Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 12 Piecemeal Acquisitions
Module 12 Piecemeal Acquisitions
Module: 12
Piecemeal Acquisitions
1. Overview
Introduction
On August 10, 2015, Google Inc. announced plans to create a new public holding
company (or parent company), named Alphabet Inc. Google CEO Larry Page
made this announcement in a blog post on Google's official blog.
The aim for the creation of this new holding company was to restructure Google by
moving subsidiaries from Google to Alphabet, narrowing Google's scope.
Essentially, this would allow Google to focus on their core web and tech products,
whilst fringe projects (such as Google glass or driver-less cars) would fall under
some other subsidiary within the Alphabet group.
However, Google own a whole range of subsidiaries (in fact, Google have been
party to almost 200 mergers and acquisitions since 2001!). So, the creation of
Alphabet Inc. was actually quite a significant re-structure.
In this chapter, the goal is to go through some of the most important types of
restructure and show you how this is accounted for. Maybe someday you'll be
working for the next Google, and you'll come back to your core knowledge on
changes in group structure!
A number of scenarios exist for each of the above leading to the formation of a
trade investment (financial asset), associate or subsidiary.
Accounting for group structure changes
The challenge here is recognising how to account for:
The chapter will look at piecemeal acquisitions, whilst disposals and group restructuring will be
in the following chapter.
2. Piecemeal acquisitions
Definition
A piecemeal acquisition is where a parent (investing) entity acquires
control over a subsidiary (investee) in stages i.e. piece by piece. This is
done by purchasing blocks of shares at different dates. As more shareholding is
acquired, the investment classification changes:
So essentially, you have a parent who gradually increases their stake in a company over time,
perhaps going from a 30% stake to an 80% stake, as is shown in the diagram - starting as an
associate and changing to a subsidiary.
Accounting treatment overview
Before control is established
Prior to the point of achieving control (i.e. greater than 50% holding), the pre-
existing equity interest in the entity is treated according to the
accounting standard that is relevant to the investment
classification:
Investment
Reporting standard Accounting treatment
classification
Equity accountingbased
Associate and joint IAS 28 Investments in
on the share of
venture (20% - 50%) Associates and JVs
investment.
Share of investment
IFRS 11 Joint
Joint arrangement recorded inindividual
Arrangements
accounts.
So, for example, if Parent P has a 25% investment in Associate A, then P will use
IAS 28 to account for this investment. Before control is established, accounting is
done as usual according to the relevant standard.
Control established
It is only on the date at which control is achieved that we have to consolidate the
subsidiary using acquisition accounting, i.e. recognise goodwill and non-
controlling interests as per IFRS 3 Business Combinations. So, when P increases
their investment to anything over 50%, they will be required to use acquisition
accounting as under IFRS 3.
Let's say 15% of shares were previously held at a cost of £30,000, and then a further
50% of shares are purchased so control is established. Let's say the 15% of shares
had a market value of £40,000 at the date it's the £40,000 which is used in the
goodwill calculation and the £10,000 gain is charged to the group's income
statement.
Control impact scenarios and their accounting treatment
There are potentially three different cases that lead to an impact on control as a
result of an increased stake:
Increased stake
Case Original stake Control impact
results in…
In the first 2 cases, control is established and the accounting treatment handling the
increased investment is the same. In case 3, control already exists and is merely
increased. In such a case, a fundamentally different accounting treatment is
employed.
The Parent Ltd Group uses the fair value method to value NCI (which means that
the fair value of the NCI's interest is the fair value of the assets + goodwill for the
NCI).
What is the goodwill arising in Subby Ltd and what is the impact on the
consolidated income statement?
Goodwill
So, as always, goodwill is the cost of investment less net assets. The calculations
need a little care in this case due to the fair values. Let's see how we do this.
The original stake had increased from £24,000 to £25,000 by 1st Jun 20X8. The re-
measurement of the original stake thus leads to a gain of £1,000. This gain is
recognised in the profit for the year for the parent.
At the new investment date, the effective investment is the new investment
plus the revalued original investment totals £175,000.
So, that's the amount for 60% of the company. However, NCIs own 40% and the
fair value of their stake is £100,000 making the total value for 100% of the
company £275,000.
As the net assets of the group are £230,000 the total goodwill of Parent Ltd
resulting from this purchase is therefore £45,000.
A Ltd B Ltd
£’000 £’000
Revenue 150 40
Operating costs (50) (10)
Profit before tax 100 30
Income tax (25) (5)
Profit for period, PAT 75 25
A Ltd B Ltd
£’000 £’000
ASSETS
Investment in B Ltd 200
Other assets 350 360
550 360
On 31 Dec 20X4, A Ltd acquired 30% of B Ltd for £80,000. At this time the
retained earnings of B Ltd stood at £70,000.
As we can see, at this stage B Ltd was an associate of A Ltd. However, a further
40% of shares were acquired three years later for £120,000 when the retained
earnings were £200,000.
On the acquisition date, the fair value of the existing holding was £100,000 and the
fair value of non-controlling interest (NCI) was also £100,000.
It is group policy to value the NCI on a full fair value basis. Prepare the
consolidated statements as at 31 Dec 20X8.
Income statement
As always with subsidiaries the first step is to combine the two companies'
income and costs:
A Ltd B Ltd A Group
£'00 £'000 £'00
Revenue 0 40 0
15 19
0 0
Operating costs (50) (10) (60)
Operating profit 100 30
3. Non-controlling interest
Of the profits earned in the subsidiary, some of that relates to non- controlling interests. We
must show the profits related to the NCI and group separately.
With the profits of B Ltd being £25,000, and the non-controlling interest being
30%, a total of £7,500 is shown as relating to the NCI.
NCI 7.5
A Group 112.5
120
It's always useful to build momentum when doing consolidations by tackling some
of the easiest elements first. Remember that:
A Ltd B Ltd 1 2 3 A
Group
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
ASSETS
B Ltd 200 (200) 0
Other 350 360 710
550 360
EQUITY
Share capital 200 100 (100) 200
Ret. earnings 250 225
450 325
LIABILITIES 100 35 135
550 360
From the income section you may remember there was an additional
£20,000 made on revaluation, plus £17,500 made post-acquisition and relating to
the group (£25,000 less the £7,500 NCI stake).
£’000
Parent (retained earnings) 250.0(as per question)
Subsidiary (post-acq'n profits) 17.5
Revaluation gain (original stake) 20.0 Fair value £100k less original cost £80k
287.5
So, this is the group’s retained earnings. From the statements, we know that A has
£250k and B has £225k in retained earnings, which total £475k.
We know the group retained earnings are $287.5k, though, so we need to find
the difference and make the adjustment:
A Ltd B Ltd 1 2 3 A
Group
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
ASSETS
B Ltd 200 (200) 0
Other 350 360 710
550 360
EQUITY
Share capital 200 100 (100) 200
Ret. earnings 250 225 (187.5) 287.5
450 325
LIABILITIES 100 35 135
550 360
3) Goodwill on acquisition
Let's start with the effective cost of the company at the acquisition date. A Ltd
purchased a further 40% stake for £120,000 and the fair value of the original stake
is now £100,000 and so A Ltd's total investment is £220,000. If we also add the fair
value of the NCI (which is is also £100,000) we have the total fair value of the
company:
£’000
Cost of additional 40% stake 120
Fair value of original 30% stake 100
Fair value of NCI 100 (per question)
320
This is the cost of the investment. From this, we must subtract the fair value of B
Ltd’s net assets at acquisition.
Net assets are the same as share capital plus reserves. We can see that the share
capital is £100,000 for B Ltd and we were told the reserves were
£200,000 at acquisition. Let's take the net assets off the total to find goodwill:
£’000
Cost of additional 40% stake 120
Fair value of original 30% stake 100 (£20k gain post to group profits)
Fair value of NCI 100 (per question)
320
Net assets at acq'n (300) (W2)
Goodwill on acquisition 20
Let's add that to our matrix and add up the SOFP so far:
A Ltd B Ltd 1 2 3 A
Group
£'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000
ASSETS
Goodwill 20 20
B Ltd 200 (200) 0
Other 350 360 710
550 360 730
EQUITY
Share capital 200 100 (100) 200
Ret. earnings 250 225 (187.5) 287.5
450 325 487.5
LIABILITIES 100 35 135
550 360 622.5
The question tells us that at acquisition the fair value of the NCI was
£100,000.
£’000
NCI (fair value at acq'n) 100.0 (as per question)
NCI (post-acq'n profits) 7.5
107.5
As we can see that works very nicely with our SOFP as adding that in balances the
SOFP.
Our calculation is complete!
£'000
ASSETS
Goodwill 20
Other 710
730
EQUITY
Share capital 200
Ret. earnings 287.5
487.5
LIABILITIES 135
622.5
NCI 107.5
730
Note: NCI goodwill decrease applies only when NCI is held at fair value and
goodwill has been calculated on their share.
Example
Parent Ltd holds a 60% investment in Subby Ltd. On 1 Jun 20X8, it acquires a
further 10% of Subby Ltd at a cost of £50,000. On this date, Subby Ltd’s net assets
are £230,000. Assume in this case that the Parent Ltd Group uses the proportion of
net assets method to value NCI. What is the impact on the group statements?
Reduction in NCI
£’000
Fair value of consideration paid (50)
Decrease in NCI in the net assets at acquisition date 23 (= 10% x £230k)
Adjustment to parent’s equity (27)
3. Chapter summary
Another chapter conquered! Below you'll find a brief summary of the key term and
concepts that we've looked at.
• There are three ways in which an entity can alter control via an
additional stake in an another entity:
◦ Acquisition of control:
◦ Increase in control:
▪ An adjustment to the parent’s equity based on the difference
between the consideration paid and the decrease in the net assets
of the NCI;