 7.09 4.06
Safety factor 200*te*s/H/d 16.76 3.13 3.10 3.06 3.09 3.14 3.11 3.00
Check Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok
Calculated Thickness (Sarkaria) 3.84 7.51 10.97 7.61 11.00 14.26 10.94 7.70

02H09_03_Headrace Pipe_Thickness_Calculations 20_HRP_StretchWise_Thickness: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Headrace Pipe StretchWise Design Data Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_21 Approved by : SG

Weir Crest level 1767.5 m amsl

Stretch 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Chainage Interval 0+000.00-0+218.00 1+348.52-1+480.00 1+480.00-1+600.00 1+600.00-3+640.00 3+640.00-3+695.00 3+695.00-3+850.00 3+850.00-3+910.00 3+910.00-6+369.55
Minimum Pipe Invert
Level at the Stretch 1754.6 1698.34 1645.7 1696.94 1645.37 1596 1646.23 1695.47
Length of Headrace
Pipe in the Stretch 218.51 148.59 162.4 2076.54 75.72 191 77.66 2478.04
Topographic head 12.9 69.16 121.8 70.56 122.13 171.5 121.27 72.03
Thickness Required 8.00 8.00 12.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 12.00 8.00
Outlet Portal to
End of forebay-Headrace Gajauni Siphon Gajauni Siphon Gajauni Siphon - Charaadi Siphon Charaadi Siphon Charaadi Siphon Charadi Siphon-Surge
Remarks Inlet Portal Portion Portion Charaadi Siphon Portion Portion Portion Pipe

02H09_03_Headrace Pipe_Thickness_Calculations 21_HRP_Design_Data: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : ID
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Surge Pipe Thickness Calculation Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_22 Approved by : SG

Design paramteres Other data


Design discharge 3.95 m3/s Minimum thickness for corrosion etc 2 mm
Overall efficiency 86.9% Minimum safety factor 3
Total gross head, Hg 359.5 Time of closure of turbine 20 Sec

Pipe paramteres
Diameter of pipe 2.5 m
Roughness value, k 0.5 mm
Modulus of elasticity of pipe 2.10E+05 N/mm2
Ultimate tensile strength of pipe 490 N/mm2 E-350
Density of pipe 7850 Kg/m3
Cost of pipe/kg 130 Rs.

Description Formula Unit Stretch


Stretch Number 1
Length of Surge Pipe m 234.94
Cumulative length 234.94
Internal diameter of pipe, d m 2.50
Minimum Thickness Check :
PG & E formula t(min) = D/288 inch 0.34
Bureau of Relcamation Formula t(min) = (D+20)/400 inch 0.30
PG & E formula t(min) = D/289 mm 8.68
Bureau of Relcamation Formula t(min) = (D+20)/401 mm 7.52
Topographic head, Hg m 61.10
Thickness, t mm 12.00
Velocity in pipe, v m/s 0.80
Wave velocity, vw 1440/sqrt(1+(2150*d/E/t)) m/s 813.55
Critical closure time 2*L/vw sec 0.5776
Time of closure of turbine sec 20.00
Surge head,Hs 10 % of Gross Head m 12.2200
Total head, H Hg+Hs 73.3200
Density of pipe Kg/m3 7850.00
Inner Pressure N/mm2 0.7193
Effective thickness of pipe, te 7.09
Safety factor 200*te*s/H/d 3.79
Check Ok
Calculated Thickness (Sarkaria) 9.50

02H09_04_Surge_Pipe_Thickness_Calculations 22_SurgePipe_Thickness: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 9/21/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : KP
Type: Hydraulic Design and Calculations Updated by : ID
Title Penstock Thickness Calculation Checked by : SwS
Sheet No: SGHP_HA_23 Approved by : SG

Design Discharge Qd
3
3.95 m /s 
Pipe Thickness t w  Pi * d * FOS /( 2 *  y * w )  2
3
Monsoon Diacharge Q 3.95 m /s
2
Youngs' modulus of steel E 200,000 N/mm Pi   w * g * H T
2
Yield Stress of steel σy 345 N/mm
Ultimate Tensile Stress 485 N/mm2 Velocity V  4 * Qd
Material Specification IS 2062 E350  *d2
Allowable Stress 1 162 One third of Ultimate Tensile Stress (Refer IS Code IS 11693 Part 2 : 1995)
Allowable Stress 2 207 60% of Yield Stress (Refer IS Code IS 11693 Part 2 : 1995)
Allowable Stress 162 Taking minimum value of above two Allowable Stress
Factor of Safety 2.13
Factor of Safety adopted FOS 2.20
3
Steel Density ρ 7850 kg/m

Surge Head (Water Hammer) 20%


3
Density of water ρw 1000 kg/m
Welding efficiency ηw 90%

Segment #1
Chainage Interval (0+018.13 -0+142.93)
Static head 120.00 m
Length of penstock 140.00 m
Diameter, d, mm 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Penstock flow velocity,V m/s 4.56 4.16 3.80 3.49 3.22 2.98 2.76 2.57 2.39 2.23
Buckling and Handling Thickness 3.90 4.02 4.15 4.27 4.40 4.52 4.65 4.77 4.90 5.02
Surge Head, Hs m 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00
Total Head, Htot m 144.00 144.00 144.00 144.00 144.00 144.00 144.00 144.00 144.00 144.00
Internal Pressure, N/Mm^2 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41
Wall Thickness mm 7.25 7.50 7.76 8.01 8.26 8.51 8.76 9.01 9.26 9.51
Actual thickness, mm 8.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Factor of safety 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.3
Check OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Weight of steel, ton 29 31 32 42 44 45 47 49 50 52

02H09_05_Penstock_Pipe_Thickness_Calculations 23_Penstock_Pipe Opt350: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Segment #2
Chainage Interval (0+142.93-0+240.96)
Static head 165.00 m
Length of penstock 108.00 m
Diameter, d, mm 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Surge Head, Hs m 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00
Total Head, Htot m 198.00 198.00 198.00 198.00 198.00 198.00 198.00 198.00 198.00 198.00
Internal Pressure, N/Mm^2 1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94
Wall Thickness mm 9.23 9.57 9.91 10.26 10.60 10.95 11.29 11.63 11.98 12.32
Actual thickness, mm 10.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 14.00
Factor of safety 2.4 2.30 2.2 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.5
Check OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Weight of steel, ton 28 29.6 31 39 40 42 44 45 47 56

Segment #3
Chainage Interval (0+240.96-0+372.20)
Static head 210.00 m
Length of penstock 140.00 m
Diameter, d, mm 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Surge Head, Hs m 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00
Total Head, Htot m 252.00 252.00 252.00 252.00 252.00 252.00 252.00 252.00 252.00 252.00
Internal Pressure, N/Mm^2 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47
Wall Thickness mm 11.20 11.63 12.07 12.51 12.95 13.39 13.82 14.26 14.70 15.14
Actual thickness, mm 12.00 12.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 16.00 16.00 16.00
Factor of safety 2.4 2.27 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.3
Check OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Weight of steel, ton 44 46.1 56 59 61 64 66 78 81 84

Segment #4
Chainage Interval (0+372.20-0+456.50)
Static head 255.00 m
Length of penstock 96.00 m
Diameter, d, mm 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Surge Head, Hs m 51.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 51.00
Total Head, Htot m 306.00 306.00 306.00 306.00 306.00 306.00 306.00 306.00 306.00 306.00
Internal Pressure, N/Mm^2 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Wall Thickness mm 13.17 13.70 14.23 14.76 15.29 15.82 16.36 16.89 17.42 17.95
Actual thickness, mm 14.00 14.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00
Factor of safety 2.3 2.25 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.273 2.2
Check OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Weight of steel, ton 35 36.9 44 46 48 50 58 60 63 65

02H09_05_Penstock_Pipe_Thickness_Calculations 23_Penstock_Pipe Opt350: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Segment #5
Chainage Interval (0+456.50-0+535.66)
Static head 300.00 m
Length of penstock 92.00 m
Diameter, d, mm 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Surge Head, Hs m 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00
Total Head, Htot m 360.00 360.00 360.00 360.00 360.00 360.00 360.00 360.00 360.00 360.00
Internal Pressure, N/Mm^2 3.53 3.53 3.53 3.53 3.53 3.53 3.53 3.53 3.53 3.53
Wall Thickness mm 15.14 15.76 16.39 17.01 17.64 18.26 18.89 19.52 20.14 20.77
Actual thickness, mm 16.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 22.00 22.00
Factor of safety 2.3 2.23 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3
Check OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Weight of steel, ton 39 40.5 48 55 58 60 62 64 73 76
2622
Segment #6
Chainage Interval (0+535.66-0+588.41)
Static head 345.00 m
Length of penstock 70.00 m
Diameter, d, mm 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Surge Head, Hs m 69.00 69.00 69.00 69.00 69.00 69.00 69.00 69.00 69.00 69.00
Total Head, Htot m 414.00 414.00 414.00 414.00 414.00 414.00 414.00 414.00 414.00 414.00
Internal Pressure, N/Mm^2 4.06 4.06 4.06 4.06 4.06 4.06 4.06 4.06 4.06 4.06
Wall Thickness mm 17.11 17.83 18.55 19.27 19.99 20.70 21.42 22.14 22.86 23.58
Actual thickness, mm 18.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 22.00 22.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Factor of safety 2.3 2.22 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.3
Check OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Weight of steel, ton 33 34.7 40 42 44 50 52 62 64 66

Segment #7
Chainage Interval (0+535.66-0+588.41)
Static head 361.00 m
Length of penstock 25.00 m
Diameter, d, mm 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Surge Head, Hs m 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20
Total Head, Htot m 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20
Internal Pressure, N/Mm^2 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25
Wall Thickness mm 17.81 18.56 19.31 20.07 20.82 21.57 22.32 23.08 23.83 24.58
Actual thickness, mm 18.00 20.00 20.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Factor of safety 2.2 2.37 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2
Check OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Weight of steel, ton 12 13.8 14 17 17 18 21 22 23 24

02H09_05_Penstock_Pipe_Thickness_Calculations 23_Penstock_Pipe Opt350: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex B: Hydraulic Design and Calculations

Branch (Penstock after Bifurcation)


Static head 361.00 m
Length of penstock 64.00 m
Diameter, d, mm 750 800.00 800 850 880 920 950 980 1020 1060
Penstock flow velocity,V m/s 8.94 7.86 7.86 6.96 6.49 5.94 5.57 5.24 4.83 4.48
Buckling and Handling Thickness 3.15 3.27 3.27 3.40 3.47 3.57 3.65 3.72 3.82 3.92
Surge Head, Hs m 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20 72.20
Total Head, Htot m 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20 433.20
Internal Pressure, N/Mm^2 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25
Wall Thickness mm 13.29 14.04 14.04 14.80 15.25 15.85 16.30 16.75 17.36 17.96
Actual thickness, mm 14.00 16.0 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00
Factor of safety 2.3 2.51 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2
Check OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Weight of steel, ton 17 20.61 21 22 23 24 28 28 29 31

OUTPUT/RESULTS
Section
Section Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7
Branch
(0+018.13 - (0+142.93- (0+240.96- (0+372.20- (0+456.50- (0+535.66- (0+535.66-
Chainge Interval
0+142.93) 0+240.96) 0+372.20) 0+456.50) 0+535.66) 0+588.41) 0+588.41)
Length of penstock of
section, m 140.00 108.00 140.00 96.00 92.00 70.00 25.00 64.00
Static Head, m 120.00 165.00 210.00 255.00 300.00 345.00 361.00 361.00
Surge Head, m 24.00 33.00 42.00 51.00 60.00 69.00 72.20 72.20
Total Head, m 144.00 198.00 252.00 306.00 360.00 414.00 433.20 433.20
Wall thickness of penstock
pipe, mm 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 16.00
Weight of Steel, Tons 31.00 30.00 47.00 37.00 41.00 34.74 13.81 20.61

02H09_05_Penstock_Pipe_Thickness_Calculations 23_Penstock_Pipe Opt350: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


VOLUME 2: ANNEX C-1
STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT
Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

TABLE OF CONTENT
TABLE OF CONTENT ............................................................................................................I
LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. IV
LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................. VII
1 PROJECT INORMATION ............................................................................................ 1-1
1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 1-1
1.2 PROJECT INFORMATION ....................................................................................... 1-1
1.3 SALIENT FEATURES ............................................................................................... 1-2
2 STANDARDS AND CODES .......................................................................................... 2-1
2.1 CODES USED .......................................................................................................... 2-1
2.2 SYSTEM OF UNITS .................................................................................................. 2-1
2.3 LOADING AND DESIGN OF SECTIONS ..................................................................... 2-1
3 DETAILS OF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN .................................................................... 3-1
3.1 MATERIAL PROPERTIES ........................................................................................ 3-1
3.1.1 Soil parameters adopted in design ................................................................... 3-1
3.1.2 Concrete ........................................................................................................... 3-1
3.1.3 Reinforcement steel ......................................................................................... 3-1
3.1.4 Crack width ...................................................................................................... 3-2
3.2 LOADINGS .............................................................................................................. 3-2
3.2.1 General Loads .................................................................................................. 3-2
3.2.2 Earthquake load ............................................................................................... 3-2
3.2.3 Load combinations ........................................................................................... 3-3
3.2.4 Stability Analaysis ........................................................................................... 3-3
3.2.5 Factor of safety (FoS) ...................................................................................... 3-3
3.2.6 Allowable bearing pressure ............................................................................. 3-4
3.3 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND REINFORCEMENT CALCULATIONS ....................... 3-4
3.4 CLEAR COVER ....................................................................................................... 3-5
3.5 STRUCTURAL DESIGN............................................................................................ 3-6
3.6 FLOOD WALL ......................................................................................................... 3-6
3.6.1 Flood wall Type A / Panel-FL-02 & Panel-FR-01 (Section B-B and
Section D-D) ................................................................................................................ 3-7

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | i


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.6.2 Left Bank Flood Wall Monolithic with U-S Apron/Panel W-1 (Section F-
F) 3-9
3.6.3 Flood Wall Monolithic with Stilling Basin/Panel W-07 & Panel-W-10
(Section J-J) ............................................................................................................... 3-10
3.7 WEIR, U/S APRON AND STILLING BASIN ........................................................... 3-12
3.7.1 Approach of Stability Analysis ...................................................................... 3-13
3.7.2 Seismic consideration .................................................................................... 3-13
3.7.3 Subsoil Conditions ......................................................................................... 3-14
3.7.4 Loads .............................................................................................................. 3-15
3.7.5 Structural analysis and design........................................................................ 3-16
3.7.6 Concrete ......................................................................................................... 3-16
3.7.7 Reinforcements .............................................................................................. 3-16
3.7.8 VDeflection criteria ....................................................................................... 3-16
3.7.9 Crack width .................................................................................................... 3-17
3.7.10 Load Cases ..................................................................................................... 3-17
3.8 UNDERSLUICE ...................................................................................................... 3-20
3.9 INTAKE................................................................................................................. 3-23
3.9.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design ....................................................... 3-23
3.10 GRAVEL TRAP ..................................................................................................... 3-26
3.10.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Gravel Trap .............................. 3-26
3.10.2 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Gravel Trap Flushing Culvert .. 3-28
3.11 APPROACH CANAL AND SPILLWAY .................................................................... 3-29
3.11.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design ....................................................... 3-29
3.12 SETTLING BASIN INLET TRANSITION ................................................................. 3-31
3.12.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design ....................................................... 3-31
3.13 SETTLING ZONE OF SETTLING BASIN ................................................................. 3-35
3.13.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design ....................................................... 3-35
3.14 OUTLET ZONE OF SETTLING BASIN (PANEL-SB-05 & PANEL-SB-06).............. 3-39
3.14.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Outlet Zone (Section K-K)....... 3-39
3.14.2 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Outlet Zone (Section M-M) ..... 3-41
3.15 APPROACH PIPE STEEL TRUSS BRIDGE ............................................................. 3-43
3.15.1 General ........................................................................................................... 3-43
3.15.2 Codes Used .................................................................................................... 3-44

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | ii


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.15.3 System of Units .............................................................................................. 3-44


3.15.4 Material Properties ......................................................................................... 3-44
3.15.4.1 Concrete ................................................................................................... 3-44
3.15.4.2 Steel ......................................................................................................... 3-45
3.15.5 Analysis Software .......................................................................................... 3-45
3.15.6 Stress Criteria................................................................................................. 3-45
3.15.7 Load Calculations .......................................................................................... 3-46
3.15.7.1 Dead load ................................................................................................. 3-46
3.15.7.2 Live load .................................................................................................. 3-46
3.15.7.3 Wind load................................................................................................. 3-46
3.15.7.4 Earthquake load ....................................................................................... 3-46
3.15.8 Load Cases and Combinations ....................................................................... 3-47
3.15.8.1 Primary Load cases .................................................................................. 3-47
3.15.8.2 Load Combinations .................................................................................. 3-47
3.15.9 Structural Analysis ......................................................................................... 3-47
3.15.9.1 Input Data Figures ................................................................................... 3-48
3.15.9.2 Results...................................................................................................... 3-49
3.15.9.3 STAAD. PRO Output .............................................................................. 3-50
3.16 FOREBAY ............................................................................................................. 3-51
3.16.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Forebay (Section C-C) ............. 3-51
3.16.2 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Forebay (Section D-D) ............. 3-53
3.17 ANCHOR BLOCK AND SADDLE SUPPORT ............................................................. 3-54
3.18 POWERHOUSE ...................................................................................................... 3-64
3.18.1 General Introduction ...................................................................................... 3-64
3.18.2 Structural Analysis ......................................................................................... 3-65
3.18.2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 3-65
3.18.2.2 Superstructure .......................................................................................... 3-65
3.19 CONTROL BUILDING DESIGN .............................................................................. 3-85
3.19.1 General ........................................................................................................... 3-85
3.19.2 Assumption and Design Principle Outlines ................................................... 3-85
3.13.3 Design of Structural Element...................................................................... 3-86
3.13.4 Foundation Design of Control Building: ................................................... 3-88

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | iii


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1: General loading taken in account for headworks structures. ...................... 3-2
Table 3-2: Partial Safety Factor for Load for Stability Analysis ................................. 3-3
Table 3-3: Factor of Safety........................................................................................... 3-4
Table 3-4: Partial Safety Factor for Load for Structural Analysis ............................... 3-5
Table 3-5: Clear cover for various structures ............................................................... 3-5
Table 3-6: Safety factor and bearing pressure in Flood wall Type-A .......................... 3-8
Table 3-7: Maximum displacement and force summary in Section D-D Flood wall .. 3-8
Table 3-8: Reinforcement details for flood wall in Section D-D Flood wall ............... 3-8
Table 3-9: Safety factor and bearing pressure in Section F-F Flood wall.................... 3-9
Table 3-10: Maximum displacement and force summary in Section F-F Flood wall.. 3-9
Table 3-11: Reinforcement details for flood wall in Section F-F Flood wall ............ 3-10
Table 3-12: Safety factor and bearing pressure in Section J-J Flood wall ................. 3-10
Table 3-13: Maximum crack and force summary of flood wall Section J-J Flood wall 3-
11
Table 3-14: Reinforcement details for flood wall Section J-J Flood wall.................. 3-11
Table 3-15: Criteria for stability analysis for Weir .................................................... 3-13
Table 3-16: Value of basic seismic coefficient for different zones ............................ 3-13
Table 3-17: Value of Importance Factor, I ................................................................. 3-14
Table 3-18: Value of β for different soil-Foundation system..................................... 3-14
Table 3-19: Results of stability analysis of Weir ....................................................... 3-18
Table 3-20: Results of Structural Analysis of Weir, U/S Apron and Stilling Basin .. 3-18
Table 3-21: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Undersluice at Section H-H ........ 3-22
Table 3-22: Maximum displacement and force summary of Undersluice at Section H-H
.................................................................................................................................... 3-22
Table 3-23: Reinforcement details for Undersluice ................................................... 3-22
Table 3-24: Safety factor and bearing pressure of side intake chamber .................... 3-25
Table 3-25: Maximum displacement and force summary of side intake chamber .... 3-25
Table 3-26: Reinforcement details for intake ............................................................. 3-25
Table 3-27: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Gravel Trap ................................. 3-27
Table 3-28: Maximum displacement and force summary of Gravel Trap ................. 3-27
Table 3-29: Reinforcement details for Gravel Trap ................................................... 3-27

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | iv


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-30: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Gravel Flushing Culvert.............. 3-28
Table 3-31: Maximum displacement and force summary of Gravel Flushing Culvert . 3-
28
Table 3-32: Reinforcement details for Gravel Flushing Culvert ................................ 3-29
Table 3-33: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Approach Canal and Spillway .... 3-30
Table 3-34: Maximum displacement and force summary of Approach Canal and
Spillway ...................................................................................................................... 3-30
Table 3-35: Reinforcement details for Approach Canal and Spillway ...................... 3-30
Table 3-36: Safety factor and bearing pressure of settling basin inlet transition ....... 3-33
Table 3-37: Maximum displacement and force summary of Settling Basin Inlet
Transition ................................................................................................................... 3-34
Table 3-38: Reinforcement details for Settling Basin Inlet Transition ...................... 3-34
Table 3-39: Safety factor and bearing pressure in settling zone of settling basin ...... 3-37
Table 3-40: Maximum displacement and force summary of settling zone of settling
basin ........................................................................................................................... 3-37
Table 3-41: Reinforcement details of settling zone of settling basin ......................... 3-38
Table 3-42: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Outlet Zone (Section K-K) ......... 3-40
Table 3-43: Maximum displacement and force summary of Outlet Zone (Section K-K)
.................................................................................................................................... 3-40
Table 3-44: Reinforcement details for Outlet Zone (Section K-K)............................ 3-41
Table 3-45: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Headpond (Section M-M) ........... 3-41
Table 3-46: Maximum moment and force summary of Headpond (Section M-M) ... 3-42
Table 3-47: Reinforcement details for Headpond (Section M-M) ............................. 3-42
Table 3-48: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Forebay Section C-C ................... 3-52
Table 3-49: Maximum displacement and force summary of Forebay Section C-C... 3-52
Table 3-50: Reinforcement details of Forebay Section C-C ...................................... 3-53
Table 3-51: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Forebay Section D-D .................. 3-53
Table 3-52: Maximum displacement and force summary of Forebay Section D-D .. 3-54
Table 3-53: Reinforcement details of Forebay Section D-D...................................... 3-54
Table 3-54: Anchor Block Details ............................................................................. 3-57
Table 3-55: Material Properties .................................................................................. 3-66
Table 3-56: Section Properties ................................................................................... 3-66
Table 3-57: Load pattern for power house frame load ............................................... 3-68
Table 3-58: Load case definition for power house frame .......................................... 3-68

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | v


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-59: Modal mass participation for machine hall ............................................ 3-70
Table 3-60: Design summary of Control Building Frame sections. .......................... 3-88

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | vi


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1: Project Location Map ................................................................................ 1-2
Figure 3-1: Flood Wall Type A (Section B-B) ............................................................ 3-7
Figure 3-2: Flood Wall (Panel-W-01) .......................................................................... 3-9
Figure 3-3: Flood Wall (Panel-W-07 & Panel-W-10)................................................ 3-10
Figure 3-4: Longitudinal Profile along Weir and Stilling Basin ................................ 3-12
Figure 3-5: Undersluice Longitudinal Profile ............................................................ 3-20
Figure 3-6: Undersluice Section at Gate Region ........................................................ 3-21
Figure 3-7: Longitudinal Profile along Intake Chamber ............................................ 3-23
Figure 3-8: Cross Section of the Intake Chamber ...................................................... 3-24
Figure 3-9: Gravel Trap Cross Section ...................................................................... 3-26
Figure 3-10: Gravel Trap Flushing Culvert ................................................................ 3-28
Figure 3-11: Cross Section of Approach Canal and Spillway ................................... 3-29
Figure 3-12: Settling Basin Inlet Transition Zone Plan ............................................. 3-31
Figure 3-13: Settling Basin Inlet Transition Zone Cross Section .............................. 3-32
Figure 3-14: Settling Basin Plan ................................................................................ 3-35
Figure 3-15: Settling Zone Cross Section .................................................................. 3-36
Figure 3-16: Outlet Zone of Settling Basin ................................................................ 3-39
Figure 3-17: Settling Basin Outlet Zone (Section M-M) ........................................... 3-41
Figure 3-18: Longitudinal Profile of Approach Pipe Steel Truss Bridge .................. 3-43
Figure 3-19: Cross-Section of Approach Pipe Steel Truss Bridge ............................. 3-43
Figure 3-20: Top Plan of Approach Pipe Steel Truss Bridge..................................... 3-44
Figure 3-21: Bottom Plan of Approach Pipe Steel Truss Bridge ............................... 3-44
Figure 3-22: Frame diagram showing node numbers................................................. 3-48
Figure 3-23: Frame diagram showing Water Load .................................................... 3-48
Figure 3-24: Frame Diagram Showing Steel Casing ................................................. 3-49
Figure 3-25: Frame Diagram Showing Live load ...................................................... 3-49
Figure 3-26: Frame Diagram showing Bending Moment Diagram Envelope Condition
.................................................................................................................................... 3-49
Figure 3-27: Frame diagram showing Shear Force Diagram Envelope Condition .... 3-50
Figure 3-28: Frame Diagram Showing Utilization ratio ............................................ 3-50
Figure 3-29: Cross Section of Forebay at Section C-C .............................................. 3-51

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | vii


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-30: Cross Section of Forebay at Section D-D ............................................. 3-53


Figure 3-31: Structural Model of the Powerhouse Building (one part) ..................... 3-66
Figure 3-32: Main reinforcement diagram at grid 1-1 ............................................... 3-72
Figure 3-33: Main reinforcement diagram at grid 4-4 ............................................... 3-73
Figure 3-34: Main reinforcement diagram at grid H-H.............................................. 3-74
Figure 3-35: Truss Section from STAADPro ............................................................ 3-75
Figure 3-36 : Extrude view of Control Building. ....................................................... 3-85
Figure 3-37 : Control Building Slab live load in first storey ..................................... 3-86
Figure 3-38: Reinforcement in Grid I-I ...................................................................... 3-86
Figure 3-39: Reinforcement in Grid J-J ..................................................................... 3-87
Fgure 3-40: Reinforcement in first storey beam ........................................................ 3-87
Figure 3-41: Reinforcement in second storey beam ................................................... 3-88

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | viii


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

1 PROJECT INORMATION

1.1 BACKGROUND
This report has been prepared as a part of agreement signed between Omega Energy
and Developer Pvt. Ltd. and E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. for Detail Engineering Design of
Suni Gad Hydropower Project of installed capacity 11.05 MW. This report describes
the outcome of structural analysis, design and results of different structures of the
project.

1.2 PROJECT INFORMATION


Suni Gad Hydropower Project is located in two Rural Municipalities (Surma Rural
Municipality and Telkot Rural Municipality) and Chainpur Municipality of Bajhang
district in the Province No.7 of Nepal. Geographically, the project area is located
between latitudes 29º 36’ 10” N to 29º 40’ 00” N and longitudes of 81º 11’ 46” E to 81º
14’16” E as per Survey License, which includes the area of alternatives considered in
this report. In the physiographical regions, the project area belongs to Midland and lies
in between 1800 m -1400 m above mean sea level. However, most of the catchment of
the River lies in the High Mountain Region. The major project components will be
located at Surma Rural Municipality, waterway alignment passes through the Surma
Rural Municipality, Chainpur Municipality and Telkot Rural Municipality. Powerhouse
lies on Telkot Rural Municipality. The proposed intake of the Suni Gad Hydropower
Project is located at a naturally undisturbed area at the right bank of Suni Gad at an
elevation of 1767.5 m amsl. Likewise, the powerhouse is located at an elevation of
1410 m amsl on the right bank of the Suni Gad.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 1-1


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 1-1: Project Location Map

1.3 SALIENT FEATURES

The principle features of the Suni Gad Hydropower Project are summarized below.

1.0 General

Source River : Suni Gad

Municipality : Chainpur Municipality, Surma Rural


Municipality and Telkot Rural Municipality

District : Bajhang

Province : Sudurpaschim

Type of Scheme : Run-of-river

Gross Head : 357.50 m

Net Head : 324.34 m - 343.46 m

Design Discharge :

Installed Capacity :

Net Annual Marketable : 81.19 GWh


Energy

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 1-2


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Dry Energy : 35.54 GWh

Wet Energy : 45. GWh

2.0 License Boundary

Longitude : 81º 11’ 46” E to 81º 14’ 16” E

Latitude : 29º 36’ 10” N to 29º 40’ 00” N

3.0 Hydrology and Meteorology

Catchment Area at Intake : 165 km2

Catchment Area at : 202 km2


Powerhouse

Average Annual : 1493.24 mm


Precipitation

Design 100-yrs Flood at : 185.34 m3/s


Intake

Design 100-yrs Flood at : 376.80 m3/s


Powerhouse

Long-term Average Flow : 7.93 m3/s

4.0 Diversion Weir, Under Sluice & Intake

Diversion Weir

Type : Free overflow, Broad Crest

Length : 25 m

Weir Crest Level : 1767.50 m amsl

Under Sluice

Invert Level : 1764.26 m amsl

No. : 1

Size : 3.00 m x 3.00 m (W x H)

Intake

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 1-3


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Type : Side intake with free-flow weir

Size : 2.50 m x 1.4 m (2 Nos.)

Intake Sill Level : 1766.30 m amsl

5.0 Gravel Trap

Size (L x W) : 6mx5m

Total Water Depth During : 3.07 m


Normal Flow

Particle Size to be desilted : 5 mm

Normal Water Level : 1767.35 m amsl

6.0 Approach Canal

Length : 16.65 m

Size : 2.4 m x 3.03 m (W x H)

Total Water Depth During : 1.3 m


Normal Flow

Bed Slope : 1 in 500

7.0 Settling Basin

Type : Surface, Dufour (Double-Chamber)

Size of each Chamber : 40.00 m x 7.0 m ( L x W)

Total Water Depth : 4.00 - 5.00 m

Particle Size to be desilted : 0.2 mm

Normal Water Level : 1767.27 m

8.0 Approach Pipe

Type : Mild Steel (E 250), Free Flow

Diameter : 2.0 m

Thickness : 8 mm

Length : 297.61 m

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 1-4


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

9.0 Forebay

Inlet Transition Length : 6m

Size : 19 m x 6 m (L x W)

Depth : 3.76 - 5.96m

Normal Water Level : 1766.85 m

10.0 Water Conveyance

Headrace Pipe

Type : Mild Steel (E 250)

Diameter : 1.4 m (From Forebay to Tunnel Inlet Portal


and from Tunnel Outlet Portal to Surge Pipe)

Thickness : 8, 12 and 16 mm

Length : 5431.20 m

Headrace Tunnel

Size : 3.2 m x 3.8 m (Excavation Size)

Shape : Inverted D-Shaped

Length : 1209.70 m

Penstock Pipe

Size : Mild Steel (E 350)

Diameter : 1.1 m (Before bifurcation) and 0.8 m (After


bifurcation)

Length : 684.34 m (Before bifurcation) and 60.52 m


(After Bifurcation)

Thickness : 8 - 20 mm

11.0 Surge Pipe

Length : 234.94 m

Type : Mild Steel Pipe, (E 350)

Diameter : 2.5 m

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 1-5


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Upsurge Level : 1781.52 m amsl

Down surge Level : 1730.11 m amsl

Thickness : 12 mm

12.0 Powerhouse

Type : Surface

Size (LXBXH) : 36.30 m x 18.20 m x 13.30 m

Number of Units : 2 Nos.

Type of Turbine : Pelton, Horizontal Shaft

Rated Turbine Output at : 5.76 MW x 2 Nos.


Shaft

Turbine centre line : 1410.00 m amsl

13.0 Tailrace Culvert

Type : RCC Box Culvert

Size : 1.5 m x 1.5 m (W x D)

Length : 28.70 m

Slope : 1 in 600

14.0 Transmission Line and Grid Connection

Specification : 33 kV single-circuit, 3 Phase, 50 Hz

Length : 10 km (Powerhouse to Chainpur substation)

15.0 Generator

Type : Salient pole synchronous, 3 Phase

Specification : 6,500 kVA, 11 kV, 50 Hz, x 2 Nos.

16.0 Transformer

Step-up Transformer - : 13,000 kVA, 33/11 kV, 50 Hz


Rating

17.0 Approach Road

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 1-6


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Kathmandu to Chainpur : 898 km (Balcktopped Highway)

Chainpur to Rajkuda : 4 km (Gravel Road)

Rajkuda to Powerhouse : 5 km (Under Construction)

18.0 Financial Indicators

Total Base Cost of the : 2297.77 Million NPR


Project

Total Cost of the Project : 2484.25 Million NPR (with IDC)


with IDC

Return on Equity : 21.54 %

Benefit Cost Ratio : 1.73

Net Present Value : 1557.19 Million NPR

Average DSCR : 2.16

19.0 Construction Period : 3.5 years

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 1-7


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

2 STANDARDS AND CODES

2.1 CODES USED


The following standards and codes were used during the design and are applicable
during the construction of the project. The codes are all internationally recognized
standards and are prescribed for use by the following organizations:

BS The British Standards Institution

IS The Indian Standards Institution

EN The European Committee for Standardization

NBC Nepal National Building Code

USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers

2.2 SYSTEM OF UNITS


The International System of Units (SI) is the standard system of units used on all
aspects of the project. When elevations are quoted they always refer to meters above
mean sea level.

2.3 LOADING AND DESIGN OF SECTIONS


For civil structural design, the following major codes and standards have been used for
determining the design loads and calculating required dimension of the sections:
IS 456: 2000 Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete
BS 8110:1985 Structural Use of Concrete
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures for Retaining Aqueous
BS 8007:1987
Liquids
ENV 1992-1-1 Euro-code 2: Design of Concrete Structures.
IS 3370 (part Concrete Structures for Storage of Liquid
2):2009
IS 1893:1970 Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures
NBC 105: 1994 Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal
Specification for Bending Dimension and Scheduling of
BS 4466:1987
Reinforcement for Concrete
Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to
IS13920:1993
Seismic Forces
SP 34 (1987) Handbook on Concrete Reinforcement and Detailing
Stability analysis of concrete structures, US Army Corps of
EM 1110-2-2100
Engineers

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 2-1


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

EM 1110-2-2200 Gravity Dam Design, US Army Corps of Engineers

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 2-2


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3 DETAILS OF ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

3.1 MATERIAL PROPERTIES

3.1.1 Soil parameters adopted in design

The following values were adopted as the properties of soil during foundation design:
Unit weight of dry soil ( 18 KN/m3
Unit weight of saturated soil (sat) 21 KN/m3
Unit weight of submerged soil (g’) 11.19 KN/m3
Angle of repose for the soil (f) 30o-35o
Soil cohesion 0

3.1.2 Concrete

Following values were adopted as the properties of plain concrete and reinforced
concrete:
Unit weight 24 KN/m3
Modulus of elasticity 5000√𝑓𝑐𝑘 MPa (Ref: IS 456:2000 Cl6.2.3)
Poisson’s ratio 0.20 (Ref: BS 8110-1:1997 Cl 2.4.2.4)
Coefficient of thermal expansion 0.00001/oC (Ref: IS 456:2000 Cl 6.2.6)
Characteristic strength (𝑓𝑐𝑘 ) is the value of 28 day cube strength below which 5 % of
all possible tests results are expected to fall. Thus:
M15 has a characteristic strength of 15 MPa (Blinding concrete)
M25 has a characteristic strength of 25 MPa
M35 has a characteristic strength of 35 MPa
The design strength is derived from the characteristic strength multiplied by a
coefficient 0.67 and divided by the material partial safety factor. The material partial
safety factor, in flexure and axial load was 1.5 (Ref: IS 456:2000 Clause 38.1 (c)),
which takes account of differences between actual and laboratory values, local
conditions and inaccuracies.

3.1.3 Reinforcement steel

The reinforcement used shall meet the following specifications


 Shall comply with the requirements of BS 8110
 TMT steel (India and Nepal): 500 MPa
 Shall comply with the requirements of BS8110 Fe500
 Modulus of elasticity=200 KN/mm2

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-1


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

The design of reinforcement steel used a material partial safety factor of 1.15 Ref: IS
456:2000 Clause 38.1 (e).

3.1.4 Crack width

All concrete structure is likely to crack on the tension face. Maximum crack width of
0.2 mm has been allowed in the reinforcement design (Ref: IS 3370 (part 2):2009). The
formulas used to calculate crack width is given in Appendix-1 which is same as given
in IS 3370 (part 2):2009.

3.2 LOADINGS
All the structures have been analysed and designed to resist all possible combinations
of vertical and lateral forces, and overturning moments.
The geometry of the structures has been designed according to the codes and following
standard practice.

3.2.1 General Loads

In general, the primary loads that act on hydropower structures are earth pressure,
uplift, gravity loads, water pressure and self-weight. The structures have been designed
to resist the combined effect of these forces.
Table 3-1: General loading taken in account for headworks structures.
SN Description
1 Earth pressure from hillside and riverside whichever applicable
2 Weight of soil
3 Weight of water
4 Uplift forces
5 Self-weight of the structure
6 Sediment loads
7 Dynamic forces (pseudo static coefficient)
8 Seismic forces (horizontal and vertical)
9 Live loads
Any additional loads taken for the analysis of specific structure are described in the
relevant section.

3.2.2 Earthquake load

For earthquake loads, a horizontal seismic coefficient of 0.3g and vertical seismic
coefficient of 0.12g have been adopted. Value adopted for acceleration due to gravity
(g) is 9.81 m/s2.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-2


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.2.3 Load combinations

All possible load combinations that the structure must resist during its life time have
been carefully determined and analysis has been done for each of the various
combinations. The load combinations differ according to the dimensions of the
structures and their layout, so determination of the critical load combinations was an
iterative process that was only completed when the final dimensions and layout of the
structure were completed.

3.2.4 Stability Analaysis

Stability analysis was done to ensure that the structures can resist all the forces without
producing excessive displacement or excessive bearing pressure on the foundation. The
stability analysis consisted of first identifying all the primary loads, seismic loads and
their appropriate combinations. In this analysis, safety against sliding, overturning and
bearing pressure were checked.
The partial safety factor for load to be used in different combinations in this analysis is
given in Table 3-2.
Table 3-2: Partial Safety Factor for Load for Stability Analysis

Load Load type


combination Dead Imposed Earth
coefficients
Adverse Favourable Adverse Favourable pressure Seismic
1. Dead and 1 1 1 —
imposed
(including
earth and
water
pressure)
2. Dead, 1 1 1 1 1 1
seismic and
imposed
(Ref: IS 456:2000 Cl 36.4 and IS 3370 (part 2):2009 Cl 4.4.1.3)

3.2.5 Factor of safety (FoS)

The safety factor to be adopted mainly depends upon the sensitivity of the structure
with respect to the project and economic viability. The general FoS adopted is given in
Table 3-3.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-3


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-3: Factor of Safety

FoS Type Without seismic With seismic consideration


consideration

Against sliding 1.2 1.1

Against overturning 1.5 1.2

3.2.6 Allowable bearing pressure

The bearing pressure of foundation of the structure depends on type and general
classification of soil. In this case, the foundations are assumed to be on medium dense
silt sand. Allowable bearing pressure is calculated according to the formula shown in
Appendix. The maximum allowable soil bearing pressure is limited to 150 MPa at
headworks area and 200 Mpa at powerhouse area. This value is adopted on the basis of
soil property with safety factor of 3. At some limited areas, bearing pressure has
exceeded little high than the allowable soil bearing pressure. It is recommended to
improve the ground’s bearing capacity at such vicinities.
In foundation design, the allowable bearing capacity could be increased by 25% on the
permissible bearing capacity of soil where seismic or wind load action (Ref: IS 1893-
1:2002, Clause: 6.3.6.2). As per Nepal Building Code, NBC 105:1994 Clause 4.3, up to
50% increase in the allowable bearing capacity could be made whenever earthquake
load is considered. In this design, 25% increase in the allowable bearing capacity of the
soil is adopted.

3.3 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND REINFORCEMENT CALCULATIONS


Based on the stable structure, further analysis is done to find the geometry of the
sections to provide sufficient strength to the structure. The partial safety factor for load
in structural analysis is given in Table 3-4. The value in the given table is based on IS
456:2000 and IS 1893:1970.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-4


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-4: Partial Safety Factor for Load for Structural Analysis

Load type

Load combination Dead Imposed Earth Seismic


coefficients and
water
Adverse Adverse
pressure

1. Dead and imposed 1.5 1.5 1.5 —


(including earth and
water pressure)

2. Dead and seismic 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2


and imposed
(Ref: IS 456:2000 Cl 36.4 and IS 1893:1970 Cl 6.3)
The load envelope obtained from the structural analysis was used to calculate
reinforcements.

3.4 CLEAR COVER


The clear cover adopted are given in Table 3-5.
Table 3-5: Clear cover for various structures

Structure Descriptions Clear cover

Base slab (bottom second and outer layer) 75 mm

Flood wall Hillside wall 50 mm

Riverside wall 50 mm

Base slab 75 mm
Weir
Surface 50 mm

Base slab (bottom second and outer layer) 75 mm

Intake Hillside wall 50 mm

Riverside wall 50 mm

Base slab (bottom outer layer) 75 mm


Intake culvert/canal
Riverside walls (in case of no contact with river) 50 mm

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-5


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Structure Descriptions Clear cover

Base slab (bottom outer layer) 75 mm


Gravel Trap
Riverside walls (in case of no contact with river) 50 mm

Base slab (bottom outer layer) 75 mm

Settling Basin Base slab (bottom second layer) 50 mm

Walls 50 mm

3.5 STRUCTURAL DESIGN


All the structural components are analysed separately during the review. Initially, each
component was checked for stability. Computer aided programme (SAP 2000) and in-
house worksheet developed in Microsoft Excel was employed for the analysis and
design.
Suni Gad Hydropower Project is designed as a run of river project. The main
components of the project consist of following structures.
1. Floodwall
2. Weir and Stilling Basin
3. Undersluice
4. Intake
5. Gravel trap
6. Approach Canal and Spillway
7. Settling basin
8. Approach Canal Pipe Crossing
9. Forebay
10. Anchor Block and Saddle Supports
11. Powerhouse

The design result of these structures are presented in the following paragraphs.

3.6 FLOOD WALL


There is a floodwall on the bank of river to protect the structures from high flood. A
part of the flood wall lies upstream of weir, some part downstream of weir and
remaining along the riverside of undersluice. The height of these flood wall are fixed to
prevent overflow at 100 yrs flood and the foundation are kept below the scouring zone
to prevent possible washing of foundation.
10.40 m of flood wall has been provided at the upstream of weir along the left bank
taking the 100 year return period design flood which is 1769.9 masl. The left bank
flood wall upstream of the weir has been presented in Construction Drawings as Flood

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-6


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Wall Type-A in Section D-D and as Flood Wall Type C in Section E-E in the Drawing
No. SGHP-52-C03.
Similarly, 18 m long of flood wall has been provided at the upstream of weir along the
left bank taking the 100 year return period design flood which is 1769.9 masl. The right
bank flood wall upstream of the weir has been presented in Construction Drawings as
Flood Wall Type-A in Section B-B in the Drawing No. SGHP-52-C02.
At the downstream of weir and stilling basin, 27.39 m long flood wall has been
proposed which ends at the exposed bed rock at the right bank of the river downstream
of weir. The right bank flood wall downstream of the weir and stilling basin has been
presented in Construction Drawings as Flood Wall Type-B in Section C-C in the
Drawing No. SGHP-52-C02.
The flood wall at right bank upstream of weir made monolithic with the upstream apron
has been presented in Section F-F in the Drawing No. SGHP-51-C07.
Similarly, the flood wall at the right bank and left bank of the stilling basin which is
downstream of weir has been presented in Section J-J in Drawing No. SGHP-51-C09.
All the floodwall has been analysed/ designed to be stable in following load
combinations:

3.6.1 Flood wall Type A / Panel-FL-02 & Panel-FR-01 (Section B-B and Section
D-D)

Figure 3-1: Flood Wall Type A (Section B-B)

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-7


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-6: Safety factor and bearing pressure in Flood wall Type-A
Factor of safety Bearing (kN/m2)
When seismic is not considered
1. Sliding 13.67 66.8
2. Overturning 3.56 56.68
When seismic considered
1. Sliding 1.35 137.07
2. Overturning 2.01 9.75
Table 3-7: Maximum displacement and force summary in Section D-D Flood wall
Parameters Values Unit
Maximum moment at base 58 kNm/m
Maximum shear force at base 83
kN/m
Maximum moment at wall 136 kNm/m
Maximum crack width <0.2 Mm
Table 3-8: Reinforcement details for flood wall in Section D-D Flood wall

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 600 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Walls 420 mm to 300 mm. Φ16 mm@150c/c

Distribution bar Φ12 mm@150c/c

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-8


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.6.2 Left Bank Flood Wall Monolithic with U-S Apron/Panel W-1 (Section F-F)

Figure 3-2: Flood Wall (Panel-W-01)


Table 3-9: Safety factor and bearing pressure in Section F-F Flood wall
Factor of safety Bearing (kN/m2)
When seismic is not considered
1. Sliding 3.46 70.81
2. Overturning 2.9 23.75
When seismic is considered
1. Sliding 1.13 91.5
2. Overturning 1.8 5.93

Table 3-10: Maximum displacement and force summary in Section F-F Flood wall
Parameters Values Unit
Maximum moment at base 695 kNm/m
Maximum shear force at base 214
kN/m
Maximum moment at wall 259 kNm/m
Maximum shear force at wall 125
kN/m
Maximum crack width <0.2 Mm

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-9


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-11: Reinforcement details for flood wall in Section F-F Flood wall

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 650 mm Φ25 mm@150c/c

Walls 300 mm to 600 mm. Φ20 mm@150c/c

Distribution bar Φ12 mm@150c/c

3.6.3 Flood Wall Monolithic with Stilling Basin/Panel W-07 & Panel-W-10
(Section J-J)

Figure 3-3: Flood Wall (Panel-W-07 & Panel-W-10)


Table 3-12: Safety factor and bearing pressure in Section J-J Flood wall
Factor of safety Bearing KN/m2
When seismic is not considered
1. Sliding 4.45 80.05
2. Overturning 3.11 36.42
When seismic is considered
1. Sliding 1.36 101.91
2. Overturning 1.97 14.73

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-10


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-13: Maximum crack and force summary of flood wall Section J-J Flood wall
Parameters Values Unit
Maximum moment at base 706 kNm/m
Maximum shear force at base 215 kN/m
Maximum moment at wall 227 kNm/m
Maximum shear force at wall 139 kN/m
Maximum crack width <0.2 Mm

Table 3-14: Reinforcement details for flood wall Section J-J Flood wall

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 1200 mm Φ20 mm@150c/c

Wall 300 mm to 500 mm. Φ20 mm@150c/c

Distribution bar Φ12 mm@150c/c

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-11


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.7 WEIR, U/S APRON AND STILLING BASIN


The proposed weir of 25 m length is located at Suni Gad river approximately 200 m
upstream of the existing suspension bridge. The broad crest weir elevation is 1767.5 m
amsl and the high flood level elevation is 1769.90 m amsl. The weir is provided with
0.3 m thick M35 grade concrete at the top to prevent the erosion and abrasion due to
movement of large boulders during the high flood events. Minimum of 0.5 m thick
M25 structural concrete has been designed around the surface and M15 plum concrete
with 40 % plum stones has been proposed in the core. The upstream apron level is
1765.30 m amsl and downstream floor level is 1763.10 m amsl.
A 9.10 m long upstream apron has been provided upstream of weir. Further upstream
0.4 m thick graded filter, geotextile and 0.4 m thick clay blanket has been provided to
increase the seepage path. Boulder riprap of 1 m diameter has been provided at the top
for the safety of clay blanket and filter layer from its erosion and wash away.
The stilling basin is designed for the complete dissipation of the energy through
hydraulic jump. The length of the stilling basin is 15 meters and the floor level of
stilling basin is 1763.10 m amsl. For the safety of uplift, 0.1 m diameter pressure
release HDPE pipe with filter material has been proposed in the stilling basin.
Cut off Wall has been proposed at the various location along the weir and stilling basin
to provide sufficient seepage path to avoid the piping failure at the downstream of weir
and stilling basin.
For detail drawings of the weir drawings, plan, profile and cross sections refer,
Drawings No. SGHP-51-C01 to C11.

Figure 3-4: Longitudinal Profile along Weir and Stilling Basin


The stability analysis of weir has been considered as a single monolithic structure. The
SAP model analysis of weir and stilling basin has not been performed. The minimum
reinforcement as specified in the IS code has been provided in both the structures.
The design has been done complying with Limit stress design method of IS456:2000
and other associated literatures whereas detailing has been done according to
IS13920:1993 and SP-34. British code has also been utilized from time to time during
the detailing of the structural elements.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-12


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.7.1 Approach of Stability Analysis

The stability analysis of Weir has been done various critical cases. The stability
analysis of the mentioned structure is done using stability criteria from USACE (EM
1110-2-2200). The factors of safety for Sliding, overturning and bearing are given in
Table 3 9.
Table 3-15: Criteria for stability analysis for Weir

Weir stability criteria


Loading Factor of safety (FOS)
Case
condition Sliding Overturning Floatation Bearing Eccentricity
1 Usual 2 1.7 1.3 <1*Qsafe B/6

2 Unusual 1.7 1.5 1.2 <1*Qsafe B/4

3 Extreme 1.3 1.2 1.1 <1.33*Qsafe B/2

3.7.2 Seismic consideration

The seismic consideration for the stability analysis and structural design of weir has
been done by seismic coefficient method from IS: 1893-1984.
Where,
αh= horizontal seismic coefficient
β = a coefficient depending upon soil foundation system = 1 (for boulder mixed soil
foundation on raft footings) (refer Table 2-4)
I = importance factor depending upon type of structure = 3 (as weir is one of the most
important structures in the project) (refer Table 2-3)
αo= basic horizontal seismic coefficient = 0.08 (for zone V) (Refer Table 2-2) The
horizontal seismic coefficient αh =0.24
Table 3-16: Value of basic seismic coefficient for different zones

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-13


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-17: Value of Importance Factor, I

Table 3-18: Value of β for different soil-Foundation system

3.7.3 Subsoil Conditions

Allowable Bearing capacity of soil was selected based on the subsoil preliminary
investigations taken as follows:
Allowable Bearing Capacity = 150KN/m^2.
The bearing pressure of foundation of the structure will depend on type and general
classification of soil. For ordinary soils with no reliable information, the permissible

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-14


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

bearing pressure shall not be taken more than 150 KN/m2. Suitable adjustment for
depth of soil and overburden pressure will be made. For boulder mixed soil, the bearing
capacity will be higher and a higher value will be taken from IS codes and other
reliable literatures. However, the bearing pressure shall not exceed 250 KN/m2 at
surface. In case of rocks, suitable values will be taken following codes and practices
and depending on the geological investigation data, if any.
Unit weight of dry soil = 13 KN/m3
Unit weight of saturated soil =19 KN/m3
Unit weight of submerged soil = 9 KN/m3
Angle of repose for the soil (f) = 30˚
The above-mentioned soil parameters shall be used for computation of active and
passive pressure due to soil for Weir components of the headworks.

3.7.4 Loads

Following loads were applied for stability analysis and structural analysis.
Dead load
The dead load includes loads that are relatively constant over time, including the
weight of the structure itself. This type of load may also include the weight and
invariable loads attached to the structure. The weight of a structure has been calculated
in per meter basis for stability analysis whereas it is calculated and applied to SAP
2000 by software itself. The plan geometry has been modelled in SAP whereas
thickness and the material weight properties were defined for each structure. The
material properties and dimensions used are as follows:
Concrete specific weight = 25 KN/m3
Dead load taken in Stability analysis and structural analysis (SAP model)
 Dead
 Weight of soil
 Upthrust
 Surcharge load
 Weight of boulder
 Active earth pressure

Live loads
Live loads are the variable load on the structure that adds on to the dead or intrinsic
load of the structure.
Live load used for Stability analysis and structural analysis (SAP model) in this project
are:
 Hydrostatic load in normal flow

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-15


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

 Hydrostatic load in average monsoon


 Hydrostatic load in 100 year flood
 Uplift load in normal flow
 Uplift load in average monsoon
 Uplift load in 100 year flood
Sesmic Loads
These loads are the loads due to the effect of the earthquake on the structure and the
surrounding. The earthquake load has been calculated on the basis of IS: 1893- 1984
and applied manually as a uniformly varying load or point load depending on the
structure. The horizontal seismic coefficient has been taken as 0.3 and the base shear
thus obtained has been applied as a uniformly varying load on the member or as point
load.

3.7.5 Structural analysis and design

The structural members are designed by using limit state method in which the structure
shall withstand safely all loads liable to act on it throughout its life. It shall also satisfy
the serviceability requirements such as limitations on deflection and cracking.
A Slab of uniform thickness 0.8 m of M35 grade has been considered as structural
concrete around the weir. Similarly, a slab of uniform thickness of 1.5m has been
considered for stilling basin floor. Since, the core of weir body and stilling basin
consist of plum concrete, structural analysis is not required. So, minimum area of
reinforcement as specified by the IS 3370(part 2) has been provided in both the
structures. However, the deflection criteria and crack width has been checked for the
structures.

3.7.6 Concrete

• Grade: M25 (Weir) & M25 Stilling Basin.


• Clear Concrete cover : 75 mm (For structure’s surface exposed to
backfilling and water)
: 50mm (For remaining surface)

3.7.7 Reinforcements

• Grade : Fe 500
• Development length : 60Ф

3.7.8 VDeflection criteria

The maximum allowable deflection for all the structural members should comply with
the deflection criteria given in IS 456:2000 (chapter 23.2).

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-16


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.7.9 Crack width

The maximum crack width allowed for any structural element is 0.2 mm as per IS 456.
The crack width has been calculated by using ANNEX F of IS 456:2000.

3.7.10 Load Cases

Following are the load condition used for stability analysis.


Usual Loading Conditions
Case 1. Normal Operation
o Dead Load
o Reservoir water surface elevation 1014 masl
o Earth Pressure(Active)
o Uplift Pressure
Unusual Loading Condition
Case 2. Annual Flood
o Dead Load
o Reservoir water surface elevation 1015.10masl
o Earth Pressure(Active)
o Uplift Pressure
Case 3. Construction Period
o Dead Load
o Earth Pressure(Active)
Extreme Loading Condition
 Case 4. Seismic load at Normal Operation
o Dead Load
o Reservoir water surface elevation 1014 masl
o Earth Pressure(Active)
o Uplift Pressure
o Seismic Load(Horizontal and Vertical)
o Hydrodynamic Force
 Case 5. Seismic load during Annual Flood
o Dead Load
o Reservoir water surface elevation 1015.10 masl

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-17


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

o Earth Pressure(Active)
o Uplift Pressure
o Seismic Load(Horizontal and Vertical)

 Case 6. High Flood (200 years return period)


o Dead Load
o Reservoir water surface elevation 1020.62masl
o Earth Pressure (Active)
o Uplift Pressure
Table 3-19: Results of stability analysis of Weir
Minimum Maximum
FOS
FOS against Bearing Bearing
against
S.N. Condition Overturning pressure pressure
Sliding
(KN/m2) (KN/m2)
5.7 3.4 53.7
1 Normal condition 76.15

2 Monsoon Condition 1.7 2.6 28.31 46.31


Seismic condition critical
3 32
in uplift 2.6 28.7 78.9
4
Seismic condition critical
in bearing 3.5 35.2 98.3 50.5

The result of Structural Design of weir, U/S apron and stilling basin is given in the
table below.
Table 3-20: Results of Structural Analysis of Weir, U/S Apron and Stilling Basin

S.N Component Main Bar Distribution Bar Remarks


16 mm dia @150 mm 16 mm dia @150
1 Weir c/c spacing on both mm c/c spacing on
faces both faces
16 mm dia @150 mm 16 mm dia @150
2 U/S apron c/c spacing on both mm c/c spacing on
faces both faces
16 mm dia @150 mm 16 mm dia @150
3 Stilling Basin c/c spacing on both mm c/c spacing on
faces both faces

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-18


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Design Codes and Guidelines Referred


 IS 456-2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete- Code of Practice
 IS 1893-1984, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures
 IS 3370 (part 2):2009 concrete structures for storage of liquid
 Design of Reinforced Concrete (Limit State Design) A.K Jain
 EM 1110-2-2100 Stability analysis of concrete structures, US Army Corps of
Engineers
 EM 1110-2-2200, Gravity Dam Design, US Army Corps of Engineers
 DoED Guidelines, Part 2B: Concrete Diversion Structures

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-19


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.8 UNDERSLUICE
Divide wall divides the undersluice and weir of the structure. It is constructed at right
angle to the axis of weir. The undersluice is designed considering the high flood level
and considering the gate operation requirements.
For detail drawings of the undersluice plan, profile and cross sections please refer,
Drawings No. SGHP-51-C01 to C11.

Figure 3-5: Undersluice Longitudinal Profile

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-20


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-6: Undersluice Section at Gate Region


Load Cases

Dead (DL) Live (LL) Quake (EL)

A Dead Load D Hydrostatic load G Earthquake load

B Active Earth pressure E Uplift

C Passive Earth pressure F Wt. of Water

Load Combination

S.N. General Combination Condition Combination


1 1.5*(Dead load + Live No flow condition 1.5*(A+B+C+E)
load)
1.2*(Dead load +Live No flow condition
2 1.2*(A+B+C+E+G)
load Earthquake load) with earthquake

3 1.5*(Dead load + Live


Normal Operation 1.5*(A+B+C+D+E+F)
Load)

4 1.2*(Dead load + Live Normal Operation


1.2*(A+B+C+D+E+F+G)
load + Earthquake load) and seismic

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-21


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

S.N. General Combination Condition Combination


5 1.2*(Dead load + Live
100 year Flood 1.2*(A+B+C+D+E+F)
load)

Table 3-21: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Undersluice at Section H-H

Factor of safety Bearing kN/m2

Normal case

1. Sliding Very high Maximum 157.75

2. Overturning 4.95 Minimum 78.61

Seismic case

1. Sliding 3.36 Maximum 195.32

2. Overturning 2.5 Minimum 35.52

Table 3-22: Maximum displacement and force summary of Undersluice at Section H-H
Parameters Values Unit
Maximum crack <0.2 Mm
Maximum moment at base 725 kNm/m
Max shear force at base 331 kN/m
Maximum moment at wall 741 kNm/m
Max shear force at wall 318 kN/m

Table 3-23: Reinforcement details for Undersluice

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 1300 mm Φ20 mm@150c/c

Side Walls 1000 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Top Slab 300 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Distribution bars Φ 12mm@150c/c

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-22


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.9 INTAKE
A side intake with two opening are designed to draw the design discharge of 4.74 m3/s
(including 20 5 additional discharge for flushing of gravel trap and settling basin
sediment) at the normal water level of 1767.50 m amsl. The invert level of intake
orifice has been kept more than 1 m above the invert level of undersluice, at level
1766.30 m amsl to prevent the entry of bed load into intake chamber from river. The
water will enter through two openings of size 2.5 × 1.4 m and then flow to the gravel
trap. Trash racks are provided to prevent entry of floating debris. The trashrack will
have the inclination of 80⁰ to the horizontal plane.
The intake gate size is 2.5 m x 1.4 m and a matching stop log gate would be erected for
the maintenance of the intake gate.
For detail Civil Construction Drawings of intake chamber, refer Drawing No. SGHP-
54-C02 to C04.

3.9.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design

The longitudinal section and cross section of the intake chamber are as shown in the
figure below. The load from combination taken for analysis and design of the intake
chamber are also shown in the table below.

Figure 3-7: Longitudinal Profile along Intake Chamber

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-23


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-8: Cross Section of the Intake Chamber


The load combination cases taken in account for analysis of intake chamber near gate
are:
Load Cases

Dead (DL) Live (LL) Quake (EL)

A Dead Load D Hydrostatic load G Earthquake load

B Active Earth pressure E Uplift

C Passive Earth pressure F Wt. of Water

Load Combination

S.N. General Combination Condition Combination


1.5*(Dead load + Live
1 No flow condition 1.5*(A+B+C+E)
load)
1.2*(Dead load +Live No flow condition
2 1.2*(A+B+C+E+G)
load Earthquake load) with earthquake

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-24


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

S.N. General Combination Condition Combination


3 1.5*(Dead load + Live
Normal Operation 1.5*(A+B+C+D+E+F)
Load)

4 1.2*(Dead load + Live Normal Operation


1.2*(A+B+C+D+E+F+G)
load + Earthquake load) and seismic

5 1.2*(Dead load + Live


100 year Flood 1.2*(A+B+C+D+E+F)
load)

Table 3-24: Safety factor and bearing pressure of side intake chamber

Factor of safety Bearing kN/m2


Normal case
1. Sliding 12.23 Maximum 99.2
2. Overturning 2.31 Minimum 46.62
Seismic case
1. Sliding 1.14 Maximum 129.53
2. Overturning 1.48 Minimum 1.88

Table 3-25: Maximum displacement and force summary of side intake chamber

Parameters Values Unit


Maximum crack <0.2 Mm
Maximum moment at base 303 kNm/m
Maximum shear force at base 203 kN/m
Maximum moment at wall 187 kNm/m

Max shear force at wall 124 kN/m

Table 3-26: Reinforcement details for intake

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 1000 mm Φ20 mm@150c/c

Intake Pier 1000 mm Φ20 mm@150c/c

Top slab 300 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Distribution bar Φ12 mm@150c/c

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-25


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.10 GRAVEL TRAP


The gravel trap is proposed after the intake transition canal at the left bank of the Suni
Gad river. The gravel trap is designed as single hopper (5.0 m width) with conventional
hydraulic flushing system. The invert level at the entrance of gravel trap is 1764.40 m
amsl with a slope of 1 in 50. The length of the gravel trap is 6 m. At the downstream
end of the gravel trap, a gravel flushing culvert is provided to flush the trapped
particles. Flushing gates are also provided downstream of the flushing canal to control
the flushing discharge. In consideration with 100 years high flood level, the external
side wall of gravel trap is maintained at 1771.40m amsl.
The design discharge for gravel flushing will be taken as 10% of design discharge.
Flushing culvert of 0.8 m width and 1.2 m height will be provided at a slope of 1 in 50
to flush out gravel entering from the intake.
For detail Civil Construction Drawings of Gravel Trap and Gravel Flushing culvert,
refer Drawing No. SGHP-55-C01 to C05.

3.10.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Gravel Trap

The cross section of the gravel trap is as shown in the figure below. The load from
combination taken for analysis and design of the gravel trap is shown in the table.

Figure 3-9: Gravel Trap Cross Section

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-26


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-27: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Gravel Trap

Factor of safety Bearing kN/m2

Normal case

1. Sliding Very high Maximum 115

2. Overturning 3.17 Minimum 32.9

Seismic case

1. Sliding 3.92 Maximum 126.9

2. Overturning 1.99 Minimum 19.4

Table 3-28: Maximum displacement and force summary of Gravel Trap

Parameters Values Unit


Maximum crack <0.2 Mm
Maximum moment at base 622 kNm/m
Maximum shear force at base 145 KN/m
Maximum moment at wall 502 kNm/m
Max shear force 287 kN/m

Table 3-29: Reinforcement details for Gravel Trap

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 1000 mm Φ20 mm@150c/c

Vertical wall 300 mm to 800 mm Φ20 mm@150c/c

Distribution Φ 12mm@150c/c

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-27


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.10.2 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Gravel Trap Flushing Culvert

The cross section of the gravel trap flushing culvert is as shown in the figure below.

Figure 3-10: Gravel Trap Flushing Culvert


Table 3-30: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Gravel Flushing Culvert

Factor of safety Bearing kN/m2

Normal case

1. Sliding Very high Maximum 36.8

2. Overturning 6.05 Minimum 12.81

Seismic case

1. Sliding 2.82 Maximum 46.5

2. Overturning 2.55 Minimum 2.91

Table 3-31: Maximum displacement and force summary of Gravel Flushing Culvert
Parameters Values Unit
Maximum crack <0.2 Mm
Maximum moment at base 22.1 kNm/m
Maximum shear force at base 20.71 KN/m
Maximum moment at wall 17.2 kNm/m
Max shear force at wall 25.56 kN/m

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-28


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-32: Reinforcement details for Gravel Flushing Culvert

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 300 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Vertical wall 300 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Distribution Φ 12mm@150c/c

3.11 APPROACH CANAL AND SPILLWAY


Approach Canal of 2.4 m width and 3.0 m height has been designed to pass the design
discharge from gravel trap to the settling basin. The total length of the approach canal
in the Panel-AP-01 is 16.25 m. Spillway of 14.00 m length has been proposed on the
right side wall of the approach canal to spill out the excess flood flow during the flood
season.
For detail Civil Construction Drawings of Approach Canal and Spillway, refer Drawing
No. SGHP-56-C01 to C02.

3.11.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design

The longitudinal section and cross section of the approach canal and spillway are as
shown in the figure below. The load from combination taken for analysis and design of
the intake chamber are also shown in the table below.

Figure 3-11: Cross Section of Approach Canal and Spillway

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-29


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-33: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Approach Canal and Spillway

Factor of safety Bearing kN/m2

Normal case

1. Sliding 36.3 Maximum 45.06

2. Overturning 2.14 Minimum 3.72

Seismic case

1. Sliding 2.17 Maximum 53.84

2. Overturning 3.02 Minimum 3.3

Table 3-34: Maximum displacement and force summary of Approach Canal and
Spillway
Parameters Values Unit
Maximum crack <0.2 Mm
Maximum moment at base 49 kNm/m
Maximum shear force at base 59 KN/m
Maximum moment at wall 52 kNm/m
Max shear force 55 kN/m
Table 3-35: Reinforcement details for Approach Canal and Spillway

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 300 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Vertical wall 400 mm to 300 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Distribution Φ 12mm@150c/c

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-30


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.12 SETTLING BASIN INLET TRANSITION


Inlet Transition of 25.40 m length has been proposed to convey the flow from approach
canal to settling zone of the settling basin. The transition angle is maintained about 13
degrees. The water depth also varies from 1.32 m at start of the transition zone which is
about 4.00 m at the end of the transition zone.
For detail Civil Construction Drawings of Inlet Transition zone of the settling basin,
refer Drawing No. SGHP-57-C01 to C05.

3.12.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design

The plan and cross section of the inlet transition zone of the settling basin are as shown
in the figure below. The load from combination taken for analysis and design of the
intake chamber are also shown in the table below.

Figure 3-12: Settling Basin Inlet Transition Zone Plan

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-31


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-13: Settling Basin Inlet Transition Zone Cross Section


Load Cases

Dead (DL) Live(LL) Quake (EL)


A Dead Load D Hydrostatic load G Earthquake load
B Active Earth pressure E Uplift
C Passive Earth pressure F Wt. of Water

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-32


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Load Combination
S.N. General Combination Condition Combination
1 All Empty – 1.5*(DL + LL) No flow condition 1.5*(A+C+G+I)
2 All Empty and Seismic load– 1.2 No flow condition and 1.2*( A+C+G+I+J)
*(DL + LL+EL) Horizontal Earthquake
3 All Empty and Seismic load– 1.2 No flow condition and 1.2*( A+C+G+I+J)
*(DL + LL+EL) Vertical Earthquake
4 All Basins Full- 1.5*(DL+LL) Flow in Both Basin 1.5*(A+C+E+F+G+I)

5 All Basins Full and Seismic load- Flow in Both Basin 1.2*(A+C+E+F+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) and Horizontal
6 All Basins Full and Seismic load- Earthquake
Flow in Both Basin 1.2*(A+C+E+F+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) and Vertical
7 One basin full- 1.5*(DL+LL) Flow in one basin
Earthquake 1.5*(A+C+E+G+I)

8 One basin full- 1.5*(DL+LL) Flow in one basin 1.5*(A+C+F+G+I)

9 One basin full and Seismic load- Flow in one basin and 1.2*(A+C+E+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) Horizontal Earthquake
10 One basin full and Seismic load- Flow in one basin and 1.2*(A+C+E+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) Vertical Earthquake
11 One basin full and Seismic load- Flow in one basin and 1.2*(A+C+F+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) Horizontal Earthquake
12 One basin full and Seismic load- Flow in one basin and 1.2*(A+C+F+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) Vertical Earthquake
Table 3-36: Safety factor and bearing pressure of settling basin inlet transition

Factor of safety Bearing kN/m2

Normal case

1. Sliding 999.00 Maximum 56.35

2. Overturning 2.29 Minimum 8.4

Seismic case

1. Sliding 4.38 Maximum 68.81

2. Overturning 2.98 Minimum 5.75

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-33


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-37: Maximum displacement and force summary of Settling Basin Inlet
Transition
Parameters Values Unit
Maximum crack <0.2 mm
Maximum moment at base 92 kNm/m
Max shear force at base 65 kN/m
Maximum moment at base 99 kNm/m
Max shear force at base 69.7 kN/m
Table 3-38: Reinforcement details for Settling Basin Inlet Transition

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 600 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Side wall bottom 500 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c


thickness

Side wall top thickness 300 mm Φ 16mm@150c/c

Intermediate wall 500 mm at bottom to 300 Φ 16mm@150c/c


mm at top

Distribution Φ 12mm@150c/c

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-34


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.13 SETTLING ZONE OF SETTLING BASIN


Settling Basin of the Suni Gad Hydropwer Project is proposed at left bank downstream
of the approach canal. Settling basin has transition zone of 25.40 m followed by the
main settling basin zone which also has been designed as a two bay each of 40.00 m
long and 7 m width. The bottom of the settling basin has been designed as a hopper
type with a bed slope of 1:40. Each basin has an independent flushing culvert
(pressurized) which conveys the sediments mixed water to the flushing culvert. The
settling basin has been designed for settlement of 0.2 mm particle. This continuous
flushing type settling basin will use surplus water (during rainy seasons) for flushing
which is about 10% of plant design flow. During the low flow season when sediment
inflows are minimal, flushing can be done intermittently as and when required, so that
most of the available water can be used for power production. Perforated drain pipe has
been provisioned at the level of hopper bottom along the right side basin to drain out
the percolated water so as to reduce the uplift.
Water will flow to the headpond through the four gated outlet orifices with the
dimension of 1.20 m width by 1.00 m height provided at the end of the settling basin.
The settling basin arrangement is shown in figure below.
For detail Civil Construction Drawings of Settling Zone of the settling basin, refer
Drawing No. SGHP-57-C01 to C06.

Figure 3-14: Settling Basin Plan

3.13.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design

The cross section of the Settling zone of the settling basin is as shown in the figure
below. The load from combination taken for analysis and design of the Settling basin is
shown in the table.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-35


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-15: Settling Zone Cross Section


Load Cases

Dead (DL) Live(LL) Quake (EL)

A Dead Load H Hydrostatic load J Earthquake load


B Wt. of Soil I Uplift
C Active Earth Pressure
D Surcharge
E Wt. of Water (Basin I)
F Wt. of Water (Basin II)
G Passive Earth Pressure
Load Combination
S.N. General Combination Condition Combination
1 All Empty – 1.5*(DL + LL) No flow condition 1.5*(A+C+G+I)
2 All Empty and Seismic load– 1.2 No flow condition and 1.2*( A+C+G+I+J)
*(DL + LL+EL) Horizontal Earthquake
3 All Empty and Seismic load– 1.2 No flow condition and 1.2*( A+C+G+I+J)
*(DL + LL+EL) Vertical Earthquake
4 All Basins Full- 1.5*(DL+LL) Flow in Both Basin 1.5*(A+C+E+F+G+I)

5 All Basins Full and Seismic load- Flow in Both Basin 1.2*(A+C+E+F+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) and Horizontal
6 All Basins Full and Seismic load- Earthquake
Flow in Both Basin 1.2*(A+C+E+F+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) and Vertical
Earthquake

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-36


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

7 One basin full- 1.5*(DL+LL) Flow in one basin 1.5*(A+C+E+G+I)

8 One basin full- 1.5*(DL+LL) Flow in one basin 1.5*(A+C+F+G+I)

9 One basin full and Seismic load- Flow in one basin and 1.2*(A+C+E+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) Horizontal Earthquake
10 One basin full and Seismic load- Flow in one basin and 1.2*(A+C+E+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) Vertical Earthquake
11 One basin full and Seismic load- Flow in one basin and 1.2*(A+C+F+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) Horizontal Earthquake
12 One basin full and Seismic load- Flow in one basin and 1.2*(A+C+F+G+I+J)
1.2*(DL+LL+EL) Vertical Earthquake

Table 3-39: Safety factor and bearing pressure in settling zone of settling basin

Normal operation Factor of safety Bearing KN/m2

1. Sliding 999 Maximum 82.44

2.30
2. Overturning Minimum 2.16

Seismic case

1. Sliding 44.57 Maximum 85.6

2. Overturning 3.23 Minimum 9.82

Table 3-40: Maximum displacement and force summary of settling zone of settling
basin

Parameters Values Unit

Maximum crack <0.2 Mm

Maximum moment at hooper slab 69 KNm

Maximum shear force at hooper slab 119 KN

Maximum moment at side wall 118 KNm

Maximum shear force at side wall 140 KN

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-37


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-41: Reinforcement details of settling zone of settling basin

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 600 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Outer Walls 600 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Divide Walls 500 mm and 300 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Distribution bar Φ12 mm@150c/c

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-38


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.14 OUTLET ZONE OF SETTLING BASIN (PANEL-SB-05 & PANEL-SB-06)


At the end of settling zone, outlet zone and gate outlet structures are proposed. The
sediment flushing culvert of 0.8 m width and 1.2 m height are proposed to flush out the
sediment water.A toe cutoff wall is proposed at the end of the settling zone. The
headpond connects to the 2.0 m diameter approach pipe which is designed to convey
the design discharge to forebay as a open channel during normal flow.
For detail Civil Construction Drawings of Settling Zone of the settling basin, refer
Drawing No. SGHP-57-C07 to C10.

3.14.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Outlet Zone (Section K-K)

The cross section of the Outlet zone of the settling basin is as shown in the figure
below. The load from combination taken for analysis and design of the Settling basin is
shown in the table.

Figure 3-16: Outlet Zone of Settling Basin

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-39


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Load Combination
S.N. General Combination Condition Combination

1 1.5*(Dead load + Live No flow condition 1.5*(A+B+C+E)


load)
1.2*(Dead load +Live No flow condition
2 1.2*(A+B+C+E+G)
load Earthquake load) with earthquake

3 1.5*(Dead load + Live


Normal Operation 1.5*(A+B+C+D+E+F)
Load)

4 1.2*(Dead load + Live Normal Operation


1.2*(A+B+C+D+E+F+G)
load + Earthquake load) and seismic

5 1.2*(Dead load + Live


100 year Flood 1.2*(A+B+C+D+E+F)
load)

Table 3-42: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Outlet Zone (Section K-K)

Factor of safety Bearing kN/m2

Normal case

1. Sliding 19.95 Maximum 42

2. Overturning 4.65 Minimum 14.89

Seismic case

1. Sliding 2.03 Maximum 55.6

2. Overturning 2.24 Minimum 1.31

Table 3-43: Maximum displacement and force summary of Outlet Zone (Section K-K)
Parameters Values Unit
Maximum crack <0.2 Mm
Maximum moment at base 43 kNm/m
Max shear force at base 42 kN/m
Maximum moment at wall 35 kNm/m
Max shear force at wall 35 kN/m

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-40


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-44: Reinforcement details for Outlet Zone (Section K-K)

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 400 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Side wall 400 mm to 300 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Distribution Φ 12mm@150c/c

3.14.2 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Outlet Zone (Section M-M)

The cross section of the Outlet zone of the settling basin at the gate zone is as shown in
the figure below. The load from combination taken for analysis and design of the
Settling basin is shown in the table.

Figure 3-17: Settling Basin Outlet Zone (Section M-M)


Table 3-45: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Headpond (Section M-M)

Factor of safety Bearing kN/m2

Normal case

1. Sliding 40 Maximum 54.12

2. Overturning 3.08 Minimum 14.83

Seismic case

1. Sliding 2.01 Maximum 36.71

2. Overturning 1.86 Minimum -0.04

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-41


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-46: Maximum moment and force summary of Headpond (Section M-M)
Parameters Values Unit
Maximum crack <0.2 Mm
Maximum moment at base 92 kNm/m
Max shear force at base 65 kN/m
Maximum moment at wall 80 kNm/m
Max shear force at wall 69 kN/m

Table 3-47: Reinforcement details for Headpond (Section M-M)

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 400 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Side wall 400 mm to 300 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Distribution Φ 12mm@150c/c

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-42


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.15 APPROACH PIPE STEEL TRUSS BRIDGE

3.15.1 General

Approach Pipe of 2.0 m diamter and 8 mm thickness has been used to convey the
design discharge from settling basin to forebay. During normal conditions, the flow in
the approach pipe shall be free flow. Approach Pipe crosses Suni Gad river and hence,
Steel Truss Bridge has been proposed at the Suni Gad River for the approach pipe
crossing. The total span length of the bridge is 32.20 m and total width of the bridge is
3.5 m.
The left bank abutment of the bridge has been designed with the foundation on alluvial
deposits whereas the right bank abutment has been designed with the foundation
located on exposed bed rock.
The detail construction drawings of the approach pipe steel truss bridge has been
presented in Drawing No. SGHP-59A-C01 to C06.
Some Drawings of the bridge are also shwon below:

Figure 3-18: Longitudinal Profile of Approach Pipe Steel Truss Bridge

Figure 3-19: Cross-Section of Approach Pipe Steel Truss Bridge

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-43


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-20: Top Plan of Approach Pipe Steel Truss Bridge

Figure 3-21: Bottom Plan of Approach Pipe Steel Truss Bridge

3.15.2 Codes Used

Nepalese, Indian and British standards have been used for Analysis and design of
Approach Pipe Truss Bridge.
• IS 800: 2007 General Constructions in steel – Code of Practice
• IS 456: 2000 Plain and reinforced concrete – Code of Practice
• IS 875: Code of Practice for design loads (other than Earthquake) for
Buildings and Structures
• BS 8110: Structural use of concrete —Part 1: Code of practice for design
and construction

3.15.3 System of Units

The International System of Units (SI) applies to all structural aspects of the Project.
• Length - Meter (m)
• Force - kilo Newton (kN)
• Moment- kilo Newton meter (kN-m)
• Stress - MPa or N/mm2

3.15.4 Material Properties

3.15.4.1 Concrete
The structural concrete shall comply with the general specifications and the
construction drawings. For the analysis purpose, the following values were adopted:

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-44


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Unit weight,
Reinforced concrete 25 KN/m3

Characteristic strength,
M15 15 MPa
M20 20 MPa
The design concrete strength is derived from the characteristic strength multiplied by a
coefficient 0.67 which is a material partial safety factor. The material partial safety
factor (0.67 = 1/1.5, where 1.5 is material partial safety factor) in flexure and axial load
takes account of differences between actual and laboratory values, local conditions and
inaccuracies.

3.15.4.2 Steel
The steel design is based on the following specifications
Complies with the requirements of IS 800.

 Young’s Modulus (E) – 200000000 kN/m2


 Poisson’s Ratio (nu) – 0.3
 Density – 76.8195 kN/m3
 Critical Damping – 0.03
 Thermal Coeff (a) – 1.2e- 005 @

3.15.5 Analysis Software

The structural analysis is performed using the Bentley’s STAAD Pro software which is
based on finite element analysis technique, it also includes the modules for generation
and application of earthquake loads, subsequent code checking of structural elements
and joints and capabilities to carryout static analysis.

3.15.6 Stress Criteria

Structural design stresses shall not exceed the allowable stresses as defined by IS 800
in accordance with the relevant steel grade and element profile and dimensions. For the
normal condition, beams, columns and truss are accepted if the utilization ratio is less
than 1 whereas, for the seismic condition, the utilization ratio below 1.33 is accepted as
mentioned in IS 800 1984: CL 3.9.2 Increase in Permissible stresses in members
proportioned for occasional Loadings.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-45


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.15.7 Load Calculations

3.15.7.1 Dead load


The dead load includes loads that are relatively constant over time, including the
weight of the structure itself, and immovable fixtures such as Girders, concrete slab,
kerbs, gusset plates, etc. Dead loads are also known as Permanent loads..

3.15.7.2 Live load


Live loads are the result of the wheeled or tracked vehicle or pedestrian movement on
the structure. The live loads are generally assumed to travel parallel to the length of the
bridge and placed at any position which will produce maximum stresses. Live loads are
derived from IRC 6:2014 Standard specifications and Code of practice for road bridges.

3.15.7.3 Wind load


The wind pressure on a structure depends on the location of the structure, height of
structure above the ground level and also on the shape of the structure. The code gives
the basic wind pressure for the structures in various parts of the country. Both the wind
pressures viz. including wind of short duration and excluding wind of short duration
have been given. All structures should be designed for the short duration wind. For
buildings up to 10m in height, the intensity of wind pressure, as specified in the code,
may be reduced by 25% for stability calculations and for the design of framework as
well as cladding. For buildings over 10m and up to 30m height, this reduction can be
made for stability calculations and for design of columns only. Staad pro default
ACSE-7 Wind load have been used.

3.15.7.4 Earthquake load


This load on a structure is a function of the site-dependent probable maximum
earthquake intensity or strong ground-motion on the local soil, the stiffness, damping
the strength and energy-dissipation characteristics of the structure, and its orientation in
relation to the incident seismic waves .For design purposes, the resultant effects are
usually represented by the horizontal and vertical seismic coefficients, A hand Av. The
philosophy of a seismic design is to obtain a no-collapse structure rather than a no
damage structure. This is a sound economic proposition for not only the poor and
undeveloped countries, but even for the developed ones as well .To achieve a great
degree of protection, the critical and important Structure are designed for higher
seismic factor by using IS 1893 (Part I): 2002.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-46


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.15.8 Load Cases and Combinations

3.15.8.1 Primary Load cases


The structures are subjected to a number of loads, forces and effects during their
service life, such as those listed in IS: 456- 2000 (Clause 19) and IS: 875 (I and II). The
following loads usually determine the member sizes:
• Dead load : DL
• Imposed load : Pipe and water Load
• Wind load :WL
• Earthquake Load : EQ

Load cases applied in STAAD Pro Analysis are:


• SEISMIC IN +X DIRECTION
• SEISMIC IN +Z DIRECTION
• WIND IN +X DIRECTION
• WIND IN +Z DIRECTION
• DEAD LOAD(SELF WEIGHT)
• LIVE LOAD
• WATER LOAD
• PIPE CASING LOAD

3.15.8.2 Load Combinations


The load, which is ever acting on a structure, is the dead load, which includes the load
of partition. Then, the effect of live load, which may vary in intensity is additive to the
effect of the dead load, as both these loads are gravity or vertical loads. So the structure
should be designed by the limit state method for the dead load and live load
combination.
Similarly, horizontal loads of wind, earthquake and temperature will act on the
building. It is assumed that the worst effect of the above three loadings will not coexist
at the same time.
Load combination can be analyzed as per IS 1893 (Part I) : 2002, Cl. 6.3.1.2 P.13. The
following are the load combination. However, auto load generation command has been
used while analyzing and designing the structure.
 1.7DL +1.7 LL
 1.3(DL+EQx)
 1.3(DL+EQz)
 1.3(DL+Wind X)
 1.3(DL+Wind Z)

3.15.9 Structural Analysis

In this chapter, the input data figures and output data results are presented. For the
detail input and output values, it is recommended to refer to the model.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-47


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

The structural model analysis is performed using the Bentley’s STAAD Pro software
which is based on finite element analysis technique; it also includes the modules for
generation and application ofearthquake loads, subsequent code checking of structural
elements.

3.15.9.1 Input Data Figures

Figure 3-22: Frame diagram showing node numbers

Figure 3-23: Frame diagram showing Water Load

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-48


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-24: Frame Diagram Showing Steel Casing


Live Load of 1.5KN/m2 is considered for the purpose of supervision only.

Figure 3-25: Frame Diagram Showing Live load

3.15.9.2 Results

Figure 3-26: Frame Diagram showing Bending Moment Diagram Envelope Condition

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-49


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-27: Frame diagram showing Shear Force Diagram Envelope Condition

3.15.9.3 STAAD. PRO Output


In this chapter, sample design calculations of Truss elements are presented. Truss
member’s checks and optimization have been done in STAAD software checking the
utilization ratio. Utilization ratio is one of the functions in STAAD which checks the
degree of strength utilized by the member by the applied loadings. For the normal
condition, beams, columns and truss are accepted if the utilization ratio is less than 1
whereas, for the seismic condition, the utilization ratio below 1.33 is accepted as
mentioned in IS 800 1984: CL 3.9.2 : Increase in Permissible stresses in embers
proportioned for occasional Loadings.

Figure 3-28: Frame Diagram Showing Utilization ratio


Above figure shows the utilization ratio of all the member is below 1. Thus the
truss member is safe to carry the approach pipe load.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-50


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.16 FOREBAY
Forebay has been designed at the start of the pressurized section of waterway (i.e.
headrace pipe) of the Suni Gad Hydropower Project to create adequate submergence so
that there is no air intrusion and vortex formation when the water level is at minimum
operating level. Forebay has inlet transition length of 6.30 m length and total width
after inlet transition zone is 6.00 m. The water depth at the forebay during normal flow
at the start is 1.76 m and at the end is 5.96 m. The total length of the forebay is 25 m
including the inlet transition length.
For detail Civil Construction Drawings of Settling Zone of the settling basin, refer
Drawing No. SGHP-59B-C01 to C02.

3.16.1 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Forebay (Section C-C)

The load from combination taken for analysis and design of the forebay is shown in the
table.

Figure 3-29: Cross Section of Forebay at Section C-C


Load Cases

Dead (DL) Live(LL) Quake (EL)


A Dead Load D Hydrostatic load G Earthquake load
B Active Earth pressure E Uplift
C Passive Earth pressure F Wt. of Water

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-51


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Load Combination
S.N. General Combination Condition Combination

1 1.5*(Dead load + Live No flow condition 1.5*(A+B+C+E)


load)
1.2*(Dead load +Live No flow condition
2 1.2*(A+B+C+E+G)
load Earthquake load) with earthquake

3 1.5*(Dead load + Live


Normal Operation 1.5*(A+B+C+D+E+F)
Load)

4 1.2*(Dead load + Live Normal Operation


1.2*(A+B+C+D+E+F+G)
load + Earthquake load) and seismic

5 1.2*(Dead load + Live


100 year Flood 1.2*(A+B+C+D+E+F)
load)

Table 3-48: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Forebay Section C-C

Factor of safety Bearing kN/m2

Normal case

1. Sliding 2.84 Maximum 89.71

2. Overturning 3.26 Minimum 17.34

Seismic case

1. Sliding 1.25 Maximum 112.3

2. Overturning 1.88 Minimum -5.22

Table 3-49: Maximum displacement and force summary of Forebay Section C-C

Parameters Values Unit


Maximum crack <0.2 Mm
Maximum moment at base 400 kNm/m
Maximum shear force at base 112 kN/m
Maximum moment at wall 265 kNm/m
Max shear force at wall 82 kN/m

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-52


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-50: Reinforcement details of Forebay Section C-C

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 600 mm Φ20 mm@150c/c both ways

Side wall 600 mm to 300 mm Φ16 mm@150c/c

Distribution Φ 12mm@150c/c

3.16.2 Stability Analysis and Structural Design of Forebay (Section D-D)

The load from combination taken for analysis and design of the forebay is shown in the
table.

Figure 3-30: Cross Section of Forebay at Section D-D


Table 3-51: Safety factor and bearing pressure of Forebay Section D-D

Factor of safety Bearing kN/m2

Normal case

1. Sliding 5.03 Maximum 123.5

2. Overturning 3.29 Minimum 31.5

Seismic case

1. Sliding 1.57 Maximum 160

2. Overturning 1.92 Minimum -4.81

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-53


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Table 3-52: Maximum displacement and force summary of Forebay Section D-D

Parameters Values Unit


Maximum crack <0.2 Mm
Maximum moment at base 993 kNm/m
Maximum shear force at base 88.5 kN/m
Maximum moment at wall 704 kNm/m
Max shear force at wall 325 kN/m

Table 3-53: Reinforcement details of Forebay Section D-D

Location Geometric section Reinforcement

Base slab 900 mm Φ25 mm@150c/c both ways

Side wall 900 mm to 300 mm Φ20 mm@150c/c at bottom and


Φ16 mm@150c/c at top

Distribution Φ 12mm@150c/c

3.17 ANCHOR BLOCK AND SADDLE SUPPORT


Reinforced concrete saddle supports are designed to support headrace pipe where the
headrace pipe are exposed (i.e. at Gajauni and Charaadi Syphon Portion of Headrace
Pipe).
Anchors are placed in the pipe or penstock alignment when there is either vertical or
horizontal bend whether it is exposed or buried. Reinforced concrete structures are
generally used for the construction of anchor blocks. Anchors are designed to withstand
any load that pipe or penstock exert on it and keep in place securely by virtue of its
weight and the bearing area. In the design of anchor block and saddle support, where
the bed rock is exposed, rock bolts has been used for anchoring the anchor block to the
ground especially in exposed pipe section of Gajauni and Charaudi Siphon.
The major forces under consideration for the design of an anchor blocks and saddle
supports are:

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-54


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Force (N) Direction of potential movement of Anchor Comment


Block or Saddle Support

F1 F1

F1 = combination of F1u and F1d Weight of pipe and


water
F1u = (Wp+Ww)*L1u*Cosα

F1d = (Wp+Ww)*L1u*Cosβ

If pipe is straight,

F1 = (Wp+Ww)*L1*Cosα

F2 F2

F2 = between 0.25 and 0.5 x F1 Sliding friction


depending on quality and
deterioration of friction reduction
arrangement.

F3 F3

F3 = combination of F3u and Hydrostatic pressure.


F3d
It only applies to
F3 = 15400 htotal z d2 Sin (β-α)/2 horizontal and vertical
bends.
For right angle bends,
Note: htotal z is the head
F3 = 1.414 x F3u (diff directions) or pressure at the anchor
block (elevation Z)
For 450 bends, including surge head.

F3 = 0.76 x F3u (diff directions)

F4 F4

F4 = combination of F4u and Component of pipe


F4d weight acting down the
length of the pipe.
F4u = Wp*L4u*Sinα
Ignore unless the pipe is
F4u = Wp*L4d*Sinβ heavy and both angles
more than 200

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-55


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Force (N) Direction of potential movement of Anchor Comment


Block or Saddle Support

F5 F5

F5 = E a (T hot-T cold) π d t wall When no expansion


joints included F5 is the
(As usual all units SI so t wall is in thermally included stress
meters) restrained by the anchor
block.

F6 F6

F6 = d x 104 F6 directions as F5 Friction in the expansion


joint

The F6 force is felt


because the joint will
resist sliding.

Applies to support piers


only

F7 F7

F7 = 3 x 104 h total d t wall F7 directions as F9 Hydrostatic pressure on


exposed ends of pipe
within the expansion
joint.

F8 F8

F8 = 2. X 103 (Q2 / d2) Sin(β-α)/2 F8 directions as F3 Dynamic pressure at a


bend due to change in
direction of moving
water.

Velocities are usually


low in penstocks so this
force is small.

F9 F9

F9 = htotal x (d big2-d small2) x 104 Reduction in pipe


diameter from d big to d
small.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-56


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Force (N) Direction of potential movement of Anchor Comment


Block or Saddle Support

Wb Wb

Wb = Vol block x ρ block x g Weight of block.

ρ concrete = 2400 kg/m3 Note that the weight


does not necessarily act
in the middle.

Ref: Adam Harvey, Micro-hydro Design Manual

The detail analysis and results of the anchor block at headrace pipe, approach pipe and
penstock pipe are presented in “Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design
Calculation.”
The summary of the size of each anchor block along with the bend details are presented
in the table below:
Table 3-54: Anchor Block Details
Horizontal
Block Vertical Vertical
deflection Type of Bend Length Breadth Height
number angle, α angle, β
angle
degree degree degree m m
Downturn
CB1 16.00 0.58 7.58 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB2 - 7.58 0.58 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB3 28.27 0.58 0.58 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB4 24.65 0.58 0.58 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB5 94.60 0.58 0.58 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
CB6 16.55 0.09 44.98 4 3 2.8
Bend
Downturn
VB7 - 44.98 33.9 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB8 - 33.9 27.08 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB9 - 27.08 52.67 5.6 3.8 3.5
Bend
VB10 - 52.67 0 Upturn Bend 8.5 7.5 4.5
Downturn
VB11 - 0 47.03 7 5.4 4
Bend
Downturn
VB12 - 47.03 37.93 3.2 2.8 2.4
Bend

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-57


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Horizontal
Block Vertical Vertical
deflection Type of Bend Length Breadth Height
number angle, α angle, β
angle
Downturn
VB13 - 37.93 37.93 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
CB14 3.74 37.93 0.29 5 3.5 2.6
Bend
Downturn
HB15 31.99 0.29 0.29 2.6 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB16 47.22 0.29 0.29 3.8 2.4 2.8
Bend
Downturn
HB17 32.61 0.29 0.29 2.6 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB18 61.45 0.29 0.29 4.8 2.8 3
Bend
Downturn
HB19 27.15 0.29 0.29 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB20 43.99 0.29 0.29 3.6 2.4 2.6
Bend
Downturn
HB21 21.18 0.29 0.29 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB22 60.49 0.29 0.29 4.8 2.8 3
Bend
Downturn
HB23 20.70 0.29 0.29 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB24 78.69 0.29 0.29 5.8 3 3.5
Bend
Downturn
HB25 85.27 0.29 0.29 6 3 3.8
Bend
Downturn
HB26 84.00 0.29 0.29 6 3 3.8
Bend
Downturn
HB27 29.41 0.29 0.29 2.5 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB28 40.43 0.29 0.29 3.4 2.4 2.6
Bend
Downturn
HB29 33.75 0.29 0.29 3 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB30 37.49 0.29 0.29 3.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB31 64.33 0.29 0.29 5.8 3 3
Bend
Downturn
HB32 59.48 0.29 0.29 6 2.8 2.8
Bend
Downturn
HB33 9.43 0.29 0.29 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB34 54.26 0.29 0.29 5.3 2.6 3
Bend
Downturn
HB35 51.92 0.29 0.29 5.5 2.4 3
Bend
Downturn
HB36 40.42 0.29 0.29 3.7 2.4 2.8
Bend
Downturn
HB37 96.70 0.29 0.29 6.7 3 4.5
Bend
Downturn
HB38 69.70 0.29 0.29 5.9 2.8 3.8
Bend
Downturn
HB39 75.71 0.29 0.29 6 3 4
Bend
HB40 30.85 0.29 0.29 Downturn 3 2.4 2.4

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-58


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Horizontal
Block Vertical Vertical
deflection Type of Bend Length Breadth Height
number angle, α angle, β
angle
Bend
Downturn
HB41 60.91 0.29 0.29 7 2.4 3.4
Bend
Downturn
HB42 39.70 0.29 0.29 4 2.4 2.8
Bend
Downturn
HB43 57.25 0.29 0.29 6 2.5 3.4
Bend
Downturn
HB44 43.06 0.29 0.29 4.8 2.4 2.8
Bend
Downturn
VB45 - 0.29 0.31 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB46 18.04 0.31 0.31 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB47 52.78 0.31 0.31 5.2 2.6 3.4
Bend
Downturn
HB48 54.22 0.31 0.31 5.5 2.6 3.4
Bend
Downturn
HB49 46.39 0.31 0.31 5 2.4 3.2
Bend
Downturn
HB50 22.02 0.31 0.31 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB51 29.65 0.31 0.31 3 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB52 14.82 0.31 0.31 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB53 9.59 0.31 0.31 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB54 48.11 0.31 0.31 5.3 2.5 3.2
Bend
Downturn
HB55 28.23 0.31 0.31 2.9 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB56 22.36 0.31 0.31 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB57 23.37 0.31 0.31 2.5 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB58 23.29 0.31 0.31 2.5 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB59 35.16 0.31 0.31 3.8 2.4 2.8
Bend
Downturn
HB60 48.31 0.31 0.31 5.4 2.4 3.5
Bend
Downturn
HB61 40.24 0.31 0.31 4.6 2.4 3
Bend
Downturn
HB62 34.74 0.31 0.31 4.4 2.4 2.5
Bend
Downturn
HB63 53.35 0.31 0.31 5.6 2.8 3.4
Bend
Downturn
HB64 76.16 0.31 0.31 7 3 4.2
Bend
Downturn
HB65 67.58 0.31 0.31 7 2.8 4
Bend
Downturn
HB66 27.60 0.31 0.31 2.9 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB67 41.91 0.31 0.31 5 2.5 3
Bend

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-59


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Horizontal
Block Vertical Vertical
deflection Type of Bend Length Breadth Height
number angle, α angle, β
angle
Downturn
HB68 35.56 0.31 0.31 4.1 2.4 2.8
Bend
Downturn
HB69 34.08 0.31 0.31 3.8 2.4 2.8
Bend
Downturn
HB70 9.85 0.31 0.31 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB71 43.13 0.31 0.31 5.2 2.6 3
Bend
Downturn
HB72 28.08 0.31 0.31 3.1 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB73 30.26 0.31 0.31 3.3 2.5 2.5
Bend
Downturn
HB74 16.38 0.31 0.31 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB75 11.35 0.31 0.31 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB76 56.38 0.31 0.31 6.4 3 3.4
Bend
Downturn
HB77 15.20 0.31 0.31 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
CB78 28.60 0.31 40.91 5.8 4.3 3
Bend
Downturn
VB79 - 40.91 49.36 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB80 - 49.36 37.17 4.6 3.2 3
Bend
Downturn
VB81 - 37.17 37.66 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB82 - 37.66 0.58 7.4 6 4.5
Bend
Downturn
VB83 - 0.58 42.58 7 5.4 4
Bend
Downturn
VB84 - 42.58 41.09 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB85 - 41.09 37.17 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB86 - 37.17 37.18 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB87 - 37.18 28.19 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
CB88 18.52 28.19 3.27 7.6 5 4
Bend
Downturn
HB89 41.16 3.27 3.27 4.8 3 2.6
Bend
Downturn
CB90 19.19 3.27 0.45 2.6 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB91 15.64 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB92 33.55 0.45 0.45 4.1 2.5 2.8
Bend
Downturn
HB93 9.36 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB94 8.71 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
HB95 11.03 0.45 0.45 Downturn 2.4 2.4 2.4

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-60


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Horizontal
Block Vertical Vertical
deflection Type of Bend Length Breadth Height
number angle, α angle, β
angle
Bend
Downturn
VB96 - 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB97 7.23 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB98 24.18 0.45 0.45 3 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB99 - 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB100 13.13 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB101 - 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB102 64.45 0.45 0.45 6.8 4 3.5
Bend
Downturn
HB103 56.84 0.45 0.45 6.5 4 3
Bend
Downturn
HB104 12.42 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB105 17.63 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB106 - 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB107 76.05 0.45 0.45 7.4 4.2 4
Bend
Downturn
HB108 2.74 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB109 14.47 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB110 13.04 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB111 5.69 0.45 0.45 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB112 55.44 0.45 0.45 6.5 3.8 3.4
Bend
Downturn
HB113 20.21 0.45 0.45 2.8 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB114 35.23 0.45 0.45 5.4 2.7 3
Bend
Downturn
HB115 31.09 0.45 0.45 4.4 2.8 3
Bend
Downturn
HB116 42.28 0.45 0.45 5.8 3 3.4
Bend
Downturn
CB117 3.00 0.45 0.42 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB118 41.53 0.42 0.42 6 3 3.4
Bend
Downturn
HB119 54.49 0.42 0.42 7 3.6 3.5
Bend
Downturn
HB120 45.49 0.42 0.42 6.4 3.2 3.4
Bend
Downturn
HB121 26.27 0.42 0.42 4 2.8 2.5
Bend
Downturn
HB122 54.76 0.42 0.42 7.2 3.6 3.6
Bend

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-61


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Horizontal
Block Vertical Vertical
deflection Type of Bend Length Breadth Height
number angle, α angle, β
angle
Downturn
HB123 42.63 0.42 0.42 6.4 3 3.4
Bend
Downturn
HB124 37.99 0.42 0.42 6 3 3.2
Bend
Downturn
HB125 50.60 0.42 0.42 7.4 3.4 3.4
Bend
Downturn
HB126 29.55 0.42 0.42 4.3 3 2.8
Bend
Downturn
HB127 25.47 0.42 0.42 4 2.5 2.8
Bend
Downturn
HB128 52.10 0.42 0.42 6.8 3 4.4
Bend
Downturn
HB129 55.34 0.42 0.42 7 3.2 4.4
Bend
Downturn
HB130 58.69 0.42 0.42 7.2 3.3 4.4
Bend
Downturn
HB131 13.54 0.42 0.42 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB132 50.56 0.42 0.42 6.6 3 4.4
Bend
Downturn
HB133 56.20 0.42 0.42 7 3.3 4.4
Bend
Downturn
HB134 31.98 0.42 0.42 4.8 3.2 3
Bend
Downturn
HB135 16.64 0.42 0.42 2.7 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB136 27.25 0.42 0.42 4.5 2.8 2.8
Bend
Downturn
HB137 3.63 0.42 0.42 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB138 34.00 0.42 0.42 5.4 3.2 3.2
Bend
Downturn
CB139 19.00 0.42 1.98 3.2 2.5 2.5
Bend
Downturn
HB140 52.55 1.98 1.98 7 3.3 4.4
Bend
Downturn
VB141 - 1.98 1.98 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
HB142 34.94 1.98 1.98 5.3 3.8 3
Bend
Downturn
HB143 47.94 1.98 1.98 6.2 4.2 4
Bend
Downturn
HB144 48.54 1.98 1.98 6.4 4.2 4
Bend
Downturn
HB145 32.11 1.98 1.98 5.4 3.6 3.2
Bend
Downturn
HB146 28.43 1.98 1.98 5 3.5 3.2
Bend
Downturn
CB147 30.48 1.98 1.71 5.4 3.7 3.2
Bend
Downturn
VB148 - 1.71 1.71 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
CB149 8.20 1.71 0.06 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
HB150 23.37 0.06 0.06 Downturn 4.8 3.2 3

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-62


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Horizontal
Block Vertical Vertical
deflection Type of Bend Length Breadth Height
number angle, α angle, β
angle
Bend
Combined Anchor Block for Headrace, Surge Pipe and Penstock Pipe
CB 151
(Refer Detail Construction Drawings)
Downturn
CB152 17 0 18.37 4 3 3
Bend
Downturn
VB153 0 18.37 29.47 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB154 0 29.47 29.47 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB155 0 29.47 29.47 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB156 0 29.47 17.03 4.4 3 2.8
Bend
Downturn
VB157 0 17.03 17.03 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB158 0 17.03 21.97 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bend
Downturn
VB159 0 21.97 31.47 4.8 3 3
Bend
Downturn
CB160 39 31.47 24.23 12 6 5
Bend
Downturn
VB161 0 24.23 37.66 6 4.4 3
Bend
Downturn
VB162 0 37.66 45.52 5 3.8 3
Bend
VB163 Combined Anchor Block at Bifurcation (Refer Detail Construction Drawings)

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-63


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.18 POWERHOUSE

3.18.1 General Introduction

The powerhouse was planned and carried out to perform all the function of power
generation. It is designed as a building to accommodate the Generators, Turbines and
its accessories. All the heavy equipment’s are lifted through overhead travelling crane
of capacity 35 tons. All the generation equipment’s and accessories are suitably
arranged in the machine hall.

Objectives and the scope of detail structural design of powerhouse

 To identify structural arrangement.

 To generalize the plan of the structures.

 To prepare model of the powerhouse for structural analysis

 To conduct detail Structural analysis using structural analysis program


SAP2000.

 To carry out sectional design of structural elements

 To design the reinforcement for all elements

 To prepare structural detailing of members and the system

Modelling of the building and analysis by the finite element method in SAP 2000 using
two nodded frame elements to model beams and columns. Calculations of the loads to
withstand by the structures and determination of the structural system of the
powerhouse to undertake the vertical and horizontal loads. The scopes of the detail
structural design of power house are as follows:

 Identification of load cases and load combinations as per the Codes

 Calculation and evaluation of the loads to be sustained by structures

 Study of the structural response of the proposed systems for different loading
patterns

 Development of constructability measures for the proposed structure

Identification of standard structural design requirements for analysis and design

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-64


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.18.2 Structural Analysis

3.18.2.1 Introduction

SAP 2000 version 20.0.0 was used as the basis for analysis and design of this
powerhouse structure considering its widespread popularity in finite element method
and reliability use in construction field.

All the beams and columns are modelled in two nodded frame elements available in the
software. Crane beams are introduced in the model to facilitate the moving crane run
throughout the powerhouse, so that it matches with real scenario.

The powerhouse structure of Sunigad Hydropower Project is divided into two parts for
analysis namely:

 Superstructure

 Substructure (Machine foundation)

3.18.2.2 Superstructure
The modelling of the power house super structure was initiated after finalizing the
machine foundation. Superstructure includes the beam and column frame structure with
the crane beam arrangement. For two way movement of the crane along the crane beam
girder of the power house, maximum axle wheel load calculations for various probable
placements of wheels and crab of the crane was carried out for input on the SAP model
as shown in Figure 3-31. Since, the machine hall has expansion joint in it, only one
structure is modelled as another one is nearly identical. The analysis for RCC
superstructure was carried out assuming the existing columns fixed on the ground and
the results were sorted out. The superstructure frame was modelled with different
loadings like dead, live, earthquake, crane load following the IS Codes (1893-2002).
Dynamic analysis was performed to obtain the design seismic force, and its distribution
to different levels along the height of the building which was performed by the Seismic
Coefficient Method. The number of modes used in the analysis is such that the sum
total of modal masses of all modes considered is at least 90 percent of the total seismic
mass. The earthquake load was applied to the superstructure only so that the masses
were lumped at the upper floor level only. The P delta function was not added to the
superstructure model as the height of powerhouse structure was not significantly high
and also the columns on the superstructures were short columns. The final analysis
after all the amendments in the property and sections was carried out in 3D for the
design, the design output was also extracted from the SAP with the necessary
overwrites.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-65


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-31: Structural Model of the Powerhouse Building (one part)

a) Material properties

Table 3-55: Material Properties

Particulars Concrete First Stage Reinforcement

Grade M25 for all frame Fe 500

Unit Weights 25 KN/m3 78.50 kN/m3

Modulus of Elasticity 5000x√fck, MPa 200000 N/mm2

Poisson’s ratio 0.2 0.3

Table 3-56: Section Properties

Section Name Material Shape Depth, mm Width, mm

Column M25 Rectangular 500 500


(Above Crane
Level)

Beam M25 Rectangular 500 700

Top Beam M25 Rectangular 300 300

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-66


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Section Name Material Shape Depth, mm Width, mm

Crane beam M25 Rectangular 850 1000

Column (Up-to M25 Rectangular 1000 700


Crane Level)

b) Assumption and Design Principle Outlines

Loads: IS 456:2000 code of practices are used in the design along with IS 4247(Part I):
1993, IS 1893:2000, IS 13920:1993, IS 3370, NBC 2005 (IS) and SP 34. Following
loads are used in design:

 Dead Load: The dead load on the frame is calculated floor wise and it
comprises of Beams, Slabs, Stairs, Partition wall, Floor finishes and fixtures
crane etc.

 Live Load: The Live Load for Powerhouse is taken from the Table 2, Minimum
Uniformly Live Load, Clause 4.2.2, IS 4247(Part I): 1993.

 External wall & Partition wall Loads: The hollow brick masonry wall is
considered for both external and internal walls. For the load calculation the
hollow brick masonry of unit weight of 20KN/m3 is considered.

 Seismic Load: Lateral Seismic Load is computed as per IS: 1893 (Part 1)-2002
Code. The design seismic coefficient Ah adopted for the design is 0.24. The
design base shear is computed by SAP 2000 v 20.0.0 in accordance with the IS
1893 (Part 1)-2002 equation 7.5.3.

1 V = Ah .W

Where, Ah = ZISa/2Rg

Further, response spectrum analysis is also done as per IS 1893.

 Crane Moving load : Technical characteristics of hoisting crane:

Hoisting Capacity = 35 tons


Distance between wheels =2 m
Weight of rails with all fittings = 150 Kg/m
Span (Half for considered model) = 14.45 m
Vehicle load considered per wheel,
Crane load Maximum = 250 KN
(Considering auxiliary loads with impact factor and additional accidental
loads)
Crane load Minimum = 125 KN

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-67


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

(Dead load of crane hoist and track with additional accidental load
considered)
(Note: The loading value could change depending upon the Electro-
Mechanical Detailing)
Crane load has been applied as a vehicle load in the crane beam. Moving
load has been applied to the crane load and following load combination has
been considered for designing the section of crane beam. Loads were
separately assigned in the SAP 2000 v.20.0.0 and the section is designed for
the critical load condition.

c) Load pattern

The following sets of loads pattern were defined for the analysis in SAP 2000:

Table 3-57: Load pattern for power house frame load

Load Pattern Design Type Self-Weight Auto Load


Multiplier

Dead Dead 1

Crane maximum Moving load 0

Crane minimum Moving load 0

EQ-x Quake 0 IS1893 2002

EQ-y Quake 0 IS1893 2002

Railing load Dead 0

Wall load Dead 0

d) Load cases

The load cases considered for the analysis is shown below.

Table 3-58: Load case definition for power house frame

Load Case Name Type Design Type

Dead Lin Static Dead

Modal Lin Modal Other

Crane 1 Lin Moving Moving load

Crane 2 Lin Moving Moving load

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-68


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Load Case Name Type Design Type

EQ-x Lin Static Quake

EQ-y Lin Static Quake

Railing load Lin Static Dead

Wall load Lin Static Dead

Rs-x Response Spectrum

Rs-y Response Spectrum

e) Load Combinations for power house frame

As per IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002 Clause no. 6.3.1.2, the following load cases were
considered for analysis:

 1.5 DL

 1.5 (DL + IL)

 1.2 (DL + IL ± EQ/RS)

 1.5 (DL ± EQ/RS)

 0.9 DL ± 1.5 EQ/RS

Earthquake load are considered for +X, -X, +Y and –Y directions.


Here, DL stands for dead load, IL stands for imposed load, EQ stands for earthquake
load and RS for response spectrum.
For seismic loading, mass equivalent to the load that composed of 100% of Dead load
and 50% of live load is taken into consideration.

f) Forces/Stress output

Checking for permissible deflection for superstructure frames

The frame elements is checked for permissible deflection and designed for the
moments given by the SAP analysis. The deflection criteria shall meet the two
relations. The relations are as given below:

i. L/d ratio

According to this relation, For vertical deflection, L/d for spans (beam) up to 10 m
shall be up to 7, 20, 26 for cantilever, simply supported and continuous beams

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-69


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

respectively, where L stands for span of beam and d stands for effective depth of beam.
The maximum L/d ratio for superstructure beam elements was found equal to 8.6 for
lower storey beams and it was found to be 20 for top beams, which was less than the
value 26. So all superstructure beam elements met this deflection criteria. The
maximum beam length for the superstructure was 6.0 m.

ii. Lateral drift relations

The lateral drift relation is considered for the seismic analysis. According to this
relation, the permissible lateral drift is checked for each storey separately or the
building as a whole. The permissible drift for both X and Y direction of the
powerhouse can be given as:
Permissible drift = 0.004 x storey height
For the designed powerhouse superstructure, the maximum height of column was 5.2
m. For entire structure, the maximum permissible deflection at top = (0.004 x 13.35) m
=53.4 mm. For this the actual deflection at top was found equal to be 8.83 mm (in X
direction) and 27.7 mm (in Y direction) which is within permissible range.

g) Check of modal mass participation ratio:

IS 1893: 2002 clause 7.8.4.2 states that number of modes to be used in the analysis
should be such that the sum total of modal masses of all modes considered is at least 90
percent (i.e 0.9 times) of the total seismic mass of the structure. Analysis was carried
out for modes up to which the 90 percent mass participation is there so that the mass
participation satisfies this criterion in both orthogonal directions. Table below shows
the mass participation calculated after 15 modes.
Table 3-59: Modal mass participation for machine hall
StepType StepNum Period UX UY SumUX SumUY
Text Unitless Sec Unitless Unitless Unitless Unitless
Mode 1 0.455349 0.000001728 0.57 0.000001728 0.57
Mode 2 0.446173 0.02513 0.0001133 0.02513 0.57
Mode 3 0.348271 0.68 2.111E-08 0.7 0.57
Mode 4 0.29503 0.0001064 0.0008635 0.7 0.57
Mode 5 0.269827 0.00004954 0.22 0.7 0.79
Mode 6 0.249781 0.19 0.00004041 0.89 0.79
Mode 7 0.167664 0.0001302 0.001121 0.89 0.79
Mode 8 0.163895 0.0001226 0.01216 0.89 0.8
Mode 9 0.141794 0.00001065 0.0234 0.89 0.82
Mode 10 0.121313 0.0488 1.478E-07 0.94 0.82
Mode 11 0.115925 0.00001723 0.0001218 0.94 0.82
Mode 12 0.114224 9.803E-07 0.005573 0.94 0.83
Mode 13 0.092404 0.05573 0.000001098 0.99 0.83
Mode 14 0.099705 2.414E-14 0.14 0.99 0.97
Mode 15 0.027275 6.559E-14 1.361E-16 0.99 0.97

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-70


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

h) Base shear and Fundamental time period:

Horizontal acceleration coefficient of magnitude 0.24g was used for base shear
calculation. Response spectrum analysis was also done in both X and Y direction and
scale factors are adjusted accordingly.
Seismic weight of the hall was calculated as = 4331.03 KN
Base shear = 1039.45 KN in both directions
Scale factor in X direction for Response spectrum in X direction = 17978.7
Scale factor in Y direction for Response spectrum in Y direction = 20418
Fundamental time period of the hall = 0.455 seconds

i) Design of Beam, Column and Crane Beam:

Beam:

All beams were designed for major direction flexure, shear and torsion. The beam
design procedure involved the following steps:

 Design of longitudinal reinforcement

 Design of shear reinforcement

 Design of torsion reinforcement

All the details of the beams were taken from the values designed by SAP. The
reinforcement details at top corner, top center, bottom corner and bottom center part of
each beam element were found as per the output given by SAP following
IS13920:1993-Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to
Seismic Forces-Code of Practice. According to this Code, the minimum reinforcement
at bottom corner of each beam element was taken 50% of the reinforcement at top
corner, and minimum of 0.24% or reinforcement is provided in each section of the
beam. The details of remaining parts of the beam elements were as per the results
shown by the SAP 2000.

Column:

All the columns were designed as rectangular reinforced concrete column. The
designed size of column throughout the superstructure is 1000 mm X 700 mm which is
reduced to 500mm x 500 mm at the level above of the crane beam. The crane beam is
to be rested in the 1000mm wide column dimension. If the E/M detailing requires
larger width for crane, then the need of corbel is to be designed. Columns are designed
according to their axial and flexural demand as evaluated in SAP2000. IS code allows
for a maximum of 6% reinforcement steel in vertically cast columns but the

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-71


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

reinforcement value is generally limited to 4%. For all columns concrete cube strength
of 25 N/mm2 is used.
The column is design from the computations made by SAP and those were used for the
detail design. The program calculates the effective length factors based on IS 456:2000
(Clause 25.2 of Annex E, Clause 39.7) with the assumption that the frame is a sway
frame entirely through analysis.
All the columns for the powerhouse superstructure were found short columns (i.e.
slenderness ratio less than 12. Since the columns were not slender columns, P-delta
function was not assigned in the SAP model.

Crane Beam:

A concrete crane beam is designed following the capacity of crane as 35 tons with
provision of additional auxiliary load. Two wheels of the crane was supposed to be
provided in each beam at a spacing of 2 m. Crane beam is modeled in SAP with power
house frame. The maximum generator load is taken from the manufacturer company.
However; X-sectional area of reinforcement required in the crane beam is taken from
the output of the SAP2000.
The details of rebar in each grid is presented below:

Figure 3-32: Main reinforcement diagram at grid 1-1

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-72


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-33: Main reinforcement diagram at grid 4-4

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-73


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-34: Main reinforcement diagram at grid H-H

j) Roof Truss

Roof trusses are commonly used in industrial buildings. One of the greatest advantages
of the roof truss is that its mid-span depth is the greatest-specially where B.M in the
span is maximum, thus resulting in great economy. It is the framed structure formed by
formed by connecting various members at their end to form a system of triangles
arranged in pre-defined pattern. The members are jointed through rivets, bolts and
welds which permits some rotation so as to form a pin joint. The truss structures
generally comprises top chord, bottom chord , ties struts and purlins ridge lines, roof
coverings, base plates etc.
Barrel truss has been used for the Nupche Likhu Hydropower Project’s power house as
shown in
Figure 3-35. The analysis has been carried out in Sap 2000 v 20.2.0 with the wind load
calculated through manual calculation. Mild Steel of 250Mpa for the truss member and
CGI sheet of 24 gauge has been considered in this truss system. Design of steel truss
has been carried out based on IS – 800: 2007.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-74


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-35: Truss Section from STAADPro

Truss loadings

Roof truss are subjected to different types of loads. Dead load, live load, snow load and
wind loads. Dead load is the self-weight of the structural members and roof coverings.
IS-875 recommends that for room and slope up to including 13 degree, live load
measured in plan should be taken as 1500N/m2 where access to roof is provided, if not
accessible 750 N/m2 is used. The load due to wind is one of the most important loads to
be considered in the design of roof trusses. The wind load is calculated (as per IS 875 –
part 3: 2015) is 1.5 KN/m2. The design wind pressure is Pz, given by:
a) Pz = 0.6 Vz2
The wind force f acting in the direction normal to the individual structural element or
cladding unit is
 F = (Cpe-Cpi)*A *Pz
Cpe =External pressure coefficient
Cpi = internal pressure coefficient
Two basic load combinations; Dead load +Live load and Dead load+ wind load, are
used in the analysis of the roof truss.
Sub-structure
The machine foundation part supports the super-structure of the powerhouse. Design of
machine foundations require a special consideration because they transmit dynamic
loads to soil in addition to static loads due to weight of foundation, machine and
accessories. The dynamic load due to operation of the machine is generally small
compared to the static weight of machine and the supporting foundation. In a machine
foundation the dynamic load is applied repetitively over a very long period of time but
its magnitude is small and therefore the soil behaviour is essentially elastic, or else
deformation will increase with each cycle of loading and may become unacceptable.
The amplitude of vibration of a machine at its operating frequency is the most
important parameter to be determined in designing a machine foundation, in addition to
the natural frequency of a machine foundation soil system.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-75


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

For Sunigad Hydropower Project the type of machine is Rotary machines having
frequency 500 rpm. A suitable foundation is selected, depending upon the type of
machine. A block foundation has a large mass and, therefore, a smaller natural
frequency. The criteria for designing machine foundations shall be discussed first
followed by the methods of analysis.

a) Criteria for design of Machine Foundation:

A machine foundation should meet the following conditions for satisfactory


performance.

Static loads

 It should be safe against shear failure.

 It should not settle excessively.

Dynamic loads

 There should be no resonance; that is, the natural frequency of the machine-
foundation-soil system should not coincide with the operating frequency of the
machine. In fact, a zone of resonance is generally defined and the natural
frequency of the system must lie outside this zone. The foundation is high tuned
when its fundamental frequency is greater than the operating speed or low tuned
when its fundamental frequency is lower than the operating speed.

 The amplitudes of motion at operating frequencies should not exceed the


limiting amplitudes, which are generally specified by machine manufacturers. If
the computed amplitude is within tolerable limits, but the computed natural
frequency is close to the operating frequency, it is important that this situation
be avoided.

 The natural frequency of the foundation –soil system should not be whole
number multiple of the operating frequency of the machine to avoid resonance
with the higher harmonics.

 The vibrations must not be annoying to the persons working in the shops or
damaging to the other precision machines. The nature of vibrations that are
perceptible, annoying, or harmful depends upon the frequency of the vibrations
and the amplitude of the motion.

b) Data for the design

The following information is used for design of a machine foundation:

 Static weight of the machine and accessories to be provided by E/M.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-76


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

 Magnitude and characteristics of dynamic loads imposed by the machine


operation and their point of application is to be provided by E/M.

 The soil profile of the site and dynamic soil properties such as dynamic shear
modulus and damping (Assumed in our case)

 Trial dimensions of the foundation. This will give the total static weight (from
IS 12800:1993, part I).

 Elastic Half Space Theory was used for the vibration analysis with the rpm of
the turbine as 500 rpm.

Dynamic analysis of the machine foundation block was done in order to check the
possibility of resonance for machine foundation. The depth was further verified while
checking global stability of powerhouse and it was finalized accordingly. Since the
detailed design of EM is not available, the design of machine foundation has been
limited with global stability of powerhouse only. After confirming the EM equipment,
currently provided foundation depth should be verified for actual short-circuit moment
force.
The result of dynamic analysis of machine foundation is provided below:

Appendix: Dynamic Analysis of block machine foundation

Step Vertical Horizontal Rocking


no. Parameter Excitation Excitation Excitation
1 Equivalent Radius (ro) (ft) 29.85 29.85 28.83
Mass (lbs.sec2/ft) and
moment of inertia
2 165993 165993 28419773.20
(lbs/sec2.ft) about bottom of
foundation
3 Mass ratio (Bz, Bx, Bψ) 0.282 0.351 0.096883291
Damping ratio ignoring
4 0.800 0.486 0.439
embeddment (Dz, Dx,Dψ)
5 Internal damping 0 0 0.05

6 Spring Coefficient (βz, βx, βψ) 1.9 0.95 0.5

Equivalent Spring Constant


7 (Kz, Kx, Kψ) lbs/ft, lbs/ft, lbs- 89080341.24 78167999.44 59801020893
ft/rad
Natural frequency (fnz, fnx, fnψ)
8 221.22 207.22 438.04
rpm

Resonance frequency (fmz, No resonance


9 285.42 606.82
fmx, fmψ) rpm possible

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-77


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Appendix: Dynamic Analysis of block machine foundation

Step Vertical Horizontal Rocking


no. Parameter Excitation Excitation Excitation
10 Frequency ratio, r 2.260 2.413 1.141
11 Magnification factor (M) 0.183 0.186 0.954
Dynamic Force (Vo, Ho, To)
12 865.58 865.58 20299.54
lbs, lbs, lbs-ft
Vibration Amplitude (ft, ft,
13 1.77537E-06 2.06497E-06 3.23992E-07
rad)
Component of rocking
14 7.8108E-06 7.59826E-06
oscillation
Resultant Vibration
15 0.000115034 0.000115959
Amplitude (in)
16 Transmissibility factor(TT) 0.685 0.476 1.431
Force Transmitted (Pv, PH, PM
17 593.31 411.72 29049.40
)(lbs, lbs, lbs-ft)

Design of machine foundation for the dynamic analysis is provided below:


Design of Machine Foundation

A. Machine Parameters
W
Weight of generator G 89924 lbs
W
Weight of rotor R 44962 lbs
Operating speed f 500 rpm
Angular speed ω 52.359 rad/sec
Critical speed fc 900 rpm
Eccentricity of unbalanced mass ё 0.0015 in
0.0021
Dynamic eccentricity at operating speed e 70 in
Acceleration of gravity g 386.22 in/sec2
Centrifugal force Fo 692.46 lbs

W 33721.
Weight of turbine T 5 lbs
W 11240.
Weight of rotor R 5 lbs
Operating speed f 500 rpm
52.359
Angular speed ω 87756 rad/sec
Critical speed fc 900 rpm

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-78


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Eccentricity of unbalanced mass ё 0.0015 in


0.0021
Dynamic eccentricity at operating speed e 696 in
Acceleration of gravity g 386.22 in/sec2
Acceleration of gravity g 32.185 ft/sec2
Centrifugal force Fo 173.12 lbs
Center line of machine from the base of
foundation 23.452 ft

TOTAL CENTRIFUGAL FORCE Fo 865.58 lbs


W
Weight of base plate and other accessories B 5000 lbs
W 12864
TOTAL WEIGHT OF MACHINE M 5.5 lbs

B. Soil and Foundation Parameters


4607.0
Ground level elevation 88 feet
4621.8
Top of foundation 48 feet
4607.0
Base of foundation 88 feet
Depth of embedment h 0 feet
Soil Unit weight γ 115.62 lbs/ft3
lbs.sec2/
Soil mass density ρ 3.59 ft4
Shear Modulus G 4000 lbs/in2
57600
Shear Modulus G 0 lbs/ft2
Poisson's ratio μ 0.35
D
Soil internal damping ratio ψi 0.05
Sa
Allowable bearing capacity ll 4176 lbs/ft2

C. Selection of Foundation Configuration


Length of foundation block L 58.056 ft
Breadth of foundation block B 48.216 ft
Height of foundation block H 9.84 ft
41316
Weight of foundation block 60.67
12837
Mass of foundation block 2.2439

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-79


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

1.2040
L/B ratio for spring constant calculation 81633
Topping is also provided in foundation block
Length of topping l 58.056 ft
Breadth of topping b 0 ft
Height of topping h 0 ft
Unit weight of concrete γc 150 lbs/ft3
Weight of topping 0 lbs
lbs.sec2/
Mass of topping 0.000 ft
10821
Weight of building 82.959 lbs
W 52138
Weight of Entire Footing+building F 43.629 lbs

53424
Total Static Load W 89.129 lbs
1908.5
Actual Soil Pressure 6 lbs/ft2 OKAY
Weight of footing/ Weight of Machine 40.53 OKAY

D. Dynamic Analysis
Refer Appendix

E. Check of Design Criteria


1) Static Conditions
1908.5
i) Static Bearing Capacity 58 lbs/ft2 OKAY
ii) Maximum Bearing Capacity Check for Static 1913.6
and Dynamic Load 675 lbs/ft2 OKAY
iii) Minimum Bearing Capacity Check for Static 1903.5
and Dynamic Load 722 lbs/ft2 OKAY
Check whether C.G of machine and footing
are within 5% or not

2) Limiting Dynamic Conditions


0.0001
i) Maximum vibration amplitude (in) 15959 in
Operating speed of machine f 500 rpm OKAY
Check whether this vibration performance is
within zone A or zone B from Chart 3-3

0.0060
ii) Horizontal peak velocity 7 in/sec OKAY

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-80


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

iii) Maximum Magnification factor for all 0.9544


modes 574 OKAY

iv)Lower Limit of resonance in all modes 400 rpm


Upper Limit of resonance in all modes 600 rpm
Check for resonance in horizontal mode 285.42 rpm OKAY
Check for resonance in rocking mode 606.82 rpm OKAY

v) Maximum Transmissibility factor for all 1.4310 Not OKAY, But design rebar
modes 4 for the transmitted force.

Coupled vibration will not occur


3) Check for possibility of coupled translation
and rocking mode vibration
The depth of the foundation was provided as 3 m from the foundation design. With this
depth of foundation, global stability of powerhouse was also checked, the summary of
which is provided below:
Stability Check
1 Normal Case:
A FOS against Sliding

Total vertical load ∑V Total Horizontal force(∑H)


21929.76 1970.41
FOS=(∑V)/(∑H)*μ>1,where μ=.3
FOS 3.34
OK
B FOS against Overturning

Total resisting moment Net moment(∑mr)-


(∑mr) Total overturning moment(∑mo) (∑mo))
KN.m KN.m KN.m
168793.29 23087.00 145706.29

Resultant force act in line(X) = 6.64


Distance of Ẍ from center
=B/2-Ẍ
eccentricity(e) 0.71
Check B/6 ration 2.45

Check e≥B/6 or e≤/6


OK
FOS=(∑mr)/(∑mo)>3

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-81


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

FOS 7.31
OK

C Check for bearing Capacity


Intensity of soil pressure = total vertical laoad/Area of base
foundation
breat
Total vertical force (∑V) length h area Qu
KN m m m2 KN/m2
21929.76 18.00 14.70 264.60 82.88

Assume soil intensity KN/m


2
pressure 200

KN/m
2
At toe 106.7538768
KN/m
2
At heel 59.00393121
OK

2 Rotation due to valve closing :


Total resisting Net moment(∑mr)-
moment(∑mr) Total rotating moment(∑mo) (∑mo))
KNm KN.m KN.m
31476.79 197.04 31279.75
FOS=(∑mr)/(∑mo)>1.5
FOS 159.75
OK

4 Uplift Case:
A Factor of safety against Flotation
Total vertical force(∑V) Total uplift force(∑f)
21929.76 7787.18

FOS against Uplift=(∑V)/(∑f)>1


FOS 2.82 OK

B FOS against Overturning


Total resisting Net moment(∑mr)-
moment(∑mr) Total overturning moment(∑mo) (∑mo))
KN.m KN.m KN.m

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-82


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

168793.29 23087.00 145706.29

Resultant force act in line(X) = 10.30


Distance of Ẍ from center
=B/2-Ẍ
eccentricity(e) -2.95
Check B/6 ration 2.45

Check e≥B/6 or e≤/6


OK
FOS=(∑mr)/(∑mo)>3
FOS 7.31
OK

C Check for bearing Capacity


Intensity of soil pressure = total vertical laoad/Area of base
foundation
breat
Total vertical force(∑V) length h area Qu
KN m m m2 KN/m2
21929.76 18.00 14.70 264.60 82.88

Assume soil intensity KN/m


2
pressure 200

KN/m
2
At toe -17.00428263
KN/m
2
At heel 182.7620907
OK

D FOS against Sliding during earthquake


Total vertical load ∑V
(Deducting Uplift) Total Horizontal force(∑H)
14142.58 3125.71
FOS=(∑V)/(∑H)*μ>1,where μ=.3
FOS 1.36
OK

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-83


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

After performing dynamic analysis of foundation and checking global stability of


powerhouse, the rebar in machine foundation is provided as according to IS 2974 (Part
1): 1982. Since, the section of foundation block is huge and transmitted
forces/moments are small, minimum rebar is provided as according to code. Provided
rebar in machine foundation block is 20 mm diameter rebar at 125 mm c/c both ways at
top and bottom.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-84


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

3.19 CONTROL BUILDING DESIGN

3.19.1 General

Analysis and design of control building is same as that of main power house super
structure excluding the moving load in the analysis part. Analysis of control building is
done in ETABS version 16.0.0, which is also similar finite element software like SAP
2000.

Figure 3-36 : Extrude view of Control Building.

3.19.2 Assumption and Design Principle Outlines

Similar to the Powerhouse Building, the loadings in the control building has been
assigned based on the codal provision as mentioned previously in loading section of
power house.

Slab:

The live load in the slab portion of the control building has been assigned based on IS
4247 (Part 1) 1993. Likewise, floor finish load of 1.5KN/m2 has been considered for
the flooring load of tile and IPS work on the slab.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-85


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-37 : Control Building Slab live load in first storey


Detailed design sheet of slab are provided in annex.

3.13.3 Design of Structural Element

The Frame structure of the control building has been design similarly as the power
house building. Same material properties of concrete is used. The analysis result
computed from the model is used for designing. The designing is also carried out with
ETABS in the maximum value of load combination.
Details of rebar are provided in drawings. The result of required longitudinal rebars
computed from ETABS software is provided below:

Figure 3-38: Reinforcement in Grid I-I

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-86


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-39: Reinforcement in Grid J-J

Fgure 3-40: Reinforcement in first storey beam

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-87


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Figure 3-41: Reinforcement in second storey beam

Design summary of control building

Table 3-60: Design summary of Control Building Frame sections.

Sections Width, m Depth, m

Beam, 1st storey 0.3 0.5

Beam, 2nd storey 0.3 0.355

Column 0.5 0.5

Slab,1st storey - 0.175

Slab, 2nd Storey - 0.125

Tie beam 0.3 0.3

3.13.4 Foundation Design of Control Building:

A shallow foundation has been proposed for the foundation in control building. The
isolated footing is provided to support an individual column. An accurate estimation of
all the loads acting on the foundation should be made before it can be properly
designed. A foundation may be subjected to one or more of the load types. The
foundation has been designed following the IS 1904-1978, where the combination of
loads proportioned to dead loads and live load has been mentioned which are:

i. Dead load + live load.

A detailed design sheet has been presented in Annex.

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-88


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

ANNEX:

Design of Isolated Footing of Control Building (F1)

Inputs
Axial Load 460.67 KN
Bearing capacity of footing 150 KN/m2
Column size a 0.5
b 0.5
Grade of concete 25 N/mm2
Grade of steel 500 N/mm2
Cover 50 mm
Dia of Bar 12 mm

Outputs
Area of Footing 3.3782 m2
Provide L 2 m
B 2 m
Net earth pressure 172.75 KN/m2
Bending moment 97.172 KN-m
Effective depth 118.67 mm
Assume depth 350 mm
Overall depth 400 mm
Area of steel 651 mm2
Spacing 150 mm
Actual area of steel 1508 mm2

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-89


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Checking
Two way shear
Critical section at d/2 from face of
column
Shear force 566.19 KN
Nominal shear stress 0.8088 N/mm2
Ks 1
Permissible Shear stress(Ѓ c) 1.25 N/mm2
safe
One way Shear
shear force at d from face of column
Ultimate Shear force 138.2 KN
Nominal shear stress 0.1974 0
percentage of steel 0.23%
Permissible Shear strength 0.3 N/mm2
safe

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-90


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Design of Isolated Footing of Control Building (F2)

Inputs
Axial Load 254.67 KN
Bearing capacity of footing 150 KN/m2
Column size a 0.5
b 0.5
Grade of concete 25 N/mm2
Grade of steel 500 N/mm2
Cover 50 mm
Dia of Bar 12 mm

Outputs
Area of Footing 1.8676 m2
Provide L 1.5 m
B 1.5 m
Net earth pressure 169.78 KN/m2
Bending moment 31.833 KN-m
Effective depth 78.431 mm
Assume depth 350 mm
Overall depth 400 mm
Area of steel 211 mm2
Spacing 150 mm
Actual area of steel 1131 mm2

b B

Checking

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-91


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

Two way shear


Critical section at d/2 from face of
column
Shear force 259.34 KN
Nominal shear stress 0.494 N/mm2
Ks 1
Permissible Shear stress(Ѓ c) 1.25 N/mm2
safe
One way Shear
shear force at d from face of column
Ultimate Shear force 38.2 KN
Nominal shear stress 0.0728 0
percentage of steel 0.23%
Permissible Shear strength 0.37 N/mm2
safe

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-92


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

DESIGN OF FLOOR SLAB OF CONTROL ROOM 1st STOREY


Design Data
Dimensions of the slab (c/c distance b/w supports), fck = 25 N/mm 2
Length of short span, Lx = 5.400 m fy = 500 N/mm 2
Length of long span, Ly = 5.900 m
Width of the supporting beam, = 300 mm
Clear cover to main reinforcement = 20 mm
Assume dia. of reinforcement steel = 10 mm

Calculations
Assume the thickness of slab as 175 mm ; Effective depth, d = 150 mm
Effective span, lx = 5.4 m (or) 5.25 m whichever is less; d = 5.25 m
ly = 5.9 m (or) 5.75 m whichever is less; d = 5.75 m
(ly / lx ) = 1.10 < 2 ; Here, (l y / l x ) is less than 2, Hence design the slab as two way slab

Load Calculations
Dead Load of slab = 0.175 x 25 = 4.38 KN/m 2 Dust Load on slab = 0 KN/m 2
Finishes load on slab = 1.50 KN/m 2 Other load on slab = 0 KN/m 2
2
Live Load on slab = 10.0 KN/m
Total Dead load acting on the Structure = 5.88 KN/m 2
Total live load acting on the Structure = 10.0 KN/m 2
Factored Design Load w = 23.82 KN/m 2

Support Condition (Type of panel according to support condition)


Interior Panels For this support condition,
Short span coefficient for (l y / l x ) = 1.1, Long span coefficient,
For negative moment, ax = 0.0370 For negative moment, ay = 0.032
For positive moment, ax = 0.0280 For positive moment, ay = 0.024

Moment Calculation
2 2
Max. BM per unit width, Mx = ax w l x & My = ay w l x

Mu Mu / bd 2 pt Ast, req Ast , min = (0.12/100) bD = 210 mm 2


2 2
KNm N/mm % mm
For Short Span,
Reinforcement details
At mid span, 18.38 0.82 0.2391 359
At supports, 24.29 1.08 0.3207 481 Provide Y 10 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
For Long span, supports for short span (Ast pro. = 524 mm 2 )
At mid span, 15.76 0.80 0.233 350 Provide Y 10 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
At supports, 21.01 1.07 0.3175 476 supports for long span (Ast pro. = 524 mm 2 )

Check for Deflection


Percentage of tension reinforcement = 0.35 %
fs = 0.58 fy (Ast req / Ast pro) = 198.8
Refer Fig. 4 of IS 456,
Modification factor = 1.7
Allowable (Span / d eff ) ratio = 44.2
Effective depth required = 119 mm
< d prov.
Hence OK

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-93


Omega Energy and Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C1: Structural Design Report

DESIGN OF FLOOR SLAB OF CONTROL ROOM 2nd STOREY


Design Data
Dimensions of the slab (c/c distance b/w supports), fck = 25 N/mm 2
Length of short span, Lx = 5.400 m fy = 500 N/mm 2
Length of long span, Ly = 5.900 m
Width of the supporting beam, = 300 mm
Clear cover to main reinforcement = 20 mm
Assume dia. of reinforcement steel = 8 mm

Calculations
Assume the thickness of slab as 125 mm ; Effective depth, d = 101 mm
Effective span, lx = 5.4 m (or) 5.201 m whichever is less; d = 5.201 m
ly = 5.9 m (or) 5.701 m whichever is less; d = 5.701 m
(ly / lx ) = 1.10 < 2 ; Here, (l y / l x ) is less than 2, Hence design the slab as two way slab

Load Calculations
Dead Load of slab = 0.125 x 25 = 3.13 KN/m 2 Dust Load on slab = 0 KN/m 2
Finishes load on slab = 1.50 KN/m 2 Other load on slab = 0 KN/m 2
2
Live Load on slab KN/m = 1.5
Total Dead load acting on the Structure = 4.63 KN/m 2
Total live load acting on the Structure = 1.5 KN/m 2
Factored Design Load w = 9.20 KN/m 2

Support Condition (Type of panel according to support condition)


Interior Panels For this support condition,
Short span coefficient for (l y / l x ) = 1.1, Long span coefficient,
For negative moment, ax = 0.0370 For negative moment, ay = 0.032
For positive moment, ax = 0.0280 For positive moment, ay = 0.024

Moment Calculation
2 2
Max. BM per unit width, Mx = ax w l x & My = ay w l x

Mu Mu / bd 2 pt Ast, req Ast , min = (0.12/100) bD = 150 mm 2


2 2
KNm N/mm % mm
For Short Span,
Reinforcement details
At mid span, 6.97 0.68 0.1965 198
At supports, 9.21 0.90 0.2639 267 Provide Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
For Long span, supports for short span (Ast pro. = 335 mm 2 )
At mid span, 5.97 0.69 0.1995 201 Provide Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
At supports, 7.96 0.92 0.2701 273 supports for long span (Ast pro. = 335 mm 2 )

Check for Deflection


Percentage of tension reinforcement = 0.33 %
fs = 0.58 fy (Ast req / Ast pro) = 171.3
Refer Fig. 4 of IS 456,
Modification factor = 2
Allowable (Span / d eff ) ratio = 52
Effective depth required = 100 mm
< d prov.
Hence OK

E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd. Page | 3-94


DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT (11.05MW)
VOLUME 2: ANNEX C2
STABILITY ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN
CALCULATIONS
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Flood Wall Type-A (Panel-FL-01 & Panel-FR-01)) Approved by : SG

Geometry of the structure Soil Properties


Top width, B1 0.30 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom width of sloping face river side, B4 0.00 m Angle made by back wall with vertical - deg
Bottom width of sloping face hillside, B5 0.30 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Width of projection at riverside, B3 1.20 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Width of projection at hillside, B6 1.70 m Coefficient of earth pressure at rest (Ko) 0.50
Thickness of base slab, H2 0.60 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.33
Height of flood stem, H1 6.10 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure 3.00
Total height of the flood wall 6.70 m Coefficient of dynamic active earth pressure 0.61
Total base width of the flood wall, B2 3.50 m Coefficient of dynamic Passive earth pressure 2.91
Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
#REF! Unit weight of concrete 25.00 KN/m3
8.00 Soil Bearing Envelope Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
200.00 Friction coefficient 0.65
6.00 187.02
150.00
4.00
100.00 102.62
68.00
2.00 50.00
0.00 8.94 Loads
0.00
-2 -1 0 1 2 Height of soil :hillside, Hhg 4.68 m
-2.00 0.00 2.00 4.00
-2.00 Height of ground water in wet season :hillside, Hhw 2.00 m
Surcharge load:hillside, w 12.50 KN/m2
Height of soil/sediment :riverside, Hrg 2.68 m
Height of water in normal flow :riverside, Hrw nor 2.20 m
Consider 1m width of section Height of water in max flow :riverside, Hrw hi 4.60 m
Result Coefficients
Factor of safety Percentage of passive pressure to use 25%
Usual Unsusal Extreme Dynamic loads (% of self wt) 5%
1. Sliding 4.28 1.14 1.19 Horizontal seismic coeff. 0.24
2. Overturning 3.07 1.95 2.97 Vertical seismic coeff. 0.12
Bearing Uplift coefficient 1.00
3.Maximum 118.85 172.98 187.02
4. Minimum 63.55 8.94 20.87
Calculations
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 36.20 +x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 16.07
P2 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside UDL 48.24 48.24 +y
P3 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 48.24 +y
P4a Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 20.00 +x
P4b Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 8.88
P5 Normal flow: Water pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 21.58 +x
P6 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside UDL 21.74 21.74 +y
P7 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 21.74 +y
P8 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside UDL 21.58 21.58 +y
P9 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 21.58 +y
P10a High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 16.47 +x
P10b High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 7.31
P11 High flow: Water pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 45.13 +x
P12 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside UDL 21.95 21.95 +y
P13 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 21.95 +y
P14 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside UDL 45.13 45.13 +y
P15 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 45.13 +y
P16a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Trapezoidal 4.16 32.23 -x
P16b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Trapezoidal 9.38 72.59
P17 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside UDL 84.24 84.24 +y
P18 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 84.24 +y
P19a Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 4.16 25.69 -x
P19b Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 9.38 57.87
P20 Wet: Water pressure-hillside Triangular 0.00 19.62 -x

01_Floodwall Type A(Panel-FL-01) Forces and Stability: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P21 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside UDL 72.21 72.21 +y
P22 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 72.21 +y
P23 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside UDL 19.62 19.62 +y
P24 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 19.62 +y
P25 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 21.58 0.00 -y
P26 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 21.58 19.62 -y
P27 High flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 45.13 0.00 -y
P28 High flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 45.13 19.62 -y

2 Dead and dynamic Loads


D1 Total dead weight of the structure Point (see centroid of structure) 121.13 +y
D2 Dynamic loads 6.06 +x

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force(+x) Converted to Point 29.07 +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force: uplift Converted to Point 14.54 +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force(-x) Converted to Point 29.07 +/-y
S4 Vertical seismic force: bearing Converted to Point 14.54 +/-y

4 Combination
C1 Both side of flood wall is dry D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18
C2 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25
C3 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26
C4 High flow in riverside+dry hillside D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16a+P17+P18+P26
C5 High flow in riverside+wet hillside D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P27
C6 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(+x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S1
C7 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(-x) D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16b+P17+P18+S3
C8 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(+x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S2
C9 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(-x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S4
C10 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(+x) D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S1
C11 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(-x) D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16b+P17+P18+P25+S3
C12 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(+x) D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S2
C13 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(-x) D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S4
C14 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+x) D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S1
C15 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-x) D1+D2+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19b+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S3
C16 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+y) D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S2
C17 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-y) D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S4
C18 Hillside full fill+riverside empty D1+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside


Force Moment Arm Moments Remarks
Descriptions Horizontal Vertical X Y Overturning Resisting
KN KN m m KNm KNm
Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 48.50 0.89 43.33 +x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 21.54 0.89 19.24
P2 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside 57.89 0.60 34.73 +y
P3 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside, in sloping face 28.94 1.20 34.73 +y
P4a Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 26.80 0.89 23.95 +x
P4b Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 11.90 0.89 10.63
P5 Normal flow: Water pressure-riverside 23.74 0.73 17.41 +x
P6 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside 26.09 0.60 15.66 +y
P7 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 1.20 0.00 +y
P8 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside 25.90 0.60 15.54 +y
P9 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 1.20 0.00 +y
P10a High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 22.07 0.89 19.72 +x
P10b High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 9.80 0.89 8.75
P11 High flow: Water pressure-riverside 49.64 1.53 76.11 +x
P12 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside 26.34 0.60 15.80 +y
P13 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 1.20 0.00 +y
P14 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside 54.15 0.60 32.49 +y
P15 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 1.20 0.00 +y
P16a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside -85.17 1.33 113.14 -x
P16b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside -191.81 1.33 254.82
P17 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside 143.21 2.65 379.50 +y
P18 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside, in sloping face 12.64 1.70 21.48 +y
P19a Wet: Earth pressure-hillside -69.87 1.26 87.91 -x

01_Floodwall Type A(Panel-FL-01) Forces and Stability: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P19b Wet: Earth pressure-hillside -157.36 1.26 198.00


P20 Wet: Water pressure-hillside 19.62 0.67 13.08 -x
P21 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside 122.75 2.65 325.29 +y
P22 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside, in sloping face 10.83 1.70 18.41 +y
P23 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside 33.35 2.65 88.39 +y
P24 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside, in sloping face 2.94 1.70 5.00 +y
P25 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside -37.77 1.17 44.06 -y
P26 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside -72.10 1.72 124.18 -y
P27 High flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside -78.97 1.17 92.13 -y
P28 High flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside -113.31 1.52 172.25 -y

Dead and dynamic Loads


D1 Total dead weight of the structure 121.13 1.57 190.24 +y
D2 Dynamic loads 6.06 1.57 9.51 +x
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force 29.07 4.26 123.83
S2 Vertical seismic force -14.54 1.57 22.83
S3 Horizontal seismic force -29.07 4.26 123.83
S4 Vertical seismic force 14.54 1.57 22.83

Load combinitions
C1 D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18 63.63 363.80 113.14 679.92
C2 D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25 49.52 326.19 166.72 685.19
C3 D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26 14.61 305.89 234.68 721.30
C4 D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16a+P17+P18+P26 25.73 291.41 246.83 724.38
C5 D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P27 0.00 298.58 202.64 760.49
C6 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S1 7.59 363.80 236.98 704.02
C7 D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16b+P17+P18+S3 199.34 363.80 254.82 803.76
C8 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S2 36.66 349.27 135.97 704.02
C9 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S4 36.66 378.34 113.14 726.84
C10 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S1 5.55 326.19 290.55 698.50
C11 D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16b+P17+P18+P25+S3 185.24 326.19 308.40 809.02
C12 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S2 34.62 311.66 189.55 698.50
C13 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S4 34.62 340.73 166.72 721.33
C14 D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S1 0.00 276.95 358.52 699.88
C15 D1+D2+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19b+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S3 131.17 276.95 344.77 810.40
C16 D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S2 0.00 262.41 257.51 699.88
C17 D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S4 0.00 291.48 234.68 722.71
C18 D1+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26 50.25 218.90 225.17 627.33

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn riverside hillside
C1 Both side of flood wall is dry 0.19 3.72 6.01 138.17 69.72
C2 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside 0.16 4.28 4.11 118.85 67.55
C3 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside 0.16 13.61 3.07 111.25 63.55
C4 High flow in riverside+dry hillside 0.11 7.36 2.93 99.14 67.38
C5 High flow in riverside+wet hillside -0.12 999.00 3.75 68.00 102.62
C6 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(+x) 0.47 31.15 2.97 187.02 20.87
C7 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(-x) 0.24 1.19 3.15 146.91 60.98
C8 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(+x) 0.12 6.19 5.18 120.94 78.64
C9 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(-x) 0.13 6.71 6.42 131.80 84.40
C10 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(+x) 0.50 38.19 2.40 172.98 13.42
C11 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(-x) 0.22 1.14 2.62 127.59 58.81
C12 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(+x) 0.12 5.85 3.69 106.90 71.19
C13 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(-x) 0.12 6.40 4.33 117.76 76.95
C14 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+x) 0.52 999.00 1.95 149.31 8.94
C15 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-x) 0.07 1.37 2.35 88.45 69.81
C16 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+y) 0.06 999.00 2.72 83.23 66.72
C17 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-y) 0.08 999.00 3.08 94.09 72.47
C18 Hillside full fill+riverside empty -0.09 2.83 2.79 53.20 71.89
Bearing stress envelope 200.00
*999=structure doesn't move towards hillside
X Stress 187.02
At toe -1.75 68.00
MIN 100.00 102.62
At heel 1.75 8.94 68.00
At toe -1.75 187.02 8.94
MAX 0.00
At heel 1.75 102.62
-2 -1 0 1 2

01_Floodwall Type A(Panel-FL-01) Forces and Stability: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Flood Wall Type-B (Panel-FR-02 & 03) Approved by : SG

Geometry of the structure Soil Properties


Top width, B1 0.30 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom width of sloping face river side, B4 0.00 m Angle made by back wall with vertical - deg
Bottom width of sloping face hillside, B5 0.12 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Width of projection at riverside, B3 0.85 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Width of projection at hillside, B6 1.23 m Coefficient of earth pressure at rest (Ko) 0.50
Thickness of base slab, H2 0.60 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.33
Height of flood stem, H1 4.10 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure 3.00
Total height of the flood wall 4.70 m Coefficient of dynamic active earth pressure 0.61
Total base width of the flood wall, B2 2.50 m Coefficient of dynamic Passive earth pressure 2.91
Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Unit weight of concrete 25.00 KN/m3
Soil Bearing Envelope Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
5.00
150.00 Friction coefficient 0.70
4.00 137.07
3.00 100.00 107.30

2.00

1.00 50.00 Loads


15.44
Height of soil :hillside, Hhg 2.95 m
0.00 9.75
0.00 Height of ground water in wet season :hillside, Hhw 1.20 m
-1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00
-1.00 -2 -1 0 1 2 Surcharge load:hillside, w 12.50 KN/m2
Height of soil/sediment :riverside, Hrg 1.77 m
Height of water in normal flow :riverside, Hrw nor 2.30 m
Consider 1m width of section Height of water in max flow :riverside, Hrw hi 3.90 m
Result Coefficients
Factor of safety Percentage of passive pressure to use 25%
Usual Unsusal Extreme Dynamic loads (% of self wt) 5%
1. Sliding 13.67 1.51 1.35 Horizontal seismic coeff. 0.24
2. Overturning 3.56 2.01 2.93 Vertical seismic coeff. 0.12
Bearing Uplift coefficient 1.00
3.Maximum 66.80 112.26 137.07
4. Minimum 56.68 15.17 9.75
Calculations
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 23.91 +x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 10.61
P2 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside UDL 31.86 31.86 +y
P3 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 31.86 +y
P4a Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 10.88 +x
P4b Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 4.83
P5 Normal flow: Water pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 22.56 +x
P6 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside UDL 9.58 9.58 +y
P7 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 9.58 +y
P8 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside UDL 22.56 22.56 +y
P9 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 22.56 +y
P10a High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 10.88 +x
P10b High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 4.83
P11 High flow: Water pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 38.26 +x
P12 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside UDL 14.50 14.50 +y
P13 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 14.50 +y
P14 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside UDL 38.26 38.26 +y
P15 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 38.26 +y
P16a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Trapezoidal 4.16 21.86 -x
P16b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Trapezoidal 9.38 49.22
P17 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside UDL 53.10 53.10 +y
P18 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 53.10 +y
P19a Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 4.16 17.93 -x
P19b Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 9.38 40.39

02_Floodwall Type B (Panel-FR-02 & 03) Forces and Stability: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P20 Wet: Water pressure-hillside Triangular 0.00 11.77 -x


P21 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside UDL 48.91 48.91 +y
P22 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 48.91 +y
P23 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside UDL 11.77 11.77 +y
P24 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 11.77 +y
P25 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 22.56 0.00 -y
P26 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 22.56 11.77 -y
P27 High flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 38.26 0.00 -y
P28 High flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 38.26 11.77 -y

2 Dead and dynamic Loads


D1 Total dead weight of the structure Point (see centroid of structure) 74.40 +y
D2 Dynamic loads 3.72 +x

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force(+x) Converted to Point 17.86 +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force: uplift Converted to Point 8.93 +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force(-x) Converted to Point 17.86 +/-y
S4 Vertical seismic force: bearing Converted to Point 8.93 +/-y
3a Soil Dynamics
SD1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive - (0.70)
SD2 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive - 2.17
SD3 Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive - (0.32)
SD4 Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive - 0.99
SD5 High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive - (0.32)
SD6 High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive - 1.21
SD7 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hactive 3.40 17.85
SD8 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hpassive (0.27) (1.44)
SD9 Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Hactive 3.40 14.65
SD10 Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Hpassive (0.27) (1.18)

4 Combination
C1 Both side of flood wall is dry D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18
C2 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25
C3 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26
C4 High flow in riverside+dry hillside D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16a+P17+P18+P26
C5 High flow in riverside+wet hillside D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P27
C6 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(+x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S1
C7 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(-x) D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16b+P17+P18+S3
C8 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(+x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S2
C9 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(-x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S4
C10 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(+x) D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S1
C11 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(-x) D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16b+P17+P18+P25+S3
C12 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(+x) D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S2
C13 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(-x) D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S4
C14 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+x) D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S1
C15 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-x) D1+D2+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19b+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S3
C16 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+y) D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S2
C17 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-y) D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S4
C18 Hillside full fill+riverside empty D1+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside


Force Moment Arm Moments Remarks
Descriptions Horizontal Vertical X Y Overturning Resisting
KN KN m m KNm KNm
Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 21.16 0.59 12.48 +x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 9.39 0.59 5.54
P2 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside 27.08 0.43 11.51 +y
P3 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside, in sloping face 13.54 0.85 11.51 +y
P4a Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 9.63 0.59 5.68 +x
P4b Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 4.27 0.59 2.52
P5 Normal flow: Water pressure-riverside 25.95 0.77 19.89 +x
P6 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside 8.14 0.43 3.46 +y
P7 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 0.85 0.00 +y
P8 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside 19.18 0.43 8.15 +y

02_Floodwall Type B (Panel-FR-02 & 03) Forces and Stability: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P9 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 0.85 0.00 +y
P10a High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 9.63 0.59 5.68 +x
P10b High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 4.27 0.59 2.52
P11 High flow: Water pressure-riverside 44.00 1.30 57.20 +x
P12 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside 12.32 0.43 5.24 +y
P13 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 0.85 0.00 +y
P14 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside 32.52 0.43 13.82 +y
P15 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 0.85 0.00 +y
P16a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside -38.38 0.75 28.86 -x
P16b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside -86.44 0.75 64.99
P17 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside 65.31 1.89 123.12 +y
P18 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside, in sloping face 3.19 1.23 3.92 +y
P19a Wet: Earth pressure-hillside -32.60 0.69 22.36 -x
P19b Wet: Earth pressure-hillside -73.41 0.69 50.35
P20 Wet: Water pressure-hillside 7.06 0.40 2.83 -x
P21 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside 60.16 1.89 113.41 +y
P22 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside, in sloping face 2.93 1.23 3.61 +y
P23 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside 14.48 1.89 27.29 +y
P24 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside, in sloping face 0.71 1.23 0.87 +y
P25 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside -28.20 0.83 23.50 -y
P26 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside -42.92 1.12 48.03 -y
P27 High flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside -47.82 0.83 39.85 -y
P28 High flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside -62.54 1.03 64.38 -y

Dead and dynamic Loads


D1 Total dead weight of the structure 74.40 1.14 84.94 +y
D2 Dynamic loads 3.72 1.14 4.25 +x
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force 17.86 3.11 55.53
S2 Vertical seismic force -8.93 1.14 10.19
S3 Horizontal seismic force -17.86 3.11 55.53
S4 Vertical seismic force 8.93 1.14 10.19
3a Soil Dynamics
SD1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 0.59 0.00
SD2 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 0.59 0.00
SD3 Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 0.59 0.00
SD4 Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 0.59 0.00
SD5 High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 0.59 0.00
SD6 High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 0.59 0.00
SD7 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 0.75 0.00
SD8 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 0.75 0.00
SD9 Wet: Earth pressure-hillside 0.69 0.00
SD10 Wet: Earth pressure-hillside 0.69 0.00

Load combinitions
C1 D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18 28.99 183.52 28.86 240.54
C2 D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25 8.16 159.28 56.61 257.51
C3 D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26 0.00 154.35 77.46 275.66
C4 D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16a+P17+P18+P26 0.00 148.54 81.13 290.75
C5 D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P27 0.00 153.42 69.28 308.90
C6 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S1 0.00 183.52 84.39 247.48
C7 D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16b+P17+P18+S3 94.90 183.52 64.99 296.07
C8 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S2 17.22 174.59 39.05 247.48
C9 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S4 17.22 192.45 28.86 257.67
C10 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S1 0.00 159.28 112.14 260.67
C11 D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16b+P17+P18+P25+S3 74.07 159.28 92.74 313.05
C12 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S2 2.81 150.35 66.80 260.67
C13 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S4 2.81 168.21 56.61 270.87
C14 D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S1 0.00 140.81 132.99 267.31
C15 D1+D2+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19b+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S3 53.98 140.81 105.45 319.69
C16 D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S2 0.00 131.88 87.65 267.31
C17 D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S4 0.00 149.74 77.46 277.50
C18 D1+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26 25.53 109.77 73.21 230.13

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn riverside hillside

02_Floodwall Type B (Panel-FR-02 & 03) Forces and Stability: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

C1 Both side of flood wall is dry 0.10 4.43 8.34 90.42 56.40
C2 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside -0.01 13.67 4.55 61.98 65.45
C3 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside -0.03 999.00 3.56 56.68 66.80
C4 High flow in riverside+dry hillside -0.16 999.00 3.58 36.43 82.40
C5 High flow in riverside+wet hillside -0.31 999.00 4.46 15.44 107.30
C6 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(+x) 0.36 999.00 2.93 137.07 9.75
C7 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(-x) -0.01 1.35 4.56 71.79 75.02
C8 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(+x) 0.06 7.10 6.34 79.26 60.42
C9 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(-x) 0.06 7.82 8.93 88.25 65.70
C10 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(+x) 0.32 999.00 2.32 112.26 15.17
C11 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(-x) -0.13 1.51 3.38 43.35 84.07
C12 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(+x) -0.04 37.50 3.90 54.44 65.84
C13 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(-x) -0.02 41.96 4.79 63.44 71.12
C14 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+x) 0.30 999.00 2.01 96.35 16.30
C15 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-x) -0.27 1.83 3.03 19.63 93.02
C16 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+y) -0.11 999.00 3.05 38.54 66.97
C17 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-y) -0.09 999.00 3.58 47.54 72.25
C18 Hillside full fill+riverside empty -0.18 3.01 3.14 24.99 62.83
Bearing stress envelope 150.00
*999=structure doesn't move towards hillside
X Stress 137.07
100.00 107.30
At toe -1.25 15.44
MIN
At heel 1.25 9.75 50.00
At toe -1.25 137.07 15.44 9.75
MAX 0.00
At heel 1.25 107.30
-2 -1 0 1 2

02_Floodwall Type B (Panel-FR-02 & 03) Forces and Stability: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location:Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Weir (Panel-W-07) Approved by : SG

Geometry of the structure Soil Properties


Top width, B1 0.30 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom width of sloping face river side, B4 0.00 m Angle made by back wall with vertical - deg
Bottom width of sloping face hillside, B5 0.20 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Width of projection at riverside, B3 5.00 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Width of projection at hillside, B6 0.00 m Coefficient of earth pressure at rest (Ko) 0.50
Thickness of base slab, H2 1.20 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.33
Height of flood stem, H1 4.68 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure 3.00
Total height of the flood wall 5.88 m Coefficient of dynamic active earth pressure 0.61
Total base width of the flood wall, B2 5.50 m Coefficient of dynamic Passive earth pressure 2.91
Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Unit weight of concrete 25.00 KN/m3
Soil Bearing Envelope Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
5.00
120.00 Friction coefficient 0.65
4.00
100.00 101.91
3.00
83.56 80.00
2.00
60.00
1.00
40.00 Loads
0.00 25.51 20.00 14.73 Height of soil :hillside, Hhg 4.40 m
-10.00 -5.00 -1.00 0.00 5.00
0.00 Height of ground water in wet season :hillside, Hhw 1.50 m
-2.00 -4 -2 0 2 4 Surcharge load:hillside, w 10.00 KN/m2
Height of soil/sediment :riverside, Hrg 1.00 m
Height of water in normal flow :riverside, Hrw nor 2.20 m
Consider 1m width of section Height of water in max flow :riverside, Hrw hi 4.20 m
Result Coefficients
Factor of safety Percentage of passive pressure to use 18%
Usual Unsusal Extreme Dynamic loads (% of self wt) 10%
1. Sliding 4.45 1.36 1.39 Horizontal seismic coeff. 0.24
2. Overturning 3.11 1.97 5.49 Vertical seismic coeff. 0.12
Bearing Uplift coefficient 1.00
3.Maximum 80.05 93.13 101.91
4. Minimum 36.42 14.73 27.07
Calculations
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 9.72 +x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 6.00
P2 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside UDL 18.00 18.00 +y
P3 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 18.00 +y
P4a Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 4.42 +x
P4b Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 2.73
P5 Normal flow: Water pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 21.58 +x
P6 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside UDL -1.64 -1.64 +y
P7 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 -1.64 +y
P8 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside UDL 21.58 21.58 +y
P9 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 21.58 +y
P10a High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 4.42 +x
P10b High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 2.73
P11 High flow: Water pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 41.20 +x
P12 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside UDL 8.19 8.19 +y
P13 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 8.19 +y
P14 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside UDL 41.20 41.20 +y
P15 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 41.20 +y
P16a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Trapezoidal 3.33 29.72 -x
P16b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Trapezoidal 5.40 48.19
P17 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside UDL 79.20 79.20 +y
P18 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 79.20 +y
P19a Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 3.33 24.82 -x

03_Weir (Panel-W-07) Forces and Stability: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P19b Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 5.40 40.24


P20 Wet: Water pressure-hillside Triangular 0.00 14.72 -x
P21 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside UDL 64.66 64.66 +y
P22 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 64.66 +y
P23 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside UDL 14.72 14.72 +y
P24 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 14.72 +y
P25 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 21.58 0.00 -y
P26 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 21.58 14.72 -y
P27 High flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 41.20 0.00 -y
P28 High flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 41.20 14.72 -y

2 Dead and dynamic Loads


D1 Total dead weight of the structure Point (see centroid of structure) 211.80 +y
D2 Dynamic loads 21.18 +x

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force(+x) Converted to Point 50.83 +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force: uplift Converted to Point 25.42 +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force(-x) Converted to Point 50.83 +/-y
S4 Vertical seismic force: bearing Converted to Point 25.42 +/-y
3a Soil Dynamics
SD1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive - (0.28)
SD2 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive - 0.88
SD3 Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive - (0.13)
SD4 Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive - 0.40
SD5 High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive - (0.13)
SD6 High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive - 0.49
SD7 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hactive 2.72 24.28
SD8 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hpassive (0.16) (1.41)
SD9 Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Hactive 2.72 20.27
SD10 Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Hpassive (0.16) (1.17)

4 Combination
C1 Both side of flood wall is dry D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18
C2 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25
C3 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26
C4 High flow in riverside+dry hillside D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16a+P17+P18+P26
C5 High flow in riverside+wet hillside D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P27
C6 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(+x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S1
C7 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(-x) D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16b+P17+P18+S3
C8 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(+x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S2
C9 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(-x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S4
C10 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(+x) D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S1
C11 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(-x) D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16b+P17+P18+P25+S3
C12 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(+x) D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S2
C13 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(-x) D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S4
C14 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+x) D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S1
C15 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-x) D1+D2+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19b+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S3
C16 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+y) D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S2
C17 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-y) D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S4
C18 Hillside full fill+riverside empty D1+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside


Force Moment Arm Moments Remarks
Descriptions Horizontal Vertical X Y Overturning Resisting
KN KN m m KNm KNm
Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 4.86 0.33 1.62 +x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 3.00 0.33 1.00
P2 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside 90.00 2.50 225.00 +y
P3 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside, in sloping face 45.00 5.00 225.00 +y
P4a Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 2.21 0.33 0.74 +x
P4b Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 1.36 0.33 0.45
P5 Normal flow: Water pressure-riverside 23.74 0.73 17.41 +x
P6 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside -8.19 2.50 20.48 +y
P7 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 5.00 0.00 +y

03_Weir (Panel-W-07) Forces and Stability: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P8 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside 107.91 2.50 269.78 +y
P9 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 5.00 0.00 +y
P10a High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 2.21 0.33 0.74 +x
P10b High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 1.36 0.33 0.45
P11 High flow: Water pressure-riverside 45.32 1.40 63.45 +x
P12 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside 40.95 2.50 102.38 +y
P13 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 5.00 0.00 +y
P14 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside 206.01 2.50 515.03 +y
P15 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 5.00 0.00 +y
P16a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside -72.71 1.28 93.18 -x
P16b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside -117.91 1.28 151.10
P17 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside 0.00 5.50 0.00 +y
P18 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside, in sloping face 7.92 5.43 43.03 +y
P19a Wet: Earth pressure-hillside -61.93 1.24 76.74 -x
P19b Wet: Earth pressure-hillside -100.42 1.24 124.44
P20 Wet: Water pressure-hillside 11.04 0.50 5.52 -x
P21 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside 0.00 5.50 0.00 +y
P22 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside, in sloping face 6.47 5.43 35.13 +y
P23 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside 0.00 5.50 0.00 +y
P24 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside, in sloping face 1.47 5.43 8.00 +y
P25 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside -59.35 1.83 108.81 -y
P26 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside -99.82 2.58 257.19 -y
P27 High flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside -113.31 1.83 207.73 -y
P28 High flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside -153.77 2.32 356.10 -y

Dead and dynamic Loads


D1 Total dead weight of the structure 211.80 3.29 697.31 +y
D2 Dynamic loads 21.18 3.29 69.73 +x
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force 50.83 2.44 123.90
S2 Vertical seismic force -25.42 3.29 83.68
S3 Horizontal seismic force -50.83 2.44 123.90
S4 Vertical seismic force 25.42 3.29 83.68
3a Soil Dynamics
SD1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 0.33 0.00
SD2 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 0.33 0.00
SD3 Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 0.33 0.00
SD4 Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 0.33 0.00
SD5 High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 0.33 0.00
SD6 High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 0.33 0.00
SD7 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 1.28 0.00
SD8 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 1.28 0.00
SD9 Wet: Earth pressure-hillside 1.24 0.00
SD10 Wet: Earth pressure-hillside 1.24 0.00

Load combinitions
C1 D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18 69.71 354.72 93.18 1191.34
C2 D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25 47.61 326.27 271.72 1273.45
C3 D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26 25.78 285.82 409.17 1273.54
C4 D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16a+P17+P18+P26 26.02 388.04 420.09 1421.64
C5 D1+D2+P10b+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P27 4.20 374.57 359.71 1421.74
C6 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S1 17.02 354.72 217.08 1191.96
C7 D1+P1b+P2+P3+P16b+P17+P18+S3 165.74 354.72 151.10 1315.24
C8 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S2 67.85 329.30 176.85 1191.96
C9 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S4 67.85 380.14 93.18 1275.63
C10 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S1 0.00 326.27 395.62 1273.73
C11 D1+D2+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16b+P17+P18+P25+S3 143.63 326.27 329.64 1397.35
C12 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S2 46.76 300.85 355.39 1273.73
C13 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S4 46.76 351.69 271.72 1357.41
C14 D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S1 0.00 240.82 533.07 1048.83
C15 D1+D2+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19b+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S3 115.11 240.82 456.87 1172.44
C16 D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S2 24.94 215.40 492.85 1048.83
C17 D1+D2+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S4 24.94 266.24 409.17 1132.50
C18 D1+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26 50.89 119.92 339.44 740.43

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity

03_Weir (Panel-W-07) Forces and Stability: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn riverside hillside
C1 Both side of flood wall is dry -0.35 3.31 12.79 40.16 88.83
C2 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside -0.32 4.45 4.69 38.60 80.05
C3 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside -0.27 7.21 3.11 36.42 67.51
C4 High flow in riverside+dry hillside 0.17 9.69 3.38 83.56 57.55
C5 High flow in riverside+wet hillside -0.09 57.93 3.95 61.77 74.44
C6 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(+x) 0.00 13.55 5.49 64.61 64.38
C7 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :bearing(-x) -0.53 1.39 8.70 27.07 101.91
C8 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(+x) -0.33 3.15 6.74 38.15 81.60
C9 Both side of flood wall is dry+seismic :uplift(-x) -0.36 3.64 13.69 41.93 96.31
C10 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(+x) 0.06 999.00 3.22 63.11 55.53
C11 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:bearing(-x) -0.52 1.48 4.24 25.51 93.13
C12 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(+x) -0.30 4.18 3.58 36.65 72.75
C13 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic:uplift(-x) -0.34 4.89 5.00 40.43 87.46
C14 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+x) 0.61 999.00 1.97 72.84 14.73
C15 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-x) -0.22 1.36 2.57 33.21 54.36
C16 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(+y) 0.17 5.61 2.13 46.38 31.95
C17 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic:(-y) 0.03 6.94 2.77 50.16 46.66
C18 Hillside full fill+riverside empty -0.59 1.53 2.18 7.68 35.93
Bearing stress envelope 150.00
*999=structure doesn't move towards hillside
X Stress
At toe -2.75 25.51 100.00 101.91
MIN 83.56
At heel 2.75 14.73 50.00
At toe -2.75 83.56 25.51 14.73
MAX 0.00
At heel 2.75 101.91
-4 -2 0 2 4

03_Weir (Panel-W-07) Forces and Stability: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Weir Approved by : SG

Normal-Q = 1 Flood- 1:200


1.00 Inputs m3/s Yrs =16m3/s
Unit weight of water 9.81 9.81 kN/m3
Unit weight of concrete 24.00 24.00 kN/m3
Silt angle of internal friction 30.00 30.00 Degree
0.52 0.52
Active earth pressure 0.33 0.33
Passiive earth pressure 3.00 3.00
Passive Percentage 0.60
Angle of internal friction for foundation 35.00 35.00
Submerged unit weight of silt 15.00 15.00 kN/m3 Results Summary
Depth of Silt deposition - - m Sliding Overtuning Bearing Max Bearing Min
Velocity of wind (V) - - km/hr Usual OK OK 53.70 76.15
Fetch Length (F) - - km Unusual OK OK 46.31 28.31
Horizontal seismic Coeff 0.24 0.24 Extreme OK OK 78.88 32.00
Vertical seismic Coeff 0.12 0.12

Thickness of ice - - m
Ice Intensity 100.00 100.00 kN/m2
Height of soil on retaining side 4.60 4.60 m

Water levels
Water head over the crest - 2.61 m
Total water depth U/S 2.20 4.81 m
Total water depth D/S - 3.00 m

Total bottom width of the whole structure 14.75 14.75


Total wall height at U/S face - - m
Resisting water volume on spillway side - - m3
x - - m
y - - m
Resisting moment - -

Structure geometry
Centroid
X 7.31 m
Y 4.51 m
Area 48.56 m2
Weight of structure 1,165.51 kN
Resisting moment 8,520.48 kNm

2.00 Forces considered

1.10 Water Pressure


1.20 Uplift pressure
1.30 Due to earthquake forces
Pressure
1.40 Silt pressure
1.50 Wave pressure
1.60 Ice pressure
1.70 Weight of the dam.

01_Weir_Stability Stabilty_No silt Consitions: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

3.00 Force Calculation


3.10 Horizontal Water Pressure
Normal-Q = 1 Flood- 1:200
m3/s Yrs =16m3/s
U/s Water Depth 2.20 4.81
D/s Water Depth - 3.00
U/s Water Pressure Top - 25.60
Bottom 21.58 47.19 1.00
D/s Water Pressure - 29.43 * Since horizontal resisting water is negligible , D/s water pressure is ignored
U/s Water Force 23.74 80.07
D/s Water Force - 44.15
U/s Point of application 0.73 0.98
D/s Point of application - 1.00

Overturning moment 17.41 78.23

3.20 Seismic Effect

Vertical Acceleration

Self weight of the structure 1,165.51 1,165.51 kN


Water weight on spill way side - - kN

Seismic (+X) 279.72 kN


Seismic (+Y) 139.86 kN
Seismic (-Y)) 139.86 kN

HydroDynamic Acceleration
U/S wall slope - - Degree
Max. value of pressure coeff.for given constant slope ,Cm 0.74 0.74
Coefficient of Horizontal Acceleration (Kh) 0.24 0.24
Effective height of water U/S, H 2.20 4.81 Pe=(0.726 Cm*Kh*9.81*H)*H*L
pe 3.81 8.32 kN/m2 pe=Cm*Kh*9.81*H
Pe 6.08 29.07 kN
Moment at toe, Me (Me=0.412*Pe*H) due to Water 5.51 57.60 kNm (Me=0.412*Pe*H)
Horizontal inertial force due to concrete structure 279.72 279.72 kN W*Kh
Moment abt toe 1,260.43 1,260.43 kNm
Total moment due to earth quake 1,265.94 1,318.03 kNm

3.30 Uplift Pressure: Normal-design QFlood- 1:50 Yrs


Bottom width of Concrete chamber 14.75 14.75 m
U/S water Depth 2.20 4.81 m
D/s Water Depth - 3.00 m
U/S pressure intensity 21.58 47.19 kN/m2
D/S pressure intensity - 29.43 kN/m2
Total uplift force 207.93 615.19 kN
Point of Application 7.50 8.51 m
Moment due to uplift force 1,559.47 5,235.49 kNm

3.40 Silt Pressure Normal-design Q


Flood- 1:50 Yrs
Active soil pressure Coeff, Ka 0.33 0.33
Horizontal silt pressure - - kN
Point of aplication - - m
Moment due to silt presure - - kNm

Recommended By USBR OR
Horizontal silt pressure - - kN
Moment due to silt Pressure USBR - - kNm

01_Weir_Stability Stabilty_No silt Consitions: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

3.50 Ice Pressure Normal-design Q


Flood- 1:50 Yrs
Effective length for Ice force - - m
Thickness of Ice formation - - m
Ice intensity 100.00 100.00 kN/m2
Ice force at the screen Chamber width - - kN
Point of application from the toe of chamber 2.20 4.81 m
Overturning moment due to ice force - - kNm
Consider ice ? NO

3.60 Passive force


Height of backfill 4.60 m
Pressure due to soil passive 149.04 kN/m2
Resisting force due to soil passive 342.79 kN
Point of application 1.53 m
Resisting moment due to passive force 525.61 kNm

3.70 Dowel Bars and Moment resistance


Dia of dowel bar 25.00 mm
No of dowel bar 1.00
Anchorage bond stress 2.19 * Type 1 deformed bar (Table 3.26)
Embedded length 1,000.00
Distance from point "toe" 1.00 m
Total force resisted by Dowel Bar 172.07 kN
Total Resisting Moment due to dowels bars 172.07 kNm

Horizontal force (shear resistance) by Dowel bars


Grade of concrete 30.00 N/mm2
Shear stress of concrete 1.83 N/mm2
Surface area of Dowel 78,539.82 mm2
Shear strength of Dowel bar 143.39 kN 91.67 kN
Consider Dowel for Vertical force? NO
Consider Dowel for Moment? NO
Consider Dowel for Shear? NO

4.00 Load summary


Forces from Vertical Force Horizontal Overturning moment Resisting Moment
Direction Usual Unsual *Extreme 1 *Extreme 2 Usual Unsual Extreme Usual Unsual *Extreme 1 *Extreme 2 Usual Unsual *Extreme 1 *Extreme 2
Headwater Horizontal - - - - 23.74 80.07 23.74 17.41 78.23 17.41 17.41 - - - -
Tailwater Horizontal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Chamber water weight Downwrd - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dam weight Downwrd 1,165.51 1,165.51 1,165.51 1,165.51 - - - - - - - 8,520.48 8,520.48 8,520.48 8,520.48
Uplift Upwrd 207.93 615.19 207.93 207.93 - - - 1,559.47 5,235.49 1,559.47 1,559.47 - - - -
Silt Horizontal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ice Horizontal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Seismic (+X) Horizontal - - - - - - 279.72 - - 1,260.43 1,260.43 - - - -
Seismic (+Y) Upwrd 139.86 1,022.46 -
Seismic (-Y)) Downwrd 139.86 - 1,022.46
HydroDynamic Horizontal - 6.08 5.51 5.51
Dowel Bars - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total verticallly Downward force 1,165.51 1,165.51 1,165.51 1,305.37
Total verticallly Upward force 207.93 615.19 347.79 207.93
Passive force 342.79 342.79 342.79 525.61 525.61 525.61 525.61
Total 957.58 550.33 817.72 1,097.44 (319.05) (262.72) (33.25) 1,576.88 5,313.71 3,865.28 2,842.82 9,046.09 9,046.09 9,046.09 10,068.55

01_Weir_Stability Stabilty_No silt Consitions: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Usual Unusual *Extreme 1 *Extreme 2


Sum of vertical forces, SV 957.58 550.33 817.72 1,097.44 kN 11.00
Sum of Horizontal forces, SH (319.05) (262.72) (33.25) (33.25) kN
Sum of Overturning moments 1,576.88 5,313.71 3,865.28 2,842.82 kNm
Sum of Resisting moments 9,046.09 9,046.09 9,046.09 10,068.55
Coefficient of friction, tanf 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70
Corresponding friction angle f, 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 Radian
Cohesion (allowable shear stress) of foundation, c 6.22 6.22 6.22 6.22 kN/m2
Angle of base inclination to Horz., a 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Radian
Base Width 14.75 14.75 14.75 14.75 m
Area of plane of contact or sliding, Ah 14.75 14.75 14.75 - m2
Safety Factors
Allowable factor of Safety against Sliding Shear 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Calculated Shear friction factor (SFF) (3.45) (2.58) (28.72) (34.18)

Factor of safety on Sliding (2.10) (1.47) (17.22) (23.11)

5.00 Load Combinations adopted


Load Qualification Load Combinations
Usual Unusual Extreme

Headwater at flood level NO YES NO


at spillway crest YES NO YES
tailwater at highest level NO YES NO
empty YES NO YES
dam weight YES YES YES
drains clear and
uplift blocked YES YES YES
silt YES YES YES
Ice NO NO NO
Seismic NO NO YES
*Extreme 1 Extreme(Critical case for Sliding)
*Extreme 2 Extreme (Critical case for Bearing)

6.00 Results Overturning Sliding Bearing Calculation


Allowable Calculated Status Allowable Calculated Status e Bearing Max Bearing Min Status
Usual 1.50 5.74 OK 3.00 (3.45) OK (0.43) 53.70 76.15
Unusual 1.25 1.70 OK 2.00 (2.58) OK 0.59 46.31 28.31
Extreme(Critical case for Sliding) 1.10 2.60 OK 1.00 (28.72) OK 1.04 78.88 32.00
Extreme (Critical case for Bearing) 1.10 3.54 OK 1.00 (34.18) OK 0.79 98.34 50.47

Unusual ( Sliding) - Inclination angle Unusual ( Sliding) , Friction angle for foundation
(2.58) (2.58)
- (1.82) 25.00 (1.91)
2.00 (1.94) 27.50 (2.06)
4.00 (2.06) 30.00 (2.22)
6.00 (2.20) 32.50 (2.39)
8.00 (2.34) 35.00 (2.58)
10.00 (2.50) 37.50 (2.79)
12.00 (2.67) 40.00 (3.01)
15.00 (2.94) 42.50 (3.26)
20.00 (1.82) 45.00 (1.91)

Extreme(Critical case for Sliding) - Extreme(Critical case for


Inclination angle Sliding) -Friction angle for
(28.72) (28.72)
- (19.98) 25.00 (20.96)
2.00 (21.37) 27.50 (22.69)
4.00 (22.83) 30.00 (24.55)
6.00 (24.38) 32.50 (26.55)
8.00 (26.03) 35.00 (28.72)
10.00 (19.98) 37.50 (20.96)
12.00 (24.38) 40.00 (26.55)
15.00 (24.38) 42.50 (26.55)
20.00 (24.38) 45.00 (26.55)

01_Weir_Stability Stabilty_No silt Consitions: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Uplift Calculations Updated by : DK
Title Weir and Stilling Basin Approved by : SG

Normal level
Seepage Analysis (Bleigh's creep theory)
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
2.1 4 0 0 0 0

L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8
0.8 0.53 4.6 8.2 0.8 0 0 0

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
2.37 6.2 0 0 0 0

Total lengt h 14.77


U/s water level 1767.5
D/s water level 1763.1
Uplift factor 1.00
Head HL 4.40
Hydraulic Gradient HL/L 0.30
Gradient i 1:3.36
Lever
Uplift Tot Force (kN) Force (kN) arm(m) Moment (kNm)
Head at 1 Start 4.40 43.16 0.94 14.66 13.71
33.60
End 4.16 40.83 32.66 14.53 474.56
Head at 2 Start 4.16 40.83 1.84 13.95 25.61
19.80
End 3.46 33.90 17.97 13.87 249.11
Head at 3 Start 3.46 33.90 30.92 12.07 373.09
125.02
End 2.09 20.46 94.10 11.30 1063.35
Head at 4 Start 2.09 20.46 74.29 6.27 465.54
93.46
End 0.24 2.34 19.17 4.90 93.94
Head at 5 Start 0.24 2.34 0.94 0.53 0.50
0.94
End 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00
Head at 6 Start 0.00 0.00
0.00
End 0.00 0.00

Total uplift force 207.93 kN


Total overturning moment 2759.41 kNm
uplift -64.88 kN
Lever arm 7.50 m

01_Weir_Stability Uplift_Calculations: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Foundation level 1759.7


Tailwater level 1763.1
Water head 3.4 m
Depth of foundation 6.4 m
Uplift Tot Force (kN) Force (kN) Lever arm(m) Moment (kNm)
Head at 1 Start 3.40 33.35 0.00 14.53 0.00
26.6832
End 3.40 33.35 26.68 14.53 387.71
Head at 2 Start 3.40 33.35 16.64 13.95 232.15
1.03986
End 3.40 -29.43 -15.60 13.87 -216.26
Head at 3 Start -3.00 -29.43 0.00 11.30 0.00
-135.378
End -3.00 -29.43 -135.38 11.30 -1529.77
Head at 4 Start -3.00 -29.43 -241.33 4.90 -1182.50
16.0884
End 3.40 33.35 257.41 6.27 1613.13
Head at 5 Start 3.40 33.35 26.68 0.40 10.67
26.6832
End 3.40 33.35 0.00 0.40 0.00
Head at 6 Start 3.40 33.35
0
End 3.40 33.35

Total uplift force -64.88334 kN


Total overturning moment -684.8710563 kNm

High flood level


Seepage Analysis (Bleigh's creep theory)

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
2.1 4 0 0 0 0

L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L5 L6
0.8 0.53 4.6 8.2 0.8 0 0 0

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
2.37 6.2 0 0 0 0

Total lengt h 14.77


U/s water level 1769.9
D/s water level 1766.16

Head HL 3.74
Hydraulic Gradient HL/L 0.25
Gradient i 1:3.95

01_Weir_Stability Uplift_Calculations: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Uplift Force Force (kN) Lever arm(m) Moment (kNm)


Head at 1 Start 3.74 36.69 0.79 14.66 11.66
28.5566244
End 3.54 34.70 27.76 14.53 403.38
Head at 2 Start 3.54 34.70 1.56 13.95 21.77
16.83203852
End 2.94 28.81 15.27 13.87 211.75
Head at 3 Start 2.94 28.81 26.28 12.07 317.13
106.2676054
End 1.77 17.39 79.99 11.30 903.85
Head at 4 Start 1.77 17.39 63.14 6.27 395.71
79.43987894
End 0.20 1.99 16.30 4.90 79.85
Head at 5 Start 0.20 1.99 0.79 0.53 0.42
0.794895599
End 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00
Head at 6 Start 0.00 0.00
0
End 0.00 0.00

Total uplift force 615.19 kN


Total overturning moment 2345.50 kNm
uplift 383.29 kN
Lever arm 8.51 m

Foundation level 1759.7


Tailwater level 1766.16
Water head 6.46
Depth of foundation 6.4
Uplift Tot Force (kN) Force (kN) Lever arm(m) Moment (kNm)
Head at 1 Start 6.46 63.37 0.00 14.53 0.00
50.69808
End 6.46 63.37 50.70 14.53 736.64
Head at 2 Start 6.46 63.37 0.00 13.95 0.00
16.949718
End 6.46 63.37 33.59 13.87 465.69
Head at 3 Start 0.06 0.59 0.00 11.30 0.00
2.70756
End 0.06 0.59 2.71 11.30 30.60
Head at 4 Start 0.06 0.59 4.83 4.90 23.65
262.24092
End 6.46 63.37 257.41 6.27 1613.13
Head at 5 Start 6.46 63.37 50.70 0.40 20.28
50.69808
End 6.46 63.37 0.00 0.40 0.00
Head at 6 Start 6.46 63.37
0
End 6.46 63.37

Total uplift force 383.29 kN


Total overturning moment 2889.99 kNm

01_Weir_Stability Uplift_Calculations: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Undersluice Approved by : SG

Total Self-weight of
Case Eccentricity Factor of safety Bearing pressure
structure 8,342.59 kN
A Input Slide Overturn At toe At heel
No water+ Gate
3
Unit weight of water Ύw 9.81 kN/m C1 open/CLOSE 5.14 - 1.39 347.40 (122.07)
3
Unit weight of concrete Ύc 25.00 kN/m C2 NWL+ Gate close 17.24 14.38 0.52 690.40 (517.44)
Friction coefficiient μ 0.60 C3 NWL+Gate open 13.70 35.22 0.62 707.99 (491.87)
Unit weight of stone
3
masonry Ύsm 21.00 kN/m C4 HFL+ Gate close 9.19 2.82 0.88 337.40 (194.54) FORCE TABLE
3
Unit weight of soil Ύs 18.00 kN/m C5 HFL+Gate open 4.58 16.28 1.30 302.10 (90.57) SN. Components Forces Lever Arm Moment (kNm.)

3
Unit weight of saturated soil Ύsst 21.00 kN/m C6 No water+seismic(+x) 6.53 2.55 1.12 410.57 (185.25) Vert. (kN) Horiz. (kN) X (m) Y (m) Resisting Overturning
Friction angle Φ 30.00 deg C7 No water+ seismic(-x) 3.76 - 1.63 284.22 (58.90) P1 Base Slab upper 2,406.63 7.50 3.48 18,049.69 8,382.27
NWL+ Gate
Horizental Seismic coeff. αh 0.24 C8 close+seismic(+x) 19.04 1.69 0.48 753.57 (580.61) P2 Base Slab lower -
NWL+ Gate close+seismic(-
Cutoff-wall upper
C9 x) 15.43 - 0.61 627.22 (454.27) P3 176.25 14.60 2.63 2,573.43 464.17
NWL+Gate
vertical Seismic coeff. 0.12 C10 open+Sesimic(+x) 15.15 2.25 0.57 771.16 (555.04) P4 Cutoff-wall lower 301.25 0.55 1.2153 366.11
NWL+Gate open+Sesimic(-
Base Length 14.81 C11 x) 12.26 - 0.70 644.81 (428.69) P5 cuttoff below piers 481.41 7.62 2.35 3,668.32 1,131.30
base area of undersluice 74.05 P6 Piers 4,399.15 7.99 7.24 35,149.21 31,855.56
P7 Piers lower part - - -
P8 Top slab 176.25 12.41 11.84 2,187.26 2,086.80
P9 Breast wall 111.66 12.52 9.52 1,397.67 1,063.49
P10 Gate Hoisting Beams - - -
P11 Gate Hoisting Columns - - -
P12 Weight of Trashrack at intake - - -
P13 Weight of stoplog 140.00 13.00 9.50 1,820.00 1,330.00
B Self Wt. Calculation P14 wt of gate 150.00 12.00 9.55 1,800.00 1,432.50
1 Base Slab upper 11 Water Load P15 Water Load at NWL 145.89 13.01 1,898.03 66,645.57
2
1a Plan area 74.05 m NWL plan area A 4.59 m2 P16 Water Load at HFL 253.51 13.95 3,536.42
Thickness of slab 1.30 m height of water l 3.24 m P17 Water Load between piers at NWL 1,598.15 7.36 11,762.36
Volume 96.27 Volume of water V 14.87 m3 P18 Water Load between piers at HFL 2,542.51 7.36 18,712.85
Wt 2,406.63 Weight of water W 145.89 kN P19 Uplift NWL (2,084.86) 7.36 15,344.54
HFL P20 Uplift HFL (3,306.46) 7.36 24,335.55
2
1 Base Slab lower plan area 4.59 m P21 Horizontal Water Pressure at NWL 308.94 5.65 1,745.54
2
1a Plan area of - m height of water l 5.63 m P22 Horizontal Water Pressure at HFL 1,166.05 6.45 7,517.13
Horizontal Water Pressure gate open
3
Thickness of slab 1.00 m Volume of water V 25.84 m P23 condition at NWL 178.05 5.30 944.27
Horizontal Water Pressure gate open
Volume - Weight of water W 253.51 kN P24 condition at HFL 330.47 5.74 1,895.82
Water Load between pier
Wt - up to stilling basin P25 Passive force consideration (168.78) 2.56 432.08
Cutoff-wall upper Plan area 74.05 P26 Active force consideration 127.05 0.73 93.17
1b X-area of cuttoff wal 1.41 Height of water at NWL 2.20 P27 Seismic +x 2,002.22 5.77 11546.93282
Length of cuttoff wall 5.00 Volume of water 162.91 P28 Seismic -x (2,002.22) 5.77 11546.93282
Volume 7.05 Weight of water 1,598.15 P29 Water Load between piers at HFL 2,542.51 10.2 25,933.57
wt 176.25 Height of water at HFL 3.50
Cutoff-wall lower Volume of water 259.18 Combo no. Combination
1b X-area of cuttoff wal 2.41 Weight of water 2,542.51 C1 No water+ Gate open/CLOSE P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P25
Height of water at HFL at
C2 NWL+ Gate close P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P25
Length of cuttoff wall 5.00 gate open 3.50
Volume 12.05 259.18 C3 NWL+Gate open P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P15+P17+P19+P23
wt 301.25 2,542.51 C4 HFL+ Gate close P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P16+P20+P22
1c cuttoff below piers C5 HFL+Gate open P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P16+P29+P20+P24
Area 1.30 12 Uplift C6 No water+seismic(+x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P27
Water head towards gated
Length C7 No water+ seismic(-x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P28
14.81 NWL side hw1 3.24 m
Water head towards
wt stilling basin C8 NWL+ Gate close+seismic(+x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P25+P27
481.41 hw2 2.50
2
p1 31.78 kN/m /m C9 NWL+ Gate close+seismic(-x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P25+P28
2
4 Breast wall p2 24.53 kN/m /m C10 NWL+Gate open+Sesimic(+x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P15+P17+P19+P23+P27
Area 1.47 m3 L 14.81 m C11 NWL+Gate open+Sesimic(-x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P15+P17+P19+P23+P28
Length 3.00 m 7.09
3
Volume 4.47 m Total force due to uplift F f x avg. dist. Descriptions Force Moment Arm Moments

01_Undersluice_Stability_Analysis Sheet1: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Weight of top slab 111.66 kN = 2,084.86 kN Horizontal Vertical X Y Overturning Resisting


Trapezoid KN KN m m KNm KNm
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+
C1
5 Pier small side in plan a 5.00 m P12+P13+P14+P26+P25 (41.73) 8,342.59 48,205.39 67,077.65
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+
C2
P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P25
5a Piers longer side in plan b 5.00 m 267.21 6,403.63 131,941.03 68,975.69
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+
C3
P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P15+P17+P19+P23
Number of piers 2.00 No. HFL 6.61 136.32 8,001.77 131,139.76 80,738.05

Water head towards gated P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+


C4
Area 87.98 m
2
side hw1 5.63 m P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P16+P20+P22 1,124.32 5,289.64 80,058.07 70,614.08

Water head towards P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+


C5
Thickness 1.00 m stilling basin hw2 4.00 P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P16+P29+P20+P24 288.74 7,832.14 74,436.76 96,547.64
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+
2 C6
weight of piers 4,399.15 p1 55.23 kN/m /m P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P27 1,960.49 8,342.59 59,752.32 67,077.65
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+
2 C7
Piers lower part p2 39.24 kN/m /m P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P28 (2,043.95) 8,342.59 48,205.39 78,624.58
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+
C8
P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P25+P27
Number of piers No. L 14.00 m 2,269.43 6,403.63 143,487.97 68,975.69
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+
C9
P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P25+P28
Plan area m (1,735.01) 6,403.63 131,941.03 80,522.62
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+
C10 P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P15+P17+P19+P23
Height 6.20 Total force due to uplift F f x avg. dist. +P27 2,138.54 8,001.77 142,686.70 80,738.05
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+
C11 P12+P13+P14+P26+P25+P15+P17+P19+P23
weight of piers - kN = 3,306.46 kN +P28 (1,865.90) 8,001.77 131,139.76 92,284.98
6 Top slab Trapezoid
Area 1.41 small side in plan a 5.00 m
Length 5.00 longer side in plan b 5.00 m

Total volume 7.05 13 Horizontal Water Pressure


wt 176.25 kn Water head upto NWL h 3.24 m
Pressure p 31.78 kN/m2/m

6 Gate Hoisting Considering length in plan L 5.00 m


6a Beams Force per meter f 51.49
number Total Force F 257.45
Depth - m Impact factor I 1.20
Width - m Design Force Fd 308.94 kN
Length m

Volume - m3 13 Horizontal Water Pressure HFL


Weight of beams - kN Water head upto HFL h 5.63 m
Pressure p 55.23 kN/m2/m

6b Columns Considering length in plan L 5.00 m


Number - Force per meter f 155.47
Depth - m Total Force F 777.37
Width - m Impact factor I 1.50
Length - m Design Force Fd 1,166.05 kN
Volume - m3
Weight of columns - kN

Horizontal Water Pressure


13 gate open condition NWL
7 Trashrack Water head upto NWL h 2.20 m
Weight of Trashrack at
7a intake - kN Pressure p 21.58 kN/m2/m

7b Weight of stoplog 140.00 kN Considering length in plan L 5.00 m


Total Wt. of Trashrack 140.00 kN Force per meter f 23.74
Total Force F 118.70
8 wt of gate 350.00 KN Impact factor I 1.50
Design Force Fd 178.05 kN

01_Undersluice_Stability_Analysis Sheet1: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Horizontal Water Pressure


13 gate open condition HFL

Water head (5 yrs flood) h 3.50 m


Pressure p 34.34 kN/m2/m

Considering length in plan L 5.00 m

Force per meter f 60.09


Total Force F 300.43
Impact factor I 1.10
Design Force Fd 330.47 kN

Passive force
14 consideration
Height of soil hsoil 1.89
Coefficient for passive
pressure Kp 3.00
% Mobilization of Passive
pressure 30%
Passive pressure p 35.72 kN/m2/m
Passive force per meter fp 33.76 kN/m
Length L 5.00 m
TotalPassive Force Fp 168.78 kN

14 Active force consideration


Height of soil hsoil 2.20
Coefficient for passive
pressure Kp 0.50
% Mobilization of active
pressure 100%
Passive pressure p 23.10 kN/m2/m
Passive force per meter fp 25.41 kN/m
Length L 5.00 m
TotalPassive Force Fp 127.05 kN

01_Undersluice_Stability_Analysis Sheet1: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Undersluice_Section_H-H (Panel-U-01) Approved by : SG

Flow conditions Soil Properties


Depth of water flow in chamber,Hw 5.63 m Bearing Capacity of Soil 150.00 KN/m2
Sediment deposition depth 0.80 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom slab Angle made by back wall with vertical deg
Base width of chamber, W1 3.00 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Thickness of slab, T 1.30 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Projection beyond side wall at hillside, Wh 0.01 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.333
Projection beyond side wall at riverside, Wr 0.01 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure(Kp) 3.00
Length of slab inside side walls 5.00 m Coefficient of Dynamic active earth pressure(Kae) 0.605
Total length of base slab 5.02 m Coefficient of dynamic passive earth pressure(Kpe) 2.91
Side walls Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Top thickness of side wall, B1 1.00 m Unit weight of saturated soil 21.00 KN/m3
Bottom thickness of side wall, B2 1.00 m Unit weight of sediment 18.00 KN/m3
Height of side wall, H1 7.44 m Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Masonary Unit weight of stone masonary 24.00 KN/m3
Height of stone masonary, H3 0.00 m Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
Width of stone masonary, B5 0.00 m Friction coefficient 0.65
Ground conditions
Height of soil :hillside Hh 6.00 m
Surcharge load:hillside - KN/m2
Height of soil :riverside Hr 6.00 m
Surcharge load:riverside - KN/m2
% of ground water height above slab 15%
% of passive pressure to use 15%
Seismic coefficients
Horizontal 0.24
Vertical 0.12
Required FOS
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme
1. Sliding 999.00 4.68 3.36
2. Overturning 4.95 3.24 2.50
3. Bearing
a. At Toe 157.75 195.32 158.40
Bearing stress envelope b. At Heel 78.61 72.44 35.52
300.00

195.32 200.00 195.32


100.00
35.52 38.54
0.00
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 48.62 -x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 35.98
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside UDL 108.00 108.00 +y
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hactive Triangular 0.00 35.98 +x
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hpassive Triangular 0.00 48.62
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 108.00 108.00 +y
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 44.65 -x
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 33.04
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 8.83 -x
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside UDL 99.17 99.17 +y
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hactive Triangular 0.00 33.94 +x
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hpassive Triangular 0.00 45.86
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 8.83 +y
P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 99.17 99.17 +x

02_Undersluice_Section H-H Force and Stability: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season Trapezoidal 8.83 8.83 -y


P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside Triangular 0.00 55.23 +/-x
P13 Weight of water in chamber UDL 55.23 55.23 +y
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber UDL 6.55 6.55 +y
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber Triangular 0.00 2.18 +/-x
P16 Weight of stone masonry right Triangular 0.00 0.00
P17 Weight of stone masonry left Triangular 0.00 0.00

2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point 513.74 +y

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) Point +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) Point +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) Point
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) Point

4 Combination
C1 Dry season + chamber empty D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C3 Wet season + chamber empty D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17
C11 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S2+P16+P17
C12 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S4+P16+P17
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C15 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C16 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17
C19 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17
C20 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17

02_Undersluice_Section H-H Force and Stability: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside


Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -145.87 2.00 291.74
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -107.95 2.00 215.89
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside 1.08 0.01 0.01
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 107.95 2.00 215.89
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 145.87 2.00 291.74
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 1.08 5.02 5.42
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -133.95 2.00 267.89
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -99.12 2.00 198.25
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside -3.97 0.30 1.19
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside 0.99 0.01 0.00
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 101.82 2.00 203.64
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 137.59 2.00 275.19
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 3.97 0.30 1.19
P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 0.99 5.02 4.97
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season -44.32 2.51 111.25 cancel each other
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside cancel each other
P13 Weight of water in chamber 165.69 2.51 415.88
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber 19.66 2.51 49.34
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber cancel each other
P16 Weight of stone masonry right 0 2.51 0.00

Dead load
D Total dead weight of the structure 513.74 2.51 1289.50
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) 123.30 2.51 309.48
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) -61.65 2.78 171.64
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) -123.30 2.51 309.48
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) 61.65 2.78 171.64
Load combinitions
C1 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17 0.00 515.90 215.89 1586.66
C2 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 0.00 701.25 215.89 2051.88
C3 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17 0.00 471.41 316.08 1563.56
C4 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 0.00 656.75 316.08 2028.78
C5 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 85.38 701.25 525.37 2051.88
C6 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 701.25 291.74 2285.51
C7 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 0.00 762.90 215.89 2223.52
C8 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 37.92 639.60 463.38 1976.03
C9 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17 85.38 515.90 525.37 1586.66
C10 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17 0.00 515.90 291.74 1820.29
C11 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S2+P16+P17 37.92 454.25 463.38 1510.81
C12 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S4+P16+P17 37.92 577.55 291.74 1682.45
C13 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 0.00 718.40 316.08 2200.42
C14 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 38.47 595.10 559.26 1959.13
C15 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 91.17 656.75 625.56 2028.78
C16 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 656.75 387.62 2268.61
C17 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17 91.17 471.41 625.56 1563.56
C18 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17 0.00 471.41 387.62 1803.39
C19 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17 38.47 409.76 559.26 1493.91
C20 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17 38.47 533.06 387.62 1665.55

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn At toe At heel
C1 Dry season + chamber empty -0.15 999.00 7.35 84.71 120.83
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment -0.11 999.00 9.50 121.63 157.75
C3 Wet season + chamber empty -0.14 999.00 4.95 78.61 109.20
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment -0.10 999.00 6.42 115.53 146.12
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) 0.33 5.34 3.91 195.32 84.07
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.33 999.00 7.83 84.07 195.32
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) -0.12 999.00 10.30 129.89 174.05
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.15 10.96 4.26 149.49 105.33
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 0.45 3.93 3.02 158.40 47.14
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.45 999.00 6.24 47.14 158.40
C11 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) 0.20 7.79 3.26 112.57 68.41
C12 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) 0.10 9.90 5.77 129.09 101.01

02_Undersluice_Section H-H Force and Stability: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) -0.11 999.00 6.96 123.79 162.43
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.16 10.06 3.50 140.89 96.21
C15 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) 0.37 4.68 3.24 189.21 72.44
C16 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.35 999.00 5.85 75.46 186.19
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 0.52 3.36 2.50 152.29 35.52
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.49 999.00 4.65 38.54 149.27
C19 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) 0.23 6.92 2.67 103.97 59.28
C20 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) 0.11 9.01 4.30 120.48 91.89
*999=structure doesnot slide towards hillside
Bearing stress envelope
X Stress
At toe 2.51 195.32
max
At heel -2.51 195.32
At toe 2.51 38.54
min
At heel -2.51 35.52

02_Undersluice_Section H-H Force and Stability: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Intake Approved by : SG

Total Self-weight of structure 5,220.35 kN


A Input
3
Unit weight of water Ύw 9.81 kN/m
3
Unit weight of concrete Ύc 25.00 kN/m
Friction coefficiient μ 0.60
3
Unit weight of stone masonry Ύsm 21.00 kN/m FORCE TABLE
3
Unit weight of soil Ύs 18.00 kN/m SN.Components Forces Lever Arm Moment (kNm.)
3
Unit weight of saturated soil Ύsst 21.00 kN/m Vert. (kN) Horiz. (kN) X (m) Y (m) Resisting Overturning
Friction angle Φ 30.00 deg P1 Base Slab 1,204.20 2.88 3,464.48
Horizental Seismic coeff. αh 0.24 P2 divide wall part of Intake 958.27 7.46 7,148.66
Height of entire str. considered for
EQ. case h 12.00 m P3 Breast wall 463.50 3.27 1,515.65
vertical Seismic coeff. 0.24 P4 Top wall of intake 290.22 2.34 679.11
Base Length 8.00 P5 Walls Pier and side wall 2,088.56 2.34 4,887.24
P6 - -
P7 - -
P8 - -
P9 - -
P10 Beams 32.00 2.25 72.00
P11 Columns 33.60 2.25 75.60
P12 Weight of Trashrack at intake 4.70 -
P13 Weight of intake gate 90.00 1.75 157.50
B Self Wt. Calculation P14 Grater between piers 60.00 4.13 247.80
1 Base Slab P15 Water Load at NWL 925.81 7.46 6,906.53
2
1a Sectional area 6.02 m P16 Water Load at HFL 1,681.57 7.46 12,544.52
Length 8.00 m P17 Water Load between piers at NWL 178.24 3.24 577.50
Volume 48.17 P18 Water Load between piers at HFL 534.72 3.24 1,732.49
Wt 1,204.20 P19 Uplift NWL (2,413.10) 4.00 9,652.38
divide wall part of Intake P20 Uplift HFL (3,529.95) 4.00 14,119.81
1b X-area 4.18 P21 Horizontal Water Pressure at NWL 409.00 0.98 400.82
Length of cuttoff wall 9.17 P22 Horizontal Water Pressure at HFL 1,471.98 1.78 2,620.13
Horizontal Water Pressure gate open
Volume 38.33 P23 condition at NWL 355.25 4.51 1,603.36
Horizontal Water Pressure gate open
wt 958.27 P24 condition at HFL 1,036.97 5.10 5,288.53
1c Breast wall P26 Passive force consideration (237.11) 1.29 306.66
X area 3.71 P27 Active force consideration 11.30 0.77 8.74
Length 5.00 P28 Seismic +x 1,252.88 2.27 2838.640189
Vol 18.54 P29 Seismic -x (1,252.88) 2.27 2838.640189
wt 463.50 P30 Water Load between piers at HFL 356.48 3.44 1,226.29
Top wall of intake
X are 1.45 Combo
Combination
no.
Length 8.00 C1 No water+ Gate open P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P27
Vol 11.61 C2 NWL+ Gate close P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P27
wt 290.22 C3 NWL+Gate open P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P15+P17+P19+P23
C4 HFL+ Gate close P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P16+P20+P22
2a Walls Pier and side wall C5 HFL+Gate open P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P15+P30+P20+P24
X-area 18.36 m2 C6 No water+seismic(+x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P28
Length 4.55 m2 C7 No water+seismic(-x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P29
Volume 83.54 m 11 Water Load C8 NWL+ Gate close+seismic(+x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P27+P28
Wt 2,088.56 KN Plan area A 32.10 m2 C9 NWL+ Gate close+seismic(-x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P27+P29
2b Height l 2.94 m C10HFL+Gate CLOSE+Sesimic(+x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P16+P18+P20+P24+P28
X-area Volume of water V 94.37 m3 C11HFL+Gate CLOSE+Sesimic(-x) P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P16+P18+P20+P24+P29
Length Weight of water W 925.81 kN
Volume - Descriptions Force Moment Arm Moments
Vertical Horizontal X Y Overturning Resisting
Wt - KN C/S area for water for HWL A 32.10 m2

01_Intake Stability Intake_Stability: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

KN KN m m KNm KNm
3 Considering width in plan l 5.34 m
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11
3 C1
Left side wall m3 Volume of water V 171.41 m +P12+P13+P14+P26+P27 5,220.35 (225.80) - 18,563.44
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11
C2
+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P27
right side wall m3 Weight of water W 1,681.57 kN 3,733.06 183.20 10,053.20 25,469.97
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11
C3 +P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P15+P17+P19+P
Total vol m3 Water Load between pier 23 3,911.30 129.44 11,255.74 26,047.47
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11
C4
+P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P16+P20+P22
wt - KN Plan area 15.14 3,371.97 1,246.18 16,739.93 31,107.96
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11
C5 +P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P15+P30+P20+P
4 Height of water at NWL 1.20 24 2,972.69 811.16 19,408.33 26,696.26
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11
C6
Base slab m3 Volume of water 18.17 +P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P28 5,220.35 1,027.08 2,838.64 18,563.44
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11
C7
Vertical wall m Weight of water 178.24 3.99 +P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P29 5,220.35 (1,478.69) - 21,402.08
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11
C8 +P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P27+P
3
Volume m Height of water at HFL 3.60 28 3,733.06 1,436.08 12,891.84 25,469.97
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11
C9 +P12+P13+P14+P15+P19+P21+P26+P27+P
Weight of top slab - kN Volume of water 54.51 29 3,733.06 (1,069.68) 10,053.20 28,308.61
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11
C10+P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P16+P18+P20+P
Weight of water 534.72 24+P28 3,906.69 2,064.05 22,246.97 32,840.45
P1+P2+P3+P4+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11
Height of water at HFL at C11+P12+P13+P14+P26+P27+P16+P18+P20+P
5 gate open 2.40 24+P29 3,906.69 (441.72) 19,408.33 35,679.09
5a Piers 36.34
Number of piers No. 356.48 Eccentricity Factor of safety Bearing pressure Status
Case
Plan area m2 Slide Overturn At toe At heel
Height m 12 Uplift C1 No water+ Gate open 0.44 13.87 999.00 99.18 49.63
Water head towards gated
Deduction NWL side hw1 3.54 m C2 NWL+ Gate close (0.13) 12.23 2.53 48.03 58.39
Water head towards app.
trash passage culvert hw2 3.50 C3 NWL+Gate open 0.22 18.13 2.31 64.87 46.62
2
p1 34.73 kN/m /m C4 HFL+ Gate close (0.26) 1.62 1.86 38.65 57.47
Volume - m3 p2 34.34 kN/m2/m C5 HFL+Gate open 1.55 2.20 1.38 91.57 (6.83)
weight of piers - kN L 8.00 m C6 No water+seismic(+x) 0.99 3.05 6.54 129.53 19.28
3.96 C7 No water+seismic(-x) (0.10) 2.12 999.00 68.84 79.97
6 Beam above pier Total force due to uplift F f x avg. dist. C8 NWL+ Gate close+seismic(+x) 0.63 1.56 1.98 78.37 28.04
6a Vol of beam 1 and 4 = 2,413.10 kN C9 NWL+ Gate close+seismic(-x) (0.89) 2.09 2.82 17.68 88.73
6b Vol of beam 2 Trapezoid C10HFL+Gate CLOSE+Sesimic(+x) 1.29 1.14 1.48 109.49 1.88
6c Vol of beam 3 small side in plan a 8.70 m C11HFL+Gate CLOSE+Sesimic(-x) (0.16) 5.31 1.84 48.80 62.57
Total volume KN longer side in plan b 8.77 m
wt - HFL
Water head towards gated
side hw1 5.34 m
Water head towards app.
6 culvert hw2 5.00
6a Beams p1 52.39 kN/m2/m
number p2 49.05 kN/m2/m
Depth 0.40 m L 8.00 m
Width 0.40 m
Length 8.00 m Total force due to uplift F f x avg. dist.
Volume 1.28 m3 = 3,529.95 kN
Weight of beams 32.00 kN Trapezoid
small side in plan a 8.70 m
6b Columns longer side in plan b 8.70 m
Number 3.00

01_Intake Stability Intake_Stability: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Depth 0.40 m 13 Horizontal Water Pressure NWL


Water head upto NWL
Width 0.40 m (1257) h 2.94 m
Length 2.80 m Pressure p 28.84 kN/m2/m

Volume 1.34 m3 Considering length in plan L 8.77 m


Weight of columns 33.60 kN Force per meter f 42.40
Total Force F 371.82
7 Trashrack Impact factor I 1.10
7a Weight of Trashrack at intake kN Design Force Fd 409.00 kN
7b Weight of intake gate 100.00 kN

Total Wt. of Trashrack 100.00 kN 13 Horizontal Water Pressure HFL

Water head upto HFL (1257) h 5.34 m


8 Grater between piers 60.00 KN Pressure p 52.39 kN/m2/m

Considering length in plan L 8.77 m


Force per meter f 139.87
Total Force F 1,226.65
Impact factor I 1.20
Design Force Fd 1,471.98 kN

Horizontal Water Pressure


13 gate open condition NWL

Water head upto HFL (1257) h 2.74 m


Pressure p 26.88 kN/m2/m

Considering length in plan L 8.77 m


Force per meter f 36.82
Total Force F 322.95
Impact factor I 1.10
Design Force Fd 355.25 kN

Horizontal Water Pressure


13 gate open condition HFL
Water head upto HFL h 4.50 m
Pressure p 44.15 kN/m2/m

Considering length in plan L 8.70 m


Force per meter f 99.33
Total Force F 864.14
Impact factor I 1.20
Design Force Fd 1,036.97 kN

01_Intake Stability Intake_Stability: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

14 Passive force consideration


Height of soil hsoil 1.94
Coefficient for passive
pressure Kp 3.00
% Mobilization of Passive
pressure 25%
Passive pressure p 30.56 kN/m2/m
Passive force per meter fp 29.64 kN/m
Length L 8.00 m
TotalPassive Force Fp 237.11 kN

14 Active force consideration


Height of soil hsoil 1.16
Coefficient for passive
pressure Kp 0.50
% Mobilization of Passive
pressure 20%
Passive pressure p 2.44 kN/m2/m
Passive force per meter fp 1.41 kN/m
Length L 8.00 m
TotalPassive Force Fp 11.30 kN

01_Intake Stability Intake_Stability: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Intake Section D-D (Panel-IN-01) Approved by : SG

Base width of left chamber, W1 2.50 m Soil Properties


Base width of right chamber, W2 2.50 m Hill side angle made by soil with horizontal, i 0.00 deg
Sediment deposition depth 0.10 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Slab Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.33
Thickness of bottom slab, Tb 1.00 m Coefficient of at rest earth pressure 0.50
Thickness of top slab, Tt 0.30 m Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Projection beyond side wall at hillside, Wh 0.01 m Unit weight of sediment 18.00 KN/m3
Projection beyond side wall at riverside, Wr 0.01 m Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Length of base slab inside side walls 8.00 m Unit weight of stone masonary 21.00 KN/m3
Total length of base slab 8.02 m Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
Total length of top slab, W3 6.00 m Friction coefficient 0.60
Side wall Other data
Top thickness of side wall, B1 1.00 m Height of soil :hillside Hh 4.70 m
Bottom thickness of side wall, B2 1.00 m Surcharge load:hillside 0.00 KN/m3
Height of side wall 5.22 m Height of soil :riverside Hr 4.70 m
Intermediate wall Surcharge load:riverside 0.00 KN/m2
Top thickness of intermediate wall, B3 1.00 m % of ground water height above slab 10%
Bottom thickness of intermediate wall, B4 1.00 m Fraction of passive pressure to use 0.15
Height of wall, H1 5.22 m Seismic coefficients
Loads Horizontal 0.24
Design pressure head inside the culvert 3.60 m Vertical 0.12
Extra load on top slab 5.00 KN/m2 Result
Factor of safety for all cases Bearing
1. Sliding 2.65 Maximum 194.84
2. Overturning 2.89 Minimum -2.67

Bearing stress envelope


1 2
300.00
194.84 200.00 184.15
100.00
28.74 0.00 -2.67
-6 -4 -2 -100.00 0 2 4 6
Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 38.07 -x
P2 Dry: Vertical wt. of soil in projection-riverside UDL 84.60 84.60 +y
P3 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 0.00 28.20 +x
P4 Dry: Vertical wt of soil in projection-hillside UDL 84.60 84.60 +y
P5 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 36.00 -x
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 4.61 -x
P7 Wet: Vertical wt of soil+water in prjtn.-r.side UDL 79.99 79.99 +y
P8 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 1.28 +x
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 4.61 +y
P10 Wet: Vertical wt of soil in projection-h.side UDL 79.99 79.99 +x
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season Trapezoidal 4.61 4.61 -y
P12 Water pressure in chamber 01, at hillside UDL 0.00 35.32 +/-x,y
P13 Water pressure inchamber 02, at r.side UDL 0.00 35.32 +/-x,y
P14 Weight of water in chamber 01 UDL 88.29 88.29 +y
P15 Weight of water in chamber 02 UDL 88.29 88.29 +y
P16 Weight of sediment in chamber 01 UDL 0.82 0.82 +y
P17 Weight of sediment in chamber 02 UDL 0.82 0.82 +y
P18 H.force due to sediment chamber 01 Triangular 0.00 0.27 +/-x
P19 H.force due to sediment chamber 02 Triangular 0.00 0.27 +/-x
P20 Extra weight on top slab UDL 40.00 40.00
2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point 611.52 +y

02_Intake Section D-D (Panel-IN-01) Force and Stability: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force : (+x) Point +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift Point +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) Point
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing Point

4 Combination
C1 Dry season +all chamber empty D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P20
C2 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20
C3 Dry season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20
C4 Dry season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P13+P15+P17+P19+P20
C5 Wet season +all chamber empty D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20
C6 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20
C7 Wet season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20
C8 Wet season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P13+P15+P17+P19+P20
C9 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S1
C10 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-x) D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S3
C11 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+y) D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S2
C12 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-y) D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S4
C13 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic:uplift(+x) D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P20+S1+S2
C14 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic:uplift(-x) D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P20+S3+S2
C15 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S1
C16 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-x) D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S3
C17 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+y) D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S2
C18 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-y) D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S4
C19 Wet season+all chamber empty+seismic(+x) D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+S1+S2
C20 Wet season+all chamber empty+seismic(-x) D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+S3
C21 Wet season+all chamber empty+seismic(+y) D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+S2
C22 Wet season+all chamber empty+seismic(-y) D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+S4

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside


Force Moment Arm Moments Remarks
Descriptions Horizontal Vertical X Y Overturning Resisting
KN KN m m KNm KNm
Primary load
P1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -89.46 1.57 140.16
P2 Dry: Vertical wt. of soil in projection-riverside 0.85 0.01 0.00
P3 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 66.27 1.57 103.82
P4 Dry: Vertical wt of soil in projection-hillside 0.85 8.02 6.78
P5 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -84.59 1.57 132.52
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside -1.08 0.16 0.17
P7 Wet: Vertical wt of soil+water in prjtn.-r.side 0.80 0.01 0.00
P8 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 3.02 1.57 4.72
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 1.08 0.16 0.17
P10 Wet: Vertical wt of soil in projection-h.side 0.80 8.02 6.41
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season -36.98 4.01 148.28 cancel each other
P12 Water pressure in chamber 01, at hillside cancel each other
P13 Water pressure inchamber 02, at r.side
P14 Weight of water in chamber 01 220.73 5.76 1271.38
P15 Weight of water in chamber 02 220.73 2.26 498.84
P16 Weight of sediment in chamber 01 2.05 5.76 11.79
P17 Weight of sediment in chamber 02 2.05 2.26 4.63
P18 H.force due to sediment chamber 01 cancel each other
P19 H.force due to sediment chamber 02 cancel each other
P20 Extra weight on top slab 5.00 4.01 20.05

Dead load
D Total dead weight of the structure 611.52 4.01 2452.20
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force : (+x) 146.76 4.01 588.53
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift -73.38 2.21 162.28
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) -146.76 4.01 588.53
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing 73.38 2.21 162.28

02_Intake Section D-D (Panel-IN-01) Force and Stability: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Load combinitions
C1 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P20 0.00 618.21 103.82 2619.19
C2 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20 0.00 1063.76 103.82 4405.83
C3 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20 0.00 840.98 103.82 3902.36
C4 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P13+P15+P17+P19+P20 0.00 840.98 103.82 3122.66
C5 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20 0.00 581.14 153.17 2611.35
C6 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20 0.00 1026.69 153.17 4397.99
C7 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20 0.00 803.91 153.17 3894.52
C8 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P13+P15+P17+P19+P20 0.00 803.91 153.17 3114.82
C9 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S1 123.57 1063.76 692.35 4405.83
C10 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S3 0.00 1063.76 103.82 4994.35
C11 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S2 0.00 990.37 266.11 4405.83
C12 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S4 0.00 1137.14 103.82 4568.11
C13 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P20+S1+S2 123.57 544.83 854.63 2619.19
C14 D+P1+P2+P3+P4+P20+S3+S2 0.00 544.83 266.11 3207.72
C15 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S1 65.19 1026.69 741.70 4397.99
C16 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S3 0.00 1026.69 153.17 4986.51
C17 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S2 0.00 953.30 315.46 4397.99
C18 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+S4 0.00 1100.07 153.17 4560.27
C19 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+S1+S2 65.19 507.76 903.99 2611.35
C20 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+S3 0.00 581.14 153.17 3199.88
C21 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+S2 0.00 507.76 315.46 2611.35
C22 D+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+S4 0.00 654.52 153.17 2773.64

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn At toe At heel
C1 Dry season +all chamber empty -0.06 999.00 25.23 73.69 80.47
C2 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment -0.03 999.00 42.44 129.25 136.03
C3 Dry season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 -0.51 999.00 37.59 65.10 144.62
C4 Dry season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 0.42 999.00 30.08 137.84 71.88
C5 Wet season +all chamber empty -0.22 999.00 17.05 60.54 84.38
C6 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment -0.12 999.00 28.71 116.09 139.94
C7 Wet season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 -0.64 999.00 25.43 51.95 148.53
C8 Wet season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 0.33 999.00 20.34 124.68 75.79
C9 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) 0.52 5.17 6.36 184.15 81.13
C10 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-x) -0.59 999.00 48.10 74.35 190.93
C11 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+y) -0.17 999.00 16.56 107.79 139.19
C12 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-y) 0.08 999.00 44.00 150.71 132.87
C13 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic:uplift(+x) 0.77 2.65 3.06 107.13 28.74
C14 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic:uplift(-x) -1.39 999.00 12.05 -2.67 138.53
C15 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) 0.45 9.45 5.93 170.99 85.04
C16 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-x) -0.70 999.00 32.55 61.19 194.84
C17 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+y) -0.27 999.00 13.94 94.63 143.10
C18 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-y) 0.00 999.00 29.77 137.56 136.78
C19 Wet season+all chamber empty+seismic(+x) 0.65 4.67 2.89 93.98 32.64
C20 Wet season+all chamber empty+seismic(-x) -1.23 999.00 20.89 5.64 139.28
C21 Wet season+all chamber empty+seismic(+y) -0.51 999.00 8.28 39.08 87.54
C22 Wet season+all chamber empty+seismic(-y) 0.01 999.00 18.11 82.00 81.22

Bearing stress envelope


X Stress
At toe 4.01 184.15
max
At heel -4.01 194.84
At toe 4.01 -2.67
min
At heel -4.01 28.74

02_Intake Section D-D (Panel-IN-01) Force and Stability: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Gravel Trap (Section G-G) Approved by : SG

Flow conditions Soil Properties


Depth of water flow in chamber,Hw 5.27 m Bearing Capacity of Soil 150.00 KN/m2
Sediment deposition depth 0.80 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom slab Angle made by back wall with vertical deg
Base width of chamber, W1 5.00 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Thickness of slab, T 1.00 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Projection beyond side wall at hillside, Wh 0.01 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.333
Projection beyond side wall at riverside, Wr 0.01 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure(Kp) 3.00
Length of slab inside side walls 6.60 m Coefficient of Dynamic active earth pressure(Kae) 0.605
Total length of base slab 6.62 m Coefficient of dynamic passive earth pressure(Kpe) 2.91
Side walls Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Top thickness of side wall, B1 0.30 m Unit weight of saturated soil 21.00 KN/m3
Bottom thickness of side wall, B2 0.80 m Unit weight of sediment 18.00 KN/m3
Height of side wall, H1 6.77 m Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Masonary Unit weight of stone masonary 24.00 KN/m3
Height of stone masonary, H3 0.00 m Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
Width of stone masonary, B5 0.00 m Friction coefficient 0.65
Ground conditions
Height of soil :hillside Hh 6.65 m
Surcharge load:hillside - KN/m2
Height of soil :riverside Hr 6.65 m
Surcharge load:riverside - KN/m2
% of ground water height above slab 15%
% of passive pressure to use 15%
Seismic coefficients
Horizontal 0.24
Vertical 0.12
Required FOS
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme
1. Sliding 999.00 7.23 4.30
2. Overturning 3.02 3.22 1.96
3. Bearing
a. At Toe 81.22 117.94 73.94
Bearing stress envelope b. At Heel 109.49 117.94 73.94
150.00 a. At Toe 29.57 63.16 19.17
117.94 117.94
100.00 b. At Heel 53.52 60.80 16.80
50.00
16.80 19.17
0.00
-4 -2 0 2 4

Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 53.89 -x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 39.88
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside UDL 119.70 119.70 +y
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hactive Triangular 0.00 39.88 +x
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hpassive Triangular 0.00 53.89
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 119.70 119.70 +y
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 49.49 -x
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 36.62
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 9.79 -x
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside UDL 109.91 109.91 +y
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hactive Triangular 0.00 37.62 +x
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hpassive Triangular 0.00 50.83
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 9.79 +y

01_Gravel Trap (Section G-G) Force and Stability: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 109.91 109.91 +x


P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season Trapezoidal 9.79 9.79 -y
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside Triangular 0.00 51.70 +/-x
P13 Weight of water in chamber UDL 51.70 51.70 +y
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber UDL 6.55 6.55 +y
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber Triangular 0.00 2.18 +/-x
P16 Weight of stone masonry right Triangular 0.00 0.00
P17 Weight of stone masonry left Triangular 0.00 0.00

2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point 337.61 +y

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) Point +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) Point +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) Point
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) Point

4 Combination
C1 Dry season + chamber empty D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C3 Wet season + chamber empty D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17
C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside

Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -179.19 2.22 397.20
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -132.60 2.22 293.94
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside 1.20 0.01 0.01
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 132.60 2.22 293.94
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 179.19 2.22 397.20
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 1.20 6.62 7.92
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -164.54 2.22 364.73
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -121.76 2.22 269.91
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside -4.88 0.33 1.62
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside 1.10 0.01 0.01
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 125.08 2.22 277.26
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 169.02 2.22 374.66
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 4.88 0.33 1.62
P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 1.10 6.62 7.27
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season -64.78 3.31 214.42 cancel each other
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside cancel each other
P13 Weight of water in chamber 258.49 3.31 855.61
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber 32.76 3.31 108.44
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber cancel each other
P16 Weight of stone masonry right 0 3.31 0.00

Dead load
D Total dead weight of the structure 337.61 3.31 1117.48

01_Gravel Trap (Section G-G) Force and Stability: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) 81.03 3.31 268.20
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) -40.51 1.76 71.13
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) -81.03 3.31 268.20
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) 40.51 1.76 71.13
Load combinitions
C1 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17 0.00 340.00 293.94 1522.61
C2 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 0.00 631.26 293.94 2486.66
C3 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17 0.00 275.03 493.30 1491.11
C4 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 0.00 566.28 493.30 2455.16
C5 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 34.44 631.26 562.13 2486.66
C6 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 631.26 397.20 2651.59
C7 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 0.00 671.77 293.94 2557.79
C8 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 46.59 590.74 468.33 2383.39
C9 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17 34.44 340.00 562.13 1522.61
C10 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17 0.00 340.00 397.20 1687.54
C11 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 0.00 606.79 493.30 2526.29
C12 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 47.26 525.77 661.84 2360.34
C13 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 41.56 566.28 761.50 2455.16
C14 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 566.28 590.70 2628.53
C15 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17 41.56 275.03 761.50 1491.11
C16 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17 0.00 275.03 590.70 1664.48
C17 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17 47.26 234.51 661.84 1396.29
C18 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17 47.26 315.54 590.70 1467.42

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn At toe At heel
C1 Dry season + chamber empty -0.30 999.00 5.18 37.22 65.50
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment -0.16 999.00 8.46 81.22 109.49
C3 Wet season + chamber empty -0.32 999.00 3.02 29.57 53.52
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment -0.15 999.00 4.98 73.56 97.52
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) 0.26 11.91 4.42 117.94 72.78
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.26 999.00 6.68 72.78 117.94
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) -0.06 999.00 8.70 95.96 106.99
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.07 8.24 5.09 94.75 83.72
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 0.49 6.42 2.71 73.94 28.78
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.49 999.00 4.25 28.78 73.94
C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) -0.04 999.00 5.12 88.31 95.02
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.08 7.23 3.57 85.14 73.70
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) 0.32 8.86 3.22 110.28 60.80
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.29 999.00 4.45 63.16 107.92
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 0.66 4.30 1.96 66.29 16.80
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.59 999.00 2.82 19.17 63.92
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) 0.18 3.23 2.11 41.15 29.70
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) 0.53 4.34 2.48 70.63 24.70
*999=structure doesnot slide towards hillside
Bearing stress envelope
X Stress
At toe 3.31 117.94
max
At heel -3.31 117.94
At toe 3.31 19.17
min
At heel -3.31 16.80

01_Gravel Trap (Section G-G) Force and Stability: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Gravel Trap (Section G-G) Approved by : SG

Flow conditions Soil Properties


Depth of water flow in chamber,Hw 5.57 m Bearing Capacity of Soil 150.00 KN/m2
Sediment deposition depth 0.80 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom slab Angle made by back wall with vertical deg
Base width of chamber, W1 5.00 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Thickness of slab, T 1.00 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Projection beyond side wall at hillside, Wh 0.01 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.333
Projection beyond side wall at riverside, Wr 0.01 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure(Kp) 3.00
Length of slab inside side walls 6.60 m Coefficient of Dynamic active earth pressure(Kae) 0.605
Total length of base slab 6.62 m Coefficient of dynamic passive earth pressure(Kpe) 2.91
Side walls Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Top thickness of side wall, B1 0.30 m Unit weight of saturated soil 21.00 KN/m3
Bottom thickness of side wall, B2 0.80 m Unit weight of sediment 18.00 KN/m3
Height of side wall, H1 7.07 m Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Masonary Unit weight of stone masonary 24.00 KN/m3
Height of stone masonary, H3 0.00 m Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
Width of stone masonary, B5 0.00 m Friction coefficient 0.65
Ground conditions
Height of soil :hillside Hh 6.65 m
Surcharge load:hillside - KN/m2
Height of soil :riverside Hr 6.65 m
Surcharge load:riverside - KN/m2
% of ground water height above slab 15%
% of passive pressure to use 15%
Seismic coefficients
Horizontal 0.24
Vertical 0.12
Required FOS
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme
1. Sliding 999.00 7.53 4.23
2. Overturning 3.08 3.30 1.98
3. Bearing
a. At Toe 84.64 122.22 76.00
Bearing stress envelope b. At Heel 112.91 122.22 76.00
150.00 a. At Toe 30.77 65.72 19.50
122.22 122.22
100.00 b. At Heel 54.72 63.36 17.14
50.00
17.14 19.50
0.00
-4 -2 0 2 4

Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 53.89 -x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 39.88
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside UDL 119.70 119.70 +y
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hactive Triangular 0.00 39.88 +x
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hpassive Triangular 0.00 53.89
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 119.70 119.70 +y
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 49.49 -x
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 36.62
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 9.79 -x
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside UDL 109.91 109.91 +y
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hactive Triangular 0.00 37.62 +x
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hpassive Triangular 0.00 50.83

02_Gravel Trap (Section H-H) Force and Stability: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 9.79 +y


P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 109.91 109.91 +x
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season Trapezoidal 9.79 9.79 -y
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside Triangular 0.00 54.64 +/-x
P13 Weight of water in chamber UDL 54.64 54.64 +y
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber UDL 6.55 6.55 +y
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber Triangular 0.00 2.18 +/-x
P16 Weight of stone masonry right Triangular 0.00 0.00
P17 Weight of stone masonry left Triangular 0.00 0.00

2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point 345.53 +y

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) Point +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) Point +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) Point
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) Point

4 Combination
C1 Dry season + chamber empty D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C3 Wet season + chamber empty D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17
C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside

Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -179.19 2.22 397.20
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -132.60 2.22 293.94
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside 1.20 0.01 0.01
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 132.60 2.22 293.94
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 179.19 2.22 397.20
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 1.20 6.62 7.92
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -164.54 2.22 364.73
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -121.76 2.22 269.91
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside -4.88 0.33 1.62
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside 1.10 0.01 0.01
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 125.08 2.22 277.26
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 169.02 2.22 374.66
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 4.88 0.33 1.62
P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 1.10 6.62 7.27
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season -64.78 3.31 214.42 cancel each other
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside cancel each other
P13 Weight of water in chamber 273.21 3.31 904.32
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber 32.76 3.31 108.44
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber cancel each other
P16 Weight of stone masonry right 0 3.31 0.00

Dead load

02_Gravel Trap (Section H-H) Force and Stability: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

D Total dead weight of the structure 345.53 3.31 1143.70


Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) 82.93 3.31 274.49
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) -41.46 1.85 76.71
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) -82.93 3.31 274.49
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) 41.46 1.85 76.71
Load combinitions
C1 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17 0.00 347.92 293.94 1548.82
C2 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 0.00 653.89 293.94 2561.58
C3 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17 0.00 282.95 493.30 1517.33
C4 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 0.00 588.91 493.30 2530.08
C5 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 36.34 653.89 568.42 2561.58
C6 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 653.89 397.20 2732.80
C7 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 0.00 695.35 293.94 2638.29
C8 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 46.59 612.43 473.91 2458.31
C9 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17 36.34 347.92 568.42 1548.82
C10 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17 0.00 347.92 397.20 1720.05
C11 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 0.00 630.38 493.30 2606.79
C12 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 47.26 547.45 667.42 2435.26
C13 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 43.46 588.91 767.79 2530.08
C14 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 588.91 590.70 2709.75
C15 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17 43.46 282.95 767.79 1517.33
C16 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17 0.00 282.95 590.70 1696.99
C17 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17 47.26 241.48 667.42 1422.50
C18 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17 47.26 324.41 590.70 1499.22

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn At toe At heel
C1 Dry season + chamber empty -0.30 999.00 5.27 38.42 66.69
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment -0.16 999.00 8.71 84.64 112.91
C3 Wet season + chamber empty -0.31 999.00 3.08 30.77 54.72
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment -0.15 999.00 5.13 76.98 100.94
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) 0.26 11.70 4.51 122.22 75.33
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.26 999.00 6.88 75.33 122.22
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) -0.06 999.00 8.98 99.19 110.89
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.07 8.55 5.19 98.36 86.66
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 0.49 6.22 2.72 76.00 29.11
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.49 999.00 4.33 29.11 76.00
C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) -0.04 999.00 5.28 91.53 98.91
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.08 7.53 3.65 88.75 76.64
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) 0.32 8.81 3.30 114.56 63.36
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.29 999.00 4.59 65.72 112.20
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 0.66 4.23 1.98 68.35 17.14
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.60 999.00 2.87 19.50 65.98
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) 0.18 3.32 2.13 42.53 30.42
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) 0.51 4.46 2.54 71.63 26.38
*999=structure doesnot slide towards hillside
Bearing stress envelope
X Stress
At toe 3.31 122.22
max
At heel -3.31 122.22
At toe 3.31 19.50
min
At heel -3.31 17.14

02_Gravel Trap (Section H-H) Force and Stability: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Gravel Flushing Culvert Approved by : SG

Geometry of the structure Soil Properties


Width of hollow chamber, W 0.80 m Bearing Capacity of Soil 176.00 KN/m3
Depth of hollow chamber, H 0.80 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Thickness of bottom slab, Tbs 0.30 m Angle made by back wall with vertical - deg
Thickness of top slab, Tts 0.30 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Thickness of side wall, Tw 0.30 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Total width of the culvert, Hgu 1.40 m Coefficient of earth pressure at rest(Ko) 0.50 at rest
Total height of the culvert, Hgd 1.40 m Coefficient of active earth pressure(Ka) 0.33 static
Loads Coefficient of Passive earth pressure(Kp) 3.00 static
Design pressure head inside the culvert 5.15 m Coefficient of dynamic active earth pressure(Kae) 0.61 dynamic
Extra load on top slab 73.00 KN/m2 Coefficient of dynamic Passive earth pressure(Kpe) 2.91 dynamic
Live load inside chamber - KN/m2 Unit weight of dry soil 18.00 KN/m3
217.53 Unit weight of saturated soil 18.00 KN/m3
Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
177.73
175.01 Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
Friction coefficient 0.65
109.62
108.67 Other data
Height of soil :hillside 3.82 m
69.82 Surcharge load:hillside - KN/m2
Height of soil :riverside 3.82 m
Surcharge load:riverside - KN/m2
% ground water height above base slab 25% of Hsoil
Factor for passive pressure 12.0% of Kp/Kpe
Height of sediment inside the chamber 0.10 m
Consider 1m width of section Seismic coefficients
Horizontal 0.24
Result Vertical 0.12
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme
1. Sliding 16.32 22.14 5.02 Safe
2. Overturning 2.03 1.92 1.79 Safe
3. Bearing
Max 175.01 177.73 217.53 Safe
Min 108.67 109.62 69.82 Safe

Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Definition Type Start Value End value Direction
P1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside RPassive Trapezoidal 15.69 24.77 -x
P2 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside HActive Trapezoidal 14.51 22.91 +x
P3 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside RActive Trapezoidal 14.51 22.91 -x
P4 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside HPassive Trapezoidal 15.69 24.77 +x
P5 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside RPassive Trapezoidal 15.69 21.39 -x
P6 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside RActive Trapezoidal 14.51 19.79 -x
P7 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside Wriver Trapezoidal - 9.37 -x
P8 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside HActive Trapezoidal 14.51 19.79 +x
P9 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside HPassive Trapezoidal 15.69 21.39 +x
P10 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside Whill Trapezoidal - 9.37 +x
P11 Uplift on slab in wet season Trapezoidal 9.37 9.37 -y
P12 Water pressure inside culvert UDL 50.52 50.52 +/-x,y
P13 Weight of water UDL 7.85 7.85 +y
P14 Extra weight on top slab + overburden UDL 116.56 116.56 +y
P15 Weight of sediment UDL 1.44 1.44 +y
P16 Live load UDL - - +y
2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point (see centroid of structure) 31.68 +y

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force(+x) Point 7.60 +x
S2 Vertical seismic force:uplift(-y) Point 3.80 -y

03_Gravel Flushing Culvert Forces and Stability: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Gravel Flushing Culvert Approved by : SG

S3 Horizontal seismic force(-x) Point 7.60 -x


S4 Vertical seismic force: bearing(+y) Point 3.80 +y

p Combination
C1 Dry season+chamber full D+P1+P2+P12+P13+P14 Usual
C2 Dry season+chamber empty+sediment+live load D+P1+P2+P14+P15+P16 Usual
C3 Wet season+ chamber full D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14 Usual
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+sediment D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15 Usual
C5 Wet season+ chamber empty+sediment+live load D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P14+P15+P16 Usual
C6 Dry season+chamber full+seismic(+x) D+P1+P2+P12+P13+P14+S1 Unusual
C7 Dry season+chamber full+seismic: (-x) D+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+S3 Unusual
C8 Dry season+chamber full+seismic(+y) D+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+S2 Unusual
C9 Dry season+chamber full+seismic(-y) D+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+S4 Unusual
C10 Dry season+chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P1+P2+P14+S1 Unusual
C11 Dry season+chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P1+P2+P14+S3 Extreme
C12 Dry season+chamber empty+seismic:(+y) D+P1+P2+P14+S2 Extreme
C13 Dry season+chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P1+P2+P14+S4 Extreme
C14 Wet season+chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P14+S1 Extreme
C15 Wet season+chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P14+S3 Extreme
C16 Wet season+chamber empty+seismic:(+y) D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P14+S2 Extreme
C17 Wet season+chamber empty+seismic:(-y) D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P14+S4 Extreme
C18 Wet season+chamber full+seismic (+x) D+P6+P7+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+S1 Unusual
C19 Wet season+chamber full+seismic (-x) D+P6+P7+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+S3 Unusual
C20 Wet season+chamber full+seismic (+y) D+P6+P7+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+S2 Unusual
C21 Wet season+chamber full+seismic (-y) D+P6+P7+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+S4 Unusual

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside


Force Moment Arm Moments Remarks
Descriptions Horizontal Vertical X Y Overturning Resisting
KN KN m m KNm KNm
Primary load
P1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside (77.27) 1.77 136.55
P2 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 71.48 1.77 126.31
P3 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside (71.48) 1.77 126.31
P4 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 77.27 1.77 136.55
P5 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside (70.82) 1.81 128.34
P6 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside (65.51) 1.81 118.72
P7 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside (17.89) 0.32 5.70
P8 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 65.51 1.81 118.72
P9 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 70.82 1.81 128.34
P10 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 17.89 0.32 5.70
P11 Uplift on slab in wet season 13.12 0.70 9.18
P12 Water pressure inside culvert cancel out
P13 Weight of water 6.28 0.70 4.39
P14 Extra weight on top slab + overburden 163.18 0.70 114.23
P15 Weight of sediment 1.15 0.70 0.81
P16 Live load - 0.70 -
Dead load
D Total dead weight of the structure 31.68 0.70 22.18
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force(+x) 7.60 0.70 5.32
S2 Vertical seismic force:uplift(-y) (3.80) 0.70 2.66
S3 Horizontal seismic force(-x) (7.60) 0.70 5.32
S4 Vertical seismic force: bearing(+y) 3.80 0.70 2.66

03_Gravel Flushing Culvert Forces and Stability: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Gravel Flushing Culvert Approved by : SG

Load combinitions
C1 D+P1+P2+P12+P13+P14 - 201.14 126.31 277.35
C2 D+P1+P2+P14+P15+P16 - 196.02 126.31 273.76
C3 D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14 7.81 201.14 133.59 274.84
C4 D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15 7.81 202.29 133.59 275.64
C5 D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P14+P15+P16 7.81 196.02 133.59 271.25
C6 D+P1+P2+P12+P13+P14+S1 1.81 201.14 131.63 277.35
C7 D+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+S3 - 201.14 136.55 272.43
C8 D+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+S2 5.79 197.34 139.21 267.11
C9 D+P3+P4+P12+P13+P14+S4 5.79 204.94 136.55 269.77
C10 D+P1+P2+P14+S1 1.81 194.86 131.63 272.95
C11 D+P1+P2+P14+S3 - 194.86 126.31 278.27
C12 D+P1+P2+P14+S2 - 191.06 128.97 272.95
C13 D+P1+P2+P14+S4 - 198.67 126.31 275.61
C14 D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P14+S1 15.41 194.86 138.92 270.44
C15 D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P14+S3 0.20 194.86 133.59 275.76
C16 D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P14+S2 7.81 191.06 136.26 270.44
C17 D+P5+P7+P8+P10+P11+P14+S4 7.81 198.67 133.59 273.10
C18 D+P6+P7+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+S1 26.03 201.14 148.54 265.21
C19 D+P6+P7+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+S3 10.82 201.14 143.22 270.54
C20 D+P6+P7+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+S2 18.43 197.34 145.88 265.21
C21 D+P6+P7+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+S4 18.43 204.94 143.22 267.87

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity Scenario
Slide Overturn At toe At heel
C1 Dry season+chamber full (0.05) 999.00 2.20 112.33 175.01 Usual
C2 Dry season+chamber empty+sediment+live load (0.05) 999.00 2.17 108.67 171.35 Usual
C3 Wet season+ chamber full (0.00) 16.75 2.06 142.32 145.02 Usual
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+sediment (0.00) 16.85 2.06 143.15 145.85 Usual
C5 Wet season+ chamber empty+sediment+live load (0.00) 16.32 2.03 138.66 141.36 Usual
C6 Dry season+chamber full+seismic(+x) (0.02) 72.23 2.11 128.63 158.72 Unusual
C7 Dry season+chamber full+seismic: (-x) 0.02 999.00 2.00 158.72 128.63 Unusual
C8 Dry season+chamber full+seismic(+y) 0.05 22.14 1.92 172.30 109.62 Unusual
C9 Dry season+chamber full+seismic(-y) 0.05 22.99 1.98 177.73 115.05 Unusual
C10 Dry season+chamber empty+seismic:(+x) (0.03) 69.98 2.07 124.14 154.24 Unusual
C11 Dry season+chamber empty+seismic:(-x) (0.08) 999.00 2.20 91.56 186.82 Extreme
C12 Dry season+chamber empty+seismic:(+y) (0.05) 999.00 2.12 105.13 167.81 Extreme
C13 Dry season+chamber empty+seismic:(-x) (0.05) 999.00 2.18 110.56 173.24 Extreme
C14 Wet season+chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 0.03 8.22 1.95 154.13 124.25 Extreme
C15 Wet season+chamber empty+seismic:(-x) (0.03) 624.72 2.06 121.55 156.83 Extreme
C16 Wet season+chamber empty+seismic:(+y) (0.00) 15.91 1.98 135.12 137.82 Extreme
C17 Wet season+chamber empty+seismic:(-y) (0.00) 16.54 2.04 140.55 143.25 Extreme
C18 Wet season+chamber full+seismic (+x) 0.12 5.02 1.79 217.53 69.82 Unusual
C19 Wet season+chamber full+seismic (-x) 0.07 12.08 1.89 184.94 102.40 Unusual
C20 Wet season+chamber full+seismic (+y) 0.10 6.96 1.82 198.52 83.40 Unusual
C21 Wet season+chamber full+seismic (-y) 0.09 7.23 1.87 203.95 88.83 Unusual

*999=structure doesn't move towards hill side


Bearing stress envelope 300.00
X Stress 217.53 200.00 186.82
At toe -0.7 217.53
max 91.56 100.00
At heel 0.7 186.82 69.82
At toe -0.7 91.56 0.00
min
At heel 0.7 69.82 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1

03_Gravel Flushing Culvert Forces and Stability: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Date : 11/2/2020
Type: Stability Analysis Developed by : BP
Title Approach Canal and Spillway (Section Q-Q) (Panel-AP-01) Updated by : DK

Flow and sediment Soil Properties


Base width of each chamber, W1 2.90 m Angle made by soil with horizontal at hillside 0.00 deg
Depth of water flow in each chamber, Hw 2.53 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Sediment deposition depth 0.30 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.33
Bottom slab Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Thickness of slab, T 0.30 m Unit weight of sediment 18.00 KN/m3
Projection beyond side wall at hillside, W2 0.01 m Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Projection beyond side wall at riverside, W3 0.01 m Unit weight of stone masonary 21.00 KN/m3
Length of slab inside side walls 7.00 m Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
Total length of base slab 7.02 m Friction coefficient 0.55
Side wall Other data
Top thickness of side wall, B1 0.30 m Height of soil :hillside, Hh 2.93 m
Bottom thickness of side wall, B2 0.40 m Surcharge load:hillside 0.00 KN/m2
Height of side wall, H1 3.03 m Height of soil :riverside, Hr 2.10 m
Intermediate wall Surcharge load:riverside 0.00 KN/m2
Top thickness of intermediate wall, B3 0.30 m Height of water in riverside 0.75 m
Bottom thickness of intermediate wall, B4 0.40 m Height of water in hillside 0.75 m
Height of intermediate wall, H2 3.03 m Percentage of passive pressure to use 20%
Masonary Seismic coefficients
Height of stone masonary, H3 0.00 m Horizontal 0.24
Width of stone masonary, B5 0.00 m Vertical 0.12
Result
Factor of safety Bearing
Normal operation
1. Sliding 36.29 Maximum 45.06
2. Overturning 2.14 Minimum 3.72
Seismic case Bearing
1. Sliding 2.17 Maximum 53.84
2. Overturning 3.02 Minimum 3.33

Bearing stress envelope


60.00
53.84
50.11 50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
7.06
3.33
0.00
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

Result
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme
1. Sliding 36.72 4.64 2.17
2. Overturning 16.04 2.77 2.14
3. Bearing
a. At Toe 15.84 9.44 7.06
b. At Heel 41.32 50.11 41.71

Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 22.69 -x
P2 Dry: Vertical wt of soil in projection-riverside UDL 37.80 37.80 +y
P3 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 12.16 -x
P4 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 1.47 -x

04_Approach Canal and Spillway (section Q-Q) Force and Stability: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P5 Wet: Vertical wt of soil+water in projection-r.side UDL 30.86 30.86 +y


P6 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 0.00 17.57 +x
P7 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 52.74 52.74 +y
P8 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 8.00 +x
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 7.36 +x
P10 Wet: Vertical wt of soil in projection-h.side UDL 31.35 31.35 +y
P11 Uplift on slab in wet season Trapezoidal 7.36 7.36 -y
P12 Water pressure inside chamber 01 Triangular 0.00 24.82 +/-x
P13 Water pressure inside chamber 02 Triangular 0.00 24.82 +/-x
P14 Weight of water in chamber 01 UDL 24.82 24.82 +y
P15 Weight of water in chamber 02 UDL 24.82 24.82 +y
P16 Weight of sediment in chamber 01 UDL 2.46 2.46 +y
P17 Weight of sediment in chamber 02 UDL 2.46 2.46 +y
P18 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber 01 Triangular 0.00 0.82 +/-x
P19 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber 02 Triangular 0.00 0.82 +/-x
P20 Weight of stone masonry in chamber 01 Triangular 0.00 0.00 +y
P21 Weight of stone masonry in chamber 02 Triangular 0.00 0.00 +y

2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point 127.04 +y

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force:(+x) Point +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force:uplift Point +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force:(-x) Point +/-x
S4 Vertical seismic force:bearing Point +/-y

4 Combination Status
C1 Dry season+all chamber empty+with sediment D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21 Applicable
C2 Dry season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20+P21 Applicable
C3 Dry season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P13+P15+P17+P19+P21 Applicable
C4 Dry season+chamber 01 & 02 full +sediment in 01 &02 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21 Applicable
C5 Wet season+all chamber empty D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+P21 Applicable
C6 Wet season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20+P21 Applicable
C7 Wet season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P13+P15+P17+P19+P20+P21 Applicable
C8 Wet season+chamber 01 & 02 full +sediment in 01 &02 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21 Applicable
C9 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(-x) D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S3 Applicable
C10 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(+x) D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S1 Applicable
C11 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(-x) D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S3 Applicable
C12 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(+x) D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S1 Applicable
C13 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+bearing D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S4 Applicable
C14 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+uplift D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S2 Applicable
C15 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+bearing D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S4 Applicable
C16 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+uplift D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S2 Applicable
C17 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic+x) D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S1 Applicable
C18 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic(-x) D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S3 Applicable
C19 Dry season+all chamber empty+uplift D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S2 Applicable
C20 Dry season+all chamber empty+bearing D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S4 Applicable

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside


Force Moment Arm Moments Remarks
Descriptions Horizontal Vertical X Y Overturning Resisting
KN KN m m KNm KNm
Primary load
P1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -23.83 0.70 16.68
P2 Dry: Vertical wt of soil in projection-riverside 0.38 0.01 0.00
P3 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -12.77 0.70 8.94
P4 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside -0.55 0.25 0.14
P5 Wet: Vertical wt of soil+water in projection-r.side 0.31 0.01 0.00
P6 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 25.74 0.98 25.14

04_Approach Canal and Spillway (section Q-Q) Force and Stability: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P7 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 0.53 7.01 3.69


P8 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 11.71 0.98 11.44
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 2.76 7.67 21.15
P10 Wet: Vertical wt of soil in projection-h.side 0.31 7.01 2.20
P11 Uplift on slab in wet season -51.65 3.51 181.29
P12 Water pressure inside chamber 01 cancel each other
P13 Water pressure inside chamber 02 cancel each other
P14 Weight of water in chamber 01 71.98 5.16 371.40
P15 Weight of water in chamber 02 71.98 1.86 133.88
P16 Weight of sediment in chamber 01 0.74 5.16 3.80
P17 Weight of sediment in chamber 02 0.74 1.86 1.37
P18 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber 01 cancel each other
P19 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber 02 cancel each other
P20 Weight of stone masonry in chamber 01 0.00 5.16 0.00
P21 Weight of stone masonry in chamber 02 0.00 1.86 0.00

Dead load
D Total dead weight of the structure 127.04 3.51 445.92
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force:(+x) 30.49 3.51 107.02
S2 Vertical seismic force:uplift -15.25 0.93 14.13
S3 Horizontal seismic force:(-x) -30.49 3.51 107.02
S4 Vertical seismic force:bearing 15.25 0.93 14.13

Load combinitions
C1 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21 1.92 127.95 28.84 462.60
C2 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20+P21 1.92 200.66 28.84 837.80
C3 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P13+P15+P17+P19+P21 1.92 200.66 28.84 597.85
C4 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21 1.92 273.38 28.84 973.05
C5 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+P21 1.15 76.02 213.88 457.20
C6 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20+P21 1.15 148.73 213.88 832.40
C7 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P13+P15+P17+P19+P20+P21 1.15 148.73 213.88 592.44
C8 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21 1.15 221.44 213.88 967.64
C9 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S3 0.00 273.38 28.84 1080.07
C10 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S1 32.41 273.38 135.86 973.05
C11 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S3 0.00 221.44 213.88 1074.67
C12 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S1 31.64 221.44 320.90 967.64
C13 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S4 1.92 288.62 28.84 987.18
C14 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S2 1.92 258.13 42.97 973.05
C15 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S4 1.15 236.69 213.88 981.78
C16 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S2 1.15 206.20 228.02 967.64
C17 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S1 32.41 127.95 135.86 462.60
C18 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S3 0.00 127.95 28.84 569.63
C19 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S2 1.92 112.70 42.97 462.60
C20 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S4 1.92 143.19 28.84 476.74

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity Status
Slide Overturn At toe (river side) At heel (hill side) Cases
C1 Dry season+all chamber empty+with sediment 0.12 36.72 16.04 20.09 16.36 Applicable Usual
C2 Dry season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 -0.52 57.58 29.05 15.84 41.32 Applicable Usual
C3 Dry season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 0.67 57.58 20.73 45.06 12.11 Applicable Usual
C4 Dry season+chamber 01 & 02 full +sediment in 01 &02 0.06 78.45 33.74 40.81 37.08 Applicable Usual
C5 Wet season+all chamber empty 0.31 36.29 2.14 13.69 7.97 Applicable Extreme
C6 Wet season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 -0.65 71.01 3.89 9.44 32.93 Applicable Unusual
C7 Wet season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 0.96 71.01 2.77 38.66 3.72 Applicable Unusual
C8 Wet season+chamber 01 & 02 full +sediment in 01 &02 0.11 105.73 4.52 34.41 28.68 Applicable Unusual
C9 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(-x) -0.34 999.00 37.46 27.78 50.11 Applicable Unusual
C10 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(+x) 0.45 4.64 7.16 53.84 24.05 Applicable Unusual
C11 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(-x) -0.38 999.00 5.02 21.38 41.71 Applicable Extreme
C12 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(+x) 0.59 3.85 3.02 47.44 15.65 Applicable Extreme
C13 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+bearing 0.19 82.83 34.23 47.78 34.45 Applicable Unusual
C14 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+uplift -0.09 74.08 22.65 33.84 39.70 Applicable Unusual
C15 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+bearing 0.27 113.00 4.59 41.37 26.06 Applicable Extreme
C16 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+uplift -0.08 98.45 4.24 27.44 31.31 Applicable Extreme

04_Approach Canal and Spillway (section Q-Q) Force and Stability: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

C17 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic+x) 0.96 2.17 3.41 33.12 3.33 Applicable Extreme
C18 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic(-x) -0.72 999.00 19.75 7.06 29.39 Applicable Extreme
C19 Dry season+all chamber empty+uplift -0.21 32.34 10.77 13.13 18.98 Applicable Extreme
C20 Dry season+all chamber empty+bearing 0.38 41.09 16.53 27.06 13.74 Applicable Extreme

*999=structure do not move towards hillside

Bearing stress envelope


X Stress Bearing stress envelope
At toe 3.51 53.84 60.00
max
At heel -3.51 50.11
53.84
At toe 3.51 7.06 50.11 50.00
min
At heel -3.51 3.33
40.00

30.00

20.00

10.00
7.06
3.33
0.00
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

04_Approach Canal and Spillway (section Q-Q) Force and Stability: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Settling Basin Inlet Transistion Zone Section D-D (Panel SB-01) Approved by : SG

Flow and sediment Soil Properties


Base width of each chamber, W1 3.65 m Angle made by soil with horizontal at hillside 0.00 deg
Depth of water flow in each chamber, Hw 3.09 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Sediment deposition depth 0.30 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.33
Bottom slab Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Thickness of slab, T 0.60 m Unit weight of sediment 18.00 KN/m3
Projection beyond side wall at hillside, W2 0.01 m Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Projection beyond side wall at riverside, W3 0.01 m Unit weight of stone masonary 21.00 KN/m3
Length of slab inside side walls 8.80 m Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
Total length of base slab 8.82 m Friction coefficient 0.55
Side wall Other data
Top thickness of side wall, B1 0.30 m Height of soil :hillside, Hh 3.20 m
Bottom thickness of side wall, B2 0.50 m Surcharge load:hillside 0.00 KN/m2
Height of side wall, H1 3.59 m Height of soil :riverside, Hr 3.20 m
Intermediate wall Surcharge load:riverside 0.00 KN/m2
Top thickness of intermediate wall, B3 0.30 m Height of water in riverside 1 m
Bottom thickness of intermediate wall, B4 0.50 m Height of water in hillside 1 m
Height of intermediate wall, H2 2.09 m Percentage of passive pressure to use 20%
Masonary Seismic coefficients
Height of stone masonary, H3 0.00 m Horizontal 0.24
Width of stone masonary, B5 0.00 m Vertical 0.12
Result
Factor of safety Bearing
Normal operation
1. Sliding 999.00 Maximum 56.35
2. Overturning 2.29 Minimum 8.40
Seismic case Bearing
1. Sliding 4.38 Maximum 68.81
2. Overturning 2.98 Minimum 5.75

Bearing stress envelope


80.00
68.81 70.00
66.32
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
8.24 10.00
5.75
0.00
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6

Result
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme
1. Sliding 999.00 8.87 4.38
2. Overturning 26.78 2.89 2.29
3. Bearing
a. At Toe 18.21 10.82 5.75
b. At Heel 56.35 68.81 56.51

Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 34.58 -x
P2 Dry: Vertical wt of soil in projection-riverside UDL 57.60 57.60 +y
P3 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 21.62 -x
P4 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 1.96 -x

01_SB_Inlet_Transistion_Section_D-D (Panel-SB-01) Force and Stability: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P5 Wet: Vertical wt of soil+water in projection-r.side UDL 45.62 45.62 +y


P6 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 0.00 19.19 +x
P7 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 57.60 57.60 +y
P8 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 8.73 +x
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 9.81 +x
P10 Wet: Vertical wt of soil in projection-h.side UDL 36.02 36.02 +y
P11 Uplift on slab in wet season Trapezoidal 9.81 9.81 -y
P12 Water pressure inside chamber 01 Triangular 0.00 30.31 +/-x
P13 Water pressure inside chamber 02 Triangular 0.00 30.31 +/-x
P14 Weight of water in chamber 01 UDL 30.31 30.31 +y
P15 Weight of water in chamber 02 UDL 30.31 30.31 +y
P16 Weight of sediment in chamber 01 UDL 2.46 2.46 +y
P17 Weight of sediment in chamber 02 UDL 2.46 2.46 +y
P18 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber 01 Triangular 0.00 0.82 +/-x
P19 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber 02 Triangular 0.00 0.82 +/-x
P20 Weight of stone masonry in chamber 01 Triangular 0.00 0.00 +y
P21 Weight of stone masonry in chamber 02 Triangular 0.00 0.00 +y

2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point 216.29 +y

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force:(+x) Point +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force:uplift Point +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force:(-x) Point +/-x
S4 Vertical seismic force:bearing Point +/-y

4 Combination Status
C1 Dry season+all chamber empty+with sediment D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21 Applicable
C2 Dry season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20+P21 Applicable
C3 Dry season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P13+P15+P17+P19+P21 Applicable
C4 Dry season+chamber 01 & 02 full +sediment in 01 &02 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21 Applicable
C5 Wet season+all chamber empty D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+P21 Applicable
C6 Wet season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20+P21 Applicable
C7 Wet season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P13+P15+P17+P19+P20+P21 Applicable
C8 Wet season+chamber 01 & 02 full +sediment in 01 &02 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21 Applicable
C9 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(-x) D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S3 Applicable
C10 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(+x) D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S1 Applicable
C11 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(-x) D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S3 Applicable
C12 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(+x) D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S1 Applicable
C13 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+bearing D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S4 Applicable
C14 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+uplift D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S2 Applicable
C15 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+bearing D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S4 Applicable
C16 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+uplift D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S2 Applicable
C17 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic+x) D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S1 Applicable
C18 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic(-x) D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S3 Applicable
C19 Dry season+all chamber empty+uplift D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S2 Applicable
C20 Dry season+all chamber empty+bearing D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S4 Applicable

01_SB_Inlet_Transistion_Section_D-D (Panel-SB-01) Force and Stability: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside


Force Moment Arm Moments Remarks
Descriptions Horizontal Vertical X Y Overturning Resisting
KN KN m m KNm KNm
Primary load
P1 Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -55.32 1.07 59.01
P2 Dry: Vertical wt of soil in projection-riverside 0.58 0.01 0.00
P3 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -34.59 1.07 36.90
P4 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside -0.98 0.33 0.33
P5 Wet: Vertical wt of soil+water in projection-r.side 0.46 0.01 0.00
P6 Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 30.71 1.07 32.75
P7 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 0.58 8.81 5.07
P8 Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 13.97 1.07 14.90
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 4.91 7.67 37.61
P10 Wet: Vertical wt of soil in projection-h.side 0.36 8.81 3.17
P11 Uplift on slab in wet season -86.52 4.41 381.57
P12 Water pressure inside chamber 01 cancel each other
P13 Water pressure inside chamber 02 cancel each other
P14 Weight of water in chamber 01 110.64 6.49 717.51
P15 Weight of water in chamber 02 110.64 2.34 258.35
P16 Weight of sediment in chamber 01 0.74 6.49 4.78
P17 Weight of sediment in chamber 02 0.74 2.34 1.72
P18 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber 01 cancel each other
P19 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber 02 cancel each other
P20 Weight of stone masonry in chamber 01 0.00 6.49 0.00
P21 Weight of stone masonry in chamber 02 0.00 2.34 0.00

Dead load
D Total dead weight of the structure 216.29 4.41 953.83
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force:(+x) 51.91 4.41 228.92
S2 Vertical seismic force:uplift -25.95 0.79 20.50
S3 Horizontal seismic force:(-x) -51.91 4.41 228.92
S4 Vertical seismic force:bearing 25.95 0.79 20.50

Load combinitions
C1 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21 0.00 217.44 37.82 1012.84
C2 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20+P21 0.00 328.82 37.82 1735.14
C3 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P13+P15+P17+P19+P21 0.00 328.82 37.82 1272.91
C4 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21 0.00 440.20 37.82 1995.21
C5 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P20+P21 0.00 130.58 434.08 994.23
C6 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P14+P16+P18+P20+P21 0.00 241.96 434.08 1716.53
C7 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P13+P15+P17+P19+P20+P21 0.00 241.96 434.08 1254.30
C8 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21 0.00 353.34 434.08 1976.60
C9 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S3 0.00 440.20 37.82 2224.13
C10 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S1 27.29 440.20 266.74 1995.21
C11 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S3 0.00 353.34 434.08 2205.51
C12 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S1 35.21 353.34 663.00 1976.60
C13 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S4 0.00 466.15 37.82 2015.71
C14 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S2 0.00 414.24 58.32 1995.21
C15 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S4 0.00 379.29 434.08 1997.09
C16 D+P3+P4+P5+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+S2 0.00 327.38 454.58 1976.60
C17 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S1 27.29 217.44 266.74 1012.84
C18 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S3 0.00 217.44 37.82 1241.76
C19 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S2 0.00 191.49 58.32 1012.84
C20 D+P1+P2+P6+P7+P20+P21+S4 0.00 243.39 37.82 1033.34

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity Status
Slide Overturn At toe (river side) At heel (hill side) Cases
C1 Dry season+all chamber empty+with sediment -0.07 999.00 26.78 23.41 25.90 Applicable Usual
C2 Dry season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 -0.75 999.00 45.87 18.21 56.35 Applicable Usual
C3 Dry season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 0.65 999.00 33.65 53.86 20.70 Applicable Usual
C4 Dry season+chamber 01 & 02 full +sediment in 01 &02 -0.04 999.00 52.75 48.67 51.15 Applicable Usual
C5 Wet season+all chamber empty 0.12 999.00 2.29 16.02 13.59 Applicable Extreme

01_SB_Inlet_Transistion_Section_D-D (Panel-SB-01) Force and Stability: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

C6 Wet season+chamber 01 full +other empty+sediment in 01 -0.89 999.00 3.95 10.82 44.05 Applicable Unusual
C7 Wet season+chamber 02 full +other empty+sediment in 02 1.02 999.00 2.89 46.47 8.40 Applicable Unusual
C8 Wet season+chamber 01 & 02 full +sediment in 01 &02 0.04 999.00 4.55 41.27 38.85 Applicable Unusual
C9 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(-x) -0.56 999.00 58.80 31.01 68.81 Applicable Unusual
C10 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(+x) 0.48 8.87 7.48 66.32 33.50 Applicable Unusual
C11 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(-x) -0.60 999.00 5.08 23.62 56.51 Applicable Extreme
C12 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+Earthquake(+x) 0.69 5.52 2.98 58.93 21.19 Applicable Extreme
C13 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+bearing 0.17 999.00 53.29 58.86 46.85 Applicable Unusual
C14 Dry season+all chamber full+with sediment+uplift -0.27 999.00 34.21 38.48 55.46 Applicable Unusual
C15 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+bearing 0.29 999.00 4.60 51.46 34.55 Applicable Extreme
C16 Wet season+all chamber full+with sediment+uplift -0.24 999.00 4.35 31.08 43.15 Applicable Extreme
C17 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic+x) 0.98 4.38 3.80 41.07 8.24 Applicable Extreme
C18 Dry season+all chamber empty+seismic(-x) -1.13 999.00 32.83 5.75 43.55 Applicable Extreme
C19 Dry season+all chamber empty+uplift -0.57 999.00 17.37 13.22 30.20 Applicable Extreme
C20 Dry season+all chamber empty+bearing 0.32 999.00 27.32 33.60 21.59 Applicable Extreme

*999=structure do
not move towards
Bearing stress envelope hillside
X Stress Bearing stress envelope
At toe 4.41 66.32 80.00
max
At heel -4.41 68.81
At toe 4.41 5.75 68.81 70.00
min 66.32
At heel -4.41 8.24 60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00

8.24 10.00
5.75
0.00
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6

01_SB_Inlet_Transistion_Section_D-D (Panel-SB-01) Force and Stability: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Settling Basin (Settling Zone) Approved by : SG

Flow conditions Soil Properties


Depth of water flow in chamber,Hw 5.70 m Hill side angle made by soil with horizontal, i 0.00 deg
Sediment deposition depth 1.50 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.33
Geometry of the structure Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Internal height h1 3.70 m Unit weight of sediment 18.00 KN/m3
Internal height h2 2.03 m Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Internal height h3 0.47 m Unit weight of stone masonary 22.00 KN/m3
External height h4 4.00 m Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
External height h5 2.05 m Friction coefficient 0.55
External height h6 0.75 m Ground conditions
Height of intemediate wall h7 2.20 m Height of soil :hillside Hh 5.80 m
Internal width W1 3.05 m Surcharge load:hillside 12.50 KN/m2
Internal width W2 0.80 m Height of soil :riverside Hr 5.80 m
External width W3 3.05 m Surcharge load:riverside 5.00 KN/m2
External width W4 2.00 m % of ground water height above slab 40% 2.32
Top thinkness of wall , t1 0.30 m % of passive pressure to use 25%
Bottom thinkness of wall , t5 0.60 m Seismic coefficients 3.001460551
Thickness of slanting slab, t2 0.60 m Horizontal 0.24 0.111003001
Thickness of vertical slab slab, t3 0.60 m Vertical 0.12
Thickness of base slab, t4 0.60 m Result
Top thickness of intermediate, t6 0.30
Bottom thickness of intermediate, t7 0.50
Total external height 6.80 m Factor of safety Bearing KN/m2
Total external width 16.20 m Normal operation
top Slab Thickness 0.00 m 1. Sliding 999.00 Maximum 82.44
Extra Load on Top Slab 0.00 KN/m2 2. Overturning 2.30 Minimum 2.16
Seismic condtions
1. Sliding 44.57 Maximum 85.58
2. Overturning 3.23 Minimum 9.82

Bearing stress envelope 8.00

100.00 6.00
85.58 80.00
73.53 4.00
60.00
40.00 2.00
20.00 0.00
11.17
0.00 2.16 -15.00 -10.00 -5.00 0.00 5.00
-10 -5 0 5 10
Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction Remarks
Definition Type Start Value End value
KN KN height to use(m)
Chamber 2
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside (top wall) Trapezoidal 3.75 44.27 -x 3.00
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside (slanting wall) Trapezoidal 44.27 71.96 -x 5.05
P1c Dry: Earth pressure-riverside (vertical wall) Trapezoidal 71.96 82.09 -x 5.80
P2a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside(top wall) Trapezoidal 4.16 22.16 +x 3.00
P2b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside(slanting wall) Trapezoidal 22.16 34.45 +x 5.05
P2c Dry: Earth pressure-hillside(vertical wall) Trapezoidal 34.45 38.95 +x 5.80
P3a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside( top wall) Trapezoidal 3.75 44.27 -x 3.00
P3b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside( slanting wall) Trapezoidal 44.27 60.40 5.05
P3c Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside( vertical wall) Trapezoidal 60.40 65.01 5.80
P4a Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside(top wall) Trapezoidal 0.00 0.00 -x 0.00
P4b Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside(slanting wall) Trapezoidal 0.00 15.40 1.57
P4c Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside(vertical wall) Trapezoidal 15.40 22.76 0.75
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside(top wall) Trapezoidal 4.16 22.16 +x 3.00
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside(slanting wall) Trapezoidal 22.16 29.32 5.05
P5c Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside(vertical wall) Trapezoidal 29.32 31.36 5.80
P6a Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside( top wall) Trapezoidal 0.00 0.00 +y 0.00
P6b Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside( slanting wall) Trapezoidal 0.00 15.40 1.57
P6c Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside( vertical wall) Trapezoidal 15.40 22.76 0.75
P7 Wet: Uplift on left slab in wet season (CH-01) Trapezoidal -y
From blighs sheet
P8 Wet: Uplift on middle slab in wet season(CH-01) Trapezoidal

02_SB_Settling Zone (Panel SB-02 to SB-04) Force and Stability: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P9 Wet: Uplift on right slab in wet season(CH-01) Trapezoidal


P7a Wet: Uplift on left slab in wet season (CH-02) Trapezoidal
P8a Wet: Uplift on middle slab in wet season(CH-02) Trapezoidal
P9a Wet: Uplift on right slab in wet season(CH-02) Trapezoidal
P10 Water pressure inside chamber, at top side walls(CH-01) Triangular 0.00 31.39 +/-x
P11 Water pressure inside chamber in slanting slab portion(CH-01) Trapezoidal 31.39 51.31 +/-x
P12 Water pressure inside chamber in vertical wall portion(CH-01) Trapezoidal 51.31 55.92 +/-x
P13 weight of water inside chamber in slanting slab left(CH-01) Trapezoidal 31.39 51.31 +y
P14 weight of water inside chamber in slanting slab right(CH-01) Trapezoidal 31.39 51.31 +y
P15 weight of water inside chamber in bottom slab(CH-01) UDL 55.92 55.92 +y
P10a Water pressure inside chamber, at top side walls(CH-02) Triangular 0.00 31.39 +/-x
P11a Water pressure inside chamber in slanting slab portion(CH-02) Trapezoidal 31.39 51.31 +/-x
P12a Water pressure inside chamber in vertical wall portion(CH-02) Trapezoidal 51.31 55.92 +/-x
P13a weight of water inside chamber in slanting slab left(CH-02) Trapezoidal 31.39 51.31 +y
P14a weight of water inside chamber in slanting slab right(CH-02) Trapezoidal 31.39 51.31 +y
P15a weight of water inside chamber in bottom slab(CH-02) UDL 55.92 55.92 +y
P16 Horizontal force due to sediment in top side wall(CH-01) Trapezoidal 0.00 0.00 +/-x
P17 Horizontal force due to sediment in slanting wall(CH-01) Trapezoidal 0.00 2.81 +/-x
P18 Horizontal force due to sediment in vertical wall(CH-01) Trapezoidal 2.81 4.09 +/-x
P19 Weight of sediment in chamber in left portion(CH-01) Trapezoidal 0.00 8.44 +y
P20 Weight of sediment in chamber in right portion(CH-01) Trapezoidal 0.00 8.44 +y
P21 Weight of sediment in chamber in middle portion(CH-01) UDL 12.29 12.29 +y
P16a Horizontal force due to sediment in top side wall(CH-02) Trapezoidal 0.00 0.00 +/-x
P17a Horizontal force due to sediment in slanting wall(CH-02) Trapezoidal 0.00 2.81 +/-x
P18a Horizontal force due to sediment in vertical wall(CH-02) Trapezoidal 2.81 4.09 +/-x
P19a Weight of sediment in chamber in left portion(CH-02) Trapezoidal 0.00 8.44 +y
P20a Weight of sediment in chamber in right portion(CH-02) Trapezoidal 0.00 8.44 +y
P21a Weight of sediment in chamber in middle portion(CH-02) UDL 12.29 12.29 +y
P22 Extra Load on Top Slab UDL 0.00 0.00

2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point 448.00 +y

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) Point +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift Point +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) Point +/-x
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing Point +/-y

4 Combination
C1 Dry season + all chamber empty D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P22
C2 Dry season+ all chamber full+with sediment D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+P22
C3 Dry season+ chamber 01 full+with sediment+other empty D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P22
C4 Dry season+ chamber 02 full+with sediment+other empty D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+P22
C5 Wet season + all chamber empty D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P22
C6 Wet season+ all chamber full+with sediment D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+P22
C7 Wet season+ chamber 01 full+with sediment+other empty D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P22
C8 Wet season+ chamber 02 full+with sediment+other empty D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+P22
C9 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S1+P22
C10 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-x) D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S3+P22
C11 Dry season+ chamber full+with sedimentbearing(y) D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S4+P22
C12 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:uplift(+y) D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S2+P22
C13 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic(+x) D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+S1+P22
C14 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic(-x) D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+S3+P22
C15 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic(+y) D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+S2+P22
C16 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic(-xy D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+S4+P22
C17 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic (+x) D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S1+P22
C18 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-x) D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S3+P22
C19 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:bearing(-y)D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S4+P22
C20 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:uplift +y) D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S2+P22

02_SB_Settling Zone (Panel SB-02 to SB-04) Force and Stability: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside


Force Moment Arm Moments Remarks
Descriptions Horizontal Vertical X Y Overturning Resisting
KN KN m m KNm KNm
Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -248.94 2.02 502.32
P1b
P1c
P2a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 125.03 2.12 265.07
P2b
P2c
P3a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -199.42 2.04 406.57
P3b
P3c
P4a Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside -8.53 0.77 6.60
P4b
P4c
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 103.04 2.16 222.55 intersection length(m)
P5b
P5c
P6a Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 8.53 0.77 6.60
P6b
P6c
P7 Wet: Uplift on left slab in wet season (CH-01) -184.99 5.05 934.19
P8 Wet: Uplift on middle slab in wet season(CH-01)
P9 Wet: Uplift on right slab in wet season(CH-01)
P7a Wet: Uplift on left slab in wet season (CH-02)
P8a Wet: Uplift on middle slab in wet season(CH-02)
P9a Wet: Uplift on right slab in wet season(CH-02)
P10 Water pressure inside chamber, at top side walls(CH-01) cancels out
P11 Water pressure inside chamber in slanting slab portion(CH-01) cancels out
P12 Water pressure inside chamber in vertical wall portion(CH-01) cancels out
P13 weight of water inside chamber in slanting slab left(CH-01) 126.11 11.50 1450.65
P14 weight of water inside chamber in slanting slab right(CH-01) 126.11 6.70 844.64
P15 weight of water inside chamber in bottom slab(CH-01) 44.73 9.10 407.08
P10a Water pressure inside chamber, at top side walls(CH-02) cancels out
P11a Water pressure inside chamber in slanting slab portion(CH-02) cancels out
P12a Water pressure inside chamber in vertical wall portion(CH-02) cancels out
P13a weight of water inside chamber in slanting slab left(CH-02) 126.11 3.61 455.49 3.05
P14a weight of water inside chamber in slanting slab right(CH-02) 126.11 -1.40 176.89
P15a weight of water inside chamber in bottom slab(CH-02) 44.73 1.00 44.73
P16 Horizontal force due to sediment in top side wall(CH-01) cancels out
P17 Horizontal force due to sediment in slanting wall(CH-01) cancels out
P18 Horizontal force due to sediment in vertical wall(CH-01) cancels out
P19 Weight of sediment in chamber in left portion(CH-01) 6.53 11.63 75.88 1.55
P20 Weight of sediment in chamber in right portion(CH-01) 6.53 6.58 42.92
P21 Weight of sediment in chamber in middle portion(CH-01) 9.83 9.10 89.43
P16a Horizontal force due to sediment in top side wall(CH-02)
P17a Horizontal force due to sediment in slanting wall(CH-02)
P18a Horizontal force due to sediment in vertical wall(CH-02)
P19a Weight of sediment in chamber in left portion(CH-02) 6.53 3.53 23.01
P20a Weight of sediment in chamber in right portion(CH-02) 6.53 -1.53 9.95 may be resisting or overturning
P21a Weight of sediment in chamber in middle portion(CH-02) 9.83 1.00 9.83
P22 Extra Load on Top Slab 0.00 6.575 0.00
Dead load
D Total dead weight of the structure 448.00 5.05 2262.38
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) 107.52 5.05 542.97
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift -53.76 2.34 125.88
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) -107.52 5.05 542.97
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing 53.76 2.34 125.88

Load combinitions
C1 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P22 0.00 448.00 265.07 2764.70
C2 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+P22
0.00 1087.69 451.91 6208.36
C3 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P22
0.00 767.84 265.07 5675.30
C4 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+P22
0.00 767.84 451.91 3297.76
C5 D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P22
0.00 263.01 1163.34 2675.55
C6 D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+P22
0.00 902.70 1350.18 6119.21
C7 D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P22
0.00 582.85 1163.34 5586.15
C8 D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+P22
0.00 582.85 1350.18 3208.61

02_SB_Settling Zone (Panel SB-02 to SB-04) Force and Stability: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

C9 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S1+P22
0.00 1087.69 994.88 6208.36
C10 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S3+P22
0.00 1087.69 451.91 6751.33
C11 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S4+P22
0.00 1141.45 451.91 6334.24
C12 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S2+P22
0.00 1033.93 577.79 6208.36
C13 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+S1+P22 0.00 448.00 808.04 2764.70
C14 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+S3+P22 0.00 448.00 265.07 3307.67
C15 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+S2+P22 0.00 394.24 390.95 2764.70
C16 D+P1a+P1b+P1c+P2a+P2b+P2c+S4+P22 0.00 501.76 265.07 2890.59
C17 D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S1+P22
11.14 902.70 1893.15 6119.21
C18 D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S3+P22
0.00 902.70 1350.18 6662.18
C19 D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S4+P22
0.00 956.46 1350.18 6245.09
C20 D+P3a+P3b+P3c+P4a+P4b+P4c+P5a+P5b+P5c+P6a+P6b+P6c+P7+P8+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P10a+P11a+P12a+P13a+P14a+P15a+P16+P17+P18+P19+P20+P21+P16a+P17a+P18a+P19a+P20a+P21a+S2+P22
0.00 848.94 1476.06 6119.21

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity At toe At heel
Slide Overturn
(Riverside) (Hillside)
C1 Dry season + all chamber empty -0.53 999.00 10.43 22.23 33.08
C2 Dry season+ all chamber full+with sediment -0.24 999.00 13.74 61.11 73.17
C3 Dry season+ chamber 01 full+with sediment+other empty -2.00 999.00 21.41 12.36 82.44
C4 Dry season+ chamber 02 full+with sediment+other empty 1.34 999.00 7.30 70.99 23.81
C5 Wet season + all chamber empty -0.70 999.00 2.30 12.03 20.44
C6 Wet season+ all chamber full+with sediment -0.23 999.00 4.53 50.91 60.53
C7 Wet season+ chamber 01 full+with sediment+other empty -2.54 999.00 4.80 2.16 69.80
C8 Wet season+ chamber 02 full+with sediment+other empty 1.86 999.00 2.38 60.78 11.17
C9 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) 0.26 999.00 6.24 73.53 60.75
C10 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-x) -0.74 999.00 14.94 48.70 85.58
C11 Dry season+ chamber full+with sedimentbearing(y) -0.10 999.00 14.02 67.76 73.16
C12 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:uplift(+y) -0.40 999.00 10.74 54.47 73.18
C13 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic(+x) 0.68 999.00 3.42 34.64 20.66
C14 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic(-x) -1.74 999.00 12.48 9.82 45.49
C15 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic(+y) -0.97 999.00 7.07 15.58 33.09
C16 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic(-xy -0.18 999.00 10.91 28.88 33.07
C17 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic (+x) 0.37 44.57 3.23 63.33 48.12
C18 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(-x) -0.83 999.00 4.93 38.50 72.95
C19 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:bearing(-y) -0.07 999.00 4.63 57.56 60.52
C20 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:uplift +y) -0.42 999.00 4.15 44.26 60.54

*999=structure doesnot slide towards hillside


Bearing stress envelope
X Stress
m KN/m2
max At toe 8.1 73.53
At heel -8.1 85.58
min At toe 8.1 2.16
At heel -8.1 11.17

02_SB_Settling Zone (Panel SB-02 to SB-04) Force and Stability: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Settling Basin_Gate_Portion (Panel-SB-05) Approved by : SG
Flow conditions Soil Properties
Depth of water flow in chamber,Hw 3.58 m Bearing Capacity of Soil 150.00 KN/m2
Sediment deposition depth 0.30 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom slab Angle made by back wall with vertical deg
Base width of chamber, W1 5.00 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Thickness of slab, T 0.40 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Projection beyond side wall at hillside, Wh 0.01 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.333
Projection beyond side wall at riverside, Wr 0.01 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure(Kp) 3.00
Length of slab inside side walls 5.80 m Coefficient of Dynamic active earth pressure(Kae) 0.605
Total length of base slab 5.82 m Coefficient of dynamic passive earth pressure(Kpe) 2.91
Side walls Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Top thickness of side wall, B1 0.30 m Unit weight of saturated soil 21.00 KN/m3
Bottom thickness of side wall, B2 0.40 m Unit weight of sediment 18.00 KN/m3
Height of side wall, H1 3.83 m Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Masonary Unit weight of stone masonary 24.00 KN/m3
Height of stone masonary, H3 0.00 m Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
Width of stone masonary, B5 0.00 m Friction coefficient 0.65
Ground conditions
Height of soil :hillside Hh 3.20 m
Surcharge load:hillside 10.00 KN/m2
Height of soil :riverside Hr 3.20 m
Surcharge load:riverside - KN/m2
% of ground water height above slab 15%
% of passive pressure to use 15%
Seismic coefficients
Horizontal 0.24
Vertical 0.12
Required FOS
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme
1. Sliding 40.04 6.03 2.01
2. Overturning 3.08 4.44 1.86
3. Bearing
a. At Toe 54.12 68.99 36.71
Bearing stress envelope b. At Heel 52.15 61.89 29.60
80.00 a. At Toe 17.42 39.69 7.41
68.99
61.89 60.00 b. At Heel 14.83 32.24 (0.04)
40.00
20.00
7.41
-0.04 0.00
-4 -3 -2 -1
-20.00 0 1 2 3 4

Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 25.93 -x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 19.19
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside UDL 57.60 57.60 +y
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hactive Triangular 3.33 22.52 +x
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hpassive Triangular 4.50 30.43
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 57.60 57.60 +y
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 23.81 -x
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 17.62
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 4.71 -x
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside UDL 52.89 52.89 +y
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hactive Triangular 3.33 21.43 +x
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hpassive Triangular 4.50 28.96
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 4.71 +y

03_SB_Gate_Portion (Panel SB-05) Force and Stability: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 52.89 52.89 +x


P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season Trapezoidal 4.71 4.71 -y
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside Triangular 0.00 35.12 +/-x
P13 Weight of water in chamber UDL 35.12 35.12 +y
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber UDL 2.46 2.46 +y
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber Triangular 0.00 0.82 +/-x
P16 Weight of stone masonry right Triangular 0.00 0.00
P17 Weight of stone masonry left Triangular 0.00 0.00

2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point 120.22 +y

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) Point +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) Point +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) Point
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) Point

4 Combination
C1 Dry season + chamber empty D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C3 Wet season + chamber empty D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17
C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17

03_SB_Gate_Portion (Panel SB-05) Force and Stability: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside

Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -41.49 1.07 44.26
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -30.71 1.07 32.75
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside 0.58 0.01 0.00
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 41.37 1.20 49.81
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 55.90 1.20 67.31
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 0.58 5.82 3.35
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -38.10 1.07 40.64
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -28.19 1.07 30.07
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside -1.13 0.16 0.18
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside 0.53 0.01 0.00
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 39.62 1.21 47.95
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 53.54 1.21 64.80
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 1.13 0.16 0.18
P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 0.53 5.82 3.08
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season -27.41 2.91 79.75 cancel each other
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside cancel each other
P13 Weight of water in chamber 175.60 2.91 510.99
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber 12.29 2.91 35.75
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber cancel each other
P16 Weight of stone masonry right 0 2.91 0.00

Dead load
D Total dead weight of the structure 120.22 2.91 349.83
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) 28.85 2.91 83.96
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) -14.43 1.07 15.42
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) -28.85 2.91 83.96
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) 14.43 1.07 15.42
Load combinitions
C1 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17 0.00 121.37 49.81 397.44
C2 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 0.00 309.25 49.81 944.18
C3 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17 1.52 93.87 127.88 393.73
C4 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 1.52 281.75 127.88 940.47
C5 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 28.73 309.25 133.77 944.18
C6 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 309.25 67.31 1016.63
C7 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 0.00 323.68 49.81 959.60
C8 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 25.19 294.83 82.73 932.68
C9 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17 28.73 121.37 133.77 397.44
C10 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17 0.00 121.37 67.31 469.89
C11 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 1.52 296.18 127.88 955.89
C12 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 25.35 267.33 160.15 929.90
C13 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 30.38 281.75 211.84 940.47
C14 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 281.75 144.73 1013.86
C15 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17 30.38 93.87 211.84 393.73
C16 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17 0.00 93.87 144.73 467.12
C17 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17 25.35 79.44 160.15 383.16
C18 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17 25.35 108.29 144.73 398.59

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn At toe At heel
C1 Dry season + chamber empty 0.05 999.00 7.98 21.84 19.87
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment 0.02 999.00 18.96 54.12 52.15
C3 Wet season + chamber empty 0.08 40.04 3.08 17.42 14.83
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment 0.03 120.18 7.35 49.71 47.12
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) 0.29 7.00 7.06 68.99 37.28
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.16 999.00 15.10 44.39 61.89
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) 0.10 999.00 19.27 61.30 49.93
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.03 7.61 11.27 52.07 49.24
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 0.74 2.75 2.97 36.71 5.00
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.41 999.00 6.98 12.10 29.60

03_SB_Gate_Portion (Panel SB-05) Force and Stability: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) 0.11 126.34 7.47 56.89 44.89
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.03 6.85 5.81 47.38 44.49
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) 0.32 6.03 4.44 64.58 32.24
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.17 999.00 7.01 39.69 57.13
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 0.97 2.01 1.86 32.30 -0.04
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.52 999.00 3.23 7.41 24.85
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) 0.10 2.04 2.39 15.10 12.20
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) 0.57 2.78 2.75 29.46 7.75

*999=structure doesnot slide towards hillside


Bearing stress envelope
X Stress
At toe 2.91 68.99
max
At heel -2.91 61.89
At toe 2.91 7.41
min
At heel -2.91 -0.04

03_SB_Gate_Portion (Panel SB-05) Force and Stability: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Settling Basin_Headpond (Panel-SB-05) Approved by : SG

Flow conditions Soil Properties


Depth of water flow in chamber,Hw 2.33 m Bearing Capacity of Soil 150.00 KN/m2
Sediment deposition depth 0.50 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom slab Angle made by back wall with vertical deg
Base width of chamber, W1 4.85 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Thickness of slab, T 0.40 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Projection beyond side wall at hillside, Wh 0.01 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.333
Projection beyond side wall at riverside, Wr 0.01 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure(Kp) 3.00
Length of slab inside side walls 5.85 m Coefficient of Dynamic active earth pressure(Kae) 0.605
Total length of base slab 5.87 m Coefficient of dynamic passive earth pressure(Kpe) 2.91
Side walls Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Top thickness of side wall, B1 0.30 m Unit weight of saturated soil 21.00 KN/m3
Bottom thickness of side wall, B2 0.50 m Unit weight of sediment 18.00 KN/m3
Height of side wall, H1 2.83 m Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Masonary Unit weight of stone masonary 24.00 KN/m3
Height of stone masonary, H3 0.00 m Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
Width of stone masonary, B5 0.00 m Friction coefficient 0.65
Ground conditions
Height of soil :hillside Hh 2.20 m
Surcharge load:hillside 10.00 KN/m2
Height of soil :riverside Hr 2.20 m
Surcharge load:riverside - KN/m2
% of ground water height above slab 15%
% of passive pressure to use 15%
Seismic coefficients
Horizontal 0.24
Vertical 0.12
Required FOS
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme
1. Sliding 19.95 4.90 2.03
2. Overturning 4.60 4.77 2.24
3. Bearing
a. At Toe 42.01 55.59 33.32
Bearing stress envelope b. At Heel 40.51 52.29 30.02
60.00 a. At Toe 16.60 26.99 4.72
52.29 55.59
40.00 b. At Heel 14.89 23.58 1.31
20.00
1.31 0.00 4.72
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 17.83 -x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 13.19
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside UDL 39.60 39.60 +y
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hactive Triangular 3.33 16.53 +x
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hpassive Triangular 4.50 22.33
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 39.60 39.60 +y
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 16.37 -x
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 12.12
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 3.24 -x
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside UDL 36.36 36.36 +y
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hactive Triangular 3.33 15.78 +x
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hpassive Triangular 4.50 21.32
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 3.24 +y
P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 36.36 36.36 +x

04_SB_Headpond (Panel SB-05) Force and Stability: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season Trapezoidal 3.24 3.24 -y


P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside Triangular 0.00 22.86 +/-x
P13 Weight of water in chamber UDL 22.86 22.86 +y
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber UDL 4.10 4.10 +y
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber Triangular 0.00 1.36 +/-x
P16 Weight of stone masonry right Triangular 0.00 0.00
P17 Weight of stone masonry left Triangular 0.00 0.00

2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point 110.69 +y

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) Point +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) Point +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) Point
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) Point

4 Combination
C1 Dry season + chamber empty D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C3 Wet season + chamber empty D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17
C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17

04_SB_Headpond (Panel SB-05) Force and Stability: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside

Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -19.61 0.73 14.38
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -14.51 0.73 10.64
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside 0.40 0.01 0.00
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 21.84 0.86 18.71
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 29.52 0.86 25.28
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 0.40 5.87 2.32
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -18.01 0.73 13.21
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -13.33 0.73 9.77
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside -0.53 0.11 0.06
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside 0.36 0.01 0.00
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 21.02 0.86 18.10
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 28.40 0.86 24.46
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 0.53 0.11 0.06
P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 0.36 5.87 2.13
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season -19.00 2.94 55.77 cancel each other
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside cancel each other
P13 Weight of water in chamber 110.86 2.94 325.37
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber 19.86 2.94 58.29
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber cancel each other
P16 Weight of stone masonry right 0 2.935 0.00

Dead load
D Total dead weight of the structure 110.69 2.94 324.87
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) 26.57 2.94 77.97
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) -13.28 0.74 9.81
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) -26.57 2.94 77.97
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) 13.28 0.74 9.81
Load combinitions
C1 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17 2.23 111.48 18.71 341.58
C2 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 2.23 242.20 18.71 725.23
C3 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17 3.01 92.41 73.93 340.27
C4 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 3.01 223.13 73.93 723.93
C5 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 28.80 242.20 96.67 725.23
C6 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 242.20 25.28 799.46
C7 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 2.23 255.48 18.71 735.04
C8 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 15.00 228.92 35.09 721.50
C9 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17 28.80 111.48 96.67 341.58
C10 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17 0.00 111.48 25.28 415.81
C11 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 3.01 236.41 73.93 733.74
C12 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 15.08 209.85 90.10 720.49
C13 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 29.58 223.13 151.90 723.93
C14 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 223.13 80.29 798.46
C15 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17 29.58 92.41 151.90 340.27
C16 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17 0.00 92.41 80.29 414.80
C17 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17 15.08 79.13 90.10 336.84
C18 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17 15.08 105.69 80.29 346.65

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn At toe At heel
C1 Dry season + chamber empty 0.04 32.48 18.26 19.74 18.24
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment 0.02 70.56 38.77 42.01 40.51
C3 Wet season + chamber empty 0.05 19.95 4.60 16.60 14.89
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment 0.02 48.17 9.79 38.86 37.16
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) 0.34 5.47 7.50 55.59 26.93
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.26 999.00 31.63 30.23 52.29
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) 0.13 74.43 39.30 49.36 37.69
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) -0.06 9.92 20.56 36.47 41.53
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 0.74 2.52 3.53 33.32 4.66
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.57 999.00 16.45 7.96 30.02

04_SB_Headpond (Panel SB-05) Force and Stability: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) 0.14 51.04 9.92 46.21 34.34
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) -0.07 9.05 8.00 33.23 38.27
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) 0.37 4.90 4.77 52.44 23.58
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.28 999.00 9.94 26.99 49.03
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 0.90 2.03 2.24 30.17 1.31
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.68 999.00 5.17 4.72 26.76
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) -0.18 3.41 3.74 10.96 16.00
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) 0.41 4.56 4.32 25.64 10.37

*999=structure doesnot slide towards hillside


Bearing stress envelope
X Stress
At toe 2.935 55.59
max
At heel -2.935 52.29
At toe 2.935 4.72
min
At heel -2.935 1.31

04_SB_Headpond (Panel SB-05) Force and Stability: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location:Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Truss Bridge - Abutment 1 Approved by : SG

Geometry of the structure Soil Properties


Top width, B1 0.80 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom width of sloping face river side, B4 0.20 m Angle made by back wall with vertical - deg
Bottom width of sloping face hillside, B5 0.20 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Width of projection at riverside, B3 2.50 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Width of projection at hillside, B6 2.50 m Coefficient of earth pressure at rest (Ko) 0.50
Thickness of base slab, H2 1.20 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.33
Height of flood stem, H1 8.92 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure 3.00
Total height of the Pier 10.12 m Coefficient of dynamic active earth pressure 0.61
Total base width of the Pier, B2 6.20 m Coefficient of dynamic Passive earth pressure 2.91
Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Soil Bearing Envelope Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
10.00 300.00 Friction coefficient 0.60
272.76 268.39
8.00 Approximate Scour depth (1+sinΦ))^2, Ref. Rankines
σ/γ* ((1-sinΦ)/ - m
200.00 Actual foundation depth below existing ground level - m
6.00
4.00 100.00
66.31 65.41
2.00 Loads
0.00
0.00 Height of soil :hillside, Hhg 7.00 m
-4 -2 0 2 4
-4.00 -2.00 Height of ground water in wet season :hillside, Hhw 4.00 m
-2.00 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00
Surcharge load:hillside, w 12.50 KN/m2
Height of soil/sediment :riverside, Hrg 6.50 m
Height of water in normal flow :riverside, Hrw nor 4.00 m
Consider 1m width of section Height of water in max flow :riverside, Hrw hi 5.80 m
Result Coefficients
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme Percentage of passive pressure to use 15%
1. Sliding 95.29 19.83 6.62 Dynamic loads (% of self wt) 0%
2. Overturning 3.70 2.40 3.09 Horizontal seismic coeff. 0.24
3. Bearing Vertical seismic coeff. 0.12
a. At Toe 160.63 245.67 272.76 Uplift coefficient 1.00
b. At Heel 166.88 229.76 268.39 Load on pier 317 KN
Braking force 0 KN
Calculations
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 52.68 +x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 38.98
P2 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside UDL 58.50 58.50 +y
P3 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 58.50 +y
P4a Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 35.01 +x
P4b Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 25.91
P5 Normal flow: Water pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 39.24 +x
P6 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside UDL 33.97 33.97 +y
P7 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 33.97 +y
P8 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside UDL 39.24 39.24 +y
P9 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 39.24 +y
P10a High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 27.06 +x
P10b High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 20.02
P11 High flow: Water pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 56.90 +x
P12 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside UDL 30.05 30.05 +y
P13 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 30.05 +y
P14 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside UDL 56.90 56.90 +y
P15 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 56.90 +y
P16a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Trapezoidal 4.16 46.14 -x
P16b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Trapezoidal 5.63 62.36
P17 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside UDL 63.00 63.00 +y
P18 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 63.00 +y

Truss Bridge - Abutment 1 Forces and Stability: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P19a Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 4.16 33.07 -x


P19b Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 5.63 44.69
P20 Wet: Water pressure-hillside Triangular 0.00 39.24 -x
P21 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside UDL 50.97 50.97 +y
P22 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 50.97 +y
P23 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside UDL 39.24 39.24 +y
P24 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 39.24 +y
P25 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 39.24 0.00 -y
P26 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 39.24 39.24 -y
P27 High flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 56.90 0.00 -y
P28 High flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 56.90 39.24 -y
P29 Load on pier Point 317
2 Dead and dynamic Loads
D1 Total dead weight of the structure Point (see centroid of structure) 392.64 +y
D2 Braking load - +x

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force(+x) Converted to Point 94.23 +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force: uplift Converted to Point 47.12 +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force(-x) Converted to Point 94.23 +/-y
S4 Vertical seismic force: bearing Converted to Point 47.12 +/-y
4 Combination
C1 Both side of Pier is dry D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18
C2 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+P29
C3 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+P29
C4 High flow in riverside+dry hillside D1+D2+P10a+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16a+P17+P18+P26+P29
C5 High flow in riverside+wet hillside D1+D2+P10a+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P27+P29
C6 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic(+x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S1+P29
C7 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic (-x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S4+P29
C8 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic (+y) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S3+P29
C9 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic(-y) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S2+P29
C10 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(+x) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S1+P29
C11 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(-x) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S3+P29
C12 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(+y) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S2+P29
C13 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(-y) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S4+P29
C14 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(+x) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S1+P29
C15 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(-x) D1+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19b+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S3+P29
C16 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(+y) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S2+P29
C17 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(-y) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S4+P29
C18 Hillside full fill+riverside empty D1+P16a+P17+P18+P29
Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside
Force Moment Arm Moments Remarks
Descriptions Horizontal Vertical X Y Overturning Resisting
KN KN m m KNm KNm
Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 171.20 2.17 370.92 +x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 126.69 2.17 274.49
P2 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside 146.25 1.25 182.81 +y
P3 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside, in sloping face 73.13 2.57 187.69 +y
P4a Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 113.78 2.17 246.52 +x
P4b Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 84.20 2.17 182.43
P5 Normal flow: Water pressure-riverside 78.48 1.33 104.64 +x
P6 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside 84.92 1.25 106.14 +y
P7 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face 3.40 2.57 8.72 +y
P8 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside 98.10 1.25 122.63 +y
P9 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside, in sloping face 3.92 2.57 10.07 +y
P10a High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 87.94 2.17 190.54 +x
P10b High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 65.08 2.17 141.00
P11 High flow: Water pressure-riverside 113.80 1.93 220.01 +x
P12 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside 75.13 1.25 93.91 +y
P13 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face 3.01 2.57 7.71 +y
P14 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside 142.25 1.25 177.81 +y
P15 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside, in sloping face 5.69 2.57 14.60 +y
P16a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside -176.08 2.10 370.10 -x
P16b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside -237.94 2.10 500.12
P17 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside 157.50 4.95 779.63 +y
P18 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside, in sloping face 6.30 3.63 22.89 +y

Truss Bridge - Abutment 1 Forces and Stability: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P19a Wet: Earth pressure-hillside -130.32 2.00 260.28 -x


P19b Wet: Earth pressure-hillside -176.11 2.00 351.71
P20 Wet: Water pressure-hillside 78.48 1.33 104.64 -x
P21 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside 127.42 4.95 630.70 +y
P22 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside, in sloping face 5.10 3.63 18.52 +y
P23 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside 98.10 4.95 485.60 +y
P24 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside, in sloping face 3.92 3.63 14.26 +y
P25 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside -121.64 2.07 251.40 -y
P26 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside -243.29 3.10 754.19 -y
P27 High flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside -176.38 2.07 364.53 -y
P28 High flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside -298.03 2.91 867.32 -y
P29 Load on pier 317.00 3.10 982.70
Dead and dynamic Loads
D1 Total dead weight of the structure 392.64 3.10 1217.18 +y
D2 Braking load 0.00 10.12 0.00 +x
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force 94.23 6.41 604.22
S2 Vertical seismic force -47.12 3.10 146.06
S3 Horizontal seismic force -94.23 6.41 604.22
S4 Vertical seismic force 47.12 3.10 146.06
Load combinitions
C1 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18 4.89 775.82 370.10 2761.12
C2 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+P29 0.00 1015.26 621.49 3788.81
C3 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+P29 0.00 964.35 1119.11 4135.37
C4 D1+D2+P10a+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16a+P17+P18+P26+P29 0.00 856.22 1124.29 3706.98
C5 D1+D2+P10a+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P27+P29 0.00 993.86 729.44 4053.54
C6 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S1+P29 0.00 1092.82 974.32 3743.82
C7 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S4+P29 4.89 1139.93 370.10 3889.89
C8 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S3+P29 99.12 1092.82 370.10 4348.05
C9 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S2+P29 4.89 1045.70 516.16 3743.82
C10 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S1+P29 0.00 1015.26 1225.72 3788.81
C11 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S3+P29 78.06 1015.26 621.49 4393.03
C12 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S2+P29 0.00 968.14 767.56 3788.81
C13 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S4+P29 0.00 1062.37 621.49 3934.87
C14 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S1+P29 0.00 964.35 1723.33 4135.37
C15 D1+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19b+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S3+P29 29.18 964.35 1210.55 4675.50
C16 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S2+P29 0.00 917.23 1265.17 4135.37
C17 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S4+P29 0.00 1011.47 1119.11 4281.43
C18 D1+P16a+P17+P18+P29 176.08 873.44 370.10 3002.40
Result of all cases
Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn riverside hillside
C1 Both side of Pier is dry 0.02 95.29 7.46 127.32 122.95
C2 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside -0.02 999.00 6.10 160.63 166.88
C3 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside -0.03 999.00 3.70 151.36 159.72
C4 High flow in riverside+dry hillside 0.08 999.00 3.30 149.27 126.93
C5 High flow in riverside+wet hillside -0.24 999.00 5.56 122.35 198.25
C6 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic(+x) 0.57 999.00 3.84 272.76 79.76
C7 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic (-x) 0.01 140.01 10.51 186.05 181.67
C8 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic (+y) -0.54 6.62 11.75 84.13 268.39
C9 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic(-y) 0.01 128.43 7.25 170.85 166.48
C10 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(+x) 0.58 999.00 3.09 254.94 72.56
C11 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(-x) -0.61 7.80 7.07 66.31 261.19
C12 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(+y) -0.02 999.00 4.94 153.03 159.28
C13 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(-y) -0.02 999.00 6.33 168.23 174.48
C14 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(+x) 0.60 999.00 2.40 245.67 65.41
C15 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(-x) -0.49 19.83 3.86 81.33 229.76
C16 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(+y) -0.03 999.00 3.27 143.76 152.12
C17 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(-y) -0.03 999.00 3.83 158.96 167.32
C18 Hillside full fill+riverside empty 0.09 2.98 8.11 152.64 129.11
Bearing stress envelope 300.00
*999=structure
X Stress 272.76 268.39 doesn't move
At toe -3.1 66.31 200.00 towards hillside
MIN
At heel 3.1 65.41 100.00
66.31 65.41
At toe -3.1 272.76
MAX 0.00
At heel 3.1 268.39
-4 -2 0 2 4

Truss Bridge - Abutment 1 Forces and Stability: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location:Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Truss Bridge - Abutment 2 Approved by : SG

Geometry of the structure Soil Properties


Top width, B1 0.80 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom width of sloping face river side, B4 0.00 m Angle made by back wall with vertical - deg
Bottom width of sloping face hillside, B5 0.00 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Width of projection at riverside, B3 0.85 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Width of projection at hillside, B6 0.85 m Coefficient of earth pressure at rest (Ko) 0.50
Thickness of base slab, H2 0.80 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.33
Height of flood stem, H1 1.90 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure 3.00
Total height of the Pier 2.70 m Coefficient of dynamic active earth pressure 0.61
Total base width of the Pier, B2 2.50 m Coefficient of dynamic Passive earth pressure 2.91
Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Soil Bearing Envelope Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
2.50 250.00 Friction coefficient 0.60
224.70
2.00 200.00 197.83 Approximate Scour depth (1+sinΦ))^2, Ref. Rankines
σ/γ* ((1-sinΦ)/ 13.89 m
1.50 150.00 Actual foundation depth below existing ground level 13.89 m
1.00 100.00 Allowable safe bearing capacity of the soil(Terzaghi) 1,650.94 KN/m2
0.50 65.28 50.00
Adopted safe bearing capacity of the soil 250.00 KN/m2
38.41 Loads
0.00 0.00
-1.00 -0.50 0.00 1.00 2.00 Height of soil :hillside, Hhg 2.90 m
-2 -1 0 1 2
Height of ground water in wet season :hillside, Hhw 1.00 m
-1.00
Surcharge load:hillside, w 12.50 KN/m2
Height of soil/sediment :riverside, Hrg 2.00 m
Height of water in normal flow :riverside, Hrw nor 0.50 m
Consider 1m width of section Height of water in max flow :riverside, Hrw hi 1.25 m
Result Coefficients
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme Percentage of passive pressure to use 15%
1. Sliding 3.69 5.57 6.29 Dynamic loads (% of self wt) 0%
2. Overturning 6.40 7.35 8.87 Horizontal seismic coeff. 0.24
3. Bearing Vertical seismic coeff. 0.12
a. At Toe 189.16 212.02 224.70 Uplift coefficient 1.00
b. At Heel 173.82 195.03 197.83 Load on pier 321 KN
Braking force 0 KN
Calculations
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 16.21 +x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 11.99
P2 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside UDL 18.00 18.00 +y
P3 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 18.00 +y
P4a Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 14.00 +x
P4b Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 10.36
P5 Normal flow: Water pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 4.91 +x
P6 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside UDL 12.27 12.27 +y
P7 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 12.27 +y
P8 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside UDL 4.91 4.91 +y
P9 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 4.91 +y
P10a High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 10.69 +x
P10b High flow: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 7.91
P11 High flow: Water pressure-riverside Triangular 0.00 12.26 +x
P12 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside UDL 11.87 11.87 +y
P13 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 11.87 +y
P14 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside UDL 12.26 12.26 +y
P15 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 12.26 +y
P16a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Trapezoidal 4.16 21.56 -x
P16b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Trapezoidal 5.63 29.13
P17 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside UDL 26.10 26.10 +y

Truss Bridge-Abutment 2 Forces and Stability: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P18 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 26.10 +y
P19a Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 4.16 18.29 -x
P19b Wet: Earth pressure-hillside Triangular 5.63 24.71
P20 Wet: Water pressure-hillside Triangular 0.00 9.81 -x
P21 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside UDL 30.42 30.42 +y
P22 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 30.42 +y
P23 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside UDL 9.81 9.81 +y
P24 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside, in sloping face Triangular 0.00 9.81 +y
P25 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 4.91 0.00 -y
P26 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 4.91 9.81 -y
P27 High flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 12.26 0.00 -y
P28 High flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside Trapezoidal, start at riverside corner 12.26 9.81 -y
P29 Load on pier Point 321
2 Dead and dynamic Loads
D1 Total dead weight of the structure Point (see centroid of structure) 84.48 +y
D2 Braking load - +x
3 Seismic load in normal operation
S1 Horizontal seismic force(+x) Converted to Point 20.28 +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force: uplift Converted to Point 10.14 +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force(-x) Converted to Point 20.28 +/-y
S4 Vertical seismic force: bearing Converted to Point 10.14 +/-y
4 Combination
C1 Both side of Pier is dry D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18
C2 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+P29
C3 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+P29
C4 High flow in riverside+dry hillside D1+D2+P10a+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16a+P17+P18+P26+P29
C5 High flow in riverside+wet hillside D1+D2+P10a+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P27+P29
C6 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic(+x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S1+P29
C7 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic (-x) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S4+P29
C8 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic (+y) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S3+P29
C9 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic(-y) D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S2+P29
C10 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(+x) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S1+P29
C11 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(-x) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S3+P29
C12 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(+y) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S2+P29
C13 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(-y) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S4+P29
C14 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(+x) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S1+P29
C15 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(-x) D1+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19b+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S3+P29
C16 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(+y) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S2+P29
C17 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(-y) D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S4+P29
C18 Hillside full fill+riverside empty D1+P16a+P17+P18+P29+P5
Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside
Force Moment Arm Moments Remarks
Descriptions Horizontal Vertical X Y Overturning Resisting
KN KN m m KNm KNm
Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 16.21 0.67 10.81 +x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside 11.99 0.67 8.00
P2 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside 15.30 0.43 6.50 +y
P3 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - riverside, in sloping face 7.65 0.85 6.50 +y
P4a Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 14.00 0.67 9.33 +x
P4b Normal flow: Earth pressure-riverside 10.36 0.67 6.91
P5 Normal flow: Water pressure-riverside 1.23 0.17 0.20 +x
P6 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside 10.43 0.43 4.43 +y
P7 Normal flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 0.85 0.00 +y
P8 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside 4.17 0.43 1.77 +y
P9 Normal flow: Weight of water riverside on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 0.85 0.00 +y
P10a High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 10.69 0.67 7.12 +x
P10b High flow: Earth pressure-riverside 7.91 0.67 5.27
P11 High flow: Water pressure-riverside 3.07 0.42 1.28 +x
P12 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside 10.09 0.43 4.29 +y
P13 High flow: Weight of sediments on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 0.85 0.00 +y
P14 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside 10.42 0.43 4.43 +y
P15 Hight flow: Weight of water on the projection riverside, in sloping face 0.00 0.85 0.00 +y
P16a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside -37.30 0.74 27.42 -x
P16b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside -50.40 0.74 37.05
P17 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside 22.19 2.08 46.03 +y
P18 Dry: Weight of soil on projection - hillside, in sloping face 0.00 1.65 0.00 +y

Truss Bridge-Abutment 2 Forces and Stability: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P19a Wet: Earth pressure-hillside -32.56 0.68 22.19 -x


P19b Wet: Earth pressure-hillside -43.99 0.68 29.99
P20 Wet: Water pressure-hillside 4.91 0.33 1.64 -x
P21 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside 25.86 2.08 53.65 +y
P22 Wet: Weight of soil & surcharge on projection - hillside, in sloping face 0.00 1.65 0.00 +y
P23 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside 8.34 2.08 17.30 +y
P24 Wet: Weight of water on projection- hillside, in sloping face 0.00 1.65 0.00 +y
P25 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside -6.13 0.83 5.11 -y
P26 Normal flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside -18.39 1.39 25.55 -y
P27 High flow: Uplift on slab-dry hillside -15.33 0.83 12.77 -y
P28 High flow: Uplift on slab-wet hillside -27.59 1.20 33.21 -y
P29 Load on pier 321.00 1.25 401.25
Dead and dynamic Loads
D1 Total dead weight of the structure 84.48 1.25 105.60 +y
D2 Braking load 0.00 2.70 0.00 +x
Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force 20.28 1.59 32.31
S2 Vertical seismic force -10.14 1.25 12.67
S3 Horizontal seismic force -20.28 1.59 32.31
S4 Vertical seismic force 10.14 1.25 12.67
Load combinitions
C1 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18 21.09 129.62 27.42 175.44
C2 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+P29 22.07 443.78 32.53 575.13
C3 D1+D2+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+P29 12.43 443.53 49.37 600.05
C4 D1+D2+P10a+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16a+P17+P18+P26+P29 23.54 429.78 52.97 570.00
C5 D1+D2+P10a+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P27+P29 13.90 444.86 36.60 594.92
C6 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S1+P29 0.81 450.62 59.73 576.69
C7 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S4+P29 21.09 460.75 27.42 589.37
C8 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S3+P29 41.36 450.62 27.42 609.01
C9 D1+P1a+P2+P3+P16a+P17+P18+S2+P29 21.09 440.48 40.09 576.69
C10 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S1+P29 1.79 443.78 64.84 575.13
C11 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S3+P29 42.34 443.78 32.53 607.44
C12 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S2+P29 22.07 433.65 45.20 575.13
C13 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P16a+P17+P18+P25+S4+P29 22.07 453.92 32.53 587.80
C14 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S1+P29 0.00 443.53 81.69 600.05
C15 D1+P3+P4b+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19b+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S3+P29 47.78 443.53 57.17 629.94
C16 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S2+P29 12.43 433.39 62.04 600.05
C17 D1+P3+P4a+P5+P6+P7+P8+P9+P19a+P20+P21+P22+P23+P24+P26+S4+P29 12.43 453.67 49.37 612.72
C18 D1+P16a+P17+P18+P29+P5 36.07 427.67 27.42 553.09
Result of all cases
Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn riverside hillside
C1 Both side of Pier is dry 0.11 3.69 6.40 65.28 38.41
C2 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside 0.03 12.07 17.68 189.16 165.87
C3 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside 0.01 21.42 12.15 181.00 173.82
C4 High flow in riverside+dry hillside 0.05 10.95 10.76 191.30 152.53
C5 High flow in riverside+wet hillside -0.01 19.20 16.26 175.78 180.10
C6 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic(+x) 0.10 332.93 9.65 224.70 135.79
C7 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic (-x) 0.03 13.11 21.49 197.73 170.87
C8 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic (+y) -0.04 6.54 22.21 162.66 197.83
C9 Both side of Pier is dry+seismic(-y) 0.03 12.53 14.38 189.62 162.76
C10 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(+x) 0.10 148.41 8.87 220.18 134.85
C11 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(-x) -0.05 6.29 18.67 158.14 196.89
C12 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(+y) 0.03 11.79 12.72 185.10 161.81
C13 Normal flow in riverside+dry hillside+seismic(-y) 0.03 12.34 18.07 193.21 169.92
C14 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(+x) 0.08 999.00 7.35 212.02 142.80
C15 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(-x) -0.04 5.57 11.02 159.79 195.03
C16 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(+y) 0.01 20.93 9.67 176.95 169.77
C17 Normal flow in riverside+wet hillside+seismic(-y) 0.01 21.91 12.41 185.06 177.88
C18 Hillside full fill+riverside empty 0.02 7.11 20.17 179.62 162.51
Bearing stress envelope 300.00
X Stress *999=structure
224.70 200.00
At toe -1.25 65.28 197.83 doesn't move
MIN
At heel 1.25 38.41 100.00 towards hillside
65.28
At toe -1.25 224.70 38.41
MAX 0.00
At heel 1.25 197.83
-2 -1 0 1 2

Truss Bridge-Abutment 2 Forces and Stability: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Forebay (Panel-FB-01) Approved by : SG

Flow conditions Soil Properties


Depth of water flow in chamber,Hw 5.41 m Bearing Capacity of Soil 150.00 KN/m2
Sediment deposition depth 0.50 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom slab Angle made by back wall with vertical deg
Base width of chamber, W1 6.00 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Thickness of slab, T 0.60 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Projection beyond side wall at hillside, Wh 0.01 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.333
Projection beyond side wall at riverside, Wr 0.01 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure(Kp) 3.00
Length of slab inside side walls 7.20 m Coefficient of Dynamic active earth pressure(Kae) 0.605
Total length of base slab 7.22 m Coefficient of dynamic passive earth pressure(Kpe) 2.91
Side walls Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Top thickness of side wall, B1 0.30 m Unit weight of saturated soil 21.00 KN/m3
Bottom thickness of side wall, B2 0.60 m Unit weight of sediment 18.00 KN/m3
Height of side wall, H1 5.61 m Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Masonary Unit weight of stone masonary 24.00 KN/m3
Height of stone masonary, H3 0.30 m Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
Width of stone masonary, B5 0.30 m Friction coefficient 0.65
Ground conditions
Height of soil :hillside Hh 5.00 m
Surcharge load:hillside - KN/m2
Height of soil :riverside Hr 3.27 m
Surcharge load:riverside - KN/m2
% of ground water height above slab 15%
% of passive pressure to use 11%
Seismic coefficients
Horizontal 0.24
Vertical 0.12
Required FOS
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme
1. Sliding 2.84 3.55 1.25
2. Overturning 3.26 4.55 1.88
3. Bearing
a. At Toe 89.71 112.27 64.76
Bearing stress envelope b. At Heel 69.26 91.80 44.30
150.00 a. At Toe 34.41 59.37 11.87
100.00 112.27 b. At Heel 17.34 42.29 (5.22)
91.80
50.00
0.00 11.87
-5.22
-4 -2 0 2 4
-50.00

Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 19.63 -x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 19.61
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside UDL 58.86 58.86 +y
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hactive Triangular 0.00 29.99 +x
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hpassive Triangular 0.00 30.01
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 90.00 90.00 +y
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 18.02 -x
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 18.01
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 4.81 -x
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside UDL 54.05 54.05 +y
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hactive Triangular 0.00 28.28 +x
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hpassive Triangular 0.00 28.31

01_Forebay (Panel-FB-01) Force and Stability: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 7.36 +y


P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 82.64 82.64 +x
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season Trapezoidal 7.36 4.81 -y
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside Triangular 0.00 53.07 +/-x
P13 Weight of water in chamber UDL 53.07 53.07 +y
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber UDL 4.10 4.10 +y
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber Triangular 0.00 1.36 +/-x
P16 Weight of stone masonry right Triangular 0.00 4.26
P17 Weight of stone masonry left Triangular 0.00 4.26

2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point 225.14 +y

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) Point +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) Point +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) Point
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) Point

4 Combination
C1 Dry season + chamber empty D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C3 Wet season + chamber empty D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17
C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside

Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -32.09 1.09 34.98
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -32.06 1.09 34.95
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside 0.59 0.01 0.00
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 74.96 1.67 124.94
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 75.03 1.67 125.05
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 0.90 7.22 6.49
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -29.47 1.09 32.12
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -29.44 1.09 32.09
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside -1.18 0.16 0.19
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside 0.54 0.01 0.00
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 70.71 1.67 117.85
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 70.77 1.67 117.95
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 2.76 0.25 0.69
P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 0.83 7.22 5.96
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season -43.93 3.36 147.53 cancel each other
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside cancel each other
P13 Weight of water in chamber 318.43 3.61 1149.54
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber 24.57 3.61 88.70
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber cancel each other
P16 Weight of stone masonry right 4.257 3.61 15.37

Dead load

01_Forebay (Panel-FB-01) Force and Stability: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

D Total dead weight of the structure 225.14 3.61 812.77


Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) 54.29 3.61 196.00
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) -27.15 1.48 40.19
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) -54.29 3.61 196.00
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) 27.15 1.48 40.19
Load combinitions
C1 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17 42.87 230.89 124.94 869.61
C2 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 42.87 573.89 124.94 2107.85
C3 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17 42.82 186.84 266.07 866.42
C4 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 42.82 529.84 266.07 2104.66
C5 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 97.17 573.89 320.94 2107.85
C6 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 573.89 125.05 2303.82
C7 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 42.87 601.04 124.94 2148.04
C8 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 42.97 546.75 165.24 2107.82
C9 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17 97.17 230.89 320.94 869.61
C10 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17 0.00 230.89 125.05 1065.58
C11 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 42.82 556.99 266.07 2144.85
C12 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 42.91 502.69 306.37 2104.63
C13 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 97.11 529.84 462.07 2104.66
C14 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 529.84 266.17 2300.63
C15 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17 97.11 186.84 462.07 866.42
C16 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17 0.00 186.84 266.17 1062.39
C17 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17 42.91 159.69 306.37 866.39
C18 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17 42.91 213.98 266.17 906.58

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn At toe At heel
C1 Dry season + chamber empty 0.38 3.50 6.96 42.20 21.75
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment 0.15 8.70 16.87 89.71 69.26
C3 Wet season + chamber empty 0.40 2.84 3.26 34.41 17.34
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment 0.14 8.04 7.91 81.92 64.85
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) 0.50 3.84 6.57 112.27 46.70
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.19 999.00 18.42 67.17 91.80
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) 0.24 9.11 17.19 100.13 66.37
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.06 8.27 12.76 79.31 72.14
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 1.23 1.54 2.71 64.76 -0.81
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.46 999.00 8.52 19.66 44.30
C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) 0.24 8.45 8.06 92.33 61.96
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.03 7.62 6.87 71.52 67.73
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) 0.51 3.55 4.55 104.48 42.29
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.23 999.00 8.64 59.37 87.40
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 1.45 1.25 1.88 56.97 -5.22
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.65 999.00 3.99 11.87 39.89
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) 0.10 2.42 2.83 24.01 20.22
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) 0.62 3.24 3.41 44.84 14.44

*999=structure doesnot slide towards hillside


Bearing stress envelope
X Stress
At toe 3.61 112.27
max
At heel -3.61 91.80
At toe 3.61 11.87
min
At heel -3.61 -5.22

01_Forebay (Panel-FB-01) Force and Stability: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project
Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020
Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Title Forebay (Panel-FB-02) Approved by : SG

Flow conditions Soil Properties


Depth of water flow in chamber,Hw 7.61 m Bearing Capacity of Soil 150.00 KN/m2
Sediment deposition depth 0.50 m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg
Bottom slab Angle made by back wall with vertical deg
Base width of chamber, W1 6.00 m Angle of interface friction between wall and soil - deg
Thickness of slab, T 0.90 m Angle of backfill with horizontal - deg
Projection beyond side wall at hillside, Wh 0.01 m Coefficient of active earth pressure 0.333
Projection beyond side wall at riverside, Wr 0.01 m Coefficient of Passive earth pressure(Kp) 3.00
Length of slab inside side walls 7.80 m Coefficient of Dynamic active earth pressure(Kae) 0.605
Total length of base slab 7.82 m Coefficient of dynamic passive earth pressure(Kpe) 2.91
Side walls Unit weight of soil 18.00 KN/m3
Top thickness of side wall, B1 0.30 m Unit weight of saturated soil 21.00 KN/m3
Bottom thickness of side wall, B2 0.90 m Unit weight of sediment 18.00 KN/m3
Height of side wall, H1 7.81 m Unit weight of concrete 24.00 KN/m3
Masonary Unit weight of stone masonary 24.00 KN/m3
Height of stone masonary, H3 0.30 m Unit weight of water 9.81 KN/m3
Width of stone masonary, B5 0.30 m Friction coefficient 0.65
Ground conditions
Height of soil :hillside Hh 6.50 m
Surcharge load:hillside - KN/m2
Height of soil :riverside Hr 5.35 m
Surcharge load:riverside - KN/m2
% of ground water height above slab 15%
% of passive pressure to use 11%
Seismic coefficients
Horizontal 0.24
Vertical 0.12
Required FOS
Factor of safety Usual Unusual Extreme
1. Sliding 5.03 3.80 1.57
2. Overturning 3.29 4.00 1.92
3. Bearing
a. At Toe 123.57 159.93 99.51
Bearing stress envelope b. At Heel 99.63 136.37 75.95
200.00 a. At Toe 53.32 77.03 16.61
150.00 159.93
136.37 b. At Heel 31.55 55.61 (4.81)
100.00
50.00
0.00 16.61
-4.81
-6 -4 -2 -50.00 0 2 4 6

Loadings
1 Primary load cases Intensity of force
Direction
Definition Type Start Value End value
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 31.79 -x
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 32.08
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside UDL 96.30 96.30 +y
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hactive Triangular 0.00 38.98 +x
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside Hpassive Triangular 0.00 38.63
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 117.00 117.00 +y
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Rpassive Triangular 0.00 29.20 -x
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside Ractive Triangular 0.00 29.46
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside Triangular 0.00 7.87 -x
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside UDL 88.43 88.43 +y
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hactive Triangular 0.00 36.77 +x
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside Hpassive Triangular 0.00 36.44

02_Forebay (Panel-FB-02) Force and Stability: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside Triangular 0.00 9.56 +y


P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside UDL 107.44 107.44 +x
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season Trapezoidal 9.56 7.87 -y
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside Triangular 0.00 74.65 +/-x
P13 Weight of water in chamber UDL 74.65 74.65 +y
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber UDL 4.10 4.10 +y
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber Triangular 0.00 1.36 +/-x
P16 Weight of stone masonry right Triangular 0.00 4.26
P17 Weight of stone masonry left Triangular 0.00 4.26

2 Dead Loads
D Total dead weight of the structure Point 393.84 +y

3 Seismic load in normal operation


S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) Point +/-x
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) Point +/-y
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) Point
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) Point

4 Combination
C1 Dry season + chamber empty D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C3 Wet season + chamber empty D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17
C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17

Stability analysis Moment shall be taken at toe of riverside

Primary load
P1a Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -85.05 1.78 151.67
P1b Dry: Earth pressure-riverside -85.83 1.78 153.06
P2 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-riverside 0.96 0.01 0.00
P3a Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 126.69 2.17 274.49
P3b Dry: Earth pressure-hillside 125.54 2.17 272.01
P4 Dry: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 1.17 7.82 9.14
P5a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -78.10 1.78 139.27
P5b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-riverside -78.81 1.78 140.54
P6 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-riverside -3.16 0.27 0.84
P7 Wet: Vertical weight of soil+water in projection-riverside 0.88 0.01 0.00
P8a Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 119.50 2.17 258.91
P8b Wet: Earth pressure in wet season-hillside 118.42 2.17 256.57
P9 Wet: Water pressure in wet season-hillside 4.66 0.33 1.52
P10 Wet: Vertical weight of soil in projection-hillside 1.07 7.82 8.40
P11 Wet: Uplift on slab in wet season -68.18 3.78 257.96 cancel each other
P12 Water pressure inside chamber, at hillside cancel each other
P13 Weight of water in chamber 447.92 3.91 1751.39
P14 Weight of sediment in chamber 24.57 3.91 96.07
P15 Horizontal force due to sediment chamber cancel each other
P16 Weight of stone masonry right 4.257 3.91 16.64

Dead load

02_Forebay (Panel-FB-02) Force and Stability: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

D Total dead weight of the structure 393.84 3.91 1539.91


Seismic load
S1 Horizontal seismic force (+x) 94.78 3.91 370.59
S2 Vertical seismic force :uplift(-y) -47.39 2.05 97.22
S3 Horizontal seismic force :(-x) -94.78 3.91 370.59
S4 Vertical seismic force :bearing(+y) 47.39 2.05 97.22
Load combinitions
C1 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P16+P17 41.64 400.23 274.49 1717.38
C2 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 41.64 872.72 274.49 3564.83
C3 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P16+P17 42.91 331.88 518.39 1705.08
C4 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17 42.91 804.37 518.39 3552.53
C5 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 136.42 872.72 645.08 3564.83
C6 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 872.72 272.01 3936.81
C7 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 41.64 920.12 274.49 3662.06
C8 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 39.72 825.33 369.23 3566.22
C9 D+P1a+P2+P3a+P4+S1+P16+P17 136.42 400.23 645.08 1717.38
C10 D+P1b+P2+P3b+P4+S3+P16+P17 0.00 400.23 272.01 2089.36
C11 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S4+P16+P17 42.91 851.76 518.39 3649.75
C12 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S2+P16+P17 41.11 756.98 613.27 3553.80
C13 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S1+P16+P17 137.69 804.37 888.98 3552.53
C14 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+P12+P13+P14+P15+S3+P16+P17 0.00 804.37 516.05 3924.40
C15 D+P5a+P6+P7+P8a+P9+P10+P11+S1+P16+P17 137.69 331.88 888.98 1705.08
C16 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S3+P16+P17 0.00 331.88 516.05 2076.94
C17 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S2+P16+P17 41.11 284.49 613.27 1706.35
C18 D+P5b+P6+P7+P8b+P9+P10+P11+S4+P16+P17 41.11 379.27 516.05 1803.57

Result of all cases


Factor of safety Bearing pressure
Case Eccentricity
Slide Overturn At toe At heel
C1 Dry season + chamber empty 0.30 6.25 6.26 63.15 39.21
C2 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment 0.14 13.62 12.99 123.57 99.63
C3 Wet season + chamber empty 0.33 5.03 3.29 53.32 31.55
C4 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment 0.14 12.19 6.85 113.75 91.98
C5 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic(+x) 0.56 4.16 5.53 159.93 63.27
C6 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.29 999.00 14.47 86.83 136.37
C7 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) 0.23 14.36 13.34 138.27 97.05
C8 Dry season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.04 13.51 9.66 108.49 102.59
C9 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 1.23 1.91 2.66 99.51 2.85
C10 Dry season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.63 999.00 7.68 26.41 75.95
C11 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+y) 0.23 12.90 7.04 128.45 89.39
C12 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-y) 0.03 11.97 5.79 98.69 94.91
C13 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(+x) 0.60 3.80 4.00 150.11 55.61
C14 Wet season+ chamber full+with sediment+Seismic:(-x) -0.33 999.00 7.60 77.03 128.69
C15 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+x) 1.45 1.57 1.92 89.69 -4.81
C16 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-x) -0.79 999.00 4.02 16.61 68.27
C17 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(+y) 0.07 4.50 2.78 38.27 34.49
C18 Wet season+ chamber empty+seismic:(-y) 0.52 6.00 3.49 67.67 29.33

*999=structure doesnot slide towards hillside


Bearing stress envelope
X Stress
At toe 3.91 159.93
max
At heel -3.91 136.37
At toe 3.91 16.61
min
At heel -3.91 -4.81

02_Forebay (Panel-FB-02) Force and Stability: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Approach Pipe Anchor Block Design (Anchor Block 01-09)

Block number : HB01 HB02 HB03 HB04 HB05 HB06


Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 70 55 69 14.153 35 2.34
Vertical angle, α degree 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.16
Vertical angle, β degree 0.00 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
Type of Bend Upturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB CB CB HB HB HB
Design Parameters Diameter of penstock m 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 17.2 59.8 81.0 114.8 138.7 172.8
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 17.17 42.66 21.15 33.77 23.96 0.00
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No Yes Yes Yes
Length m 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.20 4.50 3.00
Thrust block size Breadth m 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 3.00
Height 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm sandy clays Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays
Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
Depth of soil downstream of the block 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 17.42 17.42 17.42 18.59 46.39 17.42


Factor of safety against sliding 2.51 2.7 2.5 1.4 1.3 3.8
Factor of safety against overturning 2.21 2.3 2.2 1.5 1.8 2.7
Allowable soil bearing capacity 200 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 4 -3 4 88 108 -31
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 106 113 106 22 10 141
Stability check Eccentricity -0.47 -0.53 -0.47 0.32 0.62 -0.78
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Approach Pipe_01_to_09_DED Input: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Approach Pipe Anchor Block Design (Anchor Block 01-09)

Block number : HB07 HB08 HB09


Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 20 26.383 16.61
Vertical angle, α degree 0.16 0.16 0.16
Vertical angle, β degree 0.16 0.16 0.16
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB
Design Parameters Diameter of penstock m 2.00 2.00 2.00
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 211.4 240.9 275.9
Main valve closer timer sec 21.0 22.0 23.0
Total head m 3.2 3.3 3.4
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No Yes
Length m 3.00 3.00 3.00
Thrust block size Breadth m 3.00 3.00 3.00
Height 3.00 3.00 3.00
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 26 27 28
Rockbolts/dowels No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0

Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415


Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays
Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22
Soil parameter Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 1.3 1.3 1.3
Depth of soil downstream of the block 4.3 4.3 4.3
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 17.42 17.42 17.42


Factor of safety against sliding 3.3 3.1 3.3
Factor of safety against overturning 2.6 2.5 2.6
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 -20 -16 -21
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 130 125 131
Stability check Eccentricity -0.68 -0.64 -0.70
Safety against sliding ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Approach Pipe_01_to_09_DED Input: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (Anchor Block 01-05)

Block number : CB01 VB02 HB03 HB04 HB05


Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 15.9975 0 28.2729 24.6511 94.5998
Vertical angle, α degree 0.58 7.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Vertical angle, β degree 7.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type CB VB HB HB HB
Design Parameters Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 10.0 45.5 92.2 125.0 171.7
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 4.9 9.6 10.0 10.4 10.8
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 10.00 35.51 46.73 32.73 46.74
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No
Length m 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40
Height 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0

Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415


Firm clays & firm sandy clays Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays
Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Depth of soil downstream of the block 4 4 4 4 4
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 10.03 10.03 10.04 10.04 10.04


Factor of safety against sliding 3.70 4.2 2.7 2.8 1.5
Factor of safety against overturning 2.87 3.0 2.5 2.5 1.7
Allowable soil bearing capacity 200 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 -100 -113 -68 -72 27
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 203 213 175 179 79
Stability check Eccentricity -1.18 -1.31 -0.91 -0.94 -0.20
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_01_to_05_DED Input: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : CB06 VB07 VB08 VB09 VB010 VB011 VB012 VB013
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 16.55 - - - - - - -
Vertical angle, α degree 0.09 44.98 33.90 27.08 52.67 0.00 47.03 37.93
Vertical angle, β degree 44.98 33.90 27.08 52.67 0.00 47.03 37.93 37.93
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Upturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type CB VB VB VB VB VB VB VB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 12 12 12 12 12
Length of Penstock upto this block m 7.0 26.9 72.0 122.5 183.5 199.5 245.4 296.1
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 12.1 26.2 51.3 74.3 122.8 122.8 89.2 58.0
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 7.00 19.89 45.07 50.54 61.00 16.00 0.00 0.00
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.71 59.81
Consideration of thermal force m Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Length m 4.00 2.40 2.40 5.60 8.50 7.00 3.20 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 3.00 2.40 2.40 3.80 7.50 5.40 2.80 2.40
Height 2.80 2.40 2.40 3.50 4.50 4.00 2.40 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 5 4 4 4 12 10 4 4
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.25 0 0 0.8 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.75 4.25 4 3.2 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 26.00 8.88 9.42 62.12 268.94 137.45 14.53 8.98
Factor of safety against sliding 2.44 5.4 5.4 1.6 1.3 1.3 3.6 6.7
Factor of safety against overturning 2.63 3.6 3.3 1.5 1.6 1.6 2.2 6.1
Allowable soil bearing capacity 200 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 -168 -415 -421 -60 -13 -71 -254 -396
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 230 450 447 92 89 114 258 480
Stability check Eccentricity -4.26 -9.95 -13.20 -4.49 -1.92 -5.06 -56.82 -4.18
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 1 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : CB014 HB015 HB016 HB017 HB018 HB019 HB020 HB021
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 3.74 31.99 47.22 32.61 61.45 27.15 43.99 21.18
Vertical angle, α degree 37.93 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
Vertical angle, β degree 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type CB HB HB HB HB HB HB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 355.9 380.2 409.9 434.6 454.0 466.3 491.9 518.7
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 21.3 21.4 21.5 21.7 21.8 21.8 21.9 22.1
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 24.27 29.65 24.76 19.38 12.25 25.61 26.88
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 24.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m Yes No No No No No No No
Length m 5.00 2.60 3.80 2.60 4.80 2.40 3.60 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 3.50 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.80 2.40 2.40 2.40
Height 2.60 2.40 2.80 2.40 3.00 2.40 2.60 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt Yes No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.3 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.5 3.2 3.3 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 36.57 10.88 19.55 10.88 32.76 10.04 16.79 10.04
Factor of safety against sliding 2.1 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.7
Factor of safety against overturning 2.1 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 -81 72 94 75 96 62 88 43
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 131 15 2 12 6 25 4 44
Stability check Eccentricity -3.54 0.29 0.60 0.31 0.70 0.17 0.55 0.00
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 2 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB022 HB023 HB024 HB025 HB026 HB027 HB028 HB029
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 60.49 20.70 78.69 85.27 84.00 29.41 40.43 33.75
Vertical angle, α degree 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
Vertical angle, β degree 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB HB HB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 537.5 558.9 597.5 621.6 645.4 665.5 733.0 795.9
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 22.2 22.3 22.5 22.6 22.7 22.8 23.2 23.5
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 18.75 21.39 38.59 24.10 23.85 20.03 67.51 62.94
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 4.80 2.40 5.80 6.00 6.00 2.50 3.40 3.00
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.80 2.40 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.40 2.40 2.40
Height 3.00 2.40 3.50 3.80 3.80 2.40 2.60 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.5 0.8 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.7 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.5 3.2 3.75 3.9 3.9 3.2 3.3 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 32.76 10.04 51.77 58.95 58.95 10.46 15.86 12.56
Factor of safety against sliding 1.3 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3
Factor of safety against overturning 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.6
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 97 42 108 118 118 72 90 78
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 6 45 7 3 4 15 2 9
Stability check Eccentricity 0.70 -0.01 0.86 0.94 0.94 0.27 0.54 0.40
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 3 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB030 HB031 HB032 HB033 HB034 HB035 HB036 HB037
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 37.49 64.33 59.48 9.43 54.26 51.92 40.42 96.70
Vertical angle, α degree 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
Vertical angle, β degree 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB HB HB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 854.8 912.9 944.3 961.7 1003.0 1012.4 1051.2 1118.4
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 23.8 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.5 24.6 24.8 25.1
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 58.94 58.10 31.39 17.35 41.28 9.38 38.83 67.19
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 3.40 5.80 6.00 2.40 5.30 5.50 3.70 6.70
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.40 3.00 2.80 2.40 2.60 2.40 2.40 3.00
Height 2.40 3.00 2.80 2.40 3.00 3.00 2.80 4.50
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6 0
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.2 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.5 3.5 3.4 4.25
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 14.23 43.07 37.59 10.04 32.99 30.94 19.04 79.90
Factor of safety against sliding 1.3 1.3 1.3 2.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
Factor of safety against overturning 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.8
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 80 90 81 8 91 89 95 143
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 7 14 17 79 10 12 1 0
Stability check Eccentricity 0.47 0.70 0.65 -0.33 0.70 0.70 0.61 1.11
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 4 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB038 HB039 HB040 HB041 HB042 HB043 HB044 VB045
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 69.70 75.71 30.85 60.91 39.70 57.25 43.06 -
Vertical angle, α degree 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
Vertical angle, β degree 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.31
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB HB HB VB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 1170.0 1201.5 1230.2 1270.3 1317.1 1349.3 1367.1 1378.6
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 25.4 25.5 25.7 25.9 26.1 26.3 26.3 26.4
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 51.67 31.48 28.65 40.16 46.77 32.22 17.75 11.50
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 5.90 6.00 3.00 7.00 4.00 6.00 4.80 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.80 3.00 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.50 2.40 2.40
Height 3.80 4.00 2.40 3.40 2.80 3.40 2.80 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.1 0 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.9 4 3.2 3.7 3.4 3.7 3.4 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 53.48 62.55 12.56 46.10 20.58 41.55 24.70 10.04
Factor of safety against sliding 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 3.9
Factor of safety against overturning 1.7 1.7 1.6 2.0 1.6 1.8 1.8 2.8
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 119 126 78 93 92 101 86 -27
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 2 1 9 16 4 10 10 114
Stability check Eccentricity 0.95 0.99 0.40 0.82 0.61 0.83 0.63 -0.65
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 5 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB046 HB047 HB048 HB049 HB050 HB051 HB052 HB053
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 18.04 52.78 54.22 46.39 22.02 29.65 14.82 9.59
Vertical angle, α degree 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Vertical angle, β degree 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB HB HB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 1429.6 1457.6 1490.0 1509.4 1531.6 1562.7 1595.0 1648.0
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 26.7 26.8 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.4 27.5 27.8
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 51.06 27.96 32.36 19.44 22.16 31.18 32.25 53.01
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 2.40 5.20 5.50 5.00 2.40 3.00 2.40 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.40 2.60 2.60 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40
Height 2.40 3.40 3.40 3.20 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.2 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 10.04 37.78 39.96 30.53 10.04 12.56 10.04 10.04
Factor of safety against sliding 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.9 2.3
Factor of safety against overturning 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.8 2.1
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 45 108 105 100 63 80 35 13
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 42 3 6 5 24 7 53 74
Stability check Eccentricity 0.02 0.82 0.82 0.75 0.18 0.42 -0.08 -0.28
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 6 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB054 HB055 HB056 HB057 HB058 HB059 HB060 HB061
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 48.11 28.23 22.36 23.37 23.29 35.16 48.31 40.24
Vertical angle, α degree 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Vertical angle, β degree 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB HB HB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 1672.6 1687.5 1721.7 1735.3 1776.5 1800.8 1823.8 1841.3
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 28.0 28.0 28.2 28.3 28.5 28.6 28.8 28.9
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 24.65 14.84 34.25 13.57 41.20 24.28 23.01 17.49
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 5.30 2.90 2.40 2.50 2.50 3.80 5.40 4.60
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.50 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40
Height 3.20 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.80 3.50 3.00
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.25 0.5
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.6 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.75 3.5
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 34.05 12.14 10.04 10.46 10.46 19.55 36.86 25.88
Factor of safety against sliding 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3
Factor of safety against overturning 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 99 80 68 71 71 94 109 96
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 7 7 19 16 16 2 3 5
Stability check Eccentricity 0.77 0.41 0.22 0.26 0.27 0.61 0.85 0.69
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 7 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB062 HB063 HB064 HB065 HB066 HB067 HB068 HB069
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 34.74 53.35 76.16 67.58 27.60 41.91 35.56 34.08
Vertical angle, α degree 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Vertical angle, β degree 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB HB HB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 1875.8 1887.7 1906.4 1923.6 1957.8 1980.6 2009.3 2042.7
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 29.5 29.6 29.7 29.9
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 34.55 11.88 18.65 17.21 34.26 22.72 28.71 33.39
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 4.40 5.60 7.00 7.00 2.90 5.00 4.10 3.80
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.40 2.80 3.00 2.80 2.40 2.50 2.40 2.40
Height 2.50 3.40 4.20 4.00 2.40 3.00 2.80 2.80
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.75 0.3 0 0 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.6
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.25 3.7 4.1 4 3.2 3.5 3.4 3.4
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 19.47 44.49 77.18 67.38 12.14 29.63 21.10 19.55
Factor of safety against sliding 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
Factor of safety against overturning 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.8 1.6 1.6
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 77 105 126 116 82 93 92 95
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 13 6 7 9 5 8 4 1
Stability check Eccentricity 0.53 0.83 1.04 0.99 0.43 0.70 0.63 0.62
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 8 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB070 HB071 HB072 HB073 HB074 HB075 HB076 HB077
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 9.85 43.13 28.08 30.26 16.38 11.35 56.38 15.20
Vertical angle, α degree 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Vertical angle, β degree 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB HB HB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 2052.7 2075.2 2092.5 2121.8 2161.1 2184.9 2254.4 2276.3
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.5 30.7 31.0 31.2
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 10.01 22.57 17.28 29.29 39.28 23.84 69.46 21.91
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 2.40 5.20 3.10 3.30 2.40 2.40 6.40 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.40 2.60 2.40 2.50 2.40 2.40 3.00 2.40
Height 2.40 3.00 2.40 2.50 2.40 2.40 3.40 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.75 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.2 3.5 3.2 3.25 3.2 3.2 3.7 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 10.04 32.37 12.97 15.43 10.04 10.04 55.20 10.04
Factor of safety against sliding 2.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.7 2.0 1.3 1.7
Factor of safety against overturning 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.7
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 18 92 82 87 48 26 100 44
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 69 10 5 3 39 62 13 43
Stability check Eccentricity -0.24 0.70 0.46 0.51 0.04 -0.17 0.82 0.01
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 9 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : CB078 VB079 VB080 VB081 VB082 VB083 VB084 VB085
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 28.60 - - - - - - -
Vertical angle, α degree 0.31 40.91 49.36 37.17 37.66 0.58 42.58 41.09
Vertical angle, β degree 40.91 49.36 37.17 37.66 0.58 42.58 41.09 37.17
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type CB VB VB VB VB VB VB VB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 12 16 16 16 16
Length of Penstock upto this block m 2295.3 2324.1 2389.8 2442.6 2505.8 2540.5 2596.5 2659.6
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 31.3 50.1 100.0 131.8 170.5 170.8 133.0 91.5
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 19.00 28.79 65.74 52.71 63.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.85 63.15 43.92
Consideration of thermal force m No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Length m 5.80 2.40 4.60 2.40 7.40 7.00 2.40 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 4.30 2.40 3.20 2.40 6.00 5.40 2.40 2.40
Height 3.00 2.40 3.00 2.40 4.50 4.00 2.40 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 6 4 4 12 12 12 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.8 0 0 0.8 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.5 3.2 3.5 3.2 4.25 4 3.2 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 64.21 8.42 34.05 9.01 186.31 137.91 8.63 8.83
Factor of safety against sliding 1.3 6.4 2.6 6.6 1.3 1.3 12.1 3.1
Factor of safety against overturning 1.6 4.0 1.8 5.4 1.5 1.6 9.9 1.8
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 68 -609 -129 -401 -69 -105 -1144 -42
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 11 624 153 476 117 136 1207 91
Stability check Eccentricity 0.70 -31.67 -8.94 -4.66 -4.70 -9.12 -14.73 -1.10
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 10 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : VB086 VB087 CB088 HB089 CB090 HB091 HB092 HB093
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree - - 18.52 41.16 19.19 15.64 33.55 9.36
Vertical angle, α degree 37.17 37.18 28.19 3.27 3.27 0.45 0.45 0.45
Vertical angle, β degree 37.18 28.19 3.27 3.27 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type VB VB CB HB CB HB HB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 12 12 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 2703.5 2743.7 2769.5 2800.9 2816.9 2872.7 2915.3 2938.7
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 65.0 40.7 28.5 30.3 31.2 31.6 32.0 32.1
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.07 55.77 42.62 23.43
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 40.16 25.83 31.31 16.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m Yes Yes Yes No No No No No
Length m 2.40 2.40 7.60 4.80 2.60 2.40 4.10 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.40 2.40 5.00 3.00 2.40 2.40 2.50 2.40
Height 2.40 2.40 4.00 2.60 2.40 2.40 2.80 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.8 0.8 0 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.2 3.2 4 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.4 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 9.03 9.26 139.22 29.87 10.88 10.04 22.24 10.04
Factor of safety against sliding 3.8 3.0 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.3 2.1
Factor of safety against overturning 2.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.7 1.6 2.0
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 -27 -41 90 82 58 48 93 18
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 111 89 20 13 21 40 4 69
Stability check Eccentricity -0.66 -1.08 0.80 0.58 0.21 0.04 0.62 -0.23
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 11 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB094 HB095 VB096 HB097 HB098 VB099 HB0100 VB0101
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 8.71 11.03 - 7.23 24.18 - 13.13 -
Vertical angle, α degree 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Vertical angle, β degree 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB VB HB HB VB HB VB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 2998.6 3031.5 3080.9 3128.8 3173.8 3236.9 3300.5 3341.9
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 32.6 32.8 33.2 33.6 33.9 34.4 34.9 35.2
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 59.85 32.86 49.40 47.90 45.09 63.01 63.62 41.38
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 3.00 2.40 2.40 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40
Height 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 10.04 10.04 10.04 10.04 12.56 10.04 10.04 10.04
Factor of safety against sliding 2.2 2.0 3.9 2.3 1.3 3.9 1.7 3.9
Factor of safety against overturning 2.0 1.9 2.8 2.1 1.5 2.8 1.7 2.8
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 16 28 -27 10 82 -27 42 -27
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 71 59 114 77 6 114 45 114
Stability check Eccentricity -0.25 -0.15 -0.65 -0.31 0.44 -0.65 -0.01 -0.65
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 12 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB0102 HB0103 HB0104 HB0105 VB0106 HB0107 HB0108 HB0109
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 64.45 56.84 12.42 17.63 - 76.05 2.74 14.47
Vertical angle, α degree 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Vertical angle, β degree 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB VB HB HB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 3386.2 3414.8 3450.3 3492.9 3526.9 3564.9 3595.9 3616.5
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 35.6 35.8 36.1 36.4 36.7 36.9 37.2 37.3
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 44.29 28.60 35.55 42.55 34.01 38.00 31.02 20.60
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 6.80 6.50 2.40 2.40 2.40 7.40 2.40 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 4.00 4.00 2.40 2.40 2.40 4.20 2.40 2.40
Height 3.50 3.00 2.40 2.40 2.40 4.00 2.40 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.25 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0 0.8 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.75 3.5 3.2 3.2 3.2 4 3.2 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 84.49 67.76 10.04 10.04 10.04 112.67 10.04 10.04
Factor of safety against sliding 1.3 1.3 1.8 1.4 3.9 1.3 3.1 1.6
Factor of safety against overturning 2.0 2.1 1.8 1.5 2.8 2.0 2.5 1.6
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 103 88 41 70 -27 116 -12 54
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 15 19 47 18 114 13 99 33
Stability check Eccentricity 0.84 0.71 -0.03 0.24 -0.65 0.98 -0.51 0.10
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 13 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB0110 HB0111 HB0112 HB0113 HB0114 HB0115 HB0116 CB0117
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 13.04 5.69 55.44 20.21 35.23 31.09 42.28 3.00
Vertical angle, α degree 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Vertical angle, β degree 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.42
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB HB HB CB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 3640.5 3659.7 3674.4 3697.5 3733.8 3759.6 3783.9 3812.1
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 37.5 37.7 37.8 38.0 38.2 38.4 38.6 38.8
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 24.02 19.14 14.78 23.05 36.31 25.82 24.33 28.18
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 2.40 2.40 6.50 2.80 5.40 4.40 5.80 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.40 2.40 3.80 2.40 2.70 2.80 3.00 2.40
Height 2.40 2.40 3.40 2.40 3.00 3.00 3.40 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.2 3.2 3.7 3.2 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 10.04 10.04 73.74 11.72 35.24 30.03 50.03 10.04
Factor of safety against sliding 1.7 2.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 3.0
Factor of safety against overturning 1.7 2.2 2.0 1.5 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.4
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 47 5 101 80 91 98 104 -9
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 40 82 14 7 11 4 8 96
Stability check Eccentricity 0.03 -0.35 0.82 0.39 0.70 0.67 0.82 -0.49
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 14 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB0118 HB0119 HB0120 HB0121 HB0122 HB0123 HB0124 HB0125
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 41.53 54.49 45.49 26.27 54.76 42.63 37.99 50.60
Vertical angle, α degree 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
Vertical angle, β degree 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB HB HB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 3847.1 3862.3 3922.0 3955.1 4001.1 4025.9 4058.8 4087.7
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 39.1 39.2 39.6 39.9 40.2 40.4 40.6 40.8
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 35.00 15.16 59.68 33.16 46.01 24.75 32.95 28.84
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 6.00 7.00 6.40 4.00 7.20 6.40 6.00 7.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 3.00 3.60 3.20 2.80 3.60 3.00 3.00 3.40
Height 3.40 3.50 3.40 2.50 3.60 3.40 3.20 3.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.3 0.25 0.3 0.75 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.7 3.75 3.7 3.25 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.7
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 51.75 77.18 59.55 21.70 81.97 55.20 48.15 73.89
Factor of safety against sliding 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
Factor of safety against overturning 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.1
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 102 101 100 82 103 100 94 95
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 11 16 13 9 17 13 14 19
Stability check Eccentricity 0.81 0.84 0.82 0.53 0.87 0.82 0.74 0.81
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 15 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB0126 HB0127 HB0128 HB0129 HB0130 HB0131 HB0132 HB0133
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 29.55 25.47 52.10 55.34 58.69 13.54 50.56 56.20
Vertical angle, α degree 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
Vertical angle, β degree 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB HB HB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 4120.0 4165.9 4210.5 4251.7 4285.4 4329.1 4376.5 4397.0
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 41.1 41.4 41.7 42.0 42.3 42.6 42.9 43.1
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 32.29 45.90 44.65 41.21 33.66 43.66 47.40 20.55
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 4.30 4.00 6.80 7.00 7.20 2.40 6.60 7.00
Thrust block size Breadth m 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.20 3.30 2.40 3.00 3.30
Height 2.80 2.80 4.40 4.40 4.40 2.40 4.40 4.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.6 0.6 0 0 0 0.8 0 0
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.4 3.4 4.2 4.2 4.2 3.2 4.2 4.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 29.35 21.70 79.05 87.54 93.21 10.04 76.73 90.62
Factor of safety against sliding 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.3
Factor of safety against overturning 1.7 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.8
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 93 94 137 135 135 60 140 137
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 6 3 4 6 6 27 0 5
Stability check Eccentricity 0.63 0.62 1.08 1.07 1.09 0.15 1.09 1.09
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 16 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB0134 HB0135 HB0136 HB0137 HB0138 CB0139 HB0140 VB0141
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 31.98 16.64 27.25 3.63 34.00 19.00 52.55 -
Vertical angle, α degree 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 1.98 1.98
Vertical angle, β degree 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 1.98 1.98 1.98
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB CB HB VB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 4433.2 4475.3 4515.6 4553.0 4619.6 4635.1 4653.6 4696.9
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 43.3 43.6 43.9 44.2 44.7 44.8 45.4 46.9
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 36.14 42.10 40.37 37.36 66.61 15.52 18.50 43.32
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No
Length m 4.80 2.70 4.50 2.40 5.40 3.20 7.00 2.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 3.20 2.40 2.80 2.40 3.20 2.50 3.30 2.40
Height 3.00 2.40 2.80 2.40 3.20 2.50 4.40 2.40
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays

Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.75 0 0.8
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.5 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.6 3.25 4.2 3.2
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 38.52 11.30 28.19 10.04 46.79 14.96 90.61 10.04
Factor of safety against sliding 1.3 1.3 1.3 2.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 3.9
Factor of safety against overturning 1.8 1.5 1.7 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.8 2.8
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 97 77 91 -3 99 81 136 -27
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 7 10 7 90 10 4 5 114
Stability check Eccentricity 0.69 0.34 0.64 -0.42 0.74 0.49 1.08 -0.65
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 17 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Headrace Pipe Anchor Block Design (AB 06-150)

Block number : HB0142 HB0143 HB0144 HB0145 HB0146 CB0147 VB0148 CB0149 HB0150
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 34.94 47.94 48.54 32.11 28.43 30.48 - 8.20 23.37
Vertical angle, α degree 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.71 1.71 0.06
Vertical angle, β degree 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.71 1.71 0.06 0.06
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn BendDownturn BendDownturn BendDownturn BendDownturn BendDownturn Bend
Block type HB HB HB HB HB CB VB CB HB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Length of Penstock upto this block m 4736.1 4774.9 4800.7 4842.9 4912.7 4974.5 5029.1 5092.7 5155.7
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 48.3 49.6 50.5 52.0 54.4 56.5 58.1 60.0 60.1
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 39.16 38.81 25.82 42.21 69.74 61.81 54.64 63.62 62.93
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No No No No
Length m 5.30 6.20 6.40 5.40 5.00 5.40 2.40 2.40 4.80
Thrust block size Breadth m 3.80 4.20 4.20 3.60 3.50 3.70 2.40 2.40 3.20
Height 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.20 3.20 3.20 2.40 2.40 3.00
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415 415
Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & Firm clays & Firm clays & Firm clays & Firm clays &
Soil Type
sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays sandy clays firm sandy firm sandy firm sandy firm sandy firm sandy
clays
Steel on clays
Steel on clays
Steel on clays
Steel on clays
Steel on
Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Steel on Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
Soil parameter
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Depth of soil above the block 0.5 0 0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.5
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.5 4 4 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.2 3.2 3.5
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 52.07 94.39 97.44 53.70 48.12 55.43 10.04 10.04 38.52
Factor of safety against sliding 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 3.9 1.6 1.3
Factor of safety against overturning 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.9 2.8 1.6 1.8
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 96 126 125 101 104 102 -27 43 98
Minimum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 10 3 5 9 6 8 114 35 6
Stability check Eccentricity 0.71 0.98 0.98 0.75 0.75 0.77 -0.65 0.04 0.71
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Headrace Pipe_06_to_150_DED Input: 18 of 18 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Penstock Pipe Anchor Block Design (CB 152-162)


Block number : CB152 VB153 VB154 VB155 VB156
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 17 0 0 0 0
Vertical angle, α degree 0.00 18.37 29.47 29.47 29.47
Vertical angle, β degree 18.37 29.47 29.47 29.47 17.03
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type CB VB VB VB VB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Thickness of the pipe mm 8 12 12 12 14
Length of Penstock upto this block m 23.1 59.7 117.1 174.5 223.9
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 59.9 71.5 99.7 128.0 152.3
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 23.13 36.53 57.43 57.43 49.39
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No
Length m 4.00 2.40 2.40 2.40 4.40
Thrust block size Breadth m 3.00 2.40 2.40 2.40 3.00
Height 3.00 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.80
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415
Soil Type Firm clays & firm sandy clays Firm clays & firm sandy clays Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Friction co-efficient due to Steel on Concrete sandy
Steel on clays
Concrete sandy
Steel on clays
Concrete sandy
Steel on clays
Concrete sandy
Steel on clays
Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Soil parameter
Depth of soil above the block 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.5 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 31.98 11.20 11.09 11.09 32.14


Factor of safety against sliding 1.53 2.9 4.0 4.0 2.2
Factor of safety against overturning 1.51 1.7 2.9 2.9 1.5
Allowable soil bearing capacity 200 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 64 -40 -24 -24 25
Minimum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 15 87 117 117 30
Stability check Eccentricity 0.42 -1.09 -0.61 -0.61 -0.07
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Penstock Pipe_152_to_162_DED Input: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Title: Penstock Pipe Anchor Block Design (CB 152-162)


Block number : VB157 VB158 VB159 CB160 VB161 VB162
Design Discharge m3/s 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
Pipe Material Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel
Horizontal deflection angle degree 0 0 0 39 0 0
Vertical angle, α degree 17.03 17.03 21.97 31.47 24.23 37.66
Vertical angle, β degree 17.03 21.97 31.47 24.23 37.66 45.52
Type of Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend Downturn Bend
Block type VB VB VB CB VB VB
CB01 Diameter of penstock m 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Thickness of the pipe mm 14 18 18 20 22 22
Length of Penstock upto this block m 287.6 351.3 424.8 482.3 555.4 637.3
Main valve closer timer sec 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total head m 170.9 189.6 217.1 247.1 277.1 327.1
U/s section length (upto expansion) m 63.69 63.69 73.54 57.48 73.11 81.85
D/s section length (upto expansion) m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consideration of thermal force m No No No No No No
Length m 2.40 2.40 4.80 12.00 6.00 5.00
Thrust block size Breadth m 2.40 2.40 3.00 6.00 4.40 3.80
Height 2.40 2.40 3.00 5.00 3.00 3.00
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt No No No No No No
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels mm 25 25 25 25 25 25
Rockbolts/dowels
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ultimate tensile stress N/mm2 415 415 415 415 415 415
Soil Type Firm clays & firm sandy clays Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm Firm clays & firm
Friction co-efficient due to sandy
Steel on clays
Concrete sandy
Steel on clays
Concrete sandy
Steel on clays
Concrete sandy
Steel on clays
Concrete sandy
Steel on clays
Concrete sandy
Steel on clays
Concrete
Unit weight of saturated kN/m3 22 22 22 22 22 22
Unit weight of water kN/m3 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81 9.81
Soil parameter
Depth of soil above the block 0.8 0.8 0.5 0 0.5 0.5
Depth of soil downstream of the block 3.2 3.2 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.5
%age of water table upstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
%age of water table downstream of the block m 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%
Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Coefficients Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Coefficient of dynamic load 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Volume of Concrete, m3 11.32 11.24 37.72 346.10 71.92 50.09


Factor of safety against sliding 4.0 2.9 2.2 1.3 1.8 2.1
Factor of safety against overturning 2.9 1.6 1.5 2.2 1.5 1.5
Allowable soil bearing capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150
Maximum soil pressure at U/s of the block KN/m2 -23 -47 29 128 41 36
Minimum soil pressure at D/s of the block KN/m2 117 85 30 33 21 26
Stability check Eccentricity -0.60 -1.42 -0.01 1.17 0.32 0.13
Safety against sliding ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety against overturn ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for max soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for min soil pressure ok ok ok ok ok ok
Safety for ecentricity Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

02H09_AB_Penstock Pipe_152_to_162_DED Input: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Saddle Support (Between VB11 & VB12)
Title Angle of Inlcination of Pipe 48 degree with Horizontal Approved by : SG

Pipe Properties
Description Value Units Material Properties
Pipe slope, β 48.00 degree Unit weight of water,gw 9.81 kN/m3 1.40
Pipe diameter 1.40 m Unit weight of concrete,gc 25 kN/m3 6.00
Pipe thickness 16 mm Unit weight of steel,gs 77 kN/m3
Length of Pipe ( 2 ) 6.00 m Unit weight of soil,gs 18 kN/m3 β
2
Friction factor, μ 0.65
Block Size Dynamic load factor 0% 5
1
Block 1 Length 0.81 m Bearing Capacity of Soil 150 kN/m2
Block 1 height 1.60 m Percentage of Passive Pressure 60%
Block 4 Length - m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg 0.4 0.81 6
Block 4 Height - m Coefficient of Passive Pressure 3 7
4
Length of bottom Slab (Block 3) 1.80 m 1.16
Height of Bottom slab (Block 3) 0.40 m Seismic 3
8
Block 5 Length 0.68 m Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.24 0.64
Block 6 Length 0.31 m Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.120 1.80
Block 7 Length - m 0.00
Block 8 Length - m
Heel to mid of Block 1 (L1) 1.16 m Result Seismic Non Sesimic
C/C of Block 1 to Block 4 (L2) 0.64 m FoS of Sliding 1.51 1.68 Passive
Toe to mid of block 4 (L3) - m FoS of Overturning 6.18 8.27
sliding Width of Saddle support 2.75 m Max Bearing 338.72 331.88
Height of Shear Key - m Min Bearing 71.55 102.88
Height of Block 3 inside soil 0.50 m
Rockbolts/dowels
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels 20 mm
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 6
2
Ultimate tensile stress 500 N/mm
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt Yes

Vertical Load Horizontal Load


Volume Unit weight Lever arm Resisting Mom. Overturning Mom.
Section / Description (kN) (kN)
m3 kN/m3 H, m V, m + + KN m KN m
P1 Block 1 3.56 24.00 0.64 1.20 85.54 54.74 54.74 102.64 85.54
P2 Block 4 0.00 24.00 0.00 1.20 - - - - -
P6 Bottom Slab (Block 3) 1.98 24.00 0.90 0.20 47.52 42.77 42.77 9.50 47.52
P15 Block 5 1.50 24.00 1.50 0.93 24.02 36.00 53.80 33.51 35.90
P16 Block 6 0.68 24.00 0.03 0.93 16.37 0.46 0.46 15.28 16.37
P17 Block 7 0.00 24.00 0.00 0.40 - - - - -
P18 Block 8 0.00 24.00 0.00 0.40 - - - - -
P3 Pipe 0.43 77.01 0.90 2.72 22.01 24.44 19.81 66.38 29.60 89.32 32.89
P4 Expansion 0.90 2.72 15.89 43.15 - - -
P5 Contraction 0.90 2.72 - 15.89 43.15 - - -
P7 Water inside pipe 9.24 9.81 0.90 2.72 60.63 54.57 - 81.55 246.09 90.61
P8 Dynamic load 1.61 - - 262.92 496.35 308.82
P9 Sesmic load (Ver) 0.85 - 22.24 18.93 X bar 0.85
P10 Sesmic load (Ver) 0.85 22.24 18.93 Y bar 1.61
P11 Sesmic load (Hori) 1.61 44.48 71.49
P12 Sesmic load (Hori) 1.61 - 44.48 71.49
P13 Active Pressure 0.17 2.06 0.34
P14 Passive Pressure 0.17 - 11.14 1.86
P19 Rock bolt 0.85 819.96 376.99 698.07

Vertical Load Horizontal Load


Combination Resisting Mom. Overturning Mom.
(kN) (kN)

Saddle support Saddle Support 48 deg_Type A : 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

C1 Self Wt + No Water inside P1+P2+P3+P6+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,015.41 392.36 853.70 66.72


C2 Self Wt +Water inside P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,076.04 392.36 908.27 66.72
C3 Self Wt +Water inside+Dynamic Load P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P8+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,076.04 392.36 908.27 66.72
C4 Self Wt +Water inside+Expansion P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P4+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,076.04 408.24 908.27 109.87
C5 Self Wt +Water inside-Expansion P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P5+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,076.04 376.47 951.41 66.72
C6 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Ver) P1+P2+P3+P6+P9+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 993.17 392.36 853.70 85.66
C7 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Ver) P1+P2+P3+P6+P10+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,037.65 392.36 872.64 66.72
C8 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Hor) P1+P2+P3+P6+P11+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,015.41 436.83 853.70 138.21
C9 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Hor) P1+P2+P3+P6+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,015.41 347.88 925.19 66.72

Eccentrictit
X bar Sliding Overturning Bearing max Bearing min
Combination y
C1 Self Wt + No Water inside 0.78 0.12 1.68 12.79 290.58 119.69
C2 Self Wt +Water inside 0.78 0.12 1.78 13.61 302.83 131.93
C3 Self Wt +Water inside+Dynamic Load 0.78 0.12 1.78 13.61 302.83 131.93
C4 Self Wt +Water inside+Expansion 0.74 0.16 1.71 8.27 331.88 102.88
C5 Self Wt +Water inside+contraction 0.82 0.08 1.86 14.26 273.77 160.99
C6 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Ver) 0.77 0.13 1.65 9.97 285.36 115.92
C7 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Ver) 0.78 0.12 1.72 13.08 295.80 123.45
C8 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Hor) 0.70 0.20 1.51 6.18 338.72 71.55
C9 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Hor) 0.85 0.05 1.90 13.87 242.44 167.83

Saddle support Saddle Support 48 deg_Type A : 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Saddle Support (Between VB12 & VB14)
Title Angle of Inlcination of Pipe 27 degree with Horizontal Approved by : SG

Pipe Properties
Description Value Units Material Properties
Pipe slope, β 37.00 degree Unit weight of water,gw 9.81 kN/m3 1.40
Pipe diameter 1.40 m Unit weight of concrete,gc 25 kN/m3 6.00
Pipe thickness 16 mm Unit weight of steel,gs 77 kN/m3
Length of Pipe ( 2 ) 6.00 m Unit weight of soil,gs 18 kN/m3 β
2
Friction factor, μ 0.65
Block Size Dynamic load factor 0% 5
1
Block 1 Length 0.96 m Bearing Capacity of Soil 150 kN/m2
Block 1 height 1.53 m Percentage of Passive Pressure 60%
Block 4 Length - m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg 0.3 0.96 6
Block 4 Height - m Coefficient of Passive Pressure 3 7
4
Length of bottom Slab (Block 3) 1.79 m 1.09
Height of Bottom slab (Block 3) 0.30 m Seismic 3
8
Block 5 Length 0.68 m Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.24 0.7
Block 6 Length 0.15 m Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.120 1.79
Block 7 Length - m 0.00
Block 8 Length - m
Heel to mid of Block 1 (L1) 1.09 m Result Seismic Non Sesimic
C/C of Block 1 to Block 4 (L2) 0.70 m FoS of Sliding 1.52 1.67 Passive
Toe to mid of block 4 (L3) - m FoS of Overturning 8.07 11.47
sliding Width of Saddle support 2.50 m Max Bearing 306.61 302.46
Height of Shear Key - m Min Bearing 139.59 176.08
Height of Block 3 inside soil 0.50 m
Rockbolts/dowels
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels 20 mm
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 6
2
Ultimate tensile stress 500 N/mm
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt Yes

Vertical Load Horizontal Load Overturning


Volume Unit weight Lever arm Resisting Mom.
Section / Description (kN) (kN) Mom.
m3 kN/m3 H, m V, m + + KN m KN m
P1 Block 1 3.67 24.00 0.70 1.07 88.13 61.69 61.69 93.86 88.13
P2 Block 4 0.00 24.00 0.00 1.07 - - - - -
P6 Bottom Slab (Block 3) 1.34 24.00 0.90 0.15 32.22 28.84 28.84 4.83 32.22
P15 Block 5 1.30 24.00 1.63 0.81 24.93 40.71 50.98 25.28 31.21
P16 Block 6 0.29 24.00 0.12 0.81 6.89 0.83 0.83 5.58 6.89
P17 Block 7 0.00 24.00 0.00 0.30 - - - - -
P18 Block 8 0.00 24.00 0.00 0.30 - - - - -
P3 Pipe 0.43 77.01 0.90 2.55 26.26 19.79 23.51 50.39 29.43 83.73 32.89
P4 Expansion 0.90 2.55 12.86 32.75 - - -
P5 Contraction 0.90 2.55 - 12.86 32.75 - - -
P7 Water inside pipe 9.24 9.81 0.90 2.55 72.36 64.76 - 81.09 230.69 90.61
P8 Dynamic load 1.57 - - 252.86 443.97 281.94
P9 Sesmic load (Ver) 0.90 - 19.01 17.05 X bar 0.90
P10 Sesmic load (Ver) 0.90 19.01 17.05 Y bar 1.57
P11 Sesmic load (Hori) 1.57 38.03 59.88
P12 Sesmic load (Hori) 1.57 - 38.03 59.88
P13 Active Pressure 0.17 1.88 0.31
P14 Passive Pressure 0.17 - 10.13 1.69
P19 Rock bolt 0.90 819.96 376.99 735.38

Vertical Load Horizontal Load Overturning


Combination Resisting Mom.
(kN) (kN) Mom.

Saddle support Saddle Support 37 Deg_Type B: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

C1 Self Wt + No Water inside P1+P2+P3+P6+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 998.38 388.53 892.65 50.70


C2 Self Wt +Water inside P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,070.74 388.53 957.41 50.70
C3 Self Wt +Water inside+Dynamic Load P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P8+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,070.74 388.53 957.41 50.70
C4 Self Wt +Water inside+Expansion P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P4+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,070.74 401.40 957.41 83.46
C5 Self Wt +Water inside-Expansion P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P5+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,070.74 375.67 990.16 50.70
C6 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Ver) P1+P2+P3+P6+P9+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 979.37 388.53 892.65 67.75
C7 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Ver) P1+P2+P3+P6+P10+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,017.39 388.53 909.70 50.70
C8 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Hor) P1+P2+P3+P6+P11+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 998.38 426.56 892.65 110.58
C9 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Hor) P1+P2+P3+P6+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 998.38 350.51 952.53 50.70

Eccentrictit
X bar Sliding Overturning Bearing max Bearing min
Combination y
C1 Self Wt + No Water inside 0.84 0.05 1.67 17.61 261.76 184.45
C2 Self Wt +Water inside 0.85 0.05 1.79 18.88 277.93 200.62
C3 Self Wt +Water inside+Dynamic Load 0.85 0.05 1.79 18.88 277.93 200.62
C4 Self Wt +Water inside+Expansion 0.82 0.08 1.73 11.47 302.46 176.08
C5 Self Wt +Water inside+contraction 0.88 0.02 1.85 19.53 253.39 225.15
C6 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Ver) 0.84 0.05 1.64 13.17 257.54 180.17
C7 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Ver) 0.84 0.05 1.70 17.94 265.98 188.72
C8 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Hor) 0.78 0.11 1.52 8.07 306.61 139.59
C9 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Hor) 0.90 (0.01) 1.85 18.79 229.30 216.91

Saddle support Saddle Support 37 Deg_Type B: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

Project Name: Suni Gad Hydropower Project, 11.05 MW Date : 11/2/2020


Location: Bajhang District, Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal Developed by : BP
Type: Stability Analysis Updated by : DK
Saddle Support (Between VB08 & VB09)
Title Angle of Inlcination of Pipe 27 degree with Horizontal Approved by : SG

Pipe Properties
Description Value Units Material Properties
Pipe slope, β 27.00 degree Unit weight of water,gw 9.81 kN/m3 1.40
Pipe diameter 1.40 m Unit weight of concrete,gc 25 kN/m3 6.00
Pipe thickness 16 mm Unit weight of steel,gs 77 kN/m3
Length of Pipe ( 2 ) 6.00 m Unit weight of soil,gs 18 kN/m3 β
2
Friction factor, μ 0.65
Block Size Dynamic load factor 0% 5
1
Block 1 Length 0.96 m Bearing Capacity of Soil 150 kN/m2
Block 1 height 1.53 m Percentage of Passive Pressure 60%
Block 4 Length - m Angle of internal friction 30.00 deg 0.3 0.96 6
Block 4 Height - m Coefficient of Passive Pressure 3 7
4
Length of bottom Slab (Block 3) 1.80 m 1.16
Height of Bottom slab (Block 3) 0.30 m Seismic 3
8
Block 5 Length 0.68 m Hor. sesmic coefficient 0.24 0.64
Block 6 Length 0.15 m Ver. sesmic coefficient 0.120 1.80
Block 7 Length - m 0.00
Block 8 Length - m
Heel to mid of Block 1 (L1) 1.16 m Result Seismic Non Sesimic
C/C of Block 1 to Block 4 (L2) 0.64 m FoS of Sliding 1.54 1.69 Passive
Toe to mid of block 4 (L3) - m FoS of Overturning 9.00 14.94
sliding Width of Saddle support 2.40 m Max Bearing 328.57 321.45
Height of Shear Key - m Min Bearing 133.60 178.09
Height of Block 3 inside soil 0.50 m
Rockbolts/dowels
Diameter of Rockbolts/Dowels 20 mm
No of Rockbolts/Dowels 6
2
Ultimate tensile stress 500 N/mm
Consideration of force resisted by rockbolt Yes

Vertical Load Horizontal Load


Volume Unit weight Lever arm Resisting Mom. Overturning Mom.
Section / Description (kN) (kN)
3 3
m kN/m H, m V, m + + KN m KN m
P1 Block 1 3.53 24.00 0.64 1.07 84.60 54.15 54.15 90.10 84.60
P2 Block 4 0.00 24.00 0.00 1.07 - - - - -
P6 Bottom Slab (Block 3) 1.30 24.00 0.90 0.15 31.10 27.99 27.99 4.67 31.10
P15 Block 5 1.25 24.00 1.57 0.81 26.70 42.00 47.14 24.27 29.96
P16 Block 6 0.28 24.00 0.06 0.81 6.61 0.40 0.40 5.35 6.61
P17 Block 7 0.00 24.00 0.00 0.30 - - - - -
P18 Block 8 0.00 24.00 0.00 0.30 - - - - -
P3 Pipe 0.43 77.01 0.90 2.55 29.30 14.93 26.37 38.01 29.60 83.73 32.89
P4 Expansion 0.90 2.55 9.70 24.71 - - -
P5 Contraction 0.90 2.55 - 9.70 24.71 - - -
P7 Water inside pipe 9.24 9.81 0.90 2.55 80.73 72.66 - 81.55 230.69 90.61
P8 Dynamic load 1.59 - - 240.82 438.81 275.77
P9 Sesmic load (Ver) 0.87 - 18.27 15.96 X bar 0.87
P10 Sesmic load (Ver) 0.87 18.27 15.96 Y bar 1.59
P11 Sesmic load (Hori) 1.59 36.55 58.15
P12 Sesmic load (Hori) 1.59 - 36.55 58.15
P13 Active Pressure 0.17 1.80 0.30
P14 Passive Pressure 0.17 - 9.72 1.62
P19 Rock bolt 0.87 819.96 376.99 716.04

Vertical Load Horizontal Load


Combination Resisting Mom. Overturning Mom.
(kN) (kN)

Saddle support Saddle Support 27 Deg_Type C: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol2 Annex C2: Stability Analysis and Structural Design Calculations

C1 Self Wt + No Water inside P1+P2+P3+P6+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 998.27 384.00 868.57 38.31


C2 Self Wt +Water inside P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,079.00 384.00 941.23 38.31
C3 Self Wt +Water inside+Dynamic Load P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P8+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,079.00 384.00 941.23 38.31
C4 Self Wt +Water inside+Expansion P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P4+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,079.00 393.71 941.23 63.02
C5 Self Wt +Water inside-Expansion P1+P2+P3+P6+P7+P5+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,079.00 374.30 965.94 38.31
C6 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Ver) P1+P2+P3+P6+P9+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 980.00 384.00 868.57 54.27
C7 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Ver) P1+P2+P3+P6+P10+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 1,016.55 384.00 884.53 38.31
C8 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Hor) P1+P2+P3+P6+P11+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 998.27 420.55 868.57 96.47
C9 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Hor) P1+P2+P3+P6+P12+P13+P14+P15+P16+P17+P18+P19 998.27 347.45 926.72 38.31

Eccentrictit
X bar Sliding Overturning Bearing max Bearing min
Combination y
C1 Self Wt + No Water inside 0.83 0.07 1.69 22.67 283.70 178.47
C2 Self Wt +Water inside 0.84 0.06 1.83 24.57 302.38 197.16
C3 Self Wt +Water inside+Dynamic Load 0.84 0.06 1.83 24.57 302.38 197.16
C4 Self Wt +Water inside+Expansion 0.81 0.09 1.78 14.94 321.45 178.09
C5 Self Wt +Water inside+contraction 0.86 0.04 1.87 25.21 283.32 216.22
C6 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Ver) 0.83 0.07 1.66 16.00 279.09 174.61
C7 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Ver) 0.83 0.07 1.72 23.09 288.30 182.32
C8 Self Wt +Water inside+Seismic (Hor) 0.77 0.13 1.54 9.00 328.57 133.60
C9 Self Wt +Water inside-Seismic (Hor) 0.89 0.01 1.87 24.19 238.82 223.34

Saddle support Saddle Support 27 Deg_Type C: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT (11.05MW)
VOLUME 2: ANNEX D
GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
Final Draft Report
On
Geophysical Investigation at
Suni Gad Hydropower Project
Bajhang District, Nepal

Submitted To:
Omega Energy Developer (Pvt.) Ltd.
Kathmandu-4, Chandol Nepal

Submitted By
Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Bansathali, Kathmandu
Email: egcnepal@gmail.com / info@egcnepal.com
Phone: 01 4380156 / 9851139485 / 9841429100
www.egcnepal.com

2075
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This report on “Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Hydropower Project” has been
prepared under the contract agreement between Omega Energy Developer (Pvt.) Ltd. and
Explorer Geophysucal Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Bansthali, Kathmandu. The consultant has
prepared this report after extensive consultation/field work at the project site at Suni Gad
Hydropower Project located at Bajhang District Nepal

We are grateful to Omega Energy Developer (Pvt.) Ltd. Kathmandu for entrusting us to take the
assignment entitled “Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Hydropower Project” using
Two-Dimensional Electrical Resistivity Tomography (2D ERT) and Multi- Channel Analysis of
Surface Waves (MASW) at different components of the project

We would like to express our gratitude to the Mr. Lokendra Badal, Managing Director of Omega
Energy Developer (Pvt.) Ltd. Kathmandu for entrusting us to take the job and cooperation
extended to us while executing the assigned task.

We are thankful to the field staff and office staff of Explorer Geophysical Consultants’ Pvt. Ltd.
Nepal and Parsan Overseas Pvt Ltd, India for their continuous help during the field and office
work. Finally, we want to thank the local people of project area for their kind co-operation and
information during the execution of the project

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd.


Banasthali, Kathmandu

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali , Kathmandu


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Contents
This Page has been left blank intentionally ....................................................................................... 7

CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 8

1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 8

1.2 Field Visit Program .................................................................................................................. 8

1.3 Location and Accessibility....................................................................................................... 8

1.4 Objective and Scope of the Study .......................................................................................... 10

1.5 Materials and Methodology ................................................................................................... 11

CHAPTER 2: REGIONAL GEOLOGY OF NEPAL HIMALAYA ......................................... 12

2.1 Tectonic subdivision of Nepal Himalaya ............................................................................... 12

2.1.1 Terai zone........................................................................................................................ 12

2.1.2 SubHimalayan (Churia/Siwalik) zone ............................................................................ 13

2.1.3 Lesser Himalaya.............................................................................................................. 13

2.1.4 Higher Himalaya ............................................................................................................. 13

2.1.5 Tibetan-Tethys Himalaya................................................................................................ 14

CHAPTER 3: GENERAL GEOLOGY OF THE STUDY AREA ............................................ 15

3.1 Regional Geology of the Area ............................................................................................... 15

3.2 General Geology of the Project area ...................................................................................... 15

3.2.1 Geology of Headworks ................................................................................................... 16

3.2.2 Geology of Surge Shaft and Power House ..................................................................... 17

CHAPTER 4: GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY ............................................................................... 20

CHAPTER 5: ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY METHOD ........................... 20

5. 1 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 20

5.1.1 Electrical Resistivity Principle and Resistivity of Rocks ............................................... 20

5.1.2 The relationship between Resistivity and Porosity ......................................................... 24

5.1.3 Equipments used in the field study ................................................................................. 24

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 1


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.1.4 Electrical Resistivity Tomography Survey ..................................................................... 25

5.2 Two Dimensional Electrical Resistivity Tomography Survey ( 2D ERT) ............................ 28

5.2.1 Data Acquisition ............................................................................................................. 28

5.2.2 Data quality ..................................................................................................................... 29

5.2.3 Field Crew ....................................................................................................................... 33

5.3 Data Processing, Analysis and Interpretation ........................................................................ 33

5.3.1 Data Processing and Interpretation ................................................................................. 34

5.3.2 Pitfalls of the Processing and Interpretation ................................................................... 36

5.3.3 Interpretation ( Resistivity Tomograms and Interpretative Cross-sections) ................... 37

CHAPTER 6: MULTI SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE WAVES ............................ 70

6.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 70

6.2 Scope and objectives of the study .......................................................................................... 70

6.3 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 71

6.3.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 71

6.4 Results and Interpretation ...................................................................................................... 82

6.4.1 MASW-1 (Penstock Alignment- P-20) ........................................................................... 82

6.4.2 MASW - 2 (Penstock Alignment- P-19)......................................................................... 87

6.4.3 MASW - 3 (Penstock Alignment- P-18)......................................................................... 91

6.4.4 MASW - 4 (Penstock Alignment- P-17)......................................................................... 95

6.4.5 MASW - 5 (Penstock Alignment- P-16)......................................................................... 99

6.4.6 MASW - 6 (Penstock Alignment- P-15)....................................................................... 103

6.4.7 MASW - 7 (Penstock Alignment- P-14)....................................................................... 107

6.4.8 MASW - 8 (Penstock Alignment- P-13)....................................................................... 111

6.4.9 MASW - 9 (Penstock Alignment- P-12)....................................................................... 115

6.4.10 MASW - 10 (Penstock Alignment- P-11) ................................................................... 119

6.4.11 MASW - 11 (Pipeline Alignment- P-2) ...................................................................... 123

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 2


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.12 MASW - 12 (Penstock Alignment- P-01) ................................................................... 126

CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................. 130

Headworks Area......................................................................................................................... 130

Power House and Penstock Alignment Area ............................................................................. 130

RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................... 131

ANNEX – I .................................................................................................................................... 132

ANNEX – II ................................................................................................................................... 143

Table of Figures
Figure 1-1: Map of Nepal Showing Bajhang District –Project Area ................................................. 9
Figure 1-2: Different Components of the project on Google Earth Image ........................................ 9
Figure 2-1: Regional Geological Map of Nepal Showing Project Area ( Geological Map of Nepal,
DMG 1994) ...................................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 3-1: Regional Geological map of study area (Department of Mines and Geology, 1987) ... 15
Figure 3-2: Exposure of bedrock on left bank at weir axis (Headworks) ........................................ 16
Figure 3-3:Alluvial deposit on both bank of river at headworks area. ............................................ 17
Figure 3-4: Bedrock exposure of black shale at Powerhouse .......................................................... 18
Figure 3-5: Powerhouse, Penstock and Surge shaft area ................................................................. 19
Figure 5-1: Schematic Diagram of Wenner Configuration for Resistivity Survey ......................... 27
Figure 5-2: Principles of Resistivity Measurements (Robinson and Coruth 1988) ......................... 28
Figure 5-3: Sequence of measurements to build up a pseudo section for Wenner Array ................ 28
Figure 5-4: ERT Layout in Google Map at Headworks Area .......................................................... 32
Figure 5-5: ERT Layout in Google Map at Powerhouse Area ........................................................ 32
Figure 5-6: ERT Layout in Google Map at Headrace alignment (Kholsi). .................................... 33
Figure 5-7A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 1............................................................ 38
Figure 5-7B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 1 .................................................................... 39
Figure 5-8A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 2............................................................ 41
Figure 5-8B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 2 .................................................................... 42
Figure 5-9A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 3............................................................ 44
Figure 5-9B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 3 ................................................................... 45

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 3


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-10A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 4 .......................................................... 47


Figure 5-10B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 4 .................................................................. 48
Figure 5-11A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 5 .......................................................... 50
Figure 5-11B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 5 ................................................................. 51
Figure 5-12A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 6 .......................................................... 53
Figure 5-12B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 6 .................................................................. 54
Figure 5-13A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 7 .......................................................... 56
Figure 5-13B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 7 .................................................................. 57
Figure 5-14A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 8 .......................................................... 59
Figure 5-14B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 8 .................................................................. 60
Figure 5-15A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 9 .......................................................... 62
Figure 5-15B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 9 .................................................................. 63
Figure 5-16A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 10 ........................................................ 65
Figure 5-16B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 10 ................................................................ 66
Figure 5-17A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 11 ........................................................ 68
Figure 5-17B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 11 ................................................................ 69
Figure 6-1: Field setup and sample results of MASW .................................................................... 71
Figure 6-2: Shear Wave Velocity Map ........................................................................................... 72
Figure 6-3: MASW Array in Field................................................................................................... 72
Figure 6-4: Field procedure for active MASW ................................................................................ 73
Figure 6-5: Surface Wave Generation ............................................................................................. 73
Figure 6-6: Schematic diagram showing Generation of the phase velocity-frequency spectrum ... 79
Figure 6-7: Schematic diagram showing Velocity Profile ............................................................... 80
Figure 6-8: Schematic diagram showing Shear wave Velocity ....................................................... 81
Figure 6-9A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW - 1 .................................................................. 84
Figure 6-9B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW - 1 ....................................................... 85
Figure 6-10A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 2 ............................................................... 88
Figure 6-10B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 2 .................................................... 89
Figure 6-11A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 3 ............................................................... 92
Figure 6-11B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 3 .................................................... 93
Figure 6-12A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 4 ............................................................... 96
Figure 6-12B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 4 .................................................... 97
Figure 6-13A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 5 ............................................................. 100

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 4


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-13B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 5 .................................................. 101


Figure 6-14A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 6 ............................................................. 104
Figure 6-14B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 6 .................................................. 105
Figure 6-15A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 7 ............................................................. 108
Figure 6-15B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 7 .................................................. 109
Figure 6-16A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 8 ............................................................. 112
Figure 6-16B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 8 .................................................. 113
Figure 6-17A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 9 ............................................................. 116
Figure 6-17B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 9 .................................................. 117
Figure 6-18A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 10 ........................................................... 120
Figure 6-18B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 10 ................................................ 121
Figure 6-19A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 11 ........................................................... 124
Figure 6-19B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 11 ................................................ 125
Figure 6- 20A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 12 .......................................................... 127
Figure 6-20B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 12 ................................................ 128

List of Tables

Table 5-1: Resistivity of common geologic materials (Source: Reynolds, 1997) ........................... 22
Table 5-2: Electrical Resistivity versus Lithology (After Palaky 1987)......................................... 23
Table 5-3: Details of 2D ERT Survey Coverage ............................................................................. 31
Table 5-4: General Correlation of Electrical Resistivity and Lithology .......................................... 35
Table 6-1. Data Acquisition Parameters for Active MASW Survey .............................................. 74
Table 6-2: Details of 2D MASW Survey Coverage ........................................................................ 77
Table 6-3: Site Classification ........................................................................................................... 82
Table 6-4 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters ...................................................................... 86
Table 6-5 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters ...................................................................... 90
Table 6-6 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters ...................................................................... 94
Table 6-7 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters ...................................................................... 98
Table 6-8 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters .................................................................... 102
Table 6-9 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters .................................................................... 106
Table 6-10 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters .................................................................. 110
Table 6-11 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters .................................................................. 114

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 5


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-12 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters .................................................................. 118


Table 6-13 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters .................................................................. 122
Table 6-14 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters .................................................................. 129

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 6


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

This Page has been left blank intentionally

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 7


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background
The proposed Suni Gad Hydropower Project is Run-off river (ROR) project located at
Bajhang District of Far Western Development Region of Nepal. Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd
, Chandol, Kathmandu has contracted Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd Banasthali,
Kathmandu to carry out Geophysical investigation of project site using 2D-Electrical Resistivity
Tomography (2D-ERT) and Multi Channel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) survey in the
different component of Project. This report deals with the results of 2D-electrical resistivity
tomography (2D-ERT) and Multi Channel Analysis of Surface Wave (MASW) that was carried
out in headworks, desander, Inlet Portal surge, penstock alignment and power house area of the
project.

1.2 Field Visit Program


The field visit program for the Geophysical Survey was conducted on Asar 2075 by the
team of comprising of Geophysicist, Geologist, Surveyor, Technical Assistants and Local Labors.
Due to excessive rainfall in the area the crew could complete on MASW survey and returned to
head office after completing the data acquisition in the field. Data acquisition for 2D ERT was
postponed for Kartik 2075. The team was again mobilized to site to complete the remaining work.
The team completed the survey on the month of Kartik and returned back to head office. However
preliminary data processing was done on the site itself by experienced Geophysicist to check the
reliability of the acquired data.

1.3 Location and Accessibility


The proposed project Suni Gad Hydropower Project is located at Talkot Rural
Municipality, Surma Rural Municipality and Chainpur Municipality of Bajhang District Far
Western Development Region of Nepal. Left bank of the proposed headworks area located in
ward No. 1 of Talkot Rural Municipality while right bank located at ward No. 2 of Surma Rural
Municipality of Bajhang District. The weir axis is proposed about 200 m upstream from the
suspension bridge of Suni Gad at Khar Patal. Geographically, the project area is located between
latitudes 290 36’ 10” N to 290 40’ 00” N and longitudes of 810 11’ 46” E to 810 14’16” E. The
location Map is shown in Figure 1-1 and 1-2. Project area is accessed by black top road of 898 km up
to Chainpur, district headquarter of Bajhang district, from Kathmandu in the West direction. There is

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 8


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project
P -2075

about 5 km gravel road up to Sunigad River from Chainpur Bazar. The access road construction is
undergoing and only about 500 m is left for construction to reach the ppowerhouse
owerhouse area. There is foot
trial of about 5 hour walking distance from Rajkuda at Sunigad to headworks area.

Figure 1-1:
1: Map of Nepal Showing Bajhang District –Project
Project Area

Figure 1-2: Different Components of the project on Google Earth Image

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 9


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

1.4 Objective and Scope of the Study


The main objective of the present study is to investigate subsurface geological condition of
the area that includes degree of compactness, occurrence and strength of the materials and
formations. The findings of geotechnical parameters and investigations aimed to be used for
detailed planning and detailed engineering design purpose.

To fulfill these objectives, Geophysical Investigation techniques namely Two


Dimensional Electrical Resistivity Tomography (2D ERT) Survey and Multichannel Analysis of
Spectral Waves (MASW) will be carried out.
To meet the specific objectives, the scopes of work are as follows:
 The main scope of this work is to investigate subsurface geological condition of the project
sites where major structures like Diversion Weir, Settling Basin, Inlet & Outlet Portals of
Tunnel, Surge Tank, Penstock alignment and Power House using 2D ERT and MASW
methods.
 To conduct 2D Electrical Resistivity Tomography of the area and establish resistivity sections
of the ground profile showing different layers of lithological strata. Eleven ERT profiles with a
total length of around 2700 m will be carried out in the area.
 To carry out twelve MASW survey profiles to estimate shear wave velocity structure of
subsurface strata along different profiles,
 To find out the thickness of the overburden colluvial and alluvial soil materials.
 To find out depths of rock head and rock mass condition up to the depth of investigation.
 To find out weak zones and water bearing zones in the specified survey areas
 To find out plane of weakness for slope stability, deformed zones in bedrock, slopes and slides,
sheared zones etc.
 Calculate dynamic parameters ( Edyn, Gdyn, νdyn), natural period and natural frequency (resonant
frequency) of the soil and site stiffness.
 To calculate the ultimate bearing pressure of the layer and unit weight
 To characterize geotechnical properties of different subsurface strata layers in terms of
allowable bearing capacity and settlement.

 To identify different subsurface layers of subsurface strata

 To prepare analytical results in standard graphical format

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 10


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

 Make suggestion and recommendations on subsurface geological conditions

 Report Preparation

 To characterize geotechnical properties of different subsurface strata layers in terms of


allowable bearing capacity and settlement.

 To identify different subsurface layers of subsurface strata

 To prepare analytical results in standard graphical format

 Make suggestion and recommendations on subsurface geological conditions

 Report Preparation

1.5 Materials and Methodology


The methodology of the study consists of materials collection; literature collection and
review, geological observation and geophysical (2D ERT, MASW) survey, data computation,
processing and interpretation; and finally report preparation.
The 2D-ERT Survey was conducted with WDJD-4 Resistivity/IP equipment manufactured
by BTSK, China and MASW carried out using Ambrogeo 24 channel- Digital Seismograph
system. Other accessories that were used during the study were District Map, Total Station,
Photographic Camera, Brunton Compass etc. Literatures and information related to topography,
climate, geology, of the area were collected and reviewed.
Resistivity Meter ( WDJD -4 Resistivity/IP equipment manufactured by BTSK, China )
was used for Two Dimensional Electrical Resistivity Tomography (2D ERT), Ambrogeo 24
channel- digital seismograph system with constant geophone spacing of 1m for MASW. Signal
was generated using a 10 kg sledge hammer. Total Station was used to locate position of electrode
and geophone profiles and other important features like bedrock exposure, river channel,
proposed project structures, location of ERT / MASW profiles. Photographs were taken to
characterize the topographical and morphological character and bedrock exposure of the area.
Geological information of the area plays important role for the geophysical data interpretation.
So, Geological information was also taken into account during the study phase.
The general geology, hydrogeology of the area is taken from the geological map of the
area prepared by Department of Mines and Geology. The description of the geology of the area is
done from the published and unpublished literatures, previous studies carried out by the project
and verified in the field by observation and field measurement.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 11


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Detail of the methodology is presented in respective chapters.

CHAPTER 2: REGIONAL GEOLOGY OF NEPAL HIMALAYA


The Himalayan Range is a young mountain system of world. It is a broad and continuous
arc along the northern fringes of the Indian subcontinent extending from the bend of the Indus
River in northwest to the Brahmaputra River in the east. The Indo-Gangetic plain limits the
Himalaya in the south whereas the Tibetan plateaus in the north. The Himalayan range is
approximately 2400 km long and 200-300 km wide. It covers an area of approximately 600,000 sq.
km in south Asia. Geologically, Nepal occupies the central sector of Himalayan arc. Nearly one
third of the 2400 km long Himalayan range lies within Nepal that extends from Mahakali River in
the west to Mechi River in the east.

2.1 Tectonic subdivision of Nepal Himalaya


Nepal lies in the north-central sector of the Himalayan arc covering nearly one-third of the
length of the entire range. Geologically, Nepal Himalaya is the longest range of the Himalaya and
represents a typical unit showing all regional structural outlines as described by Gansser (1994). It
is divided into following five major subdivisions (Figure 2-1) from south to north, respectively:

1. Terai (Indo-Gangetic plain)


2. Sub-Himalaya (Siwaliks)
3. Lesser Himalaya
4. Higher Himalaya
5. Tibetan-Tethys Himalaya
A brief summary of these zones follows in order to provide the background information
about regional geological condition of the area.

2.1.1 Terai zone


Terai represents the northern edge of the Indo-Gangetic alluvial basin and belongs to the
southernmost tectonic division of the Nepal. In the north it is bounded by the Main Frontal Thrust
(MFT). The Terai plain is made up of alluvium of Pleistocene to recent age with an average
thickness of 1500 m. The Terai is already sharing a significant proportion of current Himalayan
stress accumulation, which is manifested in the development of blind thrusts, and thrust propagated
folds beneath the sediments.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 12


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

2.1.2 SubHimalayan (Churia/Siwalik) zone


Sub Himalayan zone is bounded to the south by Main Frontal Thrust (MFT) and to the
north by Main Boundary Thrust (MBT). The Sub-Himalayan Zone consists basically of the rocks
of fluvial origin belonging to the Neogene age. The lower Siwaliks consists of finely laminated
sandstone, siltstones and mudstones and the thickness of the unit is more than 2000 m. The middle
Siwaliks are is made up of medium to coarse grained salt and pepper type sandstone and its
thickness is about 3000 m. The upper Siwaliks comprises of conglomerate and boulder beds of
thickness of more than 1000 m. The Dun valleys within the Siwaliks are covered by Quaternary
fluvial sediments.

2.1.3 Lesser Himalaya


The Lesser Himalayan Zone is characterized by a broad belt of folded and faulted
Precambrian to Pliocene rocks developing number of thrusts and nappes. It is separated from the
Higher Himalayas by the Main Central Thrust (MCT) in the north and from the Sub Himalayas by
the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) in the south. The lesser Himalayan rocks throughout the
Himalaya consists of two sequences: allocthonous and autochthonous to para-autochthonous. The
MBT has brought the older Lesser Himalayan rocks over the much younger Siwaliks. The Lesser
Himalayan Zone consists of more than 15 km thick sequence of unfossiliferous low grade
metamorphic and metasedimentary rocks like slate, phyllite, schist, gneiss, quartzite, limestone,
dolomite etc ranging in age from Precambrian to Eocene (Upreti, 2000). There are also some
granitic intrusions in this zone. This zone is divided into three sub-units namely Lesser Himalayan
Metasediments, Lesser Himalayan crystalline and Igneous Rocks. Lesser Himalayan
Metasediments are represented by several rock groups such as Tansen Group, Nawakot Group and
Kunchha Group. Lesser Himalayan crystalline are represented by Phulchauki Group and
Bhimphedi Group. Igneous Rocks are represented by granites with tourmaline. The project area
lies on the Lesser Himalayan Zone.

2.1.4 Higher Himalaya


Higher Himalayan Zone has been mapped and traced along the entire Himalayan region
and has been named differently in different places. Geologically, the Higher Himalayan Zone
includes the rocks lying to the north of the Main Central Thrust (MCT) and below the
fossiliferrous Tibetan-Tethys Zone. Two sub-units namely Higher Himalayan Crystalline and
Tibetan Sedimentary Zone are identified in Higher Himalayan Zone. The upper limit of this zone
is generally marked by normal faults. This zone consists of about 10 km thick succession of

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 13


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project
P -2075

crystalline rocks also known as Tibetan Slab (Le Fort 1975). The crystalline units of the Higher
Himalaya extend continuously along the eentire length of the country. The Higher Himalayan
Crystalline zone comprises mainly Precambrian high
high-grade
grade metamorphic rocks such as kyanite-
sillimanite bearing gneiss, schist, marble of the zone form the basement of the Tibetan-Tethys
Tibetan
Zone. Migmatites and Granites are found in the upper part of this zone. The Higher Himalayan
Crystalline are underlain by fossiliferous Tibetan Sedimentary Zone. This zone is composed of
fossiliferous sedimentary rocks, such as shale, limestone, slates and sandstone, ranging in age from
Lower Paleozoic to Mesozoic. Tertiary granites occur at the upper part of the Tibetan-Tethys
Tibetan
sedimentary rocks.

2.1.5 Tibetan-Tethys
Tethys Himalaya
The Tibetan-Tethys
Tethys Zone begins from the top of the Higher Himalaya and extends to the
north in Tibet. In Nepal, the fossiliferrous rocks of this zone are well developed in the Thak Khola
(Mustang), Manang and Dolpa. Most of the great Himalayan Peaks of Nepal including Mt.
Everest, Manaslu, Annapurna and Dhawalagiri belong to this zone. This zone is composed
compos of
sedimentary rocks such as shale, limestone and sandstone ranging in age from Lower Paleozoic to
Paleogene.

Figure 2-1:
1: Regional Geological Map of Nepal Showing Project Area ( Geological Map of
Nepal, DMG 1994)

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 14


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

CHAPTER 3: GENERAL GEOLOGY OF THE STUDY AREA


3.1 Regional Geology of the Area
Geologically the project area lies in the lesser Himalaya zone of Far western Nepal. The
geological map of the study area has been prepared by Department of Mines and Geology. The main
lithology in the lesser Himalaya is Phyllite, Slate, schist, Dolomite and shale. In regional geological
map project area lies on Suntar Formation of Surkhet Group and Galyang Formation of Midland
Group. According to regional geological map of to the Department of mines and Geology, Surkhet and
Midland Group consists of Shale, Phyllite, Slate, schist, and Dolomite. The project site consists of
Schist, black to dark grey shale with dolomite bands and black shale at different component of project.
The foliation plane is dipping towards south east near the powerhouse area and dipping towards north
near the proposed intake area. The Suni Gad is a snow fed river and tributary of the Seti River. In the
study area river terraces, small flood plain and steep to moderate hill slope are the major
geomorphological features. Overall drainage pattern of the study area is essentially dendrite. Raisalli
Khola, Gajauni Khola, Charadi Khola, Suil Khola are major accessory river of Suni Gad along the
project component

Figure 3-1: Regional Geological map of study area (Department of Mines and Geology, 1987)

3.2 General Geology of the Project area


General geological survey of the area was carried out during the ERT survey along the
project area. The Headworks area of the project belongs to the Galyang Formations of midland

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 15


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

group rocks mainly consist of shale, phyllite, slate, schist and dolomite. Powerhouse area lies on the
Suntar Formation of Surkhet group rocks consist mainly shale. Bedding, rock type, lithology, slope,
aspect are noted at different exposure of survey area. The headworks and powerhouse of project
area is covered by alluvium deposits and surge shaft and penstock area are covered by cultivated
residual soil.

3.2.1 Geology of Headworks


Geologically, headwork area comprises alluvial deposit with sand gravel, pebbles, cobbles
and medium to large boulders with fractured rock fragments present at both banks of the river.
Bedrock of schist is clearly exposed towards the slope at both bank of river.
The weir axis is proposed about 200 m upstream from the suspension bridge of Suni Gad at
Khar Patal. The area consists of mainly recent and partly old alluvial deposits on left banks. The
proposed desander basin area lies on the left bank consists of about 20 m – 25 m wide with mild
slope vegetation covered alluvial deposit followed by colluviums scattered big boulders. The
deposit contains sub rounded to rounded gravels, pebbles, cobbles and boulders of schist, quartzite
supported in sand matrix, colluviums and vegetation covered. Inlet portal lies on the steep slope at
the right bank of Sunigad Khola. Inlet portal is covered by thin colluvial deposit with thick
vegetation. Bedrock is clearly exposed around the inlet portal area.

Figure 3-2: Exposure of bedrock on left bank at weir axis (Headworks)

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 16


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 3-3:Alluvial deposit on both bank of river at headworks area.


3.2.2 Geology of Surge Shaft and Power House
A surge shaft is proposed at the end of the headrace pipe alignment. This area comprises
black shale interbeded with dolomite. Almost the whole slope of the areas between surge shaft and
powerhouse comprises cultivable residual soil with small fractured rock fragments. Bedrock of
black shale are also exposed on some part on the slope. A penstock alignment is proposed along
the ridge by considering the stability of penstock pipe. The proposed penstock anchor blocks
foundation material is black shale. The proposed powerhouse site is located on the flat alluvial
deposit where bed rock of black shale is exposed. The deposit contains sub rounded to rounded
gravels, pebbles, cobbles, boulders with fractured rock fragments of shale, quartzite, schist, gneiss.
Therefore, powerhouse foundation is at black shale and alluvium deposit i.e. very sandy
gravel/boulder.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 17


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 3-4: Bedrock exposure of black shale at Powerhouse

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 18


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 3-5: Powerhouse, Penstock and Surge shaft area

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 19


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

CHAPTER 4: GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY


Geophysical methods have wide range of its applicability in locating or tracing an object
of interest as suggested by the geophysical response of the object. Detectability of the body
depends on the size and distance or depth at which the object occurs. The contrast in physical
properties between the body and its surroundings also influences the detectability. There are four
main geophysical methods viz. gravity, magnetic, seismic, and electrical (self-potential,
electromagnetic, resistivity, induced polarization and well logging) that are mainly applied for
subsurface investigation. Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) Method and Multi Channel
Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) have been used in the present study for determining
the subsurface information. Detail of Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) Method and Multi
Channel Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) is presented in respective chapters.

CHAPTER 5: ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY METHOD

5. 1 Methodology

5.1.1 Electrical Resistivity Principle and Resistivity of Rocks


The resistivity survey is carried out by injecting DC current into the ground through two
current electrodes, and measuring the resulting voltage differences at two potential electrodes. For
the current value (I) and the observed voltage difference value (V), an apparent resistivity value
(ρa) is calculated as follows.
(ρa) ═ k V/I
Where, k is the geometrical factor which depends on the arrangement of the four electrodes.
The calculated value (ρa) is not the true resistivity of the sub-surface materials. An “apparent
resistivity” value of a homogeneous ground will give the same resistance value for the same
electrode arrangement. The relationship between the apparent resistivity and the “true” resistivity
is a complex relationship. In fact, an inversion of the measured apparent resistivity values using a
computer program is necessary to determine the true sub-surface resistivity.
Electrical resistivity of the rocks or sediments depends on the resistivity of the rock
mineral matrix and the fluid contained in its pore spaces. Rocks are composed primarily of quartz,
feldspar and mica or other silicate minerals, which are poor conductors. They contain water in the
pores, which is usually a better conductor. Thus the resistivity of, say, sandstone, generally

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 20


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

depends on geometry of its pore spaces and the resistivity (or salinity) of its contained fluid. As
permeability and porosity decrease, resistivity usually increases, when there is no change in
formation fluid. The resistivity also depends upon the age of the rock or sediment as, with age,
they become compacted and/or weathered. Compacted rocks show very high resistivity compared
to unconsolidated sediments like clays, sands, gravels and so on as there will be less fluid in it.
The weathered rock shows low resistivity when there is presence of water in it. Dry rocks or
sediments have very high resistivity (of the order of 10,000 to 100,000 Ohm-m), whereas water
bearing rocks or saturated sediments become much less resistant (10 to 1,000 Ohm-m). The
resistivity of different rocks and sediments are in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2.
All rocks contain some pores in them. Under any reasonable circumstances, these pores
are partly or completely filled with water. This water usually carries some salt in solution so
thatthe water content of rock has a far greater capacity for transmitting current than does the solid
matrix of the rock unless highly conducting minerals are present.
In some rocks such as consolidated sedimentary rocks, porosity is intergranular in nature
consisting of the spaces left over after the rock grains were compacted. In other rocks and
particularly in igneous rocks, porosity occurs primarily in the form of joints.
Geologically the project area lies on the lower Surkhet group rocks and Midland group
rocks. The main rock types are shale, Phyllite, slate, schist, and dolomite. The headworks and
powerhouse of project area covered by alluvium deposits and penstock area are covered by
colluvial deposit with cultivated residual soil. When these rocks undergo changes due to
weathering, fracturing and formation joints, their responses to the current conduction also vary
drastically. Weathering processes leads to chemical change and formation of clay and other finer
particles. Increase of the proportion of the clay and other finer particles enhances role of the
surface conduction. Development of fractures, cracks and fissures, and sheared zones also lead to
the increase of secondary porosity. Fractures and joints are either filled by air, water, or by clay.
Usually fractures and joints near the surface (<10 m depth) are filled by air and has high electrical
resistivity. On the other hand fractures and joints filled by water and clay are conductive. Hence,
rocks that are fractured or jointed will have either very high or low electrical resistivity than the
unaltered bedrock. This fact allows to separate intact rock mass from fractured, jointed and
weathered rock mass. Sheared zones are identified by virtue of very low electrical resistivity
between two high resistivity bedrock zones. Schist zones are usually identified by lower electrical
resistivity zones.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 21


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

In general, hard rocks are poor conductors of electricity, but geological processes like
weathering, dissolution, hydrothermal alteration, faulting and shearing can alter rock to increase
the porosity and permeability of rock and hence decreases resistivity. By comparison, compaction
of sedimentary rock and metamorphism of all types may result in lower porosities and
permeability. Resistivity is, therefore, a widely varying parameter, which changes not only from
lithology to lithology, but also within a particular formation of same lithology.

Table 5-1: Resistivity of common geologic materials (Source: Reynolds, 1997)

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 22


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project
P -2075

Table 5-2:
2: Electrical Resistivity versus Lithology (After Palaky 1987)

Apparent resistivity values obtained in the fiel


fieldd are not equal to the actual resistivity of the
geologic units which affect the potential measured at the potential electrodes, unless
measurements are being made over homogenous ground (Telford et al, 1990). At shallow
exploration depth and at short curr
current
ent electrode spacing, shallow layers through which most of the
current flows mostly influence measured apparent resistivity. As electrode spacing increases, a
greater proportion of the induced current flows into deeper geologic layers, thus the response
measured
easured at the surface is reflective of the resistivity of increasingly deeper geologic units as the
electrode spacing are increased. Hence as the distance between the current electrodes increases, so
does the exploration depth or the depth of investigatio
investigation of the survey. (Figure 5-3)
3)

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 23


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.1.2 The relationship between Resistivity and Porosity


Naturally occurring groundwater commonly have high salinity and low resistivity. The
resistivity of a rock decreases with increasing water content. In fully saturated rocks, the water
content may be equated to the porosity, but in partially saturated rocks, the effect of de-saturation
on resistivity must be considered. The texture of a rock also has some effect on the resistivity.
One may obtain a theoretical expression for the relationship between resistivity and water content
in a rock if a simple pore cemetery is assumed. Calculations of the resistivity of a matrix
consisting of uniform spheres have been described many times in the literature. The most
satisfactory relationship for the resistivity, ρt, of a fully saturated non-cemented rock consisting of
equant grains is the following equation (Dakhnov, 1947 and 1948):

. ( ɸ) /
𝜌t = 𝜌w = F 𝜌w
( ɸ) /

Where, 𝜌w is the resistivity of the water in the pores,


ɸ is the fractional porosity, and
F= is the formation factor, defined as the ratio of rock resistivity to the resistivity of the
water contained in the rock.

5.1.3 Equipments used in the field study


The Survey was conducted with WDJD-4 Resistivity/IP equipment manufactured by
BTSK, China, having following features:
 Multi function digital DC Electrical Resistivity & Induced Polarization meter
 Multi Core Cable
 Stainless Steel Electrodes
The equipment has the following special technical features:
o Capable of conducting DC Electrical Resistivity, Induced Polarization & Spontaneous
Potential data
o Electrical Resistivity and Induced Polarization Tomography (Imaging). Any survey length
acquisition in normal mode
o Capable of conducting can be covered using roll along technique.
o Capable of mass data storage of over 100,000 number of data in equipment memory
o Input Impedance over 50 Mega Ohm

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 24


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

o Voltage 1100 V DC (2200 V Peak to peak)


o Maximum current output 6A (2.5 A)
o Transmitting Power 6600 Watt (1125 Watt for Imaging )
o All data acquisition operations are microcomputer controlled and user friendly menu
driven
o High anti interference performance and precision, integrated with multistage wave
filtration and signal enhancement technology
o Automatic cancellation of Self Potential, drift and electrode polarization
o Can perform with 18 different electrode configurations. However, virtually any electrode
configuration can be used.
o Stored field data can be downloaded to the Personal Computer easily using RS 232 port.
The data download can also be in RES2DINV recognizable format.

5.1.4 Electrical Resistivity Tomography Survey


In resistivity measurement, current flow tends to occur close to the surface. Current
penetration can be increased by increasing separation of current electrodes. An electrode array is a
configuration of electrodes used for measuring either an electric current or voltage. There are
number of ways of setting up of current and potential electrodes, in subsurface investigation by
electrical resistivity methods. The choice of an array and the distance between the electrodes is
very important for obtaining the best possible information of the subsurface geology of a given
area.

5.1.4.1 Electrical Resistivity Tomography Survey Design


Electrical Resistivity Tomography survey is usually conducted following the various
arrangements of four electrodes, two current (C1 and C2) and two potential (P1 and P2) depending
upon the specific purposes. The field operation is presented in Photographs.
There are many electrode arrangements, which can be used in the ERT field survey. These
arrays have advantages and disadvantages. In some geological situations one is particularly better
than the other to give better response. To map lateral changes in structures Dipole –Dipole and
Schlumberger are better. Wenner seems to have a strong signal/noise ratio but smoothes the picture
more.
The choice of a particular electrode array for the survey in question depends upon many
factors. These are summarized below:

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 25


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Ease in handling:
As mentioned above, gradient and pole-pole arrays are easier to handle. Only two
electrodes are to be moved along the profile. Three electrodes are to be moved in Pole-Dipole
array and all four electrodes are moved in Wenner, Schlumberger and Dipole-Dipole arrays adding
complications in handling more electrodes. But for multi core cables with takeouts at a fixed
distance and automatic equipments with switchers, there is no need to move once the cable has
been laid out. Our equipment can automatically switch between electrodes and data acquisition is
possible for 1 m, 2 m, 3 m, and so on till 95 m of spacing between two electrodes which is very
difficult in manual equipments.
Signal to noise ratio:
In a collinear electrode arrangement, signal to noise ratio or SNR depends on whether the
potential electrodes M and N are placed within or outside of the current electrodes A and B. The
voltage between M and N and SNR will be higher for the former than for the latter case. In this
regard, Wenner array rates higher followed by Schlumberger and Dipole-Dipole arrays. Wenner
array has the highest SNR among the conventional arrays. The Pole-Pole, Pole-Dipole and Dipole
–Dipole arrays are more sensitive to near surface variations. Hence, even in very noisy areas, the
Wenner array measurement is the most reliable.
EM coupling:
Frequencies of source signals used in DC resistivity surveying are usually very low (from
DC to 50 cycles per seconds) to avoid electromagnetic effects. Most commercial instruments use
square waves or pulsed direct currents as source signals. Such signals yield high harmonics, which
may result in coupling between the two dipoles and the wires connecting them to the recording
instrument. The coupling increases with the frequency, electrode configuration and conductivity of
the medium of the flowing current. In this regard, pole-dipole, gradient, Schlumberger and Wenner
arrays are progressively more susceptible to coupling. However, the coupling can be reduced
taking special care while laying the current and potential cables in the field.
Lateral resolution:
The resolving powers of these arrays are different. It is found that the gradient array has
better ability to resolve the steeply dipping inhomogeniety. Coggon, (1973) and Dey et al (1975)
establish that Schlumberger array ranks with Wenner array in its lateral resolving power.
Vertical Resolution:
A better vertical resolution helps to demarcate the boundary between different
lithology/geology more accurately. The experiment showed that (Loke, M. H. 1999) the vertical

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 26


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

resolution is best exhibited by Wenner array. The Dipole Dipole and Wenner-Schlumberger arrays
come only after Wenner array.
Anomaly Pattern:
Pole-Dipole is an asymmetrical array and gives rise to somewhat more complicated
anomalies in the pseudo section. Signal strength or anomaly strength measured with Pole-Dipole
array decrease less rapidly compared to Dipole-Dipole array.
This (Wenner) array is a robust array, which was popularized by the pioneering work
carried out by the University of Birmingham research group (Griffiths and Turnbull 1985;
Griffiths, Turnbull and Olayinka 1990). Many of the past and present 2 D surveys are carried out
with this array.
Based on these considerations, it is found that Wenner array has the advantages of i) high
signal to noise ratio, ii) symmetrical array and hence symmetrical anomalies, iii) good lateral
resolution, iv) good vertical resolution etc. Hence this array method was employed in the present
study program. The schematic diagram of this array is shown in Figure 5-3. However,
Schlumberger and Dipole – Dipole method was also employed for cross reference of the acquired
data for interpretation purposes.

Figure 5-1: Schematic Diagram of Wenner Configuration for Resistivity Survey

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 27


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-2: Principles of Resistivity Measurements (Robinson and Coruth 1988)

Figure 5-3: Sequence of measurements to build up a pseudo section for Wenner Array

5.2 Two Dimensional Electrical Resistivity Tomography Survey ( 2D ERT)

5.2.1 Data Acquisition


The quality of data acquired in the field not only depends on quality of the equipment and
accessories but also depends on the topography, geological setup and density of the measurement.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 28


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Highly heterogeneous conditions are created by surface topography and geological variation.
Planning of the fieldwork and layout of profiles is usually based on topographical map. So site
condition is essential to consider for the effective layout of the profiles. For these reasons
modifications has been carried out to best suit the site conditions. In either case aim of the
modification of the layout was for the acquisition of the better data quality and to conduct work
meaningfully. In present case, the site condition has undulations and high variation in elevation so
topography correction has been included during the preparation of the report.
Field data were gathered to obtain a continuous coverage of the subsurface along the line of
investigation. As mentioned above Wenner electrode configuration was employed in the present
study program. Further, Wenner Schlumberger and Dipole-Dipole configuration were also
employed in the study for cross reference of the acquired data.
The depth of investigation depends on the length of the profile and spacing between
electrodes. To collect information from the depth of about 40 m and deeper, a full length of profile
of more than 250 m was used. The minimum electrode spacing of 5 m is used in the survey
procedure. Eleven 2D-ERT profiles were surveyed in the area. Details of the ERT profiles is
presented in Table No. 5-3

5.2.2 Data quality


Field data are influenced by different types of noises of different origins. The degree of
influences depends on the quality of the equipment and accessories, methods of data acquisition
and geological and topographical setup. Selection of proper equipment and accessories, and data
acquisition system helps to gather reliable field data. Proper selection of the orientation of the
profiles or additional cross profiles helps to recognize noise due to the geological and
morphological setup of the area. The selection of the electrode arrangement is based on the
requirement of depth of investigation and resolution of the subsurface. Furthermore, it is related to
the power of the transmitter and signal resolving capacity of the receiver, SP cancellation capacity
of the equipment and quality of the peripheral parts and accessories. Some electrode arrangements
produce high level of signal but poor resolution whereas some produce low level of signal but
higher resolution of the subsurface. As the distance between transmitting and the receiving
electrodes increase the level of the noise also increases dramatically. The type of the noises are
capacitive coupling, induction and of telluric and cultural origin. To avoid this adverse effect on

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 29


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

the receiving signal it is necessary to have high quality accessories and signal processing capacity
of the receiver electronics.
It is necessary to understand that the geophysical methods look not only along vertical and
lateral along the profile but also look sideways. Geological variations that come within the radius
of influence in sideways also influence the data. Such influences could clutter the section and
make difficult to meaningful interpretation. So, the noises introduced into the data due to the
geological setup that are not easily interpretable are known as geological noises

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 30


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 5-3: Details of 2D ERT Survey Coverage

Profile Location Length Start End Remarks


No. (m) Easting Northing Easting Northing
ERT-1 Along Desander (Left bank) 250 521438 3282261 521598 3282165 Headworks (Desander)
ERT-2 Across Weir Axis (Right Bank) 250 521526 3282371 521452 3242144 Headworks (Weir Axis)
ERT-3 Across Weir Axis 250 521544 3282294 521519 3282077 Headworks ( Weir Axis)
ERT-4 Inlet Portal (Along Slope) 210 521532 3281708 521379 3281729 Headworks (Inlet Portal)
ERT-5 Inlet Portal (Along Slope) 205 521537 3281750 521421 3281656 Headworks (Inlet Portal)
ERT-6 Headrace alignment ( Left Bank of 300 520353 3278822 520283 3278594 Haedrace Alignment (Kholsi)
Kholsi)
ERT-7 Powerhouse (Right Bank) 250 520953 3277306 5202846 3276109 Powerhouse
ERT-8 Along Penstock Alignment 250 520935 3276230 520830 3276361 Powerhouse& Penstock
Alignment
ERT-9 Along Penstock Alignment 250 520842 3276333 520698 3276463 Penstock Alignment
ERT-10 Penstock Alignment 250 520804 3276323 520777 3276506 Penstock Alignment
ERT-11 Along Slope ,Surge Shaft 400 520768 3276781 520441 3276828 Surge shaft
Total (M) 2870 m

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 31


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-4: ERT Layout in Google Map at Headworks Area

Figure 5-5: ERT Layout in Google Map at Powerhouse Area

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 32


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-6: ERT Layout in Google Map at Headrace alignment (Kholsi).


5.2.3 Field Crew
The members of the geophysical field crew are geophysicist, geologist, surveyor,
assistants, and laborers. The main responsibilities lie on the geophysicist who was be involved in
all stages starting from planning to report submission. Present field mission was carried out by an
experienced geophysicist who was also involved for all stages of geophysical mission. Without
good knowledge of the field condition it is difficult to make reliable interpretation of the model.
Experienced assistants were involved during the field work and they were responsible for checking
of the field layout and connection between shielded multi-core cables and the electrodes,
preparation of the station for good grounding and supervising to laborers.

5.3 Data Processing, Analysis and Interpretation


Geo-electrical resistivity survey is widely used geophysical method for subsurface
investigation for groundwater exploration, environmental application and other engineering
application. The benefit of this method is to perform the survey quite fast and in the cost effective
manner. Detection of water table, variation of resistivity with depths (distinguishing layered earth),
contaminants plume detection, detection of bedrocks depth, overburden thickness, types of
subsurface geology etc. are the objectives geo-electrical resistivity survey. The interpretation of

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 33


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

electrical resistivity data is the process of deriving the values of true resistivities (ρ) and
thicknesses (t) of various subsurface strata from the values of recorded resistance (R) or apparent
resistivity (ρa) at electrode separations (a). There are a number of processing and interpretation
techniques for evaluating (ρ) and (t) of each of the stratum as proposed by many investigators.
These can be grouped as analytical, numerical, empirical, graphical, computer (software) based
etc. and several amongst each category.

5.3.1 Data Processing and Interpretation


The filed data were filtered, processed and treated with the software. However, to check the
quality of the acquired data, preliminary processing of the data was carried out in the field itself by
an experienced geophysicist.
The field data were filtered, processed and treated with the software, RES2DINV. The
software inverts the field data and calculates the appropriate model in term of resistivity and
provides output in the form of resistivity contours. This inversion data is used to draw up the
lithological and geological information. The basic principle behind the relation between resistivity
data and lithology/geology are already dealt with in above sections. The general resistivity values
of different earth materials are shown in table 5-1 and 5-2. The resistivity of certain layer depends
up on rock type, grain size, degree of void spaces and amount of water present, degree of
weathering, mineral constituents etc. However, it should be noted that the resistivity of certain
lithology has wide variation. In the conversion from resistivity data to lithology Table 5-4 has been
used. This correlation table has been prepared considering the local geological information of the
investigation site where the presence of the alluvial, colluvial deposits, residual soil, sand, gravel,
phyllite, slate, schist, angular to rounded rock fragments as overburden and experience with similar
works in other parts of the country. These inversion results showing resistivity tomogram and
lithological interpretations / interpretative cross sections of all eleven profiles are presented in
Figure 5-7 to 5-18
The sections are prepared as per topographic undulations, as the electrodes are fixed along
the slope distance (not horizontal distance or plan distance). Hence though it looks more distance
in section, they actually are shorter in plan.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 34


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 5-4: General Correlation of Electrical Resistivity and Lithology

Electrical Resistivity Expected Lithology


Resistivity class Overburden Bedrock
Range
(Ohm-m)
Up to 200 Very low Highly Saturated alluvial deposits of Highly weathered and
fine sediments/saturated to partly saturated shale/ Iron ore
saturated colluvial deposit of residual
soil /colluvial deposit with small
fractured rock fragments of iron ore

200-500 Low Saturated alluvial deposit of sand and Saturated weathered/ fractured
gravel / saturated to partly saturated rock of shale
colluvial deposit of fine sediments or
residual soil

500-1500 Medium Saturated alluvial deposit of sand, Saturated weathered/fractured


gravel, pebbles, cobbles with medium rock of schist/bedrock of black
to large boulders/ Partly saturated or shale
moist colluvial deposit

1500-2500 High Unsaturated alluvial deposit of fine Saturated to partly saturated


sand and gravel/ alluvial deposit with weathered /fractured bedrock
iron ore minerals/dry colluvail deposit of schist/fresh and intact
of residual soil/colluvial deposit with bedrock of shale
small fractured rock fragments of iron
ore.

2500 and above Very High Extremely dry overburden of sand, Fresh and intact bedrock of
gravel, pebbles, cobbles with medium schist/dolomite
to large boulders and rock
fragments/Dry colluvial deposit with
fractured rock fragments.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 35


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.3.2 Pitfalls of the Processing and Interpretation


Every geophysical method has some advantages and limitations. The limitations are usually
posed by data density, quality of the instrument and accessories, signal resolving capacity,
geological, hydro-geological and topographical setup of the area, and by the physics of the
particular methods. Data obtained from the complicated geological and topographical setup, and
noise in the data combined with the processing techniques could result in artifacts. There could be
possibility of the over interpretation of such artifacts.
In the interpretation of resistivity tomograms following factors have been taken into
accounts:
Artifacts of inversion code are usually due to the poor data coverage. To sample a
subsurface target of interest with higher degree of reliability we need to collect data with more
coverage. The equipment used in the present study has facility which helps to collect considerable
number of data. High density data coverage and measurement helps to minimize and recognize the
artifacts which are usual in scanty data coverage.
Proximity of any unusually high or low resistivity and their relative thickness: In our case
sheared zone, fractured and jointed rock mass zone are highly conductive than the intact gneiss. In
smooth model inversion technique which is generally applied to identify the geological boundaries
low resistivity zones (if they are thin) have tendency to inflate in thickness.
Limitations of the smooth model inversion method to estimate the true resistivity of the
subsurface.
Non-uniqueness of the geophysical interpretations, also called principle of equivalence
in electrical resistivity method. The resistivity and thickness of the thin layers are distorted.
Thickness of low resistivity zone is usually inflated than the actual thickness. The resistivity values
obtained for such thin zones are also distorted but they are indicative.
Since there are no sufficient data points in the start and end of 2D electrical resistivity
tomography profiles the reliability of the start and end of the profile largely depends on local
geological variation. Model section could be distorted at the start and end of the profile if there is
significant level of variation in the geology in these parts.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 36


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.3.3 Interpretation ( Resistivity Tomograms and Interpretative Cross-sections)


The model sections obtained from data inversion are presented as resistivity tomogram
sections. These tomogram sections show the variation of modeled electrical resistivity in depth and
along the line of investigation. These variations in modeled physical properties have relation with
the subsurface geological and hydro-geological set up. Representative resistivity tomograms for
each profile are presented in Figure 5 -7A to 5-17A and their interpretations are presented in
Figure 5 -7B to 5-17B

5.3.3.1 Resistivity Tomogram and Lithological Interpretation of ERT -1


This profile runs along the desander at left bank and crosses the weir axis at headworks
area with starting of the profile from the upstream of Suni Gad Khola. Total length of the profile is
245 m. Representative resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-7A while lithological
interpretation of resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-7B. The orientation and exact
location of the profile is presented in Google map and Topography map at ANNEX- I.
The lithological section can be interpreted as three layered model. Top layer with high
resistivity value of above 2000 Ω m along the profile with average thickness of around 5 m at
chainage 0 to 115 m and around thickness of 12 to 18 m at chainage 115 m to the end of profile
shows the unsaturated alluvial deposit of sand, gravel, pebbles, cobbles with medium to large
boulders and fractured rock fragments.
Second layer with low to medium resistivity value of below 1000 Ω m of thickness around
8 to 10 m up to chainage 135 m and up to depth of investigation towards the end of the profile
from 135 m chainage indicates the saturated alluvial deposit of sand and gravel with pebbles,
cobbles and boulders.
Fresh and intact bedrock of schist is expected to occur at the depth of 10 to 15 m from the
surface up to chainage 135 m. Bedrock is not expected to occur up to the investigation depth at the
desander area.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 37


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-7A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 1

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 38


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-7B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 1

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 39


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.3.3.2 Resistivity Tomogram and Lithological interpretation of ERT -2


This profile runs across the desander area with starting of the profile from the right bank of
Suni Gad Khola. Length of the profile is 245 m. Representative resistivity tomogram is presented
in Figure 5-8A while lithological interpretation of resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-
8B. The orientation and exact location of the profile is presented in Google map and Topography
map at ANNEX - I.
The lithological section can be interpreted as three layered model. Top layer with high
resistivity value up to 75 m chainage and at chainage 190 m to end of the profile with varies
thickness of 1 to 5 m indicates the unsaturated colluvial deposit of dry soil with gravel and
fractured rock fragments. High resistivity value on the first layer at chainage 75 to 190 m indicates
the alluvial deposit of sand and gravel with pebble, cobble and angular to sub angular medium to
large boulders with thickness of 2-3 m at chainage 75 to 120 and thickness of around 10-12 m at
chainage 120 to 190 m.
Second layer with low resistivity value of below 500 Ω m at chainage 75 to 190 m
indicates the saturated sand and gravel with pebble, cobble and medium to large boulders. Low
resistivity value on the second layer at chainage 50 to 80 m indicates the saturated to partly
saturated weathered/fractured Bedrock of slate/shale with quartzite and sandstone.
Bedrock of slate/shale with quartzite and sandstone is expected to occur at the shallow
depth of 2-3 m up to chainage of 50 on the second layer and at depth of 8-10 m at chainage 50 to
110 n on the third layer. Bedrock of slate/shale with quartzite and sandstone is found at shallow
depth of 1-3 towards the end of the profile at chainage 190 m to end of the profile. Bedrock is not
found up to the investigation depth towards the centre part of the profile.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 40


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-8A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 2

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 41


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-8B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 2

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 42


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.3.3.2 Resistivity Tomogram and Lithological interpretation of ERT -3


This profile runs along the weir axis with starting of the profile from the right bank of
Suni Gad Khola. Total length of the profile is 245 m. Representative resistivity tomogram is
presented in Figure 5-9A while lithological interpretation of resistivity tomogram is presented
in Figure 5-9B. The orientation and exact location of the profile is presented in Google map
and Topography map at ANNEX - I.
Lithological section can be interpreted as three layered model. The top layer with high
resistivity value larger than 2000 Ohm indicates the unsaturated alluvial/colluvial deposit.
Unsaturated alluvial deposit of sand, gravel, pebbles, cobbles with medium to large boulders
and fractured rock fragments with varying thickness of 3 to 10 m found at chainage 30 to
125 m. Unsaturated colluvial deposit is present towards the start and end of the profile
Second layer with low to medium resistivity value up to chainage 125 m indicates the
saturated alluvial deposit sand and gravel with pebbles cobbles and boulders. Second layer
with low resistivity value at chainage 125 to 200 m indicates the saturated to partly saturated
colluvial deposit. Thickness of the second layer varies from 5 to 7 m.
The third layer consists of fresh and intact bedrock of schist and saturated weathered
/fractured bedrock of Schist. Fresh and intact bedrock of schist found up to 80 m chainage
from starting of the profile with the varying depth of 10-12 m. This layer is then intercepted
by saturated weathered/fractured bedrock of Schist lying at the depth of 12 m at chainage 85
to 100 m. Fresh and intact bedrock of schist found from chainage 100 m to the end of the
profile. This layer is found at a depth of 12-15 m up to chainage 200 m and then found at a
shallow depth of 1 to 2 m towards the end of the profile.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 43


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-9A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 3

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 44


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-9B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 3

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 45


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.3.1.4 Resistivity Tomogram and Lithological Interpretation of ERT -4


This profile runs along the slope at inlet portal area on right bank of Suni Gad Khola
with starting of the profile from the downward slope. Total length of the profile is 210 m.
Representative resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-10A while lithological
interpretation of resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-10B. The orientation and exact
location of the profile is presented in Google map and Topography map at ANNEX - I.
The lithological section can be interpreted as three layered model. Top layer with very
high resistivity value of above 3000 Ω m along the profile indicates the unsaturated colluvial
deposit. Thickness of this unsaturated colluvial deposit is found to be 8 to 15 m.
Second layer with low resistivity value up to 130 m chainage with varies thickness of
5 to 8 m indicates the partly saturated or moist colluvial deposit/colluvial deposit of fine
sediments. Fresh and intact bed rock of Schist is found in third underlying layer. It is
represented by the resistivity value greater than 3000 Ω m. Bedrock is found at the varying
depth of 12 to 15 m from the surface.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 46


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-10A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 4

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 47


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-10B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 4

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 48


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.3.1.5 Resistivity Tomogram and Lithological Interpretation of ERT - 5


This profile runs along the slope at inlet portal area on right bank of Suni Gad Khola
with starting of the profile from the downward slope and cross the ERT 4 profile. Total
length of the profile is 205 m. Representative resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-
11A while lithological interpretation of resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-11B.
The orientation and exact location of the profile is presented in Google map and Topography
map at ANNEX - I.
The lithological section can be interpreted as three layered model. Top layer with high
resistivity value indicates the unsaturated colluvial deposit, which varies in thickness from 1
m to 6 m along the profile. The layer is thicker around chainage 50 m to 150 m of the profile.
Second layer with low to medium resistivity value of below 1500 Ω m up to 140 m
chainage with varying thickness of 8 to 12 m indicates the partly saturated or moist colluvial
deposit/colluvial deposit of fine sand.
Fresh and intact bedrock of schist is expected to occur at third layer along the profile.
Bedrock is found at depth of around 10 to 15 m from the surface up to chaiange 140 m and it
is found at the shallow depth of 1 to 2 m towards the end of the profile.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 49


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-11A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 5

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 50


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-11B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 5

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 51


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.3.1.6 Resistivity Tomogram and Lithological Interpretation of ERT - 6


This profile runs along the slope at the Headrace alignment on the right bank of kholsi
with starting of the profile at higher elevation. Length of the profile is 295 m. Representative
resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-12A while lithological interpretation of
resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-12B. The orientation and exact location of the
profile is presented in Google map and Topography map at ANNEX - I.
The lithological section can be interpreted as three layered model. Top layer with high
resistivity value indicates the unsaturated colluvial deposit which varies in thickness from 3
m to 6 m along the whole profile.
Second layer with medium resistivity value of varies thickness of 8 to 15 m indicates
the partly saturated or moist colluvial deposit/colluvial deposit of fine sediments
Very high resistivity value of above 5000 Ω m on third layer indicates the fresh and
intact bedrock of schist. It is expected to occur at varying depth of 12-20 m from the surface.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 52


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-12A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 6

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 53


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-12B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 6

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 54


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.3.1.7 Resistivity Tomogram and Lithological interpretation of ERT - 7


This profile runs along the powerhouse at right bank of Suni Gad khola with starting
of the profile from the upstream direction of the river. Length of the profile is 245 m.
Representative resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-13A while lithological
interpretation of resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-13B. The orientation and exact
location of the profile is presented in Google map and Topography map at ANNEX - I.
The lithological section can be interpreted as three layered model. Top layer with low
to medium resistivity value of 500 to 1500 Ω m indicates the unsaturated alluvial deposit of
sand, gravel, pebbles, and cobbles with iron ore minerals. This varies in thickness from 8-10
m at chainage 0 m to 185 m of the profile.
Second layer with very low resistivity value of below 200 Ω m up to 170 m chainage
indicates the highly saturated alluvial deposit of sand gravel of varying thickness.
Medium resistivity value on third layer at chainage 60 to 110 m and at cghainge 120
m to end of the profile indicates the bedrock of black shale. Bedrock is expected at varying
depth of 10 to 15 up to chainage 170 m and found at a shallow depth of around 1m towards
the end of the profile. Very low resistivity value of below 100 Ω m towards the centre part of
the profile at average depth of 15 m from the surface indicates the presence of highly
saturated weathered shale / iron ore.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 55


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-13A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 7

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 56


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-13B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 7

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 57


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Kalika Kali Gandaki Hydropower Project -2018

5.3.1.8 Resistivity Tomogram and Lithological interpretation of ERT - 8


This profile runs towards the hill slope along the penstock alignment with starting of the
profile from the down slope. Length of the profile is 245 m. Representative resistivity tomogram
is presented in Figure 5-14A while lithological interpretation of resistivity tomogram is presented
in Figure 5-14B. The orientation and exact location of the profile is presented in Google map and
Topography map at ANNEX - I.
The lithological section can be interpreted as three layered model. Top layer with low to
medium resistivity value of 500 to 1500 Ω m indicates the unsaturated alluvial/ colluvial deposit
of sand, gravel, pebbles, and cobbles with iron ore minerals up to 50 m chainage. Top layer with
low to medium resistivity value indicates the unsaturated dry colluvial deposit of cultivated
residual soil with small fractured rock fragments/residual soil with small fractured rock
fragments of iron ore. This top layer varies in thickness from 5 to 8 m along the profile.
Second layer with very low resistivity value of below 100 Ω m towards the starting of the
profile indicates the highly saturated alluvial deposit. Very low resistivity value of below 200 Ω
m on the second layer from 50 m chainage towards the upwards slope indicates the colluvial
deposit of fine sediment/moist colluvial deposit of residual soil with iron ore minerals. The
average thickness of this layer is 10 to 12 m.
Bedrock of black shale and is expected to occur at third layer. The bedrock is expected at
shallow depth of 8 m around at chainage of 90 m and found at a greater depth of around 15 m
around 200 m chainage. Very low resistivity value of below 50 Ω m on third layer around at
chainage 160 m indicates the presence of highly weathered shale/iron ore and it is found at
average depth of 18 m from the surface.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 58


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Kalika Kali Gandaki Hydropower Project -2018

Figure 5-14A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 8

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 59


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Kalika Kali Gandaki Hydropower Project -2018

Figure 5-14B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 8

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 60


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.3.1.9 Resistivity Tomogram and Lithological interpretation of ERT - 9


This profile runs towards the hill slope along the penstock alignment with starting of the
profile from the down slope. Length of the profile is 245 m. Representative resistivity tomogram
is presented in Figure 5-15A while lithological interpretation of resistivity tomogram is presented
in Figure 5-15B. The orientation and exact location of the profile is presented in Google map and
Topography map at ANNEX - I.
The lithological section can be interpreted as three layered model. Top layer with
medium resistivity value indicates the dry colluvial deposit of cultivated residual soil with small
fractured rock fragments with thickness of 5 m up to 120 m chainage and thickness of 10 to 15 at
chainage 120 m to end of the profile.
Second layer with low resistivity value up to 200 m chainage indicates the presence of
colluvial deposit of fine sediment/moist colluvial deposit of residual soil with varying thickness
of 5 to 15 m at different chainage.
Bedrock of black shale and highly weathered shalell is expected to occur at third layer.
Bedrock of black shale is found at 65 to 160 m chainage and at towards the end of the profile at
varying depth from the surface. Highly weathered shale is found at a depth of 18- 20 m at
chainage of 150-180 m and at chainage 50-110 m.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 61


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-15A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 9

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 62


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-15B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 9

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 63


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.3.1.10Resistivity Tomogram and Lithological interpretation of ERT - 10


This profile runs along the slope at penstock area and cross the ERT 9 with starting of the
profile from the down slope. The length of the profile is 245 m. Representative resistivity
tomogram is presented in Figure 5-16A while lithological interpretation of resistivity tomogram
is presented in Figure 5-16B. The orientation and exact location of the profile is presented in
Google map and Topography Map in ANNEX - I.
The lithological section can be interpreted as three layered model. Top layer with
medium resistivity value along the profile indicates the dry colluvial deposit of cultivated
residual soil with small fractured rock fragments with varying thickness of 5 to 8 m.
Second layer with low resistivity value of below 500 Ω m along the profile indicates the
colluvial deposit of fine sediment/moist colluvial deposit. The average thickness of second layer
is found to be 7-12 m.
Bedrock of black shale is expected to occur at third layer. Resistivity value of 500 to
1500 Ω m on third layer at chainage 70 m to 220 m represents the bedrock of black shale at
varying depth of 12 to 15 m from the surface. Very low resistivity value of below 200 Ω m on
the third layer up to chainage 160m of the profile represents highly weathered shale.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 64


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-16A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 10

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 65


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-16B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 10

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 66


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

5.3.1.11Resistivity Tomogram and Lithological interpretation of ERT - 11


This profile runs towards the hill slope at surge shaft area with starting of the profile from
the down slope. Length of the profile is 395 m. Representative resistivity tomogram is presented
in Figure 5-17A while lithological interpretation of resistivity tomogram is presented in Figure 5-
17B. The orientation and exact location of the profile is presented in Google map and
Topography map at ANNEX - I.
The lithological section can be interpreted as three layered model. Top layer with high
resistivity value along the profile shows dry colluvial deposit of cultivated residual soil with
thickness of around 10 m.
Second layer with low resistivity value up to 230 m chainage indicates the colluvial
deposit of fine sediment/moist colluvial deposit. Very high resistivity value on second layer from
chainage 230 m to end of the profile at average depth of around 8 to 10 m from the surface
represents the intact bedrock of dolomite
Bedrock of black shale, highly weather shale and fresh and intact bedrock of dolomite is
expected to occur at third layer. The bedrock is expected at depth of 25 m from chainage of
240m to 320 m. Low resistivity on the third layer at chainage 0 to 120 m and 160 to 220 m at
average depth of 20 to 22 from the surface indicates the highly weathered shale. Very high
resistivity value on the third layer around at at chainage 150 m at depth of 12 m indicates the
fresh and intact bedrock of dolomite. Medium resistivity value of 1000 to 1500 Ω m on third
layer at varying depth of 25 to 30 m on chainage 220 to 320 m from the surface indicates the
bedrock of black shale.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 67


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-17A: Electrical Resistivity Tomogram of ERT – 11

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 68


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 5-17B: Interpretative Cross section of ERT – 11

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 69


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

CHAPTER 6: MULTI SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE WAVES

6.1 Background
Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) is widely used in geotechnical
engineering for the measurement of shear wave velocity, identification of the material properties,
martial boundaries and spatial variations of ground etc. In MASW method, high frequency
surface waves (Rayleigh waves) are inverted to estimate the S-wave velocity in its propagation
path. In a non-uniform, heterogeneous medium, the propagation velocity of a Rayleigh wave is
dependent on the wavelength (or frequency) of that wave.
The Rayleigh waves with short wavelengths (or high frequencies) will be influenced by
material closer to the surface than the Rayleigh waves with longer wavelengths ( or
lowfrequencies), which reflect properties of the deeper material. This dependence of phase
velocity on frequency is called dispersion. By generationg a wide range of frequencies, MASW
surveys use dispersion to produce velocity and frequency (or wave-length) correlations known as
dispersion curves. These dispersion curves are then used to calculate shear wave velocities at
different depths and thus to delineate different soil layers along the given profile
Consultant had carried out in-situ shear wave test with MSAW technique for
determination of shear wave velocities and computation of allowable bearing capacity at
different location of the project site. The chapter includes the technical details, methodology and
results based on the field work conducted at project site.

6.2 Scope and objectives of the study


The scope of this work includes geophysical investigation along twelve different profile
lines using MASW techniques. The objectives of the work are as follows:

i. To estimate shear wave velocity structure of subsurface strata along different profiles,
ii. To identify different subsurface layers of subsurface strata,
iii. Calculate dynamic parameters (Edyn, Gdyn, νdyn), natural period and natural frequency
(resonant frequency) of the soil and site stiffness.
iv. To characterize geotechnical properties of different subsurface strata layers in terms of
allowable bearing capacity and settlement.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 70


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.3 METHODOLOGY

6.3.1 Methodology

6.3.1.1 MASW Method


First introduced in GEOPHYSICS (1999), the multichannel analysis of surface waves
(MASW) method is one of the seismic survey methods evaluating the elastic condition (stiffness)
of the ground. MASW first measures seismic surface waves generated from various types of
seismic sources—such as sledge hammer—analyses the propagation velocities of those surface
waves, and then finally deduces shear-wave velocity (Vs) variations below the surveyed area that
is most responsible for the analysed propagation velocity pattern of surface waves. Shear-wave
velocity (Vs) is one of the elastic constants and closely related to Young’s modulus. Under most
circumstances, Vs is a direct indicator of the ground strength. After a relatively simple
procedure, final Vs information is provided in 1-D, 2-D, and 3-D formats.

Figure 6-1: Field setup and sample results of MASW


Seismic methods are suitable to study the strength characteristics of dyke and dams.
Seismic measurements are sensitive to density changes and compactness of soils. Therefore,
areas with inadequate compactness of dykes can be detected. A correlation with SPT/CPT

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 71


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

(Standard/Cone Penetration Testing) is often done because these methods also depend on the
mechanical properties of the soil. The example below shows the result of a MASW(Multichannel
Analysis of Surface Waves) measurement along a dyke in comparison to two CPT readings. The
MASW procedure measures the shear wave velocity of the dyke material which enables the
direct access to the material shear strength.

Figure 6-2: Shear Wave Velocity Map

Figure 6-3: MASW Array in Field

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 72


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.3.1.2 Field Data Acquisition Procedure


Field procedure for active MASW survey is explained here. The active survey is the
most common type of MASW survey that can produce a 2-D Vs profile. The overall setup is
illustrated in Figure hereunder.

Figure 6-4: Field procedure for active MASW


The maximum depth of investigation (Zmax) that can be achieved from the survey is
usually in the 10-30 m range, but this can vary with site and type of active sources used. Surface
waves are best generated over a ‘flat’ ground within at least one receiver-spread length (D).

Figure 6-5: Surface Wave Generation

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 73


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

If this is the case, then overall topographic variation within an entire survey line should
not be critical. However, any surface relief whose dimension is greater than, say, 10% of D will
cause a significant hindrance to surface wave generation.

The following table describes most of parameters related to data acquisition. A slight
variation in any parameter can always be expected.

Table 6-1. Data Acquisition Parameters for Active MASW Survey

6.3.1.3 Source
Maximum investigation depth (Zmax) will be determined by the longest wavelength
(Lmax) of surface waves used for the analysis as Zmax ≈ 0.5Lmax. Lmax is then governed by
the impact power of the seismic source, which can be a controlled type like a sledge hammer in
an active survey (or a car moving over a road bump in the case of roadside passive survey). In
general, a longer Lmax (therefore, a deeper Zmax) is achieved with a greater impact power.
A fairly heavy sledge hammer of 10 kg was used in the present case. Using an impact
plate (also called base plate) helped the source impact point intrude less into soil. Vertical
stacking of multiple impacts can suppress ambient noise significantly and is therefore always
recommended, especially if the survey takes place in an urban area. The optimum number

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 74


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

ofstacking impacts can be determined when there is little change in signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) in
the displayed seismic record during the stacking. 3-5 vertical stacks are often used. This
number, however, was increased as the ambient noise level increases and/or total receiver array
length (D) increases.

6.3.1.4 Receivers
Low-frequency geophones of 4.5 Hz were used for the investigations. The high end of
geophone frequency is not as critical as in the reflection survey where any minor drop in
sensitivity may become critical. For instance, recording and analysis of surface waves up to 450
Hz have been reported by using 4.5-Hz geophones (Miller et al., 2000). See table for optimum
type of receiver for different investigation depth, which makes 4.5 Hz geophone the suitable
choice for this project.

6.3.1.5 Field Geometry


Length of the receiver spread (D) is directly related to the longest wavelength (Lmax)
that can be analyzed, which in turn determines the maximum depth of investigation (Zmax). D
usually has to be equal to or greater than Zmax:

D = mZmax (1 ≤ m ≤ 3) (1)

On the other hand, receiver spacing (dx) is related to the shortest wavelength (Lmin) and
therefore determines the shallowest resolvable depth of investigation (Zmin).

Zmin = kdx (0.3 ≤ k ≤ 1.0) (2)

In practice, however, Lmax (therefore D) in an active survey is usually limited by the


seismic source as it is the most significant governing factor, usually in the range of 50-100 m. If
D becomes excessively long, surface waves generated by most active sources become attenuated
below noise level at the far end of the receiver spread. However, weak low-frequency surface
waves often exist even though no visually obvious on raw record because of the much stronger
ambient noise. This can help image the lower-frequency portion of dispersion, leading to an
increased Zmax. In this sense, the maximum D to provide the maximum Zmax is usually
slightly beyond the distance data start to appear noisy.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 75


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

The source offset (x1) controls degree of contamination by the near-field effects that
indicate a congregate of all adverse influences (for example, not-fully developed surface waves)
on data acquisition because of the source being too close to the receivers. Its optimum value has
been a subject of debate. A value of about 20% of D (e.g., x1=5 m when D=25 m) is suggested
as a minimum and 100% as a maximum. A large x1 value (e.g., > 100 %) and a large D (e.g., >
100 m) will increase the risk of higher-mode domination and reduce S/N for the fundamental
mode.
Based on the desired investigation depth, and referring to the table provided in earlier
section, 2 m receiver spacing (using a 24 channel equipment) with 5 m source offset was used in
spreads. Other parameters of recording etc, were chosen based on table guidelines and initial
field tests.

6.3.1.6 Field Data Acquisition and Layout


A 24 Channel seismograph system under the brand name of Ambrogeo 24 channel-
digital seismograph manufactured by Ambergeo, Italy was deployed in the field for the data
acquisition purpose. Geophones are connected with the spread cable that transmits the signal
sensed by each geophone to the Ambrogeo 24. Signal was generated by a 10 kg sledge hammer
with multiple stacks. The data length was set to 1 sec with sampling interval of 0.2 millisecond.
The field work was carried out on the month of Asar 2075. Vertical component geophones with
natural frequency of 4.5 Hz were fixed along the designed profiles so as to gather maximum
information to resolve the problem. Table 6-2 shows the location, length and other details of the
geophysical survey.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 76


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-2: Details of 2D MASW Survey Coverage

Profile No. Location Length Start End


(m) Easting Northing Easting Northing
MASW-1 Penstock Alignment 68 520894.2 3276261 520927.5 3276293

MASW-2 Penstock Alignment 76 520861.5 3276270 520913.5 3276313

MASW-3 Penstock Alignment 68 520824.4 3276312 520884 3276347

MASW-4 Penstock Alignment 76 520776.1 3276392 520835.6 3276411

MASW-5 Penstock Alignment 76 520789. 327641 520787.2 3276480


6 8
MASW-6 Penstock Alignment 76 520780.5 3276498 520768.8 3276564

MASW-7 Penstock Alignment 76 520730 3276618 520793.1 3276635

MASW-8 Penstock Alignment 76 520710 3276683 520781.1 3276702

MASW-9 Penstock Alignment 76 520705.4 3276739 520764.2 3276786

MASW-10 Penstock Alignment 76 520734.1 3276753 520717.2 3276825

MASW-11 Pipeline Alignment 76 520294.9 3278721 520380.2 3278724

MASW-12 Pipeline Alignment 82 520313.1 3278810 520397.7 3278843

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 77


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.3.1.7 Data Processing


The data processing was carried out using one of the most popular software i.e.
EasyMASW from GeoStru Software.
According to the fundamental hypothesis of the linear physics (Fourier's Theorem)
signals can be represented as the sum of independent signals, called harmonics of the signal.
These harmonics, for one-dimensional analysis, are trigonometric functions sine and cosine, and
act independently, not interacting with each other. Focusing on each harmonic component, the
final result in linear analysis will be equivalent to the sum of partial behaviors corresponding to
different harmonics. The Fourier analysis (FFT spectral analysis) is the fundamental tool for the
spectral characterization of the signal.
The analysis of Rayleigh waves, using MASW technique is performed with the spectral
treatment of the signal in the transformed domain, where you can, quite easily, identify the signal
for the Rayleigh waves from other types of signals, observing in addition, the Rayleigh waves
propagate with a velocity that is in function of the frequency. The velocity frequency link is
called dispersion spectrum. The dispersion curve identified in the f-k domain is called the
experimental dispersion curve, and in that domain represents the maximum amplitudes of the
spectrum.
The phase of the spectral analysis is needed to determine the experimental dispersion
curve. The software performs this analysis using the double discrete Fourier transform, applied
to the variables of time and space. It allows two types of analysis:
 Generation of the phase velocity-frequency spectrum;
 Generation of the wave number-frequency spectrum.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 78


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-6: Schematic diagram showing Generation of the phase velocity-frequency


spectrum
Using the regression curve, the software can choose a set of values to use during the
inversion. It is good to note that the selected points are considered as points of the fundamental
mode. The values automatically identified are plotted on the spectrum so that the user can refine
the selection both by inserting points related to higher modes as well as changing or deleting the
ones already identified.
The phase of inversion can only be executed after completing the spectral analysis. The
window shows the points on which the inversion will be carried out and the velocity-frequency
spectrum graph. As a first step is necessary to set the ground model on which the processing will
be based. If one has defined a preliminary model in the process of spectral analysis, it is
automatically copied.
To determine the soil stratigraphy model that generates a dispersion curve similar to that
obtained from the survey experiment, the software applies a heuristic algorithm. From the model
set by the user, the solver builds a set of compatible models and for each of them compares
thedispersion curve generated with that of the experimental test. The generation of models is

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 79


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

formulated to minimize the value of an objective function that evaluates the efficiency of the
solution given by the model. The maximum number of patterns to generate is selectable by the
user and should be chosen so that they are processed a sufficient number of attempts. It is
possible to directly assess the performance of the value of the objective function; this parameter
may prove to be a good indicator for choosing the number of models to generate.
The software displays the model that has the lowest mismatch factor, the model with the
minimum value of percentage error and provides the parallel evaluation of all the models
examined by allowing the user to choose which to use among those surveyed.

Figure 6-7: Schematic diagram showing Velocity Profile

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 80


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-8: Schematic diagram showing Shear wave Velocity


6.3.1.8 SITE CLASSIFICATION
The Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria classifies sites based on VS of the top 30 m of the
soil profile (VS30). Sites are divided into the six categories (Soil Profile Types A through F)
presented in Table below. The Caltrans site classes are consistent with those used by other codes
and standards, including the National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program [BSSC 2003],
American Society of Civil Engineers [ASCE 2006, 2010], and the California Building Code
[CBSC 2010]. For site classification, VS30 is calculated as the time for a shear wave to travel
from a depth of 30 m to the ground surface, not the arithmetic average of VS to a depth of 30 m.
As shown in Equation below, the time-averaged VS30 is calculated as 30 m divided by the sum
of the travel times for shear waves to travel through each layer. The travel time for each layer is
calculated as the layer thickness (d) divided by VS.

VS30 = 30 / Σ (d/VS)

For example, the VS30 for a soil profile containing 18 m of soft clay (VS = 90 m/sec)
over 12 m of stiff clay (VS = 260 m/sec) would be calculated: 30 / (18 / 90 + 12 / 260) = 122
m/sec. The time-average method typically results in a lower VS30 than the weighted average of
velocities of the individual layers: (90 · 18 + 260 · 12) / 30 = 158 m/sec.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 81


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-3: Site Classification

6.4 Results and Interpretation


The shear wave structure of the subsurface strata can directly be used to estimate the allowable
bearing capacity and settlement of strata. The velocity of shear wave in a particular stratum is
indicative of stiffness of the strata. In the following subsections shear wave structure and its
geological interpretation along with geotechnical parameters particularly allowable bearing
capacity and smoothened allowable bearing capacity map has been presented. In profiles having
extreme lateral variations, smoothened bearing capacity maps have also been incorporated. All
units of distance and elevations are in meters and velocity in m/s (shear wave velocity). Results
section contains 2D profiles along the survey lines.

6.4.1 MASW-1 (Penstock Alignment- P-20)

MASW-1 ( 68 m long) is on the bifurcation point at powerhouse area with starting of the
profile in downstream direction. The profile crosses the penstock at location P-20. Exact location
of the profile is shown in topography map. Data was gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m.
Vibration was generated at every 2m spacing with a sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from
the location of first Geophone using roll along method. Figure 6-9A shows the S-wave velocity
map along this profile from chainage 23 m to 45 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-9B illustrates
distribution of allowable bearing capacity map along this profile. The result shows the bearing
capacity versus depth from the existing surface level. Table 6-4 shows the values of dynamic

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 82


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

parameters calculated using numerical approach. Calculated natural period and resonant
frequency is also presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 83


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-9A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW - 1

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 84
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-9B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW - 1

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 85


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-4 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters

MASW Profile-1
Calculated Values of Dynamic Parameters
Vp Vs Young's Young's Shear Shear Bulk Bulk
*Density Poisson's Soil
(m/s) (m/s) m=Vp/Vs Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus
(Kg/m3) Ratio Amplification
~ ~ (N/m2) (MPa) (N/m2) (MPa) (N/m2) (MPa)

Top 920 418 1800 2.2010 0.3699 861697451 861.70 314503200 314.50 1104182400 1104.18 1.818876214
Layer
Second 1400 658 1900 2.1277 0.3582 2234652186 2234.65 822631600 822.63 2627157867 2627.16 1.385394236
Layer

Third 2220 1187 2100 1.8703 0.2998 7691964742 7691.96 2958834900 2958.83 6404526800 6404.53 0.972385516
Layer

Natural Period = 7.625


Resonant Frequency = 0.13114754

Note :  calculated from empirical relations


* Assumed value

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 86


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.2 MASW - 2 (Penstock Alignment- P-19)

MASW-2 (76 m long) is laid along the contour and crosses penstock alignment at P-19
with starting of the profile towards downstream direction. Exact location of the profile is shown
in topography map. Data was gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m. Vibration was generated
at every 2 m spacing with a sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from the location of first
Geophone using roll along method. Figure 6-10A shows the S-wave velocity map along this
profile from chainage 23 m to 53 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-10B illustrates distribution of
allowable bearing capacity map along this profile. The result shows the bearing capacity versus
depth from the existing surface level. Table 6-5 shows the values of dynamic parameters
calculated using numerical approach. Calculated natural period and resonant frequency is also
presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 87


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 66-10A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 2

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 88
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-10B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 2

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 89


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-5 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters

MASW Profile-2
Calculated Values of Dynamic Parameters
Vp Vs Young's Young's Shear Shear Bulk Bulk
*Density Poisson's Soil
(m/s) (m/s) 3 m=Vp/Vs Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus
(Kg/m ) Ratio 2 2 2 Amplification
~ ~ (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa)

Top 950 475 1800 2.0000 0.3333 1083000000 1083.00 406125000 406.13 1083000000 1083.00 1.684584293
Layer

Second 1400 653 1900 2.1440 0.3610 2205264715 2205.26 810177100 810.18 2643763867 2643.76 1.391749276
Layer

Third 1800 793 2000 2.2699 0.3796 3470199939 3470.20 1257698000 1257.70 4803069333 4803.07 1.238639713
Layer

Natural Period = 7.625


Resonant Frequency = 0.13114754

Note :  calculated from empirical relations


* Assumed value

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 90


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.3 MASW - 3 (Penstock Alignment- P-18)

MASW-3 (68 m long) is laid along the contour and crosses penstock alignment at P-18
with starting of the profile towards downstream direction. Exact location of the profile is shown
in topography map. Data was gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m. Vibration was generated
at every 2 m spacing with a sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from the location of first
Geophone using roll along method. Figure 6-11A shows the S-wave velocity map along this
profile from chainage 23 m to 45 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-11B illustrates distribution of
allowable bearing capacity map along this profile. The result shows the bearing capacity versus
depth from the existing surface level. Table 6-6 shows the values of dynamic parameters
calculated using numerical approach. Calculated natural period and resonant frequency is also
presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 91


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 66-11A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 3

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 92
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-11B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 3

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 93


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-6 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters

MASW Profile-3
Calculated Values of Dynamic Parameters
Vp Vs Young's Young's Shear Shear Bulk Bulk
*Density Poisson's Soil
(m/s) (m/s) 3 m=Vp/Vs Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus
(Kg/m ) Ratio 2 2 2 Amplification
~ ~ (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa)

Top 850 374 1800 2.2727 0.3800 694883986 694.88 251776800 251.78 964797600 964.80 1.944401518
Layer

Second 1100 481 1900 2.2869 0.3818 1214834769 1214.83 439585900 439.59 1712885467 1712.89 1.671944538
Layer
Third
Layer 1400 615 1900 2.2764 0.3804 1984048398 1984.05 718627500 718.63 2765830000 2765.83 1.442725949

Natural Period = 7.625


Resonant Frequency = 0.13114754

Note :  calculated from empirical relations


* Assumed value

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 94


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.4 MASW - 4 (Penstock Alignment- P-17)


MASW-4 (76 m long) is laid along the contour and crosses penstock alignment at P-17
with starting of the profile towards downstream direction. Exact location of the profile is shown
in topography map. Data was gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m. Vibration was generated
at every 2 m spacing with a sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from the location of first
Geophone using roll along method. Figure 6-12A shows the S-wave velocity map along this
profile from chainage 23 m to 45 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-12B illustrates distribution of
allowable bearing capacity map along this profile. The result shows the bearing capacity versus
depth from the existing surface level. Table 6-7 shows the values of dynamic parameters
calculated using numerical approach. Calculated natural period and resonant frequency is also
presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 95


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 66-12A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 4

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 96
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-12B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 4

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 97


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-7 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters

MASW Profile-4
Calculated Values of Dynamic Parameters
Vp Vs Young's Young's Shear Shear Bulk Bulk
*Density Poisson's Soil
(m/s) (m/s) 3 m=Vp/Vs Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus
(Kg/m ) Ratio 2 2 2 Amplification
~ ~ (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa)

Top 750 315 1800 2.3810 0.3929 497561088 497.56 178605000 178.61 774360000 774.36 2.155373706
Layer

Second 1200 551 1900 2.1779 0.3664 1576416292 1576.42 576841900 576.84 1966877467 1966.88 1.541054342
Layer

Third 1400 634 1900 2.2082 0.3710 2094119855 2094.12 763716400 763.72 2705711467 2705.71 1.416626488
Layer

Natural Period = 7.625


Resonant Frequency = 0.13114754

Note :  calculated from empirical relations


* Assumed value

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 98


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.5 MASW - 5 (Penstock Alignment- P-16)

MASW-5 (76 m long) is laid along the penstock alignment with centre of the profile at
around P-16 with starting of the profile towards powerhouse direction. Exact location of the
profile is shown in topography map. Data was gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m.
Vibration was generated at every 2 m spacing with a sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from
the location of first Geophone using roll along method. Figure 6-13A shows the S-wave velocity
map along this profile from chainage 23 m to 53 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-13B illustrates
distribution of allowable bearing capacity map along this profile. The result shows the bearing
capacity versus depth from the existing surface level. Table 6-8 shows the values of dynamic
parameters calculated using numerical approach. Calculated natural period and resonant
frequency is also presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 99


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 66-13A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 5

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 100
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-13B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 5

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 101


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-8 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters

MASW Profile-5
Calculated Values of Dynamic Parameters
Vp Vs Young's Young's Shear Shear Bulk Bulk
*Density Poisson's Soil
(m/s) (m/s) 3 m=Vp/Vs Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus
(Kg/m ) Ratio 2 2 2 Amplification
~ ~ (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa)

Top 790 374 1800 2.1123 0.3556 682600565 682.60 251776800 251.78 787677600 787.68 1.944401518
Layer

Second 1400 680 1900 2.0588 0.3456 2364415214 2364.42 878560000 878.56 2552586667 2552.59 1.358324597
Layer

Natural Period = 7.625


Resonant Frequency = 0.13114754

Note :  calculated from empirical relations


* Assumed value

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 102


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.6 MASW - 6 (Penstock Alignment- P-15)

MASW-6 (76 m long) is laid along the penstock alignment with the profile at around P-
15 with starting of the profile towards powerhouse direction. Exact location of the profile is
shown in topography map. Data was gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m. Vibration was
generated at every 2 m spacing with a sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from the location of
first Geophone using roll along method. Figure 6-14A shows the S-wave velocity map along this
profile from chainage 23 m to 53 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-14B illustrates distribution of
allowable bearing capacity map along this profile. The result shows the bearing capacity versus
depth from the existing surface level. Table 6-9 shows the values of dynamic parameters
calculated using numerical approach. Calculated natural period and resonant frequency is also
presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 103


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 66-14A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 6

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 104
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-14B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 6

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 105


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-9 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters

MASW Profile-6
Calculated Values of Dynamic Parameters
Vp Vs Young's Young's Shear Shear Bulk Bulk
*Density Poisson's Soil
(m/s) (m/s) 3 m=Vp/Vs Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus
(Kg/m ) Ratio 2 2 2 Amplification
~ ~ (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa)

Top 900 429 1800 2.0979 0.3530 896422111 896.42 331273800 331.27 1016301600 1016.30 1.790748258
Layer

Second 1400 673 1900 2.0802 0.3497 2323064559 2323.06 860565100 860.57 2576579867 2576.58 1.366783962
Layer

Natural Period = 7.625


Resonant Frequency = 0.13114754

Note :  calculated from empirical relations


* Assumed value

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 106


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.7 MASW - 7 (Penstock Alignment- P-14)

MASW-7 (76 m long) is laid across the penstock alignment at P-14 with starting of the
profile towards village. Exact location of the profile is shown in topography map. Data was
gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m. Vibration was generated at every 2 m spacing with a
sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from the location of first Geophone using roll along
method. Figure 6-15A shows the S-wave velocity map along this profile from chainage 23 m to
53 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-15B illustrates distribution of allowable bearing capacity
map along this profile. The result shows the bearing capacity versus depth from the existing
surface level. Table 6-10 shows the values of dynamic parameters calculated using numerical
approach. Calculated natural period and resonant frequency is also presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 107


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 66-15A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 7

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 108
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-15B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 7

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 109


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-10 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters

MASW Profile-7
Calculated Values of Dynamic Parameters
Vp Vs Young's Young's Shear Shear Bulk Bulk
*Density Poisson's Soil
(m/s) (m/s) 3 m=Vp/Vs Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus
(Kg/m ) Ratio 2 2 2 Amplification
~ ~ (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa)

Top 850 377 1800 2.2546 0.3776 704844995 704.84 255832200 255.83 959390400 959.39 1.935103073
Layer

Second 1100 513 1900 2.1442 0.3610 1361083849 1361.08 500021100 500.02 1632305200 1632.31 1.608564551
Layer

Third 1450 693 1900 2.0924 0.3520 2467291993 2467.29 912473100 912.47 2778119200 2778.12 1.342978228
Layer

Natural Period = 7.625


Resonant Frequency = 0.13114754

Note :  calculated from empirical relations


* Assumed value

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 110


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.8 MASW - 8 (Penstock Alignment- P-13)

MASW-8 (76 m long) is laid across the penstock alignment at P-13 with starting of the
profile towards village. Exact location of the profile is shown in topography map. Data was
gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m. Vibration was generated at every 2 m spacing with a
sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from the location of first Geophone using roll along
method. Figure 6-16A shows the S-wave velocity map along this profile from chainage 23 m to
53 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-16B illustrates distribution of allowable bearing capacity
map along this profile. The result shows the bearing capacity versus depth from the existing
surface level. Table 6-11 shows the values of dynamic parameters calculated using numerical
approach. Calculated natural period and resonant frequency is also presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 111


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 66-16A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 8

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 112
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-16B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 8

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 113


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-11 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters

MASW Profile-8
Calculated Values of Dynamic Parameters
Vp Vs Young's Young's Shear Shear Bulk Bulk
*Density Poisson's Soil
(m/s) (m/s) 3 m=Vp/Vs Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus
(Kg/m ) Ratio 2 2 2 Amplification
~ ~ (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa)

Top 850 377 1800 2.2546 0.3776 704844995 704.84 255832200 255.83 959390400 959.39 1.935103073
Layer

Second 1120 513 1900 2.1832 0.3673 1367309126 1367.31 500021100 500.02 1716665200 1716.67 1.608564551
Layer

Third 1500 698 1900 2.1490 0.3618 2521219979 2521.22 925687600 925.69 3040749867 3040.75 1.337197818
Layer

Natural Period = 7.625


Resonant Frequency = 0.13114754

Note :  calculated from empirical relations


* Assumed value

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 114


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.9 MASW - 9 (Penstock Alignment- P-12)

MASW-9 (76 m long) is laid across the penstock alignment at P-12 with starting of the
profile towards village. Exact location of the profile is shown in topography map. Data was
gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m. Vibration was generated at every 2 m spacing with a
sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from the location of first Geophone using roll along
method. Figure 6-17A shows the S-wave velocity map along this profile from chainage 23 m to
53 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-17B illustrates distribution of allowable bearing capacity
map along this profile. The result shows the bearing capacity versus depth from the existing
surface level. Table 6-12 shows the values of dynamic parameters calculated using numerical
approach. Calculated natural period and resonant frequency is also presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 115


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 66-17A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 9

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 116
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-17B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 9

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 117


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-12 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters

MASW Profile- 9
Calculated Values of Dynamic Parameters
Vp Vs Young's Young's Shear Shear Bulk Bulk
*Density Poisson's Soil
(m/s) (m/s) 3 m=Vp/Vs Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus
(Kg/m ) Ratio 2 2 2 Amplification
~ ~ (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa)

Top 850 382 1800 2.2251 0.3735 721512909 721.51 262663200 262.66 950282400 950.28 1.9198659
Layer

1450 675 1900 2.1481 0.3617 2357561101 2357.56 865687500 865.69 2840500000 2840.50 1.364352682
Second
Layer

Natural Period = 7.625


Resonant Frequency = 0.13114754

Note :  calculated from empirical relations


* Assumed value

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 118


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.10 MASW - 10 (Penstock Alignment- P-11)

MASW-10 (76 m long) is laid along the penstock alignment at P-11 with starting of the
profile towards powerhouse. Exact location of the profile is shown in topography map. Data was
gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m. Vibration was generated at every 2 m spacing with a
sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from the location of first Geophone using roll along
method. Figure 6-18A shows the S-wave velocity map along this profile from chainage 23 m to
53 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-18B illustrates distribution of allowable bearing capacity
map along this profile. The result shows the bearing capacity versus depth from the existing
surface level. Table 6-13 shows the values of dynamic parameters calculated using numerical
approach. Calculated natural period and resonant frequency is also presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 119


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6--18A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 10

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 120
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-18B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 10

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 121


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-13 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters

MASW Profile- 10
Calculated Values of Dynamic Parameters
Vp Vs Young's Young's Shear Shear Bulk Bulk
*Density Poisson's Soil
(m/s) (m/s) 3 m=Vp/Vs Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus
(Kg/m ) Ratio 2 2 2 Amplification
~ ~ (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa)

Top 700 292 1800 2.3973 0.3947 428093637 428.09 153475200 153.48 677366400 677.37 2.255688897
Layer

Second 1050 446 1900 2.3543 0.3899 1050620974 1050.62 377940400 377.94 1590829467 1590.83 1.749476034
Layer

Third 1300 578 1900 2.2491 0.3768 1747880449 1747.88 634759600 634.76 2364653867 2364.65 1.497449584
Layer

Natural Period = 7.625


Resonant Frequency = 0.13114754

Note :  calculated from empirical relations


* Assumed value

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 122


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.11 MASW - 11 (Pipeline Alignment- P-2)

MASW-11 (76 m long) is laid across the pipeline alignment at P-2 with starting of the
profile towards footrack. Exact location of the profile is shown in topography map. Data was
gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m. Vibration was generated at every 2 m spacing with a
sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from the location of first Geophone using roll along
method. Figure 6-19A shows the S-wave velocity map along this profile from chainage 23 m to
53 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-19B illustrates distribution of allowable bearing capacity
map along this profile. The result shows the bearing capacity versus depth from the existing
surface level. Table 6-14 shows the values of dynamic parameters calculated using numerical
approach. Calculated natural period and resonant frequency is also presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 123


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6--19A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 11

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 124
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-19B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 11

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 125


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

6.4.12 MASW - 12 (Penstock Alignment- P-01)

MASW-12 (82 m long) is laid across the penstock alignment at P-01 with starting of the
profile towards downstream direction. Exact location of the profile is shown in topography map.
Data was gathered with a geophone spacing of 2 m. Vibration was generated at every 2 m
spacing with a sledge hammer starting from the –6 m from the location of first Geophone using
roll along method. Figure 6-20A shows the S-wave velocity map along this profile from
chainage 23 m to 59 m of the survey profile. Figure 6-20B illustrates distribution of allowable
bearing capacity map along this profile. The result shows the bearing capacity versus depth from
the existing surface level. Table 6-15 shows the values of dynamic parameters calculated using
numerical approach. Calculated natural period and resonant frequency is also presented.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 126


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-- 20A: Shear Wave Velocity Map of MASW – 12

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu


andu 127
Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Figure 6-20B: Allowable Bearing Capacity Map of MASW – 12

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 128


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Table 6-14 Calculated values of Dynamic Parameters

MASW Profile- 12
Calculated Values of Dynamic Parameters
Vp Vs Young's Young's Shear Shear Bulk Bulk
*Density Poisson's Soil
(m/s) (m/s) 3 m=Vp/Vs Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus Modulus
(Kg/m ) Ratio 2 2 2 Amplification
~ ~ (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa) (N/m ) (MPa)

Top 600 250 1800 2.4000 0.3950 313865546 313.87 112500000 112.50 498000000 498.00 2.475967316
Layer

Second 850 368 1900 2.3098 0.3847 712562724 712.56 257305600 257.31 1029675867 1029.68 1.963361278
Layer

Third 1200 547 1900 2.1938 0.3689 1556384716 1556.38 568497100 568.50 1978003867 1978.00 1.547805968
Layer

Natural Period = 7.625


Resonant Frequency = 0.13114754

Note :  calculated from empirical relations


* Assumed value

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 129


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS


Detail information of the outcome of the interpretation is presented in the previous
chapters. The general conclusions are as follows:
Geologically the project area lies on the Surkhet and midland group rocks mainly
consisting of shale, phyllite, slate, schist and dolomite. The headworks and powerhouse of project
area covered by alluvium deposits and surge shaft and penstock area are covered by colluvial
deposit with cultivated residual soil. General geological survey of the area is carried out during
the ERT and MASW survey along the project area. Rock type, associate minerals, bedding
structures and slope aspects and attitude of beds were studied during geophysical survey at
different component of project area. Geophysical Investigation results shows multi layered
model at the survey site. Result of the findings at each survey location is presented in respective
ERT / MASW profiles.

Headworks Area
Headworks lie at about 200 m upstream from suspension bridge. Rocks are exposed at
the various sections around the proposed head works area. The left bank of headworks comprises
12 to 15 m thick river terrace deposits up to weir axis area and thick river terrace deposits of
more than 30 m is found at desander area. The terrace deposits on both bank of river consist fine
to coarse grained materials like sand, gravel, boulder, cobble, pebble etc. The common rock type
exposed on head works area is schist. Bedrock is found at the depth of 10-12 m along proposed
weir axis. Bedrock is not found up to the investigation depth at desander area. Inlet portal area is
covered by colluvial deposit with thick vegetation. Bedrock is found at depth of 8 to 10 m from
the surface.

Power House and Penstock Alignment Area


Purposed Power house area is lies on the Right bank of Suni Gad khola and it is covered
by alluvial deposit of sand and gravel with pebble cobble and boulders. Bedrocks of black shale
are exposed at the various sections near around the proposed power house area. Bedrock of black
shale is expected to occur at depth of 5 to 8 m from the surface at power house. Very low
resistivity zone on some part of the power house area indicates highly weathered saturated shale
or iron ore. The penstock pipe is aligned through colluvial deposit of cultivated residual soil.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 130


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Bedrock of Black shale is found the varying depth of 10 to 20 m from the surface at penstock
alignment. Surge shaft area is covered by residual soil. Bedrock of interbeded black shale with
dolomite is expected to occur at depth of 10 m on the surge shaft.
Most of the profiles show high shear wave velocity in the lower region of profiles. The
bearing capacity sections also have been computed on actual datausing numerical methods. As
the MASW survey use sampling frequency of 50 Hz, the geophysical anomalies up to the
dimension/ diameter of 1 m can be detected. The natural period, resonant frequency bearing
capacity and associated parameters of foundation level of the project components at different
location has been presented in detail in the associated images and tables.

RECOMMENDATIONS
Geophysical subsurface studies at the site reveal thickness of overburden at different
locations to be different. Bed rocks are exposed at the various sections around the project area.
Most of the survey area is covered by alluvial/ colluvial deposits. Expected depth of the bedrock
at different locations can be taken from respective lithological section. The bearing capacity of
the area is calculated and presented in respective MASW sections. It is recommended to consult
Geotechnical, Civil and Structural Engineer for the proper design of the structure based on the
subsurface geology of the area. It is further recommended to verify the findings by core drilling
at some locations in the area.

Slight deviation on the results interpreted from geophysical methods may occur due to presence of highly
conductive materials, bad electrode contact, undulations on the topography in the survey area.

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 131


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

ANNEX – I

FIELD PHOTOGRAPHS

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 132


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Cable layout by survey assistants for ERT 1 at Desander Area

Bedrock Exposure at left bank of Suni Gad at weir axis area

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 133


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Surveyor taking Topographical data of ERT cable layout

Cable layout of ERT 2, across weir axis at right bank of Suni Gad Khola

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 134


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Cable layout of ERT 3 along weir axis crossing the river

Bedrock exposure at inlet portal area

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 135


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Cable layout of ERT 6 towards slope on headrace alignment (kholsi)

Bedrock exposure of black shale at powerhouse area

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 136


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Cable layout by survey assistants for ERT 7 at powerhouse

Data Acquisition by geophysicist at powerhouse area

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 137


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Penstock and surge shaft area

Cable layout of ERT 8 at penstock alignment

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 138


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Cable layout of ERT 9 at penstock alignment

Cable layout of ERT 11 at surge shaft area

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 139


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Cable layout and data acquisition of MASW survey

Cable layout of MASW for P-12 at Surge Shaft

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 140


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

Cable layout of MASW survey for P-20 at Penstock

MASW survey at Penstock Alignment

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 141


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

MASW survey of P-17 at Penstock Alignment

MASW survey of P-18 at Penstock Alignment

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 142


Final Draft Report on Geophysical Investigation at Suni Gad Khola Hydropower Project -2075

ANNEX – II

ERT & MASW Profile in


Topography Map

Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Banasthali, Kathmandu 143


17
85 17
17

75
80

17
7
17

17
7
17

65
0
55 17

60
50 45

17

17

17

17
40
BM-16

35

17
30

17
25

17
20

17

17
15

16
10

16
05

00

95

90
GUTHI CHAUR

BM-17

BM-18

GUTHI CHAUR

Name of Project: Client: Consultant:


EXPLORER GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
BANASTHALI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Tel:014-380156, 9851139485
D
I GA
SUN
BM-23

BM-21

SANGRA PHEDI

Name of Project: Client: Consultant:


EXPLORER GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
BANASTHALI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Tel:014-380156, 9851139485
1595

1600

1605

1610

SI
OL 1615

KH 1620
TP-506
1625

1630

1635

1640

1645

1650
KH
OLS
I
N 1655

1660

1665

1670

1675
KH
OLS
I 1680

85
16

1690

1695

1700

1705

1710

15
17

1720

1725

1730
TRACK
1735

1740

1745

SIRADI DANDA
1750
BM-14

1755

Name of Project: Client: Consultant:


EXPLORER GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
BANASTHALI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Tel:014-380156, 9851139485
159
5

1600

1605

1610

I
O LS 1615

KH 1620
TP-506
1625

1630

1635

164
0

1645

1650

N 1655

1660

5
166

1670

1675

1680

85
16

0
169

5
169

0
170

5
170

0
171

15
17

0
172

1725

1730
TRACK
1735

1740

1745

SIRADI DANDA
1750
BM-14

1755

Name of Project: Client: Consultant:


EXPLORER GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
BANASTHALI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Tel:014-380156, 9851139485
N

18
15
18

1 17

18
8
17
10

95
0 17

00
9
5 0 85 17

17
75

80

17
7
17

17
7
17

65
0
55 17

60
50 45

17

17

17

17
40

35
BM-16

17
30

17
25

17
20

17

17
15

16
10

16
05

00

95

90
GUTHI CHAUR

BM-17

Name of Project: Client: Consultant:


EXPLORER GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
BANASTHALI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Tel:014-380156, 9851139485
1815
18
10
BM-9

18
05

18
00

17

B
95

17
90

17
85

17
80

17

1765
75

17
70

17
65

B
B

B
17
65

B
1775 1770

1780

B
17
85 1775
N

B
1
7
7
0

1790

1795

1800
1775

1805
N

Name of Project: Client: Consultant:


EXPLORER GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
BANASTHALI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Tel:014-380156, 9851139485
17
75

1760
1770
N

1765

1755
BM-4

Name of Project: Client: Consultant:


EXPLORER GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
BANASTHALI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Tel:014-380156, 9851139485
N

18
15
1

18 17
8

18
17
1

05 95
0

17

00
90 85 17

17
75

80

17
7
17

17
7
17

65
0
55 17

60
50 45

17

17

17

17
4

35
BM-16

17
0

30

17
25

17
20

17

17
15

16
10

16
0

00
5

95

90
GUTHI CHAUR

BM-17

Name of Project: Client: Consultant:


EXPLORER GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
BANASTHALI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Tel:014-380156, 9851139485
159
5

1600

1605

1610

I
O LS 1615

KH 1620
TP-506
1625

1630

1635

164
0

1645

1650

1655

1660

5
166

N 1670

1675

1680

85
16

0
169

5
169

0
170

5
170

0
171

15
17

0
172

1725

1730
TRACK
1735

1740

1745

SIRADI DANDA
1750
BM-14

1755

Name of Project: Client: Consultant:


EXPLORER GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
BANASTHALI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Tel:014-380156, 9851139485
95
15

N
90
15

85
15

80
15

75
15
70
15

TP-514

65
15

60
15

55
15

50
15

5
4
5
1

40
15

35
15

30
15

25
15

20
15
15
15

01
15

1505

1500

1495

1490

1485

80
14

75
14
70
14
65
14
60
14
55
14
50
14

45
14
0
144
5
143
0
143

Name of Project: Client: Consultant:


EXPLORER GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
BANASTHALI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Tel:014-380156, 9851139485
Staff Quarter

C
W
Camp Area
SANGRA
BM-19

T
14
95

14
90
14
05 14
85
14
141 80
0
1400
1400

14

1510
75
14
70
14
65
14
60

14
5

1505
5

14
50

150
14
4 5

0
14
40

149
14

5
35
14

14
30

90
14
25
SUN

14
I GA

85
D
14
D 20

14
80
14

BM-21
15

14
75
14
10

14
70
14
14

65
05
14
60

14
55

145
0

14

N
45

14
40

14
35
14
30

14
25

14
20
BM-22

14
15

14
10

BM-23

Name of Project: Client: Consultant:


EXPLORER GEOPHYSICAL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
BANASTHALI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Tel:014-380156, 9851139485
DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT (11.05MW)
VOLUME 2: ANNEX E
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL TEST REPORT
DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT (11.05MW)
VOLUME 2: ANNEX F
SEDIMENT TEST REPORT
ilydro t sb
IN COOPERA|ION WIfH NTNU, NORWAY
HLPL/F/RSoLA/01

RESULT SHEET OF LABORATORY ANALYSES


Client: Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd.
Project: Sunigad Hydropower project (11.05 MW)
Sampling location: Headworks site
Sample provided by; Client
Analyses date: I January 2018

Type of analyses
A. Suspended sediment concentration B. Particle size distribution (PSD) r/
c. Mineral content D. Orqanic matters content

A. Results of Suspended Sediment Concentratiqn

Sampling Sample Concentration Remarks


S, No. (PPM)
date number

1 uta4t2074 49
z 06t04t2074 z 325
07t04t2074 6Z Rain
A
12t04t2074 A 11 Rain
14t04t2074 zoz
'198
o 17t04t2074 o
7 21t04t2074 7 371
8 22t04t2074 8 tto
25t04t2074 I z,)

10 3010412074 10 1,601
11 3110412074 11 114
12 0310512074 lz 602
07t05t2074 l\)
14 1010512074 14
15 1110512074 152 Rain
16 13t05t2074 '16 104 Rain
17 17 t05t2074 17 36 Rain
18 18t05t2074 1R
,1
? Rain
19 19t05t2074 19
zv 24t05t2074 20' o/
ZI 2510512074 21
zz 0310612074 zz 448 Rain
ZJ 06t06t2074 23 4o
z+ 0810612074 zq 59

25 1510612074 25
26 1710612074 zo 474 Rain
zt 2910612074 27 I

I .ir lJti i tui:


DNV.GL
I LLlillu

w Page '1 of 4
llydro Lsb
IN COOPFRATION WITH NTNU, NORWAY
HLPL/F/RSoLA/01

B. Results of Particte Size Distribution (pSD)

100
rililil ttl
90
----- 17-31t04t2074
80 -01-14104t2074

70

o 60
I
itr t
50
o ,
o ,
a
(L
40
,
t
I
JU

20

10

0
J +
0.0001 0.0010 0.0'100 0.1 000 1.0000 10.0000
Diameter in mm

Figure B-1 : PSD curves of samples taken on Shrawan 2074

'100
r|ilIil t||l
90 o3-13t05t2074

80 -----. 17-25t05t2074

70

o 60
rtr
50
()
()
c, 40
G
I
30 tl

zu
:/
/
10
L
0
0,0001 0.0 010 0.0100 0.1 000 1.0000 1 0.0000.
Diameter in mm

Figure B-2: PSD curves of samples taken on Bhadra 2074

Page 2 of 4
ilydro Lab
IN COOPERATION WITH NTNU, NORWAY
HLPL/F/RSoLA/01

100

90
-03-2910612074
80

70

o 60
F
50
o
a
q) 40
(L

30

20

10

0
0.0001 0.0010 0.0 100 0.'1 000 1,0000 10.0000

Diameter in mm

Figure B-3: PSD curves of samples taken on Ashwin 2074

C. Results of Mineral Content Analysis

abf e C-1: Samplins date: 01-141041207 Table C-2: Samplinq date: 17-31/0412074
Hardness Sample (%) Average Hardness
Sample (%) Average
Minerals (Moh's Minerals (Moh's
(%\ scale) ('/") ^^^t^\
J90tv./
1 2 J 1 2 3
Quartz 72 71 72 Quartz 78 77 76 77 7
Feldspar 6 A
4 o Feldspar Z 4 J 3 6
Mica q I 6 2-3 Mica ? aa

A 1 1 1 1 >q A 1 1 1 1 >5
Other Other
B IC 14 16 15 <5 B to 4E 17 16 <5

able C-3: Samplinq date: 03-13/0512074 Tabfe C-4: Samplinq date : 17-25/0512074
Hardness Sample (%) Average Hardness
Sample (%) Average
Minerals (Moh's Minerals (Moh's
1 2 J (%) scale) 1 2 3 (%) scare)
Qua(z 7R I3 80 76 7 Quartz 76 79 79 7B 7
Feldspar z A
6 Feldspar 3 1 2 L 6
Mica o 4 6 2-3 Mica 5 6 5 2-3
1 1 1 1
>6 1 1 1 1 >5
Other Other
B to 17 12 <5 15 14 13 14 <5

Page 3 of 4
f,tydtw Lafr
IN COOPERATIONWIIH NTNU, NORWAY
HLPL/F/RSoLAJO1

able C-5: Sampllng date: 03.2510612074


Hardness
Sample (%) Average
Minerals (Moh's
1 2. 3 ("/"1 scale)
72 7tr 78 'tE I
Quartz
Feldspar 4 z
Mica z-5
A 1 1
4 >6
Other <5
B 18 16 14 16

Nbtes:
Other A: Tourmaline, Garnet and Hornblende
Other B: CarbOnate (-70h), Qlay, Organic mattors and few unidentified sediments
4l
:

"ffi.
{fFril
\W/
\^-w
\qel.l}
I
Page 4 of 4

gry$wryut
DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT (11.05MW)
VOLUME 2: ANNEX G
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Detailed Engineering Design Cost

Contingency

Contingency

Contingency
Total Cost

Custom
Duty
Base Cost VAT/ Tax Total Cost with

with
NRs

NRs

NRs
%
S.NO. Description
NRs NRs VAT NRs

I DEVELOPMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE & LOGISTICS


1 Development Cost 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00
2 Access Road 36,784,092.10 36,784,092.10 4,781,931.97 41,566,024.07
3 Camping Facilities and Construction Power 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 3,900,000.00 33,900,000.00
4 Camp House In Rent 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00
5 Vehicles 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00
6 Land procurement and lease 40,000,000.00 40,000,000.00 40,000,000.00
7 Mobilization and demobilization Works 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00
8 Logistics and office equipments 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00
Total of I 168,284,092.10 168,284,092.10 8,681,931.97 176,966,024.07
II CIVIL WORKS
A Underdround Structures
1 InletPortal 5,584,120.08 20% 1,116,824.02 6,700,944.10 871,122.73 7,572,066.83
2 OutletPortal 4,661,968.67 20% 932,393.73 5,594,362.41 727,267.11 6,321,629.52
3 Headrace Tunnel 187,325,425.27 20% 37,465,085.05 224,790,510.33 29,222,766.34 254,013,276.67
4 Dewatering 2,000,000.00 20% 400,000.00 2,400,000.00 312,000.00 2,712,000.00
Sub Total of A 199,571,514.02 39,914,302.80 239,485,816.83 31,133,156.19 270,618,973.02
B Super-Structures
1 Cofferdam 3,000,000.00 10% 300,000.00 3,300,000.00 429,000.00 3,729,000.00
2 Weir, Undersluice & Flood wall 77,486,405.88 10% 7,748,640.59 85,235,046.47 11,080,556.04 96,315,602.51
4 Intake And Gravel Trap 19,650,217.53 10% 1,965,021.75 21,615,239.28 2,809,981.11 24,425,220.38
5 Settling Basin 44,767,210.41 10% 4,476,721.04 49,243,931.45 6,401,711.09 55,645,642.53
5 Approach Pipe, Truss Bridge Crossing and Forebay 34,569,296.52 10% 3,456,929.65 38,026,226.17 4,943,409.40 42,969,635.57
6 Headrace Pipe 159,983,650.30 10% 15,998,365.03 175,982,015.33 22,877,661.99 198,859,677.32
6 Project Road 266,195,662.16 10% 26,619,566.22 292,815,228.38 38,065,979.69 330,881,208.07
6 Surge Pipe 16,557,931.32 10% 1,655,793.13 18,213,724.45 2,367,784.18 20,581,508.62
6 Penstock Pipe 43,040,188.48 10% 4,304,018.85 47,344,207.33 6,154,746.95 53,498,954.28
7 Powerhouse 107,457,005.57 10% 10,745,700.56 118,202,706.12 15,366,351.80 133,569,057.92
8 Tailrace 3,184,628.33 10% 318,462.83 3,503,091.17 455,401.85 3,958,493.02
9 Switchyard and Valve House 5,945,435.50 10% 594,543.55 6,539,979.06 850,197.28 7,390,176.33
10 Bio-Engineering 4,000,000.00 10% 400,000.00 4,400,000.00 572,000.00 4,972,000.00
Sub Total of B 785,837,631.99 78,583,763.20 864,421,395.19 112,374,781.37 976,796,176.57
Total of II 985,409,146.02 118,498,066.00 1,103,907,212.02 143,507,937.56 1,247,415,149.58
III HYDRO-MECHANICAL WORKS

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Total Cost: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Detailed Engineering Design Cost

Contingency

Contingency

Contingency
Total Cost

Custom
Duty
Base Cost VAT/ Tax Total Cost with

with
NRs

NRs

NRs
%
S.NO. Description
NRs NRs VAT NRs

1 General Items 15,000,000.00 5% 750,000.00 15,750,000.00 511,875.00 16,261,875.00


2 Trashracks, Stoplogs and Gates all Complete 32,460,000.00 5% 1,623,000.00 34,083,000.00 383,433.75 1,107,697.50 35,574,131.25
3 Approach Pipe 16,243,500.00 5% 812,175.00 17,055,675.00 191,876.34 554,309.44 17,609,984.44
4 Headrace Pipe 219,901,500.00 5% 10,995,075.00 230,896,575.00 2,597,586.47 7,504,138.69 238,400,713.69
5 Surge Pipe 23,887,500.00 5% 1,194,375.00 25,081,875.00 282,171.09 815,160.94 25,897,035.94
6 Penstock Pipe 34,944,000.00 5% 1,747,200.00 36,691,200.00 412,776.00 1,192,464.00 37,883,664.00
Bifurcation Bends, Stiffeners, Vent Pipes and
7 26,000,000.00 5% 1,300,000.00 27,300,000.00 307,125.00 887,250.00 28,187,250.00
Other Items
Total of III 368,436,500.00 18,421,825.00 386,858,325.00 4,174,968.66 12,572,895.56 399,814,654.31
IV ELECTROMECHCANICAL EQUIPMENTS
Cost of Electromechanical Component all
1 235,640,000.00 5% 11,782,000.00 247,422,000.00 2,796,332.56 1,608,243.00 251,826,575.56
Complete
Total of IV 235,640,000.00 5% 11,782,000.00 247,422,000.00 2,796,332.56 1,608,243.00 251,826,575.56
V 33 kV SINGLE CIRCUIT TRANSMISSION LINE
Cost for 33 kV Single Circuit Transmission Line all
1 27,158,733.89 5% 1,357,936.69 28,516,670.58 213,875.03 1,853,583.59 30,584,129.20
Complete
Total of V 27,158,733.89 5% 1,357,936.69 28,516,670.58 213,875.03 1,853,583.59 30,584,129.20
TOTAL of I-V 1,784,928,472.00 150,059,827.70 1,934,988,299.70 7,185,176.24 168,224,591.69 2,106,606,532.73
VI ENGINEERING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS
1 Insurance Cost 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00
2 Engineering, Supervision & Management cost 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00
3 Owner's Cost 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00
4 Environmental and Social Mitigation Cost 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00
5 Legal and Administration 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00
6 Misc Cost 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00
Total 125,000,000.00 - 125,000,000.00 - - 140,000,000.00
BASE CONSTRUCTION COST 1,909,928,472.00 150,059,827.70 2,059,988,299.70 7,185,176.24 168,224,591.69 2,246,606,532.73
INTEREST DURING CONSTRUCTION
VIII 217,344,884.42
INCLUDING FINANCING COST
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2,463,951,417.15

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Total Cost: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 02: CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT ROAD
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
I General Items
A Contractual Requirements
Provision of price associated of obtaining performance security in accordance
A-1 T-1.1 with Clause 50.1 of Conditions of Contract and Clause 1.1 of Particular Technical LS 1.00 100,000.00 100,000.00
Specification
Provision of insurance for the plants, materials, contractor's equipment and plants,
A-2 T-1.2 third party insurance and insurance of contractor's personnel all complete as per LS 3.00 1,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Mobilization cost including movement of personnel,Contractor's Equipment,
A-3 LS 1.00
Materials, Plant, supplies to the Project Site

Provision of Contractor's camp facilities including stores, workshop, labor camp,


engineer, sub engineer and other staff's camp with the facility of drinking water,
A-4 G-9, G-10 LS 1.00 1,000,000.00
proper management of sewer system (septic tank) and soil waste management,
security all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mobilization cost including movement of personnel,Contractor's Equipment,


A-5 LS 1.00
Materials, Plant, supplies to the Project Site
Provision of as built drawings all complete as per specifications or as directed by
A-6 T-1.4 LS 1.00 500,000.00
the Engineer.
Construction of Army camp facilities including facilities of drinking water and
A-7 T-1.7 proper management of sewerage and Bunker for Storage of explosive all complete LS 1.00 2,000,000.00
as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Provision of explosive handling and management inlcuding costs of security
A-8 T-1.7 personnel, storage, other related works and incidentals all complete as per LS 1.00 5,000,000.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer
Provision of field laboratory with testing equipments and apparatus including
A-9 G-14 material, labour, etc all complete as per specifications or as directed by the LS 1.00 1,500,000.00
Engineer
Provision of medical facilities at site with medical personnel and necessary
A-10 T-1.8 medicines, equipments,etc all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Month 12.00 100,000.00 1,200,000.00
Engineer
Total for General Items (Sub Total I) 14,300,000.00
II Project Road
Site Clearance including cutting of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the site
A-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 1,563,953.98
area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
A-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed and soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 343,362.14 147.92 50,790,362.71
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate CostEstimate_Project Road: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 02: CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT ROAD
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Earthwork in excavation in ordinary rocks using rock breaker and disposal up to
A-3 T-4 the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 98,103.47 700.07 68,678,869.18
directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks including drilling and blasting, disposal up
A-4 T-4 to the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 49,051.73 1,465.96 71,908,002.46
directed by the Engineer.
Filling with ordinary soil (Alluvial/Colluvial deposits) in layers and compaction
A-5 T-2.6 with sprinkling water all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 49,051.73 355.35 17,430,533.64
Engineer.

Fabrication, Placing in position and filling with stone in machine made gabion
boxes of hexagonal mesh with heavy coated GI wires, mesh size 100mm x
A-6 T-11 Cu.m 4,450.00 4,089.73 18,199,302.50
120mm, mesh wire 10 SWG, selvedge wire 8 SWG and binding wire 12 SWG all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Rubble masonry works in 1:6 cement mortar including pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
A-7 T-12.3 Cu.m 269.60 8,821.33 2,378,229.81
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Supply, installation of perforated HDPE pipe with filter including drilling, all
A-8 T-13.3 necessary equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a 100 mm dia m - For Rate only
b 225 mm dia m - For Rate only
Providing and Laying of Geotextile including all equipments and materials all
A-9 T-9 Sq.m 3,626.00 278.00 1,008,028.00
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation 1 No. of Bailey bridge for River crossing (25m span)
A-10 including all necessary equipments, materials all complete as per specification or LS 1.00 25,000,000.00
as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation 0.9 m dia. RCC Hume pipe Culvert NP-3 for River
A-11 T-13.2 crossing including all necessary equipments, materials all complete as per RM 45.00 17,247.20 776,124.00
specification or as directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of 75 mm thick Blinding Concrete (M15) for pipe culvert and
causeway including compaction, cleaning, curing and all required equipments,
A-12 T-5.5 Cu.m 20.00 11,423.62 228,472.48
materials, all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M20) for pipe culvert and
causeway including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
A-13 T-5.5 Cu.m 50.00 12,959.38 647,969.16
materials, all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate CostEstimate_Project Road: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 02: CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT ROAD
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) For pipe culvert and
Cause way including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
A-15 T-5.5 Cu.m 45.00 16,783.59 755,261.34
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of
reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other
A-16 T-5.4 MT 5.97 139,214.36 830,552.89
materials in surface structures all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Total for Project Road(Sub Total A) 260,195,662.16

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate CostEstimate_Project Road: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 02: CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT ROAD
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
B DAYWORKS AND PROVISIONAL SUMS
B-1 Labour
The dayworks rates quoted for labour shall be the total amounts payable, and shall include all costs such as allowances for complying with the Labour Laws, insurances, accommodation, travelling time, overtime compensation, use and maintenance
of small tools of trade, supervision, overhead and profit. Only the actual time engaged upon the work will be paid for.
a Skilled Labour Md For Rate only
b UnSkilled Labour Md For Rate only
B-2 Materials
All materials used in dayworks shall comply with the specifications. The rates shall include delivery to site and necessary storage and handling.
a Cement Bag For Rate only
b Crushed gravel Cu.m For Rate only
c Sand Cu.m For Rate only
d Stone Cu.m For Rate only
e Gabion Box Sq.m. For Rate only
f Diesel Ltr For Rate only
g Petrol Ltr For Rate only
B-3 Equipments
The rates for equipment shall include all operation and maintenance costs, fuel, oil, grease, overhead and profit. Only time actually employed upon the work will be paid. The idle time shall not be paid and will be included in the quoted rates.
a Excavator(1 Cu.m) Hr For Rate only
b Loader(1/3 Cu.m) Hr For Rate only
c Tipper Hr For Rate only
d Tractor Hr For Rate only
Total for Dayworks item (sub total B)
TOTAL PROJECT COST
TOTAL PROJECT COST IN WORDS

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate CostEstimate_Project Road: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
I GENERAL ITEMS
A CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS
Provision of price associated of obtaining performance security in accordance
A-1 T-1.1 with Clause 50.1 of Conditions of Contract and Clause 1.1 of Particular Technical LS 1.00 100,000.00 100,000.00
Specification
Provision of insurance for the plants, materials, contractor's equipment and plants,
A-2 T-1.2 third party insurance and insurance of contractor's personnel all complete as per LS 3.00 5,000,000.00 15,000,000.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Mobilization cost including movement of personnel,Contractor's Equipment,
A-3 LS 1.00
Materials, Plant, supplies to the Project Site

Provision of Contractor's camp facilities including stores, workshop, labor camp,


engineer, sub engineer and other staff's camp with the facility of drinking water,
A-4 G-9, G-10 LS 1.00 10,000,000.00
proper management of sewer system (septic tank) and soil waste management,
security all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Provision for demobilisation after completion all complete as per as per


A-5 LS 1.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Provision of as built drawings all complete as per specifications or as directed by
A-6 T-1.4 LS 1.00 1,000,000.00
the Engineer.
Construction of Army camp facilities including facilities of drinking water and
A-7 T-1.8 proper management of sewerage and Bunker for Storage of explosive all complete LS 1.00 5,000,000.00
as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Provision of explosive handling and management inlcuding costs of security
A-8 T-1.8 personnel, storage, other related works and incidentals all complete as per LS 1.00 15,000,000.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer
Provision of field laboratory with testing equipments and apparatus including
A-9 G-14 material, labour, etc all complete as per specifications or as directed by the LS 1.00 5,000,000.00
Engineer
Provision of medical facilities at site with medical personnel and necessary
A-10 T-1.9 medicines, equipments,etc all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Month 30.00 80,000.00 2,400,000.00
Engineer
Total for General items (Sub Total A ) 53,500,000.00
II CIVIL WORKS
B COFFERDAM
Provision of Cofferdam for river diversion stage-I and stage-II during
construction of Headworks as per necessity including all
B-1 T-13 LS 1.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
equipments,materials,labor all complete as per specfications and the Drawings or
as directed by the Engineer
Total for Cofferdam (Sub Total B) 3,000,000.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 1 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
C WEIR, UNDERSLUICE AND FLOODWALL

Site Clearance including clearing of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
C-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 49,348.88
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including gravel
C-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed with soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 5,714.77 147.92 845,332.21
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in ordinary rocks using rock breaker and disposal up to
C-3 T-4 the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 1,071.52 700.07 750,133.49
directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks including drilling and blasting, disposal up
C-4 T-4 to the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 357.17 1,465.96 523,602.11
directed by the Engineer.
Filling with ordinary soil (Alluvial/Colluvial deposits) in layers and compaction
C-5 T-2.6 with sprinkling water all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 2,533.88 355.35 900,414.28
Engineer.
Preparation of Foundation (Base Preparation) for Weir & Undersluice all
C-6 T-2.5 LS 1.00 21,456.03
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Preparation of Foundation with dry Stone soiling for Weir & Undersluice prior to
C-7 T-16.6 blinding concrete with all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m For Rate only
Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of 75 mm thick Blinding Concrete (M15) including


C-8 T-6.5 compaction, cleaning, curing and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 99.66 11,423.62 1,138,427.82
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M20) including
C-9 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m - For Rate only
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) including
C-10 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 2,128.83 16,783.59 35,729,424.69
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M35) including
C-11 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 155.80 18,819.83 2,932,130.29
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 2 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M7.5 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
C-12 T-6.5.3 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M15 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
C-13 T-6.5.3 Cu.m 468.73 8,464.31 3,967,434.88
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of
reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other
C-14 T-6.4 MT 137.08 139,214.36 19,083,211.04
materials in surface structures all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including
C-15 T-6.3 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as -
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 1,303.00 702.00 914,706.00
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m 869.00 852.00 740,388.00
Rubble masonry works in 1:4 cement mortar including pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
C-16 T-16.5 Cu.m 76.00 10,090.77 766,898.50
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Rubble masonry works in 1:6 cement mortar including pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
C-17 T-16.5 Cu.m - For Rate only
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.

Fabrication, Placing in position and filling with stone in machine made gabion
boxes of hexagonal mesh with heavy coated GI wires, mesh size 100mm x
C-18 T-15 Cu.m 130.00 4,089.73 531,665.02
120mm, mesh wire 10 SWG, selvedge wire 8 SWG and binding wire 12 SWG all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Fabrication, Placing in position and filling with stone in machine made gabion
mattess of hexagonal mesh with heavy coated GI wires, mesh size 75mm x
C-19 T-15 Cu.m - For Rate only
100mm, mesh wire 10 SWG, selvedge wire 8 SWG and binding wire 12 SWG all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Providing and placing 1 - 2 m dia Boulder RipRap including all required


C-20 T-12 equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Sq.m 1,350.00 3,931.64 5,307,712.04
Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 3 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Providing and placing 300 mm thick Hard stone lining at undersluice including all
C-21 T-12 required equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by Sq.m 17.64 2,540.58 44,815.85
the Engineer.
Supply and Placing of 0.5 m thick pebbles and cobbles including all necessary
C-22 equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m - For Rate only
Engineer.
Supply and Placing of Well Graded Filter material including necessary
C-23 T-10 equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 120.00 1,865.63 223,875.43
Engineer.
Supply and Placing of 0.5 m thick Impervious Layer (Red Clay) including all
C-24 T-9 equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Sq.m 120.00 1,209.27 145,112.87
Engineer.
Supply, installation of perforated HDPE pipe with filter including drilling, all
C-25 T-18.4 necessary equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a 100 mm dia m 124.40 262.50 32,655.00
b 225 mm dia m For Rate only
Providing and Laying of Geotextile including necessary equipments and
C-25 T-11 Sq.m 600.00 278.00 166,800.00
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

T-6.7.3,T- Providing and Laying of 300 mm thick Waterbar including necessary equipments
C-26 m 196.77 1,528.06 300,676.86
6.7.4 and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Providing and Laying of Bitumen Sealant including necessary equipments and


C-27 T-6.7.8 m 98.39 531.88 52,328.52
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and placing of 25 mm thick joint filler (thermocoal/Saltax board) as per


C-28 T-6.7.7 Sq.m 145.64 2,067.13 301,056.09
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of 50mm dia MS steel handrails including necessary
C-29 T-19.9.3 equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Kg 120.00 140.00 16,800.00
Engineer.

Providing, Assembling and Erecting of Fabricated Structural Steel/Truss


C-30 T-19.6 Components/Elements in place including trying Down Bolts,nuts,rivets,painting MT - For Rate only
etc all Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Providing and Assembling of colour CGI sheet (24 gauge) including trying
C-31 T-19.10.6 Down Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Sq.m - For Rate only
Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 4 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Providing and Applying of two coats of Enamel Paints with primer on metal
C-32 T-19.10.4 surface including cleaning and all required equipments, materials all complete as Sq.m - For Rate only
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Drilling works for grouting including cleaning the holes, necessary materials
C-33 T-3 m - For Rate only
equipment and furnishing as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Perforated Cement Grouting works including all necessary materials, admixture


C-34 T-3 MT - For Rate only
etc. all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Provision of Dewatering facilities during construction of weir and undersluice as


C-35 T-14 per necessity including equipments and labor all complete as per specifications or LS 2,000,000.00
as directed by the Engineer.
Total for Weir (Sub Total C) 77,486,405.88

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 5 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
INTAKE, GRAVEL TRAP, SPILLWAY AND APPROACH CANAL
D

Site Clearance including clearing of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
D-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 12,749.96
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
D-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed and soft moorum stones including disposal up to the designated Cu.m 5,318.52 147.92 786,719.67
disposal site all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in ordinary rocks using rock breaker and disposal up to


D-3 T-4 the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 997.22 700.07 698,121.72
directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks including drilling and blasting, disposal up
D-4 T-4 to the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 332.41 1,465.96 487,297.27
directed by the Engineer.
Filling with ordinary soil (Alluvial/Colluvial deposits) in layers and compaction
D-5 T-2.6 with sprinkling water all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 2,215.46 355.35 787,265.45
Engineer.

Preparation of Foundation (Base Preparation) for intake, gravel trap,spillway and


D-6 T-2.5 LS 1.00 5,543.46
approach canal all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Preparation of Foundation with dry Stone soiling for intake, gravel trap,spillway
D-7 T-16.6 and approach canal prior to blinding concrete with all complete as per Cu.m - For Rate only
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of 75 mm thick Blinding Concrete (M15) including


D-8 T-6.5 compaction, cleaning, curing and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 25.28 11,423.62 288,827.92
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M20) including
D-9 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m For Rate only
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) including
D-10 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 507.63 16,783.59 8,519,916.03
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 6 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M35) including
D-11 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m #REF! #REF! #REF!
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Providing and placing 1 - 2 m dia Boulder RipRap including all required


D-12 T-12 equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Sq.m - For Rate only
Engineer.

Placing of dressed hard stone lining including all required equipment, materials as
D-13 T-16.8 Sq.m - For Rate only
per design line and level as per specificication or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M7.5 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
D-14 T-6.5.3 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M15 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
D-15 T-6.5.3 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of


D-16 T-6.4 reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other MT 45.75 139,214.36 6,368,938.32
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including


D-17 T-6.3 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as -
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 784.00 702.00 550,368.00
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m 523.00 852.00 445,596.00
Rubble masonry works in 1:4 cement mortar including pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
D-18 T-16.5 Cu.m 16.65 10,090.77 168,027.46
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Rubble masonry works in 1:6 cement mortar including pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
D-19 T-16.5 Cu.m - For Rate only
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Supply, installation of perforated HDPE pipe with filter including drilling, all
D-20 T-18.4 necessary equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a 100 mm dia m - For Rate only

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 7 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
b 225 mm dia m 109.72 262.50 28,801.50
Supply and Laying of 10 mm thick Steel lining including all equipments and
D-21 T-19.9.5 Sq.m 34.73 1,530.75 53,159.89
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing and Laying of Geotextile including all equipments and materials all
D-22 T-11 Sq.m - For Rate only
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

T-6.7.3,T- Providing and Laying of 300 mm thick Waterbar including necessary equipments
D-23 m 71.96 1,528.06 109,959.38
6.7.4 and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Providing and Laying of Bitumen Sealant including necessary equipments and


D-24 T-6.7.8 m 102.37 531.88 54,445.70
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and placing of 25 mm thick joint filler (thermocoal/Saltax board) as per


D-25 T-6.7.7 Sq.m 50.19 2,067.13 103,744.46
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation 50mm dia MS steel handrails including all necessary
D-26 T-19.9.3 equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Kg 113.55 140.00 15,897.00
Engineer.
Providing and Applying of two coats of Enamel Paints with primer on metal
D-27 T-19.10.4 surface including cleaning and all required equipments, materials all complete as Sq.m 15.00 146.12 2,191.87
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation Monkey ladder including all necessary equipments,
D-28 T-19.9.7 Kg 200.00 139.21 27,842.87
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation Steel Stair including all necessary equipments, materials
D-29 T-19.9.6 Kg 250.00 139.21 34,803.59
all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing, Assembling and Erecting of Fabricated Structural Steel/Truss
D-30 T-19.6 Components/Elements in Place including trying Down Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all MT - For Rate only
Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing and Assembling of colour CGI sheet (24 gauge)including trying Down
D-31 T-19.10.6 Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Sq.m - For Rate only
Engineer.
Provision of Dewatering facilities during construction of intake, gravel trap,
D-32 T-14 spillway and aproach canal as per necessity including equipments and labor all LS 100,000.00
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Total for Intake, Gravel Trap, Spillway and Approach Canal (Sub Total D)
#REF!

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 8 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
E SETTLING BASIN

Site Clearance including clearing of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
E-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 24,372.04
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
E-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed and soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 4,745.74 147.92 701,993.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in ordinary rocks using rock breaker and disposal up to
E-3 T-4 the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 889.83 700.07 622,936.70
directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks including drilling and blasting, disposal up
E-4 T-4 to the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 296.61 1,465.96 434,817.23
directed by the Engineer.
Filling with ordinary soil (Alluvial/Colluvial deposits) in layers and compaction
E-5 T-2.6 with sprinkling water all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 1,718.48 355.35 610,660.74
Engineer.
Preparation of Foundation (Base Preparation) for Settling basin all complete as
E-6 T-2.5 LS 10,596.54
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer. 1.00
Preparation of Foundation with dry Stone soiling prior to blinding concrete with
E-7 T-16.6 Cu.m 42.39 1,777.24 75,329.23
all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of 75 mm thick Blinding Concrete (M15) including


E-8 T-6.5 compaction, cleaning, curing and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 90.96 11,423.62 1,039,133.49
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) including
E-9 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 1,240.61 16,783.59 20,821,931.50
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M7.5 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
E-10 T-6.5.3 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M15 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
E-11 T-6.5.3 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 9 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of
reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other
E-12 T-6.4 MT 111.66 139,214.36 15,544,001.49
materials in surface structures all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including
E-13 T-6.3 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as -
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 1,241.00 702.00 871,182.00
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m 827.00 852.00 704,604.00
Rubble masonry works in 1:4 cement mortar including Pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
E-14 T-16.5 Cu.m - For Rate only
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.

Rubble masonry works in 1:6 cement mortar including Pointing work, supply of
E-15 T-16.5 hard stone, preparing mortar for construction of wall including all equipments and Cu.m 271.40 8,821.33 2,394,143.49
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and Placing of well graded Filter material including all equipments and
E-16 T-10 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply, installation of perforated HDPE pipe with filter including drilling, all
E-17 T-18.4 necessary equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a 100 mm dia m - For Rate only
b 225 mm dia m 191.60 262.50 50,295.00
Providing and Laying of Geotextile including all equipments and materials all
E-18 T-11 Sq.m - For Rate only
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

T-6.7.3,T- Providing and Laying of 300 mm thick Waterbar including necessary equipments
E-19 m 135.98 1,528.06 207,792.05
6.7.4 and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Providing and Laying of Bitumen Sealant including necessary equipments and


E-20 T-6.7.8 m 193.22 531.88 102,768.89
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and placing of 25 mm thick joint filler (thermocoal/Saltax board) as per


E-21 T-6.7.7 Sq.m 103.82 2,067.13 214,608.92
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation 50mm dia MS steel handrails including all necessary
E-22 T-19.9.3 equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the kg 227.10 140.00 31,794.00
Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 10 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Providing and Applying of two coats of Enamel Paints with primer on metal
E-23 T-19.10.4 surface including cleaning and all required equipments, materials all complete as Sq.m 10.00 146.12 1,461.25
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation Steel Stair including all necessary equipments, materials
E-24 T-19.9.6 kg 250.00 139.21 34,803.59
all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation Monkey ladder including all necessary equipments,
E-25 T-19.9.7 Kg 200.00 139.21 27,842.87
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing,assembling and Erecting of Fabricated Structural Steel/Truss
E-26 T-19.6 Components/Elements in Place including trying Down Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all MT - For Rate only
Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing and Assembling of colour CGI sheet (24 gauge)including trying Down
E-27 T-19.10.6 Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Sq.m - For Rate only
Engineer.
Supply and Laying of 10 mm thick Steel lining including all equipments and
E-28 T-19.9.5 Sq.m 26.22 1,530.75 40,142.39
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Provision of Dewatering facilities during construction of settling basin and as per
E-29 T-14 necessity including equipments and labor all complete as per specifications or as LS 200,000.00
directed by the Engineer.
Total for Settling Basin (Sub Total E) 44,767,210.41

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 11 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
APPROACH PIPE, TRUSS BRIDGE PIPE CROSSINGS AND FOREBAY
F

Site Clearance including clearing of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
F-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 27,604.64
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
F-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed and soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 6,506.95 147.92 962,511.78
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in ordinary rocks using rock breaker and disposal up to
F-3 T-4 the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 2,889.16 700.07 2,022,604.61
directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks including drilling and blasting, disposal up
F-4 T-4 to the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 527.87 1,465.96 773,831.97
directed by the Engineer.
Filling with ordinary soil (Alluvial/Colluvial deposits) in layers and compaction
F-5 T-2.6 with sprinkling water all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 3,442.32 355.35 1,223,229.65
Engineer.
Preparation of Foundation (Base Preparation) for Settling basin all complete as
F-6 T-2.5 LS 1.00 7,737.82
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Preparation of Foundation with dry Stone soiling for Approach Pipe and
F-7 T-16.6 Forebay, prior to blinding concrete with all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m - For Rate only
directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of 75 mm thick Blinding Concrete (M15) including


F-8 T-6.5 compaction, cleaning, curing and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 36.42 11,423.62 416,100.99
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M20) including
F-9 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 46.44 12,959.38 601,781.92
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) including
F-10 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 546.91 16,783.59 9,179,092.87
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M7.5 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
F-11 T-6.5.3 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 12 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M15 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
F-12 T-6.5.3 Cu.m 148.98 8,464.31 1,261,024.00
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of
reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other
F-13 T-6.4 MT 48.07 139,214.36 6,692,371.54
materials in surface structures all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including
F-14 T-6.3 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as -
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 818.45 702.00 574,555.27
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m 545.64 852.00 464,882.33
Rubble masonry works in 1:4 cement mortar including Pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
F-14 T-16.5 Cu.m - For Rate only
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Rubble masonry works in 1:6 cement mortar including Pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
F-15 T-16.5 Cu.m 268.24 8,821.33 2,366,271.62
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.

Supply and Placing of well graded Filter material including all equipments and
F-16 T-10 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply, installation of perforated HDPE pipe with filter including drilling, all
F-17 T-18.4 necessary equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a 100 mm dia m 148.76 262.50 39,049.50
b 225 mm dia m - For Rate only
Providing and Laying of Geotextile including all equipments and materials all
F-18 T-11 Sq.m 381.00 278.00 105,918.00
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing and placing 1 -2 m dia Boulder RipRap including all required
F-19 T-12 equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Sq.m 100.00 3,931.64 393,163.86
Engineer.

Fabrication, Placing in position and filling with stone in machine made gabion
boxes of hexagonal mesh with heavy coated GI wires, mesh size 100mm x
F-20 T-15 Cu.m 676.50 4,089.73 2,766,702.95
120mm, mesh wire 10 SWG, selvedge wire 8 SWG and binding wire 12 SWG all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 13 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Providing,assembling and Erecting of Fabricated Structural Steel/Truss
F-21 T-19.6 Components/Elements in Place including trying Down Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all Ton 32.62 124,865.00 4,073,536.75
Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation of Rock Bolt of specified length and spacing as directed
F-22 T-5.9.6 by the Engineer including all required equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, No. 24.00 3,396.30 81,511.32
grouting all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and Placing of Well Graded Gravel materia (at base of Approach Pipe) l
F-23 T-10 including necessary equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or Cu.m 180.00 1,865.63 335,813.14
as directed by the Engineer.

T-6.7.3,T- Providing and Laying of 300 mm thick Waterbar including necessary equipments
F-24 m - For Rate only
6.7.4 and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Providing and Laying of Bitumen Sealant including necessary equipments and


F-25 T-6.7.8 m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and placing of 25 mm thick joint filler (thermocoal/Saltax board) as per


F-26 T-6.7.7 Sq.m - For Rate only
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Provision of Dewatering facilities during construction of Approach Pipe and
F-27 T-14 Forebay and as per necessity including equipments and labor all complete as per LS 200,000.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Total forApproach pipe and Forebay (Sub Total F) 34,569,296.52

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 14 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
HEADRACE PIPE, ANCHOR BLOCK AND SADDLE SUPPORTS
G

Site Clearance including clearing of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
G-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 349,806.54
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
G-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed and soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 31,016.88 147.92 4,588,037.85
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks using rock breaker, disposal up to the
G-3 T-4 designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as directed Cu.m 4,084.64 700.07 2,859,516.42
by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks including drilling and blasting, disposal up
G-4 T-4 to the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 3,807.93 1,465.96 5,582,286.83
directed by the Engineer.
Filling with ordinary soil (Alluvial/Colluvial deposits) in layers and compaction
G-5 T-2.6 with sprinkling water all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 7,892.57 355.35 2,804,625.89
Engineer.

Preparation of Foundation (Base Preparation) for Headrace pipe and Anchor


G-6 T-2.5 LS 1.00 91,253.88
block all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Preparation of Foundation with dry Stone soiling prior to blinding concrete with
G-7 T-2.6 Cu.m - - -
all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of Blinding Concrete (M15) for Anchor Block and Saddle
Support including cleaning,compaction and curing all required equipments,
G-8 T-6.5 Cu.m 234.96 11,423.62 2,684,039.86
materials and labor all complete as per design line and level as per specifications
or as directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M15 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
G-9 T-6.5.3 Cu.m 5,534.15 8,464.31 46,842,717.68
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M20) including
G-10 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 522.04 12,959.38 6,765,342.38
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M20) including
G-11 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 676.01 16,783.59 11,345,829.55
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 15 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of
reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other
G-12 T-6.4 MT 235.63 139,214.36 32,802,650.45
materials in surface structures all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including
G-13 T-6.3 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as -
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 8,269.00 702.00 5,804,838.00
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m 919.00 852.00 782,988.00
Rubble masonry works in 1:6 cement mortar including Pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
G-14 T-16.5 Cu.m 107.84 8,821.33 951,291.93
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Supply, installation of perforated HDPE pipe with filter including drilling, all
G-15 T-18.4 necessary equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a 100 mm dia m 3,210.00 262.50 842,625.00
b 225 mm dia m - For Rate only

Supply and Placing of well graded Gravel Filter material including all equipments
G-16 T-10 Cu.m 2,568.00 1,865.63 4,790,934.17
and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Fabrication, Placing in position and filling with stone in machine made gabion
boxes of hexagonal mesh with heavy coated GI wires, mesh size 100mm x
G-17 T-15 Cu.m 222.50 4,089.73 909,965.13
120mm, mesh wire 10 SWG, selvedge wire 8 SWG and binding wire 12 SWG all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Providing and Laying of Geotextile including all equipments and materials all
G-18 T-11 Sq.m 3,000.00 278.00 834,000.00
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation of Rock Bolt of specified length and spacing as directed
G-19 T-5.9.6 by the Engineer including all required equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, No. 500.00 3,396.30 1,698,152.41
grouting all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation of ground anchors/soil nailing of specified length and at


the spacing as directed by the Engineer including all required equipment,
G-20 T-18.5 m 1,500.00 1,698.15 2,547,228.62
materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of micro Piles 32 mm dia of specified length and spacing
G-21 T-18.6 including all required equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all m 500.00 850.00 425,000.00
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 16 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Supply and Installation of Fibre reinforced shotcrete M30 of specified thickness
G-22 T-5.9.10 including all required equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or Cu.m 100.00 56,091.55 5,609,154.61
as directed by the Engineer.
Total for Headrace Pipe, Anchor Block and Saddle Supports (Sub Total G) 141,912,285.19

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 17 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
H KHOLSI PIPE CROSSINGS

Site Clearance including clearing of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
H-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 12,872.55
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
H-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed and soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 748.53 147.92 110,723.72
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks using rock breaker, disposal up to the
H-3 T-4 designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as directed Cu.m 374.27 700.07 262,011.61
by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks including drilling and blasting, disposal up
H-4 T-4 to the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 374.27 1,465.96 548,661.66
directed by the Engineer.
Filling with ordinary soil (Alluvial/Colluvial deposits) in layers and compaction
H-5 T-2.6 with sprinkling water all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 224.56 355.35 79,797.51
Engineer.
Preparation of Foundation (Base Preparation) for Kholsi and Pipe Crossing all
H-6 T-2.5 LS 1.00 4,397.46
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Preparation of Foundation with dry Stone soiling prior to blinding concrete with
H-7 T-2.6 Cu.m - For Rate only
all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of Blinding Concrete (M15) for Kholsi and Pipe crossing
including cleaning,compaction and curing all required equipments, materials and
H-8 T-6.5 Cu.m 9.59 11,423.62 109,500.79
labor all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed
by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M15 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
H-9 T-6.5.3 Cu.m 80.00 8,464.31 677,144.42
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M20) including
H-10 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m - For Rate only
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) including
H-11 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 326.62 16,783.59 5,481,770.95
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 18 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of
reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other
H-12 T-6.4 MT 30.35 139,214.36 4,225,055.51
materials in surface structures all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including
H-13 T-6.3 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as -
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 195.20 702.00 137,026.89
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m 130.13 852.00 110,870.76
Rubble masonry works in 1:4 cement mortar including Pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
H-14 T-16.5 Cu.m 150.00 10,090.77 1,513,615.46
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Supply, installation of perforated HDPE pipe with filter including drilling, all
H-15 T-18.4 necessary equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a 100 mm dia m 250.25 262.50 65,690.63
b 225 mm dia m - For Rate only

Supply and Placing of well graded Filter material including all equipments and
H-16 T-10 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Providing and placing 1 -1.5 m dia Boulder RipRap including all required
H-17 T-12 equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Sq.m 455.53 3,931.64 1,790,985.70
Engineer.
Providing and Laying of Geotextile including all equipments and materials all
H-18 T-11 Sq.m 419.00 278.00 116,482.00
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Fabrication, Placing in position and filling with stone in machine made gabion
boxes of hexagonal mesh with heavy coated GI wires, mesh size 100mm x
H-19 T-15 Cu.m 297.50 4,089.73 1,216,694.94
120mm, mesh wire 10 SWG, selvedge wire 8 SWG and binding wire 12 SWG all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation of Rock Bolt of specified length and spacing as directed
H-20 T-5.9.6 by the Engineer including all required equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, No. 99.00 3,396.30 336,234.18
grouting all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation of ground anchors/soil nailing of specified length and at


the spacing as directed by the Engineer including all required equipment,
H-21 T-18.5 m - For Rate only
materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 19 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Supply and installation of micro Piles 32 mm dia of specified length and spacing
H-22 T-18.6 including all required equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all m - For Rate only
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and Installation of plain shotcrete M30 of specified thickness including
H-23 T-5.9.10 all required equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed Cu.m 30.00 56,091.55 1,682,746.38
by the Engineer.
Provision of Dewatering facilities during construction of Kholsi Crossing and
H-24 T-14 Protection work as per necessity including equipments all complete as per LS 1,000,000.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Total for Kholsi Pipe Crossing(Sub Total H) 19,482,283.11

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 20 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
I INLET PORTAL

Site Clearance including clearing of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
I-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 4,526.73
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
I-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed and soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 483.31 147.92 71,491.18
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks including drilling and blasting, disposal up
I-3 T-4 to the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 1,127.72 1,465.96 1,653,191.57
directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of 20 mm dia Plain Cement grouted rock bolt of specified
length and spacing as an immediate support including all required equipment,
I-4 T-5.9.6
materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a 20 mm dia plain cement grouted rock bolt 2.0 m long No. 65.10 3,396.30 221,099.44
b 20 mm dia plain cement grouted rock bolt 2.5 m long No. - For Rate only
c 20 mm dia plain cement grouted rock bolt 3.0 m long No. - For Rate only
Supply and installation of 20 mm dia Resin Capsules grouted rock bolt of
specified length and spacing as an immediate support including all required
I-5 T-5.9.6
equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all complete as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
a 20 mm dia resin capsules grouted rock bolt 2.0 m long No. 27.90 3,735.94 104,232.60
b 20 mm dia resin capsules grouted rock bolt 2.5 m long No. - For Rate only
c 20 mm dia resin capsules grouted rock bolt 3.0 m long No. - For Rate only
Supply and installation of 20 mm dia Expansion grouted rock bolt of 2.0 m length
and spacing as an immediate support including all required equipment, materials,
I-6 T-5.9.6 No. 10.00 4,075.57 40,755.66
drilling, flushing, grouting all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Supply and Installation of plain shotcrete M30 of specified thickness including all
I-7 T-5.9.10 required equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by Cu.m - For Rate only
the the Engineer
Supply and Installation of steel fiber reinforced shotcrete M30 of specified
I-8 T-5.9.10 thickness including all required equipments, materials all complete as per Cu.m 28.96 56,091.55 1,624,375.84
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation of 4.75 mm dia wire mesh (100x100 mm) as


I-9 T-5.9.10 Sq.m - For Rate only
reinforcement all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 21 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Supply and installation of steel rib support built section ISMB 150 including base
plate, steel plate and nut boltss and all required equipment, materials as per
I-10 T-5.9.12 MT 0.57 298,242.52 168,566.67
requirement for tunnel support all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of 25 mm dia spilling rod of specified length and spacing
I-11 T-5.9.8 including all required equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
a 25 mm dia Spilling rod 4.0 m long No. 21.00 2,570.14 53,972.84
b 25 mm dia Spilling rod 6.0 m long No. - For Rate only
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M7.5 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones for backfilling including grouting, compaction, curing, cleaning and
I-12 T-6.5.3 Cu.m 9.60 7,310.00 70,180.55
all required equipments, materials all complete as per design line and level as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) for portal
construction including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
I-13 T-5.9.11 Cu.m 24.64 20,140.30 496,257.05
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of
reinforcement steel bars for RCC works for portal construction including
I-14 T-5.9.11 MT 0.96 139,214.36 133,779.44
necessary laps, chairs and other materials in surface structures all complete as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including
I-15 T-5.9.11 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 27.13 702.00 19,044.98
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m 18.09 852.00 15,409.61

Drilling for weep hole (50 mm dia/10 kgf HDPE pipe) including cleaning of hole,
I-16 T-5.11 installation of perforated drain pipe or as necessary including all equipments m 150.00 301.35 45,202.50
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Drilling works for grouting including cleaning the holes, necessary materials
I-17 T-3 m 100.00 2,115.90 211,590.00
equipment and furnishing as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Backfilling with ordinary soil/ tunnel muck including compaction, supply of


I-18 T-2.6 materials and necesasary equipments all complete as per the necessity as per Cu.m 322.21 355.35 114,495.55
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Grouting works including all necessary materials, admixture etc. all complete as
I-19 T-3
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
a Cement Slurry Grouting MT 2.00 49,380.11 98,760.22

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 22 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
b Cement Sand Grouting MT 2.00 28,861.63 57,723.26
c Chemical Grouting MT 1.00 74,070.17 74,070.17
Rubble masonry works in 1:4 cement mortar including supply of hard stone
blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall,scaffolding, curing,
I-20 T-16.5 Cu.m 10.00 10,090.77 100,907.70
including all pointing work, equipments and materials all complete as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Fabrication, Placing in position and filling with stone in machine made gabion
boxes of hexagonal mesh with heavy coated GI wires, mesh size 100mm x
I-21 T-15 Cu.m 50.00 4,089.73 204,486.54
120mm, mesh wire 10 SWG, selvedge wire 8 SWG and binding wire 12 SWG all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Total for Inlet Portal (Sub Total I) 5,584,120.08

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 23 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
J OUTLET PORTAL

Site Clearance including clearing of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
J-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 3,543.10
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
J-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed and soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 240.02 147.92 35,503.26
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks including drilling and blasting, disposal up
J-3 T-4 to the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 720.05 1,465.96 1,055,561.39
directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of 20 mm dia Plain Cement grouted rock bolt of specified
length and spacing as an immediate support including all required equipment,
J-4 T-5.9.6
materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a 20 mm dia plain cement grouted rock bolt 2 m long No. 48.00 3,396.30 163,022.63
b 20 mm dia plain cement grouted rock bolt 2.5m long No. - For Rate only
c 20 mm dia plain cement grouted rock bolt 3.0m long No. - For Rate only
Supply and installation of 20 mm dia Resin Capsules grouted rock bolt of
specified length and spacing as an immediate support including all required
J-5 T-5.9.6
equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all complete as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
a 20 mm dia resin capsules grouted rock bolt 2.0 m long No. 21.00 3,735.94 78,454.64
b 20 mm dia resin capsules grouted rock bolt 2.5m long No. - For Rate only
c 20 mm dia resin capsules grouted rock bolt 3.0m long No. - For Rate only
Supply and installation of 25 mm dia Expansion grouted rock bolt of 2.0 m length
and spacing as an immediate support including all required equipment, materials,
J-6 T-5.9.6 No. 10.00 4,075.57 40,755.66
drilling, flushing, grouting all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Supply and Installation of plain shotcrete M30 of specified thickness including all
J-7 T-5.9.10 required equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by Cu.m - For Rate only
the the Engineer
Supply and Installation of steel fiber reinforced shotcrete M30 of specified
J-8 T-5.9.10 thickness including all required equipments, materials all complete as per Cu.m 25.80 56,091.55 1,447,316.79
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation of 4.75 mm dia wire mesh (100x100 mm) as


J-9 T-5.9.10 Sq.m - For Rate only
reinforcement all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 24 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Supply and installation of steel rib support built section ISMB 150 including base
plate, steel plate and nut boltss and all required equipment, materials as per
J-10 T-5.9.12 MT 0.57 298,242.52 168,566.67
requirement for tunnel support all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of 25 mm dia spilling rod of specified length and spacing
J-11 T-5.9.8 including all required equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
a 25 mm dia Spilling rod 4.0 m long No. 22.00 2,570.14 56,542.98
b 25 mm dia Spilling rod 6.0 m long No. - For Rate only
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M7.5 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones for backfilling including compaction, curing, cleaning and all
J-12 T-6.5.3 Cu.m 9.60 7,310.00 70,180.55
required equipments, materials all complete as per design line and level as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) for portal
construction including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
J-13 T-5.9.11 Cu.m 24.64 20,140.30 496,257.05
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of
reinforcement steel bars for RCC works for portal construction including
J-14 T-5.9.11 MT 0.96 139,214.36 133,779.44
necessary laps, chairs and other materials in surface structures all complete as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including
J-15 T-5.9.11 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as -
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 27.13 702.00 19,044.98
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m 18.09 852.00 15,409.61

Drilling for weep hole (50 mm dia/10 kgf HDPE pipe) including cleaning of hole,
J-16 T-5.11 installation of perforated drain pipe or as necessary including all equipments m 150.00 301.35 45,202.50
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Drilling works for grouting including cleaning the holes, necessary materials
J-17 T-3 m 100.00 2,115.90 211,590.00
equipment and furnishing as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Grouting works including all necessary materials, admixture etc. all complete as
J-18 T-3 -
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
a Cement Slurry Grouting MT 2.00 49,380.11 98,760.22
b Cement Sand Grouting MT 2.00 28,861.63 57,723.26
c Chemical Grouting MT 1.00 74,070.17 74,070.17

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 25 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Backfilling with ordinary soil/muck including compaction, supply of materials
J-19 T-2.6 and necesasary equipments all complete as per the necessity as per specifications Cu.m 240.02 355.35 85,289.53
or as directed by the Engineer.
Rubble masonry works in 1:4 cement mortar including supply of hard stone
blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall,scaffolding, curing,
J-20 T-16.5 Cu.m 10.00 10,090.77 100,907.70
including all pointing work, equipments and materials all complete as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Fabrication, Placing in position and filling with stone in machine made gabion
boxes of hexagonal mesh with heavy coated GI wires, mesh size 100mm x
J-22 T-15 Cu.m 50.00 4,089.73 204,486.54
120mm, mesh wire 10 SWG, selvedge wire 8 SWG and binding wire 12 SWG all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Total for Outlet Portal (Sub Total J) 4,661,968.67

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 26 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
K HEADRACE TUNNEL

Excavation (underground) including drilling and blasting in tunnel including


K-1 T-5.3 removal of excavated materials from the site as quickly as possible up to the Cu.m 13,380.79 4,701.45 62,909,122.09
disposal area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Excavation (underground) for soft tunnelling including removal of excavated


K-2 T-5.3 materials from the site as quickly as possible up to the disposal area all complete Cu.m 133.81 4,701.45 629,091.22
as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and Installation of fibre reinforced shotcrete M30 of specified thickness
K-3 T-5.9.10 including all required equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or Cu.m 1,011.90 56,091.55 56,758,757.09
as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation of 4.75 mm dia wire mesh (100x100 mm) as


K-4 T-5.9.10 Sq.m - For Rate only
reinforcement all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and Installation of Plain shotcrete M30 of specified thickness including all
K-5 T-5.9.10 required equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by Cu.m - For Rate only
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of 20 mm dia Plain Cement grouted rock bolt of specified
length and spacing as an immediate support including all required equipment,
K-6 T-5.9.6
materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a 20 mm dia plain cement grouted rock bolt 1.5 m long No. For Rate only
b 20 mm dia plain cement grouted rock bolt 2.0 m long No. 4,596.00 3,543.42 16,285,539.32 For Rate only
Supply and installation of 20 mm dia Resin Capsules grouted rock bolt of
specified length and spacing as an immediate support including all required
K-7 T-5.9.6 -
equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all complete as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
a 20 mm dia resin capsules grouted rock bolt 1.5m long No.
b 20 mm dia resin capsules grouted rock bolt 2.0m long No. 1,149.00 3,735.94 4,292,589.67
Supply and installation of 20 mm dia Expansion grouted rock bolt of 2.0 m length
and spacing as an immediate support including all required equipment, materials,
K-8 T-5.9.6 No. 46.00 4,075.57 187,476.03
drilling, flushing, grouting all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Supply and installation of 25 mm dia spilling rod of specified length and spacing
K-9 T-5.9.8 including all required equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
a 25 mm dia Spilling rod 3.0 m long No. - For Rate only
b 25 mm dia Spilling rod 4.0 m long No. 430.00 2,570.14 1,105,158.23

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 27 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Supply and installation of 50 mm dia MS pipe forepolling of 3.0 m length and
K-10 T-5.9.8 spacing including all required equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, grouting all m - For Rate only
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of steel rib support built section ISMB 150 including base
plate, steel plate and nut boltss and all required equipment, materials as per
K-11 T-5.9.12 MT 6.06 298,242.52 1,808,271.23
requirement for tunnel support all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of steel rib support built section ISMB 200 including base
plate, steel plate and nut boltss and all required equipment, materials as per
K-12 T-5.9.12 MT -
requirement for tunnel support all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of steel laggings built section ISMC 100 including all
K-13 T-5.9.12 required equipment, materials as per requirement for tunnel support all complete MT - For Rate only
as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of steel lattice girders including all required equipment,
K-14 T-5.9.12 materials as per requirement for tunnel support all complete as per specifications MT - For Rate only
or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of 16 mm dia connecting bar including all required
K-15 T-5.9.9 equipment, materials as per requirement for tunnel support all complete as per MT 1.61 139,214.36 223,579.84
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of 16 mm dia anchor bar including all required equipment,
K-16 T-5.9.7 materials as per requirement for tunnel support all complete as per specifications MT 1.82 139,214.36 252,821.90
or as directed by the Engineer.
Stone Packing/Backfilling at geological overbreak in headrace tunnel including
K-17 T-5.6 all required equipments, materials all complete as per design line and level and as Cu.m - For Rate only
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M7.5 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones for backfilling including compaction, curing, cleaning and all
K-18 T-6.5.3 Cu.m 66.90 7,310.00 489,067.87
required equipments, materials all complete as per design line and level as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Cleaning of Invert before laying concrete for invert lining including all required
K-19 T-5.9.5 equipments, materials all complete as per design line and level as per Sq.m 3,871.04 16.35 63,276.41
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) for concrete lining
including cleaning, compaction, curing, testing and all required equipments,
K-20 T-5.9.11 Cu.m 1,235.72 20,140.30 24,887,833.01
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 28 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M15) for anchor blocks at
tunnel interface with headrace and penstock pipe including cleaning, compaction,
K-21 T-5.9.11 Cu.m - For Rate only
curing, testing and all required equipments, materials all complete as per design
line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of


reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other
K-22 T-5.9.11 MT 47.92 139,214.36 6,671,152.31
materials in underground structures all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of formwork (class F2 finish) and removing after
completion for underground arch structure/tunnel including supports and
K-23 T-5.9.11 Sq.m 4,797.10 702.00 3,367,564.32
neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.

Drilling for weep hole (50 mm dia/10 kgf HDPE pipe) including cleaning of hole,
K-24 T-5.11 installation of perforated drain pipe or as necessary including all equipments m 2,419.40 301.35 729,086.19
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Drilling for weep hole (75 mm dia/10 kgf HDPE pipe) including cleaning of hole,
K-25 T-5.11 installation of perforated drain pipe or as necessary including all equipments m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Drilling works for grouting including cleaning the holes, necessary materials
K-26 T-3 m 2,000.00 2,115.90 4,231,800.00
equipment and furnishing as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Grouting works including all necessary materials, admixture etc. all complete as
K-27 T-3
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
a Cement Slurry Grouting MT 5.00 49,380.11 246,900.55
b Cement Sand Grouting MT 5.00 28,861.63 144,308.15
c Chemical Grouting MT 2.00 74,070.17 148,140.34
Backfilling with Muck including compaction, supply of materials and necesssary
K-28 T-2.6 equipments all complete as per the necessity as per specifications or as directed by Cu.m 133.81 355.35 47,548.64
the Engineer.
50 mm dia probe drilling as per necessity including all equipments all complete as
K-29 T-5.8 m 241.94 2,910.20 704,092.76
per specifications as directed by the engineer
Supply and installation 50mm dia MS steel handrails including all necessary
K-30 T-19.9.3 equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Kg 6,412.00 140.00 897,680.00
Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 29 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Providing and Applying of two coats of Enamel Paints with primer on metal
K-31 T-19.10.4 surface including cleaning and all required equipments, materials all complete as Sq.m 305.00 146.12 44,568.11
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of MS Sheet of 1.6 mm thick including all necessary
K-32 equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Sq.m For Rate only
Engineer.
Provision of Dewatering facilities during construction of underground tunnel and
K-33 T-14 as per necessity including equipments all complete as per specifications or as LS 1.00 2,000,000.00
directed by the Engineer.
Installation of convergence measurements including supply of required
K-34 T-5.15.6 equipment, drilling, installation and necessary measurements all complete as per No. 4.00 50,000.00 200,000.00
specification or as directed by the Engineer
Total for Headrace Tunnel (Sub Total K) 189,325,425.27

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 30 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
L SURGE PIPE

Site Clearance including clearing of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
L-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 21,621.00
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
L-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed and soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 6,859.91 147.92 1,014,722.72
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks using rock breaker and disposal up to the
L-3 T-4 designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as directed Cu.m 1,714.98 700.07 1,200,597.01
by the Engineer.
Filling with ordinary soil (Alluvial/Colluvial deposits) in layers and compaction
L-4 T-2.6 with sprinkling water all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 1,286.23 355.35 457,063.00
Engineer.
Preparation of Foundation (Base Preparation) for Surge Pipe all complete as per
L-5 T-2.5 LS 1.00 7,683.02
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and Placing of well graded Gravel Filter material including all equipments
L-6 T-10 Cu.m 151.35 1,865.63 282,357.29
and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of 75 mm thick Blinding Concrete (M15) including


L-7 T-6.5 compaction, cleaning, curing and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 19.97 11,423.62 228,119.78
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) including
L-8 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 126.14 12,959.38 1,634,696.61
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M7.5 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
L-9 T-6.5.3 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M15 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
L-10 T-6.5.3 Cu.m 615.38 8,464.31 5,208,735.82
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of
reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other
L-11 T-6.4 MT 29.66 139,214.36 4,129,190.74
materials in surface structures all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 31 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including
L-12 T-6.3 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as -
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 813.00 702.00 570,726.00
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m 542.00 852.00 461,784.00
Rubble masonry works in 1:4 cement mortar including Pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
L-13 T-16.5 Cu.m For Rate only
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Rubble masonry works in 1:6 cement mortar including Pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
L-14 T-16.5 Cu.m 97.96 8,821.33 864,129.27
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.

Supply and Placing of well graded Filter material including all equipments and
L-15 T-10 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Drilling for weep hole (50 mm dia/10 kgf HDPE pipe) including cleaning of hole,
L-16 T-3 installation of perforated drain pipe or as necessary including all equipments m - - -
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply, installation of perforated HDPE pipe with filter including drilling, all
L-17 T-18.4 necessary equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as -
directed by the Engineer.
a 100 mm dia m 216.21 262.50 56,755.13
b 225 mm dia m -
Providing and Laying of Geotextile including all equipments and materials all
L-18 T-11 Sq.m - For Rate only
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation 50mm dia MS steel handrails including all necessary
L-19 T-19.9.3 equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the kg - For Rate only
Engineer.
Providing and Applying of two coats of Enamel Paints with primer on metal
L-20 T-19.10.4 surface including cleaning and all required equipments, materials all complete as Sq.m - For Rate only
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation Steel Stair including all necessary equipments, materials
L-21 T-19.9.6 kg 100.00 139.21 13,921.44
all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing,assembling and Erecting of Fabricated Structural Steel/Truss
L-22 T-19.6 Components/Elements in Place including trying Down Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all MT 1.00 124,865.00 124,865.00
Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 32 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Providing and Assembling of colour CGI sheet (24 gauge)including trying Down
L-23 T-19.10.6 Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Sq.m 23.76 1,303.36 30,963.50
Engineer.
Supply and installation of 50*50*5 mm size, 2.0 m length angle posts at the
spacing as directed by the Engineer with 12 Gauge barbed wire with five rounds
L-24 T-1.11 and two diagonaLS for barbed wire fencing including all required equipment, LS 1.00 250,000.00
materials, drilling, excavation for foundation and as per specification or as
directed by the Engineer.
Total for Surge Shaft (Sub Total L) 16,557,931.32

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 33 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
M PENSTOCK PIPE, ANCHOR BLOCK AND SADDLE SUPPORT

Site Clearance including clearing of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
M-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 49,038.30
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
M-2 T-2.4 mixed soil and soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 7,527.62 147.92 1,113,491.14
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks using rock breaker and disposal up to the
M-3 T-4 designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as directed Cu.m 1,991.57 700.07 1,394,231.82
by the Engineer.
Filling with ordinary soil (Alluvial/Colluvial deposits) in layers and compaction
M-4 T-2.6 with sprinkling water all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 1,918.46 355.35 681,725.28
Engineer.
Preparation of Foundation (Base Preparation) for Penstock pipe,Anchor block and
M-5 T-2.5 Saddle Support all complete and as per specifications or as directed by the LS 1.00 21,321.00
Engineer.

Supply and Placing of well graded Gravel Filter material including all equipments
M-6 T-10 Cu.m 252.00 1,865.63 470,138.40
and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Preparation of Foundation with dry Stone soiling for Penstock pipe and Anchor
M-7 T-2.6 block, prior to blinding concrete with all complete and as per specifications or as Cu.m - For Rate only
directed by the Engineer.
Mixing and Placing of 75 mm thick Blinding Concrete (M15) for Anchor Block
including including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
M-8 T-6.5 Cu.m 35.51 11,423.62 405,681.45
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M20) including
M-9 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials all complete Cu.m 483.34 12,959.38 6,263,736.49
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) including
M-10 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials all complete Cu.m 48.07 16,783.59 806,854.08
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M15 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
M-11 T-6.5.3 Cu.m 1,462.23 8,464.31 12,376,754.90
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 34 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of
reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other
M-12 T-6.4 MT 80.14 139,214.36 11,156,255.68
materials in surface structures all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.

Fabrication, Placing in position and filling with stone in machine made gabion
boxes of hexagonal mesh with heavy coated GI wires, mesh size 100mm x
M-13 T-15 Cu.m 572.82 4,089.73 2,342,679.65
120mm, mesh wire 10 SWG, selvedge wire 8 SWG and binding wire 12 SWG all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including


M-14 T-6.3 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as -
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 1,423.00 702.00 998,946.00
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m 159.00 852.00 135,468.00
Supply, installation of perforated HDPE pipe with filter including drilling, all
M-15 T-18.4 necessary equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as -
directed by the Engineer.
a 100 mm dia m 600.00 262.50 157,500.00
b 225 mm dia m - For Rate only
Rubble masonry works in 1:4 cement mortar including Pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
M-16 T-16.5 Cu.m For Rate only
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Rubble masonry works in 1:6 cement mortar including Pointing work, supply of
hard stone blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall including all
M-17 T-16.5 Cu.m 174.00 8,821.33 1,534,910.93
equipments and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Providing and Laying of Geotextile including all equipments and materials all
M-18 T-11 Sq.m 307.92 278.00 85,601.76
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation of 20 mm dia Rock Bolt of specified length and at the
spacing as directed by the Engineer including all required equipment, materials,
M-19 T-18.2 No. 80.00 3,396.30 271,704.39
drilling, flushing, grouting all complete and as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of ground anchors/soil nailing of 32 mm dia. of specified
length and at the spacing including all required equipment, materials, drilling,
M-20 T-18.5 m 600.00 1,698.15 1,018,891.45
flushing, grouting all complete and as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 35 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity

Supply and installation of micro Piles 32 mm dia of specified length and at the
M-21 T-18.6 spacing as including all required equipment, materials, drilling, flushing, grouting m 600.00 850.00 510,000.00
all complete and as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and Installation of plain shotcrete M30 of specified thickness including all
M-22 T-5.9.10 required equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by Cu.m 25.00 49,810.31 1,245,257.76
the Engineer.

Total for Penstock, Anchor Block and Saddle Supports (Sub Total M) 43,040,188.48

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 36 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
POWERHOUSE, TAILRACE CULVERT AND RIVER PROTECTION
N WORKS
Site Clearance including cutting of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
N-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 18,000.33
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
N-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed and soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 8,992.58 147.92 1,330,188.46
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks using rock breaker and disposal up to the
N-3 T-4 designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as directed Cu.m 1,124.07 700.07 786,924.48
by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks including drilling and blasting, disposal up
N-4 T-4 to the designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as Cu.m 1,124.07 1,465.96 1,647,847.96
directed by the Engineer.
Filling with ordinary soil (Alluvial/Colluvial deposits) in layers and compaction
N-5 T-2.6 with sprinkling water all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 1,145.68 355.35 407,117.08
Engineer.

Preparation of Foundation (Base Preparation) for Powerhouse and Tailrace all


N-6 T-2.5 LS 1.00 8,528.40
complete and as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Preparation of Foundation with dry Stone soiling for Powerhouse and Tailrace ,
N-7 T-16.6 prior to blinding concrete with all complete and as per specifications or as Cu.m 15.30 1,777.24 27,191.79
directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of 75 mm thick Blinding Concrete (M15) including


N-8 T-6.5 compaction, cleaning, curing and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 60.68 11,423.62 693,205.50
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M20) including
N-9 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m - 12,959.38 - For Rate only
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) including
N-10 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials, all complete Cu.m 2,599.20 16,783.59 43,623,902.29
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M35) including
N-11 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials all complete Cu.m 46.46 18,819.83 874,388.39
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 37 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Mixing and Placing of Plum Concrete with 60% M15 Concrete mix and 40%
Plum stones including compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments,
N-12 T-6.5.3 Cu.m - For Rate only
materials all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
Rubble masonry works in 1:6 cement mortar including supply of hard stone
blocks, preparing cement mortar for construction of wall,scaffolding, curing,
N-13 T-16.5 Cu.m 2,601.68 8,821.33 22,950,259.98
including all pointing work, equipments and materials all complete as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of
reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other
N-14 T-6.4 MT 154.47 139,214.36 21,504,739.23
materials in surface structures all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including
N-15 T-6.3 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 1,800.00 702.00 1,263,600.00
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m 1,200.00 852.00 1,022,400.00
Screeding and Punning work including cleaning and all required equipments,
N-16 T-19.10.3 materials, Curing all complete as per design line and level as per specifications or Sq.m 613.60 39.97 24,524.48
as directed by the Engineer.
200 mm thick hollow Concrete Block masonry works in 1:4 cement mortar
including Pointing work, supply of Concrete blocks, preparing cement mortar for
N-17 T-16.3 Sq.m 510.56 9,434.13 4,816,725.96
construction of wall including all equipments and materials all complete as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing and assembling of CGI sheet (24 gauge) including trying Down
N-18 T-19.10.6 Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all Complete for wall as per specifications or as directed by Sq.m 718.66 1,303.36 936,671.77
the Engineer.
Providing of 12 mm thick Plaster(1:4) including cleaning the surface ,finishing,
N-19 T-16.9 curing and all required equipments, materials all complete as per design line and Sq.m 1,996.96 375.34 749,540.02
level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing and Applying of two coats of water proof cement paint including one
coat of primer cement paint on required area including cleaning and all required
N-20 T-19.10.4 Sq.m 1,996.96 146.12 291,805.67
equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the
Engineer.
Providing and Fixing of aluminium doors on required area with all required
N-21 T-19.8 equipments, materials all complete as per design line and level as per Sq.m 15.00 6,334.85 95,022.80
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 38 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Providing and Fixing of aluminium windows and ventilation on required area
N-22 T-19.8 with all required equipments, materials all complete as per design line and level as Sq.m 192.00 6,679.85 1,282,531.89
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing and Laying of the 20mm thick crazy chips with marbles flooring
N-23 including surfacing and polishings as per design line and level as per Sq.m 658.84 2,500.00 1,647,100.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing and installation of ceramic tiles with 20 mm thick cement sand
mortar(1:1) including rubbing and polishing on required area with all required
N-24 T-19.10.2 Sq.m For Rate only
equipments, materials all complete as per design line and level as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing and placing 0.5-1 m dia Boulder RipRap/Boulder lining including all
N-25 T-12 required equipments, materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by Cu.m 100.00 3,931.64 393,163.86
the Engineer.

Fabrication, Placing in position and filling with stone in machine made gabion
boxes of hexagonal mesh with heavy coated GI wires, mesh size 100mm x
N-26 T-15 Cu.m 207.50 4,089.73 848,619.16
120mm, mesh wire 10 SWG, selvedge wire 8 SWG and binding wire 12 SWG all
complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Providing,assembling and Erecting of Fabricated Structural Steel/Truss


N-27 T-19.6 Components/Elements in Place including trying Down Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all MT 16.78 124,865.00 2,095,197.37
Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Supply and installation Steel Stair including all necessary equipments, materials
N-28 T-19.9.6 Kg 1,500.00 139.21 208,821.55
all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing, assembling and Fixing of self rotating exhaust fan on celling including
N-29 trying Down Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all Complete as per specifications or as directed Job 1.00 100,000.00
by the Engineer.
Providing, Assembling and fixing of Rolling Shutter in place including trying
N-30 Down Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Job 1.00 40,000.00
Engineer.
Providing, Assembling and fixing of MS metal grills of 10mm square rod @
spacing of 100mm horizontal and 250 mm vertical in windows place
N-31 T-19.9.4 Kg 300.00 139.21 41,764.31
including,fabrication,painting and all required materials all Complete as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

T-6.7.3,T- Providing and Laying of 300 mm thick Waterbar including necessary equipments
N-32 m 108.50 1,528.06 165,794.78
6.7.4 and materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Providing and Laying of Bitumen Sealant including necessary equipments and


N-33 T-6.7.8 m 42.70 531.88 22,711.06
materials all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 39 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Supply and placing of 25 mm thick joint filler (thermocoal/Saltax board) as per
N-34 T-6.7.7 Sq.m 59.67 2,067.13 123,345.35
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Provision for supply and installition of sanitary facilities in Powerhouse as per
N-35 T-19.12 necessary including all equipments, materials all complete as per design as per LS 1.00 200,000.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Provision for supply and installition of electrical facilities in Powerhouse as per
N-36 T-19.11 necessary including all equipments, materials all complete as per design as per LS 1.00 200,000.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Provision of Dewatering facilities during construction of Powerhouse and
N-37 T-14 Tailrace Canal as per necessity including equipments all complete as per LS 1.00 200,000.00
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Total for Powerhouse and Tailrace Culvert (Sub Total N) 110,641,633.90

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 40 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
O Outdoor Switchyard and Valve House

Site Clearance including cutting of grass, grubbing their roots and leveling the
O-1 T-2.2 LS 1.00 4,121.51
site area all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Earthwork in excavation in all type of soil except hard rock including Gravel
O-2 T-2.4 mixed soil mixed and soft moorum stones including disposal all complete as per Cu.m 219.19 147.92 32,422.62
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Earthwork in excavation in Hard rocks using rock breaker and disposal up to the
O-3 T-4 designated disposal site - open cut all complete as per specifications or as directed Cu.m 53.49 700.07 37,449.87
by the Engineer.
Filling with ordinary soil (Alluvial/Colluvial deposits) in layers and compaction
O-4 T-2.6 with sprinkling water all complete as per specifications or as directed by the Cu.m 26.75 355.35 9,504.69
Engineer.
Preparation of Foundation with dry Stone soiling for Switchyard,
O-5 T-16.6 Valvehouse,Transformer bay, prior to blinding concrete with all complete and as Cu.m 190.13 1,777.24 337,906.92
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of 75mm thick Blinding Concrete (M15) including invert
O-6 T-6.5 cleaning and all required equipments, materials, curing all complete as per design Cu.m 18.24 11,423.62 208,389.75
line and level as per specification or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M20) including
O-7 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials all complete Cu.m 43.31 12,959.38 561,270.89
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Mixing and Placing of concrete in situ for RCC work (M25) including
O-8 T-6.5 compaction, curing, cleaning and all required equipments, materials all complete Cu.m 71.76 16,783.59 1,204,339.73
as per design line and level as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.

Supply and installation with cutting, bending, placing and binding of


reinforcement steel bars for RCC works including necessary laps, chairs and other
O-9 T-6.4 MT 19.66 139,214.36 2,736,301.41
materials in surface structures all complete as per specifications or as directed by
the Engineer.
Supply and installation of formwork and removing after completion including
O-10 T-6.3 supports and neceessary equipments all complete as per specifications or as Sq.m -
directed by the Engineer.
a Class F2 Finish Sq.m 380.52 702.00 267,125.04
b Class F3 Finish Sq.m

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 41 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
200mm thick hollow Concrete Block masonry works in 1:4 cement mortar
including Pointing work, supply of Concrete blocks, preparing cement mortar for
O-11 T-16.3 Cu.m 36.04 12,959.38 466,995.39
construction of wall including all equipments and materials all complete as per
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing and Fixing of aluminium doors on required area with all required
O-12 T-19.8 equipments, materials all complete as per design line and level as per Sq.m 1.89 6,334.85 11,972.87
specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing and Fixing of aluminium windows and ventilation on required area
O-13 T-19.8 with all required equipments, materials all complete as per design line and level as Sq.m 2.64 6,679.85 17,634.81
per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Providing, Assembling and fixing of Rolling Shutter in place including trying
O-14 Down Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Job 1.00 50,000.00
Engineer.
Providing and assembling of CGI sheet (24 gauge) including trying Down
O-16 T-19.10.6 Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all Complete for wall as per specifications or as directed by Sq.m - -
the Engineer.
Providing,assembling and Erecting of Fabricated Structural Steel/Truss
O-17 T-19.6 Components/Elements in Place including trying Down Bolts,nuts,rivets,etc all MT - - -
Complete as per specifications or as directed by the Engineer.
Total for Valve House and Outdoor Switchyard (Sub Total O) 5,945,435.50

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 42 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

BIDDING DOCUMENTS
LOT 03: CONSTRUCTION OF CIVIL STRUCTURES
VOLUME 2 PART 3: BILL OF QUANTITIES (BoQ)
Rate(NRs) Amount (NRs) Remarks
S.N. Specs. No. Description of works. Unit Quantity
In Figure In Words Quantity
Z DAYWORKS AND PROVISIONAL SUMS
Z-1 LABOUR
The dayworks rates quoted for labour shall be the total amounts payable, and shall include all costs such as allowances for complying with the Labour Laws, insurances, accommodation, travelling time, overtime
a Skilled Labour Md For Rate only
b UnSkilled Labour Md For Rate only
Z-2 MATERIALS
All materials used in dayworks shall comply with the specifications. The rates shall include delivery to site and necessary storage and handling.
a Cement Bag For Rate only
b Crushed gravel Cu.m For Rate only
c Sand Cu.m For Rate only
d Stone Cu.m For Rate only
e Gabion Box Sq.m. For Rate only
f Diesel Ltr For Rate only
g Petrol Ltr For Rate only
Z-3 EQUIPMENTS
The rates for equipment shall include all operation and maintenance costs, fuel, oil, grease, overhead and profit. Only time actually employed upon the work will be paid. The idle time shall not be paid and will be
a Excavator(1 Cu.m) Hr For Rate only
b Loader(1/3 Cu.m) Hr For Rate only
c Tipper Hr For Rate only
d Tractor Hr For Rate only
Total for Dayworks item (sub total K)
TOTAL PROJECT COST
TOTAL PROJECT COST IN WORDS

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost_Estimate_Civil Structures_: 43 of 43 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of Civil Works


Amount
S.N. Description of Items Unit Quantity Item Rate (NRs) (NRs.) Remarks
A River Diversion (Coffer Dam)
1 River Diversion (Coffer Dam) LS 1.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
Total 3,000,000.00
Diversion Weir, Undersluice and Flood
B Wall
2
1 Site Clearance m 3,019.00 16.35 49,348.88
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 5,714.77 147.92 845,332.21
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m3 1,071.52 700.07 750,133.49
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
4 blasting m3 357.17 1,465.96 523,602.11
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
5 15cm thick layer (each) m3 2,533.88 355.35 900,414.28
6 Base preparation m2 3,019.00 7.11 21,456.03
3
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m 99.66 11,423.62 1,138,427.82
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m3 2,128.83 16,783.59 35,729,424.69
3
9 Cement Concrete, M35 m 155.80 18,819.83 2,932,130.29
10 Formwork for concrete works m2
F2 Class 1,303.00 702.00 914,706.00
F3 Class 869.00 852.00 740,388.00
11 Reinforcement MT 137.08 139,214.36 19,083,211.04
12 Boulder Riprap m3 1,350.00 3,931.64 5,307,712.04
3
13 M15 Plum Concrete (40 % plum) m 468.73 8,464.31 3,967,434.88
14 Gabion Works m3 130.00 4,089.73 531,665.02
2
15 Geotextile m 600.00 278.00 166,800.00
Laying 0.4 m thick filter layer of 75mm to
3
16 6mm, stone aggregates m 120.00 1,865.63 223,875.43
3
17 0.4 m thick Clay Blanket m 120.00 1,209.27 145,112.87
30 cm Thick Hard Stone Lining @
18 Undersluice m3 17.64 2,540.58 44,815.85
Stone Masanory works with 1:4 (cement:
3
19 sand) m 76.00 10,090.77 766,898.50
20 PVC Water Stop rm 196.77 1,528.06 300,676.86
21 Joint Sealant rm 98.39 531.88 52,328.52
2
22 Expansion Joint Board (Saltax) m 145.64 2,067.13 301,056.09
23 Handrail Steels kg 120.00 140.00 16,800.00

24 HDPE Perforated Pipe with filter material m 124.40 262.50 32,655.00


25 Dewatering LS 1.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
Total 77,486,405.88
Intake, Gravel Trap, Spillway and
C Approach Canal
1 Site Clearance m2 780.00 16.35 12,749.96
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 5,318.52 147.92 786,719.67
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m3 997.22 700.07 698,121.72
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
4 blasting m3 332.41 1,465.96 487,297.27
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
5 15cm thick layer (each) m3 2,215.46 355.35 787,265.45
2
6 Base preparation m 780.00 7.11 5,543.46
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 25.28 11,423.62 288,827.92
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m3 507.63 16,783.59 8,519,916.03
9 Formwork for concrete works m2
F2 Class 784.00 702.00 550,368.00
F3 Class 523.00 852.00 445,596.00
10 Reinforcement MT 45.75 139,214.36 6,368,938.32
11 12 mm thick Steel lining m2 34.73 1,530.75 53,159.89
Stone Masanory works with 1:4 (cement:
12 sand) m3 16.65 10,090.77 168,027.46
13 Handrail Steels kg 113.55 140.00 15,897.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost and Quantity Summary_Civil: 1 of 11 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of Civil Works


Amount
S.N. Description of Items Unit Quantity Item Rate (NRs) (NRs.) Remarks
14 Painting Works m2 15.00 146.12 2,191.87
15 PVC Water Stop rm 71.96 1,528.06 109,959.38
16 Joint Sealant rm 102.37 531.88 54,445.70
2
17 Expansion Joint Board (Saltax) m 50.19 2,067.13 103,744.46

18 HDPE Perforated Pipe with filter material m 109.72 262.50 28,801.50


19 Monkey Ladder kg 200.00 139.21 27,842.87
20 Steel Stair kg 250.00 139.21 34,803.59
21 Dewatering LS 1.00 100,000.00 100,000.00
Total 19,650,217.53
D Settling Basin
2
1 Site Clearance m 1,491.00 16.35 24,372.04
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
3
2 Hydraulic Excavator m 4,745.74 147.92 701,993.00

3
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m 889.83 700.07 622,936.70
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
3
4 blasting m 296.61 1,465.96 434,817.23
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
3
5 15cm thick layer (each) m 1,718.48 355.35 610,660.74
2
6 Base preparation m 1,491.00 7.11 10,596.54
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 90.96 11,423.62 1,039,133.49
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m3 1,240.61 16,783.59 20,821,931.50
3
9 Dry Stone Soling m 42.39 1,777.24 75,329.23
10 Formwork for concrete works m2
F2 Class 1,241.00 702.00 871,182.00
F3 Class 827.00 852.00 704,604.00
11 Reinforcement MT 111.66 139,214.36 15,544,001.49
Stone Masanory works with 1:6 (cement:
3
12 sand) m 271.40 8,821.33 2,394,143.49
13 Handrail Steels kg 227.10 140.00 31,794.00
2
14 Painting Works m 10.00 146.12 1,461.25
15 PVC Water Stop rm 135.98 1,528.06 207,792.05
16 Joint Sealant rm 193.22 531.88 102,768.89
17 Expansion Joint Board (Saltax) m2 103.82 2,067.13 214,608.92

18 HDPE Perforated Pipe with filter material m 191.60 262.50 50,295.00


19 Monkey Ladder kg 200.00 139.21 27,842.87
20 Steel Stair kg 250.00 139.21 34,803.59
21 12 mm thick Steel lining m2 26.22 1,530.75 40,142.39
22 Dewatering LS 1.00 200,000.00 200,000.00
Total 44,767,210.41
Approach Pipe, Truss Bridge Crossing
E. and Forebay
E.1 Approach Pipe
1 Site Clearance m2 1,200.00 16.35 19,615.32
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 4,568.03 147.92 675,706.42
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m3 2,646.80 700.07 1,852,933.80
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
4 blasting m3 285.50 1,465.96 418,535.23
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
5 15cm thick layer (each) m3 2,646.80 355.35 940,540.38
6 Base preparation m2 600.00 7.11 4,264.20
3
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m 16.01 11,423.62 182,839.39
8 M15 Plum Concrete (40 % plum) m3 148.98 8,464.31 1,261,024.00
9 Cement Concrete, M20 m3 46.44 12,959.38 601,781.92
10 Cement Concrete, M25 m3 64.44 16,783.59 1,081,575.87
11 Formwork for concrete works m2
F2 Class 221.45 702.00 155,461.27
F3 Class 147.64 852.00 125,786.33

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost and Quantity Summary_Civil: 2 of 11 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of Civil Works


Amount
S.N. Description of Items Unit Quantity Item Rate (NRs) (NRs.) Remarks
12 Reinforcement MT 7.67 139,214.36 1,067,792.64
13 Gabion Works m3 346.50 4,089.73 1,417,091.76
2
14 Geotextile m 231.00 278.00 64,218.00
15 0.2 m thick graded gravel packing m3 180.00 1,865.63 335,813.14
Total of E-1: 10,204,979.66
E.2 Truss Bridge Crossing
2
1 Site Clearance m 113.76 16.35 1,859.53
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 561.43 147.92 83,046.70
3
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m 70.18 700.07 49,129.49
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
4 blasting m3 70.18 1,465.96 102,878.90
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
3
5 15cm thick layer (each) m 451.15 355.35 160,316.86
2
6 Base preparation m 113.76 7.11 808.49
3
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m 4.01 11,423.62 45,777.32
3
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m 128.85 16,783.59 2,162,556.58
2
9 Formwork for concrete works m
F2 Class 132.00 702.00 92,664.00
F3 Class 88.00 852.00 74,976.00
10 Reinforcement MT 12.64 139,214.36 1,760,136.93
11 Structural Steel, ISMC Sections MT 32.62 124,865.00 4,073,536.75

12 HDPE Perforated Pipe with filter material m 24.00 262.50 6,300.00


Stone Masanory works with 1:6 (cement:
12 sand) m3 244.54 8,821.33 2,157,167.35
3
13 Boulder riprap m 100.00 3,931.64 393,163.86
14 Rockbolt ( 25 mm dia. 3m long) LS 24.00 3,396.30 81,511.32
16 Dewatering LS 1.00 200,000.00 200,000.00
Total of E-2: 11,445,830.07
E.3 Forebay
1 Site Clearance m2 375.00 16.35 6,129.79
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 1,377.49 147.92 203,758.66
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m3 172.19 700.07 120,541.32
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
4 blasting m3 172.19 1,465.96 252,417.84
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
5 15cm thick layer (each) m3 344.37 355.35 122,372.41
2
6 Base preparation m 375.00 7.11 2,665.13
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 16.41 11,423.62 187,484.29
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m3 353.62 16,783.59 5,934,960.42
9 Formwork for concrete works m2
F2 Class 465.00 702.00 326,430.00
F3 Class 310.00 852.00 264,120.00
10 Reinforcement MT 27.76 139,214.36 3,864,441.97
Stone Masanory works with 1:6 (cement:
11 sand) m3 23.70 8,821.33 209,104.27

12 HDPE Perforated Pipe with filter material m 124.76 262.50 32,749.50


13 Gabion Works m3 330.00 4,089.73 1,349,611.20
14 Geotextile m2 150.00 278.00 41,700.00
Total of E-2: 12,918,486.78
Total of E (Approach Pipe, Truss Bridge Crossing and Forebay) 34,569,296.52

F Headrace Alignment

F1 General Excavation and related works


1 Site Clearance m2 21,400.00 16.35 349,806.54
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 30,463.46 147.92 4,506,176.36

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost and Quantity Summary_Civil: 3 of 11 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of Civil Works


Amount
S.N. Description of Items Unit Quantity Item Rate (NRs) (NRs.) Remarks

3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m3 3,807.93 700.07 2,665,803.07


Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
4 blasting m3 3,807.93 1,465.96 5,582,286.83
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
5 15cm thick layer (each) m3 7,615.87 355.35 2,706,297.91
2
6 Base Preparation m 12,840.00 7.11 91,253.88
7 Gabion Works m3 222.50 4,089.73 909,965.13
Stone Masanory works with 1:6 (cement:
3
8 sand) m 107.84 8,821.33 951,291.93
Gravel Packing (Granular Material Filling)
3
9 in base of Headrace Pipe m 2,568.00 1,865.63 4,790,934.17
10 Geotextile m2 3,000.00 278.00 834,000.00
11 Fibre Reinforced Shotcrete m3 100.00 56,091.55 5,609,154.61

12 HDPE Perforated Pipe with filter material m 3,210.00 262.50 842,625.00


Sub-Total 29,839,595.42

F2 Anchor Block
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
1 Hydraulic Excavator m3 553.41 147.92 81,861.50
2 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m3 276.71 700.07 193,713.35
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
3 15cm thick layer (each) m3 276.71 355.35 98,327.97
4 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 144.13 11,423.62 1,646,526.91
5 M15 Plum Concrete (40 % plum) m3 5,534.15 8,464.31 46,842,717.68
6 Reinforcement Steel Works MT 193.70 139,214.36 26,965,150.98
7 Formwork for concrete works m2
F2 Class 5,472.00 702.00 3,841,344.00
F3 Class 608.00 852.00 518,016.00
8 Soil Nailing Works m 1,500.00 1,698.15 2,547,228.62
9 Micropiles m 500.00 850.00 425,000.00

10 Rockbolts of 25 mm dia and 2 m long No. 500.00 3,396.30 1,698,152.41


Sub-Total 84,858,039.43

F3 Saddle Support
1 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 90.82 11,423.62 1,037,512.95
2 Cement Concrete, M20 m3 522.04 12,959.38 6,765,342.38
3 Cement Concrete,M25 m3 676.01 16,783.59 11,345,829.55
4 Reinforcement Steel Works MT 41.93 139,214.36 5,837,499.46
5 Formwork for concrete works m2
F2 Class 2,797.00 702.00 1,963,494.00
F3 Class 311.00 852.00 264,972.00
Sub- Total 27,214,650.34
Total of Headrace Alignment 141,912,285.19

G Kholsi Crossing
G1 Gajauni Syphon Kholsi Crossing
1 Site Clearance LS 150.00 16.35 2,451.92
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 159.38 147.92 23,574.86

3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m3 79.69 700.07 55,786.48


Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
4 blasting m3 79.69 1,465.96 116,818.89
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
5 15cm thick layer (each) m3 47.81 355.35 16,990.17
6 Base Preparation LS 150.00 7.11 1,066.05
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 1.61 11,423.62 18,377.76
8 M15 Plum Concrete (40 % plum) m3 20.00 8,464.31 169,286.11

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost and Quantity Summary_Civil: 4 of 11 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of Civil Works


Amount
S.N. Description of Items Unit Quantity Item Rate (NRs) (NRs.) Remarks
3
9 Cement Concrete, M25 m 43.07 16,783.59 722,870.89
10 Reinforcement Ton 4.95 139,214.36 689,250.84
2
11 Formwork for concrete works m
Class F2 Finish 25.74 702.00 18,069.48
Class F3 Finish 17.16 852.00 14,620.32
3
12 Boulder Riprap m 150.68 3,931.64 592,411.43

13 Rock Bolts (2 m long and 25 mm diamter) No. 17.00 3,396.30 57,737.18


3
14 Gabion Works m 50.00 4,089.73 204,486.54
Stone Masanory works with 1:4 (cement:
3
15 sand) m 50.00 10,090.77 504,538.49
3
16 Fibre Reinforced Shotcrete m 10.00 56,091.55 560,915.46

17 HDPE Perforated Pipe with filter material m 33.00 262.5 8,662.50


18 Geotextile m2 50.00 278.00 13,900.00
19 Dewatering LS 1.00 200,000.00 200,000.00
Sub Total of P1 3,991,815.37

G2 Charaadi Syphon Kholsi Crossing


1 Site Clearance LS 300.00 16.35 4,903.83
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
3
2 Hydraulic Excavator m 265.79 147.92 39,315.47

3
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m 132.89 700.07 93,034.35
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
3
4 blasting m 132.89 1,465.96 194,817.25
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
3
5 15cm thick layer (each) m 79.74 355.35 28,334.28
6 Base Preparation LS 300.00 7.11 2,132.10
3
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m 5.36 11,423.62 61,259.18
8 M15 Plum Concrete (40 % plum) m3 20.00 8,464.31 169,286.11
9 Cement Concrete, M25 m3 143.57 16,783.59 2,409,569.65
10 Reinforcement Ton 12.84 139,214.36 1,787,514.18
2
11 Formwork for concrete works m -
Class F2 Finish 85.80 702.00 60,231.60
Class F3 Finish 57.20 852.00 48,734.40
3
12 Boulder Riprap m 108.00 3,931.64 424,616.96

13 Rock Bolts (2 m long and 25 mm diamter) No. 55.00 3,396.30 186,796.77


14 Gabion Works m3 167.50 4,089.73 685,029.93
Stone Masanory works with 1:4 (cement:
15 sand) m3 50.00 10,090.77 504,538.49
3
16 Fibre Reinforced Shotcrete m 10.00 56,091.55 560,915.46

17 HDPE Perforated Pipe with filter material m 110.00 262.50 28,875.00


18 Geotextile m2 119.00 278.00 33,082.00
19 Dewatering LS 1.00 200,000.00 200,000.00
Total 7,522,987.00

G3 Other Kholsi Crossings


1 Site Clearance LS 337.50 16.35 5,516.81

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost and Quantity Summary_Civil: 5 of 11 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of Civil Works


Amount
S.N. Description of Items Unit Quantity Item Rate (NRs) (NRs.) Remarks
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
3
2 Hydraulic Excavator m 323.37 147.92 47,833.39

3
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m 161.69 700.07 113,190.77
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
3
4 blasting m 161.69 1,465.96 237,025.52
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
3
5 15cm thick layer (each) m 97.01 355.35 34,473.06
6 Base Preparation LS 168.75 7.11 1,199.31
3
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m 2.61 11,423.62 29,863.85
3
8 M15 Plum Concrete (40 % plum) m 40.00 8,464.31 338,572.21
3
9 Cement Concrete, M25 m 139.98 16,783.59 2,349,330.41
10 Reinforcement Ton 12.56 139,214.36 1,748,290.49
2
11 Formwork for concrete works m -
Class F2 Finish 83.66 702.00 58,725.81
Class F3 Finish 55.77 852.00 47,516.04
3
12 Boulder Riprap m 196.85 3,931.64 773,957.30

13 Rock Bolts (2 m long and 25 mm diamter) No. 27.00 3,396.30 91,700.23


3
14 Gabion Works m 80.00 4,089.73 327,178.47
Stone Masanory works with 1:4 (cement:
15 sand) m3 50.00 10,090.77 504,538.49
16 Fibre Reinforced Shotcrete m3 10.00 56,091.55 560,915.46

17 HDPE Perforated Pipe with filter material m 107.25 262.50 28,153.13


2
18 Geotextile m 250.00 278.00 69,500.00
19 Dewatering LS 2.00 200,000.00 400,000.00
Sub Total of P3 7,767,480.74
Total of 3 (Kholsi Crossings) 19,282,283.11

H Project Road Alignment


2
1 Site Clearance m 95,677.50 16.35 1,563,953.98
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 343,362.14 147.92 50,790,362.71
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m3 98,103.47 700.07 68,678,869.18
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
4 blasting m3 49,051.73 1,465.96 71,908,002.46
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
5 15cm thick layer (each) m3 49,051.73 355.35 17,430,533.64
6 Gabion Works m3 4,450.00 4,089.73 18,199,302.50
Stone Masanory works with 1:6 (cement:
7 sand) m3 269.60 8,821.33 2,378,229.81
8 Geotextile m2 3,626.00 278.00 1,008,028.00
9 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 20.00 11,423.62 228,472.48
10 Blinding Concrete, M20 m3 50.00 12,959.38 647,969.16
11 Blinding Concrete, M25 m3 45.00 16,783.59 755,261.34
12 Reinforcement Ton 5.97 139,214.36 830,552.89
13 RCC Hume Pipe, 900 mm dia m 45.00 17,247.20 776,124.00
14 Bailey Bridge (Approx. Span: 25 m) LS 1.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00
15 Maintainance Cost km 12.00 500,000.00 6,000,000.00
Total of Project Road Total of Project Road 266,195,662.16

I Headrace Tunnel

I1 Headrace Tunnel(Inlet Portal)


1 Site Clearance m2 276.93 16.35 4,526.73
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 483.31 147.92 71,491.18

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost and Quantity Summary_Civil: 6 of 11 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of Civil Works


Amount
S.N. Description of Items Unit Quantity Item Rate (NRs) (NRs.) Remarks
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
3 blasting m3 1,127.72 1,465.96 1,653,191.57
Backfilling with Muck @ 20 % of total
3
4 excavation m 322.21 355.35 114,495.55
3
5 Cement Concrete, C25 m 24.64 20,140.30 496,257.05
6 Reinforcement Ton 0.96 139,214.36 133,779.44
7 Formwork for concrete works
Class F2 Finish m2 27.13 702.00 19,044.98
2
Class F3 Finish m 18.09 852.00 15,409.61
8 Fibre Reinforced Concrete m3 28.96 56,091.55 1,624,375.84
Rockbolt of 20 mm dia and 2 m length (Plain
9.1 Cement Grouted) No. 65.10 3,396.30 221,099.44
Rockbolt of 20 mm dia and 2 m length
9.2 (Resin Capsule) No. 27.90 3,735.94 104,232.60
9.3 Expansion grouted rock bolt No. 10.00 4,075.57 40,755.66
10 Steel ribs sets (ISMB Section) Ton 0.57 298,242.52 168,566.67

11 Spilling Rod, 4 m long and 25 mm diameter No. 21.00 2,570.14 53,972.84

12 M7.5 Plum Concrete (40 % plum) m3 9.60 7,310.00 70,180.55


Stone Masanory works with 1:4 (cement:
13 sand) m3 10.00 10,090.77 100,907.70
14 Gabion Works m3 50.00 4,089.73 204,486.54
15 Weep Holes (50 mm dia, 3.0 m long) m 150.00 301.35 45,202.50
16 Drilling works for grouting m 100.00 2,115.90 211,590.00
17 Cement Sand Grouting Ton 2.00 28,861.63 57,723.26
18 Cement Slurry Grouting Ton 2.00 49,380.11 98,760.22
19 Chemical Grouting Ton 1.00 74070.17 74,070.17
Sub-Total 5,584,120.08
I2 Headrace Tunnel(Outlet Portal)
2
1 Site Clearance m 216.76 16.35 3,543.10
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
3
2 Hydraulic Excavator m 240.02 147.92 35,503.26
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
3
3 blasting m 720.05 1,465.96 1,055,561.39
Backfilling with Muck @ 25 % of total
3
4 excavation m 240.02 355.35 85,289.53
5 Cement Concrete, C25 m3 24.64 20,140.30 496,257.05
6 Reinforcement Ton 0.96 139,214.36 133,779.44
7 Formwork for concrete works
Class F2 Finish m2 27.13 702.00 19,044.98
2
Class F3 Finish m 18.09 852.00 15,409.61
8 Fibre Reinforced Concrete m3 25.80 56,091.55 1,447,316.79
Rockbolt of 20 mm dia and 2 m length (Plain
9.1 Cement Grouted) No. 48.00 3,396.30 163,022.63
Rockbolt of 20 mm dia and 2 m length
9.2 (Resin Capsule Grouted) No. 21.00 3,735.94 78,454.64
9.3 Expansion grouted rock bolt No. 10.00 4,075.57 40,755.66
10 Steel ribs sets (ISMB Section) Ton 0.57 298,242.52 168,566.67

12 Spilling Rod, 4 m long and 25 mm diameter No. 22.00 2,570.14 56,542.98

13 M7.5 Plum Concrete (40 % plum) m3 9.60 7,310.00 70,180.55


Stone Masanory works with 1:4 (cement:
14 sand) m3 10.00 10,090.77 100,907.70
15 Gabion Works m3 50.00 4,089.73 204,486.54
16 Weep Holes (50 mm dia, 3.0 m long) m 150.00 301.35 45,202.50
17 Drilling works for grouting m 100 2115.90 211,590.00
18 Cement Sand Grouting Ton 2.00 28861.63 57,723.26
19 Cement Slurry Grouting Ton 2.00 49,380.11 98,760.22
20 Chemical Grouting Ton 1.00 74,070.17 74,070.17
Sub-Total 4,661,968.67

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost and Quantity Summary_Civil: 7 of 11 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of Civil Works


Amount
S.N. Description of Items Unit Quantity Item Rate (NRs) (NRs.) Remarks
I3 Headrace Tunnel
3
1 Excavation in Headrace Tunnel m 13,380.79 4,701.45 62,909,122.09
2 Soft Tunneling m3 133.81 4,701.45 629,091.22
3
3 Backfilling with Muck m 133.81 355.35 47,548.64
3
4 Fibre Reinforced Concrete m 1,011.90 56,091.55 56,758,757.09
Rock bolt of 20 mm diameter and 1.5 m
5.1 length, Plain Cement Grouted No. - -
Rock bolt of 20 mm diameter and 1.5 m
5.2 length, Resin Capsule Grouted No. -
Rock bolt of 20 mm diameter and 2 m
5.1 length, Plain Cement Grouted No. 4,596.00 3,543.42 16,285,539.32
Rock bolt of 20 mm diameter and 2 m
5.2 length, Resin Capsule Grouted No. 1,149.00 3,735.94 4,292,589.67
5.3 Total of Expansion Rock Bolts No. 46.00 4,075.57 187,476.03
6 Steel ribs sets (ISMB 150 Sections) MT 6.06 298,242.52 1,808,271.23
Total Spiling Rods (4m long and 25 mm
7 diamter) No. 430.00 2,570.14 1,105,158.23
8 Connecting Rod Ton 1.61 139,214.36 223,579.84
9 Anchor Rod Ton 1.82 139,214.36 252,821.90

3
10 Cement Concrete, M25 m 1,235.72 20,140.30 24,887,833.01

11 Reinforcement Ton 47.92 139,214.36 6,671,152.31


2
12 Formwork for concrete works m 4,797.10 702.00 3,367,564.32
2
13 Invert Cleaning m 3,871.04 16.35 63,276.41
14 Cement Sand Grouting Ton 5.00 28,861.63 144,308.15
15 Cement Slurry Grouting Ton 5.00 49,380.11 246,900.55
16 Chemical Grouting Ton 2.00 74,070.17 148,140.34
3
17 M7.5 Plum Backfill in Overbreak Section m 66.90 7,310.00 489,067.87
18 Weep Holes (50 mm dia, 3.0 m long) m 2,419.40 301.35 729,086.19
19 Probe Drilling, 50mm dia m 241.94 2,910.20 704,092.76
20 Handrail Steels kg 6,412.00 140.00 897,680.00
21 Painting Works for Metal Surface m2 305.00 146.12 44,568.11
22 Convergence Measurement Stations No. 4.00 50,000.00 200,000.00
23 Drilling Works m 2,000.00 2,115.90 4,231,800.00
Sub-Total 187,325,425.27
24 Dewatering LS 2,000,000.00
Sub-Total of Headrace Tunnel 189,325,425.27
Total of HeadraceTunnel 199,571,514.02
J Surge Pipe
1 Site Clearance m2 1,081.05 20.00 21,621.00
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 6,859.91 147.92 1,014,722.72
3
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m 1,714.98 700.07 1,200,597.01
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
4 15cm thick layer (each) m3 1,286.23 355.35 457,063.00
5 Base preparation m2 1,081.05 7.11 7,683.02
Gravel Packing (Granular Material Filling)
6 in base of Surge Pipe m3 151.35 1,865.63 282,357.29
Stone Masanory works with 1:6 (cement:
7 sand) m3 97.96 8,821.33 864,129.27
8 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 19.97 11,423.62 228,119.78
9 M15 Plum Concrete (40 % plum) m3 615.38 8,464.31 5,208,735.82
10 Cement Concrete, M20 m3 126.14 12,959.38 1,634,696.61
11 Formwork for concrete works m2
F2 Class 813.00 702.00 570,726.00
F3 Class 542.00 852.00 461,784.00
12 Reinforcement MT 29.66 139,214.36 4,129,190.74
13 CGI Sheet Roofing m2 23.76 1,303.36 30,963.50
Structural Steel (Roof Truss at top of steel
14 pipe) Ton 1.00 124,865.00 124,865.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost and Quantity Summary_Civil: 8 of 11 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of Civil Works


Amount
S.N. Description of Items Unit Quantity Item Rate (NRs) (NRs.) Remarks
15 Barbed Wire Fencing LS 1.00 250,000.00
16 HDPE Perforated Pipe with filter material rm 216.21 262.50 56,755.13
Total of Surge Pipe 16,557,931.32
K Penstock Pipe

K1 General Excavation and related works


1 Site Clearance m2 3,000.00 16.35 49,038.30
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 7,381.40 147.92 1,091,861.75

3
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m 1,845.35 700.07 1,291,866.17
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
3
4 15cm thick layer (each) m 1,845.35 355.35 655,745.12
2
5 Base preparation m 3,000.00 7.11 21,321.00
Gravel Packing (Granular Material Filling)
6 in base of Surge Pipe m3 252.00 1,865.63 470,138.40

7 HDPE Perforated Pipe with filter material m 600.00 262.50 157,500.00


Stone Masanory works with 1:6 (cement:
3
8 sand) m 174.00 8,821.33 1,534,910.93
3
9 Gabion Works m 572.82 4,089.73 2,342,679.65
10 Cement Concrete, M25 m3 48.07 16,783.59 806,854.08
3
11 Reinforcement m 3.77 139,214.36 525,368.42
2
12 Geotextile m 307.92 278.00 85,601.76
Sub Total 9,032,885.59
K2: Anchor Block
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
1 Hydraulic Excavator m3 146.22 147.92 21,629.40

3
2 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m 146.22 700.07 102,365.65
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
3
3 15cm thick layer (each) m 73.11 355.35 25,980.16
4 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 13.94 11,423.62 159,188.20
3
5 M15 Plum Concrete (40 % plum) m 1,462.23 8,464.31 12,376,754.90
6 Formwork for concrete works m2
F2 Class 811.00 702.00 569,322.00
F3 Class 91.00 852.00 77,532.00
7 Reinforcement MT 57.39 139,214.36 7,989,860.19
8 Soil Nailing m 600.00 1,698.15 1,018,891.45
9 Micro Piles m 600.00 850.00 510,000.00
10 Rockbolts of 25 mm dia and 2 m long No. 80.00 3,396.30 271,704.39
11 Fibre Reinforced Shortcrete m3 25.00 49,810.31 1,245,257.76
Sub Total 24,368,486.10
K3: Saddle Support
1 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 21.58 11,423.62 246,493.25
3
2 Cement Concrete, M20 m 483.34 12,959.38 6,263,736.49
3 Formwork for concrete works m2
F2 Class 612.00 702.00 429,624.00
F3 Class 68.00 852.00 57,936.00
4 Reinforcement MT 18.97 139,214.36 2,641,027.06
Sub Total 9,638,816.80
Total of Penstock Alignment 43,040,188.48
L Powerhouse
1 Site Clearance m2 1,000.00 16.35 16,346.10
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 8,646.87 147.92 1,279,051.09
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m3 1,080.86 700.07 756,672.19
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
4 blasting m3 1,080.86 1,465.96 1,584,498.59
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
5 15cm thick layer m3 1,080.86 355.35 384,083.20

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost and Quantity Summary_Civil: 9 of 11 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of Civil Works


Amount
S.N. Description of Items Unit Quantity Item Rate (NRs) (NRs.) Remarks
6 Base Preparation m2 1,000.00 7.11 7,107.00
7 Dry stone soling m3 15.30 1,777.24 27,191.79
8 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 56.22 11,423.62 642,287.55
9 Cement Concrete, M25 m3 2,525.61 16,783.59 42,388,798.25
3
10 Cement Concrete, M35 m 46.46 18,819.83 874,388.39
3
11 Hollow Concrete Block m 510.56 9,434.13 4,816,725.96
2
12 Formwork for concrete works m
F2 Class 1,578.00 702.00 1,107,756.00
F3 Class 1,052.00 852.00 896,304.00
13 Reinforcement MT 148.70 139,214.36 20,700,523.60
Stone Masanory works with 1:4 (cement:
3
14 sand) m 2,601.68 8,821.33 22,950,259.98
15 Gabion Works m3 157.50 4,089.73 644,132.62
16 Structural Steel Truss (Steel Pipe) Ton 16.78 124,865.00 2,095,197.37
2
17 CGI Sheet for Roofing m 718.66 1,303.36 936,671.77
18 Plastering works m2 1,996.96 375.34 749,540.02
2
19 Aluminium Doors m 15.00 6,334.85 95,022.80
20 Aluminium Windows m2 192.00 6,679.85 1,282,531.89
21 Painting work m2 1,996.96 146.12 291,805.67
2
22 Flooring work m 658.84 2,500.00 1,647,100.00
2
23 Screeding And Punnning m 613.60 39.97 24,524.48
24 PVC water Stopper m 89.60 1,528.06 136,914.40
25 Joint Sealants m 36.40 531.88 19,360.25
26 Expansion joint Board(Saltax Board) m2 54.00 2,067.13 111,624.75
27 Rolling Shutter Ls 1.00 40,000.00 40,000.00
28 Grills in Windows kg 300.00 139.21 41,764.31
29 Exhaust Fan No 10.00 10,000.00 100,000.00
30 Electrification Works Ls 1.00 200,000.00 200,000.00
31 Sanitary Works Ls 1.00 200,000.00 200,000.00
32 Steel Ladder Ton 1.50 139,214.36 208,821.55
33 Dewatering LS 1.00 200,000.00 200,000.00
Total 107,457,005.57
M Tailrace
1 Site Clearance m2 101.20 16.35 1,654.23
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 345.71 147.92 51,137.36
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m3 43.21 700.07 30,252.29
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and
3
4 blasting m 43.21 1,465.96 63,349.37
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in
5 15cm thick layer m3 64.82 355.35 23,033.88
2
6 Base Preparation m 200.00 7.11 1,421.40
3
8 Blinding Concrete, M15 m 4.46 11,423.62 50,917.95
9 Cement Concrete, M25 m3 73.59 16,783.59 1,235,104.04
10 Formwork for concrete works m2
F2 Class 222.00 702.00 155,844.00
F3 Class 148.00 852.00 126,096.00
11 Reinforcement MT 5.78 139,214.36 804,215.62
12 Boulder Riprap m3 100.00 3,931.64 393,163.86
13 Gabion Works m3 50.00 4,089.73 204,486.54
14 PVC Water Stopper m 18.90 1,528.06 28,880.38
15 Joint Sealant m 6.30 531.88 3,350.81
16 Expansion Joint Filler (Saltax Board) m2 5.67 2,067.13 11,720.60
Total 3,184,628.33

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost and Quantity Summary_Civil: 10 of 11 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of Civil Works


Amount
S.N. Description of Items Unit Quantity Item Rate (NRs) (NRs.) Remarks
N Switchyard Civil Works
1 Site Clearance LS 200.00 16.35 3,269.22
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
3
2 Hydraulic Excavator m 26.05 147.92 3,853.33
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m3 5.21 700.07 3,647.34
4 E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil m3 2.61 355.35 925.69
3
5 0.2 m thick Stone Soling m 137.99 1,777.24 245,241.55
3
6 Blinding Concrete, M15 m 17.36 11,423.62 198,314.11
3
7 Cement Concrete, M20 m 43.31 12,959.38 561,270.89
3
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m 42.39 16,783.59 711,456.18
9 Reinforcement Ton 17.35 139,214.36 2,415,369.21
2
10 Formwork for concrete works m 257.10 702.00 180,484.20
Total 4,323,831.73

O Valve-House
1 Site Clearance LS 52.14 16.35 852.29
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by
2 Hydraulic Excavator m3 193.14 147.92 28,569.28
3
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker m 48.28 700.07 33,802.53
3
4 E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil m 24.14 355.35 8,579.00
5 0.2 m thick Stone Soling m3 52.14 1,777.24 92,665.37
3
6 Blinding Concrete, M15 m 0.88 11,423.62 10,075.64
7 Cement Concrete, M25 m3 29.37 16,783.59 492,883.55
3
8 Hollow Block Masonry Wall m 36.04 12,959.38 466,995.39
9 Reinforcement Ton 2.31 139,214.36 320,932.20
10 Formwork for concrete works m2 123.42 702.00 86,640.84
11 Aluminium Doors m2 1.89 6,334.85 11,972.87
2
12 Aluminium Windows m 2.64 6,679.85 17,634.81
13 Main Shutter Door No. 1.00 50,000.00 50,000.00
Total 1,621,603.77

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Cost and Quantity Summary_Civil: 11 of 11 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Temporary River Diversion
A LS 1.00
Works
Cofferdam Ls 1.00 1.00
I Stage-I
1 Site Clearance Sq.m 1.00 74.27 7.00 519.89
2 Excavation Cu.m
2.1 Cofferdam 1.00 74.27 12.18 904.61
Sub Total 904.61
3 Backfilling at Cofferdam river bed Cu.m 1.00 74.27 6.70 497.53
Sub Total 497.53
4 Impervious Layer with red clay Cu.m 1.00 74.27 3.12 231.95
5 Gravel packing Cu.m 1.00 74.27 0.60 44.56
6 Geotextile Sq.m 1.00 74.27 8.3 616.44
7 Boulder Riprap (0.8-1.0 m) Cu.m 1.00 74.27 3.12 231.72
II Stage-II
1 Excavation Cu.m
1.1 Cofferdam 1.00 114.03 12.18 1,388.89
Sub Total 1,388.89
3 Backfilling at Cofferdam river bed Cu.m 1.00 114.03 6.70 763.89

Sub Total 763.89


4 Impervious Layer with red clay Cu.m 1.00 114.03 3.12 356.12
5 Gravel packing Cu.m 114.03 0.60 68.42
6 Geotextile Sq.m 1.00 114.03 8.30 946.45
7 Boulder Riprap (1-1.5m) Cu.m 1.00 114.03 3.12 355.77
8 Dewatering Ls 1.00

1 Site Clearance 519.89


2 Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S soil by Hydraulic Excavator 1,834.80
3 Hard Rock Excavation by Rock Breaker 458.70
4 Hard Rock Excavation by drilling and blasting 458.70
5 E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in 15cm thick layer (each) 1,261.42
6 Impervious Layer with red clay 588.06
7 Gravel packing 112.98
8 Geotextile 1,562.89
9 Boulder Riprap (0.8-1.0 m) 231.72
10 Boulder Riprap (1-1.5m) 355.77
11 Total of Cofferdam Dewatering 2.00

Diversion Weir, Undersluice and


B
Flood Wall
1 Site Clearance m2 1 3,019.00 3,019.00

Excavation m3 1
Boulder riprap at U/S 1 34.50 49.00 1,690.50
U/S Apron & U/S Flood wall 1 9.10 49.45 450.00
Weir & Undersluice 1 14.75 134.84 1,988.89
Stilling basin 1 15.00 156.57 2,348.49
Boulder riprap at U/S 1 10.00 51.33 513.30
D/S Flood Wall 27.39 5.56 152.29
Sub-Total 7,143.46
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 5,714.77 0.80
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 1,071.52 0.15
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by drilling
4 357.17 0.05
and blasting

E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary


5 m3
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
U/S Apron 1 25.55 0.89 22.61
Weir 1 25.30 2.98 75.34
Undersluice 1 5.00 3.34 16.71
Stilling basin 1 29.70 3.18 94.51

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 1 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Flood wall 1 1.00
U/s left-Type A 1 5.40 24.46 132.08
U/s left- Type-C 1 5.00 31.70 158.50
U/s right 1 18.00 11.54 207.72
Weir 1 38.85 27.63 1,073.56
D/s right 1 27.39 27.45 751.86
Sub-Total 2,533.88

2
6 Base preparation m 1 3,019.00 3,019.00
2
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m
7.1 U/S Apron 1 8.30 25.85 0.075 16.09
7.2 Weir 1 14.35 27.90 0.075 30.03
7.3 Undersluice 1 14.06 6.20 0.075 6.54
7.4 Stilling basin 1 14.17 32.20 0.075 34.22
7.5 Flood wall 1
Type -A 1 23.40 3.50 0.075 6.14
Type -B 1 27.39 2.50 0.075 5.14
Type -C 1 5.00 4.00 0.075 1.50
Sub-Total 99.66
3
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m
8.1 U/S Apron
Base slab 1 8.33 25.85 0.650 139.96
Cutoff 1 0.65 25.85 1.250 21.00
Flood wall 1 9.10 0.45 6.100 24.98
Divide wall 1 9.10 0.50 4.000 18.20

8.2 Weir
Base slab with cutoff wall 1 25.00 23.40 585.00
Remaining in wall at expansion
1 1.00 19.98 19.98
joint in left
Right Flood wall 1 14.75 5.22 77.00

Remaining in right Flood wall 1 0.60 19.98 11.99

8.3 Undersluice
Base slab with U/S & D/S cutoff 1 5.00 19.44 97.20
Side walls 2 14.75 1.00 6.035 178.03
Toe wall below base 2 12.94 1.05 27.17
Platform 1 4.70 5.00 0.300 7.05
Deduction for gates -2 0.300 1.80 (1.08)
Mid wall between the gates 1 5.00 1.20 5.99

8.4 Stilling basin


Base slab 1 15.00 32.30 0.967 468.35
U/S Cutoff 1 27.90 1.08 2.200 65.98
D/S Cutoff 1 29.00 1.04 1.900 57.30
Side walls 2 15.00 0.35 4.700 49.35
Wall at D./S above slab 1 29.00 1.71 49.59
Deduction for Spillway &
-1 0.375 10.33 (3.87)
Flushing culvert

8.5 Flood wall


Type - A
Base Slab 1 23.40 3.50 0.600 49.14
Vertical wall 1 23.40 0.45 6.10 64.23
Chamfer 1 23.40 0.40 0.40 3.74

Type - B
Base Slab 1 27.39 2.50 0.45 30.81
Vertical wall 1 27.39 0.35 4.45 42.66
Chamfer 1 27.39 0.30 0.30 2.47

Type - C
Base Slab 1 5.00 4.00 0.800 16.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 2 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Vertical wall 1 5.00 0.55 7.20 19.80
Chamfer 1 5.00 0.40 0.40 0.80
Sub-Total 2,128.83
3
9 Cement Concrete, M35 m
9.1 Weir 1 25.00 4.96 124.00
9.2 Stilling basin 1 4.00 25.00 0.30 30.00
9.3 Undersluice 1 2.00 3.00 0.30 1.80
Sub-Total 155.80
2
10 Formwork for concrete works m
10.1 U/S Apron 1
Right Flood wall
Inner part 1 9.10 6.10 55.51
Outer part 1 9.10 6.70 60.97
Cutoff at U/S 1 25.55 1.90 48.55
Divide wall 2 9.10 4.00 72.80
-
10.2 Weir 1 1.00
Flood wall at right wall -
Inner part 1 14.75 4.90 72.28
Outer part 1 14.75 7.35 108.41
Around the plum concrete 2 20.00 40.00
Cutoff at U/S 1 25.30 5.28 133.58
Cutoff at D/S 1 25.30 4.77 120.68
-
10.3 Undersluice -
Side wall -
Inner part 2 81.36 162.72
Outer part 2 107.51 215.02
Platform 1 1.00
Below slab 1 3.70 3.00 11.10
on sides 2 3.00 0.300 1.80
Mid wall between the gates 1 1.00
On sides 2 3.00 3.000 18.00
Below wall 1 0.50 3.00 1.50
Cutoff at U/S & D/S 2 5.00 3.400 34.00

10.4 Stilling basin


Side wall
Inner part 2 15.00 4.700 141.00
Outer part 2 15.00 5.700 171.00
Cutoff at U/S 1 29.70 2.270 67.42
Cutoff at DS 1 29.70 5.560 165.13

Deduction for culvert and spillway -2 10.33 (20.66)

10.5 Flood wall


Type - A
Base Slab 2 23.40 0.60 28.08
Vertical wall 2 23.40 6.10 285.48

Type - B
Base Slab 1 27.39 0.45 12.33
Vertical wall 1 27.39 4.45 121.89

Type - C
Base Slab 1 5.00 0.80 4.00
Vertical wall 1 5.00 7.20 36.00

Sub-Total 2,171.58
11 Reinforcement Kg 60 Kg per Cubic meter of Concrete 137,077.89
Sub-Total 137.08 MT
12 Boulder Riprap m3
12.1 For 1.0 m dia. Boulder
At U/S from Apron 1 15.00 30.00 1.00 450.00
At D/S Below stilling basin 1 30.00 30.00 1.00 900.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 3 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Sub-Total 1,350.00
M15 Plum Concrete (40 %
13
plum)
11.1 Weir 23.40 20.03 468.73
Sub-Total 468.73
3
14 Gabion Works m
12.1 First Layer at U/S 1 50.00 1.00 1.00 50.00
12.2 Second Layer at U/S 1 50.00 1.00 1.00 50.00
12.3 At D/S Below stilling basin 3 10.00 1.00 1.00 30.00
Sub-Total 130.00
2
15 Geotextile m
At U/S from Apron above and
2 15.00 20.00 600.00
below clay blanket
Sub-Total 600.00
Laying 0.4 m thick filter layer of
16 m3
75mm to 6mm, stone aggregates
At U/S from Apron above and
1 15.00 20.00 0.40 120.00
below clay blanket
Sub-Total 120.00
3
17 0.4 m thick Clay Blanket m
At U/S from Apron above and
1 15.00 20.00 0.40 120.00
below clay blanket
Sub-Total 120.00
30 cm Thick Hard Stone Lining 2
18 m 1 19 3.00 56.34
@ Undersluice
Sub-Total 17.64
Stone Masanory works with 1:4 3
19 m 1 200 0.38 76
(cement: sand)
Sub-Total 76.00
20 PVC Water Stop rm
In between U/S apron 3 9.1 27.30
In between weir panels 3 18.29 54.87
In between U/S apron and weir 1 25.3 25.30
Undersluice and weir 1 14.7 14.70
Between Weir and Stilling Basin 1 29.6 29.60
In between Stilling Basin 3 15 45.00
Sub-Total 196.77
21 Joint Sealant rm 98.39
Sub-Total 98.39
22 Expansion Joint Board (Saltax) m2
In between U/S apron 3 9.1 0.65 17.75
In between weir panels 3 18.29 0.5 27.44
In between U/S apron and weir 1 25.3 0.65 16.45
Undersluice and weir 1 14.7 4.3 63.21
Between Weir and Stilling Basin 1 29.6 3.4 100.64
In between Stilling Basin 3 15 1 45.00
Sub-Total 145.64
50 mm
23 Handrail Steels kg 20 1.00 7.57 151.40
diamter
Sub-Total 151.40
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
24 rm
filter material
1 124.40 124.40
Sub-Total 124.40
25 Dewatering LS 1.00
Sub-Total 1.00

INTAKE,GRAVEL TRAP,
C SPILLWAY AND APPROACH
CANAL
C.1 Intake (Panel-IN-01) m3
1 Site Clearance m2 1 120.00 120.00
Excavation Works m3 1

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 4 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Intake 1 8.55 53.08 453.83
Sub-Total 453.83
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 363.07 80.0%
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 68.08 15%
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 22.69 5%
drilling and blasting
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
5 m3
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
Intake 1 4.53 18.98 85.97
Sub-Total 85.97
6 Base preparation m2 1 120.00 120.00
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m2
7.1 Base slab connecting intake 1 9.10 4.59 0.075 3.13
7.2 Base slab below intake 1 4.22 8.00 0.075 2.53
Sub-Total 5.66
3
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m
8.1 Slab extra portion 1 0.75 8.00 0.30 1.80
8.2 Base slab below intake 1 4.68 8.00 1.00 37.44
8.3 Base slab at u/s from undersluice 1 4.04 5.97 24.09
8.4 Cutoff wall 1 0.74 8.00 1.90 11.17
8.5 Side walls 2 4.22 1.00 5.40 45.58
8.6 Mid pier 1 1.00 20.12 20.12
8.7 Flood wall at upstream 1 1.20 0.45 6.50 3.51
8.8 Slanting wall 2 2.50 0.30 1.30 1.95
8.9 Slab below slanting wall 2 2.50 1.27 0.30 1.91
8.1 Slab above slanting wall 2 2.50 1.00 0.30 1.50
8.11 Vertical wall above slab 2 2.50 0.30 2.10 3.15
8.12 Top slab 2 2.85 2.50 0.30 4.28
8.13 Deduction for gates in platform -2 2.50 0.50 0.30 (0.75)
8.14 Column above top slab 2 0.40 0.40 2.90 0.93
8.15 Beam connection column 1 7.00 0.40 0.40 1.12
8.16 Deduction for manhole -1 0.70 0.70 0.30 (0.15)
Sub-Total 158.81
2
9 Formwork for concrete works m
9.1 Slab extra portion 1 0.75 8.00 6.00
9.2 Base slab below intake 1 17.36 1.00 17.36
9.3 Cutoff wall
Front side 1 8.00 1.90 15.20
Back side 1 8.00 1.09 8.72
9.4 Side walls 4 4.22 5.40 91.15
9.5 Mid pier 2 - - -
9.6 Flood wall at upstream 2 1.20 6.50 15.60
9.7 Slanting wall 2 2.50 1.30 6.50
9.8 Slab below slanting wall 2 2.50 1.27 6.35
9.9 Slab above slanting wall 2 2.50 1.00 5.00
9.10 Vertical wall above slab 2 2.50 2.10 10.50
9.11 Top slab 2 2.85 2.50 14.25
9.12 Deduction for gates -2 2.50 0.50 (2.50)
9.13 Column above top slab 8 0.40 2.90 9.28
9.14 Beam connection column 4 7.00 0.40 11.20
9.15 Deduction for manhole -1 0.70 0.70
Sub-Total 214.61
10 Reinforcement Kg 90 Kg Cubic merer of Concrete 14,293.03
Sub-Total 14.29 MT
11 12 mm thick Steel lining m2
9.1 At intake base slab below gate 2 5.05 2.50 25.23
9.2 At intake above gate 2 1.90 2.50 9.50
Sub-Total 34.73
Stone Masanory works with 1:4
12 rm 1 10 0.38 3.8
(cement: sand)

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 5 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Sub-Total 3.80
13 Handrail Steels kg 15 1.00 7.57 113.55
Sub-Total 113.55
2
14 Painting Works m 5.00
Sub-Total 5.00
15 PVC Water Stop rm
Between panel -IN-01 & GT-01 15.83 15.83

Between panel Intake & flood wall 26.31 26.31

Sub-Total 42.14
16 Joint Sealant rm
Between panel -IN-01 & GT-01 25.10 25.10
Between panel Intake & flood wall 29.93 29.93

Sub-Total 55.03
2
17 Expansion Joint Board (Saltax) m

Between panel -IN-01 & GT-01 25.10 1.00 25.10

Between panel Intake & flood wall 29.93 0.50 14.96

Sub-Total 40.06
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
18 rm
filter material
2 4.54 9.08
Sub-Total 9.08
19 Dewatering LS
Sub-Total

Gravel Trap and Flushing


C.2 Culvert (Panel-GT-01 & Panel- m3
GT-02)
1 Site Clearance m2 1 314.00 314.00
3
Excavation Works m
Gravel Trap 1 14.64 165.12 2,417.28
Gravel Flushing Culvert 1 5.45 133.23 725.42
Approach canal 1 3.50 24.65 86.28
Sub-Total 3,228.98
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 2583.18 80.0%
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 484.35 15%
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 161.45 5%
drilling and blasting

E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary 3


5 m
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
5.1 Gravel Trap 1 14.64 31.07 454.86
5.2 Gravel Flushing Culvert 1 19.58 8.88 173.90
Sub-Total 628.76

6 Base preparation m2 1 314.00 314.00


7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m2
7.1 Gravel Trap 1 11.30 7.04 0.075 5.96
7.2 Gravel Flushing Culvert 1 22.48 1.40 0.075 2.36
Sub-Total 8.32
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m3
8.1 Gravel Trap
Base slab 1 7.04 11.96 84.20
Side wall 2 11.96 0.55 6.13 80.58
-
8.2 Gravel Flushing Culvert -
Base slab 1 22.48 0.80 0.30 5.40
Side wall 2 22.48 0.30 1.80 24.28

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 6 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Top slab 1 22.48 0.80 0.30 5.40
-
8.3 Gravel Flushing Gate -
Base slab 1 2.30 1.60 0.60 2.21
Vertical wall above flushing
3 2.20 0.30 6.10 12.08
culvert
Vertical side walls above flushing
2 2.30 0.60 6.10 16.84
culvert
Top slab 1 2.30 2.20 0.30 1.52

Deduction for gates in top slab -2 1.60 0.50 0.30 (0.48)

Sub-Total 232.01
9 M35 concrete m3
Below Gravel Flushing Gate 1 2.30 1.00 0.30 0.69
Sub-Total 0.69
10 Formwork for concrete works m2
10.1 Gravel Trap
Base slab 2 11.96 23.92
Side wall 4 11.96 6.13 293.02

10.2 Gravel Flushing Culvert


Side wall inside 2 22.48 1.20 53.95
Side wall outside 2 22.48 1.80 80.93
Top slab 1 22.48 0.80 17.98

10.3 Gravel Flushing Gate


Base slab 1 2.30 0.60 1.38
Vertical wall above flushing
6 2.20 6.10 80.52
culvert
Vertical side walls above flushing
4 2.30 6.10 56.12
culvert
Top slab 1 2.30 2.20 5.06
Deduction for gates -2 1.60 0.30 (0.96)
Sub-Total 611.92
11 Reinforcement Kg 90 Kg Cubic merer of Concrete 20,942.79
Sub-Total 20.94 MT
12 12 mm thick Steel lining m2
12.1 Gravel Trap 1 1.00 5.00 5.00
12.2 Gravel flushing culvert 1 23.18 5.00 115.90
Sub-Total 120.90
13 Handrail Steels 10 1.00 7.57 75.70
Sub-Total 75.70
Stone Masanory works with 1:4
14 rm
(cement: sand)
Gravel Trap 1 17.50 0.38 6.65
Sub-Total 6.65
15 Painting Works m2 5.00
Sub-Total 5.00
16 PVC Water Stop rm
Between panel GT-01 & AP-01 11.79 11.79
Sub-Total 11.79
17 Joint Sealant rm
Between panel GT-01 & AP-01 20.94 20.94
Sub-Total 20.94
18 Expansion Joint Board (Saltax) m2
Between panel GT-01 & AP-01 4.72 4.72
Sub-Total 4.72
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
19 rm
filter material
21.1 Gravel Trap 2 14.00 28.00
21.2 Gravel Flushing Culvert 2 20.00 40.00
Sub-Total 68.00
20 Monkey Ladder kg
1 200.00 200.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 7 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Sub-Total 200.00
21 Steel Stair kg
1 250.00 250.00
Sub-Total 250.00

Approach Canal and Spillway 3


C.3 m
(Panel-AP-01 & Panel-SP-01)

1 Site Clearance m2 1 346.00 346.00


Excavation Works m3
Approach canal 1 14.64 153.00 2,239.92
Spillway 1 5.45 133.23 725.42
Sub-Total 2,965.34
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 2372.27 80.0%
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 444.80 15%
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 148.27 5%
drilling and blasting

E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary 3


5 m
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
5.1 Approach canal 1 17.63 50.24 885.79
5.2 Spillway 1 8.88 8.88
Large canal 1 2.31 93.40 215.75
Small canal 1 15.00 26.02 390.30
Sub-Total 1,500.73

2
6 Base preparation m 1 346.00 346.00
2
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m
7.1 Approach canal
Intake gate portion 1 1.35 3.60 0.075 0.36
Canal portion 1 16.25 3.20 0.075 3.90

7.2 Spillway
Large canal 1 3.20 14.36 0.075 3.45
Small canal 1 13.65 3.50 0.075 3.58
Sub-Total 11.29
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m3
8.1 Approach canal
Intake gate portion
Base slab upper part 1 3.95 4.30 0.60 10.19
Side walls 2 2.00 0.30 5.41 6.49
Top slab above gate 1 1.10 3.77 0.30 1.24
Top inclined wall above gate 1 3.77 0.30 1.35 1.52
slab above inclined wall above 1 1.00 3.77 0.30 1.13
Top vertical wall 1 3.77 0.30 2.10 2.37
Cantilever slab 1 1.00 0.60 0.30 0.18
Top slab 1 3.60 2.50 0.30 2.70

Deduction for gate in side wall -2 0.50 0.30 5.41 (1.62)


Deduction for gate in top slab -1 3.00 0.50 0.30 (0.45)

8.2 Canal portion


Base slab 1 15.85 3.20 0.40 20.29
Side walls 2 15.85 0.35 3.00 33.29
Deduction for spillway -1 14.50 0.33 1.45 (6.83)

8.3 Spillway
Large canal
Base slab 1 3.20 14.36 0.30 13.79
Side walls 2 3.20 0.30 1.80 3.46
Small canal
Base slab 1 13.65 3.50 0.30 14.33
Side walls 2 13.65 0.30 1.80 14.74

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 8 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Sub-Total 116.81
9 Formwork for concrete works m2
9.1 Approach canal
Intake gate portion
Base slab upper part 2 3.95 0.60 4.74
Base slab front 1 4.30 0.60 2.58
Side walls 4 2.00 5.41 43.28
Top slab above gate 1 1.10 3.77 4.14
Top inclined wall above gate 2 3.77 1.35 10.17
slab above inclined wall above 1 1.00 3.77 3.77
Top vertical wall 2 3.77 2.10 15.81
Cantilever slab 1 1.00 0.60 0.60
Cantilever slab front 1 1.60 0.30 0.48
Top slab 1 3.60 2.50 9.00
Top slab sides 2 6.10 0.30 3.66
Deduction for gate in top slab -1 3.00 0.50 (1.50)
9.2 Canal portion
Base slab 2 15.85 0.40 12.68
Side walls 4 15.85 3.00 190.20
Deduction for spillway -2 14.50 1.45 (42.05)
9.3 Spillway
Large canal
Base slab 2 3.20 14.36 91.90
Side walls 4 3.20 1.80 23.04
Small canal
Base slab 2 13.65 0.30 8.19
Side walls 4 13.65 1.80 98.28
Sub-Total 478.97
10 Reinforcement Kg 90 Kg Cubic merer of Concrete 10,513.32
Sub-Total 10.51 MT
Stone Masanory works with 1:4
11 rm
(cement: sand)
Approach canal 1 16.32 0.38 6.20
Sub-Total 6.20
12 Handrail Steels kg 10 1.00 7.57 75.70
Sub-Total 75.70
2
13 Painting Works m 5.00
Sub-Total 5.00
14 PVC Water Stop rm
Between panel-AP-01 & SP-01 8.95 8.95
Between panel AP-01 & SB-01 9.08 9.08
Sub-Total 18.03
15 Joint Sealant rm
Between panel-AP-01 & SP-01 11.80 11.80
Between panel AP-01 & SB-01 14.60 14.60
Sub-Total 26.40
2
16 Expansion Joint Board (Saltax) m
Between panel-AP-01 & SP-01 2.69 2.69
Between panel AP-01 & SB-01 2.72 2.72
Sub-Total 5.41
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
17 rm
filter material
Approach canal 2 16.32 32.64
Sub-Total 32.64
18 Dewatering LS
Sub-Total

D Settlin Basin
1 Site Clearance m2 1 1,491.00 1,491.00
Excavation m3
Inlet zone 1 24.40 115.77 2,824.87
Settling zone 1 40.00 70.37 2,814.60
Outlet zone 1 6.67 3.50 23.35
Flushing culvert 1 4.87 55.31 269.36

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 9 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Sub-Total 5,932.17
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 4745.74 80.0%
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 889.83 15%
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 296.61 5%
drilling and blasting

E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary


5 m3
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
5.1 Inlet zone 1 24.40 9.29 226.56
5.2 Settling zone 1 40.00 22.81 912.20
5.3 Outlet zone 1 6.67 50.94 339.77
5.4 Flushing culvert 1 4.87 49.27 239.94
Sub-Total 1,718.48
`
2
6 Base preparation m 1 1,491.00 1,491.00
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m2
7.1 Inlet zone
Before gate portion 1 0.33 3.65 0.075 0.09
Gate portion 1 3.55 5.10 0.075 1.36
Inclined portion 1 21 13.26 0.075 20.89

7.2 Settling zone 1 40.17 17.20 0.075 51.80

7.3 Outlet zone


Gate portion 1 2.45 10.30 0.075 1.89
Ponding portion 1 26.01 4.76 0.075 9.29

7.4 Flushing culvert


Gate portion 2 3.24 2.50 0.075 1.22
Before bifurcation 1 20.51 1.40 0.075 2.15
After bifurcation 1 14.44 2.10 0.075 2.27

Sub-Total 90.96
3
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m
8.1 Inlet zone
Before gate portion
Base slab 1 0.33 3.65 0.40 0.48
Side walls 2 0.33 0.30 3.00 0.59
Gate portion
Base slab 1 2.80 5.10 1.00 14.28
Side walls 2 2.36 0.30 3.74 5.30
Mid pier 1 2.10 1.00 3.74 7.85
Mid wall above gate 2 1.28 0.30 2.24 1.72
Top slab 1 2.30 5.10 0.30 3.52
Deduction for gates -2 5.00 0.50 0.30 (1.50)
Inclined portion
Base slab 1 21.00 13.26 0.60 167.12
Side walls 2 21.00 0.40 4.37 73.33
Mid wall 1 21.00 0.40 2.90 24.32

8.2 Settling zone


Base slab 1 40.17 20.78 0.60 500.74
Side walls 2 40.17 0.40 3.70 118.90
Mid wall 1 40.17 0.40 2.20 35.35

8.3 Outlet zone


Gate portion
Base slab below gate 1 1.35 10.30 0.70 9.73
Base slab after the gate 1.10 10.30 0.60 6.80
End Side walls at gate 2 1.35 1.25 3.50 11.81
End Side walls after gate 2 1.10 0.35 3.50 2.70

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 10 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Middle Side walls on sides of
4 2.05 0.60 3.50 17.22
flushing gate
Middle Side walls on sides of
2 0.85 0.60 3.50 3.57
outlet gate
Vertical wall between flushing
2 1.00 0.30 3.50 2.10
gates
Deduction for gate on side walls -16 0.45 0.30 3.50 (7.56)
Front vertical wall 1 12.60 0.40 3.30 16.63
Top gate operating slab 1 2.45 14.90 0.30 10.95

Deduction for gate on stop slab -16 0.45 0.30 0.30 (0.65)

Ponding portion
Base slab 1 26.01 4.76 0.60 74.28
Side walls 1 31.37 0.35 2.83 31.07
Wall at the end/start of AP 2 0.90 0.50 3.80 3.42
Base slab at Anchor block at start
1 5.19 4.4 0.39 8.79
of AP
Top slab at Anchor block at start
1 4.76 4.40 0.67 14.03
of AP
Side wall at Anchor block at start
2 4.80 0.75 2.00 14.40
of AP

8.4 Flushing culvert


Gate portion
Base slab 1 2.45 2.50 0.65 3.98
Side walls 4 2.45 0.60 2.00 11.76
Vertical wall between flushing
2 1.00 0.30 2.00 1.20
gates
Deduction for gates -8 0.45 0.30 2.00 (2.16)
Before bifurcation
Base slab 1 20.51 0.80 0.30 4.92
Side walls 2 20.51 0.30 1.80 22.15
Top slab 1 20.51 0.80 0.30 4.92
After bifurcation
Base slab 1 14.44 0.80 0.30 3.47
Side walls 2 14.44 0.30 1.80 15.60
Top slab 1 14.44 0.80 0.30 3.47
Sub-Total 1,240.61
3
9 Dry Stone Soling m
9.1 Outlet zone
Gate portion 1 2.45 10.30 0.20 5.05
Ponding portion 1 4.91 5.20 25.53

9.2 Flushing culvert


Before bifurcation 1 20.51 1.40 0.20 5.74
After bifurcation 1 14.44 2.10 0.20 6.06

Sub-Total 42.39
2
10 Formwork for concrete works m
10.1 Inlet zone
Before gate portion
Base slab 2 0.33 0.40 0.26
Side walls 4 0.33 3.00 3.96
Gate portion
Base slab 2 2.80 1.00 5.60
Side walls 4 2.36 3.74 35.31
Mid pier 2 2.10 3.74 15.71
Mid wall above gate 4 1.28 2.24 11.48
Top slab base 1 2.30 5.10 11.73
Top slab sides 1 14.40 0.30 4.32
Deduction for gates -2 2.05 0.50 (2.05)
Inclined portion
Base slab 2 21.00 0.60 25.20
Side walls 4 21.00 4.08 342.30
Mid wall 2 21.00 1.78 74.55

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 11 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks

10.2 Settling zone


Base slab 2 40.17 0.60 48.20
Side walls 4 40.17 3.40 546.31
Mid wall 2 40.17 2.10 168.71

10.3 Outlet zone


Gate portion
Base slab below gate 2 1.35 0.70 1.89
Base slab after the gate 2 1.10 0.60 1.32
End Side walls at gate 4 1.35 3.50 18.90
End Side walls after gate 2 1.10 3.50 7.70
Middle Side walls on sides of
8 2.05 3.50 57.40
flushing gate
Middle Side walls on sides of 4 0.85 3.50 11.90
Vertical wall between flushing
4 1.00 3.50 14.00
gates

Deduction for gate on side walls -16 0.45 3.50 (25.20)

Front vertical wall 2 12.60 3.30 83.16


Top gate operating slab base 1 2.45 14.90 36.51
Top gate operating slab sides 1 34.70 0.30 10.41

Deduction for gate on top slab -16 1.00 0.45 (7.20)

Ponding portion
Base slab 2 26.01 0.60 31.21
Side walls 2 31.37 3.30 207.04
Wall at the end/start of AP 4 0.90 3.80 13.68
Base slab at Anchor block at start
2 5.19 0.39 4.00
of AP
Top slab at Anchor block at start
1 4.76 4.40 20.94
of AP base
Top slab at Anchor block at start
1 18.32 0.67 12.27
of AP sides
Side wall at Anchor block at start
2 4.80 2.00 19.20
of AP

10.4 Flushing culvert


Gate portion
Base slab 2 2.45 0.65 3.19
Side walls 8 2.45 2.00 39.20
Vertical wall between flushing
4 1.00 2.00 8.00
gates
Deduction for gates -16 1.00 2.00 (32.00)
Before bifurcation
Base slab 2 20.51 0.30 12.30
Side walls 4 20.51 1.20 98.43
Top slab base 1 20.51 0.80 16.40
Top slab sides 2 20.51 0.30 12.30
After bifurcation
Base slab 2 14.44 0.30 8.66
Side walls 4 14.44 1.20 69.31
Top slab base 1 14.44 0.80 11.55
Top slab sides 2 14.44 0.30 8.66
Sub-Total 2,066.75
11 Reinforcement Kg 90 Kg Cubic merer of Concrete 111,655.16
Sub-Total 111.66 MT
Stone Masanory works with 1:6
12 m3
(cement: sand)
Settling basin 1 95.80 0.38 36.40
At flushing culvert end 1 20.00 11.75 235.00
Sub-Total 271.40
13 Handrail Steels kg 30 1.00 7.57 227.10
Sub-Total 227.10
14 Painting Works m2 10.00
Sub-Total 10.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 12 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
15 PVC Water Stop rm
After SB Panel-01 1 23.58 23.58
Settling Zone (Between SB panel
4 28.10 112.40
02,03,04,05 and 06)
Sub-Total 135.98
16 Joint Sealant rm
After SB Panel-01 1 36.34 36.34
Settling Zone (Between SB panel
4 39.22 156.88
02,03,04,05 and 06)
Sub-Total 193.22
2
17 Expansion Joint Board (Saltax) m
After SB Panel-01 1 49.42 49.42
Settling Zone (Between SB panel
4 13.60 54.40
02,03,04,05 and 06)
Sub-Total 103.82
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
18 rm
filter material
Settling basin 2 95.80 191.60
Sub-Total 191.60
19 Monkey Ladder kg
1 200.00 200.00
Sub-Total 200.00
20 Steel Stair kg
1 250.00 250.00
Sub-Total 250.00
21 12 mm thick Steel lining m2 1
At base of Flushing culvert 32.78 0.80 26.22
Sub-Total 26.22
22 Dewatering LS 1 1.00
Sub-Total 1.00

E Approach Pipe and Forebay


E.1 Approach Pipe
1 Site Clearance m2 1 300.000 4.000 1,200.00
Excavation Works m3

Chainage 0+000.00-0+020.00 20.00 - -

Chainage 0+060.00-0+100.00 40.00 21.91 876.50

Chainage 0+100.00-0+140.00 40.00 15.33 613.32

Chainage 0+140.00-0+180.00 40.00 31.15 1,245.82

Chainage 0+180.00-0+220.00 40.00 35.40 1,416.00

Chainage 0+220.00-0+260.00 40.00 24.18 967.00

Chainage 0+260.00-0+300.00 40.00 14.79 591.40

Sub-Total 5,710.04
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 4568.03 80.0%
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 856.51 15%
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 285.50 5%
drilling and blasting

E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary


5 m3
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)

Chainage 0+000.00-0+020.00 20.00 35.00 700.00

Chainage 0+060.00-0+100.00 40.00 6.00 240.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 13 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks

Chainage 0+100.00-0+140.00 40.00 - -

Chainage 0+140.00-0+180.00 40.00 7.37 294.80

Chainage 0+180.00-0+220.00 40.00 12.87 514.80

Chainage 0+220.00-0+260.00 40.00 13.97 558.60

Chainage 0+260.00-0+300.00 40.00 8.47 338.60


Sub-Total 2,646.80
6 Base preparation m2 1 300 2.00 600.00
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3
7.1 Anchor block
AP-HB-01 1 7.09 3.00 0.075 1.60
AP-HB-02 1 5.75 3.00 0.075 1.29
AP-HB-03 1 7.04 3.00 0.075 1.58
AP-HB-04 1 3.67 3.00 0.075 0.83
AP-HB-05 1 4.25 4.50 0.075 1.43
AP-HB-06 1 4.14 4.50 0.075 1.40
AP-HB-07 1 3.00 3.00 0.075 0.68
AP-HB-08 1 3.00 3.00 0.075 0.68
AP-HB-09 1 3.00 3.00 0.075 0.68

7.2 Saddle Support


26 1.00 3.00 0.075 5.85

Sub-Total 16.01
M15 Plum Concrete (40 % 3
8 m
plum)
8.1 Anchor block
AP-HB-01 1 7.09 3.00 3.00 63.81
AP-HB-02 1 5.75 3.00 3.00 51.75
AP-HB-03 1 7.04 3.00 3.00 63.36
AP-HB-04 1 3.67 3.00 3.00 33.03
AP-HB-05 1 4.25 4.50 3.00 57.38
AP-HB-06 1 4.14 4.50 3.00 55.89
AP-HB-07 1 3.00 3.00 3.00 27.00
AP-HB-08 1 3.00 3.00 3.00 27.00
AP-HB-09 1 3.00 3.00 3.00 27.00
6.2 Deduction for Approach pipe -2 40.94 3.14 (257.23)
Sub-Total 148.98
9 Cement Concrete, M20 m3
9.1 Saddle Support
26 1.00 1.79 46.44
Sub-Total 46.44

10 Cement Concrete, M25 m3


From end of Settling Basin to
10.1 Anchor Block Truss Bridge 1 11.00 3.00 3.00 99.00
Crossing

Deduction at Approach pipe area 1 11.00 3.14 (34.56)

Sub-Total 64.44
2
11 Formwork for concrete works m

11.1 Logitudinal sides of Anchor blocks 2 122.82 245.64


11.2 Traverse sides of Anchor blocks 2 90.00 180.00
11.3 Deduction at Approach pipe area 18 3.14 (56.55)

Sub-Total 369.09
0.5%of Concrete for Saddle Support and
12 Reinforcement Ton Sub-Total 7.67
Anchor Block
3
13 Gabion Works m
1 Layer 1 77 1.00 1.00 77.00
2 Layer 1 77 1.50 1.00 115.50

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 14 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
3 Layer 1 77 2.00 1.00 154.00
Sub-Total 346.50
2
14 Geotextile m 231.00
Sub-Total 231.00
0.2 m thick graded gravel 3
15 m 1 300 3.00 0.20 180.00
packing
Sub-Total 180.00
E.2 Truss Bridge crossing
1 Site Clearance m2 1 113.76 113.76
3
Excavation Works m
Abutment-1 1 6.40 90.61 579.90
Abutment-2 1 5.50 22.16 121.88
Sub-Total 701.78
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 561.43 80.0%
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 70.18 10.0%
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 70.18 10.0%
drilling and blasting

E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary 3


5 m
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
5.1 Abutment-1 1 6.40 68.43 437.95
5.2 Abutment-2 5.50 2.40 13.20
Sub-Total 451.15
6 Base preparation m2 1 113.76 113.76
2
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m
7.1 Abutment-1 1 6.40 6.20 0.075 2.98
7.2 Abutment-2 1 5.50 2.5 0.075 1.03
Sub-Total 4.01
3
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m
8.1 Abutment-1
Base slab 1 6.40 6.20 1.20 47.62
Chamfer above base slab 1 12.20 0.50 0.50 3.05
1.2 m thick Vertical wall above
1 4.50 1.20 6.00 32.40
base
Chamfer above 1.2 m thick
1 11.40 0.20 0.30 0.68
vertical wall
0.8 m thick Vertical wall 1 4.50 0.80 2.75 9.90
Chamfer above 0.8 m thick
1 12.40 0.60 0.50 3.72
vertical wall
Top slab 1 5.50 2.00 0.50 5.50
0.5 m thick Top wall 1 3.50 0.50 0.65 1.14

8.2 Abutment-2
Base slab 1 5.50 2.50 0.80 11.00
Chamfer above base slab 1 11.80 0.40 0.40 1.89
0.8 m thick Vertical wall above
1 4.50 0.80 1.65 5.94
base
Chamfer above 0.8 m thick
1 11.90 0.40 0.40 1.90
vertical wall
Top slab 1 5.00 1.60 0.40 3.20
0.5 m thick Top wall 1 3.50 0.40 0.65 0.91
Sub-Total 128.85
2
9 Formwork for concrete works m
9.1 Abutment-1
Base slab 2 6.40 1.20 15.36
Chamfer above base slab 1 12.20 0.71 8.66
1.2 m thick Vertical wall 2 4.50 6.00 54.00
1.2 m thick Vertical wall 2 1.20 6.00 14.40
Chamfer above 1.2 m thick
1 11.40 0.36 4.10
vertical wall

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 15 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
0.8 m thick Vertical wall 2 4.50 1.95 17.55
Chamfer above 0.8 m thick
1 12.40 0.78 9.67
vertical wall
0.5 m thick Top wall 2 3.50 0.65 4.55
Top slab 2 5.50 0.50 5.50
For traverse part 2 18.62 37.24

9.2 Abutment-2
Base slab 2 5.50 0.80 8.80
Chamfer above base slab 1 11.80 0.57 6.73
0.8 m thick Vertical wall above
2 4.50 0.85 7.65
base
Chamfer above 0.8 m thick
1 11.90 0.57 6.78
vertical wall
Top slab 2 5.00 0.40 4.00
0.5 m thick Top wall 2 3.50 0.65 4.55
For traverse part 2 4.48 8.96
Sub-Total 218.51
10 Reinforcement Ton 1.25 %of Concrete Sub-Total 12.64
11 Structural Steel, ISMC Sections Kg
Bottom chord 2 X IMSC300 4 32.50 4,718.74 36.298
Floor beam 2 X IMSC300 30 3.50 3,811.29 36.298
Vertical chord 2 X IMSC200 26 3.15 1,826.21 22.298
Inclined chord 2 X IMSC200 28 4.27 2,665.95 22.298
First and last strut 2 X IMSC300 4 3.50 508.17 36.298
Top chord 2 X IMSC300 4 27.60 4,007.30 36.298
Middle Strut 2 X IMSC200 22 3.50 1,716.95 22.298
Steel chequer plate 33.10 3.20 0.00 2,494.42
Sub-Total 21,749.02
( 50 % extra added for wastages) Sub-Total 32.62 Tonnes
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
12 rm
filter material
Abutment-1 18 0.80 14.40
Abutment-2 12 0.80 9.60
Sub-Total 24.00
Stone Masanory works with 1:6
13 LS
(cement: sand)
Abutment-1 1 15 11.75 179.54
Abutment-2 1 13 5.00 65.00
Sub-Total 244.54
12 Boulder riprap LS 1.00 100.00 100
Sub-Total 100.00
13 Rockbolt ( 25 mm dia. 3m long) LS 8 3 24.00
Sub-Total 24.00
14 Dewatering LS 1.00
Sub-Total 1.00

E.3 Forebay
1 Site Clearance m2 1 25.000 15.000 375.00
3
Excavation Works m
Section B-B 1 6.50 33.39 217.04
Section C-C 1 11.80 61.10 720.98
Section D-D 1 7.20 108.87 783.84
Sub-Total 1,721.86
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 1377.49 80.0%
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 172.19 10%
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 172.19 10%
drilling and blasting

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 16 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks

E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary 3


5 m 20 % of excavation
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
5.1 Forebay 344.37
Sub-Total 344.37
2
6 Base preparation m 1 25 15.00 375.00
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m2
7.1 Inlet zone 1 6.64 5.49 0.075 2.73
7.2 Main body 1 11.63 7.2 0.075 6.28
7.3 Outlet zone 1 12.65 7.80 0.075 7.40
Sub-Total 16.41
3
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m
8.1 Inlet zone
Base slab 1 6.64 5.49 0.60 21.85
Side walls 2 6.30 0.40 4.63 23.31
Front wall 1 3.00 0.34 1.21 1.22

8.2 Main body


Base slab 1 11.63 7.20 0.60 50.24
Side walls 2 11.63 0.45 5.61 58.72

8.3 Outlet zone


Base slab 1 12.65 7.80 0.90 88.80
Side walls 2 12.65 0.60 6.31 95.79
Wall above HRP 1 4.00 0.51 6.71 13.69
Sub-Total 353.62
2
9 Formwork for concrete works m
9.1 Inlet zone
Base slab 2 6.64 0.60 7.97
Side walls 4 6.30 4.21 106.09
Front wall 2 3.00 1.21 7.26

9.2 Main body


Base slab 2 11.63 0.60 13.96
Side walls 4 11.63 5.21 242.37

9.3 Outlet zone


Base slab 2 12.65 0.90 22.77
Side walls 4 12.65 6.31 319.29
Wall above HRP 2 4.00 6.71 53.68
Sub-Total 773.38
10 Reinforcement Ton 1 % of Concrete Works Sub-Total 27.76
Stone Masanory works with 1:6
11 m3
(cement: sand)
Forebay 1 62.38 0.38 23.70
Sub-Total 23.70
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
12 rm
filter material
Forebay 2 62.38 124.76
Sub-Total 124.76
13 Gabion Works m3
First Layer 1 30.00 1.00 1.00 30.00
Second Layer 1 30.00 2.00 1.00 60.00
Third Layer 1 30.00 2.00 1.00 60.00
Fourth Layer 1 30.00 3.00 1.00 90.00
Fifth Layer 1 30.00 3.00 1.00 90.00
Sub-Total 330.00
14 Geotextile m3
First Layer 1 30.00 1.00 30.00
Second Layer 1 30.00 1.00 30.00
Third Layer 1 30.00 1.00 30.00
Fourth Layer 1 30.00 1.00 30.00
Fifth Layer 1 30.00 1.00 30.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 17 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Sub-Total 150.00

F HEADRACE PIPE
General Excavation and related
F1
works
2
1 Site Clearance m 1 5,350 4.00 21,400.00

3 (Exported from SW Road


Excavation Works m Software)
Ch. 0+000 to 0+178.81 (Forebay to
3139.03
Inlet Portal)
Ch. 1+388.52 to 1+664.48
1807.15
(Gajauni Siphon)
Along with
Ch. 1+664.48 to 2+686.34 4726.89
Road
Along with
Ch. 2+686.34 to 3+604.08 4378.03
Road
Ch. 3+604.08 to 3+974.00
5670.87
(Charaadi Siphon)
Ch. 3+974 to 5+018.21 (After IInd Along with
4952.86
Siphon) Road
Along with
Ch. 5+018.21 to 5+835.19 3960.20
Road
Ch. 5+835.19 to 6+371.00 (Upto
9444.30
Surge Pipe)
Sub-Total 38,079.33
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 30,463.46 0.8
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 3,807.93 0.1
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 3,807.93 0.1
drilling and blasting
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
5 1 20% of total Excavation 7,615.87
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)

6 Base Preparation m2 1 5,350 2.40 12,840.00


3 (5 % of the gabion works in road considered
7 Gabion Works m 1 222.50
for Headrace Works)
Stone Masanory works with 1:6 3
8 m 1 107.84
(cement: sand)
No Gravel
Gravel Packing (Granular Pacling in
9 Material Filling) in base of m3 1 5,350 2.40 0.20 2,568.00 base in
Headrace Pipe exposed pipe
section
Lumpsum
10 Geotextile m2 1 3,000.00
Basis
Lumpsum
11 Fibre Reinforced Shotcrete m3 1 100.00
Basis
HDPE Perforated Pipe with Lumpsum
12 m 2 5,350 3,210.00
filter material Basis

F2 Anchor Block- Headrace Pipe

Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S


1 10% of total Concrete 553.41
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
2 5% of total Concrete 276.71
Breaker
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
3 276.71
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
4 Blinding Concrete, M15 0.075 1921.78 144.13
M15 Plum Concrete (40 %
5
plum)
CB01 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 18 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
VB02 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB03 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
CB04 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB05 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
Interface Block at Pipe End and 95.22
Start at Headrace Tunnel 95.22
CB06 4.00 3.00 2.80 27.44
VB07 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
VB08 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
VB09 5.60 3.80 3.50 65.86
VB010 8.50 7.50 4.50 273.79
VB011 7.00 5.40 4.00 140.42
VB012 3.20 2.80 2.40 16.58
VB013 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
CB014 5.00 3.50 2.60 37.80
HB015 2.60 2.40 2.40 10.97
HB016 3.80 2.40 2.80 19.69
HB017 2.60 2.40 2.40 10.97
HB018 4.80 2.80 3.00 32.93
HB019 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB020 3.60 2.40 2.60 16.92
HB021 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB022 4.80 2.80 3.00 32.93
HB023 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB024 5.80 3.00 3.50 51.97
HB025 6.00 3.00 3.80 59.16
HB026 6.00 3.00 3.80 59.16
HB027 2.50 2.40 2.40 10.55
HB028 3.40 2.40 2.60 15.98
HB029 3.00 2.40 2.40 12.66
HB030 3.40 2.40 2.40 14.35
HB031 5.80 3.00 3.00 43.27
HB032 6.00 2.80 2.80 37.80
HB033 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB034 5.30 2.60 3.00 33.18
HB035 5.50 2.40 3.00 31.13
HB036 3.70 2.40 2.80 19.17
HB037 6.70 3.00 4.50 80.14
HB038 5.90 2.80 3.80 53.69
HB039 6.00 3.00 4.00 62.76
HB040 3.00 2.40 2.40 12.66
HB041 7.00 2.40 3.40 46.34
HB042 4.00 2.40 2.80 20.72
HB043 6.00 2.50 3.40 41.76
HB044 4.80 2.40 2.80 24.87
VB045 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB046 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB047 5.20 2.60 3.40 37.96
HB048 5.50 2.60 3.40 40.15
HB049 5.00 2.40 3.20 30.70
HB050 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB051 3.00 2.40 2.40 12.66
HB052 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB053 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB054 5.30 2.50 3.20 34.24
HB055 2.90 2.40 2.40 12.24
HB056 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB057 2.50 2.40 2.40 10.55
HB058 2.50 2.40 2.40 10.55
HB059 3.80 2.40 2.80 19.69
HB060 5.40 2.40 3.50 37.05
HB061 4.60 2.40 3.00 26.04
HB062 4.40 2.40 2.50 19.63
HB063 5.60 2.80 3.40 44.69
HB064 7.00 3.00 4.20 77.42
HB065 7.00 2.80 4.00 67.62

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 19 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
HB066 2.90 2.40 2.40 12.24
HB067 5.00 2.50 3.00 29.80
HB068 4.10 2.40 2.80 21.24
HB069 3.80 2.40 2.80 19.69
HB070 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB071 5.20 2.60 3.00 32.56
HB072 3.10 2.40 2.40 13.08
HB073 3.30 2.50 2.50 15.55
HB074 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB075 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB076 6.40 3.00 3.40 55.43
HB077 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
CB078 5.80 4.30 3.00 65.89
VB079 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
VB080 4.60 3.20 3.00 37.08
VB081 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
VB082 7.40 6.00 4.50 188.41
VB083 7.00 5.40 4.00 140.42
VB084 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
VB085 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
VB086 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
VB087 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
CB088 7.60 5.00 4.00 140.30
HB089 4.80 3.00 2.60 30.05
CB090 2.60 2.40 2.40 10.97
HB091 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB092 4.10 2.50 2.80 22.39
HB093 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB094 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB095 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
VB096 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB097 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB098 3.00 2.40 2.40 12.66
VB099 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0100 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
VB0101 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0102 6.80 4.00 3.50 84.73
HB0103 6.50 4.00 3.00 67.99
HB0104 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0105 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
VB0106 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0107 7.40 4.20 4.00 112.93
HB0108 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0109 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0110 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0111 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0112 6.50 3.80 3.40 73.97
HB0113 2.80 2.40 2.40 11.82
HB0114 5.40 2.70 3.00 35.43
HB0115 4.40 2.80 3.00 30.19
HB0116 5.80 3.00 3.40 50.23
CB0117 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0118 6.00 3.00 3.40 51.96
HB0119 7.00 3.60 3.50 77.42
HB0120 6.40 3.20 3.40 59.78
HB0121 4.00 2.80 2.50 21.84
HB0122 7.20 3.60 3.60 82.23
HB0123 6.40 3.00 3.40 55.43
HB0124 6.00 3.00 3.20 48.36
HB0125 7.40 3.40 3.40 74.15
HB0126 4.30 3.00 2.80 29.50
HB0127 4.00 2.50 2.80 21.84
HB0128 6.80 3.00 4.40 79.29
HB0129 7.00 3.20 4.40 87.78
HB0130 7.20 3.30 4.40 93.46
HB0131 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 20 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
HB0132 6.60 3.00 4.40 76.96
HB0133 7.00 3.30 4.40 90.86
HB0134 4.80 3.20 3.00 38.69
HB0135 2.70 2.40 2.40 11.40
HB0136 4.50 2.80 2.80 28.35
HB0137 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0138 5.40 3.20 3.20 46.98
CB0139 3.20 2.50 2.50 15.07
HB0140 7.00 3.30 4.40 90.86
VB0141 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0142 5.30 3.80 3.00 52.26
HB0143 6.20 4.20 4.00 94.62
HB0144 6.40 4.20 4.00 97.67
HB0145 5.40 3.60 3.20 53.90
HB0146 5.00 3.50 3.20 48.30
CB0147 5.40 3.70 3.20 55.62
VB0148 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
CB0149 2.40 2.40 2.40 10.13
HB0150 4.80 3.20 3.00 38.69
Total of M15 Plum Concrete 5,534.15
6 Reinforcement Ton (35 kg per m3 of concrete) 193.70
2
7 Formwork for concrete works m
6,550.80
-306 Deduction for Pipe End 1.54 (471.05)
Sub-Total 6,079.75
Lumpsum
8 Soil Nailing Works m 1,500.00
Basis
Lumpsum
9 Micropiles m 500.00
Basis
Rockbolts of 25 mm dia and 2 m Lumpsum
10 No. 500.00
long Basis

Saddle Support for Headrace


F3
Pipe
For Buried Pipe Section
1 Blinding Concrete, M15
3
1.1 For Buried Pipe Section m 521 0.60 2.40 0.08 56.27
1.2 For Exposed Pipe Section
In between CB06 and VB06 1 1.80 2.50 0.08 0.34
In between VB07 and VB08 6 1.80 2.50 0.08 2.03
In between VB08 and VB09 6 1.80 2.40 0.08 1.94
In between VB09 and VB10 7 1.80 2.75 0.08 2.77
In between VB11 and VB12 5 1.80 2.75 0.08 1.98
In between VB12 and VB13 7 1.80 2.50 0.08 2.52
In between VB13 and VB14 8 1.80 2.50 0.08 2.88
In between CB78 and VB79 3 1.80 2.50 0.08 1.08
In between VB79 and VB80 9 1.80 2.75 0.08 3.56
In between VB80 and VB81 7 1.80 2.50 0.08 2.52
In between VB81 and VB82 8 1.80 2.50 0.08 2.88
In between VB83 and VB84 7 1.80 2.50 0.08 2.52
In between VB84 and VB85 9 1.80 2.50 0.08 3.24
In between VB85 and VB86 5 1.80 2.50 0.08 1.80
In between VB8 and VB87 5 1.80 2.50 0.08 1.80
In between VB86 and VB88 2 1.80 2.40 0.08 0.69
Sub-Total 90.82
2 Cement Concrete, M20 m3 521 0.60 1.67 522.04
2 Cement Concrete, M25 m3
For Saddle Support at Exposed
Section of Pipe
In between CB06 and VB06 1 2.50 2.72 6.80
In between VB07 and VB08 6 2.50 2.79 41.85
In between VB08 and VB09 6 2.40 2.79 40.18
In between VB09 and VB10 7 2.75 2.90 55.83
In between VB11 and VB12 5 2.75 2.78 38.23
In between VB12 and VB13 7 2.50 2.85 49.88

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 21 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
In between VB13 and VB14 8 2.50 2.85 57.00
In between CB78 and VB79 3 2.50 3.02 22.65
In between VB79 and VB80 9 2.75 2.95 73.01
In between VB80 and VB81 7 2.50 2.72 47.60
In between VB81 and VB82 8 2.50 2.72 54.40
In between VB83 and VB84 7 2.50 2.67 46.73
In between VB84 and VB85 9 2.50 2.69 60.53
In between VB85 and VB86 5 2.50 2.72 34.00
In between VB8 and VB87 5 2.50 2.72 34.00
In between VB86 and VB88 2 2.40 2.78 13.34
Sub-Total 676.01

3 Reinforcement Ton 35 kg per m3 41.93


2
4 Formwork for concrete works m
For Buried Pipe Section
521 1 2.40 0.80 1,250.40
For Exposed Pipe Section
Longitudinal Side
In between CB06 and VB06 2 2.72 5.44
In between VB07 and VB08 12 2.79 33.48
In between VB08 and VB09 12 2.79 33.48
In between VB09 and VB10 14 2.90 40.60
In between VB11 and VB12 10 2.78 27.80
In between VB12 and VB13 14 2.85 39.90
In between VB13 and VB14 16 2.85 45.60
In between CB78 and VB79 6 3.02 18.12
In between VB79 and VB80 18 2.95 53.10
In between VB80 and VB81 14 2.72 38.08
In between VB81 and VB82 16 2.72 43.52
In between VB83 and VB84 14 2.67 37.38
In between VB84 and VB85 18 2.69 48.42
In between VB85 and VB86 10 2.72 27.20
In between VB8 and VB87 10 2.72 27.20
In between VB86 and VB88 4 2.78 11.12
Longitudinal Side
In between CB06 and VB06 2 2.50 2.74 13.70
In between VB07 and VB08 12 2.50 2.74 82.20
In between VB08 and VB09 12 2.40 2.74 78.91
In between VB09 and VB10 14 2.75 2.74 105.49
In between VB11 and VB12 10 2.75 2.74 75.35
In between VB12 and VB13 14 2.50 2.74 95.90
In between VB13 and VB14 16 2.50 2.74 109.60
In between CB78 and VB79 6 2.50 2.74 41.10
In between VB79 and VB80 18 2.75 2.74 135.63
In between VB80 and VB81 14 2.50 2.74 95.90
In between VB81 and VB82 16 2.50 2.74 109.60
In between VB83 and VB84 14 2.50 2.74 95.90
In between VB84 and VB85 18 2.50 2.74 123.30
In between VB85 and VB86 10 2.50 2.74 68.50
In between VB8 and VB87 10 2.50 2.74 68.50
In between VB86 and VB88 4 2.40 2.74 26.30
Sub-Total 3,106.73

G Kholsi Crossings

Note: Anchor Block in Khosi Region included in


G1 Gajauni Kholsi Crossing
Anchor Block Estimation

1 Site Clearance m2
15.00 10.00 150.00
Sub Total 150.00
Excavation Works m3
15.00 21.25 318.75

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 22 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks

Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S


2 159.38
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 79.69
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 79.69
drilling and blasting
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
5 47.81
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
2
6 Base Preparation m 15 10.00 150.00
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3
Base of Concrete Casing in HRP 8.25 2.60 0.08 1.61
Sub Total 1.61
M15 Plum Concrete (40 % 3 Lumpsum
8 m
plum) Basis
20.00
Sub Total 20.00
3
9 Cement Concrete, M25 m
Concrete Casing in Headrace Pipe 1.00 8.25 2.60 2.60 55.77
Deduction for Headrace Pipe -1.00 8.25 1.54 -12.70
Sub Total 43.07
10 Reinforcement m2
4.95
Sub Total 4.95
2
11 Formwork for concrete works m
Along HRP 2.00 8.25 2.60 42.90
Sub Total 42.90
3
12 Boulder Riprap m
1.00 22.83 6.60 1.00 150.68
Sub Total 150.68
Rock Bolts (2 m long and 25 mm
13 No.
diamter)
2.00 8.25 17.00
Sub Total 17.00
3
14 Gabion Works m
Lumpsum
1 50.00
Basis
Sub Total 50.00
Stone Masanory works with 1:4 3
15 m
(cement: sand)
Lumpsum
1 50.00
Basis
Sub Total 50.00
16 Fibre Reinforced Shotcrete m3
1 10.00 10.00 0.10 10.00
Sub Total 10.00
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
17 m
filter material
2 16.50 33.00
Sub Total 33.00
18 Geotextile m2
Lumpsum
50.00
Basis
Sub Total 50.00
19 Dewatering LS
1.00
Sub Total 1.00

Note: Anchor Block in Khosi Region included in


G2 Charaadi Kholsi Crossing
Anchor Block Estimation
1 Site Clearance m2
30.00 10.00 300.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 23 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Sub Total 300.00
3
Excavation Works m
27.50 19.33 531.58
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 265.79
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 132.89
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 132.89
drilling and blasting
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
5 79.74
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)

6 Base Preparation m2 30 10.00 300.00


7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3
Base of Concrete Casing in HRP 27.50 2.60 0.08 5.36
Sub Total 5.36
M15 Plum Concrete (40 % Lumpsum
8 m3
plum) Basis
20.00
Sub Total 20.00
3
9 Cement Concrete, M25 m
Concrete Casing in Headrace Pipe 1.00 27.50 2.60 2.60 185.90
Deduction for Headrace Pipe -1.00 27.50 1.54 -42.33
Sub Total 143.57
2
10 Reinforcement m
12.84
Sub Total 12.84
11 Formwork for concrete works m2
Along HRP 2.00 27.50 2.60 143.00
Sub Total 143.00
12 Boulder Riprap m3
1.00 14.40 7.50 1.00 108.00
Sub Total 108.00
Rock Bolts (2 m long and 25 mm
13 No.
diamter)
2.00 27.50 55.00
Sub Total 55.00
14 Gabion Works m3
Left Bank 1 25.00 4.50 112.50
Right Bank 1 22.00 2.50 55.00
Sub Total 167.50
Stone Masanory works with 1:4
15 m3
(cement: sand)
Lumpsum
1 50.00
Basis
Sub Total 50.00
16 Fibre Reinforced Shotcrete m3
1 10.00 10.00 0.10 10.00
Sub Total 10.00
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
17 m
filter material
2 55.00 110.00
Sub Total 110.00
18 Geotextile m2
Left Bank 1 25.00 3.00 75.00
Right Bank 1 22.00 2.00 44.00
Sub Total 119.00
19 Dewatering LS
1.00
Sub Total 1.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 24 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Note: Quantity Estimate of Other Small Kholsi
G3 Other Kholsi Crossing Crossings are made on basis of the two Syphon
Kholsi Crossings
2
1 Site Clearance m
2.00 16.88 10.00 337.50
Sub Total 337.50
Excavation Works m3
2.00 15.94 20.29 646.74
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 323.37
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 161.69
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 161.69
drilling and blasting
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
5 97.01
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
2
6 Base Preparation m 16.88 10.00 168.75
7 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3
Base of Concrete Casing in HRP 2.00 13.41 2.60 0.08 2.61
Sub Total 2.61
M15 Plum Concrete (40 % Lumpsum
8 m3
plum) Basis
20.00
Sub Total 20.00
3
9 Cement Concrete, M25 m
Concrete Casing in Headrace Pipe 2.00 13.41 2.60 2.60 181.25
Deduction for Headrace Pipe -2.00 13.41 1.54 -41.27
Sub Total 139.98
2
10 Reinforcement m
12.56
Sub Total 12.56
2
11 Formwork for concrete works m
Along HRP 4.00 13.41 2.60 139.43
Sub Total 139.43
3
12 Boulder Riprap m
2.00 13.96 7.05 1.00 196.85
Sub Total 196.85
Rock Bolts (2 m long and 25 mm
13 No.
diamter)
2.00 13.41 27.00
Sub Total 27.00
14 Gabion Works m3
80.00
Sub Total 80.00
Stone Masanory works with 1:4
15 m3
(cement: sand)
Lumpsum
50.00
Basis
Sub Total 50.00
Shotcrete works for Rock
16 m3
Stabilization
2 5.00 10.00 0.10 10.00
Sub Total 10.00
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
17 m
filter material
4 26.81 107.25
Sub Total 107.25
18 Geotextile m2
250.00
Sub Total 250.00
19 Dewatering LS

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 25 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
2.00
Sub Total 2.00

H PROJECT ROAD
2
1 Site Clearance m 1.00 12757 7.50 95,677.50
3 From SW
Excavation m
Road
Powerhouse to Tunnel outlet Portal 398237.76

Tunnel outlet Portal to Headworks 92279.58


Total 490,517.34
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 343,362.14 0.7
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 98,103.47 0.2
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 49,051.73 0.1
drilling and blasting
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
5 10% of total Excavation 49,051.73 0.1
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
6 Gabion Works m3 4,450.00
Stone Masanory works with 1:6 3
7 m 269.60
(cement: sand)
2
8 Geotextile m 3,626.00
Lumpsum
9 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 20.00
Basis
3 Lumpsum
10 Blinding Concrete, M20 m 50.00
Basis
Lumpsum
11 Blinding Concrete, M25 m3 For Causeway 45.00
Basis
12 Reinforcement Ton 5.97
13 RCC Hume Pipe, 900 mm dia m 6 8 45.00
Bailey Bridge (Approx. Span: 25
14 No. 1.00
m)
15 Maintainance Cost km 1 12 12.00

I HEADRACE TUNNEL
I1 Inlet Portal
2
1 Site Clearance m 16 17.00 276.93
Sub-Total 276.93
Excavation
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 m3 30 % of total excavation
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Upper Part from berm 17.00 12.38 210.43
Lower part upto Portal base to first
10.90 25.04 272.88
berm
Sub-Total 483.31
Hard Rock Excavation by
3 m3 70 % of total excavation
drilling and blasting
Upper Part upto berm 17.00 28.88 490.99
Lower part upto Portal base 10.90 58.42 636.72
Sub-Total 1,127.72
Backfilling with Muck @ 20 %
4 m3 322.21
of total excavation
5 Cement Concrete, C25 For Portal Works
0.5m thick M25 concrete m3
Portal Area 4.00 4.20 4.1 68.88
Deduct Tunnel Portion -4.00 11.06 -44.24
Sub-Total 24.64
6 Reinforcement Ton 0.50% % of concrete volume Sub-Total 0.96
2
7 Formwork for concrete works m 1 4 9.42 Sub-Total 45.22
Portal Stabilization

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 26 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
3
8 Fibre Reinforced Concrete m
Lower portion upto first berm 9.55 0.10 8 7.64
Upper Portion from first berm 17.00 0.10 8.73 14.84
Left Side Portion of the Portal 6.58 0.10 5.02 3.30
Right Side Portion of Portal 6.31 0.10 5.04 3.18
Sub-Total 28.96
Rockbolt of 20 mm dia and 2 m
9 No.
length
Lower portion upto first berm 1.00 9.55 8.00 20.00
Upper Portion from first berm 1.00 17.00 8.44 36.00
Portal Left Side Face 1.00 13.15 5.29 18.00
Portal Right Side face 1.00 12.61 5.735 19.00
Sub-Total 93.00
10 Steel ribs sets (ISMB Section) kg 4 9.42 15.00 kg/m 565.20
Sub-Total 565.20
Spilling Rod, 4 m long and 25
11 No 20.11 Sub-Total 21.00
mm diameter
M7.5 Plum Concrete (40 % 3
12 m Sub-Total 16.11
plum)
Stone Masanory works with 1:4
13 m3 Sub-Total 10.00 (LS Basis)
(cement: sand)
3
14 Gabion Works m Sub-Total 50.00 (LS Basis)
Weep Holes (50 mm dia, 3.0 m
15 m Sub-Total 150.00 (LS Basis)
long)
16 Drilling works for grouting m Sub-Total 100.00 (LS Basis)
17 Cement Sand Grouting Ton Sub-Total 2.00 (LS Basis)
18 Cement Slurry Grouting Ton Sub-Total 2.00 (LS Basis)
19 Chemical Grouting Ton Sub-Total 1.00 (LS Basis)

I2 Outlet Portal
1 Site Clearance m2 13.71 15.81 216.76
Sub-Total 216.76
Excavation
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 m3
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Upper Part from berm 15.08 7.46 112.50
Lower part upto Portal base to first
11.25 11.34 127.52
berm
Sub-Total 240.02
Hard Rock Excavation by
3 m3
drilling and blasting
Upper Part upto berm 15.08 22.38 337.49
Lower part upto Portal base 11.25 34.01 382.56
Sub-Total 720.05
Backfilling with Muck @ 25 %
4 m3 240.02 25%
of total excavation
3
5 Cement Concrete, C25 m
Portal Area 4.00 4.20 4.1 68.88
Deduct Tunnel Portion 4.00 11.06 44.24
Sub-Total 24.64
6 Reinforcement Ton 0.5 % of concrete volume Sub-Total 0.96
2
7 Formwork for concrete works m 1 4 9.42 Sub-Total 45.22
Portal Stabilization
8 Fibre Reinforced Concrete m3
Lower portion upto first berm 6.73 0.10 8 5.39
Upper Portion from first berm 15.20 0.10 8.72 13.25
Left Side Portion of the Portal upto
5.08 0.10 4 2.03
first berm
Left Side Portion of the Portal
3.99 0.10 2.585 1.03
above first berm
Rght Side Portion of the Portal
5.91 0.10 4 2.36
upto first berm

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 27 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Right Side Portion of the Portal
4.54 0.10 3.82 1.73
above first berm
Sub-Total 25.80
Rockbolt of 20 mm dia and 2 m
9 No.
length
Lower portion upto first berm 6.73 8 14.00
Upper Portion from first berm 15.20 8.72 34.00
Left Side Portion of the Portal upto
5.08 4 6.00
first berm
Left Side Portion of the Portal
3.99 2.585 3.00
above first berm
Rght Side Portion of the Portal
5.91 4 6.00
upto first berm
Right Side Portion of the Portal
4.54 3.82 5.00
above first berm
Sub-Total 68.00
10 Steel ribs sets (ISMB Section) kg 4 9.42 15.00 kg/m 565.20
Sub-Total 565.20
Spilling Rod, 4 m long and 25
11 No 22 Sub-Total 22.00
mm diameter
M7.5 Plum Concrete (40 % 3
12 m Sub-Total 9.60
plum)
Stone Masanory works with 1:4
13 m3 Sub-Total 10.00 (LS Basis)
(cement: sand)
3
14 Gabion Works m Sub-Total 50.00 (LS Basis)
Weep Holes (50 mm dia, 3.0 m
15 m Sub-Total 150.00 (LS Basis)
long)
16 Drilling works for grouting m Sub-Total 100.00 (LS Basis)
17 Cement Sand Grouting Ton Sub-Total 2.00 (LS Basis)
18 Cement Slurry Grouting Ton Sub-Total 2.00 (LS Basis)
19 Chemical Grouting Ton Sub-Total 1.00 (LS Basis)

I3 Headrace Tunnel Alignment


Excavation in Headrace Tunnel m3
Hard Rock Underground
1 1.00 1,209.70 11.06 13,380.79
Excavation

1% of Total
2 Soft Underground Tunneling 133.81
Excavation

Sub-Total 13,514.60
Backfilling with muck for
3 133.81
Tunnel @ 1% of Excavation
Support Works in Headrace
Tunnel, SS connecting tunnel
and Adit
Support type I 110.00
Spot rock bolt at crown: 2 m long,
Nos 293.33 293.33
20 mm dia

50 mm Shotcrete (fiber reinforced)


only at fractured/slaking rock and m3 9.43 0.05 25.92 50%
mica/clay bands

Support type II 200.00


Patterned Rock Bolt, 2 m long, 20
Nos 7.00 785.00
mm dia at 1.8 m spacing

50 mm Shotcrete (fiber reinforced)


at crown and at fractured/slaking m3 5.03 0.05 50.27
rock and mica/clay bands

50 mm Shotcrete (fiber reinforced)


at walls at fractured/slaking rock m3 0.50 4.40 0.05 22.00
and mica/clay bands

Support type III 250.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 28 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Patterned Rock Bolt, 2 m long, 20
Nos 6.00 944.00
mm dia at 1.6 m spacing
3
50 mm Shotcrete (fiber reinforced) m 9.43 0.05 117.83

Support type IV 408.83


Patterned Rock Bolt, 2 m long, 20
7.00 2,052.00
mm at 1.4 m spacing
80 mm Shotcrete (fiber reinforced)
m3 9.43 0.08 308.31
at walls and crown
Support type V 108.97
Patterned Rock Bolt, 2 m long, 20
8.00 679.00
mm at 1.3 m spacing
120 mm thick fibre reinforced
m3 9.43 0.12 123.27
shotcrete at walls and crown
Support type VI 56.97
Patterned Rock Bolt, 2 m long, 20
no 9.00 404.00
mm at 1.15 m spacing
220 mm thick fibre reinforced
m3 9.43 0.22 118.15
shotcrete at walls and crown
ISMB 150 beam sets at 1.5 m
kg 38.98 9.43 15.00 kg/m 6,063.09
spacing
Steel connecting rod 16 mm dia kg 227.88 1.50 1.58 540.17
Steel anchorage rod 16mm dia, 1m
kg 389.81 1.00 1.58 615.99
long
Spilling c/c 40-50 cm in crown of
No. 186.00 186.00
length 4 m
Support type VII 74.94
Patterned Rock Bolt, 2 m long, 20
no 10.00 587.00
mm at 1 m spacing
200 mm thick fibre reinforced
m3 9.43 0.20 141.29
shotcrete at walls and crown
ISMB 150 beam sets at 1 m
kg 75.94 9.43 15.00 kg/m 11,812.02
spacing
Steel connecting rod 16 mm dia kg 449.65 1.50 1.58 1,065.84
Steel anchorage rod 16mm dia, 1m
kg 759.42 1.00 1.58 1,200.07
long
Spilling c/c 40-50 cm in crown of
No. 244.00 244.00
length 4 m

3 Total of 50 mm Shotcrete
4.1 m 259.22
4.2 m3 Total of 80 mm Shotcrete 369.97
4.3 m3 Total of 120 mm Shotcrete 123.27
4.4 Total of 200 mm Shotcrete 141.29
4.5 Total of 220 mm Shotcrete 118.15
6 No. Rock Bolts 2 m long and 20 mm diameter 5,744.33
7 Ton Steel ribs sets (ISMB 150 Sections) 6.06
8 No. Total Spiling Rods (4m long and 25 mm diamter) 430.00
9 Ton Total weight of connecting rod 1.61
10 Ton Total weight of anchor rod 1.82

11 Cement Concrete, M25 Concrete Lining Works


Concrete lining (200 mm and 250
m3
mm)
Along invert (Support I to VI) 1.00 1,134.77 3.20 0.20 726.25
Along invert (Support VII) 1.00 74.94 3.20 0.25 59.95

along wall and crown in high


10% 1,134.77 9.23 0.25 261.75
overbreak sections (in all Supports)

0.25 m thick concrete lining with


12mm dia. rebar in Support Type 74.94 9.23 0.25 172.86
VII

Saddle Supports below HRP at


12.00 0.60 2.07 14.90
inlet and outlet portion of HRT

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 29 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Total along wall and crown 434.61
Total along Invert 786.21
Saddle Supports 14.90
Sub-Total 1,235.72
12 Reinforcement Ton
Reinforcement in tunnel invert @ 0.50 % of concrete volume 30.86
Reinforcement for concrete lining
@ 0.50 % of concrete volume 17.06
along wall and crown
Sub-Total 47.92
2
13 Formwork for concrete works m 1
along invert 1.00 1,209.71 3.10 3,750.10
along wall and crown in high
10% 1,134.77 9.23 1,047.00
overbreak sections
0.25 m thick concrete lining in
74.94 9.23 -
Support Type VII
Sub-Total 4,797.10
2
14 Invert Cleaning m 1,210 3.20 3,871.04

Grouting Ton
15 Cement Sand Grouting Ton 5.00
16 Cement Slurry Grouting Ton 5.00
17 Chemical Grouting Ton 2.00

0.5 % of the
M7.5 Plum Backfill in 3
18 m 66.90 total
Overbreak Section
excavation
Sub-Total 66.90

Weep Holes (50 mm dia, 3.0 m


19 m
long)
As per necessity 2,419.40 2,419.40
20 Probe Drilling, 50mm dia m 241.94
21 Handrail Steels kg 2 1,210 2.65 6,412.00
Painting Works for Metal 2
22 m 2 1,210 0.13 305.00
Surface
Convergence Measurement
23 No. 4 4.00
Stations
24 Drilling Works m 2,000 2,000.00 LS Basis
25 Dewatering and related works LS 1 1.00 LS Basis

J SURGE PIPE
1 Site Clearance m2 216 5.00 1,081.05
Earthwork Excavation m3
Excavation in Pipe Section 216.21 39.66 8574.89
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 6,859.91
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 1,714.98
Breaker
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
4 m3 15 % of Total Quantity 1,286.23
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
5 Base preparation m2 216 5 1,081
Gravel Packing (Granular
6 Material Filling) in base of
Surge Pipe
Below Surge Pipe m3 1.00 216.21 3.50 0.2 151.35
Sub-Total 151.35
Stone Masanory works with 1:6
7 m3
(cement: sand)
Section A-A 1.00 13.00 2.49 32.37
Setion B-B 1.00 16.37 3.59 58.77
In Drain 1.00 23.52 0.29 6.82
Sub-Total 97.96

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 30 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
3
8 Blinding Concrete, M15 m
8.1 Anchor Block
Interface Anchor Block (AB-154) 1.00 9.54 4.50 0.075 3.22
Anchor Block SP-VB-01 1.00 3.50 3.50 0.075 0.92
Anchor Block SP-VB-02 1.00 3.50 3.50 0.075 0.92
Anchor Block SP-VB-03 1.00 3.50 3.50 0.075 0.92
Anchor Block at the end of Surge
1.00 10.35 4.50 0.075 3.49
Pipe
8.2 Saddle Support
40.00 1.00 3.50 0.075 10.50
Sub-Total 19.97
M15 Plum Concrete (40 % 3
9 m
plum)
Interface Anchor Block (AB-154) 1.00 4.50 54.96 247.32
Anchor Block SP-VB-01 1.00 3.50 18.17 63.61
Anchor Block SP-VB-02 1.00 3.50 18.17 63.61
Anchor Block SP-VB-03 1.00 3.50 18.17 63.61
Anchor Block at the end of Surge
1.00 4.00 84.24 336.96
Pipe
Deduction for pipe in all anchor
1.00 32.54 4.91 -159.73
block
Sub-Total 615.38
10 Cement Concrete, M20 m3
In saddle Support 34.00 3.50 1.06 126.14
Sub-Total 126.14
2
11 Formwork for concrete works m
11.1 Anchor Block
Logitudinal Direction
Interface Anchor Block (AB-154) 2.00 9.54 5.09 97.12
Anchor Block SP-VB-01 2.00 3.50 5.03 35.18
Anchor Block SP-VB-02 2.00 3.50 18.17 127.22
Anchor Block SP-VB-03 2.00 3.50 18.17 127.22
Anchor Block at the end of Surge
2.00 88.67 177.34
Pipe
Transverse Direction
Interface Anchor Block (AB-154) 2.00 4.50 5.09 45.81
Anchor Block SP-VB-01 2.00 3.50 5.03 35.18
Anchor Block SP-VB-02 2.00 3.50 18.17 127.22
Anchor Block SP-VB-03 2.00 3.50 18.17 127.22
Anchor Block at the end of Surge
2.00 4.50 14.31 128.79
Pipe
Deduction for Pipe Portion in
10.00 4.91 -49.09
transverse direction
11.2 Saddle Support
Logitudinal Direction 68.00 1.06 72.08
Transverse Direction 68.00 4.46 303.28
Sub-Total 1,354.55
12 Reinforcement Kg 40 Kg per Cubic meter of Concrete 29,660.67
Sub-Total 29.66 MT
13 CGI Sheet Roofing m2 1 4 5.97 23.76
Structural Steel (Roof Truss at
14 Ton 1 1.00
top of steel pipe)
15 Barbed Wire Fencing rm
At end of Surge Pipe 1.00 8.30 8.30 68.89
Sub-Total 68.89
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
16 m 1 216 216.21
filter material

K PENSTOCK ALIGNMENT
J1: General Excavation and
K1
related works

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 31 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
1 Site Clearance m2 1 600 5.00 3,000.00
3
Excavation Works m
Ch: 0+000.00- Ch 0+040.00 1.00 40.00 14.63 585.00
Ch: 0+040.00- Ch 0+080.00 1.00 40.00 11.23 449.00
Ch: 0+080.00- Ch 0+120.00 1.00 40.00 12.78 511.00
Ch: 0+120.00- Ch 0+160.00 1.00 40.00 10.98 439.20
Ch: 0+160.00- Ch 0+200.00 1.00 40.00 14.22 568.60
Ch: 0+200.00- Ch 0+240.00 1.00 40.00 15.31 612.40
Ch: 0+240.00- Ch 0+280.00 1.00 40.00 15.20 607.80
Ch: 0+280.00- Ch 0+320.00 1.00 40.00 17.59 703.40
Ch: 0+320.00- Ch 0+360.00 1.00 40.00 7.48 299.20
Ch: 0+360.00- Ch 0+400.00 1.00 40.00 6.93 277.00
Ch: 0+400.00- Ch 0+440.00 1.00 40.00 8.47 338.80
Ch: 0+440.00- Ch 0+480.00 1.00 40.00 5.03 201.20
Ch: 0+480.00- Ch 0+520.00 1.00 40.00 11.82 472.60
Ch: 0+520.00- Ch 0+560.00 1.00 40.00 16.75 670.00
Ch: 0+560.00- Ch 0+600.00 1.00 40.00 50.87 2034.60
Bifurcation Pipes upto PH
1.00 13.00 35.15 456.95
Control Room
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 7,381.40 0.8
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 1,845.35 0.2
Breaker
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
4 m3 1 1,845.35 0.2
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
2
5 Base preparation m 1 600 5 3,000.00

Gravel Packing (Granular


6 Material Filling) in base of m3
Surge Pipe
Along alignemnt 1.00 600.00 2.10 0.2 252.00
Sub-Total 252.00
HDPE Perforated Pipe with
7 m 1 600 600.00
filter material
Stone Masanory works with 1:6 3
8 m 2 600 0.29 174.00
(cement: sand)
3
9 Gabion Works m
From Chainage0+ 420.00 to
0+500.00
First Layer 1.00 80.00 1.00 1 80.00
Second Layer 1.00 80.00 2.00 1 160.00
Gabion Wall for Soil Anchors and
Slope Protection
In between AB 164 and AB 165 2.00 18.49 9.00 332.82
Sub-Total 572.82
10 Cement Concrete, M25

RCC Anchor Wall for Gabion


2 18.49 1.30 48.07
Works inlcuding Drainage works

Sub-Total 48.07
11 Reinforcement Ton 1 % of total concrete volume
3.77
Sub-Total 3.77

12 Geotextile m2
From Chainage0+ 420.00 to
0+500.00
First Layer 1.00 80.00 1 80.00
Second Layer 1.00 80.00 1 80.00
Gabion Wall for Soil Anchors and
2.00 18.49 4 147.92
Slope Protection
Sub-Total 307.92
K2 Anchor Block for Penstock Pipe

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 32 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks

Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S


1 10% of total Concrete 146.22
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
2 10% of total Concrete 146.22
Breaker
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
3 73.11
Soil in 15cm thick layer (each)
4 Blinding Concrete, M15 0.08 185.80 13.94
Sub-Total 13.94
M15 Plum Concrete (40 %
5
plum)
CB152 1.00 4.00 3.00 3 36.00
VB153 1.00 2.40 2.40 2.4 13.82
VB154 1.00 2.40 2.40 2.4 13.82
VB155 1.00 2.40 2.40 2.4 13.82
VB156 1.00 4.40 3.00 2.8 36.96
VB157 1.00 2.40 2.40 2.4 13.82
VB158 1.00 2.40 2.40 2.4 13.82
VB159 1.00 4.80 3.00 3 43.20
CB160 1.00 12.00 6.00 5 360.00
VB161 1.00 6.00 4.40 3 79.20
VB162 1.00 5.00 3.80 3 57.00
VB163 1.00 7.49 112.80 844.87
Deduction for Pipe Volume 48.20 0.95 -64.12
Sub-Total 1,462.23

2
6 Formwork for concrete works m

Logitudinal sides of Anchor blocks 2.00 160.52 321.04


Traverse sides of Anchor blocks 2.00 109.80 219.60
Longitudinal Formwork for
2.00 23.03 6.21 285.80
Bifurcation Anchor Block
Transverse Formwork for
2.00 7.80 6.21 96.80
Bifurcation Anchor Block
Deduction at Penstock pipe area -24.00 0.95 -22.81
Sub-Total 900.43
7 Reinforcement Ton 0.5%of total Concrete 57.39
8 Soil Nailing m 100 6 600.00
9 Micro Piles m 100 6 600.00
Rockbolts of 25 mm dia and 2 m Lump Sum
10 No. 80 80.00
long Basis
Lump Sum
11 Fibre Reinforced Shortcrete m3 25.00
Basis

Saddle Support for Penstock


K3
Pipe
1 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3 137.00 1.00 2.10 0.08 21.58
2 Cement Concrete, M20 m3 137.00 1.00 2.10 1.68 483.34
3 Formwork for concrete works Sq. m
Longitudinal Side 274.00 1.00 0.8 219.20
Transverse Side 274.00 1.68 460.32
Sub-Total 679.52
4 Reinforcement Ton 0.50% 18.97

K POWERHOUSE
1 Site Clearance m2 40 25.00 1,000.00
3
Excavation Works m
Section D-D 1.00 52.94 196.64 10410.12
Section C-C 1.00 52.64 212.90 11207.06
Sub-Total 10,808.59

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 33 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks

Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S


2 8,646.87 0.8
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 1,080.86 0.1
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 1,080.86 0.1
drilling and blasting
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
5 m3 10 % of Total Quantity 1,080.86
Soil in 15cm thick layer
6 Base Preparation m2 40 25.00 1,000.00
3
7 Dry stone soling m
Footing for Control Building
Column
Type A (0.5x0.5), Grid J-J 5.00 2.00 2.00 0.2 4.00
Type B (0.5x0.5), Grid I-I 5.00 2.00 0.75 0.2 1.50
Combine Footing Joining Grid I-I
5.00 2.00 4.90 0.2 9.80
nad J-J
Sub-Total 15.30
8 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3
Pillar.
Type A (0.5x0.5), Grid J-J 5.00 2.00 2.00 0.075 1.50
Type B (0.5x0.5), Grid I-I 5.00 2.00 2.00 0.075 1.50
Combine Footing Joining Grid I-I
5.00 2.00 4.90 0.075 3.68
nad J-J
Powerhouse Main Builind
1.00 36.30 18.20 0.075 49.55
Foundation
Sub-Total 56.22
9 Cement Concrete, M25 m3
Superstructure (Above Machine
9.1
Floor Level 1409.10)
9.1.1 Powerhouse Main Building
All Columns upto Crane Beam
20.00 1.00 0.70 10.5 147.00
Level
Top Columns from Crane Beam to
20.00 0.50 0.50 2.8 14.00
Rood Truss Start
First Floor Beam (Grid 1-1 and 4-
2.00 24.20 0.50 0.7 16.94
4)
First Floor Beam (Grid A-A and H-
2.00 14.20 0.50 0.7 9.94
H)
Crane Beam (Grid 1-1 and 4-4) 2.00 24.20 1.00 0.85 41.14
Second Floor Beam (Grid A-A and
2.00 14.20 0.50 0.7 9.94
H-H)
Top Beam (Grid 1-1 and 4-4) 2.00 25.80 0.30 0.3 4.64
Beam (Grid A-A and H-H) 2.00 16.20 0.30 0.3 2.92
9.1.2 Control Building
All columns 10.00 0.50 0.50 7 17.50

First Floor Beam (Grid I-I and J-J) 2.00 15.70 0.30 0.5 4.71

First Floor Beam (Grid 5-5,6-6,7-


5.00 5.40 0.30 0.5 4.05
,7,8-8 and 9-9)

Top Floor Beam (Grid I-I and J-J) 2.00 15.70 0.30 0.355 3.34

Top Floor Beam (Grid 5-5,6-6,7-


5.00 5.40 0.30 0.355 2.88
,7,8-8 and 9-9)
First Floor Slab 1.00 19.60 7.10 0.175 24.35
Second Floor Slab 1.00 19.60 7.10 0.15 20.87
Substructure (Below Machine
9.2
Floor Level 1409.10)
All Foundation in Powerhouse
9.2.1
Main Building
Raft Foundation below Main
1.00 18.20 29.80 3 1627.08
Building Block (1409.1 to 1406.1)

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 34 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Additional Machine foundation
below MIV of Unit-1 (From 1.00 9.10 4.50 1.5 61.43
1406.10 m to 1404.60)
Additional Machine foundation
below MIV of Unit-1 (From 1.00 7.43 4.50 1.5 50.15
1406.10 m to 1404.60)
Deduction for MIV 2.00 4.20 4.50 3 -113.40
Additional Machine foundation
below Turbine Area (Both Unit 1
2.00 7.20 6.98 3.25 326.66
and 2), (From 1406.10 m to
1402.85)
Deduction for Machine Area and
2.00 4.74 1.78 5.24 -88.42
Tailrace Culvert Area
Dedction for Pipe along Unit 1 1.00 14.90 0.50 -7.49
All Foundation in Control Room
9.2.2
Building
Tie Beam (Grid 5-5,6-6,7-7,8-8
5.00 5.40 0.30 0.30 2.43
and 9-9)
Tie Beam (Grid I-I and J-J) 2.00 14.70 0.30 0.30 2.65
Column Foundation from 1409.10
5.00 1.00 0.75 1.3 4.88
to 1407.5 (Grid I-I)
Column Foundation from 1409.10
5.00 1.00 1.00 1.3 6.50
to 1407.5 (Grid J-J)
Column Footing I5 and I9 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.4 1.20
Column Footing (J5 and J9) 2.00 1.50 1.50 0.4 1.80
Column Footing I6,I7,I8 3.00 2.00 1.25 0.4 3.00
Column Footing J6,J7,J8 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.4 4.80
Strap Beam Foundation between
5.00 4.90 0.40 0.4 3.92
Colum Grid I-I and J-J
Base of Stone masonry Wall (River
9.3 96.09 3.95 0.5 189.78
Side)
Base of Stone masonry Wall (Hill
9.4 63.00 3.95 0.5 124.43
Side
Sub-Total 2,525.61
10 Cement Concrete, M35 m3 46.46
Sub-Total 46.46
3
11 Hollow Concrete Block m
Powerhouse Building
Longitudinal wall 4.00 29.80 0.24 13.3 380.49
Transverse wall 4.00 18.20 0.24 13.3 232.38
Deduction
Windows -20.00 3.00 0.24 2.4 -34.56
Main Entrance Door -1.00 5.00 0.24 4.8 -5.76
Column (Grid 1-1 and 4-4) upto
-32.00 0.70 0.24 10.5 -56.45
crane beam
Column (Grid A-A and H-H) upto
-16.00 1.00 0.24 10.5 -40.32
crane beam
Column (Grid 1-1 and 4-4) above
-32.00 0.50 0.24 2.8 -10.75
crane beam
Column (Grid A-A and H-H)above
-16.00 0.50 0.24 2.8 -5.38
crane beam
First Floor Beam (Grid 1-1 and H-
-4.00 24.20 0.24 0.7 -16.26
H)
First and Second Floor Beam (Grid
-8.00 14.20 0.24 0.7 -19.08
A-A and H-H)
Crane Beam (Grid 1-1 and 4-4) -4.00 24.20 0.24 0.85 -19.75

Top Floor Beam (Grid 1-1 and 4-4) -4.00 24.20 0.24 0.3 -6.97

Top Floor Beam (Grid A-A and H-


-8.00 14.20 0.24 0.3 -8.18
H)
Control Building Wall
Longitudinal wall 4.00 6.40 0.24 7 43.01
Transverse wall 4.00 18.20 0.24 7 122.30
Deductions
Windows (Type 1) -2.00 3.00 0.24 2.4 -3.46
Windows (Type 2) -4.00 2.00 0.24 2.40 -4.61

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 35 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Column -20.00 0.50 0.24 7.00 -16.80
First Floor Beam -2.00 47.00 0.24 0.50 -11.28
SecondFloor Beam -2.00 47.00 0.24 0.36 -8.01
Sub-Total 510.56
12 Formwork for concrete works m2
Powerhouse Main Building
12.1
SuperStructures
All Columns upto Crane Beam
40.00 0.70 10.50 294.00
Level (Longitudinal Side)
All Columns upto Crane Beam
40.00 1.00 10.50 420.00
Level (Transverse)
Colum above the crane Beam
40.00 0.50 2.8 56.00
(Longitudinal Side)
Colum above the crane Beam
40.00 0.50 2.8 56.00
(Transvese Side)
Frist Floor Beam 4.00 48.00 0.7 134.40
Frist Floor Beam (Base Portion) 2.00 48.00 0.5 48.00
Crane Beam 4.00 29.80 0.85 101.32
Crane Beam (Base Portion) 2.00 29.80 1 59.60
Second Floor Beam 4.00 18.20 0.7 50.96

Second Floor Beam (Base Region) 2.00 18.20 0.3 10.92

Top Floor Beam 4.00 48.00 0.3 57.60


Top Floor Beam (Base Region) 2.00 48.00 0.3 28.80
Powerhouse Machine
12.2
Foundation
Raft Foundation below Main
Building Block (1409.1 to 1406.1)

Longitudinal Side 2.00 29.80 3.00 178.80


Transverse Side 2.00 18.20 3.00 109.20
Additional Machine foundation
below MIV of Unit-1 (From
1406.10 m to 1404.60)
Longitudinal Side 2.00 9.10 1.50 27.30
Transverse Side 2.00 4.50 1.50 13.50
Additional Machine foundation
below MIV of Unit-1 (From
1406.10 m to 1404.60)
Longitudinal Side 2.00 7.43 1.50 22.29
Transverse Side 2.00 4.50 1.50 13.50
For MIV
Longitudinal Side 2.00 4.20 3 25.20
Transverse Side 2.00 4.50 3 27.00
Additional Machine foundation
below Turbine Area (Both Unit 1
and 2), (From 1406.10 m to
1402.85)
Longitudinal Side 4.00 7.20 3.25 93.60
Transverse Side 4.00 6.98 3.25 90.74
Machine Area
Longitudinal Side 4.00 4.60 5.25 96.60
Transverse Side 4.00 2.00 5.25 42.00
Control Building
12.3
Superstructures
Column
Longitudinal Side 20.00 0.50 7.00 70.00
Transverse Side 20.00 0.50 7.00 70.00
Beam
First Floor Beam 2.00 49.20 0.50 49.20
Second Floor Beam 2.00 49.20 0.36 34.93
Slab 0.00
Base of First Floor Slab 1.00 6.40 18.20 116.48
Base of Second Floor Slab 1.00 6.40 18.20 116.48
12.4 Control Building Foundation

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 36 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Tie Beam 2.00 49.20 0.30 29.52
Base Foundation from Tie beam to
Footing Level (I-I)
Longitudinal Side 10.00 1.00 1.30 13.00
Transverse Side 10.00 0.75 1.30 9.75
Base Foundation from Tie beam to
Footing Level (J-J)
Longitudinal Side 10.00 1.00 1.30 13.00
Transverse Side 10.00 1.00 1.30 13.00
Strap Beam Foundation between
Colum Grid I-I and J-J
Longitudinal Side 10.00 3.90 0.40 15.60
Column Footing I5 and I9
Longitudinal Side 4.00 1.00 0.40 1.60
Transverse Side 4.00 1.50 0.40 2.40
Column Footing (J5 and J9)
Longitudinal Side 4.00 1.50 0.40 2.40
Transverse Side 4.00 1.50 0.40 2.40
Column Footing I6,I7,I8
Longitudinal Side 4.00 1.25 0.40 2.00
Transverse Side 4.00 2.00 0.40 3.20
Column Footing J6,J7,J8
Longitudinal Side 4.00 2.00 0.40 3.20
Transverse Side 4.00 2.00 0.40 3.20

Sub Total 2,628.69


13 Reinforcement Ton 0.75 % of total Concrete 148.70
Sub Total 148.70
Stone Masanory works with 1:4 3
14 m
(cement: sand)
Flood protection wall (Riverside
1.00 96.09 17.52 1683.50
Wall)
Surface drain 1.00 91.90 0.38 34.92
Hill Side Slope Protection Wall 1.00 63.00 14.02 883.26
Sub Total 2,601.68
3
15 Gabion Works m
1.00 63.00 5.00 0.5 157.50
Sub Total 157.50
Structural Steel Truss (Steel
16 Ton
Pipe)
Top Chord (ISNB 88.90 m dia) 8.00 20.50 10.01 kg/m 1.64

Bottom Chord (ISNB 88.90 m dia) 8.00 23.28 10.01 kg/m 1.86

Vertical Struts (ISNB 48.30 mm


8.00 12.59 5.63 kg/m 0.57
dia)

Inclined Strutus (ISNB 60.30 mm) 8.00 21.36 7.89 kg/m 1.35

Purlin (ISNB 114.3 mm dia) 19.00 29.80 14.50 kg/m 8.21


MS Plate 250 x 125 x 6 152.00 0.0015 kg/No. 0.22
Angle Plate (MS Angle 150 x 150
16.00 0.0018 kg/No. 0.03
x 10)
MS Nut 0.10
20 % extra added considering
Sub Total 16.78
wastages and all
2
17 CGI Sheet for Roofing m
1.00 31.20 20.94 653.33
10 % extra added considering
Sub Total 718.66
lapping and wastages
2
18 Plastering works m
Powerhouse Main Building
Longitudinal wall 2.00 29.80 13.30 792.68
Transverse wall 2.00 18.20 13.30 484.12
Deduction
Windows -20.00 3.00 2.40 -144.00
Main Entrance Door -1.00 5.00 4.80 -24.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 37 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Control Room
Longitudinal wall 4.00 6.40 7.00 179.20
Transverse wall 4.00 18.20 7.00 509.60
Deductions
Windows (Type 1) -2.00 3.00 2.40 -14.40
Windows (Type 2) -4.00 2.00 2.40 -19.20
Ceilings 2.00 6.40 18.20 232.96
Sub Total 1,996.96
19 Aluminium Doors
Doors in Control Room Sq.m 4.00 1.00 2.5 10.00
Main Door in Control Room Sq.m 1.00 2.00 2.5 5.00
Sub Total 15.00
20 Aluminium Windows
Window W1 Sq.m 24.00 3.00 2.4 172.80
Window W2 Sq.m 4.00 2.00 2.4 19.20
Sub Total 192.00
2
21 Painting work m
Powerhouse Main Building
Longitudinal wall 2.00 29.80 13.30 792.68
Transverse wall 2.00 18.20 13.30 484.12
Deduction
Windows -20.00 3.00 2.40 -144.00
Main Entrance Door -1.00 5.00 4.80 -24.00
Control Room
Longitudinal wall 4.00 6.40 7.00 179.20
Transverse wall 4.00 18.20 7.00 509.60
Deductions
Windows (Type 1) -2.00 3.00 2.40 -14.40
Windows (Type 2) -4.00 2.00 2.40 -19.20
Ceilings 2.00 6.40 18.20 232.96
Sub Total 1,996.96
2
22 Flooring work m
Powerhouse Main Building 1.00 29.80 18.20 542.36
Control Room 1.00 6.40 18.20 116.48
Sub Total 658.84
23 Screeding And Punnning m2 38 16.00 613.60
Powerhouse Main Building 1.00 29.80 18.20 542.36
Control Room 1.00 6.40 18.20 116.48
Sub Total 613.60
24 PVC water Stopper m 2 45 89.60
Sub Total 89.60
25 Joint Sealants m 2 18 36.40
Sub Total 36.40
Expansion joint Board(Saltax
26 m2 2 18 1.50 54.00
Board)
Sub Total 54.00
27 Rolling Shutter Ls 1 1.00
Sub Total 1.00
28 Grills in Windows kg 300 300.00
Sub Total 300.00
29 Exhaust Fan No 10 10.00
Sub Total 10.00
30 Electrification Works Ls 1 1.00
Sub Total 1.00
31 Sanitary Works Ls 1 1.00
Sub Total 1.00
32 Steel Ladder Ton 1.5 1.50
Sub Total 1.50
33 Dewatering LS 1 1.00
Sub Total 1.00
L TAILRACE CULVERT
1 Site Clearance m2 1 25 4.00 101.20
Earthwork Excavation m3
Along Unit-1 1.00 18.70 18.21 340.53
Along Unit-2 1.00 6.60 13.88 91.61

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 38 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
Sub Total 432.14
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 345.71 0.8
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 43.21 0.1
Breaker
Hard Rock Excavation by
4 43.21 0.1
drilling and blasting
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
5 m3 15 % of Total Quantity 64.82
Soil in 15cm thick layer
2
6 Base Preparation m 1 25 4 101.20

3
8 Blinding Concrete, M15 m
Along Unit 1 1.00 18.70 2.10 0.075 2.95
Along Unit 2 1.00 6.60 2.10 0.075 1.04
Toe Wall at end of tailrace culvert 2.00 1.50 2.10 0.075 0.47
Sub Total 4.46
9 Cement Concrete, M25
Along Unit 1 1.00 18.70 2.16 40.39
Along Unit 2 1.00 6.60 2.16 14.26
Tailrace gate along unit-1 1.00 2.10 2.24 4.70
Tailrace gate along unit-2 1.00 2.10 2.24 4.70
Additional concrete at gate
2.00 2.10 2.10 0.20 1.76
basement
Cutoff wall 2.00 2.10 1.85 7.77
Sub Total 73.59
10 Formwork for concrete works m2
Along Unit 1 4.00 18.70 2.10 157.08
Along Unit 2 4.00 6.60 2.10 55.44
Top slab Unit-1 1.00 18.70 1.50 28.05
Top slab Unit-2 1.00 6.60 1.50 9.90
Tailrace gate front wall along unit-
1 and unit-2 side 8.00 2.10 3.10 52.08
wall(Longitudinal)
Tailrace gate along unit-1 and unit-
8.00 2.10 3.30 55.44
2 side wall(Traverse)
Top slab(Tailrace gate both) 2.00 2.54 2.10 10.67
Sub Total 368.66
11 Reinforcement Ton 78.5 Kg per Cubic meter 5.78
Sub Total 5.78
12 Boulder Riprap m3 1 100 2.00 0.50 100.00
Sub Total 100.00
13 Gabion Works Ls 50.00
Sub Total 50.00
14 PVC Water Stopper m 3.00 6.30 18.90
Sub Total 18.90
15 Joint Sealant m 3.00 2.10 6.30
Sub Total 6.30
Expansion Joint Filler (Saltax
16 m 3.00 6 0.30 5.67
Board)
Sub Total 5.67

Switchyard (Quantity in
M reference to similar sized
projects)
1 Site Clearance m2 20.00 10.00 200.00

Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S


2 m3 26.05
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock
3 m3 5.21
Breaker
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary
4 m3 2.61
Soil
3
5 0.2 m thick Stone Soling m 137.99

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 39 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimates of Quantities
S.No. Description Unit No Length Breadth Height Area Quantity Remarks
3
6 Blinding Concrete, M15 m 17.36
7 Cement Concrete, M20 m3 42.39
3
8 Cement Concrete, M25 m 43.31
3
9 Reinforcement m 17.35
10 Formwork for concrete works m3 257.10

N Valve- House
2
1 Site Clearance m 7.90 6.60 52.14
Sub Total 52.14
Excavation m3 30.56 7.90 241.42
Earthwork Excavation in B.M.S
2 m3 193.14
soil by Hydraulic Excavator
Hard Rock Excavation by Rock 3
3 m 48.28
Breaker
E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary 3
4 m 24.14
Soil
3
5 0.2 m thick Stone Soling m 7.90 6.60 0.2 52.14
6 Blinding Concrete, M15 m3
At base of Footing of all columns 6.00 1.40 1.40 0.075 0.88

Sub Total 0.88


7 Cement Concrete, M25 m3
Column 6.00 0.40 0.40 5.45 5.23
Beam 2.00 14.50 0.30 0.3 2.61
Top Slab 1.00 7.90 6.60 0.125 6.52
Column Footing 6.00 1.40 0.70 5.88
Tie Beam Foundation 2.00 14.50 0.30 0.3 2.61
Concrete Floorworks 1.00 7.90 6.60 0.125 6.52
Sub Total 29.37
3
8 Hollow Block Masonry Wall m
Longitudinal Wall 2.00 7.90 0.25 5.45 21.53
Transverse Wall 2.00 6.60 0.25 5.45 17.99
Deduction (Pipe Area) -2.00 0.25 1.54 -0.77
Deduction (Door) -1.00 2.10 0.25 0.9 -0.47
Shutter Door -1.00 2.10 0.25 3.00 -1.58
Ribbon Window -1.00 0.60 0.25 4.40 -0.66
Sub Total 36.04
9 Reinforcement Ton 2.31
10 Formwork for concrete works m2
Column
Longitudinal Portion 12.00 0.40 5.45 26.16
Transverse Portion 12.00 0.40 0.30 1.44
Beam
Longitudinal Portion 2.00 29.00 0.30 17.40
Top Slab
1.00 7.90 6.60 52.14
Tie Beam
2.00 29.00 0.30 17.40
Column Footing
Above Footing Slab 24.00 0.40 0.7 6.72
Footing Slab 24.00 0.30 0.3 2.16
Sub Total 123.42
11 Aluminium Doors m2
1 2.10 0.90 1.89
Sub Total 1.89
12 Aluminium Windows m2
1 0.60 4.40 2.64
Sub Total 2.64
13 Main Shutter Door
No. 1.00
Sub Total 1.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Quantity Estimate_Civil: 40 of 40 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Support Types for Headrace Tunnel (HRT), (Refer Geological Profile of Headrace
Tunnel)
Rock Support Type Length, m Percentage
Total Length 1209.71
I 110.00 9%
II 200.00 17%
III 250.00 21%
IV 408.83 34%
V 108.97 9%
VI 56.97 5%
VII 74.94 6%
Total 1,209.71 100%

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate
Support Type_Description_Tunnel: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MAVEN PVT LTD Suni Gad Hydropower Project
Structure:(MWRET) QUANTITY Quantity Calculation
Left
Chainage Length Height Area(m2) Volume(m3) Area for Geotextile lining(m2)
A Tunnel outlet Portal to Headworks
0+480 20 2.8 2.88 57.6 56
0+500 20 6 10.6 212 120
TOTAL 269.6 194

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Masonry_Works_Project_Road: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Left Right
Area for Area for
Chainage Length GWBRT Height Area(m2) Volume(m3) Geotextile GWBRT Height Area(m2) Volume(m3) Geotextile
2 2
lining(m ) lining(m )
A Powerhouse to Tunnel outlet Portal
0+100 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000
0+120 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 4.000 6.500 130.000 80.000
0+140 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 4.000 6.500 130.000 80.000
0+160 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000
0+180 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000
0+200 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000
0+220 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
0+300 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000
0+680 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
0+700 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 5.000 9.000 180.000 100.000
0+900 20 GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000 GWRETB - - - -
1+100 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
1+440 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
2+120 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
2+380 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
2+400 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000
2+540 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000
2+620 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
2+640 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
2+820 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000
3+320 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 4.000 6.500 130.000 80.000
3+340 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000
3+400 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 5.000 9.000 180.000 100.000
3+980 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
5+040 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
5+180 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000
8+600 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 4.000 6.500 130.000 80.000
8+620 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
8+760 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 4.000 6.500 130.000 80.000
8+840 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000
8+860 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000
9+200 20 GWRETB - - - - GWRETB 5.000 9.000 180.000 100.000
Sub-Total-B 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000 93.000 147.000 2,940.000 1,860.000
B Tunnel outlet Portal to Headworks
0+040 20 GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000 GWRETB - - - -
0+200 20 GWRETB 4.000 6.500 130.000 80.000 GWRETB - - - -
1+300 20 GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000 GWRETB - - - -
1+340 20 GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000 GWRETB - - - -
1+500 20 GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000 GWRETB - - - -
1+700 20 GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000 GWRETB - - - -
1+840 20 GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000 GWRETB - - - -
2+120 20 GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000 GWRETB - - - -
2+360 20 GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000 GWRETB - - - -
2+400 20 GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000 GWRETB - - - -
2+460 20 GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000 GWRETB - - - -
2+480 20 GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000 GWRETB - - - -
2+500 20 GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000 GWRETB - - - -
2+580 20 GWRETB 4.000 6.500 130.000 80.000 GWRETB - - - -
2+820 20 GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000 GWRETB - - - -
2+900 20 GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000 GWRETB - - - -
2+920 20 GWRETB 2.000 2.500 50.000 40.000 GWRETB - - - -
3+020 20 GWRETB 3.000 5.000 100.000 60.000 GWRETB - - - -
Sub-Total-B 47.000 70.500 1,410.000 940.000
TOTAL OF GWRETB IN M3 4,450.000
TOTAL OF GEOTEXTILE IN M2 3,432.000

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Gabion_Works_Project_Road: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MAVEN PVT LTD Sunigad Hydropower Project


EARTHWORK QUANTITY (Project Road) Quantity Calculation
Base Back fill Back Fill
Str.Cut Mean Cut Base Fill Str.Cut
Chainage Cut Area Fill Area Volume
Area Distance Volume Volume Volume
Area (Structure) (Structure)
A Powerhouse to Tunnel outlet Portal
0+000 4.178 - - - 10 41.775 - - -
0+020 3.572 0.053 - - 20 71.450 1.050 - -
0+040 16.378 - - - 20 327.550 - - -
0+060 12.863 3.155 - - 20 257.250 63.100 - -
0+080 23.725 - - - 20 474.500 - - -
0+100 22.58 1.060 5.855 2.663 20 451.600 21.200 117.100 53.250
0+120 29.44 - - - 20 588.800 - - -
0+140 22.4 - - - 20 448.000 - - -
0+160 20.445 - - - 20 408.900 - - -
0+180 22.158 - - - 20 443.150 - - -
0+200 14.28 - - - 20 285.600 - - -
0+220 22.123 - - - 20 442.450 - - -
0+240 32.503 - - - 20 650.050 - - -
0+260 48.703 - - - 20 974.050 - - -
0+280 37.645 - - - 20 752.900 - - -
0+300 30.81 0.040 - - 20 616.200 0.800 - -
0+320 25.363 - - - 20 507.250 - - -
0+340 38.725 - - - 20 774.500 - - -
0+360 41.228 - - - 20 824.550 - - -
0+380 15.77 0.347 2.303 0.713 20 315.400 6.950 46.050 14.250
0+400 5.378 1.605 6.170 2.535 20 107.550 32.100 123.400 50.700
0+420 29.965 - - - 20 599.300 - - -
0+440 20.863 - - - 20 417.250 - - -
0+460 29.648 - - - 20 592.950 - - -
0+480 67.213 - - - 20 1,344.250 - - -
0+500 37.145 - - - 20 742.900 - - -
0+520 46.405 - - - 20 928.100 - - -
0+540 31.578 - - - 20 631.550 - - -
0+560 46.138 - - - 20 922.750 - - -
0+580 37.368 - - - 20 747.350 - - -
0+600 36.003 - - - 20 720.050 - - -
0+620 39.097 - - - 20 781.950 - - -
0+640 50.53 - - - 20 1,010.600 - - -
0+660 38.26 - - - 20 765.200 - - -
0+680 47.663 0.418 8.745 3.410 20 953.250 8.350 174.900 68.200
0+700 22.463 3.783 9.630 5.295 20 449.250 75.650 192.600 105.900
0+720 111.85 - - - 20 2,237.000 - - -
0+740 132.125 - - - 20 2,642.500 - - -
0+760 73.75 - - - 20 1,475.000 - - -
0+780 38.138 - - - 20 762.750 - - -
0+800 69.865 - - - 20 1,397.300 - - -
0+820 46.498 - - - 20 929.950 - - -
0+840 57.873 - - - 20 1,157.450 - - -
0+860 54.29 - - - 20 1,085.800 - - -
0+880 48.663 - - - 20 973.250 - - -
0+900 23.868 0.780 6.613 3.005 20 477.350 15.600 132.250 60.100
0+920 25.8 0.155 - - 20 516.000 3.100 - -
0+940 111.525 - - - 20 2,230.500 - - -
0+960 104.18 0.003 - - 20 2,083.600 0.050 - -
0+980 44.465 - - - 20 889.300 - - -
1+000 26.765 1.695 - - 20 535.300 33.900 - -
1+020 42.173 - - - 20 843.450 - - -
1+040 37.623 - - - 20 752.450 - - -
1+060 46.875 - - - 20 937.500 - - -
1+080 36.785 - - - 15.24 560.603 - - -
1+090 31.445 - - - 10 164.772 - - -
1+100 9.22 0.313 8.213 3.598 14.76 136.087 4.613 121.217 53.099
1+120 22.56 - - - 20 451.200 - - -
1+140 28.868 - - - 20 577.350 - - -
1+160 24.943 0.045 - - 20 498.850 0.900 - -
1+180 56.983 - - - 20 1,139.650 - - -
1+200 31.023 - - - 20 620.450 - - -
1+220 33.67 - - - 20 673.400 - - -
1+240 15.955 - - - 20 319.100 - - -
1+260 18.163 - - - 20 363.250 - - -
1+280 41.415 - - - 20 828.300 - - -
1+300 27.368 - - - 20 547.350 - - -
1+320 25.608 - - - 20 512.150 - - -
1+340 27.053 - - - 20 541.050 - - -

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Earthworks_Project Road: 1 of 10 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MAVEN PVT LTD Sunigad Hydropower Project


EARTHWORK QUANTITY (Project Road) Quantity Calculation
Base Back fill Back Fill
Str.Cut Mean Cut Base Fill Str.Cut
Chainage Cut Area Fill Area Volume
Area Distance Volume Volume Volume
Area (Structure) (Structure)
1+360 21.055 - - - 20 421.100 - - -
1+380 23.413 - - - 20 468.250 - - -
1+400 20.988 - - - 20 419.750 - - -
1+420 14.118 - - - 20 282.350 - - -
1+440 7.27 0.358 8.035 3.508 20 145.400 7.150 160.700 70.150
1+460 20.093 - - - 20 401.850 - - -
1+480 141.005 - - - 20 2,820.100 - - -
1+500 99.543 - - - 20 1,990.850 - - -
1+520 65.808 - - - 20 1,316.150 - - -
1+540 29.725 - - - 20 594.500 - - -
1+560 50.998 - - - 20 1,019.950 - - -
1+580 25.472 - - - 20 509.450 - - -
1+600 31.535 - - - 20 630.700 - - -
1+620 15.525 0.363 - - 20 310.500 7.250 - -
1+640 22.23 - - - 20 444.600 - - -
1+660 24.95 - - - 20 499.000 - - -
1+680 29.913 - - - 20 598.250 - - -
1+700 15.278 - - - 20 305.550 - - -
1+720 21.595 - - - 20 431.900 - - -
1+740 27.41 - - - 20 548.200 - - -
1+760 18.885 - - - 20 377.700 - - -
1+780 28.753 - - - 20 575.050 - - -
1+800 27.408 - - - 20 548.150 - - -
1+820 17.995 - - - 20 359.900 - - -
1+840 17.158 - - - 20 343.150 - - -
1+860 19.285 - - - 20 385.700 - - -
1+880 18.728 - - - 20 374.550 - - -
1+900 21.715 - - - 20 434.300 - - -
1+920 15.315 0.668 6.738 3.040 20 306.300 13.350 134.750 60.800
1+940 4.365 2.470 4.908 1.793 20 87.300 49.400 98.150 35.850
1+960 65.893 0.003 - - 20 1,317.850 0.050 - -
1+980 133.592 - - - 20 2,671.850 - - -
2+000 96.348 - - - 20 1,926.950 - - -
2+020 51.513 - - - 20 1,030.250 - - -
2+040 16.927 - - - 20 338.550 - - -
2+060 10.043 - - - 20 200.850 - - -
2+080 16.228 - - - 20 324.550 - - -
2+100 20.845 - - - 20 416.900 - - -
2+120 12.963 0.153 9.418 3.758 20 259.250 3.050 188.350 75.150
2+140 8.565 - - - 20 171.300 - - -
2+160 8.903 - - - 20 178.050 - - -
2+180 19.57 - - - 20 391.400 - - -
2+200 14.698 - - - 20 293.950 - - -
2+220 10.443 - - - 20 208.850 - - -
2+240 16.968 - - - 20 339.350 - - -
2+260 13.523 - - - 20 270.450 - - -
2+280 15.3 - - - 20 306.000 - - -
2+300 13.94 0.038 - - 20 278.800 0.750 - -
2+320 16.785 - - - 20 335.700 - - -
2+340 18.48 - - - 20 369.600 - - -
2+360 19.693 - - - 20 393.850 - - -
2+380 6.268 1.183 5.497 2.525 20 125.350 23.650 109.950 50.500
2+400 12.28 0.413 2.095 0.620 20 245.600 8.250 41.900 12.400
2+420 126.948 - - - 20 2,538.950 - - -
2+440 95.103 - - - 20 1,902.050 - - -
2+460 38.64 - - - 20 772.800 - - -
2+480 14.633 - - - 20 292.650 - - -
2+500 14.013 - - - 20 280.250 - - -
2+520 8.533 - - - 20 170.650 - - -
2+540 7.153 0.445 1.785 0.502 20 143.050 8.900 35.700 10.050
2+560 15.293 0.003 - - 20 305.850 0.050 - -
2+580 21.677 - - - 20 433.550 - - -
2+600 23.988 - - - 20 479.750 - - -
2+620 17.03 0.257 8.240 3.753 20 340.600 5.150 164.800 75.050
2+640 21.565 0.445 7.618 3.498 20 431.300 8.900 152.350 69.950
2+660 23.12 - - - 20 462.400 - - -
2+680 76.223 - - - 20 1,524.450 - - -
2+700 84.2 - - - 20 1,684.000 - - -
2+720 28.07 0.003 - - 20 561.400 0.050 - -
2+740 19.898 - - - 20 397.950 - - -

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Earthworks_Project Road: 2 of 10 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MAVEN PVT LTD Sunigad Hydropower Project


EARTHWORK QUANTITY (Project Road) Quantity Calculation
Base Back fill Back Fill
Str.Cut Mean Cut Base Fill Str.Cut
Chainage Cut Area Fill Area Volume
Area Distance Volume Volume Volume
Area (Structure) (Structure)
2+760 19.302 - - - 20 386.050 - - -
2+780 14.428 - - - 20 288.550 - - -
2+800 14.303 - - - 20 286.050 - - -
2+820 7.123 0.078 2.685 0.923 20 142.450 1.550 53.700 18.450
2+840 18.668 - - - 20 373.350 - - -
2+860 30.683 - - - 20 613.650 - - -
2+880 22.148 - - - 20 442.950 - - -
2+900 27.895 - - - 20 557.900 - - -
2+920 12.613 - - - 20 252.250 - - -
2+940 22.74 - - - 20 454.800 - - -
2+960 13.15 - - - 20 263.000 - - -
2+980 14.175 - - - 20 283.500 - - -
3+000 11.54 - - - 20 230.800 - - -
3+020 19.808 - - - 20 396.150 - - -
3+040 11.115 - - - 20 222.300 - - -
3+060 20.145 - - - 20 402.900 - - -
3+080 23.988 0.003 - - 20 479.750 0.050 - -
3+100 19.64 - - - 20 392.800 - - -
3+120 22.73 - - - 20 454.600 - - -
3+140 15.753 - - - 20 315.050 - - -
3+160 32.568 - - - 20 651.350 - - -
3+180 45.28 - - - 20 905.600 - - -
3+200 32.76 - - - 20 655.200 - - -
3+220 20.155 - - - 20 403.100 - - -
3+240 22.767 - - - 20 455.350 - - -
3+260 18.802 - - - 20 376.050 - - -
3+280 13.65 0.003 - - 20 273.000 0.050 - -
3+300 11.785 - - - 20 235.700 - - -
3+320 4.815 1.828 7.768 3.828 20 96.300 36.550 155.350 76.550
3+340 24.735 0.068 2.740 0.943 16.53 408.870 1.116 45.292 15.580
3+353 53.48 0.003 - - 10 185.576 0.009 - -
3+360 65.217 - - - 13.47 878.480 - - -
3+380 76.665 0.003 - - 20 1,533.300 0.050 - -
3+400 30.098 0.968 18.483 9.283 20 601.950 19.350 369.650 185.650
3+420 92.685 - - - 20 1,853.700 - - -
3+440 50.52 - - - 20 1,010.400 - - -
3+460 42.105 - - - 20 842.100 - - -
3+480 23.785 0.023 - - 20 475.700 0.450 - -
3+500 26.788 - - - 20 535.750 - - -
3+520 29.388 - - - 20 587.750 - - -
3+540 40.585 - - - 20 811.700 - - -
3+560 43.36 - - - 20 867.200 - - -
3+580 60.2 - - - 20 1,204.000 - - -
3+600 45.108 - - - 20 902.150 - - -
3+620 51.795 - - - 20 1,035.900 - - -
3+640 44.86 - - - 20 897.200 - - -
3+660 56.395 - - - 20 1,127.900 - - -
3+680 41.433 - - - 20 828.650 - - -
3+700 41.257 - - - 20 825.150 - - -
3+720 45.368 - - - 20 907.350 - - -
3+740 67.45 - - - 20 1,349.000 - - -
3+760 33.11 - - - 20 662.200 - - -
3+780 58.73 0.003 - - 20 1,174.600 0.050 - -
3+800 36.097 - - - 20 721.950 - - -
3+820 46.26 - - - 20 925.200 - - -
3+840 26.693 - - - 20 533.850 - - -
3+860 32.505 - - - 20 650.100 - - -
3+880 37.443 - - - 20 748.850 - - -
3+900 26.91 - - - 20 538.200 - - -
3+920 48.74 - - - 20 974.800 - - -
3+940 26.528 - - - 20 530.550 - - -
3+960 28.525 - - - 20 570.500 - - -
3+980 26.373 0.703 6.850 3.025 20 527.450 14.050 137.000 60.500
4+000 41.315 0.003 - - 20 826.300 0.050 - -
4+020 55.858 0.003 - - 20 1,117.150 0.050 - -
4+040 62.005 - - - 20 1,240.100 - - -
4+060 90.935 - - - 20 1,818.700 - - -
4+080 66.763 - - - 20 1,335.250 - - -
4+100 44.705 - - - 20 894.100 - - -
4+120 46.983 0.015 - - 20 939.650 0.300 - -

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Earthworks_Project Road: 3 of 10 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MAVEN PVT LTD Sunigad Hydropower Project


EARTHWORK QUANTITY (Project Road) Quantity Calculation
Base Back fill Back Fill
Str.Cut Mean Cut Base Fill Str.Cut
Chainage Cut Area Fill Area Volume
Area Distance Volume Volume Volume
Area (Structure) (Structure)
4+140 62.925 - - - 20 1,258.500 - - -
4+160 37.395 - - - 11.025 412.280 - - -
4+162 40.615 - - - 10 364.520 - - -
4+180 51.6 - - - 18.975 979.110 - - -
4+200 74.123 - - - 20 1,482.450 - - -
4+220 74.7 - - - 20 1,494.000 - - -
4+240 84.455 - - - 20 1,689.100 - - -
4+260 44.558 - - - 20 891.150 - - -
4+280 57.82 - - - 20 1,156.400 - - -
4+300 58.99 0.028 - - 20 1,179.800 0.550 - -
4+320 53.88 - - - 20 1,077.600 - - -
4+340 52.638 - - - 20 1,052.750 - - -
4+360 70.628 - - - 20 1,412.550 - - -
4+380 41.775 - - - 20 835.500 - - -
4+400 49.795 - - - 20 995.900 - - -
4+420 26.213 - - - 20 524.250 - - -
4+440 11.165 0.005 - - 20 223.300 0.100 - -
4+460 16.443 - - - 20 328.850 - - -
4+480 14.833 - - - 20 296.650 - - -
4+500 8.298 0.045 - - 20 165.950 0.900 - -
4+520 14.9 0.028 - - 20 298.000 0.550 - -
4+540 21.628 - - - 20 432.550 - - -
4+560 35.653 - - - 20 713.050 - - -
4+580 55.74 - - - 20 1,114.800 - - -
4+600 21.063 - - - 20 421.250 - - -
4+620 34.28 - - - 20 685.600 - - -
4+640 22.722 - - - 20 454.450 - - -
4+660 33.71 - - - 20 674.200 - - -
4+680 44.27 - - - 20 885.400 - - -
4+700 37.038 - - - 20 740.750 - - -
4+720 28.08 - - - 20 561.600 - - -
4+740 25.488 - - - 20 509.750 - - -
4+760 38.275 - - - 20 765.500 - - -
4+780 42.158 - - - 20 843.150 - - -
4+800 30.503 0.120 - - 20 610.050 2.400 - -
4+820 55.84 - - - 20 1,116.800 - - -
4+840 46.573 - - - 20 931.450 - - -
4+860 40.755 - - - 20 815.100 - - -
4+880 52.36 - - - 20 1,047.200 - - -
4+900 76.935 - - - 20 1,538.700 - - -
4+920 67.882 - - - 20 1,357.650 - - -
4+940 50.83 - - - 20 1,016.600 - - -
4+960 42.685 - - - 20 853.700 - - -
4+980 49.078 - - - 20 981.550 - - -
5+000 47.703 0.003 - - 20 954.050 0.050 - -
5+020 82.373 - - - 20 1,647.450 - - -
5+040 44.25 0.028 10.883 3.640 20 885.000 0.550 217.650 72.800
5+060 51.523 - - - 20 1,030.450 - - -
5+080 35.865 - - - 20 717.300 - - -
5+100 52.913 - - - 20 1,058.250 - - -
5+120 38.69 - - - 20 773.800 - - -
5+140 42.12 - - - 20 842.400 - - -
5+160 29.458 - - - 19.095 562.491 - - -
5+178 6.588 - - - 10 5.962 - - -
5+180 11.988 0.035 2.953 1.028 10.905 130.724 0.382 32.197 11.205
5+200 13.57 0.003 - - 20 271.400 0.050 - -
5+220 20.3 - - - 20 406.000 - - -
5+240 35.615 - - - 20 712.300 - - -
5+260 38 - - - 20 760.000 - - -
5+280 26.165 - - - 20 523.300 - - -
5+300 11.06 - - - 20 221.200 - - -
5+320 16.318 - - - 20 326.350 - - -
5+340 22.77 - - - 20 455.400 - - -
5+360 20.015 - - - 20 400.300 - - -
5+380 16.32 0.015 - - 20 326.400 0.300 - -
5+400 22.158 - - - 20 443.150 - - -
5+420 2.518 1.148 - - 20 50.350 22.950 - -
5+440 15.18 - - - 20 303.600 - - -
5+460 5.5 0.768 - - 20 110.000 15.350 - -
5+480 22.048 - - - 20 440.950 - - -

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Earthworks_Project Road: 4 of 10 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MAVEN PVT LTD Sunigad Hydropower Project


EARTHWORK QUANTITY (Project Road) Quantity Calculation
Base Back fill Back Fill
Str.Cut Mean Cut Base Fill Str.Cut
Chainage Cut Area Fill Area Volume
Area Distance Volume Volume Volume
Area (Structure) (Structure)
5+500 13.18 - - - 20 263.600 - - -
5+520 8.618 - - - 20 172.350 - - -
5+540 9.125 - - - 20 182.500 - - -
5+560 26.523 - - - 20 530.450 - - -
5+580 5.39 0.550 - - 20 107.800 11.000 - -
5+600 10.945 0.003 - - 20 218.900 0.050 - -
5+620 23.233 - - - 20 464.650 - - -
5+640 1.215 2.710 - - 20 24.300 54.200 - -
5+660 24.13 - - - 20 482.600 - - -
5+680 46.215 - - - 20 924.300 - - -
5+700 43.62 - - - 20 872.400 - - -
5+720 25.808 - - - 20 516.150 - - -
5+740 41.952 - - - 20 839.050 - - -
5+760 36.568 - - - 20 731.350 - - -
5+780 63.75 - - - 20 1,275.000 - - -
5+800 63.353 - - - 20 1,267.050 - - -
5+820 84.973 - - - 20 1,699.450 - - -
5+840 106.748 - - - 20 2,134.950 - - -
5+860 31.218 0.045 - - 20 624.350 0.900 - -
5+880 44.263 - - - 20 885.250 - - -
5+900 58.198 - - - 20 1,163.950 - - -
5+920 56.453 - - - 20 1,129.050 - - -
5+940 54.3 - - - 20 1,086.000 - - -
5+960 74.713 - - - 20 1,494.250 - - -
5+980 75.5 0.005 - - 20 1,510.000 0.100 - -
6+000 101.913 - - - 20 2,038.250 - - -
6+020 66.928 - - - 20 1,338.550 - - -
6+040 64.13 - - - 20 1,282.600 - - -
6+060 57.363 - - - 20 1,147.250 - - -
6+080 61.03 5.695 - - 20 1,220.600 113.900 - -
6+100 53.873 0.510 - - 20 1,077.450 10.200 - -
6+120 92.77 2.485 - - 20 1,855.400 49.700 - -
6+140 130.168 0.433 - - 20 2,603.350 8.650 - -
6+160 128.963 0.003 - - 20 2,579.250 0.050 - -
6+180 92.03 0.153 - - 20 1,840.600 3.050 - -
6+200 37.055 - - - 10.265 380.370 - - -
6+201 71.063 - - - 10 691.793 - - -
6+220 38.43 - - - 19.735 758.416 - - -
6+240 41.702 - - - 20 834.050 - - -
6+260 20.225 - - - 20 404.500 - - -
6+280 25.78 0.003 - - 20 515.600 0.050 - -
6+300 24.453 - - - 20 489.050 - - -
6+320 21.757 - - - 20 435.150 - - -
6+340 26.023 - - - 20 520.450 - - -
6+360 45.347 - - - 20 906.950 - - -
6+380 34.36 - - - 20 687.200 - - -
6+400 94.358 - - - 20 1,887.150 - - -
6+420 85.448 - - - 20 1,708.950 - - -
6+440 78.603 - - - 20 1,572.050 - - -
6+460 58.583 - - - 20 1,171.650 - - -
6+480 39.865 - - - 20 797.300 - - -
6+500 56.628 - - - 20 1,132.550 - - -
6+520 59.31 - - - 20 1,186.200 - - -
6+540 41.65 - - - 20 833.000 - - -
6+560 73.272 - - - 20 1,465.450 - - -
6+580 109.728 - - - 20 2,194.550 - - -
6+600 88.835 - - - 20 1,776.700 - - -
6+620 56.198 - - - 20 1,123.950 - - -
6+640 41.135 - - - 20 822.700 - - -
6+660 69.333 - - - 20 1,386.650 - - -
6+680 63.83 - - - 20 1,276.600 - - -
6+700 75.733 - - - 20 1,514.650 - - -
6+720 82.123 - - - 20 1,642.450 - - -
6+740 47.528 - - - 20 950.550 - - -
6+760 59.305 - - - 20 1,186.100 - - -
6+780 53.45 - - - 20 1,069.000 - - -
6+800 63.17 - - - 20 1,263.400 - - -
6+820 44.143 0.003 - - 20 882.850 0.050 - -
6+840 26.69 0.003 - - 20 533.800 0.050 - -
6+860 37.895 - - - 20 757.900 - - -

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Earthworks_Project Road: 5 of 10 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MAVEN PVT LTD Sunigad Hydropower Project


EARTHWORK QUANTITY (Project Road) Quantity Calculation
Base Back fill Back Fill
Str.Cut Mean Cut Base Fill Str.Cut
Chainage Cut Area Fill Area Volume
Area Distance Volume Volume Volume
Area (Structure) (Structure)
6+880 31.14 0.003 - - 20 622.800 0.050 - -
6+900 23.993 - - - 20 479.850 - - -
6+920 37.288 - - - 20 745.750 - - -
6+940 42.778 - - - 20 855.550 - - -
6+960 45.382 - - - 20 907.650 - - -
6+980 53.59 - - - 20 1,071.800 - - -
7+000 62.958 - - - 20 1,259.150 - - -
7+020 44.063 - - - 20 881.250 - - -
7+040 98.733 - - - 20 1,974.650 - - -
7+060 92.518 - - - 20 1,850.350 - - -
7+080 72.848 - - - 16.54 1,204.898 - - -
7+093 60.78 - - - 10 210.299 - - -
7+100 73.708 - - - 13.46 992.103 - - -
7+120 63.76 - - - 20 1,275.200 - - -
7+140 70.658 - - - 20 1,413.150 - - -
7+160 109.708 - - - 20 2,194.150 - - -
7+180 61.33 - - - 20 1,226.600 - - -
7+200 75.68 - - - 20 1,513.600 - - -
7+220 29.048 0.153 - - 20 580.950 3.050 - -
7+240 34.632 - - - 20 692.650 - - -
7+260 29.218 - - - 20 584.350 - - -
7+280 23.618 - - - 20 472.350 - - -
7+300 25.8 - - - 20 516.000 - - -
7+320 20.865 - - - 20 417.300 - - -
7+340 27.825 - - - 20 556.500 - - -
7+360 36.393 - - - 20 727.850 - - -
7+380 55.125 - - - 20 1,102.500 - - -
7+400 57.25 - - - 20 1,145.000 - - -
7+420 38.667 - - - 20 773.350 - - -
7+440 84.935 - - - 20 1,698.700 - - -
7+460 80.478 - - - 20 1,609.550 - - -
7+480 66.568 - - - 20 1,331.350 - - -
7+500 60.045 - - - 20 1,200.900 - - -
7+520 86.268 - - - 20 1,725.350 - - -
7+540 70.605 - - - 20 1,412.100 - - -
7+560 51.87 - - - 20 1,037.400 - - -
7+580 39.663 - - - 20 793.250 - - -
7+600 23.6 - - - 20 472.000 - - -
7+620 23.04 - - - 20 460.800 - - -
7+640 31.94 - - - 20 638.800 - - -
7+660 51.955 - - - 20 1,039.100 - - -
7+680 27.765 - - - 20 555.300 - - -
7+700 29.35 - - - 20 587.000 - - -
7+720 65.013 - - - 20 1,300.250 - - -
7+740 103.37 - - - 20 2,067.400 - - -
7+760 85.943 - - - 20 1,718.850 - - -
7+780 47.448 - - - 20 948.950 - - -
7+800 59.34 - - - 20 1,186.800 - - -
7+820 67.985 - - - 20 1,359.700 - - -
7+840 107.348 0.003 - - 20 2,146.950 0.050 - -
7+860 98.77 - - - 20 1,975.400 - - -
7+880 48.153 0.073 16.330 5.615 20 963.050 1.450 326.600 112.300
7+900 81.745 - - - 20 1,634.900 - - -
7+920 98.908 - - - 20 1,978.150 - - -
7+940 55.775 - - - 20 1,115.500 - - -
7+960 46.755 - - - 20 935.100 - - -
7+980 94.863 - - - 20 1,897.250 - - -
8+000 71.397 - - - 20 1,427.950 - - -
8+020 88.555 - - - 20 1,771.100 - - -
8+040 90.23 - - - 20 1,804.600 - - -
8+060 59.358 - - - 20 1,187.150 - - -
8+080 53.55 - - - 11.35 607.793 - - -
8+083 47.425 - - - 10 64.024 - - -
8+100 56.343 - - - 18.65 1,050.788 - - -
8+120 27.093 - - - 20 541.850 - - -
8+140 19.833 - - - 20 396.650 - - -
8+160 25.533 - - - 20 510.650 - - -
8+180 27.458 - - - 20 549.150 - - -
8+200 21.87 0.003 - - 20 437.400 0.050 - -
8+220 17.915 0.058 - - 20 358.300 1.150 - -

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Earthworks_Project Road: 6 of 10 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MAVEN PVT LTD Sunigad Hydropower Project


EARTHWORK QUANTITY (Project Road) Quantity Calculation
Base Back fill Back Fill
Str.Cut Mean Cut Base Fill Str.Cut
Chainage Cut Area Fill Area Volume
Area Distance Volume Volume Volume
Area (Structure) (Structure)
8+240 88.443 1.913 - - 20 1,768.850 38.250 - -
8+260 76.44 - - - 20 1,528.800 - - -
8+280 25.335 - - - 20 506.700 - - -
8+300 45.523 0.003 - - 20 910.450 0.050 - -
8+320 33.987 - - - 20 679.750 - - -
8+340 27.55 - - - 20 551.000 - - -
8+360 29.968 - - - 20 599.350 - - -
8+380 37.75 - - - 20 755.000 - - -
8+400 15.995 - - - 20 319.900 - - -
8+420 30.123 - - - 20 602.450 - - -
8+440 24.99 - - - 20 499.800 - - -
8+460 18.1 - - - 20 362.000 - - -
8+480 31.44 - - - 20 628.800 - - -
8+500 16.267 - - - 20 325.350 - - -
8+520 16.413 0.003 - - 20 328.250 0.050 - -
8+540 52.208 - - - 20 1,044.150 - - -
8+560 55.865 - - - 20 1,117.300 - - -
8+580 33.78 - - - 20 675.600 - - -
8+600 17.587 0.668 10.840 4.935 20 351.750 13.350 216.800 98.700
8+620 18.273 0.208 9.100 3.558 20 365.450 4.150 182.000 71.150
8+640 43.263 - - - 20 865.250 - - -
8+660 30.225 - - - 20 604.500 - - -
8+680 31.13 - - - 20 622.600 - - -
8+700 25.483 - - - 20 509.650 - - -
8+720 0 - - - 20 - - - -
8+740 34.148 - - - 20 682.950 - - -
8+760 11.005 0.498 11.580 5.253 20 220.100 9.950 231.600 105.050
8+780 20.688 - - - 20 413.750 - - -
8+800 32.318 - - - 20 646.350 - - -
8+820 28.545 - - - 20 570.900 - - -
8+840 9.7 0.048 2.930 1.010 20 194.000 0.950 58.600 20.200
8+860 1.588 3.548 3.613 1.185 20 31.750 70.950 72.250 23.700
8+880 39.138 - - - 20 782.750 - - -
8+900 14.465 - - - 20 289.300 - - -
8+920 16.395 - - - 20 327.900 - - -
8+940 21.503 - - - 20 430.050 - - -
8+960 23.078 - - - 20 461.550 - - -
8+980 42.768 - - - 20 855.350 - - -
9+000 48.905 - - - 20 978.100 - - -
9+020 39.613 - - - 20 792.250 - - -
9+040 40.523 - - - 20 810.450 - - -
9+060 31.745 - - - 20 634.900 - - -
9+080 47.178 - - - 20 943.550 - - -
9+100 65.128 - - - 20 1,302.550 - - -
9+120 71.27 - - - 20 1,425.400 - - -
9+140 44.373 - - - 20 887.450 - - -
9+160 42.015 - - - 20 840.300 - - -
9+180 57.283 0.385 - - 20 1,145.650 7.700 - -
9+200 48.995 1.110 18.003 8.175 20 979.900 22.200 360.050 163.500
9+220 73.147 - - - 20 1,462.950 - - -
9+240 58.725 - - - 20 1,174.500 - - -
9+260 66.9 - - - 20 1,338.000 - - -
9+280 85.47 - - - 20 1,709.400 - - -
9+300 89.678 - - - 20 1,793.550 - - -
9+320 67.873 0.005 - - 20 1,357.450 0.100 - -
9+340 61.958 - - - 20 1,239.150 - - -
9+360 74.965 - - - 20 1,499.300 - - -
9+380 73.57 - - - 20 1,471.400 - - -
9+400 80.948 - - - 20 1,618.950 - - -
9+420 121.095 - - - 18.625 2,255.394 - - -
9+437 124.288 - - - 8.625 1,071.980 - - -
Sub-Total-A 20142.667 47.467 226.621 96.617 9437.25 ######### 946.57 4,452.906 1900.734
B Tunnel outlet Portal to Headworks
0+000 66.505 - - - 10 665.050 - - -
0+020 23.552 - - - 20 471.050 - - -
0+040 11.605 0.033 2.820 0.953 20 232.100 0.650 56.400 19.050
0+060 13.193 - - - 20 263.850 - - -
0+080 25.613 - - - 20 512.250 - - -
0+100 20.718 - - - 20 414.350 - - -
0+120 7.838 0.015 - - 20 156.750 0.300 - -

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Earthworks_Project Road: 7 of 10 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MAVEN PVT LTD Sunigad Hydropower Project


EARTHWORK QUANTITY (Project Road) Quantity Calculation
Base Back fill Back Fill
Str.Cut Mean Cut Base Fill Str.Cut
Chainage Cut Area Fill Area Volume
Area Distance Volume Volume Volume
Area (Structure) (Structure)
0+140 9.738 - - - 20 194.750 - - -
0+160 15.653 - - - 20 313.050 - - -
0+180 14.098 - - - 20 281.950 - - -
0+200 10.295 0.103 15.358 5.303 20 205.900 2.050 307.150 106.050
0+220 12.155 - - - 20 243.100 - - -
0+240 14.263 - - - 20 285.250 - - -
0+260 28.375 - - - 20 567.500 - - -
0+280 15.445 - - - 20 308.900 - - -
0+300 27.267 - - - 20 545.350 - - -
0+320 29.698 - - - 20 593.950 - - -
0+340 36.49 - - - 20 729.800 - - -
0+360 14.433 - - - 20 288.650 - - -
0+380 21.763 - - - 20 435.250 - - -
0+400 44.99 - - - 20 899.800 - - -
0+420 29.04 - - - 20 580.800 - - -
0+440 41.478 - - - 20 829.550 - - -
0+460 23.688 - - - 20 473.750 - - -
0+480 0.863 2.493 2.345 0.880 20 17.250 49.850 46.900 17.600
0+500 0 10.935 8.895 3.440 20 - 218.700 177.900 68.800
0+520 27.288 0.670 - - 20 545.750 13.400 - -
0+540 46.965 - - - 20 939.300 - - -
0+560 22.743 - - - 20 454.850 - - -
0+580 19.92 - - - 20 398.400 - - -
0+600 1.975 0.093 - - 20 39.500 1.850 - -
0+620 9.05 - - - 20 181.000 - - -
0+640 21.213 - - - 20 424.250 - - -
0+660 0 9.665 - - 20 - 193.300 - -
0+680 0 - - - 20 - - - -
0+700 22.15 - - - 20 443.000 - - -
0+720 33.243 - - - 20 664.850 - - -
0+740 24.29 - - - 20 485.800 - - -
0+760 25.722 - - - 20 514.450 - - -
0+780 32.998 - - - 20 659.950 - - -
0+800 33.52 - - - 20 670.400 - - -
0+820 21.218 - - - 20 424.350 - - -
0+840 21.355 - - - 20 427.100 - - -
0+860 15.103 - - - 20 302.050 - - -
0+880 4.12 0.010 - - 20 82.400 0.200 - -
0+900 2.643 0.025 - - 20 52.850 0.500 - -
0+920 22.203 - - - 20 444.050 - - -
0+940 18.54 - - - 20 370.800 - - -
0+960 22.455 - - - 20 449.100 - - -
0+980 24.938 - - - 20 498.750 - - -
1+000 40.68 - - - 20 813.600 - - -
1+020 33.388 - - - 20 667.750 - - -
1+040 58.978 - - - 20 1,179.550 - - -
1+060 69.618 - - - 20 1,392.350 - - -
1+080 51.885 - - - 20 1,037.700 - - -
1+100 84.31 - - - 20 1,686.200 - - -
1+120 88.285 - - - 20 1,765.700 - - -
1+140 56.89 - - - 20 1,137.800 - - -
1+160 9.555 - - - 20 191.100 - - -
1+180 25.87 - - - 20 517.400 - - -
1+200 17.038 - - - 20 340.750 - - -
1+220 31.28 - - - 20 625.600 - - -
1+240 39.923 - - - 20 798.450 - - -
1+260 34.025 - - - 20 680.500 - - -
1+280 34.188 - - - 20 683.750 - - -
1+300 9.613 0.148 2.483 0.838 20 192.250 2.950 49.650 16.750
1+320 20.443 - - - 20 408.850 - - -
1+340 9.387 0.865 6.320 2.868 20 187.750 17.300 126.400 57.350
1+360 10.185 - - - 20 203.700 - - -
1+380 30.713 - - - 20 614.250 - - -
1+400 12.293 0.003 - - 20 245.850 0.050 - -
1+420 32.81 - - - 20 656.200 - - -
1+440 28.023 - - - 20 560.450 - - -
1+460 16.555 - - - 20 331.100 - - -
1+480 8.825 - - - 20 176.500 - - -
1+500 0.33 2.408 4.535 1.665 20 6.600 48.150 90.700 33.300
1+520 16.085 - - - 20 321.700 - - -

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Earthworks_Project Road: 8 of 10 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MAVEN PVT LTD Sunigad Hydropower Project


EARTHWORK QUANTITY (Project Road) Quantity Calculation
Base Back fill Back Fill
Str.Cut Mean Cut Base Fill Str.Cut
Chainage Cut Area Fill Area Volume
Area Distance Volume Volume Volume
Area (Structure) (Structure)
1+540 19.17 - - - 20 383.400 - - -
1+560 6.79 0.185 - - 20 135.800 3.700 - -
1+580 18.18 - - - 20 363.600 - - -
1+600 3.985 0.033 - - 20 79.700 0.650 - -
1+620 9.118 - - - 20 182.350 - - -
1+640 20.835 - - - 20 416.700 - - -
1+660 23.53 - - - 20 470.600 - - -
1+680 22.785 - - - 20 455.700 - - -
1+700 11.193 0.015 3.040 1.000 20 223.850 0.300 60.800 20.000
1+720 41.478 - - - 20 829.550 - - -
1+740 33.74 - - - 20 674.800 - - -
1+760 76.995 - - - 20 1,539.900 - - -
1+780 30.15 - - - 20 603.000 - - -
1+800 12.428 - - - 20 248.550 - - -
1+820 25.133 - - - 20 502.650 - - -
1+840 10.653 0.140 2.330 0.815 20 213.050 2.800 46.600 16.300
1+860 27.543 - - - 20 550.850 - - -
1+880 25.318 - - - 20 506.350 - - -
1+900 19.075 - - - 20 381.500 - - -
1+920 33.3 - - - 20 666.000 - - -
1+940 19.693 - - - 20 393.850 - - -
1+960 13.358 - - - 20 267.150 - - -
1+980 9.868 - - - 20 197.350 - - -
2+000 1.903 1.888 - - 20 38.050 37.750 - -
2+020 56.863 - - - 20 1,137.250 - - -
2+040 31.793 - - - 20 635.850 - - -
2+060 55.678 - - - 20 1,113.550 - - -
2+080 37.038 - - - 20 740.750 - - -
2+100 25.945 0.015 - - 20 518.900 0.300 - -
2+120 37.47 1.563 1.233 0.170 20 749.400 31.250 24.650 3.400
2+140 38.908 - - - 20 778.150 - - -
2+160 56.283 - - - 20 1,125.650 - - -
2+180 32.327 - - - 20 646.550 - - -
2+200 21.538 - - - 20 430.750 - - -
2+220 33.718 - - - 20 674.350 - - -
2+240 46.828 - - - 20 936.550 - - -
2+260 47.76 - - - 20 955.200 - - -
2+280 33.243 - - - 20 664.850 - - -
2+300 37.853 - - - 20 757.050 - - -
2+320 22.555 - - - 20 451.100 - - -
2+340 13.723 - - - 20 274.450 - - -
2+360 10.458 0.150 2.308 0.798 20 209.150 3.000 46.150 15.950
2+380 19.32 - - - 20 386.400 - - -
2+400 5.483 0.563 7.075 3.165 20 109.650 11.250 141.500 63.300
2+420 19.068 - - - 20 381.350 - - -
2+440 14.443 - - - 20 288.850 - - -
2+460 6.78 0.908 6.940 2.890 20 135.600 18.150 138.800 57.800
2+480 8.88 0.200 9.895 3.443 20 177.600 4.000 197.900 68.850
2+500 10.108 0.005 13.340 3.855 20 202.150 0.100 266.800 77.100
2+520 13.243 - - - 20 264.850 - - -
2+540 27.81 - - - 20 556.200 - - -
2+560 31.313 - - - 20 626.250 - - -
2+580 14.445 0.190 15.215 5.433 20 288.900 3.800 304.300 108.650
2+600 42.825 - - - 20 856.500 - - -
2+620 81.478 - - - 20 1,629.550 - - -
2+640 61.928 - - - 20 1,238.550 - - -
2+660 24.163 - - - 20 483.250 - - -
2+680 32.17 - - - 20 643.400 - - -
2+700 18.203 - - - 20 364.050 - - -
2+720 14.005 - - - 20 280.100 - - -
2+740 42.798 - - - 20 855.950 - - -
2+760 27.595 - - - 20 551.900 - - -
2+780 44.358 - - - 20 887.150 - - -
2+800 21.28 - - - 20 425.600 - - -
2+820 6.268 1.500 0.403 0.078 20 125.350 30.000 8.050 1.550
2+840 12.642 - - - 20 252.850 - - -
2+860 17.36 - - - 20 347.200 - - -
2+880 14.075 - - - 20 281.500 - - -
2+900 4.02 0.745 1.225 0.285 20 80.400 14.900 24.500 5.700
2+920 7.165 0.083 2.822 0.988 20 143.300 1.650 56.450 19.750

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Earthworks_Project Road: 9 of 10 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE MAVEN PVT LTD Sunigad Hydropower Project


EARTHWORK QUANTITY (Project Road) Quantity Calculation
Base Back fill Back Fill
Str.Cut Mean Cut Base Fill Str.Cut
Chainage Cut Area Fill Area Volume
Area Distance Volume Volume Volume
Area (Structure) (Structure)
2+940 25.405 - - - 20 508.100 - - -
2+960 18.41 - - - 20 368.200 - - -
2+980 11.438 - - - 20 228.750 - - -
3+000 2.795 - - - 20 55.900 - - -
3+020 0.063 2.135 6.133 2.450 20 1.250 42.700 122.650 49.000
3+040 16.15 - - - 20 323.000 - - -
3+060 13.585 - - - 20 271.700 - - -
3+080 3.78 - - - 20 75.600 - - -
3+100 5.477 0.590 - - 20 109.550 11.800 - -
3+120 13.588 - - - 20 271.750 - - -
3+140 24.193 - - - 20 483.850 - - -
3+160 35.54 - - - 20 710.800 - - -
3+180 81.088 0.045 - - 20 1,621.750 0.900 - -
3+200 106.113 0.180 - - 20 2,122.250 3.600 - -
3+220 245.425 0.003 - - 20 4,908.500 0.050 - -
3+240 163.798 0.310 2.550 0.315 20 3,275.950 6.200 51.000 6.300
3+260 46.863 - - - 20 937.250 - - -
3+280 4.767 2.148 - - 20 95.350 42.950 - -
3+300 7.46 - - - 20 149.200 - - -
3+320 2.112 0.010 - - 10 21.125 0.100 - -
Sub-Total -B 4531.061 41.07 117.265 41.632 3320 89934.325 821.15 2345.25 832.550
Total of A&B 24673.728 88.537 343.886 138.249 12757.25 483719.183 1767.72 6798.156 2733.284

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Earthworks_Project Road: 10 of 10 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Transportation cost for unit material upto project site (Civil Works)
S.N Description Distance/Type Cost/unit Remarks
1 Transportation from Kathmandu to Project site (Materials Easy for transportation)
Dhangadi to Chainpur Rs 2.4/100kg Black top road 272km 6.528
Chainpur to Power house Rs 3.85 /100kg Earthen road 15 km by truck/tractor 0.5775
PH to HW Rs 0.15/kg Eathen road 8 km by truck/tractor 0.15
Local handling 0.25/kg
Transportation upto power House 7.3555
Transportation upto Alignment 7.4305
Transportation upto Headworks 7.5055

2 Transportation from Quarry Khola to Project site


Quarry Site to PH Rs 0.15/kg Earthen road could be constructed easily 0.15
Quarry Site toHW Rs 0.15/kg Earthen road could be constructed easily 0.15

Transportation upto power House 0.15


Transportation upto Alignment 0.15
Transportation upto Headworks 0.15

3 Transportation from Dhangadi to Project site (Materials Difficult for transportation)


Dhangadi to Chainpur Rs 5.2/100kg Black top road 272 km 14.144
Chainpur to Power house site Rs. 7.85/100kg Earthen road 15 km by truck/tractor 1.1775
Power house site to HW site Rs. 0.15/kg Earthen road 8km by truck/tractor 0.15
Local handling @ 0.5/kg
Transportation upto power House 15.8215
Transportation upto Alignment 15.8965
Transportation upto Headworks 15.9715

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Transportaion cost: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Unit Rate of Material at Project Site


1. Cement (per Bag)
S. No. Descriptions Rate (Rs) Remarks
Rate at Dhangadi 750.0 Rate without VAT
b Transportation from Dhangadi to Project Site 375.28 @ NRs 4/kg
Total (a+b) 1,125.3
Rate of Cement/Bag at Project Site 1,125.3 Per bag

2. Sand (per Cub.m.)


S. No. Descriptions Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Labour Charge for Collection, Sieving,Cleaning
and Stacking at Quarry Site D/S PH 290.00 NRs 30 /cft
b Transportation from Quarry site to Project Site 210.24
Total (a+b+c) 500.24
Rate of Sand/Cub.m. at Project Site 500.24

3. Aggregates (per Cub.m.)


S. No. Descriptions Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Labour Charge for Stone Breaking, Collection,
Seiving and Stacking at Quarry within 10m
distance 500.00 Rs 35/cft
b Transportation from Crusher to Project Site 210.24
Total (a+b+c) 710.2
Rate of Aggregate/Cub.m. at Project Site 710.2

4. Boulder (per Cub.m.)


S. No. Descriptions Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Labour Charge for Boulder Collection, Dressing,
Chiseling and Stacking at Quarry within 10m
distance 529.80 15Rs/CFT
b Transportation from Quarry to Project Site 210.24
Total (a+b+c) 740.04
Rate of Boulder/Cub.m. at Project Site 740.04

5. Impervious Clay Material (per Cub.m.)


S. No. Descriptions Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Labour Charge for Impervious Material Collection
and Stacking at Quarry Site within 10m distance 600.0 1.0 md
b Transportation of Material from 250m far borrow pit
for 10.0m lead 210.24
Total (a+b) 810.24
Rate of Imp. Clay/Cub.m. at Project Site 810.24

6. Pervious Material/River Gravel (per Cub.m.)


S. No. Descriptions Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Labour Charge for Impervious Material Collection
and Stacking at Quarry site within 10m distance 420.00 0.70 md
b Transportation of Material from 300m far borrow pit
for 10.0m lead 210.24
Total (a+b) 630.24
Rate of Per. Clay/Cub.m. at Project Site 630.24

7. Reinforcement Steel Bar (per Kg)


S. No. Descriptions Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 77.00 tentative
b Transportation from Dhangadi to Project Site 15.97
Total (a+b) 92.97
Rate of Steel Bar/Kg at Project Site 92.97

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Materials_Cost: 1 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Unit Rate of Material at Project Site


8. 26 Gauge Colour CGI Sheet (per sqm)
S. No. Descriptions Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 12,000.0
b Transportation from Dhangadi to Project Site 1,797.91 1 Bundle = 112.57 Kg, 4.0 Rs/kg
Total (a+b) 13,797.91
Rate of CGI Sheet/Bundle at Project Site 13,797.91 1 Bundle = 19.75 Sq. m.
Rate of CGI Sheet/Sq.m. at Project Site 698.63

9. Hard Wood (per Cub.m.)


S. No. Descriptions Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Material Cost at Site 35,970
b Transportation Cost 1,766.00 Rs. 50.00/Cub.Ft.
Total (a+b) 37,736
Rate of Saalwood/Cub.m.at Project Site 37,736
Rate of Saalwood /Cub.Ft.at Project Site 1,068.40

10. Local Wood (per Cub.m.)(Salla- Pinewood)


S. No. Descriptions Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Material Cost at Site 33,790.00
b Transportation Cost 1,766.00 Rs. 50/Cub.Ft.
Total (a+b) 35,556.00
Rate of Saalwood/Cub.m.at Project Site 35,556.00
Rate of Saalwood /Cub.Ft.at Project Site 1,006.68

11. G.I. Wire for Gabion Boxes (per Kg)


S. No. Descriptions Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 105.00 without VAT
b Transportation from Dhangadi to Project Site 15.97
Total (a+b) 120.97
Rate of G.I Wire/Kg at Project Site 120.97

12. Binding Wire (per Kg)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 105.00
b Transportation from Kathmanduto Project Site 15.97
Total (a+b) 120.97
Rate of G.I Wire/Kg at Project Site 120.97

13. 14 SWG Barded Wire (per Kg)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 105.00
b Transportation from Kathmanduto Project Site 15.97
Total (a+b) 120.97
Rate of Barbed Wire/Kg at Project Site 120.97

14. Nail (per Kg)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 150
b Transportation from Dhangadi to Project Site 15.97 0
Total (a+b) 165.97
Rate of Nail/Kg at Project Site 165.97

15. Enamel Paint (per Liter)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 500.00
b Transportation from Dhangadi to Project Site 7.51
Total (a+b) 507.51
Rate of Enamel Paint/Ltr at Project Site 507.51

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Materials_Cost: 2 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Unit Rate of Material at Project Site


16. Water Proof Cement Paint (Kg)
S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 105.00
b Transportation from Dhangadi to Project Site 7.51
Total (a+b) 112.51
Rate of Water Proof Cement Paint/Kg at Project Site 112.51

17. 300mm PVC Water Stop (per m)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 1,200.00
b Transportation from Dhangadi to Project Site 25.00 Lump Sum
Total (a+b+c) 1,225.00
Rate of PVC Water Stop/m at Project Site 1,225.00

18. Cost of supply of Diesel Fuel to Site ( per litre)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate Near Local Petrol Pump 85.00
b Local Transportation 7.51 0
Total (a+b+c) 92.51
Per Liter Rate 92.51

19. Cost of supply of Petrol to Site ( per litre)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 98.00
b Local Transportation 7.51 0
Total (a+b+c) 105.51
Per Liter Rate 105.51

20. Cost of supply of Kerosene to Site ( per litre)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 76.00
b Local Transportation 7.51 0
Total (a+b+c) 83.51
Per Liter Rate 83.51

21. Cost of supply Admixure per kg


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 700.00
b Transportation from Dhangadi to Project Site 7.51
Total (a+b+c) 707.51
Per kg Rate 707.51

22. Cost of supply of Block ( per no)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Chainpur 30.00
b Local Transportation 2.89
Total (a+b+c) 32.89
Per no Rate 32.89

23. Cost of supply of brick per no


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 17.00
b Transportation from Dhnagadi to Project Site 1.44
Total (a+b+c) 18.44
Per no Rate 18.44

24. Gelatin (per Kg)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Kathmandu 200.00 Rs. 300/Kg
b Transportation from Kathmandu to Project Site 23.10
c Expenditure for Security Personnel 100.00 50% of a
Total (a+b+c) 323.10
Rate of Gelatin/Kg at Project Site 323.10

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Materials_Cost: 3 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Unit Rate of Material at Project Site


25. Detonator (per No.)
S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Kathmandu 24.00 Rs.20.00/No.
b Transportation from Kathmandu to Project Site 12.00 (50% of a)
c Expenditure for Security Personnel 12.00 50% of a
Total (a+b+c) 48.00
Rate of Detonator/no at Project Site 48.00

26. Fuse Wire (per m)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Kathmandu 5.00 Rs. 4.5
b Transportation from Kathmandu to Project Site 2.50 (50% of a)
c Expenditure for Security Personnel 2.50 50% of a
Total (a+b+c) 10.00
Rate of Fuse Wire/mtr at Project Site 10.00

27. Machine made Gabion Box (Sq.M)


S. No. Description Rate (Rs) Remarks
a Rate at Dhangadi 261.00 Ref_ Kathamdu rate
b Transportation from Kathmandu to Project Site 19.32 0.00518
Total (a+b) 280.32
Rate of machine made gabion box @ Project Site 280.32

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Materials_Cost: 4 of 4 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Basic Rates for Rate Analysis
SN Type Unit Rate (NRs) Remarks
Manpower Rate (As per District Rate
A 2075-76)
1 Foreman 1 manday 700.0 8 Hrs/Day
2 Blaster 1 manday 850.0 8 Hrs/Day
3 Skilled Labour 1 manday 850.0 8 Hrs/Day
4 Unskilled Labour 1 manday 600.0 8 Hrs/Day
5 Excavator Operator 1 manday 900.0 8 Hrs/Day
6 Foreman S/W Hr 87.50
7 Supervisor S/W Hr 106.25
8 Skilled Labour S/W Hr 106.25
9 Semi Skilled Labour S/W Hr 90.63
10 Unskilled labour S/W Hr 75.00
11 Blaster Hr 106.25
B. Material Rate
1 Cement 1 Bag 1,125.28 53 grade OPC
1.1 Cement 1 Mt 22,505.50
2 Sand 1 Cub.m. 500.24
3 Aggregates 1 Cub.m. 710.24
4 Admixture Kg 707.51
5 Bond Stone 1 Cub.m. 925.05
6 Block Stone Cu m 777.04
7 Block 1 No. 32.89
8 Brick 1 No. 18.44
9 River Stone Cu m 740.04
300mmx300mm x 50mm thick
10 pitching stone No. 39.95
11 River Gravel 1 Cub.m. 630.24
12 Reinforcement bars 1 Kg 92.97
13 C.G.I. Sheet (26 gauge) Sq. m. 698.63
14 Saal Wood 1 Cub.m. 40,500
15 Local Wood 1 Cub.m. 32,300
16 Plywood Sq. m. 620.00
17 G.I.Wire 1 Kg 120.97
B. Material Rate
18 Binding Wire 1 Kg 120.97
19 Nail 1 Kg 165.97
20 Enamel 1 Ltr 165.97
21 Water Proof Cement Paint 1 Kg 112.51
22 Primer 1 Lit. 270.00
23 Holdfast 250mm nos. 35.00
24 Screw nos. 1.50
25 Hinges 4" nos. 15.00
26 Chheskini nos. 20.00
27 Locking set nos. 100.00
28 Handle nos. 50.00
29 4mm Glass Sq. m. 440.00
30 Listy rm 35.00
31 Nut Bolts nos. 21.00
32 J-Hook nos. 20.00
33 Bitumen Washer nos. 4.00
34 300mm Water Stop rm 1,225.00
35 Joint Sealent kg 900.00
36 Saltax Board for Joint filler Sq. m. 1,750.00
37 Joint Sealent kg 900.00
38 Saltax Board for Joint filler Sq. m. 1,750.00
39 Detonator No. 48.00
40 Mesh wire 12 BWG Medium Quality Kg 120.97
41 Mesh Wire 10 SWG Medium Quality Kg 120.97
42 Salvage Wire 8 SWG Medium Quality Kg 120.97
43 Diesel Fuel Ltr 92.51
44 Petrol Fuel Ltr 105.51
45 Kerosene Ltr 83.51
46 50mm dia. HDPE pipe rm 150.00 Panchakanya
47 Geotextile Per m2 278.00 Including rolling
48 Nepolite Kg 255.00
49 Fuse Wire md 10.00
50 Water Ltr 0.12

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 1 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


51 Hume Pipe(900 mm dia LP3 Nos 16215 DOR
52 Machine made Gabion Box m2 280.32
C Equipment Rate
1 Excavator Day 2,200 NRs2200 Without Operator,Fuel,
2 Concrete Mixer hr 619 Nrs 4950 Without Operator, fuel
3 Vibrator (Concrete Needle Vibrator) hr 96
4 Air Compressor and Drill hr 550
5 Portable Rock Drill hr 110
6 Crane (15 T capacity) hr 2,100
7 Vibrating Roller hr 1,400
8 Grader hr 2,200
9 Loader hr 1,600
10 Water bowser hr 635

Des. of item: 1. Clearing of Grass,Removing Roots Breaking sods,Levelling the


Surface And Disposal to 10m Unit : 1 Sq.m.

Ref: DOR_Activity N0. 2.02_Spec. Clause No. 201


S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md
Unskilled md 0.02 600.00 13.80

Sub Total 13.80


B Materials

Sub Total -
C Equipments
3% 0.41

Sub Total 0.41


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 14.21
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 2.13
G Total of (E+ F) 16.35
Rate per Unit 16.35

Des. of item: 2. Earthwork Excavation in soil/Gravels/BMS including disposal


upto 10 m and lift upto 1.5 m etc. all complete as per specification Unit : 1 Cu.m.
A. Manually Ref: DOR_Activity N0. 9.01.01_Spec. Clause No. 905 (a)
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md
Unskilled md 1.0 600.00 600.00

Sub Total 600.00


B Materials

Sub Total -
C Equipments
Machine and Tools 3% of A @ 3% 18.00

Sub Total 18.00


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 618.00
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 92.70
G Total of (E+ F) 710.70
Rate per Unit 710.70

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 2 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works

B. Using hydraulic Excavator (0.9 cum bucket capacity


@ 60cum per hour Ref: DOR_Activity N0. 9.01.02_Spec. Clause No. 905 (a)
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md
Operator md 0.0 900.00 5.40

Sub Total 5.40


B Materials
Fuel (Dieseal) Lt 0.34 92.51 31.45

Sub Total 31.45


C Equipments
Excavator hr 0.017 2,200 37.40

Sub Total 37.40


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 74.25
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 11.14
G Total of (E+ F) 85.39
Rate per Unit 85.39
Adopted rate for unit item 2 (10 % manual and 90% by excavator) 147.92

Des. of item: 3. Earthwork Excavation in ordinary rock including disposal upto 10


m and lift upto 1.5 m etc. all complete as per specification Unit : 1 Cu.m.

A. Manually Ref: DOR_Activity N0. 9.01.01_Spec. Clause No. 905 (b)


S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md
Unskilled md 2.75 600.00 1,650.00

Sub Total 1,650.00


B Materials

Sub Total -
C Equipments
Machine and Tools 3% of A @ 3% 49.50

Sub Total 49.50


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 1,699.50
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 254.93
G Total of (E+ F) 1,954.43
Rate per Unit 1,954.43

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 3 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works

B. Using hydraulix Excavator (0.9 cum


bucket capacity @ 60cum per hour Ref: DOR_Activity N0. 9.01.02_Spec. Clause No. 905 (b)
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md
Operator md 0.01 900.00 5.40

Sub Total 5.40


B Materials

Fuel (Dieseal) lt 0.5 92.51 46.25


Sub Total 46.25
C Equipments
Excavator Hr 0.025 2,200 55.00

Sub Total 55.00


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 106.65
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 16.00
G Total of (E+ F) 122.65
Rate per Unit 122.65
Adopted rate for unit item 2 (10 % manual and 90% by excavator) 305.83

Des. of item: 4. Earthwork Excavation in hard rock including disposal upto 10 m


and lift upto 1.5 m etc. all complete as per specification Unit : 1 Cu.m.

4.A. Using excavator with rock breaker Ref: DOR_Activity N0. 9.01.02_Spec. Clause No. 905 (c)
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower

Foreman md
Skilled md 0.01 850.00 8.50
Operator md 0.30 600.00 180.00
Sub Total 188.50
B Materials

Fuel (Diesel) Lt 0.5 92.51 46.25

Sub Total 46.25


C Equipments
Excavator with rock breaker Hr 0.17 2200 374.00

Sub Total 374.00


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 608.75
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 91.31
G Total of (E+ F) 700.07
Rate per Unit 700.07

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 4 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Ref: DOR_Activity N0. 9.01.01_Spec. Clause
4.B1. With blasting using manual drilling No. 905 (d) (ii) (I)
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Unskilled md 3.50 600.00 2,100.00
Blaster md 0.10 850.00 85.00
Sub Total 2,185.00
B Materials
Nepolite Kg 0.25 255.00 63.75
Detonator No. 2 48.00 96.00
Fuse m 2.00 10.00 20.00
Sub Total 179.75
C Equipments
Machine and Tools 3% of A @ 3% 65.55

Sub Total 65.55


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 2,430.30
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 364.55
G Total of (E+ F) 2,794.85
Rate per Unit 2,794.85

Ref: DOR_Activity N0. 9.01.01_Spec. Clause


4.B2. With blasting using mechanical drilling No. 905 (d) (ii) (II)
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Unskilled md 1.50 600.00 900.00
Blaster md 0.10 850.00 85.00
Sub Total 985.00
B Materials
Nepolite Kg 0.25 255.00 63.75
Detonator No. 2 48.00 96.00
Fuse m 2.00 10.00 20.00
Sub Total 179.75
C Equipments
Portable rock Drill Hr 1 110 110.00
Sub Total 110.00
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 0 1,274.75
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 191.21
G Total of (E+ F) 1,465.96
Rate per Unit 1,465.96

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 5 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item: 5. Earthwork Excavation shallow water foundation Unit : 1 Cu.m.
including disposal upto 10.0m lead and 1.5m lift Ref:DOI2002-E/W-22
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md
Unskilled md 2.50 600.00 1,500.00
Sub Total 1,500.00
B Materials

Sub Total -
C Equipments
Machine and Tools 3% of A @ 3% 45.00

Sub Total 45.00


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 1,545.00
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 231.75
G Total of (E+ F) 1,776.75
Rate per Unit 1,776.75

Des. of item: 6. E/W in Backfilling by Ordinary Soil in 15cm thick layer and Unit : 1 Cu.m.
compaction with sprinkling of water, haulage distance 10m. Ref:DOI2002-E/W-25
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md
Unskilled md 0.50 600.00 300.00
Sub Total 300.00
B Materials

Sub Total -
C Equipments
Machine and Tools 3% of A @ 3% 9.00

Sub Total 9.00


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 309.00
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 46.35
G Total of (E+ F) 355.35
Rate per Unit 355.35

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 6 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item: 7. Dry Stone Solling Unit : 1 Cu.m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.25 850.00 212.50
Unskilled md 0.50 600.00 300.00
Sub Total 512.50
B Materials
Stone m3 1.100 925.05 1,017.55

Sub Total 1,017.55


C Equipments
Machine and Tools 3% of A @ 3% 15.38

Sub Total 15.38


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 1,545.43
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 231.81
G Total of (E+ F) 1,777.24
Rate per Unit 1,777.24

Des. of item: 8. Laying 15cm thick filter layer of 10 mm to 20 mm, stone


aggregates incl. haulage up to 10 m and lift up to 1.5m Unit : 1 Cu.m.
Ref:DOI2002-CL-23-2
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.44 850.00 374.00
Unskilled md 0.66 600.00 396.00
Sub Total 770.00
B Materials
Stone aggregates m3 1.000 852.29 852.29

Sub Total 852.29


C Equipments

Sub Total
D Others

Sub Total
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 1,622.29
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 243.34
G Total of (E+ F) 1,865.63
Rate per Unit 1,865.63

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 7 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item: 9. Boulder Riprap, 1 m dia. Unit : 1 Cu.m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.70 850.00 595.00
Unskilled md 2.10 600.00 1,260.00
Sub Total 1,855.00
B Materials
Boulder m3 1.100 925.05 1,017.55
Diesel Lt 2.50 92.51 231.26

Sub Total 1,248.82


C Equipments
Crane (15 t) capacity hr 0.15 2100.00 315.00

Sub Total 315.00


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 3,418.82
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 512.82
G Total of (E+ F) 3,931.64
Rate per Unit G 3,931.64

Des. of item : 10. River Gravel Packing Unit: Cu.m.


S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md
Unskilled md 1.10 600.00 660.00

Sub Total 660.00


B Materials

Gravel m3 0.850 630.24 535.70


Sand m3 0.300 500.24 150.07
Sub Total 685.77
C Equipments
3% of Total A 19.80

Sub Total 19.80


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 1,365.57
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 204.84
G Total of (E+ F) 1,570.41
Rate per Unit G 1,570.41

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 8 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item: 11. Providing and laying Random rubble stone masonry in cement
mortar including scaffolding, curing, preparation of mortar etc.complete,masoned
height0-5m,lead 30m (machine mixing) mortar 35% Unit : 1 Cu.m.
11.1. Stone Masanry with cement mortar 1:6 Ref_DOR_ActivityNo.26.05_Spec. Clause: 2600
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 2.00 850.00 1,700.00
Unskilled md 3.50 600.00 2,100.00
Sub Total 3,800.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.105 22,505.50 2,363.08
Sand m3 0.5 500.24 250.12
Stone m3 1.150 925.05 1,063.80
Water lt 70.000 0.12 8.40
Dieseal lt 1.000 92.51 92.51
3,777.91
C Equipments
Concrete Mixer (0.28/0.20 m3) hr 0.15 619 92.81

Sub Total 92.81


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 7,670.72
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,150.61
G Total of (E+ F) 8,821.33
Rate per Unit 8,821.33
Unit : 1 Cu.m.
11.2. Stone Masonry Work in 1:4 Cement mortar Ref_DOR_ActivityNo.26.05_Spec. Clause: 2600
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 2.00 850.00 1,700.00
Unskilled md 3.50 600.00 2,100.00
Sub Total 3,800.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.155 22,505.50 3,488.35
Sand m3 0.45 500.24 225.11
Stone m3 1.150 925.05 1,063.80
Water lt 100.000 0.12 12.00
Dieseal lt 1.000 92.51 92.51

Sub Total 4,881.77


C Equipments
Concrete Mixer (0.28/0.20 m3) hr 0.15 618.75 92.81

Sub Total 92.81


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 8,774.58
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,316.19
G Total of (E+ F) 10,090.77
Rate per Unit 10,090.77

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 9 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item: 12. Dry Stone Masonry Work up to 5 m Height as per specifications Unit : 1 Cu.m.
Ref: DOR_ActivityNo_26.01.Spec.Clause_2602
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 1.25 850.00 1,062.50
Unskilled md 2.00 600.00 1,200.00
Sub Total 2,262.50
B Materials
Stone m3 1.150 925.05 1,063.80
Sub Total 1,063.80
C Equipments

Tool and Plants @ 3% 67.88


Sub Total 67.88
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 3,394.18
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 509.13
G Total of (E+ F) 3,903.31
Rate per Unit 3,903.31

Des. of item: 13. 20 cm th. Hard Stone Lining 1:3 Cement mortar Unit : 10 Sq.m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 4.65 850.00 3,952.50
Unskilled md 13.00 600.00 7,800.00
Sub Total 11,752.50
B Materials
Cement MT 0.310 22,505.50 6,976.71
Sand m3 0.620 500.24 310.15
Stone m3 3.300 925.05 3,052.66
Sub Total 10,339.51
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 22,092.01
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 3,313.80
G Total of (E+ F) 25,405.81
Rate per Unit 2,540.58 per sqm

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 10 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item: 14. Laying of 50mm thick layer of slate of size 300mm x 300mm and
pointing the joints by 1:3 c/m Unit : 10 Sq.m.
Ref:DOI2002-CL-23-9(b)
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 2.40 850.00 2,040.00
Unskilled md 3.60 600.00 2,160.00
Sub Total 4,200.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.017 22,505.50 382.59
Sand m3 0.036 500.24 18.01
Slate Nos. 125.000 39.95 4,993.54
Sub Total 5,394.14
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 9,594.14
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,439.12
G Total of (E+ F) 11,033.26
Rate per Unit 1,103.33 per sqm

Des. of item: 15. Brick Masonry works with supplying of material Unit : 1 Cu.m.
including haluage 30m,in 1:4 c/m Ref:DOI2002-BW-1
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 1.50 850.00 1,275.00
Unskilled md 2.20 600.00 1,320.00
Sub Total 2,595.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.100 22,505.50 2,250.55
Sand m3 0.270 500.24 135.06
Bricks Nos. 530 18.44 9,775.19
Sub Total 12,160.80
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 14,755.80
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 2,213.37
G Total of (E+ F) 16,969.17
Rate per Unit 16,969.17

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 11 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item : 16. Block Masonry Work in 1:4 c/m Unit: 1 Cu.m.
including haluage 30m
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 1.50 850.00 1,275.00
Unskilled md 2.20 600.00 1,320.00

Sub Total 2,595.00


B Materials
Block nos 98.00 32.89 3,222.98
Cement MT 0.100 22,505.50 2,250.55
Sand m3 0.270 500.24 135.06
Sub Total 5,608.59
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 8,203.59
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,230.54
G Total of (E+ F) 9,434.13
Rate per Unit 9,434.13

Des. of item: 17. Providing and placing machine mixed cement concrete (C10) for
the foundation and footing etc. including compaction,curing,testing and lead
30m.etc.all complete as per specification Unit : 1 Cu.m.
Ref:DOR_Activity No. 20.01_Spec. Clause 2000
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.50 850.00 425.00
Unskilled md 3.50 600.00 2,100.00
Sub Total 2,525.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.220 22,505.50 4,951.21
Sand m3 0.480 500.24 240.11
Aggregates m3 0.900 710.24 639.21
Water Lt 132.000 0.12 15.84
Petrol Lt 0.100 105.51 10.55
Diesel Lt 3.000 92.51 277.52
Sub Total 6,134.45
C Equipments
Concrete Mixer (0.28 m3/0.20 m3) hr 0.6 619 371.25
Vibrator hr 0.25 96 24.00
Sub Total 395.25
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 9,054.70
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,358.20
G Total of (E+ F) 10,412.90
Rate per Unit 10,412.90

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 12 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item: 18. Providing and placing machine mixed cement concrete (C15) for
the foundation and footing etc. including compaction,curing,testing and lead
30m.etc.all complete as per specification Unit : 1 Cu.m.
Ref:DOR_Activity No. 20.01_Spec. Clause 2000
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.50 850.00 425.00
Unskilled md 3.50 600.00 2,100.00
Sub Total 2,525.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.260 22,505.50 5,851.43
Sand m3 0.460 500.24 230.11
Aggregates m3 0.880 710.24 625.01
Water Lt 156.000 0.12 18.72
Petrol Lt 0.100 105.51 10.55
Diesel Lt 3.000 92.51 277.52
Sub Total 7,013.34
C Equipments
Concrete Mixer (0.28 m3/0.20 m3) hr 0.6 619 371.25
Vibrator hr 0.25 96 24.00
Sub Total 395.25
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 9,933.59
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,490.04
G Total of (E+ F) 11,423.62
Rate per Unit G 11,423.62

Des. of item: 19 Providing and placing machine mixed cement concrete (C20) Unit : 1 Cu.m.
19.1. for the foundation and footing etc. including compaction,curing,testing and
lead 30m.etc.all complete as per specification
Ref:DOR_Activity No. 20.01_Spec. Clause 2000
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.50 850.00 425.00
Unskilled md 3.50 600.00 2,100.00
Sub Total 2,525.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.320 22,505.50 7,201.76
Sand m3 0.450 500.24 225.11
Aggregates m3 0.860 710.24 610.80
Water Lt 192.000 0.12 23.04
Petrol Lt 0.100 105.51 10.55
Diesel Lt 3.000 92.51 277.52
Sub Total 8,348.78
C Equipments
Concrete Mixer (0.28 m3/0.20 m3) hr 0.6 619 371.25
Vibrator hr 0.25 96 24.00
Sub Total 395.25
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 11,269.03
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,690.35
G Total of (E+ F) 12,959.38
Rate per Unit G 12,959.38

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 13 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


19.2. for the abutment,pier,wall etc. including compaction,curing,testing and lead
30m.etc.all complete as per specification
Ref:DOR_Activity No. 20.02_Spec. Clause 2000
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.90 850.00 765.00
Unskilled md 9.00 600.00 5,400.00
Sub Total 6,165.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.320 22,505.50 7,201.76
Sand m3 0.450 500.24 225.11
Aggregates m3 0.860 710.24 610.80
Water Lt 192.000 0.12 23.04
Petrol Lt 0.100 105.51 10.55
Diesel Lt 3.000 92.51 277.52
Sub Total 8,348.78
C Equipments
Concrete Mixer (0.28 m3/0.20 m3) hr 0.6 619 371.25
Vibrator hr 0.25 96 24.00
Sub Total 395.25
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 14,909.03
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 2,236.35
G Total of (E+ F) 17,145.38
Rate per Unit G 17,145.38
Average Rate per Unit item 19 15,052.38

Des. of item: 20 Providing and placing machine mixed cement concrete (C25) Unit : 1 Cu.m.
20.1. for the foundation and footing etc. including compaction,curing,testing and
lead 30m.etc.all complete as per specification
Ref:DOR_Activity No. 20.02_Spec. Clause 2000
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.50 850.00 425.00
Unskilled md 3.50 600.00 2,100.00
Sub Total 2,525.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.375 22,505.50 8,439.56
Sand m3 0.450 500.24 225.11
3
Coarse Aggregates m 0.880 710.24 625.01
Water Lt 225.000 0.12 27.00
Petrol Lt 0.100 105.51 10.55
Diesel Lt 3.000 92.51 277.52
Sub Total 9,604.75
C Equipments
Concrete Mixer (0.28 m3/0.20 m3) hr 0.6 619 371.25
Vibrator hr 0.25 96 24.00
Sub Total 395.25
D Others
Concrete Mix Design and Quality Control @ 2.50% 313.12
Sub Total 313.12
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 12,838.12
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,925.72
G Total of (E+ F) 14,763.84
Rate per Unit G 14,763.84

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 14 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


20.2. for the abutment,pier,wall etc. including compaction,curing,testing and lead
30m.etc.all complete as per specification
Ref:DOR_Activity No. 20.02_Spec. Clause 2000
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.90 850.00 765.00
Unskilled md 9.00 600.00 5,400.00
Sub Total 6,165.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.375 22,505.50 8,439.56
Sand m3 0.450 500.24 225.11
Coarse Aggregates m3 0.580 710.24 411.94
Water Lt 225.000 0.12 27.00
Petrol Lt 0.100 105.51 10.55
Diesel Lt 3.000 92.51 277.52
Sub Total 9,391.67
C Equipments
Concrete Mixer (0.28 m3/0.20 m3) hr 0.6 619 371.25
Vibrator hr 0.25 96 24.00
Sub Total 395.25
D Others
Concrete Mix Design and Quality Control @ 2.50% 398.80
Sub Total 398.80
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 16,350.72
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 2,452.61
G Total of (E+ F) 18,803.33
Rate per Unit G 18,803.33
Average Rate per Unit item 20 16,783.59

Des. of item: 21. Placing of C35 Concrete with silica fumes Unit : 1 Cu.m.
supplying with material.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.80 850.00 680.00
Unskilled md 6.00 600.00 3,600.00
Sub Total 4,280.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.45 22,505.50 10,127.48
3
Sand m 0.44 500.24 220.10
Aggregates m3 0.9 710.24 639.21
Water lt 270.000 0.12 32.40
Petrol lt 0.100 105.51 10.55
Diesel lt 3.000 92.51 277.52
Sub Total 11,307.26
C Equipments
Mixer hr 0.6 618.75 371.25
Vibrator hr 0.25 96 24.00
Sub Total 395.25
D Others
Concrete Mix Design and Quality
Control @ 2.50% 382.56
Sub Total 382.56
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 16,365.07
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 2,454.76
G Total of (E+ F) 18,819.83
Rate per Unit of item 21 18,819.83

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 15 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item: 22. Placing of C15 Plum Concrete with 40% plum Unit : 1 Cu.m.
supplying with material.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.30 850.00 255.00
Unskilled md 3.00 600.00 1,800.00
Sub Total 2,055.00
B Materials
Cement MT 0.16 22,505.50 3,600.88
Sand m3 0.299 500.24 149.57
Aggregates m3 0.573 710.24 406.97
Stone m3 0.440 925.05 407.02
Water Lt 101.400 0.12 12.17
Petrol Lt 0.100 105.51 10.55
Diesel Lt 3.000 92.51 277.52
Sub Total 4,864.67
C Equipments
Concrete Mixer hr 0.5 618.75 309.38
Vibrator hr 0.1 96 9.60
Sub Total 318.98
D Others
2.5 % for quality control @ 2.50% 121.62
Sub Total 121.62
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 7,360.27
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,104.04
G Total of (E+ F) 8,464.31
Rate per Unit G 8,464.31

Des. of item: 23. Formwork for concrete work(F2 Class) Ref: DOR 18.2 I and ii Unit : 10 Sq.m.

S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks


A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled- Carpenter md 2.40 850.00 2,040.00
Unskilled md 2.50 600.00 1,500.00
Sub Total 3,540.00
B Materials
Plywood Sq.m. 11.000 620.00 852.50 8 times use
Strut, Ballies m3 0.450 32300.00 1,211.25 12 times use
Nails Kg 3.000 165.97 497.91
Sub Total 2,561.66
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 6,101.66
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 915.25
G Total of (E+ F) 7,016.91
Rate per Unit 701.69 per sqm

Ref_DOR_Act. No._20.6_2014_ii

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 16 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item: 24. Reinforcement Steel Works with material
(average of substructure and superstructure) Unit : 1.0 MT
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled-Bar bender md 9.00 850.00 7,650.00
Unskilled md 9.00 600.00 5,400.00
Sub Total 13,050.00
B Materials
Reinforcement Steel Bar MT 1.150 92,971.50 106,917.23
Binding Wire Kg 9.000 120.97 1,088.74

Sub Total 108,005.97


C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 121,055.97
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 18,158.40
G Total of (E+ F) 139,214.36 per MT
Rate per Unit 139 per kg

Des. of item: 25. Making of Gabion Box including rolling, cutting, weaving Unit: 1 Cu.m.
and crate filling (Hexagonal mesh size 100x120mm with 10SWG
and salvage wire 7 SWG Box Size 2.0x1.0x1.0m) Ref:DOI2002-16-RTGW-5a
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.50 850.00 425.00
Unskilled md 2.25 600.00 1,350.00
Sub Total 1,775.00
B Materials
Machine made gabion box m2 11.000 280.32 3,083.51
Binding Wire (12 SWG) Kg 1.810 120.97 218.96
Stone m3 2.200 925.05 2,035.10
Sub Total 5,337.58
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 7,112.58
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,066.89
G Total of (E+ F) 8,179.46
Rate per Unit 4,089.73 per cum

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 17 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item 26: 12.5mm thick Cement Plaster in 1:4 Cement mortar Unit: 100 Sq.m.
Ref:DOI2002-PW-1c
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 12.00 850.00 10,200.00
Unskilled md 16.00 600.00 9,600.00
Sub Total 19,800.00
B Materials
Cement Ton 0.538 22505.50 12,107.96
Sand m3 1.460 500.24 730.35

Sub Total 12,838.31


C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 32,638.31
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 4,895.75
G Total of (E+ F) 37,534.05
Rate per Unit 375.34

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 18 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item : 27. Cement Pointing Work in 1:3 Cement mortar Unit: 100 Sq.m.
in Stone Masonry Ref:DOI2002-PW-2c
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 10.00 850.00 8,500.00
Unskilled md 14.00 600.00 8,400.00
Sub Total 16,900.00
B Materials
Cement Ton 0.306 22505.50 6,886.68
Sand m3 0.630 500.24 315.15

Sub Total 7,201.83


C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 24,101.83
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 3,615.27
G Total of (E+ F) 27,717.11
Rate per Unit 277.17

Des. of item : 28. 25mm thick double coat flooring concrete Unit: 10 Sq.m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 1.00 850.00 850.00
Unskilled md 3.00 600.00 1,800.00
Sub Total 2,650.00
B Materials
Cement Ton 0.090 22505.50 2,025.50
Sand m3 0.120 500.24 60.03
Aggregates m3 0.230 710.24 163.35

Sub Total 2,248.88


C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 4,898.88
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 734.83
G Total of (E+ F) 5,633.71
Rate per Unit 56.34

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 19 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item 29: 3mm thick neat cement punning Unit: 100 Sq.m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 1.00 850.00 850.00
Unskilled md 1.00 600.00 600.00
Sub Total 1,450.00
B Materials
Cement Ton 0.090 22505.50 2,025.50

Sub Total 2,025.50


C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 3,475.50
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 521.32
G Total of (E+ F) 3,996.82
Rate per Unit 39.97

Des. of item 30: Wood Work in Chaukhat (Door/Chaukhat) Unit: 1 Cu.m.


S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled-Carpenter md 34.00 850.00 28,900.00
Unskilled md 3.40 600.00 2,040.00
Sub Total 30,940.00
B Materials
Saal Wood m3 1.100 40500.00 44,550.00
Holdfast 250mm No. 92.000 35.00 3,220.00
Screw No. 184.000 1.50 276.00
Sub Total 48,046.00
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 78,986.00
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 11,847.90
G Total of (E+ F) 90,833.90
Rate per Unit 90,833.90

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 20 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item 31: 1.5" thick Saalwood Door Shutter Unit: 2.114 Sq.m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled-Carpenter md 10.00 850.00 8,500.00
Unskilled md 1.00 600.00 600.00

Sub Total 9,100.00


B Materials
Salwood m3 0.084 40,500 3,402.00
Hinges 4" nos. 6.00 15.00 90.00
Chheskini nos. 2.00 20.00 40.00
Locking set nos. 1.00 100.00 100.00
Handle nos. 2.00 50.00 100.00
Screw nos. 35.00 1.50 52.50
Sub Total 3,784.50
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 12,884.50
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,932.68
G Total of (E+ F) 14,817.18
Rate per Unit 7,009.07 per sqm

Des. of item 32: Glass Shutter for Windows Unit: 1 Sq.m.


S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled-Carpenter md 0.06 850.00 51.00
Unskilled md 0.01 600.00 6.00
Sub Total 57.00
B Materials
4mm Glass m2 1.05 440.00 462.00
Listy nos. 4.05 35.00 141.75
Nail nos. 0.150 165.97 24.90
Sub Total 628.65
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 685.65
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 102.85
G Total of (E+ F) 788.49
Rate per Unit G 788.49

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 21 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item 33: Two Coat Water Proof Cement Paint Unit: 100 Sq.m.
Ref:DOI2002-PW-4b
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled-Painter md 5.00 850.00 4,250.00
Unskilled md 5.00 600.00 3,000.00

Sub Total 7,250.00


B Materials
Cement Paint (Snocem) Kg 48.50 112.51 5,456.52

Sub Total 5,456.52


C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 12,706.52
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,905.98
G Total of (E+ F) 14,612.49
Rate per Unit 146.12

Des. of item 34: Two Coat Enamel Paint Unit: 100 Sq.m.
Ref:DOI2002-PW-5c
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled-Painter md 4.00 850.00 3,400.00
Unskilled md 3.00 600.00 1,800.00

Sub Total 5,200.00


B Materials
Enamel Paint Liter 7.00 165.97 1,161.80
Primer Liter 3.50 270.00 945.00

Sub Total 2,106.80


C Equipments
3% of A 156.00

Sub Total 156.00


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 7,462.80
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,119.42
G Total of (E+ F) 8,582.22
Rate per Unit 85.82

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 22 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item 35: CGI Sheet Roofing works with supply of Materials Unit: 10 Sq.m.
complete Ref:DOI2002-RW-1
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled-Carpenter md 1.00 850.00 850.00
Unskilled md 1.25 600.00 750.00

Sub Total 1,600.00


B Materials
CGI Sheet m2 12.00 698.63 8,383.54
Nut Bolts nos. 30.00 21.00 630.00
J-Hook nos. 25.000 20.00 500.00
Bitumen Washer nos. 55.000 4.00 220.00
Sub Total 9,733.54
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 11,333.54
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 1,700.03
G Total of (E+ F) 13,033.57
Rate per Unit 1,303.36

Des. of item 36: PVC Water Stopper Unit: 1m.


S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled-Carpenter md 0.05 850.00 42.50
Unskilled md -

Sub Total 42.50


B Materials
PVC Water Stoper rm 1.05 1,225.00 1,286.25

Sub Total 1,286.25


C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 1,328.75
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 199.31
G Total of (E+ F) 1,528.06
Rate per Unit 1,528.06

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 23 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item 37: 25mm thick Expansion Joint Board (Saltax Board) Unit: 1 Sq.m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.05 850.00 42.50
Unskilled md

Sub Total 12.50


B Materials
Saltax Board m2 1.020 1,750.00 1,785.00
Sub Total 1,785.00
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 1,797.50
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 269.63
G Total of (E+ F) 2,067
Rate per Unit 2,067

Des. of item 38: Joint Sealent Unit: 1 m


S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.05 850.00 42.50
Unskilled md

Sub Total 12.50


B Materials
Silicon Sealent kg 0.500 900.00 450.00 2rm/kg
Sub Total 450.00
C Equipments

Sub Total -
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 462.50
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 69.38
G Total of (E+ F) 532
Rate per Unit 532

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 24 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item 39: Stone Masonry Work in mud mortar Unit : 1 Cu.m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 1.00 850.00 850.00
Unskilled md 2.00 600.00 1,200.00
Sub Total 2,050.00
B Materials
Blockstone m3 1 925.0 925.05
Bondstone m3 0.1 1110.1 111.01
Soils m3 0.420 - -
Sub Total 1,036.05
C Equipments
3% of A 61.50

Sub Total 61.50


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 3,147.55
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 472.13
G Total of (E+ F) 3,619.69
Rate per Unit 3,619.69

Des. of item 40: 1:2:4 cement concrete floor finishing by rubbing, 38 mm thick Unit : 10 sq.m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 1.25 850.00 1,062.50
Unskilled md 2.00 600.00 1,200.00
Sub Total 2,262.50
B Materials
Cement mt 0.13 22,505.50 2,925.72
sand m3 0.18 500.24 90.04
Aggregate 12 mm m3 0.360 710.24 255.69
Sub Total 3,271.44
C Equipments
3% of A 67.88

Sub Total 67.88


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 5,601.82
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 840.27
G Total of (E+ F) 6,442.09
Rate per Unit 644.21

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 25 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item 41: Flush pointing in stone masonary in 1:1 Unit : 100 sq.m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 10.50 850.00 8,925.00
Unskilled md 12.00 600.00 7,200.00
Sub Total 16,125.00
B Materials
Cement mt 0.45 22,505.50 10,127.48
Sand m3 37.5 500.24 18,758.93
- -
- -
Sub Total 28,886.40
C Equipments
3% of A 483.75

Sub Total 483.75


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 45,495.15
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 6,824.27
G Total of (E+ F) 52,319.43
Rate per Unit 523.19

Des. of item 42: 1:2:4 False Ceiling with 3 mm plywood Unit : 35.59 sq.m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 23.00 850.00 19,550.00
Unskilled md 2.30 600.00 1,380.00

Sub Total 20,930.00


B Materials
sal wood m3 0.45 40,500 18,225.00
Plywood 3 mm m2 37.5 620.00 23,250.00
Beads kg approx 90.00 90.00
Nails kg approx 90.00 90.00
Sub Total 41,655.00
C Equipments
3% of A 627.90

Sub Total 627.90


D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 63,212.90
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 9,481.94
G Total of (E+ F) 72,694.84
Rate per Unit 2,042.56

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 26 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Item No : 43 New Norms Ref. : 7.02, iii)
Providing and laying RCC pipes (NP3) , jointed with stiff mixture of cement mortar in the proportion of 1:2 (1
900 mm dia. Unit : m
S.No. Description Unit Quantity Rate in NRs Amount in NRs Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md 1.562 600.00 937.20
Skilled md 0.344 850.00 292.40
Sub Total 1 1,229.60
2 Material
RCC Pipe, 900 mm dia. m 1.000 13,500 13,500.00
Cement kg 9.062 22.51 203.94
Sand cu.m 0.013 500 6.50
Jute kg 0.375 55.00 20.63
Sub Total 2 13,731.07
3 Equipment
3 % for ballies, crowbars, chain, pulley, blocks & ropes etc 36.89
Sub Total 3 36.89
Total Amount in NRs (1) + (2) + (3) 14,998
Add 15% Contractor's Overhead 2,250 DOR
Total 17,247 per m
Rate per unit 17,247 per m

Des. Of item 44: Graded Gravel filling as filter material and craddle including watering and compacting by
ramming all complete
Unit : m3
S.No. Description Unit Quantity Rate in NRs Amount in NRs Remarks
1 Labour
Unskilled md 1.750 600.00 1,050.00
Skilled md 1.000 850.00 850.00
Sub Total 1 1,900.00
2 Material
Gravel (aggr. 10mm) m3 1.100 1,065 1,171.89

Sub Total 2 1,171.89


3 Equipment
57.00
Sub Total 3 57.00
Total Amount in NRs (1) + (2) + (3) 3,129
Add 15% Contractor's Overhead 469 DOR
Total 3,598 per m
Rate per unit 3,598 per m

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 27 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works


Des. of item 45: Backfilling with impevious materials 1 cu. m.
S.No Description Unit Quantity Unit Rate Amount (NRs) Remarks
A Manpower
Foreman md
Skilled md 0.01 850.00 4.25
Unskilled md 0.04 600.00 24.00

Sub Total 28.25


B Materials
Impervious Material (Clay) m3 1.1 810 891.26
Diesel m2 0.12 92.51 11.10
Sub Total 902.36
C Equipments
Vibrating Roller hr 0.022 1400 30.80
Grader hr 0.022 2200 48.40
Water bowser hr 0.038 635 24.13
Loader hr 0.011 1600 17.60
Sub Total 120.93
D Others

Sub Total -
E Sub Total of (A+B+C+D) 1,051.54
F Contractor Overhead and Profit @ 15% 157.73
G Total of (E+ F) 1,209.27
Rate per Unit 1,209.27

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 28 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Rate Analysis for Civil Works

B1: Formwork F3 Finish (wood)


B1a:Vertical Plain Surface(Height more than 3m upto 6m)
Rate Analysis for 10.00
Local Currency
Particulars
Description Unit Quantity Rate Amount
NRs. NRs.
1. Labour
Skilled labour md 2.98 850.00 2,528.75
Unskilled labour md 2.80 600.00 1,680.00
Subtotal 4,208.75

2. Materials

Plank (12mm) m2 11.00 620.00 1,136.67 6 times usage


12 times
Strut m3 0.55 32,300.00 1,480.42 usage
Nails, spikes etc kg 3.50 165.9715 580.90
Subtotal 3,197.98

Total(1+2) 7,406.73

3. Profit and O/H 15.00% 1,111.01

Grand Total for 10 sq m 8,517.74


Rate Per Unit 851.77 Sq.m

Site Clearance Rate Analysis for 1.00 sq.m


Local Currency
Des Unit Qty Rate Amount
NRs. NRs.
1. Labour
skilled
Unskilled md 0.01 600.00 6.00
Sub- total 6.00
Add T and P 3% 0.18
Total 6.18
3. Profit and O/H 15% 0.93
Grand Total 7.11
Rate Per Sq. m. 7.11

MS sheet
Rate Analysis for 1.00 Sq.m
Local Currency
Description Unit Quantity Rate Amount
NRs.
1. Labour
Unskilled labour hr 3.00 77.50 232.50
Skilled labor hr 3.00 109.38 328.13
Subtotal 560.63
2. Materials
MS
Sheet
sq.m 1.00 1,252.46 1,252.46
Subtotal 1,252.46

Total(1+2) 1,813.08
4. Profit and O/H 15% 271.96

Grand Total 2,085.04


Rate Per Unit 2,085.04

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Rate Analysis: 29 of 29 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Summary of Rate Analysis


SN Description of Items Unit Rate Remarks
1 EXCAVATION WORKS
1.1 Earthwork in excavation
Earthwork in excavation ( using hydraulic excavator) including disposal
upto 10m and lift upto 1.5 m etc. , trimming bottom and side slopes in
1.1
accordance with requirements of lines, grades and cross sections all
complete as per specification.
3
1.1.1 Soil/Gravel/BMS m 147.92
3
1.1.3 Hard Rock excavation with Rock breaker m 700.07
3
1.1.4 Hard Rock excavation with Blasting m 1,465.96
2 Backfilling work / sub-base preparation
Formation of embankment including compaction in layers not exceeding
2.1 150mm.Compacted depth,watering and haulage 10m.etc.all complete as
per specification.
2.1.1 Common Backfill m3 355.35
Providing, laying, spreading, watering, levelling and compaction of natural sand 3
2.1.2 m
gravel subbase grading of standards pecification lead upto 10m 1,570.41
3
2.1.3 Gravel Backfill m
Backfill with graded filter materials in layer with necessary watering and 3
2.1.4 m
compaction, lead 30m, lift 1.5m. 3,598
3 STONE MASONARY WORK
Providing and laying Random rubble stone masonry in cement mortar
3.1 including scaffolding, curing, preparation of mortar etc.complete,masoned
height 0-5m,lead 30m (machine mixing) mortar 35%
3.1.1 Stone masonry with cement mortar (1:4) m3 10,090.77
3.1.2 Stone masonry with cement mortar (1:6) m3 8,821.33
3.1.3 Filling by dry stone on Foundation and Levelling with Haulage of 30m m3 1,777.24
2
3.1.4 Dressed Hardstone Lining(400mm thick) m 2,540.58
3
3.1.5 Hollow Concrete Block Masonary m 9,434.13
4 CONCRETE WORKS
Providing and placing machine mixed cement concrete for the foundation
4.1 and footing etc.including compaction,curing,testing and lead 30m.etc.all
complete as per specification
4.1.1 M10/40 Concrete m3 10,412.90
3
4.1.2 M15/40 Concrete m 11,423.62
4.1.3 M25/20Concrete m3 16,783.59
4.1.4 M20/20Concrete m3 12,959.38
4.1.5 M35/20 Concrete With Silica Fumes m3 18,819.83
4.1.6 M15/40 Concrete(40% Plum Concrete) m3 8,464.31
3
4.1.7 M25/20Concrete(40% Plum Concrete) m 12,000.00
4.1.8 M7.5/20Concrete(40% Plum Concrete) m3 7,310.00
5 REINFORCEMENT
Providing and laying Reinforcement including cutting,bending, binding,
5.1 fixing in position and lead 30m.etc.all complete as per specification and
drawing.
5.1.1 Steel bar reinforcement(Dia. Above 16mm) Ton 139,214.36
5.1.2 Structural Steel Ton 124,865.00
6 FORMWORKS
B:Providing, Preparing and Installing formwork including necessary
6.1
supports and removing after completion for walls all complete.
6.1.1 F2 Class Finish m2 702.00
6.1.2 F3 Class Finish m2 852.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate RA_Summary_SGHP: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

7 TUNNEL WORKS
3
7.1 Tunnel Excavation For Hard rock, mucking upto 500m m 4,701.45
3
7.2 Excavation of Vertical Shaft from bottom for pilot hole mucking upto 500m m 6,338.39
7.3 Rockbolt, 2.0m long, 20mm dia in tunnel No. 3,396.30
7.4 Rockbolt, 2.5m long, 25mm dia in tunnel No. 3,890.70
7.5 Rockbolt, 2.5m long, 25mm dia in Vertical Penstock No. 4,007.60
7.6 Rockbolt, 1.5m long, 25mm dia in tunnel No. 3,221.29
7.7 Rockbolt, 4m long, 25mm dia in tunnel portal area No. 4,932.39
7.8 Spilling with 25 mm Dia Steel Bar 4 m long No. 2,570.14
7.9 M25 concrete for tunnel lining m3 20,140.30
2
7.1 Plain shotcrete 5cm thick m 2,805.19
3
7.11 Plain shotcrete Concrete m 49,810.31
7.13 Steel Fiber Reinforced shotcrete Concrete m3 56,091.55
7.14 Probe Drilling m 2,910.20
7.15 Steel Rib Support in HRT Ton 298,242.52
2
7.16 Wire mesh for shortcrete m 1,815.64
7.17 Drilling,Grout mixture 1:2 cement ratio all complete (Mortar Grout) kg 25.57
7.18 Consolidated Grouting/Surface Consolidated Grouting kg 31.68
7.19 Contact Grouting kg 39.99
7.2 Steel bar reinforcement for tunnel Ton 139,214.36
7.21 Curtain Grouting kg 44.63
7.22 Void Grouting kg 27.15
7.23 Drilling Works for Weep Hole m 301.35
7.24 Drilling Works for Grouting m 2,115.90
7.25 Cement Slurry Grouting Ton 49,380.11
7.26 Cement Sand Grouting Ton 28,861.63
7.27 Chemical Grouting Ton 74,070.17
7.28 Convergence Measurement No. 50,000.00
8 GABION WORKS
Supply and Assembling of Machine Made Gabion boxes / mattresses with
diapharagms including rolling, cutting and weaving and crate filling (Hexagonal 3
8.1 m 4,089.73
mesh size 100x120mm with 12SWG and salvage wire 8 SWG ) (for rate
analysis Box Size 2.0x1.0x1.0m assumed)
9 DRAINAGE WORK
Providing and laying HDP pipes with perforation including laying and
9.1
jointing (no. and dia of holes to be specified) all complete
9.1.1 Series II 225mm dia. m 391
9.1.2 Series II 160mm dia. m 262.5
9.1.3 Pvc 50mm Pipe (10kg/cm2) for weep hole rm 235
10 IMPERVIOUS WORK
10.1 Providing,Laying and Fixation of geotextile (Filter fabrics),lead 30m m2 278.00
10.2 Backfilling with impevious materials(Clay blanket) m3 1,209.27
Laying of Rip-rap protection work with boulders weighing 2000kg minimum
10.3 and packed with stones20-40 kg, lead 30m, using crane(1M to 1.5M BOULDER m2
RIP-RAP) 3,931.64
Laying of Rip-rap protection work with boulders packed with stones20-40 kg, 2
m
lead 30m, using crane(2M BOULDER RIP-RAP)
11 DOORS AND WINDOWS
11.1 Door opening with frame and shuttering all complete m2 6,334.85
11.2 Glazed window opening with frame and shuttering all complete m2 6,679.85
12 ROOFING WORK
12.1 CGI sheet for roofing 0.52 mm thick ((24 Gauge) m2 1,303.36
12.2 Supply, Fitting and painting primer on site for roof truss of Black Iron pipe kg
12.3 Ms Sheet 1.0mm thick kg
12.4 Handrails kg 140
12.5 Grill work for window kg

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate RA_Summary_SGHP: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

13 FINISHING WORKS
2
13.1 Pointing Work m 277.17
2
13.2 1:4 Mortar 20mm Thick plaster m 375.34
20 mm Crazy chips with 1:2:4 concrete and 5mm white cement in1:1 ratio with
Sq m
mozzaic flooring
20 mm ceramic tiles with 1:4 mortar Sq m
2
13.3 Screeding And Punning Work m 39.97
14 PAINTING WORK
14.1 Laying and Coating of Ready made Enamel Paint or Plastic emulsion Paint
2
14.1.1 Enamel Paint m 146.12
15 SITE CLEARANCE
A. Dressing and Levelling of the Construction surface including cutting and 2
15.2 m
filling of small undulation 7.11
16 DOWEL BAR
Providing and Installition of Rock Dowel including grouting using
16.1
Mechanical Aid
16.1.1 Portable Roack Driller m
17 STONE PITCHING WORKS
Dry Stone Pitching with thickness 30cm weight not less than 40kg including 2
17.1 m
levelling etc.complete.
3
17.2 Filter Materials m
18 HUME PIPE
18.1 Hume pipe dia. 450mm Int. Dia. m
18.2 Hume pipe dia. 600mm int. Dia m 17,247
19 BARBED FENCING WIRE
19.1 Barbed wire ( 8rows and 2 diagonal and 2m height) m
20 METAL DOOR AND WINDOW
Aluminium sliding door with naturally Anodized colour from the product
20.1 of Agrani Aluminium Nepal or Equivalent quality in the section of 101 x 38 Sq m
x 1.3 mm with 5mm thick glass(including Daily wages and fitting)
'Providing and fixing 2 or 3 Panel Sliding Window of 1.3mm aluminium
section in naturally anodized or black anodized/powder coaded
20.2 Sq m
color,section size (101x38x1.30mm) fitted with 5mm clear glass without
flymesh shutter.(window size 6'x5' or average area 30 sq feet per window)
Full ht patition(with 9mm thick fiber cement heavy duty wall board on
20.3 exterior side and 10mm Standard FCB interior side and 51mmGI wall Sq m
frame system)Exterior cum inteior wall Confirming to IS 14862:2000
20.4 Chowkhat for door and window m3 90,833.90
20.5 wooden shuter for door and windows Sq m 7,009.07
21 Landscaping LS
22 Joints
22.1 PVC Water Stopper m 1,528.06
22.2 25mm Thick Expansion Joint Board(Saltax Board) Sq m 2067.125
22.3 Joint Sealant m 531.875
22.4 Steel lining(10mm thick) Sq m 1,530.75

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate RA_Summary_SGHP: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

HM COST CALCULATION BREAKDOWN


Opening Size
Unit Total
Operation Head
SN Components Qty Width Height sill lvl HFL Weight Weight Rate Hoist System Type Remarks
Platform (m) Cost Item Cost Hoist Total Cost
(m) (m) (m) (m) NRs / kg
I Suni Gad Headworks
1
Undersluice Stoplog 1 3.00 3.00 1764.26 1769.90 1771.70 5.64 4,400.00 4,400.00 280.00 1,232,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,232,000.00 Chain Pulley
2
Undersluice Gate 1 3.00 3.00 1764.26 1769.90 1771.70 5.64 2,150.00 2,150.00 280.00 602,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,602,000.00 Screw Spindal
3
Intake Trash Rack 2 2.50 1.40 1766.30 1769.90 1771.70 3.60 2,000.00 4,000.00 280.00 1,120,000.00 1,120,000.00
4
Intake Stoplog 2 2.50 1.40 1766.30 1769.90 1771.70 3.60 3,500.00 7,000.00 280.00 1,960,000.00 500,000.00 2,460,000.00 Monorail Hoist
5
Intake Gate 2 2.50 1.40 1766.30 1769.90 1771.70 3.60 3,500.00 7,000.00 280.00 1,960,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,960,000.00 Motorized Screw Spindle
6
Approach Canal Gate 1 2.40 1.70 1766.00 1769.90 1771.70 3.90 3,500.00 3,500.00 280.00 980,000.00 Chain Pulley
7
Gravel Flushing Upstream Gate 1 1.00 1.00 1764.19 1769.90 1771.70 5.71 1,200.00 1,200.00 280.00 336,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,336,000.00 Screw Spindal
8
Gravel Flushing Downstream Gate 1 1.00 1.00 1764.19 1769.90 1771.70 5.71 1,200.00 1,200.00 280.00 336,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,336,000.00 Screw Spindal
9
Desander Inlet Gate 2 1.52 1.50 1765.96 1768.50 1770.00 2.54 2,400.00 4,800.00 280.00 1,344,000.00 600,000.00 1,944,000.00 Screw Spindal
10
Desander Outlet Gate 4 1.20 1.00 1766.10 1768.50 1770.00 2.40 1,800.00 7,200.00 280.00 2,016,000.00 2,000,000.00 4,016,000.00 Screw Spindal
11
Settling Basin Upstream Gates 2 1.00 1.00 1762.25 1768.50 1770.00 6.25 1,200.00 2,400.00 280.00 672,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,672,000.00 Screw Spindal
12
Settling Basin Upstream Gates 2 1.00 1.00 1762.25 1768.50 1770.00 6.25 1,200.00 2,400.00 280.00 672,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,672,000.00 Screw Spindal
13
Settling Basin Fine Trash Rack 1 4.70 3.88 1764.90 1768.50 1769.30 3.60 4,500.00 4,000.00 280.00 1,120,000.00 1,120,000.00 -
14
Fine Trashrack at Forebay 1 3.00 3.14 1760.89 1768.50 1768.70 7.61 2,000.00 2,000.00 280.00 560,000.00 560,000.00
II Power House
1 Tailrace Gate 2 1.50 1.50 1404.96 1406.00 1409.75 1.04 2,000.00 4,000.00 280.00 1,120,000.00 900,000.00 2,020,000.00 Screw Spindal
57,250.00 12,000,000.00 32,460,000.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate HM_Gates_Stoplogs_Trashracks: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Estimation Steel Pipes


Weight including
Length Thickness Diameter Weight per Rate Total Cost
SN From CH To CH wastages
(m) (mm) (mm) meter (kg) (NRs/ton) (NRs)
(ton)
Approach Pipe
1 00+000 00+300 300.00 8.00 2,000.00 396.16 124.95 130,000.00 16,243,500.00
Total 300.00 124.95 Sub-Total 16,243,500.00
Headrace Pipe

1 00+000 00+219 219.13 8.00 1,400.00 277.79 64.05 130,000.00 8,326,500.00


2 01+389 01+480 148.72 8.00 1,400.00 277.79 44.10 130,000.00 5,733,000.00
3 01+480 01+600 166.90 12.00 1,400.00 417.86 73.50 130,000.00 9,555,000.00
4 01+600 03+640 2078.11 8.00 1,400.00 277.79 606.90 130,000.00 78,897,000.00
5 03+640 03+695 76.96 12.00 1,400.00 417.86 34.65 130,000.00 4,504,500.00
6 03+695 03+910 190.96 16.00 1,400.00 558.73 112.35 130,000.00 14,605,500.00
7 03+910 06+370 77.72 12.00 1,400.00 417.86 34.65 130,000.00 4,504,500.00
8 03+695 06+318 2472.9 8.00 1,400.00 277.79 721.35 130,000.00 93,775,500.00
Total 5,431 1,691.55 Sub-Total 219,901,500.00
Surge Pipe
1 00+037 00+247 234.94 12.00 2,500.00 743.40 183.75 130,000.00 23,887,500.00
Total 234.94 183.75 Sub-Total 23,887,500.00
Penstock Pipe
0 Surge Pipe Valve House 6 8.00 1,400.00 277.79 2.10 130,000.00 273,000.00
1 0+006 0+143 151.41 8.00 1,100.00 218.60 35.70 130,000.00 4,641,000.00
2 0+143 0+241 108.47 10.00 1,100.00 273.74 31.50 130,000.00 4,095,000.00
3 0+241 0+372 138.86 12.00 1,100.00 329.08 48.30 130,000.00 6,279,000.00
4 0+372 0+457 95.81 14.00 1,100.00 384.62 38.85 130,000.00 5,050,500.00
5 0+457 0+536 91.65 16.00 1,100.00 440.36 43.05 130,000.00 5,596,500.00
6 0+536 0+588 69.49 18.00 1,100.00 496.29 36.75 130,000.00 4,777,500.00
7 0+588 0+605 22.65 20.00 1,100.00 552.42 13.65 130,000.00 1,774,500.00
8 Bifurcation Pipe 60.52 16.00 800.00 321.98 21.00 130,000.00 2,730,000.00
Total 738.86 268.80 Sub-Total 34,944,000.00
LS 26,000,000.00
Bifurcation Bends, Stifferners, Vent Pipes and Other items
Sub-Total 26,000,000.00
Grand Total 320,976,500.00

General Items including performance security, training to personnel and others LS 15,000,000.00
Sub-Total 15,000,000.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate HM_HRP, Surge_Penstock_Pipe_: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT


Cost Estimate for Electromechanical Equipment
1USD = NPR. 110
Erection & Total Erection
Trans. & Ins, Total Trans.
S.N. Description Unit Qt'y FOB,US$ CIP Site, US$ supervision, & supervision, Unit Price, US $ Total Amount, US$
US$ & Ins, US$
US$ US$
1 Turbines

5.76 MW, Horizontal Shaft Pelton Turbines,


Governors, distribution pipes, turbine housing Set 2 92,470.97 13,632.75 27,265.51 106,103.72 10,906.20 21,812.41 117,009.93 234,019.86
etc. with all auxiliary equipment & accessories

Hydraulic Governor System with complete


b) Set 2 8,756.72 1,290.98 2,581.96 10,047.70 1,032.78 2,065.57 11,080.49 22,160.97
accessories

c) Main Inlet Valves with complete accessories Set 2 28,897.18 4,260.24 8,520.47 61,063.38 3,408.19 6,816.38 64,471.57 128,943.13

d) Cooling Water System lot 1 6,304.84 929.51 929.51 13,322.92 743.60 743.60 14,066.52 14,066.52

e) Drainage & Dewatering System lot 1 2,543.63 375.00 375.00 5,375.00 300.00 300.00 5,675.00 5,675.00

f) Compressed Air System lot 1 5,254.03 774.59 774.59 11,102.43 619.67 619.67 11,722.10 11,722.10

2 Generator - - -

6.5 MVA, 0.85 pf., A.C. generator, excitation


a) system (including excitation transformer) Set 2 109,809.28 16,188.90 32,377.79 232,040.83 12,951.12 25,902.23 244,991.95 489,983.90
auxilary equipment and accessories

3 Power Transformer - - - -

11/33 kV, 13 MVA Three phase, power


a) Set 1 87,567.21 12,909.80 12,909.80 185,040.54 10,327.84 10,327.84 195,368.38 195,368.38
transformer with accessories

Distribution Transformer (Auxiliary


4 - -
Transformer)

a) Station Service Transformer Set 1 3,502.69 516.39 516.39 7,401.62 413.11 413.11 7,814.74 7,814.74

5 Ancillary Equipment - -

a) Tools and testing instruments lot 1 7,005.38 1,032.78 1,032.78 14,803.24 826.23 826.23 15,629.47 15,629.47

b) Air Conditioning System lot 1 3,502.69 516.39 516.39 7,401.62 413.11 413.11 7,814.74 7,814.74

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate EM_Cost: 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT


Cost Estimate for Electromechanical Equipment
1USD = NPR. 110
Erection & Total Erection
Trans. & Ins, Total Trans.
S.N. Description Unit Qt'y FOB,US$ CIP Site, US$ supervision, & supervision, Unit Price, US $ Total Amount, US$
US$ & Ins, US$
US$ US$

c) Fire fighting system lot 1 8,756.72 1,290.98 1,290.98 18,504.05 1,032.78 1,032.78 19,536.84 19,536.84

d) 100 kVA DG Set with accessories Set 1 8,756.72 1,290.98 1,290.98 18,504.05 1,032.78 1,032.78 19,536.84 19,536.84

Powerhouse Bridge Crane (EOT) and


e) lot 1 52,540.32 7,745.88 7,745.88 111,024.32 6,196.71 6,196.71 117,221.03 117,221.03
accessories

f) Oil handling equipment lot 2 7,005.38 1,032.78 2,065.57 14,803.24 826.23 1,652.46 15,629.47 31,258.94

33 kV Outdoor Switchgear Equipment with all


6 complete acessories including gantry, ACSR lot 1 70,053.77 10,327.84 10,327.84 148,032.43 8,262.28 8,262.28 156,294.71 156,294.71
conductor, insulator etc.
33 kV Outdoor Switching Equipment at
7 lot 1 61,297.05 9,036.86 9,036.86 129,528.38 7,229.49 7,229.49 136,757.87 136,757.87
Interconnection NEA Hub
Electrical Protection System with complete
8 lot 1 21,016.13 3,098.35 3,098.35 44,409.73 2,478.68 2,478.68 46,888.41 46,888.41
accessories
Computerized Control System including
9 SCADA and Communication System all lot 1 21,016.13 3,098.35 3,098.35 44,409.73 2,478.68 2,478.68 46,888.41 46,888.41
Complete
10 12 kV Switchgear System lot 1 17,513.44 2,581.96 2,581.96 37,008.11 2,065.57 2,065.57 39,073.68 39,073.68

11 Low Voltage Distribution System lot 1 10,508.06 1,549.18 1,549.18 22,204.86 1,239.34 1,239.34 23,444.21 23,444.21

12 Cables - - - - -

a) MV & LV Cable System lot 1 10,508.06 1,549.18 1,549.18 22,204.86 1,239.34 1,239.34 23,444.21 23,444.21
Control and instrumentation cable with
c) lot 1 8,756.72 1,290.98 1,290.98 18,504.05 1,032.78 1,032.78 19,536.84 19,536.84
accessories
Communication and Telemetry Cables with
d) lot 1 2,627.02 387.29 387.29 5,551.22 309.84 309.84 5,861.05 5,861.05
accessories
13 Storage Battery and Battery Charger - - - - -
DC and UPS System for Powerhouse,
a) Headworks and Interconnection Switchyard lot 1 17,513.44 2,581.96 2,581.96 37,008.11 2,065.57 2,065.57 39,073.68 39,073.68
System all complete
Earthing and Lightning Protection System
14 for Powerhouse, Switchyard annd lot 1 10,508.06 1,549.18 1,549.18 22,204.86 1,239.34 1,239.34 23,444.21 23,444.21
Interconnection Switchyard complete

15 Powerhouse Communication System lot 1 1,751.34 258.20 258.20 3,700.81 206.56 206.56 3,907.37 3,907.37

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate EM_Cost: 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT


Cost Estimate for Electromechanical Equipment
1USD = NPR. 110
Erection & Total Erection
Trans. & Ins, Total Trans.
S.N. Description Unit Qt'y FOB,US$ CIP Site, US$ supervision, & supervision, Unit Price, US $ Total Amount, US$
US$ & Ins, US$
US$ US$

16 Powerhouse Illumination System lot 1 3,502.69 516.39 516.39 7,401.62 413.11 413.11 7,814.74 7,814.74

17 General items -
Contractor's general site facilities including
a) LS 1 - 150,000.00
Camps, workshops and office
b) Medical facilities,establishment and operation LS 1 - 10,000.00

c) Construction Power,communications and other LS 1 - 20,000.00

d) Drawing's, reports, O&M mannual, etc. Ls 1 - 10,000.00


e) Operation and maintenance of site facilities month 9 - 1,000.00 9,000.00
19 Training of Employer's personnel Ls 1 - 50,000.00

Total - 138,019.34 110,415.47 2,142,181.82

Custom @ 1.5% 25,421.21

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate EM_Cost: 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

Construction of 3 phase 33 kV Single Circuit new line from Sunigad Switchyard to Chainpur SS (Approx. 10 km long)
S.N. Item Description Unit Qty Unit Rate Cost Amount
USD Nep. Rs USD Nep. Rs
A Construction of new 33kV Single Ckt Line (Supply)
1 Supply of ACSR Dog Conductor(100 Sqmm) km 31 1535 47585.00
2 STEEL TUBULAR POLE of 540 MPA, SP54 of 11 M height No. 240 433 103848.00

Fabrication and Supply of M.S. Galvanised Items- (Pole top bracket, Cross arm,
guarding cross arm, back Clamps for Cross arm and Guard cross arm, D P Channel, DP
3 MT 12 1438 17261.40
channel clamp, Stay clamps angle, Stay clamps side, D P cross bracing & clamps etc.
complete as required. conforming to IS 2026,1977/75,1852/79 etc or equivalent IEC.)

Hot dip galvanised bolt, nuts alongwith plane and electroplated spring washer for
4 MT 2 1608 3536.94
erection of fabricated structural steel items as per TS
Complete Pole Stay Set including stay insulator, stay wire & additional items required
5 Set 300 48 14505.00
for road crossing etc but excluding stay clamp as per TS
6 GI Wire
i GI Wire 7/16 SWG for Guarding of the line kg 15 1 14.40
ii GI Wire (8 SWG) for Lacing of Guard wire kg 2 1 1.44
7 Insulators
i 33kV Pin insulator with GI pin as per TS No. 520 9 4836.00
33kv Disc Insulator assembly comprising of 3 nos. disc insulators (70 kN EMS and
ii 320mm minimum creepage distance) with all Hardwae fittings & accessories complete Set 520 27 14248.00
suitable to ACSR Dog as per TS
8 PG Clamps suitable for ACSR Dog No. 800 2 1920.00
9 Mid Span Compression Joints suitable for ACSR Dog No. 6 7 40.50
10 GI earth spikes (2500*20mm) as per TS No. 100 16 1635.00
11 Pipe type 40mm dia , 2.5 M long GI pipe, Class-B as per TS No. 6 19 115.50
Sub Total 209431.68
Local transportation and Insurance (6%) 12565.90
B Construction of new 33kV Single Ckt Line (Installation)
1 Detailed survey km 10 30,000.00 300000.00
Erection of STEEL TUBULAR POLE of 540 MPA, SP54,11 M height with approved
2
foundation type including erection of GI items, angles, bracings, B&N etc as per TS.
a) Single pole as per TS No. 140 4,500.00 630000.00
b) Double pole structure as per TS No. 50 9,000.00 450000.00

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Transmission_LineCost: 1 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex G: Project Cost Estimate

S.N. Item Description Unit Qty Unit Rate Cost Amount


USD Nep. Rs USD Nep. Rs
Laying out & Sagging of Conductor, Mid span compression jointing, binding of
Conductor with Pin Insulator using preformed insulator binding fitting (including supply
of preformed insulator binding fitting), fixing and fitting of all accessories like top
bracket /A-clamp, cross arm, Top channel, cross bracing, back clamp, support clamp,
danger board, anti climbing device as required, disc insulator with hardware fittings,
3 km 10 45,000.00 450000.00
including pin insulator on DP wherever necessary and pin insulator with pin on single
pole / double pole using bolts, nuts and washers as per NEA standard, providing danger
board, anticlimbing device (including supply of danger board and Anticlimbing device as
per requirement) and jumpering at DP and all cut points, angle points etc, complete for
33kV Line with ACSR DOG conductors.
4 Erection of stay set complete as per TS No. 300 2,500.00 750000.00
5 GI earth spikes (2500*20mm) as per TS No. 100 1,500.00 150000.00
6 Pipe type 40mm dia , 2.5 M long GI pipe, Class-B as per TS No. 6 1,500.00 9000.00
2739000.00
Total 221997.58 2739000.00
Note: 1 USD = 110 NPR
Total NPR 27158733.89

02H09_Annex G_Project_Cost_Estimate Transmission_LineCost: 2 of 2 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT (11.05MW)
VOLUME 2: ANNEX H
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex I: Financial Analysis

Total Fixed Capital Investment of Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW)

Total Project Cost with VAT 2,246,606,532.73


Financing Cost during construction @ ~ 1.0% of total
22,466,065
project Cost
Total Project Cost Excluding IDC 2,269,072,598
Interest During Construction 194,878,819
Total Project Cost Including IDC 2,463,951,417.15

02H09_Finacial_Analysis Cost : 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex I: Financial Analysis

Input Output
Capacity MW 11.05 Payback Period (on gross Profit) 5.12 Years
Project Cost With IDC (Million NPR) NPR 2,463.95 FIRR 18.26%
Equity Portion 38% 936.30 Million NPR Net Present Value (NPV) 1,149.15 Million NPR
Debt Portion 62% 1,527.65 Million NPR Specific Energy Cost (US Cent/kwhr) 4.37
Interest During Construction 11.0% Per Annum B/C Ratio 1.53
Interest During Operation 11.0% Per Annum DSCR (Maximum) 2.45
Loan Payback Period 10.00 Years DSCR (Minimum) 1.82
DSCR (Average) 2.01

Excahange Rate (1 US $ ) 110.00 NPR


Operation and Maintenance Cost
O and M Cost @ 2% of base cost 44.93 Million NPR
Escalation of Operation and Maintenance Cost 3.00%
EM replacement cost after 15 years 53.48 Million NPR
Insurance Cost during O and M
Isurance cost of Civil and electromechanical
components during O & M phase @ 0.35% 7.94 Million NPR
Escalation of Insurance Cost 3.00%
Depreciation and Amortization
Total Depreciation and Amortization 74.89 Million NPR
Royaltee
On Saleable Energy
1-15 Years 2.00%
After 15 Years 10.00%

Capacity Royaltee
NPR/KW/Year (1-15 years) 100 1.11 Million NPR
NPR/KW/Year after 15 years 1000 11.05 Million NPR
Escalation on Installed Capacity Rate 5%
Generation lisence Issued 2020
Date of Commercial Operation 2024
Discount Rate 10%
Tax during tax waiver period 0.0%
Tax during last 15 years 20.00%
Energy Production(GWh)
Total Dry Wet
Energy Production(GWh) 81.18 35.54 45.64
Tarrif as per PPA Rate Dry Wet
Tarrif rate (NPR/KWh) Base Year 8.40 4.80
Escalation on tarrif up to 8 times 3% 0.252 0.144

02H09_Finacial_Analysis Input : 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex I: Financial Analysis

Work Sheet

Description Construction Period Energy Generation Period


Years 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Year of Operation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053
Gross Energy Generation (Gwhr) 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18
Energy Payable to Royaltee 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18
Total Sellable Energy (Gwhr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18 81.18
Dry 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54 35.54

Wet Energy 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64 45.64

Tarrif(NPR/kwh)average 6.38 6.57 6.76 6.95 7.14 7.33 7.52 7.72 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91
Dry 8.40 8.65 8.90 9.16 9.41 9.66 9.91 10.16 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42 10.42
Wet 4.80 4.94 5.09 5.23 5.38 5.52 5.66 5.81 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95 5.95
Total Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 517.61 533.14 548.66 564.19 579.72 595.25 610.78 626.31 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83

Cost
Equity Cash Flow 749.04 187.26 0.00 0.00
Annual Royaltee Energy 10.35 10.66 10.97 11.28 11.59 11.90 12.22 12.53 12.84 12.84 12.84 12.84 12.84 12.84 12.84 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18 64.18
Royaltee for Capacity Installed 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05
Operation and Maintenance Cost 44.93 46.28 47.67 49.10 50.57 52.09 53.65 55.26 56.92 58.63 60.39 62.20 64.06 65.98 67.96 70.00 72.10 74.27 76.49 78.79 81.15 83.59 86.09 88.68 91.34 94.08 96.90 99.81 102.80 105.89
EM replace 53.48
Insurance Cost 7.94 8.18 8.43 8.68 8.94 9.21 9.48 9.77 10.06 10.36 10.67 10.99 11.32 11.66 12.01 12.37 12.74 13.13 13.52 13.93 14.34 14.77 15.22 15.67 16.14 16.63 17.13 17.64 18.17 18.72
Total Operating Cost 64.33 66.23 68.17 70.17 72.21 74.31 76.45 78.66 80.92 82.93 85.00 87.13 89.33 91.59 93.92 211.09 160.08 162.63 165.25 167.95 170.73 173.59 176.55 179.58 182.72 185.94 189.26 192.68 196.21 199.83

Total Cash Outflow 749.04 187.26 0.00 0.00 290.96 315.43 307.29 328.49 346.38 360.97 342.95 354.29 333.02 311.50 85.00 87.13 89.33 91.59 93.92 211.09 160.08 162.63 165.25 167.95 170.73 173.59 176.55 179.58 182.72 185.94 189.26 192.68 196.21 199.83

Benefit
Average Tariff Rate 6.38 6.57 6.76 6.95 7.14 7.33 7.52 7.72 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91 7.91
Revenue From Energy Sale 517.61 533.14 548.66 564.19 579.72 595.25 610.78 626.31 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83 641.83
EBITDA 453.28 466.91 480.49 494.03 507.51 520.94 534.32 547.65 560.91 558.90 556.83 554.70 552.51 550.25 547.92 430.74 481.75 479.21 476.59 473.89 471.10 468.24 465.29 462.25 459.12 455.89 452.57 449.15 445.63 442.00
Depreciation 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89 74.89
EBIT 378.39 392.02 405.61 419.14 432.62 446.06 459.44 472.76 486.03 484.02 481.95 479.82 477.62 475.36 473.03 355.86 406.87 404.32 401.70 399.00 396.22 393.35 390.40 387.36 384.23 381.01 377.69 374.27 370.74 367.11
Interest on Debt 165.52 157.54 147.46 136.11 121.41 103.35 83.18 61.76 38.23 14.70 0.00 0.00 0.00
Earning Before Tax 212.87 234.48 258.15 283.03 311.21 342.71 376.26 411.00 447.80 469.31 481.95 479.82 477.62 475.36 473.03 355.86 406.87 404.32 401.70 399.00 396.22 393.35 390.40 387.36 384.23 381.01 377.69 374.27 370.74 367.11
Tax 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.19 47.98 47.76 47.54 47.30 71.17 81.37 80.86 80.34 79.80 79.24 78.67 78.08 77.47 76.85 76.20 75.54 74.85 74.15 73.42
Net Profit after tax 212.87 234.48 258.15 283.03 311.21 342.71 376.26 411.00 447.80 469.31 433.75 431.83 429.86 427.82 425.73 284.68 325.49 323.46 321.36 319.20 316.97 314.68 312.32 309.89 307.39 304.81 302.15 299.41 296.59 293.69
Bonus and Welfare Fund 4.26 4.69 5.16 5.66 6.22 6.85 7.53 8.22 8.96 9.39 8.68 8.64 8.60 8.56 8.51 5.69 6.51 6.47 6.43 6.38 6.34 6.29 6.25 6.20 6.15 6.10 6.04 5.99 5.93 5.87
Net Profit 208.61 229.79 252.99 277.37 304.99 335.86 368.73 402.78 438.84 459.93 425.08 423.20 421.26 419.27 417.21 278.99 318.98 316.99 314.93 312.82 310.63 308.39 306.08 303.69 301.24 298.71 296.11 293.42 290.66 287.82
Capital Repayment 61.11 91.66 91.66 122.21 152.76 183.32 183.32 213.87 213.87 213.87 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reimburshment of VAT
Net Cash Flow -749.04 -187.26 0.00 0.00 222.39 213.02 236.21 230.04 227.11 227.43 260.30 263.80 299.86 320.94 499.96 498.08 496.15 494.15 492.10 353.88 393.87 391.87 389.82 387.70 385.52 383.28 380.96 378.58 376.12 373.60 370.99 368.31 365.55 362.70

Output
NPV Benefit (Million NPR) 3849.92
NPV Cost (Million NPR) 2513.98
NPV (Million NPR) 1149.15
Benefit Cost Ratio 1.53
FIRR 18.26%
NPV of Energy 522.69
Specific Energy Cost (NPR/kwhr) 4.81

02H09_Finacial_Analysis worksheet.: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex I: Financial Analysis

Amortization Schedule
Total Project Base Cost 2,269.07
Interest During Construction 194.88
Total Project Cost 2,463.95
Equity Disburshment
Equity Portion 38% 936.30 1yr 749.04 80.00%
Loan Portion 62% 1,527.65 2nd yr 187.26 20.00%
3rd yr - 0.00%
Interest Rate 11% 4th yr - 0.00%
Total No. of Payment 40

4.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 14.00 14.00 14.00
% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50
15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 22.91 22.91 22.91 22.91 22.91 22.91 22.91 22.91 30.55 30.55 30.55 30.55 38.19 38.19 38.19 38.19 45.83 45.83 45.83 45.83 45.83 45.83 45.83 45.83 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47
15.28 22.91 22.91 30.55 38.19 45.83 45.83 53.47 53.47 53.47
Quartrly Loan Repayment Schedule
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Quarter Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Principal Repayment 15.28 15.28 15.28 15.28 22.91 22.91 22.91 22.91 22.91 22.91 22.91 22.91 30.55 30.55 30.55 30.55 38.19 38.19 38.19 38.19 45.83 45.83 45.83 45.83 45.83 45.83 45.83 45.83 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47 53.47
Outstanding 1,512.37 1,497.10 1,481.82 1,466.54 1,443.63 1,420.71 1,397.80 1,374.88 1,351.97 1,329.06 1,306.14 1,283.23 1,252.67 1,222.12 1,191.57 1,161.01 1,122.82 1,084.63 1,046.44 1,008.25 962.42 916.59 870.76 824.93 779.10 733.27 687.44 641.61 588.15 534.68 481.21 427.74 374.27 320.81 267.34 213.87 160.40 106.94 53.47 (0.00)
Interest 42.01 41.59 41.17 40.75 40.33 39.70 39.07 38.44 37.81 37.18 36.55 35.92 35.29 34.45 33.61 32.77 31.93 30.88 29.83 28.78 27.73 26.47 25.21 23.95 22.69 21.43 20.16 18.90 17.64 16.17 14.70 13.23 11.76 10.29 8.82 7.35 5.88 4.41 2.94 1.47
Total Payment to Bank 57.29 56.87 56.45 56.03 63.24 62.61 61.98 61.35 60.72 60.09 59.46 58.83 65.84 65.00 64.16 63.32 70.12 69.07 68.02 66.97 73.56 72.30 71.04 69.78 68.52 67.25 65.99 64.73 71.11 69.64 68.17 66.70 65.23 63.76 62.29 60.82 59.35 57.88 56.41 54.94

Yearly Schedule 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Term Loan 1527.65 1466.54 1374.88 1283.23 1161.01 1008.25 824.93 641.61 427.74 213.87
Interest 165.52 157.54 147.46 136.11 121.41 103.35 83.18 61.76 38.23 14.70
Loan Repayment 226.63 249.20 239.12 258.33 274.17 286.66 266.50 275.63 252.10 228.57
Outstanding 1466.54 1374.88 1283.23 1161.01 1008.25 824.93 641.61 427.74 213.87 0.00
Principal Repayment 61.11 91.66 91.66 122.21 152.76 183.32 183.32 213.87 213.87 213.87
Interest 165.52 157.54 147.46 136.11 121.41 103.35 83.18 61.76 38.23 14.70

02H09_Finacial_Analysis Amortization: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex I: Financial Analysis

Financial Ratio

Earning
Depreciation
Year after Interest(Million Loan Repayment
SN (Million DSCR
Ended Tax(Million NPR) (Million NPR)
NPR)
NPR)
1 1 212.87 165.52 74.89 226.63 2.00
2 2 234.48 157.54 74.89 249.20 1.87
3 3 258.15 147.46 74.89 239.12 2.01
4 4 283.03 136.11 74.89 258.33 1.91
5 5 311.21 121.41 74.89 274.17 1.85
6 6 342.71 103.35 74.89 286.66 1.82
7 7 376.26 83.18 74.89 266.50 2.00
8 8 411.00 61.76 74.89 275.63 1.99
9 9 447.80 38.23 74.89 252.10 2.22
10 10 469.31 14.70 74.89 228.57 2.45
11 11 433.75 74.89
12 12 431.83 74.89
13 13 429.86 74.89
14 14 427.82 74.89
15 15 425.73 74.89
16 16 284.68 74.89
17 17 325.49 74.89
18 18 323.46 74.89
19 19 321.36 74.89
20 20 319.20 74.89
21 21 316.97 74.89
22 22 314.68 74.89
23 23 312.32 74.89
24 24 309.89 74.89
25 25 307.39 74.89
26 26 304.81 74.89
27 27 302.15 74.89
28 28 299.41 74.89
29 29 296.59 74.89
30 30 293.69 74.89

02H09_Finacial_Analysis Fina Ratio : 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex I: Financial Analysis

IDC Calculation
Debt Portion of Base Cost 1406.83
Interest (Per Annum) 0.110
Capitalization Period 3.50 Years
No. of Loan Installment 16.00

Cumulative
Loan Outstanding
Year Quarter interest Loan at the
Disburshment Loan
End
1 1 20.00 20.00 0.55 20.55
2 20.00 40.55 1.12 41.67
3 20.00 61.67 1.70 63.36
4 20.00 83.36 2.29 85.65
2 5 70.00 155.65 4.28 159.93
6 70.00 229.93 6.32 236.26
7 70.00 306.26 8.42 314.68
8 70.00 384.68 10.58 395.26
3 9 131.00 526.26 14.47 540.73
10 131.00 671.73 18.47 690.20
11 131.00 821.20 22.58 843.79
12 131.00 974.79 26.81 1001.59
4 13 250.00 1251.59 34.42 1286.01
14 272.83 1558.84 42.87 1601.70
1406.83 194.88 1601.70

02H09_Finacial_Analysis IDC 3.5: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex I: Financial Analysis

Projected Profit and Loss Statement


Income, Million NPR Expenses, Million NPR.

Total Saleable Energy


Tariff Average for the

Depreciation and Tax

Profit Before Income


Annual Royaltee for

Net Income after tax

Gross Cash Acraual


Insurance Expenses

Reserve Transfer to
Proposed Dividend
Bonus and Welfare
Interest on Debt @

Less Provision for


Wheeling Charges

Installed Capacity

Corporate Tax @
E and M Replace
Annual Royaltee
Year NPR/kwhr

Total Operating

(NPR Milllion)
Operation and

Balance Sheet
Profit Before

Depreciation
Maintenance

(PAT+DEP)
Actual Sales

Tax (PBIT)
Receiables

Expenses

Expenses

EBITDA

(PBDT)
Energy

20.0%
12%

fund
Year Ended

1 6.38 81.18 517.61 86.27 7.94 10.35 1.11 44.93 64.33 453.28 165.52 287.76 74.89 212.87 0.00 4.26 208.61 112.36 96.26 283.50
2 6.57 81.18 533.14 88.86 8.18 10.66 1.11 46.28 66.23 466.91 157.54 309.37 74.89 234.48 0.00 4.69 229.79 112.36 213.69 304.68
3 6.76 81.18 548.66 91.44 8.43 10.97 1.11 47.67 68.17 480.49 147.46 333.04 74.89 258.15 0.00 5.16 252.99 112.36 354.32 327.87
4 6.95 81.18 564.19 94.03 8.68 11.28 1.11 49.10 70.17 494.03 136.11 357.91 74.89 283.03 0.00 5.66 277.37 112.36 519.33 352.25
5 7.14 81.18 579.72 96.62 8.94 11.59 1.11 50.57 72.21 507.51 121.41 386.10 74.89 311.21 0.00 6.22 304.99 112.36 711.97 379.88
6 7.33 81.18 595.25 99.21 9.21 11.90 1.11 52.09 74.31 520.94 103.35 417.60 74.89 342.71 0.00 6.85 335.86 140.45 907.38 410.74
7 7.52 81.18 610.78 101.80 9.48 12.22 1.11 53.65 76.45 534.32 83.18 451.14 74.89 376.26 0.00 7.53 368.73 140.45 1135.66 443.62
8 7.72 81.18 626.31 104.38 9.77 12.53 1.11 55.26 78.66 547.65 61.76 485.89 74.89 411.00 0.00 8.22 402.78 140.45 1398.00 477.67

9 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 10.06 12.84 1.11 56.92 80.92 560.91 38.23 522.68 74.89 447.80 0.00 8.96 438.84 140.45 1696.40 513.73
10 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 10.36 12.84 1.11 58.63 82.93 558.90 14.70 544.20 74.89 469.31 0.00 9.39 459.93 140.45 2015.88 534.81
11 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 10.67 12.84 1.11 60.39 85.00 556.83 0.00 556.83 74.89 481.95 48.19 8.68 425.08 140.45 2300.51 499.96
12 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 10.99 12.84 1.11 62.20 87.13 554.70 0.00 554.70 74.89 479.82 47.98 8.64 423.20 140.45 2583.26 498.08
13 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 11.32 12.84 1.11 64.06 89.33 552.51 552.51 74.89 477.62 47.76 8.60 421.26 140.45 2864.08 496.15
14 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 11.66 12.84 1.11 65.98 91.59 550.25 550.25 74.89 475.36 47.54 8.56 419.27 187.26 3096.09 494.15
15 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 12.01 12.84 1.11 67.96 93.92 547.92 547.92 74.89 473.03 47.30 8.51 417.21 187.26 3326.04 492.10
16 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 12.37 64.18 11.05 70.00 53.48 211.09 430.74 430.74 74.89 355.86 71.17 5.69 278.99 280.89 3324.14 353.88
17 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 12.74 64.18 11.05 72.10 160.08 481.75 481.75 74.89 406.87 81.37 6.51 318.98 280.89 3362.23 393.87
18 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 13.13 64.18 11.05 74.27 162.63 479.21 479.21 74.89 404.32 80.86 6.47 316.99 280.89 3398.33 391.87
19 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 13.52 64.18 11.05 76.49 165.25 476.59 476.59 74.89 401.70 80.34 6.43 314.93 280.89 3432.37 389.82
20 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 13.93 64.18 11.05 78.79 167.95 473.89 473.89 74.89 399.00 79.80 6.38 312.82 280.89 3464.29 387.70
21 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 14.34 64.18 11.05 81.15 170.73 471.10 471.10 74.89 396.22 79.24 6.34 310.63 374.52 3400.41 385.52
22 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 14.77 64.18 11.05 83.59 173.59 468.24 468.24 74.89 393.35 78.67 6.29 308.39 374.52 3334.28 383.28
23 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 15.22 64.18 11.05 86.09 176.55 465.29 465.29 74.89 390.40 78.08 6.25 306.08 374.52 3265.83 380.96
24 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 15.67 64.18 11.05 88.68 179.58 462.25 462.25 74.89 387.36 77.47 6.20 303.69 374.52 3195.00 378.58
25 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 16.14 64.18 11.05 91.34 182.72 459.12 459.12 74.89 384.23 76.85 6.15 301.24 374.52 3121.72 376.12
26 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 16.63 64.18 11.05 94.08 185.94 455.89 455.89 74.89 381.01 76.20 6.10 298.71 374.52 3045.91 373.60
27 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 17.13 64.18 11.05 96.90 189.26 452.57 452.57 74.89 377.69 75.54 6.04 296.11 374.52 2967.49 370.99
28 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 17.64 64.18 11.05 99.81 192.68 449.15 449.15 74.89 374.27 74.85 5.99 293.42 280.89 2980.03 368.31
29 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 18.17 64.18 11.05 102.80 196.21 445.63 445.63 74.89 370.74 74.15 5.93 290.66 280.89 2989.80 365.55
30 7.91 81.18 641.83 106.97 18.72 64.18 11.05 105.89 199.83 442.00 442.00 74.89 367.11 73.42 5.87 287.82 280.89 2996.72 362.70

02H09_Finacial_Analysis Proj prof and loss : 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex I: Financial Analysis

Cash Flow Projection

Net
(increase)/dec Change in Opening
Year Principal Closing
Net Profit Depreciation rease in Dividend Paid Cash Cash
Ended Payment Balance
Receivables during the Balance
year
1 208.61 74.89 (86.27) 61.11 112.36 23.77 - 23.77
2 229.79 74.89 (2.59) 91.66 112.36 98.08 23.77 121.85
3 252.99 74.89 (2.59) 91.66 112.36 121.27 121.85 243.11
4 277.37 74.89 (2.59) 122.21 112.36 115.10 243.11 358.21
5 304.99 74.89 (2.59) 152.76 112.36 112.17 358.21 470.38
6 335.86 74.89 (2.59) 183.32 140.45 84.39 470.38 554.77
7 368.73 74.89 (2.59) 183.32 140.45 117.27 554.77 672.04
8 402.78 74.89 (2.59) 213.87 140.45 120.77 672.04 792.81
9 438.84 74.89 (2.59) 213.87 140.45 156.82 792.81 949.63
10 459.93 74.89 - 213.87 140.45 180.50 949.63 1,130.13
11 425.08 74.89 - - 140.45 359.52 1,130.13 1,489.65
12 423.20 74.89 - - 140.45 357.64 1,489.65 1,847.28
13 421.26 74.89 - - 140.45 355.70 1,847.28 2,202.99
14 419.27 74.89 - 187.26 306.89 2,202.99 2,509.88
15 417.21 74.89 - 187.26 304.84 2,509.88 2,814.72
16 278.99 74.89 - 280.89 72.99 2,814.72 2,887.70
17 318.98 74.89 - 280.89 112.98 2,887.70 3,000.68
18 316.99 74.89 - 280.89 110.98 3,000.68 3,111.67
19 314.93 74.89 - 280.89 108.93 3,111.67 3,220.60
20 312.82 74.89 - 280.89 106.81 3,220.60 3,327.41
21 310.63 74.89 - 374.52 11.00 3,327.41 3,338.41
22 308.39 74.89 - 374.52 8.75 3,338.41 3,347.16
23 306.08 74.89 - 374.52 6.44 3,347.16 3,353.61
24 303.69 74.89 - 374.52 4.06 3,353.61 3,357.66
25 301.24 74.89 - 374.52 1.60 3,357.66 3,359.27
26 298.71 74.89 - 374.52 (0.92) 3,359.27 3,358.34
27 296.11 74.89 - 374.52 (3.53) 3,358.34 3,354.82
28 293.42 74.89 - 280.89 87.42 3,354.82 3,442.24
29 290.66 74.89 - 280.89 84.66 3,442.24 3,526.90
30 287.82 74.89 - 280.89 81.81 3,526.90 3,608.71

02H09_Finacial_Analysis Cash Flow Projection: 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW) Vol 2 Annex I: Financial Analysis

Projected Balance Sheet


Total Shareholder's Fund and Liabilites Fixed Assets Current Assets

Accumulated Depreciation
Total Shareholders Fund

Proposed Dividend

Receivables
Term Loan
Net Fixed
Year Share Reserve and Gross Fixed Cash and Bank Total Current Total Assets
Assests in
Ended Capital Surplus Assets Balance Assets (B) (A+B)
Operation(A)

1 936.30 96.26 1,032.56 1,466.54 112.36 2,463.95 74.89 2,389.06 23.77 86.27 110.04 2,499.10
2 936.30 213.69 1,149.99 1,374.88 112.36 2,463.95 149.77 2,314.18 121.85 88.86 210.70 2,524.88
3 936.30 354.32 1,290.62 1,283.23 112.36 2,463.95 224.66 2,239.29 243.11 91.44 334.56 2,573.85
4 936.30 519.33 1,455.63 1,161.01 112.36 2,463.95 299.55 2,164.40 358.21 94.03 452.24 2,616.65
5 936.30 711.97 1,648.27 1,008.25 112.36 2,463.95 374.43 2,089.52 470.38 96.62 567.00 2,656.52
6 936.30 907.38 1,843.68 824.93 140.45 2,463.95 449.32 2,014.63 554.77 99.21 653.98 2,668.61
7 936.30 1,135.66 2,071.96 641.61 140.45 2,463.95 524.21 1,939.74 672.04 101.80 773.83 2,713.58
8 936.30 1,398.00 2,334.30 427.74 140.45 2,463.95 599.10 1,864.86 792.81 104.38 897.19 2,762.05
9 936.30 1,696.40 2,632.70 213.87 140.45 2,463.95 673.98 1,789.97 949.63 106.97 1,056.60 2,846.57
10 936.30 2,015.88 2,952.18 213.87 140.45 2,463.95 748.87 1,715.08 1,130.13 106.97 1,237.10 2,952.18
11 936.30 2,300.51 3,236.81 38.23 140.45 2,463.95 823.76 1,640.20 1,489.65 106.97 1,596.62 3,236.81
12 936.30 2,583.26 3,519.57 140.45 2,463.95 898.64 1,565.31 1,847.28 106.97 1,954.26 3,519.57
13 936.30 2,864.08 3,800.38 140.45 2,463.95 973.53 1,490.42 2,202.99 106.97 2,309.96 3,800.38
14 936.30 3,096.09 4,032.39 187.26 2,463.95 1,048.42 1,415.54 2,509.88 106.97 2,616.85 4,032.39
15 936.30 3,326.04 4,262.34 187.26 2,463.95 1,123.30 1,340.65 2,814.72 106.97 2,921.69 4,262.34
16 936.30 3,324.14 4,260.44 280.89 2,463.95 1,198.19 1,265.76 2,887.70 106.97 2,994.68 4,260.44
17 936.30 3,362.23 4,298.53 280.89 2,463.95 1,273.08 1,190.87 3,000.68 106.97 3,107.66 4,298.53
18 936.30 3,398.33 4,334.63 280.89 2,463.95 1,347.96 1,115.99 3,111.67 106.97 3,218.64 4,334.63
19 936.30 3,432.37 4,368.67 280.89 2,463.95 1,422.85 1,041.10 3,220.60 106.97 3,327.57 4,368.67
20 936.30 3,464.29 4,400.60 280.89 2,463.95 1,497.74 966.21 3,327.41 106.97 3,434.38 4,400.60
21 936.30 3,400.41 4,336.71 374.52 2,463.95 1,572.62 891.33 3,338.41 106.97 3,445.38 4,336.71
22 936.30 3,334.28 4,270.58 374.52 2,463.95 1,647.51 816.44 3,347.16 106.97 3,454.14 4,270.58
23 936.30 3,265.83 4,202.13 374.52 2,463.95 1,722.40 741.55 3,353.61 106.97 3,460.58 4,202.13
24 936.30 3,195.00 4,131.30 374.52 2,463.95 1,797.29 666.67 3,357.66 106.97 3,464.64 4,131.30
25 936.30 3,121.72 4,058.02 374.52 2,463.95 1,872.17 591.78 3,359.27 106.97 3,466.24 4,058.02
26 936.30 3,045.91 3,982.21 374.52 2,463.95 1,947.06 516.89 3,358.34 106.97 3,465.32 3,982.21
27 936.30 2,967.49 3,903.79 374.52 2,463.95 2,021.95 442.01 3,354.82 106.97 3,461.79 3,903.79
28 936.30 2,980.03 3,916.33 280.89 2,463.95 2,096.83 367.12 3,442.24 106.97 3,549.21 3,916.33
29 936.30 2,989.80 3,926.10 280.89 2,463.95 2,171.72 292.23 3,526.90 106.97 3,633.87 3,926.10
30 936.30 2,996.72 3,933.03 280.89 2,463.95 2,246.61 217.34 3,608.71 106.97 3,715.68 3,933.03

02H09_Finacial_Analysis Balance Sheet : 1 of 1 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT
SUNI GAD HYDROPOWER PROJECT (11.05MW)
VOLUME 2: ANNEX I
CONSTRUCTION TIME SCHEDULE
Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW)
Vol 2 Annex I: Construction Time Schedule
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J
1 Sunigad Hydropower Project 1892.9 days Thu 3/15/18 Sat 5/20/23
2 Milestones 1892.9 days Thu 3/15/18 Sat 5/20/23
3 Conclusion of PPA 0 days Thu 3/15/18 Thu 3/15/18 Mar 15 '18
4 Financial Closure 0 days Wed 3/11/20 Wed 3/11/20 Mar 11 '20
5 Issuance of Generation License 0 days Tue 6/9/20 Tue 6/9/20 Jun 9 '20
6 Project ready for commission 0 days Thu 2/9/23 Thu 2/9/23 Feb 9 '23
7 Commission of the project 0 days Thu 4/20/23 Thu 4/20/23 Apr 20 '23
8 Start of commercial operation 0 days Thu 4/20/23 Thu 4/20/23 Apr 20 '23
9 RCOD 0 days Sat 5/20/23 Sat 5/20/23 May 20 '23
10 Preparatory works 670 days Fri 9/13/19 Wed 7/14/21
11 Land Acquisition (Remaining) 150 days Sat 1/11/20 Tue 6/9/20 Jan 11 '20 Jun 9 '20
12 Tendering for Site facilities 60 days Tue 6/9/20 Sat 8/8/20 Jun 9 '20 Aug 8 '20
13 Tendering for Civil and Hydromechanical 90 days Thu 7/9/20 Wed 10/7/20 Jul 9 '20 Oct 7 '20
14 Tendering for Electromechanical 90 days Sat 8/8/20 Fri 11/6/20 Aug 8 '20 Nov 6 '20
15 Site facilities mobilisation 60 days Sat 8/8/20 Wed 10/7/20 Aug 8 '20 Oct 7 '20
16 Civil and Hydromechnical Mobilisation 45 days Thu 10/8/20 Sat 11/21/20 Oct 8 '20 Nov 21 '20
17 Electromechancal Mobilsation 45 days Fri 11/6/20 Mon 12/21/20 Nov 6 '20 Dec 21 '20
18 Site facilities 670 days Fri 9/13/19 Wed 7/14/21
19 33kV Transmission line 180 days Wed 10/7/20 Mon 4/5/21 Oct 7 '20 Apr 5 '21
20 Camps and facilites 250 days Wed 10/7/20 Mon 6/14/21 Oct 7 '20 Jun 14 '21
21 Upgrading/Construction of Access Road 670 days Fri 9/13/19 Wed 7/14/21 Sep 13 '19 Jul 14 '21
22 Project Construction Schedule 925 days Fri 11/6/20 Sat 5/20/23
23 Civil Works 849.9 days Sun 11/22/20 Tue 3/21/23
24 Heaworks Construction 535 days Sat 10/2/21 Tue 3/21/23
25 Temporary River Diversion Works 30 days Sat 10/2/21 Mon 11/1/21 Oct 2 '21 Nov 1 '21
26 Excavation undersluice, intake & part of 50 days Mon 11/1/21 Tue 12/21/21 Nov 1 '21 Dec 21 '21
diver. weir
27 Concreting undersluice, intake & part of 100 days Wed 12/1/21 Fri 3/11/22 Dec 1 '21 Mar 11 '22
diver. weir
28 Hosting arrangement 30 days Fri 3/11/22 Sun 4/10/22 Mar 11 '22 Apr 10 '22
29 Erection of Hydraulic Steel Works 30 days Sun 4/10/22 Tue 5/10/22 Apr 10 '22 May 10 '22
30 River diversion from undersluice 25 days Sat 9/17/22 Wed 10/12/22 Sep 17 '22 Oct 12 '22
31 Excavation for Remaining diversion weir 50 days Wed 10/12/22 Thu 12/1/22 Oct 12 '22 Dec 1 '22
32 Concreting for Remaining diversion weir 80 days Thu 12/1/22 Sun 2/19/23 Dec 1 '22 Feb 19 '23
33 Finishing Works 30 days Sun 2/19/23 Tue 3/21/23 Feb 19 '23 Mar 21 '23
34 Desander and Headpond 505 days Wed 10/13/21 Wed 3/1/23
35 Surface Preparation 30 days Wed 10/13/21 Thu 11/11/21 Oct 13 '21 Nov 11 '21
36 Excavation for desander 150 days Fri 11/12/21 Sun 4/10/22 Nov 12 '21 Apr 10 '22
37 Remaining Excavation for desander and 110 days Thu 9/8/22 Mon 12/26/22 Sep 8 '22 Dec 26 '22
Headpond
38 Base Concreting for desander and 365 days Sun 12/12/21 Sun 12/11/22 Dec 12 '21 Dec 11 '22
Headpond
39 Slope and wall Concreting for desander and 300 days Wed 1/26/22 Mon 11/21/22 Jan 26 '22 Nov 21 '22
Headpond

Task Rolled Up Milestone Inactive Milestone Start-only Progress


Critical Task Rolled Up Progress Inactive Summary Finish-only Deadline
Milestone Split Manual Task External Tasks
Summary External Tasks Duration-only External Milestone
Rolled Up Task Project Summary Manual Summary Rollup Critical
Rolled Up Critical Task Group By Summary Manual Summary Critical Split

Construction Schedule_ RCOD_20200420 1 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW)
Vol 2 Annex I: Construction Time Schedule
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J
40 Hosting arrangement at Desander 30 days Tue 11/22/22 Wed 12/21/22 Nov 22 '22 Dec 21 '22
41 Erection of hyraulic structure u/s and d/s 45 days Thu 12/22/22 Sat 2/4/23 Dec 22 '22 Feb 4 '23
42 Finishing works 60 days Sun 1/1/23 Wed 3/1/23 Jan 1 '23 Mar 1 '23
43 Headrace Tunnel 400 days Mon 11/23/20 Fri 10/21/22 Nov 23 '20 Oct 21 '22
44 Approach Pipe Crossing and Excavation 100 days Thu 12/2/21 Wed 5/25/22 Dec 2 '21 May 25 '22
Works for Approach Pipe
45 Forebay 110 days Thu 12/2/21 Mon 6/13/22
46 Site Clearnace and Excavation Works 30 days Thu 12/2/21 Mon 1/24/22 Dec 2 '21 Jan 24 '22
47 Concreting 60 days Mon 1/24/22 Mon 5/9/22 Jan 24 '22 May 9 '22
48 Finishing Works 20 days Mon 5/9/22 Mon 6/13/22 May 9 '22 Jun 13 '22
49 Steel pipe 835 days Sun 11/22/20 Mon 3/6/23
50 Welding and Fabrication in workshop 700 days Sun 11/22/20 Sat 10/22/22 Nov 22 '20 Oct 22 '22
51 Survey and Fixing alignment 60 days Sun 11/22/20 Wed 1/20/21 Nov 22 '20 Jan 20 '21
52 Excavation in Alignment 480 days Wed 10/13/21 Sat 2/4/23 Oct 13 '21 Feb 4 '23
53 Laying and finishing of pipe from front 1 340 days Thu 10/28/21 Thu 1/19/23 Oct 28 '21 Jan 19 '23
54 Laying and finishing of pipe from front 2 320 days Sat 11/27/21 Fri 2/3/23 Nov 27 '21 Feb 3 '23
55 Laying and finishing of pipe from front 3 320 days Sat 11/27/21 Wed 1/25/23 Nov 27 '21 Jan 25 '23
56 Laying and finishing of pipe from front 4 280 days Mon 12/27/21 Thu 1/19/23 Dec 27 '21 Jan 19 '23
57 Laying and finishing of pipe from front 5 130 days Tue 9/13/22 Fri 1/20/23 Sep 13 '22 Jan 20 '23
58 Laying and finishing of pipe from front 6 130 days Wed 9/28/22 Sat 2/4/23 Sep 28 '22 Feb 4 '23
59 Laying and finishing of pipe from front 7 90 days Mon 11/7/22 Sat 2/4/23 Nov 7 '22 Feb 4 '23
60 Laying and finishing of pipe from front 8 90 days Tue 11/22/22 Sun 2/19/23 Nov 22 '22 Feb 19 '23
61 Finishing works 45 days Sat 1/21/23 Mon 3/6/23 Jan 21 '23 Mar 6 '23
62 Surge tank 365 days Wed 1/6/21 Wed 1/5/22
63 Preparatory works for surge tank 45 days Wed 1/6/21 Fri 2/19/21 Jan 6 '21 Feb 19 '21
64 laying and finishing of surge pipe 100 days Sat 2/20/21 Sun 5/30/21 Feb 20 '21 May 30 '21
65 Remaining works & Finishing 90 days Fri 10/8/21 Wed 1/5/22 Oct 8 '21 Jan 5 '22
66 Powerhouse 440 days Fri 2/19/21 Thu 5/5/22
67 Excavation for Powerhouse 40 days Fri 2/19/21 Wed 3/31/21 Feb 19 '21 Mar 31 '21
68 Foundation Conreting 60 days Wed 3/31/21 Sun 5/30/21 Mar 31 '21 May 30 '21
69 Concreting upto Crane Level 220 days Sun 5/30/21 Wed 1/5/22 May 30 '21 Jan 5 '22
70 Roofing & Finishing Works 60 days Wed 1/5/22 Sun 3/6/22 Jan 5 '22 Mar 6 '22
71 Ready for electromechanical erection 0 days Sun 3/6/22 Sun 3/6/22 Mar 6 '22
72 Second Stage Concreting 60 days Sun 3/6/22 Thu 5/5/22 Mar 6 '22 May 5 '22
73 Tailrace and Switchyard 210 days Sun 3/6/22 Sun 10/2/22
74 Excavation 30 days Sun 3/6/22 Tue 4/5/22 Mar 6 '22 Apr 5 '22
75 Concreting 60 days Tue 4/5/22 Sat 6/4/22 Apr 5 '22 Jun 4 '22
76 Erosion Protection Works 60 days Sat 6/4/22 Wed 8/3/22 Jun 4 '22 Aug 3 '22
77 Finishing Works 60 days Wed 8/3/22 Sun 10/2/22 Aug 3 '22 Oct 2 '22
78 Electromechanical 925 days Fri 11/6/20 Sat 5/20/23
79 Design, Manufacturing and Delivery to Site 365 days Fri 11/6/20 Sat 11/6/21 Nov 6 '20 Nov 6 '21
80 Erection of Overhead Travelling Crane 30 days Fri 2/4/22 Sun 3/6/22 Feb 4 '22 Mar 6 '22

Task Rolled Up Milestone Inactive Milestone Start-only Progress


Critical Task Rolled Up Progress Inactive Summary Finish-only Deadline
Milestone Split Manual Task External Tasks
Summary External Tasks Duration-only External Milestone
Rolled Up Task Project Summary Manual Summary Rollup Critical
Rolled Up Critical Task Group By Summary Manual Summary Critical Split

Construction Schedule_ RCOD_20200420 2 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.


Omega Energy Developer Pvt. Ltd. Detail Engineering Design Report
Suni Gad Hydropower Project (11.05 MW)
Vol 2 Annex I: Construction Time Schedule
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J
81 Mechanical Installation 180 days Sun 3/6/22 Fri 9/2/22
82 Unit 1 Turbine 90 days Sun 3/6/22 Sat 6/4/22 Mar 6 '22 Jun 4 '22
83 Unit 2 Turbine 90 days Sat 6/4/22 Fri 9/2/22 Jun 4 '22 Sep 2 '22
84 Electrical Installation 180 days Sat 6/4/22 Thu 12/1/22
85 Unit 1 Generator 90 days Sat 6/4/22 Fri 9/2/22 Jun 4 '22 Sep 2 '22
86 Unit 2 Generator 90 days Fri 9/2/22 Thu 12/1/22 Sep 2 '22 Dec 1 '22
87 Transformers 60 days Sat 6/4/22 Wed 8/3/22 Jun 4 '22 Aug 3 '22
88 33 kV Swithchgears 110 days Sat 6/4/22 Thu 9/22/22 Jun 4 '22 Sep 22 '22
89 Cable and Outdoor Switchgear 90 days Sat 6/4/22 Fri 9/2/22 Jun 4 '22 Sep 2 '22
90 Auxillary Power and Cable 60 days Thu 9/22/22 Mon 11/21/22 Sep 22 '22 Nov 21 '22
91 Control and Telecom 90 days Sun 6/19/22 Sat 9/17/22 Jun 19 '22 Sep 17 '22
92 Air Conditioning and Fire Fighting 130 days Fri 9/2/22 Tue 1/10/23
93 Installation of air conditioning system 60 days Fri 9/2/22 Tue 11/1/22 Sep 2 '22 Nov 1 '22
94 Fire detection system 70 days Tue 11/1/22 Tue 1/10/23 Nov 1 '22 Jan 10 '23
95 Gene. Trans. And Switch Gear 130 days Mon 7/4/22 Fri 11/11/22
96 Aux. transformer 11/0.4 KV 70 days Mon 7/4/22 Mon 9/12/22 Jul 4 '22 Sep 12 '22
97 415 V AC Switchgear (erection and test) 100 days Wed 8/3/22 Fri 11/11/22 Aug 3 '22 Nov 11 '22
98 11 KV Switchgear (erection and test) 100 days Wed 8/3/22 Fri 11/11/22 Aug 3 '22 Nov 11 '22
99 Commissioning 130 days Tue 1/10/23 Sat 5/20/23
100 Dry Commissioning 30 days Tue 1/10/23 Thu 2/9/23 Jan 10 '23 Feb 9 '23
101 Wet Commissioning 30 days Tue 3/21/23 Thu 4/20/23 Mar 21 '23 Apr 20 '23
102 ROCD 30 days Thu 4/20/23 Sat 5/20/23 Apr 20 '23 May 20 '23

Task Rolled Up Milestone Inactive Milestone Start-only Progress


Critical Task Rolled Up Progress Inactive Summary Finish-only Deadline
Milestone Split Manual Task External Tasks
Summary External Tasks Duration-only External Milestone
Rolled Up Task Project Summary Manual Summary Rollup Critical
Rolled Up Critical Task Group By Summary Manual Summary Critical Split

Construction Schedule_ RCOD_20200420 3 of 3 E.I. Maven Pvt. Ltd.

You might also like