Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Untitled

    Uploaded by

    ramya ravi
    15 views1 page
    The petitioner argues they have legal standing to file this public interest litigation. They assert the case passes the test of reasonableness as no alternative remedies are available. Finally, the petitioner contends the issues raised involve a breach of fundamental rights and are in the public interest.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The petitioner argues they have legal standing to file this public interest litigation. They assert the case passes the test of reasonableness as no alternative remedies are available. Finally, the petitioner contends the issues raised involve a breach of fundamental rights and are in the public interest.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    15 views1 page

    Untitled

    Uploaded by

    ramya ravi
    The petitioner argues they have legal standing to file this public interest litigation. They assert the case passes the test of reasonableness as no alternative remedies are available. Finally, the petitioner contends the issues raised involve a breach of fundamental rights and are in the public interest.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS – petitioner

    1. Maintainability of PIL
    the petitioners have the locus standi to file the PIL
    Test of reasonableness
    No alternate remedies available
    Public interest
    Breach of fundamental rights
    Res judicata

    You might also like