Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Republic Act 4200
Republic Act 4200
4200
Private information must be kept private in many situations in our lives. Any
professional who has access to personal information is not to release it to third parties.
They could go to jail if they reveal my information without my permission. If they do not
receive any sort of punishment for it, they should never give crucial information to that
individual again. Confidentiality restricts the information revealed for the purposes of
secrecy is critical for a variety of reasons. When you apply for a job, you provide a variety
of personal information that must be kept private between you and your employer. If the
especially in a private setting, has a reasonable expectation that the conversation is not
being recorded and will not be disclosed to anyone else without the individual's
agreement. Of course, the person with whom one is chatting may tell another person
about it, or someone may listen while the conversation is taking place. Such conduct may
violate a person's right to privacy, but the wrongdoing does not constitute a criminal
as "wiretapping." This law is a very important guide for me because, the Anti-Wiretapping
Law Republic Act 4200 has been in effect for decades, but given technological
tenfold. RA 4200 made it illegal "for any person, without the authorization of all the parties
to any private communication or spoken word, to tap any wire or cable, or to secretly
overhear, intercept, or record such communication or spoken word by using a device
students who have the line of job with the said communication devices that illegally or
legally uses for any purpose. As a electronics engineering this means that I can’t just use
and provide any devices of communication without legal authority from the government
know such law because it will help me understand the confidentiality that need to be
respected, also the importance of everyone consent and agreement when it comes to
require the use of a telephone. It can be an actual face-to-face discussion in which one
person, without the agreement of the other, records the conversation using any recording
device without the consent of all participants. For example, if a reporter conducts an
interview, the reporter may only record the dialogue with the interviewee's permission.