Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3 579 791 1 PB
3 579 791 1 PB
3 579 791 1 PB
ISSN: 2076-5061
www.recent-science.com
HEALTH SCIENCES
Abstract
The medical student is under considerable stress as he is facing a professional course that needs total dedication and
concentration. As enters the course, he goes through the anatomy curriculum, which involves interaction with cadavers and
cadaveric material. This study analyses the reactions of students on their first exposure to the human cadaver. 300 students
were included in the study. A proforma was designed with the objective of identifying specific patterns of attitudes and
problems faced by the students on their first exposure to the human cadaver. Viewpoints regarding the need for pre-education
sessions were also elicited. The positive feelings included a curiosity and interest to learn about the structure of human body.
Few were scared, some put off by the formalin fumes and few were hesitant to dissect the cadaver. Students also felt a sense
of gratefulness to the people who donated their bodies for dissection. It was reported by some that negative feelings
influenced their routine activities. Students felt the need to seek help from faculty in overcoming their anxiety. They felt that a
pre-education session should be conducted before the formal dissection teaching begins which could instill a sense of respect
into the minds of the students and eliminate the feeling of anxiety. A better teacher – student interaction will go a long way in
improving the attitude of students towards cadaveric dissection. This will offer a stable mental status for the fresh medicos to
handle higher levels of stress in their clinical careers, thereby reducing the drop- out rates.
∗
Corresponding Author, Email: spdubhashi@gmail.com
Siddharth Dubhashi et al./Rec Res Sci Tech 3 (2011) 135-138
71% students were put off by the odour in the Previous exposure to information on human
dissection hall.(Table 2). 217 students commented on anatomy(Figure1)
influence on their routine activities (Table 3). 30%
students felt the need for seeking help from faculty.
288 students cited different reasons for not
approaching the faculty. (Figure 2). 84% felt that there
is a need for conducting pre-education session for
newly admitted medical students for various
reasons.(Table 4). Only 20% students mentioned that
they would prefer CAL over cadaveric dissection.
Discussion the present study and 84% expressed the need for pre-
Cadaver based anatomical education is a education sessions which would make them mentally
prerequisite for optimal training and is necessary for prepared for the dissection room. It is to be noted that
establishing the primary of the patient, apprehension of the teachers cannot anymore ignore an important
the multidimensional body, anatomical variability, student attitude and hope that students will settle down
learning the basic language of medicine and touch – over a period of time. It is possible that in specific
mediated perception of the cadaver/patient. First year instances, the mental trauma faced during these
medical students normally experience a variety of formative years of a doctor’s profession may be carried
emotional reactions and mixed feelings when they over into clinical years and remain a serious deterrent
encounter human cadavers for the first time in the in the personality of the doctor and his attitude towards
dissection room. This study reflects a sample opinion his fellow beings, especially the patients.
of the medical students in the age group of 17 to 21 (Balasubramanyam et al.,2003).
years. Studies conducted by Dinsmore et al.,2001 and
80% of the students agreed that actual hands on Charlton et al.,1994, concluded that medical students
training on cadaver dissection gave better results than rapidly developed a copying mechanism, which
demonstration of specimens/ CAL packages. This enabled them to view the cadaveric dissection as an
finding is in consonance with the study conducted by occupation. In the present study , 40% students did not
Johnson et al, 2002. Students also mentioned that approach the faculty out of fear. A teacher must be
dissection enhanced their skill of thinking in a logical strict to the extent of maintaining class discipline, but if
manner. This finding is consistent with studies this is to the extent of not being approachable for help,
conducted by Weeks et al, 1995 and Mutyala et al, then necessary steps must be taken to improve
1996. communication. Better preparation and debriefing for
Finkelstein et al, 1990 and Evans et al, 1992 coping with dissection is required which would help in
reported that the initial exposure to a dead body “inoculating” individuals against the stressful effects of
caused emotional shock to the students. In the present handling a dead body.
study, 61% expressed emotional shock at the first
exposure. 71% were put off by formalin fumes and Conclusions
52% reported influence on routine activities. Facing a dead body at the begining of the medical
Dinsmore etal, 2001 and O’Caroll et al, 2002 have curriculum, triggers a series of attitudinal conflicts in
mentioned in their studies that the students found the minds of the medicos. There is no substitute for
cadaveric dissection to be a positive, significant and life cadaveric dissection in the teaching of human
challenging event. Mc Garvey et al, 2001 reported that anatomy. A better teacher – student interaction, pre-
95% students found their first visit to the anatomy education sessions will help in improving the attitudes
dissection room existing and 80% suffered very little or of students towards cadaveric dissection, which will in
no stress at all on their first visit. This finding is turn offer a stable mental status for medicos to handle
supported by the present study that 80% of the higher levels of stress in their clinical career, thereby
students found their first visit interesting.The present reducing the drop-out rates. Let us remember, “It is the
study reports an average level of anxiety of 5.6 on the dead who teach the living”.
VAS. This indirectly relates to 61% of students
expressing fear/emotional shock to cadaveric Recommendations
dissection. 1. Pre-education sessions must be handled
The extreme view of the students with regards to delicately and sensitively.
first reaction to cadaveric dissection is to be noted with 2. It must not be so detailed as to put off an
concern. Statements mentioning fear, influence on otherwise confident student or so short of
routine activities are clear indicators of the need for details as to leave the students with no
professional counseling. This also calls for greater improvement
vigilance in part of faculty in identifying such cases in 3. Pre-education must include a professional
time and providing necessary help. The need for counselor so that the students can opt for
seeking help from faculty was felt by 30% students in individual counseling if need be.
Siddharth Dubhashi et al./Rec Res Sci Tech 3 (2011) 135-138
4. Senior students can also be called to explain Johnson JH. 2002. Importance of dissection in learning
how they coped up with the situation Anatomy: person versus peer teaching. Clinical
Anatomy;15:38-44.
Literature Cited Kennedy GJ, Olson TR. 2009. Cadaver Conference
Balsubramanyam, Sayee.2003. The medical student – day: A Psychiatrist in the Gross Anatomy Course,
Attitude to death and Dissection. Anatomica Primary Psychiatry;16(1):26-30.
Karnataka;1(4):74-92. Mc Garvey MA, Furrell T, Convoy RM, Kandiah S,
Bertman SL, Marks SC Jr. 1985. Humanities in medical Monkhouse WS. 2001. Dissection: A positive
education: rationale and resources for the experience. Clinical Anatomy;14(3):227.
dissection laboratory. Medical Education; Mutyala S, Cahill DR. 1996. Catching up. Clinical
19(5):374-381. anatomy;9:53-56.
Charlton R, Doney SM, Jones DG, Blunt A.1994. Newel RLM. 1995.Follow the royal road: the case for
Effects of cadaver dissection on the attitudes of dissection Clinical anatomy;8:124-127.
medical students. Medical Education;28(4):290- O’Caroll RE, Whiten S, Jackson D,Sinclair DW. 2002.
295. Assessing the emotional impact of cadaver
Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. 2001. Student dissection on medical students, Medical Education,
responses to the gross anatomy laboratory in the 36(6) :550-554.
medical curriculum. Clinical Anatomy;14(3):231- Warner JH, Rizzolo LJ. 1995. Anatomical instruction
236. and training for professionalism from the 19th to
Evans EJ,Fitzgibbon GN. 1992. The dissecting room: the 21st centuries. Clinical Anat Jul:19(5):403-414.
Reactions of first year medical students. Clinical Weeks SE, Harris EE, Kinzey WG. Human gross
Anatomy;5:311-320. anatomy: A crucial time to encourage respect and
Finkelstein P, Mathers LH: 1990. Post- traumatic stress compassion in students. Clinical Anatomy 8(1):
among medical students in the anatomy dissection 69-79.
laboratory. Clin Anat;3(3).