Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rizal Law and The Opposition
Rizal Law and The Opposition
a. Accion Catolico
b. Congregation of the Mission,
c. Knights of Columbus,
d. Catholic Teacher’s Guild)
Fr. Jesus Cavana-”Rizal’s novels belonged to the past and it would be harmful to read them because it
presented a false picture of the country at that time. 333 passages, 25 patriotic, 120 anti catholic
Jesus Paredes- said that the novels contained objectionable matter and the Catholics had the right to
refuse to read them as to not endanger their faith
Narciso Pimentel-speculated that politics was involved in Recto’s drafting of the bill. It was to punish
the Catholics which Pimentel believed was responsible why Recto did not won in the election in 1955
elections
Senator Francisco Rodrigo they voiced the opposition of the church in both houses. He would not let
his teenage son read the novels because it would endanger his faith. Proposed that the novels be
footnoted and annotated versions instead of unexpurgated versions required in Recto’s bill
Senator Recto’s reaction…… He stood the ground and dared Catholic church to shut down their schools
and he rejected Senator Soc Rodrigo’s suggestion that annotated or edited edition of the novels should
be used.
Mayor Arsenio Lacson-he walked out of mass when the circular from the archbishop was read in the
mass
1.Veteranos de la Revolucion
2. Alagad ni Rizal
3. Knights of Rizal
4. Freemasons
After a month-long standoff, a compromised bill was filed authored by Sen. Jose P. Laurel based on the
proposals of Sen. Roseller Lim and Emmanuel Pelaez
June 12, 1956 _Rizal law came into effect Republic Act 1425 signed by Pres. Ramon Magsaysay