Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cancer
Cancer
Cancer
Cancer is among the leading illnesses causing death in the world. According to (Gracia-
Cazaña et al., 2020), the prevalence of recent cases in the United States is 442.4 in every 100,000
persons per year. Besides, the statistics also suggest that the mortality rate of cancer is 158.3 out
of 100,000 persons yearly. These statistics were based on cases from 2013 to 2017. Leukemia is
among the most significant cancers in children aged 15 years or less. In regards to (Henley et al.,
2017), even though in most cases the cause of leukemia is unspecified, the authors suggest that
development of cancerous cells. Additionally, various researches have suggested that childhood
leukemia is highly associated with maternal elements mostly during pregnancy. This concept has
been supported by a study conducted by (Herceg et al., 2018). The results of the study suggested
that kids whose mothers were subjected to pesticides during pregnancy were highly susceptible
to developing the manifestations of leukemia than the control group. Besides, this theory has also
been supported by (Juarez & Matthews-Juarez, 2018), who indicated that there was an
incremented risk of experiencing the leukemic condition in kids whose mothers often had
prenatal exposure to pesticides in the home and garden. This indicates that the embryo in the
uterus can be highly sensitive to carcinogenic impacts of pesticides. Besides, another research on
occupation exposome related to prostate cancer suggested that there were majorly excessive risks
for workers at perfume and soap, agriculture-associated companies, plastic companies, and
leather manufacturing companies. As such, the results indicated that there were highly
incremented standardized prevalence ratios in farmers, specific occupations, and companies with
exposures to fertilizers, herbicides, cadmium, and men with minimal physical activity had
increased risk of experiencing cancerous manifestations (Louis et al., 2017). As such, it is highly
crucial to address the exposome of cancer from a federal, state, local, household, and individual
CANCER 2
perspective to combat cancer. Even though some of the exposomes of cancer such as pesticides,
are very crucial to the agricultural sector, we can apply the concept from Rachel Carson who
fought against the application of DDT. This is because, although the insecticide eradicated
malaria as shown from the statistics (In the 1940s, before the implementation of DDT, cases of
malaria were approximately 100million but by the 1960s malaria had been eradicated), Rachel
argued that the insecticide had a negative impact on the environment. As such federal
government can apply this concept by making reforms that would lead to the eradication of
chemicals such as chloropicrin which various researchers have suggested that they are highly
related to the development of cancerous cells due to long exposures. Also, since various
researches have suggested that workers employed in industries like plastic companies (utilize
Vinyl Chloride) are highly susceptible to cancer manifestations, the federal government should
impose strict measures on these companies like imposing huge fines/shutting them down for
failure to providing their employees with protective gears. Also, since exposome is very dynamic
and as such hard to measure and that the level of concentration of endogenous and exogenous
chemicals vary over time between populations and within individuals (Neveu et al., 2020), the
government should fund long-term researches that aim at understanding the supplication of
exposures between populations and over time, plus how these exposures alter over an
individual’s lifetime. Besides, various equipment and strategies can be utilized to refine the
assessment of exposures and upgrade the capability to measure accurately the diverse personal
exposures that lead to cancer. However, for the strategy to be effective, it will necessitate the
measurements (Pisani, Bray, & Parkin, 2020). In regards to the local perspective, foundations
should be started to give more voice on the effects of these harmful exposures that lead to cancer
CANCER 3
development. One example is the statewide coalition Californians for Pesticide Reform which
focuses on the eradication of harmful fumigant pesticides and in recent was fighting the phasing-
out of cancer-causing chloropicrin (Segura, 2018). The foundation argued that the
representatives of the Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) were ignoring the realities on
the ground including findings from their scientists and that they were enabling widespread
worksites, and homes located in California. As such, through local organizations like this,
persons will be able to raise more awareness of the impacts that these exposures are causing
(development of cancer). At the individual level, there are various things that can be done to
prevent the exposome of cancer. The most crucial thing is for individual responsibility. In this
case, since tobacco- use has been associated with causing prostate cancer (Schettler, 2020),
persons should stop/minimize the application of tobacco-use and alcohol, also, the state should
impose strict regulation like drawings of the bodily effects on the packages of these items, as
well as raising their tax. Furthermore, persons should ensure that they are wearing protective
gear when working around harmful products like pesticides and herbicides. Moreover, since
white-collar jobs have been associated with the development of cancer, workers should ensure
that they have time to do exercises like jogging, walking, or yoga. Besides, pregnant women
should ensure that they protect themselves from harmful products that may lead to the
development of leukemic manifestations in their unborn kids. Also, people should ensure that
they eat fruits and vegetables regularly to give the body enough nutrients that can combat
reactive oxygen species and protect the body in general (Yang et al., 2018).
CANCER 4
References
Gracia-Cazaña, T., González, S., Parrado, C., Juarranz, Á., & Gilaberte, Y. (2020). Influence of
Henley, S. J., Anderson, R. N., Thomas, C. C., Massetti, G. M., Peaker, B., & Richardson, L. C.
(2017). Invasive cancer incidence, 2004–2013, and deaths, 2006–2015, in nonmetropolitan and
Herceg, Z., Ghantous, A., Wild, C. P., Sklias, A., Casati, L., Duthie, S. J., ... & Hernandez‐
Louis, L. M., Lerro, C. C., Friesen, M. C., Andreotti, G., Koutros, S., Sandler, D. P., ... &
Freeman, L. E. B. (2017). A prospective study of cancer risk among Agricultural Health Study
Health, 16(1), 1-11.
Neveu, V., Nicolas, G., Salek, R. M., Wishart, D. S., & Scalbert, A. (2020). Exposome-Explorer
2.0: an update incorporating candidate dietary biomarkers and dietary associations with cancer
Pisani, P., Bray, F., & Parkin, D. M. (2020). Estimates of the world‐wide prevalence of cancer
Yang, H., Villani, R. M., Wang, H., Simpson, M. J., Roberts, M. S., Tang, M., & Liang, X.