Criminal Procedure Cases

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

PART I

I. JURISDICTION

1. Requisites of Criminal Jurisdiction


2. Offenses under the jurisdiction of the first and second level courts and
of the Sandiganbayan

BP 129 as amended by R.A. 7691


PD 1606
PD 7975; R.A. No. 8249; R.A. No. 10660
Miranda vs Tuliao, GR No. 158763, March 31, 2006
People vs. Montejo, 108 Phil. 613- Jasm
De Lima vs Guerrero, G.R. No. 229781, October 10, 2017
David vs. Agbay, March 18, 2015
Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company v. Reynaldo, 627 SCRA 88

II. RULE 110 – Prosecution of Offenses


1. Institution of Criminal Actions
2. Distinctions between a complaint and an information
3. Sufficiency of complaint or information
4. Distinctions between amendment and substitution
5. Amendment of complaint or information
6. Substitution of complaint or information
7. Private Crimes

Read:
Reodica v. CA- Jasm
Francisco v. CA, G.R. No. 125066, July 8, 1996
People vs. Pangilinan, G.R. No. 152662, June 13, 2012
Lazarte, Jr. v. Sandiganbayan, 581 SCRA 431- Jasm
Miguel v. Sandiganbayan, 675 SCRA 560
People v. Posada, 667 SCRA 790
Frias v. People, G.R. No. 171437, 10-4-07
People v. Teodoro, 607 SCRA 307
People v. Valdez, 663 SCRA 272
People v. Anguac, 588 SCRA 716
People v. Canares, 579 SCRA 588
People v. Amodia, 584 SCRA 518
People v. Bonito, 342 SCRA 405
People v. Tumambing, 644 SCRA 482
Senador v. People
Malto v. People, 533 SCRA 642
Licyayo v. People, 547 SCRA 598
Pp v Ukay G.R. No. 246149, September 2020
Serapio v. Sandiganbayan,396 SCRA 443
People v. Fruelda , G.R. No. 242690, September 03, 2020
Trenas v People, 664 SCRA 355
Cabral v. Bracamonte , G.R. No. 233174, January 23, 2019
Ricarze v. CA, G.R. No. 160451, February 9, 2007
PP VS. JANAIRO, G.R. No. 129254
TEHANKEE, JR. v. MADAYAG, G.R. No. 103102, March 16, 1992
Villarba vs. CA, G.R. No. 227777, June 15, 2020
MATALAM VS. SANDIGANBAYAN, G.R. No. 165751, April 12,
2005
PACOY Vs. HON. AFABLE E. CAJIGAL, G.R. No. 157472,
September 28, 2007
R.A. No. 3326 as amended

III. RULE 111 – Prosecution of Civil Action

1. Institution of Civil Action for the Recovery of Civil Liability Arising


from the Offense
2. Effect of Acquittal of Accused on His Civil Liability
3. Effect of Accused’s Death on His Civil Liability
4. Prejudicial Question

Read:
Cheng vs. Sy, G.R. No. 174238, July 7, 2009
P/Chief Inspector Fernando Billedo vs. Wilhemina Wagan, G.R. No.
175091, July 13, 2011
Cruz v. Mina, G.R. No. 154207, April 27, 2007
Hun Hyung Park v. Eun Wong Choi, G.R. No. 165496, February 12,
2007
Lo Bun Tiong v. Balboa, G.R.No. 158177, January 28, 2008
Gosiaco v. Ching, G.R. No. 173807 (2009)
Heirs of Simon v. Chan, G.R. No. 157547 (2011)
Cabico vs. Dimaculangan-Querijero, 522 SCRA 300, 310
PHILIPPINE RABBIT BUS LINES, INC. vs. PEOPLE, G.R. No.
147703, April 14, 2004
BUMATAY VS. BUMATAY, G.R. No. 191320, April 25, 2017
TY-DE ZUZUARREGUI v. HON. VILLAROSA, G.R. No. 183788,
April 5, 2010
DOMINGO vs. SINGSON, G.R. No. 203287, April 5, 2017,
People v. Culas, G.R. No. 211166 (2017)

IV. RULE 112 – Preliminary Investigation

1. Definition
2. Purpose
3. When Required
4. Who may Conduct PI
5. Procedure in Metro Manila vs Outside Metro Manila
6. Inquest
7. Quantum of Evidence

Read:
Salapuddin v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 184681 (2013)
Iris Kristine Balois Alberto v. CA
Rosalinda Punzalan v. Michael Plata, G.R.No. 160316
Personal Collection vs. Carandang, G.R. No. 206958, November 8, 2017
Villaflor v Gozon, G.R. no. 13477, January 16, 2001
Larranaga v. CA, G.R. No. 130644 (1997)
Leviste v. Almeda, G.R. No. 182677, August 3, 2010
Perez v. Ombusman, G.R. No. 131445, May 27, 2004
Go. V. CA, 206 SCRA 138 (1992)
Office of the Ombudsman v. Breva, G.R. No. 145938, February 10, 2006
De Lima vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 209330, January 11, 2016
Gina Villa Gomez v. People, G.R. No. 216824, November 10, 2020
Ruiz v. Beldia, Jr., 451 SCRA 402

You might also like